DOCSLIB.ORG

SDOT 2018 Traffic Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Seattle Department of Transportation 2018 TRAFFIC REPORT *2017 data CONTENTS 5 Executive Summary 7 Traffic Volumes and Speeds 8 Motor Vehicle Volumes 11 Traffic Flow Map 13 Bicycle Volumes 18 Pedestrian Volumes 21 Motor Vehicle Speeds 23 Traffic Collisions 24 Citywide Collision Rate 25 Fatal and Serious Injury Collisions 27 Pedestrian Collision Rate 30 Bicycle Collision Rate 33 Supporting Data 33 Volume Data 44 Speed Data 48 Historical Collision Data 50 2016 All Collisions 54 2016 Pedestrian Collisions 63 2016 Bicycle Collisions 75 Glossary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents an end of year review of This report is prepared in compliance with Seattle the core data sets the Seattle Department of Municipal Code 11.16.220, which requires the Transportation (SDOT) collects and maintains City Traffic Engineer to present an annual traffic including volumes, speeds, and collisions. The report that includes information about traffic use of this data, guided by department plans and trends and traffic collisions on City of Seattle policies, serves as the foundation for making streets. Beyond this legal requirement, the informed decisions on nearly all work at SDOT report strives to serve as an accessible reference from safety improvements to repaving to grant of Seattle traffic data and trends for all. applications. It is fundamental to measuring project performance. The breadth and depth of In gathering and compiling the information the data collected allows objective discussion of in this report, the Seattle Department of project merits and results, be it a new crosswalk Transportation does not waive the limitations on or an entire safety corridor. As the demands and this information’s discoverability or admissibility complexity of Seattle’s transportation network under 23 U.S.C § 409. grow, the information supporting decisions about that network continues to expand and now For additional information about traffic data includes significant data on pedestrians, bicycles, and collisions on Seattle streets, readers may and trucks. contact the City Traffic Engineer Dongho Chang at [email protected] or visit the SDOT webpage at www.seattle.gov/transportation/. Linea Laird, Interim Director Dongho Chang, P.E., City Traffic Engineer Seattle Department of Transportation Seattle Department of Transportation 2018 TRAFFIC REPORT | 5 6 | SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND SPEEDS The Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) collects and maintains volume data for vehicles Traffic volumes, speeds, and (including trucks), pedestrians, and bicycles. Engineers and planners use volume data to reported collisions are the three select future project locations, support grant cardinal pieces of data traffic applications, and track the performance of traffic projects once they are installed. engineers and planners use to evaluate changes to Seattle SDOT collects vehicle speed data in addition to volume data. Speed data is particularly useful streets. for making traffic safety decisions such as those connected with traffic calming, Safe Routes to School, Seattle’s Vision Zero Plan and crossing improvements. Speed data can also be reprocessed into vehicle classification data that categorizes vehicles in up to 13 different groups, including motorcycles, cars, and numerous types of trucks. Such data gives planners and engineers a better understanding of the movement of goods within the city. 2018 TRAFFIC REPORT | 7 MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUMES vehicle volume at 111 additional locations each SDOT is responsible for counting the volume of year. The locations of control, screen line, and traffic on certain city arterial streets each year. other regular counts are shown on maps in the Traffic counts are taken throughout the year at 20 appendix. SDOT also measures volume at ad control count locations, 164 screen line locations hoc locations throughout the year as needed for and 111 additional locations. traffic analysis and engineering studies. At 20 locations, SDOT conducts control counts Using the annual counts taken at 19 of Seattle’s every month. These counts are used to create bridges (including I-90, SR 520, and 1st Ave S), a monthly control factor. This factor can be SDOT derives a proxy number for citywide motor applied to every count we take to adjust for vehicle average daily traffic (ADT). Traffic volumes seasonal changes in traffic. In addition, SDOT decreased by 1.8% from 2016 to 2017. The measures vehicle volume at 164 screen line following graph of Seattle’s ADT shows overall locations. These locations are identified in trend since 2006. Population, employment, and Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan, and the counts transit ridership trends are also shown in graphs, are used to determine screen line levels of along with commute mode share