LETTER from CANBERRA Lettersaving You Time
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Let Her Finish: Gender, Sexism, and Deliberative Participation in Australian Senate Estimates Hearings (2006-2015)
Let Her Finish: Gender, Sexism, and Deliberative Participation In Australian Senate Estimates Hearings (2006-2015) Joanna Richards School of Government and Policy Faculty of Business, Government and Law University of Canberra ABSTRACT In 2016, Australia ranks 54th in the world for representation of women in Parliament, with women accounting for only 29% of the House of Representatives, and 39% of the Senate. This inevitably inspires discussion about women in parliament, quotas, and leadership styles. Given the wealth of research which suggests that equal representation does not necessarily guarantee equal treatment, this study focuses on Authoritative representation. That is, the space in between winning a seat and making a difference where components of communication and interaction affect the authority of a speaker.This study combines a Discourse Analysis of the official Hansard transcripts from the Senate Estimates Committee hearings, selected over a 10 year period between 2006 and 2015, with a linguistic ethnography of the Australian Senate to complement results with context. Results show that although female senators and witnesses are certainly in the room, they do not have the same capacity as their male counterparts. Both the access and effectiveness of women in the Senate is limited; not only are they given proportionally less time to speak, but interruption, gate keeping tactics, and the designation of questions significantly different in nature to those directed at men all work to limit female participation in the political domain. As witnesses, empirical measures showed that female testimony was often undermined by senators. Results also showed that female senators and witnesses occasionally adopted masculine styles of communication in an attempt to increase effectiveness in the Senate. -
The John Curtin School of Medical Research Annual Review 2012
THE JOHN CURTIN SCHOOL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH ANNUAL REVIEW 2012 ANU College of Medicine, Biology & Environment CONTENTS Annual Review 2012 From the Director 3 The John Curtin School of Medical Organisation Chart 4 Research Committees 5 COMMUNITY 7 Official Opening of Stage 3 8 Launch of The John Curtin Medical Research Foundation 9 Professor Gordon Ada 10 Open Day 11 Community Activities 12 RESEARCH IN REVIEW 2012 15 Eccles Institute of Neuroscience 16 Department of Genome Biology 29 Department of Immunology 36 Department of Pathogens and Immunity 45 Department of Molecular Bioscience 47 Department of Translational Medicine 56 Australian Phenomics Facility 60 Biomolecular Resource Facility/Genome Discovery Unit 61 STAFF AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENTS 63 VISITORS AND COLLABORATIONS 69 STAFF AND STUDENTS 85 Department of Genome Biology 86 Department of Immunology 87 Eccles Institute of Neuroscience 88 Department of Pathogens and Immunity 90 Department of Molecular Bioscience 90 Department of Translational Medicine 92 APF and Animal Services 92 School Services 94 School Administration 95 Students 96 PUBLICATIONS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH 99 SUPPORT 129 Grants 130 Financial Overview 134 Donors 135 Sponsors 136 Annual Review 2012 1 2 The John Curtin School of Medical Research FROM THE DIRECTOR Zinkernagel. He will be sadly missed by his many friends and colleagues at the School, who have established the annual Gordon Ada New Investigator Award in his memory. In 2012, we finally completed the long and very necessary redevelopment project that resulted in the new John Curtin School of Medical Research building on the ANU campus. All our staff and students are once again under one roof, carrying out their research in state of the art laboratories and facilities. -
23. Explaining the Results
23. Explaining the Results Antony Green Labor came to office in 2007 with its strongest hold on government in the nation’s history—it was, for the first time, in office nationally and in every state and territory. Six years later Labor left national office with its lowest first preference vote in a century. For only the third time since the First World War, a governing party failed to win a third term in office. From a clean sweep of governments in 2007, by mid-2014 Labor’s last bastions were minority governments in South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory.1 Based on the national two-party-preferred vote, Labor’s 2013 result was less disastrous than previous post-war lows in 1966, 1975, 1977 and 1996. Labor also bettered those four elections on the proportion of House seats won. The two-party-preferred swing of 3.6 percentage points was also small for a change of government election, equal to the swing that defeated the Fraser Government in 1983 but smaller than those suffered by Whitlam in 1975, Keating in 1996 and Howard in 2007. Even over two elections from 2007 to 2013, the two-party- preferred swing of 6.2 percentage points was below that suffered by Labor previously over two elections (1961–66 and 1972–75), and smaller than the swing against the Coalition between 1977 and 1983. By the measure of first preference vote share, the 2013 election was a dreadful result for Labor, its lowest vote share since 1904.2 Labor’s vote share slid from 43.4 per cent in 2007 to 38.0 per cent in 2010 and 33.4 per cent in 2013. -
