DOCSLIB.ORG

Management Lessons from Advaita Bhavesh a Kinkhabwala

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management Lessons from Advaita Bhavesh a Kinkhabwala 143 Management Lessons from Advaita Bhavesh A Kinkhabwala Introduction Acharya Shankara is a thorough, outright one. he word ‘Advaita’ is very beautiful. It As indicated by him, whatever is, is Brahman. Tliterally means ‘non-dual’. Dvaita means Brahman itself is totally homogeneous. All dis- ‘dual’ and the prefix ‘a’ negates the exist- tinctions and plurality are deceptive.3 ence of duality so, there is no ‘two’ but, ‘one’. It Dualism, Dvaita; qualified monism, Vish- could be simpler, if we said ‘one’, but then, the ishtadvaita; and Monism, Advaita; are the three next question would be, is there ‘two’; so by say- different fundamental schools of metaphysical ing non-dual, it conveys the clear and firm mes- ideas. They are altogether different stages to the sage of being just one, that is non-dual. final stage of the ultimate Truth, namely,para- Acharya Shankara’s ‘philosophical stand- brahma. They are the steps on the stepping stool point can be tried to be summed up in a sin- of yoga. They are not in any manner conflicting gle word “Advaita”—NonDuality. The objective but, in actuality, they are complementary to one of Advaita is to is to make an individual under- another. These stages are amicably orchestrated in stand his or her fundamental (profound) char- an evaluated arrangement of spiritual experiences. acter with the preeminent realty [sic] “Nirakar Dualism, qualified monism, pure monism—all Brahm” and reality that there is no “two” yet one these come full circle inevitably in the Advaita and only. Advaita shows us to see the substance Vedantic acknowledgement of the Absolute or of oneself in each one and that nobody is sep- the supra-normal trigunatita ananta Brahman. arate from the Supreme Power The god.’1 Individuals have various personalities and What essentialness does it have for the regular various limits. Thus, various schools of theory daily life of an ordinary person? Advaita in- are additionally fundamental. The most elevated structs us to see the essence of oneself in each step is Advaita theory. A dualist or qualified one and that nobody is independent from the su- monist in the long run turns into a kevala-ad- preme power or authority, God, Nature, the Di- vaitin. A Dvaitin needs to serve the Lord as a vine power. The teachings and lessons of Acharya worker. The Dvaitin wishes to attend and serve Shankara can be summed up in a refrain: ‘Brahma the Lord. A Visishtadvaitin needs to end up like satyam jagan mithya jivo brahmaiva na aparah; Lord Narayana and appreciate the heavenly. One Brahman, the Absolute, is alone real; this world doesn’t wish to combine oneself or become in- is unreal; and the jiva or the individual soul is distinguishable with the Lord. One wishes to non-different from Brahman.’2 This is the core stay as a flash. A jnani blends oneself in Brah- of his way of thinking. The Advaita educated by man. One wishes to end up indistinguishable with Brahman. Bhavesh A Kinkhabwala is a company secretary The primary orderly proponent of the Advaita from Ahmedabad. was Acharya Gaudapada, who is the grand guru PB January 2020 133 144 Prabuddha Bharata of Acharya Shankara. Acharya Govindapada was Just as a swan lives in water, yet its quills are the disciple of Acharya Gaudapada. He was the never grimy by water, likewise an Advaitin lives guru of Acharya Shankara. Acharya Gaudapada on the planet, however, she or he is free from has given the focal teaching of Advaita Vedanta the influence of illusion. Advaita Vedanta is in in his Mandukya Karika. Be that as it may, it the meantime, a school of reasoning, a religion, was Acharya Shankara who delivered the final a religious philosophy, and a tenet of moksha. delightful form or version of Advaita theory and Its essential reason is all that eventually exists is gave a rightness and completing tone to it. Cau- the absolute Reality, nirguna Brahman, without tiously studying Acharya Shankara’s commen- characteristics. taries on the important Upanishads, the Brahma The phenomenal world has experiential le- Sutra, and the Bhagavadgita, one will obviously gitimacy. Be that as it may, it has no supreme comprehend his Advaita reasoning.4 reality. It is at last maya, an enchanted show, and Maybe the most significant school of Indian mithya, false, neither genuine nor stunning. All spiritual