DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 by ANDREW SEEDHOUSE a Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 by ANDREW SEEDHOUSE a Thesis University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2013 A Critical Evaluation of Community Rail Policy and Practice During the New Labour Years 2003 - 2010 Seedhouse, Andrew Colin http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1550 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF COMMUNITY RAIL POLICY AND PRACTICE DURING THE NEW LABOUR YEARS 2003 - 2010 by ANDREW SEEDHOUSE A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth In partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science Faculty of Science and Technology In collaboration with the Department for Transport NOVEMBER 2012 Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author's prior consent. 2 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the separate but interlinked issues of changing governance processes and the delivery of Community Rail policy and outcomes in addressing the primary research aim ‘To consider how changing governance environments introduced under New Labour, compromised or assisted the successful delivery of the Community Rail Development Strategy’. The history of Community Rail policy development and application is explored, leading to the publication in 2004 of the Community Rail Development Strategy (the 2004 Strategy). The process of governance and the academic literature detailing its changing application and form across the scalar range is considered, as is the rise of the neoliberal approach to governance favoured by recent administrations. The thesis then explores New Labour’s introduction of the Third Way and the revised approach to the renamed third sector, a space where a high number of Community Rail Partnerships (CRPs) engage. To test the primary research aim and four core research objectives, a multi-methodological approach is applied combining desk-based quantitative analysis to determine a sample set of CRPs for the fieldwork, with qualitative semi-structured interviews of actors engaged in the case study areas. The processes behind these decisions are examined in Chapter 4. Having selected the case study areas, an empirical overview of the transport planning policies of actor members of the CRPs is undertaken, as well as a visual and audio station audit. The research then considers the place of the 2004 Strategy within this wider transport planning policy landscape at all tiers of regional and sub-regional government, and concludes that not all tiers of local government appear as engaged as others. The resurgent approach to localism is then examined, and the role of Local 3 Strategic Partnerships is considered to determine the level of current CRP engagement and opportunity for enhanced integration to deliver the 2004 Strategy and wider outcomes. The research demonstrates a high level of correlation between CRP activities and alignment to core designated national indicators which make up the current performance management processes for Local Strategic Partnership members including the local authorities. The research then examines the importance of a CRPs own approach to governance, the role of core individuals and the importance of core actor engagement to support a stable platform for delivering successful Strategy outputs and outcomes. It concludes by identifying where CRPs currently engage in the wider policy environment and recommends national policy options to improve on outcome delivery for individual CRPs and their actor members. 4 CONTENTS Page No LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ 12 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. 13 LIST OF APPENDICES ......................................................................................................... 13 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................... 14 DECLARATION ................................................................................................................... 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................... 18 CHAPTER 1: Introduction ............................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2: Partnerships, Governance and a New Approach to Localism ................... 28 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 28 2.2 Governance and Scale .......................................................................................... 29 2.2.1 Defining Governance ................................................................................. 29 2.2.2 Metagovernance ....................................................................................... 31 2.2.3 Scale, Spatiality, and Territorisation.......................................................... 32 2.2.4 New State Spaces and Geographies of Governance ................................. 