British Railways

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

British Railways BRITISH RAILWAYS HUGH MUNRO ROSS sSi«-:i/^.:.=..=.;gS:^>..e^a K niocrsit^ of a ^ 4" 4 California 4 Digitized by the Internet Arciiive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation ' http://www.archive.org/details/britishrailwaystOOrossrich BRITISH RAILWAYS THEIR ORGANISATION AND MANAGEMENT BY HUGH MUNRO ROSS, B.A. LONDON EDWARD ARNOLD 1904 All Rights Reserved ^iMCKELS PREFACE This little book aims at providing for the general, non-technical reader an account of the railways of the country, which may enable him to understand something of the conditions in which they work, the difficulties they encounter, and the problems they have to solve. It is not to be regarded as a text- book of railway management, and considerations of space have rendered it necessary altogether to omit some topics that might have been treated and to dismiss others with only a brief reference. Nor is it a statistical manual, the figures contained in its pages having been introduced not for their own sake, but simply for purposes of illustration and com- parison. H. M. R m 20 — CONTENTS CHAPTER I THE GROWTH OF THE SYSTEMS PAGE Construction of Railways—Promotion in Parliament—Board of Trade Inspection—Amalgamations—The Principal Systems —Mileage of Chief Lines 1 CHAPTER II COMPETITION, COMBINATION, AND CO-OPERATION Competition does exist — Alliances between different Com- panies—Pools and Agi-eements—Conferences—The Railway Clearing House 17 I CHAPTER III RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION : TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT Board of Directors—General Manager—Superintendent of the Line—Separation of Commercial and Operating Branches Devolution of Duties—Time-Tables and the Arrangement of Trains — Punctuality — Composition of Trains — Over- crowding , 37 CHAPTER IV RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION : OTHER DEPARTMENTS Secretary and Accountant—Stores—Engineer—Maintenance of Way—Signals— Electrical Engineer—Locomotive Superin- tendent—Carriage and Wagon Superintendent ... 59 vi CONTENTS CHAPTER V SOURCES OF REVENUE PAOB Miscellaneous Receipts—Docks and Steamboats—Passenger and Goods Traffic—Receipts from Passengers —Receipts from Goods—Density of Traffic—Train-Mile Receipts . 78 CHAPTER VI TRAIN-MILES AND TON-MILES Train-Mile Statistics—Their Deficiencies—Passenger-Miles and Ton-Miles—Advantages claimed for them—Do they afford a Test of Economical Working ? —Impossibility of separ- ating Passenger Expenses from Goods Expenses—Imper- fections of the Ton-Mile as a Unit—Meagreness of British Railway Statistics 100 CHAPTER VII CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS Passenger Vehicles—Increased Weight of Trains—Increased Speeds—Diminished Remuneration from Passengers—Are First-class Passengers Profitable ?—The Loading of Pas- senger Trains—Mr. Aslett's Plan—Passenger Fares—Return Tickets—American Travelling 119 CHAPTER VIII CARRIAGE OF GOODS Standard British Trucks—The Argument for Wagons of Greater Capacity—Difficulties in the way of their use in this ' " Country — ' Private Wagons — Small Consignments — Prompt Delivery—Big Trains and Full Loads—Mineral Trains— General Merchandise Trains—Limiting Factors in the Size of Trains 150 — CONTENTS vii . CHAPTER IX GOODS RATES PAOB Excessive Charges—Caution required in comparing British and Foreign Rates—Differential Rates—Undue Preference—The Basis upon which Rates are fixed—What the Traffic will bear—What the Traffic will not bear . .176 CHAPTER X RATES LEGISLATION OP 1891 AND 1892 The Provisional Orders—Classification adopted—Station and Service Terminals—Scales of Rates for General Merchandise and Minerals—Scale for Live Stock—Scales for Perishable Articles and Small Parcels 197 CHAPTER XI CAPITAL, EXPENSES, AND DIVIDENDS High Capitalisation of British Railways—Its Explanation Cost of Construction—Causes of Growtli of Capital—Better- men ts and Capital Account—Productiveness of Capital Expended—Increased Expenses and Decreased Dividends Prospects of Future Improvement — Employment of Electrical Traction 212 Index 237 BRITISH RAILWAYS: THEIR ORGANISATION AND MANAGEMENT. CHAPTER I THE GROWTH OF THE SYSTEMS Construction of Railways—Promotion in Parliament—Board of Trade Inspection—Amalgamations—The Principal Systems—Mileage of Chief Lines. As a general rule, no railway can be constructed in the United Kingdom except with the sanction and authority of Imperial Parliament. It is true that any landowner is free to build a line on his own ground, and to operate it so long as he does not cause a nuisance or in any way interfere with the rights of his neighbours. Instances of such construction may be found in the line to the summit of Snowdon, and the private rail- way through the grounds of Eaton Hall to Balderton on the Great Western. But as soon as a railway constructor passes the boundaries of his own domain and has to enter the territories of other people, to cross public roads, to bridge rivers, and to do the various 2 BRITISH RAILWAYS other things without which a commercial railway is an impossibility, an Act