DOCSLIB.ORG

South Coast Bike Share Feasibility Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Coast Bike Share Feasibility Report SOUTH COAST BIKE SHARE FEASIBILITY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016 Prepared by: Rick Thomas, Jack Ucciferri, Yi Wen TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Executive summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 1: About bike sharing ....................................................................................................... 8 What is bike share? ..................................................................................................................................... 8 History of bike share ................................................................................................................................... 9 Elements of bike share ............................................................................................................................. 11 Bike share program goals ....................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 2: Benefits of a bike share ............................................................................................ 14 Economic/financial ................................................................................................................................... 14 Health ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Environmental ............................................................................................................................................ 15 Safety .............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Mobility ......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 3: Case studies .................................................................................................................. 18 Bay Area bike share ................................................................................................................................... 18 Breeze bike share ....................................................................................................................................... 19 B-Cycle ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 4: Community analysis .................................................................................................. 22 Demographics ............................................................................................................................................. 22 Population .................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Age ................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Income ........................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Transportation mode share .................................................................................................................................. 25 Challenges .................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Opportunities .............................................................................................................................................................. 26 Climate ........................................................................................................................................................... 26 Physical characteristics ........................................................................................................................... 27 Santa Barbara/SBCC ................................................................................................................................................ 27 Goleta .............................................................................................................................................................................. 28 University of California, Santa Barbara ........................................................................................................... 29 Isla Vista ........................................................................................................................................................................ 30 Tourism ......................................................................................................................................................... 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS Visitors ........................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Existing bike shops and rental facilities .......................................................................................................... 31 Transit ........................................................................................................................................................... 33 Policy environment ................................................................................................................................... 37 Bicycle Master Plans ................................................................................................................................................ 37 Chapter 5: Business Model and Funding .................................................................................. 39 Organizational models ............................................................................................................................. 39 Publicly owned, contractor operated ............................................................................................................... 39 Privately owned and operated ............................................................................................................................. 40 Non-profit owned and operated ......................................................................................................................... 40 Funding sources ......................................................................................................................................... 41 Public funding ............................................................................................................................................................. 42 Private funding ........................................................................................................................................... 43 User revenue ................................................................................................................................................ 44 Sponsorships ............................................................................................................................................... 44 Chapter 6: Planning the system .................................................................................................. 47 Station density ............................................................................................................................................ 47 Station placement ...................................................................................................................................... 47 System size and phasing .......................................................................................................................... 48 Launch costs ................................................................................................................................................ 54 Capital costs ................................................................................................................................................. 54 Operating costs ........................................................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 7: Ending summary ........................................................................................................ 57 Bibliography ...................................................................................................................................... 58 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive summary Bike share systems consist of a managed network of stations where users can temporarily check out a bicycle for use and return it to any station within the system once their trip is completed. The most cutting edge systems allow for completing a trip without even returning it to a specific station. The number of bike share systems is increasing dramatically as cities look for cost- effective ways to enhance mobility. Santa Barbara County’s South Coast has numerous advantages that would help make bike sharing a viable transportation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City-Bike Maintenance and Availability
