BUILD BRIGHT UNIVERSITY Siem Reap, Cambodia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BUILD BRIGHT UNIVERSITY Siem Reap, Cambodia BUILD BRIGHT UNIVERSITY Siem Reap, Cambodia MBA PROGRAM Strategic Management U.S Airway Group, INC Group Exercise Lecturer by: Mr. Rom Ra BBA, MBA, Group member: Mr. Phich Sokda 092 991 005 Ms. Pen Kesornicole 012 595 921 Ms. Ny Sandayvy 012 800 311 Mr. Lim Seanghout 012 505 853 Mr. Koet Vitiea 097 9557 357 Mr. Khoun Sokhemra 016 633 999 Mr. Heang Mengho 077 652 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 1.1 Firm Background ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Vision/Mission/Goal/Objective …………………………………………………………………………………… 12 1.3 Headquarter Office/Geographical Operation ……………………………………………………………….. 13 1.4 Firm Structure …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 15 II External environment ( Opportunities & Threats ) (Socio-culture, economics, political, legal, and technological) ………………………………………. 16 III Internal environment (Strengths &Weakness) 4.1 Management (BOD and top management) …………………………………………………………………. 23 4.2 Marketing ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 4.3 Operation/Production …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28 4.4 Finance …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 29 IV Critical success Factors/Firm strategies V Conclusion & Recommendation I. Introduction US Airways, along with US Airways Shuttle and US Airways Express, operates more than 3,000 flights per day and serves more than 200 communities in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Europe, the Middle East, the Caribbean, Central and South America. The airline employs more than 32,000 aviation professionals worldwide and is a member of the Star Alliance network, which offers its customers more than 21,000 daily flights to 1,290 airports in 189 countries. Together with its US Airways Express partners, the airline serves approximately 80 million passengers each year and operates hubs in Charlotte, N.C., Philadelphia and Phoenix, and a focus city in Washington, D.C. at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. US Airways was the only airline included as one of the 50 best companies to work for in the U.S. by LATINA Style magazine’s 50 Report for 2010 and 2011. For six years in a row, the airline also earned a 100 percent rating on the Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality index. The Corporate Equality index is a leading indicator of companies’ attitudes and policies toward lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees and customers. US Airways also ranked #1 among its competing hub-and-spoke network carriers for 2010 performance as rated by the Wichita State University/Purdue University Airline Quality Rating (AQR). For more company information follow US on Twitter @USAirways or at Facebook.com/USAirways. 1.1 Firm Background 1939 All American Aviation brings the first airmail service to many small western Pennsylvania and Ohio Valley communities with introduction of a unique 'flying post office service. 1948 Piedmont Airlines begins operations. 1949 All American Aviation becomes All American Airways and makes the transition from airmail to passenger service with introduction of the DC-3 and an expansion of its service. Pacific Southwest Airlines begins operations with service in California. 1953 All American's route system grows and the name is changed to Allegheny Airlines, recognizing the mountains and river of the same name that lie in the heart of the airline's network. 1965 Allegheny Airlines begins the transition to turbine-powered aircraft with introduction of the first Convair 580, its workhorse for the next several years. Page ‐ 1 ‐ 1966 The first jet, a DC9-10, makes its debut in Allegheny colors. It is replaced the following year by the first of what would eventually become a fleet of 62 larger DC9-30 jets. 1967 The first Allegheny Commuter service begins, between Hagerstown, MD and Baltimore/Washington International Airport by Henson Aviation, forerunner of today's Piedmont Airlines. It was the beginning of today's network of 10 regional airlines that provide US Airways Express service to 172 cities throughout the nation. 1968 Allegheny merges with Indianapolis-based Lake Central Airlines, expanding the growing route network beyond Pittsburgh to the Midwest including Dayton, Columbus and Cincinnati, OH; Indianapolis, IN; and St. Louis, MO. 1972 Allegheny acquires Mohawk Airlines, a Utica, NY airline with service to most cities throughout New York and New England. With the merger, Allegheny acquired Mohawk's BAC-1-11 jets to complement its DC9s and becomes the sixth largest airline in the world as measured by passenger boardings. 