DOCSLIB.ORG

EU-27 Watch No 8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU-27 Watch No 8 EU-27 WATCH No. 8 ISSN 1610-6458 Issued in March 2009 Edited by the Institute for European Politics (IEP), Berlin in collaboration with the Austrian Institute of International Affairs, Vienna Institute for International Relations, Zagreb Bulgarian European Community Studies Association, Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Sofia Academy of Sciences, Budapest Center for European Studies / Middle East Technical Institute for Strategic and International Studies, University, Ankara Lisbon Centre européen de Sciences Po, Paris Institute of International and European Affairs, Centre d’étude de la vie politique, Université libre de Dublin Bruxelles Institute of International Relations, Prague Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Institute of International Relations and Political Robert Schuman, Luxembourg Science, Vilnius University Centre of International Relations, Ljubljana Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and Latvian Institute of International Affairs, International Studies, Nicosia Riga Danish Institute for International Studies, Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, Copenhagen University of Malta Elcano Royal Institute and UNED University, Madrid Netherlands Institute of International Relations European Institute of Romania, Bucharest ‘Clingendael’, The Hague Federal Trust for Education and Research, London Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Foundation for European Studies - European (SIPRI) Institute, Łodz Trans European Policy Studies Association Greek Centre of European Studies and Research, (TEPSA), Brussels Athens University of Tartu Bundesallee 23, D-10717 Berlin Tel.: +49/30/88.91.34-0, Fax: +49/30/88.91.34-99 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iep-berlin.de www.eu-consent.net EU-27 Watch On the Project The enlarged EU of 27 members is in a process of reshaping its constitutional and political order, of continuing membership talks with candidate countries and taking on new obligations in international politics. This project sheds light on key issues and challenges of European integration. Institutes from all 27 EU member states as well as from Croatia and Turkey participate in the project. The aim is to give a full comparative picture of debates on European integration and current developments in European politics in each of these countries. This survey was conducted on the basis of a questionnaire that has been elaborated in November 2008 by all participating institutes. Most of the 29 reports were delivered in February 2009. This issue and all previous issues of EU-27 Watch (formerly EU- 25/27 Watch) are available on the homepage of EU-CONSENT (www.eu- consent.net) and on the internet sites of most of the contributing institutes. Please note the detailed table of content that allows readers to easily grasp key information and headlines of the country reports. The Institute for European Politics (IEP) in Berlin coordinates and edits EU-27 Watch. The IEP is grateful to the Otto Wolff-Foundation, Cologne, for supporting its research activities in the field of “Enlargement and neighbourhood policy of the EU”. Contact persons at the IEP are Barbara Lippert ([email protected]) and Tanja Leppik-Bork ([email protected]). Institutes/authors are responsible for the content of their country reports. Recommended citation form: Institut für Europäische Politik (Ed.): EU-27 Watch, No. 8, March 2009, Berlin, available at: http://www.eu-consent.net/content.asp?contentid=522. EU-27 Watch is part of EU-CONSENT, a network of excellence for joint research and teaching comprising more than 50 research institutes that addresses questions of the mutual reinforcing effects of deepening and widening of the EU. EU-CONSENT is supported by the European Union’s 6th Framework Programme. EU-27 Watch | Table of Content Table of Content On the Project ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Content .................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Authors ..................................................................................................................................... 11 The EU in 2009 – a reassuring outlook even in times of crisis? .................................................... 12 2009: A year of opportunities and uncertainties?............................................................................ 