DOCSLIB.ORG

Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Submitted by: Kiewit Pacific Co. Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Specification No. PW10-0128F Submitted to: Purchasing Office, Tacoma Public Utilities 3628 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409 June 8, 2010 Tab No. 1 - General Company Information & Team Structure Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Project TAB NO.1 - GENERAL COMPANY INFORMATION AND TEAM STRUCTURE Kiewit Pacific Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kiewit Infrastructure Group, Inc., will be the contracting party for this project, as indicated on Forms 3 and 4 in Tab No. 4 - Appendix C. As a wholly-owned subsidiary, none of the officers of Kiewit Pacific Co. (Kiewit) own stock. Incorporated on May 18, 1982, we can trace our history back to 1884, when Peter and Andrew Kiewit formed Kiewit Brothers, an Omaha masonry contracting partnership. Today, we are part of one of North America's largest and most respected construction and mining organizations. We take our place in the corporate structure of our parent company, Kiewit Infrastructure Group Inc., alongside Kiewit Construction Company and Kiewit Southern Co. Our affiliates and subsidiaries, as well as those of our parent company, operate from a network of offices throughout North America. We draw upon the Kiewit Corporation’s collective experience and personnel to assemble the strongest team possible for a given project. Therefore, work experience of such affiliates and subsidiaries is relevant in demonstrating our capabilities. For the Murray Morgan Bridge, we are supplementing our local talent with extensive moveable bridge expertise from our east coast operations, Kiewit Constructors, Inc. We are also utilizing our local subsidiary, General Construction Company (General), for mechanical and electrical expertise. General has constructed a wide variety of mechanical and electrical projects for the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) including the Hood Canal Floating Bridge Rehabilitation, Bainbridge Island Ferry Terminal, and Kingston Ferry Terminal. Kiewit Corporation has completed more than 240 design-build projects with a value in excess of $30 billion and are ranked 7th on Engineering News Record’s 2009 list of The Top 100 Design-Build Firms. These projects range in size from over $2 billion to less than $1 million. In 2009, 84% of our active projects had a contract value under $50 million. Kiewit has performed more design-build work for WSDOT than any other contractor. We have completed, or are in the process of completing, five design-build projects for WSDOT. With local offices in Vancouver, WA and Renton, WA, Kiewit will provide the City of Tacoma the national and local resources needed to successfully rehabilitate the Murray Morgan Bridge. Firm Level Organization Figure 1.1, on the following page, summarizes the relationships of our proposed project design-build team in a firm-level organization chart. Kiewit, as the contracting party, will subcontract overall project design responsibilities to KPFF Consulting Engineers (KPFF). KPFF will be the lead designer throughout the life of the project. Kiewit chose KPFF for numerous reasons including our established working relationship. They are a local designer with significant design-build experience with Kiewit. They have relevant design experience with the City and Tacoma, most notably the 11th Street Bridge. KPFF will have two subconsultants, URS Corporation (URS) and BCE Engineers (BCE). URS will be a major participant with over 30% of the design work, which is expected to include mechanical, electrical, geotechnical and urban design work. URS’s subsidiary, EC Driver & Associates (URS) brings national moveable bridge design support to the team. BCE will have less than 30% of the design work, and while not a major participant, will play an important role in the electrical and communication utilities design. Kiewit will contract with AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. (AMEC) to assist with the establishment and monitoring of our environmental compliance program. AMEC will have less than the required 20% of construction work to qualify as a major participant, but their involvement on the project will be key to its success. They have been a valuable team member, acting in this same role on three of Kiewit’s local design-build projects. Tab 1 | Page 1 We are committed to meeting the project’s 12% Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal and have identified potential subcontracting opportunities in Figure 1.1, Firm Level Organizational Chart. We do not anticipate any of these subcontracts needing to exceed the 20% threshold for major participants and will secure these contracts once the design is finalized. Figure 1.1 – Firm