A Toolbox Within a Toolbox a Diversity of Tolling Business Models Offers a Wider Toolbox of Highway Finance Options, As the IBTTA’S Patrick Jones Explains

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Toolbox Within a Toolbox a Diversity of Tolling Business Models Offers a Wider Toolbox of Highway Finance Options, As the IBTTA’S Patrick Jones Explains Charging & Tolling A toolbox within a toolbox A diversity of tolling business models offers a wider toolbox of highway finance options, as the IBTTA’s Patrick Jones explains. he business models for America’s tolled high- The design of the road reflected the philosophy of the time, with ways have gone through several different evo- President Dwight D. Eisenhower leading the charge for an integrated lutions over the last 75 years, reflecting a suc- highway network that would facilitate the flow of goods and people, cession of shifts in transportation policy and serving as the backbone for a stronger economy. politics, financing and funding models, urban “The ceaseless flow of information throughout the Republic is T patterns, customer needs, and technology. matched by individual and commercial movement over a vast system And with more and more decision-makers of interconnected highways crisscrossing the country,” Eisenhower expressing renewed interest in tolling, it’s that said in February 1955. “Together, the united forces of our communi- very diversity that makes it so easy for the industry to present itself as cation and transportation systems are dynamic elements in the very a practical solution to the transportation infrastructure funding crisis. name we bear — United States. Without them, we would be a mere User financing is often described as alliance of many separate parts.” one important part of the wider toolbox Consistent with this grand vision, agen- of highway funding options. But a closer cies received monopoly authority to build big look reveals that tolling is actually a toolbox routes and big institutions, with a large work within a toolbox, offering at least four dis- force to collect tolls and maintain the roads. tinct models that developed in response to It was an all-important milestone. But different local or regional circumstances. the original toll roads bore little resemblance “A rural road in Pennsylvania, a com- to the business models that followed. muter highway in Atlanta, and a freight gateway in New York all have different Following the demographics characteristics, challenges, and needs, and From the 1970s through 2000, metropoli- it would make no sense to try to impose a tan areas saw the need to build circumferen- one-size-fits-all solution on such a diverse tial, urban arterial roads to serve a growing transportation system,” says Rob Horr, population. The Orlando-Orange County president of the International Bridge, Tun- Expressway Authority, the Miami-Dade nel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA) and Expressway Authority, the North Texas executive director of the Thousand Islands Tollway Authority, and the E-470 toll road Bridge Authority. in Denver were among the special-purpose “The good news is that each of those authorities set up by local entities to relieve roads can look to the tolling industry for a specific pressure points across the system. different business model that might be right E-470 is a partial ring road around Den- for them, which means the decision on ver, and an interesting example of a consor- whether and how to toll in the United States tium formed by five suburban counties — not is best left to local and state governments, the city, and not the state. Today, the E-470 with a blessing, but not a mandate, from the connects with the Northwest Parkway, a federal government.” Patrick Jones, 75-mile-per-hour toll road concession that executive director serves two adjacent counties. This county- Where it all began and CEO of the based model has become more common The golden age of tolling in the US dates International Bridge, over the last two decades where local and Tunnel and Turnpike back more than three-quarters of a century. Association (IBTTA) regional authorities have proven very suc- The 1930s to 1950s were the era of the cessful in building local public support. cross-state toll roads like the Pennsylvania This experience reflects the axiom that Turnpike, the Kansas Turnpike, the Ohio Turnpike, the Maine Turn- all tolling, like all politics, is ultimately local — that the need to toll pike, the New York State Thruway, and the New Jersey Turnpike. depends on local circumstances, and the ability to introduce a toll These rural, Interstate-type highways were built by toll authorities road depends on local assent. Toll authorities can earn wide public under state charters and funded by bond issues. Opened in 1940, support and understanding when customers can see that the tolls that the Pennsylvania Turnpike was the first “modern” toll road, and sev- they pay fund improvements to the roads they drive. eral other roads predate the establishment of the Interstate highway That connection is most obvious when an agency has a focused system in 1956. mandate in a