DOCSLIB.ORG

RECEIVED 2280 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places JUN 1 7 2009 Registration Form NAT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RECEIVED 2280 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places JUN 1 7 2009 Registration Form NAT NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior RECEIVED 2280 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places JUN 1 7 2009 Registration Form NAT. REGISTER OF HISTORIC PUCES This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties an Com lete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Comp tJiy yyuil Item DymaTk"ing""x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property_________________________ _____ _____ Historic name Roanoke Park Historic District Other names/site number 2. Location street & number Roughly bounded by Shelby St. on the north, Roanoke St on the not for south, Harvard Ave on the west and Tenth Ave on the East. publication city or town ___Seattle__________________________________ vicinity State Washington code WA county King code 033 zip code 98102 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally _ statewide X_ locally. (_ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) 6-/Z-&? Signature of certifyl Date Washington State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria. ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I, hereby^ertify that this property is: Date of Action _J£ entered in the National Register. _ See continuation sheet __ determined eligible for the National Register. _ See continuation sheet _ determined not eligible for the National Register. _ removed from the National Register. _ other (explain:) _______ ROANOKE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT KING COUNTY, WA Page 2 of 4 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box (Do not incl. previously listed resources in the count.) X private __ building(s) Contributing Non-Contributing X public-local X district ____78_________21_____ buildings public-State site 1 sites public-Federal structure 55 22 structures object objects 134 43 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) listed in the National Register N/A One 6. Functions or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC /Single Dwelling DOMESTIC /Single Dwelling LANDSCAPE/ Park LANDSCAPE/ Park RELIGION / Religious Facility 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) LATE VICTORIAN / Queen Anne; foundation Concrete, Brick, Stone LATE 19™ & 20™ CENTURY REVIVAL / walls Wood, Brick, Stucco, Stone Colonial Revival Tudor Revival,______ Mission/Spanish Colonial Revival, Italian roof Asphalt, Wood, Metal Renaissance; LATE 19TH & EARLY 20TH other Terra Cotta GENTRY AMERICAN MOVEMENT/ Bungalow/ Craftsman Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET ROANOKE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT KING COUNTY , WA Page 3 of 4 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the (Enter categories from instructions) property for National Register listing.) ARCHITECTURE Property is associated with events that have COMMERCE made a significant contribution to the broad patterns LAW of our history. POLITICS/GOVERNMENT __ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. x C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high Period of Significance artistic values, or represents a significant 1899-1939 and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. __ D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) 1899,1909,1918,1919,1926,1929,1937 Property is: A owed by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person B removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) C a birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation D a cemetery. E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. Architect/Builder Green, Elmer E.; Dwyer, W.E., Ivey, Edwin ].; F a commemorative property. Ayer, Elizabeth; Sexton, Frederick; Wilcox______ G less than 50 years old or achieving significance W.R.B.; Sayward, William J.; Willatsen, Andrew; within the past 50 years. Gould, Carl F.; Huntington, Daniel R.; Lawton, George A.; Moldenhour, Herman A. (Architects) Narrative Statement of Significance SEE CONTINUATION SHEET (Explain the significance of the property.