for context. service as required by the plan. We also measure AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC IN SEATTLE 1,100,000 1,050,000 1,001,095 1,000,000 950,000 900,000 850,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 8 | SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SEATTLE POPULATION 750,000 713,700 700,000 650,000 600,000 550,000 500,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 180,000,000 170,580,780 170,000,000 160,000,000 150,000,000 140,000,000 130,000,000 120,000,000 110,000,000 100,000,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 TRAFFIC REPORT | 9 AVERAGE ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT SEATTLE, TACOMA, BELLEVUE 2,100,000 2,000,000 1,985,968 1,900,000 1,800,000 1,700,000 1,600,000 1,500,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 SEATTLE COMMUTE MODE SHARE* 1% 3% Drove Alone 11% Carpool Transit Walked Biked 51% 25% Other 9% *2017 American Community Survey 10 | SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC FLOW MAP In 2017 the top ten arterials for traffic volume The 2017 Traffic Flow Map is one of the products include four streets that were not on the list in of the volume counts program. The volumes on 2016: Aurora Bridge, Mercer St east of Boren Ave the map represent the Average Annual Weekday N, N 130th St east of Ashworth Ave N, Lake City Traffic (AAWDT) (5-days, 24-hour) for that section Way NE south of NE 95th St, Fremont Bridge and of roadway. A full-size version of this map is Aurora Ave N north of N 68th St. The West Seattle available on SDOT’s website at: Bridge east of the Delridge ramps continues to be www.seattle.gov/transportation/document- the busiest city street, as measured by SDOT. library/reports-and-studies Top 10 Arterials by Volume Average Week Day Traffic (AWDT) West Seattle Bridge (EB&WB), west of Alaska Way Viaduct 100,642 East Marginal Way S, south of S Alaska St 70,352 Montlake Bridge 66,361 Aurora Bridge 61,998 Mercer St, east of Boren Ave N 60,926 Ballard Bridge 59,123 N 130th St, east of Ashworth Ave N 42,968 Lake City Way NE, south of NE 95th St 42,194 Fremont Bridge, north of Point A 41,716 Aurora Ave N, north of N 68th St 40,714 2018 TRAFFIC REPORT | 11 0 0 17 0 5 2 3 00 0 N 145TH ST NE 145TH ST 9000 13600 29500 29500 34000 16900 27000 27000 0 0 0 0 15 0 57 R 76 2017 Seat 0 0 tle O O 0 S 9 E 3 0 V 0 E E 9 d 0 L T N W 2 4 E 0 A 60 0 0 Y V 0 9 N 0 0 A 5 0 4 T L W E 8 3 2 S N 30 N 6 3 1 n E 0 0 E E 0 N 0 V Bitter V A A E 7 6 a Lake V H D 1 A Traffic Flow Map T 0 R 5 H 3 0 0 u T 0 0 5 4 3 65 k N 130TH ST 00 0 0 0 0 1600 12900 20800 21500 80 3 6 6 4 3 o 1 0 0 0 e 0 Average Annual Weekday Traffic D 0 0 3700 2000 0 0 E 60 N 6 0 6 1 9 60 S 95 2 3 S M Haller 00 O NE 125TH ST 3600 3500 8200 5500 R Lake 2500 18500 17700 12000 14400 NW 125TH ST E N 125TH ST 0 76 0 A 0 V 20 0 E 3 0 0 5 1 N 0 5900 0 N 4 6 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 00 0 0 7 6 9 0 0 0 0 A 5 0 120 0 0 3 0 , 7 , 0 5 0 0 50 N 4 0 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 2 1 W 3 , 0 0 2 , , A 0 I N 5 0 2 0 N 7 0 D 8 0 5 , 7 E I 0 E 0 E 0 , 9 N W V , R 1 2 0 V 3 A E Y A 5 5 0 N 115TH ST E A M 0 D N W NE 115TH ST 7 0 N R 9500 L 50 T O Measured Value Estimated Value 3 P 9 S 2700 1 t T R T 0 Y 0 S U 0 A 1 H 0 0 0 E 0 D 6 a 0 3 IN 7 5 2 P 1 3 1 e 00 98 5 00 0 0 10 E WAY 51 NE 110TH ST T 30000 29 44 7 3 A 300 18200 1 00 129 00 3000 s G 0 2000 3 3500 g H 2 T 0 R Annual Daily Traffic from WSDOT 32 O u N h Scaled the same are purple lines N N 105TH ST 0 0 0 0 0 0 22500 24900 5 P 0 00 E 0 0 0 9 5 1 N 8 1 24 i L 33 2 E P 00 0 V 0 0 0 H 1 8 9900 A T 0 0 0 0 17 0 E A 0 Miles 0 E 7 1 NE 103RD ST 2 n N N N 1 W 75 9 24 N 1 N 98 00 W Y E 0 0.15 0.3 0.45 0.6 E N 5400 7200 A V 00 N V R 5 0 A W D Y NE 100TH ST A NW 100TH ST 33 R T A 0 N N g O L H 0 T W T I E 5 E E R V 0 E 2 5 0 T NW 96TH ST 1 N E G 0 V 0 0 3 0 S E N A 2800 8 Y 0 L O A 02 8 0 7 0 0 1 L D 2 1 1 W O t 0 NE 9 1 85 5TH ST O O 2 R 9100 Y 00 7600 C 0 O 0 70 T I 0 0 0 8 W N 92ND ST C 0 60 0 6 0 0 N 422 7 7 E 10300 5 E o 40 500 0 88 8 W 7 E N K W R E D A R 00 N 00 L N 90TH N G ST 9 N E A W E E 13100 61 V 7 5 M 1 V 1 n L A O A 0 0 H 00 H 0 H 0 0 0 T T 8 5 2 0 3 0 240 7 10 0 18 4 1 N 85TH ST NW 85TH ST CO 0 3 7300 10500 14800 12800 17500 18800 23500 26300 39000 R 0 NE 85TH ST 12 0 L 0 I 6 0 3 S 1 2500 0 00 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 S 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 50 5 0 5 1 3 0 38 00 A 3 95 0 3 1 2 2 2 6 Y 8 E 9 2 0 4 1 0 1 00 3 0 N 0 00 N 4 NW 80TH ST 5 0 NE 80TH ST 66 E 0 3 0 10500 14600 14300 14000 15000 13800 23900 B V 0 00 A 2800 4700 96 A 17200 10000 6800 0 N 0 H 0 0 2 N N 0 0 E E T 0 0 0 AV E R 0 0 3 0 4 5 A 8 0 A 0 W 8 1 0 N S 0 O T 0 A 3 1 0 9 IN Y 7 0 G 0 W 9 W 0 2 N 0 NE 75TH 2 R ST 4 N 90 E E A E EN L KE 0 40 E 0 18100 W D 0 R 19500 2010600 17200 12300 5600 N 1 V 00 N 13000 80 N 60 77 A E 0 3 3 70 0 E 0 V W
Recommended publications
  • Ballard/Fremont Neighborhood Greenways

