(Translation)

Minutes of the 6th Meeting of District Facilities Management Committee, the 5th Term District Council

Date: 15 September 2016 (Thursday) Time: 2:30 p.m. Venue: Conference Room, Office, Unit 05-07, 20/F Millennium City 6, 392 Kwun Tong Road, Kwun Tong,

Present:

Chairman

Mr TAM Siu-cheuk

Vice-chairman

Mr CHENG Keung-fung

Members

Mr AU YEUNG Kwan-nok Ms KAM Kin Mr BUX Sheik Anthony Mr KAN Ming-tung Dr CHAN Chung-bun, Bunny, GBS, JP Mr LAI Shu-ho, Patrick, BBS, MH, JP Mr CHAN Kok-wah, Ben, BBS, MH Mr MA Yat-chiu, Marco Mr CHAN Man-kin Mr MOK Kin-shing Mr CHAN Wah-yu, Nelson, MH Mr NGAN Man-yu Mr CHAN Yiu-hung, Jimmy Mr OR Chong-shing, Wilson, MH Mr CHENG Keng-ieong Mrs POON YAM Wai-chun, Winnie, MH Mr CHEUNG Pui-kong Mr SO Koon-chung, Kevin Mr CHEUNG Shun-wah Ms SO Lai-chun, MH, JP Mr CHEUNG Yiu-pan Mr TANG Wing-chun Ms FU Pik-chun Ms TSE Suk-chun Mr HO Kai-ming, Jonathan Mr WONG Chi-ken Mr HSU Hoi-shan Mr YIP Hing-kwok, MH, JP Mr HUNG Kam-in, Kin Mr YIU Pak-leung, Perry

1 Co-opted Members

Mr CHAN Hei-kam Mr LAU Wai-man Mr KWOK Hing-shing MR WONG Kai-san Mr LAM Fung, MH

Secretary

Miss TAM Wing-sze, Vincy Executive Officer (District Council)5, Kwun Tong District Office

Representatives of Government Departments/Organisations

Mr MAK Shui-hei, Henry Assistant District Officer (Kwun Tong)2, Kwun Tong District Office Mr LEE Yin-bun, Philip Senior Executive Officer (District Council), Kwun Tong District Office Ms SHIU Kit-chi, Kitty Senior Executive Officer (District Management), Kwun Tong District Office Miss KAM Yuen-ching Senior Liaison Officer (1), Kwun Tong District Office Ms PUT Man-chi, Scarlet Liaison Officer i/c (District Facilities), Kwun Tong District Office Mr LEUNG Ka-kin Executive Officer I (District Management), Kwun Tong District Office Ms LUK Bik-yee, Miranda Executive Officer II (District Management), Kwun Tong District Office Ms KWAN Yuen-mei, Rica Senior Librarian (Kwun Tong), Leisure and Cultural Services Department Miss TANG Man-wah, Sylvia Chief Leisure Manager (Kowloon), Leisure and Cultural Services Department Mr KWOK Kam-chiu District Leisure Manager (Kwun Tong), Leisure and Cultural Services Department Ms CHOY Cho-kwan Deputy District Leisure Manager (District Support) Kwun Tong, Leisure and Cultural Services Department Mr LO Wai-pan, Eddie Senior Executive Officer (Planning)5, Leisure and Cultural Services Department Mr LUK Ying-ki Inspector of Works (Kowloon)2, Home Affairs Department

2 Mr YING Wing-chung Assistant Inspector of Works (Kwun Tong), Home Affairs Department Mr LAW Lok-fai, Edwin Architect (Works)4, Home Affairs Department Mr MA Wai-kei Property Services Manager/Kwun Tong, Architectural Services Department Mr WONG On-wa, Edward Senior Place Making Manager (Design), Energizing Kowloon East Office Ms Mime TAN Place Making Manager (Design)1, Energizing Kowloon East Office Mr LI Pui-k, Kevin Senior Architect/12, Architectural Services Department Ms AU Pui-mei Architect/106, Architectural Services Department Mr LIN Wai-tung, Ryan Senior Project Manager 321, Architectural Services Department Mr HUI Ka-chun Senior Engineer/6 (New Territories East), New Territories East Development Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department Mr CHAN Lun-ming Engineer/6 (New Territories East), New Territories East Development Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department Mr Ricky CHAN Associate Director, Transportation, AECOM Asia Company Limited Mr CHAN Hon-wah, Freeman Associate, Andrew Lee King Fun & Associates Architects Limited Mr LING Kin-man, Kevin Architect, Andrew Lee King Fun & Associates Architects Limited Mr LEE Chun-man, John Architect, Andrew Lee King Fun & Associates Architects Limited Mr HO Hao-yen, Daniel Architectural Assistant, Andrew Lee King Fun & Associates Architects Limited Mr WONG Ka-chun, Tom Assistant Engineer, Wong & Ouyang (Building Services) Limited