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: __ preliminary determination of individual listing X State Historic Preservation Office (36 CFR 67) has been requested __ Other State agency __ previously listed in the National Register __ Federal agency __ previously determined eligible by the National X Local government Register X University __ designated a National Historic Landmark __ Other #_____________ Name of repository: recorded by Historic American Engineering UW Special Collections; MOHAI; Record#______________ City of Seattle DPD Office_______ ROANOKE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT KING COUNTY , WA Page 4 of 4 | 0. Geographical Data Acreage of Property Approx. 18.25 acres ITM References Dlace additional UTM References on a continuation sheet.) | 10 | 5 50 917 52 7 7312 3 | 10 | 5 27 198 52 76 | 873 Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing | 10 | 5 51 142 52 7 :7312 4 | 10 | 5 50 9117 52 76 873 Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property.) See continuation sheet. Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected.) See continuation sheet. 11. Form Prepared By name/title/org Erin O7 Connor, Lee O'Connor, Cheryl Thomas (Edited by DAHP Staff) date March 2009 name/title/org Friends of Roanoke Park; Roanoke Neighborhood Elms Fund___ ________ street & number 2612 Tenth Avenue East (10th Avenue E) telephone (206) 322-2125 city or town Seattle state WA zip code 98102 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items.) Property Owner (Complete this item at the request of the SHPO or FPO.)______________________ name Various street & number telephone city or town _ state zip code NPS Form 10-900a OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet - ROANOKE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Section number 7 Page 1 of 121 Narrative Description: Period of Significance The Roanoke Park Historic District contains a distinctive collection of housing stock representative of a forty-year period from 1899 through 1939. One house was built as a duplex; all of the other properties were built as single-family residences except the 1961 St. Patrick's Church. Block 9 of the district is Roanoke Park, so designated in 1908. Provenance The two oldest houses in the Roanoke Park Historic District, having been built in 1899 and 1900, are 109 and 108 years old, respectively. Forty-eight of the houses (including the two just mentioned) in the Roanoke Park Historic District will be at least 100 years old by the end of 1909, as is Roanoke Park itself already. By the end of 2010, the centenary of the district's housing boom, a total of 63 percent of the 100 buildings in the district will be 100 years old. 1 Architectural styles ranging from Colonial Revival, Neo-classical Revival, Tudor Revival, Mission/Spanish Revival, English Arts and Crafts, Craftsman, American Foursquare, Italian Renaissance, French Norman Revival, and many subtypes, combinations, and permutations of such styles and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SDOT 2018 Traffic Report
    Seattle Department of Transportation 2018 TRAFFIC REPORT *2017 data CONTENTS 5 Executive Summary 7 Traffic Volumes and Speeds 8 Motor Vehicle Volumes 11 Traffic Flow Map 13 Bicycle Volumes 18 Pedestrian Volumes 21 Motor Vehicle Speeds 23 Traffic Collisions 24 Citywide Collision Rate 25 Fatal and Serious Injury Collisions 27 Pedestrian Collision Rate 30 Bicycle Collision Rate 33 Supporting Data 33 Volume Data 44 Speed Data 48 Historical Collision Data 50 2016 All Collisions 54 2016 Pedestrian Collisions 63 2016 Bicycle Collisions 75 Glossary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents an end of year review of This report is prepared in compliance with Seattle the core data sets the Seattle Department of Municipal Code 11.16.220, which requires the Transportation (SDOT) collects and maintains City Traffic Engineer to present an annual traffic including volumes, speeds, and collisions. The report that includes information about traffic use of this data, guided by department plans and trends and traffic collisions on City of Seattle policies, serves as the foundation for making streets. Beyond this legal requirement, the informed decisions on nearly all work at SDOT report strives to serve as an accessible reference from safety improvements to repaving to grant of Seattle traffic data and trends for all. applications. It is fundamental to measuring project performance. The breadth and depth of In gathering and compiling the information the data collected allows objective discussion of in this report, the Seattle Department of project merits and results, be it a new crosswalk Transportation does not waive the limitations on or an entire safety corridor. As the demands and this information’s discoverability or admissibility complexity of Seattle’s transportation network under 23 U.S.C § 409.
