A Man, an Age, a Book

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Man, an Age, a Book MARCO FORLIVESI A Man, an Age, a Book 1. A man Bartolomeo Mastri was born in Meldola, near Forlì, on 7th December, 1602, into the lower aristocracy of the town. He en- tered the Order of Friars Minor Conventual in about 1616 and was educated at the Order’s studia in Cesena, Bologna, and Naples. After a brief period of teaching logic in the studia of the Order in Parma and Bologna, he completed his period as a stu- dent in the ‘Collegio di S. Bonaventura’ in Rome in the years 1625-1628. From 1628 to 1638 he was Regent, together with his fellow Brother Bonaventura Belluto from Catania, of the Order’s studia in Cesena and Perugia. In 1638 he was promoted, together with Belluto, to the post of Regent of the ‘Collegio di S. Antonio’ in Padua, a post he retained until 1641. From that year, which according to the customs of the time marked the end of his ca- reer as a teacher, until 1647 he resided alternately either in Mel- dola or Ravenna, a city where he held the post as private theolo- gian to Cardinal Luigi Capponi. In the meantime, together with Belluto, from 1628 to 1647 he planned, wrote and published his first great work: a cursus of Scotist philosophy articulated into logic, physics, and metaphysics. In 1647 he was elected Minister of his Order for the Province of Bologna. When this assignment was completed, in 1650, he returned to Meldola, where he lived until 1659 and compiled most of his theological works. From that year, until 1665, he was frequently a member of the retinue of the General Minister of his Order, Giacomo Fabretti from Ra- “Rem in seipsa cernere”. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673). Atti del Convegno di studi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602-1673), Meldola - Bertinoro, 20-22 settembre 2002, ed. by M. Forlivesi, (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina, 8), Padova: Il Poligrafo, 2006. – ISBN 88-7115-534-3 24 Marco Forlivesi venna. In particular, in 1662 he held the post of General Vicar. On failing to be elected as General Minister in 1665, he returned to Meldola, where he concluded the compilation of his theologi- cal works. He died on 11th January, 1673. Mastri was the author of four works. The first, of an explic- itly philosophical nature, was planned and, to a large extent, written in collaboration with Belluto. It was published in seven quarto tomes divided according to subject matter from 1637 to 1647 (tomes which were partly revised from 1644 to 1652 by Mastri alone) and was reprinted after the deaths of its authors under the title of Philosophiæ ad mentem Scoti cursus integer. A second work, of a polemical nature, aimed at his fellow friar Matteo Frće, was published in a single quarto volume in 1650 entitled Scotus et scotistæ Bellutus et Mastrius expurgati a probro- sis querelis ferchianis. A third work was published in four folio volumes from 1655 to 1664 and is generally referred to as Dispu- tationes theologicæ in quatuor libros Sententiarum. The last is a weighty Theologia moralis, published in a single folio volume in 1671. The title of the first work fully corresponds to its contents: it is a philosophical treatise divided into logic, physics, and metaphysics. The titles of the last two works, on the other hand, do not express equally as clearly their contents, since they incor- porate philosophical themes both as tools for argumentation and in the matters discussed.1 There are many sides to Bartolomeo Mastri, both as a person and as a writer. Pleading and obsequious in the letters of the summer of 1646 to Olimpia Aldobrandini Jr., even going as far as to say, “rephrasing” a passage from the Bible, that «il core de principi è in mano di Dio», he, however, also presents himself in the same letters as «uno dei primi soggetti» of his Order.2 In the final years of his life, this high self-esteem, along with a concept of government posts also as a form of remuneration for merits 1. For Mastri’s life and the editions of his works, cf. M. FORLIVESI, “Scoti- starum princeps”. Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) e il suo tempo, (Fonti e studi francescani, 11), Padova: Centro studi antoniani, 2002. For Belluto, cf. Fr. CO- STA, “Il p. Bonaventura Belluto, OFMConv (1603-1676)”, in Miscellanea france- scana, 73 (1973), pp. 81-136 e 387-437; 76 (1976), pp. 125-208. 2. Cf. FORLIVESI, “Scotistarum princeps”..., pp. 191-199. A Man, an Age, a Book 25 achieved in other fields, becomes a protest at not having been conferred dignitates: «Ut vero desideria tua [i.e.: of the reader] labore meo sint tandem adæquata, remanet ultimus, et supremus moralis theologiæ tomus complendus, ac in lucem edendus (...). Eius tamen compositioni iam incumbo, exordio a prævijs dispu- tationibus de conscientia, et legibus auspicato, et sine intermis- sione prosequar, si vita, et sanitas supererint, nec aliud obvenerit regiminis impedimentum, ut plane pluribus de causis non obven- turum opinor; sed præsertim ob rationem politicam a doctissimo p. Fabro nostro adductam 4. d. 45. de restitutione cap. 5. n. 138. et experientia ab ipso comprobatam, ubi ait quod Religiones quæ- dam litteratis velut equis, et mulis utuntur, idest, solum ad labores, ad dignitates autem, et regimina dicunt esse ineptos, quasi litteræ, et virtutes in Religionibus sint præcipua ad dignitates consequen- das impedimenta».3 In his works he does express praise for other scholars but also, and perhaps more frequently, blame. He is often caustic. When stigmatizing the “neoteric” Jesuits’ habit of not comparing themselves with authors of other Orders, he concludes: «hanc scribendi rationem noviter adinventam superbiam in eis arguere, dum cum exteris disserere renuunt, vel timorem».4 When setting about confuting some of the Theatine Zaccaria Pasqualigo’s ar- guments, he writes: «quamvis plurimæ eius rationes coincidant, ut eius moris est in arguendo, omnes tamen referam, quæ minus coincidunt, ne ullam subterfugere videamur».5 At times Mastri is even scornful, for example, when addressing his fellow friar Francesco Pontelonghi, without mentioning him by name, he in- vites him to go along the «Pontem longum, et arctum asinorum, a dialecticis pro tardioribus ingeniis erudiendis institutum»;6 else- where, referring to the scanty attention he had paid to the criti- cism made of him by another co-religionary, Alessandro Rossi, he writes: «Aquila quam mea ostentant gentilicia, muscas <non> ca- 3. MASTRIUS, Lectori benevolo, in IDEM, In IV Sent., Venetiis 1664, cc. a3v-4r; his italics. On this topic, see FORLIVESI, “Scotistarum princeps”..., pp. 254-256. 4. MASTRIUS – BELLUTUS, In De gen., disp. 5, q. 3, a. 1, n. 78, Venetiis 1640 (archetypal edition Venetiis 21652), p. 259a. 5. MASTRIUS, In Met., disp. 2, q. 2, n. 40, 2 vol., Venetiis 1646-47, vol. I, p. 98b. 6. MASTRIUS, Ad lectorem, in IDEM, In I Sent., Venetiis 1655, c. a3r-v. 26 Marco Forlivesi pit».7 However, it is the Irish Recollect, John Punch, and the Dalmatian Conventual, Matteo Frće, who arouse this author’s most irate tones. This is Mastri, in a single quæstio dedicated to Punch, protesting mockingly: «rationes adduco quibus Poncius non respondebit, si annos Mathusalæ viveret». He then exclaims disconsolately: «bone Deus, quomodo talis compositio imperfec- tionem non involvet, si est ex actu, et potentia?». Finally he con- cludes indignantly: «restat ergo ut hæc potentia passiva perfec- tionem dicens, non nisi ex tenebris sui cerebri in lucem prodi- ret».8 Frće is even the object of an entire polemical work, pub- lished moreover without the consent of the General Minister