Life Stories

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Life Stories Looking back Loco-spotting BR remembered... You couldn’t pass through a large station in the Fifties and Sixties without seeing a gaggle of school-uniformed boys (never girls) at the platform end scribbling down engine numbers. years on Tens of thousands of boys spent all their 70 spare time and pocket money in pursuit of elusive locomotives. Today, the rather sneering Railway writer and former editor of Steam World magazine Barry McLoughlin N O T description ‘anorak’ is frequently applied to E L T T celebrates the 70th anniversary of the formation of British Railways trainspotters. And yes, we did wear anoraks and E N L we usually carried duffel bags crammed with Tizer U A P bottles and sandwiches. © RITAIN’S RAILWAY network used economic forces – most importantly, the railway technology, branding, marketing For my fellow ‘gricers’ and me, our favourite There’s no mistaking the huge BR B be a vast adventure playground for massive expansion of road travel. and organisation. spotting location wasn’t at a station but by the double-arrow logo on the side of this Class my group of friends during our It’s easy to become misty-eyed As with the NHS – founded in the same busy West Coast Main Line just south of 37 diesel – one of the more successful of teenage trainspotting expeditions. about BR: it wasn’t all gleaming green year – it was a substantial achievement Warrington. From our vantage point near the the Modernisation Plan locomotives – on an In the Sixties we scaled signals and bridges, engines, spotless ‘blood and custard’ after six years of total war. Twelve Arches bridge, we could see expresses excursion to Blackpool last year climbed into goods wagons, put coins on the (red and cream) carriages and smiling hurtling down the incline from the viaduct over the N The birth of BR I tracks… it was daft and dangerous but we porters. Like any massive organisation, it Manchester Ship Canal. On the other side, L compared with what would happen under H G were young and had to find something to do could be bureaucratic, inflexible The Thirties have been called the golden meanwhile, shunting engines fussed about in the U the Good Doctor after 1963. O L C marshalling yards at Arpley and Walton. It was a M during lulls between trains. and sometimes uncaring, and many age of Britain’s railways, with sleek, stylish As for traction, steam was still seen Y R trainspotters’ paradise. R Such activities would, rightly, attract the of its engines were scruffy, smelly high-speed trains on the main routes and A as the answer. In 1951 the BTC B attention of the British Transport Police and unreliable. an astonishingly diverse network of lesser And the key to this paradise was a small but © authorised the production of a dozen new today, but somehow this seemed a more Yet it inspired a camaraderie among lines. Under the so-called ‘Big Four’ chunky book: the Ian Allan abc Combined Volume More British Railways station signs at the classes of so-called ‘standard’ steam innocent era – the era of British Railways. both its workforce and users… and – railway companies, however, there was of British Railways Locomotives . In this we preserved Ribble Steam Railway in Preston locomotives to rejuvenate the antiquated Although it lasted less than 50 years albeit very remotely – it belonged to all of also much needless duplication meticulously underlined our ‘cops’, compared fleet. With hindsight, this decision turned from its foundation on January 1, 1948, us. You didn’t, for instance, have to worry and competition for business. them with our comrades and, like anglers, began the massive process of rebranding its out to be folly: steam traction on the main BR will have been a formative fixture in whether your ticket only allowed you to The Second World War put paid to all bemoaned the ‘ones that got away’. thousands of locomotives, carriages, goods line had disappeared by the summer of the lives of many Choice readers. travel on a certain operator’s trains. that. From August 30, 1939 the network was The craze survived the transition from steam wagons and stations. 