limited geographic area. But larger agencies like the 44 ITS International March/April 2013 www.itsinternational.com - updated content every working day Charging & Tolling New Jersey Turnpike Authority and the Illinois Tollway have earned strong public support for toll increases by linking the “The decision on measures to individual roads and specific local conditions. whether and how to toll in the United Congestion relief A more recent trend is to increase capac- States is best left ity by introducing “priced” managed lanes. Interstate 25 in Denver, Interstate 394 in to local and state Minnesota, and Interstate 95 in Florida all governments, with feature high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes that have been converted to high-occupancy a blessing, but toll (HOT) lanes that allow single-occupant vehicles to use the lanes for a fee, while not a mandate, still offering free or reduced-price access for HOVs. from the federal Consultant Larry Yermack, president of government” Wendover Consult, sees this uptick in state department of transportation involvement Rob Horr as the most significant new trend in tolling. “The state DOTs are interested in toll- ing because they don’t have any money,” he wrote. “It’s been nothing but reductions in transportation funding, and nothing on the horizon to suggest that streamlined its management, eventually rebuilt it, then used that asset we will ever return to the previous levels of funding,” so the stage is as an anchor for further development. set for creative solutions. “Either the money comes from somewhere The vision is less grand, more metropolitan than Eisenhower’s or the states reduce the size of their programs, which isn’t a very original plan for the Interstate system, but in its time and context, it good idea. So they’re going to want to make up the revenue. There’s works. In a recent news article in the Austin American-Statesman, clear interest in tolling at many levels of government.” the agency earned praise for running a lean, efficient, stable opera- The state agencies don’t necessarily think of managed lanes as tion. toll roads, but all-electronic tolling (AET) is the gateway that enables Georgia’s State Road and Tollway Authority (SRTA) was estab- them to manage congestion through dynamic or time-of-day pricing. lished to operate a few miles of urban highway, but legislators eventu- A shining example in this generation of regional tolling agency, ally expanded its charter to cover the entire state. SRTA’s history the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority (CTRMA), celebrates and focus make it much more amenable to coordinating or even its tenth anniversary this fall, with two toll roads open and nearly $1 underwriting public transit, an expectation that doesn’t always sit well billion in assets. In contrast to more established agencies that formed with more traditional agencies with a fixed focus on the construction around large, iconic highways, CTRMA took over an existing road, and operation of a roadway, bridge, or tunnel. www.itsinternational.com - updated content every working day ITS International March/April 2013 45 Charging & Tolling Public-Private Partnerships profile of a toll agency and to expand tolling The US has seen some private toll road into non-toll states.” development, although it has not been “There’s clear But Yermack said the ability of US public widespread. The 91 Express Lanes were interest in tolling agencies to borrow funds under tax-exempt developed by a private consortium, sold to debt drives public-private partnerships to- Cofiroute USA, a wholly-owned subsidiary at many levels ward the status of “niche business.” Private of Cofiroute, SA of France, and then sold concessionaires often make a convincing back to the local agency, the Orange of government” case that they can get the job done faster, County Transportation Authority. Segments better, and cheaper. But “they’re competing of the Trans-Texas Corridor were built by Larry Yermack with people who already have the authority Cintra US, a private developer/operator to do it themselves, so it’s a hard argument that joined the state in a 50-year strategic to win.” partnership under Comprehensive Develop- ment Agreement legislation. Abertis recently Competition inked a deal to reconstruct and operate the or interdependence? majority of Puerto Rico’s toll roads. At first glance, the new generation of nimble, Bob Poole, director of transportation focused, all-electronic toll operations might policy at the Reason Foundation, sees the appear to be a counterpoint to the more introduction of long-term toll concessions as established, state-wide business models. The the most important long-term tolling trend transition is often reflected in the organisa- in the last 15 years in the United States. For tion charts of the engineering and consulting both “brownfield” and “greenfield” sites, the firms that serve the tolling industry: while model involves private firms in toll road de- the tolling divisions emphasise roadway man- sign, finance, construction, operation, and agement and highway infrastructure, the ITS maintenance.