of the Order: this is the previously mentioned Scotus et scotistæ Bel- lutus et Mastrius expurgati a probrosis querelis ferchianis.9 On the speculative level, we find in Mastri’s texts indications that are surprisingly modern (taking the term perhaps more in a moral than in an historical sense). First of all are the passages that I have quoted as epigraphs to this volume. The first shows a view of truth that opens the way to a hermeneutic conception of it (obviously not in the Heideggerian sense): «formalitas veritatis non consistit in simplici adæquatione, sed in similitudine qua- dam intentionali; sed similitudo suo modo dicitur suscipere ma- gis et minus; ergo et veritas».10 The second features the craving of the mind zu den Sachen selbst: «evidentia, et claritas perficit ac- tum intellectus secundum naturalem eius exigentiam, quæ talis est, ut suum assensum præbere quærat ex proprio, et non ex alie- no testimonio rem in seipsa cernendo, et intuendo, unde experi- mur intellectum nunquam quiescere, quousque rem in seipsa cer- nat, et intueatur».11 Moreover, in Mastri’s works there is a con- ception of the scientist as an artifex, who chooses «ex suo arbi- trio» to «assumere aliquam rerum seriem declarandam», and of 7. MASTRIUS, Ad lectorem, in IDEM, In III Sent., Venetiis 1661, c. a4v. Re. the disputes between Mastri and Pontelonghi, and between Mastri and Rossi cf. FORLIVESI, “Scotistarum princeps”..., pp. 244-252. 8. MASTRIUS, In I Sent., disp. 2, q. 8, a. 2, n. 327, p. 159a e n. 329, p. 160a. On the dispute with Punch, cf. FORLIVESI, “Scotistarum princeps”..., pp. 208-218. 9. Cf. Id., pp. 202-207. 2 10. MASTRIUS – BELLUTUS, In Org., disp. 10, q. 2, a. 4, n. 47, Venetiis 1646, p. 788b. 11. MASTRIUS, In I Sent., disp. 1, q. un., a. 1, n. 17, p. 6b. A Man, an Age, a Book 27 science as a scientifica fabrica, whose unity is that of a «unum quoddam artificiosum».12 Further, there is a reference to the es- sential role of language in philosophical enquiry, to the connec- tion between the object and
Recommended publications
  • Rule and Foundational Documents
    Rule and Foundational Documents Frontispiece: facsimile reproduction of a page—chapter 22, “Rules Concern- ing the Good Order and Management of the Institute”—from the Rule of the Brothers of the Christian Schools, the 1718 manuscript preserved in the Rome archives of the Institute. Photo E. Rousset (Jean-Baptiste de La Salle; Icono- graphie, Boulogne: Limet, 1979, plate 52). Rule and Foundational Documents John Baptist de La Salle Translated and edited by Augustine Loes, FSC, and Ronald Isetti Lasallian Publications Christian Brothers Conference Landover, Maryland Lasallian Publications Sponsored by the Regional Conference of Christian Brothers of the United States and Toronto Editorial Board Luke Salm, FSC, Chairman Paul Grass, FSC, Executive Director Daniel Burke, FSC William Mann, FSC Miguel Campos, FSC Donald C. Mouton, FSC Ronald Isetti Joseph Schmidt, FSC Augustine Loes, FSC From the French manuscripts, Pratique du Règlement journalier, Règles communes des Frères des Écoles chrétiennes, Règle du Frère Directeur d’une Maison de l’Institut d’après les manuscrits de 1705, 1713, 1718, et l’édition princeps de 1726 (Cahiers lasalliens 25; Rome: Maison Saint Jean-Baptiste de La Salle, 1966); Mémoire sur l’Habit (Cahiers lasalliens 11, 349–54; Rome: Maison Saint Jean-Baptiste de La Salle, 1962); Règles que je me suis imposées (Cahiers lasalliens 10, 114–16; Rome: Maison Saint Jean-Baptiste de La Salle, 1979). Rule and Foundational Documents is volume 7 of Lasallian Sources: The Complete Works of John Baptist de La Salle Copyright © 2002 by Christian Brothers Conference All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Control Number: 2002101169 ISBN 0-944808-25-5 (cloth) ISBN 0-944808-26-3 (paper) Cover: Portrait of M.
