Shankara: a Hindu Revivalist Or a Crypto-Buddhist?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shankara: a Hindu Revivalist Or a Crypto-Buddhist? Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Religious Studies Theses Department of Religious Studies 12-4-2006 Shankara: A Hindu Revivalist or a Crypto-Buddhist? Kencho Tenzin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Tenzin, Kencho, "Shankara: A Hindu Revivalist or a Crypto-Buddhist?." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2006. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses/4 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religious Studies at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SHANKARA: A HINDU REVIVALIST OR A CRYPTO BUDDHIST? by KENCHO TENZIN Under The Direction of Kathryn McClymond ABSTRACT Shankara, the great Indian thinker, was known as the accurate expounder of the Upanishads. He is seen as a towering figure in the history of Indian philosophy and is credited with restoring the teachings of the Vedas to their pristine form. However, there are others who do not see such contributions from Shankara. They criticize his philosophy by calling it “crypto-Buddhism.” It is his unique philosophy of Advaita Vedanta that puts him at odds with other Hindu orthodox schools. Ironically, he is also criticized by Buddhists as a “born enemy of Buddhism” due to his relentless attacks on their tradition. This thesis, therefore, probes the question of how Shankara should best be regarded, “a Hindu Revivalist or a Crypto-Buddhist?” To address this question, this thesis reviews the historical setting for Shakara’s work, the state of Indian philosophy as a dynamic conversation involving Hindu and Buddhist thinkers, and finally Shankara’s intellectual genealogy. INDEX WORDS: Shankara, Crypto-Buddhist, Advaita Vedanta, Brahman, Sunyata, Maya, Atman, Moksa SHANKARA: A HINDU REVIVALIST OR A CRYPTO-BUDDHIST? by KENCHO TENZIN Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2006 Copyright by Kencho Tenzin 2006 SHANKARA: A HINDU REVIVALIST OR A CRYPTO-BUDDHIST? by KENCHO TENZIN Major Professor: Kathryn McClymond Committee: Jonathan Herman Christopher White Electronic Version Approved: Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University December 2006 ACKNOWLEDMENT In the process of writing this thesis, many people have helped me, both directly and indirectly. Their ideas, suggestions, and queries were the source of my inspiration. This thesis could not have been completed without their assistance. First, my heartfelt appreciation goes to Dr. Kathryn McClymond, my thesis advisor, for her guidance and inspiration in writing this thesis and also her unwavering support throughout my graduate school years at Georgia State University. My special thanks also go to Dr. Susan Walcott and Brendan Ozawa whose encouragement and support have been both valuable and indispensable. I am also very grateful to my father-in-law, Dr. Arun Chatterjee, for showing me the underlying tenets of different Hindu philosophical schools, particularly of Advaita Vedanta of Shankara. I would like to thank my thesis committee members, Dr. Jonathan Herman and Dr. Christopher White, for their insightful comments, suggestions, and teachings as well. Finally, but most importantly I would like to thank my wife, Rinku, for her selfless support, without whom I would have never done this. iv Table of Contents Introduction 1 Historical Background 7 Gaudapada’s influence on Shankara 18 Shankara’s Philosophy 25 Critiquing Shankara’s Philosophy 37 A Response to Shankara’s Critics 42 Conclusion 51 References 54 Glossaries 56 Appendix 64 v 1 Shankara: A Hindu Revivalist or Crypto-Buddhist? Introduction One of the best known figures in the history of Indian thought, Shankara has been credited with restoring the study of Vedas, especially Advaita Vedanta to their pristine purity, and he is also widely regarded as an accurate expounder of the Upanishads. As George Cronk (2003) says, “Shankara is a towering figure in the history of Indian philosophy” (1). The same notion prevails in Surendranath Dasgupta’s Indian Idealism (1962), where he says, “The most important interpretation of Upanishadic idealism has been that of the Brahmasutras as expounded by Shankara and as further