Level Organization Chart Tab 1 | Page 2 Tab No. 2 - Technical Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Project TAB NO.2 - TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS INTRODUCTION Kiewit has assembled a highly qualified local design-build team with lead designer KPFF Consulting Engineers (KPFF) and their subconsultant URS Corporation (URS). We bring local design-build experience, similar project experience and the best value through innovative design and problem solving. Kiewit has exceptional local design-build experience, having worked nearly a decade with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) on design-build projects including: . Tacoma Narrows Bridge . I-405 Kirkland Nickel Stage I . SR 519 / I-90 to SR 99 Intermodal Access I/C Improvements Phase 2 . SR 520 Pontoon Construction . I-405/NE 195th St. to SR 527 Northbound Auxiliary Lane We are currently working with KPFF on the SR 520 Pontoon Construction design-build project. Our local bridge rehabilitation experience and expertise is supplemented by bringing together people from our east coast operations and URS’s nationally-known movable bridge experts. Each successive design-build project has allowed us to further develop and refine our design-build processes. We firmly believe co-location of contractor, designers and owner at the project site is one of the keys to a successful design-build project. Co-location provides a collaborative environment for innovation and problem solving to thrive. 2.1 – DESIGN BUILD EXPERIENCE DESIGN BUILD FOR DESIGNING AND REHABILITATING BRIDGES For these unique qualifications, Kiewit can demonstrate significant design-build experience designing and rehabilitating steel bridges, including lift bridges and pre-stressed concrete bridges. Detailed project information and resumes for key staff can be found in Tab No. 4, Appendices A and B. Our representative projects include: . Tacoma Narrows Bridge (Tacoma Narrows) . Tamiani Canal Swing Bridge Emergency Repairs (Tamiani) . I-405 Kirkland Nickel Stage I (Kirkland) . Mill Basin Bridge - Redecking of the Belt Parkway (Mill Basin) . Atlantic Avenue Viaduct Rehabilitation Phase I & II (Atlantic Avenue) Tab 2 | Page 1 Tacoma Narrows Bridge (Tacoma, WA) KEY STAFF: OWNER: Washington Bill Binnig (Kiewit) Department of Transportation Dave Stegeman (Kiewit) COMPLETED: March 2008 VALUE: $627 Million Built for WSDOT by Tacoma Narrows Constructors, a multiple equity, joint venture of Bechtel and Kiewit Pacific Co., the Tacoma Narrows Bridge (Tacoma RELEVANT ELEMENTS: Narrows) project included rehabilitating the existing Design-Build suspension bridge for seismic reasons, as well as the Steel Bridge Rehabilitation design and construction of a new suspension bridge, 2.5 Historically Significant miles of road approaches, and toll-operations facilities. Self-Administered QC/QA The longest suspension span built in the United States in four decades, Tacoma Narrows was the first to be delivered under the design-build contracting model. Kiewit completed the fixed price $627 million design- build project on schedule and nearly $80 million under WSDOT’s budget. Design and construction took into account the historical significance of the existing bridge, completed in 1950 and nominated for the National Register of Historic Places. The project team worked with many Washington State agencies to ensure the aesthetics of the new bridge were similar, but not in conflict with the look of the historically significant existing bridge. Rehabilitation of the existing bridge was completed while the bridge remained open for traffic. Work included: Strengthening foundations and substructure elements at the east and west approach spans, Identifying deficiencies in the structural steel of the towers and support trusses, Removal and replacement of deficient steel truss members, Strengthening internal tower cross bracing, and Replacement of a low profile steel traffic railing with a galvanized structural steel traffic railing. The traffic railing replacement was performed while accessing the bottom of the roadway deck with movable suspended scaffold systems. The new traffic rails’ posts were drilled, bolted, and welded to the existing deck members. The project’s quality organization was self-administered under a comprehensive Quality Management Plan that included a distinct organizational and functional separation of QC and QA activities for design and construction. This organization was responsible for all inspection and testing not only at the project site, but also for materials fabricated throughout the world. The Tacoma Narrows Bridge received the following awards: 2007 Grand Award, Best of the Best, for the large project in Highways and Transportation category from Associated General Contractors of Washington 2007
