DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Iacom Decisions 10 October 2012 Oz Litha

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Iacom Decisions 10 October 2012 Oz Litha Final Decisions of the meeting of the Impact Assessment Committee of Heritage Western Cape that was held on Wednesday, 10 October 2012, in the 1 st Floor Boardroom, Protea Assurance Building, Greenmarket Square, Cape Town at 09h00 7 Administrative Matters 7.1 Outcome of the Appeals and Tribunal Committees The CEO gave a verbal report on three Tribunal matters which have, however, not been resolved (Oude Paarl Hotel, Highclaire Blouberg, and Queens Road Sea Point). 7.2 Formulation Requirements in respect of Comments and Decisions Mr Summers will arrange a meeting with Ms Leslie to discuss the details of certain issues which would be covered in the standard conditions attached to comments and decisions. RS, ML 7.3 Requirements in respect of Impact Assessments and Associated Specialist Studies AH/CvW are reminded to send the standard letter and a draft circular in this respect to the committee members so that they can make suggestions with this respect to improving these documents. AH, CvW 7.4 Summaries of Heritage Impact Assessments. The Committee discussed the matter at length and agreed that the Committee members will circulate examples of the summary types discussed; and the matter will be discussed at the next meeting. 8. Conflict of Interest 8.1 RS: E 15.2 and E15.3. PL: E 12.1 notes prior involvement. 9. Approval of the Agenda 9.1 The Committee agreed to approve the agenda of the meeting held on 10 October 2012 with minor changes. FIRST SESSION: TEAM EAST PRESENTATION E. 10 SECTION 38(2) RESPONSES TO NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO DEVELOP E. 10.1 None E. 11 SECTION 38(1) INTERIM COMMENT E 11.1 None Final IACom Decisions_ 10 October 2012 1 E 12 SECTION 38(4) RECORD OF DECISION E.12.1 Amended Applications Heartland Holdings, Historic Sub-Precinct, Heartland, Old AECI Site, Somerset West: NM HM/SOMERSET WEST/AECI PRECINCT Case No: 110622ZS26M A Heritage Impact Assessment by Chris Snelling was tabled. The documents had been delivered to and read by PL, SW and ST. Mr Zwelibanzi Shiceka made a power-point presentation PL offered to recuse himself. Mr Snelling left the room to ask his client whether Mr Louw should recuse himself. Mr Snelling returned and advised that his client did not require PL to recuse himself. In discussion it was noted that: • DECISION The Committee resolved as follows: • The proposed subdivision of Erf 17884 is approved subject to all previously imposed conditions including those relating to height, street edge, bulk etc. • The proposed amendments of the general plan No 2232/2008 in respect of the closure of a 29 m long portion of Excelsior Road and the creation of the W.R Quinan Boulevard Road reserve are approved. • The proposed amendment of general plan No 3069/2008 in order to create two new portions in Erf 178987 and to accommodate larger substations is approved subject to all previously imposed conditions. • The proposed expanded informants for developmental potential for the “crescent houses” are approved but a detailed site developmental plan is required. It is to be noted that such developmental potential is supported only on the southern- most boundaries. • The boundaries and extent of the proposed PHS should be amended to extend the area both behind the “crescent houses” to their boundaries and beyond the open space in front of the crescent up to the vlei. ZS E.12.2 New Development of 1200 Units, Mainly Residential Use, Woodstock Quarter Erven 11043, 10944-10946, 10949, 10951, 10952 and 10959-10961, Victoria Road, Barron Street, Cornwall Street and Gympie Street, Woodstock, Cape Town: NM HM/WOODSTOCK/11043, 10944-10946, 10949, 10951, 10952 and 10959-10961 Case No: 111201SD01 Comments from the Cape Institute for Architecture and amended plans prepared by Design Three Sixty, dated 11 April 2012 were tabled. The documents were e-mailed to all members Mr Shaun Dyers made a power-point presentation. Final IACom Decisions_ 10 October 2012 2 Ms Abrahamse-Donovan was present and gave input to the discussion. In discussion it was noted that: • DECISION The Committee resolved to approve the application. SD E.12.3 Phase One Development Proposal, Dock Road, Victoria and Alfred Waterfront (Gateway Precinct): NM HM/DOCK ROAD/VICTORIA AND ALFRED WATERFRONT Case No: X120829JL28M A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Nicolas Baumann, dated August 2012 was tabled The documents had been delivered to and