1978 Deregulation comes to the U.S. airline industry. Airlines have new freedom to expand their route systems and more flexibility to develop new and innovative pricing structures, but lose the protection of the fare- and route-setting authorities exercised by the Civil Aeronautics Board, which closes down by 1984. 1979 Allegheny changes its name to USAir to reflect its expanding network, including post- deregulation entry into Arizona, Texas, Colorado, Florida and later, California. 1983 America West Airlines begins operations in Phoenix on August 1 with 230 employees and three 737s, serving Colorado Springs, CO; Kansas City, KS; Los Angeles, CA; and Wichita, KS. The airline’s schedule calls for 20 daily departures. 1984 USAir introduces its Frequent Traveler program, which provides travel benefits to USAir's most loyal customers. 1986 Piedmont acquires Empire Airlines and its Syracuse, NY hub. Page ‐ 2 ‐ 1987 Large-scale airline consolidation, a partial product of deregulation, continues. Piedmont introduces European routes in its system. Competition for the lucrative California market intensifies as local carriers are bought and merged into larger partners. Pacific Southwest Airlines of San Diego becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of USAir Group in May. Piedmont Airlines, the dominant carrier throughout the mid-Atlantic region of the United States, also becomes a subsidiary of USAir Group in November 1987. 1988 PSA is merged into USAir. 1989 Piedmont is integrated into USAir, the largest merger in airline history. The merger brings with it Piedmont's international routes as well as its Charlotte, Baltimore, Dayton and Syracuse hubs. Baltimore and Charlotte remain hubs. The merger also brings USAir's first wide body jets, the Boeing 767-200ERs now used on its transatlantic and some transcontinental routes. 1990 USAir expands its international flying with service between Pittsburgh and Frankfurt, Germany, complementing existing Charlotte-London service begun in 1987 by Piedmont; and in 1991, international expansion continues with the introduction of new nonstops between Charlotte and Frankfurt. 1992 Philadelphia-Paris is added to USAir's transatlantic schedules in January. Daily nonstops between both Philadelphia and Baltimore/Washington International Airport and London Gatwick Airport are introduced in May. USAir and Trump Shuttle begin a marketing affiliation under which the service becomes the USAir Shuttle. The Shuttle provides hourly service between New York and Boston and between New York and Washington, DC. USAir's new terminal at New York LaGuardia opens, as does the new Midfield Terminal at Pittsburgh International Airport. 1993 USAir and British Airways announce an investment/alliance plan, under which USAir gives up its London route authority. 1994 USAir makes its largest expansion ever of its 10-year-old Frequent Traveler Program by becoming the exclusive U.S. domestic airline partner of LatinPass, which has 14 Latin American airlines sharing program benefits. 1995 USAir posts its first profitable year since 1988, with earnings of $119.3 million on sales of $7.474 billion. USAir introduces Priority TravelWorksSM, allowing bookings from personal computers. Page ‐ 3 ‐ 1996 Stephen M. Wolf is elected chairman effective January 22. Seth E. Schofield retires as chairman after 38 years' service to the company and three and a half years and chief executive. USAir continues its transatlantic expansion, winning the right to serve Munich, Rome and Madrid from Philadelphia beginning in 1996. USAir introduces ticketless travel. USAir, in a dramatic two-week period, announces what might in time be the largest single order for airliners; then announces a new name, image, identity designed to carry the airline aggressively into the next century. The airline ordered up to 400 new Airbus A319, A320 and A321 narrowbody twin jets for delivery starting in 1998 and continuing through 2009; then within days announced its new identity as US Airways. The airline challenged its relationship with British Airways in court, seeking rights to London Heathrow from four U.S. gateways and to require British Airways to dispose of its USAir stock. USAir notifies BA the codeshare between the two will end in March, 1997, and in December, British Airways announces it will sell its shares in USAir and that its three directors will resign. 1997 The name US Airways is put into use officially on February 27. Signs, stationery, ticket stock, business cards, advertisements, marketing materials, ticket folders and counters all start to sport the new US Airways blue, red, gray and white identity, and the first aircraft are painted in the new scheme as the changeover approaches. The US-BA codeshare expires in March. 1998 US Airways Inc., purchased Shuttle Inc., from a consortium of banks. The Shuttle has flown under the US Airways name since 1992, when US Airways became an investor in the Shuttle with a minority ownership stake. US Airways Shuttle flies 17 daily roundtrips
