New9 Social Democratic Turn to Europe David James Bailey Thesis Submitted Fo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New9 Social Democratic Turn to Europe David James Bailey Thesis Submitted Fo Legitimation through Integration: Explaining the ‘New9 Social Democratic turn to Europe David James Bailey Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. Government Department, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London. 1 UMI Number: U194814 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U194814 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 T h e s e s F Abstract. The turn towards European integration by social democratic parties across the European Union has thus far been inadequately explained. Existing explanations are unable to account for the anticipation that traditional social democratic ‘market-correcting’ policies can be successfully promoted at the EU-level despite the lack of opportunities to do so. This thesis argues that the ‘new’ social democratic turn to Europe has enabled social democratic parties to retain a degree of ideological continuity despite the necessary retrenchment of social democracy, thereby contributing to the ongoing (yet increasingly problematic) legitimation of social democracy and the continued maintenance of a viable social democratic constituency. The turn to Europe has provided social democratic parties with the possibility of re-regulating ‘globalisation’ at the supranational level, thereby cohering with the traditional social democratic practice of promoting market-correcting public policy within institutions of representative democracy. However, there exist sizeable institutional obstacles to the implementation of such an agenda which prevent its realisation. Based on a theoretical discussion of the decline of ‘traditional’ social democracy, the thesis argues that the moderation of ‘traditional’ social democratic aims was necessary due to the inability to maintain an expansion of redistributive market-correcting regulations within institutions of representative democracy beyond the medium term. The ‘new’ social democratic turn to Europe enables redistributive market-correcting policies to be promoted, yet not realised, at the EU-level. Moreover, the non-realisation of a social democratic agenda at the European level can be understood in terms of the 2 institutional obstacles to policy implementation at the supranational level, thereby partly obfuscating the failure of ‘traditional’ social democracy and contributing to its ongoing legitimation. This argument is illustrated through case studies of social democratic parties in the UK, Sweden, France, Spain and Italy, and at the European level. 3 Contents Pg- Acknowledgements 1 Chapter 1 - The Paradoxical Social Democratic turn to Europe 9 1.1. A note on the definition of social democracy 11 1.2. The social democratic turn to Europe and the European- 15 level obstacles to social democratic policymaking 1.3. Existing explanations for the social democratic turn to 35 Europe 1.4. Summary 49 Chapter 2 - Towards a more adequate explanation: Legitimating 51 ‘New’ Social Democracy at the European Level 2.1. Explaining the social democratic turn to Europe 52 Chapter 3 - Explaining the Demise of ‘Traditional9 Social 74 Democracy 3.1. ‘New’ social democracy as an improvement over ‘traditional’ 76 social democracy 3.2. The demise of ‘new’ Social Democracy as an unnecessary and 83 regrettable mistake 4 3.3. The decline of ‘traditional’ social democracy as a failure of the 94 social democratic strategy itself 3.4. Conclusion and plan for the remainder of the thesis 113 Chapter 4 - Legitimating ‘New’ Social Democracy at the 119 European level: the case of the British Labour Party 4.1. The historical context: containable divisions over Europe 120 during the Labour Party’s ‘traditional’ social democratic phase, from 1945 to the mid-1970s 4.2. The crisis and failure of ‘traditional’ social democracy and 127 heightened divisions over Europe 4.3. The transformation to ‘new’ social democracy and the 139 legitimating role of the EU 4.4. The problematic and paradoxical legitimation of ‘new’ social 160 democracy at the EU-level: 1997-2004 4.5. Conclusion 173 Chapter 5 - Legitimating Social Democracy at the European 174 level across Western Europe 5.1. Sweden 174 5.2. France 194 5.3. Spain 205 5.4. Italy 218 5.5. Conclusion 228 5 Chapter 6 - Social Democracy at the EU-level 231 6.1. The limits to market-correcting policymaking at the EU-level 232 6.2. The development of a ‘counter-globalisation’ agenda at the 277 EU-level 6.3. Conclusion 302 Chapter 7 - Conclusion: ‘New’ Social Democracy’s 304 Problematic European Legitimation and the Future for Social Democracy? 