DOCSLIB.ORG

100 Steps Forward the European Parliament and the Upgrading of European Democracy Since the Lisbon Treaty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
100 Steps Forward the European Parliament and the Upgrading of European Democracy Since the Lisbon Treaty 100 steps forward the european parliament and the upgrading of european democracy since the lisbon treaty Cabinet of the Secretary-General April 2014 THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ONE HUNDRED STEPS FORWARD THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE UPGRADING OF EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY SINCE THE LISBON TREATY REPORT PE533.193 EN 1 This report was assembled for presentation to European Parliament’s Secretariat and the Directors-General at the 'Awaydays' meeting in Vaals, The Netherlands on 23-24 January 2014. THE EDITOR: Klaus Welle The Secretary-General European Parliament B-1047 Brussels Email contact: [email protected] RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATORS: Philipp M. Schulmeister With the assistance of Katarzyna Sochacka CSG EP2025 Long Term Trends Team Cabinet of the Secretary-General European Parliament B-1047 Brussels Email contact: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS: Original: EN DOCUMENT COMPILED BY: EP2025 Long Term Trends Team Cabinet of the Secretary-General ___________ Manuscript completed in April 2014 Brussels, © European Parliament, 2014 ___________ DISCLAIMER Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. 2 One Hundred Steps Forward: The European Parliament and the Upgrading of European Democracy since the Lisbon Treaty One Hundred Steps Forward ............................................................................................................................. 7 I. The EP in multi-polar and multi-level policy making 1. EP powers over the European budget after the Lisbon Treaty The European Parliament and the new MFF programming (putting A.312 TFEU and A.324.TFEU in practice): The SURE report on the MFF ............................ 11 The European Parliament and the new MFF programming (putting A.312 TFEU and A.324.TFEU in practice): The struggle for the new MFF ............................. 15 The battle for an own resources system .......................................................................................................... 19 The new positioning for the EU annual budget: The 2010-2013 payments crisis .................................... 23 Parliamentary scrutiny (and control) of the implementation of the European budget: The battle for a new Financial Regulation ...................................................................................................... 27 EU financial instruments for external action ................................................................................................. 31 2. Control on international agreements and negotiations International agreements ................................................................................................................................... 35 The European Parliament and the Fisheries Partnership Agreements ....................................................... 37 The European Parliament’s monitoring activities in the field of civil aviation (agreements with third countries) ..................................................................................................................... 41 The European Parliament and the Doha Round ........................................................................................... 43 The European Parliament and Bilateral Trade Agreements ......................................................................... 45 Trade Agreements: The case of the EU-KOREA FTA ............................................................................... 47 Withholding consent as ultimate ratio: Case Study on ACTA ..................................................................... 49 3. New partners and partnerships European Citizens' Initiatives ........................................................................................................................... 51 The European External Action Service (EEAS): asserting parliamentary oversight on security and defence .......................................................................... 55 The European Parliament and its relations with National Parliaments ...................................................... 59 Cooperation agreements with the Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee ....................................................... 65 3 Monetary Dialogue with the ECB .................................................................................................................... 