City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Design Build Contract 2 City of Tacoma

3 Murray Morgan Bridge

4 Rehabilitation

5

6 Request for Proposal 7 September 28, 2010 8 9 10 11 12

13 Chapter 2: Technical

14 Requirements

15

16

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Contents 2 2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION ...... 2.1-1 3 2.1.1 GENERAL ...... 2.1‐1 4 2.1.2 COMMUNICATIONS ...... 2.1‐6 5 2.1.3 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION ...... 2.1‐10 6 2.1.4 SOFTWARE ...... 2.1‐14 7 2.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.2-1 8 2.3 STATE TAXES ...... 2.3-1 9 2.4 SURVEYS AND MAPPING ...... 2.4-1 10 2.4.1 GENERAL ...... 2.4‐1 11 2.4.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.4‐1 12 2.4.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.4‐2 13 2.4.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.4‐3 14 2.4.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.4‐3 15 2.4.6 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.4‐4 16 2.5 PAVEMENT ...... 2.5-1 17 2.5.1 GENERAL ...... 2.5‐1 18 2.5.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.5‐1 19 2.5.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.5‐2 20 2.5.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.5‐3 21 2.5.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.5‐3 22 2.5.6 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.5‐4 23 2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ...... 2.6-1 24 2.6.1 GENERAL ...... 2.6‐1 25 2.6.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.6‐1 26 2.6.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.6‐2 27 2.6.4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS (ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS) 2.6‐6 28 2.6.5 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.6‐19 29 2.7 PUBLIC INFORMATION ...... 2.7-1 30 2.7.1 GENERAL ...... 2.7‐1 31 2.7.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.7‐2 32 2.7.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.7‐2 33 2.7.4 CITY OF TACOMA’S COMMUNICATIONS RESPONSIBILITIES ...... 2.7‐2 34 2.7.5 DESIGN‐BUILDER’S ROLE IN PUBLIC INFORMATION EFFORTS ...... 2.7‐3 35 2.7.6 DESIGN‐BUILDER PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIFICATIONS ...... 2.7‐5 36 2.7.7 METHODS AND TOOLS FOR DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION ...... 2.7‐8 37 2.7.8 CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION ...... 2.7‐11 38 2.7.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL ...... 2.7‐11 39 2.7.10 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.7‐12 40 2.8 UTILITIES, UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND RELOCATION AGREEMENTS 41 ...... 2.8-1 42 2.8.1 GENERAL ...... 2.8‐1 43 2.8.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.8‐2 44 2.8.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.8‐3 45 2.8.4 UTILITY RELOCATIONS ...... 2.8‐4 46 2.8.5 IDENTIFICATION OF UTILITIES ...... 2.8‐7

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 i

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.8.6 SCHEDULING, COORDINATION, AND CORRESPONDENCE ...... 2.8‐10 2 2.8.7 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.8‐11 3 2.8.8 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.8‐12 4 2.9 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION ...... 2.9-1 5 2.9.1 GENERAL ...... 2.9‐1 6 2.9.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.9‐1 7 2.9.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.9‐1 8 2.9.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.9‐2 9 2.9.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.9‐3 10 2.9.6 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.9‐6 11 2.10 BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES ...... 2.10-1 12 2.10.1 GENERAL ...... 2.10‐1 13 2.10.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.10‐8 14 2.10.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.10‐10 15 2.10.4 DESIGN CRITERIA ...... 2.10‐10 16 2.10.5 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ...... 2.10‐29 17 2.10.6 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.10‐33 18 2.11 BRIDGE ELECTRICAL POWER AND CONTROL ...... 2.11-1 19 2.11.1 GENERAL ...... 2.11‐1 20 2.11.2 SCOPE OF WORK ...... 2.11‐2 21 2.11.3 PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.11‐2 22 2.11.4 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.11‐3 23 2.11.5 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.11‐5 24 2.11.6 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ...... 2.11‐6 25 2.11.7 SALVAGE ...... 2.11‐20 26 2.11.8 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.11‐20 27 2.12 MECHANICAL WORK ...... 2.12-1 28 2.12.1 GENERAL ...... 2.12‐1 29 2.12.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.12‐2 30 2.12.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.12‐3 31 2.12.4 DESIGN CRITERIA ...... 2.12‐4 32 2.12.5 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ...... 2.12‐14 33 2.12.6 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.12‐14 34 2.13 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ...... 2.13-1 35 2.13.1 GENERAL ...... 2.13‐1 36 2.13.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.13‐1 37 2.13.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.13‐2 38 2.13.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.13‐4 39 2.13.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.13‐8 40 2.13.6 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.13‐8 41 2.14 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS ...... 2.14-1 42 2.14.1 GENERAL ...... 2.14‐1 43 2.14.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.14‐1 44 2.14.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.14‐1 45 2.14.4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.14‐2 46 2.14.5 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.14‐3 47 2.15 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ...... 2.15-1 48 2.16 WATERWAY, FREEWAY AND CITY TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ...... 2.16-1

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 ii

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.16.1 GENERAL ...... 2.16‐1 2 2.16.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.16‐1 3 2.16.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.16‐1 4 2.17 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT) ...... 2.17-1 5 2.17.1 GENERAL ...... 2.17‐1 6 2.17.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.17‐1 7 2.17.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.17‐2 8 2.17.4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.17‐3 9 2.17.5 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.17‐15 10 2.18 RAILROADS ...... 2.18-1 11 2.18.1 GENERAL ...... 2.18‐1 12 2.18.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.18‐1 13 2.18.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.18‐1 14 2.18.4 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.18‐2 15 2.18.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.18‐4 16 2.18.6 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.18‐4 17 2.19 RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW) ...... 2.19-1 18 2.19.1 GENERAL ...... 2.19‐1 19 2.19.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.19‐1 20 2.19.3 ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AND EASEMENTS ...... 2.19‐1 21 2.19.4 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ...... 2.19‐1 22 2.19.5 DEMOLITION ...... 2.19‐2 23 2.19.6 RIGHTS OF ENTRY ...... 2.19‐2 24 2.19.7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS ...... 2.19‐3 25 2.19.8 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.19‐3 26 2.20 CONTROL OF MATERIALS ...... 2.20-1 27 2.20.1 GENERAL ...... 2.20‐1 28 2.20.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.20‐1 29 2.20.3 MATERIALS APPROVAL ...... 2.20‐1 30 2.20.4 ACCEPTANCE OF MATERIALS ...... 2.20‐3 31 2.20.5 HANDLING AND STORING MATERIALS ...... 2.20‐7 32 2.20.6 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE MIX DESIGN AND BATCH PLANT ...... 2.20‐7 33 2.20.7 HOT MIX ASHPALT MIX DESIGN AND ASPHALT CONCRETE PLANT ...... 2.20‐8 34 2.20.8 CITY INSPECTED AND TESTED ITEMS ...... 2.20‐9 35 2.20.9 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.20‐10 36 2.21 NOISE MONITORING AND CONTROL...... 2.21-1 37 2.21.1 GENERAL ...... 2.21‐1 38 2.21.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.21‐1 39 2.21.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.21‐1 40 2.21.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.21‐1 41 2.21.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.21‐2 42 2.21.6 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.21‐2 43 2.22 DESIGN-BUILD QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (QMP) REQUIREMENTS 44 ...... 2.22-1 45 2.22.1 GENERAL ...... 2.22‐1 46 2.22.2 DESIGN‐BUILDER QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AND QUALITY CONTROL (QC) STAFF .. 2.22‐6 47 2.22.3 DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AND QUALITY CONTROL (QC) REQUIREMENTS OF 48 THE QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (QMP) ...... 2.22‐9

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 iii

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.22.4 MATERIALS QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AND QUALITY CONTROL (QC) PLAN 2 REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.22‐14 3 2.22.5 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4 ...... 2.22‐19 5 2.22.6 SUBMITTALS ...... 2.22‐25 6 2.23 MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION ...... 2.23-1 7 2.23.1 GENERAL ...... 2.23‐1 8 2.23.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ...... 2.23‐1 9 2.23.3 MAINTENANCE OF THE RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ...... 2.23‐2 10 2.23.4 MAINENANCE OF ROADWAYS ...... 2.23‐3 11 2.23.5 ELECTRICAL ...... 2.23‐5 12 2.23.6 HAZARDOUS SPILLS RESPONSE ...... 2.23‐5 13 2.23.7 STRUCTURES ...... 2.23‐6 14 2.23.8 EMERGENCY RESPONSE ...... 2.23‐6 15 2.23.9 MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY ...... 2.23‐6 16 2.23.10 MAINTENANCE OF AESTHETIC TREATMENT ...... 2.23‐7 17 2.24 PRODUCT WARRANTY PROVISIONS ...... 2.24-1 18 2.24.1 WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS ...... 2.24‐1 19 2.24.2 GENERAL WARRANTY ...... 2.24‐3 20 2.24.3 CONTACTS ...... 2.24‐4 21

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 iv

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION

2 2.1.1 GENERAL 3 Design-Build Flexibility – The City of Tacoma intends to allow the Design-Builder 4 flexibility in design and construction by accommodating the processes, procedures, and 5 innovative techniques that are preferred by the Design-Builder, as long as they are 6 consistent with the Basic Configuration, Site conditions, good engineering practices, and 7 the standards, guidelines, and procedures identified in the Contract. 8 9 Other Agencies – The City of Tacoma has reviewed the Project with public and private 10 agencies, and incorporated feedback from those agencies into these Technical 11 Requirements and Appendices. The City of Tacoma does not guarantee that the agencies 12 will not impose additional requirements after completion of their review of the Design- 13 Builder’s design, or that additional feedback from the agencies will not be incorporated. 14 For local permits to be obtained by the Design-Builder, all contact with the necessary 15 other agencies shall be coordinated by the Design-Builder. 16 17 The Design-Builder shall promptly notify the City of Tacoma any additional agency 18 requirements. The Design-Builder and the City of Tacoma shall coordinate all 19 negotiations with the appropriate agencies.

20 2.1.1.1 SCOPE 21 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to deliver or construct the Project, 22 unless the Work is specified to be performed by the City of Tacoma or by others. Quality 23 Control and Quality Assurance processes shall apply to all aspects of the Work, including 24 but not limited to, design, construction, environmental compliance, maintenance of 25 traffic, public involvement, utilities, and control of materials. These processes shall be 26 outlined in the Quality Management Plan.

27 2.1.1.2 DEFINITIONS 28 The following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings: 29 30 Appendix (Appendices) – Where referred to in the RFP (without other reference), 31 the term Appendix (Appendices) refers to the document listed in Appendix A1. 32 33 Project – The Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Project. 34 35 Review and Comment – The process for reviewing and commenting on the Design- 36 Builder’s submittals in accordance with the Design-Builder’s responsibility for Work. 37 See Section 1-05 of the General Provisions.

38 2.1.1.3 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT 39 The Project shall be designed, constructed, and documented in English units of measure.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.1.1.4 PURPOSE 2 The purpose of the Project is to rehabilitate the Bridge and allow all legal traffic to use 3 the bridge crossing without load restriction. The Project will relieve intercity congestion, 4 enhance mobility and reconnect a vital link across the Thea Foss Waterway.

5 2.1.1.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6 The City of Tacoma plans to rehabilitate the Murray Morgan Bridge (East 11th Street over 7 the Thea Foss Waterway) in Tacoma, Washington. 8 9 The rehabilitation consists of repair of the three truss spans over the Thea Foss 10 Waterway, repair and/or replacement of the mechanical systems, replacement of the 11 electrical systems (including controls, signals, and illumination), repairs to the two 12 approach structures, utility relocations, and stormwater collection with enhanced 13 treatment. 14 15 The existing four-lane bridge decks, on the City approach and the three center truss 16 spans will be removed and replaced with two 12-foot travel lanes, two 5-foot bicycle 17 lanes, and two pedestrian sidewalks. The existing cantilevered sidewalks on the City 18 approach and the three center truss spans will be removed and not replaced (except over 19 I-705 south bound and as needed to accommodate existing stair landing which will be 20 replaced). New sidewalks will be constructed inside of the historic four lane footprint. 21 The width of the Port approach will not change but will be modified to accommodate two 22 vehicle lanes, two bicycle lanes and two sidewalks. 23 24 The project components include but are not limited to: 25 26 • Base Program – Complete structural rehabilitation of the three center truss 27 spans; partial rehabilitation of the City and Port approach structures, to allow all 28 legal traffic vehicles to use the bridge without load restriction, at a design speed 29 of 35 mph; and selected repair and/or replacement of mechanical and electrical 30 systems. 31 o City Approach (South Approach) 32 ƒ Remove existing roadway decks. 33 ƒ Remove existing cantilever sidewalks (except replace over I-705 south 34 bound and as needed to accommodate existing stair landing). 35 ƒ Repair/rehabilitate and relocate existing historic handrail as needed, 36 including the handrail located on the unused vehicle and sidewalk ramps 37 to replace the chain link fence and existing wood rail on the pedestrian 38 route between the existing stairs. 39 ƒ Repair or replace existing timber walkway and stairs, as necessary, 40 including relocating lowest flight off of the existing timber landing. 41 ƒ Remove existing timber stair landing and 12 piling. 42 ƒ Relocate utilities conduits as needed. 43 ƒ Install railroad fence along the bridge deck and pedestrian walkway. 44 ƒ Repair girders, floor beams and stringers as needed to accommodate new 45 loading. 46 ƒ Provide new maintenance access to allow for routine cleaning and 47 inspection above BNSF and I-705.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 ƒ Repair column bents including floor beam, column, girder and lateral 2 bracing at connections. 3 ƒ Repair column base connections. 4 ƒ Spot paint all new and repaired steel. 5 ƒ New stormwater catchment system including enhanced stormwater 6 treatment. 7 ƒ New roadway and sidewalk deck system, with water tight expansion 8 joints, to accommodate new lane configuration. 9 10 o Center Truss Spans 11 ƒ Remove existing roadway deck. 12 ƒ Remove existing cantilever sidewalks. 13 ƒ Relocate utilities conduits as needed. 14 ƒ Repair/rehabilitate and relocate existing historic handrail as needed. 15 ƒ Repair gusset plates and truss bottom chords. 16 ƒ Repair truss elements, as needed, to accommodate all legal traffic loads. 17 ƒ Repair floor beams and stringers as needed to accommodate all legal 18 traffic loads. 19 ƒ Seismic enhancements to trusses, towers and bearings. 20 ƒ Provide new maintenance access to allow for routine cleaning and 21 inspection of gusset plates and bottom chords. 22 ƒ New roadway and sidewalk deck system, with water tight expansion joints 23 (except at lift span), to accommodate new lane configuration. 24 ƒ Completely paint truss spans and towers. 25 26 o Mechanical and Electrical Systems 27 ƒ Adjust span balance for lighter weight lift span. 28 ƒ Replace main counterweight sheave assemblies 29 ƒ Modify towers to maintain existing sheave trunnion elevation. 30 ƒ Replace span and counterweight guide rails and rollers. 31 ƒ Replace or repair span live load support rockers. 32 ƒ Replace centering devices. 33 ƒ Replace exposed vertical power rail system. 34 ƒ Repair and upgrade the electrical grounding and bonding system. 35 ƒ Provide electrically operated traffic control equipment and controls, 36 including traffic lights, traffic warning gates and traffic barrier gates. 37 ƒ Replace and/or upgrade bridge operating lights. 38 ƒ Replace roadway and pedestrian lighting. 39 40 o Port Approach (North Approach) 41 ƒ Remove existing asphalt on the approach structure girders. 42 ƒ Place waterproof membrane and place asphalt overlay on the approach 43 structure. 44 ƒ Remove and replace expansion joints with water tight expansion joints. 45 ƒ Repair concrete girders beneath vehicle travel lanes. 46 ƒ Repair cap beams. 47 ƒ Clean existing bearings. 48 ƒ Repair columns. 49 ƒ New stormwater catchment system including enhanced stormwater 50 treatment.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 ƒ Covert the bridge from a 4 traffic lane configuration to a 2 traffic lane 2 configuration. 3 4 o Supplemental Program – Complete the rehabilitation of the City and Port 5 approach structures, to allow all legal traffic vehicles to use the structures 6 without load restriction, at a design speed of 35 mph; and complete repair 7 and/or replacement of mechanical and electrical systems. 8 9 o City Approach (South Approach) 10 ƒ Completely paint all steel 11 ƒ Provide new maintenance access to allow for routine cleaning and 12 inspection above Dock Street and City owned property. 13 ƒ Seismically retrofit the City Approach structure. 14 ƒ Remove existing asphalt covered timber road decks. 15 16 o Center Truss Spans 17 ƒ Repair spalled concrete on in-water piers above the Ordinary High Water 18 Line. 19 20 o Mechanical and Electrical Systems 21 ƒ Provide complete replacement electrical power and control system, 22 including new motors, motor brakes and machinery brake. 23 ƒ Replace the operating rope system, including cross shafts from the gear 24 frame, operating rope drum assemblies, deflector sheave assemblies, and 25 tower and pier take-ups. 26 ƒ Replace the open gear frame with new enclosed gear reduction units. 27 ƒ Provide new emergency drive system to operate using City owned 125 28 KVA portable generator. 29 ƒ Provide new span locks. 30 31 o Port Approach (North Approach) 32 ƒ Grind existing asphalt on the fill approach above existing retaining walls. 33 ƒ Place asphalt overlay on the fill approach. 34 ƒ Modify the existing pedestrian barriers to a minimum height of 42 inches. 35 ƒ Repair all remaining concrete girders. 36 ƒ Repair concrete retaining walls. 37 ƒ Seismically retrofit the Port Approach structure.

38 2.1.1.6 PROJECT VALUES AND GOALS 39 The following are the City’s values: 40 • Safety 41 • Accountability (on time, on budget, quality products and services) 42 • Effective and Transparent Communication 43 • Stewardship of Public Resources (including environmental protection, 44 sustainability, and maintaining historically significant structures) 45 • Cost Effective Innovation 46 • Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Contractor Participation

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 With the above values in mind, the City has established the following Project goals. 2 These goals are listed below: 3 • Lead Project to Success – Establish successful working relationships with 4 Project participants holding diverse and competing interests and goals. Achieve 5 successful outcomes through dynamic leadership. 6 • Timely Delivery of a Quality Product – Meet or exceed technical quality 7 requirements for design and rehabilitation of the bridge, with construction 8 completion by December 31, 2012. 9 • Minimize Life Cycle Costs – Design the rehabilitation taking into account 10 future life cycle costs and to reduce operation and maintenance costs. 11 • Environmental Stewardship – Reduce or eliminate environmental impacts 12 through effective design and construction practices; meet or exceed 13 environmental requirements with no permit violations. 14 • Historical Mitigation – Mitigate construction impacts to historical features of 15 the bridge. 16 • Sustainability – Incorporate City sustainability goals into the Project to the 17 extent practicable. 18 • Navigate the Federal Contracting Environment – Successfully deliver the 19 Project within the federal procurement environment. 20 • Effective Community Outreach – Work with City staff to minimize 21 inconvenience; proactively and clearly communicate any effects to the public and 22 adjacent properties during design and construction.

23 2.1.1.7 COORDINATION WITH OTHERS 24 The Design-Builder shall coordinate the Work for the Project with others in accordance 25 with the General Provisions. 26 27 Permits and/or approval for construction activities have not been obtained for 28 temporary staging areas, air rights, and construction access. The Design-Builder is 29 responsible for obtaining any and all necessary permits and/or approvals for work in this 30 area. Permit and/or approvals are anticipated from the following: 31 • Washington State Department of Transportation 32 • BNSF Railway 33 • U. S. Coast Guard 34 • Tacoma Public Works Department 35 • Foss Waterway Development Authority (Republic Parking) 36 • Foss Harbor Marina 37 • Quinn’s Boats 38 39 Submittals to the affected parties shall include, but are not limited to, site utilization and 40 restoration plans. 41

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.1.2 COMMUNICATIONS

2 2.1.2.1 PUBLIC INFORMATION 3 The Design-Builder shall establish and implement a Project Communications Plan, 4 which shall describe the Design-Builder’s outreach strategy for maintaining a consistent 5 level of communication with external stakeholders and government entities, including 6 community involvement and public outreach. Stakeholders include, but are not limited 7 to: 8 • The Tacoma City Manager’s Office 9 • The Save Our Bridge Committee 10 • The Foss Waterway Development Authority 11 • Adjacent property owners and local businesses 12 • Port of Tacoma 13 • Regulatory agencies

14 This Plan shall encourage broad public awareness and understanding of the Project. All 15 external communications shall be coordinated with the City of Tacoma. For permits to be 16 obtained by the City of Tacoma, The City of Tacoma will be the primary point of contact 17 for permitting agencies. Refer to Section 2.7 for additional requirements.

18 2.1.2.2 MEETINGS AND COORDINATION

19 2.1.2.2.1 All Meetings 20 The Design-Builder shall develop all meeting agendas and provide all meeting facilities. 21 Design-Builder may use City of Tacoma facilities for public meetings and meetings 22 involving City staff, subject to advance notice and availability. Agendas shall be sent to 23 invitees prior to meetings. 24 25 The Design-Builder shall record minutes of each meeting and distribute copies to the 26 City of Tacoma attendees within seven Calendar Days of the meeting for review and 27 comment. The City of Tacoma will return comments to the Design-Builder within seven 28 Calendar Days of receipt of meeting minutes, and the Design-Builder shall finalize 29 minutes within seven Calendar Days of receiving City of Tacoma comments.

30 2.1.2.2.2 Task Force Meetings 31 The Design-Builder is encouraged to maintain close communication with the City of 32 Tacoma throughout the design and construction of the Project. It is anticipated that this 33 close communication will expedite Project reviews, facilitate the incorporation of 34 innovative Project solutions, and facilitate Final Acceptance of the Project. 35 36 The City of Tacoma has found task force meetings between the Design-Builder and City 37 staff and consultants to be an effective method of communication. Task force meetings 38 are particularly effective when they are established for each design discipline, when they 39 commence prior to starting design, and when they continue at regular intervals 40 throughout the design. Task force meetings are required for specific disciplines as noted 41 in these Technical Requirements. Should the Design-Builder choose to hold task force

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 meetings for other disciplines, the City of Tacoma will be available on a weekly basis to 2 attend them.

3 2.1.2.2.3 Environmental Meetings

4 2.1.2.2.3.1 Environmental Coordination Meetings 5 The Design-Builder’s Environmental Compliance Manager (ECM) shall organize and 6 implement meetings during design and construction to ensure that the Project design 7 meets the Project environmental commitments, and to identify which construction 8 elements such as locations, work activities, weather conditions, and times of day present 9 the greatest risk to the environment. In addition, the ECM shall review best 10 management practices at these meetings, to avoid and minimize risk. The City of 11 Tacoma shall be invited to attend these meetings. The ECM shall use the commitments 12 database (see Section 2.6) and the construction schedules to identify environmental 13 commitments pertaining to upcoming work activities.

14 2.1.2.2.3.2 Environmental Pre-Construction Meeting 15 The Design-Builder shall organize and participate in an environmental pre-construction 16 meeting with the City of Tacoma and the regulatory agencies prior to the start of 17 construction. During the environmental pre-construction meeting, the Design-Builder 18 shall discuss its Environmental Compliance Plan, including its environmental training 19 program, to demonstrate how the Design-Builder shall meet permit conditions and fulfill 20 environmental commitments. The Design-Builder shall discuss its construction schedule 21 and identify the early construction elements.

22 2.1.2.2.4 Orientation Meetings 23 Prior to commencement of construction, an orientation meeting shall be held between 24 the Design-Builder and the City of Tacoma to address documentation requirements. The 25 Design-Builder shall be responsible for obtaining, maintaining, and reviewing all 26 documents and records required in the Contract for compliance with the Contract 27 requirements.

28 2.1.2.2.5 Notification 29 When the Contract requires that a notification be sent to the City of Tacoma, the Design- 30 Builder shall send an email to the City of Tacoma Project Manager. 31 32 As soon as practicable, but not more than 30 Calendar Days after Notice to Proceed, the 33 Design-Builder shall schedule a pre-contract meeting with the City of Tacoma Project 34 Manager to discuss the Project.

35 2.1.2.3 SUBCONTRACTS

36 2.1.2.3.1 General 37 The Design-Builder shall incorporate the provisions specified in Sections 1-07 and 1-08 38 of the General Provisions into each subcontract. 39

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.1.2.3.2 Communication 2 The Design-Builder shall require all subcontractors, suppliers, and other individuals or 3 entities performing or furnishing any of the Work to formally communicate with the City 4 of Tacoma through the Design-Builder only.

5 2.1.2.4 Coordination 6 The Design-Builder shall accept sole responsibility for scheduling and coordinating the 7 Work of subcontractors, suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or 8 furnishing any of the Work under direct or indirect contract with the Design-Builder. 9 10 The Design-Builder shall accept sole responsibility for the environmental performance of 11 all subcontractors on the Project. The Design-Builder remains the sole responsible party 12 for all environmental compliance and commitments, and should structure their 13 subcontractor agreements such that compliance by their subcontractors is assured.

14 2.1.2.5 Office Space 15 The Design-Builder shall provide and maintain all office and other building space 16 (including office space for up to three (3) City of Tacoma employees, if requested) and all 17 facilities, equipment, and vehicles necessary to design and construct the Project and to 18 meet the requirements of the Contract.

19 2.1.2.6 Location 20 The Design-Builder’s design office shall be located in Pierce County. The Design- 21 Builder’s construction office shall be located within the Project limits and/or right-of- 22 way.

23 2.1.2.6.1 General Requirements 24 In addition to the requirements described above, the construction office space for the 25 City of Tacoma that is provided by the Design-Builder shall include the following: 26 • One desk, chair, two-drawer locking filing cabinet, bookcase, and telephone in 27 each office space. 28 • Telephone lines to support City provided color copier/printer, color scanner, fax 29 equipment. 30 • One touch-tone speaker telephone for each office space with a status indicator 31 and access to all outside lines and conference call systems. Each telephone shall 32 be connected to a phone service with voice mail for each extension. 33 • The City of Tacoma will pay all long distance charges for City of Tacoma phones 34 after installation. 35 • Meeting facilities for all Project-related meetings. In the event the requirements 36 for any meeting exceed the space available, the Design-Builder shall provide 37 meeting space at a suitable alternate location. The alternate location shall be 38 located within 2 miles of the Project limits. 39 • At least two exits from each building or trailer. 40 • A secure door lock plus a deadbolt lock on each entrance.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Men’s and women’s restrooms. 2 • Trash and paper recycle containers. 3 • Daily janitorial service (except holidays) including trash and paper recycle 4 pickup. 5 • Maintained exterior office space areas, including access to parking areas and 6 snow removal. 7 • Overhead lighting that meets the requirements of the United States Occupational 8 Safety and Health Administration, and building and electrical codes for office 9 space, which shall include a minimum circuit capacity of 20 amperes, and at least 10 two duplex receptacles for each office space. 11 • Heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and cooling systems capable of 12 maintaining temperatures between 65 and 75 degrees Fahrenheit in all spaces, 13 including the network room, throughout the year. 14 • Access requirements that meet the American with Disabilities Act. 15 • An office space that meets all local building code requirements. 16 Except for the Design-Builder’s construction office and the construction office space for 17 the City of Tacoma, the Design-Builder shall remove all facilities and perform any 18 required site restoration Work related to facilities provided by the Design-Builder, prior 19 to Physical Completion. 20 The Design-Builder shall remove all facilities and perform any required site restoration 21 Work related to the Design-Builder’s construction office and the construction office 22 space for the City of Tacoma within 100 Calendar Days after Physical Completion.

23 2.1.2.6.2 Information Technology

24 2.1.2.6.2.1 Personal Computer Workstations 25 The City of Tacoma will furnish and install, for its exclusive use, personal computer 26 workstations and network printer/copier/fax machine in the workspaces described 27 above. The City of Tacoma will connect these devices, with its own 12-foot patch cords, 28 to wall plates furnished by the Design-Builder. Equipment and infrastructure provided 29 by the Design-Builder shall not interfere with the City of Tacoma’s network. Network 30 devices provided by the Design-Builder shall be on a different sub-net than the City of 31 Tacoma’s, and shall not connect to the City of Tacoma’s hub or other devices.

32 2.1.2.6.2.2 Network Communications 33 The Design-Builder shall ensure that the construction office space for the City of Tacoma 34 can be wired for point-to-point network connectivity through the local Telco (telephone 35 company who provides telecommunication services such as telephony and data 36 communication), designated for the exclusive use of the City of Tacoma. The City of 37 Tacoma will arrange for installation of the connection and will pay for the connection 38 charges. In addition, the Design-Builder shall provide 1000-BASET (Category 6) 39 Ethernet wiring from each City of Tacoma closed-door office and workspace to the wiring 40 closet. The wall plates shall be located to permit the use of the 12-foot patch cords 41 provided by the City of Tacoma. In addition to the 12-foot patch cords, the City of 42 Tacoma will provide its own hub, router, and DSU/CSU to connect its computers to the

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-9 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 internet. The Design-Builder may, at its own expense, provide additional infrastructure 2 for its own use, provided that the additional infrastructure does not interfere with the 3 City of Tacoma’s use. 4 The Design-Builder shall provide space in the network room for one two-post phone 5 network rack for the City of Tacoma equipment. The City of Tacoma equipment may be 6 in the same network room as the Design-Builder's equipment. The Design-Builder shall 7 submit a wiring and office floor plan to the City of Tacoma for review and comment.

8 2.1.3 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

9 2.1.3.1 General 10 The Design-Builder shall accept sole responsibility for the documentation of all Work 11 activities. 12 The Design-Builder shall maintain in good order, in a secure and protected place at the 13 Project Site, one record copy of all drawings, specifications, addenda, written 14 amendments, change orders, change directives, field orders, and written interpretations 15 and clarifications required for the Work. The Design-Builder shall annotate the record 16 documents to show changes made during construction. The Design-Builder shall make 17 these record documents, together with all approved samples and approved shop 18 drawings, available to the City of Tacoma for reference.

19 2.1.3.1.1 Format 20 The Design-Builder shall maintain all files indicated in this Section in electronic media 21 and hard copies.

22 2.1.3.1.2 Communications Distribution 23 At a minimum, the Design-Builder shall prepare and circulate to the City of Tacoma and 24 meeting attendees, hard copies and electronic files of all correspondence, minutes of 25 meetings, and other documents developed as a result of any and all communications 26 with the following: 27 28 • City of Tacoma. 29 • Utility Owners. 30 • Government entities. 31 • Agencies. 32 • External stakeholders. 33 The Design-Builder shall accept sole responsibility for ensuring that all communications 34 are distributed to the appropriate parties.

35 2.1.3.1.3 Electronic Files

36 2.1.3.1.3.1 Backups 37 The Design-Builder shall backup all electronic files that have been revised every 38 Calendar Day; backup all electronic files every week; and store all backup media in a 39 secure offsite area in accordance with this Section.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-10 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.1.3.1.3.2 Data Backup and Recovery 2 The Design-Builder shall develop and implement data security and a backup and 3 recovery plan for Project information maintained by the Design-Builder.

4 2.1.3.2 Design Documentation

5 2.1.3.2.1 Communication and Submittal Documentation 6 Throughout the course of the Project, the Design-Builder shall maintain in the Design- 7 Builder’s construction office and make available for the City of Tacoma review, at a 8 minimum, one complete set of the following documents: 9 10 • Contract; 11 • Calculations; 12 • Reports; 13 • Studies and investigations; 14 • Preliminary Design Submittal and Final Design Submittal documents; 15 • QC/QA documentations; 16 • Released for Construction (RFC) Documents and revised RFC Documents; 17 • Communications; 18 • Minutes of meetings; 19 • Review comments and responses; 20 • Permits and other environmental agreements; and 21 • Easement agreements.

22 2.1.3.3 Construction Documentation

23 2.1.3.3.1 Communication and Submittal Documentation 24 Throughout the course of the Project, the Design-Builder shall maintain in the Design- 25 Builder’s construction office and make available for the City of Tacoma review, at a 26 minimum, one complete set of orderly hard copy files that include the following 27 documents: 28 • Subcontracts; 29 • Change orders; 30 • QC/QA documentations; 31 • Shop drawings; 32 • Record of Material; 33 • Pay invoices; 34 • Field directive changes; 35 • Claims; 36 • Calculations; 37 • Reports; and 38 • Tests. 39 Throughout the course of the Project, the Design-Builder shall maintain in the Design- 40 Builder’s construction office and make available for City of Tacoma review, at a 41 minimum, two complete sets of orderly hard copy files that include the RFC drawings 42 and specifications:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-11 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • One half-size set of drawings shall include all original markings for revisions 2 made to the Release for Construction plans and specifications. 3 • One half-size set of drawings shall not be marked on, and shall be used as the 4 master copy for as-built control records. 5 • Full size set of drawings available on request.

6 Upon Project Physical Completion, the Design-Builder shall submit both sets of the 7 documents listed above to the City of Tacoma for its use and retention.

8 2.1.3.4 Document Control Requirements

9 2.1.3.4.1 General 10 Document control is an integral part of the City of Tacoma’s proactive project 11 management process for all City of Tacoma projects. The Design-Builder shall use an 12 electronic Document Control System (DCS) to track and manage all Project 13 documentation. The DCS shall ensure that all incoming and outgoing Project 14 documentation is electronically and physically accounted for and filed. The Design- 15 Builder’s DCS shall be subject to City of Tacoma review and comment. 16 17 The Design-Builder shall establish and maintain a collaborative Website DCS, accessible 18 to both the Design-Builder and to the City of Tacoma from the design office, construction 19 office, and remote locations, to exchange, organize, list, store, record, and track 20 correspondence, drawings, technical reports, specifications, submittals, calculations, 21 control of materials, Inspector Daily Reports, meeting minutes, administrative, and 22 other Project documents. The Design-Builder shall also establish document routing, 23 filing, control, and retrieval methods. Document control, storage, and retrieval methods 24 shall include the use of both hard copies and electronic records. The Design-Builder’s 25 DCS shall manage all of the documents. The Design-Builder's DCS shall be established 26 and operational prior to the first design submittal to the City of Tacoma, and no later 27 than 30 Calendar Days after Notice to Proceed. 28 29 The Design-Builder shall provide training and system support to all City of Tacoma 30 employees and City of Tacoma representatives who require access to the collaborative 31 website DCS, including all reviewers of Project documents. If applicable, the Design- 32 Builder shall provide all licenses for City of Tacoma use.

33 2.1.3.4.2 File Format 34 Graphics shall be submitted in TIF, GIF, JPG, or PDF file formats (compressed image 35 formats only). These formats are intended for photos, conceptual sketches, and other 36 uses. 37 Data files contained in a database or a spreadsheet shall be in one of the following 38 formats: 39 • Microsoft Access; or 40 • Microsoft Excel.

41 All links between non-graphical data and graphic elements, relationships between 42 database tables, and report formats shall be maintained. All database tables shall

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-12 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 conform to the structure and file naming guidance approved by the City of Tacoma. The 2 Design-Builder shall provide the database file in the preferred file format as directed by 3 the City of Tacoma Engineer. 4 Any documents such as reports, photographs, and manuals that use a variety of software 5 packages and file formats shall be submitted as PDFs (version 9.0 or later), in addition to 6 being submitted in the base file format.

7 2.1.3.4.3 Submittals

8 2.1.3.4.3.1 Work Plan 9 The Design-Builder shall submit a Document Control Work Plan within 30 Calendar 10 Days of NTP or prior to the first design submittal, whichever occurs first. This Plan shall 11 include the following: 12 • File structure and numbering; 13 • Flow charts depicting the routing and processing of documents; 14 • Persons involved and their responsibilities; 15 • The handling and filing of hard copy documents; 16 • Incorporation of electronic documents into the system; 17 • DCS backup and recovery; and 18 • Submittal log in DCS.

19 2.1.3.4.3.2 Format 20 All documents sent to the City of Tacoma shall contain the following information at the 21 top or on the first page of the document being sent: 22 23 • The City of Tacoma Project name and contract number; 24 • Document type, such as: Letter, Letter of Transmittal, Deliverable, or 25 Submittal; and 26 • Document number, unique for the type of document. If any revisions are made 27 to the original document, the same unique number shall be used with a revision 28 number added. 29 At a minimum, all submittals shall include one hard copy and one electronic copy. 30 Unless otherwise specified, the Design-Builder shall send the original hard copy as well 31 as a PDF of the document. The City of Tacoma may also require the Design-Builder to 32 send the file in other formats as requested by the City of Tacoma Engineer.

33 2.1.3.4.3.3 Project Completion 34 Prior to Project Physical Completion, the Design-Builder shall deliver to the City of 35 Tacoma a full and complete backup of the DCS. This backup shall include all documents 36 in electronic format. The Design-Builder shall also deliver a copy of the DCS software in 37 the version that the electronic documents and databases were created in. 38 The Design-Builder shall provide a final file structure and index for the electronic 39 archived documents. Written instructions and procedures for use of the Design-Builder’s 40 software pertaining to the archived documents shall also be provided.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-13 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.1.4 SOFTWARE

2 2.1.4.1 General 3 The Design-Builder shall acquire, use, and maintain all software for the Project. 4 5 Version – The Design-Builder shall use the current version of the specified software in 6 effect as of Notice to Proceed, unless otherwise specified in this Section. 7 8 Updates – The Design-Builder shall update software programs throughout the Contract 9 within six months of release of a software update, or earlier, if mutually agreed upon 10 with the City of Tacoma. The City of Tacoma will similarly update its software. 11 12 File Server – The Design-Builder shall store all data files for the software programs on, 13 or have them accessible through, the Design-Builder’s central file server.

14 2.1.4.1.1 Required Project Software 15 The Design-Builder shall submit all design documentation, whether it is in-process, final, 16 or as-built, to the City of Tacoma as hard copies and electronic files on CDROMs. 17 CDROMs shall be labeled. The Design-Builder shall not use tape to label CDROMs. 18 In addition to any other software specified in the Contract, the Design-Builder shall use 19 the following software programs.

20 2.1.4.1.1.1 Roadway 21 AutoCAD (by Autodesk) – Same version City of Tacoma is using at Notice to Proceed.

22 2.1.4.1.1.2 Structures 23 Refer to Section 2.10.

24 2.1.4.1.1.3 Electrical and Controls 25 Refer to Section 2.11.

26 2.1.4.1.1.4 Mechanical 27 Refer to Section 2.12.

28 2.1.4.1.1.5 Signing, Traffic Operations, and Maintenance of Traffic 29 Refer to Sections 2.14, 2.16, and 2.17.

30 2.1.4.1.1.6 Drainage 31 Refer to Section 2.13.

32 2.1.4.1.1.7 CADD Files 33 AutoCAD (by Autodesk) – Same version City of Tacoma is using at Notice to Proceed. 34

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-14 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.1.4.1.1.8 Word Processing and Spreadsheets 2 The Design-Builder shall use the following software: 3 • Microsoft Word for word processing; 4 • Microsoft Excel for spreadsheets; and 5 • Microsoft Access for databases. 6 7 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.1-15 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 2 Certain Sections of this RFP list mandatory manuals and/or publications that the 3 Design-Builder shall use for the design and construction described in those Sections. 4 The Design-Builder shall use the current mandatory manuals and/or publications as of 5 this RFP issue date. 6 If there are updates to the mandatory manuals and/or publications between the RFP 7 issue date and 14 Calendar Days prior to the Proposal Due Date, the City of Tacoma may 8 issue addendums to the RFP to account for those updates. 9 If there are updates to the mandatory manuals and/or publications after 14 Calendar 10 Days prior to the Proposal Due Date, or at any time during the time of the Contract, that 11 will affect the design criteria or construction requirements, Section 1-04 of the General 12 Provisions will be enforced. 13 The following standards are adopted by the City of Tacoma municipal code and shall 14 apply to Work at the Murray Morgan Bridge Site unless more specific requirements are 15 listed in separate Sections of Chapter 2: 16 • 2009 Edition of the International Building Code (IBC). 17 • 2009 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code. 18 • 2006 Washington State Energy Code. 19 • 2006 Washington State Ventilation and Air Quality Code. 20 • Fire Prevention Code recommended by the American Insurance Association, 21 successor to the National Board of Firewriters, 1970 Edition. 22 • International Fire Code, 2006 Edition. 23 • International Mechanical Code, 2009 Edition. 24 • Chapter 296-46B of the Washington Administrative Code, and the codes and 25 standards adopted by reference therein. 26 27 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.2-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.3 STATE TAXES 2 State Department of Revenue Rule 170 (WAC 458-20-170) and its related rules shall 3 apply to all applicable Work within WSDOT Right-of-Way with the exception of all street 4 related Work on the Murray Morgan Bridge inside of WSDOT Right-of-Way. 5 State Department of Revenue Rule 171 (WAC 458-20-171) and its related rules shall 6 apply to all Work on the City of Tacoma streets outside of WSDOT right of way.

7 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.3-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.4 SURVEYS AND MAPPING

2 2.4.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to complete the land surveying and 4 survey mapping for the Project. This Work includes, but is not limited to, survey control 5 data, secondary horizontal and vertical control surveys, topographic surveys, settlement 6 monitoring surveys, Right of Way surveys, bridge surveys, structural surveys, utility 7 surveys, design surveys, construction surveys, as-built surveys, records of surveys, 8 permits to destroy and remove monuments, land corner records, survey verification, and 9 all other land surveying services necessary to complete the Project. 10 A laser scanning survey of the bridge and approach structure has been completed and is 11 being provided to the Design-Builder on an electronic hard drive. Included on the 12 electronic hard drive is: (1) the laser scanning survey in Leica Cyclone V7.0.3 format and 13 Leica Cyclone V7.0.3 program file; (2) the laser scan survey in Leica TruView V2.1.1 and 14 the free Leica TruView software; (3) existing conditions survey derived from the laser 15 scanning survey in AutoCAD format; (4) plots of the existing conditions survey derived 16 from the laser scanning survey provided in PDF format; (5) 360-degree electronic photo 17 map provided in a self-contained executable file that requires no additional software or 18 loading of additional program files.

19 2.4.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 20 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. 21 They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the 22 list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to 23 complete the design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any 24 ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design- 25 Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may 26 resolve them. 27 The meaning of words and terms used in this Section and not otherwise defined in the 28 Contract shall be as listed in the current edition of Definitions of Surveying and 29 Associated Terms, published by the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, and 30 the American Society of Civil Engineers. 31 • Special Provisions (Appendix 04). 32 • Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix 03). 33 • WSDOT Standard Specifications (M 41-10), Divisions 3 through 9. 34 • WSDOT Bridge Design Manual (M 23-50).

35 2.4.2.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

36 2.4.2.1.1 Murray Morgan Bridge Site 37 The City of Tacoma has prepared and updated mapping for the Murray Morgan Bridge 38 Site using a laser scan survey. Primary and secondary survey horizontal control was 39 established by The City of Tacoma with GPS equipment in the Washington State Plane 40 Coordinate System (SPCS), South Zone, North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83/91) 41 with a data set accuracy of less than 0.01 meter at 2 Sigma (radius of uncertainty). The

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.4-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 laser scan survey was performed by David Evans & Associates, Inc. in May 2010. The 2 laser scan data was collected with an accuracy of the overall survey of +/- 1/2 inches with 3 relative accuracy of +/- 1/8 inches for control dimensions when measured from a single 4 scan. The City of Tacoma has also collected field survey data for the Murray Morgan 5 Bridge Site. 6 The City of Tacoma has supplied Leica laser scan TruView and Cyclone files and the 7 software for viewing and measuring the laser scans. Areas that were obscured during 8 scanning may contain insufficient x, y, z data which may require verification at the 9 Design-Builder's discretion. 10 Existing primary control monumentation established by WSDOT and primary and 11 secondary control monuments established for the City of Tacoma by others are for 12 informational purposes only. Existing WSDOT geodetic primary survey monumentation 13 can be found at the following Web site: 14 www.wsdot.wa.gov/monument

15 2.4.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

16 2.4.3.1 GENERAL 17 The Design-Builder is solely responsible for the accuracy of content and completeness of 18 all survey information used in the design and construction of the Project. 19 The Design-Builder shall verify and confirm the location, accuracy, and datum of all 20 survey data and survey information, regardless of the source. The Design-Builder shall 21 document the verification of all of the data in accordance with the Quality Management 22 Plan (QMP) requirements in Section 2.22. The City of Tacoma does not warrant the 23 accuracy of the survey information provided in the RFP. Any discrepancies between the 24 survey data and the survey information provided by the City of Tacoma shall be brought 25 to City of Tacoma’s attention for resolution. The Design-Builder has sole responsibility 26 to verify all survey information provided in this RFP. 27 Horizontal control is based on the North American Datum of 1983, adjusted in 1991. 28 Vertical control for the Murray Morgan Bridge Site is based on National Geodetic 29 Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD29). National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 30 (NGVD29) can be related to Mean Lower Low Water Vertical Datum (MLLW). 31 All field survey work, design, and construction shall be done in Project ground datum in 32 U.S. survey feet.

33 2.4.3.2 SURVEY MANAGER 34 The Design-Builder shall designate a Survey Manager for the Project. The Survey 35 Manager shall be registered as a Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Washington. 36 All survey work shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of, the Survey 37 Manager. The Survey Manager shall be the single point of contact for all survey 38 activities.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.4-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.4.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

2 2.4.4.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall prepare field survey work that is suitable for preparation of 4 design documents and Released for Construction Documents and that meets the 5 technical requirements of the City of Tacoma and the Washington State Board of 6 Registration for Engineers and Land Surveyors.

7 2.4.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

8 2.4.5.1 GENERAL 9 The Design-Builder shall maintain detailed survey records, including a description of the 10 Work performed on each shift, and the methods and control points used. The records 11 will include adequate detail to allow the survey to be reproduced; graphic notes depicting 12 control points used and relationship to other control points or reference points; 13 description; coordinates; and location description. Bench marks and temporary bench 14 marks shall also have graphic notes depicting description, elevation, coordinates, and 15 location description. A data collector printout of the day's activities will not be 16 considered an acceptable record. When requested, the Survey Manager shall provide a 17 copy of each day’s record to the City of Tacoma within five Calendar Days after the end of 18 the shift. 19 Survey work by the Design-Builder shall include, but is not limited to, the following: 20 • Verifying survey data furnished by the City of Tacoma. 21 • Expanding into secondary control by adding stakes and hubs as well as additional 22 permanent survey control needed for the Project. 23 • Providing descriptions of permanent secondary control to the City of Tacoma. 24 • Notify WSDOT Geographic Services when a geodetic primary control monument 25 is going to be impacted. 26 All permanent secondary control points shall be shown on a Report of Survey Mark form 27 and shall be tied to the City of Tacoma Site property boundary as labeled on the record of 28 survey. Permanent secondary control points shall be established in accordance with the 29 industry standard. 30 For all types of construction, including but not limited to walls, bridges, slabs, grading, 31 drainage, channelization, pavement markings, illumination, signals, guardrails, barriers 32 and signing, the Design-Builder shall provide staking and layout as necessary to 33 adequately locate, construct, and check the specific construction activity. 34 Upon request, the Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with copies of all 35 calculations and staking data prior to staking.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.4-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.4.5.2 MONUMENTATION

2 2.4.5.2.1 General 3 Except for the City of Tacoma Geodetic Primary Control monuments, the Design-Builder 4 shall document all City of Tacoma and governmental monumentation and property 5 corners that will be modified, disturbed, or destroyed during the Contract.

6 2.4.5.2.2 City of Tacoma Monumentation 7 The Design-Builder shall note all City of Tacoma geodetic and highway alignment 8 monuments found either within the Project limits or close by as shown either on a City of 9 Tacoma-provided record of survey or monumentation map. The Design-Builder shall 10 notify the City of Tacoma as soon as possible, but no later than 14 Calendar Days prior to 11 any Work that may cause the City of Tacoma geodetic or highway alignment monuments 12 to be disturbed or destroyed. The City of Tacoma will determine the monuments to be 13 replaced. 14 The Design-Builder shall complete all permits required by the Washington State 15 Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). For any City of Tacoma geodetic or highway 16 alignment monuments that are disturbed, destroyed, or relocated, the Design-Builder 17 shall submit an Application for Permit to Remove or Destroy a Survey Monument 18 completion report to the City of Tacoma. The City of Tacoma will submit and process 19 these forms to DNR. Before any survey monument is removed or disturbed, an approved 20 DNR Application to Remove or Destroy a Survey Monument completion report, together 21 with an exhibit map of all found survey monuments, shall be provided to the City of 22 Tacoma Engineer. Monuments removed or disturbed prior to submitting an approved 23 application and exhibit map will be replaced by the City of Tacoma at the Design- 24 Builder's cost. 25 The City of Tacoma will replace any City of Tacoma geodetic monument within the 26 Project that may be disturbed or destroyed other than highway alignment monuments 27 that are denoted as PC, PT, POC, or POT and Right of Way monuments. 28 The Design-Builder shall work with the City of Tacoma to determine the best location, as 29 near as possible to the original location, so that the City of Tacoma may reset the 30 Geodetic Monument.

31 2.4.6 SUBMITTALS

32 2.4.6.1 SURVEY RECORDS AND SUBMITTALS 33 The Design-Builder shall deliver a hard copy and an electronic file of the survey records 34 to the City of Tacoma within 30 Calendar Days of Project Physical Completion, unless an 35 earlier delivery is requested by the City of Tacoma. The electronic file shall be in 36 AutoCAD using the same version the City of Tacoma is using at Notice to Proceed. 37 The Design-Builder shall prepare and submit calculations to the City of Tacoma within 38 14 Calendar Days after Notice to Proceed for concurrence of Project datum to be used.

39 2.4.6.2 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SUBMITTAL 40 The Design-Builder shall prepare a Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Plan whenever a 41 survey crew, or a survey crew’s vehicle, will be working within any roadway clear zone.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.4-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Submittal, review, and approval of the Maintenance of Traffic Plan shall be in 2 accordance with Section 2.17.

3 2.4.6.3 MOMUMENTATION SUBMITTAL 4 The Design-Builder shall submit the monumentation permits that are required for the 5 removal, disturbance, and resetting of monuments to the City of Tacoma 14 Calendar 6 Days prior to any removal, disturbance, or resetting.

7 2.4.6.4 AS-BUILTS 8 The Design-Builder shall produce reports documenting the as-built location of the as- 9 built alignments, profiles, drainage structures, utilities, structures and placement of the 10 survey control monument. These reports shall include descriptive statements for the 11 survey methods used to determine the as-built location of the feature being surveyed. 12 Where the City of Tacoma has provided data to the Design-Builder in x, y, z coordinate 13 format, the Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with data in x, y, z 14 coordinate format. Where the City of Tacoma has provided data to the Design-Builder in 15 x, y coordinate format only, or z coordinate format only, the Design-Builder shall provide 16 the City of Tacoma with data in x, y coordinate format only, or z coordinate format only. 17 All x, y, and z coordinates shall be in accordance with the project datum. 18 The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with an as-built survey base map 19 file for the Murray Morgan Bridge Site in AutoCAD using the same version the City of 20 Tacoma is using at Notice to Proceed. 21 The Design-Builder shall deliver all as-built survey files to the City of Tacoma within 30 22 Calendar Days of Project Physical Completion of the Project.

23 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.4-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.5 PAVEMENT

2 2.5.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall perform all Work necessary to design and construct all 4 pavement sections for the Project in accordance with the requirements of this Section. 5 The term pavement, or pavement section, shall be defined as the entire pavement 6 structural section, including but not limited to hot mix asphalt (HMA). 7 Elements of Work shall include, but are not limited to, the following for the Murray 8 Morgan Bridge Site as part of the Base Program Project Scope: 9 • Rehabilitation of HMA overlay, including pavement repair and placement of a 10 new waterproofing membrane, along the deck portion of the Port Approach.

11 Elements of Work shall include, but are not limited to, the following for the Murray 12 Morgan Bridge Site as part of the Supplemental Program Project Scope: 13 • Rehabilitation of HMA pavement, including pavement repair, along the fill 14 portion of the Port Approach.

15 Pavement shall be maintained during construction in accordance with the requirements 16 of Section 2.23. The conceptual paving limits are shown in the Conceptual Design. The 17 exact paving limits shall be determined by the Design-Builder.

18 2.5.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 19 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for pavement construction. They 20 are listed in a hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the list. 21 This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to 22 complete construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any ambiguities or 23 conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design-Builder shall notify 24 WSDOT immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may resolve them. 25 • Local agency municipal code. 26 • Amendments to the Standard Specifications. 27 • WSDOT Standard Specifications (M 41-10), Divisions 2 through 9. 28 • AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition, 29 2004. 30 • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Customary U.S. Units, 4th Edition, 31 2007. 32 • AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition, 2002. 33 • WSDOT Qualified Product List (M 46-02) (QPL). 34 • City of Tacoma, Public Works Department Design Manual.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.5-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.5.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

2 2.5.3.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall construct pavement sections that meet the following 4 performance requirements: 5 • For new and reconstructed overlays, provide a pavement smoothness that meets 6 or exceeds the pavement smoothness specified in the Standard Specifications. 7 The ride quality specification shall also apply to pavement structure transition 8 areas between the HMA, approach slabs, and structures. 9 • Provide pavements with no identifiable distress. The Design-Builder shall 10 evaluate the distress parameters on an as-needed basis determined by the City of 11 Tacoma. If corrective action needs to be taken, the Design-Builder shall 12 coordinate all such activities so as to minimize disruption to traffic. 13 • Develop design of pavement sections in conjunction with water quality best 14 management practices (BMPs) that comply with permit requirements of Section 15 2.13 (Stormwater Management) and environmental requirements in Section 2.6 16 (Environmental). 17 • For damage to city streets, sidewalks, private parking areas, and driveways by the 18 Design-Builder as a result of the Design-Builder’s operations, restore pavement 19 damaged by Design-Builder’s operations to pre-construction condition or better.

20 2.5.3.2 RESURFACING PAVEMENT

21 2.5.3.2.1 Remove and Overlay (Base Program) 22 Existing HMA pavement on the deck portion of the Port approach will be completely 23 removed from the deck girders and replacing with an overlay of minimum depth of 0.167 24 feet of HMA. The deck girders will be cleaned and prepared for application of a 25 waterproof membrane, according to manufacturer’s recommendations. The waterproof 26 membrane, to prevent leakage through the asphalt, shall then be placed between the top 27 of the deck girders and the final overlay. The final stage to the paving operation shall be 28 the final overlay, which shall be placed as a 0.167 foot minimum compacted depth of 29 HMA over all travel lanes and bicycle lanes.

30 2.5.3.2.2 Plane and Overlay (Supplemental Program) 31 Existing HMA pavement on the fill portion of the Port approach will be resurfaced by 32 planning to a minimum depth of 0.167 feet and replaced with the same depth of HMA. 33 The final stage to the paving operation shall be the final overlay, which shall be placed as 34 a 0.167 foot minimum compacted depth of HMA over all travel lanes and bicycle lanes.

35 2.5.3.3 PORT APPROACH BICYCLE LANES 36 Bicycle Lanes are defined as any portion of the existing Port approach roadway that lies 37 between a travel lane and a final sidewalk curb face. The entire width of the bicycle 38 lanes shall be replaced or planed and overlaid with full-depth HMA pavement, in the 39 same manner as the travel lanes. The bicycle lanes contain drainage inlets and electrical 40 pull boxes, which shall be adjusted to the final grade.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.5-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.5.3.4 MISCELLANEOUS PAVEMENT 2 The Design-Builder shall restore any city streets, sidewalks, private parking areas, and 3 driveways damaged during construction of the Project to pre-construction condition or 4 better.

5 2.5.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

6 2.5.4.1 GENERAL 7 The Design-Builder shall determine the pavement sections required for the Project. 8 Pavement sections shall proposed by the Design-Builder and at a minimum, shall adhere 9 to the performance requirements of this Section, meet or exceed the needs of the Project, 10 support the grading and drainage plans, and shall be subject to review and comment by 11 the City of Tacoma. The performance of the pavement section is at the sole risk of the 12 Design-Builder. Refer to Section 2.6 for environmental commitments and 13 requirements.

14 2.5.4.2 CITY STREETS AND SIDEWALKS

15 2.5.4.2.1 Sidewalks, Parking Areas, and Driveways 16 New and reconstructed sidewalks, parking areas and driveways shall be constructed 17 and/or repaired in accordance with the requirements of this Section. 18 19 At minimum, reconstructed private sidewalks, parking areas and driveways that are 20 damaged by the Project shall be reconstructed to a condition that meets or exceeds the 21 condition that existed prior to construction.

22 2.5.4.2.2 City Streets and Haul Routes 23 The Design-Builder shall coordinate with the City of Tacoma for use of local roadways as 24 haul routes for the Project. The Design-Builder shall obtain any approvals and street use 25 permits required by the City of Tacoma. Refer to Section 2.23 (Maintenance During 26 Construction) for additional requirements.

27 2.5.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

28 2.5.5.1 PAVEMENT MATERIALS 29 All HMA mix design for pavement shall be commercial grade HMA. The Design-Builder 30 shall develop the HMA mix design in accordance with the requirements of this Section, 31 Section 2.20 (Control of Materials) and Section 2.22 (Design-Build Quality Management 32 Plan (QMP) Requirements).

33 2.5.5.2 ACCEPTANCE TESTING 34 All acceptance testing for asphalt treated base and HMA aggregate, mixture, in-place 35 density, cyclic density, and longitudinal joint density shall be performed by the Design- 36 Builder. The testing will be provided to the City of Tacoma for review and comment in 37 accordance with Section 2.22.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.5-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.5.5.3 Rehabilitating HMA Pavement

2 2.5.5.3.1 Overlay 3 Installation of the overlays shall be staged with the widening and new pavement areas so 4 that the final overlay is placed over all travel lanes and shoulders as the final stage of the 5 paving operation. 6 To accommodate the overlay, vertical transverse butt joints, at a depth equal to that of 7 the overlay, shall be provided at the beginning and end of the existing HMA limits. A 8 smooth transition shall be provided between the pavement overlay and the pavement 9 beyond the Project limits. A smooth transition shall be 25 feet of transition per inch of 10 overlay thickness. Where existing curb and gutter is to remain, the existing pavement 11 edge shall be planed so the pavement overlay is flush with the existing gutter. 12 All drainage inlets, manholes, and electrical pull boxes shall be adjusted to the final 13 grade. 14 HMA used on shoulder and having a specified compaction course thickness greater than 15 0.10 foot shall be compacted to a specified level of relative density in accordance with 16 Section 5-04 of the Standard Specifications.

17 2.5.5.4 CITY STREETS AND SIDEWALKS

18 2.5.5.4.1 Pavement Materials 19 The Design-Builder shall construct all Work within the City of Tacoma rights of way 20 according to the Standard Specifications or as required by the City of Tacoma.

21 2.5.5.4.2 Acceptance Sampling and Testing 22 The Design-Builder shall provide testing of asphalt treated base and HMA pavement in 23 accordance with the Tacoma Municipal Code. All acceptance and testing required by the 24 City of Tacoma shall be performed by the Design-Builder or its representatives. The 25 testing will be provided to the City of Tacoma for review and comment in accordance 26 with Section 2.22.

27 2.5.6 SUBMITTALS

28 2.5.6.1 HMA MIX DESIGN 29 The Design-Builder shall submit a copy of the completed HMA mix design, and submit 30 representative samples of the mineral materials to the City of Tacoma in accordance with 31 Section 2.20 and Section 2.22.

32 2.5.6.2 CITY STREETS AND SIDEWALKS 33 The Design-Builder shall prepare and submit pavement designs for all City street 34 pavements to be paved or reconstructed as part of the Work in accordance with the 35 requirements of this Section. These designs shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma for 36 review and comment. The Design-Builder shall be responsible for submittals of 37 pavement sections to the City of Tacoma as required for permits, approvals and 38 agreements for the Work.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.5-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.5.6.3 CONTAINMENT, COLLECTION, AND DISPOSAL PLAN 2 A Containment, Collection, and Disposal Plan shall be prepared in accordance with this 3 Section and Section 2.6.

4 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.5-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL

2 2.6.1 GENERAL

3 2.6.1.1 SCOPE 4 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to deliver the Project while 5 protecting and enhancing the environment. Elements of the Work shall include, but are 6 not limited to, the following: 7 • Avoiding impacts to the community and to the environmental, historic, 8 archaeological, and cultural resources beyond what is indicated within the Project 9 environmental documentation and/or allowed through written approvals and 10 permits issued by the regulatory agencies. If new impacts are unavoidable, the 11 Design-Builder shall make every effort to minimize the unavoidable impacts. 12 • Fostering good relationships with Federal, State, and local agencies; and local 13 stakeholders by ensuring that the commitments the City has made are reflected 14 in the Project’s final design and are fulfilled during construction. The Design- 15 Builder shall accomplish this by meeting or exceeding all environmental 16 requirements and commitments listed in the Contract, permits, environmental 17 documents, and regulatory agency Concurrence Letters. 18 • Complying with all Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances 19 (collectively referred to in this Section as “regulations”) to minimize non- 20 compliance events and to not receive any permit violations. 21 • Securing all other required permits not obtained at the time of issuance of this 22 RFP.

23 2.6.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 24 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. 25 This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to 26 complete all design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any 27 ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the 28 requirements of an environmental document, programmatic agreement, or permit issued 29 for the Project, the Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately, so that 30 the City may resolve them. If a requirement or permit condition is unclear or 31 ambiguous, the Design-Builder shall obtain clarification from the City of Tacoma’s 32 Project Manager (PM) prior to proceeding with design or construction. 33 • City Amendments to the Standard Specifications, Divisions 2 through 9 34 • Amendments to the Standard Specifications 35 • WSDOT Standard Specifications, Divisions 2 through 9 36 • WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual 37 • 2008 City of Tacoma Surface Water Management Manual 38 • Washington State Department of Ecology 2005 Stormwater Manual for Western 39 Washington

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.6.2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS AND PERMITS 2 A Documented Categorical Exclusion (DCE) was issued for the Project on September 20, 3 2010.The NEPA documentation, which consists of an Environmental Classification 4 Summary (ECS) form, Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation, is provided in Appendix 5 22. All current and anticipated environmental requirements and mitigation measures are 6 described in Section 2.6.4. The Design-Builder shall implement any additional 7 environmental conditions or mitigation measures as required per environmental permits 8 and approvals not yet obtained for the Project. 9 The Design-Builder shall ensure that their preliminary designs are consistent with 10 commitments identified in all project permits and approvals and reflect the minimum 11 requirements. As the Project progresses, the Design-Builder shall ensure that the design 12 reflects any future commitments resulting from permits or approvals obtained by the 13 City or the Design-Builder after the issuance of this RFP. The Design-Builder shall 14 incorporate all environmental commitments into the Final Design Submittal for this 15 Project. A list of the current and anticipated permits for the Project is provided in 16 Section 2.6.4.2.

17 2.6.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

18 2.6.3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PLAN (ECP)

19 2.6.3.1.1 Documentation and Approval 20 The Design-Builder shall prepare and implement an Environmental Compliance Plan 21 (ECP) that identifies roles and responsibilities of key personnel, procedures for 22 environmental compliance, procedures to identify and correct non-compliance events, 23 and procedures for emergency response. The City of Tacoma’s goal is to ensure 24 environmental compliance with no permit violations. 25 To fulfill the ECP requirements, the Design-Builder shall submit a Temporary Erosion 26 and Sediment Control (TESC) Plan, a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures 27 (SPCC) Plan, a Stormwater Site Plan, a Containment System Plan, a Soil Management 28 Plan, an Unanticipated Archaeological Discovery Plan (provided in Appendix 27), and 29 any reference documents to the City of Tacoma for review and comment prior to 30 construction. The ECP shall address all other environmental commitments identified in 31 Section 2.6.4.3 of the RFP. 32 The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with a Draft ECP prior to or with 33 the initial Design Submittal. The Environmental Compliance Manager (ECM) shall be 34 responsible for submitting the Draft ECP. The Design-Builder shall provide the City of 35 Tacoma with the Final ECP 30 Calendar Days prior to the commencement of any 36 construction activities, so that the City of Tacoma can ensure its comments were 37 addressed and incorporated prior to sharing the Final ECP with the regulatory agencies. 38 The Design-Builder shall stamp the ECP “Released for Construction” prior to the 39 Environmental Pre-Construction Meeting. 40 The ECP shall consist of two parts: 41 • Part I: Environmental Personnel and Communications 42 • Part II: Environmental Plans and Strategies

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The Final ECP shall be stored in a format easily accessible by the City and the regulatory 2 agencies. A hard copy of the ECP shall be maintained by the ECM at the Design-Builder’s 3 construction office or at the Project Site.

4 2.6.3.1.2 Environmental Personnel and Communications (Part I)

5 2.6.3.1.2.1 Key Personnel: Environmental Compliance Manager 6 Roles and Responsibilities 7 The Design-Builder shall identify a single point of contact for all environmental issues. 8 This role, identified as the Environmental Compliance Manager (ECM), shall be 9 responsible for the overall environmental compliance for the Project, and shall function 10 as principal technical advisor and coordinator for environmental issues. The ECP shall 11 identify all critical roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the ECM. The ECP shall 12 identify the roles and responsibilities of other staff, and their roles in assuring 13 environmental compliance. The ECP shall identify how the ECM will interact with the 14 City of Tacoma’s Project Manager, as the City of Tacoma’s Project Manager will assign 15 staff to perform compliance audits. 16 The ECM shall be assigned to the Project full-time for the full duration of the Contract 17 Time. If the Design-Builder replaces the ECM, the Design-Builder shall provide an 18 equally or more qualified replacement, contingent upon the City of Tacoma’s approval. 19 The ECM shall have, for the full duration of the Contract Time, a current Certificate of 20 Training in Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control from a course approved by 21 the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). The Design-Builder shall 22 provide a copy of the course certificate or other documentation verifying completion of 23 the certification course upon request. 24 The ECM shall also be responsible for the following: 25 • Integrating with the design team during plan preparation and advising how to 26 avoid and minimize adverse effects to the natural environment and communities. 27 • Documenting avoidance and minimization measures incorporated into the 28 design. 29 • Developing the submittals necessary to obtain environmental permits. Acting as 30 a point of contact for the City of Tacoma’s permitting team to provide design 31 information, schedule details, quantities, etc. 32 • Coordinating with engineers early in the design stages to ensure they are aware of 33 environmental commitments related to their discipline. 34 • Reviewing engineering plans to ensure the Project’s design reflects 35 environmental commitments and requirements. 36 • Facilitating meetings to coordinate with the City of Tacoma’s Project Manager 37 and his staff about critical permitting and compliance issues. 38 • Meeting with the Design-Builder’s management staff on a weekly basis to ensure 39 the Project schedule reflects timing restrictions identified within the permits and 40 to provide notifications to the City of Tacoma for upcoming work in accordance 41 with the timeframes listed in the Commitments List, permits, and approvals. 42 • Providing internal QA/QC reviews and documentation that the Work complies 43 with all environmental commitments agreed to in the environmental documents, 44 permits, agreements, and approvals of the Project.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Acting as a liaison to the City of Tacoma, the design team, and the construction 2 personnel (e.g., submitting reports, discussing changes to the Project, 3 communicating compliance issues). 4 • Maintaining the authority and means to bring the Project into compliance and/or 5 stop Work if the Project is in violation of an environmental regulation or 6 commitment. 7 • Coordinating with the Tacoma Historic Preservation Officer, the Design-Builder’s 8 scheduling staff, and construction staff to comply with archaeological monitoring 9 requirements and protocols for unanticipated discoveries. 10 • Identifying when a non-compliance event is occurring or has occurred and 11 ensuring the procedures defined in the ECP are implemented. 12 • Preparing and implementing a monitoring plan to ensure erosion/sedimentation 13 and spill control devices and best management practices (BMPs) are effective and 14 maintained.

15 2.6.3.1.2.2 Environmental Communications Protocol 16 As part of the ECP, the ECM shall develop, document, and implement an Environmental 17 Communications Protocol. The Environmental Communications Protocol shall describe 18 the process to be used for non-compliance reporting; procedures for internal and 19 external communications; and communications with the City of Tacoma. 20 The Environmental Communications Protocol shall include organizational charts that 21 identify the Design-Builder’s ECM and other personnel who will be assisting the ECM to 22 ensure compliance with all permit conditions, performance standards, and 23 environmental commitments. It shall discuss the personnel’s roles and communication 24 procedures that will be used for the internal and external communications, and 25 communications with the City of Tacoma. The Environmental Communications Protocol 26 shall be consistent with the Design-Builder’s Public Involvement Plan described in 27 Section 2.7 (Public Information).

28 2.6.3.1.3 Environmental Plans and Strategies (Part II)

29 2.6.3.1.3.1 Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) Plan 30 The Design-Builder shall prepare and implement a TESC Plan that will describe 31 measures to minimize erosion during construction activities. The Design-Builder shall 32 identify a certified TESC Lead who shall develop, implement, and update the TESC Plan. 33 The TESC Lead shall have, for the life of the Project, a current Certificate of Training in 34 Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control from a course approved by Ecology. 35 The Design-Builder shall provide a copy of the course certificate or other documentation 36 verifying completion of the certification course within 30 days of NTP. 37 The Design-Builder shall submit a TESC Plan that addresses early construction elements 38 as a part of the Preliminary Design Submittal. Updated TESC Plans, including narrative 39 and plan sheets, shall be submitted as part of the Final Design Submittal as described in 40 Section 2.22. Construction shall not proceed on any element of Work until the relevant 41 TESC Plans, including narratives, have been approved by the City of Tacoma and are 42 stamped “Released for Construction” as described in Section 2.22. 43 The Design-Builder’s TESC Plan shall accommodate all Project-specific permit 44 conditions, performance standards, and environmental commitments. To ensure 45 compliance with permit conditions, the Design-Builder shall inspect all erosion and

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 sediment control BMPs at least once every seven Calendar Days and within 24 hours of 2 runoff events in which stormwater discharges from the project site. A Site Log Book 3 shall be developed and maintained by the Design-Builder. The Site Log Book shall be 4 kept on site and made available to the City of Tacoma or their designees. The Design- 5 Builder shall review the TESC Plan for compliance with permit conditions, and make 6 appropriate revisions within seven Calendar Days of the inspection.

7 2.6.3.1.3.2 Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan 8 The Design-Builder shall prepare a Project-specific SPCC Plan that will be used for the 9 duration of the Project. The Design-Builder shall submit the Plan to the City of Tacoma 10 as part of the ECP in accordance with the requirements described in this section. No on- 11 site construction activities may commence until the City of Tacoma accepts an SPCC 12 Plan. Occupational safety and health requirements that may pertain to SPCC Plan 13 implementation are contained in, but not limited to, WAC 296-824 and WAC 296-843. 14 The SPCC Plan shall be updated by the Design-Builder throughout Project construction 15 so that the written Plan reflects actual conditions and practices. The Design-Builder 16 shall update the SPCC Plan in accordance with all permit requirements and 17 environmental commitments and maintain a copy of the updated SPCC Plan. All Project 18 employees shall be trained in spill prevention and containment, shall know where the 19 SPCC Plan and spill response kits are located, and shall have immediate access to them. 20 If hazardous materials are encountered or spilled during construction, the Design- 21 Builder shall do everything possible to control and contain the material until appropriate 22 measures can be taken. The Design-Builder shall supply and maintain spill response kits 23 of appropriate size within close proximity to hazardous materials and equipment.

