The American Army and Urban Combat in World War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The American Army and Urban Combat in World War “THE STREET WAS ONE PLACE WE COULD NOT GO”: THE AMERICAN ARMY AND URBAN COMBAT IN WORLD WAR II EUROPE A Dissertation by JONATHAN ANDREW BEALL Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Joseph G. Dawson, III Committee Members, James Bradford Roger Reese David Vaught James Burk Head of Department, David Vaught May 2014 Major Subject: History Copyright 2014 Jonathan Andrew Beall ABSTRACT Much has been written about the nature of the United States Army in World War II and the topic of military effectiveness. This dissertation examines how the United States responded to a combat environment, specifically, fighting in built-up areas, that it had not planned to fight within before World War II. By following three infantry divisions, the 1st, 3rd, and 5th Infantry Divisions through their combat in World War II, this dissertation investigates how the Army of the United States fought within the urban setting to see whether the American Army improved and became more effective as the war continued. It argues that the 1st, 3rd, and 5th Infantry Divisions learned and became more proficient at urban combat over time. This dissertation asserts that as these divisions embraced combined-arms operations in general, that is, mastered the coordination of infantry weapons, armor, and artillery into battle, so they applied those lessons to the urban environment. Whereas the American military had neither doctrine nor tradition of urban combat before World War II, combat units learned to develop methods of fighting within towns and cities. Further, the United States Army processed and incorporated these battlefield lessons into military doctrine at a slower rate. The infantry divisions’ combat experience had a greater impact on army doctrine than the doctrine had on the divisions’ warfighting practices. ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated in loving memory to my grandfather, Alphonso Aguirre (1913-2010). He had always wanted to be an Aggie. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS One does not undertake a project such as this without getting help along the way. First, I am greatly indebted to my doctoral advisor, Dr. Joseph G. Dawson, for his patience and direction as this dissertation slowly took shape and especially as it competed with my teaching responsibilities. I would also like to thank my committee, Dr. James Bradford, Dr. James Burk, Dr. Roger Reese, and Dr. David Vaught, for their insightful comments, guidance, and support that helped to sharpen this dissertation. Fellow scholars such as Mr. Daniel Champagne, Mr. Jeff Danby, and Dr. John McManus generously gave me unpublished sources that I could not obtain through Interlibrary Loan. Colonel Lou DiMarco, U.S. Army (retired), helped me to frame this dissertation in its early days and then he graciously took time from his schedule to meet with me during my visit to Fort Leavenworth’s Combined Arms Research Library to discuss World War II and urban combat. At the same time, the archivists at the National Archives at College Park, Maryland, Fort Benning’s Donovan Research Library, Fort Knox’s Armor School Research Library, Fort Leavenworth’s Combined Arms Research Library, and the First Division Museum’s McCormick Research Center all offered incredible help in helping me find what I needed to write this dissertation. Alec Wahlman helped me understand some of these concepts, donated some of his research, and encouraged me through this process as he finished his dissertation. I am thankful and grateful for James Pruitt’s and Lee Daub’s friendship. James Pruitt’s companionship on our several research trips to Washington, D.C. made those trips pass iv more pleasantly. Lee Daub answered my random questions at random times on World War II equipment, armor, and aircraft. Mark and Lexi Day allowed me to stay at their place for a week in 2009 and Erin Pounders opened her place to me in 2011. Her parents, Ken and Penny Pounders, have opened their home to me on several Thanksgivings. All have taught me the meaning of generosity and hospitality. I want to extend my gratitude to the U.S. Army Heritage Education Center at the Military History Institute for its General and Mrs. Matthew B. Ridgway Research Grant that helped me to do extended research at their facility in Carlisle, Pennsylvania in 