DOCSLIB.ORG

Airport Press

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vol. 31 No. 2 Serving New York Airports April 2009 JFK EWR LGA METRO EDITION SWF JFK CHAMBER TO CONTINUE SCHOLARSHIP GRANT PROGRAM The JFK Chamber of Commerce started date about their quest for a higher education last year to give degree. It does not have to be in the pursuit an “unrestricted” of an aviation degree or career. scholarship to two Last year, the Chamber awarded two stu- employees of JFK dents $500 each. This year they are looking Airport or its’ adja- to increase the dollar amount for each schol- cent industry part- arship. This will be based on the success at ners. their monthly luncheons. The method of This month Ed Bastion of Delta/North- earning the schol- west airline will speak at the Chamber Lun- arship remains the cheon on April 28th. Check out the Cham- same; it is to write ber web site www.jfk-airport.org for more an essay, written by the scholarship candi- details. DOLORES HOFMAN OF QUEENS DEVELOPMENT Back row: Wesley Mills, Manager, Boston Culinary Group; Warren Kroeppel, General Manager, OFFICE HONORED LaGuardia Airport, Port Authority of NY & NJ; Manuel Mora, Assistant Manager, Boston Culinary Group; Paul McGinn, President, Marketplace Development; Ousmane Ba, Manager, Au Bon Excuse us at Airport Press if we share in the pride about Pain; Syed Hussain, Manager, Airport Wireless; Front Row: Lillian Tan, VP/General Manager/ the honoring of Dolores Hofman of the Queens Develop- MarketPlace Development; Lacee Klemm, Manager, The Body Shop; Belkys Polanco, Assistant ment Offi ce as Top Woman in Business. She is not only a Manager, Au Bon Pain; Margherite LaMorte, Manager, Marketing & Customer Service, friend but a neighbor in Building 141. MarketPlace Development, Eddie Morillo, Supervisor, Airport Wireless; Front, kneeling: Allison Dolores is being recognized at the Terrace on the Park Saragossi, District Manager, The Body Shop Restaurant on April 2nd at their Networking Awards Din- FOOD AND SHOPS AT LAGUARDIA ner. ANNOUNCE NEW QUEST WINNERS NEXTGEN A MUST SAY LAWMAKERS The Food & Shops at LaGuardia Airport the Central Terminal, on February 24 at La- announced the winners of their second an- Guardia’s Central Terminal Building. As re- Modernizing the outdated U.S. air traf- cutting fuel consumption and emissions. nual ‘Quest for the Best’ employee recogni- cipient of the fi rst place ‘Quest for the Best’ fi c control system should be a top priority The next-generation system will replace tion and incentive program. Winners of the award, The Body Shop received a $1,000.00 for industry regulators and members, law- radar-based air traffi c control systems with 2008 program were: The Body Shop, First grand prize and a 2008 ‘Quest for the Best’ makers said at a hearing Wednesday on the satellite-based technology, allowing planes Place; Airport Wireless, Second Place; and trophy. Federal Aviation Administration’s long- to fl y more closely together and use more Sam Adams, Third Place. Au Bon Pain was Speakers at the brunch included Warren running modernization project known as direct routes. The concept is similar to the presented with the Most Improved award; a Kroeppel, general manager of LaGuardia “NextGen.” GPS technology used in some automobiles, new category announced this year. Airport; Paul McGinn, president of Mar- Senate Commerce Committee Chairman relying on transponder-equipped aircraft to The winners were announced at a special ketPlace Development and Lillian Tan, vice John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., expressed communicate the aircraft’s position to con- awards brunch held by MarketPlace Devel- president and general manager of Market- frustration with the lack of progress on Nex- trollers in real time, and to give weather and opment, the retail development company Place Development. tGen, which some estimate could cost $20 other information to pilots. that manages the food and shops program in billion before wrapping up in 2025. “I’m just losing patience,” said Rock- See NEXTGEN page 3 efeller. “I’m sick of it.” JFK AIR CARGO EXPOSITION A BIG Industry executives who testifi ed at the inside hearing urged Congress to accelerate the SUCCESS pace of the project, saying the nation’s air Who said we are in a recession? Not the traffi c control system is outdated and inef- AAirportirport PPressress JFK Cargo community. fi cient, producing delays that frustrate trav- Airport News . 3 elers and impose hefty costs on airlines and The JFK Air Cargo Association celebrat- Aviation News . 11 ed its 10th Annual Air Cargo Exposition held the environment. at the Ramada Hotel at JFK. The two high- Waiting until 2025 to wrap up the transi- Airline News . 7 lights of the event was the large number of tion to NextGen “is simply unacceptable,” Cargo News. 4 said T.K. Kallenbach, vice president of mar- tables reserved for the airport community to Hijinx . 