7.1. Summary of the main argument 3 04 7.2. Addressing possible objections 310 7.3. Implications of the findings 314 7.4. A very brief note on normative implications and future 319 directions Appendix 1 - Interview Material 322 Bibliography 325 6 Acknowledgements I owe a deep debt of gratitude to a number of people who have helped me to complete this thesis. My supervisors, Simon Hix and Eiko Thielemann, have always provided me with expert advice, ensured that I always kept an eye on the final direction that my research should be taking, and given me enough space to find my own intellectual, methodological and theoretical perspective. Their careful reading of the drafts and chapters of my thesis have been invaluable, in particular in spotting holes in my argument and rigorously forcing me to either defend, remove or fill the hole in question. In the early stages of the thesis Eiko Thielemann provided me with both extremely useful advice on how to actually go about doing a PhD, and the right amount of steering to make sure I could work out for myself what that meant without getting completely lost in the process. During the later stages of writing the thesis Simon Hix consistently and constructively identified weaknesses in my argument, the correction of which, I feel, have contributed towards a far stronger thesis than would have otherwise been the case. I am also grateful for a series of conversations with a fellow PhD student, Sara Motta, who introduced me to a number of new ideas that I would otherwise not have considered. I also wish to acknowledge the extremely detailed and constructive comments of my PhD examiners, Colin Hay and Philippe Marliere, both of whom, based on a very close reading of the text, provided me with positive feedback and very useful advice on improving the viability of the argument made herein, for which I am extremely grateful. I am also grateful to the Party of European Socialists for granting me access to their 7 archives, providing me with the opportunity to work in and observe their office in Brussels, and to the MEPs who took part in my interviews during my field research in late 2002. For reading and critically commenting in depth on a number of draft chapters, and for providing me with an opportunity to defend my thesis, I would like to thank Abby Innes. I thank Alan Beattie, Sebastian Balfour, Bob Hancke and the students who attended GV502 European Politics and Policy, for reading some of the drafts of the thesis and providing me with useful comments. I also acknowledge ESRC award R42200034145. I am completely indebted to my mother for always providing me with the support needed to complete the thesis. Finally, I want to thank Saori Shibata, without whom I would never have found the optimism, motivation and focus needed to write this thesis. 8 Chapter 1 - The Paradoxical Social Democratic turn to Europe During the 1980s and 1990s, west European social democratic parties became increasingly positive about the political opportunities that exist within the institutions of the European Union (Holmes and Lightfoot, 2002; Hooghe, Marks and Wilson, 2002; Sassoon, 1996; Marliere, 2001). In particular, the European Union has come to be portrayed within social democratic circles as a means to influence socio-economic processes that are increasingly (perceived as) difficult to influence through the institutions of the nation-state, through the promotion of market-correcting public policy at the supranational level (see, for instance, Douglas, 2002; Hirst, 1999; Hay, 2002a). At the same time, however, a strong current within contemporary academic and political opinion argues that attempts to implement substantive market-correcting policy at the European level are destined to failure due to the obstacles to integrating several pre-existing political systems into one single one (Streeck, 1996, 2001; Scharpf, 1999; Leibfried and Pierson, 2000). These obstacles therefore make the attempt by social democratic actors to re-acquire political influence through political action at the supranational level seem paradoxical. Indeed, as Notermans points out with regard to economic and monetary union: Given that it would seem to institutionalise a form of economic policymaking foreign to traditional social democratic concepts, and that it at times has been met with rather 9 pronounced scepticism on the part of the electorate and party membership, the solid social democratic support in favour of monetary integration may indeed seem puzzling (Notermans, 2001: 5). It is in the light of this paradox that the present thesis seeks to explain the turn to pro-Europeanism witnessed in social democratic parties across the European Union. The thesis is therefore also implicitly concerned with answering the question of whether (as hoped by many within the social democratic movement) the process of European integration represents a viable institutional opportunity within which social democratic parties can successfully promote a reinvigorated social democratic agenda following the declining fortunes of such an agenda at the national level.