    [Show full text]
  • Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project
    City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project 1 Design Build Contract 2 City of Tacoma 3 Murray Morgan Bridge 4 Rehabilitation 5 6 Request for Proposal 7 September 28, 2010 8 9 10 11 12 13 Chapter 2: Technical 14 Requirements 15 16 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Technical Requirements September 28, 2010 City of Tacoma Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project 1 Contents 2 2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................... 2.1-1 3 2.1.1 GENERAL ...................................................................................................................... 2.1‐1 4 2.1.2 COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................................... 2.1‐6 5 2.1.3 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION ...................................................................................... 2.1‐10 6 2.1.4 SOFTWARE ................................................................................................................. 2.1‐14 7 2.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ................................................................ 2.2-1 8 2.3 STATE TAXES ..................................................................................... 2.3-1 9 2.4 SURVEYS AND MAPPING ................................................................... 2.4-1 10 2.4.1 GENERAL ...................................................................................................................... 2.4‐1 11 2.4.2 MANDATORY STANDARDS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 520 History.Org
    LIVING AND WORKING ON THE LAke – Pre-1850 thrOUGH 1916 520 HISTORY.ORG ELEMENTARY ESSAY #3 The Puget Sound region was home to the First Peoples for thou- Near where the Roanoke Park neighborhood is now located, there sands of years before non-Native groups arrived. The First Peoples was an open prairie. There the Natives gathered berries, roots, lived here because of the mild climate and because it had every- and other important foods that were needed for a healthy diet. thing that they needed to thrive and survive. When explorers, The Lakes Duwamish who lived in the Madison Park neighborhood pioneers, and immigrant groups discovered the promise of this land called that area “Where One Chops.” and its many natural resources, they too decided to call it home. In a Lakes Duwamish village, families of 20 or more lived in ce- Each new group brought new ideas, new traditions, and new ways dar-plank longhouses during the winter months. At one time, to appreciate the region, build homes, establish communities, and according to old records, there were five longhouses and a fishing develop industries. It is important to understand that each unique weir near Ravenna Creek. A large village called hikw’al’al – or “big group that has called the Puget Sound region their home has con- house” – was located on the southern shore of Lake Union. One of tributed to its development. They have each had a lasting influence these settlements was located south of Seward Park and was called on neighborhoods, business districts, and the natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Burke Building 400 North 34Th Street | Seattle, WA
    THE Burke Building 400 North 34th Street | Seattle, WA NEIGHBORING TENANTS FOR LEASE LOCATION high-tech 6,185 sf Fremont companies include Adobe, Impinj, Suite 200 Seattle’s funky, creative neighborhood Google, and Tableau Software “Center of the Universe” LOCATED IN FREMONT, AN OASIS FOR TECH COMPANIES For leasing information, contact JEFF LOFTUS • Newly remodeled lobbies and restrooms • Professional Management with 206.248.7326 with showers on-site building engineers [email protected] • High Speed Internet (Comcast Cable, • Views of the Ship Canal Century Link, Accel Wireless) KEN HIRATA • Parking ratio of 2/1,000 206.296.9625 • Near Fremont Canal Park, Burke • Available now [email protected] Gilman Trail, unique local shops and distinctive eateries • $32.00 PSF, FS kiddermathews.com This information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable. It is provided without any representation, warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied as to its accuracy. Prospective Buyer or Tenant should conduct an independent investigation and verification of all matters deemed to be material, including, but not limited to, statements of income and expenses. Consult your attorney, accountant, or other professional advisor. BurkeTHE Building PROXIMITY SEATTLE CBD 3 miles 10 minutes to AURORA BRIDGE downtown Seattle LAKE UNION FREMONT BRIDGE LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL N 34TH ST N 35TH ST THE BURKE BUILDING N 36TH ST JEFF LOFTUS KEN HIRATA kiddermathews.com 206.248.7326 | [email protected] 206.296.9625 | [email protected] 400 North 34th Street | Seattle, WA SHIP CANAL PARKING 2/1,000 spaces per 1,000 sf rentable area N 34TH ST SUITE 200 N 35TH ST BurkeTHE Building SECOND FLOOR SUITE 200 AVAILABLE NOW 6,185 sf JEFF LOFTUS | 206.248.7326 | [email protected] KEN HIRATA | 206.296.9625 | [email protected] This information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Washington Legislature, 1854-1963
