DOCSLIB.ORG

The Arara People Were Contacted in 1981 and 1983

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Arara People Were Contacted in 1981 and 1983 THE MORPHOLOGY OF NOUNS IN THE UGOROŊMO LANGUAGE (ARARA OF PARÁ) by Shirley Dias Cardoso de Souza Bachelor of Arts, Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras, 1984 Master of Arts, University of Brazilia, 1993 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Grand Forks, North Dakota August 2010 This thesis, submitted by Shirley Dias Cardoso de Souza in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts from the University of North Dakota, has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done and is hereby approved. _______________________________________ Chair _______________________________________ _______________________________________ This thesis meets the standards for appearance, conforms to the style and format requirements of the Graduate School of the University of North Dakota, and is hereby approved. ———————————————— Dean of the Graduate School ———————————————— Date ii PERMISSION Title The Morphology of Nouns in the Ugoroŋmo Language (Arara of Pará) Department Linguistics Degree Master of Arts In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the chairperson of the department or the dean of the Graduate School. It is understood that any copying or publication or other use of this thesis or part thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of North Dakota in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Signature ______________________________ Date __________________________________ iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ viii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................x ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ............................................................................. xii ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Location of the Ugoroŋmo (Arara) area ......................................................2 1.2 General information about the language community...................................3 2 MORPHOLOGICAL MARKING FOR POSSESSION .........................................8 2.1 Nouns that cannot be inflected for possession .............................................8 2.2 Nouns that are optionally inflected for possession ....................................11 2.3 Inherently possessed noun roots ................................................................12 2.3.1 The forms of the inherently possessed nouns ...................................12 2.3.2 Kinship noun roots ...........................................................................14 2.3.3 Body part terms and other part-whole terms ....................................18 2.3.4 Personal items ..................................................................................23 2.3.5 Generic terms ...................................................................................24 2.3.6 Locative ............................................................................................25 2.4 Derived inherently possessed noun stems..................................................26 iv 2.4.1 Derivational use of -rɯn ..................................................................26 2.4.2 Inflectional use of -rɯn ....................................................................29 3 MORPHOLOGY OF POSSESSED NOUNS ........................................................31 3.1 Possessor ....................................................................................................32 3.1.1 First person singular possessor .........................................................34 3.1.2 Second person possessor ..................................................................35 3.1.3 Third person possessor .....................................................................36 3.1.4 First person inclusive possessor .......................................................40 3.1.5 Third person reflexive possessor ......................................................42 3.1.6 A set of irregular forms ....................................................................43 3.1.7 The first person exclusive pronoun ..................................................44 3.2 Absolute form ............................................................................................46 3.2.1 Morphology of the absolute form .....................................................48 3.3 Possessive suffixes .....................................................................................51 4 CASE MARKING .................................................................................................55 4.1 The inessive case suffix .............................................................................57 4.2 The illative case suffix ...............................................................................58 4.3 The elative case suffix ...............................................................................59 