DOCSLIB.ORG

Visistadvaita.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visistadvaita.Pdf Visistadvaita A Philosophy of Religion K.R.Paramahamsa 1 2 Table of Contents Page No Preface 5 1. Visistadvaita - A Darsana 7 2. The Theory of Knowledge 12 General 12 Dharmabhuta-jnaana (Phenomenological Consciousness) 15 Svarupa-jnaana (Existential Consciousness) & Dharmabhuta-jnaana (Phenomenological Consciousness) -Interrelationship 19 3. The Theory of Judgment 22 4. The Theory of Relations 25 5. Truth, Error and Avidya 28 Truth 28 Error 30 Avidya 33 6. Saguna Brahman 37 The Brahman as Adhara 44 The Brahman as Satya 47 The Brahman as Jnaana 50 The Brahman as Ananta 54 The Brahman as Bhuvana Sundara 57 The Brahman as Saririn 65 The Brahman as Sesin 71 The Brahman as Niyantr 75 The Brahman as Redeemer 82 7. Cosmology 91 8. The Psychology of Jivatman 94 9. Mukti-Mumuksutva 99 Mukti 99 Mumuksutva 105 10. Ways to Salvation 107 Karma-yoga 107 Jnaana-yoga 109 Bhakti-yoga 112 Prapatti-yoga 117 11. The Mysticism of Visistadviata 123 3 12. The Theology of Srivaisnavism 127 13. Srivaisnavism of Visistadvaita 131 14. Evolution of Vaisnavism 136 Narayana-Visnu 136 Sankarsana-Baladeva 139 Pancaraatra 144 4 Preface Visistadvaita, as a philosophy of religion, not only interprets metaphysics in terms of religion, and religion in terms of metaphysics, but equates the two by the common designation darsana. Darsana connotes a Vedanta philosophical system as well as spiritual perception of Reality, and may be explained as an integral intuition of the Brahman. In extreme monism, the Brahman is jnaana and is realized by jnaana. Extreme theism distrusts the intellect and relies on scriptural faith. But in Visistadvaita, the Brahman can be enquired into as well as experienced. Conceptual knowledge of God is exalted by the soul- sense of God, and the soul-sight of God is rationalized by conceptual knowledge. Ramanuja integrates the experiences of risis and Alvars in relation to the Brahman, the Supreme Self, and expounds what is called Ubhaya-Vedanta. As a philosopher-saint, he establishes the truths of Visistadvaita as embodied in the Vedantasutras. Simultaneously, he elucidates each adhikarana of the Sutras as experience of the Brahman, brahmanubhava. He gives a critical exposition of the experiences of the Alvars by showing their logical coherence. As a saint, he experiences God, and as a philosopher, he proves the truths of spiritual experience. He establishes that Sribhashyam, his commentary on Vedantasutras, and the Bhagavad-visaya, the logical exposition of the spiritual experiences of Nammalvar, are similar in content and look to the Brahman as the Ultimate to be attained. He is thus the exponent of Vedanta as stated in Vedantasutras and in Bhagavad-visaya and is, therefore, considered the architect of Ubhaya-Vedanta. The end and aim of Ubhaya-Vedanta is summed up in the Upanisad itself: ‘He who knows the Brahman attains the Highest’. The catholicity of Visistadvaita lies in its synthetic insight into truth, and the spiritual transformation of such insight into universal love. Ramanuja’s synthetic method consists in his conclusion that all ideas and names ultimately connote the Brahman, Narayana, that the worship of deities like Indra is really the worship of Narayana, the inner ruler of all beings. The terms sarva-saririn, sarva-sabdavacya and sarva-raksaka refer only to the Brahman or Narayana. Srivaisnavism, as a living religion, owes itself to Ramanuja. He has moulded it into a religion of sattvic love based on sastraic authority and spiritual experience. Visistadvaitic Srivaisnavism lays stress on personal mystic experience rather than on super naturalism and historicity. It guarantees God to all persons, and affords a philosophic basis for religious consciousness. For Ramanuja, God is love, the atman is eternal and the Paramatman is immanent. The idea of God as the saririn of all and as indwelling love is the contribution of Ramanuja. This concept offers the most inspiring motive for philosophic enlightenment and achievement of social integration. Visistadvaita is not a mere metaphysical enquiry into the nature of the Brahman as the ground of existence, but it is also a spiritual method of attaining the Brahman as the supreme end of life. Thus Visistadvaita establishes itself as a philosophy of religion. It is significant to note that the term Visistadvaita is generally translated into English as Qualified Non-dualism. What is qualified in Visistadvaita is not Non-dualism, but the Brahman. Visistadvaita propounds that the Brahman is saguna as opposed to nirguna, though ontologically. It subscribes to the theory of Non-dualism, though of the Saguna Brahman. It is also significant to note that while Vaisnavism has evolved predating the Christian era as a non-Vedic religion of rites, Srivaisnavism, as a Vedic religion, has been the 5 contribution of Vedic seers such as Sri Ramanuja, Vedanta Desika, etc. These seers along with the Alvars have made Srivaisnavism a religion of spiritial realization. This book Visistadvaita- A Philosophy of Religion borrows considerably from the work ‘The Philosophy of Visistadvaita’ by P.N.Srinivasachari, a very well researched and creative presentation. 