67 The IIA between the European Parliament and the ECB on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) ................................................................................................. 69 The Parliamentary dimension of G20 ............................................................................................................. 71 The BRICS and the Programme developed by DG-EXPO to further the understanding of key governance structures of emerging foreign policy actors ............................................................................. 73 Participation in the Fiscal Compact negotiations .......................................................................................... 75 The achievements of the Fiscal Compact ....................................................................................................... 77 The issues with the EFSF and the ESM ......................................................................................................... 79 4. Appointment of and check on the Executive at European level The election of the Commission President and the consequences of Declaration n°11 of the Treaty of Lisbon ....................................................................................................... 81 Lead candidates for the European elections ................................................................................................... 83 Hearings of the commissioners: Case Study on the replacement of the nominated commissioner in charge of International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response ......................................... 87 Revision of the regulation on the financing of European political parties ................................................ 89 The US Congress benchmark on scrutiny ...................................................................................................... 91 Scrutiny of delegated and implementing acts as well as of measures under the Regulatory Procedure with Scrutiny (RPS) .................................................................. 95 Delegated acts - Annex 1 of the revised Framework Agreement 2010 ...................................................... 95 II. The EP as stronger player in a changing actor model for democracy 5. Support for policy-related work along the full legislative cycle Codecision as a general rule: Changes in AGRI, PECH, INTA, LIBE and REGI ............................... 101 Codecision in practice: Rules 70 and 70a ...................................................................................................... 105 Parliament’s influence along the full legislative cycle: Case Study on the Single Market Act ............... 107 The European Parliament's budget: Strengthening the role of Parliament and its Members ............... 109 Legislative capacity building: Staffing increase in committee secretariats ................................................ 115 Policy departments at the service of the political bodies ............................................................................ 119 The Parliamentary Research Service and the new Library concept .......................................................... 123 Independent Impact Assessment ................................................................................................................... 125 Improving the attractiveness of the plenary ................................................................................................. 127 The Washington office .................................................................................................................................... 129 The European Semester and the Packs ......................................................................................................... 131 The Social Dimension of the Economic and Monetary Union ................................................................. 135 4 6. Transparency, compliance and exemplarity Right to information and access to documents ............................................................................................ 139 Transparency Register ...................................................................................................................................... 141 The Code of Conduct for Members .............................................................................................................. 143 European Parliament Environmental Management System: A new governance ................................... 147 7. Parliamentary diplomacy in the democratic spring The Sakharov Prize .......................................................................................................................................... 149 The Sakharov Prize Network .......................................................................................................................... 151 Election Observation ....................................................................................................................................... 153 Early