    HISTORY of the History of the Washington LegislatureHistory of the Washington 1854 -1963 History of the Washington LegislatureHistory of the Washington 1854 -1963 WASHINGTONWASHINGTON LEGISLATURELEGISLATURE 18541854 - - 1963 1963 by Don Brazier by Don Brazier by Don Brazier Published by the Washington State Senate Olympia, Washington 98504-0482 © 2000 Don Brazier. All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced or used in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission of the author. 10987654321 Printed and bound in the United States i Acknowledgments A lot of people offered encouragement and moral support on this project. I cannot name them all, but a few are worthy of mention. Nancy Zussy, Ellen Levesque, Gayle Palmer, and Shirley Lewis at the Washington State Library were extremely helpful. Sid Snyder and Ralph Munro have each been treasured friends for more than 30 years. They probably know more about the history of this legislature than any other two people. I am honored and flattered that they would write brief forwards. There are many who have offered encouragement as I spent day after day seated at the microfilm machine in the Washington Room at the library. It is a laborious task; not easy on the eyes. They include my sons, Bruce and Tom, Scott Gaspard, Representative Shirley Hankins, Shelby Scates, Mike Layton, the late Gerald Sorte, Senator Bob Bailey, Sena- tor Ray Moore and his wife Virginia, Rowland Thompson, and numerous others who I know I’ve forgotten to mention. My special gratitude goes to Deanna Haigh who deciphered my handwriting and typed the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • MIKE SIEGEL / the SEATTLE TIMES South Lake Union 1882
    Photo credit: MIKE SIEGEL / THE SEATTLE TIMES South Lake Union 1882 http://pauldorpat.com/seattle-now-and-then/seattle-now-then/ Westlake 1902 Top, Westlake 2013 The Club Stables earlier home on Western Ave. north of Lenora Street: Photo Credit MOHAI Reported in the Seattle Times Sept. 26, 1909, read the headline, "Club Stables Now In Finest Quarters in West." Article describes the scene "in the very heart of the city . These up-to-date stables contain ample accommodations for 250 horses, with every safeguard and comfort in the way of ventilation, cleanliness etc. that modern sanitary science can provide . An elaborate sprinkler system of the most approved and efficient type . is practically an absolute guarantee against serious damage by fire. The management solicits an inspection at any time." Development Western Mill, early 1890s, at the south end of Lake Union and the principal employer for the greater Cascade neighborhood Development accelerated after David Denny built the Western Mill in 1882, near the site of today’s Naval Reserve Center, and cut a barrier at Montlake to float logs between the lakes. Homes soon began to appear on the Lake Union’s south shore, ranging from the ornate Queen Anne-style mansion built by Margaret Pontius in 1889 (which served as the “Mother Ryther Home” for orphans from 1905 to 1920) to humble worker's cottages. The latter housed a growing number of immigrants from Scandinavia, Greece, Russia, and America’s own teeming East, attracted by jobs in Seattle’s burgeoning mills and on its bustling docks. Beginning in 1894, their children attended Cascade School -- which finally gave the neighborhood a name -- and families worshipped on Sundays at St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastlake Bungalows Northgate