2009. I am thankful to Dr. Richard J. Sommers and Mr. David Keough for their help during those weeks. I also received timely financial assistance from the History Department grants as well as a matching grant from the Glasscock Center for Humanities Research. Lastly, I wish to thank my parents, Dick and Deanna Beall, for all their assistance and help. Their emotional, spiritual, and financial help has been invaluable. It is not too much to say that were it not for their encouragement, support, and prayers, I would not have finished this dissertation. And, finally, soli deo gloria. v NOMENCLATURE CARL Combined Arms Research Library, Fort Leavenworth, KS DRL Donovan Research Library, Fort Benning, GA MRC McCormick Research Center, First Division Museum, Wheaton, IL RG 407, Entry 427, NA Record Group 407 (Records of the Adjutant General’s Office, U.S. Army), Entry 427 (U.S. Army Operations Reports, World War II), National Archives, College Park, MD RG 407, Entry 427-A, NA “European Theater of Operations Combat Interviews, 1944-1945,” Record Group 407, Entry 427-A, National Archives, College Park, MD USAMHI United States Army Military History Institute, Carlisle, PA vi TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page I INTRODUCTION: WORLD WAR II, CITIES, AND AMERICAN MILITARY EFFECTIVENESS . 1 Objectives . 6 Historiography . 12 Procedure . 20 Endnotes . 24 II “AUGMENTED BUT UNDER-FUNDED”: INTERWAR DOCTRINE AND TRAINING . 30 Endnotes . 52 III “THAT TOWN IS FULL OF TROOPS”: TOWN FIGHTING IN OPERATIONS TORCH AND HUSKY . 60 Operation TORCH . 62 Operation HUSKY . 85 Conclusion . 104 Endnotes . 107 IV “THE STREETS WERE LITTERED WITH CORPSES”: FIGHTING FOR ITALY’S TOWNS, SEPTEMBER 1943 TO JUNE 1944 . 119 Up the Italian Boot: 18 September to 17 November 1943 . 123 Operation SHINGLE: 18 November 1943 to 4 June 1944 . 142 Endnotes . 164 V “WHAT IS TAUGHT AT BENNING . IS ALL WRONG”: DEVELOPING NEW APPROACHES TO URBAN COMBAT IN THE WARTIME ARMY. 176 Wartime Learning . 179 Wartime Doctrine . 191 Wartime Training . 204 Endnotes . 218 vii CHAPTER Page VI “KNOCK ‘EM ALL DOWN”: URBAN COMBAT WITH THE 1ST INFANTRY DIVISION, JUNE TO DECEMBER 1944 . 228 Endnotes . 280 VII “A SEEMINGLY ENDLESS NUMBER OF BRUTAL, TOE-TO-TOE SLUGFESTS”: URBAN COMBAT FOR THE 5TH AND 3RD INFANTRY DIVISIONS, JUNE TO DECEMBER 1944 . 298 5th Infantry Division . 298 3rd Infantry Division . 331 Conclusion . 363 Endnotes . 370 VIII “FIGHTING FROM HOUSE TO HOUSE AND STREET TO STREET”: URBAN COMBAT FROM DECEMBER 1944 TO MAY 1945 . 384 1st Infantry Division . 386 5th Infantry Division . 417 3rd Infantry Division . 439 Conclusion . 478 Endnotes . 480 IX CONCLUSION: “I COULD SEE NO SCARS OF BATTLE” . 504 Conclusion . 517 Endnotes . 527 REFERENCES . 531 viii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 3.1 Seizure of Oran . 64 Figure 3.2 Road Net Sketch—Fedhala Area . 78 Figure 3.3 7th Infantry Assaults and Enters Casablanca, 10-11 November 1942 . 83 Figure 3.4 The Final Landing Plan . 89 Figure 3.5 II Corps Advance, 24-31 July 1943 . 92 Figure 3.6 Licata-Agrigento, Sicily . 98 Figure 4.1 Advance to the Volturno, 15 September-6 October 1943 . 121 Figure 4.2 Capture of Acerno, 20-22 September 1943 . 127 Figure 4.3 7th Infantry Captures Volturara, San Stefano, and Avellino, 28-30 September 1943 . 130 Figure 4.4 7th Infantry Drives on to Hills South of Dragoni, 14-18 October 1943 . 134 Figure 4.5 7th Infantry Outposts to the Front 19-21 October, Reconnoiters in Force 22-25 October 1943 . 138 Figure 4.6 Stalemate, Spring 1944 . 144 Figure 4.7 Capture of Cisterna, 23-25 May 1944 . 154 Figure 6.1 Final Overlord Plan . 231 Figure 6.2 Colleville-sur-Mer . 234 Figure 6.3 Breaching the West Wall South of Aachen, VII Corps, 12-29 September 1944 . 242 Figure 6.4 The Assault on Aachen, October 1944 . 252 ix Page Figure 6.5 The Hürtgen Forest, 16 November-9 December 1944 . 270 Figure 7.1 Battle for Angers, France . 301 Figure 7.2 XX Corps (Situation, Noon 6 September 1944) . 308 Figure 7.3 XX Corps Bridgehead, 13-25 September 1944 . 316 Figure 7.4 Battle for Metz, Envelopment from the South, 8-19 November 1944 . 321 Figure 7.5 Saarlautern Bridgehead, 3-19 December 1944 . 326 Figure 7.6 Breakout from the Blue Line, 17-19 August 1944 . 332 Figure 7.7 Brignoles, 18-19 August 1944 . 334 Figure 7.8 Seventh Army Advance toward Belfort, 4-14 September 1944 . 339 Figure 7.9 Plan of Besançon . 341 Figure 7.10 3/7 Assault on Noroy-le-Bourg, 12 September 1944 . 344.