6 1. Visistadvaita - A Darsana A Darsana is a body of eternal and impersonal spiritual truths enshrined in Sruti, which can be logically tested and verified in personal experience. Sruti is self-valid, and the self-explanation of existence in its wholeness and of experience in its integrity. The Vedanta Darsanas afford insight into the nature of the Brahman. The ultimate proof of the existence of the Brahman is the experience of the Brahman. It is not tarka-drsti, the way of reasoning and dialectic, but tattva-drsti, the soul-sight of the Brahman, by knowing which everything is known. Visistadvaita, a Vedanta Darsana, maintains its position in the history of Indian thought by establishing its own siddhanta by a criticism of rival systems. It has, at the same time, a synthetic insight into the essentials of other Darsanas, and accepts whatever in them is consistent with its basic principles. It is neither pure philosophy nor pure religion. It is a true philosophy of religion, which reconciles the opposition between philosophy and religion, and the conflict between monism and pluralism. If it is liberally interpreted in terms of contemporary philosophy and comparative religion without, in any way, sacrificing its foundational principles, it is capable of satisfying the demands of science and philosophy on the one hand, and of ethics and religion on the other. It is the task of philosophy as an intellectual enquiry into the whole of reality to frame the ultimate problems of life. The three persistent problems of philosophy relate to God, nature and the self. Of them, the enquiry into the nature of God is the most valuable. The existence of God is established by the well-known theistic proofs, and not by revealed theology. Faith and reason belong to different realms. It is impossible to prove the existence of God by logical thinking. On the other hand, mere reason is ill founded and self- contradictory. As free thought leads to atheism, blind faith leads to dogmatism. The conflict between faith and philosophy is mainly due to the difference in their method of approach or enquiry. Faith claims finality. When it is supported by reason working in a subordinate capacity, it becomes dogmatic. When dogma is sanctioned by tradition, and sanctified by the worship of word, it claims absolute allegiance. Faith then results in fanaticism. On the other hand, philosophy rejects the way of faith. It accepts only the guidance of reason, and follows its conclusions. But, quite often, it starts doubting everything, and ends with doubts, with no solutions to the problems posed by it. The advancement of reason, for its own sake and unrelated to spiritual intuition, only leads to atheism. Theology, therefore, condemns its guidance and takes refuse in faith. This conflict between faith and philosophy will cease only if they get reconciled in a true philosophy of religion. Visistadvaita offers a contrast to mere philosophical speculation on the whole of reality on one hand, and to religion in the sense of a faith in revealed theology on the other. Theology insists on dogmatic faith in truths regarded as infallible on account of scriptural authority or divine disclosure. It is by its nature antagonistic to the free exercise of reason on the facts provided by human experience, which is the hallmark of philosophy. Ramanuja’s system of Visistadvaita recognizes the claims of both faith and reason. It aims at harmonizing or reconciling them. It admits a free play of reason as to the data of sense perception and inference. It also accepts spiritual intuition, anubhava of the great seers, and the doctrines or views recorded in the scriptures. 7 There is considerable divergence between secular thought and religious knowledge in different realms with varying results. The first stage is that of tension between naturalism and supernaturalism. The conflict is of value in so far as it leads to recognition of the fact that matter is real, though the materialistic outlook is false. It also becomes clear that a metaphysical system cannot be built on the foundations of the physical-chemical sciences and mathematics. Polytheism, in whatever form, cannot satisfy the demand of reason for unity, and the ethical claims of righteousness. The second is that of the collision between vitalism and animism. Vitalism accepts the primacy of reason, but denies the validity of faith. It also repudiates the mechanistic view of life. On the other hand, animism attributes life and divinity to nature. It assumes different forms such as metempsychosis, fetishism, totemism and spiritism. According to it, every natural object is animate and endowed with spirit. Visistadvaita is opposed to both the philosophy of vitalism and the religion of animism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Note to Users