    THE EASTLAKE BUNGALOWS NORTHGATE GREENWOOD BALLARD GREEN LAKE THE EASTLAKE BUNGALOWS UNIVERSITY FREMONT DISTRICT WALLINGFORD MAGNOLIA INTERBAY QUEEN ANNE CAPITOL HILL SEATTLE CBD CENTRAL DISTRICT WEST SEATTLE OFFERING The Eastlake Bungalows are situated in Seattle’s beloved Eastlake neighborhood renowned for its striking views of Lake Union, downtown Seattle and Queen Anne. The property itself contains two separate tax parcels, each with two duplexes built in 1990. The properties are being advertised both as an 8-unit sale or as individual fourplexes. The properties consist of (4) 817 SQFT 2x1 flats, (2) 1118 SQFT 2x1.5 townhome units, and (2) 704 SQFT 1x1 townhomes. Each unit conveniently has a full-size washer/dryer set and 7 off-street parking spaces are available off of the alley. The property presents the prospective Buyer with a newer construction value add deal with massive rental upside in one of Seattle’s most popular neighborhoods. The Eastlake Bungalows were designed by renowned architect Charles Edelstein with the vision of creating a houseboat style community steps away from Lake Union. Each unit has a separate entrance with walkways in-between the bungalow like structures. None of the units share a common wall to the sides. NAME The Eastlake Bungalows ADDRESS 2212-2216 Minor Ave E, Seattle, WA 98102 TOTAL UNITS 8 BUILT 1999 SQUARE FEET 6,912 Total Net Rentable PRICE $2,950,000 PRICE PER UNIT $368,750 PRICE PER FOOT $427 CURRENT GRM/CAP 17.7/3.1% MARKET GRM/CAP 13.6/4.6% This information has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable, but we make no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project
    Submitted by: Kiewit Pacific Co. Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Specification No. PW10-0128F Submitted to: Purchasing Office, Tacoma Public Utilities 3628 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409 June 8, 2010 Tab No. 1 - General Company Information & Team Structure Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Project TAB NO.1 - GENERAL COMPANY INFORMATION AND TEAM STRUCTURE Kiewit Pacific Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kiewit Infrastructure Group, Inc., will be the contracting party for this project, as indicated on Forms 3 and 4 in Tab No. 4 - Appendix C. As a wholly-owned subsidiary, none of the officers of Kiewit Pacific Co. (Kiewit) own stock. Incorporated on May 18, 1982, we can trace our history back to 1884, when Peter and Andrew Kiewit formed Kiewit Brothers, an Omaha masonry contracting partnership. Today, we are part of one of North America's largest and most respected construction and mining organizations. We take our place in the corporate structure of our parent company, Kiewit Infrastructure Group Inc., alongside Kiewit Construction Company and Kiewit Southern Co. Our affiliates and subsidiaries, as well as those of our parent company, operate from a network of offices throughout North America. We draw upon the Kiewit Corporation’s collective experience and personnel to assemble the strongest team possible for a given project. Therefore, work experience of such affiliates and subsidiaries is relevant in demonstrating our capabilities. For the Murray Morgan Bridge, we are supplementing our local talent with extensive moveable bridge expertise from our east coast operations, Kiewit Constructors, Inc. We are also utilizing our local subsidiary, General Construction Company (General), for mechanical and electrical expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Artists' View of Seattle
    WHERE DOES SEATTLE’S CREATIVE COMMUNITY GO FOR INSPIRATION? Allow us to introduce some of our city’s resident artists, who share with you, in their own words, some of their favorite places and why they choose to make Seattle their home. Known as one of the nation’s cultural centers, Seattle has more arts-related businesses and organizations per capita than any other metropolitan area in the United States, according to a recent study by Americans for the Arts. Our city pulses with the creative energies of thousands of artists who call this their home. In this guide, twenty-four painters, sculptors, writers, poets, dancers, photographers, glass artists, musicians, filmmakers, actors and more tell you about their favorite places and experiences. James Turrell’s Light Reign, Henry Art Gallery ©Lara Swimmer 2 3 BYRON AU YONG Composer WOULD YOU SHARE SOME SPECIAL CHILDHOOD MEMORIES ABOUT WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO SEATTLE? GROWING UP IN SEATTLE? I moved into my particular building because it’s across the street from Uptown I performed in musical theater as a kid at a venue in the Seattle Center. I was Espresso. One of the real draws of Seattle for me was the quality of the coffee, I nine years old, and I got paid! I did all kinds of shows, and I also performed with must say. the Civic Light Opera. I was also in the Northwest Boy Choir and we sang this Northwest Medley, and there was a song to Ivar’s restaurant in it. When I was HOW DOES BEING A NON-DRIVER IMPACT YOUR VIEW OF THE CITY? growing up, Ivar’s had spokespeople who were dressed up in clam costumes with My favorite part about walking is that you come across things that you would pass black leggings.