Absent:

Mr CHAN Chun-kit Ms POON Wai-fong Mr CHEUNG Ki-tang Mr WONG Chun-ping Mr LUI Tung-hai

3 Opening Remarks

The Chairman welcomed Members of the District Facilities Management Committee (“DFMC”) and government representatives to the meeting.

2. The Chairman said that the Secretariat had received notice of absence from Mr CHEUUNG Ki-tang, Ms POON Wai-fong and Mr WONG Chun-ping. The DFMC noted their absence.

I. Confirmation of Minutes of Last Meeting

3. The minutes of the last meeting were confirmed without amendment.

II. Improvement to Lam Wah Street Playground and Associated Open Space and Public Spaces (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 39/2016) ( 4. Mr Edward WONG of the Energizing Kowloon East Office (“EKEO”) presented the paper.

5. 10 Members made comments and enquiries as follows:

5.1 Members supported the improvement works but considered that residents did not fully understand the details of the projects. They suggested the EKEO enhance communication with the residents and provide them with the project information;

5.2 Members said that the utilisation rate of Lam Wah Street Playground was relatively low, and suggested that the EKEO provide sheltered facilities and benches to improve the functionality of the playground;

5.3 Since the playground included a 5-a-side soccer pitch, Members suggested increasing the ratio of male toilets and shower cubicles;

5.4 Members asked whether there would be a goal at the 5-a-side soccer pitch;

5.5 Members understood that the works involved tree cutting; they enquired about the varieties and age of the trees and the process and approach for tree cutting. At the same time, Members hoped that the trees could be transplanted to other locations;

5.6 Members suggested growing plants suitable for the local environment in the playground;

5.7 Members enquired about project cost;

5.8 Members were concerned with which department was responsible for managing the greening project at the roadside of the playground;

4

5.9 Members had reservations over the use of the term “unisex toilet” and suggested changing it to “family toilet”. It was opined that the EKEO could make reference to parent and child toilets in Taiwan;

5.10 Members asked whether the provision of a unisex toilet in the playground was required by law;

5.11 Members were concerned with the management approach of the unisex toilet and the details of internal design;

5.12 Members opined that the term “unisex toilet” was not clear which would easily mislead the public. Members suggested the provision of separate cubicles at the entrance of male/female toilet, which could also easily solve the problem of the use of toilets by parents with children of opposite sex;

5.13 Members opined that a unisex toilet could benefit more people. As long as it was properly located, there would not be a great problem;

5.14 Members considered that there was no legislation in place to regulate unisex toilets, and were worried about improper use. Members suggested expanding the barrier-free toilet to provide facilities for children and babies with a parent-child sign for use by members of the public;

5.15 Members were worried that after the completion of the unisex toilet, it would be developed into unisex shower cubicles. Members opined that the barrier-free toilet could be expanded and renamed “multi-purpose barrier-free toilet”;

5.16 Members said that unisex toilets were applicable territory-wide and careful consideration should be given before construction. It was hoped that the EKEO could listen to community views;

5.17 Members suggested incorporating art works into the design of the playground to enhance its artistic ambience;

5.18 Members supported the beautification of the playground and hoped that the EKEO could improve the nearby traffic and pedestrian connectivity facilities; and

5.19 Members suggested that the greening of the playground be simple and practical, and proposed providing parking spaces and converting the 5-a-side soccer pitch into a multi-purpose venue.

