DOCSLIB.ORG

Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile Formation and Talus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Nature and History on the Sierra Crest: Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile formation and talus. (Devils Postpile National Monument Image Collection) Nature and History on the Sierra Crest Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Christopher E. Johnson Historian, PWRO–Seattle National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 2013 Production Project Manager Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Copyeditor Heather Miller Composition Windfall Software Photographs Credit given with each caption Printer Government Printing Office Published by the United States National Park Service, Pacific West Regional Office, Seattle, Washington. Printed on acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America. 10987654321 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration. Contents Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 Converging Pasts: Nature and Culture in the Postpile Region One A Landscape in Time: Nature and History along the Middle Fork San Joaquin 9 Tw o Sierra Crossings: Native Americans, Trade, and Environmental Change 19 Three Euro-American Exploration and Resource Extraction in the High Sierra, 1700s–1800s 35 Four The Yosemite Grant, Tourism, and the Origins of Conservation in the Sierra Nevada, 1864–1890 59 National Monument, Regional Politics: The Administrative Evolution of Devils Postpile, 1890–2011 Five Shifting Boundaries, Shifting Values: From National Park to National Forest to National Monument, 1890–1911 71 Six Defining the Monument: Jurisdiction, Agency Values, and the Return to Yosemite, 1912–1934 85 Seven Establishing a Presence: Devils Postpile under Yosemite, 1934–1941 93 Eight The War Years: Park Service and Forest Service Cooperation, 1941–1951 105 Nine Reclaiming the Monument: Development, Interpretation, and “Mutual Cooperation” under Yosemite, 1952–1953 115 Ten A Neglected Stepchild: Mission 66 and the Trans-Sierra Highway Debate, 1954–1972 129 Eleven Reviving the Monument: Transfer to Sequoia, Interagency Cooperation, and the Origins of the Shuttle, 1972–2000 151 Contents Twelve Toward a “Quality Monument Experience”: Resource Management and Wilderness Politics, 1972–2000 167 Thirteen The Making of a Network Park: Ecological Management and Regional Politics, 2000–2010 177 Historical Contexts for the Period of Federal Management: The Mammoth Lakes Sierra, Recreation, and Science Fourteen Regional Context: The Mammoth Lakes Sierra 191 Fifteen Devils Postpile and Rustic Recreation 195 Sixteen From Geologic Interpretation to Ecosystem Management 215 Conclusion: Regional Cooperation and the Future of Devils Postpile 233 App. A Summary of Historic Contexts and Associated Resources 237 App. B National Register Recommendations 245 Selected Bibliography 247 Index 259 vi List of Figures Devils Postpile formation and talus. ii Regional Map. xiii Devils Postpile National Monument and vicinity. xiv Devils Postpile park map. xv Geologic map showing types of rocks and a self-guided nature trail. 10 Glacial polish and striations at the top of the Postpile. 10 Devils Postpile columns and talus. 11 Rainbow Falls. 12 A part of the soda spring in Soda Springs Meadow. 15 1992 Rainbow Fire burning near Reds Meadow. 16 Obsidian point. From a 2006 Park Service archaeology site condition assessment report. 21 Monument at Casa Diablo. Note the geothermal plant in the background. 22 North Fork Mono brush shelter with bedrock mortars. 23 Acorn and seed baskets. 25 North Fork Mono woman pulverizing manzanita berries. 26 Owens Valley Paiute Tule House. 26 Owens Valley Paiute Jack Stewart demonstrating a fire drill. 29 John C. Fremont´ party crossing the Sierra Nevada in 1843. 37 Map of the expeditions of the Mariposa Battalion during 1851. 38 Robert Eccleston, 1830-1911. 39 Devils Postpile cabin in 1934. 43 Overhead shot of the Postpile cabin. 44 1939 photo of the Postpile cabin showing its proximity to the Postpile formation. 44 Mammoth City resident Tex Cushions’s team of sled dogs across the river from the Postpile in winter. 45 Miners on the summit of Iron Mountain west of Devils Postpile. 46 Sketch of the Postpile formation from an 1892 State Mineralogist report on the North Fork Mining District. 46 1892 sketch map of the North Fork Mining District showing the soda spring, Reds Meadow (labeled “Peck’s Meadow”), and the Yosemite National Park boundary north of Agnew Meadow. 47 1939 photo of John Beck’s cabin near Beck’s Lake west of Devils Postpile. 48 1916 Madera County map showing Devils Postpile at its extreme eastern terminus. 