Recommended publications
  • AWA AR Editoral
    AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION Annual Report 2002 AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION America West Holdings Corporation is an aviation and travel services company. Wholly owned subsidiary, America West Airlines, is the nation’s eighth largest carrier serving 93 destinations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The Leisure Company, also a wholly owned subsidiary, is one of the nation’s largest tour packagers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chairman’s Message to Shareholders 3 20 Years of Pride 11 Board of Directors 12 Corporate Officers 13 Financial Review 15 Selected Consolidated Financial Data The selected consolidated data presented below under the captions “Consolidated Statements of Operations Data” and “Consolidated Balance Sheet Data” as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Holdings. The selected consolidated data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the respective periods, the related notes and the related reports of independent accountants. Year Ended December 31, (in thousands except per share amounts) 2002 2001(a) 2000 1999 1998 (as restated) Consolidated statements of operations data: Operating revenues $ 2,047,116 $ 2,065,913 $ 2,344,354 $ 2,210,884 $ 2,023,284 Operating expenses (b) 2,207,196 2,483,784 2,356,991 2,006,333 1,814,221 Operating income (loss) (160,080) (417,871) (12,637) 204,551 209,063 Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (c) (214,757)
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Press
    Vol. 31 No. 2 Serving New York Airports April 2009 JFK EWR LGA METRO EDITION SWF JFK CHAMBER TO CONTINUE SCHOLARSHIP GRANT PROGRAM The JFK Chamber of Commerce started date about their quest for a higher education last year to give degree. It does not have to be in the pursuit an “unrestricted” of an aviation degree or career. scholarship to two Last year, the Chamber awarded two stu- employees of JFK dents $500 each. This year they are looking Airport or its’ adja- to increase the dollar amount for each schol- cent industry part- arship. This will be based on the success at ners. their monthly luncheons. The method of This month Ed Bastion of Delta/North- earning the schol- west airline will speak at the Chamber Lun- arship remains the cheon on April 28th. Check out the Cham- same; it is to write ber web site www.jfk-airport.org for more an essay, written by the scholarship candi- details. DOLORES HOFMAN OF QUEENS DEVELOPMENT Back row: Wesley Mills, Manager, Boston Culinary Group; Warren Kroeppel, General Manager, OFFICE HONORED LaGuardia Airport, Port Authority of NY & NJ; Manuel Mora, Assistant Manager, Boston Culinary Group; Paul McGinn, President, Marketplace Development; Ousmane Ba, Manager, Au Bon Excuse us at Airport Press if we share in the pride about Pain; Syed Hussain, Manager, Airport Wireless; Front Row: Lillian Tan, VP/General Manager/ the honoring of Dolores Hofman of the Queens Develop- MarketPlace Development; Lacee Klemm, Manager, The Body Shop; Belkys Polanco, Assistant ment Offi ce as Top Woman in Business. She is not only a Manager, Au Bon Pain; Margherite LaMorte, Manager, Marketing & Customer Service, friend but a neighbor in Building 141.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, December 9, 2013
    Corporate Communications 817-967-1577 [email protected] FOR RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013 AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP ANNOUNCES EQUITY DISTRIBUTION UPDATE FORT WORTH, Texas – Today’s consummation of the merger between AMR Corporation and US Airways Group, Inc. and the effectiveness of AMR’s Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) will result in the distribution of American Airlines Group Inc. common stock (NASDAQ: AAL) and convertible preferred stock (NASDAQ: AALCP) to equity holders, creditors and employees of AMR Corporation. American Airlines Group Inc. has determined that holders of AMR common stock (formerly traded under the symbol: “AAMRQ”) will receive, for each share of AMR common stock, an initial distribution of approximately 0.0665 shares of AAL in connection with the occurrence of the effective date of the Plan. AAMRQ holders may in the future receive additional distributions based on the trading price of AAL common stock during the 120 day period after the