Volume 16 AJHR 50 Parliament.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Let Her Finish: Gender, Sexism, and Deliberative Participation in Australian Senate Estimates Hearings (2006-2015)
Let Her Finish: Gender, Sexism, and Deliberative Participation In Australian Senate Estimates Hearings (2006-2015) Joanna Richards School of Government and Policy Faculty of Business, Government and Law University of Canberra ABSTRACT In 2016, Australia ranks 54th in the world for representation of women in Parliament, with women accounting for only 29% of the House of Representatives, and 39% of the Senate. This inevitably inspires discussion about women in parliament, quotas, and leadership styles. Given the wealth of research which suggests that equal representation does not necessarily guarantee equal treatment, this study focuses on Authoritative representation. That is, the space in between winning a seat and making a difference where components of communication and interaction affect the authority of a speaker.This study combines a Discourse Analysis of the official Hansard transcripts from the Senate Estimates Committee hearings, selected over a 10 year period between 2006 and 2015, with a linguistic ethnography of the Australian Senate to complement results with context. Results show that although female senators and witnesses are certainly in the room, they do not have the same capacity as their male counterparts. Both the access and effectiveness of women in the Senate is limited; not only are they given proportionally less time to speak, but interruption, gate keeping tactics, and the designation of questions significantly different in nature to those directed at men all work to limit female participation in the political domain. As witnesses, empirical measures showed that female testimony was often undermined by senators. Results also showed that female senators and witnesses occasionally adopted masculine styles of communication in an attempt to increase effectiveness in the Senate. -
Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2012
A.2 Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2012 Parliamentary Service Commission Te Komihana O Te Whare Pāremata Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Schedule 2, Clause 11 of the Parliamentary Service Act 2000 About the Parliamentary Service Commission The Parliamentary Service Commission (the Commission) is constituted under the Parliamentary Service Act 2000. The Commission has the following functions: • to advise the Speaker on matters such as the nature and scope of the services to be provided to the House of Representatives and members of Parliament; • recommend criteria governing funding entitlements for parliamentary purposes; • recommend persons who are suitable to be members of the appropriations review committee; • consider and comment on draft reports prepared by the appropriations review committees; and • to appoint members of the Parliamentary Corporation. The Commission may also require the Speaker or General Manager of the Parliamentary Service to report on matters relating to the administration or the exercise of any function, duty, or power under the Parliamentary Service Act 2000. Membership The membership of the Commission is governed under sections 15-18 of the Parliamentary Service Act 2000. Members of the Commission are: • the Speaker, who also chairs the Commission; • the Leader of the House, or a member of Parliament nominated by the Leader of the House; • the Leader of the Opposition, or a member of Parliament nominated by the Leader of the Opposition; • one member for each recognised party that is represented in the House by one or more members; and • an additional member for each recognised party that is represented in the House by 30 or more members (but does not include among its members the Speaker, the Leader of the House, or the Leader of the Opposition). -
2013-13 Annual Report
D EPARTMENT of the H OUSE of R EPRESENTATIVES 2012-13 ANNUAL REPORT © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 ISSN 017-3233 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au. Use of the Coat of Arms The terms under which the Coat of Arms can be used are detailed on the It’s an Honour website at www.itsanhonour.gov.au/coat-arms/index.cfm. Produced by: Department of the House of Representatives Editing and indexing by: Wilton Hanford Hanover Design by: Lisa McDonald Printed by: CanPrint Communications Unless otherwise acknowledged, all photographs in this report were taken by staff of the Department of the House of Representatives. Front cover image: Department of the House of Representatives entrance viewed from the Chinese gardens. The department welcomes your comments on this report. To make a comment, or to request more information, please contact: Serjeant-at-Arms Department of the House of Representatives Canberra ACT 2600 Telephone: +61 2 6277 4444 Facsimile: +61 2 6277 2006 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aph.gov.au/house/dept Web address for report: www.aph.gov.au/house/pubs/ar12-13 iii About this report The Department of the House of The management and accountability Representatives provides services that allow section spells out our approach to corporate the House to fulfil its role as a representative governance, the management of our people and legislative body of the Australian and assets, and our obligations under various Parliament. -
Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times. -
Social Investment Panel Report 2016
The Treasury Budget 2016 Information Release Release Document July 2016 www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/budget/2016 Key to sections of the Official Information Act 1982 under which information has been withheld. Certain information in this document has been withheld under one or more of the following sections of the Official Information Act, as applicable: to prevent prejudice to the security or defence of New Zealand or the [1] 6(a) international relations of the government to prevent prejudice to the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, [4] 6(c) investigation, and detection of offences, and the right to a fair trial to damage seriously the economy of New Zealand by disclosing prematurely [11] decisions to change or continue government economic or financial policies 6(e)(vi) relating to the entering into of overseas trade agreements. [23] to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people 9(2)(a) to protect the commercial position of the person who supplied the information [25] 9(2)(b)(ii) or who is the subject of the information to prevent prejudice to the supply of similar information, or information from the [26] same source, and it is in the public interest that such information should 9(2)(ba)(i) continue to be supplied to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the authority of [27] 9(2)(ba)(ii) any enactment, where the making available of the information - would be likely otherwise -
Hon Hekia Parata Hon John Banks
Hon Hekia Parata Minister of Education Hon John Banks Associate Minister of Education Media Statement Charter School Implementation Group Members Announced Education Minister, Hekia Parata, and Associate Education Minister, John Banks, are glad to announce the appointments for the New Zealand Model of Charter School Development and Implementation Group. “Our focus is unrelentingly on raising achievement, in particular for those groups of students who have historically been under-served by the system,’’ says Ms Parata. “We already have a number of different types of schools operating in New Zealand, such as kura, religious schools, single-sex schools, private schools and co-ed schools. Charter schools are just another option, giving parents and students more freedom to choose the type of education that best suits their learning needs. “The Group will consult with a wide range of people, including the teaching profession, unions, parents, businesses, communities and educational experts from around New Zealand and around the world, to determine what charter school model will work best for New Zealand. I look forward to their findings.’’ The New Zealand Model of Charter School Development and Implementation Group will be led by Wellington businesswoman Catherine Isaac. Ms Isaac has served on a number of Boards including school Boards of Trustees, and was a member of the Welfare Working Group in the previous parliamentary term. Also appointed are former Christchurch Mayor and founder of Discovery 1 and Unlimited Paenga Tawhiti, Vicki Buck, CEO of Te Aho o Te Kura Pounamu - The Correspondence School, Michael Hollings, and Dr Margaret Southwick of Whitireia Community Polytechnic. Founder of Onehunga Business School & Just Water International CEO, Anthony Falkenstein, University of Auckland Director of Alumni Relations and Development, John Taylor, and the Dean of Te Puna Wānaka and the Director of Māori and Pasifika Studies at the Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology, Hana O’Regan complete the Group. -
Australian Electoral Commission Annual