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 0908 1 PÖYTÄKIRJA Kokous 8. Syyskuuta 2011 Klo 15.00–18.30
    EUROOPAN PARLAMENTTI 2009 - 2014 Ympäristön, kansanterveyden ja elintarvikkeiden turvallisuuden valiokunta ENVI_PV(2011)0908_1 PÖYTÄKIRJA Kokous 8. syyskuuta 2011 klo 15.00–18.30 BRYSSEL Puheenjohtaja Jo Leinen avasi kokouksen torstaina 8. syyskuuta 2011 klo 15.05. 1. Esityslistan hyväksyminen ENVI_OJ (2011)0908_1v01-00 Esityslista hyväksyttiin. 2. Puheenjohtajan ilmoitukset . Tulkkaus Kaikkien muiden kielten paitsi viron ja latvian tulkkaus oli saatavilla. Muutos valiokunnan kokoonpanossa (varajäsen) Puheenjohtaja ilmoitti, että ENVI-valiokunnan varajäsenenä toimineen Jorgo CHATZIMARKAKISin tilalle tulee varajäseneksi Britta REIMERS. ENVI-valiokunnan varajäsenenä toimineen Giommaria UGGIASin korvaa Andrea ZANONI. Muut asiat Puheenjohtaja ilmoitti myös raportista, joka koskee seitsemännen ympäristöohjelman valmistelevaa kokousta Johannesburgissa COP 17 -konferenssia varten, Itävallan vetoomuksesta, joka koskee ydinvoimasta luopumisstrategiaa, maailman vesiviikosta Tukholmassa, muuntogeenisten organismien saastuttamasta hunajasta, sekä epilepsiaa ja vaihtoehtoisia lääkkeitä koskevasta työpajasta. PV\877769FI.doc PE472.286v01-00 FI Moninaisuudessaan yhtenäinenFI 3. Parlamentin kanta neuvoston muuttamaan talousarvioesitykseen varainhoitovuodeksi 2012 – kaikki pääluokat ENVI/7/05126 2011/2020(BUD) Valmistelija: Jutta Haug (S&D) PA – PE467.318v02-00 AM – PE469.867v01-00 Vastaava: BUDG – Francesca Balzani (S&D) José Manuel Fernandes (PPE) Puheenvuoro: Jutta Haug Lausuntoluonnoksen hyväksyminen Hyväksytyt tarkistukset: 2 (1. osa), 6 (1. osa),
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthese Des Votes Par Groupes Politiques
    POINTAGE DES VOTES CONCERNANT L’ACCORD AGRICOLE UE-MAROC APPROUVE PAR LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN LE 16 FEVRIER 2012 – 17/02/2012 – SYNTHESE DES VOTES PAR GROUPES POLITIQUES Absents ou Total Adhésion au Groupe Pour Contre Abstention Présents Refus de des vote voter membres national ALDE 57 5 5 67 18 85 77.61% ECR 29 5 4 38 15 53 64.47% EFD 4 17 2 23 10 33 60.87% PPE 156 60 13 229 42 271 52.18% VERTS 2 47 2 51 7 58 88.24% GUE- 0 29 1 30 4 34 95.00% NGL NI 3 17 1 21 9 30 71.43% S&D 116 44 3 163 27 190 56.75% 367 224 31 622 132 754 Mission du Royaume du Maroc auprès de l’Union Européenne Bruxelles POINTAGE DES VOTES CONCERNANT L’ACCORD AGRICOLE UE-MAROC APPROUVE PAR LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN LE 16 FEVRIER 2012 – 17/02/2012 – SYNTHESE DES VOTES NATIONAUX Absences Adhésion Total des Etat membre Pour Contre Abstentions Présents ou refus de au vote membres voter national Autriche 7 12 0 19 0 19 44.74% Belgique 11 5 0 16 6 22 53.13% Bulgarie 14 2 0 16 2 18 81.25% Chypre 2 4 0 6 0 6 50.00% République 13 4 2 19 3 22 52.63% Tchèque Danemark 9 1 0 10 3 13 85.00% Estonie 5 1 0 6 0 6 75.00% Finlande 5 6 1 12 1 13 25.00% France 32 18 9 59 15 74 31.36% Allemagne 63 19 4 86 13 99 59.88% Grèce 12 3 2 17 5 22 55.88% Hongrie 12 1 0 13 9 22 88.46% Irlande 5 4 0 9 3 12 33.33% Italie 25 34 2 61 12 73 33.61% Lettonie 5 2 0 7 2 9 57.14% Lituanie 6 1 2 9 3 12 50.00% Luxembourg 5 1 0 6 0 6 75.00% Malte 0 4 0 4 2 6 100.00% Mission du Royaume du Maroc auprès de l’Union Européenne Bruxelles POINTAGE DES VOTES CONCERNANT L’ACCORD AGRICOLE UE-MAROC APPROUVE PAR LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 Members Jutta HAUG Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands Anne E. JENSEN Vice-Chair Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Denmark Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti Jan OLBRYCHT Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Poland Platforma Obywatelska Konrad SZYMAŃSKI Vice-Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Prawo i Sprawiedliwość Helga TRÜPEL Vice-Chair Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Germany Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Alexander Nuno PICKART ALVARO Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Germany Freie Demokratische Partei Marta ANDREASEN Member Europe of freedom and democracy Group United Kingdom United Kingdom Independence Party Richard ASHWORTH Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group United Kingdom Conservative Party Francesca BALZANI Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Partito Democratico Thijs BERMAN Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Netherlands Partij van de Arbeid 26/09/2021 1 Reimer BÖGE Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands José BOVÉ Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance France Europe Écologie Michel DANTIN Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Union pour un Mouvement Populaire Jean-Luc DEHAENE Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Belgium Christen-Democratisch & Vlaams Albert DESS Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Germany Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
