SCAR: Georgia: Port of Poti

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SCAR: Georgia: Port of Poti Social Safeguards Report GEO: Port of Poti Social Compliance Audit Report September 2010 This report is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s Public Communications Policy (2005). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. 1 GEO: Poti Sea Port Social Compliance Audit Report I. Introduction 1. The port of Poti (the Port) is Georgia's main port and is strategically located near the confluence of the Rioni River and the Black Sea. It provides access to the Mediterranean Sea via the Bosporus. Poti has been a major port city since the 19th century. In 2008, the Port was sold to Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority (RAKIA) through privatization. ADB is considering providing financial assistance to the Poti Sea Port Corporation (PSPC) as an equity investor with an investment of up to $50 million. The ADB investment will be used for modernizing current port facilities and operations of Port of Poti. 2. With respect to ADB's Safeguards Policy Statement (SPS), the transaction falls under general corporate finance (GCF) and projects involving existing facilities, hence, Safeguards Requirements (SR) 4 on Different Financing Modalities applies. SR4 requires a corporate audit of the company's current environmental and social management system (ESMS) and an environment and social compliance audit including on-site assessment, to identify past or present concerns related to impacts on the environment, involuntary resettlement, and Indigenous Peoples. A Mission1 was fielded between 12-14 August 2009 to visit the port, conduct a corporate audit of the PSPC's ESMS or its equivalent, and a social compliance audit to determine if there are any issues related to involuntary resettlement or Indigenous Peoples. This report documents the findings of the mission on the social safeguards dimensions of the compliance audit and other social aspects of the Port's establishment and operation. This also includes recent updates from PSPC on the progress made with respect to the recommendations of the Mission. II. Mission Findings A. PSPC's Environment and Social Management System 3. PSPC’s Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Management System is being implemented by the Health, Safety, Security and Environment (HSSE) Group comprised of five departments namely, health care, ecology, safety, security, watchmen, and firefighting department. There is no dedicated social staff responsible for managing social safeguards dimensions, however, these issues are handled by the HSSE Group as part of the environmental and social impact assessment. 4. For any ongoing or planned port rehabilitation, modernization or expansion, PSPC will follow the requirements of the Environmental Impact Permit Law of Georgia. This law requires the conduct of an environmental impact assessment to study and examine a development activity’s direct and indirect impact on people and the environment. Major considerations in the conduct of an EIA include human health and safety, flora and fauna, soil, air, water, climate, landscape, ecosystems and historical monuments, on cultural values (cultural heritage) and social-economic factors, as well as impacts of land acquisition and resettlement. PSPC periodically engages a scientific consulting firm, e.g. Gamma, to assist them in the conduct of environmental and social studies and assessments. 1 The Mission comprised Armando Balloffet, Senior Environment Specialist [External Consultant], S.L. Tu, Senior Environment Specialist, PSOC; J.E. Munsayac, Senior Social Safeguards Officer, PSOC. 2 5. In the event that the development or expansion of the port requires new acquisition of land or resettlement of people, this is undertaken in accordance with the following Georgian laws and regulations: Constitution of Georgia (1995); Civil Code of Georgia (1997), Law of Georgia on Protection of Cultural Heritage (2007); Law of Georgia on Notary System (1996); Law of Georgia on Privatization of State-owned Agricultural Land (2005); Law of Georgia on Ownership of Agricultural Land (1996); Law of Georgia on Entitlement of Ownership Rights to Lands Possessed (Employed) by Physical and Legal Persons of Private Law (2007); Law of Georgia on Registration Rights to Real Estate (2005); Law of Georgia on Rules for Expropriation of Ownership for Necessary Public Need (1999); Civil Procedural Code of Georgia (1997); Presidential Decree No. 525 on Rules for Entitlement of Ownership Rights to Lands Possessed (Employed) by Physical and Legal Persons of Private Law and Approval of Ownership Certificate Format (2007). These laws provide that compensation for lost assets, including land, structures and standing crops, should be based on the current market price without depreciation. All the above laws/regulations state that the principle of cost compensation at fair market price is reasonable and legally acceptable. The laws also identify the types of damages eligible for compensation and indicate that compensation is to be given. These laws envisage notification of affected people to ensure their in the process and prevent violation of their rights. 