way of thinking, Advaita is viewed as that exists is only Brahman. One’s individual self the most powerful and most overwhelming sub- is at last, the same as Brahman, consequently school of Vedanta, one of the six standard schools the significance given to the Upanishadic state- of Hindu way of thinking. Advaita Vedanta says ments like ‘I am Brahman’7 and ‘You are that’.8 that the one constant Reality, Brahman, alone It is just a kind of powerful numbness, avidya, exists and that changing elements don’t have ab- that keeps us from understanding our actual na- solute presence, much as the sea’s waves have no ture as one with the Absolute, in certainty, the separate presence in division from the sea. The Absolute itself. waves ascend inside the sea and there would be Once avidya is evacuated, there emerges the no waves without the sea. In a similar way, the experience of the Atman’s identity with Brah- transient world ascents inside the Reality and man. One moves towards becoming jivan- owes its reality to the ultimate Reality.5 mukta, freed while in the body, and after death The world has no autonomous presence from achieves moksha, identity with the Absolute. Reality and that is the reason why it is said to be Advaita metaphysics coordinates the later Man- an illusion. What is changing must be depend- dukya Upanishad, Sankhya, and various thoughts ent on something else and thereby unreal. This around that time. The Advaita thought of edifi- wonderful universe of names and structures is cation or freedom depends on an extremely sig- consistently evolving. Names and structures are nificant knowledge. Not ‘merging with God’, as liable to rot and demise. Subsequently, they are is normally misconstrued, yet realising the Ab- incredible or ephemeral. What is consistent or solute. By realising the Absolute one rises above changeless should dependably be the Real. The the cosmic order; one is never again a limited Atman or the Eternal, all-pervading Self, ever being, rather, one rises to the level of the absolute exists. It permeates all items like ether. Regard- Reality, Atman-Brahman identity. The limits of less of whether the pot is broken, the ether that oneself vanish and one emerges into the infinite.9 is inside and outside it can’t be decimated.6 Essentially, if the bodies and all other things Management Lessons die, the eternal Self that swarms them can’t be A management expert says: ‘The central chal- crushed; it is the living Truth and just Reality. lenge in all management is realizing the nature 134 PB January 2020 Management Lessons from Advaita 145 of oneself. The advancement of humankind is item; Brahman isn’t another. It is all-full, un- best served when a human being connects with bounded, constant, self-existent, self-amuse, his or her own divinity. This is in sharp con- self-learning and self-joy. It is svarupa, nature; trast to the Western view where helping others nirakara, formless. It is the pith of the knower. is viewed as the penultimate purpose of human It is the seer, drashta; transcendent, turiya; and existence. In Indian spirituality, the world is best silent witness, sakshi. served when self-understanding precedes help- Maya is the complex illusory power of Brah- ing others. The world is changed for the better man, which makes Brahman to be viewed as the when we change ourselves. The key to a better material universe of independent structures: nir- world is self-realisation.10 guna Brahman seems to be saguna Brahman. As Acharya Shankara has clarified,nirguna Dimensions of Advaita Vedanta Brahman is generic. It turns into an individual Acharya Shankara says that whatever exists is God, saguna Brahman, just through its relation- Brahman, only pure consciousness. All differ- ship with maya. ence and plurality are illusory, just as you see Saguna Brahman and nirguna Brahman are plurality in the ocean, in the waves, but the waves not two unique Brahmans. Nirguna Brahman are water and the ocean is water. The pot is not isn’t the differentiation or inverse of saguna the clay. If the pot is the clay, when the pot disap- Brahman, and neither the other way around; if at pears the clay must also disappear, but it doesn’t. all They were, it would be totally opposing to the This is very important to understand. Essence Advaita Vedanta. The equivalent nirguna Brah- can exist without the form, but form cannot exist man shows up as saguna Brahman for the devout without the essence. When we say ‘neti, neti’, it love of