Additional Estimates 2010-11
Dinner on the occasion of the First Meeting of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament Kirribilli House, Kirribilli, Sydney Sunday, 19 October 2008 Host Mr Francois Heisbourg The Honourable Kevin Rudd MP Commissioner (France) Prime Minister Chairman of the International Institute for Strategic Studies and Geneva Centre for Official Party Security Policy, Special Adviser at the The Honourable Gareth Evans AO QC Foundation pour la Recherche Strategique Co-Chair International Commission on Nuclear Non- General (Ret'd) Jehangir Karamat proliferation and Disarmament Commissioner (Pakistan) and President of the International Crisis Director, Spearhead Research Group Mrs Nilofar Karamat Ms Yoriko Kawaguchi General ((Ret'd) Klaus Naumann Co-Chair Commissioner (Germany) International Commission on Nuclear Non- Member of the International Advisory Board proliferation and Disarmament and member of the World Security Network Foundation of the House of Councillors and Chair of the Liberal Democratic Party Research Dr William Perry Commission on the Environment Commissioner (United States) Professor of Stanford University School of Mr Ali Alatas Engineering and Institute of International Commissioner (Indonesia) Studies Adviser and Special Envoy of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Ambassador Wang Yingfan Mrs Junisa Alatas Commissioner (China) Formerly China's Vice Foreign Minister Dr Alexei Arbatov (1995-2000), China's Ambassador and Commissioner (Russia) Permanent Representative to the United Scholar-in-residence -
What Killed Australian Cinema & Why Is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving?
What Killed Australian Cinema & Why is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving? A Thesis Submitted By Jacob Zvi for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne © Jacob Zvi 2019 Swinburne University of Technology All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. II Abstract In 2004, annual Australian viewership of Australian cinema, regularly averaging below 5%, reached an all-time low of 1.3%. Considering Australia ranks among the top nations in both screens and cinema attendance per capita, and that Australians’ biggest cultural consumption is screen products and multi-media equipment, suggests that Australians love cinema, but refrain from watching their own. Why? During its golden period, 1970-1988, Australian cinema was operating under combined private and government investment, and responsible for critical and commercial successes. However, over the past thirty years, 1988-2018, due to the detrimental role of government film agencies played in binding Australian cinema to government funding, Australian films are perceived as under-developed, low budget, and depressing. Out of hundreds of films produced, and investment of billions of dollars, only a dozen managed to recoup their budget. The thesis demonstrates how ‘Australian national cinema’ discourse helped funding bodies consolidate their power. Australian filmmaking is defined by three ongoing and unresolved frictions: one external and two internal. Friction I debates Australian cinema vs. Australian audience, rejecting Australian cinema’s output, resulting in Frictions II and III, which respectively debate two industry questions: what content is produced? arthouse vs. -
Master Class LETTER from MELBOURNE
LETTER FROM MELBOURNE GovernmentNext Event: Thursday 25 August 2011 Relations Saving you time. A monthly newsletter distilling public policy and government decisions which affect business opportunities in Victoria and beyond. Saving you time. A monthly newsletter distilling public policy and government decisions which affect business opportunities in Australia and beyond. The Windsor Hotel Issue 166 Another Winter Edition master class 28 June to 2 August 2011 “There is nothing more Positioning for Success difficult to carry out nor more doubtful of success, OUR TEAM presents a unique combination of experience and talent nor more dangerous to from multiple perspectives. They share their combined knowledge and handle, than to initiate a skill with participants