Final Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions. -
The Monkey Cage "Democracy Is the Art of Running the Circus from the Monkey Cage." -- H.L
11/5/13 The Czech paradox: Did the winner lose and the losers win? Sign In SUBSCRIBE: Home Delivery Digital Real Estate Rentals Cars Today's Paper Going Out Guide Find&Save Service Alley PostT V Politics Opinions Local Sports National World Business Tech Lifestyle Entertainment Jobs More The Monkey Cage "Democracy is the art of running the circus from the monkey cage." -- H.L. Mencken What's The Monkey Cage? Archives Follow : The Monkey Cage The Czech paradox: Did the winner lose and the losers win? BY TIM HAUGHTON, TEREZA NOVOTNA AND KEVIN DEEGAN-KRAUSE October 30 at 5:45 am More 3 Comments Also on The Monkey Cage Is the nonproliferation agenda stuck in the Cold War? Make-up artists prepare the Czech Social Democrat (CSSD) chairman Bohuslav Sobotka for his TV appearance after early parliamentary elections finished, in Prague, on Saturday, Oct. 26, 2013. (CTK, Michal Kamaryt/ Associated Press) [Joshua Tucker: Continuing our series of Election Reports, we are pleased to welcome the following post-election report on the Oct. 25-26 Czech parliamentary elections from political scientists Tim Haughton (University of Birmingham, UK), Tereza Novotna (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium) and Kevin Deegan-Krause, (Wayne State University), who blogs about East European politics at the excellent Pozorblog. Deegan-Krause's pre-election report is available here.] ***** Czech party politics used to be boring. The 2013 parliamentary election, however, highlights the transformation of the party system, the arrival of new entrants and the woes faced by the long-established parties. The Czech Social Democratic Party (CSSD) won the election, but the margin of victory was slender. -
Petr Nečas Zum Premierminister Ernannt
LÄNDERBERICHT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. TSCHECHIEN DR. HUBERT GEHRING TOMISLAV DELINIC Mitte-Rechts-Koalition steht - MAREN HACHMEISTER Petr Nečas zum Premierminister 30. Juni 2010 ernannt www.kas.de MITTE-RECHTS-PARTEIEN EINIGEN SICH www.kas.de/tschechien Vorbereitung des Staatshaushaltes be- nächsten Jahr auf Steuermehreinnahmen schleunigt Verhandlungen von weiteren 30 Mrd. CZK (1,2 Mrd. €). Die Europäische Kommission bezeichnet Die Koalitionsverhandlungen der drei Mit- die tschechischen Sparmaßnahmen der te-Rechts-Parteien ODS, TOP 09 und VV Regierung Fischer unterdessen schon als wurden nach den tschechischen Parla- „ausreichend“, um die Haushaltsziele mentswahlen Ende Mai mit Hochdruck 2010 zu erreichen. Die Neuverschuldung vorangetrieben. Staatspräsident Václav wird voraussichtlich mit 5,7% des BIP Klaus ernannte Petr Nečas am 28. Juni noch über den 3% der EU- zum Premierminister. Am 29 Juni wurde Konvergenzkriterien liegen. schließlich auch die Regierung zusam- mengestellt. Dem Premierminister und Zunächst überschattete die Wahl des Par- ODS-Vorsitzenden Nečas gelang es so- lamentsvorsitzenden die neue Dreieinig- mit, die Koalitionsverhandlungen noch keit der Mitte-Rechts-Koalition – dem vor Beginn der Haushaltsverhandlungen Gewohnheitsrecht folgend beanspruchte am 07. Juli erfolgreich zu einem Ende zu nämlich die nach den Wahlen stimmen- bringen. stärkste Partei, die Sozialdemokraten (ČSSD), diesen Posten für sich. Sie konn- Koalitionsvereinbarung mit härtestem ten mit ihrem Kandidaten Lubomír Zaorá- Sparpaket der tschechischen Geschich- lek schließlich nur den stellvertretenden te Parlamentsvorsitz ergattern, da die künf- tige Koalition Miroslava Němcová (ODS) Die Koalitionsvereinbarung der Mitte- durchsetzte. Rechts-Koalition enthält sieben Kapitel. Nach den anfänglichen Forderungen der Auch die Frage der Ministerienverteilung Partei VV zur Kürzung des Verteidigungs- brachte harte Verhandlungen mit sich. -
Příloha 2 Seznam Poslanců Působících V PS V Průběhu Let 1996–2016