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ballard/Fremont Neighborhood Greenways
    Ballard-Interbay Regional Transportation System Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board SDOT Policy & Planning Department of Transportation May 6, 2020 Presentation overview •Project background and purpose •Project scope, outcomes, schedule •Engagement/equity •Overview of comments •Questions for SBAB Department of Transportation 3 www.seattle.gov/transportation/birt Department of Transportation 2019 Washington State legislative language ESHB 1160 – Section 311(18)(b) “Funding in this subsection is provided solely The plan must examine replacement of the Ballard for the city of Seattle to develop a plan and Bridge and the Magnolia Bridge, which was damaged in report for the Ballard-Interbay Regional the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. The city must provide a Transportation System project to improve report on the plan that includes recommendations to the mobility for people and freight. The plan Seattle city council, King county council, and the must be developed in coordination and transportation committees of the legislature by partnership with entities including but not November 1, 2020. The report must include limited to the city of Seattle, King county, the recommendations on how to maintain the current and Port of Seattle, Sound Transit, the future capacities of the Magnolia and Ballard bridges, an Washington state military department for the overview and analysis of all plans between 2010 and Seattle armory, and the Washington State 2020 that examine how to replace the Magnolia bridge, Department of Transportation. and recommendations on a timeline
    [Show full text]
  • SDOT 2018 Traffic Report
    Seattle Department of Transportation 2018 TRAFFIC REPORT *2017 data CONTENTS 5 Executive Summary 7 Traffic Volumes and Speeds 8 Motor Vehicle Volumes 11 Traffic Flow Map 13 Bicycle Volumes 18 Pedestrian Volumes 21 Motor Vehicle Speeds 23 Traffic Collisions 24 Citywide Collision Rate 25 Fatal and Serious Injury Collisions 27 Pedestrian Collision Rate 30 Bicycle Collision Rate 33 Supporting Data 33 Volume Data 44 Speed Data 48 Historical Collision Data 50 2016 All Collisions 54 2016 Pedestrian Collisions 63 2016 Bicycle Collisions 75 Glossary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents an end of year review of This report is prepared in compliance with Seattle the core data sets the Seattle Department of Municipal Code 11.16.220, which requires the Transportation (SDOT) collects and maintains City Traffic Engineer to present an annual traffic including volumes, speeds, and collisions. The report that includes information about traffic use of this data, guided by department plans and trends and traffic collisions on City of Seattle policies, serves as the foundation for making streets. Beyond this legal requirement, the informed decisions on nearly all work at SDOT report strives to serve as an accessible reference from safety improvements to repaving to grant of Seattle traffic data and trends for all. applications. It is fundamental to measuring project performance. The breadth and depth of In gathering and compiling the information the data collected allows objective discussion of in this report, the Seattle Department of project merits and results, be it a new crosswalk Transportation does not waive the limitations on or an entire safety corridor. As the demands and this information’s discoverability or admissibility complexity of Seattle’s transportation network under 23 U.S.C § 409.
    [Show full text]
  • Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project
    City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project 1 Design Build Contract 2 City of Tacoma 3 Murray Morgan Bridge 4 Rehabilitation 5 6 Request for Proposal 7 September 28, 2010 8 9 10 11 12 13 Chapter 2: Technical 14 Requirements 15 16 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project 1 Contents 2 2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................... 2.1-1 3 2.1.1 GENERAL ...................................................................................................................... 2.1‐1 4 2.1.2 COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................................... 2.1‐6 5 2.1.3 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION ...................................................................................... 2.1‐10 6 2.1.4 SOFTWARE ................................................................................................................. 2.1‐14 7 2.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ................................................................ 2.2-1 8 2.3 STATE TAXES ..................................................................................... 2.3-1 9 2.4 SURVEYS AND MAPPING ................................................................... 2.4-1 10 2.4.1 GENERAL ...................................................................................................................... 2.4‐1 11 2.4.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Burke Building 400 North 34Th Street | Seattle, WA