18 How does the future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’ look like?.......................................................... 19 Austria (Austrian Institute of International Affairs) Conclusions of European Council seen mainly positive ................................................................ 20 Belgium (Centre d’étude de la vie politique, Université libre de Bruxelles) Hope for an early second Irish referendum but no major concern about the future of the EU ...... 20 Bulgaria (Bulgarian European Community Studies Association) Reformulation of the relationship between citizens and political elites needed............................. 22 Croatia (Institute for International Relations) Croatian concerns about the enlargement prospects after the Irish ‘No’....................................... 24 Cyprus (Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and International Studies) European Council’s decision will help to overcome the institutional crisis..................................... 26 Czech Republic (Institute of International Relations) The parliament will finally decide on the Lisbon Treaty ................................................................. 28 Denmark (Danish Institute for International Studies) Lisbon Treaty and Danish opt-outs ................................................................................................ 30 Estonia (University of Tartu) A threat to Estonia’s long-term priority of enlargement?................................................................ 32 Finland (Finnish Institute of International Affairs) Quiet… And not very interested?................................................................................................... 33 France (Centre européen de Sciences Po) The future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’: many uncertainties ......................................................... 35 Germany (Institute for European Politics) Continuation of ratification process welcomed............................................................................... 37 Greece (Greek Centre of European Studies and Research) Keep the light burning .................................................................................................................... 39 Hungary (Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) A strong pro-Lisbon and future-oriented stance............................................................................. 40 Ireland (Institute of International and European Affairs) The future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’ ......................................................................................... 41 Italy (Istituto Affari Internazionali) Linkage between European citizens and EU institutions has to be restored................................. 44 Latvia (Latvian Institute of International Affairs) National crisis management more important than future of the EU ............................................... 47 Lithuania (Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University) Attention concentrated on energy and the European Economy Recovery Plan............................ 49 Luxembourg (Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Robert Schuman) Optimism about reinforcement of democracy, transparency and efficiency .................................. 50 Malta (Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, University of Malta) Hope for the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009....................................................................... 52 Netherlands (Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’) Future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’................................................................................................ 53 Poland (Foundation for European Studies - European Institute) Positive attitude remains in Poland despite the Irish ‘No’ .............................................................. 54 EU-27 Watch | Table of Content Portugal (Institute for Strategic and International Studies) Lisbon Treaty ‘is not dead’ ............................................................................................................. 55 Romania (European Institute of Romania) After the Irish ‘No’: proceed with optimism.....................................................................................58 Slovakia (Slovak Foreign Policy Association) Slovakia and the institutional future of the EU ............................................................................... 61 Slovenia (Centre of International Relations) No stall in the enlargement process............................................................................................... 62 Spain (Elcano Royal Institute) The future of the EU after the Irish ‘No’ ......................................................................................... 64 Sweden (Stockholm International Peace
