DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on Market Transfer Conditions Market Analysis Danube Corridor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on Market Transfer Conditions Market Analysis Danube Corridor PLATFORM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAIADES II WP 1: Markets & Awareness D 1.7: Report on market transfer conditions Market Analysis Danube Corridor Grant Agreement: MOVE/FP7/321498/PLATINA II (Sub)Work Package: WP 1: Markets and Awareness Deliverable No: Midterm Report for D 1.7 Author: via donau Version (date): 18.11.2014 - 1 - PLATFORM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAIADES II Authors of the document Responsible organisation Principal author VIA Milica Gvozdic Contributing organisation(s) Contributing author(s) VIA Simon Hartl, Ulf Meinel CRUP Renata Kadric DISCLAIMER PLATINA II is funded by the Directorate General on Mobility and Transport of the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. The views expressed in the working papers, deliverables and reports are those of the project consortium partners. These views have not been adopted or approved by the Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission's or its services' views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in the working papers and reports, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. - 2 - PLATFORM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAIADES II Users and readers of the study are very welcome to share feedback, suggestions and experiences regarding inland waterway transports and potential of modal shift towards inland navigation in the Danube Corridor! Important note: This study evaluates data on production and trade volumes of all Danube riparian countries. It includes data based on a national scope. In other words, the market analysis for e.g. Germany, contains data for the whole country and not only for the German Danube Corridor. This study is based on numerous national and international data. The author of this study can therefore not guarantee the accuracy of all primary data used in the compilation of this document Contact: via donau - Austrian Waterway Management Company Milica Gvozdic Team Transport Development E [email protected] - 3 - PLATFORM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAIADES II Table of content 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... - 13 - 2. Inland waterway transport .................................................................................................. - 14 - 3. Requirements for a modal shift towards IWT ................................................................... - 15 - 4. Transport volumes on the Danube .................................................................................... - 17 - 4.1. Water transshipment at Danube ports and transshipment sites.................................... - 19 - 4.1.1. Transport volumes in Austria............................................................................................. - 21 - 4.1.2. Transport volumes in Romania .......................................................................................... - 21 - 4.1.3. Transport volumes in the Ukraine ..................................................................................... - 22 - 5. Renewable resources .......................................................................................................... - 23 - 5.1. Transport and transshipment of renewable resources in the Danube region .............. - 25 - 5.2. Market overview ................................................................................................................... - 26 - 5.2.1. Hungarian trade flows of RES ............................................................................................ - 26 - 5.2.2. Austrian trade flows of RES ............................................................................................... - 27 - 5.2.3. Serbian trade flows of RES................................................................................................. - 29 - 5.3. Wood ..................................................................................................................................... - 29 - 5.3.1. Material use .......................................................................................................................... - 30 - 5.3.1.1. Round wood ................................................................................................................. - 30 - 5.3.1.1.1. Market overview ........................................................................................................... - 31 - 5.3.1.1.2. Transport requirements .............................................................................................. - 32 - 5.3.1.2. Sawn wood ................................................................................................................... - 33 - 5.3.1.2.1. Market overview ........................................................................................................... - 33 - 5.3.1.2.2. Companies in the vicinity of the Danube River ........................................................ - 35 - 5.3.1.2.3. Transport requirements .............................................................................................. - 36 - 5.3.1.3. Wood-based panels ..................................................................................................... - 37 - 5.3.2. Energetic use ....................................................................................................................... - 38 - 5.3.2.1. Market overview ........................................................................................................... - 39 - 5.3.2.2. Transport requirements .............................................................................................. - 42 - 5.4. Paper, paperboard and pulp ............................................................................................... - 42 - 5.4.1. Market overview ................................................................................................................... - 43 - 5.4.1.1. Germany ....................................................................................................................... - 44 - 5.4.1.2. Austria .......................................................................................................................... - 45 - 5.4.2. Transport requirements ...................................................................................................... - 47 - 5.5. Starch .................................................................................................................................... - 48 - 5.5.1. Market overview ................................................................................................................... - 48 - 5.5.2. Wheat .................................................................................................................................... - 50 - 5.5.2.1. Market overview ........................................................................................................... - 50 - 5.5.2.2. Transport requirements .............................................................................................. - 51 - 5.5.3. Maize ..................................................................................................................................... - 52 - 5.5.3.1. Market overview ........................................................................................................... - 52 - 5.5.3.2. Transport requirements .............................................................................................. - 53 - 5.5.4. Bioethanol ............................................................................................................................ - 54 - 5.5.4.1. Market overview and bioethanol plants in the vicinity of the Danube River ......... - 55 - 5.5.5. Vegetable oils and fats (Oil seeds) .................................................................................... - 57 - 5.5.6. Soybean ................................................................................................................................ - 58 - 5.5.6.1. Market overview ........................................................................................................... - 58 - 5.5.6.1.1. Germany ....................................................................................................................... - 60 - 5.5.6.1.2. Austria .......................................................................................................................... - 61 - 5.5.6.2. Transport requirements .............................................................................................. - 62 - 5.5.7. Rape ...................................................................................................................................... - 62 - 5.5.7.1. Market overview ........................................................................................................... - 63 - 5.5.7.1.1. Germany ....................................................................................................................... - 63 - 5.5.7.1.2. Austria .......................................................................................................................... - 64 - - 4 - PLATFORM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAIADES II 5.5.8. Sunflower seeds .................................................................................................................. - 65 - 5.5.8.1. Market overview ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PERG G Hafen Plesching Wolfing Hohensteg Reitern Schmied- Katsdorf (306) Fraundorf Lachstatt Ut.- Gassen PRINZ EUGEN-STR
    www.donauradweg.at www.donau.com Karte 4 Donauufer von LINZ bis PERG g hafen Plesching Wolfing Hohensteg reitern Schmied- Katsdorf (306) Fraundorf Lachstatt Ut.- gassen PRINZ EUGEN-STR. Altaist 123 Haarland Länge 36 km Pfenningberg reichenbach Eichwiesl Hochstraß Pimesbauer Holzwinden Hohenstein Oberthal Hst. Ruhstetten Ober- Linz 616 h c Reidl josefstal (266) Whs. a Ägidikirche Kriechbaum b Niederthal Edtsdorf Hartl Nördl. Donauufer S. 47–50 INDUSTRIEZEILE Daxleitner n Whs. Nöbling e Schöneck Buchholz h Aich Reiser Tankhafen Obern- c Südl. Donauufer S. 51–53 i Hohenstein Wildberg VOEST Windegg bergen e Forst Am Berg Standorf Weltstein R 526 Gusen Josefstal Schwarzendf. Mascherhof Lina 3 Steyregg Lungitz Doppl Windegg 478 Lehen Greins- Marwach A Ruine Gaderer WIENER STR. Bhf. (259) Götzelsdf. berg is SchlossHasenberg Knierübl Bhf. Grünau Schnellen- t Oberle HUMMELHOF Knollmühle Weigersdf. Hochreit Pulgarn Pürach Kruckenberg df. Winden hl Hst. Daundorf Schloss Obenberg Lebing MULDENSTR. St. Georgen Danndorf Gerersdf. Schloss Statzing an der Gusen Ried Schwertberg VÖEST-Werke Luftenberg (626) Blindendorf in der Riedmark (268) Stegfeld Asanger (306) Loitzenberg Aiser an der Donau Meierhof Hintberg Hst. Hart Donau Kirchberg Anzendorf Poneggen Judenleiten Klein- Weikerlsee Luftenberg Bhf. Bhf. un Frankenberg münchen 400 Schloss Nieder- Am Tra Wagning Aisting Dachsberg Hainbuchen Gh eue Bhf. Steining Abwinden Marbach -zirking Ku mat Au Golfplatz Lanzenberg Lager Ober- Althart Aisthofen 1b Hst. Traundorf Gusen Mauthausen Hst. Weinzierl heid Ufer N 3 Langenstein Brunngraben Neuhart Fürth Schloss Ausee Mauthausen erg 1 Posch Kraftwerk 3 Zeitling nb te Hst. Abwinden-Asten Heinrichs- Nd.- Bhf. il Raffel- sebern Ebelsberg ch Pichling stetten (265) Haid S Ruine Spielberg brunn Aist Radinfostellen Bhf.