enthusiasts. It is a similar Truth from two does not mean that this form is Brahman. The unique perspectives. Nirguna Brahman is the form is never Brahman, but it never exists apart higher Brahman, the Brahman from the supra- from Brahman. normal perspective, paramarthika; saguna Brah- As indicated by Acharya Shankara, Brah- man is the alleged lower Brahman, the Brahman man, the supreme cosmic Spirit, is separated from the relative perspective, vyavaharika. from everyone and is the ultimate truth. Other Maya has two primary functions—one is to than Brahman, everything else, including the ‘conceal’ the Brahman from common human universe, material articles, and people, is unreal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heidegger and Indian Thinking: the Hermeneutic of a “Belonging-Together” of Negation and Affirmation
    Comparative Philosophy Volume 6, No. 1 (2015): 111-128 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org HEIDEGGER AND INDIAN THINKING: THE HERMENEUTIC OF A “BELONGING-TOGETHER” OF NEGATION AND AFFIRMATION JAISON D. VALLOORAN ABSTRACT: According to Heidegger the questioning of Being is unique to western philosophical tradition, however we see that the hermeneutic of Being is explicit in inter- cultural context of thinking. Understanding Brahman as “one” and “the same” Śankara speaks together with Heidegger the same hermeneutic of ontological monism. Due to the reason that there is no explicit terminological equivalent of the word ‘Being’ in Śankara’s thinking, the hermeneutic of Śankara’s ontological understanding of Brahman and its distinction as “Saguna” and “Nirguna” are not sufficiently explored. In an inter-cultural ontological context, it is important not to insist on terminological equivalence, but to search for hermeneutic depth. Similarly Madhyamaka-Buddhism of Nāgārjuna describes the universe as totally devoid of reality, called ‘Śūnya’ or void, which is an expression of nihilism; it is comparable to Heidegger’s observation of the concealing of Being as “nihil”. The hermeneutic of these explicit ontological characters of Being, as concealment and un- concealment allow us to discover a sabotaging brotherhood, because the nihil and something are ontologically two essential sides of the same thinking. Keywords: Heidegger, Śankara, Nāgārjuna, Inter-cultural Ontology, Indian Philosophy 1. INTRODUCTION Philosophies give explanations of the world, of “what” of beings, and set norms for the right relationships between human beings. Therefore it is an exclusive property of mankind; still it is an intellectual engagement in an individual culture in its highest level.
    [Show full text]
  • An Understanding of Maya: the Philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva
    An understanding of Maya: The philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva Department of Religion studies Theology University of Pretoria By: John Whitehead 12083802 Supervisor: Dr M Sukdaven 2019 Declaration Declaration of Plagiarism 1. I understand what plagiarism means and I am aware of the university’s policy in this regard. 2. I declare that this Dissertation is my own work. 3. I did not make use of another student’s previous work and I submit this as my own words. 4. I did not allow anyone to copy this work with the intention of presenting it as their own work. I, John Derrick Whitehead hereby declare that the following Dissertation is my own work and that I duly recognized and listed all sources for this study. Date: 3 December 2019 Student number: u12083802 __________________________ 2 Foreword I started my MTh and was unsure of a topic to cover. I knew that Hinduism was the religion I was interested in. Dr. Sukdaven suggested that I embark on the study of the concept of Maya. Although this concept provided a challenge for me and my faith, I wish to thank Dr. Sukdaven for giving me the opportunity to cover such a deep philosophical concept in Hinduism. This concept Maya is deeper than one expects and has broaden and enlightened my mind. Even though this was a difficult theme to cover it did however, give me a clearer understanding of how the world is seen in Hinduism. 3 List of Abbreviations AD Anno Domini BC Before Christ BCE Before Common Era BS Brahmasutra Upanishad BSB Brahmasutra Upanishad with commentary of Sankara BU Brhadaranyaka Upanishad with commentary of Sankara CE Common Era EW Emperical World GB Gitabhasya of Shankara GK Gaudapada Karikas Rg Rig Veda SBH Sribhasya of Ramanuja Svet.