    [Show full text]
  • HNA April 11 Cover-Final.Indd
    historians of netherlandish art NEWSLETTER AND REVIEW OF BOOKS Dedicated to the Study of Netherlandish, German and Franco-Flemish Art and Architecture, 1350-1750 Vol. 28, No. 1 April 2011 Jacob Cats (1741-1799), Summer Landscape, pen and brown ink and wash, 270-359 mm. Hamburger Kunsthalle. Photo: Christoph Irrgang Exhibited in “Bruegel, Rembrandt & Co. Niederländische Zeichnungen 1450-1850”, June 17 – September 11, 2011, on the occasion of the publication of Annemarie Stefes, Niederländische Zeichnungen 1450-1850, Kupferstichkabinett der Hamburger Kunsthalle (see under New Titles) HNA Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, November 2006 1 historians of netherlandish art 23 S. Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904 Telephone/Fax: (732) 937-8394 E-Mail: [email protected] www.hnanews.org Historians of Netherlandish Art Offi cers President - Stephanie Dickey (2009–2013) Bader Chair in Northern Baroque Art Queen’s University Kingston ON K7L 3N6 Canada Vice-President - Amy Golahny (2009–2013) Lycoming College Williamsport, PA 17701 Treasurer - Rebecca Brienen University of Miami Art & Art History Department PO Box 248106 Coral Gables FL 33124-2618 European Treasurer and Liaison - Fiona Healy Seminarstrasse 7 D-55127 Mainz Germany Board Members Contents Dagmar Eichberger (2008–2012) HNA News ............................................................................1 Wayne Franits (2009–2013) Matt Kavaler (2008–2012) Personalia ............................................................................... 2 Henry Luttikhuizen (2009 and 2010–2014) Exhibitions
    [Show full text]
  • Archivum Historicum Societatis Iesu
    ARCHIVUM HISTORICUM SOCIETATIS IESU VOL. LXXXII, FASC. 164 2013/II Articles Charles Libois S.J., L’École des Jésuites au Caire dans l’Ancienne Compagnie. 355 Leonardo Cohen, El padre Pedro Páez frente a la interpretación bíblica etíope. La controversia sobre “cómo llenar una 397 brecha mítica”. Claudia von Collani, Astronomy versus Astrology. Johann Adam Schall von Bell and his “superstitious” Chinese Calendar. 421 Andrea Mariani, Mobilità e formazione dei Gesuiti della Confederazione polacco-lituana. Analisi statistico- prosopografica del personale dei collegi di Nieśwież e Słuck (1724-1773). 459 Francisco Malta Romeiras, The emergence of molecular genetics in Portugal: the enterprise of Luís Archer SJ. 501 Bibliography (Paul Begheyn S.J.) 513 Book Reviews Charlotte de Castelnau-L’Estoile et alia, Missions d’évangélisation et circulation des savoirs XVIe- XVIIIe siècle (Luce Giard) 633; Pedro de Valencia, Obras completas. VI. Escritos varios (Doris Moreno) 642; Wolfgang Müller (Bearb.), Die datierten Handschriften der Universitätsbibliothek München. Textband und Tafelband (Rudolf Gamper) 647; Ursula Paintner, Des Papsts neue Creatur‘. Antijesuitische Publizistik im Deutschsprachigen Raum (1555-1618) (Fabian Fechner) 652; Anthony E. Clark, China’s Saints. Catholic Martyrdom during the Qing (1644-1911) (Marc Lindeijer S.J.) 654; Thomas M. McCoog, “And touching our Society”: Fashioning Jesuit Identity in Elizabethan England (Michael Questier) 656; Festo Mkenda, Mission for Everyone: A Story of the Jesuits in East Africa (1555-2012) (Brendan Carmody S.J.) 659; Franz Brendle, Der Erzkanzler im Religionskrieg. Kurfürst Anselm Casimir von Mainz, die geistlichen Fürsten und das Reich 1629 bis 1647 (Frank Sobiec) 661; Robert E. Scully, Into the Lion’s Den.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesuit Psychology and the Theory of Knowledge
    Chapter 5 Jesuit Psychology and the Theory of Knowledge Daniel Heider 1 Introduction Although Jesuit philosophical psychology of the sixteenth and the first decades of the seventeenth century was mostly united against secular Aristotelianism, exemplified by “the sects” of the Alexandrists and the Averroists, doctrinal vari- ety conflating the panoply of Scholastic streams with important ingredients of the neo-Platonic and medical tradition can be seen as a typical feature of the early Jesuits’ philosophical syncretism.1 Despite this doctrinal heterogeneity, the goal of this chapter is to propose what I regard as an important “paradigm shift” in the development of the early (Iberian) Jesuits’ psychology. It has been claimed that Jesuit philosophers of the third generation, such as Pedro Hurta- do de Mendoza (1578–1641), Rodrigo de Arriaga (1592–1667), and Francisco de Oviedo (1602–51), substantially revived