DOCSLIB.ORG

Fisheries and Aquaculture in Georgia – Current Status and Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fisheries and Aquaculture in Georgia – Current Status and Planning FAO Fisheries Circular No. 1007 FIPP/C1007 (En) ISSN 0429-9329 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE IN GEORGIA – CURRENT STATUS AND PLANNING Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Information Division FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 FAO Fisheries Circular No. 1007 FIPP/C1007 (En) FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE IN GEORGIA – CURRENT STATUS AND PLANNING Edited by Raymon van Anrooy FAO Fisheries Department Andrés Mena Millar FAO Consultant Melvin Spreij FAO Consultant FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2006 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Chief, Publishing Management Service, Information Division, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to [email protected] © FAO 2006 iii Preparation of this document This document contains the Review of the Current Status of Fisheries Resources and Utilization in Georgia, the Master Plan for Fishery Sector Development in Georgia (2005– 2020), the Action Plan for Fishery Sector Management and Development in Georgia (2005– 2008), the final draft version of the Law of Georgia for Fisheries and Aquaculture and the summary report of the three national workshops organized under FAO project TCP/GEO/2904(A) – “Strengthening the Capacity of the Department of Fisheries to Support Fisheries Sector Rehabilitation”. The Review of the Current Status of Fisheries Resources and Utilization in Georgia was prepared by Dr Raymon van Anrooy and Dr Andrés Mena Millar of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) with support from Mr Irakli Kacharava and Ms Maia Metreveli (national consultants) and Dr Akaki Komakhidze and Ms Maia Shavlakadze of the Marine Ecology and Fisheries Research Institute (MEFRI). Logistical and operational support in the collection of information was received from Mr Zviad Tsertsvadze, National Project Coordinator for TCP/GEO/2904(A) and staff member of the Department of Fisheries of Georgia. The Master Plan for Fishery Sector Development in Georgia (2005 - 2020) and the Action Plan for Fishery Sector Management and Development in Georgia (2005–2008) were prepared by staff of the Department of Fisheries of the Ministry of Agriculture of Georgia with technical support from Dr Raymon van Anrooy and Dr Andrés Mena Millar (FAO). The two plans were the subject of an intensive process of consultation with all relevant fishery sector stakeholders and were submitted by the Minister of Agriculture to Parliament for approval. Consequently, the plans should be considered a framework of policy guidance, prepared with inputs from national workshops held in Batumi on 19 August 2004 and in Tbilisi on 11 and 18 February 2005. Finalization of the Master Plan took place in Tbilisi from 15 to16 June 2005 at a large stakeholder conference. Additional observations on the drafts were received from relevant officials and experts involved in fisheries management and development in Georgia and from ministries and institutions with a stake in fisheries and/or aquaculture in the country. The technical work on the Law of Georgia for Fisheries and Aquaculture was led by Mr Melvin Spreij (FAO legal consultant), with support from Ms Maia Bitadze (national legal consultant) and Mr Blaise Kuemlangan and Ms Anniken Skonhoft (FAO legal officers). The law formulation process included consultations with high government officials, focusing mainly on the issue of the institutional structure for fisheries management, and consultations with technical government staff and officials, fishers’ associations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the private sector, focusing on the legal issues related to fisheries management. The legislative proposals were also discussed in the various workshops organized by the FAO TCP/GEO/2904(A) project. The final section of this Fisheries Circular, presenting the summary report of the workshops organized under TCP/GEO/2904(A) was prepared by Dr Andrés Mena Millar (FAO) with technical inputs from Ms Anniken Skonhoft and Dr Raymon van Anrooy. iv Acknowledgements The authors hereby express their gratitude to Mr Mamuka Meskhi, FAO Assistant Representative in Georgia, Ms Hazme Akyol and Mr Raimund Jehle of the FAO Regional Office for Europe, Mr Tomi Petr (FAO consultant), Mr Constantine Stamatopolous, Mr Ulf Wijkström, Mr Jean-François Pulvenis de Séligny and Ms Helen Nakouzi (FAO Fisheries Department) for their technical and operational support in the formulation and implementation of project TCP/GEO/2904(A) – “Strengthening the Capacity of the Department of Fisheries to Support Fisheries Sector Rehabilitation”. The authors particularly acknowledge the contributions to the success of the project by Dr David Iakobidze (Director of the Department of Fisheries of Georgia), Ms Maia Metrevelli, Mr Irakli Kacharava, Mr Zviad Tsertsvadze, Ms Maia Bitadze, Mr Irakli Todria and Ms Sofia Lejava (TCP/GEO/2904(A) project staff), Dr Akaki Komakhidze and Ms Maia Shavlakadze (MEFRI), Mr Blaise Kuemlangan and Ms Anniken Skonhoft (FAO legal officers). Editorial work on this document by Ms Roberta Mitchell (FAO consultant) is also much appreciated. Last, but not least, we would like to thank the workshop and conference participants for their important contributions to the drafting process of the Master Plan, Action Plan and Law and their active participation in various working groups. v Van Anrooy, R.; Mena Millar, A.; Spreij, M. (eds) Fisheries and aquaculture in Georgia – Current status and planning. FAO Fisheries Circular. No. 1007. Rome, FAO. 2006. 