Recommended publications
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • En En ***I Report
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting A7-0034/2013 7.2.2013 ***I REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (COM(2011)0895 – C7-0007/2012– 2011/0439(COD)) Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Rapporteur: Marc Tarabella RR\926628EN.doc PE483.470v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_COD_1amCom Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act In amendments by Parliament, amendments to draft acts are highlighted in bold italics. Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the draft act which may require correction when the final text is prepared – for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a language version. Suggested corrections of this kind are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned. The heading for any amendment to an existing act that the draft act seeks to amend includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Passages in an existing act that Parliament wishes to amend, but that the draft act has left unchanged, are highlighted in bold. Any deletions that Parliament wishes to make in such passages are indicated thus: [...]. PE483.470v03-00 2/296 RR\926628EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lambeth LGBTQ+ History Month 2020
    Entertaining the Troops LGBT+ fair at the Library Queer Alphabet Soup – A Mosaic Youth Forum One of Them: From Albert Tuesday 11 February, 8pm Saturday 15 February, 11am to 4pm. evening of LGBT+ Spoken Word – Intergenerational Square to Parliament Square The Bread and Roses pub (Garden Bar) Tate South Lambeth Library Wednesday 19 February, 7pm Afternoon Tea with Michael Cashman 68 Clapham Manor Street. SW4 6DZ Arts, crafts, books and more at Tate Tate South Lambeth Library Thursday 20 February, 2pm Wednesday 26 February, 7pm. From 1979 to 1988 Consenting Adults South Lambeth Library’s LGBT+ Back for a second year! QAS is a series Location: On Application Brixton Library Tickets: Free – Booking in Public was one of the leading Lesbian Fair. The Friends of Tate of readings, poetry and performance Teens will have the opportunity to meet One of Them with Michael Cashman and Gay Theatre Companies in South Lambeth Library’s from literary queer novelists, poets, with older LGBT+ people, so if you are Lambeth LGBTQ+ England. While Gay Sweatshop battled own arts and craft fairs have performance artists and writers. Featuring 13 to 19 or over 50 this event is for you. Michael Cashman has lived many with the Arts Council for funding, this become a popular feature readings and performances from: You can share your story and hear others lives, all of them remarkable: as a Community Theatre group performed of the neighbourhood, this Adam Mars- telling theirs. beloved actor of stage and screen; as History Month 2020 plays, cabaret and musicals in theatres time with a gay flair! The Vauxhall a campaigner for gay rights; as an MEP Jones – Author of and for Student Unions and Gay Groups neighbourhood is, after all, famed for its More details visit: www.mosaicyouth.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Sitting of 28 March 2012
    5.6.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 158 E/1 Wednesday 28 March 2012 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2012-2013 SESSION Sittings of 28 and 29 March 2012 BRUSSELS MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF 28 MARCH 2012 (2012/C 158 E/01) Contents Page 1. Resumption of the session . 2 2. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting . 2 3. Statement by the President . 2 4. Welcome . 3 5. Composition of Parliament . 3 6. Composition of committees and delegations . 3 7. Corrigendum (Rule 216) . 3 8. Documents received . 4 9. Oral questions (submission) . 5 10. Lapsed written declarations . 6 11. Action taken on Parliament’s resolutions . 6 12. Transfers of appropriations . 6 13. Delegated acts (Rule 87a) . 6 C 158 E/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.6.2012 Wednesday 28 March 2012 Contents (continued) Page 14. Implementing measures (Rule 88) . 7 15. Order of business . 8 16. Enlargement report for Serbia (debate) . 9 17. Enlargement report for Kosovo (debate) . 9 18. Enlargement report for Turkey (débat) . 10 19. Appointment of the members of the Special Committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering (tabling deadlines) . 11 20. Enlargement report for Montenegro (debate) . 11 21. European Refugee Fund 2008 to 2013 ***II (debate) . 11 22. Estimates of revenue and expenditure for 2013 - Section I - Parliament (debate) . 12 23. Corporate governance framework for European companies (debate) . 12 24. One-minute speeches on matters of political importance . 13 25. Agenda of the next sitting . 13 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Before-The-Act-Programme.Pdf