    [Show full text]
  • Tathagata-Garbha Sutra
    Tathagata-garbha Sutra (Tripitaka No. 0666) Translated during the East-JIN Dynasty by Tripitaka Master Buddhabhadra from India Thus I heard one time: The Bhagavan was staying on Grdhra-kuta near Raja-grha in the lecture hall of a many-tiered pavilion built of fragrant sandalwood. He had attained buddhahood ten years previously and was accompanied by an assembly of hundred thousands of great bhikshus and a throng of bodhisattvas and great beings sixty times the number of sands in the Ganga. All had perfected their zeal and had formerly made offerings to hundred thousands of myriad legions of Buddhas. All could turn the Irreversible Dharma Wheel. If a being were to hear their names, he would become irreversible in the unsurpassed path. Their names were Bodhisattva Dharma-mati, Bodhisattva Simha-mati, Bodhisattva Vajra-mati, Bodhisattva Harmoniously Minded, bodhisattva Shri-mati, Bodhisattva Candra- prabha, Bodhisattva Ratna-prabha, Bodhisattva Purna-candra, Bodhisattva Vikrama, Bodhisattva Ananta-vikramin, Bodhisattva Trailokya-vikramin, Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara, Bodhisattva Maha-sthama-prapta, Bodhisattva Gandha-hastin, Bodhisattva Sugandha, Bodhisattva Surpassing Sublime Fragrance, Bodhisattva Supreme matrix, Bodhisattva Surya-garbha, Bodhisattva Ensign Adornment, Bodhisattva Great Arrayed Banner, Bodhisattva Vimala-ketu, Bodhisattva Boundless Light, Bodhisattva Light Giver, Bodhisattva Vimala-prabha, Bodhisattva Pramudita-raja, Bodhisattva Sada-pramudita, Bodhisattva Ratna-pani, Bodhisattva Akasha-garbha, Bodhisattva King of the Light
    [Show full text]
  • The Upanishads- an Overview
    The Upanishads- An overview (S.N.Sastri) The word ‘Upanishad’ denotes Brahma-vidya by its derivation. Sri Sankara Bhagavatpada says in his Bhashya on the Kathopanishad that this word is derived by adding the prefixes ‘upa’ (meaning near) and ‘ni’ (with certainty) to the root ‘sad’ which means ‘to destroy’, ‘to reach’, and ‘to loosen’. Thus the meaning of the word ‘Upanishad’ is that it is the knowledge that destroys the seeds of worldly existence such as ignorance in the case of those seekers of liberation who, after becoming free from all desires approach (upa sad) this knowledge. The subject-matter of the upanishads is Brahman, the only Reality. Brihadaaranyaka upanishad, 3. 9. 26 says, “I ask you about Him, the Purusha of the upanishads”. The upanishads are the only source of knowledge about Brahman. The method adopted in Vedanta to impart the knowledge of Brahman is known as the method of superimposition ( adhyaaropa ) and subsequent negation ( apavaada ). In the Bhashya on Br.up.4.4.25 Bhagavatpada says, “The transmigrating self is indeed Brahman. He who knows the self as Brahman which is beyond fear becomes Brahman. This is the purport of the whole upanishad put in a nutshell. It is to bring out this purport that the ideas of creation, maintenance and dissolution of the universe, as well as the ideas of action, its factors and results were superimposed on the Self. Then, by the negation of the superimposed attributes the true nature of Brahman as free from all attributes has been brought out”. This is the method of adhyaaropa and apavaada, superimposition and negation, which is adopted by Vedanta.
    [Show full text]
  • Isavasya Upanishad
    ISAVASYA UPANISHAD 1 SHANTI MANTRA Om poornamadah poornamidam I Poornaath poorna mudachyate I Poornasya poorna madaaya I Poorname vaava sishyate I Om shanti shanti shanti hi II Om, That is Full, This also is Full, From Fullness comes that Fullness, Taking Fullness from Fullness, Fullness Indeed Remains. Om Peace, Peace, Peace. Isavasya Upanishad Shukla Yajur Veda 18 Mantras - Jnana Yoga Verse 1 - Jnana Yoga Sara Elaboration . Verse 4 - 8 - Nivritti Marga Verse 2 - Karma Yoga Sara - Karma Yoga Elaboration. Verse 9 - 14 - Pravirthi Marga - One who does not follow Karma Verse 3 - Upasakas prayer Yoga / Jnana Verse 15 - 18 Yoga criticised. for Krama Mukti 3 INTRODUCTION 1. Dasa Upanishad : 2. Isavasya and Brihadaranyaka belongs to shukla yajur veda. • Isavasya Upanishad or Isho Upanishad (2 Names). Mantra Upanishad Brahmana Upanishad - Beginning of Veda - Later portion of Veda. - Isavasya Upanishad - Commentary on Mantra / Portion - Mundak Upanishad - Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (Commentary on Isavasya Upanishad) - Prasno Upanishad (Commentary on Mundak Upanishad) 3. Most words used in contextual meaning not in dictionary meaning. 4 4) Shanti Mantra : 1st Explanation That is Whole, this is Whole ; from the Whole, the Whole becomes manifest. From the Whole, when the Whole is negated, what remains is again the Whole. Atma, Chaitanyam, Conciousness Svarupam Jivatma Paramatma Atma Chaitanyam, 3 Sharirams (Prakrti, Atma Chaitanyam, 3 Prapanchas (Maya, Conciousness Svarupam Matter, Nama / Rupa) Conciousness Svarupam Matter, Nama / Rupa) Sthula Sukshma Karana Sthula Sukshma Karana Vishwa Teijasa Pragya Virat Hiranyagarbha Ishvara 5 1) Poornam Adhaha, Poornam Idam : Poornam Adhah Poornam Idam Paramatma is Poornaha, Jivatma is Poornaha, infinite, infinite, whole whole • Equating them we can say, Jivatma and Paramatma are one and the same, both infinite.