24 2.6.3.1.3.3 Stormwater Site Plan 25 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to design, document, and construct 26 the stormwater management facilities for the Project. See Stormwater Management 27 Section 2.13 for requirements.

28 2.6.3.1.3.4 Worker and Health and Safety Plan 29 Due to the potential to encounter contaminated material in the Project area, the Design- 30 Builder shall prepare a Worker Health and Safety Plan to minimize the effects of 31 identified and unanticipated hazardous materials from contaminated environmental 32 media and construction activities. The plan shall address proper employee training, the 33 use of personal protection equipment, and contingency planning, and secondary 34 containment for hazardous materials encountered, generated, or stored at the Site. 35 The Design-Builder’s plan shall comply with the following regulations and agreements 36 and meet the minimum requirements identified for a Worker Health and Safety Plan: 37 • State Dangerous Waste Regulations (Chapter 173-303 WAC); 38 • State Health and Safety Asbestos Regulations (Chapter 49.26 RCW); 39 • Safety Standards for Construction Work (Chapter 296-155 WAC); 40 • Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (Chapter 49.17 RCW); 41 • National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) (Code of 42 Federal Regulations, Title 40, Volume 5, Parts 61 to 71); and 43 • General Occupational Health Standards (Chapter 296-62 WAC).

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.6.4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 2 (ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS) 3 Environmental documentation for the Project was completed prior to the issuance of this 4 RFP, including documents prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act 5 (NEPA), State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Section 106 of the National Historic 6 Preservation Act (Section 106), and Endangered Species Act (ESA). Other environmental 7 permits and approvals for the Project are pending. These environmental documents and 8 permits contain a number of specific design and construction criteria.

9 2.6.4.1 NEPA/SEPA DOCUMENTATION 10 A documented Categorical Exclusion (DCE) was issued for the Project on September 20, 11 2010. The NEPA documentation, which consistof an Environmental Classification 12 Summary (ECS) form and Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation, is provided in 13 Appendix 22. Supporting discipline reports are also provided in Appendices 26 and 14 27The City issue a Determination of Non-Significance for the Project to satisfy SEPA 15 requirements on September 23, 2010 (Appendix 23). If the Design-Builder’s Proposal is 16 substantially different than the Project analyzed for the DCE, additional documentation 17 such as a NEPA reevaluation may be required in order to determine if the original DCE 18 remains valid. If this occurs, the Design-Builder shall adjust the Project schedule 19 accordingly while ensuring no changes to the Contract Time.

20 2.6.4.2 PERMIT COMPLIANCE, MODIFICATIONS, AND APPROVALS 21 The City of Tacoma completed environmental documentation to satisfy the requirements 22 of NEPA, SEPA, ESA, and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The 23 City of Tacoma has obtained or is currently in the process of obtaining the following 24 permits: 25 • Hydraulic Project Approval – Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife 26 (WDFW) (see JARPA package in Appendix 24). 27 • Shoreline Substantial Development – City of Tacoma (see JARPA package in 28 Appendix 24). 29 • Exemption from Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area Development 30 Permit – City of Tacoma (complete – see Appendix 24).

31 The Design-Builder shall acquire the following permits and approvals (if necessary) and 32 all other permits necessary to perform the Work that are not identified above. 33 • NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit – Ecology. Based upon early 34 coordination with Ecology staff, it is anticipated that an NPDES Permit is not 35 required based upon an anticipated level of ground disturbance less than one 36 acre. However, the Design-Builder shall contact the local Ecology Inspector for 37 the Project area 30 days prior to construction to inform them of upcoming 38 construction activities. 39 • Noise Variance – City of Tacoma. 40 Based upon the Conceptual Project Design, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has 41 determined that a Section 404 Nationwide Permit is not required. However, if the 42 Design-Builder’s Proposal or Preliminary Design is substantially different than that 43 shown in the Conceptual Project Design, additional permits may be required, such as:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Clean Water Act Section 404 Nationwide Permit – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2 • CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification – Ecology. 3 • Coastal Zone Management Act Consistency Determination – Ecology.

4 The Design-Builder shall follow the requirements of all permits and commitments 5 referenced in this Section, and any other permits that are obtained for the Project. The 6 Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with timely notice of its intent to 7 propose an alternative construction method or a design change that is inconsistent with 8 a particular permit, environmental requirement, or commitment. The City of Tacoma 9 will work with WSDOT and the Design-Builder and will bring final detailed proposals, 10 provided by the Design-Builder, to the regulatory agencies for modifications to those 11 permits previously obtained by the City of Tacoma. The Design-Builder shall be 12 responsible for preparing any information and documentation needed to secure the 13 additional environmental approvals required for implementation of the Design-Builder's 14 alternative proposals. 15 Costs and schedule delays may result from additional impacts to Environmentally 16 Sensitive Areas not identified in the environmental documentation and permits obtained 17 for the Project. The Design-Builder shall be responsible for additional mitigation costs, 18 if required by the City of Tacoma, WSDOT, or other regulatory agencies.

19 2.6.4.2.1 Hydraulic Project Approval 20 A project-specific hydraulic project approval (HPA) has yet to be obtained for this 21 Project. However, early coordination efforts have identified some of the potential 22 provisions that are likely to be incorporated into the project specific HPA. These 23 provisions are included within the Conservation Measures and Impact Minimization 24 Measures outlined under Threatened and Endangered Species in Section 2.6.4.3.4.

25 Previous HPAs in the project vicinity have stated work below the ordinary high water 26 line shall not occur from February 15 through July 30 of any year for the protection of 27 out-migrating juvenile salmonids. This period of closure is subject to change or 28 modification by the regulatory authorities but is anticipated to be generally as outlined 29 above.

30 2.6.4.2.2 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 31 Construction of portions of the Murray Morgan Bridge will occur within the regulated 32 shoreline environment. The portion of the Thea Foss Waterway in the vicinity of the 33 project is within the “S-8” Shoreline District as described in Section 13.10.110 of the 34 Tacoma Municipal Code. Construction within this shoreline district, as permitted by a 35 Substantial Shoreline Development Permit, must comply with design guidelines and 36 development standards identified in TMC Section 13.10.110 and the Thea Foss Water 37 Design and Development Plan (TFWDDP).

38 The City of Tacoma, in coordination with the Foss Waterway Development Authority, is 39 conducting a design review as part of the shoreline permit process. The application for 40 Substantial Shoreline Development Permit identified all activities to occur within the 41 200-foot shoreline zone (see Appendix 24). If the Design-Builder proposes additional 42 activity within the shoreline zone, the Design-Builder must contact the City of Tacoma 43 Project Manager to inquire about additional permit criteria, design review, or mitigation 44 measures that may be required.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.6.4.3 OTHER AGREEMENTS AND COMMITMENTS 2 The environmental documents referenced in this RFP contain commitments for the 3 completion of the Work. The Design-Builder shall ensure that these commitments are 4 adhered to and implemented.

5 2.6.4.3.1 Noise Pollution Control 6 The Design-Builder shall implement mitigation measures for temporary noise impacts 7 associated with construction activities. The Design-Builder shall be responsible for 8 obtaining a noise variance from the City of Tacoma if deemed necessary. The Design- 9 Builder shall follow the conditions, restrictions, and notification requirements within the 10 exemption.

11 The Design-Builder shall implement construction noise abatement methods, including 12 operational methods, equipment choice, and acoustical treatments to limit the effects of 13 construction noise. All engine-powered equipment shall have mufflers installed 14 according to the manufacturer's specifications, and all equipment shall comply with 15 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) equipment noise standards.

16 The Design-Builder shall limit construction activities that produce the highest noise 17 levels (such as hauling, loading spoils, jack-hammering, and using other demolition 18 equipment) to the periods of time permitted by the City o f Tacoma.

19 2.6.4.3.2 U.S. Coast Guard Notification 20 The Design-Builder shall coordinate with the U.S. Coast Guard regarding any 21 construction element that may require closure of the waterway, deviation from standard 22 hours of operation, or create a potential safety hazard for boaters. The Design-Builder 23 shall notify the U.S. Coast Guard D 13 Bridge Administrator at least 90 days prior to 24 construction if there is a requirement to close or obstruct the waterway, deviate from 25 standard hours of operation, or create a safety concern (such as removal of the central 26 span). All navigation lights must be kept operational and visible during the duration of 27 construction, and additional lighting may be required. Use of a barge will require 28 implementation of a plan that outlines how it will be moored, method of anchoring, and 29 location and duration of use, which is to be approved by the City of Tacoma Engineer in 30 coordination with the U.S. Coast Guard and EPA. Additional restrictions on barge use 31 will be outlined within the HPA.

32 2.6.4.3.3 In-Water Work Windows 33 The Design-Builder shall be required to adhere to the in-water work window agreed to by 34 NOAA Fisheries and USFWS (the Services) as part of the ESA consultation and WDFW 35 as part of the HPA. The in-water work window affects all work below the Ordinary 36 High/Mean Higher High (OH/MHH) Water Mark and use of barges near the shoreline. 37 As noted above, previous HPAs in the project vicinity have stated work below the 38 ordinary high water line shall not occur from February 15 through July 30 of any year for 39 the protection of out-migrating juvenile salmonids.

40 2.6.4.3.4 Threatened and Endangered Species 41 The Design-Builder’s Preliminary Design Submittal shall be consistent with 42 Conservation Measures and Impact Minimization Measures (CM/IMM) as specified in 43 the Biological Assessment (BA) to minimize and/or eliminate potential impacts to listed

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 species and their associated habitats. These ESA commitments shall be implemented by 2 the Design-Builder for the duration of the Project.

3 If the Design-Builder modifies design or construction activities beyond those agreed to in 4 the BA or Letters of Concurrence(see Appendix 24), ESA consultation may need to be re- 5 initiated. If this occurs, the Design-Builder shall work through the City of Tacoma to 6 provide the necessary information required for ESA consultation. The City of Tacoma 7 and WSDOT will take the lead in coordinating with the Services. If ESA consultation 8 needs to be re-initiated due to changes made by the Design-Builder, all cost and schedule 9 impacts shall be the Design-Builder’s responsibility.

10 The CM/IMM contains several elements of the RFP that were previously described 11 including implementation of TESC and SCPP plans. Additional CM/IMMs are outlined 12 below.

13 The Design-Builder shall prepare a Containment System Plan that will protect the 14 surrounding environment from all debris associated with preparing all surfaces to be 15 painted including old paint and bird guano as outlined in WSDOT Standard 16 Specifications. The containment system shall be in accordance with SSPC Technology 17 Guide No. 6. The containment system must be approved by the City of Tacoma Engineer.

18 The project will construct an enhanced stormwater runoff treatment system that targets 19 dissolved metals and oil and gas per the 2008 City of Tacoma Surface Water 20 Management Manual.

21 CM/IMM Summary:

22 • Work below the OH/MHH will be limited to the approved in-water work as 23 stipulated in the HPA issued by the WDFW. 24 • Barges will not be located between the shoreline and adjacent in-water Pier along 25 either the City or Port approaches except during the approved in-water work 26 window. 27 • Barge usage shall be restricted to tidal elevations adequate to prevent grounding 28 of the barge. When not in use, the barge shall be relocated away from the 29 shoreline. 30 • The barge location shall be fixed through the use of methods that do not disturb 31 contaminated sediments. Walking spuds are not authorized. 32 • Installation of temporary or permanent piles is not authorized. 33 • An emergency spill containment kit must be kept along each shoreline (Port and 34 City approaches), staging areas, and on the barge. Each spill kits will contain a 35 copy of the approved SPCC. 36 • The WDFW Area Habitat Biologist and Enforcement Officer listed on the HPA 37 shall receive written notification no less than three working days prior to the start 38 of construction activities. 39 • All Bridge Painting Specifications outlined in the WSDOT Standard 40 Specifications will be implemented. 41 • Wet concrete shall be prevented from entering or leaching into waters of the 42 State. Cement-laden water shall not enter waters of the State.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-9 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • All work below the OHWM and along shoreline slopes will follow the procedures 2 within the Thea Foss and Wheeler-Osgood Waterways Slope Area Maintenance 3 Plan (Appendix 25). 4 • All piles to be extracted when demolishing the old stairway landing will be 5 removed during periods of low tide when all required work can be accomplished 6 prior to the work area being inundated by the next rising tide. Work below the 7 OH/MHH is authorized based on tidal cycle. In-water work is not authorized. 8 • BMPs will be installed according to City of Tacoma and/or WSDOT standards 9 and will be inspected and maintained throughout the life of the Project. 10 • Staging areas within 100 feet of the Thea Foss Waterway will be inspected weekly, 11 at a minimum, by the ECM. 12 • Wash water resulting from wash down of equipment or work areas will be 13 contained for proper treatment and/or disposal and will not be directly 14 discharged into state waters. 15 • Oil, fuels, or chemicals will not be discharged to surface waters or onto land 16 where there is a potential for reentry into surface waters. 17 • Cleaning solvents or chemicals used for tools or equipment cleaning will not be 18 discharged to ground or surface waters. 19 • The Design-Builder will regularly check fuel hoses, oil drums, oil or fuel transfer 20 valves, fittings, etc. for leaks and will maintain and store materials properly to 21 prevent spills. 22 • The use of lumber treated with creosote is not authorized. 23 • All lumber to be used for the project shall meet or exceed the standards 24 established in ‘Best Management Practices For the Use of Treated Wood in 25 Aquatic and Other Sensitive Environments’ developed by the Western Wood 26 Preserves Institute, Wood Preservation Canada, Southern Pressure Treaters’ 27 Association, and Timber Piling Council, dated August 1, 2006, and any current 28 amendments or addenda to it. 29 • Upon completion of all construction-related activities, the Design-Builder shall 30 remove the hogwire cage on the counterweight that is currently blocking where 31 Peregrine falcons historically nested on the bridge.

32 2.6.4.3.5 Soil Management Plan 33 It is not anticipated that contaminated soils will be encountered as part of this project. 34 However, soil work will be required for the construction of stormwater catch basins 35 and/or vaults. Therefore, to address the potential of encountering any contaminated soil 36 or groundwater the Design-Builder shall develop a Soil Management Plan (SMP) to 37 address any contaminated soil and/or groundwater that may be encountered during 38 construction of the Project. The SMP shall include protocols for managing and disposing 39 of contaminated media in accordance with applicable regulations and implementation of 40 construction techniques that minimize disturbance to the subsurface. The Design- 41 Builder’s SMP shall establish specific handling and disposal procedures and chains of 42 responsibility to effectively manage contaminated media when encountered to minimize 43 schedule delays and excessive costs. In February 2001, the City completed the 11th Street 44 ROW Site-Specific Remedial Investigation. It is included for reference in Appendix 30.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-10 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 At a minimum, the Design-Builder’s SMP shall include field screening methods, 2 notification requirements, soil stockpile management, and sampling and disposal 3 requirements. The SMP shall identify on-site locations where contaminated materials 4 can be safely stored or stockpiled and a list of off-site disposal locations that are 5 permitted to accept various types of Contaminated Media. The Design-Builder shall 6 include copies of the required permits and environmental approvals to demonstrate that 7 the listed disposal sites are in compliance with federal, state, and local regulations. In 8 addition, the SMP shall identify a protocol that requires the Design-Builder to provide 9 the City’s Representative with copies of the shipping manifest or bill of lading indicating 10 the amount of material hauled to disposal, and bearing the disposal site operator’s 11 confirmation for receipt of material. The Design-Builder shall provide the SMP to the 12 City’s Representative for review and comment at least 30 calendar days prior to the start 13 of construction activities.

14 2.6.4.3.6 Hazardous Materials 15 Due to the historical operation of the bridge, it is possible that hazardous materials will 16 be encountered during bridge rehabilitation activities. There is a potential to encounter 17 PCB light ballasts and mercury switches, asbestos-containing materials in electrical 18 boxes and cables, lubricants from historical bridge operations, and creosote treated 19 piling.

20 Permits to be furnished by the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder are identified in 21 Section 2.6.4.2. The Design-Builder is responsible for all work, records, and reports 22 required to perform the work described in this section.

23 The Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately if contamination is 24 suspected through observations associated with any soil work, slope cap maintenance 25 work, and/or work cutting timber pilings, such as an oily sheen or discolored soils or 26 sediments that may or may not emit strong chemical odors.

27 Releases of hazardous contaminated materials in the project site area may include but 28 are not limited to the following construction activities:

29 • Soil excavation for stormwater catch basins or vaults, 30 • Slope cap layback for access to creosote treated timber pilling for cutting, 31 • Cutting of creosote treated timber piles from the City approach associated with 32 the stairway and decking removal and relocation.

33 2.6.4.3.6.1 Overwater Construction Best Management Practices 34 The Design-Builder shall implement the following BMPs to minimize impacts to the 35 aquatic environment during bridge rehabilitation operations:

36 • Prior to starting rehabilitation activities, the bridge shall first be cleaned using 37 dry methods and equipment (scraping, sweeping, vacuuming) in a manner that 38 will prevent debris and substances from entering the Waterway. 39 • Bridge rehabilitation, including any associated demolition and removal shall be 40 conducted in a manner that minimizes debris and spill material from entering 41 the Waterway.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-11 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Tarps or other appropriate containment devices as specified in the HPA shall be 2 employed such that dust, debris, paint chips, and other pollutants do not enter 3 the Waterway during bridge removal, repair, cleaning, sandblasting, painting, 4 and other such activities. The containment structures shall be installed without 5 disturbance to the bed or Waterway, and cleaned as necessary to keep material 6 from entering the water. 7 • Debris and substances collected in containment structures shall be removed 8 and disposed of at an approved disposal site at least daily or whenever 9 accumulations may place the structure at risk and prior to movement or 10 removal of the containment structure. 11 • Work shall not occur when weather conditions would place the containment 12 structure at risk and/or result in loss of containment of debris and substances. 13 • Removal of bridge decking shall be accomplished by mechanical means. It is 14 anticipated that the HPA will not authorize blasting. 15 • All debris or deleterious material resulting from construction shall be removed 16 from the shoreline area and prevented from entering the Waterway. All debris 17 or construction materials shall be confined to the construction staging areas to 18 the maximum extent possible. 19 • Equipment used for all bridge rehabilitation activities shall be free of external 20 petroleum-based products while working around the water. Equipment shall 21 be checked daily for leaks and any necessary repairs shall be completed prior to 22 commencing work activities along/overlying the water. 23 • If floatable debris or spill material enters the Waterway, actions will be taken to 24 remove the material. All debris or spill material will be properly disposed of at 25 an approved disposal facility. 26 • If non-floatable demolition debris enters the waterway and sinks to the bottom 27 before it is removed, the material will be retrieved immediately and the City of 28 Tacoma as well as the Coast Guard will be notified. Any spills, other than 29 construction debris, that enter the Waterway will be reported immediately to 30 the City of Tacoma, Ecology’s Northwest Regional Office, and EPA.

31 2.6.4.3.6.2 Slope Cap Maintenance 32 The slope cap in Remedial Action Area 8 (RA 8) is the only Thea Foss Waterway 33 remedial action area that may be directly impacted by the Project. The removal of stairs 34 and decking located adjacent to the western bridge pier will include cutting off the 35 existing creosote treated piles three feet below the surface. This is the only rehabilitation 36 activity that directly comes into contact with a remedial action area. The Design-Builder 37 shall perform all timber piling cutting activities and slope cap maintenance activities in 38 accordance with the Slope Area Maintenance Plan, prepared by the City of Tacoma as 39 described below (see Appendix 25).

40 2.6.4.3.6.2.1 RA 8 Slope Cap Composition 41 Slope caps (thick slope caps, quarry spall caps, and grout mat caps) were constructed in 42 specific slope areas of the Thea Foss and Wheeler-Osgood Waterways (Appendix 25). 43 Slope caps were constructed to contain contaminated sediment and debris; to contain 44 remnant, treated (i.e., creosote treated) pilings; and to stabilize shoreline slopes. The RA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-12 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 8 thick slope and quarry spall cap components consist of the following design elements: 2 (1) 18-inches of slope cap filter material; covered by (2) 18-inches of armor material 3 (riprap or quarry spalls); and (3) habitat mix placed at rates of 25 tons per 1,000 square 4 feet or 15 tons per 1,000 square feet to fill in the voids of the riprap and quarry spalls, 5 respectively.

6 The north end of the RA 8 slope cap, adjacent to the Murray Morgan Bridge was 7 constructed from the base of the shoreline slope up to the waterward face of the existing 8 esplanade structure. Quarry spalls and/or habitat mix was placed under the timber pile 9 supported portion of the esplanade to enhance the substrate.

10 2.6.4.3.6.2.2 Slope Cap Maintenance 11 The Design-Builder shall perform a pre-conditions survey of the slope cap area prior to 12 commencing activities that may impact the slope cap, such as cutting of existing piles or 13 slope cap maintenance activities. The pre-conditions survey shall include photo 14 documentation of the presence and integrity of the slope cap materials, cap thickness 15 determination via sediment stakes or other surveying techniques, GPS documentation of 16 each piling to be cut off, and visual inspection and documentation of any evidence of 17 release of contamination using field forms and photographs. The Design-Builder shall 18 also perform a post-conditions survey following completion of any activities adjacent to 19 or within the RA 8 slope cap area to ensure that the slope cap is maintained in 20 accordance with the Operations Maintenance and Monitoring Plan (OMMP) and Slope 21 Area Maintenance Plan (Appendix 25). The post-conditions survey shall include 22 verification that the completed cap thickness meets the previously constructed 23 conditions using sediment stakes or surveying techniques.

24 The Design-Builder shall implement the following BMPs during piling cutting and slope 25 area maintenance activities in RA 8, in accordance with the remedy Slope Cap 26 Maintenance Plan: 27 • Work will be conducted in the dry to the extent possible, during periods of low 28 tide. 29 • Debris containment and sorbent booms will be deployed around slope areas 30 undergoing maintenance. 31 • Visual water quality monitoring will be conducted during all maintenance work 32 performed on slope areas to ensure that construction activities do not impact 33 adjacent surface water. 34 • All work in slope areas will be completed within agency-defined fish windows 35 to minimize potential impacts to aquatic life (see Section 2.6.4.3.3.).

36 Additional BMPs may be implemented during maintenance activities, as necessary, to 37 avoid potential impacts to surface water, potential for transport of contaminated 38 materials, and potential impact on fish and wildlife. Piling maintenance activities will be 39 performed manually using hand tools. The Design-Builder shall notify the City of 40 Tacoma of the schedule of slope cap maintenance activities to allow for City of Tacoma 41 and potential agency observation and oversight of the activities. Manual performance of 42 maintenance activities will minimize disturbance of existing cap and habitat areas and 43 provide for controlled placement of cap and habitat materials to return the cap and

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-13 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 habitat areas to post-remedial construction conditions. Creosote piles shall be disposed 2 of at an approved upland facility such that they do not re-enter waters of the state.

3 2.6.4.3.6.2.3 Construction Management and Documentation 4 Oversight and inspection of maintenance activities will be performed by the City of 5 Tacoma or its designee. The ECM will be present during all maintenance activities to 6 perform the following activities: 7 • Document construction progress; 8 • Verify that construction activities are being performed according to design and 9 that the slope area is returned to post-remedial construction conditions; and 10 • Ensure that BMPs have been implemented and are performed in accordance 11 with this Slope Area Maintenance Plan. 12 Construction progress will be documented with photographs and preparation of a Site 13 Log Book. The pre- and post-conditions survey will also be provided to the City of 14 Tacoma.

15 2.6.4.3.6.3 Potential Soil and/or Groundwater Contamination 16 The Project requires limited ground disturbance within the shadow of the bridge and 17 adjacent to the bridge approaches to conduct repairs to the existing concrete piers, 18 columns, and retaining walls and to construct the enhanced stormwater treatment 19 system. Repair work is expected to require only a small area of ground disturbance 20 around certain piers, columns, or approach footings. In addition, installation of the 21 enhanced stormwater system will require minor excavation.

22 This excavation will occur within the boundaries of the CB/NT Superfund Site. However, 23 the City of Tacoma has developed several plans to guide remediation efforts of the 24 CB/NT Superfund Site. City of Tacoma cleanup of the Thea Foss Waterway consists of 25 both sediment remediation and source control measures. The City of Tacoma manages 26 an Institutional Controls Plan for the Thea Foss Waterway and is implementing a 27 stormwater monitoring and source control strategy for the municipal storm drains 28 entering the Thea Foss and Wheeler-Osgood Waterways to help provide long-term 29 protection of sediment quality in the waterways. The Design-Builder shall implement 30 BMPs associated with the Thea Foss Waterway during construction of the proposed 31 Project to avoid potential impacts to surface water and minimize the potential for 32 transport of contaminated materials.

33 According to a search of available databases, all other facilities with hazardous materials 34 concerns within a ¼ mile of the Site are undergoing ongoing compliance or have 35 completed their cleanup and/or remediation actions. A summary of the database search 36 and assessment is provided in a Hazardous Materials Discipline Report (see Appendix 37 26).

38 All soil designated for removal shall be handled and stored in a manner that prevents the 39 spread of contamination to adjacent soil or water. Separate stockpiles shall be 40 maintained for known hazardous or contaminated material and for suspected hazardous 41 or contaminated material. The Design-Builder shall transport hazardous or 42 contaminated material and dispose of it at a permitted facility. The Design-Builder shall 43 provide the City of Tacoma with a copy of the shipping manifest or bill of lading,

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-14 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 indicating the amount of material hauled to disposal and bearing the disposal site 2 operator’s confirmation for receipt of the material.

3 2.6.4.3.6.3.1 Contaminated Water 4 All water removed from areas of contamination, including free water that leaches from 5 contaminated soil stockpiles or water suspected of being contaminated, shall be 6 collected, handled, and stored in a manner that prevents the spread of contamination to 7 adjacent soil or water. The Design-Builder shall transport contaminated water and 8 dispose of it at a permitted facility. The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma 9 with a copy of the shipping manifest or bill of lading, indicating the amount of material 10 hauled to disposal and bearing the disposal site operator’s confirmation for receipt of the 11 material.

12 2.6.4.3.6.4 Lead Based Paint and Asbestos 13 Lead based paint (LBP) is present at the Site and will require removal. The Design- 14 Builder shall ensure that the handling and removal of lead is accomplished by trained 15 workers, pursuant to procedures in the SPCC, SMP, and HASP. Construction debris 16 containing lead based paint is designated as a dangerous waste and regulated as such 17 under Chapter 173-303 WAC. The Design-Builder shall stockpile, store, and dispose of 18 all construction debris containing lead based paint in accordance with all applicable 19 state, federal, and local regulations.

20 Appropriate containment devices shall be employed such that dust, debris, paint chips, 21 and other pollutants do not enter the Waterway. The containment structures shall be 22 installed without disturbance to the bed or Waterway, and cleaned as necessary to keep 23 material from entering the water. Any soil exposed to lead based paint and materials will 24 be removed and stored according to the SPCC.

25 Although asbestos containing materials (ACM) are not anticipated at the Site, the 26 Design-Builder may encounter utilities or structures containing ACM. Should this occur, 27 the Design-Builder shall stop work in the immediate area and perform a thorough 28 hazardous materials survey including, but not limited to, ACM completed by a certified 29 Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act inspector on all suspect materials. If the 30 survey results indicate ACM is present, the Design-Builder shall be responsible for filing 31 the necessary paperwork with the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency prior to asbestos 32 abatement or demolition of any structures. The Design-Builder shall ensure notification 33 is received by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) no later 34 than 14 Calendar Days prior to the asbestos removal start date. The Design-Builder shall 35 inspect, remove, and dispose of all hazardous materials including, but not limited to, 36 ACM identified in the survey. This effort will be considered a Differing Site Condition 37 (DSC) in accordance with Section 1-04.7 of the General Provisions. Prior to commencing 38 asbestos-related Work, the Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with copies 39 of approvals and notifications that have been given and/or obtained from the required 40 jurisdictional agencies. The Design-Builder shall designate a Washington State Certified 41 Asbestos Supervisor to personally supervise the asbestos removal, and to ensure that the 42 handling and removal of asbestos is accomplished by certified workers, pursuant to L&I 43 Standards.

44 Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA) RCW 49-17 implements the 45 Occupational Health Standards WAC 296-62. RCW 49-17 also implements Safety 46 Standards for Construction Work WAC 296-155, which contains the Safety Standards for

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-15 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Asbestos and Encapsulation WAC 296-65. These safety requirements apply to all 2 construction activities and the regulations are enforced by L&I.

3 2.6.4.3.6.5 General Construction Activities 4 The Design-Builder shall dispose of construction waste material such as concrete or 5 other harmful materials at approved sites in accordance with WSDOT Standard 6 Specifications.

7 If applicable, the Design-Builder shall meet all regulatory conditions imposed at the 8 Thea Foss and Wheeler-Osgood Waterways Superfund Remediation Project (e.g., 9 Consent Decree) associated with construction. These conditions could include ensuring 10 that the surrounding properties and population are not exposed to any potential 11 contaminants originating from the Site. The Design-Builder shall ensure that the Site is 12 properly contained during construction so that contaminants do not migrate to adjacent 13 properties or resources, and so that the health and safety of all onsite personnel are 14 protected during Work. The Design-Builder shall prepare a SPCC Plan in accordance 15 with 2.6.3.1.3.2 that provides specific guidance for managing spills that may occur 16 during construction at the Site.

17 If unknown contamination is discovered during construction, the Design-Builder shall 18 stop work in the immediate area, notify the City’s Representative immediately, and 19 follow the SPCC Plan and ECP procedures as well as all appropriate regulations.

20 Machinery and equipment used during construction shall be serviced, fueled, cleaned 21 and maintained by the Design-Builder in an upland location, identified within the 22 Design-Builder's SPCC Plan, in order to prevent contamination to any surface water. 23 Some equipment will not be feasible to move on a regular basis to refuel. In this case, 24 the Design-Builder shall utilize the necessary BMPs to prevent spills to water during 25 refueling.

26 The Design-Builder shall implement general construction BMPs to limit discharge of 27 smoke, dust, or other contaminants into the atmosphere at levels greater than limits 28 established by federal, state, and local regulations and authorities. These BMPs include, 29 but are not limited to the following: 30 • Equipment shall be turned off by the Design-Builder when not in use. 31 • The Design-Builder shall ensure only well-maintained and properly functioning 32 equipment and vehicles be used. 33 • The Design-Builder shall wet down and/or cover exposed soils when not in use 34 to minimize fugitive dust and erosion due to wind. 35 • Exposed materials shall be enclosed during transport to minimize fugitive dust 36 and to prevent any loss of sediment or pollution to the surrounding 37 environment.

38 2.6.4.3.7 Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Preservation 39 The project will be completed in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic 40 Preservation Act. The Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) 41 provided concurrence on the Area of Potential Effect (APE) on April 13, 2010. No

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-16 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 archaeological sites were identified within the APE and no further archaeological 2 investigations are recommended.

3 The Unanticipated Archaeological Discovery Plan (UDP), pursuant to Section 106 of the 4 National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, shall be adopted and implemented by the 5 Design-Builder(see Appendix A of Appendix 27). The UDP shall be incorporated as part 6 of the Design-Builder’s ECP. The protocol states that in the event that ground-disturbing 7 or other construction activities result in the inadvertent discovery of a potential or actual 8 archaeological site, work should be halted in the area of discovery, the area should be 9 secured with a 30 foot perimeter, and contact should be made with DAHP, FHWA, 10 WSDOT, and the Puyallup Tribe. Work should be halted until such time as further 11 investigation and appropriate consultation is concluded. In the unlikely event of the 12 inadvertent discovery of human remains, work should be immediately halted in the area, 13 the discovery covered and secured against further disturbance, and contact effected with 14 the Coroner, law enforcement personnel, DAHP, and authorized representatives of the 15 Puyallup Tribe.

16 Three historic properties within the APE are eligible for the National Register of Historic 17 Places (NRHP). Two of the properties will not be directly impacted by the Project. 18 Indirect effects may consist of temporary noise and visual intrusions that would end 19 once Project construction is completed. The temporary noise and visual effects would 20 not affect the use, character, or integrity of the historic characteristics of these resources.

21 The third historic property, the Murray Morgan Bridge, will be adversely affected by the 22 proposed Project. DAHP provided concurrence on the adverse effect determination on 23 July 8, 2010. Because the bridge is listed on the NRHP, a Memorandum of Agreement 24 (MOA) was was developed to identify appropriate measures to mitigate for the adverse 25 effects of the Project. The MOA was was signed by FHWA, WSDOT, Washington State 26 Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and the City of Tacoma Historic Preservation 27 Officer September 20, 2010. The Design-Builder shall be responsible for adhering to all 28 mitigation commitments identified in the MOA, which may include: 29 • interpretive signage about the bridge along the Thea Foss pedestrian corridor; 30 • Prepare as-built drawings of the bridge (with AutoCAD or LIDAR) to document 31 the structure prior to rehabilitation (LIDAR to be provided by the City of 32 Tacoma); 33 • Enhance existing photographic and historical documentation of the bridge 34 using DAHP Level II Mitigation Documentation; 35 • Develop and host a website that chronicles the history of the bridge,. (his 36 commitment, shall be implemented by the City of Tacoma); 37 • Prepare an operation and maintenance plan that respects the historical 38 elements of the bridge and provides managers with a strategy for the long term 39 care of the bridge. 40 The Mitigation Plan recommends that any changes to the bridge adhere to the Secretary 41 of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation and that the following standard mitigation 42 measures be taken for any alterations to the bridge’s character-defining features: 43 • Historical Documentation – using the DAHP Level II mitigation report format;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-17 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Photographic and as-built drawings (LIDAR and/or AutoCAD); 2 • Retaining unused elements of the bridge for reuse or preservation. 3 Additional mitigation recommendations are provided in the Mitigation Plan for specific 4 features where appropriate. The Design-Builder, in coordination with the City of 5 Tacoma, shall be responsible for implementing all mitigation commitments identified in 6 the MOA and Final Mitigation Plan (Appendix 27).

7 2.6.4.3.8 Watercraft Relocation 8 All watercraft and boat houses moored at Docks M, N, and O in the Foss Harbor Marina 9 shall either be 1) protected in place from falling debris and other potential health and 10 safety threats during construction or 2) relocated to an alternate marina or dock for all 11 construction activities with the potential to result in falling debris or other potential 12 health and safety threats. Option 1 details can be outlined in the Containment System 13 Plan, as described in Section 2.6.4.3.4, which must be reviewed and approved by the City 14 of Tacoma or its designees. Option 2 requires relocation of permanent residents on an 15 estimated five boat houses moored at Dock N. Potential locations for transient moorage 16 include empty slips within the Foss Harbor Marina, the Dock Street Marina, or Petrich 17 Marine Docks. Option 2 requires preparation and implementation of a Relocation Plan 18 to be reviewed and approved by the City of Tacoma or its designees. Comparable utilities 19 must be provided during transient moorage. The Design-Builder shall be responsible for 20 the expense of implementing either option, including the cost of temporary moorage.

21 The Design-Builder shall contact the General Manager of the Foss Harbor Marina to 22 ensure that rehabilitation of the Murray Morgan Bridge does not conflict with potential 23 new construction at the marina, per the Communication Plan in Section 2.7. The Foss 24 Marina may construct new covered moorage south of the bridge within 6-12 months. 25 The marina is currently in the process of obtaining permits for the proposed 26 construction.

27 Tracy McKendry, General Manager 28 Foss Harbor Marina 29 821 Dock Street 30 Tacoma, WA 98402 31 (253) 272-4404, x102 32 (253) 272-0367 fax

33 2.6.4.3.9 Access

34 2.6.4.3.9.1 Emergency Access 35 Access to fire boats moored within the Thea Foss Waterway on the Port (east) side of the 36 bridge must be maintained at all times via East 11th Street during construction activities. 37 The Design-Builder shall ensure that construction activities do not restrict ingress and 38 egress to the City of Tacoma Fire Station #6 located at 1015 East F Street. The Design- 39 Builder shall notify the Station (via the City Fire Communications Center) of upcoming 40 detours and/or temporary road closures that may affect emergency access routes.

41 2.6.4.3.9.2 Recreational Water Access 42 The Thea Foss Waterway is designated a Water Trail in the Open Space Element of the 43 City of Tacoma Comprehensive Plan. Access under the Murray Morgan Bridge lift span

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-18 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 must be maintained for recreational purposes to the maximum extent feasible during 2 construction.

3 Pedestrian access shall be maintained to the maximum extent feasible during 4 construction activities. The Design-Builder shall contact the City of Tacoma to 5 coordinate signage requirements for pedestrian notifications and detour routes prior to 6 the initiation of construction activities that require sidewalk and/or stairway closure.

7 2.6.5 SUBMITTALS 8 The Design-Builder shall submit the following documents to the City of Tacoma as 9 required by this RFP and the permits anticipated for the Project. The submittals shall 10 include, but are not limited to, the following.

11 2.6.5.1 PERMITTING 12 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for obtaining a noise variance from the City of 13 Tacoma if deemed necessary.

14 2.6.5.2 PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION 15 Project submittals include, but are not limited to, the following: 16 • Environmental Compliance Plan 17 • TESC Plan 18 • SPCC Plan 19 • Stormwater Site Plan 20 • Containment System Plan 21 • Soil Management Plan 22 • Worker and Health and Safety Plan 23 • Relocation Plan (if needed) 24 • Site log book

25 End of Section 26

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.6-19 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.7 PUBLIC INFORMATION

2 2.7.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall work with the City of Tacoma to develop and maintain a 4 consistent level of public communication, while encouraging broad public awareness and 5 understanding of the Project. The Design-Builder shall demonstrate a commitment to 6 sharing accurate, open, consistent, clear, concise, and timely information with the City of 7 Tacoma and partnering agency staff. The Design-Builder shall work with the City of 8 Tacoma to develop and maintain consistent internal communications and to keep the 9 public informed about the Project.

10 The Design-Builder will develop and implement a strong communication and outreach 11 strategy. Providing clear, consistent, and timely messaging is an essential element to 12 successful Project delivery. The Design-Builder shall work with the City of Tacoma to 13 maintain strong relationships with external stakeholders and government entities. 14 Project information will be shared with employees and a variety of external stakeholders 15 and government entities.

16 The Design-Builder’s public information role includes preparing for and participating in 17 up to two (2) public meetings and four (4) open houses; responding to public inquiries 18 and complaints; assisting with media coordination; preparing regular construction 19 updates, press releases, Web updates, and photo and video documentation; and 20 coordinating with external stakeholders and government entities. All external 21 communication with stakeholders and government entities shall be coordinated with the 22 City of Tacoma.

23 External stakeholders may include but are not limited to the general public, the Save 24 Our Bridge Committee, nearby property owners, Thea Foss Waterway users, community 25 leaders and organizations, local businesses, media, labor unions and trade associations, 26 community college training programs, employment agencies and WorkSource offices, 27 environmental interest groups, truckers, shippers, freight interest groups, emergency 28 services, public and private utilities, Pierce Transit, BNSF Railway, U.S. Coast Guard, 29 WSDOT, employee transportation coordinators, and commuters.

30 The Design-Builder shall work with the City of Tacoma to achieve the following public 31 information and community relations goals: 32 • Support the successful delivery of the Project. 33 • Provide clear, accurate, timely and consistent information about the Project, its 34 activities, and its impacts. 35 • Educate external stakeholders and government entities about the benefits and 36 improvements associated with the Project, such as economic development. 37 • Reinforce positive City of Tacoma relationships with all external stakeholders and 38 government entities. 39 • Work with the City of Tacoma to resolve issues of concern for external 40 stakeholders and government entities. 41 • Engage external stakeholders in identifying and addressing potential Project 42 impacts. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-1

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Promptly respond to questions, concerns and information requests from all 2 external stakeholders and government entities.

3 2.7.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 4 This section is intentionally left blank.

5 2.7.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

6 2.7.3.1 JOINT COMMUNICATIONS EFFORT 7 Development and dissemination of public information for the Project requires the 8 integration of resources and labor between the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder. 9 Joint communications will educate and inform the public, establish expectations, and 10 play a significant role in delivering a successful Project.

11 The Design-Builder shall coordinate construction closures and communications with 12 other projects being constructed near the Project location. The Design-Builder shall also 13 maintain ongoing communication with the City of Tacoma regarding upcoming 14 construction activities and planned closures.

15 2.7.3.2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN 16 The Design-Builder shall submit a Draft Communications Plan that defines the Design- 17 Builder’s outreach strategy for the Project. The Communications Plan shall describe the 18 critical role of communications to the overall success of the Project. This document shall 19 describe the Design-Builder’s approach to community involvement, public outreach, 20 including communications goals and objectives, significant communications risks and 21 opportunities, key dates, outreach activities, and desired outcomes.

22 The Communications Plan shall describe the Design-Builder’s strategy for 23 communicating and disseminating information, and responding to public inquiries, 24 comments and requests. It shall include targeted communications strategies for all 25 external stakeholders that will be affected by the Project. The Communications Plan will 26 outline a plan to coordinate with these external stakeholders.

27 The Communications Plan shall describe the roles and responsibilities of the Design- 28 Builder’s Project Manager and public information staff, and how these staff will interact 29 with the City of Tacoma’s Project personnel and communications staff.

30 The Design-Builder shall submit the Draft Communications Plan, in accordance with this 31 Section, within 30 Calendar Days after the Notice to Proceed. The City of Tacoma will 32 review and comment on the Draft Communications Plan after which the Design-Builder 33 will produce a final plan.

34 As the Project progresses, the Design-Builder shall regularly review the Communications 35 Plan and update as needed. All changes to the Communications Plan shall be 36 coordinated with the City of Tacoma for additional review and comment.

37 2.7.4 CITY OF TACOMA’S COMMUNICATIONS RESPONSIBILITIES 38 The City of Tacoma retains responsibility for ensuring consistency of messaging within 39 the Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Project, for communications related to the REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-2

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 overall Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Project, for developing and maintaining 2 key messaging for the Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Project, and for certain 3 specific communications tasks of the Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Project. The 4 City of Tacoma's Public Information Team shall retain primary responsibility for the 5 following communications tasks: 6 • Creating and updating Project key messages, including maintaining message 7 consistency with the Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Project. 8 • Coordinating external and internal Project communications, including regular 9 team meetings between the City of Tacoma communications staff and the Design- 10 Builder’s staff. 11 • Coordinating major public events, such as ground-breaking and ribbon-cutting 12 events. The Design-Builder shall assist with these activities. 13 • Communications with elected officials, including state legislators, the mayor and 14 council members, and city manager. 15 • Media relations activities, including press releases and media interviews and 16 briefings. The Design-Builder shall assist with these activities. 17 • Maintaining the Project Website. The Design-Builder shall assist with developing 18 and reviewing Website content. 19 • Developing Project-related materials, including folios, fact sheets, and e-mail 20 announcements to the Project database contacts. The Design-Builder shall assist 21 with these activities. 22 • Reviewing and approving responses to public comments regarding the Project. 23 The Design-Builder shall support these activities. 24 • Responding to public comments regarding the Murray Morgan Bridge 25 Rehabilitation Project. 26 • Monitoring Project communications to meet City of Tacoma standards for 27 format, graphic design, content, and messaging.

28 2.7.5 DESIGN-BUILDER’S ROLE IN PUBLIC INFORMATION 29 EFFORTS 30 The Design-Builder shall identify and implement ways of informing external 31 stakeholders about design and construction activities that directly affect them. Such 32 information shall be clear, consistent, and comprehensive; shall meet the City of 33 Tacoma’s graphic and writing standards; and shall be subject to ongoing review by the 34 City of Tacoma before distribution.

35 City of Tacoma communications staff and the Design-Builder’s public information staff 36 will participate in the Design-Builder regular Project meetings, as required. The Design- 37 Builder shall participate in Project communications meetings between the City of 38 Tacoma and the Design-Builder monthly, and more often if determined necessary by the 39 City of Tacoma to maintain regular coordination on all public information goals and 40 activities. The Design-Builder shall participate in additional communications meetings 41 as determined by the City of Tacoma.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-3

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The Design-Builder shall accept primary responsibility for the day-to-day 2 communications effort on the Project. The Design-Builder shall retain primary 3 responsibility for the following communications tasks:

4 • Creating and implementing a Communications Plan. The City of Tacoma will 5 review and comment on the plan. The Design-Builder shall review this plan 6 regularly and update as needed. 7 • Developing and implementing emergency response procedures, including a Crisis 8 Communication Plan and emergency contact list (see Section 2.7.6.4). The crisis 9 communication plan shall detail information dissemination protocols and 10 spokesperson responsibilities. The City of Tacoma shall review the plan and 11 comment on the plan. The Design-Builder shall regularly review and update this 12 plan as needed. 13 • Providing regular construction updates to the City of Tacoma for use in public 14 information activities, including weekly construction activity reports, weekly 15 schedule updates, monthly progress reports, and quarterly employment goal 16 updates for apprenticeships, training, and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise 17 (DBE). Updates may be needed more frequently if plans and schedules change. 18 • Distributing updates on construction activities (see Section 2.7.7). 19 • Ensuring ample notification to external stakeholders regarding construction 20 activities. 21 • Maintaining Document Control. All Design-Builder communications submittals 22 will comply with Project documentation and quality standards (see Section 23 2.1.3.4, Documentation Control Requirements). The City of Tacoma will 24 maintain the official record of all public materials. 25 • Shooting video and photos for communications materials. For more information, 26 see Section 2.7.7.6. 27 • Coordinating and conducting public events, such as public meetings, open 28 houses, and Project briefings with business and community groups. The City of 29 Tacoma will assist in these activities. 30 • Managing Project signage at the construction site, including construction updates 31 and materials distribution. (For more information, Section 2.14, Signing and 32 Pavement Markings.) 33 • Managing subcontractor outreach to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) 34 firms. The City of Tacoma will assist in these activities. 35 • Managing employment outreach to the local community, such as coordination 36 with labor unions, trade associations, community college training programs, and 37 WorkSource. The City of Tacoma will assist in these activities. 38 • Managing the Project public contact database, including requests for 39 information. Public comments and questions may be received via mail, e-mail, 40 public meetings and community briefings. The Design-Builder shall update this 41 database with Project-specific information, requests, and responses. The Design- 42 Builder shall analyze and report trends, and provide a monthly status report to 43 the City of Tacoma. The City of Tacoma will provide the database, including

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-4

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 existing Project contacts, in a Web-based format to provide access for both the 2 City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder. 3 • Responding to public comments regarding the Murray Morgan Bridge 4 Rehabilitation Project. The City of Tacoma shall review and comment on all 5 responses before distribution.

6 2.7.5.1 PUBLIC INFORMATION STAFF 7 The Design-Builder shall provide staff as needed to support the Project. These staff are 8 responsible for identifying public information issues related to the Design-Builder’s 9 Work, and for formulating and implementing strategies to address those issues. Prior to 10 implementing these strategies, the Design-Builder shall consult with the City of Tacoma. 11 The Design-Builder shall work with the City of Tacoma to maintain public satisfaction 12 with the Project. The Design-Builder shall work in partnership with the City of Tacoma 13 to ensure that the City of Tacoma’s public information and communications goals and 14 objectives are met.

15 2.7.6 DESIGN-BUILDER PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIFICATIONS

16 2.7.6.1 MEETINGS 17 The Design-Builder shall work closely with the City of Tacoma communications staff, 18 including participating in monthly meetings with the City of Tacoma to maintain regular 19 coordination and communication with the City of Tacoma on all public information goals 20 and activities.

21 The Design-Builder shall be available to participate in community meetings or other 22 public events that will enhance outreach for the public.

23 2.7.6.2 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORTS 24 The Design-Builder shall provide a Monthly Progress Report to the City of Tacoma (see 25 Chapter 1, General Provisions). The Report shall summarize the previous and next 26 month's communications activities, including outreach events and public comment 27 tracking and response.

28 2.7.6.3 CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION DISSEMINATION 29 The Design-Builder shall coordinate with the City of Tacoma to collect, write, edit, and 30 disseminate design and construction information to the Murray Morgan Bridge 31 Rehabilitation Website, and any other appropriate outreach tools. The Design-Builder 32 shall provide the City of Tacoma with reader-friendly, clear, and concise information. 33 The Design-Builder shall communicate with the designated City of Tacoma Engineer and 34 the City of Tacoma's Public Information Team monthly, and more frequently when 35 requested by the City of Tacoma, regarding planned and current construction activities. 36 The Design-Builder shall collect and maintain an up-to-date schedule of planned and 37 current construction activities, such as location, estimated duration of activity, type of 38 Work being performed, physical impacts (e.g., lane closures, noise, traffic), and planned 39 construction detours.

40 The Design-Builder shall provide ample notification to external stakeholders regarding 41 construction activities, including physical impacts and street closures. The Construction

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-5

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Communications Plan shall include a description of notification methods such as 2 variable message signs, printed notices, and/or announcements to the Project database 3 contact list.

4 2.7.6.3.1 Construction Schedule 5 At least 30 Calendar Days prior to commencement of construction in any area of the 6 Project, the Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma of upcoming construction 7 activities and the anticipated construction schedule. The Design-Builder shall provide 8 construction updates to the City of Tacoma on a weekly basis. The Design-Builder shall 9 deliver additional updates if construction and traffic impacts change, or if the City of 10 Tacoma requests additional updates. These updates shall include the upcoming week’s 11 planned construction activity, Project status, and other information relevant to the 12 public.

13 The Design-Builder's Public Information Manager shall provide a summary of the 14 upcoming construction activities and associated impacts to the public. A current 15 construction activity report will be submitted to the City of Tacoma on a weekly basis.

16 2.7.6.4 CRISIS COMMUNICATION PLAN 17 Within 60 Calendar Days after the Notice to Proceed, the Design-Builder shall provide a 18 Crisis Communications Plan (emergency response protocol) for responding to 19 emergencies and incidents during the Project. The Design-Builder shall coordinate this 20 approach with the Design-Builder’s overall Maintenance of Traffic (Section 2.17).

21 The Design-Builder’s Crisis Communications Plan shall address the following:

22 • Communications approaches to emergencies such as fire, gas line strikes, injured 23 employees, auto accidents in a Work zone, environmental spills and natural 24 disasters; 25 • Communications approaches to inadvertent discovery of cultural resources and 26 hazardous materials, in accordance with the City of Tacoma policies and 27 protocols; 28 • Staff designated to respond to the emergency, including an emergency contact 29 list; 30 • The cause of specific disruptions such as construction-related disruptions and 31 weather; 32 • Actions that might be taken to mitigate the crisis; 33 • Procedures for notifying the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder; 34 • Procedures for notifying the public, including media spokesperson 35 responsibilities; 36 • Process for developing any corrective procedures that will be put in place as a 37 result of the crisis; 38 • Procedures for referring victims of construction emergencies to the City of 39 Tacoma’s risk management department.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-6

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • In the event of a crisis, the Design-Builder shall summarize the emergency 2 protocol used in an emergency incident report, and submit that report to the City 3 of Tacoma within one Calendar Day of the crisis. 4 Within 30 Calendar Days before the start of construction, the Design-Builder shall 5 organize, implement, and participate in a crisis communications workshop with the City 6 of Tacoma to discuss protocols and potential emergency situations. Staff from the local 7 jurisdictions and emergency service providers may participate in the workshop.

8 2.7.6.4.1 Dissemination of Emergency Information 9 As part of the Crisis Communications Plan, the Design-Builder shall establish and 10 manage an emergency response call list. All appropriate personnel shall be included on 11 the call list for immediate response in the event of an emergency. The call list shall be 12 divided into areas of expertise, so the proper people are contacted for specific emergency 13 situations.

14 The following City of Tacoma personnel shall be included on the call list for notification 15 of all emergencies:

16 • Project Manager 17 • Construction Manager 18 • Communications Manager

19 The following Design-Builder personnel shall be included on the call list for notification 20 of all emergencies:

21 • Construction Manager 22 • Project Manager 23 • Design Manager 24 • Public information staff

25 The personnel on the call list shall be agreed upon at the crisis communications 26 workshop between the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder. In addition, the Design- 27 Builder shall provide a trained spokesperson as needed during emergencies, and shall 28 provide prompt information and assistance as requested by the City of Tacoma during an 29 emergency.

30 2.7.6.5 COORDINATION WITH TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN 31 The Design-Builder’ shall coordinate with Project staff to communicate construction 32 traffic information to the public and other affected parties. In addition, the Design- 33 Builder shall be responsible for coordinating traffic communications as part of an 34 established coordinated communications plan. Refer to Section 2.17 for additional 35 traffic coordination requirements.

36 2.7.6.5.1 Maintenance of Traffic and Access 37 The Design-Builder shall provide maintenance of traffic and access information for the 38 entire Project to external stakeholders including commuters, residents, and businesses, 39 who are affected, at least two weeks prior to any revision to access in the area affected. 40 The City of Tacoma shall review and comment on all notifications with external 41 stakeholders. Notifications shall include the following:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-7

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Purpose of the change; 2 • Area affected and dates of impact; 3 • Alternate routes and detours; and 4 • A contact person for further information.

5 2.7.6.5.2 Emergency Vehicle Access 6 The Design-Builder shall develop a protocol for communicating information to the 7 emergency service providers regarding access to the Project area for emergency vehicles. 8 This protocol shall be included in the Construction Communications Plan.

9 2.7.6.5.3 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Handicapped Mobility Access 10 The Design-Builder shall clearly define and communicate to the City of Tacoma access 11 routes for bicycles, pedestrians, and handicapped persons, including alternate routes and 12 detours during construction.

13 2.7.7 METHODS AND TOOLS FOR DISSEMINATION OF 14 INFORMATION

15 2.7.7.1 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION SIGNS 16 The Design-Builder shall install and manage Project signage at the construction site, 17 including construction updates and materials distribution. The exact wording to be 18 included on these signs will be determined at a later date, and will be reviewed and 19 commented on by the City of Tacoma. Placement of the Project identification signs will 20 be reviewed and commented on by the City of Tacoma. Signs shall meet all applicable 21 City of Tacoma and MUTCD standards.

22 2.7.7.2 PROJECT WEBSITE 23 The City of Tacoma shall be responsible for maintaining the existing Project Website. 24 The Design-Builder shall submit information to the City of Tacoma communications staff 25 regarding Project updates and construction activities and impacts for the Project 26 Website. The Design-Builder shall provide information on lane closures, detour routes, 27 and other construction-related issues relevant to the public. The information, including 28 graphics and photos, shall be updated on a regular basis, as determined by the City of 29 Tacoma and the Design-Builder.

30 2.7.7.3 COLLATERAL MATERIALS 31 In addition to the dissemination of construction information discussed in this Section, 32 the Design-Builder shall review, provide input on, and disseminate written materials 33 produced by the City of Tacoma regarding construction issues specific to the Project. 34 These issues may include, but are not limited to, schedule, traffic, noise, lights, and 35 fugitive dust. Materials shall be made available to the public as requested through U.S. 36 mail, e-mail, City of Tacoma's Website, and individual and group meetings. The City of 37 Tacoma and the Design-Builder shall determine jointly when materials shall be 38 distributed to businesses and neighborhoods, the size of the distribution area, and the 39 content of the materials.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-8

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.7.7.4 CORRESPONDENCE AND E-MAIL 2 Project-related correspondence shall include communications with the external 3 stakeholders and government entities affected by the Project, and other communications 4 required in this RFP.

5 The City of Tacoma will forward e-mail, letters, and other forms of correspondence from 6 the public regarding design and construction issues to the Design-Builder for response. 7 The Project Website includes an e-mail contact function; inquiries received via the 8 Website will be forwarded for the Design-Builder for response.

9 The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with a contact name, postal 10 address, and e-mail address for all responses to public correspondence.

11 The Design-Builder shall answer all correspondence. All responses must be reviewed and 12 commented on by the City of Tacoma before distribution.

13 The Design-Builder shall respond to phone calls within one Calendar Day and e-mails 14 and standard mail letters within seven Calendar Days. The Design-Builder shall provide 15 copies of all correspondence regarding design and construction to the City of Tacoma 16 within 24 hours of the response being sent. For e-mail responses, the City of Tacoma 17 shall be copied on the Design-Builder’s response to the original e-mail inquiry, and on 18 any follow-up responses.

19 The Design-Builder shall record all correspondence using the Project public contact 20 database. The Design-Builder shall update this database with all Project-related 21 correspondence and shall track responses, analyze and report trends, and provide a 22 monthly status report to the City of Tacoma.

23 The Design-Builder shall furnish to the City of Tacoma written documentation of all 24 Project-related correspondence within one week of the communication.

25 2.7.7.5 OPEN HOUSES AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES

26 2.7.7.5.1 Open Houses 27 The Design-Builder shall convene up to four public open houses during the project to 28 inform the public of the Project’s status and to answer questions related to the Project. 29 The first open house shall be scheduled to occur at the 30% design and another shall be 30 held prior to the start of construction activities. The City of Tacoma will provide review 31 and comment on all open house plans and materials.

32 2.7.7.5.2 Public Engagement Activities 33 The City of Tacoma will coordinate outreach to external stakeholders and targeted to 34 elected officials. The Design-Builder shall attend public meetings and community 35 briefings. The Design-Builder shall present project information at two public meetings. 36 The Design-Builder shall provide staffing and displays. The Design-Builder shall be 37 available to make additional presentations, at the City of Tacoma’s request.

38 The Design-Builder shall conduct employment outreach to the local community, 39 including coordination with labor unions, trade associations, community college training 40 programs, and WorkSource.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-9

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 In order to meet the communications goals identified above, public engagement 2 activities shall be accessible, recurring, and responsive to the needs of external 3 stakeholders.

4 The City of Tacoma will review and comment on all public engagement activity plans and 5 materials.

6 2.7.7.5.3 City of Tacoma-Hosted Special Events 7 The Design-Builder shall assist the City of Tacoma with and participate in City of Tacoma 8 -hosted special events, such as a groundbreaking when construction begins and a ribbon 9 cutting when construction is complete. The Design-Builder shall assist the City of 10 Tacoma with and participate in public tours of the bridge.

11 2.7.7.6 PHOTOGRAPHS AND VIDEO 12 The Design-Builder shall document construction, public outreach, and other Project- 13 related events using photographs and video. The documentation shall be used for public 14 communications, media relations, and the City of Tacoma archival purposes. The 15 Design-Builder shall comply with the following standards:

16 • Produce and distribute photos and videos to document construction progress. 17 • Track and file photos and videos using the Project's documentation system. 18 • Provide or obtain accompanying information, such as use permissions and 19 publication rights.

20 All photographs, audio and video materials produced by the Design-Builder’s staff for 21 public dissemination shall comply with the City of Tacoma’s messaging and are the 22 shared property of the Design-Builder and the City of Tacoma. The City of Tacoma will 23 review the final version before release.

24 2.7.7.7 MEDIA RELATIONS 25 Although media relations are the responsibility of the City of Tacoma, the Design-Builder 26 shall participate in media interviews or other media information support activities at the 27 City of Tacoma’s request. When participating in media inquiries and interviews, the 28 Design-Builder shall provide information that complies with the City of Tacoma 29 messaging and other standards, including requirements for advance Project information, 30 Project progress and accountability, and timely response to media inquiries.

31 The Design-Builder shall coordinate all media requests with the City of Tacoma prior to 32 interviews. The City of Tacoma will be the primary point of contact for the media. The 33 Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with information and access to key 34 Project staff for press interviews, as requested.

35 The Design-Builder shall provide information and materials that meet local broadcast 36 and print media requirements and deadlines. All information released to the news 37 media must be reviewed and commented on by the City of Tacoma prior to release.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-10

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.7.7.8 CONSTRUCTION SITE TOURS 2 At the City of Tacoma’s request, the Design-Builder shall assist the City of Tacoma in 3 conducting tours of the Project Site for media, government entities, the City of Tacoma 4 management, and the public. The City of Tacoma communications staff will work with 5 the Design-Builder’s public information staff to develop visitor guidelines, protocols, and 6 safety standards. The City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder shall jointly determine 7 acceptable tour frequencies and other parameters. All tours shall be conducted in 8 accordance with these guidelines and protocols.

9 2.7.8 CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION 10 The Design-Builder shall collaborate with the City of Tacoma keep the public informed of 11 construction activities and to minimize construction impacts, including traffic and noise.

12 2.7.8.1 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC MITIGATION 13 The Design-Builder shall collaborate with the City of Tacoma on opportunities to work 14 with external stakeholders, including transportation coordinators, transit agencies, the 15 local chamber of commerce, nearby businesses, and neighborhood groups to encourage 16 more efficient use of highways and roadways. The Design-Builder shall work with the 17 City of Tacoma to keep these entities informed of construction activities. The Design- 18 Builder shall participate in meetings with the City of Tacoma as requested.

19 2.7.8.2 UTILITY SHUT-OFFS 20 The Design-Builder shall conduct regular communication with external stakeholders, 21 including residents and businesses affected by Utility shut-offs, to mitigate the impacts 22 of Utility disruptions. The Design-Builder shall contact and provide written notification 23 to all residents and businesses affected 48 hours in advance of a Utility shut-off, and 24 shall maintain a record of each notification. Notices shall indicate the purpose and 25 expected duration of the outage, and provide information indicating how those affected 26 by the outage can contact the Design-Builder. Notices shall meet the City of Tacoma's 27 communications style and be reviewed by the City of Tacoma before dissemination. 28 Such notices may also be provided by the City of Tacoma.

29 In the event of an emergency involving a Utility shutoff, the Design-Builder shall notify 30 the Utility Owner in accordance with Utility company standards and local emergency 31 services.

32 A contact list of representatives for Utility companies with facilities within the Project 33 Site is shown in Appendix 06.

34 2.7.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL 35 The Design-Builder shall maintain a high level of quality control for all public 36 information tools and materials. The Design-Builder shall be bound by the provisions of 37 the Quality Management Plan for all public information. The Construction 38 Communications Plan shall outline a process for managing review and resolution of 39 comments for all communications materials, both within the Design-Builder’s team and 40 with the City of Tacoma. The City of Tacoma will provide the Design-Builder with 41 periodic input and suggestions for improvement. The Design-Builder shall be

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-11

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 responsible for implementing any changes required by the City of Tacoma. (For more 2 information, see Section 2.1.3.4 – Documentation Control Requirements.)

3 2.7.10 SUBMITTALS 4 Project submittals include, but are not limited to, the following: 5 • Communications Plan (Section 2.7.3.2). 6 • Project contact call lists, including after hours contact information (Section 7 2.7.5). 8 • Construction information as requested by the City of Tacoma, including but not 9 limited to weekly construction activity reports, weekly schedule updates, monthly 10 progress reports, and quarterly employment goal updates. Format to be 11 established within 30 Calendar Days of Contract execution, with reporting 12 beginning immediately thereafter (Section 2.7.6.3). 13 • Construction notifications (Section 2.7.6.3). 14 • Crisis Communication Plan (Section 2.7.6.4). 15 • Crisis communication workshop (Section 2.7.6.4). 16 • Crisis communications call list (Section 2.7.6.4.1). 17 • Project identification signs at the construction site (Section 2.7.7.1). 18 • Materials for the Project Website (Section 2.7.7.2). 19 • Collateral materials and distribution list (Section 2.7.7.3). 20 • Project public contact database weekly tracking reports and Project 21 correspondence (Section 2.7.7.4). 22 • Open house plans and materials (Section 2.7.7.5.1). 23 • Public Engagement Activities plans and materials (Section 2.7.7.5.2). 24 • Photos and videos (Section 2.7.7.6). 25 • Materials for Project media relations (Section 2.7.7.7). 26 • Written notification of utility shut-offs (Section 2.7.8.2).

27 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.7-12

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.8 UTILITIES, UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND RELOCATION 2 AGREEMENTS

3 2.8.1 GENERAL

4 2.1.4.2 SCOPE 5 The City of Tacoma has identified seven Utilities On the Bridge that may require 6 relocation or protection in place. These Utilities are briefly described below. Each 7 Utility is addressed in more detail elsewhere in this Section. Unless expressly stated 8 otherwise, the specific description of Relocation Work in this Section 2.8.1.1 do not limit 9 or replace the general requirements of this Section.

10 Additional Relocation Work may be necessary to construct the Project. The Design- 11 Builder shall be responsible for determining what, if any, additional Utility Relocations 12 will be required; and shall work with Utility Owners to design and construct such 13 relocations in compliance with the Contract.

14 Incidental utility Work and any additional Relocation Work that becomes necessary due 15 to the Design-Builder’s correction of any inaccuracies in the Utility Information, changes 16 made by the Design-Builder to the Conceptual Plans, or otherwise, are addressed in this 17 Section and in Section 1-07.17 of the General Provisions. 18 • Tacoma Public Utilities 12-Inch Diameter Water Line: This Utility is supported 19 under the City Approach and extends from the South Abutment, over Cliff 20 Avenue, SR -705, the Railroad Tracks, and Dock Street to Bent 9 where it extends 21 from the underside of the superstructure into the ground. The Design-Builder is 22 responsible for protecting and/or relocating this Utility as needed for the Project. 23 • Qwest Telephone Lines: The Utility is supported under the outermost, eastbound 24 traffic lane of the City Approach and extends from the South Abutment, over Cliff 25 Avenue, I-705, the Railroad Tracks, and Dock Street to Bent 8. It then travels 26 from the underside of the superstructure into the ground. The Design-Builder is 27 responsible for protecting and/or relocating this Utility as needed for the Project. 28 • Comcast Cable: The Utility is supported adjacent to the Qwest lines under the 29 outermost, eastbound traffic lane of the City Approach and extends from the 30 South Abutment, over Cliff Avenue, SR 705, the Railroad Tracks, and Dock Street 31 to Bent 8. It then travels, in a Qwest conduit, from the underside of the 32 superstructure into the ground. The Design-Builder is responsible for protecting 33 and/or relocating this Utility as needed for the Project. 34 • Tacoma Public Utilities Power Lines and Tacoma Fire Department Fiber-optic 35 Alarm Signal: The Utilities are supported under east pedestrian sidewalk of the 36 City Approach and extend from the South Abutment, over Cliff Avenue, I- 705, 37 the Railroad Tracks, and Dock Street to Pier 1. They then travel up the Fixed 38 Truss, over the lift span, down the other Fixed Truss and then under the east 39 pedestrian sidewalk of the Port approach to the North Abutment. The Design- 40 Builder is responsible for relocating these Utilities on the City Approach and 41 protecting and/or relocating this Utility as needed for the remainder of the 42 Project. In addition, Tacoma Power has buried facilities below the City 43 Approach. Exact locations have not been determined, however, an email

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 containing a schematic drawing and brief description of the facilities is contained 2 in Appendix 18, RFP Drawings. 3 • AT&T Fiber-optic Line: The Utility is supported under the City Approach and 4 extends from the South Abutment, over Cliff Avenue, SR 705, the Railroad 5 Tracks, and Dock Street to Pier 1. It then travels up the Fixed Truss, over the lift 6 span, down the other Fixed Truss and then under the west pedestrian sidewalk of 7 the Port approach to the North Abutment. The Design-Builder is responsible for 8 protecting and/or relocating this Utility on the City Approach and protecting 9 and/or relocating this Utility as needed for the remainder of the Project. 10 • Tacoma Public Works Storm Sewer: The Utility collects surface drainage from the 11 bridge roadway and sidewalks at curb inlets and conveys the drainage to the 12 ground below. The Design-Builder is responsible for constructing a new 13 collection system and conveying surface drainage to a new enhanced treatment 14 facility beneath the bridge. Requirements for the enhanced treatment facility are 15 contained in Section 2-13. The Design-Builder is responsible for relocating this 16 Utility as needed for the Project.

17 2.8.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 18 All Work related to Utilities shall comply with the Mandatory Standards, all applicable 19 Governmental Rules, any applicable permits or franchises, the Standards required by the 20 applicable Utility. The Design-Builder is responsible for obtaining Utility Standards 21 from the Utility Owners, and for obtaining all other Mandatory Standards relating to the 22 Utility Work.

23 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. 24 They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the 25 list. If there is a conflict between or among any of the Mandatory Standards applicable to 26 utility Work, the most stringent standard shall prevail. If the Design-Builder’s Proposal 27 requirements exceed the requirements of other Mandatory Standards, the Proposal 28 requirements shall prevail. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable 29 publications may be required to complete the design and construction. If the Design- 30 Builder becomes aware of any ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the 31 Mandatory Standards, the Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately 32 before proceeding with design or construction, so that City of Tacoma may resolve them.

33 • Utility standards (applicable to the particular Utility Owner). 34 • Tacoma Municipal Code. 35 • City Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix 05) 36 • Amendments to the Standard Specifications. 37 • WSDOT Standard Specifications. 38 • WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines (LAG). 39 • WSDOT Standard Plans. 40 • Design-Builder’s Proposal.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.8.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

2 2.8.3.1 REIMBURSEMENT OF AND COLLECTION FROM UTILITY OWNERS

3 2.8.3.1.1 Reimbursement of Utility Owners – General 4 The Design-Builder shall promptly deliver to the City of Tacoma copies of all invoices 5 received from Utility Owners. If the Design-Builder fails to make any payment to a 6 Utility Owner as specified in the applicable relocation agreement on or before the 7 deadline stated in the applicable Relocation Agreement (or if no deadline is stated, 8 within 30 Calendar Days after receipt of the Utility Owner’s invoice), then City of 9 Tacoma will have the right to pay the Utility Owner the amount due (including any 10 interest and/or penalties). If City of Tacoma pays a Utility Owner, the Design-Builder 11 shall reimburse the City of Tacoma for such payment within 14 Calendar Days after 12 receipt of the City of Tacoma’s invoice; or the City of Tacoma, at its discretion, may 13 deduct the amount of reimbursement due from the payment (or payments, if necessary) 14 next due to the Design- Builder under the Contract.

15 2.8.3.1.2 Collection from Utility Owners - General 16 The Design-Builder shall promptly deliver to the City of Tacoma copies of all invoices 17 sent to Utility Owners. If the Utility Owners fails to make any payment to the Design- 18 Builder for Relocation Costs consistent with the applicable franchise, permit, and 19 Governmental Rules, the Design Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma. 20 The Relocation Agreements shall be consistent with the applicable franchise, permit and 21 Governmental Rules. These agreements shall address any Utility Relocation costs.

22 2.8.3.2 MAINTENANCE AND CARE DURING CONSTRUCTION 23 The Design-Builder shall carry out all Work affecting utilities carefully and skillfully, and 24 shall support, secure, and exercise care with respect to utilities to avoid damaging them. 25 The Design-Builder shall ensure continuity of all existing utility services to all users, 26 except when a Utility Owner determines that temporary interruption is necessary and 27 acceptable. The Design-Builder shall not move or remove any utility without the written 28 consent of the Utility Owner.

29 The Tacoma Fire Department maintains the sheath of the 48 count City Loop Fiber. This 30 section of fiber is housed in one of the four inch conduits owned by Tacoma Power. The 31 fiber controls mission critical emergency dispatch equipment, which cannot be 32 interrupted. When temporary and/or new conduit is to be placed, Tacoma Fire 33 Department personnel will perform a cutover on a planned day, which requires a 34 minimum of two weeks’ notice.