Load more

Recommended publications
  • La Prigione Di Gaza Dove I Bambini Sognano Vendetta
    RC Auto? chiama gratis 800-070762 www.linear.it Sabato 5 www.unita.it 1,20E Giugno 2010 Anno 87 n. 153 Volevo combattere il fascismo. Soprattutto dopo la morte di mio padre, non sapevo che farmene delle parole e basta. Ma quasi tutti i vecchi liberali erano emigrati all'estero, e quelli rimasti in Italia non volevano affrontare l'attività illegale. I comunisti erano i soli a combattere. Giorgio Amendola OGGI“ CON NOI... Moni Ovadia, Bruno Tognolini, Marco Rovelli, Michele Prospero, Federica Montevecchi L’Italia che non ci sta Governo, altre trappole Europa, nuovo rischio crac Magistrati, ricercatori, statali L’ira di Alfano contro le toghe Dopo la Grecia allarme Ungheria insegnanti, medici, farmacisti Imprese, il premier vuole aiutarle Il Pil italiano meglio degli altri lavoratori della cultura si mobilitano Ma cambiando la Costituzione Ma le Borse tornano in picchiata p ALLE PAGINE 4-9 La prigione di Gaza Un generale LA POLEMICA dove i bambini e Cosa Nostra Concorso esterno DA FOFI sognano vendetta per Mario Mori UN ATTACCO INTEGRALISTA Il nostro inviato nel regno di Hamas. Dove Indagato a Palermo La di Rulli e Petraglia manca persino l’acqua e avevano preparato una procura: sostegno indiretto festa per l’arrivo dei pacifisti p ALLE PAGINE 10-13 alla mafia p A PAGINA 18 p A PAGINA 38-39 2 www.unita.it SABATO 5 GIUGNO 2010 Diario RINALDO GIANOLA Vicedirettore Oggi nel giornale [email protected] PAG. 20-21 ITALIA L’industria delle Ecomafie Grasso: coinvolti i manager famiglie sentono sulla propria pelle, proprio Filo rosso oggi che le fanfare governative invitano all’ottimismo perchè c’è la ripresa, gli effetti più duri della crisi economica.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 198. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Donnerstag, 18.Oktober 2012 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 1 Artikel 3 des Gesetzentwurfs der Bundesregierung Entwurf eines Achten Gesetzes zur Änderung des Gesetzes gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen (8. GWB-ÄndG) in der Ausschussfassung Drs. 17/9852 und 17/11053 Abgegebene Stimmen insgesamt: 543 Nicht abgegebene Stimmen: 77 Ja-Stimmen: 302 Nein-Stimmen: 241 Enthaltungen: 0 Ungültige: 0 Berlin, den 18. Okt. 12 Beginn: 19:24 Ende: 19:26 Seite: 1 CDU/CSU Ja Nein Enthaltung Ungült. Nicht abg.Name Ilse Aigner X Peter Altmaier X Peter Aumer X Dorothee Bär X Thomas Bareiß X Norbert Barthle X Günter Baumann X Ernst-Reinhard Beck (Reutlingen) X Manfred Behrens (Börde) X Veronika Bellmann X Dr. Christoph Bergner X Peter Beyer X Steffen Bilger X Clemens Binninger X Peter Bleser X Dr. Maria Böhmer X Wolfgang Börnsen (Bönstrup) X Wolfgang Bosbach X Norbert Brackmann X Klaus Brähmig X Michael Brand X Dr. Reinhard Brandl X Helmut Brandt X Dr. Ralf Brauksiepe X Dr. Helge Braun X Heike Brehmer X Ralph Brinkhaus X Cajus Caesar X Gitta Connemann X Alexander Dobrindt X Thomas Dörflinger X Marie-Luise Dött X Dr. Thomas Feist X Enak Ferlemann X Ingrid Fischbach X Hartwig Fischer (Göttingen) X Dirk Fischer (Hamburg) X Axel E. Fischer (Karlsruhe-Land) X Dr. Maria Flachsbarth X Klaus-Peter Flosbach X Herbert Frankenhauser X Dr. Hans-Peter Friedrich (Hof) X Michael Frieser X Erich G. Fritz X Dr. Michael Fuchs X Hans-Joachim Fuchtel X Alexander Funk X Ingo Gädechens X Dr. Peter Gauweiler X Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ein Kessel Buntes
    Deutschland AXEL SCHMIDT / ACTION PRESS / ACTION AXEL SCHMIDT Linkspartei-Spitzenpolitiker Gysi, Bisky, Lafontaine: „Wir kümmern uns erst mal um uns selbst“ teioberen unterschätzt. Wortgewaltig de- LINKSPARTEI mentierte Wahlkampfchef Bodo Ramelow: „Wir werden uns an dem Tanz der Wahl- verlierer auf dem Jahrmarkt der Eitelkeiten Ein Kessel Buntes nicht beteiligen.