Příloha 2 Seznam poslanců působících v PS v průběhu let 1996–2016 Volební Volební Číslo Politická Navrhující Jméno, příjmení, titul Bydliště Od Do kraj strana na KL příslušnost strana 1996–1998 PRA ČSSD 1 JUDr. Petra Buzková Praha 4 ČSSD ČSSD 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ČSSD 2 František Čech Praha 12 ČSSD ČSSD 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ČSSD 3 Petr Hulinský Praha 10 ČSSD ČSSD 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ČSSD 4 Jaroslav Bašta Praha 6 ČSSD ČSSD 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ČSSD 5 Ing. Květoslava Kořínková, CSc. Praha 5 ČSSD ČSSD 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ODS 1 Ing. Josef Zieleniec* Praha 4 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 29.8.1997 PRA ODS 2 JUDr. Hana Marvanová Praha 2 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ODS 3 Ing. Miroslav Tyl Praha 10 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ODS 4 JUDr. Ondřej Zemina* Praha 3 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 16.1.1997 PRA ODS 5 Petr Koháček Praha 9 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ODS 6 RNDr. Tomáš Páv Praha 5 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ODS 7 MUDr. Milena Kolářová Praha 9 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ODS 8 MUDr. Eduard Bureš Praha 1 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ODS 9 PhDr. Ivana Plechatá Praha 6 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ODS 10 RNDr. Jiří Payne Praha 2 ODS ODS 1.6.1996 19.6.1998 PRA ODS 11 Mgr. -
Czech Republic by Jeremy Druker
Czech Republic by Jeremy Druker Capital: Prague Population: 10.5 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$18,130 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2013. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Electoral Process 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.25 Civil Society 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.25 1.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Independent Media 2.25 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Governance* 2.25 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a 2.50 2.50 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Local Democratic Governance n/a 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 2.50 2.50 2.25 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 Corruption 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Democracy Score 2.33 2.29 2.25 2.25 2.14 2.18 2.21 2.18 2.18 2.14 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects. -
The Rise and Decline of the New Czech Right
Blue Velvet: The Rise and Decline of the New Czech Right Manuscript of article for a special issue of the Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics on the Right in Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe Abstract This article analyses the origins, development and comparative success centre-right in the Czech Republic. It focuses principally on the the Civic Democratic Party (ODS) of Václav Klaus, but also discusses a number of smaller Christian Democratic, liberal and anti-communist groupings, insofar as they sought to provide right-wing alternatives to Klaus’s party. In comparative terms, the article suggests, the Czech centre-right represents an intermediate case between those of Hungary and Poland. Although Klaus’s ODS has always been a large, stable and well institutionalised party, avoiding the fragmentation and instability of the Polish right, the Czech centre- right has not achieved the degree of ideological and organisational concentration seen in Hungary. After discussing the evolution and success of Czech centre-right parties between 1991 and 2002, the article reviews a number of factors commonly used to explain party (system) formation in the region in relation to the Czech centre- right. These include both structural-historical explanations and ‘political’ factors such as macro-institutional design, strategies of party formation in the immediate post-transition period, ideological construction and charismatic leadership. The article argues that both the early success and subsequent decline of the Czech right were rooted in a single set of circumstances: 1) the early institutionalisation of ODS as dominant party of the mainstream right and 2) the right’s immediate and successful taking up of the mantel of market reform and technocratic modernisation. -
Miroslav Kalousek a 20 Let Jeho Úrednických a Politických
Miroslav Kalousek a 20 let jeho ´uˇrednick´ych a politick´ych her Struˇcn´averze pro nen´aroˇcn´ehoˇcten´aˇre Nadaˇcn´ıfond proti korupci Obsah Prolog 2 Pˇredmluva 3 Uvod´ 4 1 Zlat´a90. l´eta 7 1.1 Jak to bylo s pad´aky? . 8 1.2 Modernizace tanku T-72 . 11 1.3 St´abn´ıinformaˇcn´ısyst´em.ˇ . 13 1.4 Prodej deseti letoun˚uMiG-29 . 16 1.5 Prodej stovky tank˚uˇradyT-72 do Alˇz´ırska . 20 1.6 Prodej kas´arenna n´amˇest´ıRepubliky . 22 1.7 Shrnut´ı:Kalousk˚uvsyst´emrozd´av´an´ıveˇrejn´ych zak´azek. 25 2 Pˇresahdo nov´ehotis´ıcilet´ıa jeho pˇrelom 30 2.1 Kauza Diag Human . 30 2.2 Ochrana vzduˇsn´ehoprostoru ˇcilikauza Gripeny . 35 3 Na sam´emvrcholu 40 3.1 Kauza M´ytn´ea kauza Elektronick´evinˇety . 40 3.2 Kauza Hazard . 44 3.3 Znovu arm´ada{ kauza Letadla CASA . 50 3.4 Starost o pˇr´ırodu ˇciliekologick´asuperzak´azka . 56 3.5 Starost o c´ırkev ˇcilic´ırkevn´ınarovn´an´ı . 59 4 Humorn´eodlehˇcen´ına z´avˇer 63 4.1 Plukovn´ık N´ahl´ık\ odch´az´ı! . 63 " 4.2 Miroslav Kalousek a humor . 64 Pˇr´ıloha{ Richard H´ava & Miroslav Kalousek 65 Literatura 69 1 Prolog Kir je mal´epostavy, zat´ımjen m´ırnˇeproˇsedivˇel´y.Ve tv´aˇrinem´anic pozoruhodn´eho. " Kdybys ho potkal na ulici, ani se za n´ım neotoˇc´ıˇs,ani dech se ti nezataj´ı, srdce se ti nerozbuˇs´ı.Oblek m´ataky ten nejobyˇcejnˇejˇs´ı{ ˇsediv´ys prouˇzkem.Uˇsit´yje ovˇsems vkusem. -