    NOTE TO USERS Page(s) missing in number only; text follows. Page(s) were scanned as received. 96 This reproduction is the best copy available. ® UMI The Goddess and Her Powers: The Tantric Identities of the Saundarya Lahar; Meera Kachroo Faculty of Religious Studies McGill University, Montreal June 2005 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts ©Meera Kachroo 2005 Library and Bibliothèque et 1+1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-22601-8 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-22601-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger and Indian Thinking: the Hermeneutic of a “Belonging-Together” of Negation and Affirmation
    Comparative Philosophy Volume 6, No. 1 (2015): 111-128 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org HEIDEGGER AND INDIAN THINKING: THE HERMENEUTIC OF A “BELONGING-TOGETHER” OF NEGATION AND AFFIRMATION JAISON D. VALLOORAN ABSTRACT: According to Heidegger the questioning of Being is unique to western philosophical tradition, however we see that the hermeneutic of Being is explicit in inter- cultural context of thinking. Understanding Brahman as “one” and “the same” Śankara speaks together with Heidegger the same hermeneutic of ontological monism. Due to the reason that there is no explicit terminological equivalent of the word ‘Being’ in Śankara’s thinking, the hermeneutic of Śankara’s ontological understanding of Brahman and its distinction as “Saguna” and “Nirguna” are not sufficiently explored. In an inter-cultural ontological context, it is important not to insist on terminological equivalence, but to search for hermeneutic depth. Similarly Madhyamaka-Buddhism of Nāgārjuna describes the universe as totally devoid of reality, called ‘Śūnya’ or void, which is an expression of nihilism; it is comparable to Heidegger’s observation of the concealing of Being as “nihil”. The hermeneutic of these explicit ontological characters of Being, as concealment and un- concealment allow us to discover a sabotaging brotherhood, because the nihil and something are ontologically two essential sides of the same thinking. Keywords: Heidegger, Śankara, Nāgārjuna, Inter-cultural Ontology, Indian Philosophy 1. INTRODUCTION Philosophies give explanations of the world, of “what” of beings, and set norms for the right relationships between human beings. Therefore it is an exclusive property of mankind; still it is an intellectual engagement in an individual culture in its highest level.
    [Show full text]
  • An Understanding of Maya: the Philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva
    An understanding of Maya: The philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva Department of Religion studies Theology University of Pretoria By: John Whitehead 12083802 Supervisor: Dr M Sukdaven 2019 Declaration Declaration of Plagiarism 1. I understand what plagiarism means and I am aware of the university’s policy in this regard. 2. I declare that this Dissertation is my own work. 3. I did not make use of another student’s previous work and I submit this as my own words. 4. I did not allow anyone to copy this work with the intention of presenting it as their own work. I, John Derrick Whitehead hereby declare that the following Dissertation is my own work and that I duly recognized and listed all sources for this study. Date: 3 December 2019 Student number: u12083802 __________________________ 2 Foreword I started my MTh and was unsure of a topic to cover. I knew that Hinduism was the religion I was interested in. Dr. Sukdaven suggested that I embark on the study of the concept of Maya. Although this concept provided a challenge for me and my faith, I wish to thank Dr. Sukdaven for giving me the opportunity to cover such a deep philosophical concept in Hinduism. This concept Maya is deeper than one expects and has broaden and enlightened my mind. Even though this was a difficult theme to cover it did however, give me a clearer understanding of how the world is seen in Hinduism. 3 List of Abbreviations AD Anno Domini BC Before Christ BCE Before Common Era BS Brahmasutra Upanishad BSB Brahmasutra Upanishad with commentary of Sankara BU Brhadaranyaka Upanishad with commentary of Sankara CE Common Era EW Emperical World GB Gitabhasya of Shankara GK Gaudapada Karikas Rg Rig Veda SBH Sribhasya of Ramanuja Svet.