    Project Number: 44-JSD-DPC3 City-Bike Maintenance and Availability An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Michael DiDonato Stephen Herbert Disha Vachhani Date: May 6, 2002 Professor James Demetry, Advisor Abstract This report analyzes the Copenhagen City-Bike Program and addresses the availability problems. We depict the inner workings of the program and its problems, focusing on possible causes. We include analyses of public bicycle systems throughout the world and the design rationale behind them. Our report also examines the technology underlying “smart-bike” systems, comparing the advantages and costs relative to coin deposit bikes. We conclude with recommendations on possible allocation of the City Bike Foundation’s resources to increase the quality of service to the community, while improving the publicity received by the city of Copenhagen. 1 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following for making this project successful. First, we thank WPI and the Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Division for providing off- campus project sites. By organizing this Copenhagen project, Tom Thomsen and Peder Pedersen provided us with unique personal experiences of culture and local customs. Our advisor, James Demetry, helped us considerably throughout the project. His suggestions gave us the motivation and encouragement to make this project successful and enjoyable. We thank Kent Ljungquist for guiding us through the preliminary research and proposal processes and Paul Davis who, during a weekly visit, gave us a new perspective on our objectives. We appreciate all the help that our liaison, Jens Pedersen, and the Danish Cyclist Federation provided for us during our eight weeks in Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • City-Bike Maintenance and Availability
    LRN: 02D1621 Project Number: 44-JSD-DPC3 — Lt City-Bike Maintenance and Availability An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Michael ado Step en Herbert Disha Vachhani Date: May 6, 2002 Profe or James Demetry, A isor Abstract This report analyzes the Copenhagen City-Bike Program and addresses the availability problems. We depict the inner workings of the program and its problems, focusing on possible causes. We include analyses of public bicycle systems throughout the world and the design rationale behind them. Our report also examines the technology underlying "smart-bike" systems, comparing the advantages and costs relative to coin deposit bikes. We conclude with recommendations on possible allocation of the City Bike Foundation's resources to increase the quality of service to the community, while improving the publicity received by the city of Copenhagen. 1 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following for making this project successful. First, we thank WPI and the Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Division for providing off- campus project sites. By organizing this Copenhagen project, Tom Thomsen and Peder Pedersen provided us with unique personal experiences of culture and local customs. Our advisor, James Demetry, helped us considerably throughout the project. His suggestions gave us the motivation and encouragement to make this project successful and enjoyable. We thank Kent Ljungquist for guiding us through the preliminary research and proposal processes and Paul Davis who, during a weekly visit, gave us a new perspective on our objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Sharing in the Netherlands
    CAR SHARING IN THE NETHERLANDS ‘THE HISTORY AND PROSPECTS OF A TURBULENT MARKET’ Name: Willem Jan van Amerongen Student number: 10627944 Date: 18/07/2014 Status: Final Study: MSc. in Business Administration – Marketing Track Institution: University of Amsterdam – Amsterdam Business School Supervisor: dhr. prof. dr. J.H.J.P Tettero Second Supervisor: drs. ing. A.C.J. Meulemans Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 ABSTRACT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 I. INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 I. THE RANDSTAD REGION ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Excessive use of public space ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Congestion --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Impact on quality of life----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Impact on environmental quality----------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Impact on safety -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 II. CAR SHARING ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 Commercial car sharing ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 Private car sharing ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Mobility Evaluation at Cascais: the Impact of Bike Sharing on the Environment, Using Carbon Footprint
    SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY EVALUATION AT CASCAIS: THE IMPACT OF BIKE SHARING ON THE ENVIRONMENT, USING CARBON FOOTPRINT DOMINGOS TIAGO CARVALHO LOUREIRO Dissertation submitted for the degree of MASTER ON ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Supervisor at the University: Cecília do Carmo Ferreira da Silva (Assistant Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at FEUP and Integrated Member at CITTA - Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment) Supervisor at the hosting institution: André Delgado Martins Dias (Head of Mobility Unit - Intelligent Systems at CEiiA) June 2017 Sustainable Mobility Evaluation at Cascais: The Impact of Bike Share on the Environment, Using Carbon Footprint MESTRADO INTEGRADO EM ENGENHARIA DO AMBIENTE 2015/2016 Departamento de Engenharia Química Tel.: +351-22 508 1884 Fax: +351-22 508 [email protected] Editado por FACULDADE DE ENGENHARIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO Rua Dr. Roberto Frias 4200-465 PORTO Portugal Tel. +351-22-508 1400 Fax +351-22-508 1440 [email protected] http://www.fe.up.pt Reproduções parciais deste documento serão autorizadas na condição que seja mencionado o Autor e feita referência a Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia do Ambiente – 2015/2016, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal, 2016. As opiniões e informações incluídas neste documento representam unicamente o ponto de vista do respetivo Autor, não podendo o Editor aceitar qualquer responsabilidade legal ou outra em relação a erros ou omissões que possam existir. Este documento foi produzido a partir de versão eletrónica fornecida pelo respetivo Autor. “You don't have to be great to start but you have to start to be great” Zig Ziglar Sustainable Mobility Evaluation at Cascais: The Impact of Bike Sharing on the Environment, Using Carbon Footprint THESIS ENVIRONMENT This dissertation was made in an academic-enterprise environment, at CEiiA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Carsharing Market in Polish Cities Submitted 10/11/20, 1St Revision 14/12/20, 2Nd Revision 10/01/21, Accepted 18/02/21
    European Research Studies Journal Volume XXIV, Issue 1, 2021 pp. 87-98 The Analysis of Carsharing Market in Polish Cities Submitted 10/11/20, 1st revision 14/12/20, 2nd revision 10/01/21, accepted 18/02/21 Radosław Korneć1 Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this paper is to show the development of car sharing in Polish cities. The main focus was put on the demand on this sort of services and the range of cars offered as a part of these services. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research study covers changes in the car sharing market in Poland. The author concentrates on core criteria, such as rental prices, vehicle types, location, and the system of renting and returning vehicles. The study employs a comparative analysis. Findings: When analyzing car sharing services in Poland, one should keep in mind the fact that it is a new profile of activity, still under development. Therefore, companies are not willing to share information which may be unfavorable and could generate negative opinions about the service. Practical Implications: One of the key concerns of the urban transport system in Poland is increasing access to automobiles. Car sharing as an element of the sharing economy lowers car ownership rates, which contributes to a reduction of car traffic and noise volumes, an increase in parking spots availability, and cleaner air. Originality/Value: Subject literature rarely mentions car sharing in Poland; it is scarce and usually consists in journal and news articles, typically online. Keywords: Car-sharing, sharing economy, sustainable urban development, urban transport, Poland. JEL Codes: R41, Q01, O18, N70.