of Parliament becomes indis- pensable. An apparent exception is furnished by so-called " light railways." By the Light Railways Act of 1896, the inquiry into the desirability of the proposed line, which is conducted by Parliament itself when an ordinary railway is concerned, is held locally (thereby avoiding the expense of bringing the witnesses up to Westminster) by three Commissioners, on whose " Order," confirmed (and perhaps modified) by the Board of Trade, the line may be constructed. But, as a matter of fact, this is not an exception. The Board must rather be looked upon as merely exercising powers delegated to it by Parliament for a specific purpose—delegated, moreover, to a strictly limited extent, for schemes which affect many important interests or involve some new principle or policy have still to be submitted to the consideration of Parliament itself. The object of this delegation of powers was to simplify procedure, and reduce the costs of promotion, which form an appreciable item in the capital expen- diture of a new railway, though not so large a one now as it sometimes was formerly. It may be taken, therefore, that before any im- portant railway can be made the authorisation of Parliament must be obtained. The Standing Orders of the two Houses require that applications for new lines be filed in prescribed form, that written notices be served on landowners affected, and that drafts of the Bill, together with engineering details of the pro- posed works and a 5 per cent, deposit on their esti- mated cost, be lodged at specified times; and if the — THE GROWTH OF THE SYSTEMS 3 regulations are not exactly followed the Bill will prob- ably be killed in its infancy, and never reach the stage of being considered by either House. To guard against this mishap, the promoters employ the services of a parliamentary agent, part of whose business it is to pilot it through the dangers of parliamentary procedure. Having escaped shipwreck in its early stages, the Bill is read for a first and a second time in either the Upper or the Lower House, according as it originated in one or the other, and then comes before a Select Committee of that House. There the promoters marshal their evidence to prove that the proposed line will serve a useful purpose, that it is desired by the inhabitants of the localities through which it is to pass, and that it is likely to command sufficient traffic to pay. There also those who are opposed to it the landowners who think it will spoil the amenities of their lands, the local authorities which deem their districts will be injured by its construction or are dissatisfied with the accommodation it pro- poses, the competing railway companies which fear it will abstract some of their traffic, all combine in attempting to show that, for some reason or other because it is not wanted, or because the financial position of its promoters is not satisfactory, or because it cannot be a commercial success, or because the plans or estimates of its engineers are defective—its construction should not be sanctioned. Should the opposers be able to bring forward sufficiently strong objections to the scheme, or should the Committee form the opinion that it is unsound financially or otherwise undesirable, the Bill is thrown out and 4 BRITISH RAILWAYS becomes dead for that Session at least. If, on the other hand, it wins the approval of the Committee, it is sent, with or without modifications, to the House for third reading, after which it goes to the other House. There it is again read a first and second time, again considered by a Select Committee, and, if fortunate, again read a third time. Finally, it receives the Koyal Assent and becomes an Act. Before exercising their powers, the promoters must raise their capital. That done, they acquire the land necessary for their undertaking. With some of the landowners they will be able to agree as to the price to be paid, but others will make exorbitant demands which it is impossible to entertain. In dealing with these they find the benefit of having parliamentary authority behind them, for on serving " notices to treat " they can compel the proprietors to sell at what are adjudged to be fair values by an independent arbitrating tribunal which has heard all the circumstances as presented by both sides. The purchase having been settled, they take possession of the land, and the engineers come upon the scene, though sometimes a further delay is caused by the fact that a railway appropriating ground inhabited by the working classes is often required to provide suitable dwellings within a reasonable distance, to which the displaced population is supposed to migrate. The next few years are occupied in the actual work of construction,—in making cuttings and embankments, building bridges and viaducts, laying down the per- manent way, erecting the station buildings, fitting up the signals and telegraphic apparatus, etc. A definite THE GROWTH OF THE SYSTEMS 5 period (five years) is specified in the Act for the completion of the work, under penalty of fine, and if this time proves insufficient the railway company has to apply for a further Act extending it.