48 List of Figures 1981 photo of a cabin at the Minaret Mine site. 49 1981 photo of a partially collapsed structure at the Minaret Mine site. 49 Remnant of the Minaret Mine road bed adjacent to the present Minaret Lake Trail. 50 Ruins of one of J. W. Starkweather’s mining operations in the area, date and location unknown. 51 “Hoofed Locusts.” 52 Sheepherder carving in Devils Postpile showing the initials “E. S.” 54 Notch carved in a tree, presumably for supporting a table or sleeping platform. 55 Portrait of James M. Hutchings. 60 Early sketch of Yosemite Valley. 61 Hutchings’s photograph of Devils Postpile in 1875. Note the leaning column and the man standing below and to the right of it. 63 The Brewer Party of 1864. From left to right: James T. Gardiner, Richard Cotter, William H. Brewer, and Clarence King. 64 George Bayley’s sketch of Rainbow Falls, 1878. 65 Cavalry “T” blaze in Devils Postpile National Monument. 72 Sheepherder and sheep in a meadow. 73 Cavalry officer Nathaniel F. McClure’s 1896 map of patrol routes in Yosemite National Park. 74 Close up of the same map showing Reds Meadows as a patrol hub. 75 Walter L. Huber. 79 Original Map drawn by Walter Huber and filed with the 1911 proclamation establishing Devils Postpile National Monument. 80 Walter L. Huber surveying the Devils Postpile boundary in 1912. 81 1927 map of Sierra National Forest showing Devils Postpile at the top right. 86 Reds Meadow guard station built in 1927 by Ranger Malcolm McLeod and occupied by he and his wife Emma McLeod. 87 The original National Park Service ranger station set up at Devils Postpile in 1934 following the transfer from the Forest Service. 94 Ranger Duane Jacobs inspecting a site at the base of the Postpile talus for the placement of an interpretive sign. 95 1937 photo of the Reds Meadow Bath House, built by a CCC crew in 1935. 95 The CCC bath house as it appears today. 96 Yosemite engineer Theodore Cronyn establishing the Devils Postpile National Monument boundary during the 1934 boundary survey. 97 Cronyn’s 1934 map based on the corners established in 1912 by Walter Huber. 98 Regional map included with Cronyn’s 1934 report. 99 Photo of Soda Springs Meadow from Cronyn’s 1934 report. 100 1937 proposed boundary adjustment to match the rectangular shape of the monument as depicted in the map filed with the 1911 proclamation. 102 1941 tourist brochure map showing a rectangular boundary. 102 viii List of Figures Campers in the monument campground in 1940. 108 A family on the original bridge over the San Joaquin River south of Soda Springs Meadow, 1939. 108 Backpackers in a meadow near Devils Postpile in the 1940s. 109 1940 tourist brochure for Devils Postpile. 110 Back cover of a 1941 tourist brochure. 111 Ranger-led walk. 118 The partially collapsed Postpile cabin, 1949. 121 The cabin after its collapse in 1954. 121 Hikers with ranger at the Devils Postpile flagpole, 1955. 125 Mother and daughter at the Rainbow Falls viewpoint, 1955. 130 Map of the proposed Minaret Summit Highway, 1966. 135 Development plan, 1963. Note the location of the proposed Mammoth Pass road and the space reserved for expansion across the river opposite the campground. 136 Close-up of an alternate development plan, 1963. Note the 3,000-square-foot visitor center and the expanded parking areas. 136 Bishop local and former Sequoia and Kings Canyon superintendent Stanley Albright with Lou Roeser at Mule Days. 138 Governor Ronald Reagan with former Reds Meadow Pack Station owner Arch Mahan (left) and Rock Creek Pack Station owner Herbert M. London (right), 1972. 141 Governor Reagan beginning the ride to Summit Meadow, 1972. 142 Mules in the monument parking lot, 1974. 144 Postpile–Soda Springs Meadow Bridge. Note the cracked piling on the left, 1970s. 145 Stock trails in Soda Springs Meadow, 1974. 146 Wymond Eckhardt, 1983. 152 Postpile-Soda Springs Meadow Bridge. 154 Publicity for Devils Postpile, 1974. 155 Mules and cars in the monument parking lot, 1974. 156 Devils Postpile–Reds Meadow shuttle brochure. 160 Line for the shuttle bus at the monument ranger station, 1980. 161 One of the blue Quicksilver Stage Line shuttle busses that operated from 1981 to 1986. 162 Ranger Coy sitting in the Postpile talus, 1972. 168 The 1992 Rainbow Fire from Reds Meadow Pack Station. 173 Burnt sign. 173 The “shingle factory” near the junction of the King Creek Trail, 1977. 175 Devils Postpile, 1935. 192 Devils Postpile camp, 1935. 196 Displaying the catch, 1940. Note the fly rods. 198 A full stringer of trout, 1940. 199 Hikers on the Beck Lake trail, 1939. 203 ix List of Figures John Muir Trail backpackers resting in Soda Springs Meadow, 1970s.
Recommended publications
  • How Did Public Lands Come to Be?

