DOCSLIB.ORG

Good Practices Reports for Port Master Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Good Practices Reports for Port Master Planning Danube Port Development Strategy & Network D.5.1.2: Good practices for Port Master Formation Planning Work Package 5 Activity 5.1 PP Responsible: iC Date: 15/06/2018 Version 3.0 (FINAL) Project co-funded by European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) 1 Document History Version Date Authorised Version 0.1 10/01/2018 iC Version 2.0 07/06/2018 iC Version 3.0 15/06/2018 iC Contributing Authors Name Organisation Email Saša Jovanović iC [email protected] Monica Patrichi MT [email protected] Andra Opreanu MPAC aopreanu@constantza- port.ro Luminita Meterna APDM [email protected] Stoyan Hristov BPICO [email protected] Tomáš Červeňák VPAS [email protected] Srđa Lješević PGA [email protected] Werner Auer EHOO [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Table of Figures .......................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Tables............................................................................................................................ 5 Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Objectives of the activity 5.1 ...........................................................................................9 2 Scope of the report.......................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Legal basis for port master planning in the Danube region ...........................................11 2.2 Best practices for port master planning.........................................................................11 2.3 Guidelines and recommendations for port master planning ..........................................11 3 Characteristics of port master planning ........................................................................ 12 3.1 Rationale behind port master planning..........................................................................12 3.2 Planning levels and objectives of port master plans......................................................13 4 Austria .............................................................................................................................. 18 4.1 Legislative and regulatory basis for port master planning..............................................18 4.2 Practice beyond legislation and regulation....................................................................21 5 Slovakia............................................................................................................................ 25 5.1 Legislative and regulatory basis for port master planning..............................................25 5.2 Practice beyond legislation and regulation....................................................................29 6 Serbia................................................................................................................................ 31 6.1 Legislative and regulatory basis for port master planning..............................................31 6.2 Practice beyond legislation and regulation....................................................................34 7 Romania ........................................................................................................................... 36 7.1 Legislative and regulatory basis for port master planning..............................................36 7.2 Practice beyond legislation and regulation....................................................................37 8 Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................ 40 8.1 Legislative and regulatory basis for port master planning..............................................40 8.2 Practice beyond legislation and regulation....................................................................44 9 Best practices in port master planning .......................................................................... 48 9.1 Austria –Ennshafen Port ...............................................................................................49 9.2 Slovakia – Port of Bratislava .........................................................................................54 9.3 Romania – Port of Constanta........................................................................................58 10 Recommendations for high quality port master plans.................................................. 63 10.1 Current situation analysis..............................................................................................65 10.1.1 Land use analysis .........................................................................................................65 10.1.2 Existing hinterland connections.....................................................................................66 3 10.1.3 Inventory and assessment of capacity and degree of utilization of existing facilities .....68 10.1.4 Institutional framework and master plan related rules and regulations ..........................69 10.1.5 Assessment of existing infrastructure and port operation services ................................70 10.1.6 Safety and control of navigation....................................................................................72 10.1.7 Manpower planning ......................................................................................................73 10.1.8 Current navigation conditions........................................................................................73 10.1.9 Analysis of previous studies and other planning and design documents .......................73 10.1.10 Findings about objects of cultural and historical heritage...........................................73 10.2 Demand analysis and traffic forecasts ..........................................................................74 10.2.1 Market study .................................................................................................................74 10.2.2 Traffic forecasts ............................................................................................................74 10.2.3 Foreseen modal split.....................................................................................................75 10.2.4 Characteristics