6. The EKEO responded as follows:

6.1 The EKEO said that the information on the project plans was available at the website of the EKEO. The Office also organised workshops regularly to communicate with Members and the public, and would consider communicating with the public through more channels;

5 6.2 The EKEO would review the feasibility of providing more sheltered benches at the playground;

6.3 The EKEO said that the ratio of male to female toilets would be provided in accordance with the law;

6.4 The EKEO said that the design of the 5-a-side soccer pitch would comply with international standards and a goal would be provided;

6.5 The EKEO said that the two toilets in the layout plan were respectively a barrier-free toilet and an accessible toilet, which were different from each other. The provision of barrier-free toilets was prescribed by law, while unisex toilets were advocated by the Government. According to Practice Note for Authorized Persons, Registered Structural Engineers and Registered Geotechnical Engineers ADV-28, unisex toilets would facilitate access to the sanitary facilities by caregivers attending to persons with a disability of opposite sex, or by parents bringing along their children of opposite sex. The name “family toilet” might not fully reflect the purposes. The EKEO understood that Members had different views over the naming of the toilet, and would review the naming;

6.6 The EKEO would preserve the trees as far as possible if permitted by design considerations and technical feasibility. It would elaborate the details of the arrangements to Members at the detailed design stage;

6.7 The EKEO said that the project was still at the preliminary conceptual stage, therefore no information on the specific project cost was available;

6.8 The trees inside the playground and on the pavements were managed by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (“LCSD”);

6.9 The EKEO was organising “Public Art Scheme of Tsun Yip Street Playground – Call for Artists” and had invited artists to give art proposals for the playground. The EKEO would examine whether similar activities could be carried out at Lam Wah Street Playground and would apply different architectural approaches to ensure the aesthetic quality of the playground;

6.10 The EKEO said that the project would increase the accessibility of the playground and the streets nearby and would be in tandem with surrounding development, which would increase the utilisation of the playground;

6.11 The EKEO said that a simple greening design would be adopted;

6.12 The EKEO said that as Lam Wah Street Playground was an open space, there was no parking space and it was difficult to provide parking spaces;

6.13 The EKEO said that a multi-purpose venue would be designed for use by different parties; and

6.14 The EKEO said that there was no plan or practice note for proposing or

6 requesting the provision of unisex shower cubicles.

7. Miss Sylvia TANG of the LCSD responded that Lam Wah Street Playground was open 24 hours a day, thus the toilets inside the playground would also be open round the clock. In line with the facilities of similar scale, no staff was stationed at the venue, but staff would be deployed for regular inspection of facilities and cleaners would be arranged for cleaning. Toilets were generally provided at the facilities under the LCSD; the principle of toilet management was to maintain a clean and hygienic environment for use by the public, and no code for the management of the unisex toilet was in place at present. The LCSD welcomed the EKEO to provide information and exchange views on the code of practice. The LCSD hoped that the EKEO would maintain close contact and discussion with relevant departments regarding the selection of trees for roadside planting, in order to ensure that the LCSD could properly handle and manage the trees after receiving them.

8. The Chairman concluded that the DFMC had written to the Secretary for Development and Head of the EKEO on 20 July and 24 August 2016 respectively to express Members’ views on the unisex toilet. The Secretariat had forwarded the reply to all Members. The Chairman said that the DFMC participated in the management of district facilities and was concerned about future toilet management. The Chairman would continue to reflect local views to the authorities concerned and hoped that the project progress would not be affected.

9. Members noted the paper.

(Post-meeting note: The EKEO had written to respond to Members’ views on the unisex toilet on 4 October and provided relevant information.)

III. Alterations to District Facilities Due to Development of Anderson Road Quarry Site – Pedestrian Connectivity Facilities Works Phase 1 (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 48/2016)

10. Mr HUI Ka-chun of the Civil Engineering and Development Department (“CEDD”) presented the paper.

11. Seven Members made comments and enquiries as follows:

11.1 Members supported the plan;

11.2 Members were concerned over the safety of the pedestrian connectivity facility E1 opposite to Hiu Lai Court. The facility included several sections of escalators. Members enquired if one section was broken down, whether there were entrances at the midway of the facility, which connected to the access on the slope;

11.3 Members hoped that the E3 lift tower at Hiu Ming Street would be completed as soon as possible and pedestrian crossing facilities could be provided at Hiu Ming Street;

7 11.4 Member enquired whether there was any connectivity facility between Po Tat Estate and Tseung Kwan O Tunnel Bus-Bus Interchange.