Recommended publications
  • Liberationliberation
    LiberationLiberation Liberation 65th ANNIVERSARY 2010 By Rona Mendelsohn During the final weeks of World War II, the task of freeing the western por- tion of Czechoslovakia fell to the soldiers of the American Third Army, led by General George S. Patton, Jr. The following article is a day-by-day account of that momentous two-week period, which is clearly etched in the memories of those who lived through it. Many Czech citizens have written to the Ameri- can Embassy, sending photographs and sharing their recollections of those days in great detail. The Embassy thanks them for their generous assistance and valuable information. This account, however, has been compiled from the American side. It was written by Rona Mendelsohn, a professional writer in Washington, D. C, after consulting more than 20 original sources, including letters, books, military records, newspaper articles, and personal interviews. Cover and left: After its liberation, Pilsen was the scene of a victory parade by the U.S. 3rd Army. 1 n May 4, 1945, General the passes before anything hit us.” He had George S. Patton’s forces were also profited from the 97th Infantry Divi- deployed along the Czechoslo- sion’s attack on Cheb on April 25. Other vak-German-Austrian border. U.S. Army elements had advanced beyond He received a call from Gen- Cheb to Schönbrunn. eral Omar Bradley, Commander of the U.S. The American Third Army, now num- O12th Army Group, saving that “the green bering more than 500,000 men in 18 divi- light is on for the attack on Czechoslovakia,” sions, was poised and ready to storm through and wanting to know when Patton could put Czechoslovakia in the early morning hours the invasion into effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2021 Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era Briggs Evans East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Briggs, "Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3927. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3927 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Briggs Evans August 2021 _____________________ Dr. Stephen Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry Antkiewicz Dr. Steve Nash Keywords: Blitzkrieg, doctrine, operational warfare, American military, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, World War II, Cold War, Soviet Union, Operation Desert Storm, AirLand Battle, Combined Arms Theory, mobile warfare, maneuver warfare. ABSTRACT Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era by Briggs Evans The evolution of United States military doctrine was heavily influenced by the Wehrmacht and their early Blitzkrieg campaigns during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii in Europe
    “THEIR SACRIFICE, OUR FREEDOM” WORLD WAR II IN EUROPE War in Europe Lesson Plans Recommended Level: High School Time Required: 5 Days Introduction This unit covers the European Theater. Preceding these lessons, the students have covered the rise of dictators and identified Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin. These lessons begin with Hitler’s seizure of territories and end with V-E Day in Europe, and covers five days. Part 1 of the video gives an excellent introduction or review of the steps leading to World War II. It is used as a review of foreign policy in the 1930’s through the Allied invasion of Africa and Sicily. Part 2 covers from D-Day to V-E Day and may also be used as an introduction or review. It is used as an introduction of U.S. troops fighting in Europe. Along with excellent video, eyewitness accounts and commentaries are presented by our veterans giving the added value of thoughts and details on what it was like to be there at that time and place. Materials • Video – “Their Sacrifice, Our Freedom: World War II in Europe” • Internet resources • Map of European Theater • Art supplies and poster board Unit Goals After completing this unit, students will be able to: 1. Label and identify Hitler’s seizure of territories in 1930’s 2. Identify participants in the Munich Conference and understand the effects of appeasement. 3. Describe U.S. neutrality efforts in the 1930’s. 4. Identify Churchill and Roosevelt and the goals of the Atlantic Charter. 5. List effects of the fall of France on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of FRANCE (July 19 to August 29, 1944)