    THE Burke Building 400 North 34th Street | Seattle, WA NEIGHBORING TENANTS FOR LEASE LOCATION high-tech 6,185 sf Fremont companies include Adobe, Impinj, Suite 200 Seattle’s funky, creative neighborhood Google, and Tableau Software “Center of the Universe” LOCATED IN FREMONT, AN OASIS FOR TECH COMPANIES For leasing information, contact JEFF LOFTUS • Newly remodeled lobbies and restrooms • Professional Management with 206.248.7326 with showers on-site building engineers [email protected] • High Speed Internet (Comcast Cable, • Views of the Ship Canal Century Link, Accel Wireless) KEN HIRATA • Parking ratio of 2/1,000 206.296.9625 • Near Fremont Canal Park, Burke • Available now [email protected] Gilman Trail, unique local shops and distinctive eateries • $32.00 PSF, FS kiddermathews.com This information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable. It is provided without any representation, warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied as to its accuracy. Prospective Buyer or Tenant should conduct an independent investigation and verification of all matters deemed to be material, including, but not limited to, statements of income and expenses. Consult your attorney, accountant, or other professional advisor. BurkeTHE Building PROXIMITY SEATTLE CBD 3 miles 10 minutes to AURORA BRIDGE downtown Seattle LAKE UNION FREMONT BRIDGE LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL N 34TH ST N 35TH ST THE BURKE BUILDING N 36TH ST JEFF LOFTUS KEN HIRATA kiddermathews.com 206.248.7326 | [email protected] 206.296.9625 | [email protected] 400 North 34th Street | Seattle, WA SHIP CANAL PARKING 2/1,000 spaces per 1,000 sf rentable area N 34TH ST SUITE 200 N 35TH ST BurkeTHE Building SECOND FLOOR SUITE 200 AVAILABLE NOW 6,185 sf JEFF LOFTUS | 206.248.7326 | [email protected] KEN HIRATA | 206.296.9625 | [email protected] This information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations & Accomplishments
    INNOVATIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS East River Bridges A $2.8 billion reconstruction program is underway to rehabilitate all four East River crossings. In 2002, these bridges carried some 467,080 vehicles per day. In 2002, working in coordination with the NYPD and other law enforcement agencies, the Division implemented enhanced security measures on these bridges. This work is ongoing. BROOKLYN BRIDGE The Brooklyn Bridge carried some 121,145 vehicles per day in 2002. The $467 million reconstruction commenced in 1980 with Contract #1, will continue with Contract #6, currently in the design phase and scheduled for completion in 2012, and will end with a seismic retrofit of the bridge, slated for completion in 2013. Work completed on the bridge to date includes reconditioning of the main cables, replacement of the suspenders and cable stays, rehabilitation of the stiffening trusses, and the replacement of the suspended spans deck. The next work scheduled for the bridge is a project to replace the existing travelers with a state of the art technology system. Construction is scheduled to begin in the spring of 2005 and conclude in the spring of 2007. Brooklyn Bridge in 1909 Pedestrian Vibration Study The major blackout of August 14, 2003 forced City officials to close the bridge to vehicular traffic and open the entire bridge to pedestrians. During this mass exodus, several pedestrians reported that the bridge was vibrating and thus causing them great anxiety. At the request of the Office of Emergency Management, an emergency inspection of the bridge was performed that evening as a result of these complaints of “swaying”; no structural problems were found.
    [Show full text]
  • Men's Soccer 2016 Record Book
    MEN’S SOCCER 2016 RECORD BOOK HUSKY SOCCER STADIUM OPENED: 1997 | SEATING CAPACITY: 2,200 | TOTAL CAPACITY: 3,100 Top Crowds Husky Soccer Stadium, a soccer-only facility that opened in 1997, is located adjacent to Here are the largest men’s soccer crowds for a Lake Washington as part of Washington’s athletic village and ranks among the top in the UW game at Husky Soccer Stadium: nation for soccer game attendance. Date Opponent Att. Sept. 25, 2016 Seattle U 3,419 Oct. 22, 2000 Stanford 3,280 With comfortable seating and a large capacity, the soccer stadium has been chosen to host Nov. 24, 2013 Seattle U 3,100 Sept. 28, 2008 Gonzaga 2,981 NCAA post-season play and has been used as a practice facility for international soccer Nov. 9, 2001 Portland 2,808 teams including European powerhouses Celtic