elaborated by his followers” (149). In sharp contrast to such accolades, well-regarded scholars such as C. D .Sharma, S.G. Mudgal, and Ninian Smart do not view Shankara’s thought as innovative. According to them, Shankara’s Advaita Vedanta philosophy did not differ significantly from Mahayana Buddhism. Mudgal (1975), for example, points out in the introduction of his book Advaita of Shankara–A Reappraisal that “the difference between Sunyavada (Mahayana) and Advaita is a matter of degree and emphasis and not a matter of difference in kind” (4). “Probably because of these similarities,” Natalie Isayeva (1993) says, “even such an astute Buddhologist as Rozenberg was of the opinion that a precise differentiation between Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism is impossible to draw” (172). For this very reason, Ramanuja, the founder of the Visistadvaita Vedanta School and other orthodox Hindu schools, went so far as to describe Shankara as a “crypto-Buddhist.” Yet at the same time, ironically, Shankara is criticized by Buddhist scholars as a “born enemy of Buddhists” due to his relentless attacks on their tradition. Sengaku 2 Mayeda (1999) says, “Sankara, however, vehemently attacks Buddhism here and there in his Brahmasutrabhasya, Brhadaranyakopanisadbhasya, Upadesasahasri and his other works” (n.p.). Shankara, for instance, accuses Buddhism for sowing the general sense of pessimism in people’s mind. Shankara argues that Buddhism (Mahayana) is vainasika- mata, a teaching of non-existence and destruction. Shankara even portrays Buddha’s teachings as a means to lead the wicked and the demons astray despite his inclusion of Buddha as the ninth avatar of Vishnu (Hindu god). Gavin Flood (1996) says, “The Buddha is a curious inclusion in this list: an incarnation sent to lead the wicked and the demons astray and so to hasten the end of the current age of darkness (kali yuga)” (116). These are some of the few instances that clearly demonstrate Shankara’s attitude towards Buddhism. One reason, according to F. Whaling (1979), for Shankara’s reaction against Buddhism is “the undue Buddhist influence he felt he had received from Gaudapada” (23). This raises the key question that will be addressed in this thesis: is Shankara best regarded as a “crypto-Buddhist” or as a “born enemy of Buddhism?” According to Shankara, in his time sanatana dharma (eternal teaching, tradition, or religion) had been almost broken within the entangling of Buddhist philosophy, which had given rise to a general sense of pessimism amongst the general population. Hinduism, on the other hand, was disunited and had split into many groups and sects, each with its own views. Both Hindu and Buddhist communities were showing signs of corruption, disintegration, and a lack of inner dynamism in appealing to the general public. A philosophical emptiness prevailed, and society was in need of correct spiritual direction. It was in this atmosphere that Shankara was keen to stress the importance and correct interpretation of the Upanishads. As T.M.P. Mahadevan (1968) says, “At the time 3 when false doctrines were misguiding the people and orthodoxy had nothing better to offer than a barren and outmoded ritualism to counteract the atheism of the heterodox, Shankara expounded the philosophy of the Upanishads for the benefit of humanity” (285). A similar conclusion is also made by Isayeva in her book, Shankara and Indian philosophy. She says, “His [Shankara’s] task was to curb the activity of ‘heretics’, to put an end to mental instability in general and what was of no less importance–to set limits on ritual trends within a former brahmanist unity, submitting it to a new kind of spiritual kind” (11). However, it seems that while Shankara did assimilate some teachings of Buddhism into his Advaita system, at the same time he denied and refuted Buddhist concepts that were not in agreement with the Upanisads. For instance, he embraced the practice of ahimsa (non-violence) and condemned animal sacrifices. However, he vehemently criticized the central Buddhist doctrine of sunyata (emptiness). Regarding orthodox Hinduism, Shankara believed that early Vedantins, such as Ramanuja and Madva, failed to grasp the real nature and meaning of the philosophy of the Vedanta as taught in the Upanishads. According to Shankara, pre-Shankara Vedanta was theistic and realist. It conceived of Brahman as unity-in-diversity, with internal individual distinctions being admitted. In mukti (liberation), the jiva (individual soul) retains its individuality. These views were not palatable to Shankara, and in contrast he taught the doctrine of non- dualism (Advaita). According to Shankara, in the state of mukti, an individual is absorbed in the Brahman. By embarking in this direction, Shankara created a new form of Indian philosophy quite different from his predecessors. 