the Scholastic via moderna.2 This histo- riographical hypothesis about the crucial role of late medieval nominalism— there are, as yet, very few studies on the matter—will be verified on two issues typical of the period, both of which can be viewed as variants of the classical problem of “the one and the many.” First, there is the query about the char- acter of the distinction between the soul (the principle of unity) and its vital powers (the principle of plurality). Famously, critiques of the Scholastic theory of really distinct accidents (i.e., powers interceding between the soul and its acts; henceforth, the real distinction thesis [rdt]) constituted a representative piece of the philosophical agenda for early modern philosophers in general.3 1 For Jesuit syncretism, see Daniel Heider, “Introduction,” in Cognitive Psychology in Early Jesuit Scholasticism, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vom Seelengefährt Zum Glorienleib   
    Vom Seelengefährt zum Glorienleib Verena Lobsien Bernd Roling Lutz Bergemann Bettina Bohle (eds.) BERLIN STUDIES OF THE ANCIENT WORLD , das bereits von Platon und zuvor von Parmenides konzipiert wurde, ist für die philosophische Selbstverständigung von der Antike bis in die frühe Au lärung und darüber hinaus die moderne Esoterik von zentraler Bedeutung. Sein veranschaulichendes Potenzial reicht von der Erkundung der Möglichkeiten der Kommunikation zwischen eigentlich klar voneinander geschiedenen ontologischen Räumen – dem des Unsto ich- Göttlichen einerseits und dem des Sto ich-Irdischen bzw. menschlich Seelischen andererseits – bis hin zu natur philosophischen Entwürfen zur Erklärung des Phänomens der Elektrizität. Immer wieder wurde es von so unterschiedlichen Denkern wie z. B. Plutarch, Bernardus Silvestris, Kepler, Suarez oder Christian Wolf herangezogen, um das Problem der Einwirkung des Intelligiblen und Göttlichen auf die menschliche Seele oder die irdische Natur zu erklären. Es motivierte Dichter wie Traherne oder Donne zu literarischen Insze- nierungen sympathetisch-aitherischer Leiblichkeit und deren eschatologischen Implikationen. Diesem zentralen und spannungsvollen Themenspek- trum in seiner historischen wie thematischen Konti- nuität nähern sich die Autor*innen dieses Bandes aus interdisziplinär verschränkter Perspektive, die zudem eine innovative, künstlerische Auseinandersetzung mit den verschiedenen Aspekten des Licht(-leib)es umfasst. berlin studies of 57 the ancient world berlin studies of the ancient world ·
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Rutherford's Treatise on Providence
    Samuel Rutherford’s Treatise on Providence: The Table of Contents in English Translated by Bobby Phillips From Disputatio Scholastica de Divina Providentia (1649) Brought to you by Reformed Books Online ReformedBooksOnline.com The Best, Free, Reformed Books and Articles Online We hope this work helps you to enjoy and glorify God Text in [brackets] is the translator’s. This translation of this work is licensed under the very sharing- friendly: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License 2016 Please share and use this work in any godly way, shape, or form desired. A SCHOLASTIC DISPUTE ABOUT DIVINE PROVIDENCE Delivered to Young Candidates in the Renowned University of St Andrews by way of Various Lectures, in which (because it pertains to the greatest heads of matters) is both contended and argued a rebuttal to the Jesuits, Arminians, and Socinians, concerning the Dominion of GOD through His industrious action surrounding sin, through concurrence of primary cause, and through predetermination. Adjoined are Metaphysical Inquiries concerning Being, Possibility, the Dominion of GOD in entities and non-entities, and various Questions which especially conduce to a more fruitful and more exquisite study of the Doctrines of Divine Providence. Through the studies and diligence of Samuel Rutherford, honored Professor of Sacred Theology at the Renowned University of St Andrews. JOB XXIII:8&9 “Behold, I go forward, but he is not there; and backward, but I cannot perceive him: On the left hand, where he doth work, but I cannot behold him: he hideth himself on the right hand, that I cannot see him.” ROMANS XI:23 “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!” EDINBURGH Printed by the Heirs of George Anderson, 1 on behalf of Robert Brown, and for sale in the flank of the Northern courtyard, not much beyond the cross, toward the insignia of the Sun, in the Year of the LORD 1649.