6. The Mission discussed ADB’s safeguards requirements and PSPC agreed to prepare an Environmental and Social Management System acceptable to ADB. Over the past year, PSPC with assistance from Gamma Consulting has developed an ESMS which the Mission deems acceptable and consistent with ADB’s relevant objectives, policy principles and requirements. B. Social Safeguards Performance – Past and Current 7. The town of Poti is located in the western part of Georgia and the eastern coast of the Black Sea. It has a total land area of 59 square kilometers and a population of approximately 50,000 people in 2002. 8. Involuntary Resettlement. The total area of occupied by Poti Sea Port Corporation comprises 45.37ha: restricted area – 30.13ha; hydro-technical part of the berths – 11.76ha; area under PSPC administrative building and the yard – 0.21ha; other areas including yacht- club, garage and wash-house – 3.2ha.. Plans to build a major port in the city of Poti in Georgia began soon after Georgia was released from Turkish conquerors in 1828. In 1858, Alexander II issued a Nominal Decree addressed ordering the Senate to constitute Poti City as a merchant city for trade and industry. To fulfill this vision for Poti City, construction of a pair of breakwaters at the mouth of the Rioni River was started. In 1872, the Poti-Chiatura railway lines for the export of manganese ore was established. The reconstruction of the port continued during 1873-1888 with the construction of northern breakwater (the root part of this is now being used for the construction of present south breakwater). At the same time when the northern breakwater was constructed, Poti Port was relocated from the mouth of the Rioni River into the new delimited water area with entrance into the port from the western part. In 1905, the entrance from the western part was closed and a new entrance was constructed in the northwest portion. Starting from this period, Poti Port has obtained the features of the present port. Old illustrations and photos of the Port from the PSP Museum are available in Attachment 3. Reconstruction works such as the construction of a container terminal and a network of cargo railway lines were also carried out inside the port premises in the 20th century under the Soviet Union management. According to Poti Sea Port officials, all land utilized for construction of the Port were uninhabited, state-owned non-agricultural lands. PSPC confirms that no issues of relocation, land acquisition and compensation arose as these lands were primarily swamp land 3 and were not being used for economic or residential purposes. Berth 14 is currently being rehabilitated using EBRD financing. Rehabilitation works under EBRD financing are also not expected to trigger EBRD’s Performance Requirement 7 on Land Acquisition. 9. The Mission also visited the adjacent site (approx 300 ha) designated for the development of a Free Industrial Zone (FIZ). As shown in the satellite image and the Poti FIZ Master Plan (Attachment 2), approximately 100ha of land inside the FIZ is allocated to PSPC for future port expansion which is not included in the currently proposed financing. Majority of the land area (60 m from the coastline) of the site for future expansion has scant vegetation and is comprised mainly of sand dunes. It is fenced and uninhabited and except for occasional grazing of a few cattle and horses which is common in Georgian countryside, there is no evidence that it is in active agricultural or other economic use. Photos taken during the mission are available in Attachment 4. 10. Indigenous Peoples. Prior to 1893, Poti City has an estimated population of about 1,000 people. When the port’s development and the opening of the railway started, new jobs were created and migrants from all over Gergia moved to the port city of Poti. In a few years time, the population increased to around 30,000 inhabitants. In 2010, the city's population is approximately 47,000 people consisting mostly of 90% Georgians and 10% nationals from different nations, such as Russians, Ukrainians, Polish people, etc. For more than a hundred years, foreign ships have come to Poti Sea Port from different countries, and the locals are always able to communicate with foreigners and display their traditional Georgian hospitality and cordiality. Rehabilitation and modernization of the port is expected to increase port operations and therefore resulting in direct economic benefits in terms of increase in availability of jobs as well as indirect benefits from increase in business activities in the area and increased government revenues which can be used to improve roads and other public facilities in Poti City. These are expected to benefit all residents in Poti City regardless of ethnicity. Moreover, there are no communities of people in Poti City who may be considered as Indigenous Peoples as defined in ADB’s SPS, hence, the Project is categorized as Category C with respect to the SPS Safeguards Requirements 3 on Indigenous Peoples.
