DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Investment Panel Report 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Investment Panel Report 2016 The Treasury Budget 2016 Information Release Release Document July 2016 www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/budget/2016 Key to sections of the Official Information Act 1982 under which information has been withheld. Certain information in this document has been withheld under one or more of the following sections of the Official Information Act, as applicable: to prevent prejudice to the security or defence of New Zealand or the [1] 6(a) international relations of the government to prevent prejudice to the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, [4] 6(c) investigation, and detection of offences, and the right to a fair trial to damage seriously the economy of New Zealand by disclosing prematurely [11] decisions to change or continue government economic or financial policies 6(e)(vi) relating to the entering into of overseas trade agreements. [23] to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people 9(2)(a) to protect the commercial position of the person who supplied the information [25] 9(2)(b)(ii) or who is the subject of the information to prevent prejudice to the supply of similar information, or information from the [26] same source, and it is in the public interest that such information should 9(2)(ba)(i) continue to be supplied to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the authority of [27] 9(2)(ba)(ii) any enactment, where the making available of the information - would be likely otherwise to damage the public interest 29] to avoid prejudice to the substantial economic interests of New Zealand 9(2)(d) to maintain the current constitutional conventions protecting collective and [31] 9(2)(f)(ii) individual ministerial responsibility to maintain the current constitutional conventions protecting the confidentiality [33] 9(2)(f)(iv) of advice tendered by ministers and officials to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank [34] 9(2)(g)(i) expression of opinions [36] to maintain legal professional privilege 9(2)(h) to enable the Crown to carry out commercial activities without disadvantages or [37] 9(2)(i) prejudice [38] to enable the Crown to negotiate without disadvantage or prejudice 9(2)(j) to prevent the disclosure of official information for improper gain or improper [39] 9(2)(k) advantage that the making available of the information requested would be contrary to the [s18(c)(i)] provisions of a specified enactment [40] Not in scope Where information has been withheld, a numbered reference to the applicable section of the Official Information Act has been made, as listed above. For example, a [23] appearing where information has been withheld in a release document refers to section 9(2)(a). In preparing this Information Release, the Treasury has considered the public interest considerations in section 9(1) and section 18 of the Official Information Act. Treasury:3534443v1 Treasury Report: Social Investment Panel Report 2016 Date: 9 March 2016 Report No: T2016/338 File Number: ST-4-9-5 Action Sought Action Sought Deadline Minister of Finance note the Panel’s views on the N/A proposed social sector initiatives as (Hon Bill English) part of Budget 2016 advice Minister for Tertiary Education, note the Panel’s views on the N/A Skills and Employment proposed social sector initiatives as part of Budget 2016 advice (Hon Steven Joyce) Minister for Social Housing note the Panel’s views on the N/A proposed social sector initiatives as (Hon Paula Bennett) part of Budget 2016 advice Minister of Health note the Panel’s views on the N/A proposed social sector initiatives as (Hon Dr Jonathan Coleman) part of Budget 2016 advice Minister of Justice note the Panel’s views on the N/A proposed social sector initiatives as (Hon Amy Adams) part of Budget 2016 advice Minister of Education note the Panel’s views on the N/A proposed social sector initiatives as (Hon Hekia Parata) part of Budget 2016 advice Minister for Social Development note the Panel’s views on the N/A proposed social sector initiatives as (Hon Anne Tolley) part of Budget 2016 advice Minister of Corrections note the Panel’s views on the N/A proposed social sector initiatives as (Hon Judith Collins) part of Budget 2016 advice Treasury:3401472v1 Contact for Telephone Discussion (if required) Name Position Telephone 1st Contact Renata Lodge Analyst 04 917 7022 (wk) 0223253097 (mob) Ben McBride Manager, Health 04 917 6184 (wk) 021-869-450 (wk) [23] Actions for the Minister’s Office Staff (if required) Return the signed report to Treasury. Note any feedback on the quality of the report Enclosure: Yes (Report of the Social Investment Panel 2016:3396241) Page 2 Treasury Report: Social Investment Panel Report 2016 This note accompanies the report of the Social Investment Panel (the Panel) containing their assessment of 25 proposed new social sector initiatives for Budget 2016. Treasury has sought over a number of years, and in a variety of ways, to improve the quality of advice provided to Ministers on the Budget, such as by providing greater contestability or perspectives on advice. Last year, for example, attempts were made to provide the collective perspective of Social Sector Agency Chief Executives on a Social Sector Budget package. For a number of reasons this was not successful. The Panel, drawing partly on the experience of the Capital Investment Panel, was comprised of a range of people from within, and outside government. A list of the members is attached as an appendix in the report. The Panel’s brief was to focus solely on the merits of the proposals in light