Recommended publications
  • Adopted Text
    THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Amendment No. 2017-28 Adopted November 17, 2020 AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (2017 EDITION) The following changes to the Comprehensive Plan have adopted by the Board of Supervisors. To identify changes from the previously adopted Plan, new text is shown with underline and deleted text shown with strikethrough. MODIFY: Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2017 Edition, Area III, Fairfax Center Area, as amended through 7-31-2018, Fairfax Center Area-Wide Recommendations, page 8, to delete strikethrough text: “The core area near the first Metrorail station is planned for a mix of uses at a variety of intensities, some of which are tied to the funding of the Metrorail extension, or in the interim, funding of a Bus Rapid Transit System. Any development or redevelopment occurring prior to the funding of the Metrorail extension should not preclude higher-intensity transit-oriented development that is envisioned in the future. …” MODIFY: Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2017 Edition, Area III, Fairfax Center Area, Amended through 7-31-2018, Land Use Plan Recommendations – Suburban Center Core Area, Land Unit A, Land Use Recommendations, page 37: “Sub-unit A1 Baseline: Mixed use up to .15 FAR Overlay: Mixed use up to .65 FAR; 1.0 FAR Sub-unit A1 consists of approximately 133 acres, including a 109.5-acre portion that and contains the Fair Oaks regional mall Regional Mall at its center (“Mall Property” or “Mall”), as shown on Figure 11. and several Several office buildings, and hotels, and other commercial uses around its the perimeter of the Mall Property occupy the approximately 24-acre remainder of the sub-unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase II Highway Corridor Strategy Descriptions Technical
    ENTRAL ORK OUNTY ONNECTIONS TUDY CENTRAL YORK COUNTY CONNECTIONS STUDY PHASE II HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STRATEGY DESCRIPTIONS PHASE II TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM SEPTEMBER 2011 Prepared for: Maine Department Maine Turnpike Authority of Transportation Prepared by: In association with: Morris Communications • Kevin Hooper Associates T.Y. Lin • Planning Decisions • Facet Decision Systems Dr. Charles Colgan, University of Southern Maine • Evan Richert Normandeau Associates • Preservation Company This document is formatted for two-sided printing. Document II-4 ENTRAL ORK OUNTY ONNECTIONS TUDY CENTRAL YORK COUNTY CONNECTIONS STUDY 1 INTRODUCTION This document summarizes the potential highway corridor improvements – called strategies – that are being tested and evaluated for Phase II of the Central York County Connections Study (CYCCS). Phase II Highway Strategies are a starting point in the development and consideration of candidate improvements for the study; they are not recommendations, nor are they the only strategies that will be studied. Phase II strategies are conceptual in nature, and not yet detailed, specific proposals. Strategies considered later in the study during Phase III, as well as those ultimately recommended by the study, may differ considerably from the initial strategies currently under evaluation in Phase II. Specific aspects of these initially proposed strategies may be dropped, carried forward or combined in different ways, depending on the results of the analyses conducted during Phase II. The study is guided by a Purpose and Need Statement, which articulates that the study is to identify transportation and related land use strategies that enhance economic development opportunities and preserve and improve the regional transportation system. Additional information on the study, including the full Purpose and Need Statement, is available at the project website: www.connectingyorkcounty.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline Business Case
    West of England - Outline Business Case Project Title: A4174/Wraxall Road Roundabout Signal Scheme Project Owner: Richard Gillingham, South Gloucestershire Council Promoter and partners: South Gloucestershire Council Description of Intervention: Wraxall Road Roundabout is located on the A4174 Avon Ring Road in South Gloucestershire south- east of Kingswood and north-west of Cadbury Heath (see below). The northern and southern arms of the roundabout are the dual carriageway A4174. The side-road arms of Wraxall Road Roundabout are Wraxall Road to the west and Tower Lane to the east. A4174/Wraxall Road Roundabout To the north the A4174 continues through the A420 Roundabout that provides access to Kingswood and forms a major arterial route into Bristol. Further north the A4174 continues through the East Fringe to the M32 and the A38 beyond that to the west. The A4174 terminates some 3.6km to the south at Hicks Gate Roundabout at the intersection between the A4174 and the A4 with the latter providing a key strategic route into Brislington and Bristol, to the west, and towards Bath in the east. Wraxall Road Roundabout currently experiences congestion with delays mainly on the side-road arms during the weekday morning peak period of nearly 30 seconds according to journey time data, and delays of over a minute on most approaches during the weekday evening peak period. Delays on the A4174 southbound approach are nearly one and half minutes during this period. There are a number of development sites in the North and East Fringe that are either committed or in the planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • A6120 Outer Ring Road Improvements Roundhay Park Lane