Recommended publications
  • Electricity: 8700
    Covenant of Mayors 4 Climate & Energy Workshop on Data Solutions for Evidence- Based Policy and Stakeholder UNECE Webinar George Abulashvili COM Statistics for Georgia Signatories Population Akhaltsikhe 17,903 Lanchkhuti 31,486 Akhmeta 41,641 Mtskheta 7,800 Batumi 152,839 Ozurgeti 62,500 Bolnisi 53,590 Poti 41,465 Chokhatauri 19,001 Rustavi 125,103 Dedoplistskaro 21,221 Sagarejo 51,761 Gori 77,549 Sighnagi 29,948 Gurjaani 54,337 Tbilisi 1,108,717 Kutaisi 147,635 Telavi 38,721 Kazbegi 3,795 Tianeti 9,468 Kvareli 29,827 Zugdidi 62,511 Lagodekhi 41,678 Bagdati 29,2235 2 CNC’s ; 3 CTC’s and 3 CS’s 10 SE(C)Aps developed Georgian MDCP - Mayors Club Georgia • Analysis of barriers and drivers, Development of a National Roadmap (task 3.1.2) • Development of a Benchmark Database (task 3.1.3) • Development of a Project Pipeline (task 3.1.4) Number of Projects by Sectors 80 75 N of 70 SECAP Sectors Projects 60 Adaptation CC 0 50 EE in Buildings 12 40 Renewable energy 21 30 21 Street Lighting 75 20 12 Other (transport, …) 4 10 4 TOTAL 108 0 0 Adaptation CC EE in Buildings Renewable Street Lighting Other energy Number of municipalities implementing the projects -15; total number of CoM signatories - 24. Project Investments by Sectors, 1000 EUR 50,000 45,000 43379 40,000 Investments SECAP Sectors 000 EUR 35,000 Adaptation CC 0 30,000 EE in Buildings 8,538 25,000 Renewable energy 225 20,000 Street Lighting 1,509 15,000 Other (transport, …) 43,379 10,000 8538 TOTAL 53,651 5,000 1509 0 225 0 Adaptation CC EE in Buildings Renewable energy Street Lighting Other (transport, …) The huge figure in the “Other” sector is mainly due to the EBRD and EU E5P financing of the Tbilisi CNG bus project for 34 million euros.
    [Show full text]
  • Unofficial Working Translation
    UNOFFICIAL WORKING TRANSLATION SETTING OF TARGETS AND EVALUATION OF A PROGRESS TOWARD THE PROTOCOL ON WATER AND HEALTH (GEORGIA) BRIEF REPORT TBILISI 2010 INTRODUCTION A present report has a goal to provide a preliminary assessment of the current situation under requirements of the Protocol on Water and Health in Georgia. It is assumed, that a report would be a source of succinct and useful information allowing an evaluation of a progress on implementation of provisions of the Protocol. It is expected, that a present report will give a chance to evaluate a progress and results of works held in the country and more precisely formulate the particular goals for the future. An approach for the present report is in using of the information stored in different ministries and agencies. Its info is combined from both the public database and the data which is rarely known and taken into account. An additional value of the present report is in its sphere of coverage and a laconism. It means that, despite a report is based on using characteristics, only a limited number of them are included. This is a first report composed similar to the brief reports under the Protocol on Water and Health in compliance with the guidelines on setting of targets, evaluation of progress and reporting for reviewing the issues mentioned in such documents. But, it should be noted, that some issues from the above mentioned documents are not considered in this report due to an absence of the relevant information. The generalised analysis of the issues mentioned in the brief reports is provided within the chapters 1-20.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative
    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1.1~2.1.4 95/06/12
    Appendices Appendix-1 Member List of the Study Team (1) Field Survey 1. Dr. Yoshiko TSUYUKI Team Leader/ Technical Official, Experts Service Division, Technical Advisor Bureau of International Cooperation International Medical Center of Japan, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare 2. Mr. Hideo EGUCHI Security Control Deputy Resident Representative, Planner United Kingdom Office (JICA) 3. Mr. Yoshimasa TAKEMURA Project Coordinator Staff, Second Management Division, Grant Aid Management Department (JICA) 4. Mr. Yoshiharu HIGUCHI Project Manager CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 5. Dr. Tomoyuki KURODA Health Sector Surveyor CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 6. Mr. Hiroshi MORII Equipment Planner CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 7. Mr. Haruo ITO Equipment Planner / CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. Cost and Procurement Planner 8. Ms. Rusudan PIRVELI Interpreter CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. (2) Explanation of Draft Report 1. Dr. Yoshiko TSUYUKI Team Leader/ Technical Official, Experts Service Division, Technical Advisor Bureau of International Cooperation International Medical Center of Japan, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare 2. Mr. Yoshimasa TAKEMURA Project Coordinator Staff, Second Management Division, Grant Aid Management Department (JICA) 3. Mr. Yoshiharu HIGUCHI Project Manager CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 4. Mr. Hiroshi MORII Equipment Planner CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 5. Ms. Rusudan PIRVELI Interpreter CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. A-1 Appendix-2 Study Schedule (1) Field Survey No. Date Movement Activities Accommodation 1 Apr. 5 (Sat) Narita→Frankfurt Frankfurt (A) (B) (D) (A) (C) (D) 2 Apr. 6 (Sun) Frankfurt→Baku Baku (A) (C) (D) (A) (C) (D) 3 Apr. 7 (Mon) Baku→A) (C) (D) Visit the Embassy of Japan in Baku Train (A) (C) (D) London→(B) (A) (C) (D) Flight (B) (F) (G) Narita→Vienna→ (F) (G) 4 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report for 21 August 2008