read by ST and PL Representatives of the applicant and of a home owners association (which had commented) were present and made input into the discussion. Ms Jenna Lavin made a power-point presentation. In discussion it was noted that: • The Committee discussed the matter at length. Questions in respect of the height, position, bulk etc of the proposed new buildings were unresolved. Questions regarding the curating and musealisation of the Amsterdam Battery relics were also unresolved. INTERIM COMMENT The Committee resolved that it was unable to resolve on this matter without further detail. JL E 13 SECTION 38(8) NEMA RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO DEVELOP E.13.1 None E 14 SECTION 38(8) NEMA INTERIM COMMENTS None E 15 SECTION 38(8) NEMA FINAL COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT E 15.1 Upgrade and Expansion of Chatsworth WWTW, Erf 7819, Remaining Extent of Farm 718, Swartland Municipality, Western Cape: MA HM/WEST COAST/SWARTLAND/CHATSWORTH/CHATSWORTH WWTW Case No: 120604JL01M Final IACom Decisions_ 10 October 2012 3 A Heritage Impact Assessment Report prepared by Pro-Active Archaeological Consultants, dated August 2012 was tabled. The documents had been delivered to and read by ST, RJ and SW Ms Jenna Lavin made a power-point presentation FINAL COMMENT • HWC has no objection to the proposed development JL E 15.2 Proposed Clover Valley Wind Energy Generation Facility and Power Transmission Line near Mamre: NM HM/MAMRE/CLOVER VALLEY WIND ENERGY FACILITIES Case No: 110617JL17M A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Anne-Marie Fick, dated July 2012 was tabled. The documents had been delivered to and read by ST, SW and PL Ms Jenna Lavin made a power-point presentation. Ms Fick, Ms de Villiers and Mr Withers (all representing the applicant) and Mr Smith and Ms xxxxx (representing an objector) were present and contributed to the discussion. RS recused himself and left the room. In discussion it was noted that: • INTERIM COMMENT The Committee resolved that the HIA was incomplete in several aspects and required that the following components be improved: • That all heritage resources be mapped in a meaningful way; • That statements of significance and gradings and of the potential impacts on those significances be clearly articulated ; • That section 38(3)(d) be satisfied. The Committee agreed that a minimum of a quorum of the Committee would inspect the site and the environs following receipt of the improved report. JL Final IACom Decisions_ 10 October 2012 4 E.15.3 Proposed Groene Kloof Wind Energy Generation Facility and Power Transmission Line near Mamre: NM HM/MAMRE/GROENE KLOOF WIND ENERGY GENERATION FACILITY Case No: 120123JL12M A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Anne-Marie Fick, dated July 2012 was tabled. The documents had been delivered to and read by ST, SW and PL Ms Jenna Lavin made a power-point presentation Ms Fick, Ms de Villiers and Mr Withers (all representing the applicant) and Mr Smith and Ms xxxxx (representing an objector) were present and contributed to the discussion. RS recused himself and left the room. In discussion it was noted that: • Site 245 has considerable archaeological significance and must be protected or excavated. INTERIM COMMENT The Committee resolved that the HIA was incomplete in several aspects and required that the following components be improved: • That all heritage resources be mapped in a meaningful way; • That statements of significance and gradings and of the potential impacts on those significances be clearly articulated ; • That section 38(3)(d) and (e) be satisfied. The Committee agreed that a minimum of a quorum of the Committee would inspect the site and the environs following receipt of the improved report. JL E 16 SECTION 38(8) MPA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN RESPONSES TO NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO DEVELOP E.16.1 None E 17 SECTION 38(8) MPA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN INTERIM COMMENT E 17.1 None E 18 SECTION 38(8) MPA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL COMMENT E 18.1 None E 19 SECTION 38(8) OTHER LEGISLATION NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO DEVELOP Final IACom Decisions_ 10 October 2012 5 E 19.1 None E 20 SECTION 38(8) OTHER LEGISLATION INTERIM COMMENT E 20.1 None E 21 SECTION 38(8) OTHER LEGISLATION FINAL COMMENT E 21.1 None E 22 Other E 22.1 None SECOND SESSION: TEAM WEST PRESENTATION W 10 SECTION 38(2) RESPONSES TO NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO DEVELOP W 10.1 None W 11 SECTION 