1968 and some of the new locomotives – The butt of jokes about everything from its British Railways was a flawed but fully effectively nationalised under the control of to diesel and electric but most trains today are Harder to reform was the railways’ efficient and modern by steam standards infamously curly sandwiches to late-running integrated national network, unlike the Railway Executive Committee. what is known as ‘multiple units’ – instead of culture: the Big Four companies had – had a working life of barely a decade. being pulled by a locomotive, they are just a trains, BR nevertheless kept the railway on an today’s fragmented regiment of The war left the always jealously guarded their ‘patches’, Happily, however, a fine selection of them series of carriages with an engine underneath. even keel at a time when it was in decline as competing companies. railways nearly and the six new BR regions – London are now still working on preserved lines. Coupled with security fears and health and safety a result of social, demographic and And despite rail being seen in the Sixties Midland, Eastern, North Eastern, laws, it’s made trainspotting the preserve of a The Modernisation Plan and Seventies as outmoded and evocative of dedicated band of mainly adult enthusiasts. Western, Southern and Scottish – were in Below: With the early ‘cycling lion’ emblem the Victorian era, BR pioneered some some ways re-creations of the pre-war As the growth of the road network on its tender, and the dignified lined black important developments in situation. As late as the Sixties, BR continued to eat into railway revenues, livery of BR mixed-traffic locomotives, bankrupt, with locomotives and enginemen would still refer to particularly on the freight side, BR’s preserved ‘Black Five’ No 45407 The infrastructure devastated. However, the locomotives from other regions working finances remained precarious and in N O Lancashire Fusilier stands at Bury Bolton T E L wartime nationalisation had shown how a in their areas as ‘foreigners’. 1955 it posted its first operating loss. T T Street Station on the East Lancashire E N unified system could pull all the railway’s BR was bequeathed an incredibly The BTC grasped the nettle by L Railway. It is ‘double-heading’ a train of U A P disparate strands together, and Clement diverse collection of rolling stock, some publishing its much-vaunted Modernisation © mixed ‘Rail Blue’ and BR maroon carriages Attlee’s triumphant Labour government of dating back to the Victorian era, and Plan early in 1955. It proposed investment 1945, with its radical programme of public around 20,000 route miles of track. Many of more than £1.2bn – £25bn today – in a ownership of vital industries, saw no reason of these were overlapping and 15-year drive to revive the railways’ fortunes to change things. competing, a legacy of the days before the with new locomotives, rolling stock, The Transport Act of 1947 received Big Four were created in 1923. particularly for goods trains, track royal assent in August that year, and put Another major problem was the massive electrification and signalling. the war-ravaged railways under the network of secondary and branch lines, Just four years after the authorisation of control of a new British Transport with tiny stations, some of which were the new standard steam locomotives, the Commission (BTC). used by only a handful of passengers every report recommended the rapid British Railways came into being on day. Competition from the expanding bus replacement of steam by thousands of New Year’s Day 1948, inheriting a vast network was putting a further strain on new electric or diesel trains. The new enterprise that also included subsidiary their profitability. In the 15 years before diesels that began to appear were a shock for businesses such as shipping, ports, road the Beeching Report, some 3000 route a generation brought up with romantic but haulage and even hotels. It immediately miles were axed, though this was nothing smelly and smoke-shrouded steam engines. t 78 CHOICE FEBRUARY 2018 FEBRUARY 2018 CHOICE 79 Looking back infamous report on the ‘Reshaping of privatised railway industry of the 21st routes electrified included the East Coast, The fires go out on steam N O British Railways’. century. Indeed, one of the main South Western and Great Eastern Main I T C E Fifty years ago this summer, in August 1968, the L The statistics were telling. In 1938, fewer criticisms aimed at him is that he failed to Lines. Coupled with an intensive TV L O C final main line steam locomotives ran on BR. than two million private cars were registered; take into account the social value of the advertising campaign, the ‘Sparks Effect’ D R A Steam had powered Britain’s railways for 150 K by 1961 there were around six million, and railways. Post-Beeching, the railway attracted thousands of new passengers to C I P years and BR had inherited some 20,000 steam D road haulage had grabbed more than 40 per rumbled along, with its market share the electrified network. R A N locomotives; now there were none. R cent of what had once been a railway being steadily eroded by road transport. One much-publicised mis-step, E B As the BR board sought to modernise the © monopoly. The railway’s problems were Critics claimed it was in a period of however, was the tilting Advanced In the days before high-vis clothing, a compounded by a spate of industrial action, ‘managed decline’, an acceptance that Passenger Train, introduced in the early railways’ image, it had dramatically telescoped the group of BR workers takes a break outside caused by poor labour relations.