Annual Report 2013–14 Produced by Australian Electoral Commission Printed by CanPrint Communications Pty Ltd Web address annualreport.aec.gov.au/2014 AEC website www.aec.gov.au Feedback and enquiries Feedback on this report is welcome and should be directed to the contact officer. Contact officer Assistant Commissioner, Education & Communications Branch Australian Electoral Commission West Block Offices Queen Victoria Terrace Parkes ACT 2600 PO Box 6172 Kingston ACT 2604 Telephone: 02 6271 4411 Fax: 02 6215 9999 Email: [email protected] Accessible services Visit the AEC website for telephone interpreter services in 18 languages. Readers who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS): – TTY users phone 133 677 and ask for 13 23 26 – Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 – Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 ISSN: 0814–4508 © Commonwealth of Australia 2014 The licence for this work is under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au. The Australian Electoral Commission asserts the right of recognition as author of the original material. The report should be attributed as Australian Electoral Commission Annual Report 2013–14. This report may contain the names and images of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people now deceased. ii Australian Electoral Commission Annual Report 2013–14 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Letter of transmittal iii ABOUT THIS REPORT This report describes AEC activities and services for the financial year ending 30 June 2014. -
Form to Email
To: Bee: Subject: NZ Superannuation Fund enquiry Date: Thursday, 6 December 2012 4: 10:53 PM Attachments: Guardians Final response to Israel petition.pdf Dea . , Thank you for your email via our website. Your comments have been noted and passed on to our Chairman and CEO. I have attached a copy of the Guardians' response to the petition and FYI the Committee's report is available at http://www parliament nz/NR/rdonlyres/60EEA9A7-4218-473F-BCFF- 2347E483EBEB/244228/DBSCH $CR 5595 Petjtjon2008143ofLojsGrjffithsand38 pdf We expect to be in a position to respond more fully to your email next week. In future, please feel free to contact me directly on the details below. Best regards Catherine Etheredge Catherine Etheredge Head of Communications DDI: Mobile: Email: A Great Team Building the Best Portfolio PO Box 106 607, Auckland 1143, New Zealand Level 12, Zurich House, 21 Queen Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand Office: +64 9 300 6980 I Fax: +64 9 300 6981 I Web: www.nzsuperfund.co.nz From: formmail@digitaistream co oz [mailto·formmail@digitaistream co oz] Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2012 2:53 p.m. To: Enquiries Subject: Query from website Form to Email Form to email received the following values Name - Company Optional Phone email from Contact Email me by Website feedback Responsible Investment Query re Responsible Investment Dear NZ Superfund, Please send this message to the Board or at least to the Chair. In September 2011,ex-MP Keith Locke presented a petition to Parliament, ■■■■■I asking for Parliament to ask the Guardians of Superfund to divest ow ve een to t at t e ommerce ommIttee as reJecte e pe 1 I0n. -
Parliamentary Scrutiny of Human Rights in New Zealand (Report)
PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN NEW ZEALAND: GLASS HALF FULL? Prof. Judy McGregor and Prof. Margaret Wilson AUT UNIVERSITY | UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO RESEARCH FUNDED BY THE NEW ZEALAND LAW FOUNDATION Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 Recent Scholarship ..................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 22 Select committee controversy ................................................................................................. 28 Rights-infringing legislation. .................................................................................................... 32 Criminal Records (Expungement of Convictions for Historical Homosexual Offences) Bill. ... 45 Domestic Violence-Victims’ Protection Bill ............................................................................. 60 The Electoral (Integrity) Amendment Bill ................................................................................ 75 Parliamentary scrutiny of human rights in New Zealand: Summary report. .......................... 89 1 Introduction This research is a focused project on one aspect of the parliamentary process. It provides a contextualised account of select committees and their scrutiny of human rights with a particular -
Marchers Back Gay Marriage B7 CLASSIFIED INDEX B7 CROSSWORDS Belle Mayston and Kyasha Robin- HOW MPS VOTED Son Are Young and in Love