    [Show full text]
  • Bezirk Amstetten
    Bei den folgenden öffentlichen allgemein bildenden Pflichtschulen handelt es sich um ganztägige Schulformen, die von der Bildungsdirektion für Niederösterreich bewilligt wurden. Ob im laufenden Schuljahr eine bzw. mehrere Gruppen in der Nachmittagsbetreuung tatsächlich geführt werden, ist bei der jeweiligen Schulleitung zu erfragen. Bezirk Amstetten VS Allhartsberg schulübergreifend mit NÖMS Allhartsberg VS Amstetten, Allersdorferstraße VS Amstetten, Elsa Brandström-Straße VS Amstetten, Hausmening VS Amstetten, Preinsbacherstraße VS Ardagger schulübergreifend mit NÖMS Ardagger VS Aschbach-Markt schulübergreifend mit NÖMS Aschbach-Markt VS Behamberg VS Biberbach VS Ernsthofen VS Euratsfeld schulübergreifend mit NÖMS Euratsfeld VS Haag VS Haidershofen VS Hollenstein an der Ybbs schulübergreifend mit NÖMS Hollenstein an der Ybbs VS Kematen an der Ybbs VS Neuhofen an der Ybbs schulübergreifend mit NÖMS Neuhofen an der Ybbs VS Neustadtl an der Donau VS Oed-Öhling, Oed VS Oed-Öhling, Öhling VS St. Georgen am Ybbsfelde VS St. Pantaleon-Erla VS St. Peter in der Au VS Seitenstetten VS Sonntagberg, Rosenau schulübergreifend mit NÖMS Sonntagberg, Rosenau VS Strengberg VS Viehdorf VS Wallsee-Sindelburg VS Weistrach VS Wolfsbach schulübergreifend mit NÖMS Wolfsbach VS Winklarn VS Zeillern NÖMS Amstetten, Hausmening NÖMS Amstetten, Mauer NÖMS Amstetten, Pestalozzistraße NÖMS St. Valentin, Langenhart NÖMS St. Valentin, Schubertviertel NÖMS Seitenstetten NÖMS Strengberg NÖMS Wallsee-Sindelburg ASO Haag schulübergreifend mit NÖMS Haag ASO St. Valentin
    [Show full text]
  • 2021.04.08 Updated List of RGLA Treated As
    EU regional governments and local authorities treated as exposures to central governments in accordance with Article 115(2) of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 Disclaimer: The below list was compiled using exclusively the information provided by relevant competent authorities on the regional governments and local authorities which they treat as exposures to their central governments in accordance with Article 115(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013’ Date of the last update of information in this Annex 08. Apr 21 Name of the counterparty Name of the counterparty Member State Type of counterparty1 Region / District (original language) (English) Austria Local authority Bezirk Lienz Abfaltersbach Austria Local authority Bezirk Innsbruck‐Land Absam Austria Local authority Bezirk Tulln Absdorf Austria Local authority Bezirk Hallein Abtenau Austria Local authority Bezirk Mödling Achau Austria Local authority Bezirk Schwaz Achenkirch Austria Local authority Bezirk Gänserndorf Aderklaa Austria Local authority Bezirk Steyr‐Land Adlwang Austria Local authority Bezirk Liezen Admont Austria Local authority Bezirk Hallein Adnet Austria Local authority Bezirk Bruck‐Mürzzuschlag Aflenz Austria Local authority Bezirk Villach Land Afritz am See Austria Local authority Bezirk Krems (Land) Aggsbach Austria Local authority Bezirk Liezen Aich Austria Local authority Bezirk Wels‐Land Aichkirchen Austria Local authority Bezirk Liezen Aigen im Ennstal Austria Local authority Bezirk Rohrbach Aigen‐Schlägl Austria Local authority Bezirk Lienz Ainet Austria Local authority
    [Show full text]
  • Erinnerungszeichen NÖ