“ Einige Neue, sekundier- te Dietmar Bartsch, früher PDS-Bundes- Wie Triumphatoren zogen sie am Freitag in den Reichstag ein, doch geschäftsführer, jetzt Bundestagsabgeord- neter, „müssen ganz schnell lernen, dass Gregor Gysi und Oskar Lafontaine müssen nun eine sich jetzt jeder Satz in eine Nachricht und schwer zu bändigende Truppe aus Ost- und Westgenossen führen. Politik verwandeln kann“. Der Schlagabtausch unter den linken in wenig war es wie beim ersten „Die Lebenswelten und Ansichten der Bündnispartnern ist wie ein Vorspiel für Schultag. Auf den Tischen im Proto- disziplinfreien West-PDS-Chaoten, die das, was kommen mag. „Wir kümmern uns Ekollsaal 2 M 001 lagen Plastikbeutel, gern mal kiffen und einen heben“, so Par- erst mal um uns selbst“, sagt Klaus Ernst, gefüllt mit Müsli-Power-Riegeln, Wein- teienforscher Eckhard Jesse, „unterschei- Gründer der WASG und nun ebenfalls im gummi und einem wichtigen Dokument – den sich von denen der DDR-Altgenossen Bundestag, kleinlaut. dem vorläufigen Bundestagsausweis. Die genauso wie von steif-konservativen West- Das ist auch bitter nötig. Denn klar Neuzugänge des Deutschen Bundestags gewerkschaftern.“ Auch Roland Claus, scheint bislang nur eines: Fraktionschefs hatten sich fein gemacht: Diether Dehm früher PDS-Fraktionschef und nun einfa- sind die Alpha-Tiere Lafontaine und Gysi. aus Niedersachsen, gut gebräunt wie im- cher Abgeordneter, hat zwei Denkschulen Sie wollen sich die ihnen im Parlament zu- mer, war im dunklen Anzug erschienen, in der neuen Truppe geortet: Anhänger ei- stehende Redezeit zukünftig teilen.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyriakos Mitsotakis Visits Israel Prominent Dr
    S o C V st ΓΡΑΦΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ W ΤΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ E 101 ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 1915 The National Herald anniversa ry N www.thenationalherald.com a weekly Greek-american Publication 1915-2016 VOL. 19, ISSUE 979 July 16-17, 2016 c v $1.50 John Brademas, ex-Congressman, Majority Whip, NYU President, Dies at 89 Outpour of Affection and Admiration from Community for a Champion of Hellenism By Theodore Kalmoukos to Watergate to civil rights, Brademas was his party's major - John Brademas, an 11-term ity whip, winning landslide elec - Congressman from Indiana and tion after election in a predom - the 13th President of NYU and inantly conservative district. later Life Trustee of the Univer - After losing reelection in sity – died on July 11. 1980 during the conservative Andrew Hamilton, President revolution that swept Ronald of NYU in a statement said, AP Reagan into office, Brademas reported: "John Brademas was lobbied hard to become presi - a person of remarkable charac - dent of New York University, the ter and integrity. He exemplified Times noted, and essentially a life of service to causes and transformed the institution institutions greater than himself. "from a commuter school into Both in Congress and at NYU, one of the world's premier resi - he brought progress in difficult dential research and teaching times. He believed NYU should institutions." be at the center of the great civic The Times described Brade - discourses of our times and used mas as "looking collegiate in his influence to draw world tweeds and sweaters [and] dis - leaders to Washington Square.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks E541 HON. JOHN B. LARSON
    April 16, 2002 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E541 Chairman of the N.J. Home Care Committee can offer my support and encouragement for Congress, top Administration officials, other for the White House Conference on Aging; as work well done in good times and bad. I can key policy makers, and leaders of the Cypriot- Vice Chairman of the Human Services Advi- offer my thanks for charitable contributions to American community. As elected representa- sory Council; as a Board Member of First Call our community. And I can ask my colleagues tives who serve in this great Body, it is a privi- for Help, an information and referral service; to join me in this endeavor and reach out to lege to receive visits from our counterparts and as a peer reviewer for the National Home the innocent Andersen employees in their dis- serving in the legislative bodies of other coun- Care Council. Corrine was also past President tricts. Let them know that their hard work is tries—particularly when the visitor represents of NORWESCAP, an umbrella agency for five appreciated and that their community will not a country with which we enjoy very friendly re- counties, overseeing 54 action service pro- abandon them during this difficult period. lations, have so much in common and in grams; past President of the League of f which we have so many important interests. Women Voters of the Morris Area and the Mr. Speaker, Representative Demetris Morris County League; and also as a charter HONORING BOB AND JOAN HINES Christofias was elected President of the member and past President of The Human House of Representatives on June 7, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Governo Berlusconi Iv Ministri E Sottosegretari Di