    [Show full text]
  • The Provo Bicycle Trick: Radical Form As Vehicle for Pedestrian Content Alan Smart Published in Russian Translation, the New Literary Observer, September 2012
    The Provo Bicycle Trick: Radical Form as Vehicle for Pedestrian Content Alan Smart Published in Russian Translation, The New Literary Observer, September 2012 The pamphlet bearing the title PROVO’s Fietsenplan (Provo’s Bicycle Plan) is addressed to “Amsterdammers” and begins with a polemical assertion couched in a mixture of terms borrowed from leftist militancy and the ecstatic, surrealist (or merely absurdist) mysticism of beatnik rhetoric: “The asphalt terror of the motorized bourgeoisie has gone on long enough. Accident victims are human sacrifices offered up to the new authority to which the masses have surrendered: the automotive authority. Carbon monoxide is his stifling incense, his image [effigy] has ruined canals and streets in their thousands.”1 The pamphlet appeared on the streets of Amsterdam in 1966 announcing a “happening” called the Witte Fietsenplan or “White Bicycle Plan”. The plan’s author was an industrial designer named Luud Schimmelpennink who had fallen in with a group of nozems (hooligans or bored, shiftless youth in popular Dutch parlance) known as the Provos. Schimmelpennink’s plan called for a fleet of fifty bicycles to be painted white and, in a parallel act of anti-authoritarian sacrifice, made available to the public to be used as desired and, afterward, left unlocked to be taken by others. As a practical “plan” — in the sense of a “business plan”, or of city planning — the Witte Fietsenplan is a reasonable, if optimistic, piece of transportation-management thinking that has inspired a range of campus bicycle sharing and urban bike rental schemes aimed at providing flexible, emissions-free alternatives to private cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Going Dutch a New Moment for Carsharing in the Netherlands
    Going Dutch A New Moment for Carsharing in the Netherlands This project aims to inform local and national government leaders and planners about the state of the art in planning, expanding and integrating carsharing into the broader sustainable transport and emerging new mobility strategies of towns and cities of all sizes GOING DUTCH Abstract This report informs local and national government on latest developments in the fast- growing field of carsharing, in an attempt to put this relatively recent concept into a broader strategic planning frame. Carsharing has over the last decade proven itself to be an effective transport option which is, or at least should be, a key element of an integrated mobility strategy for people and for cities. It is a thrifty transport mode and is largely self-financing. People choose to carshare because they see it as a better way to get around for a portion of their daily trips. Properly positioned it offers real potential for energy savings, pollution reduction, and reduced requirement for expensive public investments in infrastructure to support cars or conventional public transport. Until recently however the sector has been largely neglected by national governments -- and has for the most part been treated on an ad hoc basis, if at all, by, the cities and villages who are the primary beneficiaries and partners. This report is also intended to be useful to the international reader wishing to know more about progress in the Netherlands, on the grounds that the Dutch are among the world leaders in the field. a popular English-language expression which refers to the practice of people each covering their own costs when dining together or sharing other events in which there is an amount to be paid.
