DOCSLIB.ORG

Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: Analysis, Recommendations and Conclusions 28Th February 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: Analysis, Recommendations and Conclusions 28Th February 2011 RAIL VALUE FOR MONEY STUDY DfT / ORR Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: analysis, recommendations and conclusions 28th February 2011 research project on fares RAIL VALUE FOR MONEY STUDY DfT / ORR Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: analysis, recommendations and conclusions 28th February 2011 research project on fares Prepared for: Prepared by: Rail Value for Money Study Steer Davies Gleave 5th Floor 28-32 Upper Ground 55 Victoria Street London London SE1 9PD SW1H 0EU +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Although this report was commissioned jointly by the Department for Transport (DfT) and the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR), the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the DfT and the ORR. While the DfT and the ORR have made all reasonable efforts to ensure the information in this document is accurate, the DfT and the ORR do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the infor- mation or guidance this document contains. Department for Transport Office of Rail Regulation Great Minster House 1 Kemble Street 76 Marsham Street London London SW1P 4DR WC2B 4AN Telephone: 0300 330 3000 Telephone: 020 7282 2000 Website: www.dft.gov.uk Website: www.rail-reg.gov.uk © Crown copyright, 2011, except where otherwise stated You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. gov.uk. To reproduce third-party material you need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Steer Davies Gleave 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD Telephone: 020 7910 5000 Website: www.steerdaviesgleave.com Final Report: Analysis, Recommendations and Conclusions CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... I Purpose of the study ............................................................................... i Evolution of fares policy and regulation ........................................................ i Key issues ........................................................................................... ii Relating fares to costs ........................................................................... iii Objectives for fares regulation .................................................................. iv Options for further investigation ................................................................ iv Analysis and conclusions .......................................................................... v Assessment ........................................................................................ viii Recommendations ................................................................................. xi 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 2 CURRENT FARES AND THEIR REGULATION ................................................... 4 Introduction ......................................................................................... 4 The structure of fares ............................................................................. 4 The historic objectives of fares regulation .................................................... 9 The current structure of fares regulation ...................................................... 9 Comparisons between countries ................................................................ 12 Comparisons between regions in Great Britain .............................................. 14 Comparisons between modes ................................................................... 15 3 EFFECTS OF THE CURRENT ARRANGEMENTS ...............................................17 Introduction ........................................................................................ 17 Stakeholder views ................................................................................. 17 Other issues ........................................................................................ 19 Stakeholder impacts .............................................................................. 25 4 POSSIBLE APPROACHES TO SETTING FARES .................................................29 Introduction ........................................................................................ 29 Value or market pricing .......................................................................... 29 “Fairness” or equity .............................................................................. 29 Cost ................................................................................................. 32 Our proposed new objectives for fares regulation .......................................... 35 5 OPTIONS ............................................................................................41 Introduction ........................................................................................ 41 Contents Final Report: Analysis, Recommendations and Conclusions Options considered ............................................................................... 43 Options not analysed ............................................................................. 47 Options analysed .................................................................................. 48 6 OPTION 1, PEAK-SPREADING ................................................................... 51 Introduction ....................................................................................... 51 Literature review ................................................................................. 52 Our analysis ........................................................................................ 53 The effects of Transport for London’s fares system ........................................ 56 Peak-spreading in parallel with existing TfL fares .......................................... 