DOCSLIB.ORG

Fly Quiet Program Chicago O’Hare International Airport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fly Quiet Program Chicago O’Hare International Airport 2nd Quarter 2016 Report Fly Quiet Program Chicago O’Hare International Airport Visit the O’Hare Noise Webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/ORDNoise nd 2 Quarter 2016 Report Background On June 17, 1997, the City of Chicago announced that airlines operating at O’Hare International Airport had agreed to use designated noise abatement flight procedures in accordance with the Fly Quiet Program. The Fly Quiet Program was implemented in an effort to further reduce the impacts of aircraft noise on the surrounding neighborhoods. The Fly Quiet Program is a voluntary program that encourages pilots and air traffic controllers to use designated nighttime preferential runways and flight tracks developed by the Chicago Department of Aviation in cooperation with the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, and the air traffic controllers. These preferred routes direct aircraft over less-populated areas, such as forest preserves, highways, as well as commercial and industrial areas. As part of the Fly Quiet Program, the Chicago Department of Aviation prepares a Quarterly Fly Quiet Report. This report is shared with Chicago Department of Aviation officials, the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, and the general public. The Fly Quiet Report contains detailed information regarding nighttime runway use, flight operations, flight tracks, and noise complaints and 24-hour tracking of ground run-ups. The data presented in this report is compiled from the Airport Noise Management System (ANMS) and airport operation logs. Operations O’Hare has seven runways that are all utilized at different times depending on a number of conditions including weather, airfield pavement and construction activities and air traffic demand. The Nighttime Runway Use Report compares the average percentage of use for each runway during the current quarter with the previous quarter as well as with the 12-month average. The percentage of use for departures and arrivals is shown graphically for each runway. This data is presented for all aircraft types during nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The Nighttime Hourly Operations Report compares the arrivals and departures by hour to the current quarter with the previous quarter as well as with the 12- month average. Percentage is a ratio whereas a percentage point is the difference between two percentages. Highlights for 2Q 2016 include: Departures Arrivals Most used nighttime departure runway: 28R – 28% Most used nighttime arrival runway: 27L – 31% 9R night departures increased by 12pp from 1Q 2016 10C night arrivals increased by 12pp from 1Q 2016 28R night departures decreased by 10pp from 1Q 2016 28C night arrivals decreased by 7pp from 1Q 2016 pp = Percentage Points Nighttime operations represent 11% of the overall daily operations Arrival Summary A summary of nighttime arrivals is provided for the two most-used arrival runways (10C and 27L); the airline summary is also compared to the data from the same quarter of the previous year. Preferential Flight Tracks As part of the Fly Quiet Program, the Chicago Department of Aviation worked with the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, and the air traffic controllers to identify preferred runways and flight Chicago Department of Aviation Page 1 2nd Quarter 2016 tracks for nighttime operations at O’Hare. The preferred routes direct aircraft over less-populated areas in an effort to limit the effects of noise on the surrounding communities. Adherence to nighttime departure preferential flight tracks is measured by the ANMS. A detailed airline deviation summary is provided for the two most-used departure runways (28R and 9R); the airline deviation is also compared to the data from the same quarter of the previous year. An average deviation graphic and table is provided for all runways. The Nighttime Flight Track Report measures deviation (in nautical miles) from the preferred flight tracks and is divided into three categories: less than 0.5 miles between 0.5 and 1.0 miles greater than 1.0 miles Noise Complaints The Chicago Department of Aviation maintains a toll-free O’Hare noise hotline (1-800-435-9569) and an on-line service at www.flychicago.com/ORDNoise for citizens to express their concerns about particular incidents or about aircraft noise levels in general. The Nighttime Noise Complaint Report summarizes the number of complaints received and where the complainants were located. The tabular report lists the number of complaints by community as well as the number of individual complainants. The graph at the bottom of the page illustrates the nature of