and Barcelona. The site has also welcomed Dec. 1, 2013 Stanford 2,690 numerous Major League Soccer and national teams, including the U.S., Canada and Hon- Oct. 10, 2010 California 2,529 Oct. 24, 1999 Stanford 2,524 duras. Nov. 5, 2004 UCLA 2,520 Oct. 13, 2001 Oregon State 2,490 Nov. 8, 2013 Stanford 2,425 The 72 x 120 yard grass playing surface provides the Husky men’s and women’s program Oct. 22, 2006 UCLA 2,303 with a premier playing field on a year-round basis. Dec. 7, 2013 New Mexico 2,240 Nov. 11, 2007 Stanford 2,238 Oct. 5, 2014 Stanford 2,155 Since opening in 1997, the Huskies have posted a 135-54-16 overall record at Husky Soccer Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Pac-10 Conference Pac-12 Conference
    PAC-10 CONFERENCE PAC-12 CONFERENCE 1350 Treat Blvd., Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 // PAC-12.COM // 925.932.4411 For Immediate Release // Tuesday, September 10, 2013 Contact // Kyra Geithman ([email protected]) 2013 PAC-12 CONFERENCE MEN’S SOCCER STANDINGS Conference Overall TP W L T PCT HOME AWAY W L T PCT HOME AWAY NEUT STREAK Washington 0 0 0 0 .000 0-0 0-0 3 0 0 1.000 2-0-0 1-0-0 0-0-0 W3 California 0 0 0 0 .000 0-0 0-0 3 0 0 1.000 2-0-0 1-0-0 0-0-0 W3 Oregon State 0 0 0 0 .000 0-0 0-0 3 1 0 .750 2-0-0 1-1-0 0-0-0 W1 Stanford 0 0 0 0 .000 0-0 0-0 1 1 1 .500 0-1-1 1-0-0 0-0-0 W1 UCLA 0 0 0 0 .000 0-0 0-0 1 1 1 .500 0-1-0 1-0-0 0-0-1 L1 San Diego State 0 0 0 0 .000 0-0 0-0 1 2 0 .333 1-2-0 0-0-0 0-0-0 L2 The Conference champion is determined by highest number of points (TP); Win = 3 pts, Tie = 1 pt, Loss = 0 pts. PAC-12 MEN’S SOCCER NOTES • WASHINGTON’s senior defender Taylor Peay earned Pac-12 Player of the • THE WEEK AHEAD... Washington faces two top-25 ranked teams in No. Week honors for the week of Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal
    Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal October 2017 Alternative Formats Available Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal Prepared for: King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Wastewater Treatment Division Submitted by: Timothy Clark, Wendy Eash-Loucks, and Dean Wilson King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank for following people for their contributions to this report: Staff at the King County Environmental Laboratory for field and analytical support. Dawn Duddleson (King County) for her help in completing the literature review. The King County Water Quality and Quantity Group for their insights, especially Sally Abella for her thorough and thoughtful review. Lauran Warner, Frederick Goetz, and Kent Easthouse of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Judy Pickar (project manager), Dean Wilson (science lead), and King County project team members (Bob Bernhard, Mark Buscher, Timothy Clark, Betsy Cooper, Wendy Eash‐Loucks, Elizabeth Gaskill, Martin Grassley, Erica Jacobs, Susan Kaufman‐Una, Lester, Deborah, Kate Macneale, Chris Magan, Bruce Nairn, Sarah Ogier, Erika Peterson, John Phillips, Cathie Scott, Jim Simmonds, Jeff Stern, Dave White, Mary Wohleb, and Olivia Wright). The project’s Science and Technical Review Team members—Virgil Adderley, Mike Brett, Jay Davis, Ken Schiff, and John Stark—for guidance and review of this report. Citation King County. 2017. Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Checklist
    Spokane St Swing Bridge Access Project Seattle, Washington SEPA Checklist December 8, 2020 Spokane St Swing Bridge Access Project SEPA Checklist Page 2 of 24 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Spokane St Swing Bridge Access Project 2. Name of applicant: Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Sara Zora, Project Manager Seattle Department of Transportation Project Development Division 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3800 P.O. Box 34996 Seattle, WA 98124 206-733-9973 4. Date checklist prepared: December 12, 2020 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Access restrictions on the Spokane St Swing Bridge began in April 2020, shortly after the West Seattle High-Rise Bridge was closed due to safety concerns on March 23, 2020. These access restrictions were enforced by the Seattle Police Department until January 11, 2021, and since then by an automated photo enforcement system. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are concurrent project activities to strengthen the Spokane St Swing Bridge, construct a new telecommunications system, and replace the control systems. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A capacity analysis and traffic study were completed for the project in December 2020. Spokane St Swing Bridge Access Project SEPA Checklist Page 3 of 24 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood Canal Bridge Assessment Is a Floating Bridge Impacting the Hood Canal Ecosystem?