of vessels .............................................................................................76 10.2.5 Competition analysis.....................................................................................................76 10.3 Engineering aspects .....................................................................................................77 10.3.1 Berth capacity planning.................................................................................................77 10.3.2 Land side capacity planning..........................................................................................81 10.3.3 Hydraulic modelling ......................................................................................................81 10.3.4 Geotechnical study .......................................................................................................81 10.3.5 Seismic characteristics .................................................................................................82 10.3.6 Topography and bathymetry .........................................................................................82 10.3.7 Meteorological and hydrological conditions...................................................................83 10.3.8 Material supply..............................................................................................................85 10.3.9 Dredging and reclamation.............................................................................................85 10.3.10 Options for quay wall construction.............................................................................86 10.3.11 Land survey study and expropriation study ...............................................................86 10.3.12 Layout planning.........................................................................................................87 10.3.13 Access for different types of terminals.......................................................................88 10.3.14 Possibility of land extension ......................................................................................88 10.3.15 Utilities ......................................................................................................................88 10.3.16 Maintenance..............................................................................................................89 10.3.17 Safety, security and border control ............................................................................89 10.3.18 Terminal planning......................................................................................................90 10.3.19 Phasing of the development ......................................................................................92 10.4 Financial and socio-economic analysis .........................................................................92 10.4.1 Funding options analysis ..............................................................................................93 10.4.2 Financial analysis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roadmap Towards the DBS Gateway Region
    Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Roadmap towards the DBS Gateway Region Final Report Vienna, October 2018 WP4 – Regional Action Plan Document Control Sheet Project DBS Gateway Region – regional and Transport Development in the Danube-Black Sea Region towards a Transnational Multiport Gateway Region Code DTP1-050-3.1 Funds ERDF, IPA Document Title Final Report Step II Roadmap + Regional Action Plans Nature Report, Output O4.1 Available Languages English Version 1 Date October 2018 Number of Pages 190 Authors Christina Narval Contributors All partners of the project Checked by LP Approved by SCOM Content 2 WP4 – Regional Action Plan CONTENT 1 Importance of Action – Why a Roadmap? ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Danube-Black Sea (DBS) Gateway Region ......................................................................................... 6 1.3 Objectives – Roadmap supporting the Joint Vision 2040 .................................................................. 7 2 Roadmap within the project “DBS Gateway Region” ................................................................................ 9 2.1 Structure of the project ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Position of the Roadmap within the project ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Calculation and Operations Research in Terms of LNG Carriage by Water Transport: a Case Study of the Port of Bratislava
    sustainability Article Economic Calculation and Operations Research in Terms of LNG Carriage by Water Transport: A Case Study of the Port of Bratislava Martin Jurkoviˇc 1,* , Tomáš Kalina 1, Ondrej Stopka 2 , Piotr Gorzelanczyk 3 and Borna Abramovi´c 4 1 Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Žilina, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Technology, Institute of Technology and Business in Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice, 370 01 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice,Czech Republic; [email protected] 3 Department of Transport, Stanislaw Staszic University of Applied Sciences in Piła, 64-920 Piła, Poland; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +421-41-513-3554 Abstract: The presented manuscript discusses a specific research study examining several variants of liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriage from chosen seaports to the port of Bratislava using the Danube waterway, assessing them using chosen multi-criteria analysis techniques. Two ports in Turkey and one port in Georgia are deemed export terminals. A total of twelve variants are compared, whereby the comparison is carried out based on multiple evaluation criteria defined by a panel of experts who laid particular stress on their importance. An economic calculation is performed in the first phase to assess LNG carriage in all the variants. This represents the very foundation for the multi-criteria Citation: Jurkoviˇc,M.; Kalina, T.; evaluation, which is conducted using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and the Technique Stopka, O.; Gorzelanczyk, P.; for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS).