    [Show full text]
  • C 268 Jornal Oficial
    Jornal Oficial C 268 da União Europeia 57.º ano Edição em língua portuguesa Comunicações e Informações 14 de agosto de 2014 Índice IV Informações INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA Parlamento Europeu PERGUNTAS ESCRITAS E SUA RESPOSTA 2014/C 268/01 Perguntas escritas apresentadas por deputados ao Parlamento Europeu e respetiva resposta dada por uma instituição da União Europeia ......................................................................................................................... 1 (Ver nota ao leitor) PT Nota ao leitor A presente publicação contém perguntas escritas apresentadas por deputados ao Parlamento Europeu e a respetiva resposta dada por uma instituição da União Europeia. Para cada pergunta e resposta é apresentada, antes de uma eventual tradução, a versão na língua original. Por vezes, a resposta pode ser dada numa língua que não seja a da pergunta. Isto depende da língua de trabalho da comissão a quem é requerida a resposta. Estas perguntas e respostas são publicadas nos termos dos artigos 117.º e 118.º do Regimento do Parlamento Europeu. Todas as perguntas e respostas são acessíveis através do website do Parlamento Europeu (Europarl) na rubrica «Perguntas parlamentares»: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/pt/parliamentary-questions.html SIGNIFICADO DAS SIGLAS DOS GRUPOS POLÍTICOS PPE Grupo do Partido Popular Europeu (Democratas-Cristãos) S&D Grupo da Aliança Progressista dos Socialistas e Democratas no Parlamento Europeu ALDE Grupo da Aliança dos Democratas e Liberais pela
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Between the European Council and the European Parliament
    Relations between the European Council and the European Parliament Institutional and political dynamics STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Desmond Dinan European Council Oversight Unit PE 630.288 – November 2018 EN Relations between the European Council and the European Parliament Institutional and political dynamics This study explores the development of relations between the European Council (of Heads of State or Government) and the European Parliament, two institutions that have become increasingly central to the operation of the European Union political system, especially since the 2009 Lisbon Treaty. It explains the Treaty framework for relations between the two institutions and traces their practical evolution over time, including an analysis of the roles of the presidents of each institution in such interaction. It also examines points of contention in the relationship to date, including in relation to 'legislative trespassing' by the European Council and the Spitzenkandidaten process. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHOR This study has been written by Desmond Dinan, Ad Personam Jean Monnet Chair and Professor of Public Policy at George Mason University, Virginia, United States, at the request of the European Council Oversight Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value of the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS). Professor Dinan completed this work during his half-year as a Visiting Fellow at EPRS. ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Astrid Worum, European Council Oversight Unit, EPRS To contact the publisher, please e-mail [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript completed in September 2018. DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work.
    [Show full text]
  • En En ***I Report
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting A7-0034/2013 7.2.2013 ***I REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (COM(2011)0895 – C7-0007/2012– 2011/0439(COD)) Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Rapporteur: Marc Tarabella RR\926628EN.doc PE483.470v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_COD_1amCom Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act In amendments by Parliament, amendments to draft acts are highlighted in bold italics. Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the draft act which may require correction when the final text is prepared – for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a language version. Suggested corrections of this kind are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned. The heading for any amendment to an existing act that the draft act seeks to amend includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Passages in an existing act that Parliament wishes to amend, but that the draft act has left unchanged, are highlighted in bold. Any deletions that Parliament wishes to make in such passages are indicated thus: [...]. PE483.470v03-00 2/296 RR\926628EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Template