the complaints during the current quarter. Complaints include all complaints made within the State of Illinois to the O’Hare Noise Hotline toll-free number or on-line feature. Ground Run-ups Ground run-ups are aircraft engine tests that are performed to ensure that the engines are working properly after maintenance is performed. Ground run-ups typically occur at night and generate high levels of noise for extended periods of time. In 1997, the Chicago Department of Aviation constructed a ground run-up enclosure (GRE) at O’Hare to help reduce the noise impacts of ground run-ups on the communities surrounding the airport. This facility was the first of its kind in the United States. When it is not possible to use the GRE, run-ups are performed on one of the three identified alternative locations. The Airline Ground Run-up Report displays the total number of ground run ups from the current quarter by airline. The Aircraft Ground Run-up Report displays the total number of ground run ups from the current quarter by aircraft. Both reports compare the percent utilization of the GRE facility to the percent utilization of other locations for ground run-ups. It also compares the current quarter’s GRE usage to the 12-month average and to the same quarter of the previous year. Aircraft Noise The Nighttime Aircraft Noise Report summarizes noise measurements from each of the 33 noise monitors located around O’Hare. The data presented summarizes the Equivalent Sound Level (Leq). Leq is used to identify the average sound level over a given period of time (in this case 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) and is the metric used for this analysis as it is the most appropriate noise measure for periods of time less than 24 hours. The data in this report displays the average Leq for the current quarter and its comparison to the previous four quarters. It also compares the current quarter’s Leq to the 12-month average. Numbers displayed in red represent an increase of at least 1 dB over the aircraft Leq from the same quarter of the previous year whereas numbers displayed in green represent a decrease of at least 1 dB from the aircraft Leq from the same quarter of the previous year. Chicago Department of Aviation Page 2 2nd Quarter 2016 Runway Use Report Chicago O'Hare International Airport Period: 2nd Quarter 2016 Time of Day: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Runway Use (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) Source: Airport Noise Management System (ANMS) Runway Utilization 4L 4R 9L 9R 10L 10C 10R 14L 14R 22L 22R 27L 27R 28L 28C 28R 32L 32R Average Daily Departures 2Q 2016 0 0 0 29 16 2 0 n/a 0 11 0 0 0 0 3 33 24 n/a 1Q 2016 0 0 0 13 7 1 0 n/a 0 14 0 1 0 0 2 39 28 n/a 12 Month Avg. 0 0 0 14 9 1 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 35 30 1 Average Daily Arrivals 2Q 2016 0 0 11 5 16 36 1 n/a 2 0 0 46 3 0 24 6 n/a n/a 1Q 2016 0 1 5 2 10 16 0 n/a 1 0 0 48 2 0 30 12 n/a n/a 12 Month Avg. 0 0 7 3 11 22 0 0 2 0 0 43 5 0 37 14 n/a 0 Departures (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) Arrivals (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) 80% 80% 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Percentage Departure Utilization Percentage Arrival Utilization 2Q 2016 2Q 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 20 1 0 24 3 31 0 0 28 14 11 4 2 2 24 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 Purple denotes Fly Quiet preferential departure and arrival runways. Runway 10R-28L was commissioned on October 15, 2015. Chicago Department of Aviation Page 3 2nd Quarter 2016 Nighttime Hourly Operations Report Chicago O'Hare International Airport Period: 2nd Quarter 2016 Time of Day: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Average Departures by Hour 70 60 48 50 41 34 40 29 30 Average Departures Average 20 14 13 9 8 10 6 5 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 10 p.m. 11 p.m. 12 a.m. 1 a.m. 2 a.m. 3 a.m. 4 a.m. 5 a.m. 6 a.m. Hour 2Q16 1Q16 12 Month Average* Operations by Hour (%) 2Q 2016 10 p.m. 11 p.m 12 a.m. 1 a.m. 2 a.m. 3 a.m. 4 a.m. 5 a.m. 6 a.m. Total Departures 40.6% 11.7% 4.5% 2.6% 2.5% 1.4% 0.6% 7.5% 28.6% 100% Arrivals 14.0% 11.8% 5.5% 1.7% 1.0% 1.4% 8.7% 16.6% 39.2% 100% Average Arrivals by Hour 70 59 60 50 50 40 25 Average Arrivals Average 30 21 18 21 18 16 20 13 8 11 6 10 3 2 1 1 2 2 0 10 p.m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AWA AR Editoral
    AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION Annual Report 2002 AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION America West Holdings Corporation is an aviation and travel services company. Wholly owned subsidiary, America West Airlines, is the nation’s eighth largest carrier serving 93 destinations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The Leisure Company, also a wholly owned subsidiary, is one of the nation’s largest tour packagers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chairman’s Message to Shareholders 3 20 Years of Pride 11 Board of Directors 12 Corporate Officers 13 Financial Review 15 Selected Consolidated Financial Data The selected consolidated data presented below under the captions “Consolidated Statements of Operations Data” and “Consolidated Balance Sheet Data” as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Holdings. The selected consolidated data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the respective periods, the related notes and the related reports of independent accountants. Year Ended December 31, (in thousands except per share amounts) 2002 2001(a) 2000 1999 1998 (as restated) Consolidated statements of operations data: Operating revenues $ 2,047,116 $ 2,065,913 $ 2,344,354 $ 2,210,884 $ 2,023,284 Operating expenses (b) 2,207,196 2,483,784 2,356,991 2,006,333 1,814,221 Operating income (loss) (160,080) (417,871) (12,637) 204,551 209,063 Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (c) (214,757)
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Noise and Operations Report 2014 Bi-Annual Summary January – June
    Aircraft Noise and Operations Report 2014 Bi-Annual Summary January – June Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport AIRCRAFT NOISE AND OPERATIONS REPORT 2014 BI-ANNUAL SUMMARY JANUARY - JUNE Table of Contents and Summary of Reports Aircraft Noise Report Page 1 This report details the locations of all complaints for the reporting period. Comparisons include state, county and areas within each county. Quarterly & Annual Comparison of Complaints Page 2 This report shows the trends of total complaints comparing the previous five years by quarter to the current year. Complaints by Category Page 3 Complaints received for the reporting period are further detailed by fourteen types of complaints, concerns or questions. A complainant may have more than one complaint, concern or question per occurrence. Complaint Locations and Frequent Complainants Page 4 This report shows the locations of the complainants on a map and the number of complaints made by the most frequent/repeat complainants for the reporting period. Total Runway Usage - All Aircraft Page 5 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of departures and arrivals on each runway for the reporting period. Nighttime Usage by Large Jets Page 6 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of large jet departures and arrivals on each runway during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. for the reporting period. Nighttime Usage by Small Jets and Props Page 7 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of small jet and prop departures and arrivals on each runway during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Economic Report
    2011 ECONOMIC REPORT We Connect the World A4A airlines and their affiliates transport more than 90 percent of all U.S. airline passenger and cargo traffic. Airlines for America ® Contents A4A Members ................................................... 2 Members: Operating and Financial Results ....................... 3 Safety Trend ...................................................... 5 U.S. Airline Rankings ..................................... 7-9 Employees and Operating Revenues ............ 7 Aircraft Departures/Passengers Enplaned ....8 Cargo/Passenger Traffic and Capacity ......... 9 Top U.S. City Pairs by O&D Passengers .........11 Revenue Collected per Passenger ................. 12 Airport Passengers/Cargo and Departures .... 14 Profitability ....................................................... 16 U.S. Passenger Airline Costs vs. Inflation ...... 17 Fuel Expense per Passenger Mile .................. 18 Passengers Enplaned ..................................... 19 Domestic Capacity Trend ................................ 20 Customer Service ........................................... 22 Federal Aviation Taxes .................................... 24 U.S. Export Value by Transport Mode ............ 26 Associate Member: Noise Reduction .............................................. 28 Fuel Efficiency Gains ...................................... 29 Report Content Unless otherwise noted, the data provided in this report reflects the worldwide operations of all U.S. passenger and cargo airlines as recorded by the Bureau of Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • APR 2009 Stats Rpts