    [Show full text]
  • Brahma Sutra
    BRAHMA SUTRA CHAPTER 1 1st Pada 1st Adikaranam to 11th Adhikaranam Sutra 1 to 31 INDEX S. No. Topic Pages Topic No Sutra No Summary 5 Introduction of Brahma Sutra 6 1 Jijnasa adhikaranam 1 a) Sutra 1 103 1 1 2 Janmady adhikaranam 2 a) Sutra 2 132 2 2 3 Sastrayonitv adhikaranam 3 a) Sutra 3 133 3 3 4 Samanvay adhikaranam 4 a) Sutra 4 204 4 4 5 Ikshatyadyadhikaranam: (Sutras 5-11) 5 a) Sutra 5 324 5 5 b) Sutra 6 353 5 6 c) Sutra 7 357 5 7 d) Sutra 8 362 5 8 e) Sutra 9 369 5 9 f) Sutra 10 372 5 10 g) Sutra 11 376 5 11 2 S. No. Topic Pages Topic No Sutra No 6 Anandamayadhikaranam: (Sutras 12-19) 6 a) Sutra 12 382 6 12 b) Sutra 13 394 6 13 c) Sutra 14 397 6 14 d) Sutra 15 407 6 15 e) Sutra 16 411 6 16 f) Sutra 17 414 6 17 g) Sutra 18 416 6 18 h) Sutra 19 425 6 19 7 Antaradhikaranam: (Sutras 20-21) 7 a) Sutra 20 436 7 20 b) Sutra 21 448 7 21 8 Akasadhikaranam : 8 a) Sutra 22 460 8 22 9 Pranadhikaranam : 9 a) Sutra 23 472 9 23 3 S. No. Topic Pages Topic No Sutra No 10 Jyotischaranadhikaranam : (Sutras 24-27) 10 a) Sutra 24 486 10 24 b) Sutra 25 508 10 25 c) Sutra 26 513 10 26 d) Sutra 27 517 10 27 11 Pratardanadhikaranam: (Sutras 28-31) 11 a) Sutra 28 526 11 28 b) Sutra 29 538 11 29 c) Sutra 30 546 11 30 d) Sutra 31 558 11 31 4 SUMMARY Brahma Sutra Bhasyam Topics - 191 Chapter – 1 Chapter – 2 Chapter – 3 Chapter – 4 Samanvaya – Avirodha – non – Sadhana – spiritual reconciliation through Phala – result contradiction practice proper interpretation Topics - 39 Topics - 47 Topics - 67 Topics 38 Sections Topics Sections Topics Sections Topics Sections Topics 1 11 1 13 1 06 1 14 2 07 2 08 2 08 2 11 3 13 3 17 3 36 3 06 4 08 4 09 4 17 4 07 5 Lecture – 01 Puja: • Gratitude to lord for completion of Upanishad course (last Chandogya Upanishad + Brihadaranyaka Upanishad).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16 INDEX
    By Suresvaracharya Volume 16 INDEX S. No. Title Verse Page No. Destruction of avidya through scriptural 60. 67 – 72 2579 to 2668 knowledge [Verse 65 – 72] Restatement of agency, etc. for the purpose 61. 73 – 77 2683 to 1764 of negation [Verse 73 – 80] [ii] INDEX S. No. Title Page No. II Chapter 3 : Topic 60 to 61 66 Verse 67 2601 67 Verse 68 2606 68 Verse 69 2611 69 Verse 70 2624 70 Verse 71 2656 71 Verse 72 2667 72 Verse 73 2683 73 Verse 74 2698 74 Verse 75 2703 75 Verse 76 2724 76 Verse 77 2747 [iii] Topic 60 to 61 Verse 67 to 77 Verse 67 – Introduction : The removal of this illusion of ignorance takes place through the rise of the right knowledge. [Introduction – Chapter 3 – Verse 67] • Since Moola Avidya is non enquirable, can only work for negating it. Verse 67 : From text such as "You are that Being," which remove the desire for further inquiry, certain knowledge about the inward Self does arise, and this [knowledge] cannot be obtained from other sources. [Chapter 3 – Verse 67] a) Tatu Asi Iti Akinam : • With help of Mahavakyam. • Sad Asi = Tat Tvam Asi. • Tat = Pronoun – That – standing for what? • Tatu = Pure existence, Attributeless, sat. 2601 • Sureshvaracharya replaces Tat by Sat, drops word Tvam because verb Asi is 2nd person – singular. • Tvam – Singular, need not be said. • Subject, understood as you. • Sad Asi = Tat Tvam Asi. b) Sad Asi Iti Adhi Mahavakyam : • For the student, Samyak Jnanam, right knowledge w.r.t. Atma, Pratyag Atma, inner self, Advitiya Jnanam.