Recommended publications
  • Rural Railways
    House of Commons Transport Committee Rural Railways Fifth Report of Session 2004–05 Volume I HC 169-I House of Commons Transport Committee Rural Railways Fifth Report of Session 2004–05 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 March 2005 HC 169-I Published on 15 March 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody MP (Labour, Crewe) (Chairman) Mr Jeffrey M Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr Brian H. Donohoe MP (Labour, Cunninghame South) Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) Ian Lucas MP (Labour, Wrexham) Miss Anne McIntosh MP (Conservative, Vale of York) Mr Paul Marsden MP (Liberal Democrat, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Mr John Randall MP (Conservative, Uxbridge) Mr George Stevenson MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent South) Mr Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/transcom.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Queasy Rider:' the Failure of the Advanced Passenger Train
    ‘Queasy Rider:’ The Failure of the Advanced Passenger Train. A dissertation submitted by 0529050 Benjamin Robert Goodwin as part of the requirements for the degree of B.A. with Honours in Medieval and Modern History. February 2006. 1 ‘Queasy Rider:’ The Failure of the Advanced Passenger Train. Contents. Abbreviations and Acronyms………………………………………………3 Introduction………………………………………………………………....4 Chapter One – Technical Problems…………………………………………9 Chapter Two – Inadequate Management…………………………………..23 Chapter Three – The Intervention of the Government and the Media………………………………………………...38 Conclusion………………………………………………………………….52 Appendix…………………………………………………………………...56 Bibliography………………………………………………………………..59 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………...…64 Frontispiece: The prototype APT-P (370001) sits in the yard at the Derby Test Centre, June 1978. Only one half of the train is seen here. Source: BR Publicity Photograph 2 Abbreviations and Acronyms AAPT Advanced American Passenger Train AGT Advanced Ground Transport APT Advanced Passenger Train APT-E Advanced Passenger Train Experimental APT-P Advanced Passenger Train Prototype APT-S Advanced Passenger Train Squadron ASLEF Associated Society of Locomotive Steam Enginemen and Firemen BR British Rail BRB British Rail Board BREL British Rail Engineering Limited CM & EE Chief Mechanical and Electrical Engineer’s Department TGV Train á Grande Vitesse WCML West Coast Mainline 3 Introduction When the Advanced Passenger Train (APT) was immobilised formally in 1987, all three prototype rakes were dismantled save one half set; numbered 370003. Visitors to The Railway Age, Crewe, can now visit this relic. Incongruously, the train that was once described by early enthusiasts as ‘the Concorde of the rails’ is now used to host children’s parties at the aforementioned visitor centre.1 If you’ll excuse the pun, British Rail saw the Advanced Passenger Train Project as a piece of birthday cake, yet it merely ended as the insipid icing.
    [Show full text]
  • Publicity Material List
    Early Guides and Publicity Material Inventory Type Company Title Author Date Notes Location No. Guidebook Cambrian Railway Tours in Wales c 1900 Front cover not there 2000-7019 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook Furness Railway The English Lakeland 1911 2000-7027 ALS5/49/A/1 Travel Guide Cambrian & Mid-Wales Railway Gossiping Guide to Wales 1870 1999-7701 ALS5/49/A/1 The English Lakeland: the Paradise of Travel Guide Furness Railway 1916 1999-7700 ALS5/49/A/1 Tourists Guidebook Furness Railway Illustrated Guide Golding, F 1905 2000-7032 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook North Staffordshire Railway Waterhouses and the Manifold Valley 1906 Card bookmark 2001-7197 ALS5/49/A/1 The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Inscribed "To Aman Mosley"; signature of Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1908 1999-8072 ALS5/29/A/1 Staffordshire Railway chairman of NSR The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Moores, Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1891 1999-8083 ALS5/49/A/1 Staffordshire Railway George Travel Guide Maryport & Carlisle Railway The Borough Guides: No 522 1911 1999-7712 ALS5/29/A/1 Travel Guide London & North Western Railway Programme of Tours in North Wales 1883 1999-7711 ALS5/29/A/1 Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7680 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7681 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales,
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of High Speed 2