    SUMMARY OF ENPLANED PASSENGERS Colorado Springs Airport Month Year-to-date Percent Percent Enplaned passengers by Airline Apr-09 Apr-08 change 2009 2008 change Scheduled Carriers Allegiant Air 2,417 2,177 11.0% 10,631 10,861 -2.1% American/American Connection 14,126 14,749 -4.2% 55,394 60,259 -8.1% Continental/Cont Express (a) 5,808 5,165 12.4% 22,544 23,049 -2.2% Delta /Delta Connection (b) 7,222 8,620 -16.2% 27,007 37,838 -28.6% ExpressJet Airlines 0 5,275 N/A 0 21,647 N/A Frontier/Lynx Aviation 6,888 2,874 N/A 23,531 2,874 N/A Midwest Airlines 0 120 N/A 0 4,793 N/A Northwest/ Northwest Airlink (c) 3,882 6,920 -43.9% 12,864 22,030 -41.6% US Airways (d) 6,301 6,570 -4.1% 25,665 29,462 -12.9% United/United Express (e) 23,359 25,845 -9.6% 89,499 97,355 -8.1% Total 70,003 78,315 -10.6% 267,135 310,168 -13.9% Charters Other Charters 120 0 N/A 409 564 -27.5% Total 120 0 N/A 409 564 -27.5% Total enplaned passengers 70,123 78,315 -10.5% 267,544 310,732 -13.9% Total deplaned passengers 71,061 79,522 -10.6% 263,922 306,475 -13.9% (a) Continental Express provided by ExpressJet. (d) US Airways provided by Mesa Air Group. (b) Delta Connection includes Comair and SkyWest . (e) United Express provided by Mesa Air Group and SkyWest.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Pilots' Scheduling Reference Handbook
    Delta Pilots’ Scheduling Reference Handbook Prepared by the Delta MEC Scheduling Committee Revision 8 | October 2020 UPDATES Updated October 2020: • New contact information for the MEC Scheduling Committee • Reorganized entire document into sequential subject matter chapters • Added Table of Contents to each chapter • Added examples of common scenarios to When Have You Been Contacted? • Clarified references to eight-hour uninterrupted sleep opportunity • Deleted references to Special Incentive Lines (SIL) • Clarified references to ACARS notification of reroutes • Added references to ARCOS • Added references to ACARS notification of FDP extension • Updated information on fatigue calls and the Fitness Review Board • Incorporated information from recent Flight Time Duty Time Updates and Scheduling Alerts • Moved iCrew User Guide from Appendix to separate file in AeroDocs Contents Introduction 1 Can They Do That to Me? 2 When Have You Been Contacted? 4 You Have to Tell Someone 7 Timeline of Scheduling Events 9 Monthly Bidding Process 11 Regular Line Adjustment Process 18 Pilot Change Schedule (PCS), Slip Requests and Pay 19 Reserve 45 Reroute and Recovery Obligations 65 Flight and Duty Time Limits and Rest Requirements 73 Fatigue and the Fitness Review Board 103 Vacation 105 Training 115 Sick Leave 118 Staffing, Vacancies, and Surpluses 124 Odds and Ends 139 Airport Longitude Table 153 Appendix I: FAR 117 & IROPS Information 160 Appendix II: FAR 117 Quick Reference Guide (QRG) 169 Appendix III: FAR Part 117 – An In-Depth Discussion 177 Introduction The Scheduling Reference Handbook has been developed by the MEC Scheduling Committee to provide the line pilot with a quick and easy reference to various scheduling, FAR, and Pilot Working Agreement (PWA) rules and processes.
    [Show full text]
  • DAYTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Passenger Enplanements and Air Cargo Trends January 2015
    DAYTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Passenger Enplanements and Air Cargo Trends January 2015 MONTH % Y-T-D % 2015 2014 Change 2015 2014 Change PASSENGER ENPLANEMENTS 77,253 82,000 -5.8% 77,253 82,000 -5.8% Delta Air Lines, System Total 22,377 23,809 -6.0% 22,377 23,809 -6.0% Delta Air Lines 15,947 16,434 -3.0% 15,947 16,434 -3.0% Chautauqua dba Delta Connection 0 2,903 -100.0% 0 2,903 -100.0% Endeavor Airlines dba DL 2,557 4,309 -40.7% 2,557 4,309 -40.7% Skywest Airlines (Delta) 1,526 0 100.0% 1,526 0 100.0% Shuttle America 2,347 0 100.0% 2,347 0 100.0% Express Jet 0 163 -100.0% 0 163 -100.0% Southwest/AirTran System Total 11,861 15,453 -23.2% 11,861 15,453 -23.2% AirTran Airways System Total 0 10,274 -100.0% 0 10,274 -100.0% Southwest Airlines 11,861 5,179 129.0% 11,861 5,179 129.0% US Airways System Total 16,949 17,877 -5.2% 16,949 17,877 -5.2% US Airways Express (PSA) 16,420 17,817 -7.8% 16,420 17,817 -7.8% US Airways Express (Air Wsconsin) 529 60 781.7% 529 60 781.7% United Airlines System Total 12,717 11,688 8.8% 12,717 11,688 8.8% United Express (Skywest) 1,220 2,672 -54.3% 1,220 2,672 -54.3% United Express (Trans State) 2,355 2,072 13.7% 2,355 2,072 13.7% United Express (GoJet) 1,738 2,147 -19.0% 1,738 2,147 -19.0% United Express (Express Jet) 6,285 4,797 31.0% 6,285 4,797 31.0% Mesa Airlines 1,119 0 100.0% 1,119 0 100.0% American Airlines System Total 13,349 13,093 2.0% 13,349 13,093 2.0% American Airlines 8,653 9,804 -11.7% 8,653 9,804 -11.7% American Eagle 4,696 3,289 42.8% 4,696 3,289 42.8% Charters 0 80 -100.0% 0 80 -100.0% AIR CARGO (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Trends