    Ballard/Fremont Neighborhood Greenways

    Ballard-Interbay Regional Transportation System Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board SDOT Policy & Planning Department of Transportation May 6, 2020 Presentation overview •Project background and purpose •Project scope, outcomes, schedule •Engagement/equity •Overview of comments •Questions for SBAB Department of Transportation 3 www.seattle.gov/transportation/birt Department of Transportation 2019 Washington State legislative language ESHB 1160 – Section 311(18)(b) “Funding in this subsection is provided solely The plan must examine replacement of the Ballard for the city of Seattle to develop a plan and Bridge and the Magnolia Bridge, which was damaged in report for the Ballard-Interbay Regional the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. The city must provide a Transportation System project to improve report on the plan that includes recommendations to the mobility for people and freight. The plan Seattle city council, King county council, and the must be developed in coordination and transportation committees of the legislature by partnership with entities including but not November 1, 2020. The report must include limited to the city of Seattle, King county, the recommendations on how to maintain the current and Port of Seattle, Sound Transit, the future capacities of the Magnolia and Ballard bridges, an Washington state military department for the overview and analysis of all plans between 2010 and Seattle armory, and the Washington State 2020 that examine how to replace the Magnolia bridge, Department of Transportation. and recommendations on a timeline
  • Burke Building 400 North 34Th Street | Seattle, WA