35 The Design-Builder shall comply with all Applicable Laws relating to grading or 36 excavation in the area of underground utilities. Before starting construction that may 37 affect any utility in a particular area (whether underground or overhead), the Design- 38 Builder shall notify the affected Utility Owners in writing at least 30 Calendar Days prior 39 to commencement of the Work. The Design-Builder shall contact the One-Call Locate 40 Center (1-800-424-5555) 3 business days prior to performing any excavation. The 41 Design-Builder shall maintain all appropriate clearances from active power lines in 42 accordance with WAC 296-155-428.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 If any utilities are damaged by the Design-Builder’s activities, the Design-Builder shall 2 immediately notify the affected Utility Owner, the One-Call Locate Center, and the City 3 of Tacoma. The Design-Builder shall pay for all costs associated with damage caused by 4 the Design-Builder, including utility down-time; all reconstruction; all remediation of 5 hazards; litigation; loss of product; and utility start-up and delay costs. At the Utility 6 Owner’s request, the Design-Builder shall repair the damage, or the Utility Owner may 7 choose to repair the damage at the Design-Builder’s expense. All repairs by the Design- 8 Builder shall be performed to the reasonable satisfaction of the Utility Owner. The 9 Design-Builder shall pay any reimbursement due to the Utility Owner because of any 10 damage caused by the Design-Builder within 30 Calendar Days after receipt of the Utility 11 Owner’s invoice, unless otherwise provided in an applicable Relocation Agreement.

12 2.8.3.3 GOVERNMENT APPROVALS AND OTHER PERMITS 13 The Design-Builder shall obtain, or ensure that the Utility Owner obtains, all 14 Governmental Approvals and any other clearances, permits, approvals, and agreements 15 necessary for the Work; and shall verify that the same have been obtained prior to 16 commencing or permitting the commencement of any construction. The Design-Builder 17 shall verify that the Work performed (whether by the Design-Builder or by or on behalf 18 of the Utility Owner) complies with the requirements of such Governmental Approvals 19 and other clearances, permits, approvals, and agreements.

20 2.8.3.4 ACCESS TO EXISTING UTILITIES 21 Any authorized agent of City of Tacoma, a Utility Owner, or a Utility Owner's 22 representative may enter City of Tacoma property to inspect, repair, maintain, rearrange, 23 alter, or connect utility facilities and equipment. The Design-Builder shall cooperate 24 with such efforts and shall avoid creating delays or hindrances to the performance of 25 such Work. If the Design-Builder determines, or a Utility Owner requests, that a Utility 26 Owner must be onsite to protect its facility, the Design-Builder shall provide at least 27 seven Calendar Days advance notice to the Utility Owner.

28 2.8.3.5 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TEMPORARY EROSION AND 29 SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 30 Regardless of who performs or pays for any Utility Work, the Design-Builder shall ensure 31 that appropriate best management practices (BMPs) and temporary erosion and 32 sedimentation control (TESC) measures are followed in the performance of Utility Work. 33 Refer to Section 2.6 (Environmental) for BMP and TESC requirements.

34 2.8.4 UTILITY RELOCATIONS 35 Utilities shall be relocated consistent with the historic character of the structure. 36 Specifically, conduits may be relocated using either of the following options: 37 • Beneath new sidewalks, in locations comparable to the existing locations 38 • In the interior of the structure behind stringers/girders. 39

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.8.4.1 RELOCATION AGREEMENTS

2 2.8.4.1.1 Requirements 3 Each relocation (other than Relocations subject to an Intergovernmental Agreement; and 4 any Protections in Place) shall be addressed in a Relocation Agreement between the 5 Design-Builder and the Utility Owner. The Design-Builder shall prepare and negotiate 6 each Relocation Agreement including such exhibits as may be appropriate, and shall 7 prepare and provide all Project information (e.g. reports, plans and surveys) necessary to 8 negotiate the Relocation Agreement. For each Relocation, the Design-Builder shall 9 initiate contact with the Utility Owner at the earliest possible time in order to begin 10 working with the Utility Owner to develop a Relocation Agreement and a Relocation Plan 11 that meet the Project design and schedule. 12 The Design-Builder shall prepare Relocation Agreements. At a minimum, each 13 Relocation Agreement shall set forth the specific details of the Work, which typically 14 include the following: 15 • The nature and location of relocated facilities; 16 • Allocation of responsibility for design, construction, and other relocation tasks; 17 • Applicable standards; 18 • Cost responsibility, cost estimates, and eligibility of costs for reimbursement, if 19 applicable; 20 • Reimbursement procedures, where appropriate; 21 • Schedules; 22 • Joint use issue resolution; and 23 • Procedures for design review and approval including inspection of construction, 24 acceptance of the Relocation work, and such other provisions as may be 25 appropriate or reasonably required by the City of Tacoma. 26 Cost Responsibility for each Relocation shall be determined in accordance with Section 27 1-07.17 of the General Provisions, and Section 1.3.3 of the Instructions to Proposers, 28 unless otherwise directed by the City of Tacoma. Each Relocation Agreement shall 29 designate the City of Tacoma as a third-party beneficiary. Schedules for completion of 30 the tasks specified in each Relocation Agreement shall conform to the Contract Schedule, 31 which shall provide reasonable and adequate time for each task. 32 The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with the opportunity to participate 33 in negotiation of Relocation Agreements. Accordingly, the Design-Builder shall give the 34 City of Tacoma at least seven Calendar Days advance notice of negotiation sessions. The 35 Design-Builder shall submit draft minutes of each negotiation session to the City of 36 Tacoma within seven Calendar Days after the session, and final minutes incorporating 37 any City of Tacoma comments within seven Calendar Days after the City of Tacoma 38 provides its concurrence. 39 No material modifications to the Relocation Work or terms of a fully-executed 40 Relocation Agreement shall be made without processing a revision to the Relocation 41 Agreement using the procedures described above.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.8.4.1.2 Process for the City of Tacoma Review

2 2.8.4.1.2.1 Draft Relocation Agreement 3 The Design-Builder shall submit a draft of each Relocation Agreement and exhibits to 4 the City of Tacoma for Review and Comment. The submittal shall also include the most 5 current copy of the sections of the Design Documents that identify the Utility facilities 6 being affected by the Project. The City of Tacoma will review and deliver its comments 7 within 14 Calendar Days from receipt of the draft document. The City of Tacoma’s 8 failure to respond within this time frame does not constitute an approval of the terms or 9 form of the submittal. The Design-Builder shall incorporate all City of Tacoma 10 comments into the Draft Relocation Agreement, and obtain the City of Tacoma’s 11 approval prior to submitting it to the Utility Owner. The Design-Builder shall deliver 12 each Draft Relocation Agreement concurrently to the City of Tacoma and the Utility.

13 2.8.4.1.2.2 Final Relocation Agreement 14 The Final Relocation Agreement shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma for review at 15 least 14Calendar Days prior to the date scheduled for its full execution. A Relocation 16 Agreement shall be considered final and ready for execution when all of its provisions 17 have been reviewed and approved by the City of Tacoma through the review process 18 described above.

19 2.8.4.2 NEW FRANCHISES AND PERMITS 20 A permit or franchise is required for any Utility Work within Right of Way in which the 21 Utility Owner has not established a property right. Specifically, agreements must be 22 obtained from WSDOT for crossing I-705. The Utility Owner shall prepare an 23 application for a new franchise or permit simultaneously with preparation of the 24 Relocation Agreement or design of modifications necessary for Protection in Place. The 25 Design-Builder shall ensure that the Utility Owner submits an application for a new 26 franchise or permit to the City of Tacoma as far in advance of construction as possible, 27 but in any event not later than 30 Calendar Days prior to construction. The application 28 and Relocation Agreement shall be revised as necessary to obtain a franchise or permit 29 from the City of Tacoma. 30 The Design-Builder shall ensure that a new franchise or permit has been issued by the 31 City of Tacoma, or other applicable property owners, prior to beginning construction of 32 any Relocation or Protection in Place. A new franchise or permit is not required for the 33 abandonment or removal of an existing Utility from within the Right of Way. The 34 Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma of any abandoned Utility, noting the 35 permit number and how it was abandoned.

36 2.8.4.3 UTILITY RELOCATION RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS 37 For each Utility determined by the Design-Builder as requiring Relocation, the Design- 38 Builder shall prepare a Utility Relocation document, signed by the appropriate utility 39 representative, approving the Design-Builder planned relocation and stating the Design- 40 Builder obligations to the utility. The Design-Builder shall submit the completed 41 document to the City of Tacoma for approval and execution. The Design-Builder may 42 begin working with a Utility Owner prior to execution of the document by the City of 43 Tacoma, provided that the document shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma no later 44 than the Design-Builder’s submittal of the first draft of the Relocation Agreement.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 If the Design-builder determines that it will be unable to successfully negotiate a 2 reasonable Relocation Agreement with the Utility Owner for a particular 3 Franchise/Permit Utility, the Design-Builder shall notify the Utility Owner and the City 4 of Tacoma of such determination.

5 2.8.5 IDENTIFICATION OF UTILITIES

6 2.8.5.1 INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF TACOMA 7 As specified in Section 1-07.17 of the General Provisions, the City of Tacoma has 8 performed certain investigations of existing utilities located within the Right of Way. 9 These investigations were preliminary, and their results may be inaccurate and/or 10 incomplete. The Design-Builder is advised of the following: 11 • The City of Tacoma’s investigations have included visually locating above-ground 12 utility objects, including, but not limited to, poles, cabinets, vents, visible 13 manholes, valve boxes, and vault covers; and surveying above ground objects. 14 • The City of Tacoma has not identified Service Lines for this Project.

15 Unless specified otherwise, the Design-Builder’s reliance on any Utility Information 16 included in the RFP is at the Design-Builder’s sole risk.

17 2.8.5.1.1 Tacoma Power Requirements 18 To best facilitate the project, several meetings between Tacoma Power, the Contracting 19 Agency, the bridge designer, and the Design-Builder are mandatory. This will ensure 20 that Tacoma Power requirements are incorporated during the planning, design and 21 construction stages of the bridge and prevent changes in the scope of work, reordering of 22 materials or delays in the project schedule. 23 The new Murray Morgan Bridge power service will need to be constructed to Tacoma 24 Power standards when applicable and be inspected by Tacoma Power Electrical 25 Inspections Department. 26 The Design-Builder is responsible for all costs associated with the new bridge service and 27 dismantling of old bridge services. The Design-Builder will work with Tacoma Power on 28 dismantling the old services. An application for service will need to be completed before 29 the new service will be engineered and constructed. 30 Some specific items that will need to be addressed include but are not limited to: 31 1) The new service will be fed by one padmount transformer at a standard Tacoma 32 Power size, voltage and phase. These selections are 120/208v, 3-phase, wye gnd; 33 277/480v, 3-phase, wye gnd; 120/240v, 1-phase, ctr tap gnd. This transformer 34 will be set where the current transformers are set. The current transformer 35 platform does not meet Tacoma Powers safety standards and will need to be 36 rebuilt for these standards and for the additional weight. The Design-Builder will 37 ground the transformer to the frame of the bridge. 38 2) Tacoma Power will require the Design-Builder to submit any plans for changes or 39 alternations for review and approval by Tacoma Power engineers and Tacoma 40 Powers Electrical Inspections.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 3) Tacoma Power will provide construction inspection of the installation of Tacoma 2 Power owned service equipment. 3 4) The service for the street lights will be inspected by Tacoma Power Electrical 4 inspection and built to Tacoma Power and City of Tacoma Signal/Street Light 5 department standards. Please contact Steve Davis (253-591-5278) at the City of 6 Tacoma Signal/Street Light department with questions. 7 5) The interior branch circuits for the control room will need to be constructed to 8 Tacoma Power and NEC standards. 9 6) If the new service is 400 amps or greater, a plan review will be required by 10 Tacoma Power Electrical Inspection Department per the department standards. 11 7) On the east side of the bridge there is an existing light service attached to the 12 bridge. This service will need to be undergrounded per Tacoma Power 13 Standards.

14 The Design-Builder must have a licensed structural, electrical etc. engineers design and 15 stamp all drawings that pertain to Tacoma Power owned and operated systems. 16 Tacoma Power currently has 4 x 6in-conduits and 2 x 4in-conduits attached to the south 17 side of the Murray Morgan Bridge. The conduits begin at the west end bridge approach, 18 extending from Cliff Ave. across I- 705, the Railroad Tracks, and Dock Street to the east 19 bridge approach approximately 400ft from the east shore of the Thea Foss Waterway. 20 These conduits routes must be maintained. Close coordination with Tacoma Power is 21 required for relocation to accommodate bridge repair. Allow two (2) months of lead 22 time to accommodate relocation. 23 The Design-Builder is to place Anvil Universal Concrete Inserts Fig. 282 3/4 (or 24 comparable) every 6 feet, on the underside of the new sidewalk, along the current 25 conduit path. Reinforcing rods are to be placed in the opening on the top of the insert as 26 per Anvil’s design specification. The inserts will start at Pull Box 11B4 on the west side of 27 Dock Street and continue approximately 500 feet to Pull Box 11B3 on the deck of the 28 bridge. The width of spacing of these inserts will be 18 inches. These are to be used as 29 the new conduit supports . 30 The existing access holes in the sidewalk under Pull Box 11B3 (West half of bridge on the 31 bridge deck) and 11B2 (located 600 feet east of 11B3 - East half of bridge on the bridge 32 deck) will need to remain in the new design for the deck. Tacoma Power will remove 33 Pull Box 11B3 and 11B2 during construction and replace them after the Design-Builder 34 finishes the new deck. The Design-Builder will be responsible for placing fasteners in the 35 concrete to hold the Pull Boxes in place. After the design of the sidewalk is completed, 36 the Design-Builder will work with Tacoma Power on type and placement of fasteners. 37 Tacoma Power’s engineers will provide feedback and related technical information on 38 Design-Builders designs. The existing connection boxes for the power cables at the ends 39 of the conduit must be accessible from the deck of the bridge. Any construction of new 40 conduits will be done by journeyman electricians and inspected by Tacoma Power. 41 Tacoma Power will need to have 24/7 access to all its equipment. 42 The Design-Builder must have a licensed structural, electrical etc. engineers design and 43 stamp all drawings that pertain to Tacoma Power owned and operated systems and the 44 attachments of same to the bridge.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.8.5.2. UTILITY EASEMENTS 2 All utility easements (existing and proposed) within the Project limits shall be identified 3 or described by the Design-Builder in the Final Design Documents. All new utility 4 easements are subject to prior review and comment by the City of Tacoma.

5 2.8.5.2.1 Project Utility Easements 6 The City of Tacoma investigations have identified the following 7Utilities that have 7 easement rights within the Project limits: 8 • Tacoma Public Utilities Water Line; 9 • Quest Telephone Line; 10 • Tacoma Public Utilities Power Lines; 11 • Tacoma Fire Department Fiber-optic Alarm Signal Line; 12 • Tacoma Public Works Storm Sewer; 13 • AT&T Fiber-optic Conduit; 14 • Comcast Cable. 15 The City of Tacoma has not identified Utility easements outside of the Project limits. The 16 Design-Builder shall identify all Utilities and Utility easements impacted by construction 17 activities necessary to complete the Work.

18 2.8.5.3 DESIGN-BUILDER’S INVESTIGATIONS 19 The Design-Builder shall be solely responsible for verifying, at its expense, the exact 20 horizontal and vertical location, size, type, and all other relevant characteristics of all 21 utilities located within the Project limits or otherwise potentially impacted by the Project 22 (including any utilities located on private property), whether or not such utilities are 23 shown in the Utility Information. Such actions shall include making diligent inquiry at 24 the offices of the Utility Owners, consulting public records, and conducting field studies, 25 as appropriate. The Design-Builder shall consider the possibility that the Utility 26 Information and the information provided by Utility Owners may be inaccurate and 27 incomplete. 28 Refer to Section 1-07 of the General Provisions for the Design-Builder’s obligations upon 29 determining that any Major Underground Utility was not identified in the Utility 30 Information with Reasonable Accuracy, or identifying any other Utilities not described in 31 the Utility Information.

32 2.8.5.4 UTILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 33 The Design-Builder shall maintain a Utility Management Plan to the City of Tacoma in 34 tabular form, in both electronic and hard copy formats, which shall list each existing and 35 proposed Utility located within the Right of Way or other potentially impacted by the 36 Project. At a minimum, the Utility Management Plan shall include the following 37 information for each listed Utility: 38 • The name of the Utility Owner; 39 • A brief description of the Utility by size and type;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-9 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • The location of the Utility; 2 • The proposed disposition (e.g., relocation, Protection in Place) for the Utility; 3 • The determination as to whether the Utility is a Category 1 Utility or a Category 2 4 Utility, based on information provided by the City of Tacoma. 5 • The nature of the Utility Owner’s right of occupancy of the Right of Way for such 6 Utility (e.g., franchise, permit, easement), based upon information provided by 7 the City of Tacoma and the Utility; 8 • The status of the applicable Relocation Agreement; 9 • The status of Utility design and construction activities; and 10 • Such additional information as the City of Tacoma shall reasonably request.

11 The Design-Builder shall update the Utility Management Plan to reflect revisions to 12 Utility Information and status as new information is received.

13 2.8.6 SCHEDULING, COORDINATION, AND CORRESPONDENCE

14 2.8.6.3 Scheduling 15 The Contract Schedule shall identify all Utility Work and allow sufficient time for 16 completion of all such Work.

17 2.8.6.4 Coordination Responsibilities with Utilities 18 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for coordination with all Utility Owners with 19 Utilities located within the Project limits. Such responsibilities shall include obtaining 20 information from and providing information to the Utility Owners; coordination and 21 scheduling of design review, inspections, approvals, and acceptances; and coordination 22 and scheduling of construction Work. The Design-Builder is responsible for monitoring 23 the progress of Work by Utility Owners, and for resolving any scheduling difficulties with 24 them. 25 The Design-Builder shall keep Utility Owners informed of the Design-Builder’s 26 construction schedules, and of changes which affect their Utilities. The Design-Builder 27 shall also provide Utility Owners with sufficient time to notify their customers of any 28 potential impacts to service. 29 The Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Utility Owners to the extent that such 30 cooperation is consistent with the Design-Builder’s obligations pursuant to the Contract 31 and the scope of Work. The Design-Builder shall act diligently in maintaining a positive 32 relationship with the Utility Owners.

33 2.8.6.5 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED

34 2.8.6.6 NOTICES AND CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE DESIGN- 35 BUILDER AND UTILITY OWNERS 36 All notices to Utility Owners from the Design-Builder shall be in writing unless otherwise 37 specified. The Design-Builder shall deliver to the City of Tacoma copies of all

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-10 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 correspondence between the Design-Builder and the Utility Owner within six Calendar 2 Days of receipt or sending, as applicable.

3 2.8.6.7 MEETINGS WITH UTILITY OWNERS 4 The Design-Builder shall implement a schedule of periodic coordination meetings with 5 each Utility Owner affected by the Work. Such meetings shall commence as early as 6 possible in the Project design process and shall continue until Completion of the Project. 7 Such meetings shall include a preliminary design meeting for the Design-Builder and 8 Utility Owners affected to meet and familiarize themselves with design elements, utility 9 facilities, and general features of the Project. Thereafter, the frequency of meetings 10 between the Design-Builder and each Utility Owner affected shall be appropriate to the 11 matters under discussion. The Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma at least 12 seven Calendar Days in advance of each meeting, and shall allow the City of Tacoma the 13 opportunity to participate in each meeting.

14 2.8.6.8 MEETINGS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TACOMA AND THE DESIGN- 15 BUILDER 16 Both the City of Tacoma and Design-Builder representatives shall be available to meet as 17 necessary at the request of either party to discuss and resolve matters relating to Utility 18 Work. The Design-Builder shall schedule such meetings at the reasonable convenience 19 of the City of Tacoma’s representatives.

20 2.8.6.9 MEETING MINUTES 21 The Design-Builder shall record and maintain minutes of all meetings with Utility 22 Owners and/or the City of Tacoma with respect to Utility Work. The Design-Builder 23 shall deliver copies of these meeting minutes to the meeting attendees and make 24 available to the City of Tacoma within seven Calendar Days after each meeting.

25 2.8.6.10 CONTACT INFORMATION 26 Utility Owners with utilities potentially affected by the Project are listed in Appendix 06. 27 The information provided for those Utility Owners includes contact names and mailing 28 addresses. The contact information is current as of the date of issuance of this RFP. The 29 Design-Builder shall be responsible for verifying the accuracy of the contact information 30 and maintaining current contacts for all Utilities affected by the Project, whether or not 31 such Utility Owners are listed in Appendix 06.

32 2.8.7 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

33 2.8.7.3 General Design Criteria 34 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for verifying that all design plans for Relocation 35 Work, whether furnished by the Design-Builder or by the Utility Owner, are consistent 36 and compatible with the following: 37 • The requirements specified in this Section; 38 • The requirements of the applicable Relocation Agreements and 39 Intergovernmental Agreements;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-11 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • The Design-Builder’s design and construction of the Project; 2 • Any other Utilities being installed in the same vicinity; and 3 • The terms and conditions of all applicable new and/or amended permits and 4 franchises.

5 2.8.7.4 Relocation Design Furnished by the Design-Builder 6 Where the Design-Builder and the Utility Owner have agreed that the Design-Builder 7 will furnish the Relocation design, the Design-Builder shall submit its design to the City 8 of Tacoma and the Utility Owner for Review and Comment. The Design-Builder shall 9 coordinate any necessary modifications and re-submittal with the City of Tacoma and 10 the Utility Owner, and obtain written approval from the Utility Owner prior to 11 commencing construction of the Relocation. All subsequent changes to Relocation 12 designs shall be subject to the same review, comment, and written approval process. 13 The Design-Builder is advised that Category 2 Utility Owners are generally entitled to 14 reimbursement of their design review costs as Relocation Costs.

15 2.8.7.5 RELOCATION DESIGN FURNISHED BY THE UTILITY OWNER 16 The Design-Builder shall coordinate the delivery of each Relocation design to be 17 furnished by the Utility Owner pursuant to the applicable Relocation Agreement. The 18 Design-Builder shall review each design for compliance with the specifications, and shall 19 provide comments to the Utility Owner as appropriate. The Design-Builder shall submit 20 the Relocation design to the City of Tacoma for Review and Comment; transmit the City 21 of Tacoma comments to the Utility Owner; and coordinate modification and re-submittal 22 as necessary.

23 2.8.8 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

24 2.8.8.1 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 25 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for verifying that all construction of Relocation 26 Work, whether performed by the Design-Builder or by the Utility Owner, complies with 27 the following: 28 • The requirements specified in this Section; 29 • The requirements of the applicable Relocation Agreements; 30 • The approved plans for construction; 31 • The Design-Builder’s design and construction of the Project; 32 • Any other Utilities being installed in the same vicinity; and 33 • The terms and conditions of all applicable new and/or amended permits and 34 franchises. 35 The Design-builder shall cooperate with the Utility Owner to obtain all necessary 36 permits, and assure that Utility Owners meet all Project safety and environmental 37 requirements.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-12 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.8.8.2 SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS 2 For any Relocations for which the Design-Builder is assigned responsibility for 3 construction as specified in this Section and in Section 1-07.17 of the General Provisions, 4 and for which special qualifications are required by the Utility Owner to perform such 5 construction, the Design-Builder shall utilize (or cause its subcontractors to utilize) 6 qualified personnel acceptable to the Utility Owner to perform such Relocation Work.

7 2.8.8.3 INSPECTION 8 The Design-Builder shall perform all inspection, sampling, and testing of the Utility 9 Owner’s and the Design-Builder’s Relocation Work necessary to comply with its 10 obligations under the Contract, Relocation Agreements, and the Quality Management 11 Plan. The Design-Builder shall immediately notify the City of Tacoma and the Utility 12 Owners regarding any noncompliance. 13 Each Utility Owner shall have the right to inspect construction performed on its Utilities 14 by the Design-Builder. The Design-Builder shall not refuse the inspection requests, and 15 shall coordinate a mutually agreeable schedule and scope with the Utility Owner for the 16 inspections. The Design-Builder shall inform the Utility Owner in writing, prior to 17 commencing any Work, so that the Utility Owner may report such deficiencies to the 18 Design-Builder’s Construction Quality Assurance Manager for resolution. 19 The Design-Builder shall obtain the Utility Owner’s written acceptance of each Utility for 20 which the Design-Builder performs construction Relocation Work, promptly upon 21 completion of the Work. The Design-Builder shall submit the original document of each 22 written acceptance to the City of Tacoma.

23 2.8.8.4 ABANDONMENT AND REMOVAL 24 The Design-Builder shall obtain approval from the Utility Owner to remove any 25 permanently out of service utility facility unless the Utility facility owner approves 26 abandonment of the facility in place. Abandonment in place shall mean allowing 27 elements of the Utility facility to remain in the property following flushing, capping, 28 grouting, and other Work required to meet Utility Standards and/or Applicable Law 29 (whichever is more stringent). 30 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for all Work associated with the removal and 31 disposal of permanently out of service utility facilities. If the City of Tacoma approves 32 abandonment in place of a utility, the Design-Builder shall make all arrangements and 33 perform all Work necessary for any proposed abandonment including design, 34 construction, and consent from Utility Owners and landowners. The Design-Builder 35 shall also obtain any necessary Governmental Approvals and the City of Tacoma’s 36 approvals and/or permits, or the Design-Builder shall confirm that the Utility Owner has 37 performed the same. 38 The Design-Builder is advised that certain utilities may be composed of asbestos-coated 39 pipe. The Design-Builder shall design the Project to avoid affecting asbestos-coated pipe 40 where feasible, and shall take all other appropriate action to minimize conflicts with such 41 utility facilities. Any removal of such pipe shall be performed in compliance with all 42 applicable Governmental Rules and Environmental Laws. 43 Any utility abandoned outside of the City of Tacoma’s property shall be abandoned in 44 accordance with the Utility Owner's Utility Standards.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-13 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma in writing of any utilities that will be 2 abandoned or removed.

3 2.8.8.5 PROTECTION IN PLACE 4 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for Protecting in Place (or causing to be 5 Protected in Place by the Utility Owners) all utilities impacted by the Project (including 6 any utilities remaining in place, any utilities installed during the course of the Work), as 7 necessary to ensure their continued safe operation and structural integrity, in accordance 8 with the requirements of this Section. 9 Protection in Place may be permanent or temporary, depending upon the types of 10 measures that are necessary to satisfy the specific requirements of a particular Utility 11 Owner.

12 2.8.8.6 MAINTENANCE OF SERVICE 13 All Utilities shall remain operational during all phases of construction, except as 14 specifically allowed and approved in writing by the Utility Owner. The Design-Builder 15 shall obtain the Utility Owner’s approval in writing prior to any temporary diversion or 16 interruption of service of affected utility facilities.

17 2.8.8.7 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC 18 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for all traffic control to ensure safe and efficient 19 traffic flow during the Utility Work. Refer to Section 2.17 for Maintenance of Traffic 20 requirements.

21 2.8.8.8 SITE RESTORATION 22 The Design-Builder shall ensure that resurfacing and restoration of all streets, roadside 23 features, or other affected areas are in compliance with the standards of the City of 24 Tacoma.

25 2.8.8.9 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PERTAINING TO UTILITY WORK 26 The Design-Builder shall comply with all applicable Environmental Laws in performance 27 of Utility Work. Refer to Section 2.6 for environmental requirements.

28 2.8.8.10 MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS

29 2.8.8.10.1 Construction and Inspection Records 30 The Design-Builder shall maintain construction and inspection records in order to 31 ascertain that the Work proposed in all permits and agreements is accomplished in 32 accordance with the approved plans and the requirements of the Contract.

33 2.8.8.10.2 Utility As-Built Plans 34 Upon Project Physical Completion (or upon completion of the Utility Relocations, if 35 earlier), the Design-Builder shall deliver to the City of Tacoma a complete set of Utility 36 As-Built Plans and design files that incorporate all changes and details of the Utility 37 Work. All As-Built Plans shall be of a quality and format acceptable to the City of

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-14 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Tacoma, showing the location of all utilities and any utilities located outside of the Right 2 of Way that were part of the utility Work. 3 Refer to Section 2.9 for final Project documentation requirements. 4 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.8-15 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.9 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

2 2.9.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to complete the required 4 documentation for the design and construction of the Project, and to obtain City of 5 Tacoma acceptance of the final Project documentation.

6 2.9.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 7 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all Project documentation. 8 They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the 9 list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to 10 complete the Project documentation. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any 11 ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design- 12 Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may 13 resolve them. 14 • City Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix 03). 15 • Amendments to the Standard Specifications. 16 • WSDOT Standard Specifications. 17 • WSDOT Bridge Design Manual (BDM). 18 • WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines. 19 • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) - Washington State 20 Modifications. 21 • FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 22 • AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition, 23 2004. 24 • WSDOT Standard Plans. 25 • Tacoma Municipal Code. 26 • WSDOT Qualified Products List (QPL).

27 2.9.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 28 All documentation for the Project, including Site construction and Work on local streets, 29 shall be submitted for review, in accordance with the Quality Management Plan (QMP) 30 (see Section 2.22, Design build QA Management Plan). All drawings shall be submitted 31 in accordance with the Mandatory Standards, except as described in this Section.

32 2.9.3.1 DESIGN DOCUMENTATION PLAN 33 The Design-Builder shall develop a Design Development Checklist for review and 34 approval by the City of Tacoma. The checklist shall list all project elements necessary for 35 the Design-Builder to complete the Work and shall include, but not be limited to: 36 schedule, necessary permits/approvals, regulatory requirements, design elements, 37 construction staging, as-built/record plans, project documentation and product warranty 38 and commissioning. The Design-Builder will use the approved Design Development 39 Checklist as the basis for developing the Design Development Plan (DDP) and the

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.9-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Project File (PF) which shall include all of the elements identified in the Design 2 Development Checklist. 3 The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with updates to the DDP and PF 4 items throughout the construction of the Project. These updates shall be submitted to 5 the City of Tacoma as soon as any changes are made to the Released For Construction 6 documents. The Design Development Plan and Project File must be reviewed and 7 commented on by the City of Tacoma before Project Physical Completion. City of Tacoma 8 approval is required prior to Final Acceptance.

9 2.9.3.2 TECHNICAL MEMORANDA 10 The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma the opportunity to review and 11 comment on technical memoranda that document decisions made during completion of 12 the design regarding components not included in the Mandatory Standards. Technical 13 memoranda shall be dated, indicate the Project title, and include the name of the person 14 who wrote the memoranda. The technical memoranda shall follow the following format: 15 • Section 1 - Subject or purpose. 16 • Section 2 - Background or existing conditions. 17 • Section 3 - Discussion of alternatives. 18 • Section 4 – Recommendations. 19 • Section 5 – Conclusions.

20 2.9.3.3 CALCULATIONS 21 All calculations shall be prepared and checked in accordance with the QMP. Complete 22 sealed and signed calculations, which support all designs, shall be included with each 23 design review and submittal. All structural calculations shall be complete at the 60% 24 design submittal. 25 All of the calculations shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of, a 26 Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Washington under Title 18 RCW. The 27 cover of each set of calculations shall carry the Professional Engineer’s stamp and 28 signature.

29 2.9.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

30 2.9.4.1 PRELIMINARY DESIGN SUBMITTALS 31 Preliminary Design Submittals shall be submitted at 30%, 60%, and 90% completion. 32 Preliminary design submittals shall be developed to a sufficient level of design to ensure 33 that conflicts between disciplines have been resolved. The Preliminary Design 34 Submittals shall include the following: 35 • Index sheet; 36 • All Project discipline plans and specifications addressing discipline-specific 37 Project elements, consistent with relative design completion; 38 • Supporting calculations for elements listed above, consistent with relative design 39 completion; and

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.9-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Technical memoranda for all major components of the submittal, consistent with 2 relative design completion.

3 The Preliminary Design Submittal packages for each discipline shall be consistent with 4 the requirements as described in Section 2.6.2.1 and the QMP requirements as described 5 in Section 2.22.

6 2.9.4.2 FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL 7 Following the incorporation of the City of Tacoma’s comments from the Preliminary 8 Design Submittals, the Design-Builder shall prepare a Final Design Submittal. The Final 9 Design Submittal shall be submitted in one or more stand-alone packages consistent 10 with the QMP requirements as described in Section 2.22.

11 2.9.4.3 RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL 12 Following the incorporation of the City of Tacoma’s comments from the review of each 13 Final Design Submittal, the Design-Builder shall prepare the documents to be Released 14 for Construction. The Design-Builder’s Design Quality Assurance Manager shall stamp 15 the documents as “Released For Construction” (RFC) only after all quality assurance 16 procedures have been completed to ensure all review comments have been incorporated 17 as agreed to during the comment resolution process between the City of Tacoma, the 18 Design-Builder, and the local agency where applicable. 19 The review and written certification process governing the RFC submittal shall be in 20 accordance with requirements of the QMP, as described in Section 2.22.

21 2.9.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 22 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to provide temporary and 23 permanent final records for the Project.

24 2.9.5.1 REVISED RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 25 The Design-Builder shall document all revisions made to the RFC and design documents 26 during the construction phase of the Project by preparing new, revised, or supplemental 27 documents (including plan sheets, Technical Specifications, calculations, reports, and 28 narratives). The new, revised, and supplemental documents shall meet the requirements 29 for the original documents. Every revision will be assigned a number. The revision 30 number shall be assigned sequentially, with each change in a document or plan sheet 31 identified by a revision number. The assigned number shall be located both at the 32 location of the change on the sheet and in the revision block of the document, along with 33 an explanation of the change. A new RFC or design document (including plan sheets, 34 Technical Specifications, calculations, reports, and narratives) shall be issued after a 35 maximum of five revisions have been made to the current document. All revised 36 documents shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma for review and shall be re-released 37 in accordance with the RFC Submittal process prior to implementation of the revisions 38 during construction. 39 Any proposed changes requiring permit modifications or additional regulatory agency 40 approvals shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma for review prior to submittal to any 41 regulatory agencies. The City of Tacoma will work with the Design-Builder and the

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.9-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 appropriate regulatory agencies if an approved design change requires a permit 2 modification or additional approvals. 3 All revisions to the RFC Documents shall be performed by, or under the direct 4 supervision of, the Engineer of Record (EOR) for the documents. Each re-issued sheet of 5 the revised RFC plans, and the cover of each of the re-issued revised RFC Technical 6 Specifications, shall include the EOR’s stamp. 7 Calculations for design revisions made during construction shall be available for City of 8 Tacoma review and comment prior to implementation of the revisions during 9 construction. Calculations for design revisions made during construction shall be 10 incorporated into the design calculation file when construction is completed.

11 2.9.5.2 AS-BUILT PLANS 12 The Design-Builder shall maintain a complete marked up set of As-Built Plans, City 13 Amendments to the Standard Specifications, Amendments to the Standard 14 Specifications, and Technical Specifications to record changes, alterations, and deletions 15 made to the RFC documents on a daily basis. All revisions shall be made legibly in red 16 ink, and dated for correlation with all field changes. 17 Prior to the Project Physical Completion, the Design-Builder shall submit As-Built Plans 18 as a record of how the Project was actually constructed. As-Built Plans shall reflect the 19 same degree of detail as the RFC Documents. Underground features, including but not 20 limited to buried or abandoned structures, shall be documented on the As-Built Plans 21 showing the location and elevation. The Design-Builder shall also provide reproducible 22 originals of the shop drawings for pre-fabricated structural elements, concrete 23 reinforcing, and all structural steel components. The shop drawings, as a portion of the 24 As-Built Plans, shall be updated to include any subsequent field changes that occur after 25 fabricated items leave the shop. 26 The Design-Builder shall submit the As-Built Plans as a complete package in sequence, 27 in accordance with standard City of Tacoma numbering and naming conventions. The 28 As-Built Plans shall include a cover sheet for the work, which shall include the following: 29 • A written certification by the EOR that the As-Built Plans accurately and 30 completely reflect all changes and corrections made during construction; 31 • The EOR’s original signature, date of signature, original seal, registration 32 number, and date of expiration; and 33 • An accompanying index and instructions. 34 Each sheet of the As-Built Plans shall be stamped or clearly marked “AS-BUILT”. 35 Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) and Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) 36 Plans are exempt from the as-built requirements.

37 2.9.5.3 WORKING DRAWINGS 38 The Design-Builder shall submit all Working Drawings in accordance with the QMP 39 requirements as described in Section 2.22. 40

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.9-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.9.5.4 COMPREHENSIVE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 2 The Design-Builder shall assemble a comprehensive Operation and Maintenance (O&M) 3 manual for the Murray Morgan Bridge and submit it within 30 calendar days of 4 achieving Project Physical Completion.

5 2.9.5.4.1 Content 6 The Design-Builder shall assemble all operations and maintenance materials listed in the 7 Technical Requirements into a single multi-volume reference manual, including but not 8 limited to the following: 9 • Operations and maintenance data for systems and equipment as listed in the 10 O&M manual subsections of the following Sections: 11 o 2.10, Bridge and Structures; 12 o 2.11, Electrical and Controls; and 13 o 2.12, Mechanical; 14 o 2.13, Stormwater Management. 15 • Written warranty information for systems, components, or equipment where a 16 warranty is required by this or other Sections of the Technical Requirements, or 17 where a warranty has been provided by a manufacturer; 18 • Shop drawings for electrical and mechanical systems, components, and 19 equipment; 20 • Wiring diagrams; 21 • Programming manuals; 22 • Replacement parts lists; 23 • Equipment nameplate dates; and 24 • Other information not listed above that is required for successful operation and 25 maintenance of the facility.

26 2.9.5.4.2 Organization and Format 27 The manual shall be assembled in multiple 3-ring binders. The manual shall have a 28 typewritten index and divider sheets between categories, with identifying tabs. The 29 covers and binder spines shall be imprinted with the name of the Project, the City of 30 Tacoma, name of the Design-Builder, and the year of completion. Six sets shall be 31 submitted. The Design-Builder shall also submit an electronic copy of the manual in 32 accordance with the requirements of Section 2.1. 33 Pages of the manual shall be in either 8.5-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch format.

34 2.9.5.4.3 Training 35 The Design-Builder shall obtain training from the equipment manufacturer for each 36 piece of equipment installed on the Project. This training shall include operational 37 methodology, troubleshooting techniques, and general maintenance for the equipment. 38 The Design-Builder shall provide a minimum of ten (10) working days of training to City 39 of Tacoma’s operations and maintenance personnel. The training shall include detailed

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.9-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 classroom review of the O&M Manual, followed by hands-on operation and inspection of 2 all systems and equipment installed under this Project. The Design-Builder shall 3 schedule and coordinate this training with the City of Tacoma Engineer. This training 4 shall include operational methodology, troubleshooting techniques, and general 5 maintenance.

6 2.9.6 SUBMITTALS 7 The City of Tacoma will review all scheduled submittals and return comments to the 8 Design-Builder in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.22.

9 2.9.6.1 FINAL PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTATION 10 Prior to Project Physical Completion or termination of the Contract, the Design-Builder 11 shall collect, properly identify, and deliver to the City of Tacoma all original diaries, logs, 12 notebooks, accounts, records, reports, and all other documents prepared in the 13 performance of the Contract. The Final Project Design Documentation shall include, but 14 is not limited to, the following: 15 • Design Documentation Package and Project File Update per DDP Checklist; 16 • Channelization Plan for Approval Package. 17 • Design calculations and documentation; 18 • Reports and technical memoranda; 19 • Project Development Approval Package; 20 • Updated AutoCAD files, including all Released for Construction (RFC) sheets, 21 reference files, and base mapping (topography); 22 • Updated Site base map AutoCAD files (topography, including survey updates); 23 • Updated Structural AutoCAD files, including all Released for Construction (RFC) 24 sheets and reference files; 25 • Released for Construction documents; 26 • Revised Released for Construction documents; and 27 • Amendments to the Standard Specifications, and Technical Specifications, both 28 the unmarked set and the marked-up set.

29 The Design-Builder shall ensure that the Final Project Design Documents reflect the 30 actual condition of the constructed Work, to the same degree of detail as the RFC 31 Documents. 32 The Final Project Design Documents shall include all changes and corrections to the 33 documents that depict the final completed component, with relevant data shown 34 (including copies of calculations not previously submitted with shop drawings or with 35 the Final Design Submittal). 36 The City of Tacoma will review the submittal and advise the Design-Builder of its 37 acceptance of the Final Project Design Documents or will provide comments detailing 38 issues to be resolved. The Design-Builder shall address all comments in a manner 39 consistent with the agreed-to comment resolution process, and then resubmit the Final 40 Project Design Documents to the City of Tacoma for acceptance.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.9-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.9.6.2 CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTALS 2 The construction submittals shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 3 • As-Built Plans and specifications. As Built Plans shall be full size, 22-inch by 34- 4 inch, blackline prints. Each plan sheet shall have lettering or a stamp identifying 5 it as As-Built Plans; 6 • Shop drawings (one hard copy and one reproducible copy); and 7 • Comprehensive Operation and Maintenance Manual for the Murray Morgan 8 Bridge.

9 The Design-Builder shall submit the following final records prior to completion or 10 termination of the Contract: 11 • Final Record Book No. 1: 12 o This book of documents shall be bound in a semi-rigid, water resistant cover. 13 Each page shall be numbered consecutively. The following documents shall 14 be included, and the order in which they are to be arranged is described 15 below. No other material shall be included in this book. 16 1. Index sheet containing the detailed index for Final Record Book No.1 and 17 also the listing of the other final records contained in each book. 18 2. The Design-Builder personnel list containing the name and classification 19 of managers, supervisors, foremen, testers, engineers, and any other 20 Design-Builder personnel who were responsible for signing documents or 21 forms or were responsible for decision-making on the Project. Each 22 person shall sign his or her identifying initials after his or her name on 23 this list in the same manner as it appears in other Project documents. 24 3. Final Contract Voucher Certification, including the Design-Builder’s 25 authorized signature and the City of Tacoma authorized signature. 26 4. Contract Estimate Payment Totals Report - To be provided by the City of 27 Tacoma. 28 5. Affidavit of Wages Paid, State L & I Form F700-007-000 - The original or 29 copy of the approved affidavits. 30 6. List of change orders showing the change order numbers, a brief 31 description of each, and the change order cost. 32 7. Record of construction materials tabulating the source of the construction 33 materials. See Section 2.20 (Control of Materials) for additional 34 information. 35 8. A list of all field design changes. 36 • Final Record Book No. 2: 37 o Project diaries, daily reports, and the Design-Builder’s daily reports of traffic 38 control. The construction Project diaries and the daily reports shall be 39 organized in chronological order and bound in books similar to Final Record 40 Book No. 1. The pages of these books do not require numbering; however, the 41 books themselves shall be numbered consecutively starting with Final Record 42 Book No. 2. The Design-Builder’s daily reports of traffic control shall be

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.9-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 bound in the same manner and the books numbered consecutively after the 2 diaries/daily reports books. 3 • Materials Certification. See Section 2.20 (Control of Materials) for additional 4 information. 5 • Test Reports for Storm Sewers and enhanced treatment facilities: 6 o The Design-Builder shall develop and complete a report for the testing of 7 storm sewers and enhanced treatment facilities. This report shall include the 8 type of pipe; the location of the pipe; all of the calculated factors for the 9 testing; the test results; and whether the pipe passes or fails, and shall be 10 consistent with the requirements of the City of Tacoma and Section 2.22. 11 • The Design-Builder Construction Survey: 12 o Copies of all survey calculations and survey notes including grade books and 13 cross-section notes shall be kept and turned over to the City of Tacoma with 14 the final records. 15 o Update to reflect survey work related to moorage areas. 16 • Temporary Final Records: 17 o Temporary final records comprise all relevant records not included in the 18 final records. The Design-Builder shall submit these to the City of Tacoma 19 Engineer with the final records. Examples of these records include but are 20 not limited to the following: 21 1. Material acceptance test reports; 22 2. Concrete pour records; 23 3. Source of materials documentation; 24 4. Prints of shop drawings; 25 5. Copies of certified payrolls (for Federally-funded projects only); and 26 6. Horizontal and vertical alignment data.

27 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.9-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10 BRIDGES ANDSTRUCTURES

2 2.10.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to complete the Base Program 4 Project Scope. Elements of Work shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 5 • Partially rehabilitate the City and Port Approaches to return vehicular traffic to 6 the spans without legal load restrictions. 7 • Completely rehabilitate the Center Truss Spans to return vehicular traffic to the 8 spans without legal load restrictions. 9 • Phase 1 Seismic Enhancements of the Center Truss Spans.

10 The Design-Builder may also be contracted to conduct additional Work necessary to 11 complete selected Supplemental Program Project Scope items. Elements of Work of the 12 Supplemental Program shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 13 • S1 – Completely rehabilitate the City Approach and seismically enhance the 14 structure. 15 • S2 – Completely rehabilitate the Port Approach and seismically enhance the 16 structure. 17 • S3 – Complete all additional minor structural rehabilitation work. 18 • S4 – Rehabilitate the Center Truss Span Piers.

19 Either the Base Program Project Scope or the Base Program Project Scope and one or 20 more elements of the Supplemental Program Project Scope shall be performed by the 21 Design-Builder. The “Supplemental Program Project Scope” alone will not be 22 performed. 23 Plans and shop drawings showing the existing structures are located in Appendices 19 24 and 20. The plans are not guaranteed to be dimensionally accurate or complete. The 25 Design-Builder shall field measure and field verify all existing elements, geometry and 26 dimensions as necessary. The bridge inspection and study reports are located in 27 Appendices 7 through 16. The inspection and study reports are not guaranteed to be 28 complete or fully accurate. The Design-Builder shall verify the information in the 29 inspection and study reports as necessary.

30 2.10.1.1 SCOPE OF WORK 31 The Design-Builder shall at a minimum rehabilitate the City Approach, Port Approach 32 and Center Truss Spans in accordance with the base program requirements. As a 33 rehabilitation project, it is recognized that repairs can be done in a variety of ways. The 34 Design-Builder is responsible for meeting the City of Tacoma’s project requirements by 35 performing repairs to the individual structural elements of the bridge using either Repair 36 Class A and/or Repair Class B as described below in the Base Program. 37 The Design-Builder may be contracted to complete the rehabilitation of both the City 38 Approach and Port Approach in accordance with Supplemental Program requirements. 39 As a rehabilitation project, it is recognized that repairs can be done in a variety of ways. 40 The Design-Builder is responsible for meeting the City’s project requirements by

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 performing repairs, to the individual structural elements of the bridge, using either 2 Repair Class C and/or Repair Class D as described below in the Supplemental Program,.

3 2.10.1.1.1 Base Program

4 2.10.1.1.1.1 Base Program Requirements 5 The Design-Builder shall complete the following minimum required work items included 6 in the Base Program.

7 City Approach 8 • Remove the existing bridge deck and replace it with a new concrete or exodermic 9 deck in the City Approach. 10 • Remove the cantilevered concrete sidewalks and immediate steel support 11 elements (except supports over I-705 south bound) for the City Approach. 12 • Replace the bridge expansion joints in the City Approach. 13 • Repair/replace the pedestrian stairs leading from Dock Street to the car ramp 14 deck under the City Approach and pedestrian stairs from the car ramp deck to the 15 11th Street sidewalk level including a new cantilever landing area. Complete all 16 associated work. 17 • Remove, rehabilitate and re-install the existing pedestrian railings on the City 18 Approach, including the handrail located on the unused vehicle and sidewalk 19 ramps to replace the chain link fence and existing wood rail on the pedestrian 20 route between the existing stairs. 21 • Install new traffic barriers and pedestrian railings on the City Approach, if 22 required. 23 • Install railroad throw fence along the City Approach over the BNSF rail lines. 24 • Convert the existing 4 lanes of traffic to 2 traffic lanes and 2 pedestrian/bicycle 25 lanes. 26 • Install stormwater collection system and treatment basin on the City Approach 27 side of Thea Foss Waterway. 28 • Deficient Rivet Replacement in the City Approach. 29 • Electrical support structure replacement and/or addition on the City Approach. 30 • Inspection access enhancement.

31 Center Truss Spans 32 • Replace the bridge expansion joints in the Center Truss Spans. 33 • Rehabilitate and/or replace the bearings for the Center Truss Spans. 34 • Remove the existing bridge deck and replace it with a new concrete or exodermic 35 deck in the Center Truss Spans. 36 • Remove the cantilevered sidewalks and immediate steel support elements for the 37 Center Truss Spans.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Convert the existing 4 lanes of traffic to 2 traffic lanes and 2 pedestrian/bicycle 2 lanes. 3 • Remove, rehabilitate and re-install the existing pedestrian railings on the outside 4 of the thru trusses of the Center Truss Spans. 5 • Install new traffic barriers and pedestrian railings inside the through trusses of 6 the Center Truss Spans, if required. 7 • Perform a Phase 1 seismic retrofit on the superstructure of the Center Truss 8 Spans. 9 • Deficient Rivet Replacement in the Center Truss Spans. 10 • Mechanical and electrical support structure replacement and/or addition on the 11 Center Truss Spans. 12 • Repair, rehabilitation and/or replacement of the operator and mechanical 13 buildings on the Center Truss Spans. 14 • Inspection Access Enhancement.

15 Port Approach 16 • Remove and replace the asphalt overlay and waterproof membrane on the bridge 17 deck portion of the Port Approach. 18 • Repair/Replace the bridge expansion joints in the Port Approach. 19 • Clean and lubricate the rocker bearings in the Port Approach. 20 • Convert the existing 4 lanes of traffic to 2 traffic lanes and 2 pedestrian/bicycle 21 lanes. 22 • Install stormwater collection system and treatment basin on the Port Approach 23 side of Foss Waterway.

24 2.10.1.1.1.2 Repair Class A (Build, Repaint) 25 City Approach 26 The Design-Builder shall restore the deteriorated and deficient structural elements of the 27 City Approach to a capacity where they achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal load 28 rating factor of 1.0. The Design-Builder shall repaint the structural elements of the City 29 Approach where work occurs according to Section 2.10.4.3. The elements of the City 30 Approach in Repair Class A of the Base Program to be restored to a load rating factor of 31 1.0 include, but are not limited to, the following items: 32 • Concrete Encased Steel Column Bases 33 • Steel Bent Columns 34 • Steel Bent Horizontal Bracing 35 • Steel Bent Diagonal Bracing 36 • Steel Riveted Connections

37 The Design-Builder shall restore the deteriorated and deficient structural elements of the 38 City Approach to a capacity where they achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal load 39 rating factor of 1.25. The Design-Builder shall repaint the structural elements of the City

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Approach where work occurs according to Section 2.10.4.3. The elements of the City 2 Approach in Repair Class A of the Base Program to be restored to a load rating factor of 3 1.25 include, but are not limited to, the following items: 4 • Steel Girders 5 • Steel Floorbeams 6 • Steel Stringers 7 • Steel Riveted Connections

8 Center Truss Spans 9 The Design-Builder shall restore the deteriorated and deficient structural elements of the 10 Center Truss Spans to a capacity where they achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal 11 load rating factor of 1.25. The Design-Builder shall repaint the structural elements of the 12 Center Truss Spans according to Section 2.10.4.3. The elements of the Center Truss 13 Spans in Repair Class A of the Base Program include, but are not limited to, the following 14 items: 15 • Steel Gusset Plates 16 • Steel Bottom Chords 17 • Steel Floorbeams 18 • Steel Stringers 19 • Steel Riveted Connections 20 • Steel Diagonal and Vertical Posts 21 • Steel Top Chords 22 • Steel Truss Horizontal Bracing 23 • Steel Truss Diagonal Bracing 24 • Steel Tower Columns 25 • Steel Tower Horizontal Bracing 26 • Steel Tower Diagonal Bracing 27 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Bottom Chords 28 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Top Chord Horizontal Members 29 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Vertical Members 30 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Diagonal Members

31 Port Approach 32 The Design-Builder shall restore the deteriorated and deficient structural elements of the 33 Port Approach to a capacity where they achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal load 34 rating factor of 1.0. The Design-Builder shall restore the failed corrosion protection 35 systems of the structural elements of the Port Approach according to Section 2.10.4.3. 36 The elements of the Port Approach where work occurs in Repair Class A of the Base 37 Program include, but are not limited to, the following items: 38 • Concrete Abutment and Wingwalls 39 • Concrete Columns 40 • Concrete Caps 41 • Concrete Girders 42 • Concrete Diaphragms

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.1.1.1.3 Repair Class B (No-Build, Repair Paint) 2 City Approach 3 The Design-Builder shall demonstrate using field measurements and calculations that 4 the structural elements of the City Approach have the necessary capacity to achieve a 5 minimum inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.0. The Design-Builder shall 6 demonstrate using testing and calculations that existing paint where work occurs can be 7 overcoated, and will spot repair and overcoat the structural elements of the City 8 Approach where work occurs according to Section 2.10.4.3. The elements of the City 9 Approach in Repair Class B of the Base Program that must achieve a minimum load 10 rating factor of 1.0 include, but are not limited to, the following items: 11 • Concrete Encased Steel Column Bases 12 • Steel Bent Columns 13 • Steel Bent Horizontal Bracing 14 • Steel Bent Diagonal Bracing 15 • Steel Riveted Connections

16 The Design-Builder shall demonstrate using field measurements and calculations that 17 the structural elements of the City Approach have the necessary capacity to achieve a 18 minimum inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25. The Design-Builder shall 19 demonstrate using testing and calculations that existing paint where work occurs can be 20 overcoated, and will spot repair and overcoat the structural elements of the City 21 Approach where work occurs according to Section 2.10.4.3. The elements of the City 22 Approach in Repair Class B of the Base Program that must achieve a minimum load 23 rating factor of 1.25 include, but are not limited to, the following items: 24 • Steel Girders 25 • Steel Floorbeams 26 • Steel Stringers 27 • Steel Riveted Connections

28 Center Truss Spans 29 • The Design-Builder shall demonstrate using field measurements and calculations 30 that the structural elements of the Center Truss Spans have the necessary 31 capacity to achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25. 32 Spot repair and overcoat of the elements of the Center Truss Spans will not be 33 permitted. The elements of the Center Truss Spans in Repair Class B of the Base 34 Program include, but are not limited to, the following items: 35 • Steel Gusset Plates 36 • Steel Bottom Chords 37 • Steel Floorbeams 38 • Steel Stringers 39 • Steel Riveted Connection 40 • Steel Diagonal and Vertical Posts 41 • Steel Top Chords 42 • Steel Truss Horizontal Bracing 43 • Steel Truss Diagonal Bracing 44 • Steel Tower Columns

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Steel Tower Horizontal Bracing 2 • Steel Tower Diagonal Bracing 3 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Bottom Chords 4 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Top Chord and Horizontal Members 5 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Vertical Members 6 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Diagonal Members

7 Port Approach 8 The Design-Builder shall demonstrate using field measurements and calculations that 9 the structural elements of the Port Approach have the necessary capacity to achieve a 10 minimum inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.0. The Design-Builder shall 11 demonstrate using testing and calculations that the corrosion protection systems of the 12 structural elements of the Port Approach meet or exceed the requirements in Section 13 2.10.4.3. The elements of the Port Approach in Repair Class B of the Base Program 14 include, but are not limited to, the following items: 15 • Concrete Abutment and Wingwalls 16 • Concrete Columns 17 • Concrete Caps 18 • Concrete Girders 19 • Concrete Diaphragms

20 2.10.1.1.2 Supplemental Program Requirements

21 2.10.1.1.21 .Supplemental Program Requirements 22 The Design-Builder shall complete the following minimum required work items included 23 in the Supplemental Program.

24 City Approach (S1) 25 • Remove the ramp deck from the remaining I-705 to Dock Street car ramp located 26 under the City Approach. 27 • Perform a Phase 1 seismic retrofit on the City Approach. 28 • Additional Deficient Rivet Replacement in the City Approach.

29 Port Approach (S2) 30 • Perform a Phase 1 seismic retrofit on the Port Approach. 31 • Retrofit or replace the pedestrian railings on the Port Approach. 32 • Remove and replace the asphalt overlay on the fill portion of the Port Approach. 33 • Perform a Phase 1 seismic retrofit on the Port Approach.

34 Center Truss Spans (S3) 35 • Additional mechanical and electrical support structure replacement and/or 36 addition on the Center Truss Spans. 37 • Additional repair, rehabilitation and/or replacement of the operator and 38 mechanical buildings on the Center Truss Spans.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Center Truss Spans (S4) 2 • Repair spalls, cracks and voids in the concrete piers supporting the Center Truss 3 Spans.

4 2.10.1.1.2.1 Repair Class C (Build, Repaint) 5 City Approach (S1) 6 The Design-Builder shall restore the deteriorated and deficient structural elements of the 7 City Approach to a capacity where they achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal load 8 rating factor of 1.25. The Design-Builder shall repaint the structural elements of the City 9 Approach according to Section 2.10.4.3. The elements of the City Approach in Repair 10 Class C of the Supplemental Program include, but are not limited to, the following items: 11 • Concrete Encased Steel Column Bases 12 • Steel Bent Columns 13 • Steel Bent Horizontal Bracing 14 • Steel Bent Diagonal Bracing 15 • Steel Riveted Connections

16 Port Approach (S2) 17 The Design-Builder shall restore the deteriorated and deficient structural elements of the 18 Port Approach to a capacity where they achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal load 19 rating factor of 1.25. The Design-Builder shall restore the failed corrosion protection 20 systems where work occurs of the individual structural elements of the Port Approach 21 where work occurs according to Section 2.10.4.3. The elements of the Port Approach in 22 Repair Class C of the Supplemental Program include, but are not limited to, the following 23 items: 24 • Concrete Abutment and Wingwalls 25 • Concrete Columns 26 • Concrete Caps 27 • Concrete Girders 28 • Concrete Diaphragms

29 2.10.1.1.2.2 Repair Class D (No-Build, Repair Paint) 30 City Approach (S1) 31 The Design-Builder shall demonstrate using field measurements and calculations that 32 the structural elements of the City Approach have the necessary capacity to achieve a 33 minimum inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25. Spot repair and overcoat of 34 the structural elements of the City Approach will not be permitted. The elements of the 35 City Approach in Repair Class D of the Supplemental Program include, but are not 36 limited to, the following items: 37 • Concrete Encased Steel Column Bases 38 • Steel Bent Columns 39 • Steel Bent Horizontal Bracing 40 • Steel Bent Diagonal Bracing 41 • Steel Riveted Connections

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Port Approach (S2) 2 The Design-Builder shall demonstrate using field measurements and calculations that 3 the structural elements of the Port Approach have the necessary capacity to achieve a 4 minimum inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25. The Design-Builder shall 5 demonstrate using testing and calculations that the corrosion protection systems where 6 work occurs of the structural elements of the Port Approach where work occurs meet or 7 exceed the requirements in Section 2.10.4.3. The elements of the Port Approach in 8 Repair Class D of the Supplemental Program include, but are not limited to, the 9 following items: 10 • Concrete Abutment and Wingwalls 11 • Concrete Columns 12 • Concrete Caps 13 • Concrete Girders 14 • Concrete Diaphragms 15 • Concrete Retaining Walls

16 2.10.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 17 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. 18 They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the 19 list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to 20 complete the design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any 21 ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design- 22 Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may 23 resolve them. 24 • City Amendments to WSDOT Standard Specifications (Appendix 04). 25 • Special Provisions (Appendix 04). 26 • Amendments to WSDOT Standard Specifications (Appendix 03). 27 • WSDOT Standard Specifications (M 41-10). 28 • WSDOT Design Manual (M 22-01) (DM). 29 • WSDOT Bridge Design Manual LRFD (M 23-50) (BDM). 30 • WSDOT Geotechnical Design Manual (M46-03) (GDM). 31 • WSDOT Maintenance Manual (M51-01) (GDM). 32 • AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, 1st Edition – 33 2009. 34 • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Customary U.S. Units, 4th Edition 35 - 2007, including interims through 2009. 36 • AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design Specifications, Customary U.S. 37 Units, 2nd Edition - 2007, including interims through 2008. 38 • WSDOT Plans Preparation Manual (M 22-31) (PPM). 39 • WSDOT Construction Manual (M 41-01).

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications, 2nd Edition - 2004, 2 including interims through 2008. 3 • WSDOT Materials Manual (M 46-01). 4 • WSDOT Standard Plans (M 21-01). 5 • WSDOT Qualified Products List (M 46-02) (QPL). 6 • AASHTO LRFD Manual for Bridge Evaluation, Customary U.S. Units, 1st Edition 7 - 2008, including interims through 2010. 8 • AASHTO Movable Bridge Inspection, Evaluation and Maintenance Manual, 1st 9 Edition - 1998. 10 • Structural Welding Code: AASHTO/AWS D1.1M/D1.1: 2008, An American 11 National Standard 21st Edition, with interims through 2009 12 • Bridge Welding Code: AASHTO/AWS D1.5M/D1.5: 2008, An American National 13 Standard, 5th Edition, with interims through 2009. 14 • AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition, 2002. 15 • FHWA Publication No. FHWA-HRT-06-032; Seismic Retrofitting Manual for 16 Highway Structures: Part 1-Bridges, January 2006. 17 • WISHA Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, WAC 296. 18 • ADA Americans with Disabilities Act.

19 2.10.2.1 MODIFICATIONS TO THE WSDOT BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL 20 (BDM) 21 WSDOT Design Memoranda shall apply to the Project, except that the references to the 22 Project advertisement dates shall not apply. 23 The BDM, as modified by WSDOT Design Memoranda, shall be further modified for 24 Design-Build as follows: 25 • Rights and Responsibilities - The following clarifies which rights and 26 responsibilities discussed in the BDM are applicable to the Design-Builder: 27 o The Design-Builder shall complete all analyses, evaluations, load ratings, 28 plans and specifications discussed in the BDM. 29 o All such analyses, evaluations, load ratings, plans, and specifications are 30 subject to review and comment by the City of Tacoma. 31 o All references to WSDOT sections, offices, and Engineers shall mean City of 32 Tacoma. 33 • The Design-Builder shall obtain the City of Tacoma’s approval for all proposed 34 deviations from the provisions of the BDM. 35 • The Design-Builder shall follow the guidelines established by Section 1-03.5 of 36 the General Provisions for resolution of perceived ambiguities in or disputes 37 regarding the interpretation of specific provisions of the BDM.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-9 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.2.2 ADDITIONAL REFERENCES 2 • Tacoma Central Business District to Port Connection Study, (2003) published by 3 Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., as shown in Appendix07. 4 • WSDOT Bridge Inspection Reports, (2007) published by WSDOT as shown in 5 Appendix 08.

6 2.10.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

7 2.10.3.1 GENERAL 8 Upon completion of the Base Program the Design-Builder shall demonstrate using 9 calculations that the City and Port Approaches achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal 10 load rating factor of 1.0, and the Center Truss Spans achieve a minimum inventory 11 bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25. In addition, the design Design-Builder shall 12 demonstrate that the corrosion protection system of the Center Truss Spans meets or 13 exceeds the requirements of Section 2.10.4.3. 14 If selected, upon completion of the Base Program and applicable Supplemental Program 15 options, the Design-Builder shall demonstrate using calculations that the entire bridge 16 structure achieves a minimum inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25, and 17 demonstrate using calculations that the entire bridge structure achieves a minimum 18 sufficiency rating of 70. In addition, the design Design-Builder shall demonstrate using 19 calculations and/or testing that the corrosion protection system of the entire bridge 20 meets or exceeds the requirements of Section 2.10.4.3. 21 Upon completion of the Base Program or Supplemental Program, the physical 22 appearance of the structure shall not be significantly altered, except as noted below. 23 • Addition of the railroad throw fences on the City Approach. 24 • Removal of the cantilever sidewalks on the Center Truss Spans and City 25 Approach. 26 • Replacement of the bridge deck on the City Approach and Center Truss Spans. 27 • Addition of new traffic barriers and relocated pedestrian railings inside the thru 28 trusses, if required. 29 • Addition of new traffic barriers and relocated pedestrian railings on the City 30 Approach, if required. 31 • Retrofitted or new traffic barriers and pedestrian railings on the Port Approach.

32 2.10.4 DESIGN CRITERIA

33 2.10.4.1 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS 34 The Design-Builder shall provide a Structural Lead Engineer with a minimum of 15 years 35 of experience as a Bridge Engineer, over which time the Structural Lead Engineer shall 36 have performed as a Design Engineer, Project Engineer and Project Manager for the 37 design of new bridges and the design related to the rehabilitation, retrofit and repair of 38 existing bridges. The Structural Lead Engineer shall be a Professional Engineer, licensed

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-10 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 under Title 18 RCW, State of Washington, and shall be in responsible charge of the 2 structural design elements of the Project.

3 2.10.4.2 DESIGN CRITERIA 4 All new permanent bridge elements, and all existing structural elements whose load 5 carrying capacities are altered by the Work, shall be analyzed and designed using the 6 WSDOT BDM. 7 The seismic analyses and design for all new permanent bridge elements and all existing 8 structural elements whose load carrying capacities are altered by the Work, shall be in 9 accordance with the requirements of the AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD 10 Seismic Bridge Design. 11 The Extreme Event-I transient load factor for live load as specified in the AASHTO LRFD 12 Bridge Design Specifications shall be 0.0 for the entire bridge.

13 2.10.4.3 CORROSION PROTECTION 14 Steel elements, including but not limited to structural steel members, connection 15 hardware, fittings, fabrications, and appurtenances, shall have corrosion protection 16 designed for a lifespan of at least 15 years in the marine environment at the Site. The 17 corrosion protection design shall be appropriate for the function of the element and 18 specific service environment in which it will exist (e.g. directly exposed to road salt, 19 located in splash zone, etc.). This corrosion protection may consist of a paint system, 20 hot-dip galvanization, other applied coatings, or inherent properties of the steel (such as 21 stainless steel). 22 Contact between dissimilar metals shall be minimized, and shall have physical 23 separation between components of dissimilar metals where practical, consisting of a gap, 24 inserts such as rubber, non-reactive coatings on one or more of the components, or other 25 methods as approved by the City of Tacoma. Where physical separation is impractical or 26 impossible, the smaller components in the connection, such as, but not limited to, 27 connecting parts such as bolts, nuts, and studs should be more cathodic than the larger 28 components in the connection. 29 Concrete elements, including but not limited to concrete columns, caps, girders and wall 30 surfaces shall have a corrosion protection system designed for a lifespan of at least 15 31 years in the marine environment at the Site. The corrosion protection system design 32 shall be appropriate for the function of the element and specific service environment in 33 which it will exist (e.g. directly exposed to road salt, located in splash zone, etc.). This 34 corrosion protection may consist of appropriate concrete cover, concrete sealer, or 35 exterior surface coating material. The final appearance of the corrosion protection 36 system shall not significantly alter the physical appearance of the structure.

37 2.10.4.3.1 Painting General 38 The Base Program includes a complete paint removal and repaint of the three truss 39 sections (601 ft. long) over the Thea Foss Waterway. Additionally the City approach steel 40 shall receive a spot surface preparation and spot painting at specific locations where 41 additional steel will be added for strengthening or seismic upgrading. All steel on the 42 City approach located a minimum of four (4) feet horizontally, on either side of 43 expansion joints shall be completely abrasive blasted and painted.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-11 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The Supplemental Program includes, for the City approach, painting all new steel and 2 complete paint removal and repainting of all existing steel including girders, floor 3 beams, stringers, laterals, and the bridge support bents. 4 The complete removal and repainting shall require a containment system to capture the 5 high level of hazardous heavy metals present in the paint. See the Section 2.6 for further 6 details. The spot surface preparation on the City approach will require containment but 7 it can be in the form of localized vacuum shrouded blasting or power tool cleaning. The 8 vacuum shroud shall be connected to an approved HEPA filter equipped vacuum system.

9 2.10.4.3.1.1 Materials 10 As called for in 6.07.2 of WSDOT 2010 Standard Specifications.

11 2.10.4.3.1.2 Construction Requirements 12 As called for in the Section 6-07.3 of WSDOT 2010 Standard Specifications with 13 exception of 6-07.3 (10)D – Surface Preparation Prior to Overcoating. 14 This Section covers the surface preparation and painting on either side of expansion 15 joints and spot surface and spot painting on the City approach. No overcoating as such 16 shall be done. 17 Following any preparation by SSPC-SP1 to all locations the steel, four (4) feet on either 18 side of expansion joint or as far out as rust and corrosion are present, shall be initially 19 cleaned by water jetting per SSPC SP-12/LP WC followed by abrasive blasting to SSPC 20 SP-6. Where new steel will be added and locations of rusted or corroded steel the 21 surfaces shall be prepared by spot abrasive blasting to SSPC SP-6 or power tool cleaning 22 to SSPC SP-11. Abrasive blasting shall be done in such a manner that the adjacent areas 23 are protected from damage. After abrasive blasting or power tool cleaning the perimeter 24 of the existing paint shall be feathered back 1 – 2 inches. The profile shall be 1-mil 25 minimum or in accordance with the paint manufacturer’s recommendations, whichever 26 is greater.

27 2.10.4.3.1.3 Painting Wooden Structures 28 The operator and machine room wooden buildings shall be painted on the exterior after 29 removing all the flaking and deteriorated paint. The old window glazing shall be removed 30 and new glazing installed. Broken or damaged windows shall be replaced with new glass. 31 The flaking and deteriorated paint may be removed by hand, mechanically or with City of 32 Tacoma approved, environmental safe paint strippers. Only sound and well adhered 33 paint as determined by the Engineer shall be left on the structure before application of a 34 primer coat of paint. 35 The paint materials shall be a three coat system from the premium brand(s) of one major 36 manufacturer. The primer coat shall be an oil base alkyd intended for wood structures. 37 The application of the primer shall be well worked in to all cracks and crevices and back 38 rolled if first applied by spray application. The intermediate coat shall be a latex water 39 base system with a contrasting color from the finish coat. The finish coat shall be semi- 40 gloss latex of a color to be determined by the City of Tacoma. The coverage rate for all 41 three coats shall be as called for in the manufacturer technical bulletins. 42 Labels, names or other nomenclature that currently exist on each building shall be 43 replaced similar in size and style.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-12 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.4 PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION (CITY APPROACH, CENTER 2 TRUSS SPANS AND PORT APPROACH) 3 Prior to beginning Work on any bridge elements, the Design-Builder shall inspect and 4 document all deficiencies in the bridge elements. A deficiency in the structural elements 5 is defined as, but not limited to, rust, corrosion, section loss, paint failure, cracking, 6 spalling and delamination. 7 The pre-construction inspections shall be used to verify as-built information and to 8 create the rehabilitation plan for the structural elements.

9 2.10.4.5 REMOVAL OF CAR RAMP DECK (CITY APPROACH) 10 The remaining I-705 to Dock Street car ramp deck shall be removed as part of the 11 Supplemental Program. The Design-Builder shall minimize damage to the permanent 12 City Approach structure during the demolition and removal of the car ramp deck located 13 under the City Approach. Any damage to elements of the car ramp structure that 14 reduces the load resistance capacity of the elements to below their original capacity shall 15 be repaired by the Design-Builder. 16 The paint system of the individual structural elements that are damaged during the 17 demolition and removal of the remaining I-705 to Dock Street car ramp deck located 18 under the City Approach shall be repaired by the Design-Builder according to Section 19 2.10.4.3.

20 2.10.4.6 RAILROAD FENCE INSTALLATION (CITY APPROACH) 21 Throw fences shall be installed along the City Approach bridge deck and along the 22 pedestrian ramp that is adjacent to the car ramp located under the City Approach Bridge 23 deck as part of the Base Program. The fence shall meet the railroad throw fence 24 requirements specified by BNSF and meet all other application design load and geometry 25 requirements.