160p. Abstract In 2003 the Government of Georgia requested the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) to provide technical assistance for the sustainable development and management of the fishery sector in the country. FAO, through its Technical Cooperation Programme (TCP), approved project TCP/GEO/2904(A), entitled: “Strengthening the Capacity of the Department of Fisheries to Support Fisheries Sector Rehabilitation”. The aim of this Fisheries Circular is first to inform those interested in fisheries and aquaculture in Georgia about the current situation with regard to fishery resources and their utilization in the country. Second, it attempts to provide an example of a consultative and participative policy and legal framework development process. The approach used in the preparation of the Master Plan for Fishery Sector Development in Georgia (2005–2020), the Action Plan for Fishery Sector Management and Development in Georgia (2005–2008), and the Law of Georgia for Fisheries and Aquaculture could also be applicable in other countries in transition that have a relatively small fishery sector. The documents presented here are considered as final versions and cleared as such by the Department of Fisheries (DoF) of the Ministry of Agriculture of Georgia. All the documents are also available in the Georgian language from the DoF in Tbilisi. At the time of publication, the DoF is steering the approval process of the Master Plan, Action Plan and Law within the Government of Georgia and has already started to implement the Action Plan. The Review of the Current Status of Fisheries Resources and Utilization in Georgia is presented in the first part of this Fisheries Circular. The second part contains the final version of the Master Plan for Fishery Sector Development in Georgia, 2005–2020, while the third part provides the Action Plan for Fishery Sector Management and Development in Georgia, 2005–2008. The final draft version of the Law of Georgia for Fisheries and Aquaculture is presented in the fourth part. The last part contains a summary report of the proceedings and recommendations of the Workshop on Fisheries Management and Development (Batumi, 19 August 2004), the Workshop on Fisheries Legislation and Management, (Tbilisi, 11 and 18 February 2005), and the National Conference on Fisheries Management and Development in Georgia (Tbilisi, 15–16 June 2005). Keywords Fishery sector review, Fisheries Master Plan, Fisheries Action Plan, Fisheries Law, Aquaculture, Institutional strengthening, Georgia, Caucasus. vii Contents Page Preparation of this document iii Acknowledgements iv Abstract v REVIEW OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF FISHERIES RESOURCES AND UTILIZATION IN GEORGIA 1 MASTER PLAN FOR FISHERY SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN GEORGIA – 2005–2020 57 ACTION PLAN FOR FISHERY SECTOR MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN GEORGIA – 2005–2008 85 LAW OF GEORGIA ON FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE 103 SUMMARY REPORT OF THE WORKSHOP ON FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, BATUMI, 19 AUGUST 2004 WORKSHOP ON FISHERIES LEGISLATION AND MANAGEMENT, TBILISI, 11 and 18 FEBRUARY 2005 NATIONAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unofficial Working Translation
    UNOFFICIAL WORKING TRANSLATION SETTING OF TARGETS AND EVALUATION OF A PROGRESS TOWARD THE PROTOCOL ON WATER AND HEALTH (GEORGIA) BRIEF REPORT TBILISI 2010 INTRODUCTION A present report has a goal to provide a preliminary assessment of the current situation under requirements of the Protocol on Water and Health in Georgia. It is assumed, that a report would be a source of succinct and useful information allowing an evaluation of a progress on implementation of provisions of the Protocol. It is expected, that a present report will give a chance to evaluate a progress and results of works held in the country and more precisely formulate the particular goals for the future. An approach for the present report is in using of the information stored in different ministries and agencies. Its info is combined from both the public database and the data which is rarely known and taken into account. An additional value of the present report is in its sphere of coverage and a laconism. It means that, despite a report is based on using characteristics, only a limited number of them are included. This is a first report composed similar to the brief reports under the Protocol on Water and Health in compliance with the guidelines on setting of targets, evaluation of progress and reporting for reviewing the issues mentioned in such documents. But, it should be noted, that some issues from the above mentioned documents are not considered in this report due to an absence of the relevant information. The generalised analysis of the issues mentioned in the brief reports is provided within the chapters 1-20.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018
    STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018 Statistical Publication TBILISI 2019 1 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Editors: Gogita Todradze Lia Dzebisauri Person responsible for the publication: Irakli Tsikhelashvili Persons worked on the publication: Tamar Tarashvili Nino Zurabishvili Notation keys: ... Data are not available - Magnitude nil Negligible 0.0 magnitude The discrepancy between the totals and the sum in some cases can be explained by using rounded data The data in this publication do not cover uccupied territories of Georgia (Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region) © National Statistic Office of Georgia 30, Tsotne Dadiani Str., 0180, Tbilisi, Georgia Phone/Fax: (+995 32) 2 36 72 10 (500) E-mail: [email protected] Web-page: www.geostat.ge 2 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Foreword Statistical publication "Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of