4 Although Sankara’s time seems far removed from ours, and the differences and similarities between his thought and that of Nagarjuna’s tradition may not seem of great relevance today, there is actually
Recommended publications
  • Atman/Anatman in Buddhism
    Åtman/Anåtman in Buddhism and Its Implication for the Wisdom Tradition by Nancy Reigle Does Christianity believe in reincarnation? Of course it does not. Yet, students of the Wisdom Tradition may seek to find evidence that early Christians did accept reincarnation. Similarly in Buddhism. Does Buddhism believe in the åtman, the permanent self? Certainly the Buddhist religion does not. Yet, there is evidence that the Buddha when teaching his basic doctrine of anåtman, no-self, only denied the abiding reality of the personal or empirical åtman, but not the universal or authentic åtman. The Wisdom Tradition known as Theosophy teaches the existence of “An Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless, and Immu- table PRINCIPLE,” 1 often compared to the Hindu åtman, the universal “self,” while Buddhism with its doctrine of anåtman, “no-self,” is normally understood to deny any such universal principle. In regard to Buddhism, however, there have been several attempts to show that the Buddha did not deny the exist- ence of the authentic åtman, the self.2 Only one of these attempts seems to have been taken seriously by scholars3; namely, the work of Kamaleswar Bhattacharya. His book on this subject, written in French, L’Åtman-Brahman dans le Bouddhisme ancien, was published in Paris in 1973; and an English translation of this work, The Åtman-Brahman in Ancient Buddhism, was published in 2015.4 It is here that he set forth his arguments for the existence of the Upanißadic åtman in early Buddhism. This is the work that we will discuss. How must we understand
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Buddhist Hetuvidyā (Epistemology and Logic ) in Europe and Russia
    Nataliya Kanaeva STUDIES IN BUDDHIST HETUVIDYĀ (EPISTEMOLOGY AND LOGIC ) IN EUROPE AND RUSSIA Working Paper WP20/2015/01 Series WP20 Philosophy of Culture and Cultural Studies Moscow 2015 УДК 24 ББК 86.36 K19 Editor of the series WP20 «Philosophy of Culture and Cultural Studies» Vitaly Kurennoy Kanaeva, Nataliya. K19 Studies in Buddhist Hetuvidyā (Epistemology and Logic ) in Europe and Russia [Text] : Working paper WP20/2015/01 / N. Kanaeva ; National Research University Higher School of Economics. – Moscow : Higher School of Economics Publ. House, 2015. – (Series WP20 “Philosophy of Culture and Cultural Studiesˮ) – 52 p. – 20 copies. This publication presents an overview of the situation in studies of Buddhist epistemology and logic in Western Europe and in Russia. Those studies are the young direction of Buddhology, and they started only at the beginning of the XX century. There are considered the main schools, their representatives, the directions of their researches and achievements in the review. The activity of Russian scientists in this field was not looked through ever before. УДК 24 ББК 86.36 This study (research grant № 14-01-0006) was supported by The National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow). Academic Fund Program in 2014–2015. Kanaeva Nataliya – National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow). Department of Humanities. School of Philosophy. Assistant professor; [email protected]. Канаева, Н. А. Исследования буддийской хетувидьи (эпистемологии и логики) в Европе и России (обзор) [Текст] : препринт WP20/2015/01 / Н. А. Канаева ; Нац. исслед. ун-т «Высшая школа экономи- ки». – М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2015. – (Серия WP20 «Философия и исследо- вания культуры»).