38(1) INTERIM COMMENT W.11.1 None W 12 SECTION 38(4) RECORD OF DECISION W.12.1 Proposed New Lecture Theatre, Erf 44201, University Avenue, University of Cape Town Upper Campus, Rhodes Estate, Rondebosch: NM HM/RONDEBOSCH/UCT/ERF 44201 A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ARCON, dated September 2012 was tabled The documents had been delivered to and read by SW, QL, ST and SdG Ms Laura Bridgman made a power-point presentation Dr Townsend noted that he is employed by UCT and stated that he presumed no party thought he should recuse himself. The applicant was was represented by Mssrs Jacobs, Flint, Vermeulen and Haupt and the CIA (an interested party) was represented by Mr Buttgens. These parties made contributions to the discussion. In discussion it was noted that: • DECISION The Committee resolved to approve Alternative 2 subject to the submission and approval of a revised sketch proposal with a landscape plan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Church Square Slavery Memorial
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329866268 The mirror and the square —old ideological conflicts in motion: Church square slavery memorial Chapter · January 2017 CITATIONS READS 0 35 1 author: Gavin Younge University of Cape Town 4 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Short article for De Arte Journal View project Book on public art in South Africa View project All content following this page was uploaded by Gavin Younge on 06 January 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Mirror and the Square Old ideological conflicts in motion: Church Square Slavery Memorial Gavin Younge Citation: The Mirror and the Square--Old Ideological Conflicts in Motion: Church Square Slavery Memorial. In, K. Miller & B. Schmahmann. Public Art in South Africa: Bronze Warriors and Plastic Presidents (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017), pp. 53--70. ISBN 978-0-253-02992-8. isitors to Cape Town often remark on the concern that the general public would have difficulty Vvineyards stretching up to beautiful Cape in accepting an abstract approach. Contestants for Dutch manor houses from the seventeenth century. the commission were drawn from all parts of South Low white-painted walls surround these buildings Africa, and judging by some of the unsuccessful and each ensemble seems to follow the same pattern proposals,3 a highly figurative approach had been – an H-shaped manor house featuring gables, a favoured by most. Such works were in the tradition jonkmanshuis (Afrikaans and Dutch for ‘young of Karl Broodhagen’s Bussa Emancipation Statue man’s house’), a former slave lodge, and a slave (1985) in Barbados which features a large man on a bell.
    [Show full text]
  • Cmc Heritage Resources Sensitivity Study
    IDENTIFICATION AND MAPPING OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS IN THE CAPE METROPOLITAN AREA (CMA) HERITAGE COMPONENT Prepared for Cape Metropolitan Council Project No: J90136a June 1999 Prepared by Tim Hart & Belinda Mutti Archaeology Contracts Office Department of Archaeology University of Cape Town Private Bag Rondebosch 7701 Phone (021) 650 2357 Fax (021) 650 2352 Email [email protected] CMC HERITAGE RESOURCES SENSITIVITY STUDY ACCOMPANYING STATEMENT This statement accompanies the set of maps and spreadsheets produced by the Archaeology Contracts Office for Gibb Africa and The Cape Metropolitan Council. It is designed to place the work in context so users of the final product will understand how the information was collected and the implications thereof. 1. Team members We are a team of professional archaeologists who have extensive local knowledge of heritage issues and sites. We have collected the information contained in the spreadsheets and maps. Thus the areas, sites and priorities that have been identified in the study reflect our background and values. Perceptions of what is an important heritage object or site range from places valued by members of a small community, to broadly recognised places of historical or community distinction. This study cannot cover the entire range of possibilities, however we have attempted to identify areas that are known and significant to a range of people who work regularly in the heritage field. This includes historic landscapes, buildings, graveyards (disused), shipwrecks, colonial and pre-colonial archaeological sites. 2. Parameters The new heritage legislation (the South African Heritage Resources Act of 1999) has been the guidline to which we have referred with respect to identification of areas and definition of sensitivity.
