DOCSLIB.ORG

Notes on Hinduism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NOTES ON HINDUISM Note: Many "Hindus" prefer the name "Sanatana Dharma" (Eternal Truth) for their religion. "Hinduism" – meaning "the religions of the Indians" – is a term that was probably introduced by the British in the 18th century. BASIC BELIEFS The origins of Hinduism have been dated as early as 3000 BC. It is a rich religious and cultural tradition containing and encompassing many diverse and even conflicting beliefs and practices. While there is, in Hinduism, no rigidly enforced set of doctrines or dogmas, there is a configuration of themes and claims that represents a generally agreed upon Hindu belief system. 1. Hindus believe in a single Supreme Reality known as Brahman, which is the ultimate source of the cosmos and all things in it. Some Hindus consider Brahman to be God, a savior to be loved and worshiped; others think of it as a Transcendent and Unmanifest Absolute, a Ground of Being, without any of the characteristics traditionally attributed to "God" by religious believers. The three main characteristics of Brahman are sat (absolute being), chit (absolute consciousness and knowledge), and ananda (absolute bliss). The Supreme Reality in its transcendent, absolute, and unmanifest essence is called Nirguna-Brahman (unrevealed, "without attributes"); in its revealed or manifest nature, it is called Saguna-Brahman ("with attributes"). There are three major manifestations of Saguna-Brahman: Brahma (God the Creator), Vishnu (God the Preserver) and Shiva (God the Destroyer). Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva (the Trimurti, the "three forms" of Brahman) are not really three distinct deities in addition to the supreme Brahman; rather, they are the three ways in which Brahman is manifested in the cosmos and in which Brahman appears to human consciousness. There are many denominations and sects of Hinduism, but the three major forms are Shivaism (Saivism) (devotion to Shiva), Shaktism (Saktism) (worship of and devotion to mother goddesses, especially the divine wives of Shiva such as Durga and Kali), and Vishnuism (Vaishnavism) (devoted to Vishnu and his incarnations [avatara] such as Rama and Krishna). 2. Hindus believe that there is a beginningless and endless cosmic evolutionary process known as samsara. Within that process, universes are created, evolve through time, and then dissolve. On the worldly plane, the samsaric cycle of creation, preservation, and dissolution of worlds goes on forever. Souls enmeshed in samsara are inevitably subject to suffering. 3. Part of the samsaric process is the law of karma, the law of cause and effect by which each individual works out his own spiritual evolution through "his thoughts, words, and deeds." The main idea here is that, as you shape your own destiny through your manner of existence and action, you reap what you sow. 4. As an extension of the doctrines of samsara and karma, Hindus believe in transmigration and reincarnation of the soul (jiva). The soul transmigrates from life to life, living many lives and suffering many deaths, until it has relieved itself of its karmic burden. When all aspects and consequences of one's karma – good as well as bad – are resolved, the soul is then liberated from the limitations of finite existence, transcends ego-consciousness in a realization of its True Self (Atman), and finally achieves union with Brahman. 5. Hindus believe that all souls (jivas) are evolving toward true self-knowledge (knowledge of Atman) and union with Brahman and will ultimately find moksha – spiritual knowledge (vidya) of Self and God and liberation from the cycle of rebirth (karma and samsara). Not a single soul will be eternally deprived of this destiny. All souls ultimately achieve moksha. There is no eternal hell, no damnation. Hinduism is a mystical religion, leading the devotee to personally experience True Reality (Brahman-Atman), finally reaching the pinnacle of consciousness where Self (Atman) and God (Brahman) are one (God-Consciousness, God- Realization). 6. Hindus believe that we can gain knowledge (vidya) of the True Self (Atman) and of the Transcendent Absolute (God, Brahman) through self-discipline, morally upright action, and meditation (yoga), especially under the guidance of spiritually awakened and enlightened masters or gurus. 7. There are three major paths (margas) to salvation (liberation): Jñana Marga, the path of intellectual advancement and meditation; Karma Marga, the path of selfless social and religious; Bhakti Marga, the path of religious-spiritual love and devotion focused on a chosen god such as Vishnu or Shiva. (Some authorities 1 list a 4th path, namely, Raja Yoga – the life of rigorous yogic meditation [see Huston Smith's detailed discussion of these paths/yogas in his The World's Religions (Harper, 1991), pp. 26-50.]) 