    Emergency Operation in Georgia Daily Report for 21 August 2008 Displacements caused by recent conflict over South Ossetia Displacement within Georgia excl. South Ossetia 98,600 Displacement within South Ossetia 30,000 Sub Total Georgia 128,600 Displacement to Russian Federation 30,000 Displacements Total 158,600 In addition, Georgia has a caseload of 220,000 IDPs from previous crises. Western Georgian distribution in full swing In Western and Central Georgia, UNHCR estimates that there are between 20 000 and 25 000 persons in need of assistance. The first shipment of aid arrived on August 19 by plane to Batumi airport and after a swift transport to the warehouses, the distribution is already well on its way. Today the UNHCR team distributed non-food items for some 500 IDPs in the city of Senaki. These IDPs have been in the region already since 1992 – 1993 and are now facing a new catastrophe as their centres have been damaged by the bombings. The UNHCR team assessing the damages concluded that immediate reparations are needed to provide proper shelter before winter. At the same time, a coordination meeting was held in the city of Kutaisi which will serve as a distribution hub for the region. The meeting, assisted by the local authorities, IDP representatives and UNHCR, assessed the needs in the area and the distribution started immediately reaching close to the western border of South Ossetia, as close as the villages of Sachkhre and Chiatura. Furthermore, the urgently needed hygiene kits are being distributed by ICRC and NRC, upon request from UNHCR.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Report on the Advisory Service for the Local Self-Government of Imereti and Guria Conducted by the Fund “Sukhumi” In
    A short report on the Advisory Service for the local self-government of Imereti and Guria conducted by the Fund “Sukhumi” in frames of the project "Experience of the Visegrad countries to advocate the equal, inclusive and democratic governance" From February to July 2018, the consultative group of the Fund "Sukhumi", consisting of 5 staff members, worked with 15 municipalities (12 municipalities of Imereti 3 municipalities of Guria) on the issues of gender policy of self-government, organization of work of local gender equality councils. The "Guide" of the Fund "Sukhumi" - "Introduction of Gender Mainstreaming in Local Authorities" was actively used in the work. A short review of the current situation: local governments gradually master the essence of gender policy and issues related to them. This is facilitated by the instructions of higher authorities, especially the Ministry of Regional Management and Infrastructure, on the recommendation of which, since January 2018, all the municipalities of Imereti and Guria have created gender equality councils, approved the provision of the councils (the remaining municipality – Sakrebulo of Vani, plans to approve the provision of the Gender Council within the next few days). Part of the Municipalities of Imereti and Guria, with the help of partner NGOs, began to work on local action plans for gender equality. In spite of the fact that the instructions indicated that this is not a plan of gender council, but of a municipality, several municipalities developed and approved an action plan of Gender Council (Kutaisi, Tskaltubo). At this stage development of an action plan for Gender Equality of the municipality is carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Migration Profile of Georgia
    State Commission on Migration Issues 2019 Migration Profile of Georgia 2019 Tbilisi, Georgia Unofficial Translation State Commission on Migration Issues The European Union for Georgia This publication was produced in the framework of the project “Support to Sustained Effective Functioning of the State Commission on Migration Issues”, funded by the European Union. The contents of this publication in no way represent the views of the European Union. Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations1 Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) between Georgia and EU “Enhancing Georgia’s Migration Management 2” European Migration Network /EC/ Statistical Office of the European Union GDP Gross Domestic Product National Statistics Office of Georgia Human Development Index International Centre for Migration Policy Development IDP Internally Displaced Person International Organization for Migration Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia Ministry of Education, Science, Culture And Sport of Georgia Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories, Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia National Agency of Public Registry Policy and Management Consulting Group Public Service Development Agency State Commission on Migration