of the Government’s social investment objectives articulated in the budget strategy cabinet paper, ignoring wider political-economy considerations. From a Treasury perspective the Panel demonstrated a keen ability to get to the nub of the issues being addressed, able to bring an expert, community and sector knowledge to the discussions with agencies beyond the capability of Treasury. The collective view of the Panel was that there were very few proposals that were multi agency and looked to advance the Government’s social investment objectives. The Panel also noted that their involvement may be more beneficial to agencies were they consulted earlier in the process as bids were being developed. The nature and scope of the questions asked by the Panel of the initiatives would be equally applicable to core cost pressure proposals from agencies when considered in the context of their Four Year Plans. We will report back to you as part of the Budget review on how the Social Investment panel could be used in Budget 2017. T2016/338 : Social Investment Panel Report 2016 Page 3 Recommended Action We recommend that you: a note the Panel’s views on the proposed social sector initiatives have been reflected in Treasury’s Budget 2016 advice, and Agree/disagree Minister of Finance b share the Panel’s views with agencies to improve the quality of initiatives over time. Agree/disagree Minister of Finance Ben McBride Manager, Health Hon Bill English Hon Steven Joyce Minister of Finance Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills and Employment Hon Paula Bennett Hon Dr Jonathan Coleman Minister for Social Housing Minister of Health Hon Amy Adams Hon Hekia Parata Minister of Justice Minister of Education Hon Anne Tolley Hon Judith Collins Minister for Social Development Minister of Corrections T2016/338 : Social Investment Panel Report 2016 Page 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 22 – 26 May 2021
    1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 22 – 26 May 2021 Attention: Television New Zealand Contact: (04) 913-3000 Release date: 27 May 2021 Level One 46 Sale Street, Auckland CBD PO Box 33690 Takapuna Auckland 0740 Ph: (09) 919-9200 Level 9, Legal House 101 Lambton Quay PO Box 3622, Wellington 6011 Ph: (04) 913-3000 www.colmarbrunton.co.nz Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of results .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key political events ................................................................ .......................................................................... 4 Question order and wording ............................................................................................................................ 5 Party vote ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Preferred Prime Minister ................................................................................................................................. 8 Public Sector wage freeze .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Transcript of Prime Minister John Key's Speech to the Canterbury Employers' Chamber of Commerce Function, 2Nd July 2015. Good
    A transcript of Prime Minister John Key's speech to the Canterbury Employers' Chamber of Commerce function, 2nd July 2015. Good afternoon. Thank you Peter for that warm welcome and for the Chamber's hosting of this event. It's good to see so many of you here today. Can I start by acknowledging Mayor Lianne Dalziel and other local body representatives from around the region. Just as central government has to make some tough decisions and trade-offs, so too do councils as we work together to rebuild this city. Together, we're making significant progress. Although, of course, there is still much to do. I'd also like to acknowledge my ministerial colleagues Gerry Brownlee, Amy Adams and Nicky Wagner. Gerry has provided strong leadership in overseeing what continues to be one of New Zealand's largest and most complex undertakings. Most recently he has been turning his mind to where we go following the expiry of the special earthquake recovery laws next April. I'll have some more to say about that in a few minutes. As we've said before, the estimated cost of the rebuild is around $40 billion. As a proportion of the economy, this makes it one of the most expensive natural disasters in the developed world. So thanks to all of you here who have worked so hard since the first earthquake in September 2010. I want to start today by talking about the economy and the significant contribution Canterbury makes to it. A strong and growing economy allows us to provide essential public services like hospitals and schools, and support our most vulnerable families.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Trust Inquiry Information Release
    The Treasury Foreign Trust Inquiry Information Release Release Document July 2016 www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/reviews-consultation/foreign-trust-disclosure-rules Key to sections of the Official Information Act 1982 under which information has been withheld. Certain information in this document has been withheld under one or more of the following sections of the Official Information Act, as applicable: to prevent prejudice to the security or defence of New Zealand or the international [1] 6(a) relations of the government [2] to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people 9(2)(a) to maintain the current constitutional conventions protecting the confidentiality of advice [3] 9(2)(f)(iv) tendered by ministers and officials to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression [4] 9(2)(g)(i) of opinions that the making available of the information requested would be contrary to the [5] 18(c)(i) provisions of a specified enactment [the Tax Administration Act 1994] Where information has been withheld, a numbered reference to the applicable section of the Official Information Act has been made, as listed above. For example, a [2] appearing where information has been withheld in a release document refers to section 9(2)(a). In preparing this Information Release, the Treasury has considered the public interest considerations in section 9 and section 18 of the Official Information Act. Treasury:3534443v1 From: Jessica Rowe <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, 14 April 2016 12:59