    GOVERNO BERLUSCONI IV MINISTRI E SOTTOSEGRETARI DI STATO MINISTRI CON PORTAFOGLIO Franco Frattini, ministero degli Affari Esteri Roberto Maroni, ministero dell’Interno Angelino Alfano, ministero della Giustizia Giulio Tremonti, ministero dell’Economia e Finanze Claudio Scajola, ministero dello Sviluppo Economico Mariastella Gelmini, ministero dell’Istruzione Università e Ricerca Maurizio Sacconi, ministero del Lavoro, Salute e Politiche sociali Ignazio La Russa, ministero della Difesa; Luca Zaia, ministero delle Politiche Agricole, e Forestali Stefania Prestigiacomo, ministero dell’Ambiente, Tutela Territorio e Mare Altero Matteoli, ministero delle Infrastrutture e Trasporti Sandro Bondi, ministero dei Beni e Attività Culturali MINISTRI SENZA PORTAFOGLIO Raffaele Fitto, ministro per i Rapporti con le Regioni Gianfranco Rotondi, ministro per l’Attuazione del Programma Renato Brunetta, ministro per la Pubblica amministrazione e l'Innovazione Mara Carfagna, ministro per le Pari opportunità Andrea Ronchi, ministro per le Politiche Comunitarie Elio Vito, ministro per i Rapporti con il Parlamento Umberto Bossi, ministro per le Riforme per il Federalismo Giorgia Meloni, ministro per le Politiche per i Giovani Roberto Calderoli, ministro per la Semplificazione Normativa SOTTOSEGRETARI DI STATO Gianni Letta, sottosegretario di Stato alla Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri, con le funzioni di segretario del Consiglio medesimo PRESIDENZA DEL CONSIGLIO DEI MINISTRI Maurizio Balocchi, Semplificazione normativa Paolo Bonaiuti, Editoria Michela Vittoria
    [Show full text]
  • Fo Reign Rights Autumn 2020
    HANSER • HANSER BERLIN • HANSER KINDERBUCH •HANSERBLAU • ZSOLNAY HANSER LITERATURVERLAGE FOREIGN RIGHTS AUTUMN 2020 Impressum Cover: © Peter-Andreas Hassiepen Translation: Lucy Jones Design: Tessa Schlesinger Concept and compilation: Claudia Horzella Copyright: September 2020 Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG Vilshofener Straße 10 81679 München, Germany www.hanser-literaturverlage.de http://foreignrights.hanser.de FICTION LITERARY FICTION Dorothee Elmiger, Aus der Zuckerfabrik 2 Robert Seethaler, Der letzte Satz 4 Rolf Lappert, Leben ist ein unregelmäßiges Verb 6 Thilo Krause, Elbwärts 8 Irene Diwiak, Malvita 10 Lisa Eckhart, Omama 12 Ronya Othmann, Die Sommer 14 Karin Wieland • Heinz Bude • Bettina Munk, Aufprall 16 Daniel Glattauer, Die Liebe Geld 18 Elke Heidenreich, Männer in Kamelhaarmänteln 20 Verena Keßler, Die Gespenster von Demmin 22 Beatrix Kramlovsky, Fanny oder das weiße Land 24 Margrit Schriber, Die Vielgeliebte meines Mannes 26 CRIME FICTION / THRILLER Claude Cueni, Genesis 2.0 28 Holger Senzel, Später Zeuge 30 Leif Karpe, Der Mann, der in die Bilder fiel 32 ESSAY Mely Kiyak, Frausein 34 Karl-Markus Gauß, Die unaufhörliche Wanderung 36 Edi Zollinger, Herkules am Spinnrad 37 POETRY Oskar Pastior, »eine sanduhr für methapern« 38 FICTION Nominated for the Swiss Book Prize Shortlisted for Selected by the German New books Book Prize in German DOROTHEE ELMIGER »It is already clear that Out of the Sugar Factory will be one If the connections between world events should suddenly be wiped out, we would be of this year’s most grateful to find Dorothee Elmiger’s book to help us understand what happened in the important books. This past. Its subject: the cycles of capital, labour and lust.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1 Annual Compliance Costs 15 1.2 One-Off Compliance Cos 19 2
    Give Serious Attention to Follow-Up Costs – Seize Opportunities 2014 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL REGULATORY CONTROL COUNCIL 2014 Annual Report of the NKR pursuant to Section 6(2) of the Act on the Establishment of a National Regulatory Control Council (NKRG) October 2014 4 Annual compliance costs 10,5 billion 10,0 EUR 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 3,0 Milliarden 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 July 13 January 14 April 14 June 14 -0,5 -1,0 Cumulated for the business sector Cumulated for the public authorities Cumulated for the citizens Total Compliance costs of the preceding period A holistic approach to effective bureaucracy reduction and better regulation Analysis of benefits* Ex-ante