    [Show full text]
  • Ketelec Final Statement
    EXPRESSWAY R7, BRATISLAVA KETELEC – BRATISLAVA PRIEVOZ F I N A L O P I N I O N (Number: 2303/13 - 3.4/ml) issued by the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic under Act No. 24/2006 Coll. on the Environmental Impact Assessment amending and supplementing other acts as amended I. BASIC DATA ON THE PROPOSER 1. Name Národná diaľničná spoločnosť, a.s. 2. Identification number 35 919 001 3. Registered Office Mlynské Nivy 45, 821 09 Bratislava II. BASIC DATA ON THE PROPOSED WORKS 1. Name "Expressway R7, Bratislava Ketelec – Bratislava Prievoz" 2. Purpose The purpose of constructing R7 in section Bratislava Ketelec – Bratislava Prievoz is to connect the highway D4 under preparation in section Bratislava, Jarovce – Ivanka pri Dunaji, north, up to the existing Prievoz interchange on highway D1 ensuring fluent and safe operation, which in terms of capacity will satisfy the requirements of traffic flow that will be efficient in terms of transport, operation and technologies, and which will be feasible and acceptable from viewpoint of the investments, impacts on the residents and environment as well as from the viewpoint of planned development of the affected municipalities of the Capital City of the Slovak Republic Bratislava. 3. User User : general public Administrator: Národná diaľničná spoločnosť, a.s. 4. Place of construction Location of the relevant territory according to the territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic: Upper-tier regional unit: Bratislava region, District: Bratislava II, City: Bratislava, Municipality: Bratislava – Ružinov, Bratislava – Podunajské Biskupice Cadastral territory: Ružinov, Nivy, Podunajské Biskupice. 5. Date of commencement and termination Anticipated date the construction will commence: 2016 Anticipated date the construction will be terminated: 2018 Termination of operation: no time limit 1 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Node of Bratislava in Relationship with Pan-European Multimodal Corridors Marcel HORŇÁK, Zuzana KOVÁČIKOVÁ
    Transport Node of Bratislava in Relationship with Pan-European Multimodal Corridors Marcel HORŇÁK, Zuzana KOVÁČIKOVÁ Abstract Bratislava as a capital of the Slovak Republic plays a special role in transport network of Slovakia. This peculiarity is a consequence of several geographical circumstances: eccentric and border position in the state, closeness of Vienna, natural conditions as well as intraurban and spatial structure of the city and its specific development. In 1990s, Bratislava became a point of intersection of three pan- European transport corridors which has brought a new impulses to the city. Key words: pan-European transport corridor, transport node Introduction Change of political and economic orientation of central and eastern Europe countries brought a demand to extend and link the transport network working in west Europe towards these countries, with an aim to create a pan-European transport network. Four of the ten pan-European multimodal corridors defined in Crete and Helsinki in 1994 and 1997 for the territory of central and eastern Europe cross the area of the Slovak Republic. Bratislava is an intersection point of three of these multimodal corridors (see Fig. 1): ¾ Corridor IV connecting Berlin/Nürnberg – Prague – Budapest – Constanta – Thessaloniki – Istanbul, ¾ Corridor VA connecting Bratislava – Žilina – Košice – Uzhorod - Lviv, ¾ Corridor VII – the Danube. Defining the multimodal corridors means a concentration of investments into trasport infrastructure aimed to construction of an efficient trans-European network being able to increase opportunities to cross borders and develop economies. The corridors are also a direct contribution to the pan-European integration and give a new start to the development of the central and eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Barge