26 2.10.4.7 EXPANSION JOINT REPLACEMENT (CITY APPROACH, CENTER 27 TRUSS SPANS AND PORT APPROACH) 28 The Design-Builder shall replace the entire expansion joint assemblies for the Center 29 Truss Span structures as part of the Base Program. Strip seal and compression seals 30 shall not be used. The new joints shall have a redundant drainage system that will drain 31 all water from the bridge deck and will not allow water from the bridge deck to contact 32 the primary or secondary elements of the Center Truss Span superstructure and 33 substructure concrete piers. The new expansion joints shall have a minimum service life 34 of 20 years. 35 The entire expansion joint assemblies for the City Approach and Port Approach 36 structures shall be replaced as part of the Base Program. Only silicone seals, strip seals 37 or compression seals are permitted. All expansion joints shall be watertight. The new 38 joints shall also have a supplemental drainage system that will drain all water from the 39 bridge deck, in the event of an expansion joint failure, and will not allow water from the 40 bridge deck to contact the primary or secondary elements of the City Approach and Port 41 Approach superstructures and substructures. The new expansion joints shall have a 42 minimum service life of 20 years.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-13 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.8 REPLACEMENT OF PEDESTRIAN STAIRS AND LANDING REMOVAL 2 (CITY APPROACH) 3 The lower pedestrian stairs providing access from the City Approach sidewalk to Dock 4 Street under the City Approach shall be repair/replaced as part of the BASE. The width 5 of the stairway access from Dock Street shall be a minimum of 44-inches wide if the 6 stairs are replaced. Removal of the timber landing and timber piles shall be completed 7 as part of the lower pedestrian stair repairs/replacement.

8 2.10.4.9 BEARING CLEANING (CITY APPROACH AND PORT APPROACH) 9 All of the movable and fixed bearing assemblies supporting the City Approach and Port 10 Approach Superstructures shall have all debris and loose rust removed as part of the 11 Base Program. The bearing assemblies shall be coated with a lubricant that will prevent 12 excessive corrosion and enable the movable bearings to function as intended. 13 The movable and fixed bearing assemblies of the City Approach and Port Approach shall 14 be left accessible for future bridge inspections.

15 2.10.4.10 BEARING REHABILITATION AND/OR REPLACEMENT (CENTER 16 TRUSS SPANS) 17 The bearings supporting the Center Truss Span superstructure shall be rehabilitated as 18 part of the Base Program. The movable and fixed bearing assemblies shall have all 19 debris, corrosion and rust removed from the bearings. The movable bearings shall be 20 replaced with seismic isolation bearing systems to be able to accommodate all service 21 and seismic movements of the Center Truss Span superstructures. 22 The caps of the concrete support piers shall be improved as necessary to allow the 23 superstructure to meet the seismic retrofit requirements described in the Base Program. 24 Any construction work necessary to accommodate seismic retrofit requirements below 25 the bottom of the caps of the concrete support piers will not be included in the Scope of 26 Work. Detailed recommendations and a repair plan for completing the concrete support 27 pier seismic rehabilitation and retrofit below the caps shall be included in the 28 Supplemental Program Scope of Work.

29 2.10.4.11 BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT (CITY APPROACH AND CENTER 30 TRUSS SPANS) 31 The Design-Builder shall remove the concrete bridge deck from each of the Center Truss 32 Spans as part of the Base Program. Damage to the permanent Center Truss Span 33 structural elements during the demolition and removal of the bridge deck shall be 34 minimized. Any damage to elements of the structure that reduces the load carrying 35 capacity of the elements to below an inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25 shall 36 be repaired by the Design-Builder. Concrete or Exodermic decks are permitted and a 1/2 37 –inch wearing surface shall be assumed for design purposes. Light weight aggregate, 38 steel grid or steel orthotropic decks shall not be used. 39 The concrete bridge deck for the City Approach shall be removed as part of the Base 40 Program. Damage to the permanent City Approach structure during the demolition and 41 removal of the bridge deck shall be minimized. Any damage to elements of the structure 42 that reduces the load carrying capacity of the elements to below an inventory bridge legal 43 load rating factor of 1.25 shall be repaired by the Design-Builder. Concrete or Exodermic

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-14 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 decks are permitted and a 1/2 –inch wearing surface shall be assumed for design 2 purposes. Light weight aggregate, steel grid or steel orthotropic decks shall not be used. 3 The paint systems of adjacent structural elements that are damaged during the 4 demolition and removal of the Center Truss Span and/or City Approach bridge decks 5 shall be repaired according to Section 2.10.4.3. 6 Concrete bridge decks shall have a minimum thickness of 7.5-inches. The new concrete 7 decks shall be System 1 bridge deck protective system (2.5-inch concrete cover with 8 epoxy-coated reinforcing steel) as defined in the WSDOT BDM.

9 2.10.4.12 CANTILEVER SIDEWALK REMOVAL (CITY APPROACH AND CENTER 10 TRUSS SPANS) 11 The cantilever sidewalks and immediate steel supporting elements shall be removed 12 from the Center Truss Spans as part of the Base Program. The Design-Builder shall 13 minimize damage to the permanent Center Truss Span structures during the demolition 14 and removal of the cantilever sidewalks and immediate steel supporting elements. Any 15 damage to elements of the structure that reduces the load resistance of the elements to 16 below an inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25 shall be repaired by the Design- 17 Builder. 18 The cantilever sidewalks and immediate steel supporting elements shall be removed 19 from the City Approach and/or rehabilitated as part of the Base Program. A portion of 20 the sidewalk shall either remain or be replaced so that the pedestrian stairs from Dock 21 Street can connect to the deck of the City Approach. The width of the entire bridge deck 22 shall be maintained between the South Abutment and Bent 4, and shall be transitioned 23 to the rehabilitated bridge deck width between Bents 4 and 5. The Design-Builder shall 24 minimize damage to the permanent City Approach structure during the demolition and 25 removal of the cantilever sidewalks and immediate steel support elements. Any damage 26 to elements of the structure that reduces the load resistance of the elements to below an 27 inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25 shall be repaired by the Design-Builder. 28 The paint system of the adjacent structural elements that are damaged during the 29 demolition and removal of the cantilever sidewalks and immediate steel supporting 30 elements shall be repaired according to Section 2.10.4.3.

31 2.10.4.13 HISTORIC RAILING REHABILITATION (CITY APPROACH AND 32 CENTER TRUSS SPANS) 33 The historic pedestrian railings on the exterior of the Center Truss Spans, including the 34 handrail located on the unused vehicle ramps, shall be removed prior to the demolition 35 of the cantilever sidewalks as part of the Base Program. The Design-Builder shall 36 remove the original paint and repaint the historic pedestrian railing at a location that is 37 fully protected from the outside environment. The existing condition of the railing after 38 construction begins shall be documented prior to removal, and any new damage to the 39 railing shall be repaired by the Design-Builder to the condition prior to the new damage. 40 The historic pedestrian railing shall be re-installed on the exterior of the Center Truss 41 Spans thru trusses after the original sidewalk and deck has been removed. 42 The historic pedestrian railings on the City Approach shall be removed prior to the 43 demolition of the cantilever sidewalks as part of the BASE. The Design-Builder shall 44 remove the original paint and repaint the historic pedestrian railing at a location that is 45 fully protected from the outside environment. The existing condition of the railing after

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-15 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 construction begins shall be documented prior to removal, and any new damage to the 2 railing shall be repaired by the Design-Builder to the condition prior to the new damage. 3 The historic pedestrian railing shall be installed on the exterior edge of the City 4 Approach after the original sidewalk and deck has been removed. 5 The existing railings on the Center Truss Spans and the City Approach may not meet 6 current code requirements. Design-Builder shall design modifications to the railings to 7 bring them into code compliance, if required, and submit to the City of Tacoma for 8 review. The existing railings are one of the significant historical features of the bridge 9 and modifications should take this into consideration.

10 Refer to Section 2.6.4.3.7 for additional requirements.

11 2.10.4.14 TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN RAILINGS (CITY APPROACH, CENTER 12 TRUSS SPANS AND PORT APPROACH) 13 The Design-Builder shall install pedestrian railings and traffic barriers on the City 14 Approach, Center Truss Spans as part of the Base Program. 15 The Design-Builder shall either install new combination traffic-pedestrian barriers, or 16 enhance the existing railings to meet current code requirements (42 inches) on the Port 17 Approach as part of the Supplemental Program. Pre-cast concrete barriers shall not be 18 used for permanent applications on bridges or approach slabs.

19 2.10.4.15 4 TRAFFIC LANES CONVERSION TO 2 TRAFFIC LANES AND 2 20 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE LANES (ENTIRE BRIDGE) 21 The Design-Builder shall re-stripe the existing 4 traffic lanes to 2 traffic lanes and 2 22 pedestrian/bicycle lanes as part of the Base Program.

23 Refer to Section 2.14 for additional details.

24 2.10.4.16 MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT STRUCTURES (ENTIRE 25 BRIDGE) 26 The Design-Builder shall design and construct all associated gate supports, utility 27 relocation mounting members, reconstructed or new conduit supports, reconstructed or 28 new mechanical element or system supports and any additional structural design work 29 required to complete the mechanical and electrical enhancements to the bridge 30 structure. 31 New utility supports shall be design to have a minimal visual impact on the structure and 32 shall protect the utilities they are supporting from environmental elements. 33 Refer to Section 2.6.4.3.7 for additional requirements.

34 2.10.4.17 OPERATION AND MECHANICAL BUILDING REPAIR, 35 REHABILITATION AND/OR REPLACEMENT (CENTER TRUSS SPANS) 36 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document the existing condition of the Operation 37 and Mechanical Buildings located on the Center Truss Spans according to Section 38 2.10.4.4. The Operation and Mechanical Buildings shall be evaluated in conjunction 39 with the mechanical and electrical rehabilitation plans, and a repair, rehabilitation

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-16 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 and/or replacement plan shall be created as part of the Base Program or Supplemental 2 Program. 3 The existing dimensions of the buildings and the visual features of the buildings shall not 4 be altered. Refer to Section 2.6.4.3.7 for additional requirements.

5 2.10.4.18 SHORELINE PROTECTION 6 If the Design-Builder provides shoreline protection, the design shall consider the 7 physical Site conditions. The design shall minimize placement or removal of material 8 below the ordinary high water (OHW) mark. Shoreline protection shall be designed to 9 remain intact and not migrate outside of the original placement area. Refer to Section 10 2.6 for other requirements.

11 2.10.4.19 STORMWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM (CITY APPROACH, CENTER 12 TRUSS SPANS AND PORT APPROACH) 13 A stormwater collection system shall be installed to prevent stormwater from running off 14 the bridge deck onto the primary and secondary elements of the superstructure and 15 substructure. The portions of the drainage system that are either directly above or with 16 18-inches of primary and secondary superstructure and substructure elements shall have 17 a redundant system installed to drain the water and/or protect the bridge elements from 18 contact with the stormwater. If downspouts are used, all downspout parts shall be 19 accessible for maintenance and cleaning, and downspout elbows shall be 45 degrees or 20 less. Drainpipes shall not be installed within bridge substructure units. Drain pipes 21 shall be a minimum of 6-inches in diameter, and shall be accessible for maintenance. 22 The stormwater collection system shall be fully installed and functional for the City 23 Approach, Center Truss Spans and Port Approach as part of the Base Program. 24 Portions of the entire bridge structure that are known to collect and hold standing water 25 or are discovered during construction to collect and hold standing water shall be 26 modified to drain future standing water. Any drainage modifications to elements of the 27 structure that reduces the load carrying capacity of the elements to below an inventory 28 bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25 shall be reinforced by the Design-Builder. Any 29 damage during construction to the permanently exposed corrosion protection system 30 resulting from drainage modifications shall be repaired by the Design-Builder according 31 to Section 2.10.4.3.

32 2.10.4.20 VAULTS AND BURIED STRUCTURES (CITY APPROACH AND PORT 33 APPROACH) 34 Live load distribution through the soil shall be based on Sections 3.6.1.2.6 and 3.6.2.2 of 35 the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications for distribution of wheel loads and 36 impact, respectively. 37 Vaults shall be designed for earthquake loads even if the stormwater vaults do not rest 38 on an active fault. Seismic design of vaults shall be based on geotechnical 39 recommendations. 40 Construction loads shall be considered, in service load cases, for the design of the 41 structure.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-17 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The Design-Builder shall check vaults for buoyancy under high water table conditions. 2 For water-containing vaults, this includes the condition where all water must be 3 removed in order to repair the structure (i.e., the vault is empty). The Design-Builder 4 shall provide a safety factor of 1.25 against flotation, and shall include the appropriate 5 self weight of the structure and/or tie-downs appropriate for soil conditions, including 6 construction scenarios. 7 Hatches, lids, covers, and risers for vaults and other buried structures shall be designed 8 for a 16,000 pound wheel load (or greater based on equipment to be used by the Design- 9 Builder on the Site), with increased impact as a deck joint (AASHTO LRFD Bridge 10 Design Specifications, Table 3.6.2.1-1) at the critical location, in addition to the 11 appropriate soil and live load lateral pressures. These loads shall be transferred to the 12 vault structure with HL-93 or greater loading distributed through the appropriate soil 13 depth. 14 Refer to Sections 2.11 and 2.12 (Electrical and Mechanical) and 2.13 (Stormwater 15 Management) for other requirements.

16 2.10.4.21 STORMWATER VAULTS (CITY APPROACH AND PORT APPROACH) 17 Stormwater and other water-containing vaults shall be designed in accordance with the 18 requirements of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and the following 19 requirements of ACI 350-06, Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering 20 Concrete Structures: 21 • Flexural cracking requirements (Chapter 10 - Flexure and axial loads) shall apply 22 to all concrete structures. 23 • Seismic design of liquid-containing concrete structures (ACI 350.3-06), or 24 equivalent analysis (as approved by the City of Tacoma), shall be applied to all 25 structure types, not just concrete. The assumption is that when the vault is almost 26 full of water, the seismic event has moved soil away from the exterior walls and is 27 sloshing the water, as the event ends. 28 Vault connections shall meet the following criteria: 29 • Joints using welded shear connectors with grouted keyways shall use details for 30 precast, prestressed members as shown in the BDM, or equivalent (as approved 31 by City of Tacoma), at 4 feet - 0 inches maximum spacing, or the Design-Builder 32 shall submit design calculations supporting changes to this requirement. 33 • Calculations shall be provided for grouted shear connections.

34 2.10.4.22 CONCRETE ENCASED STEEL COLUMN BASES (CITY APPROACH) 35 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the concrete encased 36 steel column bases of the City Approach according to Section 2.10.4.4. The City 37 Approach concrete encased steel column bases shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation 38 plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created 39 as part of the Base Program, or a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair 40 Class C and/or Repair Class D shall be created as part of the Supplemental Program.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-18 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.23 STEEL BENT COLUMNS (CITY APPROACH) 2 Steel bent columns shall refer to the vertical steel elements extending from the concrete 3 encased steel column bases to the bottom of the connections to the floorbeams and 4 girders of the City Approach. The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all 5 deficiencies in the steel bent columns of the City Approach according to Section 2.10.4.4. 6 The City Approach steel bent columns shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan 7 meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created as 8 part of the Base Program, or a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair 9 Class C and/or Repair Class D shall be created as part of the Supplemental Program. 10 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 11 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 12 reinforcement is added to the steel bent columns as part of the BASE, reinforcement may 13 be added after the removal of the car ramp deck and City Approach bridge deck, and 14 prior to the placement of the City Approach replacement bridge deck. If reinforcement is 15 added to the steel bent columns as part of the SUPP, reinforcement may be added at any 16 time during the contract period.

17 2.10.4.24 STEEL BENT HORIZONTAL AND DIAGONAL BRACING (CITY 18 APPROACH) 19 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the steel bent 20 horizontal and diagonal bracing of the City Approach according to Section 2.10.4.4. The 21 City Approach steel bent horizontal and diagonal bracing shall be evaluated and a 22 rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B 23 shall be created as part of the Base Program, or a rehabilitation plan meeting the 24 requirements of Repair Class C and/or Repair Class D shall be created as part of the 25 Supplemental Program. 26 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 27 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 28 reinforcement is added to the steel bent horizontal and diagonal bracing as part of the 29 Base or Supplemental Programs, reinforcement may be added at any time during the 30 contract period.

31 2.10.4.25 STEEL GIRDERS (CITY APPROACH) 32 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the steel girders of the 33 City Approach according to Section 2.10.4.4. The City Approach steel girders shall be 34 evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or 35 Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base Program. 36 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 37 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 38 reinforcement is added to the steel girders as part of the Base Program, reinforcement 39 shall be added after the removal of the City Approach bridge deck and prior to the 40 placement of the City Approach replacement bridge deck. If reinforcement is added to 41 the steel girders as part of the Supplemental Program, reinforcement may be added at 42 any time during the contract period.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-19 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.26 STEEL FLOORBEAMS (CITY APPROACH AND CENTER TRUSS 2 SPANS) 3 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the steel floorbeams of 4 the City Approach and Center Truss Spans according to Section 2.10.4.4. The City 5 Approach steel floorbeams shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the 6 requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base 7 Program. The Center Truss steel floorbeams shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan 8 meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created as 9 part of the Base Program. 10 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 11 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 12 reinforcement is added to the steel floorbeams of the City Approach as part of the Base 13 Program, reinforcement shall be added after the removal of the City Approach bridge 14 deck and prior to the placement of the City Approach replacement bridge deck. If 15 reinforcement is added to the steel floorbeams of the City Approach as part of the 16 Supplemental Program, reinforcement may be added at any time during the contract 17 period. 18 If reinforcement is added to the steel floorbeams of the Center Truss Spans as part of the 19 Base Program, reinforcement may be added after the removal of the Center Truss Spans 20 bridge deck and prior to the addition of the Center Truss Spans replacement bridge deck.

21 2.10.4.27 STEEL STRINGERS (CITY APPROACH AND CENTER TRUSS SPANS) 22 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the steel stringers of 23 the City Approach and Center Truss Spans according to Section 2.10.4.4. The City 24 Approach steel stringers shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the 25 requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base 26 Program. The Center Truss Spans steel stringers shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation 27 plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created 28 as part of the Base Program. 29 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 30 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 31 reinforcement is added to the steel stringers of the City Approach as part of the Base 32 Program, reinforcement shall be added after the removal of the City Approach bridge 33 deck and prior to the placement of the City Approach replacement bridge deck. If 34 reinforcement is added to the steel stringers of the City Approach as part of the 35 Supplemental Program, reinforcement may be added at any time during the contract 36 period. 37 If reinforcement is added to the steel stringers of the Center Truss Spans as part of the 38 Base Program, reinforcement may be added after the removal of the Center Truss Span 39 bridge deck and prior to the placement of the Center Truss Span replacement bridge 40 deck.

41 2.10.4.28 STEEL BOTTOM CHORD (CENTER TRUSS SPANS) 42 Steel Bottom Chord shall refer to the horizontal steel tension elements running along the 43 bottom of the east and west trusses of the Center Truss Spans. The Design-Builder shall 44 inspect and document all deficiencies in the steel bottom chords according to Section 45 2.10.4.4. The Center Truss Spans steel bottom chords shall be evaluated and a

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-20 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B 2 shall be created as part of the Base Program. The rehabilitation plan must show a step 3 by step procedure depicting the sequence of events for adding reinforcing steel plates, 4 including descriptions of which bolts to leave, replace or repair. 5 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 6 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 7 reinforcement is added to the steel bottom chord as part of the Base Program Scope of 8 Work, reinforcement shall be added after the removal of the Center Truss Spans bridge 9 deck and prior to the placement of the Center Truss Spans replacement bridge deck. 10 Installation of the reinforcing steel plates or elements for the steel bottom chords shall 11 be staged so that only one reinforcement installation operation is occurring on a single 12 truss span chord during steel bottom chord rehabilitation operations.

13 2.10.4.29 STEEL GUSSET PLATES (CENTER TRUSS SPANS) 14 The steel gusset plates shall refer to the steel connection plates along the top and bottom 15 chords of the east and west trusses of the Center Truss Spans. The Design-Builder shall 16 inspect and document all deficiencies in the steel gusset plates according to Section 17 2.10.4.4. The Center Truss Spans steel gusset plates shall be evaluated and a 18 rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B 19 shall be created as part of the Base Program. The rehabilitation plan must show a step 20 by step procedure depicting the sequence of events for adding reinforcing steel plates, 21 including descriptions of which bolts to leave, replace or repair. 22 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 23 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 24 reinforcement is added to the steel gusset plates as part of the Base Program, 25 reinforcement shall be added after the removal of the Center Truss Spans bridge deck 26 and prior to the placement of the Center Truss Spans replacement bridge deck. 27 Installation of the reinforcing steel plates for the steel gusset plates shall be staged so 28 that only one reinforcement installation operation is occurring on a single exterior truss 29 span during steel gusset plate rehabilitation operations.

30 2.10.4.30 STEEL TRUSS ELEMENTS (CENTER TRUSS SPANS) 31 Steel Truss Elements shall refer to the steel diagonal posts, vertical posts, top chords, 32 truss horizontal bracing, truss diagonal bracing and any other primary or secondary steel 33 truss elements. The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the 34 steel truss elements according to Section 2.10.4.4. The Center Truss Spans steel 35 elements shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair 36 Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base Program. 37 Bolted and/or weld connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. 38 Weld connections may only be used on secondary members and only with the Engineer’s 39 written approval. Mixing of bolts and welds in a single connection are not permitted. If 40 reinforcement is added to the steel truss elements as part of the Base Program, 41 reinforcement may be added after the removal of the Center Truss Spans bridge deck 42 and prior to the addition of the Center Truss Spans replacement bridge deck.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-21 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.31 STEEL TOWER ELEMENTS (CENTER TRUSS SPANS) 2 Steel Tower Elements shall refer to the steel tower columns, steel tower horizontal 3 bracing, steel tower diagonal bracing and any other primary or secondary steel tower 4 elements. The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the steel 5 tower elements according to Section 2.10.4.4. The steel tower elements shall be 6 evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or 7 Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base Program. 8 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 9 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 10 reinforcement is added to the steel tower elements as part of the Base Program, 11 reinforcement may be added at any time during the contract period.

12 2.10.4.32 STEEL OVERHEAD CABLE SUPPORT ELEMENTS (CENTER TRUSS 13 SPANS) 14 Steel Overhead Cable Support Elements shall refer to the steel overhead cable support 15 bottom chords, top chords, horizontal members, vertical members, diagonal members 16 and any other primary or secondary steel tower elements. The Design-Builder shall 17 inspect and document all deficiencies in the steel overhead cable support elements 18 according to Section 2.10.4.4. The steel overhead cable support elements shall be 19 evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or 20 Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base Program. 21 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 22 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 23 reinforcing is added to the steel overhead cable support elements as part of the Base 24 Program, reinforcement may be added at any time during the contract period.

25 2.10.4.33 STEEL RIVETED CONNECTIONS (CITY APPROACH AND CENTER 26 TRUSS SPANS) 27 Steel Riveted Connections shall refer to all locations in the City Approach and Center 28 Truss Spans where two or more individual steel plates, members and/or elements are 29 connected together using steel plates and/or rivets, exclusive of the steel gusset plate 30 connections in the Center Truss Spans. The Design-Builder shall inspect and document 31 all deficiencies in the steel riveted connections according to Section 2.10.4.4. The City 32 Approach steel riveted connections shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting 33 the requirements of either Repair Class A or Repair Class B shall be created as part of the 34 Base Program, or a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class C 35 and/or Repair Class D shall be created as part of the Supplemental Program. The Center 36 Truss Spans steel riveted connections shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan 37 meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created as 38 part of the Base Program. 39 Bolted connections for reinforcing steel plates and members shall be used. Welded 40 connections for the reinforcing steel plates and members are not permitted. If 41 reinforcement is added to the steel riveted connections within the City Approach and 42 Center Truss Spans structures as part of the Base Program, reinforcement may be added 43 at any time during the contract period. If reinforcement is added to the steel riveted 44 connections within the City Approach structure as part of the Supplemental Program, 45 reinforcement may be added at any time during the contract period.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-22 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.34 RIVET REPLACEMENT (CITY APPROACH AND CENTER TRUSS 2 SPANS) 3 Rivet Replacement shall refer to all rivets requiring replacement within the City 4 Approach and Center Truss Span structures that are used to connect steel plates together 5 to make a single steel element, or are used to connect one or more steel elements 6 together. The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all rivets in the City Approach 7 and Center Truss Span structures according to Section 2.10.4.4. A deficient rivet shall be 8 one that shows signs of significant corrosion. Deficient Rivets shall be evaluated as 9 follows: 10 1) The rivet will be categorized into one of three connection categories based on the 11 load the rivet is designed to resist (shear only, tension only, or combined shear 12 and tension). 13 2) Rivet replacement qualifying measurements shall be taken on painted surfaces 14 where the corrosion protection system of the paint is fully intact or on unpainted 15 surfaces that have been cleaned of all debris, rust and flaking paint. All headless 16 and loose rivets shall be replaced with high-strength bolts regardless of the 17 connection category. A rivet shall be considered loose if it can be felt to move 18 after being firmly struck on the side of the head in a direction approximately 19 perpendicular to the shank of the rivet with a minimum 40 oz. hammer. 20 3) For shear only connections the rivet shall be replaced if no portion of either head 21 extends beyond the rivet hole and/or corrosion has entered into the shank of the 22 rivet. 23 4) For tension only connections, the rivet shall be replaced if it has a 10% or more 24 reduction in head radius along two or more axes and/or has a 10% or more 25 reduction in the height of the rivet head at two or more locations on the rivet. 26 5) For combined shear and tension connections, a linear interaction between the 27 percentage of force in tension and the amount of tolerable head deterioration 28 shall be used to determine if the rivet shall be replaced. The total force on the 29 rivet for this evaluation shall be assumed to equal the shear force plus the tension 30 force. 31 For the Center Truss Spans, the deficient rivets shall be evaluated as stated above and a 32 rivet replacement plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class 33 B shall be created as part of the Base Program. For the City Approach, the deficient 34 rivets shall be evaluated as stated above and a rivet replacement plan meeting the 35 requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base 36 Program, or a plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class C and/or Repair Class D 37 shall be created as part of the Supplemental Program.

38 High strength steel bolts shall be used for the replacement of rivets. Welds are not 39 permitted to replace rivets. If rivets are replaced as part of the Base Program or 40 Supplemental Program, rivets may be replaced at any time during the contract period. 41 Replacement of the steel rivets shall be staged so either a maximum of two rivets or 10% 42 of the rivets in a connection or element are in the process of being replaced at the same 43 time. A higher limit of 30% of the rivets in a connection or element is allowed if the deck 44 is fully removed and the element under repair provides a direct load path for their 45 elements. Adjacent rivets requiring replacement may not be in the process of being

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-23 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 replaced at the same time. The process of being replaced shall be defined as from the 2 beginning of rivet structural material remove to fully tensioning the replacement bolt. 3 An estimated maximum number of 15% of the total rivets in the City Approach and 4 Center Truss Spans require replacement. This estimated total rivet replacement value 5 does not included rivets that are replaced as part of member reinforcement and/or 6 member replacement work. 7 Repair of the failed corrosion protection system resulting from rivet replacement shall be 8 performed prior to the loss of access to an area requiring repair and after all significant 9 work that could damage the repaired corrosion protection system is complete. The 10 Design-Builder shall repair any damage caused by the Design-Builder to the new paint 11 system and/or paint protection system of the rivets according to Section 2.10.4.3.

12 2.10.4.35 CONCRETE RIVER PIERS (CENTER TRUSS SPANS) 13 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the concrete river piers 14 of the Center Truss Spans according to Section 2.10.4.4. The Center Truss Spans 15 concrete river piers shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the 16 requirements of Repair Class C and/or Repair Class D shall be created as part of the 17 Supplemental Program.

18 2.10.4.36 CONCRETE ABUTMENT AND WINGWALLS (CITY APPROACH AND 19 PORT APPROACH) 20 The bearing seats of the north and south abutments shall be clean and all debris shall be 21 removed from the bearing seats as part of the Base Program. Debris on the vertical and 22 remaining horizontal surfaces of the abutments and wingwalls shall be removed as part 23 of the Supplemental Program. Debris shall be disposed in accordance with applicable 24 regulations. 25 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document the extent of the holes in the south 26 abutment as part of the Supplemental Program. The holes shall be evaluated and a 27 rehabilitation plan will be created and implement.

28 2.10.4.37 CONCRETE COLUMNS (PORT APPROACH) 29 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the concrete columns 30 of the Port Approach according to Section 2.10.4.4. The Port Approach concrete 31 columns shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair 32 Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base Program, or a 33 rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class C and/or Repair Class D 34 shall be created as part of the Supplemental Program.

35 2.10.4.38 CONCRETE CAPS (PORT APPROACH) 36 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the concrete caps of 37 the Port Approach according to Section 2.10.4.4. The Port Approach concrete caps shall 38 be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class A 39 and/or Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base Program, or a rehabilitation 40 plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class C and/or Repair Class D shall be created 41 as part of the Supplemental Program.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-24 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.39 CONCRETE GIRDERS AND DIAPHRAGMS (PORT APPROACH) 2 The Design-Builder shall inspect and document all deficiencies in the concrete girders 3 and diaphragms of the Port Approach according to Section 2.10.4.4. The Port Approach 4 concrete girders and diaphragms shall be evaluated and a rehabilitation plan meeting the 5 requirements of Repair Class A and/or Repair Class B shall be created as part of the Base 6 Program, or a rehabilitation plan meeting the requirements of Repair Class C and/or 7 Repair Class D shall be created as part of the Supplemental Program. 8 No live load or temporary construction load will be permitted on a span of the Port 9 Approach that is in the process of rehabilitating either the concrete girders or 10 diaphragms within that span. In addition, no live load or temporary construction load 11 will be permitted on a span that has received rehabilitation work to the concrete girders 12 or diaphragms for minimum period of 24 hours after the completion of the last 13 individual rehabilitation operation for that span.

14 2.10.4.40 MEMBER REPLACEMENT 15 Complete replacement of individual steel members will be permitted with the approval of 16 the City of Tacoma Engineer. The Design-Builder shall submit a detailed rehabilitation 17 plan to the City of Tacoma a minimum of 21 days prior to beginning member 18 replacement work. The rehabilitation plan must show a step by step procedure depicting 19 the sequence of events for replacing individual steel members. The following elements 20 are permitted to be replaced: 21 City Approach: 22 • Steel Bent Columns 23 • Steel Bent Horizontal Bracing 24 • Steel Bent Diagonal Bracing 25 • Steel Girders 26 • Steel Floorbeams 27 • Steel Stringers 28 Center Truss Spans: 29 • Steel Gusset Plates 30 • Steel Bottom Chords 31 • Steel Floorbeams 32 • Steel Stringers 33 • Steel Stringers 34 • Steel Diagonal and Vertical Posts 35 • Steel Top Chords 36 • Steel Truss Horizontal Bracing 37 • Steel Truss Diagonal Bracing 38 • Steel Tower Columns 39 • Steel Tower Horizontal Bracing 40 • Steel Tower Diagonal Bracing 41 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Bottom Chords 42 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Top chord Horizontal Members 43 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Vertical Members 44 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Diagonal Members

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-25 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.41 ASPHALT OVERLAY REPLACEMENT (PORT APPROACH) 2 The existing asphalt bridge deck overlay on the Port Approach shall be removed and 3 replaced with a new membrane and asphalt overlay by the Design-Builder as part of the 4 Base Program. 5 Damage to the concrete girders of the Port Approach structure during the demolition 6 and removal of the asphalt overlay shall be minimized. Any damage to elements of the 7 structure that reduces the load carrying capacity of the elements to below an inventory 8 bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25 shall be repaired by the Design-Builder. In 9 addition, any damage to the elements of the structure that exposes reinforcing steel shall 10 also be repaired by the Design-Builder prior to placing the new membrane and asphalt 11 overlay. 12 The existing asphalt overlay on the fill portion of the Port Approach shall be replaced by 13 the Design-Builder as part of the Supplemental Program. 14 Refer to Section 2.5 for additional details.

15 2.10.4.42 UNKNOWN MAJOR DEFICIENCIES 16 Unknown Major Deficiencies discovered after construction begins and not documented 17 in existing documents provided in the RFP or documents created according to Section 18 2.10.4.4 shall be rehabilitated and/or replaced by the Design-Builder as part of the Base 19 or Supplemental Programs. 20 An Unknown Major Deficiency within the Base Program shall be defined as a structural 21 deficiency where any primary member in the City Approach and/or Port Approach 22 Structures cannot achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.0, 23 and any primary member in the Center Truss Spans that cannot achieve a minimum 24 inventory bridge legal load rating factor of 1.25. An Unknown Major Deficiency within 25 the Base Program shall also include any paint and/or corrosion protection system of 26 primary member in the Center Truss Spans that cannot meet the paint and/or corrosion 27 protection requirements according to Section 2.10.4.3. If a contract unit price is not 28 available for the Work element, the costs associated with unknown Major Deficiency 29 Work may be assessed in accordance with Section 1.9.4, Equitable Adjustment. 30 31 An Unknown Major Deficiency within the Supplemental Program shall be defined as a 32 structural deficiency where any primary member in the City Approach, Port Approach 33 and/or Center Truss Span Structures cannot achieve a minimum inventory bridge legal 34 load rating factor of 1.25. An Unknown Major Deficiency within the Supplemental 35 Program shall also include any paint and/or corrosion protection system of primary 36 member in the City Approach, Port Approach and/or Center Truss Spans that cannot 37 meet the paint and/or corrosion protection requirements according to Section 2.10.4.3. 38 If a contract unit price is not available for the work element, the costs associated with 39 unknown Major Deficiency Work may be assessed in accordance with Section 1.9.4 40 Equitable Adjustment.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-26 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.43 COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH UNKNOWN MAJOR DEFICIENCY WORK 2 SHALL BE ASSESSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2.10.5.10. 3 DAMAGE TO NON-WORK ELEMENTS 4 A “Non-Work Element” is defined as a structural or non-structural element on or 5 connected to the bridge that is not scheduled to receive Work according to the Base or 6 Supplemental Programs. Elements of the bridge structure that are not part of the 7 Design-Builders Scope of Work that are damaged by the Design-Builder during 8 construction shall be repaired by the Design-Builder as part of the Base and/or 9 Supplemental Programs.

10 2.10.4.44 STRUCTURAL AND SEISMIC ANALYSIS 11 The Design-Builder shall develop detailed finite elemental 3D structural analysis models 12 for the City Approach, Port Approach and Center Truss Spans that are capable of 13 modeling the as-built structures, deteriorated structures and rehabilitated structures as 14 part of the Base Program. The structural analysis models shall be able to generate forces 15 and displacements that shall be used to analyze service and strength loading conditions 16 for the City Approach and Port Approach. The structural analysis models shall be able to 17 generate forces and displacements that shall be used to analyze service, strength and 18 earthquake loading conditions for the Center Truss Spans. 19 The Design-Builder shall develop additional detailed finite elemental 3D structural 20 analysis models for the City Approach and Port Approach that are capable of modeling 21 the as-built structures, deteriorated structures and rehabilitated structures as part of the 22 Supplemental Program. The structural analysis models shall be able to generate forces 23 and displacements that shall be used to analyze earthquake loading conditions.

24 2.10.4.45 SEISMIC RETROFIT OF THE CITY APPROACH 25 The City Approach shall be analyzed under seismic loading conditions. A capacity 26 demand ratio for each primary and secondary element shall be generated by the Design- 27 Builder. The rehabilitated or replaced element capacity demand ratios for each element 28 shall be equal to or greater than the values below: 29 • Steel Bent Columns, 1.0 30 • Steel Bent Horizontal Bracing, 1.0 31 • Steel Bent Diagonal Bracing, 1.0 32 • Steel Girders, 1.0 33 • Steel Floorbeams, 1.0 34 • Steel Stringers, 1.0 35 • Steel Riveted and/or Bolted Connections, 1.0 36 • Other Secondary Elements, 0.67

37 The Design-Builder may seismically retrofit the City Approach using methods that either 38 increase the capacity of the individual structural elements and/or decreases the demand 39 on the individual structural elements.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-27 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.46 SEISMIC RETROFIT OF THE CENTER TRUSS SPAN 2 SUPERSTRUCTURE 3 The Seismic Retrofit of the Center Truss Spans shall be analyzed under seismic loading 4 conditions. A capacity demand ratio for each primary and secondary element shall be 5 generated by the Design-Builder. The rehabilitated or replaced element capacity 6 demand ratios for each element shall be equal to or greater than the values below: 7 • Steel Gusset Plates, 1.0 8 • Steel Bottom Chords, 1.0 9 • Steel Floorbeams, 1.0 10 • Steel Stringers, 0.8 11 • Steel Diagonal and Vertical Posts, 0.8 12 • Steel Top Chords, 1.0 13 • Steel Truss Horizontal Bracing, 1.0 14 • Steel Truss Diagonal Bracing, 1.0 15 • Steel Tower Columns, 1.0 16 • Steel Tower Horizontal Bracing, 1.0 17 • Steel Tower Diagonal Bracing, 1.0 18 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Bottom Chords, 1.0 19 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Horizontal Members, 1.0 20 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Vertical Members, 0.8 21 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Diagonal Members, 0.67 22 • Steel Riveted and/or Bolted Connections, 1.0 23 • Other Secondary Elements, 0.8 24 The Design-Builder may seismically retrofit the Center Truss Spans using methods that 25 either increase the capacity of the individual structural elements and/or decreases the 26 demand on the individual structural elements.

27 2.10.4.47 SEISMIC RETROFIT OF THE PORT APPROACH 28 The Seismic Retrofit of the Port Approach shall be analyzed under seismic loading 29 conditions. A capacity demand ratio for each primary and secondary element shall be 30 generated by the Design-Builder. The rehabilitated or replaced element capacity 31 demand ratios for each element shall be equal to or greater than the values below: 32 • Concrete Abutment and Wingwalls, 0.8 33 • Concrete Columns, 0.8 34 • Concrete Caps, 0.8 35 • Concrete Girders, 0.8 36 • Concrete Diaphragms, 0.67 37 • Other Secondary Elements, 0.67

38 The Design-Builder may seismically retrofit the Port Approach using methods that either 39 increase the capacity of the individual structural elements and/or decreases the demand 40 on the individual structural elements.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-28 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.4.48 BRIDGE INSPECTION ACCESS 2 All new joints and bearings shall be accessible for inspection and maintenance, and shall 3 be designed, detailed and constructed by the Design-Builder to allow for future 4 replacement of the joints and bearings. Superstructure and substructure elements shall 5 be improved and/or reinforced as required to accommodate jacks for future bearing 6 replacements. Jacking loads shall be 200 percent of the calculated lifting load. A jacking 7 plan shall be created by the Design-Builder as part of the Base Program Scope of Work. 8 The City Approach, Port Approach and Center Truss Spans shall be accessible by a 9 ladder, a “snooper” (under-bridge inspection) truck or bucket truck. The Design-Builder 10 shall replace all existing deficient inspection access ladders, steps and inspection cables, 11 and shall install new inspection walkways under the City Approach and Center Truss 12 Span Superstructures.

13 2.10.4.49 BRIDGE LOAD RATINGS 14 The Design-Builder shall load rate all primary and secondary elements of the City 15 Approach, Port Approach and Center Truss Spans at the completion of work as part of 16 the Base Program and/or Supplemental Program. Two copies of load rating calculations, 17 structural analysis models and structural analysis calculations shall be provided to the 18 City of Tacoma at the completion of the project.

19 2.10.5 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA

20 2.10.5.1 REPAIR OF PAINT 21 Repair to the paint system of the steel members shall be performed prior to the loss of 22 access to an area requiring repair and after all significant work that could damage the 23 repaired corrosion protection system is complete. The Design-Builder shall repair any 24 damage caused by the Design-Builder to the new and/or existing paint system of the 25 steel elements according to Section 2.10.4.3. The steel elements that may require repair 26 are as follows:

27 City Approach: 28 • Steel Bent Columns 29 • Steel Bent Horizontal Bracing 30 • Steel Bent Diagonal Bracing 31 • Steel Girders 32 • Steel Floorbeams 33 • Steel Stringers 34 • Steel Riveted Connections

35 Center Truss Spans: 36 • Steel Gusset Plates 37 • Steel Bottom Chord 38 • Steel Floorbeams 39 • Steel Stringers 40 • Steel Riveted Connections 41 • Steel Diagonal and Vertical Posts

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-29 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Steel Top Chords 2 • Steel Truss Horizontal Bracing 3 • Steel Truss Diagonal Bracing 4 • Steel Tower Columns 5 • Steel Tower Horizontal Bracing 6 • Steel Tower Diagonal Bracing 7 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Bottom Chords 8 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Top chord Horizontal Members 9 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Vertical Members 10 • Steel Overhead Cable Support Diagonal Members

11 2.10.5.2 REINFORCED CONCRETE REPAIR 12 Cracks in the reinforced concrete elements shall be repaired as part of the Base or 13 Supplemental Programs. Cracks with widths equal to or less than 0.012” shall be sealed 14 using a penetrating sealer. Cracks with widths greater than 0.012” shall be sealed using 15 epoxy injection. 16 Spalls and delaminated areas of reinforced concrete elements shall be repaired as part of 17 the Base or Supplemental Programs. Spalls without exposed reinforcing steel may be 18 repaired using an epoxy patching material. Spalls with exposed reinforcing steel shall be 19 repaired according to the rehabilitation plan. The rehabilitation plan for spall with 20 exposed steel reinforcing shall include requirements that the spall shall be chipped back 21 to 1-1/2” behind the reinforcing steel and the horizontal perimeters shall be level for the 22 depth of the spall.

23 City Approach: 24 • Concrete Abutments and Wingwalls 25 • Concrete Encased Steel Column Bases

26 Center Truss Spans: 27 • Concrete River Piers

28 Port Approach: 29 • Concrete Abutments and Wingwalls 30 • Concrete Retaining Walls

31 2.10.5.3 PRESTRESSED/POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE REPAIR 32 Cracks in the reinforced concrete elements shall be repaired as part of the Base or 33 Supplemental Programs. Cracks with widths equal to or less than 0.012” shall be sealed 34 using a penetrating sealer. Cracks with widths greater than 0.012” shall be sealed using 35 epoxy injection. 36 Spalls and delaminated areas of prestress/post-tensioned concrete elements shall be 37 repaired as part of the Base or Supplemental Programs. Spalls without exposed 38 reinforcing steel may be repaired using an epoxy patching material. Spalls with exposed 39 reinforcing and/or prestressing/post-tensioning steel shall be repaired according to the 40 rehabilitation plan.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-30 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Port Approach: 2 • Concrete Columns 3 • Concrete Caps 4 • Concrete Girders 5 • Concrete Diaphragms

6 2.10.5.4 CONSTRUCTION LOADS 7 The Design-Builder shall minimize all construction loads on the existing structure. If 8 any portion of the existing structure is used to support construction personnel, 9 equipment, scaffolding or any other temporary structure, structural analysis calculations 10 shall be included in the as part of the rehabilitation plans. 11 Refer to Section 2.23 for additional requirements.

12 2.10.5.5 SALVAGE 13 The City of Tacoma may retain ownership of select bridge and/or structural items that in 14 its opinion reflect the historic character of the bridge. It is the intent to salvage 15 representative items only, not all items. Items may include representative gusset plates, 16 representative structural members, and pedestrian rails. The Design-Builder shall 17 obtain approval from the City of Tacoma prior to disposal of bridge and/or structural 18 items. The City of Tacoma will then specify the items that are to be salvaged for the 19 City’s ownership. The Design-Builder shall transport the specified salvaged items 20 banded and palletized to a location that will be within the City of Tacoma’s city limits. 21 The Design-Builder shall stack the material where directed by the City of Tacoma 22 Engineer. 23 The Design-Builder shall contact the City of Tacoma Engineer at least seven Calendar 24 Days prior to scheduled delivery of the items to confirm delivery arrangements.

25 2.10.5.6 WELDING EPOXY-COATED STEEL REINFORCING BARS 26 Where epoxy-coated steel reinforcing bars are specified to be spliced by welding, the 27 epoxy coating shall be left off or removed from the end six inches of each bar being 28 welded. After the welding is complete, the Design-Builder shall apply epoxy patching 29 material to the uncoated portions of the bar in accordance with Section 6-02.3(24) H of 30 the Standard Specifications.

31 2.10.5.7 EPOXY BONDING AGENT FOR SURFACES AND FOR STEEL 32 REINFORCING BAR DOWELS 33 Epoxy bonding agent for surfaces shall be Type II, as specified in Section 9-26.1 of the 34 Standard Specifications. Epoxy bonding agent for steel reinforcing bar dowels shall be 35 either Type I or Type IV, as specified in Section 9-26.1 of the Standard Specifications. 36 The grade and class of epoxy bonding agent shall be as recommended by the resin 37 manufacturer and approved by the Engineer of Record.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-31 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.10.5.8 DRILLING HOLES FOR, AND SETTING, STEEL REINFORCING BAR 2 DOWELS 3 The Design-Builder may use any method for drilling the holes provided the method 4 selected does not damage the concrete and the steel reinforcing bar that is to remain. 5 The Design-Builder shall exercise care in locating and drilling the holes to avoid damage 6 to existing steel reinforcing bars and concrete. Location of the holes may be shifted 7 slightly in order to avoid damaging the existing steel reinforcing bars. 8 Steel reinforcing bars shall be set into the holes with epoxy resin. The holes shall be 9 blown clean with dry compressed air before placing the resin. 10 The method used for setting the steel reinforcing bars shall completely fill the void 11 between the steel reinforcing bar and the concrete with epoxy resin. Dams shall be 12 placed at the front of the holes to confine the epoxy and shall not be removed until the 13 epoxy has cured in the hole. Refer to Section 2.10.6.5 for additional requirements.

14 2.10.5.9 CONSTRUCTION JOINTS 15 Construction joints shall be perpendicular to the mild steel reinforcing bars crossing the 16 joint.

17 2.10.5.10 PAYMENT 18 In addition to the lump sum bid items provided in the Price Proposal, Design-Builder 19 shall provide the following unit price information for use in the event additional repair is 20 required after the Notice to Proceed. 21 Steel Replacement (Per Pound) – Payment for additional, City approved, steel 22 replacement shall be full pay for all costs in connection with furnishing all materials 23 labor, tools, and equipment necessary for the manufacture, fabrication, transportation, 24 existing paint removal, removal of existing steel element, temporary supports and/or 25 bracing, erection, installation and painting of all replacement steel used to complete an 26 element of work on the project. Removal and disposal of replaced material shall also be 27 included in the unit price. Three unit prices for Individual Steel Replacement Repairs 28 shall be provided by the Design-Builder as follows: 29 1) Additional replacement repair work weighing less than 1,000 pounds, 30 2) Additional replacement repair work weighing equal to or more than 1,000 31 pounds and less than 5,000 pounds, and 32 3) Additional replacement repair work weighing more than 5,000 pounds. 33 34 Concrete Patching (Per Square Foot) – Payment for additional, City approved, 35 concrete patching shall be full pay for providing all material, labor, tools and equipment 36 necessary for removal of unsound concrete, surface cleaning and preparation of concrete 37 and exposed reinforcing steel, furnishing and placing patching material, and curing and 38 finishing concrete patch. Removal and disposal of unsound material shall also be 39 included in the unit price. 40 Concrete Girder Strand Repair (Per Strand) – Payment for additional, City 41 approved, Concrete Girder Strand Repair shall be full pay for providing all material, 42 labor, tools and equipment necessary for removal of unsound concrete, surface cleaning

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-32 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 and preparation of concrete and exposed steel strand, temporary supports, restoration of 2 prestressing strand force, furnishing and placing patching material, and curing and 3 finishing concrete girder strand repair. Removal and disposal of unsound material shall 4 also be included in the unit price. 5 Rivet Replacement (Per Each) – Payment for additional, City approved, Rivets 6 replaced with high strength bolts shall be full pay for providing all material, labor, tools 7 and equipment necessary for the existing paint removal, removal of the existing rivet, 8 temporary supports and/or bracing, furnishing and installing the high strength bolt and 9 necessary connection hardware and painting of high strength bolt and necessary 10 connection hardware. Removal and disposal of the replaced rivet material shall also be 11 included in the unit price.

12 2.10.6 SUBMITTALS

13 2.10.6.1 DESIGN SUBMITTALS 14 The City of Tacoma will review all scheduled submittals and return comments to the 15 Design-Builder in accordance with the requirements of Sections 2.9 and 2.22.

16 2.10.6.2 REHABILITATION PLANS 17 The Design-Builder shall submit Rehabilitation Plans to the City of Tacoma for the 18 elements to receive work under this Project, including the City Approach, Port Approach 19 and Center Truss Spans. The Rehabilitation Plans shall detail construction supports, 20 contractor’s means and methods, location of personnel, equipment and any necessary 21 coordination with other elements of the bridge under construction for each step in the 22 Rehabilitation Plan. 23 Refer to Section 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

24 2.10.6.3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLANS 25 The Design-Builder shall submit 60% and Preliminary Design Plans on City of Tacoma 26 standard sheets for all Work constructed under this Project, including the Port 27 Approach, City Approach, Center Truss Spans and all accessories. All preliminary design 28 documents shall include the stamp of the Lead Structural Engineer, licensed in the State 29 of Washington. 30 The Preliminary Design Plans shall be submitted in conjunction with the shop drawing 31 submittals specified in Section 2.10.6.8 for steel structural reinforcing members, 32 prefabricated elements and connection hardware, and shall include, but not be limited 33 to, the following: 34 • General descriptions of work on a structural element that will be rehabilitated, 35 repaired and/or replaced; 36 • Design criteria, including, but not limited to, design loads and deflection 37 tolerances; 38 • Design assumptions; 39 • Description of gravity and lateral load resisting systems for each major structure;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-33 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Description of seismic analysis and seismic design approach for each structure, if 2 applicable; 3 • Key dimensions and elevations; and 4 • Supplemental design codes and references not part of the Mandatory Standards.

5 See Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

6 2.10.6.4 FINAL DESIGN PLANS 7 The Design-Builder shall submit Final Design Plans on City of Tacoma standard sheets 8 for all structures rehabilitated and constructed under this Project, including the Port 9 Approach, City Approach, Center Truss Spans and all accessories. All final design 10 documents shall include the stamp of the Lead Structural Engineer, licensed in the State 11 of Washington. 12 The Final Design Plans shall be complete prior to the start of construction, and shall 13 include the following: 14 • All information provided in the Preliminary Design Plans and all necessary 15 additional details to rehabilitate and/or construct the elements of the Project. 16 • Demolition and construction sequences for the major elements within the Port 17 Approach and City Truss Spans, including verification of global structural 18 stability of the all structures while local structural rehabilitations and/or 19 replacements are occurring. 20 • Additional reinforcement installation sequences for hole drilling, bolt installation 21 and bolt tensioning for bolted connections. 22 • Additional reinforcement installation sequences for surface preparation and 23 welding for welded connections. 24 • Blockouts required by the minimum technical requirements, formwork system, 25 temporary drainage for storm and cleaning water, and temporary construction 26 access. 27 • Inserts for formwork system, and those specified in the minimum technical 28 requirements. 29 • All construction joints required by the construction sequence with specified 30 treatment. 31 • Embedded items such as assembly bars, anchor bolts, jigs, and plates.

32 See Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

33 2.10.6.5 RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION (RFC) DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL 34 The Design-Builder shall submit RFC documents to the City of Tacoma for all structural 35 work related to bridge construction and rehabilitation, including plans, specifications, 36 design calculations and supporting reports. All RFC documents shall include the stamp 37 of the Lead Structural Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-34 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 All details and processes successfully completing the painting test section requirements 2 of Section 2.10.4.3 shall be fully incorporated into the RFC documents prior to their 3 release. 4 The plans of the RFC documents shall be complete integrated bridge rehabilitation 5 drawings developed from the steel and concrete reinforcement or replacement 6 fabrication plans, and all associated shop drawings for all structural components 7 incorporated into the bridge rehabilitation. The integrated bridge rehabilitation 8 drawings of the RFC documents shall be reproduced on sheets conforming to standard 9 City of Tacoma format for title block template. The integrated bridge rehabilitation 10 drawings of the RFC documents shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 11 • Steel reinforcement 12 • Rivets to be replaced 13 • Bolt hole drilling locations 14 • Mild reinforcement 15 • Embedments 16 • Inserts 17 • Anchor bolts 18 • Blockouts 19 • Construction joints 20 • Construction aids 21 • Temporary drainage 22 • Temporary access 23 • Expansion joints 24 • Bearings 25 • Repairs

26 See Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

27 2.10.6.6 DESIGN, LOAD RATING AND SUFFICIENCY RATING CALCULATIONS 28 The Design-Builder shall provide complete sets of calculations support all structural 29 designs described in this Section. Complete sets of calculations shall be included with 30 each design review submittal (including temporary structures, falsework and other 31 temporary works). 32 All final design calculations shall include the stamp of a Structural Engineer licensed in 33 the State of Washington under Title 18 RCW. 34 The sets of calculations shall include the following: 35 • Index Sheets – These shall include numbered calculation sheets and an index by 36 subject with the corresponding sheet numbers. The name of the Project, 37 Structure Identification, date (month, day and year) when calculations are 38 printed, designer, checker, lead engineer and project engineer name’s, title’s, 39 initial’s and signature’s shall be listed. 40 • Design Calculations – These shall include design criteria; loadings; structural 41 analysis; one set of moment and shear diagrams; and pertinent computer input 42 and output data (reduced to a 8.5-inch by 11-inch sheet size). Each sheet or 43 logical group of sheets shall be initialed and dated by the designer and checker.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-35 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Design Completed Checklist.

2 Refer to Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

3 2.10.6.7 DESIGN AND LOAD RATING SOFTWARE 4 The Design-Builder shall use the following software for the bridge rehabilitation analysis 5 and design: 6 • SAP2000 (by CSI) for structural analysis - The same version the City of Tacoma 7 is using at Notice to Proceed. 8 • PGSUPER (by WSDOT) for prestressed concrete girder analysis design - The 9 same version the City of Tacoma is using at Notice to Proceed. 10 • AutoCAD (by Autodesk) for all bridge and structure rehabilitation design 11 drawings - The same version the City of Tacoma is using at Notice to Proceed. 12 Other software may be used on the project after approval from the City of Tacoma.

13 2.10.6.8 SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL 14 The Design-Builder shall submit shop drawings for all bridge elements requiring 15 fabrication or construction according to Section 2.9, to the City of Tacoma for Review 16 and Comment but not approval. Review and Comment by the City does not release the 17 Design-Builder from any or in any way of the full responsibility for the structural and 18 constructability adequacy of the items being reviewed, nor does Review and Comment by 19 the City serve to place any responsibility of the structural and constructability adequacy 20 of the item under review. The following minimum information shall be included in the 21 shop drawings: 22 • Size of member and fasteners; 23 • Length dimensions; 24 • Finish such as painting, anodizing, and galvanizing; 25 • Weld size and type and welding procedures; 26 • Fabrication-reaming, drilling, and assembly procedures; 27 • Penetrations in walls; and 28 • Erection procedures.

29 2.10.6.9 WORKING DRAWINGS FOR FALSEWORK, FORMS, TEMPORARY 30 STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS 31 The Design-Builder shall prepare working drawings with supporting design calculations 32 for all falsework, forms, temporary structures, and construction process. 33 Construction process working drawing submittals shall include, but not be limited to, the 34 following: 35 • Bridge deck replacement geometry control plan, including description of the 36 personnel, equipment and process responsible for monitoring the removal and 37 replacement of the deck geometry throughout the replacement process, 38 particularly adherence to the deck tolerance requirements. 39 • Individual member replacement geometry control plan, including description of 40 the personnel, equipment and process responsible for monitoring the load

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-36 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 transfer off the existing deficient members, monitoring of the temporary support 2 elements while the existing deficient members are removed and replaced, and 3 monitoring of the load transfer to the new replacement members. 4 • Construction joint locations for all cast-in-place construction. 5 • Concrete pumping procedure, including proposed equipment, stand-by 6 equipment, pumping line supports, remixing facilities, methods of preventing 7 segregation and plugging, and slump control. 8 • Sequence and scheduling of concrete placement. 9 • Products used to perform crack repair, including manufacturer's recommended 10 procedures for product use.

11 The City of Tacoma will review and comment on the working drawing submittals.

12 2.10.6.10 WARRANTIES 13 Warranties provided by manufacturers for all equipment and components shall be 14 transferred from the Design-Builder to the City of Tacoma and the warranty 15 documentation shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma. 16 See Section 2.24 for additional requirements.

17 2.10.6.11 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 18 The Design-Builder shall include the following information in the comprehensive 19 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) manual for the Murray Morgan Bridge required by 20 Section 2.9: 21 City Approach: 22 • Structural design criteria, including loading diagrams for the primary members; 23 and 24 • Operating and maintenance plan to minimize corrosion and maintain the bridge 25 bearings and expansion joints.

26 Center Truss Spans: 27 • Structural design criteria, including loading diagrams for the primary members; 28 and 29 • Operating and maintenance plan to minimize corrosion, minimize the 30 accumulation of debris and maintain the bridge bearings and expansion joints. 31 Port Approach: 32 • Structural design criteria, including loading diagrams for the primary members; 33 and 34 • Operating and maintenance plan to minimize corrosion and maintain the bridge 35 bearings and expansion joints. 36 37 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.10-37 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.11 BRIDGE ELECTRICAL POWER AND CONTROL

2 2.11.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to complete the Base Program Project 4 Scope. Elements of Work shall include, but are not be limited to the design of rehabilitation, 5 removal, furnish and install the following: 6 • Power rail system. 7 • Grounding and bonding associated with the bridge and bridge approaches. 8 • Vehicular and pedestrian traffic control system associated with both bridge approaches. 9 • Bridge marine traffic navigation system. 10 • Bridge area lighting including operator’s house, machinery spaces, stairways, ladders 11 and catwalks. 12 • Bridge roadway lighting. 13 • Survey, document and relocate all electric utility and fiber optic lines located under the 14 bridge approach sidewalks (outboard of the girders) that impact the work of the 15 rehabilitation of the bridge to locations inboard of the girders. This work shall be 16 coordinated with Tacoma Public Utilities (TPU) and other third parties involved in utility 17 relocation work at the bridge. See Section 2.8. 18 • Operate and maintain the bridge during construction. 19 • Training including that affected by the changes in the operation of the bridge and the 20 installation of the new traffic control system. 21 In addition to the Base Program Project Scope, the following optional supplementary work may 22 also be required as part of this Contract. This work will be awarded at the discretion of the City 23 of Tacoma and may or may not be performed simultaneously with the Base Project Program 24 work; it may be awarded in total, multiple options or on a piecemeal basis. These optional items 25 will be defined as Supplemental Program Project Scope. Elements of the Supplemental Program 26 shall include, but not be limited to the design for rehabilitation, removal, furnish and install the 27 following optional items: 28 • Option E1 - Design, furnish and install a new bridge electrical drive, power and control 29 system. 30 • Option E2 - Design, furnish and install a new bridge electrically operated emergency 31 drive system. 32 • Option E3 - Design, furnish and install electrical power and control system for an 33 electrically operated span lock system.

34 The Design-Builder shall develop their proposal for both the Base Program Project Scope and 35 Supplemental Program Project Scope. The City of Tacoma may at their discretion include, 36 delete or delay the award and implementation of some or all of the defined Supplemental 37 Program options. 38 All references to the Supplemental Program Project Scope refer to Work that is additional to or 39 increases the scope of the Base Program Project Scope if included in the final contract by the 40 City of Tacoma.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Plans and shop drawings showing the existing structures are located in Appendix 19. The plans 2 are not guaranteed to be dimensionally accurate or complete. The Design-Builder shall field 3 measure and field verify all existing elements, wiring and cabling, geometry and dimensions as 4 necessary. The bridge inspection and study reports are located in Appendix 14. The inspection 5 and study reports are not guaranteed to be complete or fully accurate. The Design-Builder shall 6 verify the information in the inspection and study reports as necessary.

7 2.11.2 SCOPE OF WORK 8 The Design-Builder shall at a minimum replace and upgrade the bridge vertical power rail 9 system, bridge grounding and bonding, bridge and bridge approach vehicular and pedestrian 10 traffic controls, marine traffic navigation lighting, bridge roadway and area lighting and operate 11 and maintain the bridge for the total duration of construction as well as training City staff in the 12 operation and maintenance of the rehabilitated bridge, all as described below and defined as the 13 Base Program. 14 In addition to the Base Program and at the discretion of the City of Tacoma, the Design-Builder 15 may be contracted to implement supplemental options consisting of new bridge electric drive, 16 power and control system, a bridge electrically operated emergency drive system and electrical 17 power and control for a new span lock installation.

18 2.11.3 PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

19 2.11.3.1 BASE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 20 The Design-Builder shall complete the following minimum required work items included in the 21 Base Program. 22 • Remove and replace the existing power rail system. 23 • Rehabilitate, replace and upgrade all electrical grounding and bonding associated with 24 the bridge and bridge approaches. 25 • Replace and upgrade the vehicular traffic control system. 26 • Replace and upgrade the bridge general lighting installation. 27 • Replace roadway and pedestrian sidewalk lighting. 28 • Relocation of existing utilities running under the City approach sidewalk (outboard of 29 the girders).

30 2.11.3.2 OPTION E1 (NEW BRIDGE ELECTRIC DRIVE, POWER AND CONTROL 31 SYSTEM) 32 The Design-Builder shall complete the following minimum required work items included in the 33 Supplemental Program Option E1 including, but are not limited to, the following items: 34 • Survey of the existing bridge electric drive, power and control system. 35 • Perform all engineering calculations to verify the sizes and ratings of defined motors and 36 controllers, brakes and all electrical service, distribution, motor control, feeder cables 37 and all necessary protective devices. 38 • Design proposed new bridge electric drive, power and control system installation.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Furnish, install and test the proposed new bridge electric drive, power and control 2 system installation. 3 • Remove and replace the existing bridge motor brakes. 4 • Remove and replace the existing bridge machinery brake. 5 • Remove existing drive motor cam drum type controllers and associated rotor resistors 6 and replace with variable frequency drives. 7 • Remove existing bridge power and control switchgear and replace with new Motor 8 Control Center (MCC). 9 • Furnish and install a new bridge PLC based control system and operator’s control desk. 10 • Furnish all power and control conduit, wireways and cabling required for the installation 11 of the Supplemental Program Option E1.

12 2.11.3.2.1 Option E2 (Bridge Electrically Operated Emergency Drive System) 13 The Design-Builder shall complete the following minimum required work items included in the 14 Supplemental Program Option E2 including, but are not limited to, the following items: 15 • Furnish and install an emergency dive motor. 16 • Furnish and install electrically operated clutch. 17 • Furnish all power and control conduit, wireways and cabling required for the installation 18 of the Supplemental Program Option E2.

19 2.11.3.2.2 Option E3 (Electrical Power and Controls New Span Locks) 20 The Design-Builder shall complete the following minimum required work items included in the 21 Supplemental Program Option E3 including, but are not limited to, the following items: 22 • Furnish and install feeder cables and disconnect switches for new span locks. 23 • Furnish and install span lock limit switches. 24 • Furnish all power and control conduit, wireways and cabling required for the installation 25 of the Supplemental Program Option E3.

26 2.11.4 MANDATORY STANDARDS 27 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. They are 28 listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the list. This is not a 29 comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to complete the design and 30 construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any ambiguities or conflicts relating in any 31 way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma 32 immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may resolve them. 33 • City Amendments to WSDOT Standard Specifications (Appendix03). 34 • Amendments to WSDOT Standard Specifications. 35 • WSDOT Standard Specifications (M 41-10).WSDOT Design Manual (M 22-01) (DM) 36 • WSDOT Bridge Design Manual LRFD (M 23-50) (BDM). 37 • AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, 1st Edition – 2009.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Customary U.S. Units, 4th Edition - 2007, 2 including interims through 2009. 3 • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 4 Standard Specifications for Movable Highway Bridges. 5 • National Electrical Code (NEC) 6 • American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 7 • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 8 • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 9 • Insulated Power Cable Engineers Association (IPCEA). 10 • National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). 11 • National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 12 • Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL). 13 • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 14 • AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design Specifications, Customary U.S. Units, 15 2nd Edition - 2007, including interims through 2008. 16 • WSDOT Plans Preparation Manual (M 22-31). 17 • WSDOT Construction Manual (M 41-01). 18 • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications, 2nd Edition - 2004, including 19 interims through 2008. 20 • WSDOT Materials Manual (M 46-01). 21 • WSDOT Standard Plans (M 21-01). 22 • WSDOT Qualified Products List (M 46-02) (QPL). 23 • AASHTO LRFD Manual for Bridge Evaluation, Customary U.S. Units, 1st Edition - 2008, 24 including interims through 2010. 25 • AASHTO Movable Bridge Inspection, Evaluation and Maintenance Manual, 1st Edition - 26 1998. 27 • Structural Welding Code: AASHTO/AWS D1.1M/D1.1: 2008, An American National 28 Standard 21st Edition, with interims through 2009 29 • Bridge Welding Code: AASHTO/AWS D1.5M/D1.5: 2008, An American National 30 Standard, 5th Edition, with interims through 2009. 31 • AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition, 2002. 32 • FHWA Publication No. FHWA-HRT-06-032; Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway 33 Structures: Part 1-Bridges, January 2006. 34 • WISHA Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, WAC 296. 35 • ADA Americans with Disabilities Act. 36

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.11.4.1 TACOMA POWER REFERENCED REQUIREMENTS 2 The following information and project directives have been provided by Tacoma Power. These 3 are provided for Design-Builder information and use and shall be used as the basis for project 4 coordination with Tacoma Power: 5 • Tacoma Power currently has 4 x 6in-conduits and 2 x 4in-conduits attached to the south 6 side of the Murray Morgan Bridge. The power service in these conduits is currently 7 deengergized. The conduits begin at the west end bridge approach, extending from Cliff 8 Ave. across SR 705, the Railroad Tracks, and Dock Street to the east bridge approach 9 approximately 400ft from the east shore of the Thea Foss Waterway. These conduits 10 routes must be maintained. Close coordination with Tacoma Power is required if 11 relocation or temporary removal is needed to accommodate bridge repair. Allow 60 days 12 lead time to accommodate temporary removal. 13 • If replacement conduits for the utility power system are agreed to by Tacoma Power, the 14 system must be built to Tacoma Power standards and the individual duct runs are 15 limited to 270-degrees of bends between connection boxes. There are several existing 16 points that the conduits terminate into vaults or a connection boxes. These termination 17 points must remain the same if any rebuild or route modification occurs. Tacoma 18 Power’s engineers must pre-approve the conduit attachments, hangers, configuration, 19 expansion joints etc. Tacoma Power’s engineers will provide feedback and related 20 technical information on your designs. The existing connection boxes for the power 21 cables at the ends of the conduit must be accessible from the deck of the bridge. Any 22 construction of new conduits will be done by journeyman electricians and inspected by 23 Tacoma Power. Tacoma Power will need to have 24/7 access to all its equipment. 24 • The new Murray Morgan Bridge power service will need to be constructed to Tacoma 25 Power standards when applicable and be inspected by Tacoma Power Electrical 26 Inspections Dept. Tacoma Power will require the contractor to submit any plans for 27 changes or alternations for review and approval by Tacoma Power engineers. Tacoma 28 Power will provide construction inspection of the installation of Tacoma Power owned 29 service equipment. 30 • The contractor must have a licensed structural, electrical etc. engineers design and 31 stamp all drawings that pertain to Tacoma Power owned and operated systems.

32 2.11.4.2 ADDITIONAL REFERENCES 33 • Tacoma Central Business District to Port Connection Study, (2003) published by 34 Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., as shown in Appendix 07. 35 • WSDOT Bridge Inspection Reports, (2007) published by WSDOT as shown in Appendix 36 08.

37 2.11.5 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

38 2.11.5.1 GENERAL 39 Upon completion of the Base Program and the contracted Supplemental Program Options of 40 work, the Design-Builder shall demonstrate using calculations, testing and operation of each 41 replaced sub-system and bridge integrated operating system, that the Electrical Power and 42 Control work defined herein for the Bridge and Bridge approaches achieves the specified

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 requirements for the electrical work in accordance with the scope of the RFP and all referenced 2 and prevailing codes, standards and specifications. 3 Upon completion of the Base Program and/the contracted Supplemental Program Options, the 4 physical appearance of the structure shall not be significantly altered, except as noted below. 5 • Addition of new traffic gates. 6 • Addition of new traffic barriers. 7 • Replacement of bridge lighting. 8 • Replacement of the bridge approach roadway, sidewalk, and stair lighting. 9 • Replacement of marine traffic navigation lighting.

10 2.11.6 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA

11 2.11.6.1 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS 12 The Design-Builder shall provide an Electrical Lead Engineer with a minimum of 15 years of 13 experience as a Bridge Electrical Engineer, over which time the Electrical Lead Engineer shall 14 have performed as a Design Engineer and Project Engineer for the design of new bridges and the 15 design related to the rehabilitation, retrofit and repair of existing bridges. The Electrical Lead 16 Engineer shall be a Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, and shall be in 17 responsible charge of the Electrical Power and Control Design elements throughout the life of 18 the Project.

19 2.11.6.2 DESIGN CRITERIA 20 All new permanent bridge electrical power and control elements, and all existing electrical 21 elements to remain shall be designed and installed in accordance with the above mandatory 22 standards and the following criteria. The criteria has been arranged to represent all items of 23 work as defined in Section 2.11.3.

24 2.11.6.2.1 Base Project Program Criteria

25 2.11.6.2.1.1 Remove and Replace Existing Power Rails 26 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 27 • Survey of the bridge in sufficient detail to define and design the supporting system for 28 the removal of the existing and installation of the new power rails. 29 • Perform engineering calculations to electrically size and provide supporting structure for 30 the required power rails. The power rails shall be sized for the maximum calculated 31 electrical loading and be in accordance with the requirements of the latest edition of the 32 NEC and AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications. 33 • Furnish a design for the proposed new power rail installation. The design documentation 34 shall include but not be limited to structural supporting calculations for the power rails, 35 details and specification of proposed power rail system, drawings describing the removal 36 of the existing system, form of installation, both electrical and physical of the new 37 system. In addition, the design of the new power rail system shall be such that it can be 38 integrated into the existing bridge power system but shall also be compatible with the 39 proposed bridge electrical drive, power and control system defined in Supplemental 40 Program Option E1.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • The Design-Builder shall determine the means and method of removal and disposal of 2 the existing power rail system. The Design-Builder shall submit its proposed means and 3 method for the removals and installation of the new power rails to the City of Tacoma for 4 approval and obtain approval prior to beginning the work. 5 • Furnish, install, test and commission the new power rail system. This work shall be 6 staged to minimize downtime for bridge operations and be performed to assure safety of 7 the general public, City of Tacoma personnel and the Design-Builder’s staff. The Design- 8 Builder shall submit his staging plan for the work to the City of Tacoma for approval and 9 receive approval prior to beginning the work.