    [Show full text]
  • Theological of I
    IN THIS ISSUE: on The Work of the Academy Including the results of the Independent Annual Meeting Survey, beginning on page 10. RELIGIOUSELIGIOUS STUDIESTUDIES NEEWSWS 2008 Annual Meeting News Annual Meeting 2008 ..........................................4 March 2008 Published by the American Academy of Religion Vol. 23, No. 2 Beautiful Chicago Introducing the Program Planner.........................5 Details on Our New Annual Meeting Publication AAR President Emilie Townes discusses her Important 2008 Annual Meeting Dates................5 Registration Deadlines thoughts on her journey and her goals for New Program Units..............................................5 the Academy as its new president. See her 15 New Units interview on page 9. Where to Stay in Chicago ....................................5 Annual Meeting Hotels Eating, Drinking, and Entertainment ..................6 Around the City From the Editor ......................................................3 Changes to AAR’s Career Services ........................7 Introducing Our New Job Postings and Job Center A Conversation with the President ......................9 Chairs Workshop ..................................................8 Emilie Townes Taking Religion(s) Seriously: What Students Need to Know 2008 Committee Roster ......................................16 2007 Annual Meeting News Scholars Serving the AAR A Successful and Popular Meeting......................22 Call for Committee Nominations ........................17 San Diego Had Greatest Number of Sessions Available
    [Show full text]
  • The Vaishnavite Reformers of India; Critical Sketches of Their Lives and Writings
    23 Ic: Lttp- IE THE YAISHNAYITE REFORMERS OF INDIA CRITICAL SKETCHES OF THEIR LIVES AND WRITINGS BY T. RAJAGOPALA CHARTAR, M.A., B.L. PRICE RF:. ONK. PUBLISHED BY G. A NATESAN & CO., ESPLANADE, ronp CONCERN fic Building . .* HIS LIPE AND TIMES BY C. N. KUISHNASWAMI AIYAK, M.A,, L.T. HIS PHILOSOPHY BY PANDIT SITANATII TATTVABHUSHAN. Price As. 12. " To Subscriber* of the Indian Her law," As. S. Sri Madfiwa^RTadliwaism A HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL SKETCH IIY 0- N. KUISHNASWAMV AIYA1I, M.A Price AS. 12. " To Subscribers of the Imiitiit /iW'jV?/'," As. S. SRI RAMANUJAGHARYA 'HIS LIFE AND TIMES S. KRISHNASWAMI AIYANGAll, M.A HIS PHILOSOPHY BY T. RAJAGOPALACHARIAR, M.A., B.L. Price As. 12. To Subscribers of the *' Indian Review" As. 8. G- A- NATESAN & CO., ESPLANADE, MADRAS. CONTENTS. FACE. noN ... ... ... i 'lamuni ... ... .... 1 Pundavikuksha ... ... ... 12 ya ... ... ... 2i> Raroarmjacharya ... Sri Vedanta iK'sika ... !>7 Manavala Mulia ]\funi Chaitanya INTRODUCTION, These are a series of Seven Essays on the Lives and Writings of the principal religious reformers of the Vaishnavite or Yisishtadwaita School of India. The treatment is critical and historical has also ; but special prominence been given to the literary side of this School's of activity. A clear account of the growth Vaishnavaism is intended to be conveyed by these Lives of Eminent Keformers, and refe- rence has throughout been made to the deve- lopment of doctrines. A special chapter is devoted to the exposition of the Visishtad- waita philosophy according to Ramanuja. The growth of Yaishnavaism in Northern India is briefly dealt with in the last Essay, that on Sri Chaitanya, wherein that great Saint's career is also fully described.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phenomenology of Color and Desire