    [Show full text]
  • APM Minutes 06 May 2020
    APPROVED MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE (HWC) ARCHAEOLOGY, PALAEONTOLOGY AND METEORITES COMMITTEE (APM) Held on Wednesday, 6 May 2020. On Microsoft Teams Cape Town at 09:00 AM 1. Opening and Welcome The Chairperson, Dr Lita Webley (LW), officially opened the meeting at 09:05 and welcomed everyone present. 2. Attendance Members Members of Staff Dr Lita Webley (LW) Ms Penelope Meyer (PM) Ms Emmylou Bailey (EB) Ms Stephanie Barnardt (SB) Dr Jayson Orton (JO) Ms Waseefa Dhansay (WD) Ms Cecilene Muller (CM) Mr Jonathan Windvogel (JW) Mr John Gribble (JG) Ms Colette Scheermeyer (CS) Dr Ragna Redelstorff (RR) Ms Nuraan Vallie (NV) Ms Ameerah Peters (AP) Dr Mxolisi Dlamuka (MX) Ms Nosiphiwo Tafeni (NT) Ms Cathy-Ann Potgieter (CP) Visitors None Observers None 3. Apologies Dr Wendy Black Absent None 4. Approval of Agenda Dated 6 May 2020 4.1 The Committee approved the agenda dated 6 May 2020 with minor changes including additional items. 5. Approval of Minutes and Matters Arising from Previous Meeting 5.1 APM Minutes dated 20 March 2020. The Committee reviewed the minutes dated 20 March 2020 and approved the minutes with amendments. Page 1 of 6 6. Disclosure of Interest 6.1 Recusals None 7. Confidential Matters 7.1 None 8. Appointments 8.1 The Committee noted the appointment for item 12.1 set for 09h30. Erf 4998, Sayers Lane, Simons Town to be deferred. Invitations were sent out to the parties identified during the meeting of the 20th of March 2020 but no response was received. This matter is therefore deferred to the next APM meeting in June 2020 and invitations to be sent to parties again.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Impact Assessment: Gateway Precinct Victoria and Alfred Waterfront Company Pty Ltd
    Archaeological Impact Assessment: Gateway Precinct Victoria and Alfred Waterfront Company Pty Ltd Prepared for Nicholas Baumann on behalf of the Victoria and Alfred Waterfront Company September 2014 Prepared by 8 Jacobs Ladder St James 7945 Email [email protected] www.aco-associates.com Phone 021 7064104 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 2 Historical overview .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Dutch Period ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 British Period: 1795- 1827 ................................................................................................ 6 2.3 British Period: second half 19th century ............................................................................ 6 2.4 Heritage resources directly or indirectly affected by the proposed development ............. 7 3 Amsterdam battery ................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Assessment of significance .............................................................................................. 9 4 Burial grounds of the underclass and slaves .......................................................................... 10 4.1 Likelihood of impacts .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment (Sea) for the Port of Cape Town and Environmental Impact Assessment (Eia) for the Expansion O
    Strategic Environmental Assessment (Sea) For The Port Of Cape Town And Environmental Impact Assessment (Eia) For The Expansion Of The Container Terminal Stacking Area: Specialist Study On Maritime Archaeology Item Type Working Paper Authors Werz, Bruno E.J.S. Citation SEA/EIA Port of Cape Town Download date 26/09/2021 21:33:13 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/391 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) FOR THE PORT OF CAPE TOWN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE CONTAINER TERMINAL STACKING AREA SPECIALIST STUDY ON MARITIME ARCHAEOLOGY BRUNO E.J.S. WERZ CAPE TOWN, MAY 2003 Maritime archaeology and the port of Cape Town SUMMARY The following specialist report forms part of the larger Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the Port of Cape Town, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the extension of the container terminal in that port, and the related sourcing of fill material. The development and management of these assessments, as well as the monitoring and guiding of specialist studies, is being