European Policy of the Czech Republic
BULLETIN No. 37 (370) April 5, 2012 © PISM Editors: Marcin Zaborowski (Editor-in-Chief), Katarzyna Staniewska (Executive Editor), Jarosław Ćwiek-Karpowicz, Beata Górka-Winter, Artur Gradziuk, Beata Wojna European Policy of the Czech Republic Dariusz Kałan In its European policy, the Czech Republic distances itself from deepening political and economic integration, and proposes an alternative vision of the European Union as a confederation of sovereign states. At the same time, fearing marginalization they actively support initiatives for economic growth and the Multiannual Financial Framework, 2014–2020. Poland should use its upcoming presidency of the Visegrad Group to maintain Czech support for two crucial issues: a high EU budget and strong cohesion policy. A Vision of the European Union. The largest Czech party in the ruling coalition, the Civic Democratic Movement (ODS), linked with both President Václav Klaus and PM Petr Nečas, has called for the EU to be a confederation of sovereign nation-states with limited roles for the supranational institutions. The Czech Republic resists deepening political and economic integration (strengthening the European Parliament, adopting the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Fiscal Pact, rapid accession to the eurozone), claiming that these lead to reinforcing bureaucratic structures and limitations on the free market. According to the Czech viewpoint, the EU should instead reduce economic barriers by liberalising the internal market, extend the border-free zone by bringing Bulgaria and Romania into the Schengen Area as well as continue the process of enlargement through the accession of Turkey and the Western Balkans countries. An important part of the Czech vision also comes from critical attitudes about certain ideologies, such as feminism, environmentalism and multiculturalism, which are points of contention raised mainly by President Klaus, who includes them in the notion of “europeanism” and finds them contradictory to local political and cultural models in the country. -
Politické Vedy 2/2016 Politické 2/2016 Ročník XIX
The objective of the scienti¿ c journal “Political Sciences” is to present original papers of Slovak and foreign authors covering areas of social sciences with the concentration on political sciences, international relations, modern history and security studies. At the same time the journal brings out current reviews of new books published by Slovak and foreign publishing houses. The attention is also placed on the evaluation of scholarly activities, social events and a host of other outcomes which might be of interest for the academic community. The contents of our political science journal have the ambition to facilitate needs of researchers, teachers, students, activists, politicians and quali¿ ed writers and academic workers. However, the interests of general public are not neglected, the published papers might also serve for the welfare of those who themselves feel related to political science problems and the latest research issues. The journal Political Sciences is published by the Faculty of Political Sciences and International Relations at Matej Bel University in Banska Bystrica, Slovakia. There are four issues available per annum. Submitted papers should be written in the Slovak or English languages. Papers written in Slovak should contain an English summary. ISSN 1335-2741 Politické vedy 2/2016 Politické 2/2016 Ročník XIX. POLITICKÉ VEDY journal for political science modern history international relations security studies 2/2016 VOLUME XIX. ════════════════ Politické vedy ═══════════════ POLITICKÉ VEDY / POLITICAL SCIENCES journal -
Final-Signatory List-Democracy Letter-23-06-2020.Xlsx