    [Show full text]
  • Provo Amsterdam's Anarchist Revolt Richard Kempton.Pdf
    amsterdam's anarchist revolt richard kempton autonomedia In memory of Suzanne Kempton-Gerson The Hague 1940-Berkeley 2000 whose interest in the Proves inspired this book. uxori carissimae Copyright © 2007 Richard Kempton Photographs on the following pages are copyright Cor Jaring, and used with permission: 20, 22, 29, 32, 37, 40, 54, 58, 64, 71, 74, 79, 82, 87, 97, 106. Book design: Josh MacPhee Published by Autonomedia, PO Box 568, Williamsburgh Station, Brooklyn, NY 11211-0568, USA. Autonomedia publishes and distributes a wide variety of materials on radical politics and culture. Please visit www.autonomedia.org for a full catalog and more information. State of the Arts This publication is made possible in part with public funds from the New York State Council on the Arts, a state agency. NYSCA Printed in Canada contents 6 acknowl edgements 7 pub lisher's forew ord 10 provo map of amsterdam 11 au thor's introduction 15 1. amsterdam, the magic center (1961-1965) 23 2. the prophet of magic amsterdam: robert jasper grootveld 31 3. the birth of provo (may-july 1965) 47 4. the state is provoked! (july 1965- march 1966) 59 5. the finest hour of the du tch republ ic (march 10, 1966) 69 6. the tw o dimensions of police brutality : amsterdam under seige (march 19-ju ne 13, 1966) 91 7. the monster of amsterdam (ju ne 14, 1966) 105 8. af termath of the battle: the gradual decline and death of provo (ju ne 15, 1966- may 14, 1967) 117 appendix 1: new babyl on 119 appendix 2: provo and the situationists 122 appendix 3: dada influences 125 appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Bike-Sharing and the Performative Promotion of Urban Sustainable Mobility
    A MASTER THESIS BY MATTHIEU FLORET BIKE-SHARING AND A COMPARISON OF THE POLITICAL- THEcover images PERFORMATIVE credits by Matthieu Floret AESTHETIC PROMOTION OF URBAN EXPERIENCES PROVIDED BY SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY VIENNA’S CITYBIKE AND PARIS’ VÉLIB’ A MASTER THESIS BY MATTHIEU FLORET cover images credits by Matthieu Floret 4CITIES UNICA EUROMASTER IN URBAN STUDIES BIKE-SHARING AND Floret, Matthieu THE PERFORMATIVE PROMOTION Universität Wien Cohort 1 – 2008-2010 OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY DATE OF SUBMISSION 1st September 2014 A COMPARISON OF THE POLITICAL-AESTHETIC EXPERIENCES DATE OF DEFENSE PROVIDED BY 26th September 2014 VIENNA’S CITYBIKE SUPERVISOR AND PARIS’ VÉLIB’ Ass.-Prof.Mag.Dr. Walter Matznetter, MSc Universität Wien SECOND READER Ass.-Prof. Henrik Reeh, PhD Københavns Universitet MASTERARBEIT Bike-sharing and the promotion of urban sustainable mobility A comparison of the political-aesthetic experiences provided by Vienna’s Citybike and Paris’ Vélib Verfasser/in Matthieu Floret, BA angestrebter akademischer Grad Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 2014 Studienkennzahl lt. A 066 664 Studienblatt: Studienrichtung lt. Masterstudium DDP Urban Studides Studienblatt: Betreuerin / Betreuer Ass.-Prof.Mag.Dr. Walter Matznetter, MSc (Supervisor): Acknowledgments I would like to thank my supervisor Walter Matznetter for his advises and enthusiasm. I would also like to thank my interview partners, Rüdiger Maresch, Hans-Erich Dechant, Anthonin Darbon, Lea Marzloff, Olivier Pégard and Martin Tironi, for their time and expertise. Finally, I am grateful to Elena, my partner in life, for her precious aid in the last weeks of production. Last but not least, I want to specially thank my parents, Renée and Nicolas, for their patience and steady support.