10 2.11.6.2.1.2 Rehabilitate, Replace and Upgrade Electrical Grounding and Bonding 11 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 12 • The Design-Builder shall survey the bridge and bridge approaches and document all 13 metallic structures and component parts. Assess through visual inspection and testing 14 ground integrity and continuity of the steel structures, steel reinforcement and all 15 permanent metallic infrastructure and enclosures associated with bridge and bridge 16 approaches. This survey shall determine the extent of the work to assure the future 17 integrity of the bridge grounding and bonding installation in accordance with the NEC, 18 AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications and IEEE Standards 142 and 19 1100. The Design-Builder shall prepare and submit a grounding and bonding survey and 20 assessment report to include details of the status of the existing grounding and bonding 21 associated with the bridge, bridge equipment and bridge approaches to the City of 22 Tacoma for review prior to proceeding with its design work for the grounding and 23 bonding. 24 • The Design-Builder shall develop design drawings and specifications for the 25 rehabilitation, replacement and upgrade of the grounding and bonding system in 26 accordance with the requirements of the latest editions of the NEC, AASHTO LRFD 27 Movable Highway Design Specifications and IEEE Standards 142 and 1100. This design 28 shall also incorporate all additional grounding and bonding that shall be required in the 29 future to implement Supplemental Program Options E2 and E3. The Design-Builder 30 shall submit its proposed design for the work to the City of Tacoma for review. Furnish, 31 install and test the new grounding and bonding system. This work shall be staged to 32 eliminate downtime for bridge operations and performed to assure safety of the general 33 public, City of Tacoma personnel and the Design-Builder’s staff. The Design-Builder 34 shall submit his installation plan for the work to the City for review prior to beginning 35 the work. 36 • The Design-Builder shall submit his final “As-Built” plans of his grounding and bonding 37 together with a comprehensive test report describing the tests performed, the test 38 equipment and procedures used and in tabular form with references to the “As-Built” 39 plans the results of all tests of grounds and bonded items.

40 2.11.6.2.1.3 Replace and Upgrade Vehicular Traffic Control 41 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 42 • The Design-Builder shall survey the existing bridge approaches and the existing traffic 43 control system to verify the quantities and locations of the existing gates, traffic lights 44 and signage and determine their conformance with AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway 45 Design Specifications, MUTCD and WSDOT and City of Tacoma regulations.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • The Design-Builder shall develop design drawings and specifications for the replacement 2 and upgrade of the entire traffic control system in accordance with the requirements of 3 MUTCD and WSDOT and the City of Tacoma regulations. 4 • The Design-Builder shall submit his proposed design for the work to the City of Tacoma 5 for review. This new system shall consist of but not be limited to: 6 o Traffic lights mounted at each bridge approach with quantity, functionality and 7 configuration in conformance with the requirements of MUTCD and WSDOT and 8 City of Tacoma regulations. The traffic light control system shall be designed as an 9 integral part of the bridge control system. The Design-Builder shall also verify if the 10 bridge traffic control system is integrated with the City of Tacoma system and if so, 11 develop the necessary control interfaces between the two systems. 12 o (4) Traffic gates, two at each approach and each straddling half the width of the 13 roadway and as required straddling the pedestrian sidewalk. The gates shall meet the 14 requirements of AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications and 15 MUTCD and be designed for operation as part of the bridge control system. 16 o (4) Traffic resistance barriers, two at each approach and each straddling half the 17 width of the roadway and be locked at the middle of the roadway to afford the 18 specified vehicular collision resistance. The resistance barriers shall meet the 19 requirements of AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications and 20 MUTCD and be designed for operation as part of the bridge control system. 21 o All existing warning signs identified by the Design-Builder during the survey of the 22 bridge approach traffic control system will be replaced and upgraded as part of this 23 work. The upgrades based on the results of the survey and in accordance with City of 24 Tacoma regulations. 25 o New traffic control panel mounted in the operator’s house. This panel shall contain 26 and control indication devices to enable a single operator to safely control traffic for 27 the operation of the bridge. The traffic control panel shall also be arranged to provide 28 safety interlocks with the existing bridge control system as defined in AASHTO LRFD 29 Movable Highway Design Specifications. These interlocks will be developed such that 30 they are capable of being integrated into the replacement bridge electric drive, power 31 and control system defined in Supplemental Program Option E1. 32 o New traffic control Motor Control Center (MCC) mounted on the bridge to power and 33 control the traffic gate and resistance barrier motors. This shall be designed and 34 specified to be compatible with and capable of being extended to serve the MCC 35 defined in Supplemental Program Option E1. 36 • Furnish, install and test the new traffic control system. This work shall be staged to 37 minimize downtime for bridge operations and performed to assure safety of the general 38 public, vehicular traffic, City of Tacoma personnel and Design-Builder’s staff and 39 involved third parties. The Design-Builder shall submit installation plans for the work to 40 the City for review prior to beginning the work. 41 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of the installed traffic control 42 system together with a comprehensive test report describing the tests performed, the test 43 equipment and procedures and results obtained. Note the tests performed must be in 44 sufficient detail to satisfy the City of Tacoma that the traffic control system meets the 45 requirements of AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications, MUTCD and 46 WSDOT and City of Tacoma regulations with respect to system safety, reliability, 47 functionality and its capability of being operated by a single bridge operator.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.11.6.2.1.4 Replace and Upgrade Bridge General Lighting 2 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 3 • The Design-Builder shall survey the general areas of the bridge where equipment, 4 machinery and occupancy is located to verify and determine the extent of the existing 5 lighting installation and verify the dimensions of the surveyed areas. 6 • The Design-Builder as a basis for general lighting design shall develop a matrix 7 describing each area of the bridge, its dimensions, AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway 8 Design Specifications required illumination levels and uniformity ratio. This matrix 9 together with Design-Builders proposed form of lighting and illumination calculations 10 shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma for review. 11 • The Design-Builder shall develop design drawings and specifications for the replacement 12 and upgrade of the bridge general lighting system in accordance with the requirements 13 of the latest editions of the NEC and AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design 14 Specifications. The design drawings shall be in sufficient detail to identify all proposed 15 lighting fixtures, switched circuits, new lighting panelbords and emergency lighting 16 fixtures. The Design-Builder shall submit its proposed design for the work to the City of 17 Tacoma for review prior to beginning the work. 18 • Furnish, install and test the installed bridge general lighting installation. This work shall 19 be staged to minimize downtime for bridge operations and performed to assure safety of 20 the general public, vehicular traffic, City of Tacoma personnel and Design-Builder’s staff 21 and involved third parties. The Design-Builder shall submit his installation plan for the 22 work to the City of Tacoma for review prior to beginning the work. 23 • The Design-Builder shall submit his final “As-Built” plans of his installed general bridge 24 lighting installation together with a test report describing the tests performed, the test 25 equipment and procedures and results obtained. Note the testing shall include all 26 electrical inspection and testing of the electrical installation plus photometric 27 measurements of the illumination levels in all areas of the bridge for City of Tacoma for 28 review.

29 2.11.6.2.1.5 Replace Roadway and Pedestrian Lighting 30 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 31 • The Design-Builder shall survey the bridge approach and bridge roadway and sidewalks 32 to verify and determine the extent of the existing roadway lighting installation and the 33 locations of all lighting poles and widths of roadway and sidewalk. The survey shall also 34 determine feeding conduits, manholes, pullboxes and handholes used for the existing 35 roadway lighting. 36 • In order to comparatively evaluate all proposals, the City of Tacoma has provided 37 Proposers with specified roadway and pedestrian lighting fixtures and materials in 38 Appendix 31, RFP Questions and City Responses. The Proposers are directed to use the 39 specified fixtures and materials, referenced in Appendix 31, in preparing their proposals. 40 • The Design-Builder shall work with the City of Tacoma to verify and/or select alternative 41 bridge lighting fixtures and materials that will be used on the bridge. If the lighting 42 fixtures and/or materials differ from those specified by the City of Tacoma, the bid costs 43 will be adjusted accordingly.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-9 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • The Design-Builder, as a basis for the roadway and pedestrian lighting for bridge 2 roadways, sidewalks and stairs (see next bullet), shall develop a criteria for the required 3 illumination levels and uniformity ratio. These criteria will be based on the roadway 4 lighting guidelines set forth by AASHTO and the specific requirements of the City of 5 Tacoma. The Design-Builder shall prepare illumination calculations to achieve the 6 defined illumination criteria utilizing as many of the existing lighting pole locations as 7 possible but in coordination with and as recommended by the City of Tacoma. The 8 Design-Builder shall submit his proposed form of lighting and illumination calculations 9 to the City of Tacoma for review. 10 • The stair lighting to be designed and installed by the Design-Builder shall include the 11 lighting for both stairs from the 11th Street bridge deck to Dock Street. 12 • The Design-Builder shall develop design drawings and specifications for the replacement 13 and upgrade of the bridge approach and bridge roadway and sidewalk lighting system in 14 accordance with the requirements of the latest editions of the NEC and AASHTO GL-6 15 Roadway Lighting Design Guide. The design drawings shall be in sufficient detail to 16 identify all proposed lighting poles, existing and new conduits and ductbanks being used 17 and new lighting panelboards if required for the roadway lighting. The Design-Builder 18 shall submit his proposed design for the work to the City of Tacoma for review prior to 19 beginning the work. 20 • Furnish, install and test the installed bridge approach, bridge and sidewalk lighting 21 installation. This work shall be staged to minimize downtime for bridge operations and 22 performed to assure safety of the general public, vehicular traffic, City of Tacoma 23 personnel and Design-Builder’s staff and involved third parties. The Design-Builder shall 24 submit his installation plan for the work to the City of Tacoma for review prior to 25 beginning the work. 26 • The Design-Builder shall submit his final “As-Built” plans of his installed general bridge 27 lighting installation together with a test report describing the tests performed, the test 28 equipment and procedures and results obtained. Note the testing shall include all 29 electrical inspection and testing of the electrical installation plus photometric 30 measurements of the representative illumination levels of the bridge approach and 31 bridge roadway and sidewalks for City of Tacoma for review.

32 2.11.6.2.1.6 Relocation of Existing Utilities Running Under the City Approach Sidewalk 33 (Outboard of the Girders) 34 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 35 • The Design-Builder shall survey the bridge approach and bridge roadway and sidewalks 36 to verify and determine the extent of existing utilities in the bridge approaches and 37 sidewalks. The survey shall also determine the number and locations of utility manholes, 38 pullboxes and handholes used to traverse the bridge with utilities. This survey work and 39 the development of the utility relocations shall be coordinated by the Design-Builder 40 with Tacoma Public Utilities (TPU) and other affected utilities, and confirm to the City of 41 Tacoma that this coordination has been satisfactorily concluded and their requirements 42 included in the existing utilities relocation scope. 43 • The Design-Builder shall coordinate with all local utilities to verify and expand its data 44 and develop up to date plans of all utilities crossing the bridge or impacting the 45 rehabilitation and upgrade work at the bridge. The updated utility plans produced by the

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-10 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Design-Builder shall be submitted to all affected local utilities and City of Tacoma for 2 review prior to the Design-Builder advancing its utility relocation plans. 3 • As part of the development and requirements of the bridge utility relocations the Design- 4 Builder in conjunction with the City of Tacoma coordinate with all affected utilities to 5 determine the costs and cost sharing with the City of Tacoma for the relocations. 6 • Following all approvals and inputs, the Design-Builder shall develop design plans and 7 specifications for the relocation of utilities crossing the bridge that will impact the 8 rehabilitation work. The Design-Builder shall submit his proposed design for the work to 9 the City of Tacoma and all affected utilities for review prior to beginning the work. 10 • Furnish, install and testing of relocated utilities crossing the bridge will be performed in 11 coordination with the local utilities and/or their third party contractors. This work shall 12 be staged in accordance with the utility requirements and to minimize downtime for 13 bridge operations and performed to assure safety of the general public, vehicular traffic, 14 City of Tacoma personnel and Contractors staff and involved third parties. The Design- 15 Builder shall submit its installation staging plans for the work to the City of Tacoma and 16 the affected utilities for review prior to beginning the work. 17 • The Design-Builder shall submit its final “As-Built” plans of the relocated utilities 18 together with documentation provided by the utility of satisfactory completion of the 19 utility work for the City of Tacoma records.

20 2.11.6.2.2 Supplemental Program Criteria

21 2.11.6.2.2.1 Option E1 (New Bridge Electric Drive, Power and Control System) 22 2.11.6.2.2.1.1 General Criteria and Requirements 23 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 24 • The Design-Builder shall provide the following general documentation and meet the 25 defined criteria as part of its work for Supplemental Program Option E1. These should 26 include but not be limited to: Survey of the existing bridge electric drive, power and 27 control system to define the space requirements, any and all drive shaft couplings and 28 mounting and supporting system requirements for the proposed replacement 29 equipment. Any issues found by the Design-Builder during this survey that relate to the 30 installation of the replacement bridge electric drive, power and control system as defined 31 herein shall be immediately brought to the attention of the City of Tacoma. 32 • Perform all engineering calculations to verify the sizes and ratings of defined motors and 33 controllers, brakes and all electrical service, distribution, motor control, feeder cables 34 and all necessary protective devices and environmental protection for the defined 35 equipment in accordance with the requirements of the NEC and AASHTO LRFD 36 Movable Highway Design Specifications. The Design-Builder shall submit all engineering 37 calculations to the City of Tacoma for review prior to proceeding with the design of the 38 bridge electric drive, power and control system installation. 39 • Furnish a design for the proposed new bridge electric drive, power and control system 40 installation. The design documentation shall include but not be limited to structural 41 supporting requirements for the defined equipment, details and specifications of 42 proposed equipment, drawings describing all removals of the existing equipment, form 43 of installation for the electrical and physical details of the replacement equipment. In 44 addition, the design of the new bridge electric drive, power and control system 45 installation shall be such that it provides a safe, reliable and fully integrated operating

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-11 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 system and developed to conform to the requirements of the NEC and AASHTO LRFD 2 Movable Highway Design Specifications. The Design-Builder shall submit installation 3 plans and specifications for the work to the City of Tacoma for review prior to beginning 4 the work. 5 • Furnish, install and test the proposed new bridge electric drive, power and control 6 system installation. This work shall be staged to minimize downtime for bridge 7 operations. The Design-Builder shall submit installation staging plans for the work to the 8 City of Tacoma for review prior to beginning the work. 9 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed new bridge electric 10 drive, power and control system installation together with a test report describing the 11 tests performed, the test equipment and procedures and results obtained. Note the 12 testing shall include all electrical inspection and testing of the electrical installation and 13 submitted to the City of Tacoma for review.

14 2.11.6.2.2.1.2 Remove and Replace Existing Bridge Drive Motors 15 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 16 • Survey of the existing drive motor system to define the space requirements, drive shaft 17 couplings and mounting and supporting system requirements for the proposed 18 replacement motors. Any issues found by the Design-Builder during this survey, that 19 relate to the installation of the replacement drive motors, shall be immediately brought 20 to the attention of the City of Tacoma. 21 • Perform engineering calculations to verify the size of the two (2) proposed drive motors 22 and electrically size the required drive controller, feeder cables and all necessary 23 protective devices and motor environmental protection in accordance with the 24 requirements of the NEC and AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications. 25 The motors shall be of the squirrel cage induction motor type designed for vector drive 26 duty rating. The base speed of the motor shall be the same as existing unless 27 Supplemental Program, Option M3 is completed. In that case, the base speed of the 28 motors shall be in accordance with AASHTO recommendations. The motor shall be 29 rated 75hp, measured on a 1.0 service factor. The service factor rating shall be 1.15 or 30 higher. The Design-Builder shall submit its engineering calculations for the drive motors 31 to the City for review. 32 • Furnish a design for the proposed new drive motor installation. The design 33 documentation shall include but not be limited to structural supporting calculations for 34 the motors, details and specification of proposed motors, drawings describing the 35 removals of the existing motors, form of installation for the electrical and physical details 36 of the replacement motors. In addition, the design of the new drive motor installation 37 shall be such that it is electrically matched to proposed drive motor controller and has 38 taken account of the physical needs of the replacement brakes and the installation of 39 proposed tachometers/over-speed switches, rotary cam limit switches and encoders all 40 as defined herein. The Design-Builder shall submit its installation plans and 41 specifications for the work to the City of Tacoma for review. 42 • Furnish, install and test the drive motor installation. The Design-Builder shall submit its 43 installation staging plans for the work to the City of Tacoma for review. 44 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed drive motor 45 installation together with a test report describing the tests performed, the test equipment 46 and procedures and results obtained

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-12 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.11.6.2.2.1.3 Remove and Replace Existing Bridge Motor Brakes 2 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 3 • Survey of the existing motor brake installation to define the space requirements, drive 4 shaft couplings and mounting and supporting system requirements for the proposed 5 replacement motor brakes. Any issues found by the Design-Builder during this survey 6 that relate to the installation of the replacement motor brakes shall be immediately 7 brought to the attention of the City of Tacoma. 8 • Perform engineering calculations to size the proposed two (2) motor brakes and 9 electrically size the required starter equipment for the brakes, feeder cables and all 10 necessary protective devices and brake environmental protection in accordance with the 11 requirements of the NEC and AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications. 12 The Design-Builder shall submit engineering calculations for the motor brakes to the 13 City of Tacoma for review. 14 • Furnish a design for the proposed new motor brake installation. The design 15 documentation shall include but not be limited to structural supporting calculations for 16 the motor brakes, details and specification of proposed motor brakes, drawings 17 describing the removals of the existing motor brakes, form of installation for the 18 electrical and physical details of the replacement motor brakes. In addition, the design of 19 the new motor brake installation shall be such that it has taken account of the physical 20 needs of the replacement drive motors, machinery brakes and the installation of 21 proposed tachometers/over-speed switches, rotary cam limit switches and encoders all 22 as defined herein. The Design-Builder shall submit installation plans and specifications 23 for the work to the City of Tacoma for review. 24 • Furnish, install and test the motor brake installation. The Design-Builder shall submit 25 installation staging plans for the work to the City of Tacoma for review. 26 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed motor brake 27 installation together with a test report describing the tests performed, the test equipment 28 and procedures and results obtained.

29 2.11.6.2.2.1.4 Remove and Replace Existing Bridge Machinery Brake 30 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 31 • Survey of the existing machinery brake installation to define the space requirements, 32 drive shaft couplings and mounting and supporting system requirements for the 33 proposed replacement machinery brake. Any issues found by the Design-Builder during 34 this survey that relate to the installation of the replacement machinery brake shall be 35 immediately brought to the attention of the City of Tacoma. 36 • Perform engineering calculations to size the proposed machinery brake and electrically 37 size the required starter equipment for the brake, feeder cables and all necessary 38 protective devices and brake environmental protection in accordance with the 39 requirements of the NEC and AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications. 40 The Design-Builder shall submit engineering calculations for the machinery brakes to 41 the City of Tacoma for review. 42 • Furnish a design for the proposed new machinery brake installation. The design 43 documentation shall include but not be limited to structural supporting calculations for 44 the machinery brake, details and specification of proposed machinery brake, drawings 45 describing the removals of the existing machinery brake, form of installation for the

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-13 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 electrical and physical details of the replacement machinery brake. In addition, the 2 design of the new machinery brake installation shall be such that it has taken account of 3 the physical needs of the replacement drive motors, motor brake and the installation of 4 proposed tachometers/over-speed switches, rotary cam limit switches and encoders all 5 as defined herein. The Design-Builder shall submit installation plans and specifications 6 for the work to the City of Tacoma for review. 7 • Furnish, install and test the machinery brake installation. The Design-Builder shall 8 submit installation staging plans for the work to the City of Tacoma for review. 9 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed machinery brake 10 installation together with a test report describing the tests performed, the test equipment 11 and procedures and results obtained.

12 2.11.6.2.2.1.5 Remove Existing Drive Motor Cam Drum Controllers and Replace with 13 Variable Frequency Drives 14 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 15 • Utilizing the engineering calculations to size the proposed bridge drive motors, the 16 Design-Builder shall analyze the drive motor operating requirements and bridge 17 operating criteria and in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design 18 Specifications and as herein defined, select and propose an appropriate drive motor 19 controller to satisfy these defined needs. The proposed drive motor controller shall be 20 provided with but not be limited to the following: 21 o The drive controllers shall be rated to satisfy all normal and contingency operating 22 conditions for the bridge as defined in AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design 23 Specifications. 24 o The drive controller shall be of the vector-control type, 4-quadrant, vector- 25 controlled, pulse width modulated, reversing. 26 o The Design-Builder shall confirm the capacity, short-circuit rating, voltage and 27 voltage fluctuation of the electric utility service to the bridge and base the design and 28 specification for the drive controllers on this data. 29 o The drive controller shall be provided with a form of dynamic braking. The dynamic 30 braking shall be rated at 100 percent of rated torque and be furnished complete with 31 dynamic braking resistors rated for the defined braking torque and braking duration 32 and necessary protective devices to prevent overhauling of the drive system in the 33 event of dynamic braking failure. 34 o The drives shall be provided with speed regulation to 0.01 percent of its speed setting 35 by the use of a furnished encoder feedback. Note an encoder-less or sensor-less 36 design will not be accepted. This speed regulation setting shall be adjustable and set 37 in the field to satisfy the requirements of the operating system. 38 o The drive controller shall be furnished with a means of programming its performance 39 parameters. These parameters shall include but not be limited to: 40 ƒ Speed of operation (minimum of at least two (2) pre-set speeds in each direction) 41 ƒ Rates of acceleration and deceleration 42 ƒ Adjustable speed control response time

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-14 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 ƒ Torque output settings to allow 150 percent rated torque for 1 minute, 180 2 percent upper limit and clamp at 20 percent (adjustable from 5 to 25 percent) 3 when span is seating 4 ƒ The bridge drive motors and drive controllers shall be configured as a pair with 5 both motors operating as duty motors but with the capability of being operated 6 from one (1) motor at reduced speed in the event of single motor failure. 7 ƒ The bridge drive motor and drive controller shall be so configured, under single 8 failure conditions, for manual switching of either motor to be driven from either 9 drive controller but not a single drive controller driving two (2) drive motors. 10 ƒ The drive controller shall include a means of dynamic braking with dynamic 11 braking resistors and be rated to provide 100% braking torque. 12 ƒ The drive shall be provided with digital output that indicates when the drive is 13 producing torque. This shall be capable of being set between 0 and 50 percent of 14 rated torque and be used to initiate release of the motor brakes. The Design- 15 Builder shall submit engineering calculations for the drive controller to the City 16 of Tacoma for review. 17 ƒ Drives shall be programmable to operate with an encoder feedback. Note only an 18 encoder drive controller will be accepted. 19 ƒ Drives shall be provided in separate enclosures specified for the prevailing 20 environmental conditions. 21 ƒ Each drive shall be provided complete with an input isolation transformer if 22 deemed necessary for the proposed system. If the Design-Builder does not 23 consider that an isolation transformer is necessary, he shall substantiate this 24 assertion with calculations to be submitted to the City of Tacoma for review. 25 ƒ Each drive controller shall be provided with a logic control system to interface 26 with the bridge control system and between drive controllers. 27 ƒ Furnish a design for the proposed new drive controller installation. The design 28 documentation shall include but not be limited to details and specification of 29 proposed drive controller, drawings describing the removals of the existing drive 30 motor cam drum controllers, form of installation for the electrical and physical 31 details of the new drive controllers. The Design-Builder shall submit installation 32 plans and specifications for the work to the City of Tacoma for review. 33 ƒ Furnish, install and test the drive controller installation together with the drive 34 motor as a matched pair for normal operation and alternative motor conditions. 35 The Design-Builder shall submit installation plan for the work to the City of 36 Tacoma for review. 37 ƒ The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed drive 38 controller and drive motor installation together with a test report describing the 39 tests performed, the test equipment and procedures and results obtained.

40 2.11.6.2.2.1.6 Remove Existing Power and control Switchgear and Replace with New 41 Motor Control Center (MCC) 42 The scope of this work shall include the following tasks: 43 • The new (MCC) shall be of the conventional modular constructed motor control center. 44 Note that the defined MCC described for traffic control equipment as part of the Base

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-15 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Program requirements shall be specified and furnished to allow extension as part of this 2 option to include all requirements. 3 • Utilizing all equipment engineering calculations, size the motor starters, feeder breakers 4 and main breaker for the proposed MCC. The MCC shall be designed and furnished in 5 accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications and as 6 herein defined. The proposed MCC shall be provided with but not be limited to the 7 following: 8 o The MCC shall be provided with tin plated copper horizontal and vertical bus 9 systems, bus braced based on the maximum symmetrical short circuit level as 10 provided by the local electric utility but at a minimum be 42,000 AIC. 11 o The MCC main breaker shall include all protection devices in accordance with the 12 requirements of AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications and 13 provided complete with three phase power, voltage and current metering. The main 14 breaker shall be sized based on the calculated rating of the MCC, connected load and 15 the short circuit level provided by the local electric utility. 16 o The MCC combination starters shall be across-the-line, non-reversing and reversing 17 for all motors, brakes and actuators defined in Supplemental Program Option E1, 18 Supplemental Program Option E2 and Supplemental Program OptionE3. The 19 combination starters shall at a minimum be equipped with: 20 ƒ Three (3) overload relays 21 ƒ Motor circuit protector (MCP) 22 ƒ Minimum of 4 N.O and 4 N.C contactor auxiliary contacts apart from contactor 23 hold-in contacts 24 o The MCC feeder breakers shall include all protection devices in accordance with the 25 requirements of AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications. The feeder 26 breakers shall be sized based on the calculated rating of the specific feeder connected 27 load and the short circuit level provided by the local electric utility. 28 • The Design-Builder shall submit engineering calculations for the MCC to the City of 29 Tacoma for review. 30 • Furnish a design for the proposed new MCC installation. The design documentation shall 31 include but not be limited to details and specification of proposed MCC, drawings 32 describing the removals of the existing power and control switchgear, form of 33 installation for the electrical and physical details of the MCC. The Design-Builder shall 34 submit installation plans and specifications for the work to the City of Tacoma for 35 review. 36 • Furnish, install and test the MCC installation together with all motors, brakes and 37 actuators powered by the MCC. The Design-Builder shall submit installation staging 38 plans for the work to the City of Tacoma for review. 39 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed MCC and with all 40 motors, brakes and actuators powered by the MCC installation together with a test report 41 describing the tests performed, the test equipment and procedures and results obtained.

42 2.11.6.2.2.1.7 New Bridge PLC Based Control System 43 The control system shall consist of a state-of-the-art control desk, distributed PLC control and 44 all limit switches, encoders and necessary analog and digital devices to operate and control the

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-16 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 bridge in a safe and reliable manner. The scope of this work shall include but not be limited to 2 the following: 3 • An operators control desk that shall be designed by the Design-Builder to provide a 4 state-of-the-art, ergonomically configured operators control desk and located to provide 5 the bridge operator with adequate vision of the highway and navigable channel for safe 6 and reliable operation of the bridge. 7 • A PLC based control system that shall be developed in accordance with the requirements 8 of ASSHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications. 9 • The PLC system shall be furnished as a fully redundant control system with dual 10 processors configured as duty and hot standby processors. 11 • The PLC system will be configured in a distributed manner with PLC and PLC I/O racks 12 located in the operators control desk, MCC and drive controllers and other locations as 13 considered appropriate by the Design-Builder for efficient and effective control, 14 communications transmission and distribution and for reliability enhancement and 15 submitted to the City of Tacoma for review. 16 • The PLC shall Allen-Bradley (AB) SLC5 Series or equal and be submitted to the City of 17 Tacoma for review. 18 • The Design-Builder shall specify the PLC and associated I/O racks, power supplies, UPS, 19 power conditioners and all ancillary equipment to protect the system from the adverse 20 affects of the prevailing environment and to be electro-magnetic compatible with all 21 other defined bridge operating systems. 22 • Furnish all limit switches including rotary cam limit switches as required for a fully 23 functional bridge integrated control system. All limit switches shall be specified and 24 installed to satisfy a design life of at least 40 years. 25 • All specified limit switches shall satisfy the requirements of ASSHTO LRFD Movable 26 Highway Design Specifications and be adequately protected from the prevailing 27 environment. 28 • Rotary cam limit switches shall be specified based on the bridge operating requirements, 29 the number of revolutions of the input shaft of the rotary cam limit switch over the span 30 full travel and in conjunction with the mechanical design, the required mechanical 31 coupling of the switch drive shaft. 32 • Furnish and install required encoders for span position and span drive speed feedback. 33 • Encoders for drive speed feedback shall be specified based on the drive controller 34 feedback and over-speed requirements. 35 • Furnish a design for the proposed new integrated bridge control system installation. The 36 design documentation shall include but not be limited to details, specification and 37 drawings describing the proposed operators control desk, PLC and PLC configuration, 38 limit switches and their installation, encoder and their installation and all other 39 proposed digital and analog control devices and the proposed functionality and 40 programming to satisfy the operation of the bridge under both normal and contingency 41 conditions. The Design-Builder shall submit installation plans and specifications for the 42 work to the City of Tacoma for review.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-17 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Furnish, install and test the integrated bridge control system installation. The Design- 2 Builder shall submit installation staging plans for the work to the City of Tacoma for 3 review. 4 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed integrated bridge 5 control system and final PLC logic program together with a test report describing the 6 tests performed, the test equipment and procedures and results obtained.

7 2.11.6.2.2.1.8 New Bridge Electrical Drive, Power and Control System Installation 8 Furnish all power and control conduit, wireways and cabling required for the installation of 9 Supplemental Program Option E1. The scope of this work shall include but not be limited to the 10 following: 11 • This installation shall be designed, furnished and installed by the Design-Builder in 12 accordance with of the latest editions of the NEC, AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway 13 Design Specifications and IEEE Standards 142 and 1100.

14 • Furnish a design for the proposed new drive, power and control installation. The design 15 documentation shall include but not be limited to details, specification and drawings 16 describing the proposed installation. The Design-Builder shall submit its installation 17 plans and specifications for the work to the City of Tacoma for review.

18 • Furnish, install and test designed electrical drive, power and control installation. The 19 Design-Builder shall submit installation staging plans for the work to the City of Tacoma 20 for review.

21 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed drive, power and 22 control installation together with a test report describing the tests performed, the test 23 equipment and procedures and results obtained.

24 2.11.6.2.2.2 Option E2 (Bridge Electrically Operated Emergency Drive System) 25 2.11.6.2.2.2.1 Furnish and Install Emergency Drive Motor 26 The scope of this work shall include but not be limited to the following: 27 • Based on the bridge drive requirements developed under Supplemental Program Option 28 E1, the Design-Builder shall develop an emergency drive motor capable of operating the 29 bridge at reduced speed and being powered by a mobile generator with a maximum 30 rating of 125 kW, 460 volt, three phases, 60 Hz. Any issues found by the Design-Builder 31 during its development of the emergency drive motor or related installation shall be 32 immediately brought to the attention of the City of Tacoma.

33 • Perform engineering calculations to size the proposed emergency drive motor and 34 electrically size the required drive controller, feeder cables and all necessary protective 35 devices and motor environmental protection in accordance with the requirements of the 36 NEC and AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications. The motor shall be of 37 the squirrel cage induction type designed for across-the-line starting. The motor shall be 38 rated based on the above calculations and limited in output torque and horsepower 39 based on the proposed mobile generator rating of 125 kW. The service factor rating shall 40 be 1.15 or higher. The Design-Builder shall submit engineering calculations for the 41 emergency drive motors to the City of Tacoma for review.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-18 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Furnish a design for the proposed emergency drive motor installation. The design 2 documentation shall include but not be limited to structural supporting calculations for 3 the motor, details and specification of proposed motor, drawings describing the form of 4 installation, both electrical and physical of the emergency drive motor. In addition, the 5 design of the emergency drive motor installation shall take account of the physical needs 6 of the replacement drive motor, brakes and the installation of proposed 7 tachometers/over-speed switches, rotary cam limit switches and encoders all as defined 8 herein. The Design-Builder shall submit installation plans and specifications for the 9 work to the City of Tacoma for review.

10 • Furnish, install and test the emergency drive motor installation. The Design-Builder 11 shall submit its installation staging plan for the work to the City of Tacoma for review.

12 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed emergency drive 13 motor installation together with a test report describing the tests performed, the test 14 equipment and procedures and results obtained.

15 2.11.6.2.2.2.2 Furnish and Install Emergency Drive Clutch 16 Electrically operated clutch installed to engage and disengage the emergency drive motor. The 17 scope of this work shall include but not be limited to the following: 18 • Based on the bridge drive requirements developed under Supplemental Program Option 19 E1 and the sizing of the emergency drive motor, the Design-Builder shall develop a 20 design for a clutch to engage and disengage the emergency drive motor. Any issues found 21 by the Design-Builder during its development of the emergency drive clutch or related 22 installation shall be immediately brought to the attention of the City of Tacoma.

23 • Perform engineering calculations to verify the size of the proposed emergency clutch and 24 electrically size the required clutch controller, feeder cables and all necessary protective 25 devices and specify clutch environmental protection in accordance with the 26 requirements of the NEC and AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications. 27 The Design-Builder shall submit engineering calculations for the emergency drive 28 motors to the City of Tacoma for review.

29 • Furnish a design for the proposed emergency drive clutch installation. The design 30 documentation shall include but not be limited to structural supporting calculations for 31 the clutch, details and specification of proposed clutch, drawings describing the form of 32 installation, both electrical and physical. The Design-Builder shall submit installation 33 plans and specifications for the work to the City of Tacoma review.

34 • Furnish, install and test the emergency drive clutch installation. The Design-Builder 35 shall submit installation plan for the work to the City of Tacoma for review.

36 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed emergency clutch 37 installation together with a test report describing the tests performed, the test equipment 38 and procedures and results obtained.

39 2.11.6.2.2.3 Option E3 (Span Locks) 40 2.11.6.2.2.3.1 Furnish and Install New Span Lock Electrical Power and Control System 41 Provide all necessary electrical power and control systems for the satisfactory operation of the 42 new span locks. The scope of this work shall include but not be limited to the following:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-19 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Based on the bridge drive requirements developed under Supplemental Program Option 2 E1 and the sizing of the span lock drive motor, the Design-Builder shall develop a design 3 for the power and control of the proposed span locks. Any issues found by the Design- 4 Builder during its development of the span locks or related installation shall be 5 immediately brought to the attention of the City of Tacoma.

6 • Perform engineering calculations to verify the size of the proposed span lock drive 7 controller, feeder cables and all necessary protective devices and specify the required 8 electrical installation environmental protection in accordance with the requirements of 9 the NEC and AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Design Specifications. The Design- 10 Builder shall submit engineering calculations for the span lock installation to the City of 11 Tacoma for review.

12 • Furnish a design for the proposed span lock installation. The design documentation shall 13 include but not be limited to any structural supporting calculations for the installation, 14 details and specification of proposed equipment, drawings describing the form of 15 installation, both electrical and physical. The Design-Builder shall submit installation 16 plans and specifications for the work to the City of Tacoma for review.

17 • Furnish, install and test the span lock installation. The Design-Builder shall submit 18 installation staging plans for the work to the City of Tacoma for review.

19 • The Design-Builder shall submit final “As-Built” plans of installed span lock installation 20 together with a test report describing the tests performed, the test equipment and 21 procedures and results obtained.

22 2.11.7 SALVAGE 23 The City of Tacoma may retain ownership of any electrical and/or control items that in its 24 opinion reflect the historic character of the bridge. It is the intent to salvage representative 25 items only, not all items. The Design-Builder shall obtain approval from the City of Tacoma 26 prior to disposal of electrical and/or control items. The City of Tacoma will then specify the 27 items that are to be salvaged for the City’s ownership. The Design-Builder shall transport the 28 specified salvaged items banded and palletized to a location that will be within the City of 29 Tacoma’s city limits. 30 The Design-Builder shall stack the material where directed by the City of Tacoma Engineer. 31 The Design-Builder shall contact the City of Tacoma Engineer at least seven Calendar Days prior 32 to scheduled delivery of the items to confirm delivery arrangements.

33 2.11.8 SUBMITTALS

34 2.11.8.1 DESIGN SUBMITTALS 35 The City of Tacoma will review all scheduled submittals and return comments to the Design- 36 Builder in accordance with the requirements of Sections 2.9 and 2.22.

37 2.11.8.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLANS 38 The Design-Builder shall submit 60% Preliminary Design Plans on City of Tacoma standard 39 sheets for all Work constructed under this Project, including the Port Approach, City Approach,

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-20 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Center Truss Spans and all accessories. All preliminary design documents shall include the 2 stamp of the Lead Electrical Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington. 3 The Preliminary Design Plans shall be submitted in conjunction with the shop drawing 4 submittals specified in Section 2.11.7.7 and shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 5 • General descriptions of work on a electrical element that will be rehabilitated, repaired 6 and/or replaced; 7 • Design criteria; 8 • Design assumptions; 9 • Key dimensions and elevations; and 10 • Supplemental design codes and references not part of the Mandatory Standards.

11 See Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

12 2.11.8.3 FINAL DESIGN PLANS 13 The Design-Builder shall submit Final Design Plans on City of Tacoma standard sheets for all 14 electrical work under this Project. All final design documents shall include the stamp of the 15 Lead Electrical Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington. 16 17 The Final Design Plans shall be complete and reviewed by the City of Tacoma prior to the start 18 of construction, and shall include: 19 • A comprehensive set of design drawings to include all equipment proposed, their 20 locations on the bridge, their installation and any additional detail required for their safe 21 and reliable operation. 22 • Demolition and construction sequences for the major elements, including verification of 23 existing status, procurement process for major items of electrical equipment, installation 24 and installation staging, testing and training of the completed work.

25 See Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

26 2.11.8.4 RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION (RFC) DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL 27 The Design-Builder shall submit RFC documents to the City of Tacoma for all electrical work 28 under this Project, including the Base Program Project and the contracted Supplemental 29 Program Project Options, including plans, specifications, design calculations and supporting 30 reports. All RFC documents shall include the stamp of the Lead Electrical Engineer, licensed in 31 the State of Washington. 32 All details and processes for successfully completing the procurement, installation and testing of 33 specified electrical power and control systems shall be fully incorporated into the RFC 34 documents prior to their release. 35 The plans of the RFC documents shall be a complete integrated bridge rehabilitation set of 36 electrical power and control system plans and all associated shop drawings for all electrical 37 components incorporated into the bridge rehabilitation. The integrated bridge electrical 38 rehabilitation drawings of the RFC documents shall be reproduced on sheets conforming to 39 standard City of Tacoma format for title block template. The integrated bridge electrical 40 rehabilitation drawings of the RFC documents shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-21 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Power rails; 2 • Electrical grounding and bonding; 3 • Vehicular and pedestrian traffic control system; 4 • Bridge general lighting installation; 5 • Roadway and pedestrian sidewalk and stair lighting; 6 • Utility relocations; 7 • Bridge electrical drive and control system; 8 • Bridge electrically operated emergency drive; 9 • Bridge span locks; and 10 • Repairs

11 See Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

12 2.11.8.5 ELECTRICAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS 13 The Design-Builder shall provide complete sets of calculations that support all electrical power 14 and control designs described in this Section. Complete sets of calculations shall be included 15 with each design review submittal. 16 All final design calculations shall include the stamp of an Electrical Engineer licensed in the 17 State of Washington. 18 The sets of calculations shall include the following: 19 • Index Sheets – These shall include numbered calculation sheets and an index by subject 20 with the corresponding sheet numbers. The name of the Project, Sub System 21 Identification, date (month, day and year) when calculations are printed, designers, 22 checkers, lead engineer and project engineer names, titles, initials and signatures shall 23 be listed.

24 • Design Calculations – These shall include design criteria; verification of motor sizes, 25 MCC sizing including circuit breakers, overloads and protective relaying, drive controller 26 sizing and operating parameters, feeder cables, disconnect switches, etc. Each sheet or 27 logical group of sheets shall be initialed and dated by the designer and checker.

28 2.11.8.6 DESIGN SOFTWARE 29 The Design-Builder shall use the following software for the bridge rehabilitation analysis and 30 design: 31 AutoCAD (by Autodesk) for all bridge and electrical rehabilitation design drawings - The same 32 version the City of Tacoma is using at Notice to Proceed. 33 Other software may be used on the project after submittal and concurrence from the City of 34 Tacoma.

35 2.11.8.7 SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL 36 The Design-Builder shall submit shop drawings for all proposed bridge electrical power and 37 control elements defined herein to the City of Tacoma for Review and Comment but not

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-22 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 approval. Review and Comment by the City does not release the Design-Builder from any or in 2 any way of the full responsibility for the electrical systems constructability, adequacy of the 3 items being reviewed, nor does Review and Comment by the City of Tacoma serve to place any 4 responsibility of the constructability adequacy of the item under review on them. The following 5 minimum information shall be included in the shop drawings: 6 • Power rails.

7 • Grounding and bonding materials.

8 • Traffic Gates.

9 • Resistance barriers.

10 • Traffic Lights.

11 • Lighting fixtures.

12 • Miscellaneous warning signs.

13 • Navigation lighting fixtures.

14 • Traffic control panel and MCC.

15 • Drive Motors.

16 • Brakes.

17 • Drive controller.

18 • MCC.

19 • PLC control system.

20 • Operator’s control desk.

21 • Emergency drive motor.

22 • Clutch.

23 • Electrical installation hardware.

24 2.11.8.8 WORKING DRAWINGS FOR FALSEWORK, FORMS, TEMPORARY 25 STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS 26 The Design-Builder shall prepare working drawings with supporting design calculations for all 27 equipment installation including power and control cabling, and construction process including 28 any required construction staging. 29 Construction process working drawing submittals shall include, but not be limited to, the 30 following:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-23 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • All equipment placements on the bridge and bridge approaches.

2 • Electrical single line and block diagrams.

3 • Electrical installation raceways.

4 • All equipment power cabling

5 • All equipment control wiring.

6 • The City of Tacoma will review and comment on the working drawing submittals.

7 2.11.8.9 WARRANTIES 8 Warranties provided by manufacturers for all equipment and components shall be transferred 9 from the Design-Builder to the City of Tacoma and the warranty documentation shall be 10 submitted to the City of Tacoma.

11 2.11.8.10 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 12 The Design-Builder shall include the following information in the comprehensive Operation and 13 Maintenance (O&M) manual for the Murray Morgan Bridge to cover the O&M for the items 14 described in Section 2.11 including but not limited to: 15 • Power rails.

16 • Motors and brakes.

17 • Traffic gate and resistance barriers.

18 • Drive controller.

19 • Bridge PLC control system

20 • Motor control center.

21 • Emergency drive motor

22 • Clutch.

23 • All miscellaneous electrical equipment.

24 2.11.8.11 REVIEW OF REHABILITATION CONSTRUCTION METHODS 25 The Design-Builder shall secure the services of a Professional Engineer in civil/electrical 26 engineering, licensed in the State of Washington, with experience in bridge rehabilitation 27 construction practices to review and approve the Design-Builder's proposed methods of 28 performing the work in, on, and around the bridge. The Design-Builder shall adhere to all 29 recommendations of this Professional Engineer in regards to preparing submittals to the City of 30 Tacoma, required on-going surveillance, reporting on construction activities, and immediate 31 correction of operations that may lead to any damage to the existing and/or rehabilitated bridge 32 structure.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-24 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 End of Section 2

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.11-25 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.12 MECHANICAL WORK

2 2.12.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to complete the Base Program Project 4 Scope. Elements of Work shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 5 • Maintaining mechanical machinery. 6 • Maintaining lift span balance. 7 • Replacing main counterweight sheave assemblies. 8 • Replacing the lift span counterweight guide system. 9 • Rehabilitating the lift span guide system. 10 • Replacing the lift span live load support rockers. 11 • Replacing lift span centering devices. 12 • Documenting alignment and performing acceptance testing.

13 The Design-Builder may also be contracted to conduct additional Work necessary to complete 14 Supplemental Program Project Scope items for rehabilitation of the bridge mechanical 15 machinery. Elements of Work for the Supplemental Program shall include, but are not limited 16 to, the following: 17 • Modifying the span drive machinery and supports to integrate new span drive motors 18 and brakes. 19 • Replacing the low speed span drive machinery. 20 • Replacing the open gear frame in the machinery room with new enclosed gear reduction 21 units. Provide new emergency drive system. 22 • Providing new span locks.

23 Plans and shop drawings showing the existing structures are located in Appendices 19 and 20. 24 The plans are not guaranteed to be dimensionally accurate or complete. The Design-Builder 25 shall field measure and field verify all existing elements, geometry and dimensions as necessary. 26 The bridge inspection and study reports are located in Appendices 07 through 16. The 27 inspection and study reports are not guaranteed to be complete or fully accurate. The Design- 28 Builder shall verify the information in the inspection and study reports as necessary. 29 All material and machinery installed on the bridge as part of this work shall be new.

30 2.12.1.2 SCOPE OF WORK 31 The Design-Builder shall at a minimum complete the work as described below in the Base 32 Program. 33 The Design-Builder may also be contracted to perform additional work as described below in the 34 Supplemental Program, in addition to the Base Program Scope of Work. 35

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.12.1.2.1 Base Program

2 2.12.1.2.1.1 Base Program Requirements 3 The Design-Builder shall complete the following minimum required work items included in the 4 Base Program. 5 • Maintain the mechanical machinery during the construction period. 6 • Maintain lift span balance during the construction period. 7 • Replace main counterweight sheave assemblies. 8 • Replace the counterweight guide system. 9 • Rehabilitate the span guide system. 10 • Replace the lift span live load support rockers. 11 • Install lift span centering devices. 12 • Documenting alignment and performing acceptance testing of the new and rehabilitated 13 machinery components.

14 2.12.1.2.2 Supplemental Program Requirements

15 2.12.1.2.2.2.1 Supplemental Program Requirements 16 The Design-Builder shall complete the following work items identified in the Supplemental 17 Program: 18 • M1 -Provide new span drive motors and brakes. Replace the open gear frame in the 19 machinery room with new enclosed gear reduction units. Include provisions for a new 20 emergency drive system with reduced power requirement to permit operation using an 21 existing City of Tacoma-owned portable 125 KVA portable generator. 22 • M2 - Replace the low speed span drive machinery outboard of the open gear frame. 23 Components to be replaced include shafts, bearings, couplings, wire rope drums, 24 deflector sheaves, operating ropes and operating rope take ups at the tower and at the 25 pier. 26 • M3 - Provide new span locks.

27 2.12.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 28 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. They are 29 listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the list. This is not a 30 comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to complete the design and 31 construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any ambiguities or conflicts relating in any 32 way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma 33 immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may resolve them. 34 • Design Build Special Provisions for the Project (Appendix 04) 35 • City Amendments to WSDOT Standard Specifications (Appendix B3). 36 • Amendments to WSDOT Standard Specifications.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design Specifications, Customary U.S. Units, 2 2nd Edition - 2007, including interims through 2008. 3 • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications, 2nd Edition - 2004, including 4 interims through 2008. 5 • WSDOT Qualified Products List (M 46-02) (QPL). 6 • AASHTO Movable Bridge Inspection, Evaluation and Maintenance Manual, 1st Edition - 7 1998. 8 • Structural Welding Code: AASHTO/AWS D1.1M/D1.1: 2008, An American National 9 Standard 21st Edition, with interims through 2009 10 • Bridge Welding Code: AASHTO/AWS D1.5M/D1.5: 2008, An American National 11 Standard, 5th Edition, with interims through 2009. 12 • AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition, 2002. 13 • FHWA Publication No. FHWA-HRT-06-032; Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway 14 Structures: Part 1-Bridges, January 2006. 15 • WISHA Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, WAC 296. 16 • ADA Americans with Disabilities Act.

17 2.12.2.1 ADDITIONAL REFERENCES 18 • Tacoma Central Business District to Port Connection Study, (2003) published by 19 Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., Appendix 07. 20 • WSDOT Bridge Inspection Reports, (2007) published by WSDOT Appendix 08.

21 2.12.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

22 2.12.3.1 GENERAL 23 The Design-Builder shall demonstrate using calculations that upon completion of the Base 24 Program that all work conducted will meet all AASHTO requirements unless specified otherwise 25 herein and that the balance of the lift span and counterweights will be maintained within 26 acceptable limits during construction. 27 Upon completion of the Base and Supplemental Program, the physical appearance of the 28 structure shall not be significantly altered, except as noted below. 29 • Replacement of the main counterweight sheaves assemblies on the Center Truss Spans. 30 • Replacement of the operating rope drums on the Lift Span. 31 • Addition of new span locks on the Center Truss Spans and Lift Span.

32 Upon completion of the Base or Supplemental Program, the Design-Builder shall demonstrate 33 by measurements that all machinery components are properly aligned. All measurements 34 performed to demonstrate acceptable alignment shall be documented and reported to the City of 35 Tacoma. 36 Upon completion of the Base or Supplemental Program, the Design-Builder shall demonstrate 37 by performing functional testing that all machinery components function properly without 38 unusual noise, vibration, heat or movement.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The Design-Builder shall demonstrate using calculations that upon completion of the 2 Supplemental Program the replacement operating rope assemblies, deflector sheaves, take-ups, 3 enclosed gear reducers, emergency drive system and span locks will meet AASHTO 4 requirements. 5 Refer to Section 2.10 for additional details.

6 2.12.4 DESIGN CRITERIA

7 2.12.4.1 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS 8 The Design-Builder shall provide a Mechanical Lead Engineer with a minimum of 10 years of 9 experience as a full time Bridge Engineer, over which time the Mechanical Lead Engineer shall 10 have performed as a Design Engineer, Project Engineer and Project Manager for the design of 11 new bridges and the design related to the rehabilitation, retrofit and repair of existing movable 12 bridges. The Mechanical Lead Engineer shall be a Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of 13 Washington, and shall be in responsible charge of the mechanical design elements of the 14 Project. The lead mechanical engineer shall have a Bachelor of Science degree from an 15 accredited mechanical engineering program at a college or university.

16 2.12.4.2 DESIGN CRITERIA 17 All new permanent bridge elements, and all existing mechanical elements whose load carrying 18 capacities are altered by the Work, shall be analyzed and designed according to the 19 requirements of the AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design Specifications.

20 2.12.4.2.1 Corrosion Protection 21 Steel elements, including but not limited to structural steel members, non-lubricated surfaces of 22 machinery components, connection hardware, fittings, fabrications, and appurtenances, shall 23 have corrosion protection designed for a lifespan of at least 15 years in the marine environment 24 at the Site. The corrosion protection design shall be appropriate for the function of the element 25 and specific service environment in which it will exist (e.g. directly exposed to road salt, located 26 in splash zone, etc.). This corrosion protection may consist of a paint system, hot-dip 27 galvanization, other applied coatings, or inherent properties of the steel (such as stainless steel). 28 Contact between dissimilar metals shall be minimized, and shall have physical separation 29 between components of dissimilar metals where practical, consisting of a gap, inserts such as 30 rubber, non-reactive coatings on one or more of the components, or other methods acceptable to 31 the City of Tacoma. Where physical separation is impractical or impossible, the smaller 32 components in the connection, such as, but not limited to, connecting parts such as bolts, nuts, 33 and studs should be more cathodic than the larger components in the connection. 34 Refer to Section 2.11 for additional details.

35 2.12.4.2.2 Pre-Construction Inspection (Lift Span and Center Truss Spans) 36 Prior to beginning Work on any bridge elements, the Design-Builder shall inspect and document 37 in a comprehensive report all deficiencies in the bridge elements. A deficiency in the mechanical 38 elements is defined as, but not limited to, poor alignment, excessive wear, corrosion or other 39 surface degradation, section loss, paint failure, cracking, seizure, leakage, heating and vibration. 40 The pre-construction inspections shall be used to verify as-built information and to create the 41 rehabilitation plan for the mechanical elements.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.12.4.2.3 Maintain mechanical machinery (Lift Span and Center Truss Spans) 2 The Design-Builder shall take over operation and maintenance of the bridge when construction 3 on the bridge commences or the 2nd quarter of 2011, whichever occurs first. The existing lift 4 span mechanical machinery shall be protected from damage and maintained throughout all 5 stages of construction as part of the Base Program. The following minimum maintenance shall 6 be performed: 7 • Quarterly maintenance of mechanical room and sheave bearings. Mechanical room 8 maintenance includes lubricating gears and fittings. Sheave bearing maintenance 9 involves lubricating the sheave bearings at the top of the lift towers while the bridge is 10 raised and lowered. Two individuals are required for quarterly maintenance. These 11 individuals must have fall-protection training and be capable of working at heights. 12 • Annual operating rope maintenance. The operating ropes are coated once a year. A 13 previous contractor has had four personnel with rollers to coat the cables as the bridge is 14 raised and lowered. 15 • Annual pier cleaning. Design-Builder will clean bird droppings and other debris 16 (materials) from top of piers. Design-Builder will collect this material and dispose offsite 17 in accordance will all applicable codes, regulations and laws governing the disposal of the 18 materials. Identification of all materials is the responsibility of the Design-Builder. 19 • The City of Tacoma will specify all lubricants to be used by the Design-Builder. Design- 20 Builder shall provide all safety equipment and permanent tools required to maintain the 21 bridge. Disposable materials and lubricants purchased by the Design-Builder will be 22 reimbursed at Cost plus Design-Builder’s markup.

23 The Design-Builder shall evaluate the level of maintenance that is required dependent upon 24 construction activities at the bridge and shall develop and submit a maintenance plan for the 25 duration of construction for approval by the City of Tacoma. The maintenance plan shall 26 address the need to cover or otherwise protect all moving machinery parts from intrusion of 27 construction debris, cleaning or painting materials or from contamination from any other 28 source. Requirements to visually inspect, clean and lubricate all moving machinery components 29 as warranted prior to operating the lift span shall be established to ensure that contamination or 30 obstructions do not damage equipment. Any damage to existing machinery resulting from 31 contamination or inadequate lubrication shall be repaired at no additional cost to the City of 32 Tacoma. 33 The Design-Builder shall prepare a comprehensive lubrication plan for all of the existing, new 34 and rehabilitated mechanical machinery for approval. The plan shall be developed from 35 recommendations made by the machinery manufacturers. The Design-Builder shall coordinate 36 the lubrication plans for the various machinery elements and minimize the number of different 37 lubricants required. The Design-Builder shall furnish the Engineer with copies of letters from 38 the machinery manufacturers endorsing the lubricants which have been selected. Lubricants 39 shall be selected for year round exposure at the bridge. All Lubricants shall be selected to be 40 compatible with lubricants currently in use by the City of Tacoma. The Design-Builder shall 41 submit written documentation indicating compatibility for any lubricant which is not in current 42 use by the City of Tacoma. 43 The Design-Builder shall furnish a minimum of four lubrication charts (one for the span drive 44 machinery, one for the span support machinery (e.g. main counterweight sheaves & ropes) one 45 for the span lock machinery and one for the traffic gate machinery) which shall show all points 46 requiring lubrication with type of lubricant to be used at each point and the frequency and the 47 method of lubrication. All electrical components related to the span drive machinery, span lock

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 machinery, tail lock machinery and pedestrian gate machinery, which require lubrication, shall 2 be shown on the charts. The charts shall be submitted for approval and the approved charts 3 shall be mounted with a suitable and approved frame and transparent cover in the locations 4 selected by the City of Tacoma.

5 2.12.4.2.4 Maintain Lift Span Balance (Lift Span) 6 The balance of the lift span shall be maintained throughout all stages of construction as part of 7 the Base Program. The Design-Builder shall: 8 • Develop the lift span structural rehabilitation concept and estimate the final weight of 9 the rehabilitated lift span vs. the existing lift span. 10 • Stage the work so that balance is maintained and/or the lift span and counterweights are 11 properly supported during all stages of the work. 12 • Develop a concept for modifying/repairing the counterweight to address existing 13 deterioration and to achieve the required final balance. 14 • Perform balance testing using the strain gage method to measure span balance after 15 completion of all work affecting the balance of the lift span. 16 • Adjust the final balance at each corner so that the lift span is equally span heavy when 17 seated as counterweight heavy when full open. Equal balance is defined as a differential 18 from the calculated theoretical balance of less than 500 lbs. 19 • Final balance testing shall not be completed until the operating ropes and live load 20 supports are properly adjusted.

21 2.12.4.2.5 Replace Main Counterweight Sheave Assemblies (Center Truss Spans) 22 The Design-Builder shall replace the main counterweight sheave assemblies as part of the Base 23 Program. 24 The components for the lift span supports that were designed and fabricated as part of the circa 25 2009/2010 main counterweight rope replacement project are owned by the City of Tacoma and 26 may be utilized for this project. The Design-Builder assumes all responsibility and risk 27 associated with the use of these components and shall verify capacity and physical condition of 28 the components for the intended use. All missing or consumable parts including bolts 29 associated with the lift span supports are to be provided by the Design-Builder at no additional 30 cost to the City of Tacoma. 31 The counterweight sheave assemblies consist of the counterweight sheaves, sheave trunnions, 32 trunnion bearings and all associated and hardware. 33 Spherical roller pillow block bearings shall be utilized in a simply supported arrangement. The 34 bearing housings are to be provided with contact seals that result in minimal leakage and that 35 can be replaced without removal of the bearing from the trunnion shaft as recommended by the 36 manufacturer of the bearing. Labyrinth or other non-contacting seals that have inherent 37 leakage are not permitted. The sheave pitch diameter shall not be modified from existing. 38 Otherwise, all AASHTO requirements shall be met. The bearing supports shall be modified or 39 replaced as required so that the location of the centerline of the sheave is the same as existing 40 for the new assemblies. 41 Oversight for the installation of trunnion bearings shall be done by a roller bearing service 42 engineer employed by the trunnion bearing manufacturer. The roller bearing service engineer 43 must have a minimum of 5 years experience in the installation and inspection of large rolling

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 element bearings for movable bridges or similar applications. The roller bearing service 2 engineer shall verify proper fit of the bearing in the bearing housing and on the shaft, proper 3 alignment of the bearings on the supports under full dead loading and shall certify that they 4 have witnessed satisfactory installation, lubrication and protection of the bearings in writing. 5 This certification shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma.

6 2.12.4.2.6 Replace the Counterweight Guide System (Center Truss Spans and Lift 7 Span) 8 The Design-Builder shall replace the lift span counterweight guide system as part of the Base 9 Program. The counterweight guide system consists of the upper and lower counterweight guides 10 and the counterweight guide rails. The new counterweight guide system shall meet the 11 following requirements: 12 • The guide rails shall be replaced with new guide rails including all connections to the 13 Center Truss Spans. 14 • The guides shall be of the sliding type and provide for both transverse and longitudinal 15 guidance. 16 • A minimum of 4 guides (2 upper and 2 lower) shall be provided for each counterweight. 17 • The guide system shall meet all AASHTO requirements.

18 Proper alignment of the counterweight guide system shall be verified by demonstrating equal 19 clearance (within 1/8”) at all guides when the bridge is fully seated and no contact between the 20 guides and the guide rails during a full lift of the bridge in the absence of wind loading.

21 2.12.4.2.7 Replace the Span Guide System (Center Truss Spans and Lift Span) 22 The Design-Builder shall replace the lift span guide system as part of the Base Program. The 23 existing span guide system is a spring loaded system that keeps the longitudinal guides at both 24 ends of the span in contact with the guide rails and allows the bridge to float within prescribed 25 limits from a nominal position. Therefore there is effectively no fixed end of the bridge, 26 although one end of the bridge has a rocker type live load shoe with a curved bottom and the 27 other end has a rocker type live load shoe with a flat bottom. Both live load shoes contact flat 28 strike plates that are apparently secured to the lift span piers however no anchor bolts were 29 noted during a recent inspection. 30 The Design-Builder shall replace the existing Span Guide System with a more conventional span 31 guide system as part of the Base Program. 32 The design of the Span Guide System shall be coordinated with the design of the span Live Load 33 Support Rockers (Section 2.12.4.2.7) and the Centering Device (Section 2.12.4.2.9). 34 In addition the system shall be coordinated to allow both the present operating rope 35 configuration and any changes to the operating rope system associated with Supplemental 36 Program item M2. 37 The new system shall have the following features: 38 • A defined fixed end of the lift span that is the same as the defined fixed end for the Live 39 Load Supports. 40 • A defined expansion end of the lift span that is the same as the expansion end for the 41 Live Load Supports.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • The fixed end shall have both longitudinal and transverse guides at each side of the lift 2 span in the vicinity of the bottom cord. 3 • The fixed end shall have transverse guides at each side of the lift span in the vicinity of 4 the top cord. 5 • The expansion end shall have transverse guides at each side of the lift span at both the 6 bottom and top cords. 7 • Guide rails along the center truss spans to mate with the transverse and longitudinal 8 guides for the full lift height of the lift span. 9 • The guide system shall meet all AASHTO requirements.

10 The Design–Builder may use the existing guide rails as part of the new Span Guide System 11 provided it can be demonstrated that the existing guide rails meet the requirements of the 12 design with regard to capacity and provided that the Design-Builder documents that the 13 physical condition of the existing guide rails is suitable for the intended use and would meet the 14 design life expectancy of at least 20 years. 15 Proper alignment of the span guide system shall be verified by demonstrating equal clearance 16 (within 1/8”) at all guides when the bridge is fully seated and no contact between the guides and 17 the guide rails during a full lift of the bridge in the absence of wind loading.

18 2.12.4.2.8 Replace Live Load Support Rockers (Lift Span) 19 The Design-Builder shall replace the lift span live load support rockers as part of the Base 20 Program. The Design-Builder shall coordinate the design of this work with the design of the 21 Span Guide System (Section 2.12.4.2.7) and the Centering Device (Section 2.12.4.2.9). 22 The live load supports include the rocker shoe, the pin and nuts that secure the shoe and the live 23 load strike plate. 24 Presently one end of the bridge has rocker shoes with a curved bottom and the other end has 25 rocker shoes with a flat bottom. Both of the shoes contact flat strike plates on the pier. 26 The new system shall have the following features: 27 • A defined fixed end of the lift span that is the same as the defined fixed end for the span 28 guides. 29 • A defined expansion end of the lift span that is the same as the defined expansion end for 30 the span guides. 31 • The fixed end shall locate the lift span in the proper longitudinal position as the lift span 32 nears the fully seated position and secure the lift span against longitudinal movement 33 when the lift span is seated. The function of the live load support shall be similar to a 34 saddle type live load support as used on other vertical lift bridges. 35 • The expansion end shall allow the bridge to expand as a result of span deflection and 36 temperature changes. The length of contact between the live load shoe and the strike 37 plate shall not change as a result of deflection or expansion of the lift span. 38 • The system shall have provision for independent vertical adjustment of each live load 39 support. 40 • The supports shall be adjusted to meet the following criterion:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 o 100% contact (full bearing) between the live load shoes and the strike plates with 2 the span properly balance and the span drive machinery brakes released when 3 the bridge is fully seated. 4 o Roadway surface at ends of lift span and roadway surface of adjacent approach 5 spans shall be at the same elevation within 1/8”. 6 o Equal load at each live load strike plate with the span properly balanced and the 7 span drive brakes released with the span fully seated. 8 • The Live load Supports shall meet all AASHTO requirements.

9 2.12.4.2.9 Install Lift Span Centering Devices 10 The Design-Builder shall provide a new centering device for the lift span. One centering device 11 shall be provided at each end of the lift span as part of the Base Program. 12 The design of the Centering Devices shall be coordinated with the design of the Span Guide 13 System (Section 2.12.4.2.7) and the Span Lock System (Section 2.12.4.2.9) with the following 14 features: 15 • The device shall have a tapered male and a tapered female component with the male 16 component mounted to the pier and the female component mounted to the lift span. 17 • The device shall be capable of centering the span when it is 1” of either side of the 18 established centerline of the bridge at the point of initial engagement. 19 • The device shall center the bridge in the transverse direction only. 20 • The device shall be grease lubricated. 21 • There shall be no contact at any point other than the tapered surfaces of the components 22 under maximum traffic loading conditions. 23 • The Centering Devices shall meet all AASHTO requirements.

24 2.12.4.2.10 Documenting Alignment and Performing Acceptance Testing (Center Truss 25 Spans and Lift Span) 26 The Design-Builder shall document the alignment of all new and rehabilitated machinery and 27 perform functional testing as part of the Base Program. 28 Alignment of all mechanical components shall be measured and documented to be acceptable 29 based on requirements established by the manufacturer or as established herein. A permanent 30 copy of all alignment documentation shall be provided to the City of Tacoma. 31 After completion of all mechanical work including painting of the machinery, perform the 32 following functional tests: 33 • Span drive machinery 34 o Operate the lift span through a minimum of 6 cycles at approximately 25% of full 35 speed operation. 36 o During this initial testing all components are to be observed for proper function 37 in accordance with any applicable manufacturer’s literature and as specified 38 herein. 39 o Operate the lift span through a minimum of 10 cycles at full speed. 40 • Span lock machinery

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-9 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 o Prior to testing the span lock machinery electrically, each of the lock bars shall be 2 operated through one complete cycle using the manual drive. Electrical testing 3 shall not commence until the City of Tacoma has approved the manual test. 4 • Demonstrate proper mechanical function of the span lock machinery using the electric 5 motor through a minimum of ten (10) complete cycles. 6 • With the bridge fully seated after a normal operation, the span locks shall be pulled and 7 driven during which time there shall be no movement of the movable span caused by the 8 operation of the span locks. 9 • During each test the motor amperage during both pulling and driving shall be 10 continuously recorded using a strip chart or similar type recording device with a 11 minimum sampling rate of 60 Hz. The time to pull and drive the span locks for each 12 operation shall also be recorded. A permanent copy of the recorded data shall be 13 provided in the final version of the maintenance and lubrication manuals.

14 Following completion of all work, including successful completion of the functional testing and 15 all repair items that are identified during the functional tests, conditional acceptance for the 16 bridge shall be made and the bridge shall be opened for vehicular and marine traffic. The 17 condition of acceptance is that the Design-Builder shall provide all materials and labor to 18 operate and maintain the bridge for a 60 day Operational Testing period. 19 If repairs or replacement of machinery is required during the Operational Testing period, all 20 materials shall be furnished by and the repair work shall be performed by the Design-Builder at 21 no additional cost to the City of Tacoma. If any of the components previously approved for 22 installation are required to be replaced by components from a different manufacturer or 23 modified in any way, the changes shall be subject to the approval of the City of Tacoma. The 60 24 day Operational Testing period may be increased or restarted at the sole discretion of the City of 25 Tacoma if significant changes or repairs are required. 26 During the Operational Testing Period the Design-Builder will provide Bridge Tending.

27 2.12.4.2.11 Intentionally Omitted

28 2.12.4.2.12 Provide span drive machinery and supports to integrate new span drive 29 motors and brakes with the existing machinery (Lift Span) 30 The Design-Builder shall provide span drive machinery and supports to integrate new span 31 drive motors and brakes as part of the Supplemental Program, Option M1. The span drive 32 machinery and supports shall accommodate the new components while utilizing a similar 33 arrangement as existing. 34 Both existing motors, both motor brakes and the machinery brake shall be replaced as part of 35 this work. The motors and brakes shall be fully coordinated and properly integrated with any 36 required electrical work related to these components to produce a fully functional, safe and 37 reliable system. All modifications required to properly integrate the new components into the 38 existing machinery shall be included. All existing machinery (materials) that will no longer be 39 used shall be removed from the bridge and properly disposed of in accordance will all applicable 40 codes, regulations and laws governing the disposal of the materials. Identification of all 41 materials is the responsibility of the Design-Builder. 42

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-10 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The modifications shall have the following features: 2 • The electric motors shall be in accordance with AASHTO recommendations. The 3 Design-Builder shall prepare calculations to demonstrate that the motor torque capacity 4 meets AASHTO requirements. 5 • The capacity of the motor and machinery brakes shall be in accordance with AASHTO 6 requirements. The Design-Builder shall prepare calculations to demonstrate that the 7 motor and machinery brake capacity meets AASHTO requirements. 8 • The brakes shall be electrically operated from the operators control desk. 9 • The machinery brake shall not be used to stop the span except under emergency 10 conditions. For normal operation the machinery brake will serve as a holding brake. 11 • All motor couplings and brake wheels shall be new. 12 • Alignment of couplings and brakes to brake wheels shall be verified to be in compliance 13 with all of the manufacturer’s requirements. 14 • All AASHTO requirements shall be met.

15 2.12.4.2.13 Replace the low speed span drive machinery (Center Truss Spans and Lift 16 Span) 17 The Design-Builder shall replace the low speed span drive machinery as part of the 18 Supplemental Program, Option M2. Components to be replaced include shafts, bearings, 19 couplings, wire rope drums, deflector sheaves, operating wire ropes and operating wire rope 20 take ups at the tower and at the pier. 21 The modifications shall have the following features: 22 • The capacity of the operating ropes shall be increased to meet AASHTO requirements. 23 The existing operating ropes do not meet AASHTO requirements. It is anticipated that 24 the existing single uphaul and single downhaul rope at each corner will need to be 25 replaced with two uphaul and downhaul ropes at each corner. This change will 26 necessitate significant changes to the design of the operating rope drums, deflector 27 sheaves, wire rope terminations and wire rope take-ups. 28 • The pitch diameter of the operating rope drum may not be modified, unless in 29 conjunction with Supplemental Program, Option M1. As such, the AASHTO 30 requirement for the minimum ratio of the pitch diameter of the drum versus the rope 31 diameter shall not apply, but this ratio shall be no worse than existing. If Supplemental 32 Program, Option M1 is completed, the AASHTO requirement for the minimum ratio of 33 the pitch diameter of the drum versus the rope diameter shall be met. 34 • The new wire rope take-ups shall provide equal to or greater adjustment capacity 35 compared to the existing take-ups. 36 • At the completion of construction 70% of the total wire rope take-up adjustment capacity 37 shall be available for future adjustment. 38 • All AASHTO requirements shall be met. 39

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-11 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.12.4.2.14 Replace the open gear frame in the machinery room (Lift Span) 2 The Design-Builder shall replace the existing open gear frame in the machinery room with an 3 enclosed gear reduction unit or units as part of the Supplemental Program, Option M1. 4 The enclosed gear reduction unit shall have the following features: 5 • All speed reducers shall be designed to current AGMA standards unless otherwise 6 specified in the Specifications or on the Contract Plans. 7 • In-line and planetary reducers shall not be used except for the emergency drive where 8 units of these type will be permitted. 9 • All gearing shall be either helical or spiral bevel type. 10 • Reducers must have an AGMA rating equal to or greater than the sum of the horsepower 11 of the two span drive motors at full load motor torque and speed with a minimum service 12 factor of 1.5. 13 • The AGMA strength rating must be provided for momentary overloads of 300 percent of 14 the motor full load torque. 15 • The reducer ratio(s) shall be selected so that the full speed velocity of the lift span is 16 within 10% of the current full speed velocity of the lift span for the selected motors, 17 which shall have a base speed in accordance with AASHTO recommendations, and the 18 new operating rope drum diameter, which may be modified versus the existing operating 19 rope drum diameter. 20 • The design of the unit shall include an emergency drive. The Design-Builder shall 21 develop a complete design for a new emergency drive system with a reduced power 22 requirement to permit operation using an existing City of Tacoma-owned portable 125 23 KVA portable generator in the event of a power failure. The mechanical components of 24 the emergency drive are required even if the electrical work required to make the 25 emergency drive operational is not conducted. 26 • The emergency drive shall be operated from the operators control desk and shall be 27 disengaged when not in use. 28 • All bearings shall be anti-friction type and provide an L10 life of 40,000 hours at motor 29 full load speed and torque. 30 • All reducer shaft extensions shall have a minimum of two seals. The two seals shall be 31 separated by a grease cavity with provision to add grease to the cavity and a pressure 32 relief fitting for the cavity to prevent damage to the seals. Alternate seal arrangements of 33 similar quality as determined by the City of Tacoma will be considered. 34 • All reducers shall support any overhung loads they are subjected to. 35 • All reducers are to have steel housings. 36 • All reducer manufacturers shall submit complete as-built detail drawings for each part of 37 each reducer that is installed on this bridge. All materials shall be noted on each drawing 38 along with all information necessary for replacement of any part of the reducer. All fits, 39 finishes, and dimensions, with tolerances, shall be stated for each part. All bearings and 40 seals shall be called out stating model, size, and manufacturer. All gear information shall 41 be stated in its entirety. 42 • Oil drains shall be provided for each reducer with bronze or stainless steel drain cocks to 43 permit easy replacement of oil. The proper oil level shall be marked on the side of each

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-12 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 housing in a readily visible location. A stand pipe with a threaded pipe cap shall be 2 provided adjacent to the oil level indicator to permit checking the oil level. 3 • All AASHTO requirements shall be met. 4 All speed reducers provided under this Contract shall be tested as follows: 5 • After the reducers are completely assembled, they shall be filled completely with light oil 6 in the manufacturer’s plant to test for leaks. No leakage shall occur around seals, covers, 7 welds, etc., with the reducer filled with oil for a minimum of one hour. 8 • After assembly of the reducer gear drives, the manufacturer will conduct a no load spin 9 test of the unit. The units will be brought up to 115% of the rated speed; the unit will be 10 operated at that speed for one hour in each direction. Sound level readings taken at 5 11 feet from the reducer surface cannot exceed 90 DBA with the unit running at 115% of 12 rated speed. The reducer shall be closely monitored during the spin test for oil leaks, 13 excessive heating of bearings or seals, and other abnormalities. 14 • Following the no load spin test, the reducer shall be tested under load. Running at rated 15 speed, a load of 100%, 150% of full load motor torque will be applied. Runs of thirty 16 minutes in each direction of rotation will be made at 100% and 150% full load motor 17 torque. The reducer shall be closely monitored during the test for oil leaks, excessive 18 heating of bearings, unusual noises and other abnormalities. 19 • At the conclusion of the testing, the unit will be disassembled and inspected for any 20 abnormal gear, bearing, or shaft condition. The gear teeth will be examined for contact 21 patterns. A minimum of 85% tooth flank contact must be evident. Out of tolerance parts 22 shall be replaced and adjustments made as required. 23 • After reassembly of the speed reducer and acceptance by the City of Tacoma, if no 24 material modifications are required, run the unit at 100% full speed at no load for 30 25 minutes in each direction and monitor for changes in the operating conditions. Correct 26 any noted deficiencies that result from this test. 27 • If material modifications are required after the initial or any subsequent test, all testing 28 shall be repeated including the load testing until satisfactory results are obtained at no 29 additional cost to the City of Tacoma. 30 • Notice of the schedule of any of the testing will be sent to the City of Tacoma so the 31 testing can be witnessed. 32 • The speed reducer will be closely inspected for any oil leaks and if found, be repaired.