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. ___X___ New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Seattle’s Olmsted Parks and Boulevards (1903–68) B. Associated Historic Contexts None C. Form Prepared by: name/title: Chrisanne Beckner, MS, and Natalie K. Perrin, MS organization: Historical Research Associates, Inc. (HRA) street & number: 1904 Third Ave., Suite 240 city/state/zip: Seattle, WA 98101 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] telephone: (503) 247-1319 date: December 15, 2016 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ ______________________ _________________________ Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING and CULTURAL AWARENESS JIM WOODS, DIRECTOR of TRIBAL AFFAIRS, SPECIAL ASSISTANT to the DIRECTOR Native American Tribes Are Here
    Working with Tribes SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING AND CULTURAL AWARENESS JIM WOODS, DIRECTOR OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS, SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR Native American Tribes are here 574 Recognized Tribes in the United States 29 Federally Recognized Tribes in Washington 21 + 2 Treaty Tribes 8 Executive Order Tribes Tribes with Fishing Rights 24 Tribes with off-reservation Hunting Rights Out of State Tribes with rights in Washington Working with our tribal partners The overview: History of Tribal Governments Cultural Relevance & Differences Awareness of Native Lifeways Social Characteristics Stewardship Shared Management and Responsibilities Professional Perspective Resiliency Culture is not a divide. Although Indian tribes are sovereign, that sovereignty is not absolute. It has been challenged, defined, and battled over throughout U.S. history. History of Tribal Governments Tribes have been on this Continent and here in the Pacific Northwest for thousands of years. Historically the Makah believe Orca transformed into a wolf, and thus transforming again into Man. Pre-1492: Pre-Columbus Period Native people lived in organized societies with their own forms of governance for thousands of years before contact with Europeans. Historic Ancient Chinese Explorers traded with WA Coastal Tribes early 1400’s 1513- Spanish explorer Vasco Núñez de Balboa, the first European to sight the Pacific Ocean, when he claimed all lands adjoining this ocean for the Spanish Crown. In the vicinity of the Duwamish River and Elliott Bay where in 1851 the first U.S. settlers began building log cabins, the Duwamish tribe occupied at least 17 villages. The first non-Natives to settle the area were farmers who selected their claims on the Duwamish River on September 16, 1851.
    [Show full text]
  • Louise Olivereau and the Seattle Radical Community (1917 1923)
    Louise Olivereau and the Seattle Radical Community (1917 1923) Sarah Ellen Sharbach 1986 Contents Acknowledgments 3 Chapter 1: Pre-War Seattle: Progressives, Radicals And Preparedness 4 Chapter 2: The People Do Not Want This War: Anti-War Radical Culture And Community 14 Chapter 3: A Woman Acting Alone: Louise Olivereau And The First World War 28 Chapter 4: “this after-the-war period”: Post-War Turmoil And The Prelude To The 1919 Seattle General Strike 41 Chapter 5: “No One Knows Where!” The Seattle General Strike 54 Chapter 6: Hysteria, Disillusionment and Normalcy: Seattle’s Radical Community, 1920–23 72 Conclusion 84 Selected Bibliography 93 Primary Sources ............................ 93 Published Materials .......................... 93 Interviews/Memoirs .......................... 94 Books .................................. 94 Articles ................................. 96 Unpublished Works .......................... 97 Appendix A: On Thursday at 10 A.M. 98 2 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Professor Karen Blair, who was the first to teach me the craft of researching history. It was under Dr. Blair’s guidance that I first discovered Louise Olivereau. Professor Robert Burke has been a crucial source of assistance and encourage- ment to me on this thesis; his enthusiasm for my work has never wavered. Dr. Burke pushed me towards excellence, and for this I am deeply grateful. All historians are indebted to the work of librarians and archivists, and those whom I depended upon were consistently thorough in their assistance. I wish also to express my appreciation for the comments and ideas that came from my fellow graduate students. My association with my seminar colleagues will always serve me well. Finally, I wish to thank Tari Eastman for her friendship, her generosity, and her keen editor’s eye.
    [Show full text]