8. Hindus believe that many supernatural beings – devas, good spirits, something like angels – exist on the spiritual plane. We can enter into communion with these spiritual beings through temple worship, religious rituals and sacraments, and personal devotions (including scripture study). Both ceremonial worship (puja) and personal love of and devotion to "the gods" (bhakti) bring us into association with the "higher powers." 9. Hindus believe that all life is sacred and that it is to be loved and revered, and they therefore encourage the practice ahimsa or non-injury (non-violence). 10. Hindus believe that no particular religion teaches the only way to salvation above all others. All religious paths lead to "God" and "salvation" and are thus deserving of tolerance and understanding (although Hinduism is the most direct and effective path). 11. Hindus believe that there are four acceptable goals of life: pleasure (kama), worldly success (artha), performance of duty (dharma), and spiritual liberation (moksha). 12. Hindus believe that there are four stages (ashramas) in an ideal life: student (Brahmacharya), householder (Garhasthya), forest dweller (hermit) (Vanaprasthya), and realized (enlightened) being (Sannyasin, Sadhu, wandering ascetic). After fulfilling the duties of student and householder, retirement to the life of a spiritual seeker (forest dweller) is encouraged or at least allowed. The forest dweller who seeks and finds, who achieves enlightenment or a state of consciousness and being close to it, enters the fourth stage of the ideal life, that of the sannyasin, a holy one, who has renounced all worldly things and transcended all selfish interests in his concentration on complete union with Brahman. 13. Hindus believe that the ideal society is organized into four main classes or "castes" (varnas): Brahmins (priests and intellectuals), Kshatriyas (political and military leaders and administrators), Vaisyas (skilled technicians, economic leaders, and other "producers"), and Shudras (laborers and servants). Traditionally, the lowest orders of the Shudras were considered Pariahs, i.e., outcastes and untouchables. Since 1955, when untouchability was outlawed in India, the latter groups have been known as "Scheduled Castes." Over the centuries the four main castes have subdivided into numerous sub-castes (jatis). THE SACRED LITERATURE OF HINDUISM 1. Canonical literature (shruti, "that which is heard") (the primary sacred scriptures of Hinduism) The Vedas (veda = "sacred knowledge"): Rig-Veda, Sama-Veda, Yajur-Veda, and Atharva-Veda The divisions of the four Vedas: (1) Samhitas ("collections" of hymns, prayers, rites, mantras, and magical incantations and spells) (c. 1500-900 BC) (2) Brahmanas (commentaries on and liturgical arrangements of the Samhitas for use in worship services) (c. 850 BC) (3) Aranyakas ("Forest Treatises" on the use of the Samhitas and the practice of meditation by "forest dwellers," those who have retired from society to the forests in search of spiritual liberation) (c. 500 BC) (4) Upanishads (also known as Vedanta, "end of the Vedas;" philosophical writings on major themes of Hinduism such as Brahman, Atman, samsara, karma, moksha, etc.) (c. 500 BC) 2. Non-canonical literature (smriti, "tradition," "that which is remembered") The great epics: the Mahabharata, which includes the Bhagavad Gita; and the Ramayana (all composed between 1000 BC and 200 AD; date of Gita c. 200 BC) The Puranas ("Antiquities"): popular, poetic writings on humanity and the gods (composed between 1000 BC and 200 AD) The Tantras (Agamas): sectarian scriptures of Shivaism and Shaktism (c. 8th century AD) The Dharma Shastras: treatises on duty and justice – the Artha Shastra (economic principles); the Manu Shastra ("Laws of Manu," social and moral life); the Shastra of Vajnavalkya (justice and order in 2 the life of the individual); and the Kama Shastra (the orderly and effective pursuit of pleasure) (all composed between 1000 BC and 200 AD; the date of the Manu Shastra c. 200 BC) The Sutras (c. 500 BC - 500 AD) and Commentaries (c. 500-1500 AD) of Philosophical Hinduism (Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva Mimamsa, and Vedanta schools) Writings of modern Hindu saints and philosophers (1800 AD - present) (e.g., Ramakrishna, Vivekenanda, Aurobindo, Radhakrishnan, Gandhi) 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Heidegger and Indian Thinking: the Hermeneutic of a “Belonging-Together” of Negation and Affirmation