    How Did Public Lands Come to Be?

    Module 2 How did Public Lands Come to Be? Main Takeaways Public lands in the United States were created within the context of complex social and historical movements and mindsets. A more complete understanding of public lands requires acknowledgement of the people and cultures who have been negatively affected throughout the complex history of public lands. © Kevin McNeal This module will examine the history of public lands in the Historical Overview United States. It is important for people to know the history of public lands so that we can understand the perspectives of Time Immemorial others who have different types of connections to these places. When conservationists talk about the establishment of public lands in the United States, they sometimes focus on governmental decisions to protect land for future generations. However, the protection of lands as public did not occur in a vacuum. The conservation of these places reflects the larger social, cultural, and political forces and events of United States history. These influences are as diverse as the lands themselves. With this module, we try to provide a more comprehensive history of public lands. In doing so, we try to include the stories of some of the people and communities that have been History is conveyed in different ways by different cultures. For left out of the traditional Euro-American narrative. the Indigenous Peoples of the Americas, history begins with time immemorial - time before the reach of human memory. However, the history presented in no way encompasses the The history of connection to the land before memory is passed complete story of the people who have been impacted by public on through oral tradition.
  • The Impacts of the State and Federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Acts

    The Impacts of the State and Federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Acts

    THE IMPACTS OF THE STATE AND FEDERAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACTS IN CONSERVATION EFFORTS ON CALIFORNIA’S TRINITY RIVER ———————— A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Chico ———————— In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Master of Arts in History ———————— by Michael I. Muraki Fall 2018 THE IMPACTS OF THE STATE AND FEDERAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACTS IN CONSERVATION EFFORTS ON CALIFORNIA’S TRINITY RIVER A Thesis by Michael I. Muraki Fall 2018 APPROVED BY THE INTERIM DEAN OF GRADUATE STUDIES: _________________________________ Sharron A. Barrios, Ph.D.____________ APPROVED BY THE GRADUATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: _________________________________ Michael F. Magliari, Ph.D., Chair______ _________________________________ Jesse A. Dizard, Ph.D._______________ _________________________________ Timothy G. Sistrunk, Ph.D._________ __ TABLE OF CONTENTS ——————————————————————————————————————— PAGE List of Figures ........................................................................................................... iv Abstract ..................................................................................................................... v CHAPTER Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 I. Planning for the Future, The Water Bank of California: 1957-1972 .............. 12 II. The California Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and the Fight to Preserve the North- Coast Rivers: 1968-1972 ............................................................................
  • Ansel Adams in Color Free