    Through a glass darkly 1 Briefing note June 2014 The new European Parliament: what to expect From 22 to 25 May 2014, Europeans went to the polls. Many of them went to express their dissatisfaction. Although the majority of the incoming 751 MEPs remain broadly supportive of the EU, both they and those who need to engage with the European Parliament will have to adapt to the increased power of a disparate anti-EU and anti- establishment minority over the next five years. This briefing provides an overview of the election results* at the EU level and what happens next, further analysis on results in France, Germany, Greece and the UK, a look at the key outgoing and incoming MEPs, and an examination of the selection procedures for the new leaders of the European Commission, European Parliament and European Council. The election results The election saw a marked rise, of about 10%, in the number of MEPs elected from anti-EU and anti-establishment parties from both ends of the political spectrum. They won around 230, or 31%, of the 751 seats, compared to 164, or 21%, of the 766 seats in 2009. What remains to be seen is whether the newly -elected MEPs will join existing, or form new, political groups in the Parliament (see below for more information on the importance of political groups and how they are formed). Despite their decreased numbers, the pro-Europeans remain the dominant force in the European Parliament. Their four groups – the centre-right, the centre-left, the liberals and the greens – won 521, or 69%, of the 751 available seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Sitting of 28 March 2012
    5.6.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 158 E/1 Wednesday 28 March 2012 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2012-2013 SESSION Sittings of 28 and 29 March 2012 BRUSSELS MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF 28 MARCH 2012 (2012/C 158 E/01) Contents Page 1. Resumption of the session . 2 2. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting . 2 3. Statement by the President . 2 4. Welcome . 3 5. Composition of Parliament . 3 6. Composition of committees and delegations . 3 7. Corrigendum (Rule 216) . 3 8. Documents received . 4 9. Oral questions (submission) . 5 10. Lapsed written declarations . 6 11. Action taken on Parliament’s resolutions . 6 12. Transfers of appropriations . 6 13. Delegated acts (Rule 87a) . 6 C 158 E/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.6.2012 Wednesday 28 March 2012 Contents (continued) Page 14. Implementing measures (Rule 88) . 7 15. Order of business . 8 16. Enlargement report for Serbia (debate) . 9 17. Enlargement report for Kosovo (debate) . 9 18. Enlargement report for Turkey (débat) . 10 19. Appointment of the members of the Special Committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering (tabling deadlines) . 11 20. Enlargement report for Montenegro (debate) . 11 21. European Refugee Fund 2008 to 2013 ***II (debate) . 11 22. Estimates of revenue and expenditure for 2013 - Section I - Parliament (debate) . 12 23. Corporate governance framework for European companies (debate) . 12 24. One-minute speeches on matters of political importance . 13 25. Agenda of the next sitting . 13 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberale Nachrichten Februar 2014
    Ausgabe 02/2014 Februar 2014 Alexander Graf Lambsdorff führt die FDP in den Europawahlkampf Platz 2 der Bundesliste den Landes- vorsitzenden der FDP Baden- Württemberg, Michael Theurer. Auf Platz 3 folgt die liberale Europaab- geordnete Gesine Meißner. Auf Platz 4 setzte sich die bayerische Spitzenkandidatin Nadja Hirsch ge- gen zwei Mitbewerber durch. Die weiteren Platzierungen: 5. Wolf Klinz, 6. Britta Reimers, 7. Alexandra Thein, 8. Cécile Bonnet, 9. Renata Alt, 10. Arian Kriesch, 11. Najib Ka- Auf dem Europaparteitag der FDP entschlossener Reformen und libera- rim und 12. Christiane Gaethgens. am vergangenen Sonntag in Bonn ler Wirtschaftspolitik" gewesen. Auf Platz 51 wurde die Düsseldorfer wurde Graf Lambsdorff mit 86,2 Für die Düsseldorfer FDP konnte Gi- Kandidatin Marie-Catherine Meyer Prozent zum Spitzenkandidaten be- sela Piltz als