    THE BATTLE OF FRANCE (July 19 to August 29, 1944) N our last issue's review of the invasion battle 31. This breakthrough decided the entire cam­ we pointed out two remarkable facts. viz.• paign. Another wave of US troop. advanoe!l I (1) that only one major landing operation had east from Granville to Villedieu to CO-<lperate been carried out during the first six weeks, and with formatioJlB furt,her t.o the northeast ill (2) that the number of troops pumped into the protecting the left Bank of the main thruli,. comparatively narrow bridgehead was out of Several German attacks against this flank in the proportion to the area then at the disposal of the area of Tessy. VilJedieu. and Mortain. which u Allied Command. Although this seemed to indicate one time narrowed the American corridor of that General Eisenhower intended to concentrate Avranches to twenty kilometers. had to be aban. all hi' available forces for a push from this one doned, as the sout.hward advance of the Britilh bridgehead. the German High Command could not 2nd Army from the region of Caumont threatened be sure of that and had therefore to maintain con· the rear of the German divisioJlB. The fate of the siderable forces all along the far·Bung coasts of campaign in FTance was sealed: what was at stake Europe. a factor which limited the forces opposing now was no longer tbe fat.e of French territory the Normandy invaders and gave the Allies a vast but that of the German armiCl in France.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Du Centre D'études Médiévales
    Bulletin du centre d’études médiévales d’Auxerre | BUCEMA 22.1 | 2018 Varia Alsace and Burgundy : Spatial Patterns in the Early Middle Ages, c. 600-900 Karl Weber Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/cem/14838 DOI: 10.4000/cem.14838 ISSN: 1954-3093 Publisher Centre d'études médiévales Saint-Germain d'Auxerre Electronic reference Karl Weber, « Alsace and Burgundy : Spatial Patterns in the Early Middle Ages, c. 600-900 », Bulletin du centre d’études médiévales d’Auxerre | BUCEMA [Online], 22.1 | 2018, Online since 03 September 2018, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/cem/14838 ; DOI : 10.4000/ cem.14838 This text was automatically generated on 19 April 2019. Les contenus du Bulletin du centre d’études médiévales d’Auxerre (BUCEMA) sont mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International. Alsace and Burgundy : Spatial Patterns in the Early Middle Ages, c. 600-900 1 Alsace and Burgundy : Spatial Patterns in the Early Middle Ages, c. 600-900 Karl Weber EDITOR'S NOTE Cet article fait référence aux cartes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 et 10 du dossier cartographique. Ces cartes sont réinsérées dans le corps du texte et les liens vers le dossier cartographique sont donnés en documents annexes. Bulletin du centre d’études médiévales d’Auxerre | BUCEMA, 22.1 | 2018 Alsace and Burgundy : Spatial Patterns in the Early Middle Ages, c. 600-900 2 1 The following overview concerns the question of whether forms of spatial organisation below the kingdom level are discernible in the areas corresponding to present-day Western Switzerland and Western France during the early Middle Ages.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 18, ISSUE 2 Studies “Lessons learned” in WWI: The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917 Christian Stachelbeck The Battle of Arras in the spring of 1917 marked the beginning of the major allied offensives on the western front. The attack by the British 1st Army (Horne) and 3rd Army (Allenby) was intended to divert attention from the French main offensive under General Robert Nivelle at the Chemin des Dames (Nivelle Offensive). 1 The French commander-in-chief wanted to force the decisive breakthrough in the west. Between 9 and 12 April, the British had succeeded in penetrating the front across a width of 18 kilometres and advancing around six kilometres, while the Canadian corps (Byng), deployed for the first time in closed formation, seized the ridge near Vimy, which had been fiercely contested since late 1914.2 The success was paid for with the bloody loss of 1 On the German side, the battles at Arras between 2 April and 20 May 1917 were officially referred to as Schlacht bei Arras (Battle of Arras). In Canada, the term Battle of Vimy Ridge is commonly used for the initial phase of the battle. The seizure of Vimy ridge was a central objective of the offensive and was intended to secure the protection of the northern flank of the 3rd Army. 2 For detailed information on this, see: Jack Sheldon, The German Army on Vimy Ridge 1914-1917 (Barnsley: Pen&Sword Military, 2008), p. 8. Sheldon's book, however, is basically a largely indiscriminate succession of extensive quotes from regimental histories, diaries and force files from the Bavarian War Archive (Kriegsarchiv) in Munich.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Tribunal, Indictments
    MILITARY TRIBUNALS Case No. 12 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -against- WILHELM' VON LEEB, HUGO SPERRLE, GEORG KARL FRIEDRICH-WILHELM VON KUECHLER, JOHANNES BLASKOWITZ, HERMANN HOTH, HANS REINHARDT. HANS VON SALMUTH, KARL HOL­ LIDT, .OTTO SCHNmWIND,. KARL VON ROQUES, HERMANN REINECKE., WALTERWARLIMONT, OTTO WOEHLER;. and RUDOLF LEHMANN. Defendants OFFICE OF MILITARY GOVERNMENT FOR GERMANY (US) NORNBERG 1947 • PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ TABLE OF CONTENTS - Page INTRODUCTORY 1 COUNT ONE-CRIMES AGAINST PEACE 6 A Austria 'and Czechoslovakia 7 B. Poland, France and The United Kingdom 9 C. Denmark and Norway 10 D. Belgium, The Netherland.; and Luxembourg 11 E. Yugoslavia and Greece 14 F. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 17 G. The United states of America 20 . , COUNT TWO-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST ENEMY BELLIGERENTS AND PRISONERS OF WAR 21 A: The "Commissar" Order , 22 B. The "Commando" Order . 23 C, Prohibited Labor of Prisoners of Wal 24 D. Murder and III Treatment of Prisoners of War 25 . COUNT THREE-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST CIVILIANS 27 A Deportation and Enslavement of Civilians . 29 B. Plunder of Public and Private Property, Wanton Destruc­ tion, and Devastation not Justified by Military Necessity. 31 C. Murder, III Treatment and Persecution 'of Civilian Popu- lations . 32 COUNT FOUR-COMMON PLAN OR CONSPIRACY 39 APPENDIX A-STATEMENT OF MILITARY POSITIONS HELD BY THE DEFENDANTS AND CO-PARTICIPANTS 40 2 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ INDICTMENT