4.4 The perlative case suffix ............................................................................59 4.5 Comparative case suffix .............................................................................60 5 PLURAL ................................................................................................................63 5.1 Basic uses of the plural suffix -kom ..........................................................63 5.2 The structure of a word inflected for plural ...............................................65 v 5.2.1 The possessor is plural .....................................................................65 5.2.2 The possessed item is pluralized ......................................................69 5.2.3 Pluralizing both the possessor and possessed item ..........................71 5.2.4 The suffix -am with the former suffix -tp ........................................72 6 COMPOUND NOUNS AND MODIFYING SUFFIXES .....................................74 6.1 Compound nouns .......................................................................................74 6.2 Modifying suffixes .....................................................................................81 6.2.1 Augmentative ...................................................................................82 6.2.2 Diminutive ........................................................................................85 6.2.3 Deceased ...........................................................................................86 6.2.4 Long, flat and short ..........................................................................86 6.2.5 Birthmark .........................................................................................88 6.2.6 Crooked ............................................................................................89 6.2.7 ‗Encircled by black‘ and ‗one of a pair‘ ...........................................90 6.2.8 Soft ...................................................................................................91 6.3 Former ........................................................................................................91 7 DENOMINAL PREDICATE ADJECTIVES........................................................97 7.1 The forms of the predicate adjectivizer suffix ...........................................99 7.1.1 tɯ-...-k ..............................................................................................99 7.1.2 tɯ-…-ŋ ...........................................................................................100 7.1.3 tɯ-...-ŋie .........................................................................................101 7.1.5 tɯ-…-re ..........................................................................................101 7.1.6 tɯ-…-igere .....................................................................................102 vi 7.1.7 tɯ- ... -t ...........................................................................................103 7.2 Some common features for basic adjectives and denominal adjectives ..103 7.2.1 Features of the class of basic adjectives .........................................103 7.2.2 Features of denominal adjectives ...................................................107 8 SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................109 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................111 Appendix A: Phonological rules ......................................................................................112 Appendix B:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A First Comparison of Pronominal and Demonstrative Systems in the Cariban Language Family*
    A FIRST COMPARISON OF PRONOMINAL AND DEMONSTRATIVE SYSTEMS IN THE CARIBAN LANGUAGE FAMILY* Sérgio Meira Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 1. Introduction The Cariban language family is composed of approximately 25 languages (numbers ranging from 20 to 50, depending on different researchers’ opinions about which varieties are dialects and which are independent languages), spoken by approximately 100,000 people in lowland South America, from south-eastern Colombia (where Karihona is spoken) to the Oiapoque river in Brazil (Karinya), from the coast of the Guianas (Karinya) down to the southern Xingu area in central Brazil (Bakairí). The field of comparative Cariban studies was initiated more than two hundred years ago, when the relationship between a number of Cariban languages was first noticed by Filippo Salvadore Gilij (1782). Unfortunately, the historical-comparative method has been only very rarely applied to Cariban languages, for two main reasons: (1) most of the languages are, to this day, poorly known, which means that there is very little reliable material to compare; (2) most people who compared Cariban languages were not trained comparativists. Girard (1971) remains the only methodical attempt at reconstructing Proto-Cariban lexical items and proposing a classification (unfortunately based on a still very poor data base). In the area of morphosyntax, Gildea (1998) presents the first reconstruction of the person-marking http://www.etnolinguistica.org/illa and tense-aspect-mood (TAM) systems of Proto-Cariban and their syntactic properties. This file is freely available for download at The present work attempts to contribute to the development of historical studies in the Cariban family by presenting a first preliminary reconstruction of the pronominal system of Proto-Cariban (including non-third-person and third-person, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Histories from Brazil and Papua New Guinea