    Burke Building 400 North 34Th Street | Seattle, WA

    THE Burke Building 400 North 34th Street | Seattle, WA NEIGHBORING TENANTS FOR LEASE LOCATION high-tech 6,185 sf Fremont companies include Adobe, Impinj, Suite 200 Seattle’s funky, creative neighborhood Google, and Tableau Software “Center of the Universe” LOCATED IN FREMONT, AN OASIS FOR TECH COMPANIES For leasing information, contact JEFF LOFTUS • Newly remodeled lobbies and restrooms • Professional Management with 206.248.7326 with showers on-site building engineers [email protected] • High Speed Internet (Comcast Cable, • Views of the Ship Canal Century Link, Accel Wireless) KEN HIRATA • Parking ratio of 2/1,000 206.296.9625 • Near Fremont Canal Park, Burke • Available now [email protected] Gilman Trail, unique local shops and distinctive eateries • $32.00 PSF, FS kiddermathews.com This information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable. It is provided without any representation, warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied as to its accuracy. Prospective Buyer or Tenant should conduct an independent investigation and verification of all matters deemed to be material, including, but not limited to, statements of income and expenses. Consult your attorney, accountant, or other professional advisor. BurkeTHE Building PROXIMITY SEATTLE CBD 3 miles 10 minutes to AURORA BRIDGE downtown Seattle LAKE UNION FREMONT BRIDGE LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL N 34TH ST N 35TH ST THE BURKE BUILDING N 36TH ST JEFF LOFTUS KEN HIRATA kiddermathews.com 206.248.7326 | [email protected] 206.296.9625 | [email protected] 400 North 34th Street | Seattle, WA SHIP CANAL PARKING 2/1,000 spaces per 1,000 sf rentable area N 34TH ST SUITE 200 N 35TH ST BurkeTHE Building SECOND FLOOR SUITE 200 AVAILABLE NOW 6,185 sf JEFF LOFTUS | 206.248.7326 | [email protected] KEN HIRATA | 206.296.9625 | [email protected] This information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable.
  • Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal

    Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal

    Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal October 2017 Alternative Formats Available Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal Prepared for: King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Wastewater Treatment Division Submitted by: Timothy Clark, Wendy Eash-Loucks, and Dean Wilson King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank for following people for their contributions to this report: Staff at the King County Environmental Laboratory for field and analytical support. Dawn Duddleson (King County) for her help in completing the literature review. The King County Water Quality and Quantity Group for their insights, especially Sally Abella for her thorough and thoughtful review. Lauran Warner, Frederick Goetz, and Kent Easthouse of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Judy Pickar (project manager), Dean Wilson (science lead), and King County project team members (Bob Bernhard, Mark Buscher, Timothy Clark, Betsy Cooper, Wendy Eash‐Loucks, Elizabeth Gaskill, Martin Grassley, Erica Jacobs, Susan Kaufman‐Una, Lester, Deborah, Kate Macneale, Chris Magan, Bruce Nairn, Sarah Ogier, Erika Peterson, John Phillips, Cathie Scott, Jim Simmonds, Jeff Stern, Dave White, Mary Wohleb, and Olivia Wright). The project’s Science and Technical Review Team members—Virgil Adderley, Mike Brett, Jay Davis, Ken Schiff, and John Stark—for guidance and review of this report. Citation King County. 2017. Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal.
  • Ordinance 13166