effective date and the total amount of allowed claims, in each case, in accordance with the terms of the Plan. Additional Information and Where to Find It For questions about distributions under the Plan, please visit www.amrcaseinfo.com. For information about American Airlines Group Inc., including financial information, corporate governance and its SEC filings, please visit www.aa.com/investorrelations. About American Airlines Group American Airlines Group (NASDAQ: AAL) is the holding company for American Airlines and US Airways. Together with American Eagle and US Airways Express, the airlines operate an average of nearly 6,700 flights per day to 339 destinations in 54 countries from hubs in Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Philadelphia, Phoenix and Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation
    Darienite News for Darien https://darienite.com Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation Author : David Gurliacci Categories : Opinion, Transportation Tagged as : Cameron on Air Travel 2019, Cameron on Transportation, Cameron on Transportation 2019, Cameron on Transportation History 2019, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column 2019 Date : July 12, 2019 Rail fans call them “fallen flags.” They are railroads that no longer exist, like the original New Haven and New York Central railroads. But before I start getting all misty eyed, let’s also pay homage to airlines that have flown away into history. 1 / 3 Darienite There’s PEOPLExpress, the domestic discount airline that flew out of Newark’s grungy old North Terminal startingNews infor 1981. Darien Fares were dirt cheap, collected on-board during the flight and checked bags cost $3. You https://darienite.comeven had to pay for sodas and snacks. The airline expanded too fast, even adding a 747 to its fleet for $99 flights to Brussels, and was eventually merged with Continental under its rapacious Chairman Frank Lorenzo, later banished from the industry by the Department of Transportation. There were any number of smaller, regional airlines that merged or just folded their wings, including Mohawk, Northeast, Southeast, Midway, L’Express, Independence Air, Air California, PSA and a personal favorite, Midwest Express, started by the Kimberly Clark paper company to shuttle employees between its mills and headquarters in Milwaukee. Midwest flew DC-9s, usually fitted with coach seats in a 2-and-3 configuration, but equipped instead with business-class 2-and-2 leather seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Trends
    9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 15 1 M Overview and Trends The Transportation Research Board (TRB) study committee that pro- duced Winds of Change held its final meeting in the spring of 1991. The committee had reviewed the general experience of the U.S. airline in- dustry during the more than a dozen years since legislation ended gov- ernment economic regulation of entry, pricing, and ticket distribution in the domestic market.1 The committee examined issues ranging from passenger fares and service in small communities to aviation safety and the federal government’s performance in accommodating the escalating demands on air traffic control. At the time, it was still being debated whether airline deregulation was favorable to consumers. Once viewed as contrary to the public interest,2 the vigorous airline competition 1 The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 was preceded by market-oriented administra- tive reforms adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) beginning in 1975. 2 Congress adopted the public utility form of regulation for the airline industry when it created CAB, partly out of concern that the small scale of the industry and number of willing entrants would lead to excessive competition and capacity, ultimately having neg- ative effects on service and perhaps leading to monopolies and having adverse effects on consumers in the end (Levine 1965; Meyer et al. 1959). 15 9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 16 16 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY spurred by deregulation now is commonly credited with generating large and lasting public benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • RESOURCE Air Travel 2001
    RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP INCORPORATED Air Travel 2001 What do they tell us about the future of US air travel? An Industry Report by Resource Systems Group, Inc. December 2001 331 Olcott Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 802.295.4999 www.rsginc.com www.surveycafe.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................2 THE SURVEY SAMPLE ..............................................................................................................................2 TRIP CHARACTERISTICS..........................................................................................................................2 RESERVATIONS AND TICKETING............................................................................................................3 CHOICE OF TICKETING LOCATIONS ....................................................................................................3 SATISFACTION WITH TICKETING OPTIONS ........................................................................................4 TICKETING SEGMENTS .........................................................................................................................7 AIRPORTS ..................................................................................................................................................7 AIRLINE RANKINGS.................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • A Work Project, Presented As Part of Requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA - School of Business and Economics
    A Work Project, presented as part of requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA - School of Business and Economics US Airways: The Ugly Girl Gets Married Again Milton José Andrade Figueira, n.º 2298 A Project carried out on the Master in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Paulo Soares de Pinho January 2018 Abstract Title: US Airways: The Ugly Girl Gets Married Again This case follows US Airways’ performance from inception to the potential merger with bankrupted American Airlines in 2012. Throughout the case, several events that endangered the existence of US Airways are brought into light. These events serve as basis to introduce the value of leverage and financial distress costs. Moreover, the case reflects on the decision between out-of-court restructuring and chapter 11, while assessing distressed mergers and acquisitions. Finally, the potential merger is analyzed and the proposed solution is that new equity should be split 69-31 per cent between American Airlines’ unsecured creditors and shareholders, and US Airways’ shareholders. Keywords: Costs of Financial Distress, Bankruptcy, Mergers and Acquisitions, Deal Financing 2 Nova School of Business and Economics Paulo Soares de Pinho Milton Andrade Figueira US Airways: The Ugly Girl Gets Married Again “As one of you simply put it, “Why are we the ugly girl?” The answer, of course, is we are not and there’s no better evidence of that than our recent performance.” Douglas Parker - Chief Executive Officer, US Airways On January 2012, William Douglas Parker, usually treated as Doug Parker, US Airways Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • US and Plaintiff States V. US Airways Group, Inc. and AMR Corporation
    Case 1:13-cv-01236-CKK Document 170 Filed 04/25/14 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:13-cv-01236 (CKK) US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and AMR CORPORATION Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT WHEREAS, Plaintiffs United States of America ("United States") and the States of Arizona, Florida, Tennessee and Michigan, the Commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia ("Plaintiff States") filed their Complaint against Defendants US Airways Group, Inc. ("US Airways") and AMR Corporation ("American") on August 13, 2013, as amended on September 5, 2013; AND WHEREAS, the United States and the Plaintiff States and Defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without this Final Judgment constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issue of fact or law; AND WHEREAS, Defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of the Final Judgment pending its approval by the Court; 1 Case 1:13-cv-01236-CKK Document 170 Filed 04/25/14 Page 2 of 28 AND WHEREAS, the essence of this Final Judgment is the prompt and certain divestiture of certain rights or assets by the Defendants to assure that competition is not substantially lessened; AND WHEREAS, the Final Judgment requires Defendants to make certain divestitures for the purposes of remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint; AND WHEREAS, Defendants have represented to the United States and the Plaintiff States that the divestitures required below can and will be made, and that the Defendants will later raise no claim of hardship or difficulty as grounds for asking the Court to modify any of the provisions below; NOW THEREFORE, before any testimony is taken, without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of the parties, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: I.