    www.doew.at – Heinz Arnberger / Claudia Kuretsidis-Haider (Hg.): Gedenken und Mahnen in Niederösterreich. Erinnerungszeichen zu Widerstand, Verfolgung, Exil und Befreiung, mandelbaum verlag 2011 BEZIRK MELK » Bergern-Maierhöfen (Gemeinde Zelking-Matzleinsdorf) » Blindenmarkt » Emmersdorf an der Donau » Erlauf » Göttsbach (Gemeinde Ybbs an der Donau) » Hofamt Priel » Hürm » Kälberhart (Gemeinde Mank) » Mank » Melk » Petzenkirchen » Pöchlarn » Roggendorf (Gemeinde Schollach) » Ruprechtshofen » St. Leonhard am Forst » St. Oswald » Ybbs an der Donau www.doew.at – Heinz Arnberger / Claudia Kuretsidis-Haider (Hg.): Gedenken und Mahnen in Niederösterreich. www.doew.at – Heinz Arnberger / Claudia Kuretsidis-Haider (Hg.): Gedenken und Mahnen in Niederösterreich. Erinnerungszeichen zu Widerstand, Verfolgung, Exil und Befreiung, mandelbaum verlag 2011 Erinnerungszeichen zu Widerstand, Verfolgung, Exil und Befreiung, mandelbaum verlag 2011 318 Bezirk Melk 319 Bezirk Melk Bergern-Maierhöfen (Gemeinde Zelking-Matzleinsdorf) Bundesstraße 1 (Einmündungsbereich der Bundesstraße 215 in die Bundesstraße 1, am Stra- ßenrand) Flurdenkmal Inschrift: 19. Feb. 1945 Text auf einer der beiden am Flurdenk- mal angebrachten Inschrifttafeln: In Erinnerung an etwa 100 tote politische Gefangene, die durch einen Fliegerangriff der englischen Luftwaffe ums Leben gekommen sind. ÖKB Matzleinsdorf Stifter: Ludwig Pichler Das Denkmal wurde im Oktober 2001 errichtet. Flurdenkmal bei Bergern-Maierhöfen Foto: Heinz Arnberger Ein Transportkonvoi der SS mit slowakischen politischen Gefangenen wurde von ameri- kanischen Tieffliegern beschossen. Augenzeugen hielten sie – wie auf der Erinnerungstafel vermerkt – für britische Flugzeuge. Laut Begleitbroschüre zur ständigen Ausstellung in der Gedenkstätte des ehemaligen KZ Melk kamen dabei am 19. Februar 1945 mindestens 20 slowakische KZ-Häftlinge ums Le- ben. Siehe dazu: Melk, Schießstattweg, KZ-Gedenkstätte, Denkmal für die slowakischen Opfer. www.doew.at – Heinz Arnberger / Claudia Kuretsidis-Haider (Hg.): Gedenken und Mahnen in Niederösterreich.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap Towards the DBS Gateway Region
    Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Roadmap towards the DBS Gateway Region Final Report Vienna, October 2018 WP4 – Regional Action Plan Document Control Sheet Project DBS Gateway Region – regional and Transport Development in the Danube-Black Sea Region towards a Transnational Multiport Gateway Region Code DTP1-050-3.1 Funds ERDF, IPA Document Title Final Report Step II Roadmap + Regional Action Plans Nature Report, Output O4.1 Available Languages English Version 1 Date October 2018 Number of Pages 190 Authors Christina Narval Contributors All partners of the project Checked by LP Approved by SCOM Content 2 WP4 – Regional Action Plan CONTENT 1 Importance of Action – Why a Roadmap? ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Danube-Black Sea (DBS) Gateway Region ......................................................................................... 6 1.3 Objectives – Roadmap supporting the Joint Vision 2040 .................................................................. 7 2 Roadmap within the project “DBS Gateway Region” ................................................................................ 9 2.1 Structure of the project ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Position of the Roadmap within the project ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KIG 2020 GKZ Gemeinde ZZ in Euro 30.101 Krems an Der Donau 2.893