    [Show full text]
  • Some Reflections on Critical Buddhism
    Stone on Critical Buddhism.qxd 5/14/99 5:21 PM Page 159 Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 1999 26/1–2 REVIEW ARTICLE Some Reµections on Critical Buddhism Jacqueline STONE Jamie HUBBARD and Paul L. SWANSON, eds., Pruning the Bodhi Tree: The Storm over Critical Buddhism. Nanzan Library of Religion and Culture, no. 2. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1997. xxviii + 515 pp. $45.00 cloth, ISBN 0-8248-1908-X; $22.95 paper, ISBN 0-8248-1949-7. THE INTELLECTUAL MOVEMENT known as “Critical Buddhism” (hihan Bukkyõ −|[î) began around the mid-1980s in Sõtõ Zen circles, led by Hakamaya Noriaki and Matsumoto Shirõ, both Buddhologists as well as ordained Sõtõ priests. Since then it has indeed raised storm waves on the normally placid waters of Japanese academic Buddhist studies. “Criticism alone is Buddhism,” declares Hakamaya, by which he means the critical discrimination of truth from error. Aggressively normative, Critical Buddhism does not hesitate to pronounce on what represents “true” Buddhism and what does not. By its de³nition, Bud- dhism is simply the teachings of non-self (an„tman) and dependent origination (prat‡tya-samutp„da). Many of the most inµuential of Mah„y„na ideas, including notions of universal Buddha nature, tath„gata-garbha, original enlightenment, the nonduality of the Vimalak‡rti Sðtra, and the “absolute nothingness” of the Kyoto school, are all condemned as reverting to fundamentally non-Buddhist notions of „tman, that is, substantial essence or ground. Thus they are to be rejected as “not Buddhism”—the “pruning” of this volume’s title.
    [Show full text]
  • Iom'y T/ GIPE-PUNE-000986 , I • :To:
    ~hi " 4$$ '~----?~-,...,.,..... .......---'" ., - -~ .-. -~ J ) ,I OhananJayarao G d " I111111 11m 1I111111111~lliti;ll!iom'Y t/ GIPE-PUNE-000986 , I • :to: ....... """"" -'-- - --~ ~r 1';\, 1( J"'"~"\.,.t'" ,,' ,\..• J' .. ' i\\.1~1 ¥ L I F E OFTBE A]IIR DOST l\IOHA]I~IED KHAN, OF KA.BUL: WITH HIS POLITICAL PROCEEDINGS TOWARDS THE ENGLISH, RUSSIAN, AND PERSIAN GOVERNMENTS, IBCLI1DIB& THE VICTORY AND DISASTERS OF THE BRITISH ARMY IN AFGHANISTAN. By MOHAN LAL, ESQ., KNIGHT OP THB PSRSIAlf ORDEB OF THE LION A.ND StTN; LATELY ATTACHED TO T MISSION' IN KABUL. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. 1'.• LONDON: LONGMAN, BRO~NJ GREEN, AND LONGMANS. PATERNOSTER-ROW. 1846. VL(?JI / I (;7 L]) ~rL( G } rtg6 London :-Prlnted by WiLL ...... OLown aud Solll, Stamford Str... t .. Hm 'kosT G~CJOUS MAJESTY QUEEN VIeT ORIA . DEDicATION TO HER MOST GRACIOUS MAJESTY QUEEN VICTORI~ 80VIIBar8S OP GRE4.T BRITA.IN 4ND OF THE INDIAN EMPIRE, 4.ND TO Hila BOYAL CONsoaT, IDS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCE ALBERT. SINCE the creation of the world it has been the custom and rule of the devoted Joyal servants of every ancient and modern Government, that either on receiving marks of distinction, or the honour of being presented to their. lawful Sovereign, they submit some present showing their homage and attac.l;1ment to the Throne. This usage of submissive 'devotion has not been limited to human beings, but it has been adopted ever by other species of God's creatures, and has met with the approbation of the greatest in the world. If we trace back as far as three thousand years, we find, from tradition as well as from historical anecdotes, one of the most striking instances in an insignificant creature of God, namely, a small ant having secured a grain of rice in its forceps; crept some distance~ and having gained an access a 2 IV DEDICATION.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-07-06 Dharma Samadhi (1 of 5) Carried by Inspiration
    2020-07-06 Dharma Samadhi (1 of 5) Carried by Inspiration Mon, 7/6 8:00AM • 16:13 SUMMARY KEYWORDS gladness, dharma, joy, paper airplane, inspiration, mind, buddha, samadhi, running, inspired, effort, practice, talk, feel, inspiring, dharma practice, hindrances, cooperative, concentration, arise SPEAKERS Gil Fronsdal So if you make the effort to climb up the ladder, up a slide, and then you allow yourself to slide down, you're in a certain way, making your own effort to get to the top, but then you're allowing gravity to slide you, pull you down in a delightful way. And yesterday I watched some kids in a waterslide and just delightfully kind of coming down and smashing into the water. Very nice. If you make a paper airplane, you have to maybe fold the paper just right and know what to do. But then when you throw the paper airplane, it's not just up to you how you throw it. It's also up to the air that holds you up, holds the paper airplane up. And that air is what allows the paper airplane to fly. And if you have a, if you want to grow a garden, maybe you want to grow tomatoes. You have to plant the seed and maybe make a lot of conditions in the soil fertile and keep it watered. But the whole thing depends on having the sun, having light come and we create, we do offer our part to care for the plant. But we also allow for the sun to do its work, and allows the plant to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • Shields, James Mark