    SIL Electronic Working Papers 2004-004, August 2004 (Revised edition of SIL Electronic Working Papers 1999-006, October 1999) Copyright © 1999, 2004 Michael Cahill and SIL International All rights reserved. From Endangered to Less Endangered Case Histories from Brazil and Papua New Guinea Michael Cahill Contents Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Brazil o 2.1 Hixkaryana o 2.2 Pirahã o 2.3 Mamaindé o 2.4 Paumarí 3. Papua New Guinea: Binumarien 4. Concluding remarks Notes References Abstract This article examines various factors in the revitalization of several endangered languages of Brazil and Papua New Guinea in which the people were in imminent danger of dying out as a group. Among these factors were access to consistent medical care and a heightened self-respect. “The only person I have left to talk to is a linguist and talking to a linguist is no fun.” Amerindian woman’s comment to Joshua Fishman (Fishman 2000:24) 1. Introduction In 1976, a professor in London was expounding on why no object-initial languages existed in the world.1 A student in the class hesitantly raised his hand and said, “Excuse me, but I speak an object-initial language.” The professor was Geoffrey Pullum, and the student was SIL field-linguist Desmond Derbyshire. Up to that time, an object-initial language had never been documented, but Derbyshire had been living and working among the Hixkaryana people of Brazil and had documented his facts thoroughly. His dissertation was later published as Derbyshire 1985. As this demonstrates, one of the benefits of investigating small or endangered languages is the discovery of previously unknown linguistic phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Cards | Joshua Project
    Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Agavotaguerra in Brazil Aikana, Tubarao in Brazil Population: 100 Population: 300 World Popl: 100 World Popl: 300 Total Countries: 1 Total Countries: 1 People Cluster: Amazon People Cluster: South American Indigenous Main Language: Portuguese Main Language: Aikana Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Status: Minimally Reached Status: Significantly reached Evangelicals: 1.00% Evangelicals: 25.0% Chr Adherents: 35.00% Chr Adherents: 50.0% Scripture: Complete Bible Scripture: Portions www.joshuaproject.net www.joshuaproject.net Source: Anonymous "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Ajuru in Brazil Akuntsu in Brazil Population: 300 Population: Unknown World Popl: 300 World Popl: Unknown Total Countries: 1 Total Countries: 1 People Cluster: South American Indigenous People Cluster: Amazon Main Language: Portuguese Main Language: Language unknown Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Status: Unreached Status: Minimally Reached Evangelicals: 0.00% Evangelicals: 0.10% Chr Adherents: 5.00% Chr Adherents: 20.00% Scripture: Complete Bible Scripture: Unspecified www.joshuaproject.net www.joshuaproject.net "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Amanaye in Brazil Amawaka in Brazil Population: 100 Population: 200 World Popl: 100 World Popl: 600 Total Countries:
    [Show full text]
  • PRACTICES of COLONIALITY/DECOLONIALITY for LANGUAGE LEARNING and ACQUISITION in the AMAZON Dados Internacionais De Catalogação Na Publicação – CIP
    RAIMUNDO NONATO DE PÁDUA CÂNCIO PRACTICES OF COLONIALITY/DECOLONIALITY FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING AND ACQUISITION IN THE AMAZON Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação – CIP C215p Câncio, Raimundo Nonato de Pádua. Practices of coloniality/decoloniality for language learning and acquisition in the Amazon. / Raimundo Nonato de Pádua Câncio. – Palmas, TO: EDUFT, 2020. 108 p. ; 21 x 29,7 cm. ISBN 978-65-89119-40-1 Title inpotuguese: Práticas de colonialidade/decolonialidade na aquisição e aprendizagem de línguas na amazônia. 1. Brazilian Amazon. 2. Coloniality. 3. Languages. 4. Learning, language. 5. Brazil. I. Raimundo Nonato de Pádua Câncio. II. Title. CDD – 469 RAIMUNDO NONATO DE PÁDUA CÂNCIO PRACTICES OF COLONIALITY/DECOLONIALITY FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING AND ACQUISITION IN THE AMAZON PALMAS - TO 2020 Universidade Federal do Tocantins Reitor Membros por área: Luis Eduardo Bovolato Liliam Deisy Ghizoni Eder Ahmad Charaf Eddine Vice-reitora (Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde) Ana Lúcia de Medeiros Pró-Reitor de Administração e Finanças (PROAD) João Nunes da Silva Jaasiel Nascimento Lima Ana Roseli Paes dos Santos Lidianne Salvatierra Pró-Reitor de Assuntos Estudantis (PROEST) Wilson Rogério dos Santos Kherlley Caxias Batista Barbosa (Interdisciplinar) Pró-Reitora de Extensão, Cultura e Assuntos Comunitários (PROEX) Alexandre Tadeu Rossini da Silva Maria Santana Ferreira Milhomem Maxwell Diógenes Bandeira de Melo (Engenharias, Ciências Exatas e da Terra) Pró-Reitora de Gestão e Desenvolvimento de Pessoas (PROGEDEP) Vânia Maria de Araújo Passos