    KIG 2020 GKZ Gemeinde ZZ in Euro 30.101 Krems an der Donau 2.893.896,56 30.201 St. Pölten 6.954.506,83 30.301 Waidhofen an der Ybbs 1.314.634,57 30.401 Wiener Neustadt 5.277.014,26 30.501 Allhartsberg 224.660,16 30.502 Amstetten 2.762.048,74 30.503 Ardagger 372.057,35 30.504 Aschbach-Markt 399.419,13 30.506 Behamberg 358.428,87 30.507 Biberbach 235.458,10 30.508 Ennsdorf 315.446,76 30.509 Ernsthofen 234.619,43 30.510 Ertl 132.091,37 30.511 Euratsfeld 279.593,39 30.512 Ferschnitz 187.548,77 30.514 Haag 583.718,04 30.515 Haidershofen 386.734,17 30.516 Hollenstein an der Ybbs 178.008,84 30.517 Kematen an der Ybbs 275.295,18 30.520 Neuhofen an der Ybbs 311.987,23 30.521 Neustadtl an der Donau 222.982,81 30.522 Oed-Oehling 202.015,92 30.524 Opponitz 95.189,65 30.526 St. Georgen am Reith 57.763,76 30.527 St. Georgen am Ybbsfelde 301.608,62 30.529 St. Pantaleon-Erla 273.408,16 30.530 St. Peter in der Au 544.614,80 30.531 St. Valentin 979.762,99 30.532 Seitenstetten 363.041,59 30.533 Sonntagberg 403.717,34 30.534 Strengberg 218.160,42 30.536 Viehdorf 142.469,97 30.538 Wallsee-Sindelburg 228.119,69 30.539 Weistrach 231.369,56 30.541 Winklarn 178.428,18 30.542 Wolfsbach 211.660,69 30.543 Ybbsitz 358.638,54 30.544 Zeillern 198.556,39 30.601 Alland 267.327,76 30.602 Altenmarkt an der Triesting 219.732,94 30.603 Bad Vöslau 1.283.991,72 30.604 Baden 3.027.491,48 30.605 Berndorf 952.239,63 30.607 Ebreichsdorf 1.176.664,11 30.608 Enzesfeld-Lindabrunn 437.054,69 30.609 Furth an der Triesting 91.101,11 30.612 Günselsdorf 180.524,87 30.613 Heiligenkreuz
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Calculation and Operations Research in Terms of LNG Carriage by Water Transport: a Case Study of the Port of Bratislava
    sustainability Article Economic Calculation and Operations Research in Terms of LNG Carriage by Water Transport: A Case Study of the Port of Bratislava Martin Jurkoviˇc 1,* , Tomáš Kalina 1, Ondrej Stopka 2 , Piotr Gorzelanczyk 3 and Borna Abramovi´c 4 1 Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Žilina, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Technology, Institute of Technology and Business in Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice, 370 01 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice,Czech Republic; [email protected] 3 Department of Transport, Stanislaw Staszic University of Applied Sciences in Piła, 64-920 Piła, Poland; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +421-41-513-3554 Abstract: The presented manuscript discusses a specific research study examining several variants of liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriage from chosen seaports to the port of Bratislava using the Danube waterway, assessing them using chosen multi-criteria analysis techniques. Two ports in Turkey and one port in Georgia are deemed export terminals. A total of twelve variants are compared, whereby the comparison is carried out based on multiple evaluation criteria defined by a panel of experts who laid particular stress on their importance. An economic calculation is performed in the first phase to assess LNG carriage in all the variants. This represents the very foundation for the multi-criteria Citation: Jurkoviˇc,M.; Kalina, T.; evaluation, which is conducted using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and the Technique Stopka, O.; Gorzelanczyk, P.; for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS).