Recommended publications
  • Railfuture RAIL USER EXPRESS Welcome to This Edition of Rail User
    railfuture RAIL USER EXPRESS 29 May 2011 Welcome to this edition of Rail User Express. Please support Britain’s number one As always, feel free to forward RUEx to a colleague, or to reproduce advocate for the items in your own newsletter (quoting sources). If you want further details railways and rail users! of any of the stories mentioned, look on the relevant website or, failing that, get back to me so I can send you the full text. For details about group We begin with a roundup of news from rail user groups around the affiliation to Railfuture, UK. I‟m grateful to RUGs that send me their magazines and bulletins. contact David Harby Follow Railfuture on Twitter! Just add us to your Twitter account. Look for us @Railfuture GUEST RAIL USER GROUP OF THE MONTH Action Rail Monifieth contact Following my recent enquiry to this group in the Tayside area of Scotland, their Secretary, Councillor John Whyte, kindly replied with some background information about ARM: “The local rail service in and around Dundee is amongst the worst in the UK, far less just us in Scotland! Currently, Invergowrie and Monifeith have just two stopping trains a day(!!) and Broughty Ferry has three stopping trains. The population denied an adequate train service between Monifieth and Broughty Ferry is over 25,000! If this situation were replicated in any other similar area, anywhere in the UK, it would not be tolerated! “ARM is active in trying to get Network Rail, Transport Scotland and First ScotRail fully on board with this lousy rail service and is meeting with some success.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carrying Trade and the First Railways in England, C1750-C1850
    The Carrying Trade and the First Railways in England, c1750-c1850 Carolyn Dougherty PhD University of York Railway Studies November 2018 Abstract Transport and economic historians generally consider the change from moving goods principally on roads, inland waterways and coastal ships to moving them principally on railways as inevitable, unproblematic, and the result of technological improvements. While the benefits of rail travel were so clear that most other modes of passenger transport disappeared once rail service was introduced, railway goods transport did not offer as obvious an improvement over the existing goods transport network, known as the carrying trade. Initially most railways were open to the carrying trade, but by the 1840s railway companies began to provide goods carriage and exclude carriers from their lines. The resulting conflict over how, and by whom, goods would be transported on railways, known as the carrying question, lasted more than a decade, and railway companies did not come to dominate domestic goods carriage until the 1850s. In this study I develop a fuller picture of the carrying trade than currently exists, highlighting its multimodal collaborative structure and setting it within the ‘sociable economy’ of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century England. I contrast this economy with the business model of joint-stock companies, including railway companies, and investigate responses to the business practices of these companies. I analyse the debate over railway company goods carriage, and identify changes in goods transport resulting from its introduction. Finally, I describe the development and outcome of the carrying question, showing that railway companies faced resistance to their attempts to control goods carriage on rail lines not only from the carrying trade but also from customers of goods transport, the government and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices
    Long Term Planning Process West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices August 2017 Contents August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 02 Technical Appendices 03 A1 - Midlands Rail Hub: Central Birmingham 04 elements A2 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 11 Nottingham/Leicester elements A3 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 17 Worcester/Hereford via Bromsgrove elements A4 - Chiltern Route 24 A5 - Birmingham to Leamington Spa via 27 Coventry A6 - Passenger capacity at stations 30 A7 - Business Case analysis 50 Technical Appendicies August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 03 Introduction to Technical Appendices Cost estimation These Technical Appendices provide the technical evidence to Cost estimates have been prepared for interventions or packages of support the conclusions and choices for funders presented in the interventions proposed in the Route Study. The estimates are based main Route Study document. The areas of technical analysis on the pre-GRIP data available, concept drawings and high level outlined in these appendices are capability analysis, concept specification of the intervention scope. To reflect the level of development (at pre-GRIP level), cost estimation, business case information available to support the estimate production, a analysis and passenger capacity analysis at stations. contingency sum of 60% has been added. The estimates do not include inflation. Indicative cost ranges have been provided based The appendices are presented by geographical area with the on this assessment. exception of the business case analysis and passenger capacity analysis. Business case analysis The areas of technical analysis are summarised below. Business case analysis has been undertaken to demonstrate to funders whether a potential investment option is affordable and Capability Analysis offers value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Fosbr Newsletter Number 88 May 2015 Highlighting Pilning's “Ghost”