11.5 Members enquired whether the escalator connecting Po Tat Estate to Sau Mau Ping Estate and Sau Mau Ping South Estate would be included in Phase 1 of the works;

11.6 Members enquired whether the bus-bus interchange from Kwun Tong to Tseung Kwan O would be included in Phase 1 of the works;

11.7 Members said that the pavement on the flyover at Lin Tak Road across Tseung Kwan O Road was narrow and suggested the CEDD widen the pavement and provide railings to avoid accidents;

11.8 Members said that the road opposite to Hiu Kwong Street Rest Garden was busy, and were worried that traffic would be affected by the project. In addition, as the utilisation rate of the rest garden was relatively low, they suggested the department concerned consider providing a taxi stand there;

11.9 Members suggested providing parking spaces for motorcycles underneath E2 footbridge at the pedestrian connectivity facilities E2 – C1 – E3;

11.10 Members enquired about the pedestrian flow capacity and the construction method of the pedestrian connectivity facilities E1 and E3;

11.11 Members suggested providing benches at the bus-bus interchange; and

11.12 Members hoped that the barrier-free access connecting the bus-bus interchange could be completed as soon as possible.

12. The CEDD responded as follows:

12.1 The CEDD said that other than Phase 1 of the pedestrian connectivity facilities works mentioned in the briefing, which had been granted funding approval by the Legislative Council, the Department was introducing related road improvement works and the remaining works for pedestrian connectivity facilities. The pedestrian connectivity facility E8 was gazetted on 19 August this year. Since environmental impact assessment was required for the road improvement works, funding application for the works concerned would be made at the next stage. Since the remaining pedestrian connectivity facilities involved complex land issues, the CEDD was making efforts in taking them forward;

12.2 As regards the safety of pedestrian connectivity facility E1, the CEDD thanked the Members’ suggestion and would study the feasibility of providing entrances and inclusion of directional signs at the midway of the escalators;

12.3 The CEDD would examine whether pedestrian crossing facilities could be provided at Hiu Ming Street, and would reflect to the Transport Department (“TD”) the proposals of providing parking spaces for motorcycles underneath

8 the footbridge at the pedestrian connectivity facilities E2 – C1 – E3 and providing a taxi stand at Hiu Kwong Street Rest Garden;

12.4 The CEDD would endeavour to speed up the works progress;

12.5 The CEDD said that as the bus-bus interchange would first be provided in Phase 1 of the works next to the Tseung Kwan O-bound bus-bus interchange, barrier-free access would be provided as soon as possible upon completion of the works and temporary pedestrian facilities would be considered during the works period;

12.6 The CEDD acknowledged Members’ wish of widening the pavement over the flyover at Lin Tak Road across Tseung Kwan O Road, the proposal would tie in with the works schedule and the Department would complete the works as soon as possible;

12.7 The maximum pedestrian flow capacity for pedestrian connectivity facilities E1 and E3 was 1 800 people per hour.

12.8 During the construction of the pedestrian connectivity facility E1, the CEDD would provide an access point at Hiu Ming Street and Hiu Kwong Street for dump trucks in order to expedite the works. The Department would remind contractors to avoid access during peak periods;

12.9 The CEDD would actively follow up on the progress of Phase 2 of the works; and

12.10 The CEDD would consider providing temporary protective facilities at the pavement at Lin Tak Road to avoid accidents.

13. The Chairman suggested the CEDD discuss the project details with Members of the relevant constituencies after the meeting and take timely follow-up action.

14. Members noted the paper and agreed to relocate the sign of the Kwun Tong District Council next to the toll plaza of Tseung Kwan O Tunnel as well as the arrangement for demolition and reprovisioning of sheltered benches next to the vehicular access of Service Reservoir Playground.