    Ordinance 13166

    Aprill, 1998 clerk 5/19198 Introduced By: Rob McKenna Proposed No.: ", 1 ORDINANCE NO. _ 2 AN ORDINANCE for the September 1998 public 3 transportation service improvements for King County. 4 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 5 The September 1998 public transportation service improvements for 6 King County, substantially as described in Exhibits A, B, and C, attached hereto, are hereby 7 approved. 8 SECTION 2. These transportation service improvements will be implemented 9 effective September 19, 1998, except that the total amount of service change is significantly 10 more than was anticipated the adopted 1998 budget, and some service improvements may 11 be instead implemented in 1999 as vehicles, operator and budget allow, 12 13 16 17 18 - 1 ­ 6 1 The Metro Transit U1\rlS1C)ll shall work with the local jurisdictions, 2 residents and bus riders to determine the appropriate streets on which to operate the Routes 3 72 and 79 north Seattle and the appropriate +..",.....,+ community service network for 4 Mercer Island including possible revisions to Route 201. The division shall submit 5 recommendations on these services to the council by September 30, 1998. 6 INTRODUCED READ for the first time this ~~__ day of 7 8 PASSED by a vote of /3 to 0 this...l.-.::::.._ day of Vl11ay 9 19!!(f' 10 KING COUNTY COUNCIL 11 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~)2J~ 12 13 Charr 14 ATTEST: 15 ~counCil 16 18 19 Attachments: Exhibit A - September 1998 Service Changes King County 21 Exhibit B - September 1998 Service Changes West King County 22 Exhibit C - 1998 Service Changes South King County & 23 West Seattle - 2 ­ EXHIBEDH.DOC September 1998 Service Change Ordinance EXHIBIT A 31 Exhibit A: EXHIBETC.DOC 5/12198 September 1998 Service Change Ordinance EXHIBIT A EAST SUBAREA SERVICE CHANGES ROUTE: 222 1 1 OBJECTIVE: 1.
  • Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

    Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

    Submitted by: Kiewit Pacific Co. Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Specification No. PW10-0128F Submitted to: Purchasing Office, Tacoma Public Utilities 3628 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409 June 8, 2010 Tab No. 1 - General Company Information & Team Structure Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Project TAB NO.1 - GENERAL COMPANY INFORMATION AND TEAM STRUCTURE Kiewit Pacific Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kiewit Infrastructure Group, Inc., will be the contracting party for this project, as indicated on Forms 3 and 4 in Tab No. 4 - Appendix C. As a wholly-owned subsidiary, none of the officers of Kiewit Pacific Co. (Kiewit) own stock. Incorporated on May 18, 1982, we can trace our history back to 1884, when Peter and Andrew Kiewit formed Kiewit Brothers, an Omaha masonry contracting partnership. Today, we are part of one of North America's largest and most respected construction and mining organizations. We take our place in the corporate structure of our parent company, Kiewit Infrastructure Group Inc., alongside Kiewit Construction Company and Kiewit Southern Co. Our affiliates and subsidiaries, as well as those of our parent company, operate from a network of offices throughout North America. We draw upon the Kiewit Corporation’s collective experience and personnel to assemble the strongest team possible for a given project. Therefore, work experience of such affiliates and subsidiaries is relevant in demonstrating our capabilities. For the Murray Morgan Bridge, we are supplementing our local talent with extensive moveable bridge expertise from our east coast operations, Kiewit Constructors, Inc. We are also utilizing our local subsidiary, General Construction Company (General), for mechanical and electrical expertise.
  • Estimating PCB and PBDE Loadings to the Lake Washington Watershed: Final Data Report

    Estimating PCB and PBDE Loadings to the Lake Washington Watershed: Final Data Report