A2 NEWS Thursday, August30, 2012 THE PRESS, Christchurch ■ MARITAL RIGHTS » PRESS INFO Marchers back gay marriage B7 CLASSIFIED INDEX B7 CROSSWORDS Belle Mayston and Kyasha Robin- HOW MPS VOTED son are young and in love. B8 FAMILY NOTICES They have been living together B9 SHARE TABLES in Wellington for the past year How your MP voted in the Marriage B8 ENTERTAINMENT and one day, they say, they may (Definition of Marriage) want to get married. Amendment Bill: The couple, aged 20 and 21, FOR: 80 joined the march to Parliament Amy Adams (N); Jacinda Ardern (L); » REGULARS yesterday in favour of Labour MP Chris Auchinvole (N); John Banks (A); Louisa Wall’s Definition of Mar- Maggie Barry (N); Paula Bennett (N); riage Amendment Bill, on which Jackie Blue (N); Steffan Browning News A1-A10 MPs were voting last night. (G); Gerry Brownlee (N); Cam Calder BusinessDay A11-A12 Their families and friends (N); David Carter (N); Charles Editorial/Letters A14 accepted their love, they said, so Chauvel (L); David Clark (L); David Perspective A15 they could see no reason why the Clendon (G); Jonathan Coleman (N); Weather/TV listings A16 Government shouldn’t as well. Judith Collins (N); Clayton Cosgrove World B1, B3, B5-B6 Mayston said the institution of (L); David Cunliffe (L); Clare Curran Sport B13-B14 marriage was as important to gay (L); Lianne Dalziel (L); Jacqui Dean Racing PUNT LIFTOUT couples as it was to heterosexuals. (N); Catherine Delahunty (G); Peter ‘‘Civil union sounds cold. Dunne (UF); Ruth Dyson (L); Kris ‘‘It sounds clinical. It sounds Faafoi (L); Darien Fenton (L); Te PANPA (Australasia & Pacific) Newspaper of the Year 2011, like sort of a business partner- Ururoa Flavell (MP); Craig Foss (N); daily newspapers 25,000 to 90,000 circulation. -
The Ministry of Public Input
The Ministry of Public Input: Report and Recommendations for Practice By Associate Professor Jennifer Lees-Marshment The University of Auckland, New Zealand August 2014 www.lees-marshment.org [email protected] Executive Summary Political leadership is undergoing a profound evolution that changes the role that politicians and the public play in decision making in democracy. Rather than simply waiting for voters to exercise their judgement in elections, political elites now use an increasingly varied range of public input mechanisms including consultation, deliberation, informal meetings, travels out in the field, visits to the frontline and market research to obtain feedback before and after they are elected. Whilst politicians have always solicited public opinion in one form or another, the nature, scale, and purpose of mechanisms that seek citizen involvement in policy making are becoming more diversified and extensive. Government ministers collect different forms of public input at all levels of government, across departments and through their own offices at all stages of the policy process. This expansion and diversification of public input informs and influences our leaders’ decisions, and thus has the potential to strengthen citizen voices within the political system, improve policy outcomes and enhance democracy. However current practice wastes both resources and the hope that public input can enrich democracy. If all the individual public input activities government currently engages in were collated and added up it would demonstrate that a vast amount of money and resources is already spent seeking views from outside government. But it often goes unseen, is uncoordinated, dispersed and unchecked. We need to find a way to ensure this money is spent much more effectively within the realities of government and leadership. -
CESCR, NZ LOIPR, Peace Movement Aotearoa, February 2016
Peace Movement Aotearoa PO Box 9314, Wellington 6141, Aotearoa New Zealand. Tel +64 4 382 8129 Email [email protected] Web site www.converge.org.nz/pma ______________________________________________________________________________ NGO information for the 57th session of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, February 2016 List of Issues Prior to Reporting: New Zealand Overview 1. This preliminary report provides an outline of some issues of concern with regard to the state party's compliance with the provisions of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, the Covenant). Its purpose is to assist the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the Committee) with its preparation of the List of Issues Prior to Reporting (LOIPR) in advance of New Zealand's Fourth Periodic Report (the Periodic Report). 2. There are five main sections below: A. Information on Peace Movement Aotearoa B. Constitutional and legal framework C. Indigenous Peoples’ Rights (Articles 1, 2 and 15) i) Overview, ii) Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, and iii) Impact of the activities of New Zealand companies on indigenous communities overseas. D. Socio-economic conditions (Articles 2, 3, 7, 9 11, and others) i) Increasing levels of child poverty, ii) Right to an adequate standard of living: social welfare / paid employment, iii) Housing crisis, iv) Allocation of public spending E. The Optional Protocol to the Covenant 3. More detailed information will be provided on these and other issues in parallel reports from Peace Movement Aotearoa and other NGOs following the state party’s submission of the Periodic Report next year. Due to time constraints, we have not covered as many issues in this report as we would have liked to, and we therefore refer the Committee to the Human Rights Foundation’s report which covers a range of concerns that we share.