Georgia" presents information on the use of land, forest and water resources, ambient air protection, protected areas, natural disasters and environ- mental violations. It also includes methodological explanations and information from different reference and scien- tific sources. The preparation of this publication is based on the growing interest of a wide range of users, however, the in- formation collected in it, presents the best way of policy planning at local or global levels. In addition, the need to produce environmental indicators is related to the most important issues of global policy, such as climate change and environmental security. The data in the publication reflects the natural resources of Georgia and developed trends of environmental activities in 2000-2018. Substantive comments and suggestions on the format and content of the publication will be highly appreciated by the group of authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Potentials in Georgia
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1(En) ISSN 2070-6065 REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1 (En) REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA by Marina Khavtasi † Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Marina Makarova Head of Division Water Resources Protection Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Irina Lomashvili Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Archil Phartsvania National Consultant Thomas Moth-Poulsen Fishery Officer FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Budapest, Hungary András Woynarovich FAO Consultant FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia
    National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia 2007 - 2009 FOREWORD This National Report on the State of Environment 2007-2009 has been developed in accordance with the Article 14 of the Law of Georgia on Environmental Protection and the Presidential Decree N 389 of 25 June 1999 on the Rules of Development of National Report on the State of Environment. According to the Georgian legislation, for the purpose of public information the National Report on the State of Environment shall be developed once every three years. 2007-2009 National Report was approved on 9 December 2011. National Report is a summarizing document of all existing information on the state of the environment of Georgia complexly analyzing the state of the environment of Georgia for 2007-2009. The document describes the main directions of environmental policy of the country, presents information on the qualita- tive state of the environment, also presents information on the outcomes of the environmental activities carried out within the frames of international relations, and gives the analysis of environmental impact of different economic sectors. National Report is comprised of 8 Parts and 21 chapters: • Qualitative state of environment (atmospheric air, water resources, land resources, natural disasters, biodiversity, wastes and chemicals, ionizing radiation), • Environmental impact of different economic sectors (agriculture, forestry, transport, industry and en- ergy sector), • Environmental protection management (environmental policy and planning, environmental regula- tion and monitoring, environmental education and awareness raising). In the development of the present State of Environment (SOE) the Ministry of Environment Protection was assisted by the EU funded Project Support to the Improvement of the Environmental Governance in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • 15-00835-4 Gurunda Bagrationi Komplett Master.Pdf 229191 1 1.PDF
    Master Thesis Guranda Bagrationi Water Quality, Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins in Two Freshwater Reservoirs on the Coast of Georgia Telemark University College Faculty of Arts and Sciences Master’s Thesis in Environmental and Health Studies 2015 Guranda Bagrationi Water Quality, Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins in Two Freshwater Reservoirs on the Coast of Georgia Telemark University College Faculty of Art and Sciences Department of Environmental and Health Studies Hallward Eikas plass 3800 Bø, Norway http://www.hit.no © 2015 Guranda Bagrationi 2 Abstract Cyanobacteria constitute a diverse group of photoautotrophic bacteria that inhabit a wide range of aquatic and terrestrial environments. Several aquatic bloom-forming species of cyanobacteria produce toxic secondary metabolites that are hazardous to humans and animals. This thesis presents the study of cyanobacterial communities and cyanotoxins in relation to water quality parameters in two coastal lagoons - Lake Paliastomi and Lake Nurigeli situated in Georgia. Microscopic, immunological (ELISA) and molecular techniques (PCR) combined with physical-chemical parameters were applied to evaluate ecological conditions of Lake Paliastomi and Lake Nurigeli with the focus on cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins. Cyanobacteria species identified by microscopy in these lakes belong to genera Anabaena, Anabaenopsis and Microcystis. Microscopic analyses were in accordance with PCR amplification, which was positive for oxyphotobacteria specific primers. Negative results on PCR when amplifying mcy gene regions could also be linked to low concentrations of microcystin. Toxin analyses demonstrated low concentrations of microcystin and saxitoxin and high concentrations of anatoxin-a in two lakes. On the bases of total phosphorus concentrations (0,1-0,2 mg/L), temperature (25,2 - 29,2°C) and pH (7,4 - 9,2) Lake Paliastomi and Lake Nurigeli provide good environments for cyanobacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Multifunctional Transshipment Terminal at Port of Poti, Georgia Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