    Lorenzo Marinucci University of Rome Tor Vergata Iro A Phenomenology of Color and Desire This essay is a phenomenological analysis of the meanings expressed by the character 色 ( Jp. iro/shiki, Ch. sè). They include “color,” “love,” “eroticism,” “sensuous beauty,” and even “phenomenon.” Is this overlap fortuitous, or can we reach a deep insight on these apparently disparate elements by reflecting on色 ? Does the East Asian approach to color qua desire reveal something essential about both color and desire, heavily downplayed within European philosophy? I will address this phenomenological issue through five sections. First, we will consider Husserl’s description ofplena and Merleau-Ponty’s reflection on sexuality as metaphysics; then, the role of color as a paradigm for emotion in Japanese aesthetics will be addressed. Both these discourses will offer a new perspective on the Heart Sutra’s equation of 色 and “emptiness” (空). We will argue how and why Goethe’s theory of color shows a distinct affinity with these Asian sources. Lastly, I will highlight the interplay of all these elements in Kuki Shūzō’s The Struc- ture of Iki. Color and eroticism are ultimately connected as the pre-formal and yet transcendental disclosure of the world: central paradigms for view- ing experience itself as relation and immersion. keywords: color—desire—phenomenology—Husserl—Goethe— Buddhism—Kuki Shūzō—Japanese philosophy—aesthetics European Journal of Japanese Philosophy 5 • 2020, pp. 193–226 his text tries to approach philosophically what at first glance appears Tas a lexical problem: the complex intermingling of meanings in the Chinese and Japanese expressions of erotic love and color.
    [Show full text]
  • Brahma Sutra
    BRAHMA SUTRA CHAPTER 1 1st Pada 1st Adikaranam to 11th Adhikaranam Sutra 1 to 31 INDEX S. No. Topic Pages Topic No Sutra No Summary 5 Introduction of Brahma Sutra 6 1 Jijnasa adhikaranam 1 a) Sutra 1 103 1 1 2 Janmady adhikaranam 2 a) Sutra 2 132 2 2 3 Sastrayonitv adhikaranam 3 a) Sutra 3 133 3 3 4 Samanvay adhikaranam 4 a) Sutra 4 204 4 4 5 Ikshatyadyadhikaranam: (Sutras 5-11) 5 a) Sutra 5 324 5 5 b) Sutra 6 353 5 6 c) Sutra 7 357 5 7 d) Sutra 8 362 5 8 e) Sutra 9 369 5 9 f) Sutra 10 372 5 10 g) Sutra 11 376 5 11 2 S. No. Topic Pages Topic No Sutra No 6 Anandamayadhikaranam: (Sutras 12-19) 6 a) Sutra 12 382 6 12 b) Sutra 13 394 6 13 c) Sutra 14 397 6 14 d) Sutra 15 407 6 15 e) Sutra 16 411 6 16 f) Sutra 17 414 6 17 g) Sutra 18 416 6 18 h) Sutra 19 425 6 19 7 Antaradhikaranam: (Sutras 20-21) 7 a) Sutra 20 436 7 20 b) Sutra 21 448 7 21 8 Akasadhikaranam : 8 a) Sutra 22 460 8 22 9 Pranadhikaranam : 9 a) Sutra 23 472 9 23 3 S. No. Topic Pages Topic No Sutra No 10 Jyotischaranadhikaranam : (Sutras 24-27) 10 a) Sutra 24 486 10 24 b) Sutra 25 508 10 25 c) Sutra 26 513 10 26 d) Sutra 27 517 10 27 11 Pratardanadhikaranam: (Sutras 28-31) 11 a) Sutra 28 526 11 28 b) Sutra 29 538 11 29 c) Sutra 30 546 11 30 d) Sutra 31 558 11 31 4 SUMMARY Brahma Sutra Bhasyam Topics - 191 Chapter – 1 Chapter – 2 Chapter – 3 Chapter – 4 Samanvaya – Avirodha – non – Sadhana – spiritual reconciliation through Phala – result contradiction practice proper interpretation Topics - 39 Topics - 47 Topics - 67 Topics 38 Sections Topics Sections Topics Sections Topics Sections Topics 1 11 1 13 1 06 1 14 2 07 2 08 2 08 2 11 3 13 3 17 3 36 3 06 4 08 4 09 4 17 4 07 5 Lecture – 01 Puja: • Gratitude to lord for completion of Upanishad course (last Chandogya Upanishad + Brihadaranyaka Upanishad).