    Dea F ·e s. Than o · g here tonight and for your Since Clause 14 (later 27, 28 and 29) was an­ contribution o e Organisation for Lesbian and Gay nounced, OLGA members throughout the country Action (OLGA) in our fight against Section 28 of the have worked non-stop on action against it. We raised Local Govern en Ac . its public profile by organising the first national Stop OLGA is a a · ~ rganisa ·o ic campaigns The Clause Rally in January and by organising and on iss es~ · g lesbians and gay e . e ber- speaking at meetings all over Britain. We have s ;>e o anyone who shares o r cancer , lobbied Lords and MPs repeatedly and prepared a e e eir sexuality, and our cons i u ion en- briefings for them , for councils, for trade unions, for s es a no one political group can take power. journalists and for the general public. Our tiny make­ C rre ly. apart from our direct work on Section 28, shift office, staffed entirely by volunteers, has been e ave th ree campaigns - on education , on lesbian inundated with calls and letters requ esting informa­ cus ody and on violence against lesbians and gay ion and help. More recently, we have also begun to men. offer support to groups prematurely penalised by We are a new organisation, formed in 1987 only local authorities only too anxious to implement the days before backbench MPs proposed what was new law. then Clause 14, outlawing 'promotion' of homosexu­ The money raised by Before The Act will go into ality by local authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnecting the European Parliament and Its People Is the Culmination of a Year Long E C O N
    R Reconnecting the European Parliament and its People is the culmination of a year long e c o n project between the Foreign Policy Centre and the European Commission n e c Representation in the United Kingdom. Edited by FPC Policy Director Adam Hug, the t i n g pamphlet includes contributions from Dr Richard Corbett, Dr Michael Shackleton, Liz t h e Atkins, Dr Adam Marshall, Cllr Flo Clucas, Dr Christian Kaunert and Kamil Zwolski. E u r o p e RECoNNECTINg ThE a The pamphlet argues that there is clearly room for improvement in the way MEPs and n P a the Parliament engage with the British public and a need to reform the electoral r l i a EURoPEAN PARLIAmENT system . The report seeks to provide positive recommendations for action that help m e n strengthen the bond between the European Parliament and the people it represents. t a n AND ITS PEoPLE d i t s P e o p Edited by Adam hug l e T h e F o r e i g n P o l i c y C e n t r e a The Foreign Policy Centre n d Suite 11, Second floor E u r 23-28 Penn Street o p London N1 5DL e a n United Kingdom C o www.fpc.org.uk m [email protected] m i s s © Foreign Policy Centre 2010 i o All rights reserved n R e p r ISBN-13 978-1-905833-18-4 e s e ISBN-10 1-905833-18-0 n t a t i o £4.95 n i n t h e U K Reconnecting the European Parliament and its People Edited by Adam Hug First Published in September 2010 by The Foreign Policy Centre Suite 11, Second Floor, 23-28 Penn Street London, N1 5DL United Kingdom www.fpc.org.uk [email protected] ©Foreign Policy Centre 2010 All Rights Reserved ISBN 13 978-1-905833-18-4
    [Show full text]
  • 0906 1 Протокол Извънредно Заседание От 6 Септември 2010
    ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПАРЛАМЕНТ 2009 - 2014 Комисия по външни работи AFET_PV(2010)0906_1 ПРОТОКОЛ Извънредно заседание от 6 септември 2010 г., 19.00 ч.-20.30 ч. СТРАСБУРГ Заседанието беше открито на 6 септември 2010 г., понеделник, в 19.05 ч., под председателството на Gabriele Albertini (председател). 1. Приемане на дневния ред AFET_OJ (2010)0906_1v01 Дневният ред се приема във вида, отразен в настоящия протокол. 2. Съобщения на председателя *** Електронно гласуване *** 3. Позиция на Парламента относно проектобюджета за 2011 г. във вида, в който е изменен от Съвета – всички раздели AFET/7/01923 2010/2001(BUD) 12699/2010 – C7-0202/2010 Докладчик по José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra PA – PE445.946v01-00 становище: (PPE) AM – PE445.959v01-00 Водеща: BUDG – Sidonia Elżbieta Jędrzejewska DT – PE445.756v01-00 (PPE) DT – PE439.387v01-00 Helga Trüpel (Verts/ALE) DT – PE443.001v01-00 DT – PE439.064v01-00 DT – PE440.041v01-00 DT – PE439.848v02-00 Приети изменения (бюджетни изменения): 5040, 5012, 5013, 5014, 5039, 5015, 5041, 5072, 5038, 5017, 5035, 5023, 5024, 5025, 5008, 5049, 5026, 5006, 5068, 5028, 5033, 5007, 5011, 5004, 5009, 5069, 5005, 5010, 5080, 5037, 5055, 5043, 5061, 5062, 5029, 5063, 5021, 5030, 5031, 5032, 5065, 5066, 5067, 5081, 5022. PV\829024BG.doc PE448.641v01-00 BG Единство в многообразието BG Приети изменения (проектостановище): 2, 4, 5, 7. Измененото проектостановище беше прието с 40 гласа "за", 6 гласа"против" и 4 гласа "въздържал се". 4. Изменение на Регламент (ЕО) № 539/2001 за определяне на третите страни, чиито граждани трябва да притежават виза, когато преминават външните граници на държавите-членки, както и тези, чиито граждани се освободени от това изискване AFET/7/03030 ***I 2010/0137(COD) COM(2010)0256 – C7-0134/2010 Докладчик по Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) PA – PE445.622v01-00 становище: Водеща: LIBE – Tanja Fajon (S&D) PR – PE445.748v01-00 Становището беше прието без изменения с 41 гласа „за“, 2 „против“ и 3 „въздържал се“ *** Край на електронното гласуване *** 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Strenghtening European Social Democracy
    Brochure_roundtable_sd_EN:Mise en page 1 11/5/10 5:41 PM Page 1 STRENGTHENING EUROPEAN SOCIAL S&D GROUP ROUND TABLE DEBATES DEMOCRACY MAY & JUNE 2010 Brochure_roundtable_sd_EN:Mise en page 1 11/5/10 5:41 PM Page 2 PARTICIPANTS Juan Fernando López Aguilar Head of Delegation Spain Kader Arif Coordinator S&D Group France Henning Meyer Social Europe journal Germany Kriton Arsenis MEP Greece Miguel Ángel Martínez Martínez EP Vice-President Spain Maria Badia I Cutchet S&D Group Vice-President Spain Kyriakos Mavronikolas Head of Delegation Cyprus Thijs Berman Head of Delegation Netherlands Jelena Milinovic S&D Trainee Serbia Janna Besamusca Ecosy Secretary General Netherlands Alexander Mirsky Head of Delegation Latvia Antony Beumer S&D Group Secretariat Netherlands Javier Moreno GPF Secretary General Spain Henrik Bokor Facebook debate Sweden Anne Muxel Academic Speaker France David Capezzuto PES secretariat Italy Katarina Nevedalová MEP Slovakia Anna Colombo S&D Group Secr. General Italy Justas Vincas Paleckis Head of Delegation Lithuania Philip Cordery PES Secretary General France Ivari Padar Head of Delegation Estonia Massimo D’Alema FEPS President/speaker Italy Jan Pronk Professor/Speaker Netherlands Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă Head of Delegation Romania Kévin Pusieux Facebook debate France Jacki Davis Moderator UK Bernhard Rapkay Head of Delegation Germany Véronique De Keyser S&D Group Vice-President Belgium Poul Nyrup Rasmussen PES Pres./Speaker Denmark Proinsias De Rossa Head of Delegation Ireland Maria Joao Rodrigues PES special advisor Portugal Saîd El Khadraoui MEP Belgium Libor Roucek EP Vice-President Czech Rep. Edite Estrela Head of Delegation Portugal David-Maria Sassoli Head of Delegation Italy Monika Flašíková Beňová S&D Group Vice-President Slovakia Martin Schulz S&D Group President Germany Krisztian Gal Facebook debate Hungary Adrian Severin S&D Group Vice-Pres.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2009 RESEARCH PAPER 09/53 17 June 2009