33 2.12.4.2.15 Provide Span Locks (Center Truss Spans and Lift Span) 34 The Design-Builder shall provide new span locks as part of the Supplemental Program, Option 35 M3. The new span locks shall have the following features: 36 • All span lock machinery shall be located at the top of the pier out of view of the public. 37 • The time of operation shall be 10 seconds or less. 38 • The span locks shall be electrically operated from the control desk. 39 • Hydraulic operation of the locks is not acceptable. 40 • A means of manually disengaging or engaging the span locks shall be provided.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-13 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Heavy duty, corrosion proof covers or shields shall be provided to protect all moving 2 parts of the span locks from falling debris. 3 • All AASHTO requirements shall be met.

4 2.12.4.3 UNKNOWN MAJOR DEFICIENCIES 5 Unknown Major Deficiencies discovered after construction begins and not documented in 6 existing documents shall be brought to the attention of the City of Tacoma. 7 An Unknown Major Deficiency shall be defined as a mechanical deficiency which compromises 8 the capacity of the machinery to function as originally designed and eliminates the option of 9 leaving the existing machinery in service with no repairs. The Design-Builder shall evaluate the 10 discovered Unknown Major Deficiency, and develop a rehabilitation plan. The City of Tacoma 11 may elect to execute the rehabilitation plan or to execute the optional work defined in the 12 Supplemental Program which replaces the item.

13 2.12.4.4 DAMAGE TO NON-WORK ELEMENTS 14 A “Non-Work Element” is defined as a mechanical or non-mechanical element on or connected 15 to the bridge that is not scheduled to receive Work according to the Base or Supplemental 16 Program. Elements of the bridge structure that are not part of the Design-Builders Scope of 17 Work that are damaged by the Design-Builder during construction shall be repaired by the 18 Design-Builder as part of the Base Program and/or Supplemental Program.

19 2.12.5 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA

20 2.12.5.1 REPAIR OF PAINT 21 Repair to the paint system of the steel components shall be performed prior to the loss of access 22 to an area requiring repair and after all significant work that could damage the repaired 23 corrosion protection system is complete. The Design-Builder shall repair any damage caused by 24 the Design-Builder to the new and/or existing paint system of the steel components.

25 2.12.5.2 SALVAGE 26 The City of Tacoma may retain ownership of any mechanical items that in its opinion reflect the 27 historic character of the bridge. It is the intent to salvage representative items only, not all 28 items. The Design-Builder shall obtain approval from the City of Tacoma prior to disposal of 29 mechanical items. The City of Tacoma will then specify the items that are to be salvaged for the 30 City’s ownership. The Design-Builder shall transport the specified salvaged items banded and 31 palletized to a location that will be within the City of Tacoma’s city limits. 32 The Design-Builder shall stack the material where directed by the City of Tacoma Engineer. 33 The Design-Builder shall contact the City of Tacoma Engineer at least seven Calendar Days prior 34 to scheduled delivery of the items to confirm delivery arrangements.

35 2.12.6 SUBMITTALS

36 2.12.6.1 DESIGN SUBMITTALS 37 The City of Tacoma will review all scheduled submittals and return comments to the Design- 38 Builder in accordance with the requirements of Sections 2.9 and 2.22.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-14 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.12.6.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLANS 2 The Design-Builder shall submit 60% and Preliminary Design Plans on City of Tacoma standard 3 sheets for all Work constructed under this Project, including the Port Approach, City Approach, 4 Center Truss Spans and all accessories. All preliminary design documents shall include the 5 stamp of the Lead Mechanical Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington. 6 The Preliminary Design Plans shall be submitted in conjunction with the shop drawing 7 submittals specified in Section 2.10.6.8 for steel structural reinforcing members, prefabricated 8 elements and connection hardware, and shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 9 • General descriptions of work on a structural element that will be rehabilitated, repaired 10 and/or replaced; 11 • Design criteria, including, but not limited to, design loads and deflection tolerances; 12 • Design assumptions; 13 • Key dimensions and elevations; and 14 • Supplemental design codes and references not part of the Mandatory Standards.

15 See Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

16 2.12.6.3 FINAL DESIGN PLANS 17 The Design-Builder shall submit Final Design Plans on City of Tacoma standard sheets for all 18 mechanical work performed under this Project. All final design documents shall include the 19 stamp of the Lead Mechanical Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington. 20 The Final Design Plans shall be complete prior to the start of construction, and shall include the 21 following: 22 • A comprehensive set of design drawings to include all equipment proposed, their 23 locations on the bridge, their installation and any additional detail required for their safe 24 and reliable operation. 25 • Demolition and construction sequences for the major elements, including verification of 26 existing status, procurement process for major items of mechanical equipment, 27 installation and installation staging, testing and training of the completed work.

28 See Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

29 2.12.6.4 RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION (RFC) DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL 30 The Design-Builder shall submit RFC documents to the City of Tacoma for all mechanical work 31 related to bridge construction and rehabilitation, including plans, specifications, design 32 calculations and supporting reports. All RFC documents shall include the stamp of the Lead 33 Mechanical Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington. 34 The plans of the RFC documents shall be complete integrated bridge rehabilitation drawings 35 developed from all associated shop drawings for all mechanical components incorporated into 36 the bridge rehabilitation. The integrated bridge rehabilitation drawings of the RFC documents 37 shall be reproduced on sheets conforming to standard City of Tacoma format for title block 38 template. The integrated bridge rehabilitation drawings of the RFC documents shall include, but 39 not be limited to, the following: 40

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-15 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Certified Drawings of manufactured products 2 • Shop Drawings 3 • Erection Drawings

4 See Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

5 2.12.6.5 DESIGN CALCULATIONS 6 The Design-Builder shall provide complete sets of calculations support all mechanical designs 7 described in this Section. Complete sets of calculations shall included with each design review 8 submittal (including temporary structures, falsework and other temporary works). 9 All final design calculations shall include the stamp of the Lead Mechanical Engineer, licensed in 10 the State of Washington. 11 The sets of calculations shall include the following: 12 • Index Sheets – These shall include numbered calculation sheets and an index by subject 13 with the corresponding sheet numbers. The name of the Project, Structure 14 Identification, date (month, day and year) when calculations are printed, designers, 15 checkers, lead engineer and project engineer names, titles, initials and signatures shall 16 be listed. 17 • Design Calculations – These shall include design criteria; loadings; analysis; and 18 pertinent computer input and output data (reduced to an 8.5-inch by 11-inch sheet size). 19 Each sheet or logical group of sheets shall be initialed and dated by the designer and 20 checker. 21 Refer to Sections 2.9 and 2.22 for additional requirements.

22 2.12.6.6 DESIGN SOFTWARE 23 The Design-Builder shall use the following software for the mechanical rehabilitation analysis 24 and design: 25 • AutoCAD (by Autodesk) for all mechanical design drawings - The same version the City 26 of Tacoma is using at Notice to Proceed. 27 • Other software may be used on the project after approval from the City of Tacoma.

28 2.12.6.7 SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL 29 The Design-Builder shall submit shop drawings for all bridge elements requiring fabrication or 30 construction according to Section 2.9, to the City of Tacoma for Review and Comment but not 31 approval. Review and Comment by the City of Tacoma does not release the Design-Builder from 32 any or in any way of the full responsibility for the structural, mechanical and constructability 33 adequacy of the items being reviewed, nor does Review and Comment by the City of Tacoma 34 serve to place any responsibility of the structural, mechanical and constructability adequacy of 35 the item under review. The following minimum information shall be included in the shop 36 drawings: 37 • Size of members and fasteners; 38 • Complete dimensions including all fits and surface finish requirements; 39 • Finish such as painting, anodizing, and galvanizing;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-16 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Weld size and type and welding and stress relief procedures; 2 • Fabrication-reaming, drilling, machining and assembly procedures; 3 • Penetrations in walls; 4 • Erection, assembly and/or alignment procedures; and 5 • Start-up testing procedures.

6 2.12.6.8 WORKING DRAWINGS FOR FALSEWORK, FORMS, TEMPORARY STRUCTURES 7 AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS 8 The Design-Builder shall prepare working drawings with supporting design calculations for all 9 falsework, forms, temporary structures, and construction process. 10 Construction process working drawing submittals shall include, but not be limited to, the 11 following: 12 • Lift span and counterweight support falsework.

13 The City of Tacoma will review and comment on the working drawing submittals.

14 2.12.6.9 WARRANTIES 15 Warranties provided by manufacturers for all equipment and components shall be transferred 16 from the Design-Builder to the City of Tacoma and the warranty documentation shall be 17 submitted to the City of Tacoma.

18 2.12.6.10 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 19 The Design-Builder shall prepare a comprehensive Operation and Maintenance (O&M) manual 20 for the Murray Morgan Bridge for all of the existing, new and rehabilitated mechanical 21 machinery. Six preliminary copies of the Manual shall be submitted prior to shipment of 22 machinery to the site. The preliminary manual shall be complete in all respects with regard to 23 material content, organization and legibility for review. Preliminary copies need not comply 24 with presentation requirements including page size, paper weight, paper reinforcement and 25 protection including oil, moisture and wear resistant covers, and copy method. 26 Six final copies of the Manual shall be submitted after the machinery is in operation. The final 27 manual shall incorporate all of the City of Tacoma’s comments on the preliminary manual, all 28 field changes made during construction and installation, and records of all alignment 29 measurements performed as part of the work. Final copies shall also comply with all 30 presentation requirements to ensure permanence of the manuals. 31 Manufacturer's operating and maintenance manuals shall be included giving complete 32 instructions relative to assembly, installation, operation, adjustment, lubrication, maintenance, 33 and carrying complete parts list shall be furnished by the Design-Builder for every item of 34 equipment furnished by the Design-Builder. 35 Manuals may be manufacturer's standard publications provided that they comply with specified 36 requirements relative to quantity and quality of information and data. 37 Manuals shall be in hard or flexible covers. Illustrations shall be clear. Printed matter, 38 including dimensions and lettering on drawings, shall be easily legible. If reduced drawings are 39 incorporated into the manuals, the original lines and letters shall be darkened if necessary to 40 retain their legibility after reduction. Larger drawings may be folded into manuals to page size.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-17 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The contents of the Manual shall be as follows: 2 • Table of contents, in numerical order. 3 • Index, in alphabetical order. 4 • Manufacturer's literature describing each piece of equipment and giving manufacturer's 5 model number and drawing number. 6 • Operation instructions, including step by step details for preparation for opening, 7 opening procedures, closing procedures, conclusion procedures, and emergency 8 procedures. 9 • Sequence of operation and how each component and interlock affects the operation of 10 other components. 11 • Schematics that show all components of the entire operating machinery system that 12 require lubrication. Include also on the charts, the type and frequency of lubrication. 13 • Copies of all approved machinery installation procedures. 14 • Copies of all assembly, erection and shop drawings. These drawings to be included “as 15 built” in the final version of the manual. 16 • Records of all final alignment measurements 17 • Complete details and procedures for adjusting all items that have adjustments to 18 compensate for wear. 19 • Steps for cursory inspection that should be carried out annually. 20 • Steps for semi-in-depth inspection that should be carried out every 3 years. 21 • Steps for in-depth inspection that should be carried out every 6 years. 22 • List of nearest local suppliers of all equipment parts. 23 • List of parts and supplies that are to be furnished as part of the Contract. 24 • Name, address and telephone number of the local manufacturer's representative and 25 service company, for each piece of equipment so that prices or spare parts can easily be 26 obtained.

27 The covers and title page shall be neatly imprinted with a descriptive title and shall contain the 28 name of the bridge, owner, and location. The title page shall also contain the names of the 29 Design-Builder, and the date of issue. Divider pages with tabs shall separate the various 30 sections which comprise the Manual. All parts information shall be correct for the equipment 31 provided under this Contract. If standard parts drawings are used, they shall be modified to be 32 suitable and irrelevant material shall be blocked out. All general information used as text shall 33 be modified where necessary to show pertinence to the equipment furnished under this 34 Contract, and irrelevant material shall be removed. The arrangement of the Manual, method of 35 binding, including material and text shall be submitted to the Engineer for approval. 36 Diagrams and prints used in the manual shall be reproduced to a size not to exceed 11 in. by 17 37 in. and shall be complete and legible in all respects. Diagrams shall be made on white paper and 38 vacuum sealed in transparent plastic material impervious to moisture and oil, and resistant to 39 abrasion. Other formats which are equal in clarity, sharpness, durability and permanence will 40 be considered.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-18 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Manuals shall be prepared from the following materials: 2 • Loose leaf, on 60 lb. punched paper with plastic reinforcement strips. 3 • Page size, 8 1/2 inches by 11 inches. 4 • Fold out diagrams and illustrations. 5 • Reproducible by dry copy xerography method. 6 • Oil, moisture and wear resistant plastic covers.

7 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.12-19 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.13 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

2 2.13.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to design, document, and construct 4 the stormwater management facilities for the Project. Elements of Work shall include, 5 but are not limited to, the following: 6 • Drainage systems for the permanent Project facilities and the temporary 7 construction conditions that meet 2008 City of Tacoma Surface Water 8 Management Manual (SWMM. 9 • Temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures that meet threshold 10 requirements stipulated in the 2008 City of Tacoma SWMM. 11 • Maintenance of existing flows in the Murray Morgan Bridge and approach Site 12 vicinity that pass through the Project area. 13 • Temporary pumping system(s) to address the collection of groundwater and 14 stormwater within the excavations for the stormwater treatment vaults if 15 required. 16 • Preparation of a Final Stormwater Site Plan Report using the guidelines of the 17 City of Tacoma SWMM and Washington State Department of Ecology 18 Stormwater Management Manual (WSDOESMM). 19 • If the stormwater management approaches change during preparation of the 20 final design, the Design-Builder shall coordinate with the City of Tacoma and 21 Department of Ecology (for the required permits as stipulated by Ecology), to 22 verify and/or make adjustments as stipulated in the NPDES permit.

23 2.13.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 24 The following is a list of publications and computer programs that shall be used for all 25 design and construction of the drainage system. They are listed in hierarchical order, 26 with the most important appearing at the top of the list. This is not a comprehensive list; 27 other applicable publications may be required to complete the design and construction. 28 If the requirements of a mandatory standard, programmatic agreement, or permit issued 29 for the Project conflict, then the provisions within the Project-specific permits shall take 30 precedence. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any ambiguities or conflicts relating 31 in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design-Builder shall notify the City of 32 Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may resolve them. 33 • City of Tacoma Surface Water Management Manual 34 • City of Tacoma Building and Land Use Services (BLUS) Division 35 • Chapter 12.08 of the Tacoma Municipal Code (TMC) 36 • TMC Chapters 13.04 and 13.05 (Subdivision and Land Use Permit Procedures) 37 • TMC Section 2.02.130 Off-site Improvements that Include Storm Drainage 38 • TMC Chapter 10.14 Driveway Control 39 • TMC Chapter 12.09 Groundwater Protection

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-1

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • TMC Chapter 13.10 Shoreline Regulation 2 • TMC Chapter 13.11 Critical Areas Protection 3 • Washington State Department of Ecology, Stormwater Management Manual for 4 Western Washington, 2005.

5 2.13.2.1 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 6 The following computer software is the primary software accepted by the City of Tacoma 7 for use on the Project for hydraulic analysis. Use of other hydraulic analysis computer 8 software by the Design-Builder may require submittal of additional details about the 9 software, and coordination and acceptance from the City of Tacoma that the programs 10 conform to existing programs. 11 • Mandatory Software: 12 o WWHM continuous simulation hydrologic model.

13 • Approved Software: 14 o WSDOT spreadsheet for pavement runoff spread calculations. 15 o StormShed3G by Boss International. 16 o HY-8, Culvert Hydraulic Analysis Program by FHWA. 17 o WSPRO Backwater/Surface Water Computation. 18 o HEC-RAS Backwater/Surface Water Computation. 19 o PondPack FlowMaster, StormCAD and CulvertMaster by Haestead Methods.

20 2.13.2.2 APPROVED DESIGN MANUALS 21 The following design manuals are accepted by the City of Tacoma for use in hydraulic 22 design for the Project. The Design-Builder shall obtain the City of Tacoma’s approval 23 prior to using other design manuals. 24 • City of Tacoma Surface Water Management Manual 25 • Washington State Department of Ecology, Stormwater Management Manual for 26 Western Washington, 2005. 27 • HEC-13, Hydraulic Design of Improved Inlets for Culverts; 28 • HEC-14, Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipaters for Culverts and Channels; 29 • HEC-15, Design of Roadside Channels with Flexible Linings; and 30 • HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges.

31 2.13.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

32 2.13.3.1 GENERAL 33 The stormwater drainage system (consisting of runoff collection systems, conveyance 34 systems, runoff treatment facilities, and outfalls) shall meet the requirements of this 35 Section, the Mandatory Standards, and all Project permits. The Design-Builder shall 36 provide and maintain facilities for handling runoff from non-pollution-generating

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-2

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 surfaces, flows originating from the Project Site vicinity, and cross-drainage as required 2 in the Project permits.

3 These conveyance and treatment facilities shall be sized using the methods described in 4 the Mandatory Standards, unless otherwise noted in this Section. 5 The Design-Builder shall coordinate stormwater design with Section 2.6.

6 2.13.3.2 STORMWATER SUPPORT FOR PROJECT VICINITY ROADWAY 7 WORK 8 Should Project vicinity roadway mitigation be required, the Design-Builder shall 9 coordinate any required stormwater improvements with the City of Tacoma.

10 2.13.3.3 SITE GRADING 11 Stormwater design shall include Site grading requirements per City of Tacoma 12 standards.

13 2.13.3.4 GROUNDWATER – DEWATERING 14 Discharge of groundwater shall comply with State water quality standards or NPDES 15 permits issued for the Site. The Design-Builder will be responsible for all geotechnical 16 field and laboratory investigations required in order to meet the City of Tacoma 17 requirements. Some groundwater information is included within the 11th Street ROW, 18 Site-Specific Remedial Investigation, Feb 20, 2001. For informational purposes it has 19 been included as Appendix 30.

20 2.13.3.5 CULVERTS 21 Additional culvert(s) may be required depending on the means and methods chosen by 22 the Design-Builder. The Design-Builder shall follow culvert requirements per Volume 3, 23 Chapter 3 of the City of Tacoma SWMM.

24 2.13.3.6 OUTFALLS 25 There shall be no additional outfalls to the shoreline. If the Design-Builder creates a 26 design that requires additional outfalls to the shoreline, it is the Design-Builder’s 27 responsibility to acquire the necessary permits at no additional cost to the City of 28 Tacoma.

29 2.13.3.7 EROSION CONTROL AND FILING OF NOTICE OF INTENT; TRANSFER 30 OF PERMIT; FILING NOTICE OF TERMINATION 31 The Design-Builder shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention plan according to 32 the City of Tacoma SWMM and gain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge 33 Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater general permit for discharges associated with 34 construction activities (the “permit”) or other laws and regulations in effect in the State 35 of Washington that allows or requires the Design-Builder to file for coverage under the 36 applicable Permit through submittal of a Notice of Intent (“NOI”), Notice of Coverage 37 (“NOC”), or through such other application to be covered by such Permit as a separate 38 permittee or co-permittee. The Design-Builder agrees that it will file such application for 39 coverage. The NOI Permit coverage shall be transferred from the City of Tacoma, as 40 owner of the Project to the Design-Builder. The Design-Builder agrees that it will accept

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-3

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 such transfer and execute any documents necessary and required to effect the transfer of 2 the permit coverage from the City of Tacoma.

3 The Design-Builder will not initiate, or allow its Subcontractors or Sub-subcontractors to 4 initiate ground-disturbing activities at the Site until all required stormwater 5 authorizations have been issued by the local, state and/or federal authorities, or until 6 coverage has been obtained pursuant to any applicable Permit. The Design-Builder shall 7 obtain Permit coverage, transfer any Permit and terminate Permit coverage as required 8 by the applicable Permit.

9 2.13.3.8 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS – STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 10 The stormwater management design shall be prepared by, or under the direct 11 supervision of, the Drainage Design Lead Engineer.

12 The Drainage Design Lead Engineer shall have a minimum of ten years of experience in 13 the design and construction of bridge and Site-related drainage elements, and a 14 minimum of two years of specific drainage design experience in Western Washington 15 within the last four years. The Drainage Design Lead Engineer shall be a Professional 16 Engineer licensed in the State of Washington under Title 18 RCW; shall be familiar with 17 the City of Tacoma’s 2008 Surface Water Management Manual; and shall be responsible 18 for the stormwater design including hydraulic impact mitigation evaluations. The 19 Drainage Design Lead Engineer shall also be responsible for any drainage design 20 revisions made throughout the duration of the Contract.

21 2.13.3.9 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER SITE PLAN REPORT 22 The Conceptual Schematic Design Plans provide potential stormwater management 23 areas with a potential solution, which is the basis for the Project’s current permit 24 approach. The Schematic Plans addresses the stormwater design issues related to the 25 construction of the retrofitted Murray Morgan Bridge Project. It is the Design-Builder’s 26 responsibility to determine the exact stormwater facilities that will be used to convey 27 runoff to a series of approved enhanced treatment water quality facilities that connect to 28 the existing storm drainage conveyance systems that currently outfall into the Thea Foss 29 Waterway.

30 Following the outline in the Section 2.13.2 Mandatory Standards, the Design-Builder 31 shall begin by developing a Conceptual Stormwater Site Plan Report to include all 32 elements of the design, and shall refine and detail the documentation as necessary to 33 demonstrate that the design meets all Mandatory Standards and fulfills the Project’s 34 environmental commitments.

35 2.13.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

36 2.13.4.1 DESIGN CRITERIA 37 The Design-Builder shall use the design criteria described in this Section to develop the 38 drainage design of the Project.

39 The Design-Builder is encouraged to seek cost-effective solutions that provide equal or 40 greater environmental benefits and reduced long-term maintenance, compared to the 41 solutions shown in the conceptual designs. Cost-effective solutions may include the

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-4

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 innovative use of runoff treatment and reduction or conversion of Pollution Generating 2 Imperious Surface (PGIS). Any modification to the conceptual designs shall follow the 3 mandatory standards in Section 2.13.2.

4 The project will require the Design-Builder to demonstrate the following minimum 5 requirements are met: 6 • Preparation of Stormwater Site Plan 7 • Preparation of Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 8 • Source Control of Pollution 9 • Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls 10 • On-Site Stormwater Management 11 • Runoff Advanced Treatment 12 • Flow Control. The City of Tacoma has indicated that they have completed a 13 quantitative analysis of the storm drainage conveyance systems that the site will 14 discharge to and has concluded that both systems have adequate capacity to 15 convey flows from the Project site; therefore, there is no requirement for reducing 16 flow rates during operation of the Site treatment systems. 17 • Wetlands Protection 18 • Basin/Watershed Planning 19 • Operations & Maintenance 20 • Off-Site Analysis and Mitigation 21 • Financial Liability

22 2.13.4.2 COLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE STRUCTURES 23 All proposed storm drains, ditches, outfalls and other new conveyance structures within 24 the Project limits shall be sized and/or checked for capacity and included in the Design- 25 Builder’s Stormwater Site Plan Report. Capacity calculations shall compare required 26 capacity to actual capacity to verify that the designed system meets the mandatory 27 standards. The City has concluded that the existing conveyance system has the capacity 28 to convey the fully developed design event as defined in Volume 3, Chapter 3 of the City 29 of Tacoma SWMM.

30 The Design-Builder shall work with the Utility Owners to design and construct all storm 31 drainage conveyance Utility crossings to meet the requirements of the Utility Owners 32 and of Section 2.8.

33 2.13.4.3 INFILTRATION 34 The runoff treatment concepts identified in the Conceptual Stormwater Site Plan Report 35 assumed that no infiltration was feasible within the Murray Morgan Bridge Site area, 36 particularly under the City approach. If the Design-Builder wants to evaluate infiltration, 37 preliminary soil investigations shall be conducted by the Design-Builder to determine if 38 soil conditions exist that make infiltration of runoff feasible.

39 The Design-Builder shall perform supplemental investigations if needed for the design of 40 any infiltration systems as necessary to meet the City of Tacoma requirements. The

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-5

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Design-Builder’s design of infiltration systems, including the locations, BMP types, and 2 design infiltration rates, shall be based on the recommendations of the Design-Builder’s 3 Geotechnical Engineer.

4 2.13.4.4 RUNOFF TREATMENT 5 The Project site discharges to the Thea Foss Waterway which is considered a sensitive 6 habitat and will require enhanced water quality treatment to be provided for all of the 7 replaced bridge surfaces except for lift span portion of the bridge.

8 Along the City approach, the conceptual design assumes that a two train treatment 9 facility will be required in order to provide enhanced treatment for the catchment area. 10 The conceptual design consists of a treatment train that consists of a wet vault followed 11 by a media filter vault per Volume 5, Chapter 2 of the City of Tacoma SWMM. A 12 conceptual schematic of the facilities is illustrated in Appendix 18.

13 Along the Port approach, there are existing landscaped and gravel areas that could be 14 used to achieve enhanced treatment through bioretention areas. Another treatment 15 option is a combination of wet vault followed by a media filter vault. The conceptual 16 design consists of a series of catchbasins and storm drain pipe attached to the bridge 17 deck that are conveyed to a treatment train to the south consisting of a bioswale followed 18 by a media filter vault and a bioretention area to the north. All stormwater quality 19 facilities shall conform to Volume 5, Chapter 2 of the City of Tacoma SWMM. A 20 conceptual schematic of the facilities is illustrated in Appendix 18.

21 Another option is to convey runoff from the bridge deck through storm drain pipes 22 connected to the existing bridge columns to a Filterra Bioretention type system and then 23 outlet to the existing City of Tacoma stormwater conveyance system

24 The conceptual schematic plans outline the areas that can be used for enhanced 25 stormwater quality treatment facilities. The stormwater quality treatment facilities shall 26 not exceed 8 feet in depth measured from existing ground to bottom of facility. 27 Permanent stormwater quality treatment facilities shall be located outside of streams or 28 steep slopes, and designed in accordance with the City of Tacoma SWMM, unless 29 otherwise noted in this Section.

30 The use of emerging technologies such as Filterra Bioretention Systems and other 31 proprietary (vendor-supplied) treatment facilities shall meet the requirements of 32 Chapter 10 Emerging Technologies of the City of Tacoma SWMM. Any proprietary 33 stormwater treatment products proposed to be used by the Design-Builder shall be 34 specifically submitted for review and acceptance by the City of Tacoma, prior to being 35 incorporated into the Project.

36 The Design-Builder shall follow the BMP selection process in the City of Tacoma SWMM.

37 2.13.4.5 VAULTS 38 Vaults, if proposed for the Murray Morgan Site, shall be designed for hydrostatic uplift if 39 groundwater conditions warrant it.

40 Vaults, tanks, and galleries if proposed for the Murray Morgan Site shall be arranged, 41 partitioned, or compartmentalized with internal baffles or partial-height water-tight

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-6

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 walls so that maintenance workers will be able to handle, remove, or relocate up to a 2 maximum volume of 6,000 gallons of combined fluid and debris/sediment within each 3 compartment. Access covers shall be located directly above the inlet and outfall pipes, 4 and over the low floor end of each compartment. The floor shall slope (both longitudinal 5 and transverse directions) to the clean-out location and outlet. Smaller vaults, tanks, and 6 galleries, up to 10 feet wide, shall be designed and constructed so as to be suitable for 7 cleaning with high-pressure rodding and vactor trucks. Larger vaults greater than 10 feet 8 in width shall have ramp access suitable for motorized sediment removal equipment 9 (e.g., small front-end loaders such as bobcats or skid steers), or removable lids suitable 10 for crane lift access of larger cleaning equipment and buckets, as accepted by the City of 11 Tacoma.

12 The City of Tacoma requires 50-foot spacing for access points for the first third of any 13 vault or tanks as needed for sediment removal. Secondary access shall also be provided 14 suitable for easy entry by personnel during inspections. All hatches shall be provided 15 with access ladders. The facility shall meet OSHA confined space requirements for entry 16 (examples include maximum 50 feet to the nearest exit point when inside, ladder fall 17 restraints, ventilation, and provisions for lighting in large vaults); shall be vented; and 18 shall have locking covers or otherwise be fenced to protect against unauthorized entry. 19 Confined space with access shall be a minimum of 4 feet wide and 7 feet tall. Depth from 20 existing grade to bottom of vault shall not exceed 8 feet. Inspection access covers shall be 21 at least 30 inches in size. Access covers and ladders shall be supplied for the inlet and 22 outfall controls such that visual inspection of the inlet and outfall elements can be 23 achieved conveniently. The access ladders and operating controls shall be designed such 24 that a maintenance person will be able to reach any grab handles, grates, or screens 25 outside of the standing water.

26 Where access lids or covers are required to be placed within the pavement, curb gutters, 27 parking areas, vehicle travel areas such as shoulders, the access lids or covers shall be 28 designed to carry vehicle loads in accordance with Section 2.10. Preferred cover and 29 frame types for live loadings are bolt-down ductile iron type. Refer to Section 2.10 for 30 additional structural requirements.

31 The Design-Builder shall submit maintenance access, pipe slope, internal baffle walls, 32 drain systems, and other provisions for maintenance to the City of Tacoma for review 33 and comment.

34 2.13.4.6 PERMITS AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS 35 See Section 2.6 for information related to permitting, environmental requirements and 36 commitments.

37 2.13.4.7 PUMP STATION DESIGN 38 Discharge of stormwater or groundwater shall comply with State water quality standards 39 or NPDES permits issued for the Site.

40 All pumps, motors, power cable, base elbows, and accessories shall be supplied by one 41 pump manufacturer. All equipment related to any required flow splitters shall be the 42 responsibility of the Design-Builder to design, procure, and install.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-7

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 All pumping, valving, and flow splitting equipment and accessories furnished under this 2 Section shall be of a design and manufacture that has been used in similar applications 3 and it shall be demonstrated as such to the satisfaction of the City of Tacoma.

4 To ensure a consistent high standard of quality, the manufacturers of this equipment 5 shall comply with the requirements of the ISO 9001 Quality System, and such 6 compliance shall be verified by an independent certification agency approved by the 7 International Organization for Standardization. Documentation shall be submitted for 8 comment showing compliance with this requirement, and the equipment will not be 9 released for shipment until approved by the Design-Builder.

10 2.13.4.8 TAIL WATER 11 The tide elevation shall be determined by the Design-Builder. The Design-Builder shall 12 ensure that the Ordinary High Water Elevation due to the high tide elevation does not 13 backup into the proposed water quality facilities.

14 2.13.4.9 GROUNDWATER – DEWATERING 15 Discharge of groundwater shall comply with State water quality standards or NPDES 16 permits issued for the Murray Morgan Site.

17 2.13.4.10 MAINTENANCE ACCESS WITHIN THE STORMWATER FACILITIES 18 The Design-Builder shall maintain all stormwater and groundwater treatment facilities 19 during facility construction, in accordance with the City of Tacoma requirements. 20 Hydraulic control structures such as weirs, orifices, valves, and gates that are used for 21 the operation, monitoring, and maintenance of vaults, ponds, and other treatment or 22 flow control facilities shall be accessible by a maintenance access road or from pavement. 23 Maintenance access adjacent to the sedimentation pools of ponds and vaults shall 24 include a working area suitable for the loading and maneuvering of sediment disposal 25 equipment and trucks.

26 Maintenance access designs shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma for review and 27 comment prior to being incorporated into the Project.

28 2.13.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

29 2.13.5.1 MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES 30 Refer to Section 2.23 for specifications on maintaining drainage conveyance facilities 31 during the course of the Work.

32 2.13.6 SUBMITTALS

33 2.13.6.1 GENERAL 34 Drawing submittals shall be complete with associated engineering documentation 35 sufficient to verify that the design meets the Mandatory Standards, specifications, 36 permits, and applicable agreements.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-8

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.13.6.2 DRAINAGE EXISTING CONDITION SURVEY 2 As part of the Preliminary Design Submittal, the Design-Builder shall complete the 3 existing condition inventory to include all existing onsite drainage pipe systems and 4 associated structures that will remain after completion of the Project. The Design- 5 Builder shall complete this Work prior to submittal of the first Draft Stormwater Site 6 Plan Report.

7 2.13.6.3 DESIGN CALCULATIONS 8 The Design-Builder is responsible for completing all calculations necessary for the design 9 of the Work. The Design-Builder shall prepare calculations in accordance with the City of 10 Tacoma SWMM, to support the design shown on the plans and details. The associated 11 set of design calculations shall be submitted with each set of Drainage Plans submitted in 12 accordance with the City of Tacoma SWMM.

13 The calculations shall include a narrative that describes the approach taken and the 14 order of the calculations, including sections on the methodologies used (appropriateness 15 and accuracy requirements), design decisions made, and resultant summaries. The 16 calculations shall include copies of the input and output printouts from the supporting 17 computer programs, spreadsheets, hand calculations, exhibits, and sketches. The 18 calculations shall also include, but are not limited to, the following items:

19 • Index Sheets – The Design-Builder shall number all calculation sheets and 20 prepare an index by subject with the corresponding sheet numbers. The Design- 21 Builder shall list the name and number of the Project, SR Number, 22 designer/checker initials, date (month, day, and year), and supervisor’s initials. 23 • Design Calculations – These calculations shall include design criteria, hydrology 24 and hydraulics calculations, and pertinent computer input and output data 25 (reduced to 8.5-inch by 11-inch sheet size). The calculations shall include a 26 narrative of the approach taken, and final conclusions and summaries of the 27 calculation results in both narrative and table format. The calculations shall be in 28 logical order, technically clear, and cross-referenced to correspond directly with 29 drainage structure and basin numbering on the drainage plans, maps, and 30 exhibits for ease of reference. 31 • Special Design Features – The Design-Builder shall include a brief narrative of 32 major design decisions or revisions, and the reasons for them. 33 • Design decision summaries. 34 • Pump station design (if used) to include how the system will accommodate 35 chemical addition to assist in the water treatment if necessary. 36 • Any Amendments to the Standard Specifications, and Technical Specifications 37 necessary for construction. 38 • Drainage maps showing the hydrologic features, drainage basins, sub-basins, 39 existing and final conveyance and cross-drain structures, flow direction arrows, 40 numbering system, and any other features necessary to support and clarify the 41 design calculations. The drainage maps shall also show all geotechnically and 42 environmentally sensitive areas, streams and wetlands with buffer boundaries, 43 riparian zones, the ordinary high water and FEMA flood level contours, aquifer 44 and well head protection zones, sanitary drain fields, and major Utilities that will

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-9

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 affect the drainage design. The drainage design drawings and maps shall be on 2 22-inch by 34-inch paper. 3 • Other exhibits to provide details necessary to clarify and support the calculations.

4 2.13.6.4 STORMWATER SITE PLAN REPORT 5 A Stormwater Site Plan Report shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of, 6 the Drainage Design Lead Engineer. The report shall be in accordance with the City of 7 Tacoma SWMM. The Stormwater Site Plan Report shall follow the guidance, outline, and 8 format described in Volume 1, Chapter 4 of the SWMM.

9 The Design-Builder shall submit a Draft Stormwater Site Plan Report to support the City 10 of Tacoma's review of the drainage design drawings. The Draft Stormwater Site Plan 11 Report shall show the Design-Builder’s overall Project runoff treatment, process water, 12 pumping, dewatering, and storm drainage concept for the Project. In particular, the 13 report shall include the overall drainage basin and sub-basin layouts; locations of cross- 14 drains and outfalls; basic hydrology and hydraulic calculations; major conveyance 15 system layout; and concepts to be used at specific locations for treatment of Project 16 runoff.

17 The Design-Builder shall update the Stormwater Site Plan Report to reflect changes in 18 the original design during construction. All drawing submittals for changes made during 19 construction shall include a supplemental hydraulic design attachment to support the 20 City of Tacoma design review. The supplements shall reference the Stormwater Site Plan 21 Report and be specific as to the changes; be easily readable as stand-alone documents; 22 show why the revision was made and how it affected the design; and include the revised 23 drawings and exhibits, supporting calculations, and revised summaries and tables. The 24 combined Stormwater Site Plan Report and supplemental updates shall reflect the 25 design and as-built condition of the drainage system at the end of construction.

26 The Design-Builder shall assemble the Final Stormwater Site Plan Report and all 27 Supplemental Hydraulic Reports into a single document, in accordance the City of 28 Tacoma SWMM. The Final Stormwater Site Plan Report shall incorporate the final as- 29 built documentation in accordance with this Section, including the updated report text, 30 records of decision, associated design criteria, drainage maps, drainage plans and 31 profiles, calculations, and details. The Final Stormwater Site Plan Report is subject to 32 City of Tacoma review and comment.

33 The Design-Builder shall submit three copies, in three ring binders, on 8.5-inch by 11- 34 inch paper, except that exhibits may be on 11-inch by 17-inch paper. The final submittal 35 shall include the Final Stormwater Site Plan Report in electronic form on a CDROM, 36 complete with all associated drawing files (Autocadd format), calculations, documents 37 (Microsoft Word format), and hydrologic/hydraulic models.

38 The Final Stormwater Site Plan Report and all supplemental attachments shall include 39 the Drainage Design Lead Engineer’s stamp.

40 2.13.6.5 SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS 41 The Design-Builder shall submit shop drawings in accordance with Section 2.24 for all 42 drainage structures, pumping elements, and pipe elements.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-10

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.13.6.6 PUMP STATION WARRANTY 2 If a pump system is required, the centrifugal pumps, valves, flow splitter and associated 3 equipment shall be warranted for a period of not less than 5 years from the date of 4 commissioning against defects in materials and workmanship.

5 2.13.6.7 DESIGN REVISIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION 6 Calculations for revisions made during construction shall be incorporated into the Final 7 Stormwater Site Plan Report when construction is completed.

8 When new plan sheets are required as part of a construction revision, the revisions shall 9 be made in accordance with the City of Tacoma SWMM.

10 2.13.6.8 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 11 The Design-Builder shall prepare a Drainage Operation and Maintenance Manual that 12 describes the “what” and “when” maintenance procedures for all Project drainage 13 facilities, including the maintenance requirements for the runoff treatment, process 14 water, and dewatering facilities. The Drainage Operation and Maintenance Manual shall 15 include a description of the BMPs used on the Project and how they function; a 16 tabulation of quantities for new stormwater facilities (e.g., manholes, catch basins, linear 17 feet of storm drain pipe, vaults, sand filters, Filterra Bioretention Systems, Stormfilter 18 Vault, acres of pond site, linear feet fencing, and pump station). The Drainage Operation 19 and Maintenance Manual shall be prepared and incorporated into the comprehensive 20 Operation and Maintenance Manual for the Murray Morgan Site per this Section.

21 2.13.6.9 LIST OF SUBMITTALS 22 Project submittals include, but are not limited to, the following: 23 • Certifications of Construction Site Erosion Control personnel; 24 • Drainage design calculations submitted with the corresponding drainage design 25 plans; 26 • Drainage design plans submitted at preliminary, final, and RFC stages; 27 • Stormwater Site Plan Report (various submittals during design development, 28 supplemental updates during construction, and complete Final As-Built 29 Stormwater Site Plan Report for the record); 30 • Shop drawings; and 31 • Final submittal including Stormwater Site Plan in pdf format and all calculations, 32 documents, and drawing files on a CDROM.

33 2.13.6.10 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 34 The Design-Builder shall obtain the City of Tacoma Public Works Stormwater Utility’s 35 written acceptance of the stormwater utility upon which the Design-Builder performs 36 construction Relocation Work, promptly upon completion of the work. The Design- 37 Builder shall submit the original document of written acceptance to the City of Tacoma 38 Engineer.

39 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.13-11

City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.14 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS

2 2.14.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to meet the requirements for 4 permanent signing and pavement markings for the Project. Refer to Section 2.17 5 (Maintenance of Traffic) for additional temporary signing requirements.

6 2.14.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 7 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. 8 They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the 9 list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to 10 complete the design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any 11 ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design- 12 Builder shall notify The City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may 13 resolve them. 14 • City Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix 04). 15 • Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix 03) 16 • WSDOT Standard Specifications (M 41-10). 17 • City of Tacoma Standard Plans 18 • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) - Washington State 19 Modifications (M 24-01). 20 • FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways 21 (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revisions 1 and 2 Incorporated, December 2007. 22 • Tacoma Municipal Code. 23 • WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines Manual (M 36-63). 24 • AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition, 25 2004. 26 • AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, 27 Luminaires, and Traffic Signals, 5th Edition, 2009. 28 • AASHTO Roadside Design Guide, 3rd Edition, 2002, and 2006 Chapter 6 29 Update.

30 2.14.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

31 2.14.3.1 SOFTWARE 32 The Design-Builder shall use software for producing engineering drawings of guide signs 33 and pavement markings that can either create or seamlessly convert files to AutoCAD 34 DWG.

35 2.14.3.2 PAVEMENT MARKINGS PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 36 The Design-Builder shall ensure that all pavement markings on the Project meet the 37 requirements of Section 8-22 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.14-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.14.3.3 MEETINGS 2 The Design-Builder shall work with the City of Tacoma to establish a Traffic Design 3 Team to oversee and provide input on the design and construction of traffic-related 4 objects and issues including, but not limited to, signing, lighting, pavement marking, 5 traffic operations, and traffic signals. The Design-Builder shall schedule and chair the 6 meetings during the design and construction stages until Project Physical Completion. 7 The Design-Builder shall prepare the agenda, meeting minutes, exhibits, and design 8 plans necessary for each meeting (see Section 2.1, General Information). Meetings shall 9 include representatives from the City of Tacoma and other representatives as requested 10 by the City of Tacoma.

11 2.14.4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

12 2.14.4.1 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

13 2.14.4.1.1 General 14 The Design-Builder shall prepare a Signing and Pavement Marking Plan for review and 15 approval by the City of Tacoma.

16 The Design-Builder shall ultimately be responsible for designing, per the requirements of 17 this Section, all signs and pavement markings. Final placement of all signs and 18 pavement markings shall be determined by the Design-Builder.

19 2.14.4.1.2 Plan Requirements 20 The Design-Builder shall develop a Signing and Pavement Marking Plan that provides 21 for all Project signing and pavement markings, including reestablishing parking stall 22 markings in the parking lot below the bridge on the City side if required due to the work 23 of the Design-Builder. The Signing and Pavement Marking Plan shall provide for 24 modifications to signs and pavement markings outside of the Site of Work that are 25 rendered inaccurate, ineffective, confusing, or unnecessary as a result of modifications 26 by the Project.

27 The Design-Builder shall coordinate with the City of Tacoma regarding proposed signing 28 and pavement marking modifications within the City of Tacoma’s right of way. Signs 29 shall be placed in accordance with the City of Tacoma’s code and the MUTCD guidelines.

30 2.14.4.1.3 Sign Material Requirements 31 Sign Sheeting Material –All signs shall be constructed in accordance with Section 9- 32 28 of the Standard Specifications and shall be approved by the City of Tacoma.

33 2.14.4.1.4 Permanent Pavement Marking Material Requirements 34 The Design-Builder shall provide permanent pavement markings that meet the 35 requirements of Section 9-34 of the Standard Specifications for all locations within the 36 Project.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.14-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.14.4.1.5 Pavement Marking Material Certification 2 The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with a manufacturer’s certification 3 that the pavement marking material meets the requirements of Section 9-34 of the 4 Standard Specifications. The Design-Builder shall ensure that the certification includes 5 the manufacturer’s address, telephone number, and contact person. The Design-Builder 6 shall perform all required testing in accordance with Section 9-34 of the Standard 7 Specifications, Section 2.20 (Control of Materials) and Section 2.22 (Design-Build 8 Quality Management Plan (QMP) Requirements). 9 2.14.4.2 PERMANENT SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS CONSTRUCTION 10 REQUIREMENTS 11 2.14.4.2.1 General 12 The Design-Builder shall meet the construction requirements of Sections 8-22 and 9-28 13 of the Standard Specifications. The Design-Builder shall provide and apply all necessary 14 control points for preliminary spotting and pavement marking layout.

15 The Design-Builder shall use materials approved in accordance with Section 2.20 16 (Control of Materials).

17 2.14.4.2.2 Material Requirements 18 The Design-Builder shall supply new materials for all sign posts, structures and 19 foundations. The Design-Builder shall use approved pavement marking materials as 20 specified in this Section.

21 2.14.4.2.3 Salvage 22 The Design-Builder shall salvage existing signs to be removed as directed by the City of 23 Tacoma. The Design-Builder shall coordinate with the City of Tacoma in advance of any 24 removal of existing City of Tacoma signs and sign structures. If the City of Tacoma elects 25 to salvage such items, the Design-Builder shall make arrangements to deliver the items 26 to the location specified by the City of Tacoma.

27 All other sign panels, sign structures, and associated lighting fixtures and ballasts 28 removed from the City of Tacoma Right-of-Way shall become the property of the Design- 29 Builder. 30 2.14.5 SUBMITTALS 31 All submittals shall be in accordance with Section 2.9 (Project Documentation) and the 32 Quality Management Plan (see Section 2.22).

33 2.14.5.1 PERMANENT SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS PLANS (FINAL 34 DESIGN SUBMITTAL) 35 Prior to releasing the Final Design Submittal, the Design-Builder shall respond to and 36 incorporate all comments from the City of Tacoma following the City of Tacoma’s review 37 of the Signing and Pavement Marking Plan. Refer to Section 2.22 for additional 38 requirements. 39 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.14-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge – Phase I & II Rehabilitation

2.15 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.15-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.16 WATERWAY, FREEWAY AND CITY TRAFFIC 2 OPERATIONS

3 2.16.1 GENERAL 4 The Design-Builder shall perform all Work necessary to meet the requirements 5 associated with traffic operations including, but not limited to coordinating all traffic 6 operations Work with the agencies having jurisdiction over the transportation system 7 being affected. The Design-Builder shall design and implement traffic mitigation 8 measures in a manner consistent with the requirements of the following RFP Sections: 9 • 2.5 (Pavement) 10 • 2.14 (Signing and Pavement Markings) 11 • 2.17 (Maintenance of Traffic) 12 • 2.18 (Railroad) 13 • 2.19 (Right-of-Way (ROW))

14 2.16.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 15 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. 16 They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the 17 list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to 18 complete the design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any 19 ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design- 20 Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may 21 resolve them. 22 • Tacoma Municipal code 23 • City of Tacoma Standard Plans 24 • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – Washington State 25 Modifications (M 24-01) 26 • FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), with Revisions 27 Number 1 and 2 Incorporated, 2007

28 2.16.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 29 The Murray Morgan Bridge crosses over transportation facilities and property owned 30 and/or controlled by multiple jurisdictions. The Design-Builder will be required to 31 protect and minimize disruptions to the existing facilities below the bridge. Design- 32 Builder shall conduct a use analysis that identifies existing traffic volumes and property 33 uses and the mitigation required to accommodate the existing traffic volumes and uses.

34 The use analysis study area encompasses State and City of Tacoma roadways, the Foss 35 Waterway, and the BNSF right-of-way. The Design-Builder shall therefore submit a 36 Jurisdictional Use Analysis Report to the City of Tacoma, WSDOT, the United States 37 Coast Guard, and the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (regarding 38 moorage below the bridge) for review and comment. Subsequent to addressing 39 comments, the Design-Builder shall submit the Jurisdictional Use Analysis Report to the 40 City of Tacoma for review and comment and to WSDOT, United States Coast Guard, and 41 the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for review and approval. The

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.16-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 proposed mitigation shall meet the standards of the City of Tacoma, WSDOT, the United 2 States Coast Guard, and the Washington State Department of Natural Resources as 3 applicable.

4 2.16.3.1 JURISDICTIONAL USE ANALYSIS AND PERFORMANCE 5 Proposed changes by the Design-Builder that may affect the operations for the state 6 routes, local streets and waterway shall be analyzed by the Design-Builder and will be 7 reviewed by the City of Tacoma, WSDOT, the United States Coast Guard, and the 8 Washington State Department of Natural Resources.

9 The City of Tacoma, WSDOT, the United States Coast Guard, and the Washington State 10 Department of Natural Resources may reject mitigation measures proposed by the 11 Design-Builder that result in poor operations, as measured by delay, level of service, or 12 unreasonable conflict with the use of property.

13 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.16-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.17 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT)

2 2.17.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to meet the requirements 4 associated with maintenance of traffic (MOT), including providing for the safe and 5 efficient movement of people, goods, and services to, from and under the Project, while 6 minimizing negative impacts to residents, commuters, and businesses. 7 The Murray Morgan Bridge is currently closed to vehicular traffic. The Design-Builder 8 will be allowed to keep the bridge closed to vehicular traffic until the Physical 9 Completion Date. The Design-Builder shall allow pedestrian traffic, using the bridge to 10 travel between Dock Street and East 11th Street, to use that route to the maximum 11 amount feasible.

12 2.17.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 13 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. 14 They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the 15 list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to 16 complete the design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any 17 ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design- 18 Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may 19 resolve them. 20 • Tacoma Municipal code. 21 • City of Tacoma Standard Plans 22 • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – Washington State 23 Modifications (M 24-01). 24 • FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), with Revisions 25 Number 1 and 2 Incorporated, 2007.

26 2.17.2.1 CONFORMANCE TO ESTABLISHED STANDARDS 27 Flagging (including use of flagmen required by the BNSF Railway), signs, and all other 28 traffic control devices and procedures provided by the Design-Builder shall conform to 29 the standards adopted by the City of Tacoma, BNSF Railway and the Washington State 30 MUTCD. The Washington State Modifications to the MUTCD may be obtained from the 31 Department of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, 98504. 32 The condition of signs and traffic control devices shall be new or “acceptable” and will be 33 accepted based on a visual inspection by the Traffic Control Supervisor (TCS). The City 34 of Tacoma may also identify devices that are unacceptable. The City of Tacoma’s 35 decision on the condition of a sign or traffic control device will be final. The Design- 36 Builder shall remove a sign or traffic control device determined to be unacceptable, and 37 replace it within 12 hours of notification. 38

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.17.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

2 2.17.3.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall prepare a TMP to be approved by the City of Tacoma prior to 4 any construction activity that may impact traffic below the bridge. The City of Tacoma 5 will only permit activities such as surveying or environmental and other design-related 6 Work prior to approval of the TMP provided the Design-Builder prepares MOT Plans in 7 accordance with the requirements of this Section. MOT plans that are within the 8 jurisdiction of I-705 will require approval from WSDOT. MOT plans that are within the 9 jurisdiction of the Foss Waterway will require approval from the United States Coast 10 Guard. MOT plans that are within the jurisdiction of the BNSF Railway will require 11 approval from the BNSF Railway.

12 2.17.3.2 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP) 13 The Design-Builder shall develop a TMP that includes the following items: 14 • Identification of all Site access points; 15 • Identification of haul routes; 16 • Procedures to identify and incorporate the needs of facilities owned and/or 17 controlled by the City of Tacoma, the United States Coast Guard, and the BNSF 18 Railway that are affected by the Work; 19 • Descriptions of proposed traffic phasing, including conceptual MOT Plans, to 20 accommodate construction staging; 21 • Procedures to identify and incorporate the needs of transit operators, utility 22 owners, schools, and business owners in corridors affected by the work; 23 • Procedures for obtaining concurrence of stakeholders and implementing road 24 and lane closures; 25 • Procedures to identify and incorporate the needs of emergency service providers, 26 law enforcement entities, and other related roadway users. The Design-Builder 27 shall also include procedures to ensure all information required by these agencies 28 to protect the public is made available; 29 • Provisions for incident and emergency response; 30 • Methods and frequency of inspection and maintenance of all traffic control 31 provided for facilities affected by the Work, including response times to correct, 32 modify, or implement changes to pavement marking, signing, and temporary lane 33 configurations; 34 • Descriptions of contact methods, personnel available, and response times for 35 responses to any project related conditions requiring attention during off-hours. 36 Include communications plan to contact the City of Tacoma; 37 • Provisions to maintain existing access to all properties served by public corridors 38 affect by the Work for the duration of the Project, except as provided by other 39 Sections. Appropriate information about access modifications shall be made 40 available to the appropriate parties;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Procedures to modify the plans as needed to adapt to current Project 2 circumstances; 3 • Procedures to determine detour routes, including pedestrian routes, and for 4 obtaining acceptance from all stakeholders for all proposed detour routes. 5 • Procedures to communicate MOT information to the Design-Builder’s public 6 information personnel, and to notify the public of MOT issues in accordance with 7 Section 2.7.

8 2.17.3.3 TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (TIMP) 9 The Design-Builder shall prepare and implement a formal TIMP to address how traffic 10 incidents shall be managed.

11 2.17.3.3.1 General 12 The TIMP shall identify methods for incident detection and response management. The 13 In addition, the Design-Builder shall be responsible for coordinating with City of 14 Tacoma, the BNSF Railway and United States Coast Guard incident management 15 guideline policies and procedures. The TIMP shall reflect proposed construction 16 phasing.

17 2.17.3.3.2 Emergency Vehicle Access 18 The Design-Builder shall provide coordination with local and regional emergency service 19 providers, law enforcement entities, and other related roadway users including timely 20 communication of lane closure plans, detour plans, and other Project elements that may 21 affect the appropriate delivery of time-sensitive services. Emergency vehicle access shall 22 be maintained through all nighttime, weekend, and evening closures, when feasible. 23 Refer to Section 2.7 (Public Information) for additional requirements.

24 2.17.3.3.3 Design-Builder Response Time 25 The Design-Builder shall have a TCS on-call or on-site equipped with a mobile phone 26 that can respond to and take appropriate action to manage an emergency situation. The 27 TCS shall be on-site within 45 minutes of notification of an emergency situation, in 28 accordance with this Section. Upon arrival, the TCS shall have the experience, resources, 29 and equipment required to set up temporary traffic control, as necessary. This may 30 include closing lanes, setting up detours, and replacing the repairing TCB.

31 2.17.4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

32 2.17.4.1 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

33 2.17.4.1.1 Work Zone Traffic Engineering Manager (WTEM) 34 The Design-Builder shall have a Work Zone Traffic Engineering Manager (WTEM) to 35 ensure the design of all elements related to construction phasing, work zone safety, and 36 work zone traffic control are completed and all applicable design requirements are met. 37 The WTEM shall also be available for approval of modifications to the phasing or MOT 38 Plans through Project Physical Completion. The WTEM shall be a Professional 39 Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington under Title 18 RCW.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Design elements that the WTEM is responsible for include, but are not limited to, the 2 following: 3 • Detours 4 • Phasing and MOT Plans

5 2.17.4.1.2 MOT Plans 6 The Design-Builder shall use the procedures in the TMP to develop detailed MOT Plans 7 that provide for all construction stages and phasing, and identify opportunities to 8 expedite construction throughout the course of the Project. 9 At a minimum, the MOT Plans shall include the following items: 10 • Complete plan sheets and details for all stages of construction. 11 • United States Coast Guard approved Foss Waterway marine vessel restrictions. 12 • BNSF Railway approved Right of Entry Agreement and construction impact 13 mitigation plan. 14 • WSDOT approved construction impact mitigation plan. 15 • Roadway plan sheets showing all existing traffic control devices that will be 16 retained, relocated, or removed, and all temporary traffic control devices that will 17 be installed, retained, relocated, or removed. 18 • The spacing, size, color (legend and background, if applicable) and quantity of all 19 traffic control devices. 20 • Work areas including ingress and egress for construction vehicles. 21 • Access and control of bicyclists and pedestrians including persons with 22 disabilities in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) 23 through the traffic control zones shall be included on the MOT Plans. 24 • Detail modifications to the MOT Plans to address wintertime conditions or 25 periods of suspended Work. 26 • A switching procedure for each control stage change identified in the MOT Plans. 27 The switching procedure shall consist of the methods, actions, and signing 28 necessary to complete the switch and the number and duties of traffic personnel 29 assigned to perform the switch.

30 The MOT plans shall meet all the requirements of the City of Tacoma, the MUTCD, 31 WSDOT, the BNSF Railway and the United States Coast Guard. The MOT Plans shall be 32 complete, including all necessary details. Typical plans are not acceptable unless 33 incorporated as details into the MOT Plans. 34 The Design-Builder shall prepare documentation to justify all proposed closures and 35 detour routes. The documentation shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma for review 36 and approval with the proposed MOT Plans.

37 2.17.4.1.3 Closures 38 The Design-Builder will not be allowed closures, below the bridge, of City of Tacoma 39 roadways, BNSF Railway tracks, I-705 lanes and the Foss Waterway without written 40 permission from the affected parties. All proposed closures must identify precise

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 locations, dates and durations. The Design-Builder shall notify the public in advance of 2 closures, in accordance with Section 2.7. 3 The Design-Builder shall coordinate their Work activities with other local events in the 4 area, so that the events will not be impacted. The City of Tacoma will have sole 5 discretion to modify traffic restrictions.

6 2.17.4.2 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION 7 The Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma when setting up and removing all 8 traffic control measures.

9 2.17.4.3 I-705 DURING CONSTRUCTION

10 2.17.4.3.1 Design Criteria 11 The design speed shall not be less than the posted speed.

12 2.17.4.3.2 Temporary Lane Closures 13 The Design-Builder shall provide written notification to the City of Tacoma and WSDOT 14 a minimum of seven Calendar Days prior to any closures. Each lane closure shall have 15 one sequential arrow board per closed lane, as part of the traffic control layout. No 16 closures shall be scheduled until the MOT Plans are Released for Construction. 17 The Design-Builder shall use traffic safety drums on all lane closures. 18 Four lane closures longer than 500 feet, the Design-Builder shall use a minimum of two 19 transverse devices in the closed lane at 500-foot normal spacing.

20 2.17.4.3.3 Law Enforcement 21 The Design-Builder shall coordinate with the local enforcement agency and Washington 22 State Patrol (WSP) as needed. The Design-Builder shall include all related costs for law 23 enforcement services in the proposal price of the Contract.

24 2.17.4.3.4 Sequential Arrow Displays 25 Each vehicle used to place, maintain, or remove components of a traffic control system 26 on multi-lane highways shall be equipped with a sequential arrow display that shall be in 27 operation when the vehicle is in use. Vehicles equipped with sequential arrow displays 28 not involved in placing, maintaining, or removing components when operated within a 29 stationary-type lane closure shall display only the four-corner flash caution mode. The 30 operator of the vehicle shall control the arrow display while the vehicle is in motion. 31 Sequential arrow displays used in moving lane closures shall be truck-mounted. This 32 requirement applies to all vehicles placing, maintaining, and removing traffic control 33 devices, including concrete barrier trailers and “cherry pickers”.

34 2.17.4.3.5 Notice of Closures 35 Refer to Section 2.7 (Public Information) and this Section for advance and public 36 notification requirements.

37 2.17.4.3.6 Late Reopening 38 Refer to Section 1-08 of the General Provisions for liquidated damages.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.17.4.4 LOCAL ROADS DURING CONSTRUCTION 2 All MOT Plans affecting local roads shall follow the requirements of the City of Tacoma. 3 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for submitting plans and obtaining approval 4 from the City of Tacoma for each planned closure. Allowable closure hours for lane 5 closures on local roads shall be included in the City of Tacoma approvals. The Design- 6 builder shall coordinate with the City of Tacoma regarding concurrent construction work 7 along city cross streets that may be affected by traffic control for the Project.

8 2.17.4.4.1 Design Criteria 9 The design speed of all local roads during construction shall be at the existing posted 10 speed limit. A design speed 10 mph under the posted speed limit may be used only with 11 approval from the City of Tacoma. Any required reduction from the existing posted 12 speed limit shall be identified in the TMP. 13 The existing number of through lanes shall be maintained at all times except as approved 14 by the City of Tacoma. All lanes for local roads shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide, 15 measured to the front of gutter, unless the existing lane width is less than 11 feet, in 16 which case the lane shall not be less than the existing width.

17 2.17.4.4.2 Detours 18 All detours shall be in place, including all signing, prior to closure of any road. Detours 19 using local roads shall follow traffic control permit requirements for the City of Tacoma.

20 2.17.4.5 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION 21 The Design-Builder shall maintain existing pedestrian access on all sidewalks below the 22 bridge. Pedestrian access on the Port approach structure and the three trusses over the 23 Foss Waterway may be restricted until the Physically Complete Date. The Design- 24 Builder shall also maintain safe access and passage for the Dock Street to East 11th Street 25 pedestrian route, to the maximum extent feasible. Pedestrian sidewalks and path that 26 are currently ADA accessible shall be maintained and continue to conform to ADA 27 requirements. Occupational safety regulations that apply to the Project limits shall also 28 be considered the minimum standard for personal safety to pedestrians. If Work will be 29 performed over any pedestrian and bicycle routes, temporary lighted covered walkways 30 shall be provided to protect pedestrians and bicyclists from overhead hazards. 31 Protective barricades and fencing, together with warning and guidance devices and 32 signs, shall be used so that the passageway for pedestrians is safe, well defined, and 33 accessible. When the existing facility is illuminated or Traffic Control Plans require 34 illumination, illumination shall be provided during the hours of darkness. 35 Retroreflective delineation, with or without illumination, shall be provided during hours 36 of darkness. 37 When accessible pedestrian routs are allowed to be closed by the Design-Builder during 38 construction, an alternate accessible pedestrian route shall be provided that complies 39 with the FHWA MUTCD, Washington State ADA requirements, and these Technical 40 Requirements. The alternate accessible pedestrian route shall not have abrupt changes 41 in grade or terrain. Barriers and channelizing devices shall be detectable to pedestrians 42 who have visual disabilities. Where it is necessary to divert pedestrians into the 43 roadway, barricading or channelizing devices shall be provided to separate the 44 pedestrian rout from the adjacent vehicular traffic lane. Barricading or channelizing

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 devices used to separate pedestrian and vehicular traffic shall be crashworthy and, when 2 struck by vehicles, present a minimum threat to pedestrians, workers, and occupants of 3 impacting vehicles. At no time shall pedestrians be diverted into a portion of the street 4 used concurrently by moving vehicular traffic. 5 The Design-Builder shall not park motor vehicles or construction equipment on a 6 pedestrian sidewalk or path, or use a pedestrian sidewalk or path for loading operations, 7 stockpiling of materials, or allowing demolished or spoil materials to be deposited on the 8 surface of a pedestrian sidewalk or path. Any surface of a pedestrian sidewalk or path 9 affected by the Work shall be restored to its pre-construction condition, or better, prior 10 to re-opening to pedestrian traffic. The trail surface shall be swept or washed free of 11 debris including, but not limited to, mud, gravel, grease, and excavated, spoiled, or 12 stockpiled materials. 13 Pedestrian and bicycle routes may only be closed during full closures of the adjacent 14 roadways, and a pedestrian access plan shall be implemented with a minimum of 14 15 Calendar Days advance notice provided to all pedestrians. Advance notice shall consist 16 of signs located at the construction limits and all accesses serving the affected area; and 17 public notification in accordance with Section 2.7. All access closures and pedestrian 18 access plans shall be shown in the MOT Plans. All detours and Work sites shall be signed 19 in accordance with the MUTCD, the Washington State ADA requirements, and these 20 Technical Requirements.

21 2.17.4.6 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND SAFETY

22 2.17.4.6.1 Construction Under Traffic 23 The Design-Builder shall conduct all operations with the least possible obstruction and 24 inconvenience to the public. The Design-Builder shall not have under construction a 25 greater length or amount of Work than can be prosecuted properly with due regard to 26 the rights of the public. To the extent possible, the Design-Builder shall finish each 27 section of Work before commencing Work on the next section. 28 To disrupt public traffic as little as possible, the Design-Builder shall permit traffic to 29 pass through the Work zone with the least possible inconvenience or delay. The Design- 30 Builder shall maintain existing roads and streets within the Project limits, keeping them 31 open, and in a good, clean, safe condition at all times. Deficiencies caused by the Design- 32 Builder’s operations shall be repaired at the Design-Builder’s expense. Deficiencies not 33 caused by the Design-Builder’s operations shall be repaired by the Design-Builder, when 34 directed by the City of Tacoma’s Engineer, at the City of Tacoma’s expense. The Design- 35 Builder shall also maintain roads and streets adjacent to the Project limits when affected 36 by the Design-Builder’s operations. The Design-Builder shall perform the following, 37 when directed by the City of Tacoma Engineer: 38 • Remove or repair any condition resulting from the Work that might impede 39 traffic or create a hazard. 40 • Keep highway lighting systems in operation as the Work proceeds. 41 • Keep drainage structures clean to allow for free flow of water. 42 • Conduct the construction to minimize inconvenience to abutting property 43 owners. 44 • Maintain ready access to driveways within the Project limits.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.17.4.6.1.1 Controlled Access 2 The Design-Builder shall not be allowed any special access, egress, including leaving the 3 roadway shoulder to enter the Work area, or breaks in limited access, other than normal 4 legal movement or movements as approved by the City of Tacoma. The Design-Builder 5 shall be allowed short-duration shoulder stops in the Work area, using light vehicles 6 properly equipped with amber warning lights. 7 All ingress and egress to the Work area shall be shown on site-specific MOT Plans. The 8 Design-Builder shall provide appropriate warning signs and traffic control devices when 9 vehicles will be departing or entering traffic flow. 10 The access location shall not adversely affect wetlands or other sensitive areas. Airborne 11 particulates created as a result of using the access shall be effectively controlled. The 12 continuity of the existing drainage system shall be maintained throughout the access site. 13 At the completion of the Project, the Design-Builder shall restore the area of the access 14 site to its original, pre-Contract, Condition. Any damage to the traveled way, shoulders 15 or side slopes or other areas caused by the access shall be repaired. The Design-Builder 16 shall include all related costs in the proposal price of the Contract.

17 2.17.4.6.1.2 Work During Hours of Darkness 18 Work during hours of darkness may be required for the Project. The Design-Builder 19 shall obtain any required noise variance or exemption for such Work. The Design- 20 Builder shall, at no additional cost to the City of Tacoma, make all arrangements for 21 operations during the hours of darkness. Flagger stations shall be illuminated using a 22 minimum 150 watt steady-burn floodlight during hours of darkness. Lighting for 23 construction activity shall be directed away from maintained traffic to minimize glare to 24 motorists. 25 Refer to this Section and Section 1-07 of the General Provisions for additional 26 requirements.

27 2.17.4.6.1.3 Signs and Traffic Control Devices 28 All signs and traffic control devices for lane and roadway closures shall be installed only 29 during the hours specified in this Section. If placed earlier than the specified hours of 30 closure, the construction signs shall be turned or covered so as not to be visible to 31 motorists.

32 2.17.4.6.1.4 Advance Notification 33 The Design-Builder shall submit MOT Plans for lane and sidewalk closure requests in 34 writing to the City of Tacoma in advance of the proposed closure, in accordance with 35 Section 2.7 and these Technical Requirements.

36 2.17.4.6.1.5 Public Notification 37 The Design-Builder shall furnish and install information signs that provide advance 38 notification of ramp and road closures a minimum of seven Calendar Days prior to the 39 scheduled closure. The signs shall have a black legend on a white reflective background. 40 Sign locations, messages, letter sizes, and sign sizes shall be shown in the MOT Plans. 41 For ramp and local road closures, PCMS shall be used to supplement the required signs. 42 The Design-Builder shall notify the Washington State Patrol and Tacoma fire

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 departments, police departments, engineering departments, public transit agencies, and 2 the affected school districts in writing a minimum of seven Calendar Days prior to 3 scheduled closures. The Design-Builder shall provide written copies of these 4 notifications to the City of Tacoma. Refer to Section 2.7 for additional requirements.

5 2.17.4.7 Construction Requirements

6 2.17.4.7.1 General 7 The Design-Builder shall plan, manage, supervise, maintain, and perform all temporary 8 traffic control activities required to support the Work using labor, equipment, and 9 materials provided by the Design-Builder. 10 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for all MOT starting at 12:01 a.m. on the day 11 construction begins. The traffic control devices, including temporary and permanent 12 signal systems, must be continually and adequately monitored and maintained to ensure 13 proper placement and working order, and to ensure the safe and efficient flow of all 14 traffic in corridors affected by the Work. Such responsibility and maintenance shall 15 continue until 11:59 p.m. on the day of Final Acceptance of the Project by the City of 16 Tacoma. The City of Tacoma may, in writing, temporarily suspend such responsibility in 17 conjunction with an official suspension for weather or other reasons.

18 2.17.4.7.2 Materials 19 All materials shall meet the requirements of the City of Tacoma, Section 9-53 of the 20 WSDOT Standard Specifications, and the MUTCD.