    A6120 Outer Ring Road Improvements Roundhay Park Lane Sub-carriageway ducts to be installed off-peak under single lane closures. Wherever possible, where multiple ducts e.g.. Street lighting and UTMC cross adjacent these will be installed under the same closure , in a combined trench where possible or by separate resources when there is sufficient safe ty zone between them. Main drainage crossings also installed – Not shown for clarity Drawing Title Notes UTMC duct crossing Drawing Number E17015/SK/PH-1B/1 Rev 0 Outline Phasing Plan Enabling Works – Off peak Street lighting duct crossing Issue Date 01/10/2018 NPG Diversion duct crossing Drawn By Rob Evans A6120 Outer Ring Road Improvements Roundhay Park Lane Pedestrian route to be maintained Pedestrian route to be maintained by constructing verge half and half. by constructing verge half and half. Pedestrian route diverted into Pedestrian route diverted into carriageway within TM off-peak carriageway within TM off-peak when works dictate access is when works dictate access is required to full width of verge. required to full width of verge. Pedestrian routes to be maintained on existing footway which is to be re-surfaced only. Pedestrian route to be moved on to carriageway within TM off-peak to facilitate surfacing operations. Drawing Title Key Under Construction TM Limit Drawing Number E17015/SK/PH-1B/2 Rev 0 Outline Phasing Plan Stage 1 – – Peak Time Arrangement Completed Traffic Movement Issue Date 01/10/2018 Temporary Surfacing Pedestrian Route Drawn By Rob Evans A6120 Outer Ring Road Improvements Roundhay Park Lane Pedestrian route to be maintained Pedestrian route to be maintained by constructing verge half and half.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomic Functions Implemented in Existing ITS
    EU EIP SA42 Task 4 Autonomic functions implemented in existing ITS Version: 3.2 Date: 22 December 2016 http://www.its-platform.eu Document Information Authors Name Organisation Mihai Niculescu ITS Romania Florin Nemtanu ITS Romania Jacqueline Barr IBI Group Risto Kulmala Finnish Traffic Agency Jessica Rausch Hessen Mobil Ana Blanco DGT Gema Garcia ICEACSA Merja Penttinen VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Peter McGillion Transport Scotland Distribution Date Version Dissemination 29 June 2016 0.2 Internal 21 September 2016 1.3 Internal 17 November 2016 2.0 Internal 09 December 2016 3.0 Internal 19 December 2016 3.1 Internal 22 December 2016 3.2 Public EU EIP SA42, Deliverable 1 EU EIP EU EIP A42/2016/N°1 2/93 Preface This document is elaborated in the framework of Sub-activity 4.2 – Facilitating Automated Driving of the EU EIP project and represents the first deliverable of Task 4 – Automatic road side ITS systems/Automation of road operator ITS. The Sub-activity 4.2 is divided in several tasks: 0. Task management. 1. Identification of requirements. 2. Impacts and economic feasibility. 3. Road map and action plan. 4. Automation of road operator ITS. 5. Monitoring, liaison, dissemination. Task 4 will identify the requirements of automating the road operators´ ITS systems to facilitate automated vehicle – infrastructure integration. This includes the road side ITS systems with properties like: self-maintenance, self-optimisation, self-management, self- healing fully or partly based on specific needs. Secondly, the task will identify good and avoidable practices in implementing automatic functions on road side and traffic centre systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadway &Traffic Operations Strategy
    ESTABLISHING MULTI-MODAL STRATEGIES | CHAPTER 4 ROADWAY & TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STRATEGY To serve planned growth, the future transportation system needs multi-modal improvements and strategies to manage the forecasted travel demand. This chapter presents a detailed strategy to improve Moscow’s roadway network and traffic operations over the next 20 years, including network connectivity options, regional circulation enhancements, intersection modifications, and multi-modal street design guidelines. MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN This page intentionally left blank. Moscow on the Move 4 ROADWAY & TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STRATEGY Supporting the guiding principles of Moscow on the Move, the Roadway & This Transportation Traffic Operations Strategy strives to provide a truly multi-modal Commission “check mark” icon signifies transportation system and improve safety, access, and mobility for all street which actions have unanimous users by identifying strategies, policies, and projects that help achieve support from the Commission. Moscow’s vision for mobility and access. This strategy of Moscow on the Move The icon is a way to illustrate the level of support for identifies opportunities to retrofit existing streets in Moscow and develops the implementation. street grid to improve citywide connectivity for motor vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. This strategy specifically provides an overview of the existing traffic conditions and how conditions might change by 2035, a street network plan, various design tools that could be applied throughout the city, and descriptions of recommended street projects. FUTURE DEFICIENCIES AND NEEDS Existing and future roadway and traffic operation conditions were assessed to determine the needs and deficiencies of the system. The key areas projected to require improvement or to present future challenges are summarized below.