14 sell their wares; and, a lively discussion pan- keting at Honeywell Aerospace, a unit of el which spoke to a wide range of important Honeywell International (HON). “Improve- Names in the News. 14 matters that may shape the future direction ments are needed today.” Security News . 12 of Air Cargo in New York and consequently Airline offi cials echoed that view. Unit- Classified . 17 around the World. ed Airlines, a unit of UAL Corp. (UAUA), Remo Hanselmannk, Head of Cargo for Aer loses up to $600 million a year because of Name That Plane . 16 Topics such as “Transportation and the Lingus, and William Mercado, President of Economy”, “Security” (TSA screening), the JFK Air Cargo Association and Cargo Sales air traffi c delays, and the cost to the nation Comic. 14 “Alliances” (to include Mergers and Acqui- & Reservations Manager North America for probably exceeds $41 billion annually, said Focus on the Customer . 19 sitions), and “How will the Freight Forward- Aer Lingus Cargo pictured at the JFK Air Cargo United Airlines Senior Vice President Joe ers adjust to the same?” were discussed at Association’s 10th Annual Expo held at the JFK Kolshak. Traveler News . 14 the session. Ramada Plaza Hotel, held late March, 2009. It is cost sustainable say advocates April 2009 • Vol. 31 No. 4 Over 240 members of the JFK Cargo the Air Cargo Community for demonstrating NextGen advocates say it should pay for Community attended the event. Kudos go to confi dence in their industry. itself quickly by reducing fl ight delays and aairportpress.usirportpress.us 2 • April 2009 • Airport Press Metro Edition V >iÊ V iÌ>ÊÀÊià 7}ÃÊiLiÀÊÃViÊ£nx When Michael Chock took a job with Delta Air Lines, he was surprised by how effortlessly his Wings membership followed him through a job change and cross-country move. “I’d been with Wings since day one at Northwest; switching institutions was never a consideration. When I first made the move, I worried that I wouldn’t have direct deposit. But it was set up on my very first day. It’s like I never missed a beat.” For 70 years, Wings Financial has been dedicated to creating value for the people of the air transportation industry through tailored financial services. See the difference membership can make in your life. New York JFK branch: United Airlines Cargo Bldg., 22A North Service Road www.wingsfinancial.com 1 800 881-6801 Wings Financial Federal Credit Union is federally insured by NCUA. REAL MEMBERS. REAL VALUE.® Airport Press Metro Edition • April 2009 • 3 Airport News NEXTGEN from page 1 Because of congestion and delays, La- trespass. Guardia’s takeoffs and landings are limited United’s Kolshak said airlines are willing by the U.S. Department of Transportation AIRPORT MURAL to invest in the necessary equipment, pro- and Federal Aviation Administration, which vided it can be used in the next three to fi ve are attempting to reduce the number even EXPANSION TO HONOR years. Honeywell’s Kallenbach suggested more. The airline industry so far has been VETERANS using readily available software, saying that able to block the government’s effort in A mural of Magic Valley life at Twin could speed up the switch. court. Falls’ airport is expanding again, this time The FAA’s approach has been slower, in Southwest has declined to reveal where to honor veterans of the wars in Iraq and Af- part because the project is so complex and in it plans to fl y from LaGuardia, and the 14 ghanistan. part because of safety concerns. slots will give it only seven departures a day. Kimberly artist Gary Stone has continued “This is the fi rst major overhaul of air But Montgomery said the airline would like to fl esh out his initial 42-foot mural since he traffi c since the nineteen-fi fties and sixties,” themed tasting fl ights of small pours, and by to eventually pick up additional takeoff and began it in 1995. This week, he started work said Henry Krakowski, chief operating of- the bottle for retail customers to take home landing slots. on an 18-foot extension that will eventually fi cer of the FAA’s Air Traffi c Organization. or have shipped. “Of course, things at LaGuardia are feature the names of Magic Valley soldiers He told the subcommittee that the switch The Heineken Lounge, operated by Dela- changing very rapidly. We’re in touch with killed or injured in the two wars. won’t be swift, and that “in order to keep the ware North Travel Hospitality Services, is the Port Authority [of New York and New Unlike the main section, where Stone system safe, we have to do it that way.” Heineken USA’s fi rst branded luxury airport Jersey, which operates the airport] and with charges people and businesses to appear, the bar offering quality Heineken products, pre- the FAA on that whole mix.
Recommended publications
  • RESOURCE Air Travel 2001