IV. Report on the Utilisation of Public Libraries of the Leisure and Cultural Services Department in Kwun Tong (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 40/2016)

15. Ms Rica KWAN of the LCSD presented the paper.

16. Members noted the paper.

9

V. Report on the Management of the LCSD Facilities in Kwun Tong for June to July 2016 (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 41/2016)

17. Miss Sylvia TANG of the LCSD presented the paper.

18. Five Members made comments and enquiries as follows:

18.1 Members asked which section of Choi Hei Road Park would be given to the Housing Department (“HD”) for its use and the time required, and whether the facilities there would be reprovisioned;

18.2 Members supported re-designating Centre Rest Garden as a venue where smoking was prohibited, and hoped that the LCSD would deploy more staff for inspection at the early stage of implementation;

18.3 As regards the replacement works of the mist system at Kwun Tong Promenade, Members said that a mist system would generally last for 10 years and hoped that the LCSD could enhance the monitoring of the use of the system;

18.4 Members hoped that the LCSD could expedite the clean-up of the flowers and trees fallen down in gardens after typhoon.

19. The LCSD’s representative responded that part of the land, which was mainly occupied by flower beds of plants and trees, at Choi Hei Road Park would be temporarily handed over to the HD between January 2017 and September 2020 to meet project needs. The LCSD would remind the CEDD that a durable mist system with high performance should be selected to replace the system at Kwun Tong Promenade for better use of public money. As regards re-designating Yau Tong Centre Rest Garden as a venue where smoking was prohibited, the LCSD would post notices, publicity posters and banners in the rest garden in advance to inform the public of the arrangement. Inspection and management would be stepped up in the early stage of implementation and enforcement actions would be carried out jointly with the Tobacco Control Office. The LCSD attached great importance to the treatment of trees fallen down after typhoon and would maintain close contact with contractors to clear up the affected sites as early as possible. As the collection service was required at all 18 districts, transporters were in shortage, resulting in some branches remained to be cleared at some locations. The LCSD would continue to strengthen the cooperation with contractors to complete the clean-up as early as possible.

20. Members noted the paper and endorsed the proposals in para. 5 and para. 10 of the paper: re-designating Yau Tong Centre Rest Garden as a venue where smoking was prohibited, improvement works of the lighting system at Village Sitting-out Area No. 3 and replacement works of the mist system at Kwun Tong Promenade.

VI. Report on the Utilisation of Community Centres/Community Halls in Kwun Tong (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 42/2016)

21. Ms Scarlet PUT of the Kwun Tong District Office (“KTDO”) presented the paper.

10

22. Members asked the progress of the glass repair works at the functional room on 2/F of Yau Tong Community Hall.

23. The KTDO’s representative said that the manager of Yau Tong Community Hall would be asked to give a response to Members’ question.

24. Members noted the paper.

VII. Details and Budget Estimates on the Production of Souvenirs for 2016/17 (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 43/2016)

25. Ms Scarlet PUT of the KTDO presented the paper.

26. Four Members made comments and enquiries as follows:

26.1 Members enquired about the organisations to which souvenirs would be distributed.

26.2 Members asked whether it was necessary to produce souvenirs; and

26.3 Members suggested producing simple souvenirs to make better use of resources, such as folders or cards, which could achieve the same publicity effect.

27. The KTDO’s representative responded that souvenirs aimed at publicising the DFMC and providing the contact information of community centres/halls to local people, and the souvenirs would be distributed to a total of 1 200 to 1 300 residents’ organisations including owners’ corporations, owners’ committees and mutual aid committees.

28. The Chairman said that the DFMC produced publicity souvenirs every year and agreed that production of simple souvenirs could make better use of resources. He suggested the KTDO report the details and budget of souvenirs to the DFMC at the next meeting.

29. This item would be further discussed at the next meeting.

VIII. Progress Report on Recreational and Cultural Works in Kwun Tong (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 44/2016)

30. Members enquired about the works progress at Sai Tso Wan Park.

31. Mr Eddie LO of the LCSD responded that the LCSD noted the concern of Members over the works at Sai Tso Wan Park. The LCSD would give consideration to population change in the district, the public demand for recreational facilities and the utilisation of facilities as a whole.

32. Members noted the paper.

11

IX. Progress Report on the East Kowloon Cultural Centre at Lower Estate

33. Mr Eddie LO of the LCSD reported that the foundation works for the East Kowloon Cultural Centre had commenced in January 2016. In addition, the Architectural Services Department (“ArchSD”) was actively preparing for the tender documents for the superstructure works and the works was expected to commence in mid-2017.

34. Members noted the paper.

X. New Proposals on District Minor Works in Kwun Tong for 2016/17 (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 45/2016)

35. Ms Rica KWAN of the LCSD presented the paper and reported that the works at Shui Wo Street Public Library involved improvement to air-conditioner components, and the anti-theft system at Lam Tin Public Library required replacement as it was beyond repair.