    FoSBR Newsletter Number 88 May 2015 Highlighting Pilning’s “ghost” train service On Saturday 21st March Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) invited local rail users to join them in riding a “parliamentary service” from Pilning railway station. A “parliamentary train” is a token service, run to avoid the cost of formal closure of a railway station. In the case of Pilning, this ghost service is provided by two trains on a Saturday, the 08:32 to Bristol Temple Meads and the 15:41 to Newport. 15 FOSBR members & friends took a roundabout route to Pilning, riding the “Beach Line” to Severn Beach and walking across fields and lanes to lunch at The Plough in Pilning. FOSBR then caught the westbound “parliamentary train” under the River Severn to Newport. In Newport the disabled lift was out of action so station staff helpfully re- platformed the next train to allow our colleague David to board the eastbound Bristol train in his wheelchair. This train provided a fleeting glimpse of Pilning station sleeping peacefully for another week. Pilning is only 2 miles from Severn Beach, Severn Beach station being convenient for a large number of local residents. Until 1964 the railway from Severn Beach continued north to Redwick Halt to loop around to join the South Wales Main Line via Pilning Low Level 1 station. Pilning station has massive potential for passengers in view of planned commercial developments nearby at West Gate, Western Approach and Central Park - covering many of the fields across which we walked. These new premises could employ 10,000+ workers in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Railway Clerks' Association, 1919-1939
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs The Railway Clerks’ Association, 1919-1939 Thesis How to cite: McMahon, Anthony (1993). The Railway Clerks’ Association, 1919-1939. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 1992 Anthony McMahon https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.00010181 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk ANTHONY MCMAHON, B.A. (HONS, ) THE RAILWAY CLERKS’ ASSOCIATION, 1919-1939 Submitted for the degree of Ph. D in History, Open University October 1992 - 1 ProQuest Number: C347624 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest C347624 Published by ProQuest LLO (2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLO. ProQuest LLO. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.Q. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 The Railway Clerks' Association 1919 - 1939 Abstract This thesis analyses the history of the Railway Clerks' Association between 1919 and 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • Time to Change!
    Time to Change! “Railway Time” With the introduction of the railway, travel became faster. With every station keeping its own local mean time, the need for a synchronized time arose. The first railway company to implement a common time for all stations, appropriately named “Railway Time,” was the Great Western Railway in November 1840. By 1847, most railways were using “London Time,” the time set at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich. In 1847, the Railway Clearing House, an industry standards body, recommended that Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) be adopted at all stations as soon as the General Post Office permitted it. On December 1, 1847, the London and North Western Railway, as well as the Caledonian Railway, adopted “London Time,” and by 1848 most railways had followed. Unofficial GMT By 1844, almost all towns and cities in Britain had adopted GMT, though the time standard received some resistance, with railway stations keeping local mean time and showing “London Time” with an additional minute hand on the clock. In 1862, the Great Clock of Westminster, popularly known as Big Ben, was installed. Though not controlled by the Royal Observatory at Greenwich, it received hourly time signals from Greenwich and returned signals twice daily. Standard Time Adopted However, it was not until 1880 that the British legal system caught up with the rest of the country. With the Statutes (Definition of Time) Act (43 & 44 Vict.), Greenwich Mean Time was legally adopted throughout the island of Great Britain on August 2, 1880. Images of original British Railways South Region Clocks at Bat & Ball Station Above – Clock circa 1950 ex Ashford Station Below – Clock circa 1949 ex Dartford Station .