    RESOURCE Air Travel 2001

    RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP INCORPORATED Air Travel 2001 What do they tell us about the future of US air travel? An Industry Report by Resource Systems Group, Inc. December 2001 331 Olcott Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 802.295.4999 www.rsginc.com www.surveycafe.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................2 THE SURVEY SAMPLE ..............................................................................................................................2 TRIP CHARACTERISTICS..........................................................................................................................2 RESERVATIONS AND TICKETING............................................................................................................3 CHOICE OF TICKETING LOCATIONS ....................................................................................................3 SATISFACTION WITH TICKETING OPTIONS ........................................................................................4 TICKETING SEGMENTS .........................................................................................................................7 AIRPORTS ..................................................................................................................................................7 AIRLINE RANKINGS.................................................................................................................................12
  • Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services

    Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2017 COMMERCIAL AVIATION Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services GAO-17-756 September 2017 COMMERCIAL AVIATION Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services Highlights of GAO-17-756, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Since 2008, U.S passenger airlines Since 2010, selected U.S. airlines have introduced a variety of new fees for have increasingly charged fees for optional services and increased some existing fees. For example, each of the 11 optional services that were previously U.S. airlines that GAO examined introduced fees for “preferred” seating, which included in the price of a ticket, such may include additional legroom or a seat closer to the front of the economy as checked baggage or seat selection. cabin. Some of these airlines have also introduced new fees for other optional Consumer advocates have raised services, such as fees for carry-on baggage and priority boarding. Since 2010, questions about the transparency of many of the selected airlines have also increased existing fees for some optional these fees and their associated rules. services, including fees for checked baggage and for changing or cancelling a In April 2011, DOT issued a final rule reservation. From 2010 to 2016, U.S. airlines’ revenues from these two fees— requiring, among other things, that the only optional service fees for which revenues are separately reported to the certain U.S. and foreign airlines disclose information about optional Department of Transportation (DOT)—increased from $6.3 billion in 2010 to $7.1 service fees on their websites.
  • Pilots Jump to Each Section Below Contents by Clicking on the Title Or Photo

    Pilots Jump to Each Section Below Contents by Clicking on the Title Or Photo

    November 2018 Aero Crew News Your Source for Pilot Hiring and More... ExpressJet is taking off with a new Pilot Contract Top-Tier Compensation and Work Rules $40/hour first-year pay $10,000 annual override for First Officers, $8,000 for Captains New-hire bonus 100% cancellation and deadhead pay $1.95/hour per-diem Generous 401(k) match Friendly commuter and reserve programs ARE YOU READY FOR EXPRESSJET? FLEET DOMICILES UNITED CPP 126 - Embraer ERJ145 Chicago • Cleveland Spend your ExpressJet career 20 - Bombardier CRJ200 Houston • Knoxville knowing United is in Newark your future with the United Pilot Career Path Program Apply today at expressjet.com/apply. Questions? [email protected] expressjet.com /ExpressJetPilotRecruiting @expressjetpilots Jump to each section Below contents by clicking on the title or photo. November 2018 20 36 24 50 32 Also Featuring: Letter from the Publisher 8 Aviator Bulletins 10 Self Defense for Flight Crews 16 Trans States Airlines 42 4 | Aero Crew News BACK TO CONTENTS the grid New Airline Updated Flight Attendant Legacy Regional Alaska Airlines Air Wisconsin The Mainline Grid 56 American Airlines Cape Air Delta Air Lines Compass Airlines Legacy, Major, Cargo & International Airlines Hawaiian Airlines Corvus Airways United Airlines CommutAir General Information Endeavor Air Work Rules Envoy Additional Compensation Details Major ExpressJet Airlines Allegiant Air GoJet Airlines Airline Base Map Frontier Airlines Horizon Air JetBlue Airways Island Air Southwest Airlines Mesa Airlines Spirit Airlines
  • The Impacts of Liberalization on Competition on an Air Shuttle Market