21 2.17.4.7.3 Description 22 The Design-Builder shall provide flaggers, spotters, and all other personnel required for 23 traffic control activities, and not otherwise specified in the Contract as being provided by 24 the City of Tacoma. 25 The Design-Builder shall perform all procedures necessary to support the Work. 26 The Design-Builder shall provide signs and other traffic control devices not otherwise 27 specified in the Contract as being provided by the City of Tacoma. The Design-Builder 28 shall erect and maintain all construction signs, warning signs, detour signs, and other 29 traffic control devices necessary to warn and protect the public at all times from injury or 30 damage as a result of the Design-Builder’s operations which may occur on or adjacent to 31 freeways, roads, streets or waterways. No Work shall be done on or adjacent to the 32 roadway until all necessary signs and traffic control devices are in place. 33 The traffic control resources and activities described shall be used for the safety of the 34 public, the Design-Builder’s employees, and City of Tacoma personnel; and to facilitate 35 the movement of the traveling public. Traffic control resources and activities may be 36 used for the separation or merging of public and construction traffic when such use is in 37 accordance with the approved MOT Plans. 38 Upon failure of the Design-Builder to immediately provide flaggers; erect, maintain, and 39 remove signs, or provide, erect, maintain, and remove other traffic control devices when 40 requested to do so by the City of Tacoma, the City of Tacoma may, without further notice 41 to the Design-Builder or the Surety, perform any of the above and deduct all of the costs 42 from any payments due or coming due to the Design-Builder.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-9 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for providing adequate labor, sufficient signs, 2 and other traffic control devices, and for performing traffic control procedures needed 3 for the protection of the Work and the public at all times regardless of whether or not the 4 labor, devices, or procedures have been ordered by the City of Tacoma, provided by the 5 City of Tacoma, or paid for by the City of Tacoma. 6 Wherever possible when performing Work, the Design-Builder’s equipment shall follow 7 normal and legal traffic movements. The Design-Builder’s ingress and egress of the 8 Work area shall be accomplished with as little disruption to traffic as possible. Traffic 9 control devices shall be removed by picking up the devices in a reverse sequence to that 10 used for installation. This may require backing up through the Work area. When located 11 behind barrier or at other locations show on approved MOT Plans, equipment may 12 operate in a direction opposite to adjacent traffic.

13 2.17.4.7.4 Signing, Pavement Markings, and Traffic Control Devices During 14 Construction 15 The Design-Builder shall inspect all signing (existing and temporary) daily, noting 16 damaged signs, misplaced signs, and graffiti affecting legibility of the sign. Every detour 17 route shall be driven hourly to ensure all detour signing is in place. Signing for detours 18 shall be covered or removed when detours are not in use. The Design-Builder shall 19 provide a schedule for repairing, cleaning, or replacing signs; procedures shall address 20 rectifying incorrect or misleading signing that may present a hazard to road users. 21 The Design-Builder shall ensure there are no conflicting or misleading signs due to 22 adjacent projects. The Design-Builder shall coordinate with adjacent projects, and 23 relocate signs as required to avoid conflicting information. 24 The Design-Builder shall have adequate spare sections of temporary barrier and the 25 necessary equipment on-site to replace and repair temporary barrier within four hours of 26 identification by or notice given to the Design-Builder of damaged barrier. Temporary 27 traffic control shall be set up immediately upon notice of damage to ensure vehicle 28 safety.

29 2.17.4.8 TRAFFIC CONTROL PERSONNEL 30 The Design-Builder shall plan, conduct, and safely perform the Work. The Design- 31 Builder shall manage temporary traffic control. One or more of the Design-Builder’s 32 supervisors, who are actively involved in the planning and management of field Contract 33 activities, shall assume the responsibilities for traffic control management. The 34 supervisors shall have at least five years of practical MOT experience with the design 35 and/or implementation of traffic control on city construction projects. 36 The Design-Builder shall designate one or more people to perform the duties of the 37 primary TCS, and identify an alternate TCS who can assume the duties of the primary 38 TCS in the event of that person’s inability to perform. The TCS shall be responsible for 39 safe implementation of the approved MOT Plans. 40 Possession of a current flagging card by the TCS is mandatory. A traffic control 41 management assignment and a TCS designation are required for the Project. 42 The Design-Builder shall provide all personnel for flagging; spotting; execution of all 43 procedures related to temporary traffic control; and setup, maintenance, and removal of 44 all temporary traffic control devices and construction signs necessary to control traffic 45 during construction operations.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-10 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Workers engaged as flaggers or spotters shall wear reflective vests and hard hats. During 2 hours of darkness, white coveralls or white or yellow rain gear shall be worn. The vests 3 and other apparel shall be in accordance with Section 1-07 of the General Provisions.

4 2.17.4.8.1 Traffic Control Management 5 The Design-Builder’s traffic control management personnel shall be responsible for the 6 following: 7 • Overseeing and approving the actions of the TCS to ensure that proper safety and 8 traffic control measures are implemented and consistent with the specific 9 requirements of the Project. An alternate form of oversight shall be in place and 10 effective when the traffic control management personnel are not present at the 11 Work area. 12 • Providing the Design-Builder’s designated TCS with approved MOT Plans which 13 are compatible with the Work and Traffic control for which they will be 14 implemented. Having the latest adopted edition of the MUTCD and applicable 15 standards and specifications available at all times on the Project. 16 • Discussing proposed traffic control measures and coordinating implementation 17 of the MOT Plans with the City of Tacoma. 18 • Coordinating all traffic control operations, including those of subcontractors and 19 suppliers, with each other and with any adjacent construction or maintenance 20 operations. 21 • Coordinating the Project’s activities (such as road closures, lane closures and 22 navigable waterway closures) with appropriate jurisdictions. 23 • Overseeing all requirements of the Contract that contribute to the convenience, 24 safety, and orderly movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 25 • Reviewing the TCS’s diaries and being aware of field traffic control operations. 26 • Being present on-site a sufficient amount of time to adequately satisfy the above- 27 referenced responsibilities. 28 • Failure to carry out any of the above-referenced responsibilities shall be 29 considered a failure to comply with the Contract and may result in a suspension 30 of work as described in Section 1-08 of the General Provisions.

31 2.17.4.8.2 Traffic Control Supervisor (TCS) 32 A TCS shall be present on the Project whenever flagging, spotting, or other traffic control 33 is occurring; or less frequently, as authorized by the City of Tacoma. 34 The TCS shall personally perform all of the duties of the TCS. During non-working 35 hours, the TCS shall be available at the Project within 45 minutes after notification by 36 the City of Tacoma. 37 The TCS’s duties shall include the following: 38 • Possessing a current set of approved MOT Plans; applicable Contract provisions 39 as provided by the Design-Builder; the latest adopted edition and applicable 40 standards and specifications.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-11 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Inspecting traffic control devices and nighttime lighting for proper location, 2 installation, message, cleanliness, and effect on the traveling public. The TCS 3 shall correct, or arrange to have corrected, any deficiencies noted during these 4 inspections. 5 • Preparing a daily traffic control diary on each day that traffic control is performed 6 and submitting them to the City of Tacoma Engineer no later than the end of the 7 next business day. Diary entries shall include, but are not limited to, the 8 following: 9 o Time of day when signs and traffic control devices are installed and removed; 10 o Location and condition of signs and traffic control devices; 11 o Revisions to the MOT Plans; 12 o Lighting used at night; 13 o Observations of traffic conditions, and 14 o Identify MOT and Traffic Control Plans in use and provide location on the 15 Project where Plans are used. 16 • Making minor revisions to the MOT Plans to accommodate site conditions, 17 provided that the original intent of the MOT Plans is maintained. The revisions 18 shall be documented in the daily traffic control diary. The MOT Plans shall be 19 revised and re-released when determined necessary by the WTEM. 20 • Attending traffic control coordination meetings or coordination activities, 21 including meetings and activities for adjacent projects, as necessary, for a 22 complete understanding of the Project and effective performance. 23 • Ensuring that all required traffic control devices and equipment are available and 24 in good working condition prior to the need to install or use them.

25 2.17.4.8.3 Flaggers and Spotters 26 Flaggers and Spotters shall be posted where shown on the approved MOT Plans, or 27 where directed by The City of Tacoma. All flaggers or spotters shall possess a current 28 flagging card issued by the State of Washington. The flagging card shall be immediately 29 available and shown to the City of Tacoma upon request. 30 Flagging stations shall be shown on MOT Plans at locations where construction 31 operations require stopping or diverting public traffic. Flagging stations shall be staffed 32 only when flagging is required. This staffing may be continuous or intermittent, 33 depending on the nature of the construction activity. Whenever a flagger is not required 34 to stop or divert traffic, the flagger shall move away from the flagging station to a safer 35 location. During hours of darkness, flagging stations shall be illuminated in a manner 36 that ensures that flaggers can be seen easily, but that does not cause glare to the traveling 37 public. Flaggers shall be equipped with portable two-way radios, with a range suitable 38 for the Project. The radios shall be capable of having direct contact with Project 39 management (e.g., foremen and superintendents). 40 The Design-Builder shall provide the standard Stop/Slow paddles for all flagging 41 operations. 42 Spotting stations shall be shown on MOT Plans at locations where a spotter can detect 43 errant drivers, vessels or other hazards, and provide an effective warning to other

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-12 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 workers. Spotting stations will not be allowed at locations where the spotter will be in 2 unnecessary danger. The Design-Builder shall provide noise-makers or other effective 3 warning devices for spotting operations. The duties of a spotter shall not include 4 flagging.

5 2.17.4.8.4 Other Traffic Control Labor 6 In addition to flagging or spotting duties, the Design-Builder shall provide personnel for 7 all other traffic control procedures required by the construction operations, and 8 personnel to install, maintain, and remove any traffic control devices shown on the MOT 9 Plans.

10 2.17.4.9 Traffic Control Devices 11 Traffic control devices are used to visually guide drivers through Work zones. Signing, 12 channelizing devices, arrow boards, and warning beacons all display a message to the 13 driver. Work zone credibility is established through the proper use of these devices to 14 send correct messages to drivers. Poor Work zone credibility has a direct, negative 15 impact on Work zone safety by causing driver confusion, frustration, and disrespect 16 which results in an increased potential for accidents.

17 2.17.4.9.1 Construction Signs 18 All construction signs required by the approved MOT Plans, as well as any other 19 appropriate signs directed by the City of Tacoma, shall be provided by the Design- 20 Builder. The Design-Builder shall provide the posts or supports, and erect and maintain 21 the signs in a clean, neat, and presentable condition until they are no longer required. 22 Post-mounted signs shall be installed as shown in the Standard Plans. Sign attachment 23 to posts shall conform to the applicable detail shown in the Standard Plans. When the 24 construction signs are no longer required, the Design-Builder shall remove all signs, 25 posts, and supports from the Project and they shall remain the property of the Design- 26 Builder. 27 All existing signs, new permanent signs installed as part of the Work, and construction 28 signs installed as part of the Work that are inappropriate for the traffic configuration at a 29 given time, shall be removed or completely covered with metal, plywood, or an approved 30 product specifically manufactured for sign covering, during periods when they are not 31 needed. 32 Construction signs are divided into two classes. Class A construction signs are those 33 signs that remain in services throughout the construction or during a major phase of the 34 Work. They are mounted on posts, existing fixed structures, or substantial supports of a 35 semi-permanent nature. Class A signs shall be designated as such on the approved MOT 36 Plans. Sign and support installation for Class A signs shall be in accordance with the 37 Contract or the Standard Plans. Class B construction signs are those signs that are 38 placed and removed daily, or are used for short durations which may extend for one or 39 more days. They are mounted on portable or temporary mountings. 40 Class A construction signs mounted behind traffic barrels shall be mounted a minimum 41 of 5 feet above the ground (ground to bottom of sign). 42 Where it is necessary to add weight to signs for stability, the Design-Builder shall follow 43 the manufacturer’s recommendations for sign ballasting.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-13 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Sign, posts, or supports that are lost, stolen, damaged, destroyed, or which the City of 2 Tacoma deems to be unacceptable while used on the Project, shall be replaced by the 3 Design-Builder.

4 2.17.4.9.2 Sequential Arrow Signs 5 Sequential arrow signs shall be shown on the MOT Plans as either a stand-along unit 6 without a TMA or as a unit with a TMA. When required, and as shown on the MOT 7 Plans, the Design-Builder shall provide, operate, and maintain the sequential arrow 8 signs.

9 2.17.4.9.3 Portable Changeable Message Signs (PCMS) 10 Where shown on the approved MOT Plans or when requested by the City of Tacoma, the 11 Design-Builder shall provide, operate, and maintain PCMS.

12 2.17.4.9.4 Barricades 13 Where shown on the approved MOT Plans or when requested by the City of Tacoma, the 14 Design-Builder shall furnish, install, and maintain barricades. Barricades shall be kept 15 in good repair, and shall be removed and/or replaced immediately when they are no 16 longer functioning as designed. 17 Where it is necessary to add weight to barricades for stability, the Design-Builder shall 18 follow the manufacturer’s recommendations for sign ballasting.

19 2.17.4.9.5 Traffic Safety Drums 20 Where shown on the approved MOT Plans, or when requested by the City of Tacoma, the 21 Design-Builder shall furnish, install, and maintain traffic safety drums. 22 Used traffic safety drums may be utilized, proved all drums used on the Project are of 23 essentially the same configuration and in acceptable condition. 24 Traffic safety drums shall be designed to resist overturning by means of a weighted lower 25 unit that will separate from the drum when impacted by a vehicle. 26 Traffic safety drums shall be regularly maintained to ensure that they are clean and that 27 the drum and reflective material are in good condition. When a drum has been damaged 28 beyond usefulness, or provides inadequate reflectivity, a replacement drum shall be 29 provided by the Design-builder at no cost to the City of Tacoma. 30 When the traffic safety drums are no longer required, they shall be removed from the 31 Project and shall remain the property of the Design-Builder.

32 2.17.4.9.6 Traffic Cones 33 Where shown on the approved MOT Plan, or when requested by the City of Tacoma, the 34 Design-Builder shall furnish, install, and maintain traffic cones. The Design-Builder 35 shall not use traffic cones on ramps or on the Interstate. Traffic cones shall be kept in 36 good repair, and shall be removed immediately when directed by the City of Tacoma. 37 Where wind or moving traffic frequently displaces cones, an effective method of 38 stabilizing cones, such as stacking two together at each location, shall be employed.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-14 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.17.4.9.7 Tubular Markers and Tall Channelizing Devices 2 The Design-Builder shall not use tubular markers or tall channelizing devices on ramps 3 or freeways. 4 Warning Lights and Flashers 5 The Design-Builder shall provide and maintain Type C, steady-burning lights attached to 6 traffic safety drums, barricades, or other traffic control devices used for lane closures or 7 shifting tapers during hours of darkness.

8 2.17.5 SUBMITTALS 9 The TMP and TIMP shall be submitted and approved by the City of Tacoma prior to 10 commencement of any construction activity that has the potential to impact traffic. MOT 11 Plans require a Preliminary Design Submittal and a Final Design Submittal prior to 12 approval for each construction.

13 2.17.5.1 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP) 14 The Design-Builder shall submit six copies of the Draft TMP to the City of Tacoma, 15 WSDOT, the United States Coast Guard and BNSF Railway. The City of Tacoma will 16 respond to the submittal within 14 Calendar Days of receipt. 17 The Design-Builder shall prepare a Final TMP for review and comment by City of 18 Tacoma, WSDOT, the United States Coast Guard and BNSF Railway. The Final TMP 19 shall carry a Washington State Professional Engineer’s seal. The Design-Builder shall 20 submit six copies and an electronic copy of the Final TMP to City of Tacoma, WSDOT, 21 the United States Coast Guard and BNSF Railway. The City of Tacoma will respond to 22 the Final TMP within 14 Calendar Days of receipt. The final TMP must be submitted to 23 the City of Tacoma and approved by WSDOT, the United States Coast Guard and BNSF 24 Railway prior to commencement of any construction activity that has the potential to 25 impact vehicles, vessels, trains and/or traffic.

26 2.17.5.2 TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (TIMP) 27 The Design-Builder shall submit six copies of the Draft TIMP to the City of Tacoma, 28 WSDOT, the United States Coast Guard and BNSF Railway. The City of Tacoma will 29 respond to the submittal within 14 Calendar Days of receipt. 30 The Design-Builder shall prepare a Final TIMP, for review and comment by the City of 31 Tacoma, WSDOT, the United States Coast Guard and BNSF Railway. The Final TIMP 32 shall carry a Washington State Professional Engineers seal. The Design-Builder shall 33 submit six copies and an electronic copy of the Final TIMP to the City of Tacoma, 34 WSDOT, the United States Coast Guard and BNSF Railway. The City of Tacoma will 35 respond to the final TIMP within 14 Calendar Days of receipt. The final TIMP must be 36 submitted to the City of Tacoma and approved by WSDOT, the United States Coast 37 Guard and BNSF Railway prior to commencement of any construction activity that has 38 the potential to impact traffic.

39 2.17.5.3 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC (MOT) PLANS 40 The Design-Builder shall submit MOT Plans to the City of Tacoma for review with the 41 Preliminary and Final Design Submittals. The Design-Builder may submit MOT Plans 42 separately for each phase of construction. The plans must be distributed and approved

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-15 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 prior to implementation. The Design-Builder shall consider the review times when 2 planning for implementation of the MOT phases. 3 The Design-Builder shall prepare plan sheets in AutoCAD format. 4 The Preliminary Design Submittal shall show lane configurations including typical cross 5 sections, signing, and Work zones. General notes to show the intent shall also be 6 included; however, it is not required that stations and offsets be identified for all 7 elements. The Design-Builder shall submit six copies and one electronic copy of the 8 MOT Plans to the City of Tacoma for review. The City of Tacoma will provide comments 9 on the Preliminary Design Submittal MOT Plans within 14 Calendar Days of receipt. 10 The Final Design Submittal shall include, at a minimum, all required details including 11 station and offset for all elements, cross sections, temporary paving, pavement marking 12 details, signing, traffic control devices, temporary or modified traffic signals, and 13 temporary lighting. The Design-Builder shall submit six copies and one electronic copy 14 of the MOT Plans to the City of Tacoma for review. 15 When all comments from the Final Design Submittal MOT Plans have been 16 incorporated, the Design-Builder shall prepare Released for Construction MOT Plans, 17 carrying the stamp of a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Washington under 18 Title 18 RCW. The Design-Builder shall submit plans for review and approval to the 19 jurisdiction responsible for the roadway or waterway. The Design-Builder shall provide 20 an informational copy of the submittal to the City of Tacoma. The Design-Builder shall 21 allow a minimum of 14 Calendar Days for the local jurisdiction to review the plans. If the 22 plans are not approved, they must be corrected and resubmitted until they are approved. 23 Once approval is received and all requirements of the QMP are satisfied, the plans may 24 be Released for Construction. The Design-Builder shall provide four sets of the approved 25 Released for Construction MOT Plans to the City of Tacoma prior to implementation. 26 The Released for Construction MOT Plans shall be distributed to all stakeholders a 27 minimum of 14 Calendar Days prior to implementation of any lane, ramp, sidewalk, or 28 roadway closures or detours, in order to allow for public notification.

29 2.17.5.4 TEMPORARY ILLUMINATION PLANS 30 The Design-Builder shall coordinate any and all temporary illumination work with the 31 City of Tacoma, WSDOT, the United States Coast Guard and BNSF Railway. Plans shall 32 be submitted to the local agency for approval prior to commencement of construction. 33 Temporary illumination plans shall be submitted as part of the MOT Plans packages for 34 the phase in which they will be required.

35 2.17.5.5 OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 36 A copy of all preliminary and final submittals required by the WSDOT, the United States 37 Coast Guard and BNSF Railway shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma. 38 39 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.17-16 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.18 RAILROADS

2 2.18.1 GENERAL 3 Railroad facilities located within the Project limits are operated by the BNSF Railway 4 Company (BNSF). BNSF shall be the primary coordinating railroad company for all 5 tracks within the Project limits. This Section provides information relating to the 6 requirements applicable to the Work performed upon or adjacent to BNSF property. The 7 Design-Builder shall abide by and fulfill the requirements related to BNSF as described 8 in this Section and the Mandatory Standards. 9 BNSF has indicated its willingness to accommodate the City of Tacoma with the 10 construction of this Project. 11 Five train tracks travel through the Project limits below the Murray Morgan Bridge. 12 Since rail traffic services levels are subject to change by BNSF at any time, the Design- 13 Builder shall verify the average daily traffic with BNSF. Except as specifically permitted 14 by an authorized representative of BNSF in writing, the Design-Builder shall not 15 interfere with BNSF’s operations.

16 2.18.1.1 CONTACTS 17 BNSF Railway Company – Manager Public Projects: 18 Todd M. Kuhn, PE 19 2454 Occidental Avenue South, Suite 1A 20 Seattle, WA 98134 21 Phone: 206-625-6146 22 Cell: 303-319-0542 23 Fax: 206-625-6115 24 E-mail: [email protected]

25 2.18.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 26 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. 27 They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the 28 list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to 29 complete the design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any 30 ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design- 31 Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may 32 resolve them. 33 • WSDOT Design Manual (M 22-01) 34 • BNSF Railway Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation Projects (Appendix 22) 35 • BNSF Railway Guideline for Temporary Shoring 36 • BNSF Railway Utility Accommodation Policy 37 • AREMA Manual for Railway Engineering

38 2.18.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 39 The Design-Builder shall meet all clearance requirements in accordance with the BNSF 40 Final Clearances and Contractor Submittals Overhead Structures.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.18-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.18.4 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

2 2.18.4.1 CONTRACTOR’S RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT 3 No Work shall be commenced within BNSF property until the Design-Builder has 4 executed, delivered, and received in return a fully-executed Contractor Right of Entry 5 Agreement from BNSF; has obtained all of the insurance required; and has complied 6 with all requirements specified within the Contractor Right of Entry Agreement. All 7 Work within BNSF property shall be performed in accordance with the Contractor Right 8 of Entry Agreement. 9 The Design-Builder shall provide any insurance coverage as may be required by the 10 Contractor Right of Entry Agreement. Insurance coverage shall be effective during the 11 period any Work is being performed within 50 feet of BNSF property.

12 2.18.4.2 CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 13 The rights of the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder to access BNSF property to 14 construct the Project shall be in accordance with the Construction and Maintenance (C 15 and M) Agreement executed between the City of Tacoma and BNSF, including all 16 exhibits attached thereto. The C and M Agreement between the City of Tacoma and 17 BNSF is currently being negotiated and will be in place prior to construction.

18 2.18.4.3 PERMITS 19 Permits shall be required for any demolition, construction and utility installations or 20 relocations within BNSF property or access to portions of BNSF property not provided 21 for in the C and M Agreement. Permits may be arranged by contacting BNSF. 22 • The Design-Builder shall take all measures necessary to ensure that the Work 23 complies with BNSF’s permit requirements. These measures shall include, but 24 are not limited to, the following: 25 • Work above the BNSF right-of-way shall be limited to a maximum of seventy-five 26 (75) calendar days for the Base Program; 27 • Work above the BNSF right-of-way shall be limited to a maximum of twenty-five 28 (25) calendar days for the Supplemental Program; 29 • Obtaining and complying with the terms and conditions of any required permits 30 for any and all Work within BNSF property; and 31 • Payment for any and all services required to complete the Work in compliance 32 with BNSF regulations.

33 2.18.4.4 PROTECTION OF RAILROAD PROPERTY 34 The Design-Builder shall exercise care in all operations and shall, at the Design-Builder's 35 expense, protect all BNSF property and its appurtenances, property in its custody, or 36 persons lawfully upon its Right-of-Way, from damage, destruction, interference, or 37 injury; prosecute the Work so as not to interfere with BNSF or its appurtenances, or any 38 of BNSF 's trains or facilities; and complete the Work to a condition that shall not 39 interfere with or menace the integrity or safe and successful operations of BNSF or its 40 appurtenances, or any of BNSF 's trains or facilities.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.18-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Except as specifically permitted by an authorized representative of BNSF in writing, the 2 Design-Builder shall perform the Work in such a manner so as not to interfere with the 3 operations of railroad traffic. BNSF will specify when the Design-Builder shall be 4 allowed to execute any part of the Work in which BNSF’s tracks will be impacted or made 5 unsafe for operation of railroad traffic. 6 With respect to the Design-Builder’s operations in carrying out the Work, the Design- 7 Builder shall employ such personnel as may be necessary to prevent obstruction of the 8 railroad tracks and interference with train movements. Such personnel shall cooperate 9 with BNSF’s flaggers or employees to ensure the safety of train movements.

10 2.18.4.5 PROTECTIVE SERVICE 11 BNSF may require services to protect BNSF’s facilities, property, and movement of its 12 trains or engines, including railroad flagging and other devices, from the Design- 13 Builder's operations. 14 BNSF will determine the nature and extent of protective services, personnel, and other 15 measures required. Nothing in these specifications will limit BNSF’s right to determine 16 and assign the number of personnel, the classes of personnel for protective services, or 17 other protective measures it deems necessary. Unless otherwise provided, all personnel 18 assigned by BNSF, other than those engaged in performing Work by BNSF as described 19 in this Section, will be considered protective personnel. 20 BNSF will provide flaggers or security personnel when BNSF determines in its sole 21 discretion that flaggers or security personnel are necessary for the protection of BNSF’s 22 facilities as a result of the Design-Builder's operations. The Design-Builder shall notify 23 BNSF’s Roadmaster a minimum of 30 Calendar Days prior to performing any Work 24 within or adjacent to BNSF property to enable BNSF to provide flagging or other 25 protective services. 26 In general, BNSF will furnish protective services when any of the Design-Builder’s 27 operations take place within or near BNSF property and, in the opinion of BNSF’s 28 representative, could endanger railroad facilities or create a hazard to railroad 29 operations. Communications Linemen or Signalmen may be used to protect 30 communication and signal facilities, if deemed necessary by BNSF. 31 In addition to flagging, protective devices such as indicators, tell tales, lights, and 32 telephones may be required. BNSF may require tell tales for any proposed restrictions or 33 vertical clearance to less than 23.5 feet. BNSF will install the telltales and the Design- 34 Builder shall pay for the costs. 35 The Design-Builder shall pay for all costs for protective services provided by BNSF. 36 No act of BNSF in supervising or approving any Work shall reduce or in any way affect 37 the liability of the Design-Builder for payment of damages, expenses, or costs which may 38 result from the construction of this Contract.

39 2.18.4.6 EMERGENCIES 40 In the event that an emergency occurs in connection with the Work, BNSF reserves the 41 right to perform any and all Work that may be necessary to maintain railroad traffic. If 42 the emergency is caused by the Design-Builder, the Design-Builder shall pay BNSF for 43 the entire cost of such emergency work.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.18-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.18.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 2 The Design-Builder shall coordinate all Work with BNSF if the Work is within 25 feet of 3 the rail measured horizontally. The Design-Builder shall perform the following Work: 4 • Placement of railroad protective structures; 5 • Structural steel repair and painting; 6 • Demolition of existing bridge deck; 7 • Placement of steel reinforcement for bridge; and 8 • Placement of new bridge deck.

9 All Work performed by BNSF at the Design-Builder’s request, and which is for the 10 Design-Builder’s benefit or convenience, shall be at the Design-Builder’s expense. The 11 Design-Builder shall reimburse BNSF for all costs of such Work.

12 2.18.6 SUBMITTALS

13 2.18.6.1 INSURANCES 14 The Design-Builder shall provide a Railroad Protective Insurance Policy and a 15 Contractor’s Public Liability Insurance Policy to the City of Tacoma.

16 2.18.6.2 DESIGN DRAWINGS 17 As design progresses, the Design-Builder shall file subsequent Bridge Design Plans with 18 BNSF in accordance with the C and M Agreement. BNSF will review the subsequent 19 Bridge Design Plans for “Acceptance” and ultimately, “Final Approval” prior to 20 construction of the Project within BNSF property. 21 If design elements within BNSF property occur in stages (“Design Elements”), the 22 Design-Builder shall submit Bridge Design Plans for individual Design Elements to 23 BNSF for its Acceptance. BNSF’s Acceptance of Design Plans for individual Design 24 Elements will authorize the Design-Builder to construct those individual Design 25 Elements; however, BNSF’s Acceptance of those individual Design Elements will not 26 constitute or guarantee BNSF’s Acceptance of any future Design Elements. 27 BNSF’s Acceptance of the final Design Elements will constitute its Final Approval of the 28 final Design Plans. Construction of any Design Elements within BNSF property shall not 29 commence until BNSF has issued its Acceptance, including providing verification to the 30 City of Tacoma of its Acceptance. 31 The Design-Builder shall provide BNSF with additional submittals, including but not 32 limited to, plans and calculations for any demolition, shoring, falsework, and formwork 33 proposed within or above BNSF property for its approval. Design-Builder will make 34 submittals to BNSF in the manner prescribed by BNSF. 35 All plans referred to in this Section must be submitted electronically in PDF format, to 36 the parties specified in this Section. 37 BNSF anticipates providing comments to the Design-Builder either accepting or 38 rejecting each submittal within 45 Calendar Days of receipt of each submittal. If BNSF 39 objects to any submittal described in this Section, its comments will specify those aspects

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.18-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 of the submittal that are objectionable, and it will provide sufficient information so that 2 the Design-Builder can redesign the submittal to BNSF’s satisfaction. Subsequent 3 submittals will then be subject to the same anticipated 45 Calendar Days review period. 4 Review times are based on estimates provided by BNSF. The Design-Builder is 5 responsible for any and all costs associated with BNSF submittals, including costs related 6 to schedule delay caused by BNSF review times exceeding these estimates.

7 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.18-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.19 RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW)

2 2.19.1 GENERAL

3 2.19.1.1 AVAILABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY 4 The Design-Builder shall have access to the ROW upon Notice to Proceed. The City of 5 Tacoma has prepared mapping, monumentation, and survey control for the Project as 6 described in Section 2.4.

7 2.19.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 8 This section is left intentionally blank.

9 2.19.3 ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY AND 10 EASEMENTS

11 2.19.3.1 ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY 12 The project does not require the acquisition of additional right-of-way.

13 2.19.3.2 OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS 14 The Design-Builder may acquire any rights or interests in real property that, in the 15 Design-Builder’s discretion, are deemed necessary or advisable to acquire. Such real 16 property may be required for workspace, lay-down areas, material storage areas, or other 17 convenience. The City of Tacoma will not be obligated to exercise its power of eminent 18 domain; will not come into title to the property; and will not take any responsibility for 19 the acquisition, maintenance, or disposition of additional properties or of any temporary 20 rights of interest therein. 21 The Design-Builder shall submit to the City of Tacoma a signed and notarized copy of 22 any other property right described in this Section that the Design-Builder has acquired 23 for the Project.

24 2.19.4 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 25 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for maintaining improvements and for 26 providing reasonable safety and security measures relative to the preservation of the 27 ROW parcels acquired for the Project. 28 The Design-Builder shall assume responsibility for the ROW and any additional acquired 29 parcels indicated above beginning on the 30th Calendar Day after the Notice to Proceed, 30 and ending on the 30th Calendar Day following Project Physical Completion. The 31 Design-Builder shall establish a Property Management Plan and shall submit the Plan to 32 the City of Tacoma for review and comment within seven Calendar Days after Notice to 33 Proceed. The Plan shall assure that all acquired ROW is maintained in a manner that 34 will prevent, minimize, or correct problems such as vandalism, trespassing, rodent 35 infestation, and illegal dumping or disposal of rubble and debris within the ROW. 36

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.19-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.19.5 DEMOLITION 2 The Design-Builder’s proposal shall include demolition of the bridge roadway and 3 sidewalks for both the City approach structure and the three through trusses above the 4 Thea Foss Waterway. The Design-Builder’s proposal shall also include the inspection, 5 sampling, and testing of any lead-based paint, asbestos, or other hazardous materials, in 6 accordance with applicable Washington State regulations and Section 2.6 7 (Environmental). The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with a hazardous 8 materials abatement plan for review and comment. All Utilities installed on or 9 connected to the bridge or other improvements in the ROW shall be relocated, 10 abandoned or removed in accordance with the requirements of the applicable Utility 11 Owner as part of the demolition, unless otherwise specified.

12 2.19.6 RIGHTS OF ENTRY 13 The Design-Builder will be allowed to use any portion of the City’s right-of-way, within 14 the project limits, that is needed to construct the project. 15 The City of Tacoma has not obtained permission for right of entry from property owners. 16 The property that contains the parking lot south of the City Approach is owned by the 17 City of Tacoma and managed by the Foss Waterway Development Authority (FWDA). 18 The parking lot lease includes a provision that allows a contractor working on repairs to 19 the Bridge to use the lot for purposes of construction staging. The Design-Builder will be 20 permitted to use a portion of the parking for construction staging if absolutely necessary. 21 The FWDA also manages additional property that can be made available to the Design- 22 Builder for construction staging. Due to the revenue impact and the inconvenience to 23 marina customers, it is preferred that the use of the parking lot be a last resort. If the 24 Design-Builder determines that there is a need to use either the additional property or 25 the parking lot, it shall be the Design-Builder’s responsibility to comply with the 26 following conditions: 27 • Obtain permission from the FWDA to enter the property and use it for 28 construction staging; 29 • Compensate the FWDA for all lost revenue associated with use of the property 30 (current monthly rent is approximately $1403); 31 • Explain the type of work that will take place, the type of equipment that will be 32 used; 33 • Agree that any damage to the property will be repaired to the satisfaction of the 34 City of Tacoma at the Design-Builder’s expense; 35 • Maintain a safe and secured work site; 36 • Accommodate safe pedestrian and vehicular traffic to the marina facilities the 37 Murray Morgan Bridge stairs, and any remaining parking operations; 38 • Specify dates, time, and duration the Design-Builder will be on the property; and 39 • Provide a minimum of 180 days notice prior to of use of the property and comply 40 with all requirements of the FWDA. 41 • The Design-Builder shall submit a copy of the signed letter to the City of Tacoma, 42 prior to entering the private property.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.19-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.19.6.1 CONTACT 2 Su Dowie, Acting Director 3 Foss Waterway Development Authority 4 535 Dock Street, Suite 204 5 Tacoma WA 98402 6 Phone: 253-597-8122 7 Email: [email protected]

8 2.19.7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS 9 The project does not require the acquisition of temporary construction easements.

10 2.19.8 SUBMITTALS 11 Project submittals include, but are not limited to, the following: 12 • Right-of-way Management Plan; and 13 • Right of entry letter, together with all supporting documentation for right of 14 entry.

15 2.19.8.1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ABATEMENT 16 Prior to any demolition, the Design-Builder shall submit a Hazardous Material 17 Abatement Plan to the City of Tacoma for review and comment. At a minimum, the Plan 18 shall address the following: 19 • The name and location of the disposal site of the hazardous material; and 20 • How the hazardous material will be abated to prevent release into the 21 atmosphere, onto the earth, and into underground and surface water.

22 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.19-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

2.20 CONTROL OF MATERIALS

2.20.1 GENERAL The Design-Builder shall be responsible for the quality of materials, methods of construction, and testing incorporated into the Project, and shall comply with FHWA and City of Tacoma requirements for approval of materials, sampling, and testing used in the Project. The Design-Builder’s Quality Assurance (QA) procedures shall ensure that operational techniques and activities comply with the Contract, and that all materials used in the Work are of acceptable quality. Refer to Section 2.22 for information regarding the Quality Management Plan.

2.20.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to complete the design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design- Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may resolve them. • Special Provisions. • Amendments to the Standard Specifications. • WSDOT Standard Specifications (M 41-10). • WSDOT Construction Manual (M 41-01). • WSDOT Materials Manual (M 46-01). • WSDOT Qualified Products List (M 46-02) (QPL). • AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, 1st Edition, 2009. • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Customary U.S. Units, 4th Edition, with 2008 and 2009 Interim Revisions. • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications, 2nd Edition with 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 Interims.

2.20.3 MATERIALS APPROVAL The Design-Builder shall use the WSDOT Qualified Product List, or the WSDOT Request for Approval of Materials form (RAM), which can be accessed online at the following web site: www.wsdot.wa.gov All permanent equipment, materials, and articles incorporated into the Project, and any temporary equipment, materials, and articles that have a specification shown in Division 9 of the Standard Specifications, such as erosion control devices and temporary traffic control devices, shall adhere to the following standards:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

• Shall be new, unless specified otherwise in these Technical Requirements; • Shall meet the requirements of the Contract and be approved by the Materials Approval Engineer; • Shall be inspected or tested in accordance with these Technical Requirements, City of Tacoma standards, WSDOT standards, and WSDOT manuals; and • Shall not be used in the Work if they become unfit after being previously approved.

Prior to use by the Design-Builder, all materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Materials Approval Engineer. The Design-Builder may use the QPL; may submit a Request for Approval of Materials (RAM) to the Materials Approval Engineer for approval; or may list the material in the plans and specifications that have been stamped by the Engineer of Record. The Design-Builder shall be responsible for approval and acceptance of all materials by means of testing, inspection, and documentation. A Materials Certification Package, as described in this Section and approved by the Design-Builder's Construction Quality Assurance Manager, shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma prior to Final Acceptance of the Project. Qualified Products List (QPL) – The Design-Builder may use products listed on the most recent edition of WSDOT’s QPL, without submitting a RAM to the Materials Approval Engineer. The Design-Builder shall follow the acceptance requirements listed in the QPL for the product/material used. The current QPL can be accessed online at the following Website:

http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Publications/Manuals/M46-02.htm

Request for Approval of Material (RAM) – The RAM shall be used if the Design- Builder elects not to use the QPL, or if the material is not listed in the QPL or not shown on the plans and specifications stamped by the Engineer of Record. The RAM shall be prepared by the Design-Builder and submitted to the Materials Approval Engineer for approval before the material is incorporated into the Work. Approval of the material does not constitute acceptance of the material for incorporation into the Work. The current RAM form can be accessed online at the following Website:

www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/mats/Ram/

Proprietary Items – Proprietary items are those items that the Engineer of Record has identified on the plans and specifications as a single source by manufacturer’s make and model number. These items are considered approved if they are shown on the plans and specifications stamped by the Engineer of Record. Acceptance shall be as stated in Section 2.20.4, Acceptance of Materials.

WSDOT Aggregate Source Approval (ASA) Database – The Design-Builder may use any approved aggregate that is included in the WSDOT ASA Database. If the Design- Builder wishes to use an aggregate source that is not in the WSDOT ASA Database, preliminary samples shall be evaluated for quality, in addition to the testing performed for acceptance. The WSDOT ASA Database can be accessed online at the following Website:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/mats/ASA

WSDOT Oversight – The Design-Builder shall distribute copies of all documents that list materials that have been approved to the City of Tacoma for review within three Calendar Days of receipt of approval. The City of Tacoma will use these documents to verify the materials being used.

2.20.4 ACCEPTANCE OF MATERIALS

2.20.4.1 GENERAL All materials that the Design-Builder intends to use shall be approved prior to use, and shall be tested and/or inspected, field-verified, and documented. The Design-Builder shall also track and maintain a daily listing of material quantities. The materials acceptance program shall be in accordance with the City of Tacoma Standards, WSDOT Construction Manual, the WSDOT Materials Manual, the Standard Specifications, or other provisions of the Contract. For most materials, the method of acceptance can be found in Chapter 9 of the WSDOT Construction Manual. Record of Materials (ROM) – The Design-Builder shall develop a tracking system for the ROM that will number and list all materials used on the Project; track the estimated quantities required; and identify the required acceptance criteria, acceptance frequency, and number of tests and/or inspections required for the estimated quantities. The ROM will also be used for tracking the quantities of materials used; the number of acceptance tests or inspections performed; and all acceptance documents and the status of each (i.e. approved or rejected). The ROM shall be updated daily, kept at the design or construction office, and available for City of Tacoma review. Upon award of the Contract, the City of Tacoma will provide the Design-Builder's Construction QA Manager with a CDROM containing the most recent listing of the method of acceptance for materials, to assist the Design-Builder in developing the ROM. Visual Inspection – If visual inspection is required as part of the acceptance criteria for materials, or is the acceptance criteria, the materials shall be inspected by the Construction QA Inspector to ensure they are as specified. The QA Inspector shall document the results of the inspection in a signed field note record or as an additional entry on the Construction QA Inspector’s daily report. Manufacturer’s Certificate of Compliance – If a Manufacturer’s Certificate of Compliance is required as part of the acceptance criteria for materials, the Construction QA Manager shall review the certificate for compliance with the required specification prior to incorporating the materials into the Project. The Manufacturer’s Certificate of Compliance shall meet the requirements of this Section.

Field Verification – The Construction QA Inspector shall field-verify and document all materials permanently incorporated into the Project. The field verification or visual inspection shall occur prior to or during placement of materials. Documentation of the field verification shall consist of sufficient information to identify the materials used, including manufacturer and/or source, product identity, and quantities. The field verification information shall be recorded on a field note record or as an entry in the Construction QA Inspector’s daily report, and shall include the date and the initials or

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

signature of the inspector verifying the work. The field verification information is the link between what is specified by the Engineer of Record or approved on the RAM or QPL, and what is placed.

Proprietary Items – Proprietary items that have been approved on the plan sheets shall require acceptance by testing, inspection, or other forms of acceptance as required by the Contract, and shall also require field verification. Tested Materials – The Design-Builder’s Quality Assurance staff shall test materials that require testing for acceptance. All materials with five or more sublots as listed in Table 6, Section 1-06 of the General Provisions, or any other materials where five or more tests are required, shall be statistically accepted. In order to use the Design- Builder's QA test results for acceptance, the QA test results shall be statistically validated by comparing them with the City of Tacoma's independent Quality Verification (QV) test results. Materials that only require one or two QA tests for acceptance or that have less than five sublots will require validation using the QA test results and the City of Tacoma’s QV test results in accordance with this Section. All field and laboratory materials testing by the Design-Builder shall follow the methods described in the WSDOT Materials Manual and the Contract.

2.20.4.2 VALIDATION BY F AND T TEST ANALYSIS The Construction QA Manager shall be responsible for statistically evaluating all the QA test results against the City of Tacoma's QV test results to determine the acceptability of the QA test results. This evaluation shall be performed by using the F and T test analysis as described in Section 2.22. If the test results are validated, then the QA test results shall be used for acceptance. If the test results are not validated, then an investigation shall be conducted by the Quality Assurance Team, as described in Section 2.22, to resolve the discrepancy. If a resolution cannot be reached, then the City of Tacoma's QV test results will be used for acceptance.

2.20.4.3 STATISTICAL ACCEPTANCE OF MATERIALS The Construction QA Manager shall be responsible for statistically evaluating the validated QA test results to determine if the materials tested are acceptable, as described in Section 2.22. Section 1-06 of the General Provisions defines acceptance specifications for Statistical and Non-Statistical Materials.

2.20.4.4 COMPARISON TESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MATERIALS The Construction QA Manager shall be responsible for comparing the QA test results to the City of Tacoma’s QV test results to determine the acceptability of the test results. This validation process compares the differences between the QA and QV test results to the limits in Table 3, Section 1-06 of the General Provisions, or to the precision and bias statement in the test procedure. If the test results are within the tolerances, then the Design-Builder’s QA test results shall be used for acceptance. If the test results are outside of the tolerances, then the City of Tacoma’s QV test results shall be used for acceptance.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

2.20.4.5 MANUFACTURER’S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE When authorized by these Technical Requirements and prior to use, the Construction QA Manager may accept certain materials on the basis of a Manufacturer's Certificate of Compliance as an alternative to material inspection and testing. The Manufacturer’s Certificate of Compliance must identify the manufacturer; the type and quantity of material being certified; the applicable specifications being affirmed, and the signature of a responsible corporate official of the manufacturer; and include supporting mill tests or documents. A Manufacturer’s Certificate of Compliance shall be furnished with each lot of material delivered to the Project, and the lot shall be clearly identified in the Certificate. Upon receipt of the Manufacturer's Certificate of Compliance, the Construction QA Manager shall review it for compliance with the specifications using the Manufacturer's Certificate of Compliance Checklist Form 350-572, or Design-Builder’s own checklist with the same information. All materials used on the basis of a Manufacturer’s Certificate of Compliance may be sampled and tested at any time by the Construction QA Manager or by the City of Tacoma. Any material not conforming to the requirements will be subject to rejection whether or not it has been used. The Construction QA Manager has the authority to refuse to accept materials on the basis of a Manufacturer’s Certificate of Compliance. In lieu of using the material without a proper Manufacturer’s Certificate of Compliance, the Design-Builder may request that the Construction QA Manager sample and test the materials prior to incorporating them into the Project. Any material not conforming to the requirements will be subject to rejection whether or not it has been used.

2.20.4.6 ACCEPTANCE OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF MATERIALS Upon the request of the Design-Builder, the Construction QA Manager may elect to accept small quantities of materials without normal sampling and testing frequencies. The determination to accept materials using this provision is at the sole discretion of the Construction QA Manager. Structural concrete will not be considered under the small quantity definition. An item can be accepted as a small quantity if the proposed total quantity for a specific material is less than one testing frequency. For mainline paving, a small quantity shall be less than one-half of a sublot, as defined in Table 6, Section 1-06 of the General Provisions. Questions that the Design-Builder shall consider prior to use of small quantity acceptance are: • Has the material been previously approved? • Is the material certified? • Is there a current mix design or reference design? • Has it been recently tested with satisfactory results? • Is the material structurally significant?

Small quantity acceptance may be accomplished by visual inspection, certification, or other methods. Acceptance of small quantities of materials by these methods shall be fully documented. Documentation of materials shall be provided by the Design-Builder’s

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

QA Inspector accepting the material. For visual acceptance, the Construction QA Manager shall have written documentation, such as an entry in the Construction QA Inspector’s Daily Report or a note on field records, with a statement as to the basis of acceptance of the material and the approximate quantity involved. Small quantity acceptance may be used for any quantity of the following: • Curbs and sidewalks; • Driveways; • Road approaches; and • Paved ditches and slopes.

2.20.4.7 FABRICATION INSPECTION The City of Tacoma will be responsible for in-plant inspection and approval of items fabricated specifically for the Project as detailed in the WSDOT Construction Manual and as determined by the Design-Builder and the City of Tacoma. The Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma at least 60 Calendar Days prior to fabrication to allow for fabrication plant approval. If deficiencies are found during the plant approval process, additional time will be required to obtain fabrication plant approval. The Design-Builder shall include the fabrication schedule in a detailed report submitted to the City of Tacoma as part of the Monthly Contract Schedule Update. Any change to the currently published fabrication schedule shall be communicated in writing to the City of Tacoma at least three Calendar Days before the proposed effective date. The Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma 14 Calendar Days prior to commencing fabrication of any item, and provide two copies of plans, specifications, and approved shop drawings for items being fabricated. No fabrication inspection will be performed until the fabrication facility has been approved by the City of Tacoma, and the approved shop drawings have been received. A pre-fabrication meeting shall be held prior to fabrication of any major item requiring City of Tacoma fabrication inspection and approval. Major items include, but are not limited to, the following: • Precast concrete wall panels; • Prestresssed concrete products; • Precast three-sided structures; • Steel or wood pedestrian stairs; • Wood structures; • Bridge bearings; • Expansion joints; • Steel reinforcing elements; and • Prefabricated mechanical elements.

The Design-Builder shall be responsible for scheduling the pre-fabrication meeting which shall be held at the facility where the fabrication will take place. The pre- fabrication meeting may be waived upon mutual agreement between the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder. At a minimum, the fabricator’s Production Manager and QA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

Manager, the Construction QA Manager, and the City of Tacoma representative shall attend the pre-fabrication meeting. The City of Tacoma’s Fabrication Inspector will be responsible for the following: • Collecting and reviewing all material certification documents for acceptance; • Collecting and reviewing all of the fabricator’s inspection reports for acceptance; • Visually inspecting the fabricated items for acceptance; and • Maintaining the Inspection Daily Report.

Items requiring fabrication inspection will be stamped or tagged for approval as specified in Section 9-1.5D of the WSDOT Construction Manual prior to the item being shipped to the job site. Exceptions to in-plant inspections are described in Section 9-4 of the WSDOT Construction Manual. The City of Tacoma will perform random dimensional inspections. The fabricator or the Design-Builder shall be responsible for assuring compliance with the Contract, performing the QC inspections, and maintaining all QC records. These records shall be available for review by the City of Tacoma. All items requiring City of Tacoma fabrication inspection shall be inspected and approved prior to being incorporated into the Project. All documentation collected as part of the City of Tacoma fabrication inspection shall be retained by the City of Tacoma Public Works Department. The fabricator or the Design-Builder shall be responsible for all materials QC sampling and testing. City of Tacoma’s Fabrication Inspector shall be responsible for sampling and testing moisture-cured polyurethane, prestressing strand, and high strength bolts that are being used by the fabricator and the shop coating facilities prior to their use. In the event of non-compliance that will prevent approval of a fabricated item, The City of Tacoma’s Fabrication Inspector will notify the fabricator, the Construction QA Manager, and City of Tacoma Engineer’s office for resolution. All risk for schedule delay due to non-approval of a fabricated item shall be borne by the Design-Builder.

2.20.5 HANDLING AND STORING MATERIALS In storage and handling, the Design-Builder shall protect materials against damage from careless handling, exposure to weather, mixture with foreign matter, and all other causes. The Construction QA Manager shall reject and refuse to test materials improperly handled or stored. The Design-Builder shall repair, replace, or make good all City of Tacoma-provided materials that are damaged or lost due to the Design-Builder’s operation or while in the Design-Builder’s possession, at no expense to the City of Tacoma.

2.20.6 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE MIX DESIGN AND BATCH PLANT The Design-Builder, or its designee, shall develop the concrete mix design in accordance with the Standard Specifications. The Construction QA Manager shall certify that the concrete mix design conforms to the Contract provisions and to the Standard Specifications.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

The concrete batch plant that the Design-Builder uses for the production of Portland Cement Concrete shall have a current National Ready Mix Concrete Association plant certification. The certification shall be maintained for the duration of the Contract.

2.20.7 HOT MIX ASHPALT MIX DESIGN AND ASPHALT CONCRETE PLANT Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Mix Design – The Design-Builder or mix supplier shall submit a mix design to the City of Tacoma’s Project Engineer prior to the initial production of HMA and prior to the production of HMA. The mix design aggregate structure and asphalt binder content shall be determined in accordance with WSDOT Standard Operating Procedure 732 and meet the requirements of Sections 9-03.8(2) and 9-03.8(6). Mix designs that were developed during the calendar year prior to current year’s production of HMA that have been issued a City of Tacoma or WSDOT mix design report will be accepted provided the Design-Builder or mix supplier submits a certification letter stating that the aggregate and asphalt binder have not changed. Changes to the aggregate that may require a new mix design include the source of material or a change in the percentage of material from a stockpile greater than 5 percent. Changes to asphalt binder that may require a new mix design include the source of the crude petroleum supplied to the refinery, the refining process and additives or modifiers in the asphalt binder. If commercial HMA is to be used on the Project, then the mix designs for commercial HMA shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma Project Engineer on DOT form 350-042; only the first page is required. Verification of the mix design by the City of Tacoma is not required. The City of Tacoma Project Engineer will determine anti-strip requirements for the HMA. Paving shall not begin before the anti-strip requirements have been provided to the Design-Builder. For commercial HMA, the Design-Builder or mix supplier shall select a class of HMA and design level of equivalent single axle loads (ESALs) appropriate for the required use. Changes to the aggregate or asphalt binder require approval from the Construction QA Manager with concurrence from the City of Tacoma, and may require a new mix design submittal from the Design-Builder or mix supplier. For aggregate, this will include changes in the source of material or a change in the percentage of material from a stockpile greater than five percent. Asphalt binder changes include the source of the crude petroleum supplied to the refinery; the refining process; and additives or modifiers in the asphalt binder. For mix designs that will be used beyond the calendar year of the original mix design and no change to the mix design is proposed, the Design-Builder or mix supplier shall submit a certification to the City of Tacoma Engineer that the original mix design has not changed. The Design-Builder or mix supplier shall submit representative samples of the mineral materials that are to be used in the HMA production. The City of Tacoma will use these samples to conduct verification testing of the mix design in accordance with WSDOT Standard Operating Procedure 732 and to determine anti-strip requirements, if any, in accordance with WSDOT test method T718. Verification testing of HMA mix designs proposed by the Design-Builder or mix supplier that includes recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) will be completed without inclusion of the RAP. Submittal of RAP samples is not required. A mix design report will be provided within 25 Calendar Days after a mix design submittal has been received in the State Materials Laboratory in Tumwater,

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

Washington. No paving shall begin prior to issuance of the mix design report or reference mix design report for that year. The mix design shall be the initial job mix formula (JMF) for the class of mix. The Design-Builder or mix supplier may request a change in the JMF. Any adjustment to the JMF will require approval of the City of Tacoma Project Engineer per Section 9-03.8(7) of the Standard Specifications. Asphalt Plant - The asphalt concrete plants that the Design-Builder uses for the production of asphalt concrete shall meet all of the requirements of the Standard Specifications. The Construction QA Manager shall inspect the asphalt concrete plants and document that they meet all requirements.

2.20.8 CITY INSPECTED AND TESTED ITEMS Certain items have been identified by the City of Tacoma as critical to the everyday operations of the Project. These items shall be inspected and tested by the City of Tacoma to ensure that they meet State and Federal requirements. These items include the following: Traffic Signs – All traffic signs will be inspected at the point of fabrication by the City of Tacoma. All inspected traffic signs and hardware will be tagged by City of Tacoma's Fabrication Inspector prior to shipment. HMA and Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) – Unless as otherwise explicitly stated elsewhere in the RFP, the verification and anti-strip requirements for the HMA and ATB mix designs shall be performed by the City of Tacoma. All acceptance testing for HMA and ATB aggregate, mixture, in-place density, cyclic density, longitudinal joint density, and coring as required shall be performed by the City of Tacoma or its representatives. Miscellaneous Materials Testing – The materials listed below are not statistically accepted and are not included in Table 6, Section 1-06 of the General Provisions, but may still require testing. These materials shall generally require a single sample for each lot of material to be tested for acceptance. The Design-Builder shall be responsible for sampling the materials; providing the proper paperwork as described in Chapter 9 of the WSDOT Construction Manual ; and delivering the samples to the City of Tacoma. Prior to any sampling of the materials listed below, the Design-Builder shall provide notice to the City of Tacoma 14 Calendar Days prior to sampling, and coordinate these activities with the City of Tacoma Engineer. The sampling requirements and the testing procedures shall be in accordance with the WSDOT Construction Manual: • Premolded joint filler; • Joint sealant and longitudinal joint seal; • Hot-poured joint sealant; • Elastomeric expansion joint seals; • Two-component poured rubber joint sealer; • Hot melt traffic button adhesive; • Plastic raised pavement markers (RPMs); • Thermoplastic RPMs; • Bagged Portland cement; • Aggregate extenders; • Rubberized asphalt; • Mineral filler;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-9 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

• Epoxy systems and epoxy resin; • Crack injection resin; • Pigmented sealer; • Paint for structures; • Abrasive sand; • Construction geosynthetic; • Curing compound; • Pre-packaged concrete; • Rigid galvanized steel (RGS) conduit; • Electrical conductors; • Chain link fabric; • Wire mesh; • Fencing tension and barbed wire; • Grade 1 fence posts; • Wire fence line posts; and • Mechanical rebar splices.

2.20.9 SUBMITTALS

2.20.9.1 PRODUCTION DATA The Design-Builder shall submit two hard copies of all manufacturer's warranties, guarantees, instruction sheets, parts lists, and other product data to the City of Tacoma for acceptance within 20 Calendar Days of installation of the items to which they relate. The City of Tacoma will advise the Design-Builder of the status of this product data within 14 Calendar Days of receipt. Refer to additional warranty requirements in other Sections of the RFP. The Design-Builder shall submit two hard copies of all inspection reports to the City of Tacoma daily, and copies of testing reports within 24 hours of test completion. The Design-Builder shall ensure that the product data cited in this Section is organized and indexed in a manner to allow easy retrieval of information.

2.20.9.2 MATERIALS CERTIFICATION PACKAGE The Design-Builder shall submit a final Materials Certification Package to the City of Tacoma. The Design-Builder may use DOT Form 350-115, Contract Materials Checklist, or develop its own checklist with the same information. The Materials Certification Package shall include all necessary supporting documentation. This documentation shall consist of all documentation practices used for material acceptance, and an explanation of any deficiencies noted in the checklist. The summary of this documentation shall be organized in an order similar to Division 9 of the Standard Specifications. Refer to Section 2.9 (Project Documentation) for additional information on materials documentation.

End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.20-10 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.21 NOISE MONITORING AND CONTROL

2 2.21.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to monitor and control noise 4 caused by activities required for construction of the Project. 5 The noise criteria for this Project are based on the City of Tacoma’s noise ordinance.

6 2.21.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 7 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for noise monitoring and control. 8 They are listed in a hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of 9 the list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required 10 to complete construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any ambiguities or 11 conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design-Builder shall notify 12 the City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma may resolve them. 13 • Tacoma Municipal Code. 14 • City Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix xx). 15 • Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix 03). 16 • WSDOT Standard Specifications (M 41-10). 17 • WSDOT Communications Standards and Guide (Appendix 21).

18 2.21.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

19 2.21.3.1 GENERAL 20 Noise caused by activities required for the construction of the Project shall not violate 21 the City of Tacoma’s Noise Ordinance Number 27673, which is found in the Tacoma 22 Municipal Code 8.122.

23 2.21.3.2 NOISE COMPLAINTS 24 The Design-Builder shall report any and all complaints from the surrounding property 25 owners to the City of Tacoma. The City of Tacoma will respond to public complaints in 26 accordance with Section 2.7.

27 2.21.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

28 2.21.4.1 NOISE MITIGATION AND MONITORING PLAN 29 At least 30 Calendar Days prior to commencement of any Work, the Design-Builder shall 30 provide a Noise Mitigation Plan to the City of Tacoma, which shall include, but is not 31 limited to, the following: 32 • Description of noise-producing construction activities including equipment types 33 and sizes; 34 • Schedule coordination plans developed in conjunction with noise sensitive area 35 owners;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.21-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Anticipated noise levels at the closest noise sensitive area. 2 During all noise producing activities, the Design-Builder shall monitor noise levels, and 3 shall not exceed the safe level established by the City of Tacoma’s noise ordinance.

4 2.21.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

5 2.21.5.1 CONSTRUCTION HOURS 6 The Tacoma noise ordinance allows construction between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 7 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekends and Federal Holidays.

8 2.21.5.2 PUBLIC RELATIONS 9 In addition to the requirements of Section 2.7, the Design-Builder is required to have 10 both letter and personal contact with residents and owners or operators of the buildings 11 that are adjacent to the construction area or near enough to it for noise from 12 construction operations to affect the personal property of these buildings. This contact 13 will be made prior to the beginning of noise producing activities on the Project. The 14 Design-Builder shall maintain a list of those contacted.

15 2.21.5.2.1 Maintenance of Records 16 The Design-Builder shall maintain a complaint log of all noise-related complaints, 17 contacts, and actions, and shall furnish copies to the City of Tacoma Engineer upon 18 request.

19 2.21.6 SUBMITTALS

20 2.21.6.1 NOISE MITIGATION PLAN 21 The Design-Builder shall submit a Noise Mitigation Plan as described in this Section. 22 The Design-Builder shall submit three originals of the Noise Mitigation Plan to the City 23 of Tacoma, for approval, on 8.5-inch by 11-inc paper, except that exhibits may be 24 submitted on 11 inch-by 17-inch paper. The Plan shall be submitted bound on bond 25 paper and in electronic pdf format on a CDROM.

26 2.21.6.2 NOISE COMPLAINT LOG 27 The Design-Builder shall maintain a noise complaint log as described in this Section.

28 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.21-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.22 DESIGN-BUILD QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (QMP) 2 REQUIREMENTS

3 2.22.1 GENERAL 4 The Design-Builder will develop its own Quality Management Plan (QMP). The QMP 5 shall be consistent with the summary information submitted with the Design-Builder’s 6 proposal, and shall be approved in writing by the City of Tacoma. A draft QMP shall be 7 submitted to the City of Tacoma within 30 Calendar Days after notice to Proceed. The 8 City of Tacoma will not accept any Preliminary Design submittals until the Design- 9 Builder’s Final QMP for design has been approved in writing by the City of Tacoma. No 10 construction Work activities that require Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC) 11 inspection and testing shall commence until the Design-Builder’s Final QMP for 12 construction has been approved in writing by the City of Tacoma. The QMP shall be in 13 effect until all requirements of the Contract have been fulfilled and the Project is 14 accepted. 15 The Design-Builder’s QA organization is responsible for obtaining all documentation 16 necessary for approval and acceptance of materials; obtaining materials certifications as 17 required; and ensuring that all required materials testing is completed, all meeting the 18 Contract requirements, prior to the materials being incorporated into the Project. The 19 QA organization shall ensure that sufficient inspection is conducted in order to 20 determine that the Work complies with the processes outlined in the RFP. 21 The QMP shall detail how the Design-Builder shall provide QA and QC for design and 22 construction of the Project, and verify that all environmental and permit commitments 23 are met to ensure the Work conforms to the Contract requirements. The Design-Builder 24 shall consult the applicable environmental requirements and City of Tacoma and 25 AASHTO publications listed in this RFP to prepare the QMP. The Design-Builder shall 26 revise its QMP and its implementation when repetitive or recurring quality issues arise. 27 The Design-Builder’s QMP shall include an organizational chart of the QA and QC 28 personnel, listing the number of full-time equivalent employees, specific responsibilities 29 for each employee, and the lines of authority and reporting responsibilities. The QA and 30 QC organizations and personnel shall be completely independent of each other, with 31 separate reporting authorities. The personnel and organizations performing QA 32 functions shall have sufficient authority and organizational autonomy to identify quality 33 issues, and to be able to initiate, recommend, and verify implementation of Corrective 34 Action Plans. Personnel performing QA functions shall be at an organizational level that 35 ensures they will not be influenced by the impact of the QA measures on the Project 36 schedule, performance, or cost. The QMP shall list by discipline the name, 37 qualifications, applicable certifications, duties, responsibilities, and authority for all 38 personnel proposed to be responsible for QA and QC. All key personnel performing QA 39 functions shall be exclusively designated to those functions, and shall not be assigned to 40 perform conflicting duties.

41 2.22.1.1 PARTNERING AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION 42 Partnering shall be considered an integral part of the QMP. A partnering agreement is 43 recommended for handling disputes. During the initial partnering session, a separate 44 procedure for conflict resolution shall be developed and agreed to by the partners. The 45 procedure shall include, but is not limited to, the following elements:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Before the Project begins, a time frame for resolving disputes at each level of 2 authority shall be established and a list of typical disputes that could occur on the 3 Project shall be developed. 4 • Disputes shall be delegated to the lowest appropriate level of authority on the 5 Project team to resolve within the specified time frame. 6 • If the dispute is not resolved to the satisfaction of both parties within the 7 specified time frame, the dispute shall be automatically elevated to the next level 8 of authority on the Project team. The elevation process shall be developed by and 9 agreed to by both the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder at the conclusion of 10 the initial partnering session. 11 • If still unresolved, the dispute shall then be directed to the highest level of 12 authority where a final resolution shall be arbitrated by an unbiased third party, 13 whose selection has been agreed upon in advance as part of the QMP. 14 • A written report prepared by the Design-Builder and signed by both the City of 15 Tacoma and the Design-Builder, describing the dispute, all subsequent actions, 16 and final disposition of the dispute, shall be submitted to the Project records. 17 • If subsequent disputes arise on the same issue, the written report shall be 18 included as a resource during the resolution process. 19 • Disputes not resolved informally through the partnering process may be brought 20 to the Disputes Review Board in accordance with Section 1-04.5 of the General 21 Provisions.

22 2.22.1.2 PRE-ACTIVITY MEETINGS 23 Prior to the start of any Work activity, the Design-Builder shall hold pre-activity 24 meetings to ensure that all Project personnel have a thorough understanding of the Work 25 to be accomplished. Work activities include design, survey, fabrication, and construction 26 activities. The pre-activity meetings should include discussions relating to what will be 27 accomplished and where, when, how, and by whom the Work will be done. The pre- 28 activity meetings are to ensure that all parties have the same understanding of the design 29 intent; have the appropriate plans, specifications, and any special details; and are aware 30 of safety regulations and procedures that need to be followed. The QA Inspection 31 Checklist for each activity should be reviewed. 32 Pre-activity meetings shall be scheduled a minimum of seven Calendar Days in advance 33 of the start of any Work activity to allow for additional preparation, if necessary. The 34 Design-Builder’s Design QA Manager and/or Construction QA Manager shall plan, 35 conduct, and take minutes at the pre-activity meetings. The Design-Builder shall 36 document any clarifications and understandings related to the Work activity that are not 37 documented elsewhere in the minutes of the meeting. The Design-Builder shall 38 distribute the minutes to attendees and other QA, QC, and Quality Verification (QV) staff 39 who require the information. Pre-activity meetings are classified as hold points, and 40 shall be identified in the QMP. 41 Example topics for a pre-activity meeting: 42 • Scope (design criteria and intent, constraints); 43 • Environmental commitments; 44 • BMPs to be installed prior to Work;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Notification, monitoring, and reporting requirements; 2 • Applicable documents; 3 • Work activity outline and schedule (what, where, who, when, and how); 4 • Geometry control plan; 5 • Safety regulations and procedures; 6 • Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Plan; 7 • Work area ingress/egress; 8 • Coordination and utilities; 9 • Inspection Plan/QA procedures; 10 • Status of submittals; 11 • Status of material approvals and acceptance requirements; 12 • Acceptance criteria, including hold and witness points; 13 • Frequency of materials testing; 14 • Examination of the Work area; 15 • Examination of stored material; and 16 • Open discussion.

17 2.22.1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM 18 The City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder will jointly form a Quality Assurance Team. 19 The team meetings will address and rectify issues relating to inspection, substandard 20 material quality, inadequate QA and QC processes that need to be adjusted, test results 21 that are out of tolerance, disparity between QA and QV test data, future quality concerns, 22 and any issues that the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder may have regarding 23 quality of the Project. 24 At a minimum, the Design-Builder shall assign the personnel in charge of QA and QC 25 activities, superintendents, and any other personnel the Design-Builder acknowledges as 26 having quality-related concerns from the Design-Build team to the Quality Assurance 27 Team. The City of Tacoma may assign similar personnel related to the Project or others 28 having quality concerns on the Project to the Quality Assurance Team. 29 The Project Quality Manager (described below) or the Construction QA Manager shall be 30 responsible for setting the meeting schedule and agenda, and documenting the meeting 31 minutes and distribution to attendees. At the start of the design and construction 32 phases, meetings shall be held weekly to discuss quality issues. The meeting frequency 33 may decrease as quality issues decrease. In the event that Contract performance 34 becomes substandard, the City of Tacoma will require that the Quality Assurance Team 35 meet more frequently. 36 The Design-Builder shall review all of the current and unresolved Nonconformance 37 Reports (NCRs) and Nonconforming Issues (NCI) during the Quality Assurance Team 38 meetings. For each NCR and NCI, the Design-Builder shall address the following items 39 at the Quality Assurance Team meetings: 40 • Action taken by QC – How will QC or production ensure the NCR/NCI will not be 41 repeated? How has this action been addressed in the QMP? 42 • Action taken by QA – How will QA ensure the NCR/NCI will not be repeated? 43 How has this action been addressed in the QMP? 44 • Resolution of the initial issue that caused the NCR/NCI – How was it corrected?

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • How will the issue be prevented from becoming a recurring error? 2 Example topics for a weekly Quality Assurance Team meeting: 3 • Safety; 4 • Schedule; 5 • Review of previous action items from prior weeks; 6 • Current and upcoming activities; 7 • QA/QC inspections and testing; 8 • Materials documentation status; 9 • Review of statistical materials evaluation; 10 • Open NCRs/NCIs; and 11 • New issues. 12 Note: For each item, the Design-Builder shall record clear action items, due dates, and 13 responsibilities in the meeting minutes.

14 2.22.1.4 MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVE 15 The Design-Builder shall designate a Project Quality Manager who shall be responsible 16 for developing and updating the QMP, and scheduling and facilitating the Executive 17 Management Review.

18 2.22.1.5 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT REVIEW 19 The Design-Builder’s executive management shall approve the QMP, and conduct a 20 review or an internal audit of the QMP at least quarterly, and more frequently if 21 repetitive QA issues and Corrective Action Reports have been issued. This review or 22 internal audit shall ensure the QMP’s ongoing suitability and effectiveness in satisfying 23 the requirements of the Contract and the Design-Builder’s stated quality policy and 24 objectives. 25 The Design-Builder shall invite the City of Tacoma to participate in the Executive 26 Management Reviews. 27 At a minimum, the Executive Management Review or internal audit shall evaluate the 28 results of the review, City of Tacoma audit results, Corrective Action Reports, and plans 29 implemented as a result of the NCRs and NCIs. The Design-Builder shall respond within 30 20 Calendar Days to requests for the implementation of Corrective Action Plans that 31 result from Executive Management Reviews. The Design-Builder shall incorporate the 32 updated Corrective Action Plan into the QMP in a timely manner. Any changes to the 33 QMP shall be approved by the City of Tacoma.

34 2.22.1.6 QUALITY SYSTEM

35 2.22.1.6.1 General 36 The Design-Builder shall prepare a QMP that includes a quality system which meets the 37 Contract requirements. 38 The precedence of the documents describing the quality system shall be: 39 • Quality policy (for the entire system); 40 • Quality objectives;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Resources (for each section of the QMP); 2 • Procedures; and 3 • Work instructions.

4 The QMP shall include a flow chart or other graphical representation showing the 5 processes and their relationships to each other, the inspection and test controls, and a 6 narrative for each process. 7 The QMP shall include written procedures that describe the purpose, overview, 8 responsibilities, and steps of the Quality System process, and records resulting from the 9 process.

10 2.22.1.6.2 Quality Planning 11 The QMP shall include an Inspection and Test Plan describing all of the proposed QA 12 inspections and tests to be performed throughout the construction process. Activity- 13 specific Inspection and Test Plans shall be prepared during the preparatory phase for 14 each definable feature of Work. The Inspection and Test Plans shall be updated when 15 new subcontractor or supplier contracts are implemented. The Construction QA 16 Manager shall review and approve all Inspection and Test Plans prior to submittal to the 17 City of Tacoma for review at least 14 Calendar Days prior to the start of the Work activity. 18 Inspection and Test Plans shall: 19 • Identify hold and witness points when Work shall be accepted by QA personnel 20 prior to proceeding to the next stage of the Work. 21 • Define the activity to be tested/inspected, the agency/laboratory to perform the 22 test/inspection, the frequency of the test/inspection, the test/inspection 23 procedure or reference standard, the specified requirement reference, and the 24 record that documents the results. 25 • Develop the Test Plans for materials that will be statistically accepted, for 26 materials that will be non-statistically accepted, and for materials that will be 27 accepted by small quantities according to this RFP. 28 In addition, the QMP shall: 29 • Describe all of the material receiving, in-process, and final inspections and tests 30 to be undertaken. 31 • Show what products or services are to be subcontracted. 32 • Describe verification of compliance by suppliers and subcontractors with 33 requirements. 34 • Identify who within the Construction QA organization has stop work authority.