    [Show full text]
  • Ketelec Final Statement
    EXPRESSWAY R7, BRATISLAVA KETELEC – BRATISLAVA PRIEVOZ F I N A L O P I N I O N (Number: 2303/13 - 3.4/ml) issued by the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic under Act No. 24/2006 Coll. on the Environmental Impact Assessment amending and supplementing other acts as amended I. BASIC DATA ON THE PROPOSER 1. Name Národná diaľničná spoločnosť, a.s. 2. Identification number 35 919 001 3. Registered Office Mlynské Nivy 45, 821 09 Bratislava II. BASIC DATA ON THE PROPOSED WORKS 1. Name "Expressway R7, Bratislava Ketelec – Bratislava Prievoz" 2. Purpose The purpose of constructing R7 in section Bratislava Ketelec – Bratislava Prievoz is to connect the highway D4 under preparation in section Bratislava, Jarovce – Ivanka pri Dunaji, north, up to the existing Prievoz interchange on highway D1 ensuring fluent and safe operation, which in terms of capacity will satisfy the requirements of traffic flow that will be efficient in terms of transport, operation and technologies, and which will be feasible and acceptable from viewpoint of the investments, impacts on the residents and environment as well as from the viewpoint of planned development of the affected municipalities of the Capital City of the Slovak Republic Bratislava. 3. User User : general public Administrator: Národná diaľničná spoločnosť, a.s. 4. Place of construction Location of the relevant territory according to the territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic: Upper-tier regional unit: Bratislava region, District: Bratislava II, City: Bratislava, Municipality: Bratislava – Ružinov, Bratislava – Podunajské Biskupice Cadastral territory: Ružinov, Nivy, Podunajské Biskupice. 5. Date of commencement and termination Anticipated date the construction will commence: 2016 Anticipated date the construction will be terminated: 2018 Termination of operation: no time limit 1 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Schatzkarte Nibelungengau
    Schatzkarte Nibelungengau www.nibelungengau.at Basilika Maria Taferl www.mariataferl.at Willkommen im Nibelungengau Der Nibelungengau bringt dich in Schwung – „Lebensgefühl Donau“ Bevor die Donau in Niederösterreich das welt- Vom bekannten Wallfahrtsort Maria Taferl über bekannte Tal der Wachau durchfließt, durchquert das beliebte Schloss Artstetten bis zum ältesten sie zwischen Ybbs und Melk ein weites, sonnen- Donaukraftwerk Österreichs in Ybbs-Persenbeug, durchflutetes Tal: den Nibelungengau. gibt es entlang der Donau einige Highlights zu sehen. Oder sie wandern auf den Spuren der Diese Region wurde nach dem Volk der deut- Nibelungen durch die Altstadt Pöchlarns, erkun- schen Nibelungensage benannt, welches der den bei einem gemütlichen Stadtspaziergang die Erzählung nach beim Markgrafen Rüdiger von historische Altstadt von Ybbs und besuchen dort Bechelaren (dem heutigen Pöchlarn), einem Va- das neue Fahrradmuseum „FAMUS“. sallen-Fürsten des Hunnenkönigs Attila, einkehr- te und seine letzten fröhlichen Stunden feierte. Das Oskar Kokoschka Zentrum in Pöchlarn lockt Relaxen am Fluss ebenso zu einem Besuch wie das zeithistorisch in- Weitwanderweg Nibelungengau Der Nibelungengau hat viel zu erzählen und ist teressante Museum ERLAUF ERINNERT, welches ein spannendes Ausflugsziel für Entdecker, Ruhe- an das Ende des 2. Weltkrieges erinnert. suchende und Familien. Schloss Artstetten www.schloss-artstetten.at Wandern am Fluss Nibelungendenkmal in Pöchlarn 2 Kulinarisch verwöhnen lassen oder entspannt pausieren können sie dabei in allen 10 Orten/Gemeinden. Vom traditionellen Kulinarisch pausieren Wirtshaus oder Café im Nibelungengau Entspannt Rasten an der Donau bis zum exquisiten Unterwegs Hauben-Restaurant am Donauradweg ist alles dabei. z.B. direkt an der Donau in Ybbs finden sie zum „Chillen“ die Donau Lodge oder Unterwegs am Donauradweg in Marbach die Strandkörbe am Donausteg der Der Donauradweg zählt zu den bekanntesten Konditorei von Barbara Braun.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Node of Bratislava in Relationship with Pan-European Multimodal Corridors Marcel HORŇÁK, Zuzana KOVÁČIKOVÁ