    [Show full text]
  • Bikes on Dikes: a Dutch Plan for (Almost) Free Wheeling
    Bikes on Dikes: a Dutch plan for (almost) free wheeling Joep Huffener, Cycling Officer, Department of Infrastructure, Traffic and Transport of the City of Amsterdam, Postbus 95089, 1090 HB Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] Summary Inner cities are becoming more and more congested. City dwellers and visitors are subjected to air pollution and noise. Access to and travel within the city centres is problematic. In order to maintain a reasonable environment within inner cities it is vital to connect established traffic styles with alternative methods of transport. To make cycling more accessible, the city of Amsterdam supported by a group of companies (KPN Telecom, Chipper Nederland, The Amsterdam municipal Transport Company GVB, the Postbank and Y-Tech innovation centre) are introducing an individual public transport system that will put 750 white public bikes at some 45 depositories across town. GVB, the municipal Transport Company will act as operator, because they think of it as individual public transport. The public bicycle (White Bike) is clearly distinguishable from private bikes by its special design. The White bike has no lock because it is not intended to be parked anywhere outside the depos. Replacing the bike in the parking rack at the destination site results in automatically locking the bike, charging the battery and ending the rent period. The white bike transport system is a network of unmanned “parking lots” (depo) where White bikes await the passenger The passenger inserts a chipcard, transfers payment, takes a bicycle out of the parking rack and proceeds to the White bike depo of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • ITDP the Bike-Share Planning Guide
    DOWNTOWN BOISE Parking Strategic Plan APPENDIX A3 The Bike-share Planning Guide THE BIKE- SHARE PLANNING GUIDE Introduction Sub 1 Introduction Sub 2 THE BIKE- SHARE PLANNING GUIDE Introduction Sub 3 The Bike-share Planning Guide Cover Photo: Mexico City's Ecobici has helped to increase cycling mode share in Mexico City. Cover Photo By: Udayalaksmanakartiyasa Halim 9 East 19th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10003 tel +1 212 629 8001 www.itdp.org Introduction Sub 4 Authors and Acknowledgements The writing of this report was a collaborative effort across ITDP and our partners. Contributing authors include: Aimee Gauthier, Colin Hughes, Christopher Kost, Shanshan Li, Clarisse Linke, Stephanie Lotshaw, Jacob Mason, Carlosfelipe Pardo, Clara Rasore, Bradley Schroeder, and Xavier Treviño. The authors would also like to thank Christopher Van Eyken, Jemilah Magnusson, and Gabriel Lewenstein for their support in the creation of the guide. ITDP is especially grateful to the following people for providing comments on and contributions to sections of this report: Alison Cohen, Director of Bike Share Services, Toole Design Group (with many thanks to Shomik Mehndiratta and the World Bank for their support of Ms. Cohen’s research) Dani Simons, Director of Marketing, NYC Bike Share Matteo Martignoni, International Human Powered Vehicle Association and former ITDP board member Jeff Olson, Alta Planning and Design Chris Holben, former Project Manager for Capital Bikeshare District Department of Transportation. Introduction Sub 5 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Going Dutch: City Carshare Strategies
    Kennisplatform Verkeer en Vervoer (KpVV) Going Dutch:& EcoPlan City InternationalCarshare Strategies Report on 20 February Utrecht Cities Workshop #1 & EcoPlan International This project aims to inform national and local government leaders and planners about the present state of the art in planning and integrating carsharing into the broader sustainable transport and emerging new mobility pattern of the city. eric britton ecoplan international 05-Mar-14 Going Dutch: City Carshare Strategies Cover page photo: shows one of the world’s first operating technology-based carshare systems, the ingenious electric Witkar, conceived and developed in Amsterdam and operated on the city streets from 1974 to 1986. “Going Dutch” is a popular English-language expression which refers to the practice of people each covering their own costs when dining together or sharing other events in which there is an amount to be paid. The term has been chosen as the title for this project because it evokes notions of sociability, equity, sharing and self-reliance which are also keys to the success of any carshare operation. And also because of the open collaborative nature of this project. KpVV: (Kennisplatform Verkeer en Vervoer --Knowledge Platform for Mobility and Transport). Supports local and regional authorities in their efforts to develop and implement mobility and transport policy by providing practical know-how, developing reports and guidelines, arranging meetings, and setting up networks. Contact: Friso Metz. Projectmanager mobiliteitsmanagement. Jaarbeursplein 22, Utrecht http://www.kpvv.nl T +31 (0)30 291 8209. Skype: kkpvmetz EcoPlan: An independent advisory network and NGO providing strategic counsel for government and industry in the areas of economic development, sustainable transport and sustainable cities.
    [Show full text]