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Care Cascade in the Country of Georgia: Monitoring Progress Towards Elimination
    IVHEM 2019. November 22-23, 2019, Amsterdam EVALUATION OF THE HEPATITIS C CARE CASCADE IN THE COUNTRY OF GEORGIA: MONITORING PROGRESS TOWARDS ELIMINATION Tengiz Tsertsvadze,1,2 Amiran Gamkrelidze,3 Nikoloz Chkhartishvili,1 Akaki Abutidze,1 Lali Sharvadze,2,4 Maia Butsashvili,5 David Metreveli,6 Lia Gvinjilia,7 Shaun Shadaker,8 Muazzam Nasrullah,8 Tamar Gabunia, 9 Ekaterine Adamia,9 Stefan Zeuzem,10 Nezam Afdhal,11 Sanjeev Arora,12 Karla Thornton,12 Francisco Averhoff8 1Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center, Tbilisi, Georgia; 2Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia; 3National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia; 4Hepatology clinic HEPA, Tbilisi, Georgia; 5Health Research Union, Tbilisi, Georgia; 6Medical Center Mrcheveli, Tbilisi, Georgia; 7CDC Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia; 8Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD&TB Prevention, Atlanta, USA; 9Ministry of IDPs, Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia; 10Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany; 11Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Liver Center, Boston, USA; 12University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center Disclosure No relevant financial relationship exists Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center 12 COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE ON TRACK TO ELIMINATE HEPATITIS C INFECTION BY 2030 Georgia’s HCV elimination program builds on delivering
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 66462-GE PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 25.8 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized (US$40.00 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$30 MILLION TO GEORGIA Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE SECOND SECONDARY AND LOCAL ROADS PROJECT (SLRP-II) FEBRUARY 21, 2012 Sustainable Development Department South Caucasus Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 1, 2012) Currency Unit = Georgian Lari (GEL) GEL 1.66 = US$ 1.00 US$1.551 = SDR 1.00 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic MCC Millennium Challenge Corporation ADB Asian Development Bank MENR Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources CPS Country Partnership Strategy MESD Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development EA Environmental Assessment MRDI Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure EIB European Investment Bank NBG National Bank of Georgia EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return NCB National Competitive Bidding EMP Environmental Management Plan NPV Net Present Value ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework FA Financing Agreement PAD
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018
    STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018 Statistical Publication TBILISI 2019 1 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Editors: Gogita Todradze Lia Dzebisauri Person responsible for the publication: Irakli Tsikhelashvili Persons worked on the publication: Tamar Tarashvili Nino Zurabishvili Notation keys: ... Data are not available - Magnitude nil Negligible 0.0 magnitude The discrepancy between the totals and the sum in some cases can be explained by using rounded data The data in this publication do not cover uccupied territories of Georgia (Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region) © National Statistic Office of Georgia 30, Tsotne Dadiani Str., 0180, Tbilisi, Georgia Phone/Fax: (+995 32) 2 36 72 10 (500) E-mail: [email protected] Web-page: www.geostat.ge 2 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Foreword Statistical publication "Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of Georgia" presents information on the use of land, forest and water resources, ambient air protection, protected areas, natural disasters and environ- mental violations. It also includes methodological explanations and information from different reference and scien- tific sources. The preparation of this publication is based on the growing interest of a wide range of users, however, the in- formation collected in it, presents the best way of policy planning at local or global levels. In addition, the need to produce environmental indicators is related to the most important issues of global policy, such as climate change and environmental security. The data in the publication reflects the natural resources of Georgia and developed trends of environmental activities in 2000-2018. Substantive comments and suggestions on the format and content of the publication will be highly appreciated by the group of authors.