    [Show full text]
  • Brahman, Atman and Maya
    Sanatana Dharma The Eternal Way of Life (Hinduism) Brahman, Atman and Maya The Hindu Way of Comprehending Reality and Life Brahman, Atman and Maya u These three terms are essential in understanding the Hindu view of reality. v Brahman—that which gives rise to maya v Atman—what each maya truly is v Maya—appearances of Brahman (all the phenomena in the cosmos) Early Vedic Deities u The Aryan people worship many deities through sacrificial rituals: v Agni—the god of fire v Indra—the god of thunder, a warrior god v Varuna—the god of cosmic order (rita) v Surya—the sun god v Ushas—the goddess of dawn v Rudra—the storm god v Yama—the first mortal to die and become the ruler of the afterworld The Meaning of Sacrificial Rituals u Why worship deities? u During the period of Upanishads, Hindus began to search for the deeper meaning of sacrificial rituals. u Hindus came to realize that presenting offerings to deities and asking favors in return are self-serving. u The focus gradually shifted to the offerings (the sacrificed). u The sacrificed symbolizes forgoing one’s well-being for the sake of the well- being of others. This understanding became the foundation of Hindu spirituality. In the old rites, the patron had passed the burden of death on to others. By accepting his invitation to the sacrificial banquet, the guests had to take responsibility for the death of the animal victim. In the new rite, the sacrificer made himself accountable for the death of the beast.
    [Show full text]
  • Panchadashee – 05 Mahavakya Vivekah
    Swami Vidyaranya’s PANCHADASHEE – 05 MAHAVAKYA VIVEKAH Fixing the Meaning of the Great Sayings MODERN-DAY REFLECTIONS On a 13TH CENTURY VEDANTA CLASSIC by a South African Student TEXT Swami Gurubhaktananda 47.05 2018 A FOUNDATIONAL TEXT ON VEDANTA PHILOSOPHY PANCHADASHEE – An Anthology of 15 Texts by Swami Vidyaranyaji PART Chap TITLE OF TEXT ENGLISH TITLE No. No. Vers. 1 Tattwa Viveka Differentiation of the Supreme Reality 65 2 Maha Bhoota Viveka Differentiation of the Five Great Elements 109 3 Pancha Kosha Viveka Differentiation of the Five Sheaths 43 SAT: 4 Dvaita Viveka Differentiation of Duality in Creation 69 VIVEKA 5 Mahavakya Viveka Fixing the Meaning of the Great Sayings 8 Sub-Total A 294 6 Chitra Deepa The Picture Lamp 290 7 Tripti Deepa The Lamp of Perfect Satisfaction 298 8 Kootastha Deepa The Unchanging Lamp 76 CHIT: DEEPA 9 Dhyana Deepa The Lamp of Meditation 158 10 Nataka Deepa The Theatre Lamp 26 Sub-Total B 848 11 Yogananda The Bliss of Yoga 134 12 Atmananda The Bliss of the Self 90 13 Advaitananda The Bliss of Non-Duality 105 14 Vidyananda The Bliss of Knowledge 65 ANANDA: 15 Vishayananda The Bliss of Objects 35 Sub-Total C 429 WHOLE BOOK 1571 AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY THE STUDENT/AUTHOR The Author wishes to acknowledge the “Home Study Course” offerred by the Chinmaya International Foundation (CIF) to students of Vedanta in any part of the world via an online Webinar service. These “Reflections” are based on material he has studied under this Course. CIF is an institute for Samskrit and Indology research, established in 1990 by Pujya Gurudev, Sri Swami Chinmayananda, with a vision of it being “a bridge between the past and the present, East and West, science and spirituality, and pundit and public.” CIF is located at the maternal home and hallowed birthplace of Adi Shankara, the great saint, philosopher and indefatigable champion of Advaita Vedanta, at Veliyanad, 35km north-east of Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Dvaita Vedanta
    Dvaita Vedanta Madhva’s Vaisnava Theism K R Paramahamsa Table of Contents Dvaita System Of Vedanta ................................................ 1 Cognition ............................................................................ 5 Introduction..................................................................... 5 Pratyaksa, Sense Perception .......................................... 6 Anumana, Inference ....................................................... 9 Sabda, Word Testimony ............................................... 10 Metaphysical Categories ................................................ 13 General ........................................................................ 13 Nature .......................................................................... 