undertaken jointly by Sakaza Communications and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), and specifically the Council’s environmental department (Environmentek). The project is commissioned by the National Ports Authority (NPA), Port of Cape Town. The project was set in motion towards the end of the 1990s, whereby the emphasis initially lay with the EIA for the proposed expansion of the container terminal in Cape Town harbour. During the orientation phase for this, that included a public participation process, a number of key issues were identified. These vary considerably and range from planning, traffic management, visual and noise effects, to potential impacts on the marine ecology and cultural resources in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cape Town Restoration and Re/Creation of Lacunae: the Attitudes and Principles of Gabriël Fagan Architect As Ex
    University Of Cape Town Restoration and Re/Creation of Lacunae: The Attitudes and Principles of Gabriël Fagan Architect as Expressed In the Restoration of the Castle of Good Hoop Mini-Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Engineering & the Built Environment: School of Architecture, Planning & Geomatics In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Magister Philosophiae Conservation of the Built Environment Peter J. Büttgens BTTPET004 Supervisor: Dr. S.S. Townsend November 2010 PLAGIARISM DECLARATION I know that plagiarism is wrong. Plagiarism is to use another‟s work and pretend that it is one‟s own. I have used a standard convention for citation and referencing. Each contribution to, and quotation in, this mini-dissertation from the work(s) of other people has been attributed, and has been cited and referenced. This mini-dissertation is my own work. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as his or her own work. Signature Removed Peter J. Büttgens Cape Town 11 November 2010 i AUTHOR‟S STATEMENT This 60-credit research project (mini-dissertation) is submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of M.Phil of Conservation of the Built Environment. The course code is APG5071S. All other courses in the program have been completed. The work in this document was undertaken during the Second Semester between 15th July 2010 and 12th November 2010. Course Convenor: Dr S.S. Townsend School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics, UCT [email protected] Supervisor: Dr S.S. Townsend ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Assessment of the Proposed Cape Town International Convention Centre 2 on Erwen 192, 245, 246 and the Remainder
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED CAPE TOWN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTRE 2 ON ERWEN 192, 245, 246 AND THE REMAINDER OF ERF 192, “SALAZAR SQUARE”, ROGGEBAAI, CAPE TOWN FORESHORE Prepared for Vidamemoria On behalf of Cape Town International Convention Centre Company October 2012 Prepared by D.J. Halkett ACO Associates cc Physical: Unit C26, Prime Park, 21 Mocke Rd, Diep River, 7800 Postal: 8 Jacobs Ladder, St James, 7945 Phone (021) 706 4104 Fax to e-mail (021) 086603795 Email [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed development of the CTICC 2 and associated infrastructure on various land parcels on the foreshore Erwen 192, 245, 246 and the Remainder of Erf 192, “Salazar Square”, has been examined to assess the risk of impacting heritage in the course of construction and for planning/design purposes. We have concluded that prior to the land reclamation of the late 1930’s, the various land parcels would have been located offshore in approximately 2 - 2.5 Fathoms of water (4 -4.5 meters), in the region of the old anchorage area in Table Bay. Information on shipwreck locations in the Bay indicate that the greatest number of recorded cases were as the result of fierce north westerly gales driving ships onto the old shorelines between Milnerton Lagoon and the Castle. Few vessels are recorded as having sunk at anchor. The changes over time to the bay’s shoreline due to reclamation was driven largely by the need for additional land in order to facilitate the expansion of the town, and to provide better harbour facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway Precinct) !