    H-Buddhism Shields, James Mark Page published by A. Charles Muller on Tuesday, January 15, 2019 My Life in Buddhist Studies James Mark Shields Professor of Comparative Humanities and Asian Thought Inaugural Director, Bucknell Humanities Center Bucknell University First, I’d like to thank Chuck Prebish for the opportunity to contribute to this interesting and valuable project. Second, I am sure that my version of this story is considerably less engaging than those of my peers—especially those who came of age in the generation before mine; i.e., in the 1960s and 1970s. With that caveat (always good to lower expectations!), let’s begin. Family Connections It was in the early 1980s that, as a late adolescent, my curiosity was first piqued by Asian cultures and civilizations. The primary causal force was very close to home: my mother. For it was at this time, roughly the age of 12, that it began to dawn on me that my mother—a seemingly ordinary middle-aged and middle-class Canadian woman—was in fact the product of a somewhat more exotic, even tragic, upbringing. Born in Manila, the Philippines in 1937, of Scots, Spanish, and a tiny sliver of native Filipino heritage, she found herself at the tender age of 4 rounded up by an invading Japanese military force and placed in an internment camp on the grounds of Santo Tomas University in Manila, where she and her family were forced to reside for the next 3 years. Needless to say, these were difficult times, and though my mother’s memories are vague, she does recall a clear distinction between the ‘nice’ and ‘nasty’ Japanese guards, as well as the decreasing supplies of food as the war wore on and Japan went from aggressor to defender of the islands.
    [Show full text]
  • An Understanding of Maya: the Philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva
    An understanding of Maya: The philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva Department of Religion studies Theology University of Pretoria By: John Whitehead 12083802 Supervisor: Dr M Sukdaven 2019 Declaration Declaration of Plagiarism 1. I understand what plagiarism means and I am aware of the university’s policy in this regard. 2. I declare that this Dissertation is my own work. 3. I did not make use of another student’s previous work and I submit this as my own words. 4. I did not allow anyone to copy this work with the intention of presenting it as their own work. I, John Derrick Whitehead hereby declare that the following Dissertation is my own work and that I duly recognized and listed all sources for this study. Date: 3 December 2019 Student number: u12083802 __________________________ 2 Foreword I started my MTh and was unsure of a topic to cover. I knew that Hinduism was the religion I was interested in. Dr. Sukdaven suggested that I embark on the study of the concept of Maya. Although this concept provided a challenge for me and my faith, I wish to thank Dr. Sukdaven for giving me the opportunity to cover such a deep philosophical concept in Hinduism. This concept Maya is deeper than one expects and has broaden and enlightened my mind. Even though this was a difficult theme to cover it did however, give me a clearer understanding of how the world is seen in Hinduism. 3 List of Abbreviations AD Anno Domini BC Before Christ BCE Before Common Era BS Brahmasutra Upanishad BSB Brahmasutra Upanishad with commentary of Sankara BU Brhadaranyaka Upanishad with commentary of Sankara CE Common Era EW Emperical World GB Gitabhasya of Shankara GK Gaudapada Karikas Rg Rig Veda SBH Sribhasya of Ramanuja Svet.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonization of Dharma