    Heidegger and Indian Thinking: the Hermeneutic of a “Belonging-Together” of Negation and Affirmation

    Comparative Philosophy Volume 6, No. 1 (2015): 111-128 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org HEIDEGGER AND INDIAN THINKING: THE HERMENEUTIC OF A “BELONGING-TOGETHER” OF NEGATION AND AFFIRMATION JAISON D. VALLOORAN ABSTRACT: According to Heidegger the questioning of Being is unique to western philosophical tradition, however we see that the hermeneutic of Being is explicit in inter- cultural context of thinking. Understanding Brahman as “one” and “the same” Śankara speaks together with Heidegger the same hermeneutic of ontological monism. Due to the reason that there is no explicit terminological equivalent of the word ‘Being’ in Śankara’s thinking, the hermeneutic of Śankara’s ontological understanding of Brahman and its distinction as “Saguna” and “Nirguna” are not sufficiently explored. In an inter-cultural ontological context, it is important not to insist on terminological equivalence, but to search for hermeneutic depth. Similarly Madhyamaka-Buddhism of Nāgārjuna describes the universe as totally devoid of reality, called ‘Śūnya’ or void, which is an expression of nihilism; it is comparable to Heidegger’s observation of the concealing of Being as “nihil”. The hermeneutic of these explicit ontological characters of Being, as concealment and un- concealment allow us to discover a sabotaging brotherhood, because the nihil and something are ontologically two essential sides of the same thinking. Keywords: Heidegger, Śankara, Nāgārjuna, Inter-cultural Ontology, Indian Philosophy 1. INTRODUCTION Philosophies give explanations of the world, of “what” of beings, and set norms for the right relationships between human beings. Therefore it is an exclusive property of mankind; still it is an intellectual engagement in an individual culture in its highest level.
  • An Understanding of Maya: the Philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva

    An Understanding of Maya: the Philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva

    An understanding of Maya: The philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva Department of Religion studies Theology University of Pretoria By: John Whitehead 12083802 Supervisor: Dr M Sukdaven 2019 Declaration Declaration of Plagiarism 1. I understand what plagiarism means and I am aware of the university’s policy in this regard. 2. I declare that this Dissertation is my own work. 3. I did not make use of another student’s previous work and I submit this as my own words. 4. I did not allow anyone to copy this work with the intention of presenting it as their own work. I, John Derrick Whitehead hereby declare that the following Dissertation is my own work and that I duly recognized and listed all sources for this study. Date: 3 December 2019 Student number: u12083802 __________________________ 2 Foreword I started my MTh and was unsure of a topic to cover. I knew that Hinduism was the religion I was interested in. Dr. Sukdaven suggested that I embark on the study of the concept of Maya. Although this concept provided a challenge for me and my faith, I wish to thank Dr. Sukdaven for giving me the opportunity to cover such a deep philosophical concept in Hinduism. This concept Maya is deeper than one expects and has broaden and enlightened my mind. Even though this was a difficult theme to cover it did however, give me a clearer understanding of how the world is seen in Hinduism. 3 List of Abbreviations AD Anno Domini BC Before Christ BCE Before Common Era BS Brahmasutra Upanishad BSB Brahmasutra Upanishad with commentary of Sankara BU Brhadaranyaka Upanishad with commentary of Sankara CE Common Era EW Emperical World GB Gitabhasya of Shankara GK Gaudapada Karikas Rg Rig Veda SBH Sribhasya of Ramanuja Svet.
  • Understanding the Super Excellence of Gaudiya Vaishnavism

    Understanding the Super Excellence of Gaudiya Vaishnavism

    Understanding the Super Excellence of Gaudiya Vaishnavism Understanding the Super Excellence of Gaudiya Vaishnavism. So that is the theme, understanding the super excellence of Gaudiya Vaishnavism. Srila Prabhupada ki jay! He was and he is Gaudiya Vaishnava, coming in the line of disciplic succession and we are getting connected. So we are making this presentation, I won’t say this is complete presentation but some introductory presentation to make the point that Gaudiya Vaishnavism is super excellent like, mattah parataram nanyat kincid asti dhananjaya mayi sarvam idam protam sutre mani-gana iva [Bg 7.7] Translation: O conqueror of wealth [Arjuna], there is no Truth superior to Me. Everything rests upon Me, as pearls are strung on a thread. Krishna said no one is equal to me and no one is superior to me. So Krishna is super excellent personality of godhead. So like that there are different features of Gaudiya Vaishnavism, so we have picked up a few items which are listed here. Achintya-Bheda-Abheda tattva or philosophy or the commentary on vedanta sutra is of Gaudiya Vaishnavas is super excellent, so that one. And Gaudiya sampradaya is super excellent and raganuga sadhana bhakti. And Goloka dhama, amongst all the dhamas and there are many of them, is the topmost realm, super excellent and that is Gaudiya Vaishnavas preference, they don’t settle on any other level they go all the way to the top, topmost abode, super excellent abode Goloka. Mellows of bhakti, Gaudiya Vaishnavas only settle for the topmost rasa, madhurya rasa. That is what Sri Krishna Chaitanya Mahaprabhu relished and shared.
  • Brahman, Atman and Maya