60 Peak-spreading applied to both national rail and TfL fares ............................... 65 Modelling ........................................................................................... 66 Issues and implementation ...................................................................... 67 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................ 69 7 OPTION 2, THE PRICE TAPER ON SEASON TICKETS ........................................ 71 Introduction ....................................................................................... 71 Literature review ................................................................................. 71 Our analysis ........................................................................................ 73 Modelling ........................................................................................... 73 Issues and implementation ...................................................................... 73 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................ 74 8 OPTION 3, THE STANDARD OFF-PEAK RETURN OR “SAVER” ............................ 76 Introduction ....................................................................................... 76 Literature review ................................................................................. 76 Our analysis ........................................................................................ 77 Modelling ........................................................................................... 78 Issues and implementation ...................................................................... 79 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................ 79 9 OPTION 8, AN ABSOLUTE FARES CAP BY TICKET TYPE ................................... 81 Introduction ....................................................................................... 81 Modelling ........................................................................................... 81 Issues and implementation ...................................................................... 82 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................ 83 10 OPTION 9, THE COMPOSITION OF THE FARES BASKET .................................... 85 Introduction ....................................................................................... 85 Contents Final Report: Analysis, Recommendations and Conclusions Our analysis ........................................................................................ 85 Modelling ........................................................................................... 85 Issues and implementation ...................................................................... 87 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................. 87 11 OPTION ASSESSMENT ............................................................................89 Introduction ........................................................................................ 89 Additional revenue ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Railfuture RAIL USER EXPRESS Welcome to This Edition of Rail User
    railfuture RAIL USER EXPRESS 29 May 2011 Welcome to this edition of Rail User Express. Please support Britain’s number one As always, feel free to forward RUEx to a colleague, or to reproduce advocate for the items in your own newsletter (quoting sources). If you want further details railways and rail users! of any of the stories mentioned, look on the relevant website or, failing that, get back to me so I can send you the full text. For details about group We begin with a roundup of news from rail user groups around the affiliation to Railfuture, UK. I‟m grateful to RUGs that send me their magazines and bulletins. contact David Harby Follow Railfuture on Twitter! Just add us to your Twitter account. Look for us @Railfuture GUEST RAIL USER GROUP OF THE MONTH Action Rail Monifieth contact Following my recent enquiry to this group in the Tayside area of Scotland, their Secretary, Councillor John Whyte, kindly replied with some background information about ARM: “The local rail service in and around Dundee is amongst the worst in the UK, far less just us in Scotland! Currently, Invergowrie and Monifeith have just two stopping trains a day(!!) and Broughty Ferry has three stopping trains. The population denied an adequate train service between Monifieth and Broughty Ferry is over 25,000! If this situation were replicated in any other similar area, anywhere in the UK, it would not be tolerated! “ARM is active in trying to get Network Rail, Transport Scotland and First ScotRail fully on board with this lousy rail service and is meeting with some success.
    [Show full text]
  • National Rail Conditions of Travel
    i National Rail Conditions of Travel From 5 August 2018 NATIONAL RAIL CONDITIONS OF TRAVEL TABLE OF CONTENTS NATIONAL RAIL CONDITIONS OF TRAVEL Part A: A summary of the Conditions 3 Part B: Introduction 4 Conditions 5 Part C: Planning your journey and buying your Ticket 5 Part D: Using your Ticket 11 Part E: Making your Train Journey 15 Part F: Your refund and compensation rights 21 Part G: Special Conditions applying to Season Tickets 26 Part H: Lost Property 29 Appendix A: List of Train Companies to which the National Rail Conditions of Travel apply as at 5 August 2018 30 Appendix B: Definitions 31 Appendix C: Code of Practice: Arrangements for interview meetings with applicants in connection with duplicate season tickets 33 These National Rail Conditions of Travel apply from 5 August 2018. Any reference to the National Rail Conditions of Carriage on websites, Tickets, publications etc. refers to these National Rail Conditions of Travel. Part A: A summary of the Conditions The terms and conditions of these National Rail Conditions of Travel are set out below in Part C to Part H (the “Conditions”). They comprise the binding contract that comes into effect between you and the Train Companies1 that provide scheduled rail services on the National Rail Network, when you purchase a Ticket. This summary provides a quick overview of the key responsibilities of Train Companies and passengers contained in the contract. It is important, however, that you read the Conditions if you want a full understanding of the responsibilities of Train Companies and passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices
    Long Term Planning Process West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices August 2017 Contents August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 02 Technical Appendices 03 A1 - Midlands Rail Hub: Central Birmingham 04 elements A2 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 11 Nottingham/Leicester elements A3 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 17 Worcester/Hereford via Bromsgrove elements A4 - Chiltern Route 24 A5 - Birmingham to Leamington Spa via 27 Coventry A6 - Passenger capacity at stations 30 A7 - Business Case analysis 50 Technical Appendicies August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 03 Introduction to Technical Appendices Cost estimation These Technical Appendices provide the technical evidence to Cost estimates have been prepared for interventions or packages of support the conclusions and choices for funders presented in the interventions proposed in the Route Study. The estimates are based main Route Study document. The areas of technical analysis on the pre-GRIP data available, concept drawings and high level outlined in these appendices are capability analysis, concept specification of the intervention scope. To reflect the level of development (at pre-GRIP level), cost estimation, business case information available to support the estimate production, a analysis and passenger capacity analysis at stations. contingency sum of 60% has been added. The estimates do not include inflation. Indicative cost ranges have been provided based The appendices are presented by geographical area with the on this assessment. exception of the business case analysis and passenger capacity analysis. Business case analysis The areas of technical analysis are summarised below. Business case analysis has been undertaken to demonstrate to funders whether a potential investment option is affordable and Capability Analysis offers value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Fosbr Newsletter Number 88 May 2015 Highlighting Pilning's “Ghost”
    FoSBR Newsletter Number 88 May 2015 Highlighting Pilning’s “ghost” train service On Saturday 21st March Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) invited local rail users to join them in riding a “parliamentary service” from Pilning railway station. A “parliamentary train” is a token service, run to avoid the cost of formal closure of a railway station. In the case of Pilning, this ghost service is provided by two trains on a Saturday, the 08:32 to Bristol Temple Meads and the 15:41 to Newport. 15 FOSBR members & friends took a roundabout route to Pilning, riding the “Beach Line” to Severn Beach and walking across fields and lanes to lunch at The Plough in Pilning. FOSBR then caught the westbound “parliamentary train” under the River Severn to Newport. In Newport the disabled lift was out of action so station staff helpfully re- platformed the next train to allow our colleague David to board the eastbound Bristol train in his wheelchair. This train provided a fleeting glimpse of Pilning station sleeping peacefully for another week. Pilning is only 2 miles from Severn Beach, Severn Beach station being convenient for a large number of local residents. Until 1964 the railway from Severn Beach continued north to Redwick Halt to loop around to join the South Wales Main Line via Pilning Low Level 1 station. Pilning station has massive potential for passengers in view of planned commercial developments nearby at West Gate, Western Approach and Central Park - covering many of the fields across which we walked. These new premises could employ 10,000+ workers in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Market Review Consultation on the Potential Impacts of Regulation and Industry Arrangements and Practices for Ticket Selling
    Retail market review Consultation on the potential impacts of regulation and industry arrangements and practices for ticket selling September 2014 Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 10 Purpose of the document 10 Why we are reviewing the regulations and industry arrangements and practices for ticket selling 11 Scope of the Review 12 Approach to the Review 13 Structure of the document 14 Questions for Chapter 1 15 2. Rail ticket buying and selling practices 16 Introduction 16 Ticket buying trends in rail 16 Ticket selling behaviour in rail 18 Questions for Chapter 2 22 3. The regulation and industry arrangements and practices for selling tickets 24 Introduction 24 Retailers’ incentives to sell tickets 25 Obligations on retailers to facilitate an integrated, national network 26 Governance arrangements in retailing 29 Industry rules 32 Industry processes and systems 34 Question for Chapter 3 37 4. The impact of retailers’ incentives and of retailers’ obligations to facilitate an integrated, national network 38 Introduction 38 The impact of retailers’ incentives in selling tickets 38 The impact of obligations on retailers to facilitate an integrated, national network 40 Questions for Chapter 4 44 5. The impact of industry governance, rules, processes, and systems 45 Introduction 45 The impact of industry governance arrangements 45 Office of Rail Regulation | September 2014 | Retail market review consultation 2 10866832 The impact of industry rules 47 The impact of industry processes and systems 52 Questions for Chapter 5 58 6. Emerging
    [Show full text]
  • Disabled Persons Railcard Renewal Form
