Leaders and Followers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leaders and Followers Heinz Wilhelm Guderian (17 June, 1888 – 14 May, 1954) Nickname Schneller Heinz Place of birth Kulm, West Prussia Place of death Schwangau, Allgäu Allegiance German Empire (to 1918) Weimar Republic (to 1933) Nazi Germany Years of service 1907 – 1945 Rank Generaloberst Commands held 2. Panzer Division , XVI. Army-Corps, XIX. Army-Corps, Panzergruppe Guderian and Panzergruppe 2 Awards Ritterkreuz des Eisernen Kreuzes mit Eichenlaub Relations Heinz Günther Guderian A military theorist and innovative General of the German Army during the Second World War. Germany's panzer forces were raised and fought according to his works, best-known among them Achtung— Panzer! He held posts as Panzer Corps commander, Panzer Army commander, Inspector - General of Armoured Troops, and Chief of Staff of the Army ( Chef des Generalstabs des Heeres). He rose to the rank of full general ( General der Panzertruppe ) in July 1940 and was later promoted to Generaloberst. He never became a field marshal , but he is recognized as one of the most prominent generals of the Second World War. Guderian, Heinz (1937). Achtung—Panzer! (reissue ed.). Sterling Press. ISBN 0-304-35285-3. Guderian describes what he would do if he was in charge of German tank forces. Guderian, Heinz (1942). Mit Den Panzern in Ost und West . Volk & Reich Verlag. Guderian, Heinz (1952). Panzer Leader. Da Capo Press Reissue edition, 2001. New York: Da Capo Press. ISBN 0-306-81101-4. Guderian describes what he did when he was in charge of German tank forces. It was originally published with the German title Erinnerungen eines Soldaten (Memories of a Soldier). Achtung - Panzer! was written in 1936-37 as an explanation of Guderian's theories on the role of tanks and aircraft in modern warfare. It was actually a compilation of not only of Guderia n's own theories but also the ideas of other proponents of armored and combined -arms warfare within the general staff, though the bulk of the credit rightly is Guderian's. The panzer force he created would become the core of the German Army's power during the Second World War and would deliver the core of the fighting style known as blitzkrieg . To this day, his contributions to combined arms tactics are studied throughout military schools. The concepts of blitzkrieg were not fully developed in other countries, although initially promoted and partially implemented by the British Army, but the German army of the First World War had worked out the complexities of breaking through a front with highly concentrated resources. This technique failed the Germans in their Michael offensives of March 1918, largely because the breakthrough elements were on foot and could not sustain the impetus of the initial attack. Motorized infantry was the key to sustaining a breakthrough, and this would have to wait until the 1930s to have a chance at being realized. Tukhachevsky, in Russia, can be said to have already grasped this pote ntial, but the influence of his military philosophy in the ongoing development of the Red Army diminished after he was no longer able to personally advocate for it (he was executed by Stalin in 1937). Guderian probably was the first who fully developed and advocated the principle of Blitzkrieg and put into the final shape. He summarized the tactics of blitzkrieg as the way to get the mobile and motorized armored divisions to work together and support each other in order to achieve decisive success. In his book Panzer Leader he wrote: In this year (1929) I became convinced that tanks working on their own or in conjunction with infantry could never achieve decisive importance. My historical studies; the exercises carried out in England and our own experience with mock-ups had persuaded me that the tanks would never be able to produce their full effect until weapons on whose support they must inevitably rely were brought up to their standard of speed and of cross-country performance. In such formation of all arms, the tanks must play primary role, the other weapons being subordinated to the requirements of the armor. It would be wrong to include tanks in infantry divisions: what was needed were armored divisions which would include all the supporting arms needed to fight with full effect. In the Invasion of France, he personally led the attack that traversed the Ardennes Fores t, crossed the Meuse River and broke through the French lines at Sedan. During the French campaign, he led his panzer forces in rapid blitzkrieg -style advances and earned the nic kname "Schneller Heinz" (Hurry -Up Heinz) among his troops.