14 Individual Soul (Jiva) ..................................................... 17 God .............................................................................. 21 Purusartha, Human Goal ................................................ 30 Purusartha .................................................................... 30 Sadhana, Means of Attainment ..................................... 32 Evolution of Dvaita Thought .......................................... 37 Madhva Hagiology .......................................................... 42 Works of Madhva-Sarvamula ......................................... 44 An Outline .................................................................... 44 Gitabhashya ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lapaglia Final Final Dissertation in Template 2019 22 Mar 2019
    A CULTURAL GENEALOGY OF STRATEGIC RATIONALITY A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Liberal Studies By Gino R LaPaglia, M.S. Washington, DC April 10, 2018 Copyright 2018 by Gino R LaPaglia All Rights Reserved !ii A CULTURAL GENEALOGY OF STRATEGIC RATIONALITY Gino R. LaPaglia, M.S. Thesis Advisor: Francis Ambrosio, Ph.D ABSTRACT I construct in this thesis a cultural genealogy to trace in Western civilization a consistent set of values that underlie a worldview that I call Strategic Intelligence (SI). I argue that the plethora of cultural data indicates the presence both of an underlying strategic rationality and a metaphorological paradigm that functions at a level that is more expansive than the terminological and conceptual. I conclude that the values of SI have been transmitted in cultural sources for thousands of years, in multiple cultures. Invested with the highest forms of authority, the continuous transmission of the values of SI in two distinct civilizations (European, Chinese) over the trajectory of their unique cultural evolution provides evidence for the authority, legitimacy and potency of this ancient framework of meaning as fundamental to culture. (Keywords: Strategic Intelligence, Strategic Rationality, Philosophy of Strategy, Philosophical Anthropology, Hermeneutic Philosophy, Axiology, Metaphorical Analysis, Cultural Studies, Mētic) !iii The research and writing of this thesis is dedicated to everyone who helped along the way. Foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to the two professors who most influenced the course of my doctoral studies, my advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syndrome of the House Taken Over* a Síndrome Da Casa Tomada
    Os conteúdos deste periódico de acesso aberto estão licenciados sob os termos da Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-UsoNãoComercial-ObrasDerivadasProibidas 3.0 Unported. 4 The syndrome of the house taken over* A síndrome da casa tomada **Eduardo Luft Abstract: To overcome the paradoxical situation in which the modern subject finds itself, on conceptualizing nature in such a way that its very presence in nature becomes inconceivable, modernity has supplied at least four alternatives: a) the first is to defend dualism (Descartes, Kant); b) the second option is to support a monism of nature (Spinoza, Hobbes); c) the third alternative is to defend a monism of subjectivity (Fichte); d) the fourth and last alternative is to support a dialectical monism (Schelling, Hegel). It is well known that, of these four alternatives to the self-interpretation crisis of modern subjectivity, the first ultimately had a more lasting influence on the philosophical scene, marking, point to point, this last breath of modernity that some call post-modern, which flows into the present situation of “hyperincommensurability” between subjectivity and nature, as diagnosed by Bruno Latour. The crisis of subjectivity thus becomes a crisis of philosophy, which ends up as a hostage to the syndrome of the house taken over. Keywords: Dialectical monism. Crisis of modern subjectivity. Nature. Ontology. System. Resumo: Com o intuito de superar a situação paradoxal em que se encontra, ao conceitualizar a natureza de tal modo que a sua própria presença na natureza resulta inconcebível, a modernidade apresenta ao menos quatro alternativas: a) defesa do dualismo (Descartes, Kant); b) apelo a um monismo da natureza (Spinoza, Hobbes); c) afirmação de um monismo da subjetividade (Fichte); d) ou, por fim, elaboração de um monismo dialético (Schelling, Hegel).
    [Show full text]