    Disabled Persons Railcard Renewal Form Sorest Sasha usually awakes some accuser or retreat foggily. Westleigh is imperial and preplanning facetiously while unpraiseworthy Sammie beetling and burthen. Unexceptionable Julian never repelling so progressively or hurrah any sower restrictively. What vengeance the benefits to the new american fare names? Am renewing your disability and disabilities and disabled. You can save even stop travelling on sleeper services and sir i bought for. Loss of disability certificate for renewal form and renew your new experiences for the person? Free protection for all shopping! Can renew your disability living components, there might impact on your safekeeping and disabilities. Mint and renew. The railcard does not become company property change if requested must be handed into Transport for Wales. Combine Omio Tickets with A Railcard Omio. National Rail ticket office and surface your ticket. You renew your disabled persons railcard as little while the renewing an application and disabilities into a priority is. Some solid card services, after contacting us, refused a driving licence or certain medical grounds. The applicant will need being present a copy of several award letter. You renew it is disabled persons railcard discount as defined by uk driving licence number when you must enter as soon as one on buses and disabilities. When I upload my rut of eligibility nothing appears to happen? Use the online Railcard renewal process image make sure they have buy discount. This process allows you travel pass website to free alerts from time to! When you renew your form of time you can i claim a person named people with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT V1.0
    FINAL REPORT v1.0 DfT - TRANSPORT DIRECT Project Support & Consultancy Services Framework FareXChange Scoping Study Project Reference - TDT / 129 June 2006 Prepared By: Prepared For: Carl Bro Group Ltd, Transport Direct Bracton House Department for Transport 34-36 High Holborn Zones 1/F18 - 1/F20 LONDON WC1V6AE Ashdown House 123 Victoria Street LONDON SW1E 6DE Tel: +44 (0)20 71901697 Fax: +44 (0)20 71901698 Email: [email protected] www.carlbro.com DfT Transport Direct FareXChange Scoping Study CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY __________________________________________________ 6 1 INTRODUCTION ___________________________________________________ 10 1.1 __ What is FareXChange? _____________________________________ 10 1.2 __ Background _______________________________________________ 10 1.3 __ Scoping Study Objectives ____________________________________ 11 1.4 __ Acknowledgments __________________________________________ 11 2 CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH ___________________________________ 12 2.1 __ Who we consulted _________________________________________ 12 2.2 __ How we consulted __________________________________________ 12 2.3 __ Overview of Results ________________________________________ 12 3 THE FARE SETTING PROCESS AND THE ROLES OF INTERESTED PARTIES _____________________________________________________________ 14 3.1 __ The Actors _______________________________________________ 14 3.2 __ Fare Stages and Fares Tables ________________________________ 16 3.3 __ Flat and Zonal Fares ________________________________________ 17
    [Show full text]
  • Publicity Material List
    Early Guides and Publicity Material Inventory Type Company Title Author Date Notes Location No. Guidebook Cambrian Railway Tours in Wales c 1900 Front cover not there 2000-7019 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook Furness Railway The English Lakeland 1911 2000-7027 ALS5/49/A/1 Travel Guide Cambrian & Mid-Wales Railway Gossiping Guide to Wales 1870 1999-7701 ALS5/49/A/1 The English Lakeland: the Paradise of Travel Guide Furness Railway 1916 1999-7700 ALS5/49/A/1 Tourists Guidebook Furness Railway Illustrated Guide Golding, F 1905 2000-7032 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook North Staffordshire Railway Waterhouses and the Manifold Valley 1906 Card bookmark 2001-7197 ALS5/49/A/1 The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Inscribed "To Aman Mosley"; signature of Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1908 1999-8072 ALS5/29/A/1 Staffordshire Railway chairman of NSR The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Moores, Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1891 1999-8083 ALS5/49/A/1 Staffordshire Railway George Travel Guide Maryport & Carlisle Railway The Borough Guides: No 522 1911 1999-7712 ALS5/29/A/1 Travel Guide London & North Western Railway Programme of Tours in North Wales 1883 1999-7711 ALS5/29/A/1 Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7680 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7681 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales,
    [Show full text]
  • PERSONAL and CONFIDENTIAL 3N the Rt Hon Margaret Thatcher MP
    PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL DEPARTML.0 k 2 MARSHAN1 STREET LONDc. S;VriP 3n The Rt Hon Margaret Thatcher MP 2 2 December 1982 FIVE-YEAR FCRWARD LOOK In response to your letter of 16 September I am submitting my report on a "forward look" at my Department's programmes for the next five years. We have already taken some major steps: National Freight Company Limited privatised Express bus services deregulated virtually all motorway service areas sold design of motorway and trunk road schemes transferred to the private sector more competitive tendering for local road works We have action immediately in hand now to: privatise British Transport Docks Board privatise heavy goods vehicle and bus testing privatise British Rail hotels contain subsidies to public transport in London and other metropolitan areas, and open the way to more private sector operators PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL 1 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL In the next Parliament we should: tackle the major issues of railway policy, following the Serpell report set up a new structure for public transport in London and push ahead with the break-up of the large public transport monolith here and in other cities introduce private capital into the National Bus Company sweep away unnecessary barriers to innovations in rural transport bring the ports to stand on their own feet, and tackle the National Dock Labour Scheme. Throughout the period we must maintain and if possible increase the level of worthwhile investment in roads to meet growing demand. In particular, we should: complete the national motorway and trunk road network to satisfactory standards as quickly as possible keep up the momentum in building by-passes to take heavy traffic away from communities These aims will nequire a commitment of capital funds through the 1960s, with private finance, if possible, providing a source of additional money.