    Brahman, Atman and Maya

    Sanatana Dharma The Eternal Way of Life (Hinduism) Brahman, Atman and Maya The Hindu Way of Comprehending Reality and Life Brahman, Atman and Maya u These three terms are essential in understanding the Hindu view of reality. v Brahman—that which gives rise to maya v Atman—what each maya truly is v Maya—appearances of Brahman (all the phenomena in the cosmos) Early Vedic Deities u The Aryan people worship many deities through sacrificial rituals: v Agni—the god of fire v Indra—the god of thunder, a warrior god v Varuna—the god of cosmic order (rita) v Surya—the sun god v Ushas—the goddess of dawn v Rudra—the storm god v Yama—the first mortal to die and become the ruler of the afterworld The Meaning of Sacrificial Rituals u Why worship deities? u During the period of Upanishads, Hindus began to search for the deeper meaning of sacrificial rituals. u Hindus came to realize that presenting offerings to deities and asking favors in return are self-serving. u The focus gradually shifted to the offerings (the sacrificed). u The sacrificed symbolizes forgoing one’s well-being for the sake of the well- being of others. This understanding became the foundation of Hindu spirituality. In the old rites, the patron had passed the burden of death on to others. By accepting his invitation to the sacrificial banquet, the guests had to take responsibility for the death of the animal victim. In the new rite, the sacrificer made himself accountable for the death of the beast.
  • A Phenomenological Inquiry Into Sacred Time in Hinduism Netty Provost Purdue University

    A Phenomenological Inquiry Into Sacred Time in Hinduism Netty Provost Purdue University

    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 A phenomenological inquiry into sacred time in Hinduism Netty Provost Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Provost, Netty, "A phenomenological inquiry into sacred time in Hinduism" (2016). Open Access Dissertations. 990. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/990 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information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¶V ³3ROLF\RI ,QWHJULW\LQ5HVHDUFK´DQGWKHXVHRIFRS\ULJKWPDWHULDO $SSURYHGE\0DMRU3URIHVVRU V 'DQLHO : 6PLWK $SSURYHGE\ 5RGQH\ - %HUWROHW +HDGRIWKH'HSDUWPHQWDO*UDGXDWH3URJUDP 'DWH i A PHENOMENOLOGICAL INQUIRY INTO SACRED TIME IN HINDUISM A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Netty Provost In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2016 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii Dedicated with love to my mother, Christy Daskoski, my father, Daryl Provost, and best friend, Dara Hill. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Without the support of many wonderful people, both academically and personally, I could not have completed this thesis. I would like to begin by thanking the members of my thesis committee, Dr.
  • The Essence of the Samkhya II Megumu Honda

    The Essence of the Samkhya II Megumu Honda

    The Essence of the Samkhya II Megumu Honda (THE THIRD CHAPTER) (The opponent questions;) Now what are the primordial Matter and others, from which the soul should be discriminated? (The author) replies; They are the primordial Matter (prakrti), the Intellect (buddhi), the Ego- tizing organ (ahankara), the subtle Elements (tanmatra), the eleven sense organs (indriya) and the gross Elements (bhuta) in sum just 24." The quality (guna), the action (karman) and the generality (samanya) are included in them because a property and one who has property are iden- tical (dharma-dharmy-abhedena). Here to be the primordial Matter means di- rectly (or) indirectly to be the material cause (upadanatva) of all the mo- dification (vikara), because its chief work (prakrsta krtih) is formed of tra- nsf ormation (parinama), -thus is the etymology (of prakrti). The primordial Matter (prakrti), the Capacity (sakti), the Unborn (aja), the Principal (pra- dhana), the Unevolved (avyakta), the Dark (tamers), the Illusion (maya), the Ignorance (avidya) and so on are the synonyms') of the primordial Matter. For the traditional scripture says; "Brahmi (the Speech) means the science (vidya) and the Ignorace (avidya) means illusion (maya) -said the other. (It is) the primordial Matter and the Highest told the great sages2)." And here the satt va and other three substances are implied (upalaksita) as. the state of equipoise (samyavastha)3). (The mention is) limitted to implication 1) brahma avyakta bahudhatmakam mayeti paryayah (Math. ad SK. 22), prakrtih pradhanam brahma avyaktam bahudhanakammayeti paryayah (Gaudap. ad SK. 22), 自 性 者 或 名 勝 因 或 名 爲 梵 或 名 衆 持(金 七 十 論ad.
  • Samkhya System