34 2.2.5 Hollowing Out and Filling In ...................................................................... 36 2.3 The Changing Approach to Governance within the UK ....................................... 38 2.3.1 The English Question ................................................................................. 38 2.3.2 The Rise of Neoliberal Resource Led Governance .................................... 39 2.3.3 Shifting the Balance from Government to Governance ............................ 42 2.4 New Labour and the Third Way of Governance .................................................. 43 2.4.1 The Third Way ........................................................................................... 44 2.4.2 The Quiet Revolution of the Third Sector ................................................. 45 2.5 Summary ............................................................................................................... 47 CHAPTER 3: Policy Development and Influences on the Community Rail Development Strategy ................................................................................ 50 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 50 3.2 British Railways and the Governance of Post War Branch Lines ........................ 51 3.2.1 Post War Neostatism and the 1947 Transport Act ................................... 51 3.2.2 Reducing Social Obligations and Changing Perceptions of Social Value ... 53 3.2.3 The Reshaping of British Railways ............................................................. 55 5 3.3 New-Welfarism Supporting a Socially Necessary Railway .................................. 57 3.3.1 The 1968 Transport Act - A Wolf in Sheeps Clothing ................................ 57 3.3.2 The 1974 Railway Act, Unified PSO Block and EEC Obligations ............... 58 3.3.3 Quantifying the Social Consequences of Rail Closures ............................. 59 3.4 Internal Hollowing Out of British Railways at a Regional Scale ......................... 60 3.4.1 A Neoliberal Approach to Railway Finance and Sectorisation ................. 60 3.4.2 The Serpell Report ..................................................................................... 62 3.4.3 Closures and Bustitution or Investment and Operational Efficiencies ..... 64 3.4.4 A More Commercially Responsive Railway – the Omega Report ............. 66 3.4.5 Challenging Assumptions and the Value of Partnership Working ............ 67 3.5 Privatisation and Partnerships ............................................................................. 68 3.5.1 Organising for Quality and Support from the Supranational Scale ........... 68 3.5.2 New Opportunities for the Railways ......................................................... 70 3.5.3 New Futures for Rural Rail ........................................................................ 72 3.5.4 What use are Rural Railways? ................................................................... 74 3.6 A New Age, A New Opportunity ......................................................................... 76 3.6.1 The Growth of Community Rail Partnerships and Governance ................ 77 3.6.2 The Association of Community Rail Partnerships (ACoRP) ....................... 78 3.6.3 The 2004 Community Rail Development Strategy Consultation .............. 79 3.6.4 The 2004 Community Rail Development Strategy and the Future of Rail 80 3.7 Summary ............................................................................................................... 83 CHAPTER 4: Methodology ............................................................................................... 88 4.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    176 Exchange (Penzance), Rail Ale Trail, 114 43, 49 Seven Stones pub (St Index Falmouth Art Gallery, Martin’s), 168 Index 101–102 Skinner’s Brewery A Foundry Gallery (Truro), 138 Abbey Gardens (Tresco), 167 (St Ives), 48 Barton Farm Museum Accommodations, 7, 167 Gallery Tresco (New (Lostwithiel), 149 in Bodmin, 95 Gimsby), 167 Beaches, 66–71, 159, 160, on Bryher, 168 Goldfish (Penzance), 49 164, 166, 167 in Bude, 98–99 Great Atlantic Gallery Beacon Farm, 81 in Falmouth, 102, 103 (St Just), 45 Beady Pool (St Agnes), 168 in Fowey, 106, 107 Hayle Gallery, 48 Bedruthan Steps, 15, 122 helpful websites, 25 Leach Pottery, 47, 49 Betjeman, Sir John, 77, 109, in Launceston, 110–111 Little Picture Gallery 118, 147 in Looe, 115 (Mousehole), 43 Bicycling, 74–75 in Lostwithiel, 119 Market House Gallery Camel Trail, 3, 15, 74, in Newquay, 122–123 (Marazion), 48 84–85, 93, 94, 126 in Padstow, 126 Newlyn Art Gallery, Cardinham Woods in Penzance, 130–131 43, 49 (Bodmin), 94 in St Ives, 135–136 Out of the Blue (Maraz- Clay Trails, 75 self-catering, 25 ion), 48 Coast-to-Coast Trail, in Truro, 139–140 Over the Moon Gallery 86–87, 138 Active-8 (Liskeard), 90 (St Just), 45 Cornish Way, 75 Airports, 165, 173 Pendeen Pottery & Gal- Mineral Tramways Amusement parks, 36–37 lery (Pendeen), 46 Coast-to-Coast, 74 Ancient Cornwall, 50–55 Penlee House Gallery & National Cycle Route, 75 Animal parks and Museum (Penzance), rentals, 75, 85, 87, sanctuaries 11, 43, 49, 129 165, 173 Cornwall Wildlife Trust, Round House & Capstan tours, 84–87 113 Gallery (Sennen Cove, Birding,