    TRANSFORD LLC Multifunctional Transshipment Terminal at Port of Poti, Georgia Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Tbilisi 2015 Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 7 2 Updated ESIA ............................................................................................................... 8 3 Environmental and Social Objectives of the Report ..................................................... 10 4 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Methodology ....................................... 10 5 Legal and Regulatory Framework ................................................................................ 11 5.1 Georgian legislation .............................................................................................. 11 5.2 Environmental Standards in Georgia .................................................................... 15 5.3 Environmental Impact Assessment in Georgia ..................................................... 17 5.4 IFC Performance Standards ................................................................................. 18 5.5 International Conventions ..................................................................................... 19 5.6 Marine sediment quality guidelines ....................................................................... 20 5.7 Gaps between Georgian legislation and IFC requirements ................................... 21 6 Project Description .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Planning Tool for the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
    NATIONAL PLANNING TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS (And the approved format for National Reports to be submitted for the 9th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Uganda, 2005) Ramsar COP9 National Planning Tool-National Report Format Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS (see footnote 1) INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................................4 SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION (OPTIONAL) ............................................................................4 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE 1. INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT .................................................4 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE 1.1: Describe the extent of wetland resources, especially at global and national (or, where appropriate, provincial) scales, in order to inform and underpin implementation of the convention and in particular the application of the wise use principle ..4 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE 1.2: Assess and monitor the condition of wetland resources, both globally and nationally (or, where appropriate, provincially), in order to inform and underpin implementation of the Convention and in particular the application of the wise use principle......................................................................................................................................................................................................7 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE 2. POLICIES AND LEGISLATION, INCLUDING IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND VALUATION........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • IEE: Georgia: Regional Power Transmission Enhancement Project
    Government of Georgia Asian Development Bank Initial Environmental Examination Report Project Number: 44183 May 2011 Georgia: Regional Power Transmission Enhancement Project The Initial Environmental Examination is a document of the Borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarilyThe views representexpressed those herein of ADB’s are those Board of of theDirectors, consultant Management, and do notor staff, necessarily and may representbe preliminary those in of ADB’s naturemembers,. Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 3 A. Overview 3 B. Scope and Objective of the IEE 3 C. Report Structure 4 III. POLICY LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 4 A. ADB Policies 4 B. Legal and Institutional Framework of Georgia 4 IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 12 A. Introduction 12 B. Location 12 C. Technical Components 14 D. Construction 15 E. Associated Facilities 16 V. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT (BASELINE DATA) 16 A. Physical Resources 16 B. Biological Resources 19 C. Economic Resources 22 D. Social and Cultural Resources 24 E. Infrastructure 24 VI. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 25 A. Introduction 25 B. Location Impacts 25 C. Design Impacts 27 D. Construction Impacts 29 E. Operation and Maintenance Impacts 32 VII. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 33 VIII. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION 33 A. Consultation Undertaken 33 IX. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 35 A. Introduction 35 B. Type of Grievances 35 C. Submission of Grievance 35 D. Grievance Resolution Process 36 E. Confidentiality and Anonymity 37 X. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 37 3 A. Introduction 37 B. Overall Institutional Framework for Project Implementation 37 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlements and Necropoleis of the Black Sea and Its Hinterland in Antiquity