[5] Guderian's panzer group led the "race to the sea" that split the Allied armies in two, depriving the French arm ies and the BEF in Northern France and Belgium of their fuel, food, spare parts and ammunition. Faced with orders fr om nervous superiors to halt on one occasion, he managed to continue his advance by stating he was performing a 'reconnaissance in force'. Guderian's column was famously denied the chance to destroy the Allied beachhead at Dunkirk by Hitler's personal orde r. In 1941 he commanded Panzergruppe 2, better known as Panzergruppe Guderian , in Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union, receiving the 24th award of the Oak Leaves to his Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross on July 17 of that year. From October 5, 1941 he led the redesignated Second Panzer Army. His armored spearhead captur ed Smolensk in a remarkably short time and was poised to launch the final assault on Moscow when he was ordered to turn south towards Kiev (see Lötzen decision). German tanks lacked antifreeze or enough fuel to run all night. Russian tanks emerged from Moscow with air-cooled diesel engines, and the Germans quickly began desig n work on an air-cooled diesel engine of their own. He protested against Hitler's decision and as a result lost the Führer's confidence. He was relieved of his command on 25 December 1941 after Fieldmarshal Günther von Kluge , not noted for his ability to face up to Hitler, claimed that Guderian had ordered a withdrawal in contradiction of Hitler's "stand fast" order. In Panzer Leader (da Capo Press), Guderian claims he told Hitler to his face that because Moscow had not been taken by Christmas 1941, the war would be lost. Guderian was transferred to the Oberkommando des Heeres (OKH) reserve pool, his chances of being promoted to fieldmarshal, which depended on Hitler's personal decision, possibly ruined forever. Guderian would deny that he ordered any kind of withdrawal. Ironically this act of apparent insubordination is cited by his admirers as further proof of his independence of spirit when dealing with Hitler. Guderian's own view on the matter was that he had been victimised by von Kluge who was the commanding officer when German troops came to a standstill at the Moscow front in late autumn/winter 1941. At some point he so provoked von Kluge with accusations related to his dismissal that the fieldmarshal challenged him to a duel, which Hitler forbade. Only after the German defeat at Stalingrad was Guderian given a new position. On 1 March 1943 he was appointed Inspector-General of the Armoured Troops. Here his responsibilities were to determin e armoured strategy and to oversee tank design and production and the training of Germany's panzer forces. According to Guderian, Hitler was easily persuaded to field too many new tank designs, and this resulted in supply and logistical problems for German forces in Russia. Guderian preferred large numbers of Panzer IIIs and IVs over smaller numbers of heavier tanks like the Tiger, which had limited range and could rarely go off-road without getting stuck in the Russian mud. George Smith Patton, Jr. (also George Smith Patton III) (November 11, 1885 – December 21, 1945) Nickname Old Blood and Guts Place of birth San Gabriel, California Place of death Heidelberg, Germany Allegiance United States of America Service/branch United States Army Years of service 1909–1945 Rank General Commands held Machinegun Platoon/3/15th Cavalry Regiment K/3/15th Cavalry Regiment A/1/7th Cavalry Regiment HQs Troop/American Expeditionary Force 302nd Tank Center 1st Light Tank Battalion 1st Light Tank Regiment 1st Tank Brigade 304th Tank Brigade 3/3rd Cavalry Regiment 5th Cavalry Regiment 3rd Cavalry Regiment 2/2nd Armored Division 2nd Armored Division US 1st Armored Corps Desert Training Ce nter US 1st Armored Corps U.S. II Corps US 1st Armored Corps U.S. Seventh Army U.S. Third Army U.S. Fifteenth Army Battles/wars Mexican Expedition World War I World War II Awards Distinguished Service Cross (2) Distinguished Service Medal (3) Silver Star (2) Legion of Merit Bronze Star Purple Heart Order of the Bath Order of the British Empire Relations Major General George Patton IV (son) A distinguished though controversial U.S. Army officer. Commissioned in the army in 1909, Patton participated in the unsuccessful attempt to capture Pancho Villa in 1916-17. In World War I, he was a senior commander of the new United States Tank Corps and saw action in France. After the war, he was a strong advocate of armored warfare. Patton often got into trouble with his outspokenness and strong opinions. In addition to the slapping incident, towards the end of the war, he voiced his detestation and mistrust of the Soviets and his desire to fight them. He has also been criticized for sending an ill -fated rescue mission for his son-in-law, held in a prison camp deep behind enemy lines. Patton participated in the 1912 Summer Olympics in Stockholm in the first -ever modern pentathlon.