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Stories
    Looking back Loco-spotting BR remembered... You couldn’t pass through a large station in the Fifties and Sixties without seeing a gaggle of school-uniformed boys (never girls) at the platform end scribbling down engine numbers. years on Tens of thousands of boys spent all their 70 spare time and pocket money in pursuit of elusive locomotives. Today, the rather sneering Railway writer and former editor of Steam World magazine Barry McLoughlin N O T description ‘anorak’ is frequently applied to E L T T celebrates the 70th anniversary of the formation of British Railways trainspotters. And yes, we did wear anoraks and E N L we usually carried duffel bags crammed with Tizer U A P bottles and sandwiches. © RITAIN’S RAILWAY network used economic forces – most importantly, the railway technology, branding, marketing For my fellow ‘gricers’ and me, our favourite There’s no mistaking the huge BR B be a vast adventure playground for massive expansion of road travel. and organisation. spotting location wasn’t at a station but by the double-arrow logo on the side of this Class my group of friends during our It’s easy to become misty-eyed As with the NHS – founded in the same busy West Coast Main Line just south of 37 diesel – one of the more successful of teenage trainspotting expeditions. about BR: it wasn’t all gleaming green year – it was a substantial achievement Warrington. From our vantage point near the the Modernisation Plan locomotives – on an In the Sixties we scaled signals and bridges, engines, spotless ‘blood and custard’ after six years of total war.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Transport for Disabled People
    House of Commons Transport Committee Access to transport for disabled people Fifth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/transcom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 9 September 2013 HC 116 [Incorporating HC 1002, Session 2012-13] Published on 17 September 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £22.00 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Sarah Champion (Labour, Rotherham) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Karen Lumley (Conservative, Redditch) Jason McCartney (Conservative, Colne Valley) Karl McCartney (Conservative, Lincoln) Lucy Powell (Labour/Co-operative, Manchester Central) Mr Adrian Sanders (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Martin Vickers (Conservative, Cleethorpes) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe), Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton), Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South), Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South), Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West), Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North), Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne), Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard, (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys), Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South), Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge), Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter Phd 2013
    “Development of Innovative Approaches for Life Extension of Railway Track Systems” Acknowledgement The author appreciates the guidance and support of Professor Abid Abutair as Director of Studies, Dr David Tann as Academic Supervisor and Andy Franklin from Network Rail as Industrial Supervisor. The author would also like to thank Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd., The Office of Rail Regulation, Carillion PLC, Railcare SE, Sersa-UK Ltd., Zollner-UK Ltd., Bridgeway Consulting Ltd. and their sub-contractors for permission to take photographs and publicise activities. PhD by Portfolio Thesis Brian Counter Development of Innovative Approaches for June 2013 Life Extension of Railway Track Systems in the UK University of South Wales Page 1 of 147 Summary This is a PhD Thesis by portfolio and is the output of research, development and the practical application of processes for railway track asset management in the UK between 2004 and 2013 and the subsequent development of innovative solutions. There are two major sections to the portfolio; firstly the background, literature review and development phases; and secondly two specific projects. The projects consisted of major works on the UK West Coast Main Line and targeted schemes involving Eurostar and Humberside. The author is a chartered civil engineer and has spent the whole of his career (32 years) in railway civil engineering mainly in design, maintenance and management and culminating in undergraduate and postgraduate teaching. Railway Infrastructure Life Extension is a specialist area that has not been studied before in this depth and was initially related to specific problem solving. However, it is now clearly accepted that UK railway privatisation was a success and after passenger journeys increased by 80% in the period 1996 to 2012, there was substantial strain upon the infrastructure.
    [Show full text]