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Young Children Acquire Case Marking?
    INVESTIGATING FINNISH-SPEAKING CHILDREN’S NOUN MORPHOLOGY: HOW DO YOUNG CHILDREN ACQUIRE CASE MARKING? Thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy in the Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences 2015 HENNA PAULIINA LEMETYINEN SCHOOL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... 7 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 8 DECLARATION .......................................................................................................................... 9 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT .......................................................................................................... 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1: General introduction to language acquisition research ...................................... 11 1.1. Generativist approaches to child language............................................................ 11 1.2. Usage-based approaches to child language........................................................... 14 1.3. The acquisition of morphology .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peoples in the Brazilian Amazonia Indian Lands
    Brazilian Demographic Censuses and the “Indians”: difficulties in identifying and counting. Marta Maria Azevedo Researcher for the Instituto Socioambiental – ISA; and visiting researcher of the Núcleo de Estudos em População – NEPO / of the University of Campinas – UNICAMP PEOPLES IN THE BRAZILIAN AMAZONIA INDIAN LANDS source: Programa Brasil Socioambiental - ISA At the present moment there are in Brazil 184 native language- UF* POVO POP.** ANO*** LÍNG./TRON.**** OUTROS NOMES***** Case studies made by anthropologists register the vital events of a RO Aikanã 175 1995 Aikanã Aikaná, Massaká, Tubarão RO Ajuru 38 1990 Tupari speaking peoples and around 30 who identify themselves as “Indians”, RO Akunsu 7 1998 ? Akunt'su certain population during a large time period, which allows us to make RO Amondawa 80 2000 Tupi-Gurarani RO Arara 184 2000 Ramarama Karo even though they are Portuguese speaking. Two-hundred and sixteen RO Arikapu 2 1999 Jaboti Aricapu a few analyses about their populational dynamics. Such is the case, for RO Arikem ? ? Arikem Ariken peoples live in ‘Indian Territories’, either demarcated or in the RO Aruá 6 1997 Tupi-Mondé instance, of the work about the Araweté, made by Eduardo Viveiros de RO Cassupá ? ? Português RO/MT Cinta Larga 643 1993 Tupi-Mondé Matétamãe process of demarcation, and also in urban areas in the different RO Columbiara ? ? ? Corumbiara Castro. In his book (Araweté: o povo do Ipixuna – CEDI, 1992) there is an RO Gavião 436 2000 Tupi-Mondé Digüt RO Jaboti 67 1990 Jaboti regions of Brazil. The lands of some 30 groups extend across national RO Kanoe 84 1997 Kanoe Canoe appendix with the populational data registered by others, since the first RO Karipuna 20 2000 Tupi-Gurarani Caripuna RO Karitiana 360 2000 Arikem Caritiana burder, for ex.: 8,500 Ticuna live in Peru and Colombia while 32,000 RO Kwazá 25 1998 Língua isolada Coaiá, Koaiá contact with this people in 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • Deductions Suggested by the Geographcial Distribution of Some
    Deductions suggested by the geographcial distribution of some post-Columbian words used by the Indians of S. America, by Erland Nordenskiöld. no.5 Nordenskiöld, Erland, 1877-1932. [Göteborg, Elanders boktryckeri aktiebolag, 1922] http://hdl.handle.net/2027/inu.32000000635047 Public Domain in the United States, Google-digitized http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-us-google This work is deemed to be in the public domain in the United States of America. It may not be in the public domain in other countries. Copies are provided as a preservation service. Particularly outside of the United States, persons receiving copies should make appropriate efforts to determine the copyright status of the work in their country and use the work accordingly. It is possible that heirs or the estate of the authors of individual portions of the work, such as illustrations, assert copyrights over these portions. Depending on the nature of subsequent use that is made, additional rights may need to be obtained independently of anything we can address. The digital images and OCR of this work were produced by Google, Inc. (indicated by a watermark on each page in the PageTurner). Google requests that the images and OCR not be re-hosted, redistributed or used commercially. The images are provided for educational, scholarly, non-commercial purposes. Generated for Eduardo Ribeiro (University of Chicago) on 2011-12-10 23:30 GMT / Public Domain in the United States, Google-digitized http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-us-google Generated for Eduardo Ribeiro