Recommended publications
  • Training Soldiers and Becoming a Strategist in Peace and War
    Cardinal Point: An Oral History — Training Soldiers and Becoming a Strategist in Peace and War. by General Paul F. Gorman Cardinal Point, Virginia 2010 - 2011 Published by Combat Studies Institute GENERAL PAUL F. GORMAN Cardinal Point: An Oral History — Training Soldiers and Becoming a Strategist in Peace and War. CSI Press Publications cover a variety of military topics. The views expressed in this CSI Press Publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense. ii Editor’s Introduction to the Oral History of General Paul Francis Gorman, U.S.A. Retired The oral history that follows is based on five interviews conducted with General (Retired) Paul F. Gorman by Lieutenant Colonel Robert P. Reddy, Mr Richard Swain, and Mr. Michael Starry. The Reddy interview was conducted as a student project at the Army War College during Academic Year 1990-91.1 Reddy inquired about General Gorman’s early years, his experience in various professional schools, and particularly, General Gorman’s command of the 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry, ‘Blue Spaders’ in the First Infantry Division in Vietnam. Four additional interviews were conducted by Mr. Swain and Mr. Starry between October 2010 and April 2011 in the midst of the vineyards at General Gorman’s home at Cardinal Point near Afton, Virginia. Midway in the conduct of the more recent interviews, the participants made a decision to integrate all the interview material into a single chronological narrative that could provide General Gorman’s contextual overview for the electronic archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Violence: the German Army and Politics, 1918-1923
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-11 Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 Bucholtz, Matthew N Bucholtz, M. N. (2015). Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27638 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2451 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 By Matthew N. Bucholtz A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 © Matthew Bucholtz 2015 Abstract November 1918 did not bring peace to Germany. Although the First World War was over, Germany began a new and violent chapter as an outbreak of civil war threatened to tear the country apart. The birth of the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government, did not begin smoothly as republican institutions failed to re-establish centralized political and military authority in the wake of the collapse of the imperial regime. Coupled with painful aftershocks from defeat in the Great War, the immediate postwar era had only one consistent force shaping and guiding political and cultural life: violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Panzer Leader
    PANZER LEADER by Heinz Guderian First published in 1952 FOREWORD by CAPTAIN B. H. LIDDELL HART In this book a man who has made history—on a great scale—gives us his own story of how he shaped it by means of a new idea, and how it led to an end he had not foreseen. Guderian had a tremendous impact on the course of events in our time. Without him, it is probable that Hitler would have met early frustration in his offensive efforts when he embarked on war. For in 1939-40 Germany's forces in general were not sufficient to overcome any major Power. Her opening run of victory in the Second World War was only made possible by the panzer forces that Guderian had created and trained, and by his auda¬cious leading of those forces in disregard of his superiors' caution as well as Hitler's fears. Guderian's break-through at Sedan and lightning drive to the Channel coast virtually decided the issue of the Battle of France. A year later, the drive he led into the East came close to producing the complete collapse of Russia's armies, but this time renewed hesitancy on top imposed a delay that spun out the campaign until winter intervened, and gave the Russians a breathing-space for recovery. Stalin was able to raise fresh armies and develop new arms factories to replace those that had been captured. Russia's strength went on increasing, while Germany was never again as strong as in that first campaign. Hitler's 1942 effort, though dangerous, was a more limited one than in the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seeing Eye® in Its EOrts to Enhance the Lives of People Who Are Blind
    Summer 2020 | Volume 86, Number 2 THE SEEING EYE ® GUIDE A MAGAZINE FOR FRIENDS OF THE SEEING EYE FROM THE PRESIDENT The Seeing Eye A Seeing Eye Perspective It’s certainly been an interesting, and puppy raiser families continued to meet, virtually, and participated unprecedented, few months at The in our annual Puppy Raiser Calendar contest; and we held a number Seeing Eye. I hope you and your loved of important fundraisers, including our online auction, our annual ones are safe and healthy. Dinner Party (turned into a virtual event), and participated in the national Giving Tuesday Now. Thank you to all of you who have In March, with coronavirus hitting New continued to support us through this difficult time! Jersey and New York particularly hard, The Seeing Eye was required to enter “limited operations mode.” It’s been quite an eventful first year for me as President & CEO of We finished up our March class about a week early, graduating those The Seeing Eye. I’ve been asked by a few people, maybe not entirely students with their Seeing Eye® dogs, and had most of our staff in jest, if I regret taking this job. And I can honestly tell you: Not for begin to work remotely. one minute. As the old saying goes, “smooth seas do not make for skilled sailors.” Crisis reveals The Seeing Eye’s character and Following local, state, and federal guidelines, we are cautiously resilience. beginning to return to normal operations, with a plan that our first students will be matched with dogs in August.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue 509Th PARACHUTE INFANTRY ASSOCIATION