    The Impacts of Liberalization on Competition on an Air Shuttle Market

    The Impacts of Liberalization on Competition on an Air Shuttle Market Alessandro V. M. Oliveira§ Abstract This paper aims at assessing the impacts of deregulation on the most important airline market in Brazil: the air shuttle Rio de Janeiro – São Paulo. By making use of both a two-stages budgeting representation of the demand system, and a competition model with product heterogeneity among rivals, and based on the framework of the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO), it was possible to infer whether a structural change on airlines' conduct parameters due to liberalization was observed. This exercise ultimately served as a test of the efficacy of the policy employed by the regulators since 1998. The main conclusions were that regulatory reform effectively stimulated firms to significantly increase the degree of competition in the market (via a decrease in market power), and that marginal-cost or even below-marginal-cost pricing was not rejected for some airlines. JEL: L13 – L50 – L93 Key words: deregulation – market power – conduct – airline Note: Paper competing to the Young Economist Award. § Center for Studies of Airline Competition and Regulation (NECTAR) - Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Brazil. E-mail address: [email protected] 1. Introduction This paper aims at developing an empirical model for assessing the impacts of economic liberalization on competition in a relevant subset of the Brazilian airline industry: the air shuttle service on the route Rio de Janeiro - São Paulo. In this market the first air shuttle in the world, the ‘Ponte Aérea’, was created in 1959, by an agreement of airline managers, and had a dominant position in the airport-pair linking both city centers for almost forty years.
  • 03-04-13 AMR-US HSR Release

    03-04-13 AMR-US HSR Release

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE AMERICAN AIRLINES AND US AIRWAYS RECEIVE REQUEST FROM DOJ IN CONNECTION WITH PROPOSED MERGER FORT WORTH, TX, and TEMPE, AZ, March 4, 2013 – AMR Corporation (OTCQB: AAMRQ), the parent company of American Airlines, Inc., and US Airways Group, Inc. (NYSE: LCC) today announced that, on March 4, 2013, each company received a request for additional information (“Second Request”) from the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in connection with the proposed merger of the two airlines. A DOJ Second Request is a standard part of the regulatory process. A Second Request extends the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, during which the parties may not close the transaction, until 30 days after American Airlines and US Airways have substantially complied with the Second Request (or the waiting period is otherwise terminated by the DOJ). American Airlines and US Airways expect to respond promptly to the Second Request and to continue working cooperatively with the DOJ as it conducts its review of the proposed combination. American Airlines and US Airways continue to expect the combination to be completed in the third quarter of 2013. The merger is conditioned on the approval by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, regulatory approvals, approval by US Airways shareholders, other customary closing conditions, and confirmation and consummation of the Plan of Reorganization. About American Airlines American Airlines focuses on providing an exceptional travel experience across the globe, serving more than 260 airports in more than 50 countries and territories.
  • A Competition Model for a Brazilian Air Shuttle Market