transparency in terms of financial consequences - No one-sided analysis of costs only - Independent review by the NKR - Analysis of compliance costs in their entirety from 2011 onwards Sept. 2006 Conduct of NKR projects Implementation-oriented legislation* - Multi-level projects for simplification in individual - Greater inclusion of the Federal States areas of law and the municipalities in the legislative - Preparation of specific proposals for simplification process Index of bureaucracy costs and compliance costs monitor Determination of costs at the EU level* - Net reduction target of 25 percent - Development of the ex-ante - Avoidance of unnecessary compliance costs procedure of the EU for the early prevention of follow-up costs June 2014 stemming from EU legislation Strengthening of eGovernment suitability - Application of the eGovernment review guidelines "Better Regulation 2014" work programme - Life situations approach to looking into the Ex-post evaluation procedure appreciability of bureaucracy - Putting target achievement and efficiency to the test - Piloting to be completed by early 2015 * Topics are under discussion 5 Key Messages 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monkey Cage "Democracy Is the Art of Running the Circus from the Monkey Cage." -- H.L
    11/5/13 The Czech paradox: Did the winner lose and the losers win? Sign In SUBSCRIBE: Home Delivery Digital Real Estate Rentals Cars Today's Paper Going Out Guide Find&Save Service Alley PostT V Politics Opinions Local Sports National World Business Tech Lifestyle Entertainment Jobs More The Monkey Cage "Democracy is the art of running the circus from the monkey cage." -- H.L. Mencken What's The Monkey Cage? Archives Follow : The Monkey Cage The Czech paradox: Did the winner lose and the losers win? BY TIM HAUGHTON, TEREZA NOVOTNA AND KEVIN DEEGAN-KRAUSE October 30 at 5:45 am More 3 Comments Also on The Monkey Cage Is the nonproliferation agenda stuck in the Cold War? Make-up artists prepare the Czech Social Democrat (CSSD) chairman Bohuslav Sobotka for his TV appearance after early parliamentary elections finished, in Prague, on Saturday, Oct. 26, 2013. (CTK, Michal Kamaryt/ Associated Press) [Joshua Tucker: Continuing our series of Election Reports, we are pleased to welcome the following post-election report on the Oct. 25-26 Czech parliamentary elections from political scientists Tim Haughton (University of Birmingham, UK), Tereza Novotna (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium) and Kevin Deegan-Krause, (Wayne State University), who blogs about East European politics at the excellent Pozorblog. Deegan-Krause's pre-election report is available here.] ***** Czech party politics used to be boring. The 2013 parliamentary election, however, highlights the transformation of the party system, the arrival of new entrants and the woes faced by the long-established parties. The Czech Social Democratic Party (CSSD) won the election, but the margin of victory was slender.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-27 Watch No 8
    EU-27 WATCH No. 8 ISSN 1610-6458 Issued in March 2009 Edited by the Institute for European Politics (IEP), Berlin in collaboration with the Austrian Institute of International Affairs, Vienna Institute for International Relations, Zagreb Bulgarian European Community Studies Association, Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Sofia Academy of Sciences, Budapest Center for European Studies / Middle East Technical Institute for Strategic and International Studies, University, Ankara Lisbon Centre européen de Sciences Po, Paris Institute of International and European Affairs, Centre d’étude de la vie politique, Université libre de Dublin Bruxelles Institute of International Relations, Prague Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Institute of International Relations and Political Robert Schuman, Luxembourg Science, Vilnius University Centre of International Relations, Ljubljana Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and Latvian Institute of International Affairs, International Studies, Nicosia Riga Danish Institute for International Studies, Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, Copenhagen University of Malta Elcano Royal Institute and UNED University, Madrid Netherlands Institute of International Relations European Institute of Romania, Bucharest ‘Clingendael’, The Hague Federal Trust for Education and Research, London Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Foundation
    [Show full text]