    H 509th PARACHUTE INFANTRY ASSOCIATION Newsletter | Volume 7 - Issue 2 | July 2019 In This Issue Geronimo Visits Normandy …... Page 1 President’s Message ……...….. Page 2 Executive Committee ……..….. Page 3 DMOR/HMOR Recipients ….... Page 4 Order of Geronimo Recipient .. Page 5 Reunion Guest Speaker ……... Page 6 75th Anniversary of D-Day During our 2019 reunion, we remembered the 75th anniversary of Guest Speaker ………….…..… Page 7 D-Day, the single most pivotal day in World War II. In the early hours of June 6, 1944, Allied forces launched greatest Reunion Information ……...….. Page 8 combination of sea, land and air power in history headed for Nor- mandy. Overhead, twelve hundred planes launched an airborne 1-509th IN (ABN), Ft. Polk …... Page 14 assault, preparing five thousand ships to land on the beaches. It was an all-or-nothing mission. Out of the 160,000 troops and 3-509th IN (ABN), JBER …..… Page 16 13,000 paratroopers who landed on D-Day, 73,000 were Ameri- cans. Five thousand died on the beaches, most in the first few Memorials …………………..…. Page 18 hours. Membership Application …..…. Page 21 America’s First Combat Paratroopers! Lawrence Blood (retired Geronimo) Lawrence and his wife Lori made the “trip of a lifetime” and were able to observe and participate in the 75th Anniversary of D-Day. During their travels and touring, they bumped into two active duty Geronimo’s from 1-509th IN (ABN)! Would you believe that this chance meeting happened in Sainte-Mère-Église…. At the beer tent?! V OLUME 7, I SSUE 2 P AGE 2 1 As the newly elected President, it is my absolute honor to represent the best Airborne Association in the world! This year has seen significant change for the 509th Parachute Infantry Association and I am extremely happy to be part of everything we’re doing.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Return, German Army, 30 April 1945
    German Army 30 April 1945 Army Group E (South East) LXIX z.b.V. Corps: Sturm Brigade Südost XV Cossack Cavalry Corps 1st Cossack Division 2nd Cossack Division 11th Luftwaffe Field Division XXI Mountain Corps: 22nd Volks Grenadier Division 369th Croatian Division 7th SS Mountain Division "Prinz Eugen" 41st Infantry Division 181st Infantry Division XV Mountain Division: 373th Croatian Division 639th Security Regiment LXXXXI z.b.V. Corps 104th Jager Division 20th Jager Regiment LXXXXVII z.b.V. Corps 237th Infantry Division 188th Mountain Division Remains/392nd Croatian Division Army Group South: Army Troops: 9th SS Panzer Division "Hohenstaufen" 9th Mountain Division (reforming) 2nd Panzer Army: LXVIII Corps: 71st Infantry Division 13th SS Mountain Division 118th Jäger Division "Handschar" XXII Mountain Corps: 297th Infantry Division Szentlaszlo Infantry Division I Cavalry Division: 23rd Panzer Division 3rd Cavalry Division 4th Cavalry Division 16th SS Panzer Grenadier Division "SS Reichsführer" 6th Army IV SS Panzer Corps Kampfgruppe 3rd Panzer Division Kampfgruppe 5th SS Panzer Division "Wiking" 14th SS Waffen Group (1st Ukranian) III Panzer Corps: 1st Volks Grenadier Division 1st Panzer Division 6th Panzer Army Army Troops: 1 117th Jäger Division I SS Panzer Corps 1st SS Panzer Division "Adolph Hitler" Kampfgruppe 356th Infantry Division 12th SS Panzer Division "Hitler Jugend" II SS Panzer Division: 3rd SS Panzer Division "Totenkopf" 48th Volks Grenadier Division 8th Army XXXXIII Corps: 96th Infnatry Division 48th Volks Grenadier Division
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Qtr 2014
    ThunderThunder RunRun Vol. 29 – NO. 4 “Together Then – Together Again” 4th Quarter, 2014 The 11th Armored Cavalry’s Veterans of Vietnam and Cambodia Columbus Georgia, Here We Come! The Blackhorse By: Steve Page Director and Reunion Chairman This Reunion will have many mov- Lands in Vietnam ith the memories of our Las ing parts. The primary purpose is By Raye Ashe, Vegas reunion still fresh in our to rededicate our Monument in HHT Regiment 1966-67 minds our attention turns to W this new place of honor. he landing craft eased softly into Columbus Georgia and our 30th Annual the Vietnamese beach and the Reunion. Thirty consecutive years is a ramp lowered to the sand. Colonel milestone in any organization. This event visits to Georgia to work out all of the T William W. Cobb, age 49 of Dallas, TX, will prove to be one that is not soon for- many details. stepped from the landing craft followed gotten Hotel reservation information is listed by CSM Arthur W. Hawthorne and the This Reunion will have many moving in this issue of Thunder Run. Please make your hotel reservations early, remember honor guard carrying the American Flag parts. The primary purpose is to rededicate and the Regimental Colors. They were our Monument in this new place of honor. you are not charged until you arrive on site. Please check with the hotel you followed by the Squadron Commander We will use multiple hotels and have and then the troop guidons. transportation and varied sites to visit. choose on their cancellation policy as they may vary.