    HOUSE OF LORDS Economic Affairs Committee 1st Report of Session 2014‒15 The Economics of High Speed 2 Ordered to be printed 10 March 2015 and published 25 March 2015 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 134 Select Committee on Economic Affairs The Economic Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Lords in each session “to consider economic affairs”. Membership The Members of the Select Committee on Economic Affairs are: Baroness Blackstone Lord Carrington of Fulham Lord Griffiths of Fforestfach Lord Hollick (Chairman) Lord Lawson of Blaby Lord May of Oxford Lord McFall of Alcluith Lord Monks Lord Rowe-Beddoe Lord Shipley Lord Skidelsky Lord Smith of Clifton Baroness Wheatcroft Declaration of interests See Appendix 1 A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests Publications All publications of the Committee are available at: http://www.parliament.uk/hleconomicaffairs Parliament Live Live coverage of debates and public sessions of the Committee’s meetings are available at: http://www.parliamentlive.tv Further information Further information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords Committee staff The staff who worked on this inquiry were Robert Whiteway (Clerk), Ben McNamee (Policy Analyst), Stephanie Johnson (Committee Assistant) and Oswin Taylor (Committee Assistant). Contact details All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Economic Affairs Committee, Committee Office, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSONAL and CONFIDENTIAL 3N the Rt Hon Margaret Thatcher MP
    PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL DEPARTML.0 k 2 MARSHAN1 STREET LONDc. S;VriP 3n The Rt Hon Margaret Thatcher MP 2 2 December 1982 FIVE-YEAR FCRWARD LOOK In response to your letter of 16 September I am submitting my report on a "forward look" at my Department's programmes for the next five years. We have already taken some major steps: National Freight Company Limited privatised Express bus services deregulated virtually all motorway service areas sold design of motorway and trunk road schemes transferred to the private sector more competitive tendering for local road works We have action immediately in hand now to: privatise British Transport Docks Board privatise heavy goods vehicle and bus testing privatise British Rail hotels contain subsidies to public transport in London and other metropolitan areas, and open the way to more private sector operators PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL 1 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL In the next Parliament we should: tackle the major issues of railway policy, following the Serpell report set up a new structure for public transport in London and push ahead with the break-up of the large public transport monolith here and in other cities introduce private capital into the National Bus Company sweep away unnecessary barriers to innovations in rural transport bring the ports to stand on their own feet, and tackle the National Dock Labour Scheme. Throughout the period we must maintain and if possible increase the level of worthwhile investment in roads to meet growing demand. In particular, we should: complete the national motorway and trunk road network to satisfactory standards as quickly as possible keep up the momentum in building by-passes to take heavy traffic away from communities These aims will nequire a commitment of capital funds through the 1960s, with private finance, if possible, providing a source of additional money.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter Phd 2013
    “Development of Innovative Approaches for Life Extension of Railway Track Systems” Acknowledgement The author appreciates the guidance and support of Professor Abid Abutair as Director of Studies, Dr David Tann as Academic Supervisor and Andy Franklin from Network Rail as Industrial Supervisor. The author would also like to thank Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd., The Office of Rail Regulation, Carillion PLC, Railcare SE, Sersa-UK Ltd., Zollner-UK Ltd., Bridgeway Consulting Ltd. and their sub-contractors for permission to take photographs and publicise activities. PhD by Portfolio Thesis Brian Counter Development of Innovative Approaches for June 2013 Life Extension of Railway Track Systems in the UK University of South Wales Page 1 of 147 Summary This is a PhD Thesis by portfolio and is the output of research, development and the practical application of processes for railway track asset management in the UK between 2004 and 2013 and the subsequent development of innovative solutions. There are two major sections to the portfolio; firstly the background, literature review and development phases; and secondly two specific projects. The projects consisted of major works on the UK West Coast Main Line and targeted schemes involving Eurostar and Humberside. The author is a chartered civil engineer and has spent the whole of his career (32 years) in railway civil engineering mainly in design, maintenance and management and culminating in undergraduate and postgraduate teaching. Railway Infrastructure Life Extension is a specialist area that has not been studied before in this depth and was initially related to specific problem solving. However, it is now clearly accepted that UK railway privatisation was a success and after passenger journeys increased by 80% in the period 1996 to 2012, there was substantial strain upon the infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Rests with Its Author
    University of Bath PHD Management strategy and labour relations on British Rail Pendleton, Andrew Award date: 1986 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 08. Oct. 2021 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND LABOUR RELATIONS ON BRITISH RAIL Submitted by Andrew Pendleton for the degree of Ph.D of the University of Bath 1986 COPYRIGHT "Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with its author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published wihout the prior written consent of the author".