    [Show full text]
  • Palacký University in Olomouc 2004; and V
    Palacký University Olomouc Philosophical Faculty Department of Philosophy Mgr. Vlastimil Vohánka Modality, Logical Probability, and the Trinity: A Defence of Weak Skepticism MODALITA, LOGICKÁ PRAVDĚPODOBNOST A TROJICE: OBHAJOBA UMÍRNĚNÉHO SKEPTICISMU Dissertation thesis Study program: Philosophy Supervisor: Prof. PhDr. et RNDr. Jan Štěpán, CSc. Olomouc 2011 1 Statement I declare that I wrote this dissertation on my own and that I cited all used sources. Olomouc, ............................... Vlastimil Vohánka ............................... 2 Abstract (EN) The author defends the thesis that, apart from religious experience, it cannot be evident – in a defined sense of psychological impossibility – that the Trinity doctrine is logically possible. The Trinity doctrine is understood broadly, as the proposition that there is just one God but three persons each of which is God. It is concluded that, apart from religious experience, none of the following claims can be evident: the Trinity doctrine is true; Christianity is true; the Trinity doctrine is logically possible; Christianity is logically possible; the Trinity doctrine has some but not minimal (zero) logical probability with respect to all that is evident; Christianity has some but not minimal logical probability with respect to all that is evident. Christianity is understood as a particular compound proposition including the Trinity doctrine. Replies are provided to objections against the employed principles of logical probability. The author leaves as undecided whether the Trinity doctrine, Christianity, or their logical possibility are: epistemically justified; well-argued; plausibly logically probable with respect to all that is evident (though not evidently logically probable on such information apart from religious experience); or probable in other than the logical sense.
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to Reformed Orthodoxy Brill’S Companions to the Christian Tradition
    A Companion to Reformed Orthodoxy Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition A series of handbooks and reference works on the intellectual and religious life of Europe, 500–1800 Editor-in-Chief Christopher M. Bellitto (Kean University) VOLUME 40 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/bcct A Companion to Reformed Orthodoxy Edited by Herman J. Selderhuis LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 Cover illustration: Franeker University Library. Courtesy: Tresoar, Leeuwarden, Atlas Schoemaker. This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 1871-6377 ISBN 978-90-04-23622-6 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-24891-5 (e-book) Copyright 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Global Oriental, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper. CONTENTS List of Contributors ........................................................................................ vii Abbreviations ................................................................................................... ix Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Herman J. Selderhuis PART I RELATIONS Reformed Orthodoxy: A Short History of Research ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Books
    Italian Books I Philobiblon Rome London New York In collaboration with Govi Rare Books, New York Italian Books I Spring 2019 Preface We are very pleased to present Philobiblon’s new publishing initiative Italian Books, a series of numbered catalogues devoted to the important place of Italian culture on the world stage. The catalogues will feature manuscripts, documents, printed books, engravings, drawings, and artist’s books produced in Italy, as well as Italian books printed outside the country, translations attesting to the impact of Italian culture abroad, including volumes finely bound by sought-after Italian binders, and those once owned by great protagonists of Italian book collecting. Together these selections will illuminate a journey into the multifarious Italian book world in the broadest and richest sense. After all, the history of the book itself is a fascinating narrative, an uninterrupted medley of fruitful cultural transfers and the migration of ideas. In this regard, Italy has always represented a unique crossroad among cultures, the custodian of ancient past, as well as the gateway between Western and Eastern worlds, whose academies, art collections, libraries, printing houses, and bookshops have provided, over the centuries, fertile meeting grounds for generations of scholars, bibliophiles, and connoisseurs. In the first decades of the twentieth century, two international exhibitions paid homage to the Italian book. The Mostra Storica dell’Arte della Stampa in Italia opened in Leipzig in 1914 and presented the magnificence of Italian book production from the fifteenth to the eighteenth century. The splendid Exposition du Livre Italien followed in Paris in 1926, mounted at the Bibliothèque Nationale and the Musée des Arts Décoratifs.