    [Show full text]
  • Departemen Ilmu Politik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Univeristas Sumatera Utara Medan 2019
    skripsi ANALISIS KEMENANGAN DONALD TRUMP DALAM PEMILIH PRESIDEN AMERIKA SERIKAT TAHUN 2016 (Figur Politik Donald Trump) Disusun Oleh: REIZA JANUARDHY SIREGAR 140906006 Dosen Pembimbing : Drs. Heri Kusmanto, MA,. Ph.D DEPARTEMEN ILMU POLITIK FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK UNIVERISTAS SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2019 Universitas Sumatera Utara UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK DEPARTEMEN ILMU POLITIK REIZA JANUARDHY SIREGAR (140906006) ANALISIS KEMENANGAN DONALD TRUMP DALAM PEMILIH PRESIDEN AMERIKA SERIKAT TAHUN 2016 (Figur Politik Donald Trump) Rincian isi skripsi: 68 Halaman, 10 buku, 3 jurnal, 22 sumber internet ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat menganalisis kemenangan Donald Trump pada Pemilihan Presiden Amerika Serikat pada tahun 2016 melawan Hillary Clinton. Figur politik Donald Trump yang kontroversial menimbulkan aksi protes karena pernyataan-pernyataannya yang kontroversial setelah kemenangannya menjadi Presiden Amerika Serikat. Rumusan masalah pada penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat bagaimana figur politik Donald Trump sehingga ia dapat menang dalam pemilihan Presiden Amerika Serikat tahun 2016. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif dengan jenis penelitian kualitatif dan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data studi pustaka. Teori yang digunakan untuk penelitian ini adalah teori marketing politik dan publik figur. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Donald Trump memenangi pemilihan pendahuluan beberapa negagara bagian yang menguatkan posisinya menjadi satu-satunya calon
    [Show full text]
  • IAM Mechanic Agreement – July 18, 2014
    AGREEMENT by and between US AIRWAYS, INC. and the INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS July 18, 2014 Table of Contents Article Page Preamble ...................................................................... 1 1 Purpose .......................................................... 2 2 Scope of Agreement ...................................... 4 3 Status of Agreement ...................................... 7 4 Classification and Work Requirements ......... 9 5 Hours of Service ............................................ 18 6 Overtime and Holidays ................................. 25 7 Travel Pay ..................................................... 41 8 Seniority ........................................................ 45 9 Filling Vacancies ........................................... 58 10 Leaves of absence ......................................... 81 11 Vacation with Pay ......................................... 84 12 Sick leave, Premiums and Bonuses ............... 90 13 Transportation ............................................... 93 14 Grievance Procedures .................................... 94 15 System Board of Adjustment ........................ 98 16 Safety and Health .......................................... 101 17 General and Miscellaneous ........................... 104 18 Wage Rates ................................................... 111 19 Union Shop & Dues Check-off Agreement .. 117 20 Severance Allowance .................................... 122 21 Retirement ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 300000000 Airport System Revenue Bonds Series 2006A
    NEW ISSUE/BOOK-ENTRY ONLY In the respective opinions of Co-Bond Counsel to the Authority to be delivered upon the issuance of the Series 2006A Bonds, under existing law and assuming compliance by the Authority with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), that must be met subsequent to the issuance of the Series 2006A Bonds, with which the Authority has certified, represented and covenanted its compliance, interest on the Series 2006A Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes except for any period during which such Series 2006A Bonds are held by a person who is a “substantial user” of the facilities financed or a “related” person, as those terms are used in Section 147(a) of the Code, but is an item of tax preference in calculating the federal alternative minimum tax liability of individuals, trusts, estates and corporations, Also, in the respective opinions of Co-Bond Counsel to be delivered upon the issuance of the Series 2006A Bonds, under existing law, interest on the Series 2006A Bonds is exempt from income taxation by the Commonwealth of Virginia and is exempt from all taxation of the District of Columbia except estate, inheritance and gift taxes. See “TAX MATTERS” for a more detailed discussion. $300,000,000 Airport System Revenue Bonds Series 2006A (AMT) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: October 1 in the years as shown herein Interest on the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority’s (the “Authority”) $300,000,000 Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A (the “Series 2006A Bonds”), will be payable on April 1, 2006, and semiannually thereafter on each April 1 and October 1.
    [Show full text]