    Estimating PCB and PBDE Loadings to the Lake Washington Watershed: Final Data Report September 2013 Alternate Formats Available 206-296-6519 TTY Relay: 711 Estimating PCB and PBDE Loading Reductions to the Lake Washington Watershed: Final Data Report Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Submitted by: Richard Jack and Jenée Colton King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Funded by the United States Environmental Protection Agency Grant PC-J28501-1 Disclaimer: This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement PC-00J285-01 to King County. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. King County i September 2013 Estimating PCBs and PBDEs Loadings to the Lake Washington Watershed: Final Data Report Acknowledgements A fantastic group of people have made this project possible and contributed to its success. Colin Elliott of the King County Environmental Laboratory provided laboratory project management services throughout the field study. Many thanks go to Ben Budka, Marc Patten, David Robinson, Bob Kruger, Jim Devereaux, and Stephanie Hess, who led the year-long field sampling program. The knowledgeable staff at AXYS Analytical Services (AXYS) provided high quality advice and analytical services. Archie Allen and Kirk Tullar of the Washington Department of Transportation provided critical assistance during siting and sampling of the highway bridge runoff location. John Williamson of the Washington Department of Ecology graciously allowed us access and shared space at the Beacon Hill air station.
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 117.1058

    Coast Guard, DHS § 117.1058

    Coast Guard, DHS § 117.1058 through the Seattle Marine Operator, accumulated vehicular traffic. How- Station KOH, or through other marine ever, the draw shall open without wire or radiotelephone service. delay, when requested by vessels en- (c) The draw need not be opened from gaged in towing operations. 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Fri- (2) For any vessel or watercraft of day, except for all Federal holidays less than 1,000 gross tons, unless the other than Columbus Day. vessel has in tow a vessel of 1,000 gross tons or over, from Monday through [CGD 82–025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD13 84–13, 49 FR 35628, Sept. Friday, except Federal Holidays: 11, 1984; CGD13–94–039, 60 FR 54434, Oct. 24, (i) The draw need not open from 7 1995] a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. from April 30 to September 1 and § 117.1051 Lake Washington Ship from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. and from 3:30 Canal. p.m. to 7 p.m. from September 1 to (a) When fog prevails by day or by April 30. night, the drawtender of each bridge (ii) The draw need open only on the listed in this section, after giving the hour and half hour from 12:30 p.m. to acknowledging signal to open, shall 3:30 p.m. and from 6 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. toll a bell continuously during the ap- [CGD 82–025, 49 FR 17452, Apr.
  • WEST SEATTLE BRIDGE CLOSURE Transit Action Plan FINAL

    WEST SEATTLE BRIDGE CLOSURE Transit Action Plan FINAL

    WEST SEATTLE BRIDGE CLOSURE Transit Action Plan FINAL July 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Transit Action Plan .................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction/Problem Statement ................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose of Plan ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Mobility Planning for 2021 and Beyond ................................................................................................... 6 Goals & Objectives ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Challenges/Opportunities ......................................................................................................................... 7 Travel Markets .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Data Analytics ............................................................................................................................................
  • Historic Seattle 2016 Programs Historic Seattle

    Historic Seattle 2016 Programs Historic Seattle

    HISTORIC SEATTLE 2016 PROGRAMS HISTORIC SEATTLE HISTORIC SEATTLE is proud to offer an outstanding 2016 educational program for lovers of buildings and heritage. 2016 Enjoy lectures and workshops, private home, local, and out-of-town tours, informal advocacy-focused, issues- PROGRAMS based events, and special opportunities that bring you closer to understanding and PAGE appreciating the rich and varied JANUARY built environment that we seek 26 (TUES) Members Meeting: German House 3 to preserve and protect with your help. FEBRUARY 6 (SAT) Workshop: Digging Deeper: Pacific Northwest Railroad Archive 7 20 (SAT) Tour: Religious Life off Campus: University District Churches 10 28 (SUN) Documentary Screening: Bungalow Heaven 4 MARCH 8 (TUES) Tour: First Hill Neighborhood 10 9 (WED) Lectures: Gardens of Eden: American Visions of Residential Communities 4 12 (SAT) Workshop: Digging Deeper: Special Collections, University of Washington 7 26 (SAT) Tour: Georgetown Steam Plant 11 APRIL 2 (SAT) Tour: Montlake 11 4 (MON) Members Meeting: Congregation Shevet Achim 3 9 (SAT) Workshop: Digging Deeper: Seattle Theatre Group Library 7 23 (SAT) Tour A: Behind the Garden Wall: Good Shepherd Center Gardens 8 30 (SAT) Tour B: Behind the Garden Wall: Good Shepherd Center Gardens 8 COVER PHOTO MAY From “Seattle: In the Charmed Land,” 7 (SAT) Workshop: Digging Deeper: Ballard Historical Society 7 Seattle Chamber of Commerce, 1932 9 (MON) Lecture: The Impact of World War I on Seattle and its Cityscape 5 Collection of Eugenia Woo 22 (SUN) Tour: Bloxom Residence,
  • Baseline Or No Build Scenario