    Samkhya System

    HE RITA G E O F INDIA . ZARIAH The Right Reverend V S A , Bishop of Dornakal . AR UHAR . ITT . J N F " , M A , D L Alr a u lish d e dy p b e . Th f B u h e e a r K . M A. H o dd s m . S AU S . t i I NDER , R As ok . D M . M P M . M . a E V . A A HA L . J C I , , In a di n a n n . r n a Y B c l OW Ca lcu ta . P i ti g P i ip PERC R N , t Ka n r r r RE . E B . ese e a u . R a L e V . A it t P ICE , n s u n r aration S u bjects p roposed a d volu me de p rep . A KRIT A D R R S N S N P ALI LITE AT U E . M O ord H mns r h V d A . A . A LL O . r . y f om t e e a s . P o f CD NE , xf n h r . ro . LA A t olo gy o f M a hayana Lite ra tu e P f . L DE VALLEE ou e Gh e n . P s , t M A h S e le c r h h ST R . D m n a d . W e l . ons o t e U a s s . ti f p i F J E E N , i M M .
  • Management Lessons from Advaita Bhavesh a Kinkhabwala

    Management Lessons from Advaita Bhavesh a Kinkhabwala

    143 Management Lessons from Advaita Bhavesh A Kinkhabwala Introduction Acharya Shankara is a thorough, outright one. he word ‘Advaita’ is very beautiful. It As indicated by him, whatever is, is Brahman. Tliterally means ‘non-dual’. Dvaita means Brahman itself is totally homogeneous. All dis- ‘dual’ and the prefix ‘a’ negates the exist- tinctions and plurality are deceptive.3 ence of duality so, there is no ‘two’ but, ‘one’. It Dualism, Dvaita; qualified monism, Vish- could be simpler, if we said ‘one’, but then, the ishtadvaita; and Monism, Advaita; are the three next question would be, is there ‘two’; so by say- different fundamental schools of metaphysical ing non-dual, it conveys the clear and firm mes- ideas. They are altogether different stages to the sage of being just one, that is non-dual. final stage of the ultimate Truth, namely,para- Acharya Shankara’s ‘philosophical stand- brahma. They are the steps on the stepping stool point can be tried to be summed up in a sin- of yoga. They are not in any manner conflicting gle word “Advaita”—NonDuality. The objective but, in actuality, they are complementary to one of Advaita is to is to make an individual under- another. These stages are amicably orchestrated in stand his or her fundamental (profound) char- an evaluated arrangement of spiritual experiences. acter with the preeminent realty [sic] “Nirakar Dualism, qualified monism, pure monism—all Brahm” and reality that there is no “two” yet one these come full circle inevitably in the Advaita and only. Advaita shows us to see the substance Vedantic acknowledgement of the Absolute or of oneself in each one and that nobody is sep- the supra-normal trigunatita ananta Brahman.
  • Shraman Bhagavan Mahavira and Jainism the Jaina

    Shraman Bhagavan Mahavira and Jainism the Jaina

    SHRAMAN BHAGAVAN MAHAVIRAAND JAINISM By: Dr. Ramanlal C. Shah Published - Jain Society of Metro Washington Shraman Bhagavan Mahavira and Jainism JAINISM Jainism is one of the greatest and the oldest religions of the world, though it is not known much outside India. Even in India, compared to the total population of India, Jainism at present is followed by a minority of the Indian population amounting to about four million people. Yet Jainism is not unknown to the scholars of the world in the field of religion and philosophy, because of its highest noble religious principles. Though followed by relatively less people in the world, Jainism is highly respected by all those non-Jainas who have studied Jainism or who have come into contact with the true followers of Jainism. There are instances of non- Jaina people in the world who have most willingly either adopted Jainism or have accepted and put into practice the principles of Jainism. Though a religion of a small minority, Jainism is not the religion of a particular race, caste or community. People from all the four classified communities of ancient India; Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Shudra have followed Jainism. In the principles of Jainism, there is nothing which would debar a person of any particular nation, race, caste, community, creed, etc., from following Jainism. Hence Jainism is a Universal Religion. The followers of Jainism are called Jainas. The word "Jaina" is derived from the Sanskrit word "Jina." One who follows and worships Jina is called a Jaina. Etymologically "Jina" means the conqueror or the victorious.
  • Dvaita Vedanta