    [Show full text]
  • “Où Est La Masse De Manoeuvre?”: Maurice Gamelin and the Lessons of Blitzkrieg in Poland
    “Où est la Masse de Manoeuvre?”: Maurice Gamelin and the Lessons of Blitzkrieg in Poland Robert Parker A Thesis in The Department Of History Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (History) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada September 2nd, 2013 © Robert Parker, 2013 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Robert Parker Entitled: “Où est la Masse de Manoeuvre?”: Maurice Gamelin and the lessons of Blitzkrieg in Poland. and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (History) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: __Ted McCormick _______________________ Chair __Alison Rowley ________________________ Examiner __Frederick Bode________________________ Examiner __Norman Ingram________________________Supervisor Approved by _____________________________________________________ Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director _____________________________________________________ Dean of Faculty Date _______________________________________________________ iii Abstract “Où est la Masse de Manoeuvre?”: Maurice Gamelin and the Lessons of Blitzkrieg in Poland Robert Parker The spectacular defeat of the French army in May-June 1940 has invited a long tradition of criticism aimed at France’s Commander-in-Chief, Maurice Gamelin. In particular, Gamelin’s strategy has been criticised for failing to provide a strong strategic reserve behind the French continuous front. This thesis will endeavor to explain why the armies of France were left with no strategic reserve to counter the German breakthrough along the Meuse river on May 12th, 1940. How could the French high command fail to provide the country with such a fundamental safeguard? It will be argued that Gamelin’s strategy was deeply affected by the Polish campaign of September 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Service of Kaiser and King: State Sovereignty, Nation-Building
    In the Service of Kaiser and King: State Sovereignty, Nation-Building, and the German Army, 1866-1918 By Gavin Wiens A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Gavin Wiens, 2019 In the Service of Kaiser and King: State Sovereignty, Nation-Building, and the German Army, 1866-1918 Gavin Wiens Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2019 Abstract From its creation during the Wars of Unification (1864-71) until its defeat at the end of the First World War, the German army remained a federal institution. To be sure, the imperial constitution recognized the Kaiser as commander-in-chief of Germany’s land forces. Under the Kaiser’s direction, the Prussian war ministry prepared the military budget and the Prussian General Staff drafted operational plans for future wars. A patchwork of military agreements nevertheless limited the authority of the Kaiser and Prussia’s military leaders over nearly one- quarter of the German army. According to these agreements, separate war ministries, cadet schools, and general staffs oversaw the arming, clothing, feeding, housing, and training of Bavarians, Saxons, and Württembergers, while the monarchs of Germany’s three smaller kingdoms determined personnel appointments, the deployment of units, and even the design of insignia and uniforms. The army’s contingent-based structure ensured that Prussians and non-Prussians served alongside, but only rarely with, one another after 1871. Based on research in archives and libraries in Germany, Austria, England, and the United States, this dissertation explores the means by which the smaller armies of Bavaria, ii Saxony, and Württemberg were integrated into Prussia’s much larger military structure after 1871 and seeks to understand why the German army, burdened by numerous loyalties and overlapping spheres of control, did not simply fall apart during the First World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the MS-244: George S. Patton Jr. Family Memoir and Letters