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Train Operation in Inter-War Britain
    Management Information and Management Practice: A Freight Train Operation in Inter-War Britain Roy A. Edwards Department of Economic History, The London School of Economics Phd Dissertation UMI Number: U616001 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U616001 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I Hr££ £ S F 7382. POLITICAL tOMl C & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A thesis always involves contributions and support from family and friends, as well as colleagues. It was my good fortune that in the writing of the thesis, colleagues became friends. In particular, my supervisor Dudley Baines provided insights both into railway operation and analysis. Mary Morgan as my second supervisor provided a critical review of early drafts which both built confidence and demolished long cherished ideas. To them both I owe a great deal. In my more desperate moments, Linda Sampson provided an insight into the correct use of Word Perfect and prevented, or at least ameliorated, a complete loss of mental faculties as the submission date drew near. I am also greatful to Rajiv Ball who helped in the final preparations for submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography THE following bibliography lists those sources which have been most helpful to the author in the preparation of this volume. Many of the items vary in quality considerably and the reader wishing to pursue his studies further will find those sources marked with an asterisk the most helpful. All works are published in the United Kingdom unless other­ wise stated. BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS W. M. AcwoRTH, The Elements ifRailway Economics ( Igo5) *- The Elements ifRailway Economics (I g24 ed.) C. J. ALLEN, Locomotive Practice and Performance in the Twentieth Century (I g4g) - The Great Eastern Railway (Ig55) *G. F. ALLEN, British Rail After Beeching ( Ig66) T. C. BARKER and M. RoBBINS, A History if London Trans­ port, vol. I, The Nineteenth Century (I g63) B. BAYLiss, European Transport (Ig65) R. BELL, History if the British Railways During the War, I93!}­ I945 (Ig46) W. BoLLAND, The Railways and the Nation (I gog) R. BRADY, Crisis in Britain (Ig5o, University of California Press) BRITISH ELECTRICAL DEVELOPMENT AssociATION, The Case for Electrification ifthe Railways (I g35) A. BROWN, The Future ifthe Railways (Ig28) - The Railway Problem (I g32) P. BuRTT, Railway Rates, Principles and Problems ( Ig26) - Railway Electrification and Traffic Problems (I g2g) R. CALVERT, TheFutureifBritishRailways (Ig65) BIBLIOGRAPHY 227 C. D. CAMPBELL, British Railways in Boom and Depression: An Essay in Trade Fluctuations and their Effects, 1878-1930 (I932) D. N. CHESTER, Public Control ofRoad Passenger Transport (I 936) H. A. CLEGG and T. E. CHESTER, The Future of Nationalisa­ tion (I953) E. S. Cox, British Railways' Experience with Diesel and Electric Traction (I 96 I) E.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps.RLY Railway Companies/Authors Only
    Railway Collection Railway Company/author List. Some items are listed as railway company/author [Not known] [manuscript list] [Not known] [Various] Adams, Brian Warren Alexandra Docks and Railways American Railways Anstruther & St. Andrews Railway Armstrong Whitworth & Co. Ltd. Arthur & C. Harston Arthur Balfour Ashby-de-la-Zouch R.D.C. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Balfour Beatty Banff, Portsoy Strathsla Railway Bangor & Carnarvon Barry Dock & Railways Barry Railway Bayliss Jones & Bayliss Ltd. Beadel & Sons Beale & Co Bedford & Cambridge Railway Bergen Steamship Company Berks & Hants Railway Birkenhead Railway Birmingham & Derby Junction Railway Birmingham Corporation Birmingham Locomotive Club Birmingham University Transport Society Body, Geoffrey Bolsover Colliery Co. Ltd. Borough Engineer, Southend-on-Sea Borough of Chesterfield Boston & Albany Railroad Boys & Tweedie Bradford Corporation 21 November 2019 Page 1 of 9 Bradford Corporation Waterworks Bradshaw's Braithwaite & Buttermere Railway Branch Line Society Bristol Corporation Bristol Port Extension Railways British Oxygen Company British Rail British Rail International British Railways British Railways (Western Region) British Railways? Bute and Great Western Railway Bute Docks Company C.J. Mander Caledonian Railway Cambrian Railways Cambridge & Lincoln Railway Cambridge & Oxford Railway Cambridge Royston & [Waddon?] Railway Cannock Chase Railway Canvey Island Urban District Council Cardiff Railway Company Central Wales Railway Cheltenham
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Reminiscences