    Dvaita Vedanta

    Dvaita Vedanta Madhva’s Vaisnava Theism K R Paramahamsa Table of Contents Dvaita System Of Vedanta ................................................ 1 Cognition ............................................................................ 5 Introduction..................................................................... 5 Pratyaksa, Sense Perception .......................................... 6 Anumana, Inference ....................................................... 9 Sabda, Word Testimony ............................................... 10 Metaphysical Categories ................................................ 13 General ........................................................................ 13 Nature .......................................................................... 14 Individual Soul (Jiva) ..................................................... 17 God .............................................................................. 21 Purusartha, Human Goal ................................................ 30 Purusartha .................................................................... 30 Sadhana, Means of Attainment ..................................... 32 Evolution of Dvaita Thought .......................................... 37 Madhva Hagiology .......................................................... 42 Works of Madhva-Sarvamula ......................................... 44 An Outline .................................................................... 44 Gitabhashya ................................................................
  • Jiva Or Soul in Jainism Dr. N.L.Kachhara Jiva Or Soul the Jaina Conception of Jiva (Soul) Occupies the First Place Among the Doctrines of Independent Soul

    Jiva Or Soul in Jainism Dr. N.L.Kachhara Jiva Or Soul the Jaina Conception of Jiva (Soul) Occupies the First Place Among the Doctrines of Independent Soul

    Jiva or Soul in Jainism Dr. N.L.Kachhara Jiva or Soul The Jaina conception of Jiva (Soul) occupies the first place among the doctrines of independent soul. The Jaina view of soul appears to be older than the views of other Indian systems of thought and it is comprehensible to the common people. This sentient principle was well established as the object of meditation for liberation of Lord Parshvanath in the eighth century B.C. The Jaina doctrine of soul did not change from the long past to the present time as it happened in the Buddhist and Vedic traditions The term Jiva connotes that Soul is consciousness itself and consciousness also is invariably soul. The Jiva is non-corporeal, living, eternal and permanent, and fixed (constant) substance of the Cosmic Universe, having the attributes of consciousness (Cetana). Jiva is the generic name of sentient substance. Jiva substance is non-physical and is not sense - perceptible; it does not have the properties of colour, smell, taste and touch. Consciousness and upayoga are the differentia of the jiva. Upayoga and consciousness are the two sides of the same entity jiva. Consciousness may be interpreted both as a structure and a function of the jiva but upayoga refers to the functional side only. Upayoga gives us almost the same meaning as we get by being mentally active. Just as a mental activity is a fact of mental functioning and a mental capacity, a fact of mental structure; in the same way consciousness or chetana may be taken as a fact of the jiva’s structure and upayoga, as a fact of the jiva’s function.
  • (2011) 1-26 the Significance of Adhyavasāya in Jain Karma

    (2011) 1-26 the Significance of Adhyavasāya in Jain Karma

    International Journal of Jaina Studies (Online) Vol. 7, No. 3 (2011) 1-26 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ADHYAVASĀYA IN JAIN KARMA THEORY Kristi L. Wiley1 In discussions of the classical Jaina conceptions of the bondage of the soul (jīva) in the beginningless cycle of death and rebirth (saṃsāra), the centrality of mohanīya karma, which causes delusion or confusion regarding proper belief (samyak-darśana) and proper conduct (samyak-cāritra), has been emphasized. In the words of Paul Dundas (2002: 99), it is “the keystone of the whole structure in that its destruction paves the way for the elimination of the other varieties of karma.” While the influx (āsrava) of karmic matter is caused by activities (yoga) of the body, speech, and mind (TS 6.1, 6.2), its binding with the soul is caused by a deluded view of reality (mithyā-darśana), which is produced through the operation of darśana-mohanīya karma, and by non-restraint (avirati), carelessness or inattentiveness (pramāda), and passions (kaṣāya), all of which are produced through the operation of the conduct-deluding (cāritra-mohanīya) karmas (TS 8.1). The most important of these is the four passions, namely, anger (krodha), pride (māna), deceit (māyā), and greed (lobha). The intensity of these passions is the determining factor for two of the four aspects of karmic bondage: duration bondage (sthiti-bandha), the length of time that karma can remain bound with the soul, and intensity bondage (rasa-, anubhāva-, or anubhāga-bandha), the strength of the effect produced when karmic matter comes to fruition (TS 8.4 = SS 8.3).2 Karmic matter is grouped into four rasas, or degrees of intensity.