    A Competition Model for a Brazilian Air Shuttle Market

    A COMPETITION MODEL FOR A BRAZILIAN AIR SHUTTLE MARKET Alessandro Oliveira§ ABSTRACT This paper aims at developing a competition model for a relevant subset of the Brazilian airline industry: the air shuttle market on the route Rio de Janeiro – São Paulo, a pioneer service created in 1959. The competition model presented here contains elements of both vertical product differentiation and representative consumer. I also use the conduct parameter approach to infer about the behaviour of airlines in the market under three situations: a quasi- deregulation process (from 1998 on), two price war events (1998 and 2001), and a shock in costs due to currency devaluation (1999). Results permitted making inference on the impacts of liberalisation on competition and investigating an alleged collusive behaviour of 1999. Key words: air shuttle – competition – deregulation – product differentiation JEL Classification: L93 § Department of Economics, University of Warwick – UK. Email: [email protected] 1. INTRODUCTION This paper aims at developing a competition model for a relevant subset of the Brazilian airline industry: the air shuttle service on the route Rio de Janeiro - São Paulo. This market was where the first air shuttle in the world, the ‘Ponte Aérea’, was created, in 1959, by an agreement of airline managers, and which dominated the airport-pair linking the city centres of the cities for almost forty years. Air shuttles are usually characterised by frequent service, walk-on flights with no reservations and short-haul markets. This concepts is nowadays very common in the airline industry, usually providing service for highly time-sensitive passengers, with notorious examples being the Eastern Airlines’ Boston-New York-Washington and the Iberia’s Madrid-Barcelona.
  • Open Honors Thesis Lap Chi Adriano Chao.Pdf

    Open Honors Thesis Lap Chi Adriano Chao.Pdf

    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF SUPPLY CHAIN AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS AIRLINE MERGER WAVES IN THE UNITED STATES IS A MERGER BETWEEN AMERICAN AIRLINES AND US AIRWAYS POSSIBLE? LAP CHI ADRIANO CHAO Spring 2011 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in Management and Economics with honors in Supply Chain and Information Systems Reviewed and approved* by the following: Robert Novack Associate Professor of Supply Chain and Information Systems Thesis Supervisor John Spychalski Professor Emeritus of Supply Chain and Information Systems Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Commercial airlines are an important part of the transportation industry in the United States. A better understanding of the reasons for a series of airline merger waves in the United States can help airline professionals realize the criteria and requirements of a merger. This study examined three recent U.S. airline mergers (i.e., Delta-Northwest, United-Continental and Southwest-AirTran) and deduced eight major dimensions of merger motivations, including network synergies, antitrust immunity, fleet commonality, alliance coordination, market positioning, financial benefits and shareholders’ approval, union support and organizational learning. The feasibility of a hypothetical merger between American Airlines and US Airways was determined using the eight dimensions derived. Results suggested that the merger was unlikely to increase the competitiveness
  • United Airlines-Us Airways Merger Hearing Committee

    United Airlines-Us Airways Merger Hearing Committee

    S. HRG. 106–1015 UNITED AIRLINES-US AIRWAYS MERGER HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ANTITRUST, BUSINESS RIGHTS, AND COMPETITION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 26, 2000 PITTSBURGH, PA Serial No. J–106–92 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–290 WASHINGTON : 2001 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 03:13 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 073290 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\A290.XXX pfrm04 PsN: A290 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Chairman STROM THURMOND, South Carolina PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JON KYL, Arizona HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin MIKE DEWINE, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York BOB SMITH, New Hampshire MANUS COONEY, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Minority Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON ANTITRUST, BUSINESS RIGHTS, AND COMPETITION MIKE DEWINE, Ohio, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey STROM THURMOND, South Carolina PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont PETE LEVITAS, Chief Counsel and Staff Director JON LEIBOWITZ, Minority Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 03:13 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 073290 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\A290.XXX pfrm04 PsN: A290 C O N T E N T S STATEMENT OF COMMITTEE MEMBER Page Specter, Hon.
  • US Airways, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) (Commission File No

    US Airways, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) (Commission File No

    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 or o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to US Airways Group, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) (Commission File No. 1-8444) Delaware 54-1194634 (State or other Jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 111 West Rio Salado Parkway, Tempe, Arizona 85281 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (480) 693-0800 (Registrants telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None US Airways, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) (Commission File No. 1-8442) Delaware 54-0218143 (State or other Jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 111 West Rio Salado Parkway, Tempe, Arizona 85281 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (480) 693-0800 (Registrants telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the proxy statement related to US Airways Group, Inc.’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which proxy statement will be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 120 days of the end of US Airways Group, Inc.’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
  • San Francisco International Airport 2014 Sustainability Report Table of Contents