35 2.22.1.6.3 Other Project Documents 36 The QMP shall describe how it is applied to all submittals required by the Contract. The 37 following is a list of plans and documents that are required in addition to the design and 38 construction documents specifically addressed in this Section. This is not a 39 comprehensive list; other documents may be required to complete the Work. 40 • Safety Management Plan, including Accident Prevention Program, and Site 41 Safety Plan;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Public Information Plan; 2 • Environmental permit application materials; 3 • Environmental Compliance Plan; 4 • Environmental Commitment Close-Out Report; 5 • Project progress schedule; 6 • Submittal schedule; 7 • Design schedule, acknowledging documents, and/or packages that will be 8 submitted for review; 9 • Utility Management Plan; 10 • Roadside Work Plan; 11 • Traffic Management Plan; 12 • Traffic Incident Management Plan; 13 • Document Control Work Plan; and 14 • Construction documentation including, but not limited to: 15 o Inspector's Daily Reports; 16 o Non-Conformance Reports; 17 o QA and QC Inspection Checklists; 18 o Materials Testing Reports; and 19 o Traffic Control Supervisor's Daily Report.

20 2.22.2 DESIGN-BUILDER QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AND 21 QUALITY CONTROL (QC) STAFF 22 At a minimum, the Design-Builder’s QA and QC staff shall include the personnel 23 described in this Section.

24 2.22.2.1 DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER 25 The Design QA Manager shall have overall responsibility for the design portion of the 26 QMP. Through audits, the Design QA Manager shall be responsible for verifying and 27 validating that the QA and QC procedures required by the QMP are administered and 28 being followed. The Design QA Manager shall report to the Design Manager or the 29 Project Manager. 30 In accordance with this Section and the QMP, the Design QA Manager shall certify that 31 all Design Documents have been subjected to all required QC checking procedures; all 32 documentation has been completed and filed in an acceptable manner; and all design 33 packages have been subjected to a QA audit prior to submittal to the City of Tacoma or 34 prior to release. 35 Minimum Qualifications: 36 The Design QA Manager must be a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of 37 Washington, and have at least ten years of recent experience in the design or quality 38 management of design build projects including two years experience with rehabilitated 39 structures.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.22.2.2 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER 2 The Construction QA Manager shall have overall responsibility for implementation of the 3 construction portion of the QMP. The Construction QA Manager shall be responsible for 4 implementing, monitoring, and adjusting the processes to assure acceptable quality. The 5 Construction QA Manager shall report directly to the person or group with overall 6 Project management responsibilities. It is the responsibility of the Construction QA 7 Manager to implement quality planning; oversee the QA testing and inspection; and 8 coordinate with the City of Tacoma’s verification testing and inspection. The 9 Construction QA Manager shall not be assigned any other duties or responsibilities on 10 the Project. The Construction QA Manager shall have the authority to stop any Work 11 that does not meet the standards, specifications, or criteria established for the Project. 12 The Construction QA Manager shall be available so that they can be on the Project Site 13 within two hours of being notified of a problem regarding the QA of any Work being 14 performed by the Design-Builder, or any of its subcontractors or agents. 15 Minimum Qualifications: 16 The Construction QA Manager must have at least six years, ten years preferred, of recent 17 experience overseeing inspection and materials testing on rehabilitated structures. Of 18 the six years minimum, the Construction QA Manager shall have a minimum of three 19 years experience in construction materials acceptance administration, including 20 statistical acceptance of materials, and a minimum of three years experience in 21 construction inspection administration.

22 2.22.2.3 MATERIALS APPROVAL ENGINEER 23 The Materials Approval Engineer shall have authority for the approval of materials. 24 Minimum Qualifications: 25 The Materials Approval Engineer shall be a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of 26 Washington under Title 18 RCW, and shall be an employee of the firm that leads the 27 design for the Design-Builder.

28 2.22.2.4 QUALITY TESTING SUPERVISOR (QTS) 29 The Quality Testing Supervisor (QTS) may be an employee of the Design-Builder’s QA 30 testing laboratory or of the testing laboratory hired by the Design-Builder to perform the 31 QA testing. The QTS or their representative shall be at the Site where the testing is being 32 performed. The QTS shall schedule, review, and verify for compliance all test reports 33 performed by the QA testing laboratory. The QTS shall report to the Construction QA 34 Manager. 35 Minimum Qualifications: 36 The QTS shall meet one of the following qualifications: 37 • Professional Engineer license; an Engineer-In-Training; or a Bachelor of Science 38 Degree in Civil Engineering, Civil Engineering Technology, Construction, or 39 related experience; and at least four years of highway materials testing 40 experience; or 41 • Certification by the National Institute for Certification in Engineering 42 Technologies in the Construction Materials Testing field as an Engineering

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Technician (Level III) or higher, with at least four years of experience in the 2 appropriate subfield in which sampling and testing is being performed; or 3 • Eight years of highway materials testing and construction experience.

4 2.22.2.5 ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR 5 The City of Tacoma will inspect all electrical systems for code compliance, functionality, 6 and acceptance.

7 2.22.2.6 QA TESTING TECHNICIANS AND QA INSPECTION TECHNICIANS 8 The QA Testing Technicians and QA Inspection Technicians shall perform the required 9 QA inspections and tests. The QA Testing Technicians and QA Inspection Technicians 10 shall have the following qualifications: 11 QA Testing Technicians - Acceptance testing shall be performed by QA Testing 12 Technicians qualified in accordance with AASHTO R-18, using the procedural checklist 13 in the WSDOT Materials Manual (M 46-01).The qualifications of the laboratory 14 technicians employed by an AASHTO accredited laboratory will be accepted for 15 performing AASHTO test methods only when confirmed by the laboratory’s training and 16 evaluation records. The competency of each QA Testing Technician shall be re-evaluated 17 annually in all tests they perform, in accordance with the laboratory’s Laboratory Quality 18 Systems Manual approved by the City of Tacoma. 19 A testing technician currently qualified in concrete testing by the American Concrete 20 Institute (Level I) will be considered qualified to perform concrete tests. 21 The QA Testing Technicians performing the field and laboratory QA sampling and 22 testing shall be employed by the Design-Builder or an agent’s laboratory, and supervised 23 by the QTS. The QA Testing Technicians shall not be affiliated with or employed by any 24 materials supplier or the QC organization. The QA Testing Technicians shall not 25 perform QC testing. 26 QA Inspection Technicians -The QA Inspection Technicians shall inspect, verify 27 materials, and document all construction activities for compliance to the Contract. The 28 QA Inspection Technicians shall report to the Construction QA Manager. The QA 29 Inspection Technicians shall not be affiliated with or employed by any materials 30 suppliers or subsidiaries. The QA Inspection Technicians shall not perform QC 31 inspection. The QA Inspection Technicians shall have a minimum of four years of 32 qualifying experience in large urban transportation projects including rehabilitated 33 structures.

34 2.22.2.6.1 Quality Assurance Staff Training 35 QA staff shall be trained in the applicable procedures for inspection of Work, 36 environmental monitoring, and material sampling and testing. The professional training 37 and experience of the QA staff shall be commensurate with the scope, complexity, and 38 nature of the activity to be inspected, monitored, or tested.

39 2.22.2.6.2 Rights to Remove Quality Assurance Staff 40 By written notice, the City of Tacoma reserves the right to permanently remove any of 41 the following personnel from the Project:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-8 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • A QA Testing Technician who does not perform the QA tests in accordance with 2 the test methods. 3 • A QA Testing Technician who does not report test results accurately. 4 • A QA Inspecting Technician or environmental monitor who, in the opinion of the 5 City of Tacoma, does not exercise good judgment in the performance of their 6 duty. 7 • A QA Testing Technician who is not certified in accordance with the Contract 8 requirements.

9 2.22.2.7 QUALITY CONTROL (QC) TESTERS AND PERSONNEL 10 The Design-Builder shall perform QC measures to ensure operational techniques and 11 activities provide acceptable quality, and are in compliance with the Contract. QC may 12 be performed by personnel from a separate organization within the Design-Builder’s 13 organization, by the Design-Builder’s front line supervisors, or by the supplier, producer, 14 or manufacturer, but in no case by personnel associated with the QA organization. The 15 QC personnel shall be trained and provided with the necessary tools, testing procedures, 16 and inspection checklists to ensure the Work product meets the Contract requirements. 17 The QC Testers and Inspectors shall report to the Construction Manager or designee. 18 The designee shall not be the Construction QA Manager.

19 2.22.3 DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AND QUALITY 20 CONTROL (QC) REQUIREMENTS OF THE QUALITY 21 MANAGEMENT PLAN (QMP)

22 2.22.3.1 GENERAL 23 The QMP shall specify all aspects of the QA and QC for design. The QA and QC 24 procedures for each type of Design Document and Released for Construction (RFC) 25 Document shall be organized by engineering discipline. The Design-Builder shall 26 include measures and objective evidence to ensure that appropriate quality standards are 27 specified and included in the Design Documents and RFC Documents, and to control 28 deviations from the standards. The Design-Builder shall not deviate from the standards 29 unless the deviation has been approved by the City of Tacoma. 30 The QMP shall include the following: 31 • QA and QC procedures for preparing, submitting, and checking all plans, 32 calculations, drawings, and other items to ensure that they are independently 33 checked and back-checked by experienced architects and engineers, in 34 accordance with generally accepted architectural and engineering practices. The 35 originator, checker, and back-checker shall be clearly identified on the face of all 36 submittals. 37 • Specific procedures for validating computer programs used on the Project. 38 • QA and QC procedures for verifying that all submittals meet the requirements of 39 the Contract. 40 • Assurance that all materials, equipment, and elements of Work have been 41 provided for and designed to perform satisfactorily for the purpose intended.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-9 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • A defined process for stamping, signing, and dating plans, reports, and other 2 documents by the responsible Professional Engineer licensed in the State of 3 Washington under Title 18 RCW, where required by the Contract. 4 • The level, frequency, and methods of review for the adequacy of the design of the 5 Project. 6 • The method by which drawing changes are incorporated into a revision change. 7 • The procedures for coordinating Work performed by different personnel in the 8 same area, in adjacent areas, or on related tasks to ensure that conflicts, 9 omissions, or misalignments do not occur between the drawings or between the 10 drawings and the specifications; and to coordinate the review, approval, release, 11 distribution, and revision of documents involving such personnel. 12 • Identification of those elements of the Contract, Design Documents, or RFC 13 Documents requiring special QA and/or QC attention or emphasis, including 14 applicable standards of quality or practice to be met, and level of completeness 15 and/or extent of detailing required. 16 • Identification by discipline of the name, qualifications, duties, responsibilities, 17 and authorities for all persons responsible for QA and QC. 18 • Description of the name, qualifications, duties, responsibilities, and authorities of 19 external technical experts necessary to ensure the quality of the design of the 20 Project. Information regarding the anticipated timing, use, anticipated 21 availability, and any coordination required with respect to any experts. 22 • Procedures for assuring that the documents fully provide for constructability and 23 compatibility of materials. 24 • Identification of the inspection guidelines for each item of Work to determine 25 what significant characteristics of each item need to be monitored during the 26 construction phase to ensure that the completed Project will function in 27 accordance with the design intent over its expected lifetime. The inspection 28 guidelines shall include the appropriate criteria, tests, and inspection 29 requirements described in this Section. 30 • Descriptions of the required design QA and QC functions, including scheduled 31 activities for design QA and QC identifying the Design Documents and RFC 32 Documents to be delivered to the City of Tacoma for its review at each stage of 33 the design or construction phase of the Project. The QMP shall specify written 34 certifications by the Design QA Manager for each submittal document showing 35 that all QMP requirements have been completed satisfactorily. 36 • Development and maintenance of an accessible Document Control System (DCS) 37 by the Design-Builder to provide all relevant design inputs, including a list of 38 references to design inputs that should be used by design personnel in the design. 39 • Verification by the Design-Builder that the design inputs are communicated to, 40 and accessible by, the relevant designers responsible for incorporating design 41 inputs into the design. 42 • Specification of QA procedures to verify the construction surveying, property 43 surveying, establishment of Right of Way markers, as-built plans, re-established 44 county and subdivision monuments, and Record of Survey Map.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-10 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • A defined process for tracking the design drawings through the Final Design 2 Documents and including the RFC Documents. 3 The QMP shall describe procedures to require that a written certification is signed by the 4 Design QA Manager verifying that all quality procedures have been completed in 5 accordance with the QMP.

6 2.22.3.2 CITY OF TACOMA DESIGN REVIEW 7 The QMP shall define the timing, content, and format of all design reviews. The Design- 8 Builder shall provide a 15 Working Day review period for City of Tacoma review and 9 comment on all design submittals. The Design-Builder shall address all comments made 10 by the City of Tacoma in each submittal, and shall include comment resolutions in 11 subsequent submittals. 12 The Design-Builder shall schedule and maintain minutes of all resolution meetings with 13 the appropriate City of Tacoma staff to document and resolve the Design-Builder’s 14 responses to the comments. It is intended that all comments will be resolved at these 15 meetings. If agreement is not reached on any specific comment, it shall be resolved as 16 described in the QMP.

17 2.22.3.3 DESIGN TASK FORCES AND OVER-THE-SHOULDER REVIEWS 18 The QMP shall also include processes and procedures for how regular scheduled 19 coordination meetings between the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder will be used 20 to support quality goals. These meetings, combined with over-the-shoulder reviews, 21 shall be an integral part of the process to discuss and resolve design issues outside of the 22 formal review process. 23 The QMP shall define how over-the-shoulder reviews with the City of Tacoma during the 24 course of the development of each design package will be included. The over-the- 25 shoulder reviews are not hold points that restrict the progress of design. They are 26 reviews of the design as it progresses, and opportunities for the City of Tacoma to 27 provide comments and feedback on the design.

28 2.22.3.4 RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION (RFC) DOCUMENT REVIEW 29 The Design-Builder shall provide preliminary and final submittals of all plans and 30 Technical Specifications and resolve all comments prior to being Released for 31 Construction. Any deviation from the Mandatory Standards and Technical 32 Requirements must be approved by the City of Tacoma prior to a submittal being 33 Released for Construction.

34 2.22.3.4.1 Technical Specifications 35 The Standard Specifications are supplemented and modified by the City of Tacoma 36 Amendments to the Standard Specifications, Amendments to the Standard 37 Specifications, and these Technical Requirements. The Design-Builder shall develop any 38 additional Technical Specifications that are required to address Work not covered by the 39 City Amendments to the Standard Specifications, Standard Specifications, Amendments 40 to the Standard Specifications, or these Technical Requirements.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-11 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.22.3.4.2 Preliminary Design Submittals 2 The Preliminary 30%, 60% and 90% Design Submittals provides a formal opportunity 3 for the City of Tacoma, the Design-Builder, various design team disciplines, and other 4 approved Project stakeholders to review the construction documents. The intent of this 5 review is to ensure that the design is progressing appropriately and proceeding in the 6 right direction; the plans reflect Design-Builder requirements for construction; design 7 features are coordinated; and there are no fatal flaws within a given discipline or 8 between disciplines. The contents of the Preliminary Design Submittal for each 9 discipline shall be as specified in these Technical Requirements and as mutually agreed 10 upon by members of the applicable task force or by agreement between the City of 11 Tacoma and the Design-Builder if no specific task force applies.

12 2.22.3.4.3 Final Design Submittal 13 The Final Design Submittal shall be prepared when the design for a given element or 14 area is 100 percent complete. The Final Design Submittal may include plan sheets, 15 specifications, technical memos, reports, calculations, and other pertinent data, as 16 applicable. As a result of the on-going discussion and resolution of design and 17 construction issues through the regularly-scheduled task force meetings and over-the- 18 shoulder reviews, it is anticipated that there will be very few revisions or changes at this 19 stage. 20 The Final Design Submittal shall include all specifications, necessary to construct the 21 Work represented in the submittal, including but not limited to all City Amendments to 22 the Standard Specifications, Amendments to the Standard Specifications, Special 23 Provisions, Technical Requirements, and Technical Specifications, necessary to construct 24 the Work represented in the submittal. Following resolution of all comments, the Final 25 Design Submittal may proceed through the written certification process described below 26 in preparation for being Released for Construction.

27 2.22.3.4.4 Released for Construction (RFC) Documents 28 The QMP shall describe how the Design-Builder will ensure that the RFC Documents 29 reflect all QA, QC, and design reviews required by the QMP and the Contract. The QMP 30 shall also describe the written certification process to be used to verify to the City of 31 Tacoma that all QA procedures have been completed to ensure that all review comments 32 have been incorporated as agreed to during the comment resolution process among the 33 City of Tacoma, any affected agency, and the Design-Builder, and that the documents are 34 ready to be Released for Construction. 35 Each sheet of the plan set and the cover of each set of Technical Specifications in the RFC 36 Documents shall carry the Professional Engineer’s stamp and shall be stamped 37 "Released For Construction" by the Design QA Manager. 38 Once plans and Technical Specifications have been Released for Construction, the 39 Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with six hard copies and electronic files 40 (in both AutoCAD and PDF format), on CDROM of all RFC Documents. The electronic 41 drawing files shall include copies of all sheet and reference files used in the RFC 42 Documents. 43 The Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with a Microsoft Excel (version 44 2003) spreadsheet for each RFC Submittal containing the file name and the 45 corresponding conformance level for every file that is part of the submittal. Construction

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-12 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 shall not proceed on any element of Work until the relevant submittal is stamped 2 “Released for Construction” and signed by the Design QA Manager, and all required 3 government and private approvals have been obtained by the Design-Builder.

4 2.22.3.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AND QUALITY CONTROL (QC) OF 5 DESIGN CHANGES 6 The QMP shall describe the process for implementing design changes, including field 7 changes, shown on the Design Documents and RFC Documents. The design changes 8 shall be subject to QA and QC measures and procedures, commensurate with those 9 applied to the original design or that portion of the Project under consideration for 10 change. 11 The QMP shall also address and clearly define the number of changes to a drawing that 12 will result in a drawing revision, and the time frame for the release of the updated 13 drawing. Each drawing revision shall be assigned a number. The revision number shall 14 be assigned sequentially, with each change in a document or plan sheet identified by the 15 revision number. The assigned number shall be located both at the location of the 16 change on the sheet and in the revision block of the document, together with an 17 explanation of the change.

18 2.22.3.6 WORKING DRAWINGS 19 The QMP shall describe the personnel assigned to Working Drawings review and 20 approval, forms, temporary structures, and construction processes and other critical 21 structure shop drawings; the procedures for documenting reviews and obtaining 22 approvals; the process for implementing corrective actions; the procedures for auditing 23 and checking compliance to the requirements of the Contract and the distribution to the 24 City of Tacoma for review and comment. 25 The Design-Builder shall submit all Working Drawings required by the Contract to the 26 City of Tacoma for review and comment. The submittal shall include one hard copy and 27 one electronic copy of shop drawings. If the City of Tacoma elects to offer any 28 comments, they will be submitted to the Design-Builder within 14 Calendar Days. 29 The Design-Builder shall submit shop drawings for all steel elements and prefabricated 30 elements to the City of Tacoma prior to implementation. The submittal shall include one 31 hard copy and one electronic copy of shop drawings. 32 Prior to submittal to the City of Tacoma, the Design-Builder shall mark the shop 33 drawings in the lower right corner with one of the two following indicators: 34 • APP’D (approved, no corrections required); and 35 • AAN (approved as noted, minor corrections only. The Design-Builder shall not 36 place written questions on Approved-As-Noted sheets, but shall clearly note the 37 corrections).

38 2.22.3.7 AS-BUILT DOCUMENTATION 39 The QMP shall describe how the Design-Builder will ensure that the As-Built Documents 40 meet the requirements of the Contract and accurately represent the as-constructed 41 conditions in the field, and how the As-Built Documents are updated continuously and 42 made available for periodic reviews conducted by the City of Tacoma or their designees.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-13 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.22.3.8 DOCUMENT AND DATA CONTROL 2 The QMP shall describe the procedures to be used in managing and documenting all 3 Project files. The Design-Builder shall establish and maintain its own DCS to store and 4 record hard copies and electronic records including, but not limited to, all 5 correspondence, meeting minutes, design inputs, drawings, progress reports, technical 6 reports, specifications, Contract documents, submittals, calculations, test results, 7 inspection reports, non-conformance reports (NCRs), administrative documents, and 8 other documents generated under the Contract. The Design-Builder shall ensure that its 9 DCS is compatible with the DCS used by the City of Tacoma. 10 The QMP shall describe the methods by which all documents issued and received by the 11 Design-Builder will contain a unique serialization, date issued or received, Project name, 12 Contract name, Contract number, specific subject or content of the correspondence, 13 name of the sender or recipient, and reference information to which the correspondence 14 relates to, such as prior correspondence. The Design-Builder shall maintain separate 15 incoming and outgoing correspondence logs. 16 All documents shall be maintained, organized, and indexed by the Design-Builder for the 17 duration of the Contract. Documents shall be delivered to the City of Tacoma upon Final 18 Acceptance unless the Contract requires earlier delivery, or within seven Calendar Days 19 of receipt of request from the City of Tacoma, even if the documents are incomplete.

20 2.22.3.8.1 Document and Data Approval and Issuance 21 The QMP shall require that all deliverables include a signed and dated certification by 22 the originator of the deliverable, and that deliverables must be complete and meet the 23 Contract requirements.

24 2.22.3.8.2 Document and Data Changes 25 The QMP shall require that any document changes are provided to the City of Tacoma in 26 a format that shows the changes clearly, and is easily tracked (e.g., documents use the 27 redline/strikeout method).

28 2.22.3.9 DESIGN VALIDATION 29 The QMP shall describe all verification, validation, monitoring, inspection, and activities 30 to be carried out for the purposes of demonstrating that the Work is acceptable.

31 2.22.4 MATERIALS QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AND QUALITY 32 CONTROL (QC) PLAN REQUIREMENTS

33 2.22.4.1 GENERAL 34 The QMP shall specify all aspects of the Materials QA and QC Plan. At a minimum, the 35 Materials QA and QC Plan shall include the items described in this Section to verify that 36 all materials conform to the Contract requirements. The Materials QA and QC shall be 37 separate functions performed by separate personnel who have no affiliation to each other 38 or to the same organization.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-14 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.22.4.2 DESIGN-BUILDER RESPONSIBILITIES 2 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for the quality of construction and materials 3 incorporated into the Project. The Design-Builder’s QC measures are intended to ensure 4 that operational techniques and activities provide material of acceptable quality. 5 The Materials QA organization shall be responsible for the acceptance of all materials 6 and workmanship incorporated into the Project. The Materials QA organization shall 7 also perform sampling and testing, determine acceptance/rejection of the materials, and 8 implement a tracking system to monitor nonconforming materials and disposition of 9 nonconforming materials, according to the Contract.

10 2.22.4.3 MATERIALS TESTING QUALITY PROGRAM 11 The Design-Builder shall monitor and measure the characteristics of all Work activities 12 to verify that all Project requirements have been met. This monitoring and measurement 13 shall be carried out at appropriate stages of construction in accordance with the planned 14 Work and minimum frequencies for sampling and testing as described in Table 6, 15 Section 1-06 in the General Provisions. 16 The Design-Builder’s QA test data shall be used for acceptance, provided it can be 17 statistically verified by the City of Tacoma’s QV test data, except as noted in Section 2.20 18 (Control of Materials). The Quality Assurance Team will attempt to resolve any 19 discrepancies in test data between the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder. If a 20 resolution cannot be reached, then the City of Tacoma’s QV test results will be used for 21 acceptance. 22 The five levels of quality management provided by the Design-Builder and the City of 23 Tacoma where testing is being used for acceptance are: 24 Quality Assurance (QA): The Construction QA Manager shall be responsible for the 25 materials sampling, testing, and processes for QA. Testing for QA includes all planned 26 (e.g., audits and assessments) and systematic actions necessary to ensure that all 27 materials incorporated into the Work meet the Contract requirements for the material 28 being used, and will perform satisfactorily for the purposes intended. All materials 29 sampling and testing for QA will be performed by a statistically valid random sampling 30 method using testing methods and minimum frequencies defined in Section 1-06, the 31 WSDOT Construction Manual, the WSDOT Materials Manual, and the Contract. 32 Quality Control (QC): The Design-Builder shall be responsible for QC, which is 33 defined as activities performed by the Design-Builder, the producer, or the manufacturer 34 to ensure that a product is of uniform quality meeting the Contract requirements. 35 Components of QC may include inspecting and obtaining material certifications, 36 materials handling, construction procedures, calibration and maintenance of equipment, 37 production process controls, and any sampling, testing, or re-testing conducted for these 38 purposes. 39 Quality Verification (QV): The City of Tacoma or its agent will perform an 40 independent material QV to validate the Design-Builder’s sampling and testing QA 41 program. All verification sampling and testing will be performed by a statistically valid 42 random sampling method using testing methods defined in the WSDOT Construction 43 Manual, the WSDOT Materials Manual, and the Contract. 44 Independent Assurance (IA): The IA is an independent verification performed by 45 the City of Tacoma that includes an observation of sampling and testing procedures, a

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-15 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 review of the qualifications of the tester, and a verification of the testing equipment used 2 to perform acceptance testing activities. The IA will validate both the Design-Builder’s 3 QA processes and the City of Tacoma’s QV processes. The IA may include auditing of 4 acceptance testing records, observing the tests being performed by the Design-Builder’s 5 technicians, or taking split samples with the Design-Builder on a random basis for 6 verifying the Design-Builder’s testing equipment. The City of Tacoma will enter findings 7 of all IA observations into the Construction Audit Tracking Systems (CATS). Any 8 deficiency will result in an NCI. The Design-Builder shall take corrective action 9 immediately for any noted deficiencies. 10 Quality Assessment: The City of Tacoma will perform non-scheduled Quality 11 Assessments of the Design-Builder’s Work, including sampling, testing, and 12 documentation reviews for the benefit of the owner.

13 2.22.4.4 MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY 14 All QA testing that will be used for acceptance of materials shall be performed by a 15 laboratory approved by the City of Tacoma. The laboratory shall report directly to the 16 Construction QA Manager. The Design-Builder or a subcontractor shall employ the 17 laboratory personnel. The materials testing laboratory that is used for QA testing shall 18 not perform QC testing, and shall not be owned, operated, equipped, or staffed by 19 material suppliers. The laboratory shall meet the requirements of AASHTO R-18 for 20 qualified testers and calibrated/verified equipment, and be able to accomplish the 21 testing according to the test procedure they are performing. 22 The Design-Builder’s laboratory shall develop and maintain a Laboratory Quality 23 Systems Manual. The Manual shall include: 24 • Staff qualifications, position description, and qualification process; 25 • Listing of test procedures approved for performance throughout the Project; 26 • Equipment, including verification, calibration, recall procedures, and inventory; 27 • Test reports, worksheet, summary logs, and forms; 28 • Sample management procedures; 29 • Diagnostic and Corrective Action Reports; and 30 • Quality Systems review. 31 The City of Tacoma will perform an onsite evaluation of the facility, in accordance with 32 the WSDOT Materials Manual (, to ensure all Work is being performed according to the 33 Contract. The evaluation will include audit and inspection functions; review of training, 34 equipment calibration, and verification of records; and observance of testers as they 35 perform the test procedures. For laboratories located outside of Washington State, or 36 laboratories performing only minor testing, the City of Tacoma may use the AASHTO 37 Accreditation program or another state’s Department of Transportation to inspect the 38 laboratory. 39 The Design-Builder shall request the City of Tacoma inspection a minimum of 14 40 Calendar Days prior to the start of construction. Together with the request, the Design- 41 Builder shall submit a copy of the Laboratory Quality Systems Manual and a list of the 42 testing procedures that the laboratory shall perform throughout the Project. The 43 laboratory shall be properly equipped, staffed, and fully operational at the time of the 44 City of Tacoma’s inspection and for the duration of its use on the Project. 45 The City of Tacoma will advise the Design-Builder in writing of any deficiencies noted 46 during the inspection, and the Design-Builder shall take immediate action to correct

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-16 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 them. Work requiring laboratory acceptance will not proceed until the laboratory and 2 staff has been inspected and has received written approval from the City of Tacoma 3 Engineer. 4 The test equipment for the following test procedure shall be as shown below and in the 5 Field Operation Procedure in accordance with the WSDOT Materials Manual so that 6 proper correlation between the QA and QV test results may be established. 7 WSDOT Field Operation Procedure for AASHTO T-310 In-place Densities by Nuclear 8 Method (Troxler 3430, or 3440 Series Moisture/Density Gauge). 9 Materials listed in Section 2.20 shall be delivered to the City of Tacoma.

10 2.22.4.5 MATERIALS TESTING FREQUENCIES AND RANDOM SAMPLING 11 The Design-Builder shall perform field and laboratory sampling and testing as specified 12 in the WSDOT Standard Specifications and the WSDOT Materials Manual to control 13 these processes. Sampling and testing shall be performed by qualified testing personnel 14 described in this Section. Representative samples shall be randomly obtained by the 15 Design-Builder at specified frequencies as shown in Table 6, Section 1-06 of the General 16 Provisions. The Design-Builder shall furnish copies of all test results to the City of 17 Tacoma within 24 hours of completion of the test or the next business day. For concrete 18 cylinders, the test results shall be furnished within 24 hours after cylinder break. 19 The City of Tacoma or its agent will perform independent materials QV sampling and 20 testing to validate the Design-Builder’s sampling and testing QA program. Typically, the 21 testing rate will be one verification test to every five of the Design-Builder’s acceptance 22 tests. During production startup, the QV testing will be performed at the same frequency 23 as the Design-Builder’s QA program for the first five samples, to establish a statistical 24 base for verification and acceptance. After that, the QV testing will be performed on a 25 more frequent basis as needed until the process is established and considered to be 26 under control. When QV testing reaches 25 samples, and the QA and QV testing can be 27 statistically validated, the frequency of the QV tests may be reduced to one in 20. If at 28 any time the QA and QV testing has wide variances or cannot be validated, the QV 29 testing frequency shall be increased to one in 5 until 25 samples are reached again with 30 satisfactory statistical validation. 31 If the Design-Builder elects to take extra samples, the QV sampling frequency will 32 continue to be based on the frequency described in Table 6, Section 1-06 of the General 33 Provisions. 34 For HMA, the City of Tacoma will conduct the acceptance testing for Asphalt Treated 35 Base and HMA aggregate, mixture, in-place density, cyclic density, and longitudinal joint 36 density at the frequency described in Table 6, Section 1-06 of the General Provisions. 37 Materials that require less than five tests for acceptance, or that have less than five 38 sublots, will require City of Tacoma and the QA personnel to test at the same frequency. 39 Refer to Chapter 9 of the WSDOT Construction Manual for testing requirements. For all 40 materials that are not addressed by City of Tacoma or WSDOT standards, the material 41 testing specifications, testing procedures and frequencies will be determined by the 42 Quality Assurance Team with the Engineer of Record's concurrence. 43 Small quantities of materials can be accepted without sampling and testing when the 44 quantity of materials proposed for use by the Design-Builder is less than the minimum 45 sampling and testing frequencies. Structural concrete will not be considered as a small

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-17 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 quantity. The Construction QA Manager shall follow the procedure for acceptance of 2 small quantities described in Section 2.20.

3 2.22.4.6 TESTING PLAN 4 All acceptance and verification sampling and testing shall be randomly obtained, at the 5 location and frequency stated in the Contract. The Design-Builder shall provide the City 6 of Tacoma with a Testing Plan for each material. The Testing Plan shall identify the 7 frequency, location for testing, test procedures, attributes to test, material acceptance 8 requirements, Sampling Plan developed using WSDOT Test Method T 716 Method of 9 Random Sampling or other random number generator, and the estimated Project 10 quantity. The Testing Plan shall be submitted prior to the beginning of production or 11 placement of the material. The QMP shall include a method for notifying the QA 12 organization of the quantity of material produced, placed, or delivered to the Project, so 13 that the testing effort can be current.

14 2.22.4.7 MATERIALS QUALITY ANALYSIS PROGRAM 15 The Design-Builder’s QA sampling and testing results shall be used for acceptance 16 provided that they are validated by the City of Tacoma’s QV sampling and testing. 17 Both the Design-Builder’s QA and City of Tacoma’s QV test results shall be recorded in 18 the Statistical Analysis of Materials software that will be provided by the City of Tacoma. 19 This software shall be used to statistically evaluate the QA test data against the QV test 20 data to determine the acceptability of the QA test data. This evaluation will be 21 performed by using the F and t Test analysis tool. This evaluation will be performed on 22 all test results for the total quantity of material placed for a single material type, i.e., 23 gravel backfill for walls, CSBC or gravel borrow. There needs to be at least three QA and 24 three QV test results to perform the F and t analysis. 25 The Construction QA Manager shall be responsible for performing this evaluation. Any 26 test data that is found to be outside the normal F and t distribution shall be reviewed by 27 the Quality Assurance Team, and a determination shall be made as to why the test data is 28 outside the normal distribution. 29 The Quality Assurance Team shall identify the cause of discrepancies in the test results 30 and generate a report defining the problems, the cause of the problems, and the 31 solutions to prevent a recurrence. At a minimum, the review shall include the following 32 actions: 33 • A check of test data, calculations, and results; 34 • An observation of the sampling and testing by the IA Inspector; and 35 • A check of test equipment by the IA Inspector. 36 If the Quality Assurance Team fails to identify the cause of discrepancies in the test 37 results, then the City of Tacoma’s QV test results will be used for acceptance.

38 2.22.4.8 MATERIALS DOCUMENTATION REVIEW 39 The Design-Builder shall schedule regular documentation reviews to ensure that all 40 materials documentation and certifications are complete prior to the material being 41 installed on the Project.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-18 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 The City of Tacoma will perform periodic formal materials documentation reviews at 2 approximately 25 percent and 75 percent completion of construction. Items to be 3 reviewed will be randomly selected by the City of Tacoma. These reviews are intended to 4 ensure the Design-Builder is maintaining all necessary materials documentation and 5 records. A final review will be performed at the completion of the Project to review all 6 materials documentation. 7 In addition to the formal reviews, the City of Tacoma onsite personnel will perform 8 periodic materials documentation checks. Examples of these checks include materials 9 approval, materials acceptance, and field verification that the approved material was 10 placed.

11 2.22.5 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY 12 CONTROL PLAN REQUIREMENTS

13 2.22.5.1 GENERAL 14 The QMP shall include a program for construction inspections, examinations, 15 measurements, and tests of materials or elements for each Work operation, where 16 appropriate, to verify quality. The requirement for these inspections is not limited to 17 those required for quality testing purposes. 18 The QMP shall specify all aspects of QA and QC for construction. At a minimum, the 19 QMP shall include the following items to verify that all construction activities conform to 20 the Contract requirements: 21 • Project progress schedule; 22 • Submittal schedule; 23 • Structural elements that have been integrated during the design process and as a 24 result approved Working Drawings reflect all changes/modifications; 25 • Inspection requirements; 26 • Instrumentation and survey monitoring for verification of the performance of the 27 Project features; 28 • Specific documentation for QA and QC activities, including control charts; and 29 • City of Tacoma requirements for corrective action and Corrective Action Plans 30 when QC and/or acceptance QA criteria are not met.

31 2.22.5.2 COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION 32 The Construction QA Manager shall designate a primary point of contact for 33 notifications of inspections at hold points. An alternate contact may be designated to 34 function in the primary contact’s absence. The City of Tacoma will designate one person 35 to handle responses to the Design-Builder for written reports or releases for hold points. 36 The time necessary to respond to the notification for inspection at hold points shall be 37 included in the QMP and mutually agreed upon by the Design-Builder and the City of 38 Tacoma.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-19 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.22.5.3 HOLD POINTS AND WITNESS POINTS 2 Hold points shall be identified in the construction process where critical characteristics 3 are to be measured and maintained, and at points where it is impractical to determine 4 the adequacy of either materials or workmanship once Work proceeds past this point. 5 Pre-activity meetings shall be included in the Design-Builder’s QMP as hold points. 6 Hold points shall be established where required QA inspection is mandatory. The 7 Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with three Calendar Days notice of each 8 hold point so that the City of Tacoma, at its discretion, can observe or visually examine a 9 specific Work operation or test. Work shall not proceed until inspection is performed 10 and a written release is granted by the Design-Builder’s QA organization. 11 Witness points shall be identified as QC inspections in the construction process intended 12 to facilitate early identification of non-conforming materials or workmanship where it 13 would be impractical to remove, rework, or repair once the Work proceeds past this 14 point. Witness points shall be established where QC inspection is mandatory and 15 included in the Design-Builder’s QMP. The Design-Builder’s QMP shall define the 16 process for QC inspection and work proceeding beyond the witness points. Witness 17 points shall be identified at pre-activity meetings for coordination with QA and City of 18 Tacoma staff for participation at their discretion. 19 The RFC Documents shall indicate specific hold points. 20 At a minimum, the Construction QA Manager shall establish hold points and witness 21 points at the stages listed below. The QMP shall identify any additional hold points and 22 witness points necessary to certify compliance. The following hold points and witness 23 points are not intended to limit or diminish the Design-Builder’s responsibility to inspect 24 all construction Work. The listed points are Hold Points unless otherwise noted as 25 Witness Points. 26 Utility relocations 27 • Prior to any relocation of existing utilities. 28 • Prior to backfill of utility relocations and as required by Utility Owner’s permit.

29 Railroad 30 • Prior to any work within BNSF Railroad Right-of-Way.

31 Structures (City Approach, Port Approach and Center Truss Spans) 32 • At completion of excavation, and before the start of structure foundation work. 33 • Before saw-cutting or grinding of concrete. 34 • Before concrete placement of any subsurface element. 35 • Prior to placing and bolting reinforcing steel plates. 36 • After fully tensioning bolts for reinforcing steel plates. 37 • Prior to grouting pads and anchor bolts into concrete. 38 • Before concrete placement of bridge deck, approach slabs, traffic barrier, and 39 parapet walls (with formwork, inserts, and reinforcement in place). 40 • After completion of bridge deck grinding and deck repair.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-20 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Drainage 2 • After placement of pipe or storm water vaults and prior to backfilling. 3 • After installation and placement of bands or gaskets and prior to backfilling. 4 • After placement of catch basins and manholes and prior to backfilling. 5 • After completion of drainage systems.

6 Surfacing and pavement 7 • Prior to surfacing placement. 8 • At completion of surfacing placement and prior to asphalt treated base, HMA, 9 and reinforcement for approach slab placement.

10 Electrical 11 • Prior to installation of electrical and traffic management systems for which 12 inspection will be performed by the City of Tacoma as required by WAC 296-46B- 13 010(15) and RCW 19.28.141. 14 • Prior to removal of existing illumination, and new or temporary illumination in 15 place or operational, in accordance with Section 2.17 (Maintenance of Traffic).

16 Mechanical 17 • Prior to installation of mechanical systems and equipment.

18 2.22.5.4 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION 19 The Design-Builder shall inspect all electrical systems. In addition, the City of Tacoma 20 will inspect all electrical systems for code compliance, functionality, and acceptance.

21 2.22.5.5 PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION OF PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL 22 ELEMENTS/FEATURES 23 The QMP shall include inspection and verification tests to determine the integrity of 24 foundation structures and elements, and to verify that their performance is as 25 anticipated from the design.

26 2.22.5.6 CITY OF TACOMA OVERSIGHT 27 The City of Tacoma will periodically audit the field performance of the Design-Builder’s 28 QA staff, testing frequencies, and acceptance testing results. The City of Tacoma will 29 conduct oversight inspection audits to verify the adequacy of the Design-Builder’s 30 inspection activities and testing procedures.

31 2.22.5.7 QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTION 32 The QMP shall contain inspection plans for each construction Work item included in the 33 Project, whether performed by the Design-Builder, a subcontractor, or a vendor. Work 34 items may be definable features or items of Work defined by the Standard Specifications.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-21 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.22.5.8 INSPECTION GUIDELINES 2 During the design of the Project, the Design-Builder shall review each item of Work to 3 determine which significant characteristics of the items need to be monitored during the 4 construction phase, to ensure that the completed Project will function in accordance with 5 the design intent over its expected lifetime. The inspection guidelines shall include the 6 appropriate criteria, tests, and inspection requirements identified in the Standard 7 Specifications, the WSDOT Construction Manual, and the WSDOT Materials Manual. 8 The Inspection Plan shall address the following elements within each item of Work: 9 • Identification – Work items included in the Inspection Plan. 10 • Characteristics – What characteristics of the item will be inspected? 11 Acceptance Criteria – Directly or by reference, the Design-Builder shall provide 12 sufficient information for the inspector to use to determine if the item or activity is 13 conforming or nonconforming. Maximum use of checklists shall be made for this 14 purpose. 15 Inspections shall be performed during all phases of the Project from start to completion 16 in order to ensure that the Work meets and is being performed in accordance with the 17 Contract, RFC Documents, approved submittals, and any requirements of local 18 jurisdictions. 19 The Design-Builder shall conduct an examination of the quality of workmanship to 20 confirm that all Work is being performed in accordance with the RFC Documents, and 21 any understandings reached at the pre-activity meeting for that item of Work. 22 The Design-Builder shall conduct appropriate follow-up inspections, and sampling and 23 testing of materials as each item of Work progresses, to assure consistency in 24 workmanship; compliance with Contract requirements, Design Documents, and RFC 25 Documents; and satisfactory performance of the Work in service.

26 2.22.5.9 INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION 27 QA Inspectors shall summarize their daily inspections, tests, and material sampling 28 activities in daily reports. The QA Inspectors shall use the City of Tacoma’s or WSDOT’s 29 Inspectors Daily Report or a similar form to maintain a written record of inspection 30 results, and shall provide copies of the daily reports to the City of Tacoma the next 31 business day. The Inspector’s Daily Reports shall include the following key points of 32 record: 33 • Work performed by the Design-Builder, subcontractor, or material supplier; 34 • Weather conditions; 35 • Inspections performed and their results, including any corrective actions taken; 36 • Materials used, the manufacturer or source, product identity, and quantities; 37 • Communications; 38 • Type, location, and results of all tests performed; 39 • Delays encountered; 40 • Type of traffic control setup in accordance with approved MOT plans, and any 41 inspection and corrective action taken by the Design-Builder;

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-22 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 • Any safety-related problems and corrective action taken; 2 • All nonconforming Work and the corrective action taken; 3 • A copy of any checklist used for the inspection; and 4 • The Inspector’s signature.

5 2.22.5.10 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FORMS AND CHECKLISTS 6 The Design-Builder’s QMP shall include construction inspection forms and checklists for 7 all anticipated construction operations and processes. These forms shall be used by the 8 Design-Builder’s QA inspection personnel and other personnel responsible for QC, such 9 as foreman and individual workers. 10 Construction inspection forms shall be used to document all construction Work activities 11 required in the QMP. For each critical construction Work activity, construction 12 inspection forms shall include activity specific checklists approved by the City of Tacoma, 13 prior to the start of the Work activity. The checklist for each Work activity shall include 14 the construction requirements described in the Standard Specifications or the Contract 15 for that Work activity. At a minimum, each checklist shall address the following: Date

Time

> Structure component > Drainage code # Location > Compaction Report (referenced to centerline station and subgrade elevation, etc.)

Completion of drainage code, final check, pre-pour Type of Inspection check, etc.

Specification Requirement List of applicable specifications for this item

Indicated test or inspection frequency if any (see Frequency Section 1-06 of General Provisions for material test requirements)

List elements or items inspected (e.g., rebar, chair Items Inspected placement or pipe size and type, grate box, pipe bedding, etc.)

Verify Work and materials meet the appropriate Conformation to Specifications specifications

Deficiencies Noted Note any deficiencies to specifications

Individual notified for corrective action (City of Individual Notified Tacoma notified)

What corrective action is required to ensure Corrective Action Noted products conform to specifications

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-23 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.22.5.11 NONCONFORMING WORK 2 The construction QA staff shall identify and document all elements of Work that have 3 not, or are believed to have not, been constructed in accordance with the approved 4 drawings and specifications, and the reason for nonconformance in an NCR. The NCR 5 shall be submitted to the City of Tacoma in writing within 24 hours of identification, and 6 a copy sent to the Design Manager or designated Engineers.

7 2.22.5.12 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) REMEDIATION 8 The Design Manager or a designated Engineer shall evaluate and determine whether a 9 nonconformance exists; and the effect of the nonconformance on performance, safety, 10 durability, long-term maintenance, and the life of the item of Work. 11 If required, documented remedial actions shall be stamped by a Professional Engineer 12 licensed in the State of Washington under Title 18 RCW. The Design-Builder shall 13 submit copies to the City of Tacoma for review within 24 hours, and prior to performing 14 the remedial action. The Construction QA Manager shall also sign the NCR stating that 15 the remedial actions to be implemented have undergone the same level of inspection and 16 testing as required by the original design. 17 If the nonconforming condition is repetitive and recurring, the Design-Builder shall 18 develop and implement a Corrective Action Plan to eliminate the nonconforming 19 conditions.

20 2.22.5.13 WORK WITH NONCONFORMANCE (NCR) REPORTS 21 When the City of Tacoma does not agree with the remedial actions set forth in the NCR, 22 the City of Tacoma has the authority to call for removal of the nonconforming Work, or 23 to stop Work within that area until the Corrective Action Plan has been approved by the 24 City of Tacoma.

25 2.22.5.14 NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING 26 The Construction QA Manager shall maintain a log of all NCRs and Corrective Action 27 Plans, and present them at the Quality Assurance Team Meetings. The Construction QA 28 Manager shall number each NCR and Corrective Action Plan sequentially, and maintain 29 an active summary log that provides a brief description and status of the nonconforming 30 Work. The Construction QA Manager shall not grant acceptance for any portion of Work 31 that has an outstanding NCR.

32 2.22.5.15 CITY OF TACOMA NONCONFORMING ISSUES AND AUDIT FINDINGS 33 The City of Tacoma shall retain the right to write its own NCIs and audit findings based 34 on its observance of Work. NCIs and audit findings generated by the City of Tacoma will 35 be entered into the CATS program, and will require the same review and ultimate closure 36 as NCRs generated by the Construction QA Manager.

37 2.22.5.16 RIGHT TO STOP WORK 38 If there is evidence that QMP procedures are not adequate, or if a problem is 39 encountered during the oversight inspections or becomes evident during construction, 40 the City of Tacoma may, at its sole discretion, stop Work until appropriate quality 41 procedures have been established and implemented. 42 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-24 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 In addition, The City of Tacoma retains authority to stop Work without liability wholly or 2 in part, if the Design-Builder fails to perform the following: 3 • Correct conditions that are unsafe for Project personnel or the general public; or 4 • Correct unacceptable construction practices.

5 2.22.6 SUBMITTALS

6 2.22.6.1 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (QMP) 7 The Design-Builder shall submit six hardcopies and one electronic copy on CDROM of 8 the Draft QMP for evaluation. The City of Tacoma will provide comments to the Design- 9 Builder on the Draft QMP. Following resolution of the comments, and receipt of written 10 approval from the City of Tacoma, the Design-Builder shall submit six hard copies and 11 six electronic copies on CDROM of the Final QMP. 12 Modifications to the Final QMP shall be approved in writing by the City of Tacoma. 13 When the modifications are approved, the Design-Builder shall correct the six hard 14 copies of the Final QMP, and submit six electronic copies of the revised QMP on 15 CDROM. Each hardcopy or CDROM shall be clearly marked with which revision has 16 been included in that copy.

17 2.22.6.2 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT REVIEWS AND INTERNAL AUDITS 18 The Design-Builder shall provide a hard copy of its Executive Management Review to the 19 City of Tacoma within 20 Calendar Days of completion of the review. 20 The Design-Builder shall provide a hard copy of its internal audit of the QMP to the City 21 of Tacoma within 20 Calendar Days of completion of the audit.

22 2.22.6.3 REVIEW DOCUMENTS 23 Prior to every design review, the Design-Builder shall provide the City of Tacoma with six 24 hard copies and a complete set of electronic files on CDROM of each design submittal to 25 be reviewed, unless specified otherwise in these technical requirements.

26 2.22.6.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL DOCUMENTATION 27 The Design-Builder shall include documentation with each submittal showing that the 28 QA and QC processes have been completed. The City of Tacoma will not accept 29 submittals without documentation that the QA and QC processes have been completed. 30 Acceptable documentation for design submittals will include a marked set and a 31 corrected clean set of plans and specifications, including originator, back-checker, and 32 corrector and verifier annotations as described in this section and per industry standard. 33 The Design-Builder has the option of producing deliverables in accordance with the 34 approved Murray Morgan Bridge Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QC/QA) process.

35 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.22-25 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.23 MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION

2 2.23.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to meet the maintenance 4 requirements described in this Section. Elements of Work shall include operation, 5 maintenance and repair of the existing facilities, in addition to facilities constructed 6 under the Contract beginning at Notice to proceed and ending on the day of Physical 7 completion, at which point product warranties, shall govern the Work. 8 The Design-Builder shall perform maintenance during construction in a safe, reasonable, 9 and prudent manner, and shall employ good business practices and appropriate 10 management techniques. The Design-Builder shall furnish all labor, materials, 11 equipment and necessary services in connection with maintenance during construction. 12 For the purpose of maintenance during construction, the Project limits are defined as all 13 Right of Way, including any easements that may be necessary to construct the Project, 14 that are located within the following areas: 15 • The area parallel to 11th Street that is supported by the Murray Morgan Bridge. 16 Following Notice to Proceed, the Design-Builder shall provide maintenance, inspections 17 and repairs required on an “as needed” basis throughout the duration of the Contract in 18 a manner acceptable to the City of Tacoma. If the City of Tacoma determines that the 19 Design-Builder has failed to provide adequate routine maintenance; emergency and 20 operational response; or inspections and repairs, the City of Tacoma will issue a verbal 21 notification of the failure to the Design-Builder. 22 The City of Tacoma will follow the verbal notification with a written notification of 23 commence and continue correction of the failure. Failure by the Design-Builder to 24 correct the stated deficiency within 24 hours of verbal notification may result in the City 25 of Tacoma performing the Work without prejudice to other remedies the City of Tacoma 26 may have. In such case, the City of Tacoma will deduct the cost of correcting such 27 deficiencies from payments then or thereafter due to the Design-Builder. If payments 28 then or thereafter due are not sufficient to cover correcting the deficiencies, the Design- 29 Builder shall pay the difference to the City of Tacoma upon demand.

30 2.23.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS 31 The following is a list of publications that shall be used for maintenance during 32 construction. They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at 33 the top of the list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be 34 required to complete the design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware 35 of any ambiguities or conflicts relating in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the 36 Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma immediately, so that the City of Tacoma 37 may resolve them. 38 • Tacoma Municipal Code. 39 • City Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix 04). 40 • Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix03). 41 • WSDOT Standard Specifications (M 41-10).

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.23-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.23.3 MAINTENANCE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY

2 2.23.3.1 GENERAL 3 The Design-Builder shall maintain the roadway and facilities within the ROW disturbed 4 by the Design-Builder’s operations.

5 2.23.3.2 HEALTH HAZARDS 6 The Project area is occupied by transients, birds, bats, and rodents, and will contain 7 biological and associated physical hazards. The areas most impacted by these hazards 8 are the areas under the bridge within the Project. Other areas may also be impacted. 9 Transients 10 The Project area includes materials and waste that pose a physical and/or biological 11 safety and health hazard, such as waste associated with transients and drug users. 12 Materials and waste may include, but are not limited to, hypodermic needles, food, 13 garbage, clothing, bedding, broken glass, human and animal excrement, drug 14 paraphernalia, makeshift dwellings, and other hazards. 15 In the event transients are encountered within the Project limits and are hampering 16 work or causing unsafe work conditions, the Design-Builder shall notify the responsible 17 enforcement agency (Washington State Patrol, local law enforcement agency, community 18 service patrol), who will assist the Design-Builder with removing the transients. The 19 Design-Builder shall schedule a place, date, and time to meet the enforcement agencies, 20 so that the enforcement agencies can escort the transients from the Project limits. 21 The City of Tacoma will assist the Design-Builder with initial contact of the enforcement 22 agencies to remove the transients from the Project limits. 23 The Design-Builder shall ensure that the public, including persons who may be non- 24 English speaking or may not be able to recognize potential safety and health hazards 25 within the Project area, are not harmed by the Design-Builder’s activities. 26 All costs to remove the transients and clean up the site within the Project limits shall be 27 included in the Contract Price. 28 Health and Safety Requirements 29 The Design-Builder shall communicate with the City of Tacoma Engineer to ensure a 30 coordinated effort for providing and maintaining a safe Project area for the City of 31 Tacoma’s and the Design-Builder’s personnel. 32 Construction Requirements 33 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for the sanitation measures required to provide 34 and maintain a safe and healthy Project area for the duration of the Project, in 35 accordance with the applicable laws and these Technical Requirements. The Design- 36 Builder shall develop and maintain a plan for mitigation of health hazards at the Project 37 site. The plan shall be available at the City of Tacoma’s request. 38 Site Maintenance for Biological and Physical Hazards 39 Prior to commencement of the construction Work, the Design-Builder shall perform an 40 initial cleanup of the Project area, including all preparatory Work required to make the 41 Project area sanitary and safe in accordance with applicable laws and the health hazards

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.23-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 plan, and to address all biological and physical hazards present. Necessary training of 2 personnel, on-site and off-site preparations, and safety equipment shall be provided by 3 the Design-Builder to complete the initial cleanup and disposal of the biological and 4 physical hazards.

5 Public Notification 6 The Design-Builder shall furnish and install informational signs approved by the City of 7 Tacoma three Calendar Days prior to performing hazardous activities within the Project 8 area know to be occupied by transients. Hazardous activities include, but are not limited 9 to, demolition, cleaning, painting, overhead activities and operating equipment. The 10 Design-Builder shall conduct a visual reconnaissance of the area at least 72 hours in 11 advance to determine the type of cleanup and removal effort needed. The signs shall 12 include dates and locations of the activity and state that trespassing is not authorized. 13 The signs shall be visible from each apparent access route into the Work area. Each sign 14 shall be weather-resistant and post-mounted; written in both English and Spanish; state 15 “No Trespassing”; and include the dates and location of the Work. Signs shall be 16 maintained in legible condition until the hazardous Work at the Work area is physically 17 completed, at which time the signs shall be removed from the Project.

18 Periodic Site Maintenance 19 If the Project area becomes unsanitary or unsafe due to biological and physical hazards 20 after the Design-Builder prepares the site for the first phase of construction activities, the 21 Design-Builder shall perform additional site maintenance and take additional measures 22 as needed to protect the public and the City of Tacoma’s and Design-Builder’s personnel. 23 The nature and frequency of the site maintenance activities shall be included in the 24 health hazards plan. Periodic maintenance of the Project area may include the use of 25 signs, fencing, lighting, law enforcement, or security.

26 2.23.4 MAINENANCE OF ROADWAYS

27 2.23.4.1 GENERAL 28 The Design-Builder shall complete all components of the Work to allow for unrestricted 29 waterway and traffic access to lanes and shoulders in accordance with Sections 2.11 30 (Electrical Work), 2.12 (Mechanical Work), and 2.17 (Maintenance of Traffic).

31 2.23.4.2 LIFT SPAN AND PIERS 32 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for maintaining and operating the lift span 33 throughout the duration of the Project. Piers within the Foss Waterway will be protected 34 and kept clear of debris.

35 2.23.4.3 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 36 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for maintaining active travel lanes free from 37 traffic control devices such as traffic barrels, cones, and other devices. 38 All traffic control devices shall be placed behind barrier or guardrail away from traffic 39 when not in use. In areas where traffic control devices cannot be placed behind barrier 40 or guardrail, the devices may be placed on the shoulder of the roadway when the 41 shoulder width is 5 feet or greater. When the shoulder width is less than 5 feet, the

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.23-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 devices shall be placed off the paved shoulder and a minimum of 8 feet from the traveled 2 lanes. The Design-Builder shall locate traffic control devices so as not to block any 3 existing sidewalks or bicycle trails, and to leave adequate space for wheelchairs.

4 2.23.4.4 GUARDRAIL, CONCRETE BARRIER, AND ATTENUATORS 5 The Design-Builder shall replace or repair any guardrail, concrete barrier, and 6 attenuators that become damaged by the public or by the Design-Builder’s operations. 7 Attenuators that are damaged and must be replaced shall meet current National 8 Cooperative Highway Research Program, City of Tacoma and WSDOT standards. Any 9 parts used to repair a damaged attenuator shall be direct replacement parts as required 10 by the manufacturer. Payment for any damaged guardrail, concrete barrier, or 11 attenuators qualifying for relief under Section 1-07 of the General Provisions, shall be in 12 accordance with Section 1-09 of the General Provisions, except for temporary devices 13 installed by the Design-Builder.

14 2.23.4.5 TRAFFIC SYSTEM SIGNS 15 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for maintenance of existing permanent signs. 16 Maintenance of existing permanent signs includes, cleaning, repairing, and replacing 17 damaged signs and posts. Cleaning will only be required when directed by the City of 18 Tacoma. Payment for maintenance of existing permanent signs shall be in accordance 19 with Section 1-09 of the General Provisions. 20 Payment for repairing permanent signs qualifying for relief under Section 1-07 of the 21 General Provisions shall be in accordance with Section 1-09 of the General Provisions. 22 Repair of damaged caused by the Design-Builder’s operations shall be at the Design- 23 Builder’s expense.

24 2.23.4.6 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 25 The Design-Builder shall maintain and provide adequate stormwater management on 26 the Project until Physical Completion. Maintenance shall include cleaning and repair of 27 storm water treatment vaults, riprap, cribbing, ditches, channels, culverts, cross drains, 28 drainage structures and gutters.

29 2.23.4.7 ACCESS TO PUBLIC FACILITIES 30 The Design-Builder shall maintain uninterrupted access to all public facilities affected by 31 the Project. Access shall mean providing a clear and easily understood route into and 32 out of existing public and private facilities and businesses. The Design-Builder shall 33 provide all necessary signing to convey that the route to the facilities and businesses is 34 open to traffic. The City of Tacoma will determine whether the signing is adequate. The 35 Design-Builder shall provide access for all types of vehicles, including delivery trucks.

36 2.23.4.8 PROTECTION OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND ELECTRICAL 37 BOXES 38 The Design-Builder shall verify that all existing and new drainage structures and 39 electrical boxes located within 2 feet of temporary or permanent travel lanes have 40 sufficient strength to safely carry highway traffic loads without failing. If any of these 41 structures or boxes do not have sufficient strength, they shall be reinforced and/or 42 protected prior to opening the travel lanes to traffic.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.23-4 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.23.4.9 VIDEO DOCUMENTATION OF PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 The Design-Builder shall make a video record of the pre-existing conditions of any 3 section of road, street or public facility within 14 Calendar Days of starting work or using 4 that section of road, street or public facility. This video record shall be made available to 5 the City of Tacoma upon request.

6 2.23.5 ELECTRICAL

7 2.23.5.1 LUMINARIES 8 The Design-Builder shall maintain and operate all lighting systems in accordance with 9 Section 2.11 (Electrical and Controls). Maintenance and operation shall include, but is 10 not limited to, the following: 11 • Replacement of lamps, as required; 12 • Replacement or repair of any damaged equipment or underground cable; 13 • Maintenance concerning a public safety issue (including exposed wires and 14 knockdowns), within one hour of notice from the City of Tacoma; and 15 • Routine maintenance and other maintenance that does not affect the public 16 safety, within 24 hours of notice from the City of Tacoma. 17 Payment for repairing damaged permanent luminaries qualifying for relief under Section 18 1-07 of the General Provisions shall be in accordance with Section 1-09 of the General 19 Provisions.

20 2.23.6 HAZARDOUS SPILLS RESPONSE

21 2.23.6.1 PUBLIC TRAVEL WAY 22 Cleanup of hazardous spills within the public traffic lanes and shoulders will be the 23 responsibility of the City of Tacoma or WSDOT, and the Washington State Department 24 of Ecology. The Design-Builder shall allow access to the Project area for the spill 25 response. The Design-Builder shall make personnel and equipment available to respond 26 to all emergencies, except when such emergencies are life-threatening to the personnel. 27 In the event the hazardous spill is caused by the Design-Builder’s equipment, operations 28 or Work, the Design-Builder shall be responsible for costs incurred by the City of 29 Tacoma, WSDOT, the Washington State Department of Ecology, and other resource 30 agencies and/or contractors required to mitigate the hazard.

31 2.23.6.2 WORK ZONE 32 Any hazardous spills within the Work area and outside of the public travel lanes shall be 33 the responsibility of the Design-Builder. The Work shall be performed in accordance 34 with the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan described in Section 2.6.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.23-5 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.23.7 STRUCTURES

2 2.23.7.1 EXISTING BRIDGE 3 The Design-Builder shall maintain drainage structures on and off the bridge within the 4 Project. Free draining of water through any drainage structure shall be maintained.

5 2.23.8 EMERGENCY RESPONSE

6 2.23.8.1 COOPERATION 7 The Design-Builder shall cooperate with law enforcement and other emergency response 8 agencies in response to accidents, fires, spills, or other emergencies in any area affected 9 by the Project, including the Project area and public traffic lanes. The Design-Builder 10 shall cooperate in all City of Tacoma and WSDOT investigations of accidents and other 11 incidents within the Project area. Refer to Section 2.7 for additional public information 12 requirements regarding emergency response.

13 2.23.8.2 EMERGENCY ACCESS 14 The Design-Builder shall work with emergency service providers to address their 15 concerns about emergency access to and through the Project. Refer to Section 2.20 for 16 additional Maintenance of Traffic requirements.

17 2.23.8.3 NOTIFICATION 18 The Design-Builder shall notify the City of Tacoma, the Washington State Patrol and all 19 emergency service providers in the affected area in writing of any access closures at the 20 construction site. Notification shall include the names, pager numbers, and telephones 21 numbers (business, residence and cellular) of Project personnel to contact in case of 22 emergencies. This contact list shall be updated as necessary. Refer to Section 2.7 for 23 additional public information requirements.

24 2.23.8.4 USE OF DESIGN-BUILDER RESOURCES 25 The Design-Builder shall make personnel and equipment available to respond to all 26 emergencies, except when the emergency is life-threatening to the personnel. Refer to 27 Section 2.20 for additional maintenance of traffic requirements.

28 2.23.9 MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY

29 2.23.9.1 GENERAL 30 The Design-Builder shall preserve public and private property at all times in accordance 31 with Section 1-07 of the General Provisions. 32 The Design-Builder shall witness or reference land monuments and property marker 33 locations by a Land Surveyor licensed in the State of Washington before moving, 34 disturbing or damaging any property. Refer to Section 2.4 (Surveys and Mapping) for 35 additional requirements regarding monumentation and surveying. 36

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.23-6 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.23.9.2 RESTORATION OF PROPERTY AND LANDSCAPE 2 The Design-Builder shall restore, at its own cost, property and landscaping that is 3 damaged in the course of construction, to a condition similar to, equal, or better than 4 that existing prior to the occurrence of damage by repairing, replacing in kind, 5 rebuilding, or replanting or compensating the property owner.

6 2.23.9.3 TEMPORARY FENCING 7 The Design-Builder shall be required to furnish and install temporary chain link security 8 fencing in order to contain animals and people before removing any existing sound 9 barrier or Right-of-Way fencing within the Project limits.

10 2.23.10 MAINTENANCE OF AESTHETIC TREATMENT

11 2.23.10.1 GENERAL 12 The Design-Builder shall monitor the appearance of the aesthetic treatments on walls or 13 bridges for any defects, flaws or vandalism until Physical Completion. The Design- 14 Builder shall note and bring to the City of Tacoma’s attention defects, flaws and 15 vandalism. 16 Defects and flaws shall be corrected in accordance with Section 1-05 of the General 17 Provisions. 18 The Design-Builder shall be responsible for cleaning up and restoring property impacted 19 by vandalism until Physical Completion. 20 The use of paint and/or permanent marking of any type on permanent barrier, railing, 21 and walls will not be allowed except as required by the Contract.

22 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.23-7 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.24 PRODUCT WARRANTY PROVISIONS

2 2.24.1 WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS 3 All warranties provided by the Design-Builder shall meet the requirements of the 4 following subsections.

5 2.24.1.1 SUBCONTRACTOR WARRANTIES 6 Without in any way derogating the Design-Builder’s own representations, warranties, 7 and other obligations with respect to the Work, the Design-Builder shall obtain from all 8 Subcontractors and cause to be extended to the City of Tacoma, appropriate 9 representations, Warranties, guarantees, and obligations with respect to design, 10 material, plants, workmanship, equipment, tools, and supplies furnished by the 11 Subcontractors. All representations, Warranties, guarantees, and obligations of 12 Subcontractors shall be in writing, and shall run directly to and be enforceable by the 13 Design-Builder and City of Tacoma and their respective successors and assigns.

14 2.24.1.2 PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITY 15 The Design-Builder retains responsibility for all Work performed on the Project, 16 including all Work of Subcontractors and all materials and equipment provided by 17 suppliers, vendors, and/or manufacturers. Upon receipt from the City of Tacoma of 18 notice of a failure of any of the Work to satisfy a warranty, representation, covenant, 19 guarantee, or obligation provided by any Subcontractor, the Design-Builder shall be 20 responsible for enforcing or performing any such warranty, representation, covenant, 21 guarantee, or obligation, in addition to the Design-Builder’s other obligations. The City 22 of Tacoma’s rights under this Section shall commence at the time the warranty, 23 representation, covenant, guarantee, or obligation is furnished to the City of Tacoma, 24 and shall continue until the expiration of the warranty, including extensions for repaired 25 or replaced Work. Until such expiration, the cost of any equipment, material, plants, 26 labor (including re-engineering), and shipping shall be paid by the Design-Builder, if the 27 cost is covered by the warranty, and the Design-Builder shall be required to repair or 28 replace defective equipment, material, plants, or workmanship furnished by 29 Subcontractors.

30 2.24.1.3 NO LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY 31 All warranties are in addition to all rights and remedies available under the Contract or 32 applicable law, and shall not limit the Design-Builder’s liability or responsibility imposed 33 by the Contract or by applicable law with respect to the Work, including liability for 34 design defects, latent construction defects, strict liability negligence, or fraud.

35 2.24.1.4 REMEDIES 36 Within seven Calendar Days of receipt of notice from the City of Tacoma specifying a 37 failure of any Work required to satisfy the warranty; or specifying a failure of any 38 subcontractor representation, warranty, guarantee, or obligation which the Design- 39 Builder is responsible for enforcing, the Design-Builder and the City of Tacoma shall 40 mutually agree when and how the Design-Builder shall remedy such failure. In the case 41 of an emergency requiring immediate curative action, the Design-Builder shall 42 implement such immediate action it deems necessary, and shall notify the City of

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.24-1 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 Tacoma of the urgency of a mutually agreed-upon remedy. The Design-Builder and the 2 City of Tacoma shall agree on a remedy immediately upon notice by or to the City of 3 Tacoma of such emergency. If the Design-Builder does not use its best efforts to proceed 4 to effectuate a remedy within the seven-day period, or if the Design-Builder and the City 5 of Tacoma fail to reach an agreement within the seven-day period (or immediately, in the 6 case of emergency conditions), then the City of Tacoma, upon notice to the Design- 7 Builder, shall have the right to order the Design-Builder to perform the Work, or to 8 perform or have performed by other that remedy approved by the City of Tacoma, and 9 the cost shall be paid by the Design-Builder.

10 2.24.1.5 DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY 11 In addition to all rights and remedies available under the Contract or applicable law, if 12 the Design-Builder fails or refuses to provide the warranty remedies described in this 13 Section, the Design-Builder shall be liable for the cost of performance of the warranty 14 Work by others. If a Warranty Bond is provided, the City of Tacoma may also call upon 15 the Warranty Bond issuer for reimbursement of costs incurred by the City of Tacoma and 16 others.

17 2.24.1.6 EXCLUSIONS 18 The warranty shall not require the Design-Builder to perform repair or replacement 19 Work under the following circumstances: 20 • Normal wear and tear provided that damage and/or deterioration outside 21 allowable limits specified in the Contract shall not be considered normal wear 22 and tear. 23 • Failure to perform routine maintenance consistent with policies and/or 24 procedures established by the City of Tacoma or other maintenance agencies, 25 including Utility Owners, or in the absence of such policies and/or procedures in 26 accordance with industry standards of maintenance for similar projects in the 27 United States. 28 • Rebellion, war, riot, act of sabotage, civil commotion, or acts of vandalism. 29 • Wind, flood, and/or earthquakes, and other acts of God. 30 • Spill or release of hazardous or contaminated substances not caused by the 31 Design-Builder.

32 2.24.1.7 WARRANTY INSPECTION 33 The failure to conduct any inspection specified shall not invalidate or cancel the 34 warranty, provisions, responsibilities, or performance requirements. Notwithstanding 35 the provisions of this Section, the City of Tacoma may inspect any component of the 36 Project at any time prior to the completion of the warranty, and issue notice to the 37 Design-Builder to perform repair or replacement work.

38 2.24.1.8 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 39 In addition to the warranty provisions of this Section, the Work shall meet the 40 requirements specified in the Contract.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.24-2 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.24.1.9 COSTS OF CORRECTION WORK 2 All costs of repair and replacement Work, including additional testing and inspections, 3 shall be paid by the Design-Builder. The Design-Builder shall reimburse the City of 4 Tacoma within 14 Calendar Days after receipt of the City of Tacoma’s invoice.

5 2.24.1.10 DISPUTES 6 Any disagreement between the City of Tacoma and the Design-Builder relating to this 7 Section shall be subject to the dispute resolution provisions described In Section 1-04.5 8 of the General Provisions, provided that the Design-Builder process as directed by the 9 City of Tacoma, pending resolution of the dispute.

10 2.24.2 GENERAL WARRANTY 11 The Design-Builder shall provide a General Warranty commencing on the day of Physical 12 Completion and ending one year thereafter. The Design-Builder shall not be required to 13 provide a Warranty Bond for the General Warranty. 14 At any time during the General Warranty period, if the City of Tacoma determines that 15 any of the Work has not met the standards set forth in the Contract, then the Design- 16 Builder shall correct the Work in accordance with this Section, even if the performance 17 of such correction extends beyond the stated General Warranty period. 18 The Design-Builder shall represent and warrant the following: 19 • All design Work performed pursuant to the Contract, including Work performed 20 by Subcontractors and manufactures, conforms to all professional engineering 21 principles generally accepted as industry standard in the State of Washington. 22 • The Project is free of defects, including design errors, omissions, inconsistencies, 23 and other defects in the design and construction of the Project. 24 • Materials and equipment furnished under the Contract are of good quality, and 25 were new when installed, unless otherwise approved by the City of Tacoma. 26 • The Work meets all of the requirements of the Contract. 27 • The specifications and/or drawings selected or prepared for use during 28 construction are appropriate for their intended use. 29 • The Project has been constructed so that it can be used for the intended function.

30 2.24.2.1 General Warranty – Extension of General Warranty 31 The General Warranty shall apply to all repaired or replaced Work pursuant to the terms 32 of the Contract. The General Warranty for repaired or replaced Work shall extend 33 beyond the original General Warranty period, if necessary, to provide an additional one- 34 year General Warranty period following acceptance by the City of Tacoma of any 35 repaired or replaced Work.

36

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.24-3 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project

1 2.24.3 CONTACTS 2 Within 30 Calendar Days after Physical Completion, the Design-Builder shall submit to 3 the City of Tacoma contact information for the Design-Builder’s personnel who will be 4 managing the General Warranty.

5 End of Section

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 2.24-4