    [Show full text]
  • The Rail User Express. We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News Items from Groups Around the UK. Please Keep Your C
    September 2019 Welcome to the Rail User Express. RUX is published around the middle of each month. It may be forwarded, or items reproduced in another newsletter (quoting sources). Anyone may request RUX as an email attachment, or opt to be notified when it is posted on the Railfuture (Rf) website. There is no charge for either service. Following GDPR, Railfuture Membership now maintains both lists. Please advise if you no longer wish to receive the newsletter or link, or if you know of anyone who would like to be added. For further details of any of the stories mentioned, please consult the relevant website, or ask the editor for the source material. RUX congratulates Network Rail (NR) for delivering £98million of vital improvements over the late August Bank Holiday weekend. Blessed with fine albeit very hot weather, a 10,500 strong team worked round the clock to finish 448 projects on time, allowing a normal service to resume on the Tuesday. Some projects such as track renewal and the transfer of signalling control will have an immediate benefit; some will enable an improved timetable in December, while others have laid the ground for future developments. But all contribute to the Rf aim of a better railway. Well done! Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line FoFNL is still awaiting news of any improvements, which seems to extend back at least a couple of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Strategy 2006-2011 and Beyond Now We’Removing Informing, Engaging and Inspiring Foreword Essex Rail Strategy – 2006-2011 and Beyond
    Essex Rail Strategy 2006-2011 and Beyond now we’removing informing, engaging and inspiring Foreword Essex Rail Strategy – 2006-2011 and Beyond ‘I cannot think of a higher priority for the County Council than for it to strive to achieve a first class highways and transportation system for all who live in, work in or visit the county of Essex. The challenges in front of us are enormous. Over 130,000 new homes are being proposed for Essex and its borders with surrounding authorities, the travel needs of which will have a direct impact on the transport network in Essex. All aspects of passenger transport will play a key role in delivering this vision. The County Council has therefore produced three daughter strategies to support the Local Transport Plan, focusing on how passenger transport will contribute towards a fully integrated transport network. The Road Passenger Transport, Bus Information and Rail Strategies outline the ways in which we intend to improve the lives of Essex people by addressing traffic growth, road congestion and improving public transport. They contain measures aimed at improving options for travel and access to services to develop a more effective transport network. To produce the strategies the County Council has consulted widely at regional, district and parish level, with key service providers, a wide range of user groups and the general public so that collectively they represent a tangible commitment by Essex County Council to make our County a better place to live and work and to support a decent public transport network. I am committed to delivering a transport system that meets the challenges we face in Essex and look forward to working in partnership with stakeholders to bring about the transformation we now need.’ Councillor Rodney L.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Rail Campaigner Number 48 – March 2020
    Yorkshire Rail Campaigner Number 48 – March 2020 Yorkshire President: Alan Whitehouse: Vice-Presidents: Mike Crowhurst, Alan Williams & Chris Hyomes Trans-Pennine Upgrade Under Threat! By Mark Parry With the proposed trans-Pennine high speed line being supported, we feared the upgrade of the existing line had been quietly forgotten. Transpennine Express new rolling stock at Manchester Piccadilly–Photo by Robert Pritchard The following is a joint press release from our branch and HADRAG: The Halifax & District Rail Action Group; SHRUG: Stalybridge to Huddersfield Rail Users Group; UCVRSTG: Upper Calder Valley Renaissance Sustainable Transport Group. CAMPAIGNERS in West Yorkshire are extremely concerned about lack of progress by the Government and Network Rail on infrastructure proposals that should deliver improvements for travellers in the next few years, including the TransPennine Route Upgrade (TRU). Three rail user groups and the Yorkshire Branch of Railfuture have written to Andrew Haines, Chief Executive of Network Rail, who was recently been quoted as casting doubt on TRU. In a magazine interview (RAIL 897, 29 Jan’2020) Haines had said the scope of TRU could depend on the high-speed rail proposal “Northern Powerhouse Rail” (NPR). The campaigners say NPR is decades away and will not benefit stations on regional routes that desperately need investment now. Continued overleaf… Railfuture, Yorkshire & North West Joint Branch Meeting This meeting has been postponed because of concerns about the Coronavirus. We will contact members later about alterative arrangements. 