    San Francisco International Airport 2014 Sustainability Report Table of Contents

    San Francisco International Airport 2014 Sustainability Report Table of Contents. 1. SFO Profile 1 . 2. Economic Viability 9 . 3. Operational Efficiency 15 . 4. Natural Resource Conservation 21 . 5. Social Responsibility 31. Awards 52 . Appendix: SFO by the Numbers 55 . Airport Sustainability “A holistic approach to managing an airport so as to ensure the integrity of the Economic viability, Operational efficiency, Natural resource conservation and Social responsibility (EONS) of the airport.” – Airports Council International - North America SFO recognizes that creating Efficient movement of aircraft minimizes state-of-the-art facilities, such as the delays for SFO’s passengers and results new air traffic control tower, is in lower greenhouse gas emissions from essential to the Airport’s long-term taxiing or idling aircraft. economic success and viability. EEconomic Viability OOperational Efficiency As an example of Airport’s commitment SFO’s new WAG Brigade helps to conserving natural resources, SFO has passengers feel more at ease. This planted over 2,000 trees of more than program exemplifies SFO’s commitment 15 species, resulting in sequestration of to social responsibility and to providing approximately 120 metric tons of carbon an exceptional Airport for its passengers. dioxide each year. NNatural Resources SSocial Responsibility December 2014 Prepared for the San Francisco International Airport Commission by (www.vhb.com) Message from the Director We take pride in being an exceptional Airport in service to our communities. Sustainability is close to the heart of our mission. I’m excited to announce that this year we adopted The Airport Council International’s EONS guidelines to help us shape our sustainability programs and practices.
  • DRAFT AMR-US Merger Release

    DRAFT AMR-US Merger Release

    FOR RELEASE: Tuesday, Nov. 12, 2013 AMR CORPORATION AND US AIRWAYS ANNOUNCE SETTLEMENT WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL Settlement Allows for Completion of Merger in December FORT WORTH, Texas and TEMPE, Ariz, – AMR Corporation (OTCQB: AAMRQ), the parent company of American Airlines, Inc., and US Airways Group, Inc. (NYSE: LCC) today announced that the airlines have settled the litigation brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the States of Arizona, Florida, Michigan and Tennessee, the Commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia challenging the merger of AMR and US Airways. The companies also announced an agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) related to small community service from Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). Tom Horton, chairman, president and CEO of AMR, and incoming chairman of the board of the combined company, said, “This is an important day for our customers, our people and our financial stakeholders. This agreement allows us to take the final steps in creating the new American Airlines. With a renewed spirit, we are about to create the world’s leading airline that will offer, along with our oneworld® partners, a comprehensive global network and service by the best people in the business. There is much more work ahead of us but we’re energized by the challenge and look forward to competing vigorously in the ever-changing global marketplace.” Doug Parker, chairman and CEO of US Airways, and incoming CEO of the combined airline, said, “This is very good news and we are grateful to all who have made it happen.
  • Robert Novell Year in Review 2011

    Robert Novell Year in Review 2011

    Robert Novell Year in Review 2011 1 Table of Contents 1. A Brief History of United Airlines 3 2. A Brief History of TWA Airlines 40 3. A Brief History of Eastern Airlines 74 4. Closing Thoughts 116 2 Part One United Airlines before the Deregulation Act of 1938 United Airlines officially began airline operations in 1926 as a mail carrier. It was also the first fare- paying airline to fly customers from coast to coast in the United States, and by 1930, had introduced the concept of an airline stewardess. The airline soon became one of the “Big Four” contenders in the U.S. and continues to be one of America’s major airlines. It was founded in Boise, Idaho. United Airlines was originally formed as a partnership between Boeing Airplane Company and Pratt & Whitney. It was overseen by the United Aircraft and Transport Corporation and United Air Lines was actually an operating division that was established on July 1, 1931. United’s slogan was the “World’s Largest Air Transport System”. The four transport divisions of the United Aircraft and Transportation Corporation had now become United Airlines. When the Air Mail Act of 1934 broke up all of the aviation holding companies in the United States, the United Aircraft and Transport Corporation was broken up into Boeing, United Aircraft and United Air Lines. It was at this time that United Airlines began offering coast-to-coast service from New York to San Francisco and Los Angeles. Within four months of the beginning coast-to-coast operations, United Air Lines was making as many as 11 round trips every day between Chicago and New York.