    9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 15 1 M Overview and Trends The Transportation Research Board (TRB) study committee that pro- duced Winds of Change held its final meeting in the spring of 1991. The committee had reviewed the general experience of the U.S. airline in- dustry during the more than a dozen years since legislation ended gov- ernment economic regulation of entry, pricing, and ticket distribution in the domestic market.1 The committee examined issues ranging from passenger fares and service in small communities to aviation safety and the federal government’s performance in accommodating the escalating demands on air traffic control. At the time, it was still being debated whether airline deregulation was favorable to consumers. Once viewed as contrary to the public interest,2 the vigorous airline competition 1 The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 was preceded by market-oriented administra- tive reforms adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) beginning in 1975. 2 Congress adopted the public utility form of regulation for the airline industry when it created CAB, partly out of concern that the small scale of the industry and number of willing entrants would lead to excessive competition and capacity, ultimately having neg- ative effects on service and perhaps leading to monopolies and having adverse effects on consumers in the end (Levine 1965; Meyer et al. 1959). 15 9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 16 16 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY spurred by deregulation now is commonly credited with generating large and lasting public benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • MAR 2009 Stats Rpts
    SUMMARY OF ENPLANED PASSENGERS Colorado Springs Airport Month Year-to-date Percent Percent Enplaned passengers by Airline Mar-09 Mar-08 change 2009 2008 change Scheduled Carriers Allegiant Air 3,436 3,735 -8.0% 8,214 8,684 -5.4% American/American Connection 15,900 15,873 0.2% 41,268 45,510 -9.3% Continental/Cont Express (a) 6,084 6,159 -1.2% 16,736 17,884 -6.4% Delta /Delta Connection (b) 7,041 10,498 -32.9% 19,785 29,218 -32.3% ExpressJet Airlines 0 6,444 N/A 0 16,372 N/A Frontier/Lynx Aviation 6,492 0 N/A 16,643 0 N/A Midwest Airlines 0 2,046 N/A 0 4,673 N/A Northwest/ Northwest Airlink (c) 3,983 6,773 -41.2% 8,982 15,110 -40.6% US Airways (d) 7,001 7,294 -4.0% 19,364 22,892 -15.4% United/United Express (e) 24,980 26,201 -4.7% 66,140 71,510 -7.5% Total 74,917 85,023 -11.9% 197,132 231,853 -15.0% Charters Other Charters 150 188 -20.2% 289 564 -48.8% Total 150 188 -20.2% 289 564 -48.8% Total enplaned passengers 75,067 85,211 -11.9% 197,421 232,417 -15.1% Total deplaned passengers 72,030 82,129 -12.3% 192,861 226,953 -15.0% (a) Continental Express provided by ExpressJet. (d) US Airways provided by Mesa Air Group. (b) Delta Connection includes Comair and SkyWest . (e) United Express provided by Mesa Air Group and SkyWest.
    [Show full text]
  • Associate Leisure Travel Guide
    Associate Leisure Travel Guide SHUTTLE AMERICA REPUBLIC AIRLINES Revision Effective: December 2015 Contents QUICK LINKS 4 INTRODUCTION 5 What Is Non-Revenue Travel? 5 Contacting the Republic Airways Travel Department 5 GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR TRAVEL 6 Conditions of Travel 6 Pass Rider Travel 7 Conduct and Courtesy 8 Dress Code 8 Baggage Advisory 8 Multiple Listings 8 Selling Non-Revenue Pass Travel 9 Refunding Travel Charges 9 PASS TRAVEL FOR NON-COMPANY BUSINESS PROHIBITED 9 Disciplinary Action 9 ELIGIBILITY AND PASS RIDERS 10 Eligibility Timeline 10 Enrolling in Travel 10 Eligible Pass Riders 12 Parents 12 Spouse 12 Domestic Partners and Registered Companions 13 Minor and Dependent Children 15 CODE SHARE AND REPUBLIC AIRWAYS PASS PROGRAMS 16 American Airlines 16 Delta Air Lines 17 Eligible Pass Riders 17 Charges 17 2 Registering For Delta Travel 18 Online listing for Delta Travel 19 United Airlines 22 Eligible Pass Riders 22 Enrollment Fees and Charges 22 Obtaining Your United ‘N’ Number and Logging Into United 23 Refunds 23 Online Listing for United Travel 24 ZED Travel 27 Eligibles 27 Charges 27 To Access myIDTravel 28 Booking/Listing 28 Refunds 28 Online ZED listing for myIDTravel 29 TRAVELING AS A NON-REVENUE PASSENGER 32 Advice When Listing for Travel 32 Preparing for Travel 32 At the Airport 34 TRAVEL DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS 35 3 Quick Links AMERICAN AIRLINES TRAVEL PROGRAM: See the Travel Services page on the Company intranet for details DELTA AIRLINES TRAVEL PROGRAM : http://connect.delta.com REGISTER FOR DELTA AIRLINES TRAVEL PROGRAM : http://register.delta.com REPUBLIC AIRWAYS INTRANET: https://intranet.rjet.com REPUBLIC AIRWAYS LEISURE TRAVEL DEPARTMENT: [email protected] ULTIPRO ACCESS: www.myrjet.com UNITED AIRLINES TRAVEL PROGRAM: http://skynet.ual.com ZED TRAVEL HOME PAGE: http://www.myidtravel.com 4 Introduction This guide is designed to familiarize associates with their travel privileges.