    Ansel Adams in Color Free

    FREE ANSEL ADAMS IN COLOR PDF Ansel Adams,John P. Schaefer,Andrea Gray Stillman | 176 pages | 03 May 2011 | Little, Brown & Company | 9780316056410 | English | New York, United States Ansel Adams in Color by Ansel Adams Ansel Adams never made up his mind about color photography. Long before his death in at age 82, he foresaw that this "beguiling medium" might one day replace his cherished black and white. In notes tentatively dated tohe observed that "color photography is rapidly becoming of major importance. Yet he once likened working in Ansel Adams in Color to playing an out-of-tune piano. America's regnant Western landscape photographer tried to control every step of picture-making, but for much of his lifetime too many stages of the color process were out of his hands. Kodachrome—the first mass-market color film, introduced in —was so complicated that even Adams, a darkroom wizard, had to rely on labs to develop it. Color printing was a crapshoot in the s and '50s. Reproductions in magazines and books could be garish or out of register. Before the s, black-and-white film often actually yielded subtler, less exaggerated pictures of reality. Still, Adams' misgivings did not prevent him from taking hundreds of color transparencies. As he traveled the country on commercial assignments or on Guggenheim Fellowships—a project to celebrate the national parks—he often took pictures in color as well as black and white. A generous selection of Ansel Adams in Color Kodachromes, most created between andappears in a new book, Ansel Adams in Colorrevised and expanded from the edition, with laser scans that might have met even his finicky standards.
  • Matthew Greene Were Starting to Understand the Grave the Following Day

    Matthew Greene Were Starting to Understand the Grave the Following Day

    VANISHED An account of the mysterious disappearance of a climber in the Sierra Nevada BY MONICA PRELLE ILLUSTRATIONS BY BRETT AFFRUNTI CLIMBING.COM — 61 VANISHED Three months earlier in July, the 39-year-old high school feasted on their arms. They went hiking together often, N THE SMALL SKI TOWN of Mammoth Lakes in math teacher dropped his car off at a Mammoth auto shop even in the really cold winters common to the Northeast. California’s Eastern Sierra, the first snowfall of the for repairs. He was visiting the area for a summer climb- “The ice didn’t slow him down one bit,” Minto said. “I strug- ing vacation when the car blew a head gasket. The friends gled to keep up.” Greene loved to run, competing on the track year is usually a beautiful and joyous celebration. Greene was traveling with headed home as scheduled, and team in high school and running the Boston Marathon a few Greene planned to drive to Colorado to join other friends times as an adult. As the student speaker for his high school But for the family and friends of a missing for more climbing as soon as his car was ready. graduation, Greene urged his classmates to take chances. IPennsylvania man, the falling flakes in early October “I may have to spend the rest of my life here in Mam- “The time has come to fulfill our current goals and to set moth,” he texted to a friend as he got more and more frus- new ones to be conquered later,” he said in his speech.
  • Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California

    Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California

    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Denny Shaffer SIERRA CLUB OFFICER AND LEADER, 1970 TO 1997: FOCUS ON MEMBERSHIP, FINANCES, AND MANAGEMENT With an Introduction by Lawrence Downing An Interview Conducted by Ann Lage in 1993-1997 Copyright © 2006 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral history is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ************************************ All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreements between The Regents of the University of California and Denny Shaffer, dated August 9, 2003. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
  • Native Sustainment: the North Fork Mono Tribe's

    Native Sustainment: the North Fork Mono Tribe's

    Native Sustainment The North Fork Mono Tribe's Stories, History, and Teaching of Its Land and Water Tenure in 1918 and 2009 Jared Dahl Aldern Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from Prescott College in Education with a Concentration in Sustainability Education May 2010 Steven J. Crum, Ph.D. George Lipsitz, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Margaret Field, Ph.D. Theresa Gregor, Ph.D. External Expert Reader External Expert Reader Pramod Parajuli, Ph.D. Committee Chair Native Sustainment ii Copyright © 2010 by Jared Dahl Aldern. All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation may be used, reproduced, stored, recorded, or transmitted in any form or manner whatsoever without written permission from the copyright holder or his agent(s), except in the case of brief quotations embodied in the papers of students, and in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Requests for such permission should be addressed to: Jared Dahl Aldern 2658 East Alluvial Avenue, #103 Clovis, CA 93611 Native Sustainment iii Acknowledgments Gratitude to: The North Fork Mono Tribe, its Chairman, Ron Goode, and members Melvin Carmen (R.I.P.), Lois Conner, Stan Dandy, Richard Lavelle, Ruby Pomona, and Grace Tex for their support, kindnesses, and teachings. My doctoral committee: Steven J. Crum, Margaret Field, Theresa Gregor, George Lipsitz, and Pramod Parajuli for listening, for reading, and for their mentorship. Jagannath Adhikari, Kat Anderson, Steve Archer, Donna Begay, Lisa
  • Nevada Fall Corridor