    Baseline Or No Build Scenario

    Appendix A Alternatives Technical Report TRANSPORTATION 2040 Appendix A ALTERNATIVES TECHNICAL REPORT Contents 1. Process of designing the alternatives ...................................................................................1 a. Organizational structure b. Organizational process 2. The alternatives....................................................................................................................3 a. Introduction to the alternatives ......................................................................................3 b. The baseline alternative .................................................................................................3 c. Core strategies for all action alternatives.....................................................................15 d. Alternative 1.................................................................................................................18 e. Alternative 2.................................................................................................................27 f. Alternative 3.................................................................................................................32 g. Alternative 4.................................................................................................................39 h. Alternative 5.................................................................................................................46 i. Preferred Alternative (Constrained) ..........................................................................
  • DIRECTIONS from the North (Everett, Bellingham, Vancouver, BC) 1) Take South on I-5

    DIRECTIONS from the North (Everett, Bellingham, Vancouver, BC) 1) Take South on I-5

    DIRECTIONS From the North (Everett, Bellingham, Vancouver, BC) 1) Take south on I-5. 2) Look for and get off at the exit marked N. 45th Street and N. 50th Street. 3) Turn to the left (east) onto N.E. 50th Street. (If you miss 50th, get off on 45th). 4) Go approximately 3/4 mile on N.E. 50th (or 45th), turn right (south) onto 15th Avenue N.E. 5) Go to the fourth light (one block past the pedestrian overpass) to N.E. 40th Street. 6) Get into the left-hand turn lane at N.E. 40th Street. 7) Enter the UW campus at Gate 5 (N.E. 40th and 15th Ave. N.E.). 8) Go up the hill past Gate 5 and turn right (south) onto Stevens Way at the first corner. 9) Benson Hall is the third building down the road on the left-hand side. 10) Turn into the lower driveway, just before the "Benson Hall" sign. 11) There is a 30-minute limit for parking in the Loading Zone area of Benson Hall. The "Parking Enforcement" is strictly monitored. From the Eastside (Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond) 1. Take I-520 west, across the Lake Washington floating bridge, towards Seattle. 2. On the Seattle side, take the second exit, "Montlake." 3. At the end of the exit, go right onto Montlake Avenue; you'll be heading north. Start moving over to the left lane as soon as you can. 4. Proceed across the Montlake Bridge, a small lift bridge crossing the Lake Washington Ship Canal. 5.
  • Freeway Network Usage and Performance

    Freeway Network Usage and Performance

    CentralPugetSound FREEWAY NETWORK USAGE AND PERFORMANCE Washington State Department of Transportation 1999 Update, Volume 1 Washington State Transportation Center Research Report Research Project T1803, Task 19 FLOW Evaluation Central Puget Sound FREEWAY NETWORK USAGE AND PERFORMANCE 1999 Update, Volume 1 by Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 John M. Ishimaru University District Building Senior Research Engineer 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Jennifer Nee Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 Research Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation Mark E. Hallenbeck Technical Monitor , David P. McCormick Director Regional Traffic Engineer Prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission Department of Transportation and in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Network Usage and Performance 1 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 493.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Central Puget Sound Freeway Network Usage and Performance, May 2001 1999 Update, Volume 1 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. John M. Ishimaru, Jennifer Nee, and Mark E. Hallenbeck 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. University District Building; 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Agreement T1803, Task 19 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED Washington State Department of Transportation Research report Transportation Building, MS 7370 Olympia, Washington 98504-7370 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Project Manager Gary Ray, 360-705-7975 15.