    DOCK ROAD, VICTORIA AND ALFRED WATERFRONT (GATEWAY PRECINCT) ! V`1 :$"] 1J ` ^_`! `]R`Q` .V 1H R`R: `QJ0]7 G7 11 . 1HQCV `QJ$ 3G: VV1$J %$% VICTORIA & ALFRED GATEWAY PRECINCT HIA 1 1HQC::%I:JJ1J:QH1:QJ11 .1HQCV `QJ$ 30 8 "!0" 8 @RR7 ]8 8 1 VCQH:QJ ]8 8 1 R] ]8 8 V$`:IV1@ ]8 8 3:IV1@ ]8 8 VR7 ]8 8 "!"0!" 8 % H.R ]8 888 %`1:C$`R 888 3:QJ 8 `1.R^ R _ ]8 88 %`1:C$`R 888 3:QJ 8 `1.R^ R _ ]8 888 %`1:C$`R 888 3:QJ 8 3!"@"@"3"00 88 I V`RG7 ]8 8 %`1:C$`R`RR0V ]8 8 11QJ" % V ]8 8 !"@""0!!3 APPROVED PRECINCT PLAN 8 I V`RV7 ]8 8 11QJ " % V ]8 8 1%:CH07GR75 V`R75R ]8 .VV: 8 0VV6]`: V1:7R 1J `G 107R ]8 : `QJ8 8 " ]V :QJ ]8 8 !^07@]_ ]8 8 "00" 8 0]" % `Q``H.1 VH %`5:$0VV ]8 8 `:1C1 7 77 ]8 8 .V03RQJ ]8 VICTORIA & ALFRED GATEWAY PRECINCT HIA 2 1HQC::%I:JJ1J:QH1:QJ11 .1HQCV `QJ$ 8 !"@"03@3! 0[! 8 .V`V VJ` V`R7R" % V ]8 88 R`]]] VVG@ Q`V RQJ V6` :7 88 .V1J V$`:`7 ]G]]7 VI 88 .V`V VJ`0 R`QI .V:7 88 R`Q`:`H.:VQCQ$1H:C1J0V$:5R]]] VHQJV`0:QJ IVR75R ]V :8 8 .V`V VJ` 1V0 @7Q .VQQJ:7 ]8 @R 8 6]`: V1:7R : `QJ ]8 8 " V$`:07: `QJ ]8 8 0]G70 V63:IV1@]GRG707`0]Q1J ]8 RQQ`R RR0]: `QJ 8 00"!0" ]8 !0 ]8 7 Q`1H0V`0L "0 "7! "7!0"05 5" "07"!3!! "7" "7[!@"! "37!!! "@7"@!"0"35@ "7"@!"0"0 ""703"0 "_70"305 @ 3"@! 377 ]]]`0]Q1J.Q11J$ .VCQH:`@ V1:78 37 `@ V1:7]]Q6 V:`` V`R78 37@ V1:7VH1JH 370 5 5 5 3 7]`G757 7RQ`RQ .V1V`VJ$`:H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Castle of Good Hope
    FREE Please support our advertisers who make this free guide possible PLEASE TIP Cape Town EMPOWERMENT VENDORS GATEWAYGUIDES The Castle of Good Hope Castle of Good Hope Over the centuries six different flags have flown over The Castle yet in all that time not a single shot has ever been fired in anger at it or from it. Muizenberg 1 False Bay To advertise here contact Hayley Burger: Cape Town • South Africa 021 487 1200 • [email protected] One of his first tasks was to The style of this new castle was Peak. The present day site of the Castle is 1 The reason for a fort at the 4 5 Cape of Good Hope build a fort as the interests associated with the renowned French probably the best of a bad situation. This Cape Point With the expansion of world trade by of the Dutch East India fortress engineer, Sebastien Vauban. position is about 230 metres south east the European powers in the 1500s, Companies latest assets had Menno, Baron van Coehoorn, a Dutch of the old fort. The site is close enough 6 trade routes were vital to economic to be protected at all costs. artillerist and military engineer, was to anchorage, within firing range of the also associated with the outcome of the town and close enough to fresh water. History and facts power. The main trade route to the The first fort built at Castle’s design. The defensive system at the Cape was East used to be overland; but in 1453 the Cape of Good Hope Constantinople was captured by the This design was based on the fact that slowly rectified over time by means of of the Castle including Two days after setting foot Turks which effectively closed off this firepower due to technology had greatly many defensive structures placed around on the shores of Table Bay, 3D illustrations, trade passage.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Town's V&A Waterfront Project Adaptive Re-Use As a Foundation for Sustainable Urban Renewal
    VAN ZYL, Pieter Cape Town’s V&A Waterfront Project 49th ISOCARP Congress 2013 Cape Town’s V&A Waterfront Project Adaptive Re-use as a Foundation for Sustainable Urban Renewal Pieter VAN ZYL Head of Department: Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Western Cape Provincial Government Cape Town, South Africa Synopsis The Victoria and Alfred Waterfront Project in Cape Town, South Africa, is an urban regeneration project that has over the past twenty-five years successfully transformed the historic and previously under-utilised part of the Port of Cape Town into the City’s premier tourist, retail, entertainment, commercial and residential destination. This