    [Show full text]
  • A Work Project, Presented As Part of Requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA - School of Business and Economics
    A Work Project, presented as part of requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA - School of Business and Economics US Airways: The Ugly Girl Gets Married Again Milton José Andrade Figueira, n.º 2298 A Project carried out on the Master in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Paulo Soares de Pinho January 2018 Abstract Title: US Airways: The Ugly Girl Gets Married Again This case follows US Airways’ performance from inception to the potential merger with bankrupted American Airlines in 2012. Throughout the case, several events that endangered the existence of US Airways are brought into light. These events serve as basis to introduce the value of leverage and financial distress costs. Moreover, the case reflects on the decision between out-of-court restructuring and chapter 11, while assessing distressed mergers and acquisitions. Finally, the potential merger is analyzed and the proposed solution is that new equity should be split 69-31 per cent between American Airlines’ unsecured creditors and shareholders, and US Airways’ shareholders. Keywords: Costs of Financial Distress, Bankruptcy, Mergers and Acquisitions, Deal Financing 2 Nova School of Business and Economics Paulo Soares de Pinho Milton Andrade Figueira US Airways: The Ugly Girl Gets Married Again “As one of you simply put it, “Why are we the ugly girl?” The answer, of course, is we are not and there’s no better evidence of that than our recent performance.” Douglas Parker - Chief Executive Officer, US Airways On January 2012, William Douglas Parker, usually treated as Doug Parker, US Airways Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus Regional Airport Authority
    COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY - PORT COLUMBUS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TRAFFIC REPORT June 2014 7/22/2014 Airline Enplaned Passengers Deplaned Passengers Enplaned Air Mail Deplaned Air Mail Enplaned Air Freight Deplaned Air Freight Landings Landed Weight Air Canada Express - Regional 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 Air Canada Express Totals 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 AirTran 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 AirTran Totals 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 American 21,754 22,200 - - - 306 174 22,210,000 Envoy Air** 22,559 22,530 - - 2 ,027 2 ,873 527 27,043,010 American Totals 44,313 44,730 - - 2,027 3,179 701 49,253,010 Delta 38,216 36,970 29,594 34,196 25,984 36,845 278 38,899,500 Delta Connection - ExpressJet 2,888 2,292 - - - - 55 3,709,300 Delta Connection - Chautauqua 15,614 14,959 - - 640 - 374 15,913,326 Delta Connection - Endeavor 4 ,777 4,943 - - - - 96 5,776,500 Delta Connection - GoJet 874 748 - - 33 - 21 1,407,000 Delta Connection - Shuttle America 6,440 7,877 - - 367 - 143 10,536,277 Delta Connection - SkyWest 198 142 - - - - 4 188,000 Delta Totals 69,007 67,931 29,594 34,196 27,024 36,845 971 76,429,903 Southwest 97,554 96,784 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 Southwest Totals 97,554 96,784 - - 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 United 3 ,411 3,370 13,718 6 ,423 1 ,294 8 ,738 30 3,990,274 United Express - ExpressJet 13,185 13,319 - - - - 303 13,256,765 United Express - Mesa 27 32 - - - - 1 67,000 United Express - Republic 4,790 5,133 - - - - 88 5,456,000 United Express - Shuttle America 9,825 9,076 - - - - 151 10,919,112
    [Show full text]