    Quest Journals Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science Volume 6 ~ Issue 5 (2018) pp.: 13-15 ISSN(Online) : 2321-9467 www.questjournals.org Research Paper Colonization of Dharma Dr Chaitanya Visiting Asst. Prof. Bhagwant Unv., Raj. Corresponding Author: Dr Chaitanya ABSTRACT: Even after independence from the British, Indian psyche is still ruled and governed by the theory of ‘White Supremacy’, causing greater harm to Indian culture and philosophy; considering it inferior to the British one. One of such colonial legacies is our perception of the word ‘Dharma’ as ‘Religion’. This misconstruction has greatly subverted the true concept and framework of ‘Dharma’. ‘Dharma’ means the universal or ultimate law that holds one and innumerable universes, and their all animate and inanimate objects together in harmony. It is the eternal law of universe, inherent in the very nature of things. Law of gravitation is Dharma as it holds not only different plenary systems of this universe but also innumerable universes outside of this universe. Religion is simply a particular system of faith and worship that is based on the belief in the existence of a particular God or gods. Religion is founded by someone; Dharma cannot be founded as every man is born with many Dharmas of body and mind. Religion has a life span; Dharma is eternal, sanatan. Our failure to comprehend this essential difference between the two concepts has led not only to an irreparable loss of our rare spiritual identity and a vast cultural heritage but has also created a socio- political chaos. Present research paper is an attempt to analyze the difference and interlinking of ‘Dharma’ and ‘Religion’.
    [Show full text]
  • Balabodha Sangraham
    बालबोध सङ्ग्रहः - १ BALABODHA SANGRAHA - 1 A Non-detailed Text book for Vedic Students Compiled with blessings and under instructions and guidance of Paramahamsa Parivrajakacharya Jagadguru Sri Sri Sri Jayendra Saraswathi Sri Sankaracharya Swamiji 69th Peethadhipathi and Paramahamsa Parivrajakacharya Jagadguru Sri Sri Sri Sankara Vijayendra Saraswathi Sri Sankaracharya Swamiji 70th Peethadhipathi of Moolamnaya Sri Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham Offered with devotion and humility by Sri Atma Bodha Tirtha Swamiji (Sri Kumbakonam Swamiji) Disciple of Pujyasri Kuvalayananda Tirtha Swamiji (Sri Tambudu Swamiji) Translation from Tamil by P.R.Kannan, Navi Mumbai Page 1 of 86 Sri Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham ॥ श्रीमहागणपतये नमः ॥ ॥ श्री गु셁भ्यो नमः ॥ INTRODUCTION जगत्कामकलाकारं नािभस्थानं भुवः परम् । पदपस्य कामाक्षयाः महापीठमुपास्महे ॥ सदाििवसमारमभां िंकराचाययमध्यमाम् । ऄस्मदाचाययपययनतां वनदे गु셁परमपराम् ॥ We worship the Mahapitha of Devi Kamakshi‟s lotus feet, the originator of „Kamakala‟ in the world, the supreme navel-spot of the earth. We worship the Guru tradition, starting from Sadasiva, having Sankaracharya in the middle and coming down upto our present Acharya. This book is being published for use of students who join Veda Pathasala for the first year of Vedic studies and specially for those students who are between 7 and 12 years of age. This book is similar to the Non-detailed text books taught in school curriculum. We wish that Veda teachers should teach this book to their Veda students on Anadhyayana days (days on which Vedic teaching is prohibited) or according to their convenience and motivate the students.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience of the Yogic Theory of Mind and Consciousness
    1 Neuroscience of the Yogic Theory of 2 Mind and Consciousness 3 Vaibhav Tripathi1* and Pallavi Bharadwaj2 *For correspondence: [email protected] (VT) 4 1Boston University; 2Massachusetts Institute of Technology † Present address: Department of 5 Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, ‡ USA 02215; Laboratory for 6 Abstract Yoga as a practice and philosophy of life has been followed for more than 4500 years Information and Decision Systems, 7 Massachusetts Institute of with known evidence of Yogic practices in the Indus Valley Civilization. A plethora of scholars have Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 8 contributed to the development of the field, but in last century the profound knowledge 9 remained inaccessible and incomprehensible to the general public. Last few decades have seen a 10 resurgence in the utility of Yoga and Meditation as a practice with growing scientific evidence 11 behind it. Significant scientific literature has been published, illustrating the benefits of Yogic 12 practices including asana, pranayama and dhyana on mental and physical well being. 13 Electrophysiological and recent functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies have 14 found explicit neural signatures for Yogic practices. In this article, we present a review of the 15 philosophy of Yoga, based on the dualistic Sankhya school, as applied to consciousness 16 summarized by Patanjali in his Yoga Sutras followed by discussion on the five vritti (modulations 17 of mind), practice of pratyahara, dharana, dhyana, different states of samadhi, and samapatti. We 18 introduce Yogic Theory of Mind and Consciousness (YTMC), a cohesive theory that can model 19 both external modulations and internal states of the mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Buddhist Psychology