Wahlleiterin des Euro- vom Parteitag gewählt. Die Deutsch- stimmt. In seiner Rede bezeichnete er paparteitages gratulieren. Französin wird das Düsseldorfer Ge- die FDP als "überzeugte Europapar- sicht der FDP zur Europawahl. tei". Seine Partei spiele eine Schlüs- FDP-Chef Christian Lindner erklärte, Beschlossen wurde außerdem das selrolle bei der Frage, ob die Euro- die FDP werde für mehr Bürgernähe Programm für die Europawahl. Kern Stabilisierung "marktwirtschaftlich und Realismus kämpfen: „Das des Programms ist ein klares Ja zu umgesetzt wird", sagte der Vorsit- braucht Europa. Und ich bin mir si- Europa und zum Euro. Ziel: „Mehr zende der FDP im Europaparlament, cher, auch Europa braucht diese Li- Gemeinsamkeit, wo wir ein starkes Alexander Graf Lambsdorff. Schuld beralen“, sagte Lindner. Europa brauchen“ – Währung, Bin- an der europäischen Krise sei "das Die 662 Delegierten wählten auf nenmarkt, Handelspolitik, Energie, Fehlen ausgeglichener Haushalte, Innen-, Rechts- und Außenpolitik.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2010
    ELLLLIGIGEEN TTE NCC INN E I A L A L G AA G E R R E N T T N C N N C Y E Y E C C U U A N N A C I IT C I T E RI R E D S E E D S TAT F A MAM TATEESSO OF Directorate of Intelligence Chiefs ofState& CabinetMembers OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS A DIRECTORY DI CS 2010-10 Supercedes DI CS 2010-09 October 2010 Chiefs ofState& CabinetMembers OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS A DIRECTORY Information received as of 1 October 2010 has been used in preparation of this directory. DI CS 2010-10 Supercedes DI CS 2010-09 October 2010 PREFACE The Chiefs of State and Cabinet Members of Foreign Governments directory is intended to be used primarily as a reference aid and includes as many governments of the world as is considered practical, some of them not officially recognized by the United States. Regimes with which the United States has no diplomatic exchanges are indicated by the initials NDE. Governments are listed in alphabetical order according to the most commonly used version of each country’s name. The spelling of the personal names in this directory follows transliteration systems generally agreed upon by US Government agencies, except in the cases in which officials have stated a preference for alternate spellings of their names. NOTE: Although the head of the central bank is listed for each country, in most cases he or she is not a Cabinet member. Ambassadors to the United States and Permanent Representatives to the UN, New York, have also been included.
    [Show full text]
  • 0906 1 Протокол Извънредно Заседание От 6 Септември 2010
    ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПАРЛАМЕНТ 2009 - 2014 Комисия по външни работи AFET_PV(2010)0906_1 ПРОТОКОЛ Извънредно заседание от 6 септември 2010 г., 19.00 ч.-20.30 ч. СТРАСБУРГ Заседанието беше открито на 6 септември 2010 г., понеделник, в 19.05 ч., под председателството на Gabriele Albertini (председател). 1. Приемане на дневния ред AFET_OJ (2010)0906_1v01 Дневният ред се приема във вида, отразен в настоящия протокол. 2. Съобщения на председателя *** Електронно гласуване *** 3. Позиция на Парламента относно проектобюджета за 2011 г. във вида, в който е изменен от Съвета – всички раздели AFET/7/01923 2010/2001(BUD) 12699/2010 – C7-0202/2010 Докладчик по José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra PA – PE445.946v01-00 становище: (PPE) AM – PE445.959v01-00 Водеща: BUDG – Sidonia Elżbieta Jędrzejewska DT – PE445.756v01-00 (PPE) DT – PE439.387v01-00 Helga Trüpel (Verts/ALE) DT – PE443.001v01-00 DT – PE439.064v01-00 DT – PE440.041v01-00 DT – PE439.848v02-00 Приети изменения (бюджетни изменения): 5040, 5012, 5013, 5014, 5039, 5015, 5041, 5072, 5038, 5017, 5035, 5023, 5024, 5025, 5008, 5049, 5026, 5006, 5068, 5028, 5033, 5007, 5011, 5004, 5009, 5069, 5005, 5010, 5080, 5037, 5055, 5043, 5061, 5062, 5029, 5063, 5021, 5030, 5031, 5032, 5065, 5066, 5067, 5081, 5022. PV\829024BG.doc PE448.641v01-00 BG Единство в многообразието BG Приети изменения (проектостановище): 2, 4, 5, 7. Измененото проектостановище беше прието с 40 гласа "за", 6 гласа"против" и 4 гласа "въздържал се". 4. Изменение на Регламент (ЕО) № 539/2001 за определяне на третите страни, чиито граждани трябва да притежават виза, когато преминават външните граници на държавите-членки, както и тези, чиито граждани се освободени от това изискване AFET/7/03030 ***I 2010/0137(COD) COM(2010)0256 – C7-0134/2010 Докладчик по Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) PA – PE445.622v01-00 становище: Водеща: LIBE – Tanja Fajon (S&D) PR – PE445.748v01-00 Становището беше прието без изменения с 41 гласа „за“, 2 „против“ и 3 „въздържал се“ *** Край на електронното гласуване *** 5.
    [Show full text]