    [Show full text]
  • Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: Analysis, Recommendations and Conclusions 28Th February 2011
    RAIL VALUE FOR MONEY STUDY DfT / ORR Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: analysis, recommendations and conclusions 28th February 2011 research project on fares RAIL VALUE FOR MONEY STUDY DfT / ORR Research Project on Fares Contract No: NRP10026 Final Report: analysis, recommendations and conclusions 28th February 2011 research project on fares Prepared for: Prepared by: Rail Value for Money Study Steer Davies Gleave 5th Floor 28-32 Upper Ground 55 Victoria Street London London SE1 9PD SW1H 0EU +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Although this report was commissioned jointly by the Department for Transport (DfT) and the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR), the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the DfT and the ORR. While the DfT and the ORR have made all reasonable efforts to ensure the information in this document is accurate, the DfT and the ORR do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the infor- mation or guidance this document contains. Department for Transport Office of Rail Regulation Great Minster House 1 Kemble Street 76 Marsham Street London London SW1P 4DR WC2B 4AN Telephone: 0300 330 3000 Telephone: 020 7282 2000 Website: www.dft.gov.uk Website: www.rail-reg.gov.uk © Crown copyright, 2011, except where otherwise stated You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Discursive Story-Lines During Socio-Technical Transitions
    The University of Manchester Research The evolution of discursive story-lines during socio- technical transitions: An analytical model applied to British and American road and rail transport during the twentieth century. Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Roberts, J. C. (2015). The evolution of discursive story-lines during socio-technical transitions: An analytical model applied to British and American road and rail transport during the twentieth century. University of Manchester. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:10. Oct. 2021 The evolution of discursive story-lines during socio-technical transitions: An analytical model applied to British and American road and rail transport during the twentieth century. A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the Degree of PhD in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 John Cameron Dinsmore Roberts Alliance Manchester Business School 3 Cameron Roberts, 2015 Contents Contents.............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Sheffield Hallam University Thesis
    Railways, land-use planning and urban development : 1948-94. HAYWOOD, Russell. Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/19777/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/19777/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. Fines are charged at 50p per hour 2 4 SEP 2003 H- I fp M Z\ 2 1 NOV^OP ProQuest Number: 10697079 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10697079 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Railways, Land-Use Planning and Urban Development: 1948-94 Russell Haywood A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2001 Thanks Many people and organisations have provided me with help and support over the five years or so that I have been carrying out this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Responses
    Passenger rail services: competition policy project – consultation responses Contents Page Background ................................................................................................................ 4 PART A: Responses to the CMA’s July 2015 consultation on the possibilities for greater competition between train operators in Great Britain’s passenger rail services ............................................................................................................... 5 1. Industry ................................................................................................................ 5 Arriva ............................................................................................................... 5 First Group....................................................................................................... 5 Stagecoach...................................................................................................... 5 Network Rail .................................................................................................... 5 RDG ................................................................................................................ 5 2. Government and regulators ................................................................................. 5 Department for Transport ................................................................................ 5 ORR ................................................................................................................ 5 Transport
    [Show full text]
  • HS2”, Which Would Be the Second Purpose-Built High- Speed Railway in the British Isles (HS1 Being the Line from London to the Channel Tunnel)
    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________17RA16E Railways and civilization In the UK there is currently a great deal of debate about “HS2”, which would be the second purpose-built high- speed railway in the British Isles (HS1 being the line from London to the Channel Tunnel). It is one of three big infrastructure projects under consideration, the other two being the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station and London airport expansion. HS2 would require by far the biggest investment, conservatively almost 60,000 million pounds sterling, whereas the other two are estimated to cost around 20,000 million pounds each (that is the cost of expanding Heathrow; Gatwick would be about half that but the cost of building a brand-new airport in the inner Thames estuary could exceed that of HS2). Whereas Figure 1. Birmingham Snow Hill station ( British Railways’ France, with a population density less than half that of the Western Region) in 1957. United Kingdom, has actively developed its equivalent programme of trains à grande vitesse (TGV) for the It is above all in the lack of breadth and long-term past 35 years, it is a much harder decision for crowded vision that the deficiencies of the Beeching report are most Britain to take. Hence, whereas the TGV costs about 7 apparent. As Lord Stonham remarked,1 “Dr Beeching million pounds per km to build, HS2 is projected to cost was not allowed to spare a thought for the economy of about 10 times more. Furthermore, even now Britain has the country as a whole”. Since Beeching was a physicist, a much denser (per unit land area) conventional rail one might have thought that would have had some network than France (and 50 years ago it was about appreciation of the nature of a system, which the railway twice what it is today), and it is presently the trend to is par excellence (implying that one cannot remove parts reopen, or consider reopening, parts of the former network.
    [Show full text]