    Settlements and Necropoleis of the Black Sea and its Hinterland in Antiquity Select papers from the third international conference ‘The Black Sea in Antiquity and Tekkeköy: An Ancient Settlement on the Southern Black Sea Coast’, 27-29 October 2017, Tekkeköy, Samsun edited by Gocha R. Tsetskhladze and Sümer Atasoy with the collaboration of Akın Temür and Davut Yiğitpaşa Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978-1-78969-206-8 ISBN 978-1-78969-207-5 (e-Pdf) © Authors and Archaeopress 2019 Cover: Sebastopolis, Roman baths. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents Preface ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ iii List of Figures and Tables ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� iv Once again about the Establishment Date of Some Greek Colonies around the Black Sea ������������������������������������1 Gocha R� Tsetskhladze The Black Sea on the Tabula Peutingeriana �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������42
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential the Eastern P Ntial for Paludicult Rn Partnership Culture In
    The potentialntial for paludicultculture in the Easternrn PPartnership Case studies from MMoldova, Ukraine and GeorgiaGeor Paludiculture in theth Eastern Partnership The work done for this reportrt wawas supported by the Re-granting Scheme of thehe EasternE Partnership Civil Society Forum (EaP CSF). Project title: Promotion of paludiculture in Black Sea region wetlands for carbon sequestration, sustainable deveevelopment and community-based renewable energy Grant Agreement no: SEC003/2016/WG3/02 Project duration: 1 May – 30 November 2016 (7 Months)ths) Lead organisation: Environment People Law Address: PO Box 316, Lviv 79000, Ukraine Person responsible for the projeroject: Dr Oleg Rubel Contact: [email protected] Partner organisations NGO Agricola, Odessa, Ukraineine: Natalia Goriup Cross-border Cooperation andnd EEuropean Integration Agency, Cahul, Moldova: ValeriuVa Ajder Caucasus Green Area Union,, BatBatumi, Georgia: Maka Ochigava This report has been produceded wwith the assistance of the European Union. Thehe ccontentso of this publication are the sole responsionsibility of the implementing partners and can in non way be taken to reflect the views of the Europeapean Union. 2 Paludiculture in theth Eastern Partnership CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. OVERVIEW OF CASE STUDIEUDIES 5 Table 1: Summary of main charaharacteristics of the case study sites 5 Table 2: Current and potentialial activities at the three case study sites 6 MOLDOVA CASE STUDY 7 UKRAINE CASE STUDY 16 GEORGIA CASE STUDY 30 3 Paludiculture in theth Eastern Partnership 1. INTRODUCTION Because of its low tidal rangee anand presence of many large river deltas (includiningg Danube, Dniester, Dnipr and Don), the Black Seaa reregion is particularly well-endowed with wetlandsnds in the lower river floodplains and around the coasoast.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Research of the Market Potential of Historical and Cultural Tourism in the Black Sea Basin
    www.greethis.net Contextual research of the market potential of historical and cultural tourism in the Black Sea basin Georgia November 2020 1 www.greethis.net The contextual research of the market potential of historical and cultural tourism in the Black Sea basin includes following particularly interesting municipalities - Batumi, Poti, Kobuleti, Lanchkhuti, of one of the most ancient countries of the Eastern Black Sea region – Georgia. Flag and coat of arms of Poti Municipality Flag and coat of arms of Lanchkhuti municipality Flag and coat of arms of Batumi municipality 2 www.greethis.net Flag and coat of arms of Kobuleti municipality 3 www.greethis.net Contents CHAPTER I ........................................................................................................ 6 About the project ............................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER II ........................................................................................................ 7 Green and Historical Tourism Trends in Georgia .......................................................... 7 Legislation, academic publications, articles ............................................................ 7 Statistical data ................................................................................................. 13 Resident Visitors ............................................................................................. 13 Non-resident visitors .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Coastal and Halophytic Habitats 2 Coastal Sand Dunes and Inland
    1 Coastal and halophytic habitats 2 Coastal sand dunes and inland dunes 3 Freshwater habitats 4 Temperate heath and scrub 5 Sclerophyllous scrub (matorral) 6 Natural and semi-natural grassland formations 7 Raised bogs and mires and fens 8 Rocky habitats and caves 9 Forests 1 Coastal and halophitic communities 2 Non-marine waters 3 Scrub and grasslands 4 Woodland 5 Bogs and marshes 6 Rocky habitats 7 Agriculture land and highly artificial landscapes 1 INTRODUCTION The habitat classification of Georgia is based on the Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27. The "Habitats" Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, O.J. L206) is a Community legislative instrument in the field of nature conservation that establishes a common framework for the conservation of wild animal and plant species and natural habitats of Community importance; it provides for the creation of a network of special areas of conservation, called Natura 2000, to "maintain and restore, at favourable conservation status, natural habitats and species of wild fauna and flora of Community interest". The Directive is developed on the bases of CORINE biotope classification (1989, 1991) determining codes and habitat types of Europe, in particular involving the division of the latter into sub-types. To avoid the difficulties of classification of the habitat types in different countries the Scientific Working Group, set up by the Habitats Committee (established by Directive 92/43/EEC), expressed in May 1992 the need to prepare a manual for the interpretation of Annex I including habitat type classification.
    [Show full text]