    [Show full text]
  • EXCEPTIONAL TREKKING TRIP to RACHA, the LEAST TOURISTIC REGION in GEORGIA, ALSO CALLED GEORGIAN SWITZERLAND This Offer Is Something Special
    EXCEPTIONAL TREKKING TRIP TO RACHA, THE LEAST TOURISTIC REGION IN GEORGIA, ALSO CALLED GEORGIAN SWITZERLAND This offer is something special. During this trip we will visit one of the most beautiful mountain regions in Georgia. Racha is also the least popular place for tourist to visit, and is still a place untouched by mass tourism, unlike other places in the country. For that reason we will have the mountains “for ourselves”, and we will have a chance to experience the famous Georgian hospitability. During the trip, we will go off the beaten track Racha (Khvanchkara, Aleksandreuli, Ojaleshi, and explore the mysteries of Racha. Racha among others). This means that during our is a region of picturesque mountains and trip, you will also have a chance to visit lo- green canyons. According to legends, one day cal vineyards and try some of the best kinds a Georgian hunter climbed one of the near of wine, traditional supras and never-ending peaks and looked down at the narrow gorge of Georgian toasts! On the last day of the trip, the Rioni river. The sight was so amazing that we will visit Chiatura, the Katshki pillar, Gori he compared it to a well (cha in Georgian) and and a rock-hewn town Uplistsikhe. This trip amazed shouted: What a well! (Ra cza), and is a perfect choice for nature and mountain for this reason the place is called Racha. All lovers who want to get to know real Georgia, trekking routes of the trip are technically easy away from the touristic routes. The trip is full and do not require specialized equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • How Preparedness Pays Off
    Community early warning systems: Howguiding preparedness principles pays off Evolution, costs, benefits and prospects of disaster risk management in Georgia www.ifrc.org Saving lives, changing minds. The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) is the world’s largest volunteer-based humanitarian network. Together with our 189 member National Red Cross and Red Crescent TheSocieties International worldwide, Federation we reach of 97 Red million Cross people and Red annually Crescent through Societies long- (IFRC)term services is the world’s and development largest volunteer-based programmes humanitarian as well as 85 millionnetwork. people Togetherthrough disasterwith our response 189 member and earlyNational recovery Red Cross programmes. and Red WeCrescent act before, Societiesduring and worldwide, after disasters we reach and 97 health million emergencies people annually to meet through the needs long- and termimprove services the lives and ofdevelopment vulnerable people.programmes We do as so well with as impartiality 85 million peopleas to throughnationality, disaster race, responsegender, religious and early beliefs, recovery class programmes. and political We opinions. act before, during and after disasters and health emergencies to meet the needs and Guided by Strategy 2020 – our collective plan of action to tackle the improve the lives of vulnerable people. We do so with impartiality as to major humanitarian and development challenges of this decade – we are nationality, race, gender, religious beliefs, class and political opinions. committed to ‘saving lives and changing minds’. Guided by Strategy 2020 – our collective plan of action to tackle the Our strength lies in our volunteer network, our community-based major humanitarian and development challenges of this decade – we are expertise and our independence and neutrality.
    [Show full text]