Signatories by Surname Name Affiliation Country Davood Moradian General Director, Afghan Institute for Strategic Studies Afghanistan Rexhep Meidani Former President of Albania Albania Juela Hamati President, European Democracy Youth Network Albania Nassera Dutour President, Federation Against Enforced Disappearances (FEMED) Algeria Fatiha Serour United Nations Deputy Special Representative for Somalia; Co-founder, Justice Impact Algeria Rafael Marques de MoraisFounder, Maka Angola Angola Laura Alonso Former Member of Chamber of Deputies; Former Executive Director, Poder Argentina Susana Malcorra Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Argentina; Former Chef de Cabinet to the Argentina Patricia Bullrich Former Minister of Security of Argentina Argentina Mauricio Macri Former President of Argentina Argentina Beatriz Sarlo Journalist Argentina Gerardo Bongiovanni President, Fundacion Libertad Argentina Liliana De Riz Professor, Centro para la Apertura y el Desarrollo Argentina Flavia Freidenberg Professor, the Institute of Legal Research of the National Autonomous University of Argentina Santiago Cantón Secretary of Human Rights for the Province of Buenos Aires Argentina Haykuhi Harutyunyan Chairperson, Corruption Prevention Commission Armenia Gulnara Shahinian Founder and Chair, Democracy Today Armenia Tom Gerald Daly Director, Democratic Decay & Renewal (DEM-DEC) Australia Michael Danby Former Member of Parliament; Chair, the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Australia Gareth Evans Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Australia and -
Vysoká Škola CEVRO INSTITUT Praha Úřednické Vlády České
Vysoká škola CEVRO INSTITUT Praha Katedra politologie a mezinárodních vztahů Úřednické vlády České republiky Marie Ţiláková Bakalářská práce Praha 2011 1 Vysoká škola CEVRO INSTITUT Praha Katedra politologie a mezinárodních vztahů Úřednické vlády České republiky Marie Ţiláková Studijní program: Bakalářský Studijní obor: Politologie a mezinárodní vztahy Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Ladislav Mrklas, Ph.D. Bakalářská práce Praha 2011 2 Čestné prohlášení: Prohlašuji, ţe bakalářskou práci na téma ,,Úřednické vlády České republiky“ jsem zpracovala samostatně s pouţitím literatury a zdrojů, které jsou v práci řádně uvedeny. …........................................... podpis Marie Ţiláková 3 Poděkování Děkuji panu Mgr. Ladislavu Mrklasovi, Ph.D. za poskytnutou pomoc, cenné rady a podporu při vypracování bakalářské práce. 4 Základní struktura práce (osnova): 1. Úvod......................................................................................................... 9-10 2. Výkonná moc v parlamentním systému v České republice................ 11 2.1. Zakotvení v ústavě........................................................................... 11-12 2.2. Principy parlamentarismu............................................................. 12-14 2.3. Moc výkonná v parlamentním systému........................................ 15 2.5. Definice, rozdíly úřednických a stardních vlád............................ 15 2.3. Hlava státu v parlamentním systému............................................ 15-17 3. Postavení vlády v České republice....................................................... -
Premiéři V Rukách Poradců Aneb Kdo Komu Vládne
Premiéři v rukách poradců aneb kdo komu vládne Nadační fond proti korupci Obsah Prolog 3 Úvod 4 1 Václav Klaus aneb narcis v zajetí poradců 11 1.1 Poradci a černá konta ODS . 12 1.2 Jiří Weigl aneb tichá voda… . 18 1.2.1 Investiční a poštovní banka . 20 1.2.2 Doporučení Viktora Koženého . 24 1.2.3 Utajená schůzka s velkými následky . 26 1.3 Další „drobnosti“ kolem Klause . 28 1.3.1 Kocourkův odklon a Key Investments . 28 1.3.2 Ranko Pecić . 30 1.3.3 Alexandr Nikolajevič Rebjonok . 31 1.3.4 Nejbližší osoba . 32 2 Miloš Zeman aneb svéráz na scéně 33 2.1 Miroslav Šlouf – olympionik lobbingu . 37 2.2 Martin Nejedlý – Rusko na Hradě . 41 3 Vladimír Špidla aneb byrokrat v oblacích 44 3.1 Jaroslav Ungerman – trojjediný poradce . 48 4 Stanislav Gross aneb divoké mládí 51 4.1 Uhlí a kamarádi Musela, Sýkora a Pokorný . 55 4.2 Provize – Pandury – pokus č. 1 . 59 4.3 Křišťálová čistota a životní obchod . 59 5 Jiří Paroubek aneb urputně proti všem! 62 6 Mirek Topolánek aneb zemitá pravice vpřed! 68 6.1 Aleš Řebíček a zvedací most v Kolíně . 70 6.2 Marek Dalík a astronomický úplatek . 71 7 Petr Nečas aneb osudová žena 76 7.1 Jana Nagyová – carevna na Úřadu vlády . 81 8 Bohuslav Sobotka tedy Radek Pokorný 90 8.1 Škoda plzeňské Škody . 93 8.2 OKD a… Pokorného kancelář . 100 8.3 Lokomotivy a arbitráž s Pokorným . 103 8.4 Schůzka s předsedou Vrchního soudu v Praze . 105 8.5 Dvě velké oslavy jednoho právníka .