    Hood Canal Bridge Assessment Is a Floating Bridge Impacting the Hood Canal Ecosystem? Purpose: The Hood Canal Bridge Ecosystem Impact Assessment will pinpoint the causes of high fish Project Duration mortality at the bridge and determine whether the bridge is lowering water quality in a 2016 2018 priority water body of Washington State. Solutions that do not substantially impact the bridge Phase 1 will then be identified and tested. Context: Estimated Total Coined “the wild side of Washington”, Project Cost many tourists and locals go to Hood $2.4 Million Canal to experience nature. However, vital elements of Hood Canal’s natural ecosystem are at risk. Wild salmon — including Chinook, chum, and Funds Raised steelhead — are listed as threatened To Date under the Endangered Species Act. Low $800,000 dissolved oxygen events periodically kill fish and ocean acidification threatens commercially important Project Status shellfish beds. Research Underway The Hood Canal Bridge carries State Route 104 across the northern outlet of Hood Canal, connecting the Olympic and Kitsap peninsulas. As a floating bridge, its pontoons span 83% of the width of Hood Canal and extend 15 feet into the upper water layer. Recent studies show higher mortality of juvenile steelhead Project Partners as they migrate past the bridge. Research also suggests that the bridge may disrupt water Hood Canal Coordinating circulation for all of Hood Canal, potentially increasing water temperatures, lowering dissolved Council oxygen levels and exacerbating the effects of ocean acidification and climate change. This dual Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe threat to migrating fish and their local marine ecosystem may be limiting the effectiveness of Washington Department of millions already spent recovering steelhead, salmon and their habitat in Hood Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Environment $3.7 Billion
    Physical Environment $3.7 Billion GENERAL GOVERNMENT HEALTH AND 17% HUMAN SERVICES 19% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 21% LAW SAFETY AND JUSTICE 11% PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 32% Airport & Ferry Permitting & Facilities Environmental 2% Review Fleet Administration 1% Parks & Recreation 2% 7% Roads Solid Waste & 6% Closure 8% Water Transit Management 44% 30% Organization of the Pie Chart: The following agencies were combined to make the pie chart more readable. Roads: Roads and Roads Construction Transfers Parks & Recreation: Parks & Recreation, Youth Sports Facilities Grants, Open Space and Trails Levy Solid Waste & Closure: DNRP Admin., Solid Waste, Post‐Closure Landfill Maintenance, Historic Preservation Program Water Management: Intercounty River Improvement, Water & Land Resources, Surface Water Management Local Drainage, Wastewater Treatment, Noxious Weeds, Flood Control District Fleet Administration: Fleet Motor Pool, Fleet Management Equipment, Fleet Wastewater Equipment Repair & Replacement Airport & Ferry Facilities: Airport and Marine Services Transit: Transit and DOT Director Due to rounding, figures may not add to 100%. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM AREA INTRODUCTION The King County Physical Environment departments support services related to building and land use permitting; community and regional parks; various recreational programs; solid waste disposal; surface water management; wastewater treatment; road and bridge maintenance and improvement in the unincorporated area; and transit operations. These services are delivered by three county departments: Department of Natural Resources and Parks (DNRP), Department of Permitting and Environmental Review (DPER), and Department of Transportation (DOT). These departments are supported by dedicated funding sources and provide services that enhance the quality of life and economic vitality of the Puget Sound region. The Department of Natural Resources and Parks (DNRP) serves as the steward of the region’s environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: History and Projection of Traffic, Toll Revenues And
    APPENDIX E HISTORY AND PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC, TOLL REVENUES AND EXPENSES and Review of Physical Conditions of the Facilities of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority April 26, 2013 Prepared for the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority A Constituent Agency of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority By TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................. E-1 Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (TBTA) .......................................................... E-1 Metropolitan Area Arterial Network ............................................................................... E-3 Other Regional Toll Facilities .......................................................................................... E-4 Regional Public Transportation ....................................................................................... E-5 TOLL COLLECTION ON THE TBTA FACILITIES ................................................................ E-5 Present and Proposed Toll Structures and Operation ...................................................... E-5 E-ZPass Electronic Toll Collection System ..................................................................... E-8 TBTA‘s Role in E-ZPass ............................................................................................... E-10 Passenger Car Toll Rate Trends and Inflation ............................................................... E-11 HISTORICAL TRAFFIC, REVENUES AND EXPENSES AND ESTIMATED/BUDGETED NUMBERS
    [Show full text]