    rafc ^' NQTJSS ''SUPEB/. CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY FROM Cornell University Library HE3018.2.N37 A3 Railway reminiscences. 3 1924 030 116 960 olin RAILWAY REMINISCENCES. All books are subject to recall after two weeks Olin/Kroch Library DATE DUE ' RAILWAY REMINISCENCES BY GEORGE P. NEELE, LATE SUTERINTENDENT OF THE LINE OF THE LONDON AND NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY. NOTES AND REMINISCENCES OF HALF A century's PROGRESS IN RAILWAY WORKING, AND OF A RAILWAY SUPERINTENDENT'S LIFE, PRINCIPALLY ON THE LONDON AND NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY, WITH SOME SUPPLEMENTARY MEMORANDA AS TO THE RAILWAY JOURNEYS TO AND FROM SCOTLAND MADE BY HER LATE MAJESTY QUEEN VICTORIA. XonDon: M'^CORQUODALE & CO., LIMITED, PRINTERS, CARDINGTON STREET. 1904. ^7 A77373S" PREFACE. Owing to suggestions made from time to time by old comrades in railway life, I have been induced to put together some record of the part I have taken in connection with the inner working of Railways; going back to very early experiences, and through gradual developments extending over a long series of years, to the time when it became advisable for me to retire from the daily pressure of the work. A railway service commencing in 1847, carries one back a long way towards association with those who were the actual pioneers of our railway system ; from whom we learnt our first lessons, by whose successes we have profited, by whose failures we have acquired knowledge ; and on whose foundation we have endeavoured to raise a superstructure of so sub- stantial a character, that those who follow in our steps will have no reason to be ashamed of their predecessors.
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 Committee
    PUBLIC SESSION MINUTES OF ORAL EVIDENCE taken before HIGH SPEED RAIL COMMITTEE on the HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL Monday 7 December 2015 (Afternoon) In Committee Room 5 PRESENT: Mr Robert Syms (Chair) Sir Peter Bottomley Geoffrey Clifton-Brown Mr David Crausby Mr Mark Hendrick _____________ IN ATTENDANCE: Timothy Mould QC, Lead Counsel, Department for Transport Witnesses: Nathalie Lieven QC, representing Transport for London and the Greater London Authority Neil Cameron QC, representing London Borough of Camden Stephen Locke and Tim Bellinger, London Transport Users Committee _____________ IN PUBLIC SESSION INDEX Subject Page Introduction by the Chair 3 Transport for London and the Greater London Authority Statement from Ms Lieven 3 London Borough of Camden Submission from Mr Cameron 4 Response from Mr Mould 6 London Transport Users Committee Submission from Mr Locke 7 Response from Mr Mould 11 Final comments from Mr Locke 14 Additional comments from Mr Bellinger 15 2 (At 3.43 p.m.) 1. CHAIR: Order, order. Welcome to the HS2 Select Committee. We have AP2:163, AP2:164, AP3:83, Transport for London and the Greater London Authority, represented by Nathalie Lieven. Welcome back. You have a short statement for the Committee. Transport for London and the Greater London Authority 2. MS LIEVEN QC: Thank you, sir. I do indeed. I’m very pleased to say that agreement has been reached between the Mayor, acting on behalf of the GLA/TfL and HS2. I think I should record that the parties have worked extremely hard to resolve the outstanding issues relating to Euston and Hillingdon, and we have reached agreement on ways forward on all the outstanding issues, such that we don’t need to bother this committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: Analysis, Recommendations and Conclusions 28Th February 2011
    RAIL VALUE FOR MONEY STUDY DfT / ORR Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: analysis, recommendations and conclusions 28th February 2011 research project on fares RAIL VALUE FOR MONEY STUDY DfT / ORR Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: analysis, recommendations and conclusions 28th February 2011 research project on fares Prepared for: Prepared by: Rail Value for Money Study Steer Davies Gleave 5th Floor 28-32 Upper Ground 55 Victoria Street London London SE1 9PD SW1H 0EU +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Although this report was commissioned jointly by the Department for Transport (DfT) and the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR), the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the DfT and the ORR. While the DfT and the ORR have made all reasonable efforts to ensure the information in this document is accurate, the DfT and the ORR do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the infor- mation or guidance this document contains. Department for Transport Office of Rail Regulation Great Minster House 1 Kemble Street 76 Marsham Street London London SW1P 4DR WC2B 4AN Telephone: 0300 330 3000 Telephone: 020 7282 2000 Website: www.dft.gov.uk Website: www.rail-reg.gov.uk © Crown copyright, 2011, except where otherwise stated You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence.
    [Show full text]