    Nevada Fall Corridor

    NEVADA FALL CORRIDOR: A CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT by MARTI M. GERDES A THESIS Presented to the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science August 2004 ii "Nevada Fall Corridor: A Cultural Landscape Report," a thesis prepared by Marti M. Gerdes in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation. This thesis has been approved and accepted by: Robert Z. Melnick, Chair of the Examining Committee 2 Date Committee in Charge: Robert Z. Melnick, Chair Cathy Gilbert Lee Roth Fred Walters Accepted by: Dean of the Graduate School iii C 2004 Marti M. Gerdes iv An Abstract of the Thesis of Marti M. Gerdes for the degree of Master of Science in the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation to be taken August 2004 Title: NEVADA FALL CORRIDOR: A CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT Approved: Robert Z. Melnick This study describes existing conditions, evaluates significance and historic integrity, and recommends treatment strategies to preserve historic elements of the Nevada Fall Corridor cultural landscape in Yosemite National Park. It reports findings from field investigation that examined and inventoried landscape features such as stone retaining walls, treadway material, bridges and causeways, and water features on both current-use and abandoned trail segments. The site was examined numerous times over a three-month period, with a followup visit one year later. Libraries and other archives were consulted for written and photographic historic documentation, which were analyzed against current conditions.
  • Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks a Tool for Planning Stock-Supported Wilderness Trips

    Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks a Tool for Planning Stock-Supported Wilderness Trips

    Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Parks Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks A tool for planning stock-supported wilderness trips SEQUOIA & KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS Wilderness Office 47050 Generals Highway Three Rivers, California 93271 559-565-3766 [email protected] www.nps.gov/seki/planyourvisit/wilderness.htm Revised May 6th, 2021 EAST CREEK .............................................................................. 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPHINX CREEK .......................................................................... 19 INTRO TO GUIDE ........................................................................ 2 ROARING RIVER ....................................................................... 19 LAYOUT OF THE GUIDE............................................................. 3 CLOUD CANYON ....................................................................... 20 STOCK USE & GRAZING RESTRICTIONS: DEADMAN CANYON ................................................................ 20 KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARK .................................... 4 SUGARLOAF AND FERGUSON CREEKS ................................. 21 SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARK ................................................ 6 CLOVER AND SILLIMAN CREEKS .......................................... 23 MINIMUM IMPACT STOCK USE ................................................ 8 LONE PINE CREEK .................................................................... 23 MINIMUM
  • Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake Between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facili

    Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake Between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facili

    Draft FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facilitate Water Supply for the Exchange Contractors and Friant Division Contractors FONSI-15-034 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation June 2015 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION South-Central California Area Office, Fresno, California FONSI-15-034 Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facilitate Water Supply for the Exchange Contractors and Friant Division Contractors _____________ Prepared by: Rain L. Emerson Date Supervisory Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Concurred by: Shauna McDonald Date Wildlife Biologist _____________ Approved by: Michael Jackson, P.E. Date Area Manager FONSI-15-034 Introduction In accordance with section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the South-Central California Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), has determined that an environmental impact statement is not required for the facilitation of an exchange of 13,195 acre-feet (AF) between Westlands Water District (Westlands) and the San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors (Exchange Contractors).
  • Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1980

    Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1980

    Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1980 Robert L. Richardson, Jr. A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2009 Approved by, Michael H. Hunt, Chair Richard Kohn Timothy McKeown Nancy Mitchell Roger Lotchin Abstract Robert L. Richardson, Jr. Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1985 (Under the direction of Michael H. Hunt) This dissertation examines the origins and evolution of neoconservatism as a philosophical and political movement in America from 1945 to 1980. I maintain that as the exigencies and anxieties of the Cold War fostered new intellectual and professional connections between academia, government and business, three disparate intellectual currents were brought into contact: the German philosophical tradition of anti-modernism, the strategic-analytical tradition associated with the RAND Corporation, and the early Cold War anti-Communist tradition identified with figures such as Reinhold Niebuhr. Driven by similar aims and concerns, these three intellectual currents eventually coalesced into neoconservatism. As a political movement, neoconservatism sought, from the 1950s on, to re-orient American policy away from containment and coexistence and toward confrontation and rollback through activism in academia, bureaucratic and electoral politics. Although the neoconservatives were only partially successful in promoting their transformative project, their accomplishments are historically significant. More specifically, they managed to interject their views and ideas into American political and strategic thought, discredit détente and arms control, and shift U.S. foreign policy toward a more confrontational stance vis-à-vis the Soviet Union.
  • Visitor Guide to Devils Postpile and the Reds Meadow Valley

    Visitor Guide to Devils Postpile and the Reds Meadow Valley

    National Forest Service Visitor Guide to Devils Postpile and U.S. Department of Agriculture the Reds Meadow Valley National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior The Post 2009-2010 What’s Inside Information and Services.................. 2 Ranger-led Activities Shuttle Bus Information.................... 3 Hiking ................................................ 4 Making the Most of Your Time Bear Safety......................................... 5 Maps .................................................. 6 Science and Resources Student Conservation Association Welcome to Devils Postpile Junior Ranger Program..................... 7 Volcanic Landscape Aquatic Hitchhikers and the Reds Meadow Valley Bookstores and Partners................... 8 Welcome to Reds Meadow Valley and Southern Sierra species of plants as “wanton destruction of scenery” displayed as an exhibit in the valley or and Devils Postpile in the spectacu- and animals converge along the river and enlisted the support of District in Mammoth. If you have any pho- lar Upper Middle Fork of the San corridor and in the many wetlands. Forester F.E. Olmsted and Univer- tos or stories you would like to share, Joaquin River Valley. Beauty abounds sity of California Professor Joseph N. please feel free to contribute these for in the forms of unusually rich and The value of the natural and recre- LeConte to evaluate the situation with possible inclusion in this exhibit. diverse flora and fauna, traditional ational resources was recognized in the hope of denying the permit and recreational opportunities and a 1890 with its inclusion in the initial protecting the area. Devils Postpile is also embarking on fascinating cultural history. boundaries of Yosemite National Park. its first ever general management plan, Their efforts, along with the support of in cooperation with the Inyo National Researchers, writers, visitors, and In 1905 the Devils Postpile formation, the Sierra Club, resulted in President Forest.
  • Wickman Pnw-Gtr-638

    Wickman Pnw-Gtr-638

    GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-638 een, PNW K P. F. Figure 63—Forest Service Chief Colonel Greeley (far right) with entourage at the SONC Project, 1923. (Left to right) J.F. Kimball, Hal H. Ogle, A.J. Jaenicke, S.R. Black, George Cecil, Gilbert D. Brown, W.J. Rankin, J.M. Miller, E.E. Carter, Colonel William B. Greeley. I feel that I am not saying much that is new to Arizona, then another train to the south rim, horseback or all of you. From reading your News Letters during walking down to the Colorado River at Phantom Ranch, the past summer I have been greatly impressed then up the trail to Bright Angel and the north rim. Miller with the excellent manner in which you all are undertaking your various investigations. I look for- chose the latter route. He walked down to the Phantom ward to meeting you all at the conference this fall Ranch where horses awaited to ride to Bright Angel. On and to a thorough discussion of our policy for the the return trip he reversed the mode of transport. He said it future. – F.C. Craighead. was an interesting trip, but he would not care to repeat it. For the remainder of 1923, Miller was headquartered in In the fall he spent time on the SONC project with North Fork but was there only intermittently. He continued Keen and Kimball helping to smooth operational problems. his field work on the San Joaquin Project; in May he was Miller had been a football fan since his student days at on a demonstration trip to the SONC project (fig.