    Transport Node of Bratislava in Relationship with Pan-European Multimodal Corridors Marcel HORŇÁK, Zuzana KOVÁČIKOVÁ Abstract Bratislava as a capital of the Slovak Republic plays a special role in transport network of Slovakia. This peculiarity is a consequence of several geographical circumstances: eccentric and border position in the state, closeness of Vienna, natural conditions as well as intraurban and spatial structure of the city and its specific development. In 1990s, Bratislava became a point of intersection of three pan- European transport corridors which has brought a new impulses to the city. Key words: pan-European transport corridor, transport node Introduction Change of political and economic orientation of central and eastern Europe countries brought a demand to extend and link the transport network working in west Europe towards these countries, with an aim to create a pan-European transport network. Four of the ten pan-European multimodal corridors defined in Crete and Helsinki in 1994 and 1997 for the territory of central and eastern Europe cross the area of the Slovak Republic. Bratislava is an intersection point of three of these multimodal corridors (see Fig. 1): ¾ Corridor IV connecting Berlin/Nürnberg – Prague – Budapest – Constanta – Thessaloniki – Istanbul, ¾ Corridor VA connecting Bratislava – Žilina – Košice – Uzhorod - Lviv, ¾ Corridor VII – the Danube. Defining the multimodal corridors means a concentration of investments into trasport infrastructure aimed to construction of an efficient trans-European network being able to increase opportunities to cross borders and develop economies. The corridors are also a direct contribution to the pan-European integration and give a new start to the development of the central and eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Danube Navigation Imprint
    Manual on Danube Navigation Imprint Published by: via donau – Österreichische Wasserstraßen-Gesellschaft mbH Donau-City-Straße 1, 1220 Vienna [email protected] www.via-donau.org Responsibility for content: Hans-Peter Hasenbichler Project management: Martin Paschinger Editing: Thomas Hartl, Vera Hofbauer Technical contributions: Maja Dolinsek, Simon Hartl, Thomas Hartl, Brigitte Hintergräber, Vera Hofbauer, Martin Hrusovsky, Gudrun Maierbrugger, Bettina Matzner, Lisa-Maria Putz, Mario Sattler, Juha Schweighofer, Lukas Seemann, Markus Simoner, Dagmar Slavicek Sponsoring: Hedwig Döllinger, Hélène Gilkarov Layout: Bernd Weißmann Print: Grasl Druck & Neue Medien GmbH Vienna, January 2013 ISBN 3-00-009626-4 © via donau 2013 Klimaneutrale Produktion Erneuerbare Energie Nachhaltiges Papier Pflanzenölfarben The Manual on Danube Navigation is a project of the National Action Plan Danube Navigation. Preface Providing knowledge for better utilising the Danube’s potential In connection with the Rhine, the Danube is more and more developing into a main European traffic axis which ranges from the North Sea to the Black Sea at a distance of 3,500 kilometres, thereby directly connecting 15 countries via waterway. Some of the Danube riparian states show the highest economic growth rates amongst the states of Europe. Such an increase in trade entails an enormous growth of traffic in the Danube corridor and requires reliable and efficient transport routes. The European Commission has recognised that the Danube waterway may serve as the backbone of this dynamically growing region and it has included the Danube as a Priority Project in the Trans-European Transport Network Siim Kallas (TEN-T) to ensure better transport connections and economic growth. Vice-President of the European Prerequisite for the utilisation of the undisputed potentials of inland naviga- Commission, Commissioner for tion is the removal of existing infrastructure bottlenecks and weak spots in the Transport European waterway network.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Barge
    ENERGY BARGE Building a Green Energy and Logistics Belt Project Code: DTP1-175-3.2 Deliverable 5.1.3 Slovak shipping and ports JSC - Pre-feasibility pilot study June 2018 Project co-funded by European Union funds (ERDF) For the implementation of the project “ENERGY BARGE – Building a Green Energy and Logistics Belt” a subsidy is awarded from the European Regional Development Fund under the Danube Transnational Programme. The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Regional Development Fund is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Project co-funded by European Union funds (ERDF) 1 I. About the ENERGY BARGE project The Danube region offers a great potential for green energy in the form of biomass. The main objective of ENERGY BARGE is to exploit this potential in a sustainable way, considering the Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC, thereby increasing energy security and efficiency in the Danube countries. The project brings together key actors along the entire value chain, biomass companies and Danube ports as well as relevant public authorities and policy stakeholders. The project maps value chains and facilitates the market uptake of biomass, supports better connected transport systems for green logistics and provides practical solutions and policy guidelines. The Agency for Renewable Resources (FNR) coordinates the ENERGY BARGE project consortium with fourteen partners from Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Slovakia and Romania. Project co-funded
    [Show full text]