    [Show full text]
  • Study for the Ring Roads
    Intelligent Transportation Systems Study for the Edmonton and Calgary Ring Roads Terms of Reference Highway Policy and Planning Branch 3rd Floor, 4999-98 Avenue Edmonton, AB T6B 2X3 March 1, 2004 Background Alberta Transportation has developed a strategic vision for implementing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) to improve the safety, capacity, and efficiency of the provincial transportation system. The ITS Strategic Plan, dated September 2000, provides a vision for the future of ITS in Alberta’s provincial highway system and outlines strategies for Alberta Transportation to develop and deploy these technologies. The ring roads in the cities of Edmonton and Calgary are top priority projects in Alberta, and they are integral components of the Trans-Canada Highway and the Trans-Canada Highway Yellowhead Route through the province. Deployment of ITS technologies will further enhance the safe and efficient operation of the ring roads in the two cities. Edmonton Ring Road – Anthony Henday Drive A major part of the Edmonton ring road, also known as Anthony Henday Drive (AHD), is located inside the city limits of Edmonton. By agreement with the City, Alberta Transportation is responsible for funding and developing AHD. AHD is part of Alberta Transportation’s initiative to provide a high standard highway trade corridor linking Alberta to the United States and Mexico. In addition, the roadway forms an important part of Edmonton’s overall transportation system and is included in the City’s Transportation Master Plan, which addresses future transportation needs to the year 2020. Growth in the Edmonton metropolitan area will reach a population of 1.17 million by 2020 with significant traffic growth at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • PR Colas Canada
    PRESS RELEASE Boulogne, May 29, 2017 Two Colas Canada companies secure 300 million CAD in contracts for the construction and maintenance of the Southwest Calgary Ring Road in Alberta The Southwest Calgary Ring Road (SWCRR) Project, a PPP awarded to Mountain View Partners (MVP) 1, involves the construction and maintenance of 31 km of 6- to 8-lane highway, 14 interchanges, 47 bridges and a tunnel. Alberta Highway Services Ltd (AHSL), a Colas Canada company and subconsultant to the MVP consortium, has secured the maintenance contract for the section under construction. The contract, which will run up to 2051, amounts to 204 million Canadian dollars². AHSL is renowned for its expertise, boasting 22 years of experience on a number of maintenance and winter maintenance contracts involving roads and highways throughout the province of Alberta. Standard General Calgary, another Colas Canada company that has been a leader in road construction in the city of Calgary for more than 75 years, was contracted by the Design and Build Consortium of KGL Constructors 1 to manufacture and apply all the asphalt concrete required by the project, i.e., some one million tons, for a total of 95 million Canadian dollars. The work has started, with completion scheduled for October 2021. ¹ Mountain View Partners is a consortium comprising: Kiewit Mountain View Partners Investors Inc., Meridiam Infrastructure Mountain View ULC, CC&L MVP Holdings Ltd, LMVP Limited Partnership. KGL Constructors is a consortium comprising: Kiewit Management Co., Graham Infrastructure LP, Ledcor CMI Ltd. Operations Period Maintenance performed by: Alberta Highway Services Ltd., a Colas Canada Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Impact and Access Study, Sherwood Plaza South (SPS) – Phased Master Plan Redevelopment, Natick, Massachusetts; VHB; April 2014
    TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: Atlanta, Georgia December 2014 Prepared by: VANASSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 35 New England Business Center Drive Suite 140 Andover, MA 01810 (978) 474-8800 www.rdva.com Copyright © 2014 by VAI All Rights Reserved CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................. 1 Future Conditions ................................................................................................................ 3 Traffic Operations Analysis ................................................................................................ 6 Parking Demand Analysis ................................................................................................... 6 Drive-Through Window Vehicle Queue Analysis .............................................................. 7 Sight Distance Evaluation ................................................................................................... 8 Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 10 Project Description ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Staten Island Bus Service