    [Show full text]
  • SECOND SCHOLASTICISM and BLACK SLAVERY1 Segunda Escolástica E Escravidão Negra La Segunda Escolástica Y La Esclavitud Negra
    PORTO ALEGRE http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.36112 SECOND SCHOLASTICISM AND BLACK SLAVERY1 Segunda Escolástica e escravidão negra La Segunda Escolástica y la esclavitud negra Roberto Hofmeister Pich2 Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil Abstract In order to systematically explore the normative treatment of black slavery by Second Scholastic thinkers, usually placing the problem within the broad discussion of moral conscience and, more narrowly, the nature and justice of trade and contracts, I propose two stations of research that may be helpful for future studies, especially in what con- cerns the study of Scholastic ideas in colonial Latin America. Beginning with the analysis of just titles for slavery and slavery trade proposed by Luis de Molina S.J. (1535–1600), I show how his accounts were critically reviewed by Diego de Avendaño S.J. (1594–1688), revealing basic features of Second Scholastic normative thinking in Europe and the Americas. Normative knowledge provided by these two Scholastic intellectuals would be deeply tested throughout the last decades of the 17th century, especially by authors who sharpened the systemic analysis and a rigorist moral assessment of every title of slavery and slaveholding, as well as the requirements of an ethics of restitution. Keywords: black slavery, Second Scholasticism, commutative justice, probabilism, Luis de Molina, Diego de Avendaño. 1 This study was prepared during a stay as guest professor at the Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms- Universität Bonn / Germany, as first “CAPES / Universität Bonn Lehrstuhlinhaber”, from July 2018 to February 2019. I hereby express my gratitude to the remarkable support of the Brazilian Agency Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) and the University of Bonn.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Truthmaking in 17Th-Century Scholasticism
    Truth and Truthmaking in 17th-Century Scholasticism by Brian Embry A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Toronto © Copyright by Brian Embry 2015 Truth and Truthmaking in 17th-Century Scholasticism Brian Embry Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Toronto 2015 Abstract Some propositions are true and others are false. What explains this difference? Some philosophers have recently defended the view that a proposition is true because there is an entity, its truthmaker, that makes it true. Call this the ‘truthmaker principle’. The truthmaker principle is controversial, occasioning the rise of a large contemporary debate about the nature of truthmaking and truthmakers. What has gone largely unnoticed is that scholastics of the early modern period also had the notion of a truthmaker [verificativum], and this notion is at the center of early modern scholastic disputes about the ontological status of negative entities, the past and future, and uninstantiated essences. My project is to explain how early modern scholastics conceive of truthmaking and to show how they use the notion of a truthmaker to regiment ontological enquiry. I argue that the notion of a truthmaker is born of a certain conception of truth according to which truth is a mereological sum of a true mental sentence and its intentional object. This view entails the truthmaker principle and is responsible for some surprising metaphysical views. For example, it leads many early modern scholastics to posit irreducible negative entities as truthmakers for negative truths, giving rise to an extensive literature on the nature of negative entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Sovereignty and Economic Ethics Among the Spanish Second Scholasticism: Its Influence on Modern Thought
    June 8, 2011 16:44 Research Publishing : IJAS Sample ijas-0403 International Journal of Arts & Sciences, CD-ROM. ISSN: 1944-6934 :: 4(3):141-150 (2011) Copyright c 2011 by InternationalJournal.org POLITICAL SOVEREIGNTY AND ECONOMIC ETHICS AMONG THE SPANISH SECOND SCHOLASTICISM: ITS INFLUENCE ON MODERN THOUGHT Rui Coimbra Gonçalves University of Coimbra, Portugal The question of power as it was thought by the theologians from the Spanish Second Scholasticism results always sensitive, especially while converting her in terms of political sovereignty exercise over the conquered peoples from the overseas. If the pattern native from Francisco de Vitoria, based in his turn in the ideas of Saint Thomas Aquinas, offered us already at the dawn of the XVI th century a compromise situation according to this matter, recognising the rights from the aborigine of no submission to the Christian missions, for Luis de Molina, the struggle was clearly for the defence by which the conquered peoples should convert in practical actions their claim to maintain their condition of independence and resistance against colonial power. The case was quite different in Francisco Suárez, a Spanish theologian from the University of Coimbra, like Molina. For him the church would have legitimacy to employ her force through the secular arm delegated in and offered by a prince of Christianity if any native nation refused to be evangelized. Finally the main aim of this report will be to find how the Spanish doctors from the early modern age in Europe continue today exerting their influence on the contemporary ethics namely through the economic questions.
    [Show full text]