paper gives a brief historical overview of the project and its cultural and social context. It then describes how the new facilities for residential, commercial, retail and leisure uses have been developed, through adaptive re-use of harbour sheds, workshops and stores, while retaining the character of Cape Town’s waterfront as a working harbour. The paper is a case study on how a development idea was turned into action – it will also describe how an innovative planning and land use management process (known as the “Package of Plans Process”) has been used by the developer, Victoria & Alfred Waterfront (Pty) Ltd and the Cape Town City Council in facilitating an urban regeneration success story. The paper concludes with an assessment of the sustainability of the Victoria and Alfred Waterfront Project, which could be of benefit to other city and harbour authorities around the world. 1. Introduction For over forty years some of the world’s most innovative real estate developments have taken place at waterfronts.
    [Show full text]
  • Tt•Fl' [ to Possible Attackers - Around First the Fort ..~
    Raying Slave Heritage a rea First ~rprzvatE Walks house~ of CapeTown Wage aer'S',-ese • • , . Fresh River mouth and first jetty'- I ..• ---.. - Table Bay ~ City of Cape Town Heritage Groote Kerk of the settlement. With the possibility of a second war with England looming in 1665, pamphlet no. 17 0 the VOC ordered the construction of a more substantia l fortification in January 1666. IITY Of CAPE TOWII IISIIDIOSAS EWA I SIADW PSIAO The Groote Kerk of the Dutch Reformed Ch urch overlooks Church Square . The This became the Castle of Good Hope 0 about 200 metres to the east. Walk to the THIS CITY WORKS FORYOU above 1830 water colour by H.C. De Meillon, shows the original church built on this trees in the middle of the Grand Parade in front of the City Hall. site (1700-1704) of wh ich only the clock tower remains today. Churchgoers wou ld outspanthe ir wagons and carriages on the square while attending services. This gave e Grand Parade the slaves who accompanied th em an opportunity to socialise while awaiting their owners. Ever fearful of opportunities such as this where disgruntled slaves might The Gra nd Parade evolved out of a 'roying' plot unrest, the Company issued a placaator edict, forbidding slaves from gath ering area of 50 Rh ineland roods (approximately 190 near the entrance of a ch urch during services. metres) that the VOC insisted be kept clear of ~~~=<t=~ any obstructions that could provide protection tt•fl' [ to possible attackers - around first the Fort ..~ . _- ~ Slave Auction Tree and later the Castle.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle of Good Hope Integrated Conservation Management Plan 2020
    Castle of Good Hope Integrated Conservation Management Plan 2020 - 2024 DESKTOP STUDY September 2018 Vision The Castle Control Board shall be a globally significant, truly accessible centre of excellence that showcases South Africa’s shared heritage. Mission The Castle Control Board is a service-orientated public entity, striving to create an environment where national pride serves to: • Build an internationally known and recognised cultural and heritage brand for Ubuntu, dialogue, nation-building and human rights recognition; • Guarantee the development of a smooth functioning, self-sustaining, “must-see” iconic visitor and learner destination; • Optimises its tourism potential and accessibility to the public; and • Preserve and protect its cultural and military heritage by elevating it to United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) World Heritage status. - From the Annual Performance Plan 2018 Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... iii List of Maps ............................................................................................................................................ iv List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]