    CHAPTER 1 Buddhist Psychology Andrew Olendzki THEORY AND PRACTICE ince the subject of Buddhist psychology is largely an artificial construction, Smixing as it does a product of ancient India with a Western movement hardly a century and a half old, it might be helpful to say how these terms are being used here. If we were to take the term psychology literally as referring to “the study of the psyche,” and if “psyche” is understood in its earliest sense of “soul,” then it would seem strange indeed to unite this enterprise with a tradition that is per- haps best known for its challenge to the very notion of a soul. But most dictio- naries offer a parallel definition of psychology, “the science of mind and behavior,” and this is a subject to which Buddhist thought can make a significant contribution. It is, after all, a universal subject, and I think many of the methods employed by the introspective traditions of ancient India for the investigation of mind and behavior would qualify as scientific. So my intention in using the label Buddhist Psychology is to bring some of the insights, observations, and experi- ence from the Buddhist tradition to bear on the human body, mind, emotions, and behavior patterns as we tend to view them today. In doing so we are going to find a fair amount of convergence with modern psychology, but also some intriguing diversity. The Buddhist tradition itself, of course, is vast and has many layers to it. Al- though there are some doctrines that can be considered universal to all Buddhist schools,1 there are such significant shifts in the use of language and in back- ground assumptions that it is usually helpful to speak from one particular per- spective at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legal Analysis of the Enemy Property Act of Bangladesh
    A Legal Analysis of the Enemy Property Act of Bangladesh Samir Kalra, Esq. and Arvind Chandrakantan, M.D. Abstract: The designation of minority owned land as “Enemy Property” under the provisions of the Enemy Property Act (EPA), sanctioned a vast and unparalleled appropriation of land in Bangladesh, and the erstwhile East Pakistan. Initially instituted by the Government of Pakistan in 1965, the EPA encompassed a series of discriminatory property laws targeting primarily Hindus and tribal communities in the eastern portion of the country (Bangladesh). After achieving independence from Pakistan in 1971, the newly formed Republic of Bangladesh retained the inequitable provisions of the EPA through the Vested Property Act (VPA). This paper will trace the evolution of the EPA and its subsequent versions, and provide an in- depth analysis of the Act in the context of international jurisprudence and human rights law. I. Introduction In 1965, following the outbreak of war between India and Pakistan, the military government of Pakistan promulgated one of history’s most racist and discriminatory laws, the Enemy Property Act (EPA). Years later, the United State Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), a quasi-governmental body responsible for promoting religious freedom throughout the world, described the EPA as “one of Pakistan’s key instruments of anti-Hindu discrimination,” which was used “selectively to seize Hindu- owned property after the 1965 Indo-Pakistan War...”1 Bangladesh, the successor state to Pakistan’s East Bengal Province, adopted the EPA after gaining independence in 1971, and each successive administration has continued this repressive law in one form or the other, often using it to “reward well- connected members of the Muslim majority community.”2 By labeling Hindus and other minorities as “enemies” of the state in the erstwhile East Pakistan and Bangladesh, the EPA and its subsequent versions, not only led to a massive appropriation of Hindu owned land, but also precipitated a drastic decline in the Hindu population.
    [Show full text]