1 | Railfuture: Yorkshire Rail Campaigner 4 8 – M a r c h 2020 The campaigners have also written to Secretary of State for Transport Grant Shapps MP, and to the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, calling for urgent, overdue projects to go ahead without further delay.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RURAL ECONOMY of NORTH EAST of ENGLAND M Whitby Et Al
    THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND M Whitby et al Centre for Rural Economy Research Report THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST ENGLAND Martin Whitby, Alan Townsend1 Matthew Gorton and David Parsisson With additional contributions by Mike Coombes2, David Charles2 and Paul Benneworth2 Edited by Philip Lowe December 1999 1 Department of Geography, University of Durham 2 Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of the Study 1 1.2 The Regional Context 3 1.3 The Shape of the Report 8 2. THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE REGION 2.1 Land 9 2.2 Water Resources 11 2.3 Environment and Heritage 11 3. THE RURAL WORKFORCE 3.1 Long Term Trends in Employment 13 3.2 Recent Employment Trends 15 3.3 The Pattern of Labour Supply 18 3.4 Aggregate Output per Head 23 4 SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL DYNAMICS 4.1 Distribution of Employment by Gender and Employment Status 25 4.2 Differential Trends in the Remoter Areas and the Coalfield Districts 28 4.3 Commuting Patterns in the North East 29 5 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 Formation and Turnover of Firms 39 5.2 Inward investment 44 5.3 Business Development and Support 46 5.4 Developing infrastructure 49 5.5 Skills Gaps 53 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 55 References Appendices 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The scope of the study This report is on the rural economy of the North East of England1. It seeks to establish the major trends in rural employment and the pattern of labour supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Colchester Borough Local Plan 2017 – 2033
    Publication Draft The Publication Draft stage of the Colchester Borough Local Plan 2017 – 2033 June 2017 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Local Plan: The Process ......................................................................................... 1 National planning guidance ................................................................................. 1 County Level Plans ............................................................................................. 2 Borough Strategies ............................................................................................. 3 Duty to Co-operate .............................................................................................. 3 Evidence Base .................................................................................................... 4 Sustainability Appraisal ....................................................................................... 4 Habitat Regulations Assessment ........................................................................ 5 Local Plan: Structure of the Plan and other related documents .............................. 5 Other Colchester Planning Documents ................................................................... 6 How to respond....................................................................................................... 7 What Happens Next? .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Census Report for Parliamentary Constituencies
    Reference maps Page England and Wales North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 42 North West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 43 Yorkshire & The Humber: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 44 East Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 45 West Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 46 East of England: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 47 London: County & Parliamentary Constituencies 48 South East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 49 South West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 50 Wales: Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 51 Scotland Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Regions 52 Central Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 53 Glasgow Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 54 Highlands and Islands Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 55 Lothians Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 56 Mid Scotland and Fife Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 57 North East Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 58 South of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 59 West of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 60 Northern Ireland Northern Ireland: Parliamentary Constituencies 61 41 Reference maps Census 2001: Report for Parliamentary Constituencies North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies Key government office region parliamentary constituencies counties