    [Show full text]
  • Atassinari KARIPUNAS
    KARIPUNAS” E “BRASILEIROS” A TRAJETÓRIA DE DOIS TERMOS Uma contribuição à história indígena da região do baixo Rio Oiapoque Antonella Maria Imperatriz Tassinari GT: Etnologia Indígena XXI Encontro Anual da ANPOCS Caxambu, 27 a 31 de outubro de 1998. “KARIPUNAS” E “BRASILEIROS” A TRAJETÓRIA DE DOIS TERMOS 1 “... a objetivação etnonímica inside primordialmente sobre os outros , não sobre quem está em posição de sujeito. Os etnônimos são nomes de terceiros, pertencem à categoria do ‘eles’, não à categoria do ‘nós’ .” (Viveiros de Castro 1996:126). Este paper é dedicado à história da população Karipuna do Rio Curipi, região do Baixo Oiapoque, Norte do Amapá, de um ponto de vista externo ao grupo, através de uma análise sobre a trajetória de seu etnônimo 2. A história dessa população é quase inteiramente desconhecida, embora haja vasta documentação histórica sobre a região em que habita (Caetano da Silva 1861, Paranhos 1898,1945). Há citações sobre os Caripous na região do Oiapoque no século XVII, mas este etnônimo deixa de aparecer nas fontes do século seguinte (embora seja citado em diversas regiões da Amazônia), para ressurgir no século XIX. Alguns autores consideram que a população do Curipi formou-se por refugiados da Cabanagem (Coudreau 1893, Arnaud 1989a, 1996), deslocando a história do grupo, da região do Oiapoque, para a costa paraense. Considero que, para melhor compreender a história vivenciada por esta população, é preciso fazer uma distinção entre a trajetória de seu etnônimo, e as diversas trajetórias de vida dos atuais Karipuna e de seus antepassados. Isso porque o termo nem sempre esteve associado à população do Curipi (às famílias que ali habitam e seus antepassados, ou a outras famílias ali residentes em momentos diversos) e fazer esta separação será útil para entender o próprio significado que hoje tem o nome Karipuna, referindo-se à identidade étnica atualmente compartilhada pela população do Rio Curipi.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.1 Inflection
    4.1 Inflection Within a lexeme-based theory of morphology, the difference between derivation and inflection is very simple. Derivation gives you new lexemes, and inflection gives you the forms of a lexeme that are determined by syntactic environment (cf. 2.1.2). But what exactly does this mean? Is there really a need for such a distinction? This section explores the answers to these questions, and in the process, goes deeper into the relation between morphology and syntax. 4.1.1 Inflection vs. derivation The first question we can ask about the distinction between inflection and derivation is whether there is any formal basis for distinguishing the two: can we tell them apart because they do different things to words? One generalization that has been made is that derivational affixes tend to occur closer to the root or stem than inflectional affixes. For example, (1) shows that the English third person singular present inflectional suffix -s occurs outside of derivational suffixes like the deadjectival -ize, and the plural ending -s follows derivational affixes including the deverbal -al: (1) a. popular-ize-s commercial-ize-s b. upheav-al-s arriv-al-s Similarly, Japanese derivational suffixes like passive -rare or causative -sase precede inflectional suffixes marking tense and aspect:1 (2) a. tabe-ru tabe-ta eat- IMP eat- PERF INFLECTION 113 ‘eats’ ‘ate’ b. tabe-rare- ru tabe-rare- ta eat - PASS-IMP eat- PASS-PERF ‘is eaten’ ‘was eaten’ c. tabe-sase- ru tabe-sase- ta eat- CAUS-IMP eat- CAUS-PERF ‘makes eat’ ‘made eat’ It is also the case that inflectional morphology does not change the meaning or grammatical category of the word that it applies to.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Probability in South American Protected Areas
    Technical Note Fire probability in South American Protected Areas August to October 2020 South American authors: Liana O. Anderson, João B. C. dos Reis, Ana Carolina M. Pessôa, Galia Selaya, Luiz Aragão UK authors: Chantelle Burton, Philip Bett, Chris Jones, Karina Williams, Inika Taylor, Andrew Wiltshire August 2020 1 HOW TO CITE THIS WORK ANDERSON Liana O.; BURTON Chantelle; DOS REIS João B. C.; PESSÔA Ana C. M.; SELAYA Galia; BETT Philip, JONES Chris, WILLIAMS Karina; TAYLOR Inika; WILTSHIRE, Andrew, ARAGÃO Luiz. Fire probability in South American Protected Areas: August to October 2020. 16p. São José dos Campos, 2020.SEI/Cemaden process: 01250.029118/2018-78/5761326. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13727.79523 Contact: [email protected] Institutions Met Office Hadley Centre – United Kingdom Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alerta de Desastres Naturais - Brazil Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais – Brazil This Technical Note was prepared with the support of the following projects: CSSP-BRAZIL - Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) Brazil. Fund: Newton Fund MAP-FIRE – Multi-Actor Adaptation Plan to cope with Forests under Increasing Risk of Extensive fires Fund: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI-SGP-HW 016) PRODIGY BMBF biotip Project – Process‐based & Resilience‐Oriented management of Diversity Generates sustainabilitY Fund: German BMBF biotip Project FKZ 01LC1824A João B. C. dos Reis and Ana C. M. Pessôa were funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - 444321/2018-7 and 140977/2018-5, respectively). Luiz Aragão was funded by CNPq Productivity fellowship (305054/2016-3). Liana Anderson acknowledges EasyTelling, and the projects: CNPq (ACRE-QUEIMADAS 442650/2018-3, SEM-FLAMA 441949/2018-5), São Paulo Research Foundation – (FAPESP 19/05440-5, 2016/02018-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Indígenas Com Inscrição Homologada
    Serviço Público Federal Universidade Federal do Pará Pró-Reitoria de Ensino de Graduação Comissão Permanente de Processos Seletivos EDITAL Nº 2/2021 – COPERPS, DE 09 DE JULHO DE 2021 PROCESSO SELETIVO ESPECIAL 2021 -2 – PSE 2021 - 2 RELAÇÃO DE CANDIDATOS INDÍGENAS COM INSCRIÇÃO HOMOLOGADA Nome Insc. Etnia Aldeia Liderança 1 Liderança 2 Liderança 3 ADEILDO FELICIO IAPARRA 615112 Palikur Aldeia Kumenê Sofonias Hipolito Jefre Ioio Azarias Ioio Iaparra José De Ribamar Gomes Filho Carlos Henrique Gomes ADILINO FILHO LIMA LOPES GUAJAJARA 614451 Guajajara Cajazeira Ademar Lima Lopes Guajajara Guajajra Guajajara ADONIAS OHXO 614299 Hiskaryana Kassawa Zaquel Feya Orivaldo Kaywana Miguel Taryma RAILEY BATISTA DOS ADRIANE DOS SANTOS SILVA NETO 615424 KARIPUNA ALDEIA MANGA JOSÉ ELITO DOS SANTOS MAXWARA DOS SANTOS CARDOSO SANTOS ADRIANO KESU KAXUYANA 614432 Kaxuyana Aldeia sanidade Cândido waratana kaxuyana João pekiriruwa kaxuyana Alcino pauya kaxuyana José de Ribamar Gomes Filho Lucélia Gomes Guajajara AGEU LIMA GUAJAJARA 616133 Guajajara Aldeia Cajazeira Carlos Henrique Gomes Guajajara Guajajara Lima ALCIELLE WAYTIA WAI WAI 614074 Wai Wai Mapuera Elizeu Rodrigues da Silva Way way Roberto Carlos de souza João kaiuri wai wai ALCILENE RODRIGUES WAITYA 613709 Wai Wai Mapuera Elizeu Rodrigues da Silva Way Way Roberto Carlos de Souza João Kaiurí Wai Wai ALDELAN NUNES FELÍCIO 615986 PALIKUR Kumene Sanfonias Hipólito Jefre Ioiô Azarias Ioiô Iaparra ALEXANDRE KIRIXI MUNDURUKU 613636 Munduruku Missão são Francisco Isaías Munduruku Giovane Kaba Munduruku
    [Show full text]
  • Origem Da Pintura Do Lutador Matipu
    GOVERNO DO ESTADO DE MATO GROSSO SECRETARIA DE ESTADO DE CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA UNIVERSIDADE DO ESTADO DE MATO GROSSO CARLOS ALBERTO REYES MALDONADO UNEMAT CAMPUS UNIVERSITÁRIO DEP. RENÊ BARBOUR LICENCIATURA INTERCULTURAL INDÍGENA MAIKE MATIPU ORIGEM DA PINTURA DO LUTADOR MATIPU Barra do Bugres 2016 MAIKE MATIPU ORIGEM DA PINTURA DO LUTADOR MATIPU Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso apresentado à Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso- UNEMAT, Campus Universitário Dep. Est. Renê Barbour, como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de graduado em Línguas, Artes e Literatura. Orientador: Prof.ª Drª. Mônica Cidele da Cruz Barra do Bugres 2016 FICHA CATALOGRÁFICA MAIKE MATIPU ORIGEM DA PINTURA DO LUTADOR MATIPU Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso apresentado à Banca Avaliadora do Curso de Licenciatura Intercultural – UNEMAT, Campus Universitário Dep. Renê Barbour como requisito para obtenção do título de Licenciado em Línguas, Artes e Literatura. Barra do Bugres, 28 de abril de 2016. BANCA EXAMINADORA _______________________________________________ Prof.ª Drª. Mônica Cidele da Cruz Professora Orientadora _______________________________________________ Prof. Esp. Aigi Nafukuá Professor Avaliador _______________________________________________ Prof. Me. Isaías Munis Batista Professor Avaliador Barra do Bugres 2016 DEDICATÓRIA Dedico este trabalho para minha esposa Soko Kujahi Agika Kuikuro, aos meus filhos, às famílias e filhos da comunidade. Através do conhecimento do meu povo Matipu, consegui realizar o trabalho e fortalecer a cultura para futuras gerações. AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço aos dois anciões narradores da história do passado. Principalmente agradeço ao meu pai Yamatuá Matipu, reconhecido como grande flautista e cantor. Agradeço, ainda, Manufá Matipu, que me auxiliou durante a pesquisa sobre o conhecimento dos antepassados. Agradeço a toda minha família que fez o trabalho comigo, e também agradeço muita minha esposa Soko Kujahi Agika Kuikuro, meus filhos Amatuá Matheus Matipu, Kaintehi Marquinho Matipu, Tahugaki Parisi Matipu e Ariati Maiate Rebeca Matipu.
    [Show full text]