    European Parliament Elections 2009 RESEARCH PAPER 09/53 17 June 2009 Elections to the European Parliament were held across the 27 states of the European Union between 4 and 7 June 2009. The UK elections were held concurrently with the county council elections in England on 4 June. The UK now has 72 MEPs, down from 78 at the last election, distributed between 12 regions. The Conservatives won 25 seats, both UKIP and Labour 13 and the Liberal Democrats 11. The Green Party held their two seats, while the BNP won their first two seats in the European parliament. Labour lost five seats compared with the comparative pre-election position. The Conservatives won the popular vote overall, and every region in Great Britain except the North East, where Labour won, and Scotland, where the SNP won. UKIP won more votes than Labour. UK turnout was 34.5%. Across Europe, centre-right parties, whether in power or opposition, tended to perform better than those on the centre-left. The exact political balance of the new Parliament depends on the formation of Groups. The UK was not alone in seeing gains for far-right and nationalistic parties. Turnout across the EU was 43%. It was particularly low in some of the newer Member States. Part 1 of this paper presents the full results of the UK elections, including regional analysis and local-level data. Part 2 presents summary results of the results across the EU, together with country-level summaries based on data from official national sources. Adam Mellows-Facer Richard Cracknell Sean Lightbown Recent Research
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 G G G Session document FINAL A5-0121/2004 26 February 2004 * REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 90/434/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States (COM(2003) 613 – C5-0506/2003 – 2003/0239(CNS)) Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Rapporteur: Othmar Karas RR\333088EN.doc PE 333.088 EN EN PR_CNS_am Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure majority of the votes cast **I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast **II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position *** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty ***I Codecision procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast ***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position ***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission) Amendments to a legislative text In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics. Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
    [Show full text]
  • Jede Stimme Zählt Nordrhein-Westfalen Vor Den Kommunalwahlen Und Nach Der Europawahl
    SCHWERPUNKTPLENUM Jede Stimme zählt Nordrhein-Westfalen vor den Kommunalwahlen und nach der Europawahl Juni 2009 – „Das Volk bekundet seinen Willen durch Wahl, Volksbegehren und Volksentscheid.“ So steht es in Artikel 2 der NRW-Landesverfassung. Gleich dreimal können die Wählerinnen und Wähler im „Super-Wahljahr 2009“ zur Urne schreiten und mit ihren Stimmen die Politik von morgen bestimmen. Nach den Wahlen zum Europäischen Parlament im Mai und vor der Bundestagswahl Ende September stehen am 30. August 2009 die Kommunalwahlen bevor. Die politischen Akteure in den Kommunen und auch auf Landesebene können gespannt sein, wie sich die Wählerinnen und Wähler entscheiden werden. In 23 kreisfreien Städten, in 373 kreisangehöri- zusammenlegen wollten, sehen CDU und FDP te 4,6 Prozent, und alle anderen Parteien lagen gen Gemeinden sowie in 31 Kreisen werden am die Bedeutung der Kommunalwahlen durch den bei 1 Prozent der Stimmen oder darunter. 30. August die Mitglieder der kommunalen Ver- separaten Termin gestärkt, da sich dann die Bür- 18 Abgeordnete aus NRW werden dem tretungen auf die nächsten fünf Jahre gewählt. gerinnen und Bürger verstärkt mit kommunalen Europäischen Parlament bis zur nächsten Eu- Zugleich finden – bis auf wenige Ausnahmen Themen beschäftigen würden. Nachdem der ropawahl im Jahr 2014 angehören. Insgesamt – fast landesweit die Direktwahlen der (Ober-) nordrhein-westfälische Verfassungsgerichtshof stellt Deutschland 99 von 736 Abgeordne- Bürgermeisterinnen und (Ober-)Bürgermeis- in Münster erst vor wenigen Wochen, Ende Mai, ten. Im Folgenden die vorläufigen amtlichen ter sowie der Landrätinnen und Landräte statt. den 30. August als Wahltermin bestätigt hat, steht Ergebnisse. sw/cw Nachdem der Landtag Nordrhein-Westfalen den Kandidatinnen und Kandidaten um kom- im Herbst 2007 die Gemeindeordnung geän- munalpolitische Ämter ein kurzer, aber sicher- dert hat, werden die Bürgermeisterinnen und lich nicht minder engagierter Wahlkampf bevor.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]