    ________________________________________________________________________ Guide to the MS-244: George S. Patton Jr. Family Memoir and Letters Jujuan K. Johnson ’21, Brian C. Pohanka Intern July 2019 MS – 244: Papers of George S. Patton Jr. (1 box, .5 cubic feet) Location: Special Collections Inclusive Dates: 1750-1927 (1903-1908 are the dates of the letters, all others show up in “My Father as I remembered him.”) Bulk Dates: 1890-1907 Processed by: Jujuan K. Johnson ‘21, Pohanka Intern July 2019 Provenance This collection was donated by Robert and Victoria Patton P ’13 in December 2018. Biographical Note George Smith Patton Jr. (1885-1945) was born and raised in California. He attended the Virginia Military Institute from 1903-1904, then transferred to the United States Military Academy at West Point. Patton graduated from West Point in 1909 and became a Second Lieutenant in the Cavalry Branch of the United States Army. A year later, Patton married Beatrice Banning Ayer and they had three children, Beatrice Smith (1911), Ruth Ellen (1915), and George Patton IV (1923). In 1912, Patton was selected as the Army’s entry for the first Modern Pentathlon held in Stockholm, Sweden. He was proficient in marksmanship, horsemanship, swordsmanship, foot racing, and swimming, finishing fifth overall. He served on the border with John J. Pershing in 1915 pursuing Pancho Villa. After the United States entered World War I in 1917, Patton was assigned to Pershing’s staff in the American Expeditionary Force. Patton was wounded in the leg a year later during the Meuse- Argonne Offensive, while commanding a light tank brigade.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Army, 1 May 1943
    Italian Army 1 May 1943 Commando do Gruppo Armate Asse (1st Army): General Messe German 90th Light Afrika Division German 164th Light Afrika Division Ramke Fallschirmjäger Brigade German 19th Flak Division LII Special Brigade: General Carasi 1st MVSN Legion of Libya 5th CCNN Battalion 6th CCNN Battalion 570th CCNN Battalion 10th "M" Battalion Bersaglieri d'Africa XX Corps: General T. Orlando 45th "Bersaglieri di Africa" Division: General Boselli 101st "Trieste" (mot) Division: General La Ferla XXI Corps: General Berardi 16th "Pistoia" Division: General Falugi 80th "La Spezia" Division: no commander assigned Deutsch Afrika Korps: German 21st Panzer Division 1st "Superga" Division: General Gelich L Special Brigade: General Imperiali German 5th Army: German 10th Panzer Division German 15th Panzer Division German 334th Infantry Division German Manteuffel Infantry Division German Herman Göring Infantry Division XXX Corps: General Songno (in Corsica - no troops assigned) Comando Superiore FF.AA. Albania: General Dalmazzo 38th "Pulgie" Division: General d'Arle 115th CCNN Battalion 92nd CCNN Legion 92nd CCNN Battalion 95th CCNN Battalion 109th CCNN Battalion 80th CCNN Legion 26th CCNN Battalion 67th CCNN Battalion 29th "M" Battalion IV Army Corps: General Spatocco 49th "Parma" Division: General Podio XXV Army Corps: General Mondino 41st "Firenze" Division: General Azzi 53rd "Arezzo" Division: General d'Arminio Comando Superiore FF.AA. Grecia: General Geolso 51st "Siena" Division: General Carta LI Infantry Brigade: General Matteucci III Army Corps:
    [Show full text]
  • BORDERS and CONFLICTS in the MEDITERRANEAN BASIN ISBN Online: 978-88-99662-01-1
    Mediterranean, Knowledge, Culture and Heritage 2 Giuseppe D’ANGELO – Jorge MARTINS RIBEIRO Editors BORDERS AND CONFLICTS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN BASIN ISBN online: 978-88-99662-01-1 Mediterranean, Knowledge, Culture and Heritage 2 Mediterranean, Knowledge, Culture and Heritage Book Series edited by Giuseppe D’Angelo and Emiliana Mangone The Book Series, published in electronic open access, shall be a permanent platform of discussion and comparison, experimentation and dissemination, promoting the achievement of methodological action-research goals, in order to enforce the development of the territories and of the local and European identities, starting from the cultural heritage and from the Mediterranean Area. All the research work revolves around three key topics: Mediterranean: The knowledge and cultural values of southern Europe and the Mediterranean Area may represent the strategic elements to overcome the current crisis in Europe, to the point of be- coming a stimulus for the review of policies. Knowledge: Language, history, tradition and art have always conveyed dialogic relations and inter- personal relationships within societies, founding on otherness the peculiarities understood as knowledge development, processes, sedimentation and transformation. What becomes peculiar is the "knowledge" as the achievement of an advantage derived from the possession of unique and inimitable knowledge. Culture and Heritage: Culture, understood as its cultural heritage, is proposed as one of the privi- leged areas of the "new economy". In fact,
    [Show full text]