on how to successfully influence government new order of things” department policy and understand the importance of research and strategy in marketing and selling to government.They enable participants – Machiavelli in THE PRINCE (1513) to understand both the strategic and tactical elements that must fit together in order to bring a desired result. THE LOBBYIST Alistair Urquhart These are very special events; they are an unlikely constellation of political, government and industry expertise that will focus on the Alistair Urquhart is a respected challenge of how to influence government. How often does one hear a and independent public affairs former government Minister, a former Permanent Head of department professional with over 20 years and an experienced ex-bureaucrat interact with a professional lobbyist experience both in Australia and overseas. to discuss how to influence ‘affairs of state?’ THE BUREAUCRAT Doug Connell The change of government in Victoria Doug Connell is a project may bring new opportunities. -
2009 Yearbook, Which Coincides with LV’S Experiencebank 30 20Th Anniversary
Leadership Victoria Yearbook 2009 Our Mission Leadership Victoria LEADERSHIP VICTORIA IS AN INNOVATIVE, INDEPENDENT, NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANISATION DEVELOPING PEOPLE WHO EXERCISE POSITIVE AND ENDURING LEADERSHIP IN AND FOR THE REAL WORLD. Yearbook 2009 Table of Contents Message from the Chairman 6 Message fron the Executive DIrector 8 A Letter to Hugh Williamson 10 Williamson Community Leadership Program 14 WCLP – 2009 Fellows 16 WCLP and the Victorian Bushfire Reconstruction and Recovery Authority 26 Welcome to the Leadership Victoria (LV) WCLP – 2009 Guest Speakers 28 2009 Yearbook, which coincides with LV’s ExperienceBank 30 20th Anniversary. ExperienceBank — 2009 Guest Speakers 37 This publication serves to recognise individuals Praise for ExperienceBank 38 graduating from our Williamson Community SkillsBank 41 Leadership and ExperienceBank programs. Praise for SkillsBank 42 It also highlights some of the achievements Organisations supported by LV 44 made through LV’s community engagement LV Alumni 46 programs: ExperienceBank and SkillsBank. LV Council Members 2009 60 These formal programs help meet the needs LV Alumni Representitive Group of community organisations by matching skilled Convenor’s Report 2009 63 LV Alumni to specific projects, and enabling LV Staff 64 our Alumni to enhance the wellbeing and Our Sponsors 66 development of the broader community. Thank You 67 We warmly welcome the current graduates of the Williamson Community Leadership Program and the 2008 ExperienceBank programs as Alumni of LV. 5 Message from the Chairman Garry Ringwood I am pleased to congratulate and welcome our 2009 is the 20th Anniversary of Leadership Victoria 2009 Alumni — this year’s Williamson Community and while that is significant, this year also marks the Leadership Fellows and ExperienceBank Associates. -
Part 4 Australia Today
Australia today In these pages you will learn about what makes this country so special. You will find out more about our culture, Part 4 our innovators and our national identity. In the world today, Australia is a dynamic business and trade partner and a respected global citizen. We value the contribution of new migrants to our country’s constant growth and renewal. Australia today The land Australia is unique in many ways. Of the world’s seven continents, Australia is the only one to be occupied by a single nation. We have the lowest population density in the world, with only two people per square kilometre. Australia is one of the world’s oldest land masses. It is the sixth largest country in the world. It is also the driest inhabited continent, so in most parts of Australia water is a very precious resource. Much of the land has poor soil, with only 6 per cent suitable for agriculture. The dry inland areas are called ‘the Australia is one of the world’s oldest land masses. outback’. There is great respect for people who live and work in these remote and harsh environments. Many of It is the sixth largest country in the world. them have become part of Australian folklore. Because Australia is such a large country, the climate varies in different parts of the continent. There are tropical regions in the north of Australia and deserts in the centre. Further south, the temperatures can change from cool winters with mountain snow, to heatwaves in summer. In addition to the six states and two mainland territories, the Australian Government also administers, as territories, Ashmore and Cartier Islands, Christmas Island, the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Jervis Bay Territory, the Coral Sea Islands, Heard Island and McDonald Islands in the Australian Antarctic Territory, and Norfolk Island. -
Will the “Real Karina” Please Stand Up!