    [Show full text]
  • China's Political Influence Activities Under Xi Jinping Professor
    Magic Weapons: China's political influence activities under Xi Jinping Professor Anne-Marie Brady Global Fellow, Wilson Center, Washington, DC; Department of Political Science and International Relations University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand In September 2014 Xi Jinping gave a speech on the importance of united front work— political influence activities—calling it one of the CCP’s “magic weapons”. The Chinese government’s foreign influence activities have accelerated under Xi. China’s foreign influence activities have the potential to undermine the sovereignty and integrity of the political system of targeted states. Conference paper presented at the conference on “The corrosion of democracy under China’s global influence,” supported by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, and hosted in Arlington, Virginia, USA, September 16-17, 2017. Key points: • CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping is leading an accelerated expansion of political influence activities worldwide. • The expansion of these activities is connected to both the CCP government’s domestic pressures and foreign agenda. • The paper creates a template of the policies and modes of China’s expanded foreign influence activities in the Xi era. • The paper uses this template to examine the extent to which one representative small state, New Zealand, is being targeted by China’s new influence agenda. Executive Summary In June 2017 the New York Times and The Economist featured stories on China's political influence in Australia. The New York Times headline asked "Are Australia's Politics too Easy to Corrupt?,"1 while The Economist sarcastically referred to China as the "Meddle Country."2 The two articles were reacting to an investigation by Fairfax Media and ABC into the extent of China's political interference in Australia,3 that built on internal enquiries into the same issue by ASIO and Australia's Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet in 2015 and 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon Bill English Minister of Finance
    Hon Bill English Minister of Finance Speech to the Auckland Chamber of Commerce and Massey University Building Our Economic Opportunity Embargoed until 12.30pm Thursday February 17 2011 1 Good afternoon and thank you to the Auckland Chamber of Commerce and Massey University for inviting me back to speak to you this year. A lot has happened since I was at this forum 12 months ago. Throughout 2010, aftershocks from the global financial crisis continued to ripple around the world. Today I’m going to talk about what we are doing to equip New Zealand for this changed world. First, the end goal is one we can all agree on. We’d all like to see our economy growing at a strong, sustainable pace, creating new jobs, and supporting all the things Kiwis are good at. Who’s to say what we’re actually capable of? The sky is the limit. But more objectively, we can set a minimum standard of what the economy ought to achieve simply by looking at what we’ve managed in the recent past. Between 1989 and 2005, over a 17-year period, on average the New Zealand economy: • Grew GDP by over 3 per cent per year • Expanded export volumes by over 5 per cent a year • And created 32,000 jobs a year We did this despite one world recession, two Gulf wars, the Asian crisis, tech wreck and various other setbacks. Government finances improved steadily through this period. Why did we perform so well? Put simply, we did it because the economy was competitive.
    [Show full text]
  • National Party Spokesperson Allocations July 2020
    National Party Spokesperson Allocations July 2020 Spokesperson for Hon Judith Collins National Security Leader Hon Gerry Brownlee NZSIS Deputy Leader GCSB Covid-19 Border Response Hon Paul Goldsmith Finance Earthquake Commission Hon Simon Bridges Foreign Affairs Justice Dr Shane Reti Health Hon Todd McClay Economic Development Tourism Chris Bishop Infrastructure Transport Shadow Leader of the House Todd Muller Trade Hon Louise Upston Social Development Social Investment Hon Scott Simpson Environment Climate Change Planning (RMA reform) Hon David Bennett Agriculture Hon Michael Woodhouse Regional Economic Development Pike River re-entry Deputy Shadow Leader of the House Nicola Willis Education Early Childhood Education Hon Jacqui Dean Housing and Urban Development Conservation Hon Mark Mitchell Defence & Disarmament Sport & Recreation Melissa Lee Broadcasting Communications and Digital Media Data and Cyber-security Andrew Bayly Revenue Commerce State-Owned Enterprises Associate Finance Small Business and Manufacturing Hon. Dr Nick Smith State Services Electoral Law Reform Drug Reform Hon Alfred Ngaro Pacific Peoples Community and Voluntary Children and Disability Issues Barbara Kuriger Senior Whip Food Safety Rural Communities Women Harete Hipango Shadow Attorney-General Crown-Maori Relations and Treaty Negotiations Māori Tourism Jonathan Young Energy & Resources Arts Culture and Heritage Hon Tim MacIndoe ACC Skills and Employment Seniors Civil Defence Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi Ethnic Communities Associate Justice Matt Doocey Junior Whip Mental