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notices
    facebook.com/TeessideGazette FRIDAY, MAY 15, 2020 The Gazette 45 Public Notices SECTION 153 OF THE PLANNING ACT 2008 SECTION 153 OF THE PLANNING ACT 2008 REGULATION 6 OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING REGULATION 6 OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (CHANGES TO, AND REVOCATION OF, DEVELOPMENT CONSENT (CHANGES TO, AND REVOCATION OF, ORDERS) REGULATIONS 2011 DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDERS) REGULATIONS 2011 NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO MAKE A NON-MATERIAL CHANGE NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO MAKE A NON-MATERIAL CHANGE TO THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER: TO THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER: THE DOGGER BANK TEESSIDE A AND B OFFSHORE WIND THE DOGGER BANK TEESSIDE A AND B OFFSHORE WIND FARM FARM ORDER 2015 (SI 2015/1592) AS AMENDED BY ORDER 2015 (SI 2015/1592) AS AMENDED BY THE DOGGER THE DOGGER BANK TEESSIDE A AND B OFFSHORE WIND BANK TEESSIDE A AND B OFFSHORE WIND FARM AMENDMENT FARM AMENDMENT ORDER 2019 (SI 2019/699) ORDER 2019 (SI 2019/699) 1. An application has been made by Sofia Offshore Wind Farm 1 An application has been made by Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited and Doggerbank Offshore Wind Farm Project 3 Projco Limited to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Limited to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy to make a non-material change to the above Industrial Strategy to make a non-material change to the above mentioned Development Consent Order (the DCO). mentioned Development Consent Order (the DCO). 2 The DCO granted development consent to Doggerbank Project 2. The DCO granted development consent to Doggerbank 2 Bizco Limited for ‘Project A’ and Doggerbank Project 3 Bizco Project 2 Bizco Limited for ‘Project A’ and Doggerbank Project Limited for ‘Project B’ - two offshore wind turbine generating 3 Bizco Limited for ‘Project B’ – two offshore wind turbine stations each comprising up to 200 wind turbine generators generating stations each comprising up to 200 wind turbine (WTGs) and associated development in the Dogger Bank Zone generators (WTGs) and associated development in the and the Borough of Redcar and Cleveland.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal & Committee Services
    Appendix Anglia Level Crossing Reduction Strategy - Preferred Options Colchester Borough Council - detailed comments on Network Rail’s proposals The Main Line – London to Norwich • E25 Church 2 Copford/Marks Tey –no objection to closure The crossing is currently closed. The footpath which serves it has already been severed by the construction of the A12. An alternative route is already in place, and an additional route linking the footpath via Turkey Cock Lane is proposed. • E23 Long Green Marks Tey – no objection to closure The crossing has been replaced recently with a bridge. However we note that the design of the bridge used here is very functional and its form is very intrusive on the local environment. It is suggested that Network Rail seek an improved design for future structures used elsewhere. • E24 Church 1 Marks Tey – no objection to closure The crossing closed in 1989. The alternative route is via the new bridge 300m to the west. Sunshine Coast Line – Colchester to Clacton branch line • E 41 Paget Road – CBC does not object but seeks improvements to the alternative pedestrian routes. This crossing is used by a large number of local residents of Wivenhoe (approximately 220 a day). The alternative to the Paget Road crossing is Anglesea Road and High Street bridges approximately 90m and 180m east and west of the current crossing point. Anglesea Road is an unmade and unadopted road and Queens Road has an incline leading to Anglesea Road, making it difficult for less able people to negotiate. The alternative crossing point is the High Street bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Travel in the Tamar Valley – Baseline 2 Mapping