36. Members endorsed the paper.

XI. Progress Report on District Minor Works (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 46/2016)

37. Mr John LEE of Andrew Lee King Fun & Associates Architects Limited (“Consultant”) presented the paper.

38. Members made the following enquiries:

38.1 The progress of the construction of a sitting-out area at Wang Kwong Road near Richland Gardens, the reasons for delay and the venue’s opening date;

38.2 The progress of the feasibility study on the provision of a covered walkway from Lei On Court to ;

38.3 The progress and fallback plan for the provision of a rain shelter and shelter with bench near minibus stops (near the car park entrance of Lower Ngau Tau Kok Estate), Ngau Tau Kok Road; and

38.4 The location of the covered walkway at a crossing on Rehab Path, Sin Fat Road and its progress.

39. The Consultant responded as follows:

39.1 The construction of a sitting-out area at Wang Kwong Road near Richland Gardens was largely completed and the venue was expected to be handed over to the LCSD within the month. It could be open for use after inspection;

(Post-meeting note: The Consultant explained that the works was affected by the

12 rainy weather on a number of occasions, and the time required by the Water Services Department (“WSD”) for going through the procedures for inspection of water pipes, therefore the works were completed behind the original schedule. It was expected that the venue would be handed over to the LCSD in the fourth quarter of 2016.)

39.2 As regards the provision of a covered walkway from Lei On Court to Sceneway Garden, due to the hindrance from underground utilities and the requirement of non-occupancy of the WSD’s protected areas, it was unlikely that a foundation could be constructed. The power company said that it would take three years for diversion of underground utilities, and the gas company also said that it would first carry out borehole drilling for further consideration and it would take about one year;

39.3 As regards the provision of a rain shelter and shelter with bench near minibus stops (near the car park entrance of Lower Ngau Tau Kok Estate), Ngau Tau Kok Road, the power company said that it would first conduct a study on borehole drilling, and the diversion of underground utilities would take one year. The Consultant would study the proposals further with the TD and the Highways Department (“HyD”);

39.4 As regards the construction of a covered walkway at a crossing on Rehab Path, Sin Fat Road, the Consultant was communicating with the HyD with respect to anti-bumping requirements and rainwater discharge.

40. The Chairman hoped that the Consultant would further communicate with the Members concerned after the meeting.

41. Members noted the paper.

XII. District Facilities Management Committee Financial Statement for 2016/17 (KTDC DFMC Paper No. 47/2016)

42. The Secretary presented the paper.

43. Members endorsed the paper.

XIII. Any Other Business

Lift Works at Kwun Tong Community Centre and Lam Tin (West) Estate Community Centre

44. Ms Kitty SHIU of the KTDO said that the lift works at Kwun Tong Community Centre and Lam Tin (West) Estate Community Centre would commence in the first quarter of 2017, the ArchSD would communicate with the tenants before project commencement. The lift works at Kwun Tong Community Centre and Lam Tin (West) Estate Community Centre were expected to complete in the third quarter of 2018 and the fourth quarter of 2018 respectively.

13

45. Four Members made comments and enquiries as follows:

45.1 Members understood that the basketball court in Kwun Tong Community Centre would be affected during the lift works and after its completion, and suggested converting the basketball court into a dodgeball court or a multi-purpose venue;

45.2 Members asked whether Lam Tin (West) Estate Community Centre would be redeveloped;

45.3 Members hoped that Lam Tin (West) Estate Community Centre could be redeveloped; and

45.4 Members said that the works would provide convenience to members of the public going to the kindergarten on the top floor of the community centre.

46. The KTDO’s representative responded that the two lift projects aimed at providing barrier-free facilities to facilitate access by residents. To her understanding, there was no redevelopment plan for the two community centres.

47. Members agreed that the works could enhance community facilities but a launching ceremony for the works was not necessary.

XIV. Date of Next Meeting

48. The next meeting was scheduled for 10 November 2016 (Thursday) at 2:30 p.m.

49. There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:10 p.m.

The minutes of the meeting were confirmed on 10 November 2016.

Kwun Tong District Council Secretariat November 2016

14