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Agenda for Constitutional Reform
    UCL DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Constitution Unit Department of Political Science UniversityThe Constitution College London Unit 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU phone: 020 7679 4977 fax: 020 7679 4978 The Conservative email: [email protected] www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit A genda for Constitutional The Constitution Unit at UCL is the UK’s foremost independent research body on constitutional change. It is part of the UCL School of Public Policy. THE CONSERVATIVE Robert Hazell founded the Constitution Unit in 1995 to do detailed research and planning on constitutional reform in the UK. The Unit has done work on every aspect AGENDA of the UK’s constitutional reform programme: devolution in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the English regions, reform of the House of Lords, electoral reform, R parliamentary reform, the new Supreme Court, the conduct of referendums, freedom eform Prof FOR CONSTITUTIONAL of information, the Human Rights Act. The Unit is the only body in the UK to cover the whole of the constitutional reform agenda. REFORM The Unit conducts academic research on current or future policy issues, often in collaboration with other universities and partners from overseas. We organise regular R programmes of seminars and conferences. We do consultancy work for government obert and other public bodies. We act as special advisers to government departments and H parliamentary committees. We work closely with government, parliament and the azell judiciary. All our work has a sharply practical focus, is concise and clearly written, timely and relevant to policy makers and practitioners. The Unit has always been multi disciplinary, with academic researchers drawn mainly from politics and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon Hekia Parata Hon John Banks
    Hon Hekia Parata Minister of Education Hon John Banks Associate Minister of Education Media Statement Charter School Implementation Group Members Announced Education Minister, Hekia Parata, and Associate Education Minister, John Banks, are glad to announce the appointments for the New Zealand Model of Charter School Development and Implementation Group. “Our focus is unrelentingly on raising achievement, in particular for those groups of students who have historically been under-served by the system,’’ says Ms Parata. “We already have a number of different types of schools operating in New Zealand, such as kura, religious schools, single-sex schools, private schools and co-ed schools. Charter schools are just another option, giving parents and students more freedom to choose the type of education that best suits their learning needs. “The Group will consult with a wide range of people, including the teaching profession, unions, parents, businesses, communities and educational experts from around New Zealand and around the world, to determine what charter school model will work best for New Zealand. I look forward to their findings.’’ The New Zealand Model of Charter School Development and Implementation Group will be led by Wellington businesswoman Catherine Isaac. Ms Isaac has served on a number of Boards including school Boards of Trustees, and was a member of the Welfare Working Group in the previous parliamentary term. Also appointed are former Christchurch Mayor and founder of Discovery 1 and Unlimited Paenga Tawhiti, Vicki Buck, CEO of Te Aho o Te Kura Pounamu - The Correspondence School, Michael Hollings, and Dr Margaret Southwick of Whitireia Community Polytechnic. Founder of Onehunga Business School & Just Water International CEO, Anthony Falkenstein, University of Auckland Director of Alumni Relations and Development, John Taylor, and the Dean of Te Puna Wānaka and the Director of Māori and Pasifika Studies at the Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology, Hana O’Regan complete the Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions for Education Renewal in Greater Christchurch AUGUST 2012
    SHAPING EDUCATION TE TĀREINGA MĀTAURANGA Directions for Education Renewal in Greater Christchurch AUGUST 2012 Opportunity plus innovation to enhance education across greater Christchurch Ma te angitu hou ka whakareihia te Ma-tauranga ki Waitaha wha-nui ‘Greater Christchurch’ comprises Christchurch City and Waimakariri and Selwyn districts Ministerial welcome E te tipua whakairo a Aorangi maunga, tū toka mai rā i runga i te The Canterbury earthquakes changed the landscape in Christchurch, āhuatanga o ngā aituā Waimakariri and Selwyn (greater Christchurch), and caused immense huhua. Whārikihia tōu loss and disruption for the community. korowai haumaru, ko te The extent of damage to early childhood education centres, schools and tertiary facilities, and the ensuing relocation of people, means manawarū o Ruaumoko kia we cannot restore the education network to its previous state. ārikarika, mauru noa. Kia What we can do is renew the network to meet changing community needs, and embrace opportunity and innovation to achieve better mārakerake te huarahi mo educational outcomes. Waitaha. O mātou koingo In this way we can address issues impacting educational o mātou nako, hikihikitia, performance prior to the earthquakes, and position greater Christchurch as a future leader in teaching and learning practice. hapahapainga, tau ai e, tau Renewal is about achieving multiple outcomes - for the young ai e! E ngā mana, e ngā reo, people of greater Christchurch, their families, whānau, and local e ngā kārangarangatanga communities, but also for Canterbury and New Zealand. maha, tēnā koutou, tēnā We need to plan for these outcomes in a fl uid environment and achieve them in a cost-eff ective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Lusk's Plan