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Ordinary Level HINDUISM 2055/01 Paper 1 October/November 2018 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark
    Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge Ordinary Level HINDUISM 2055/01 Paper 1 October/November 2018 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark: 100 Published This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers. Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes. Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2018 series for most Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level components. This document consists of 18 printed pages. © UCLES 2018 [Turn over 2055/01 Cambridge O Level – Mark Scheme October/November PUBLISHED 2018 Generic Marking Principles These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1: Marks must be awarded in line with: • the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question • the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question • the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
    [Show full text]
  • Brahman, Atman and Maya
    Sanatana Dharma The Eternal Way of Life (Hinduism) Brahman, Atman and Maya The Hindu Way of Comprehending Reality and Life Brahman, Atman and Maya u These three terms are essential in understanding the Hindu view of reality. v Brahman—that which gives rise to maya v Atman—what each maya truly is v Maya—appearances of Brahman (all the phenomena in the cosmos) Early Vedic Deities u The Aryan people worship many deities through sacrificial rituals: v Agni—the god of fire v Indra—the god of thunder, a warrior god v Varuna—the god of cosmic order (rita) v Surya—the sun god v Ushas—the goddess of dawn v Rudra—the storm god v Yama—the first mortal to die and become the ruler of the afterworld The Meaning of Sacrificial Rituals u Why worship deities? u During the period of Upanishads, Hindus began to search for the deeper meaning of sacrificial rituals. u Hindus came to realize that presenting offerings to deities and asking favors in return are self-serving. u The focus gradually shifted to the offerings (the sacrificed). u The sacrificed symbolizes forgoing one’s well-being for the sake of the well- being of others. This understanding became the foundation of Hindu spirituality. In the old rites, the patron had passed the burden of death on to others. By accepting his invitation to the sacrificial banquet, the guests had to take responsibility for the death of the animal victim. In the new rite, the sacrificer made himself accountable for the death of the beast.