    Quality Assurance Document Management Document Title Error! No text of specified style in document. Name of File 20157C REP Tamar Valley Line Evaluation Report JT 2.docx Last Revision Saved On 17/05/2018 15:20:00 Version FINAL Prepared by JA/MM/MR/RT Checked by JT Approved by JT Issue Date 17 May 2018 Copyright The contents of this document are © copyright The TAS Partnership Limited, with the exceptions set out below. Reproduction in any form, in part or in whole, is expressly forbidden without the written consent of a Director of The TAS Partnership Limited. Cartography derived from Ordnance Survey mapping is reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of HMSO under licence number WL6576 and is © Crown Copyright – all rights reserved. Other Crown Copyright material, including census data and mapping, policy guidance and official reports, is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under licence number C02W0002869. The TAS Partnership Limited retains all right, title and interest, including copyright, in or to any of its trademarks, methodologies, products, analyses, software and know-how including or arising out of this document, or used in connection with the preparation of this document. No licence under any copyright is hereby granted or implied. Freedom of Information Act 2000 The TAS Partnership Limited regards the daily and hourly rates that are charged to clients, and the terms of engagement under which any projects are undertaken, as trade secrets, and therefore exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail Report
    Community Rail Report Author: Jerry Swift, Interim Project Manager Date: August 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Committed obligations 2 1.2 Director's foreword 6 1.3 Executive Summary 7 2. Community Rail Report 8 2.1 Introduction to the report 8 2.2 Community and Sustainability Director’s report 8 2.2.1 Community Rail Partnerships 8 2.2.2 Funding for Community Rail Partnerships 8 2.2.3 Community Rail Partnership funding 9 2.2.4 Additional funding to support community rail 10 2.2.5 ComREG 11 2.2.6 Station adoption 12 2.2.7 Community Rail Partnerships 12 2.2.8 Volunteering 12 2.2.9 Working with communities 12 2.2.10 Growth in passenger numbers 13 2.2.11 The CRPs in their own words 13 3. Community Rail Partnership profiles 14 3.1 Settle & Carlisle Railway Development Company (SCRDC) 15 3.2 Leeds-Morecambe Community Rail Partnership (The Bentham Line) 17 3.3 Barton-Cleethorpes Community Rail Partnership 19 3.4 Yorkshire Coast Community Rail Partnership (YCCRP) 20 3.5 Penistone Line Community Rail Partnership 22 3.6 Bishop Line Community Rail Partnership 24 3.7 Tyne Valley Community Rail Partnership 26 3.8 Esk Valley Railway Development Company 28 3.9 South Fylde Line Community Rail Partnership 29 3.10 West of Lancashire Community Rail Partnership (WofLCRP) 31 3.11 Cumbrian Coast Line Community Rail Partnership 33 3.12 Furness Line Community Rail Partnership 35 3.13 Lakes Line Community Rail Partnership 37 3.14 North Cheshire Rail Users Group 39 3.15 Mid Cheshire Community Rail Partnership 40 3.16 East Lancashire Community Rail Partnership 42 3.17 Clitheroe Line Community Rail Partnership (CLCRP) 44 3.18 South East Manchester Community Rail Partnership 46 3.19 Crewe to Manchester Community Rail Partnership 48 3.20 High Peak and Hope Valley Community Rail Partnership 50 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry in the Tees Valley
    Industry in the Tees Valley Industry in the Tees Valley A Guide by Alan Betteney This guide was produced as part of the River Tees Rediscovered Landscape Partnership, thanks to money raised by National Lottery players. Funding raised by the National Lottery and awarded by the Heritage Lottery Fund It was put together by Cleveland Industrial Archaeology Society & Tees Archaeology Tees Archaeology logo © 2018 The Author & Heritage Lottery/Tees Archaeology CONTENTS Page Foreword ........................................................................................ X 1. Introduction....... ...................................................................... 8 2. The Industrial Revolution .......... .............................................11 3. Railways ................................................................................ 14 4. Reclamation of the River ....................................................... 18 5. Extractive industries .............................................................. 20 6. Flour Mills .............................................................................. 21 7. Railway works ........................................................................ 22 8. The Iron Industry .................................................................... 23 9. Shipbuilding ........................................................................... 27 10. The Chemical industry ............................................................ 30 11. Workers .................................................................................
    [Show full text]