    CHAPTER 5 SIMON LUSK’S PLAN Simon Lusk had been watching US Republican politics for years and looking for ideas that were applicable to New Zealand. Gradually he put together a plan to move the country’s politics to the right. He laid this out in conver- sations with his close political allies and in a three-page strategy paper that was never intended to be made public. The plan was practical and methodical. The idea was to target candidate selection processes in safe National seats, installing a rump of hard right candi- dates who would influence politics for many years to come. Suitable candidates could also be found and trained for local government elections. At the same time, a pool of younger people would be identified, cultivated and guided into right-wing politics. Each of these groups would be managed and supported by professional strategy advisers, notably Lusk himself. Such figures were familiar in US politics but not in New Zealand. Lusk was also well aware, from his American observations, that the single greatest advantage of right-wing parties and candidates was their ability to greatly outspend their opponents with support from wealthy and corporate donors. Fundraising was central to the plan. Next, the right could dominate the media by the dominance of right-wing blogs: ‘the right currently controls the blogosphere,’ he wrote, ‘and political journalists repeat much of what appears on blogs.’ The blogs were part of the second track of politics available for ‘black ops’ and nega- tive campaigning. Finally, his plan involved ‘weakening the power of those who believe in big government’, meaning deliberate strategies and tactics to margin- alise anyone, even within the National Party itself, who did not hold hard right views.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Minute EGI Min (10) 5/1: Increasing Tourism's Performance
    Cabinet Economic Growth EGI Min (10) 5/1 and Infrastructure Copy No: Committee Minute of Decision This document contains information for the New Zealand Cabinet. It must be treated in confidence and handled in accordance with any security classification, or other endorsement. The information can only be released, including under the Official Information Act 1982, by persons with the appropriate authority. Increasing Tourism's Performance Through Marketing Portfolio: Tourism On 24 March 2010, the Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee: 1 noted that in August 2009, Cabinet: 1.1 noted that the government’s priority for tourism is to increase tourism’s contribution to the New Zealand economy, in particular to increase productivity and the return from each visitor; 1.2 approved an increase in funding in 2009/10 for Tourism New Zealand for destination marketing and a joint venture partnerships marketing programme; 1.3 noted that the Minister of Tourism would be directing the Tourism New Zealand Board to develop a three-year marketing strategy, which reflects the additional funding; 1.4 [deleted – confidentiality of advice]; [CAB Min (09) 30/6A] 2 noted that the current level of investment in destination marketing does not allow Tourism New Zealand to aggressively pursue opportunities in major existing and emerging markets; 3 3.1 noted that Tourism New Zealand has completed a full review of its marketing portfolio, and has developed a three-year strategy focusing on more targeted and conversion-based activity across key and certain
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Design and Māori Development in Aotearoa New Zealand
    Accounting for Diversity: Policy Design and Māori Development in Aotearoa New Zealand Prepared by Dena Ringold With funding from the sponsors of the Ian Axford Fellowship in Public Policy July 2005 © Fulbright New Zealand 2005 ISBN 0-437-10213-7 i The Ian Axford Fellowships in Public Policy We acknowledge and thank the following corporate and government sponsors that support the programme: • ERMA New Zealand • LEK Consulting • The Department of Internal Affairs • The Department of Labour • The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet • The Ministry for the Environment • The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry • The Ministry of Economic Development • The Ministry of Education • The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade • The Ministry of Health • The Ministry of Justice • The Ministry of Research, Science and Technology • The Ministry of Social Development • The State Services Commission • The Treasury The Ian Axford Fellowships were named in honour of Sir Ian Axford, a New Zealand astrophysicist and space scientist. Since his education in New Zealand, England and later at Cornell University and the University of California, Sir Ian has been closely involved in the planning of several space missions, notably the Voyager probes to the outer planets. Since 1974, Sir Ian has been director of the Max Planck Institute of Aeronomy in Germany. He is the recipient of many notable science awards and was named “New Zealander of the Year” for 1995. In the world of space science, Sir Ian has emerged as one of the great thinkers and communicators, and a highly respected and influential administrator. Currently, he is working to create the first mission to interstellar space with the Voyager spacecraft.
    [Show full text]