    [Show full text]
  • Hinduism and Hindu Philosophy
    Essays on Indian Philosophy UNIVE'aSITY OF HAWAII Uf,FU:{ Essays on Indian Philosophy SHRI KRISHNA SAKSENA UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII PRESS HONOLULU 1970 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 78·114209 Standard Book Number 87022-726-2 Copyright © 1970 by University of Hawaii Press All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contents The Story of Indian Philosophy 3 Basic Tenets of Indian Philosophy 18 Testimony in Indian Philosophy 24 Hinduism 37 Hinduism and Hindu Philosophy 51 The Jain Religion 54 Some Riddles in the Behavior of Gods and Sages in the Epics and the Puranas 64 Autobiography of a Yogi 71 Jainism 73 Svapramanatva and Svapraka!;>atva: An Inconsistency in Kumarila's Philosophy 77 The Nature of Buddhi according to Sankhya-Yoga 82 The Individual in Social Thought and Practice in India 88 Professor Zaehner and the Comparison of Religions 102 A Comparison between the Eastern and Western Portraits of Man in Our Time 117 Acknowledgments The author wishes to make the following acknowledgments for permission to reprint previously published essays: "The Story of Indian Philosophy," in A History of Philosophical Systems. edited by Vergilius Ferm. New York:The Philosophical Library, 1950. "Basic Tenets of Indian Philosophy," previously published as "Are There Any Basic Tenets of Indian Philosophy?" in The Philosophical Quarterly. "Testimony in Indian Philosophy," previously published as "Authority in Indian Philosophy," in Ph ilosophyEast and West. vo!.l,no. 3 (October 1951). "Hinduism," in Studium Generale. no. 10 (1962). "The Jain Religion," previously published as "Jainism," in Religion in the Twentieth Century. edited by Vergilius Ferm.
    [Show full text]
  • Advaita Is Vedanta.Pdf
    1 UNEDITED BOOKLET Advaita Is Vedanta States-Stations-Experiences and Samskaras Nothing is Permanent, Nothing is Temporary There Is No Nothing, There Is No Something There is No Not Nothing There is no separation, There is no Oneness There Is No Me Prior To Emptiness There Is No Me Prior To Form There Is No Me Prior To Or Without Samskaras Nisargadatta Maharaj (Paraphased), You think your thoughts are yours, actually they come from the collective 1 2 DEDICATION To Avadhut Nityananda Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj Baba Prakashananda Maharaj Who devoured the mind and opened the heart Without whose love and grace none of this would have been possible 2 3 “ALL THAT IS HEARD, (or that is about to be read) IS NON-EXISTENT”… SHANKARA 3 4 Advaita Is Vedanta Nisargadatta Maharaj (Paraphased), You think your thoughts are yours, actually they come from the collective Advaita is Vedanta Advaita is Not Two Neti Neti is Not This, Not This Advaita It seems ridiculous to even discuss Advaita as 4 5 Advaita is correctly translated as Not Two. Like many presenters of Advaita language has become extremely sloppy For example we incorrectly refer to Advaita as: The One, The One Substance, Consciousness, The Being, God, Emptiness or as Awareness. Shankara: “All that is heard is non-existent.” None of these words have anything to do with Advaita Advaita means NOT TWO. The words used to describe Advaita All mistakenly represent both states-stations and experiences which lead one to believe that there is such a thing as The One, Consciousness, God The Being Emptiness, One Substance, 5 6 or Awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • Vedic Brahmanism and Its Offshoots
    Vedic Brahmanism and Its Offshoots Buddhism (Buddha) Followed by Hindūism (Kṛṣṇā) The religion of the Vedic period (also known as Vedism or Vedic Brahmanism or, in a context of Indian antiquity, simply Brahmanism[1]) is a historical predecessor of Hinduism.[2] Its liturgy is reflected in the Mantra portion of the four Vedas, which are compiled in Sanskrit. The religious practices centered on a clergy administering rites that often involved sacrifices. This mode of worship is largely unchanged today within Hinduism; however, only a small fraction of conservative Shrautins continue the tradition of oral recitation of hymns learned solely through the oral tradition. Texts dating to the Vedic period, composed in Vedic Sanskrit, are mainly the four Vedic Samhitas, but the Brahmanas, Aranyakas and some of the older Upanishads (Bṛhadāraṇyaka, Chāndogya, Jaiminiya Upanishad Brahmana) are also placed in this period. The Vedas record the liturgy connected with the rituals and sacrifices performed by the 16 or 17 shrauta priests and the purohitas. According to traditional views, the hymns of the Rigveda and other Vedic hymns were divinely revealed to the rishis, who were considered to be seers or "hearers" (shruti means "what is heard") of the Veda, rather than "authors". In addition the Vedas are said to be "apaurashaya", a Sanskrit word meaning uncreated by man and which further reveals their eternal non-changing status. The mode of worship was worship of the elements like fire and rivers, worship of heroic gods like Indra, chanting of hymns and performance of sacrifices. The priests performed the solemn rituals for the noblemen (Kshsatriya) and some wealthy Vaishyas.
    [Show full text]