    Staten Island Bus Service Color matches bus route on map. For Additional Information More detailed service information, timetables and schedules are available Bus Route Number S59 Richmond Avenue Major Street(s) of Operation on the web at mta.info. Or call 511 and Operates between Main St/Amboy Rd and Richmond Terrace/Park Av dur- or Origin/Destination say Subways and Buses”. Timetables Description of Route ing weekdays. Evenings and weekends, S59 buses run between Hylan Blvd/ and schedules are also displayed at most Richmond Av and Richmond Terrace/Park Av. bus stops. Note: traffic and other Operates between Main St/Amboy Rd and Richmond Terrace/Park Av, conditions can affect scheduled arrivals Service Variation and departures. weekdays: Direction of Travel IF YOU SEE AVG. FREQUENCY (MINS.) TOWARD MAIN ST TOWARD RICHMOND TERR AM NOON PM EVE NITE Hours of Operation 5:00AM – 9:10AM 6:15AM – 9:40AM WEEKDAYS: 15 – 15 – – Frequency of Service In this case, the first bus of the weekday service, 1:10PM – 6:45PM 1:55PM – 7:37PM Scheduled time between buses, traveling toward Main Street, leaves in minutes. Richmond Terrace/Park Avenue at 5:00 a.m. SOMETHING, Operates between Hylan Blvd/Richmond Av and Richmond Terrace/Park Av, The last bus of the weekday Morning Rush service daily: AM = Morning rush (7:00 a.m.–9:00 a.m.) leaves Richmond Terrace/Park Avenue at 9:10 a.m. AVG. FREQUENCY (MINS.) TOWARD HYLAN BLVD TOWARD RICHMOND TERR AM NOON PM EVE NITE NOON = Midday (11:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m.) WEEKDAYS: 4:15AM – 1:25AM 4:35AM – 1:00AM 15 20 15 20 – PM = Afternoon rush (4:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.) Primary Service SATURDAYS: 5:00AM– 1:30AM 4:45AM – 12:45AM 17 20 20 20 – SAY EVE = Evening (7:00 p.m.–9:00 p.m.) “Daily” indicates service 7 days a week.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of a Motorist Awareness System By
    Savolainen, McAvoy, Reddy, Pinapaka, Santos, and Datta 1 Evaluation of a Motorist Awareness System by Peter T. Savolainen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Wayne State University 5050 Anthony Wayne Drive, 2166 Engineering Building Detroit, MI 48202 Telephone: 313/577-9950, Fax: 313/577-8126 [email protected] (corresponding author) Deborah S. M cAvoy, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering Ohio University 119 Stocker Center Athens, OH 45701 Telephone: 740/541-3583; Fax: 740/593-0625 E-mail: [email protected] Vivek Reddy, P.E. HNTB Corporation 6363 NW 6 th Way, Suite 420 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Telephone: 954/377-0179, Fax 954/486-9733 Email: [email protected] Satya V. Pinapaka, P.E., PTOE Project Engineer HNTB Corporation 6363 NW 6 th Way, Suite 420 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Joseph B. Santos, P.E. Transportation Safety Engineer State Safety Office, Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS 53 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 Phone: 850/245-1502, Fax: 850/245-1554 Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E. Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Wayne State University 5451 Cass Avenue, 208 Schaver Building Detroit, MI 48202 Telephone: 313/577-9154, Fax 313/577-8126 Email: [email protected] Words excluding Tables = 4587 Figures: 2 x 250 = 500 Tables: 7 x 250 = 1750 Total Words = 6837 Date Submitted: November 15, 2008 TRB 2009 Annual Meeting CD-ROM Paper revised from original submittal. Savolainen, McAvoy, Reddy, Pinapaka, Santos, and Datta 2 ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to determine the effects of a Motorist Awareness System (MAS) on vehicle speeds in highway work zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation Analysis of Truck Restricted and HOV Lanes Saidi Siuhi
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2006 Simulation Analysis of Truck Restricted and HOV Lanes Saidi Siuhi Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF TRUCK RESTRICTED AND HOV LANES By SAIDI SIUHI A Thesis submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2006 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Saidi Siuhi defended on November 06, 2006. Renatus N. Mussa Professor Directing Thesis John O. Sobanjo Committee Member Wei-Chou V. Ping Committee Member Approved: Kamal Tawfiq, Chair, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Ching-Jen Chen, Dean, College of Engineering The Office of Graduate Studies Has Verified and Approved the Above Named Committee Members. ii To my family iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my major professor Dr. Renatus Mussa for his outstanding academic contributions and financial support he provided me during my study at Florida State University. His profound intellectual abilities, tireless efforts, and willingness to share his in-depth knowledge and experience provided me with valuable elements essential for my academic and career progressions. Moreover, I am grateful to my Committee Members, Dr. Wei-Chou V. Ping and Dr. John Sobanjo for their contributions. I am particularly grateful to the management of the Florida State University and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for their financial support.
    [Show full text]