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchism, the Republic and Civil War in Spain: 1931–1939
    Anarchism, the Republic and Civil War in Spain: 1931–1939 This groundbreaking new study, translated for the first time into English, is the first synthesis to relate and interpret the main evolutionary milestones of anar- chism in Spain, and is crucial to understanding the social conflict of 1930s Spain. Casanova explores the concept of anarchism as both a political ideology and a social movement during the Second Republic and the Civil War (1931–1939). Dividing the work into two parts, the author first explores anarchism’s strained relation with the republican regime. He then goes on to analyse the revolu- tionary process that broke out in the summer of 1936. This complete new study also examines possible reasons why anarcho-syndicalism did not resurface after the death of the Spanish dictator Franco, and offers a commentary on other writings on anarchism in contemporary Spain. Casanova’s work will interest historians across a range of disciplines as well as readers with a general interest in Spain. Julián Casanova is currently Professor of Modern History at the University of Zaragoza, Spain. Routledge/Cañada Blanch Studies on Contemporary Spain Series editors Paul Preston and Sebastian Balfour, Cañada Blanch Centre for Contemporary Spanish Studies, London 1 Spain 1914–1918 Between war and revolution Francisco J. Romero Salvadó 2 Spaniards in the Holocaust Mauthausen, horror on the Danube David Wingeate Pike 3 Conspiracy and the Spanish Civil War The brainwashing of Francisco Franco Herbert R. Southworth 4 Red Barcelona Social protest
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Finding
    A Guide to World War II Resources at the Delaware Public Archives Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Notes on Access ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Federal Records at the Delaware Public Archives ........................................................................................ 6 Governor’s Papers (RG 1302)....................................................................................................................... 8 State Council of Presidents and Executives ............................................................................................ 13 Delaware Department of State Records (RG 1325) .................................................................................... 15 Delaware Veterans Military Pay Commission (RG 1470) .......................................................................... 24 Delaware Department of Transportation (RG 1540) .................................................................................. 29 Delaware State Council of Defense (RG 1673) .......................................................................................... 29 Military Records (RG 1800) ....................................................................................................................... 33 Sussex County Levy Court (RG 4200) ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Historical and Physical Geography of the Theatres of War Author(S): Vaughan Cornish Source: the Geographical Journal, Vol
    Notes on the Historical and Physical Geography of the Theatres of War Author(s): Vaughan Cornish Source: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 45, No. 5 (May, 1915), pp. 371-381 Published by: geographicalj Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1779725 Accessed: 01-05-2016 15:45 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Wiley, The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Geographical Journal This content downloaded from 132.174.255.116 on Sun, 01 May 2016 15:45:57 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms GEOGRAPHY OF THE THEATRES OF WAR. 371 order that one who has travelled so much in Persia and written so much about it might have added to our information. I am afraid my personal experiences of Persia are limited. I have been to Tabriz, and I shall never forget the excite- ment of first entering a great Persian town, and its difference from the towns of the nearer East. The first view of the city, surrounded by its orchards, its grey flat roofs shining in the sun; the fascination of the arcaded bazaars, with their domed halls or khans, under which the merchandise is set out, and where? " Above their merchandise The merchants of the market sit Lying to foolish men and wise," still, after nearly fifty years, remain in my memory.
    [Show full text]