WILL THE “REAL KARINA” PLEASE STAND UP! CONFESSIONS OF A POLITICAL ACTIVIST. ABALINX 15 JANUARY 2020 PETER ADAMIS I feel compelled to write another point of view regarding the rise and fall of Karina Okotel. The Karina Okotel that I knew is somewhat different from the one I read in the news media of today. I am disappointed to say the least but politics is politics no matter which way matters appear to be. The Abalinx ENewsletter 9 describes in detail what has happened. I remember advising her to hang in there and not to give up. I distinctly remember saying to her, that if she performed well at the pre-selection, she would be considered for higher office in due time. Little did I know that Karina would! Karina’s capacity to meet and greet the Party faithful around the state, and the country, was legendary. At a another time at a function in the electorate of Menzies, I endeavoured to give her some advice to heal the rift that she caused, but as history has demonstrated, she went on to create chaos and disunity. The Liberal party is a broad church and there is room for everyone according to John Howard. Karina must therefore learn to live with the congregation. More recently, highly respected Party stalwarts have observed that Karina Okotel would never have achieved all that she did, without the patronage of powerbroker, and then Party president, Michael Kroger. Now that she is aligned with Scott Ryan and Frank Greenstein, life is going to be interesting. I must add that over the years I have admired the political skills and strategic abilities of Scott Ryan (The General) and that of Frank Greenstein. -
Building a Better Australia: Getting the Best from Our Infrastructure
AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING (ATSE) NUMBER 187 DECEMBER 2014 BUILDING A BETTER AUSTRALIA GETTING THE BEST FROM OUR INFRASTRUCTURE Shaping the way the nation lives, works and moves will depend on getting our infrastructure right – starting now Enhancing Australia’s prosperity through technological innovation The Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (ATSE) ATSE is made up of some of Australia’s leading thinkers in technology and engineering. One of Australia’s four Learned Academies, it’s an eclectic group, drawn from academia, government, industry and research, with a single objective in mind – to apply technology in smart, strategic ways for our social, environmental and economic benefit. To achieve that goal, ATSE has formed a variety of expert, independent forums for discussion and action – platforms to move debate and public policy on issues concerning Australia’s future. These focus on energy, water, health, education, built environment and innovation – and the international collaboration necessary to ensure that Australia is abreast of world trends. It’s an open, transparent approach – one that government, industry and community leaders can trust for technology-led solutions to national and global challenges. Each year, the Australian Government recognises the importance of the work we do by awarding the Academy an establishment grant to help with: n Fostering research and scholarship in Australia’s technological The Australian Academy of Technological sciences and engineering; Sciences and Engineering (ATSE) n 1/1 Bowen Crescent Providing and conducting administrative support, workshops, Melbourne Victoria 3004 forums and similar events to enable the Academy and its Fellows Australia to contribute on important national issues; +613/ (03) 9864 0900 n Managing the development and execution of our programs; and [email protected] n Supporting relationships with international communities. -
Victorian Election 1999
ISSN 1328-7478 © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2010 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2010 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Research Paper No. 19 1999–2000 Victorian Election 1999 Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Group Gerard Newman, Statistics Group 11 April 2000 Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Greg Baker, John Gardiner-Garden, Margaret Healy, Rob Lundie, Cathy Madden, Leanne Manthorpe, Deirdre McKeown, Adrienne Millbank, Derek Woolner, Rose Verspaandonk, Viv Wilson, Geoff Winter and the Victorian Electoral Commission for their assistance in writing this paper. -
Volume 16 AJHR 50 Parliament.Pdf
APPENDIX TO THE JOURNALS OF THE House of Representatives OF NEW ZEALAND 2011–2014 VOL. 16 J—PAPERS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE IN THE REIGN OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND Being the Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand 0110–3407 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND: Published under the authority of the House of Representatives—2015 ARRANGEMENT OF THE PAPERS _______________ I—Reports and proceedings of select committees VOL. 1 Reports of the Education and Science Committee Reports of the Finance and Expenditure Committee Reports of the Government Administration Committee VOL. 2 Reports of the Health Committee Report of the Justice and Electoral Committee Reports of the Māori Affairs Committee Reports of the Social Services Committee Reports of the Officers of Parliament Committee Reports of the Regulations Review Committee VOL. 3 Reports of the Regulations Review Committee Reports of the Privileges Committee Report of the Standing Orders Committee VOL. 4 Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 Estimates VOL. 5 Reports of select committees on the 2013/14 Estimates VOL. 6 Reports of select committees on the 2014/15 Estimates Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 7 Reports of select committees on the 2011/12 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 8 Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Crown entities, public organisations, and State enterprises VOL.