    ENERGY BARGE Building a Green Energy and Logistics Belt Project Code: DTP1-175-3.2 Deliverable 5.1.3 Slovak shipping and ports JSC - Pre-feasibility pilot study June 2018 Project co-funded by European Union funds (ERDF) For the implementation of the project “ENERGY BARGE – Building a Green Energy and Logistics Belt” a subsidy is awarded from the European Regional Development Fund under the Danube Transnational Programme. The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Regional Development Fund is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Project co-funded by European Union funds (ERDF) 1 I. About the ENERGY BARGE project The Danube region offers a great potential for green energy in the form of biomass. The main objective of ENERGY BARGE is to exploit this potential in a sustainable way, considering the Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC, thereby increasing energy security and efficiency in the Danube countries. The project brings together key actors along the entire value chain, biomass companies and Danube ports as well as relevant public authorities and policy stakeholders. The project maps value chains and facilitates the market uptake of biomass, supports better connected transport systems for green logistics and provides practical solutions and policy guidelines. The Agency for Renewable Resources (FNR) coordinates the ENERGY BARGE project consortium with fourteen partners from Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Slovakia and Romania. Project co-funded
    [Show full text]
  • Market Observation for Danube Navigation Results in 2017
    MARKET OBSERVATION FOR DANUBE NAVIGATION RESULTS IN 2017 Budapest 2018 European Commission Danube Commission MARKET OBSERVATION FOR DANUBE NAVIGATION RESULTS IN 2017 Budapest 2018 This project has received funding from the European Union’s CEF under Grant Agreement No. MOVE/B4/SUB/2015-426/CEF/PSA/SI2.719921. Danube Commission, Budapest Pyotr Semyonovich Suvorov – responsible for compilation and publication Olga Rotaru – responsible for editing 3 Table of contents Chapter 1 Overview of the Danube navigation market ..................................... 5 1.1 Overview of transport demand on the Danube ............................ 5 1.2 Overview of transport supply on the Danube .............................. 7 1.3 Danube transport market trends in 2017 ...................................... 9 Chapter 2 Market observation for Danube navigation: Ship traffic and cargo transport .................................................................................. 11 2.1 Navigation conditions on the Danube in 2017 ........................... 11 2.1.1 Navigation conditions in the first half of 2017 ................. 11 2.1.2 Navigation conditions in the second half of 2017 ............ 13 2.1.3 Conclusions ....................................................................... 14 2.2 Observation of ship traffic and cargo transport ......................... 15 2.2.1 Passenger shipping ............................................................ 15 2.2.2 Cargo transport .................................................................. 17 2.2.3 Inter-basin
    [Show full text]
  • Key Data on Danube Navigation 2008
    ECKEYK DADATENTA ON DON DAANUBEUSCH IFFFNavAHRIGATIONT 2007 2008 ChangesVeränderungen over 2007 gegenüber are given 2006 as findenpercentages sich als in bracketsProzentwerte in Klammern TRANSPORTA VUFKOOLUMMME EN 11.212,1 Mio.million t (+11,6%) tons (-7.4%) Import:Import: 5.7 million6,3 Mio. tons t (+30,1%) (-8.5%) Export:Export: 2.2 million1,5 Mio. tons t (+7,4%) (+40.0%) Transit:Transit: 2.8 million3,3 Mio. tons t (-3,8%) (-15.5%) Domestic:Inland: 0.5 1,0 million Mio. t (-14,5%)tons (-48.3%) TRANSPORTLEIT PESRTUNFORMAG NCE 12,511.8 Mrd.billion tkm tkm (+6,5%) (-6.3%) WithinInnerhalb Austria: des2.4 Bundesgebietes: billion tkm (-9.2%) 2,6 Mrd. tkm (+7,3%) DANUBE NAVIGATION IN AUSTRIA 12.34111,741 beladene loaded journeys Fahrten (-4.9%) (+7,5%) OutsideAußerhalb Austria: des 9.4 Bundesgebietes: billion tkm (-5.5%) 9,9 Mrd. tkm (+6,3%) WASSATERE RSTRAEITINSHGEIPR MUMSCHENT ATL AGAU SÖSTRTEIARRN POEICHRTISSCH ANEDR T DONRANSHAUIPHÄFENMENT UN SITED -LÄNS DEN 8.9 million tons (-6.4%) Ores and metal waste: 3.3 million tons (-4.9%) 9,5 Mio. t* (+17,6%) Erze und Metallabfälle: 3,4 Mio. t (+36,1%) Petroleum products: 2.3 million tons (-14.3%) *exklusive Schotter aus Instandhaltungs- Erdöl- und Mineralölerzeugnisse: 2,7 Mio. t (+28,7%) Metal products: 1.0 million tons (+37.0%) und Renaturierungsbaggerungen Steine, Erden und Baustoffe: 0,8 Mio. t (+8,5%) Fertilisers: 0.8 million tons (+14.4%) Eisen und Stahl: 0,7 Mio. t (+7,8%) Stones, earths and building materials: 0.5 million tons (-37.4%) Düngemittel: 0,7 Mio.
    [Show full text]
  • Container Market Report
    Container Market Report D.5.4.3 Work Package: 5 Activity: 5.4 EHOO Date: 2018/10/17 Version 1.2 (FINAL REPORT) Project co-funded by European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) 2 Document History Version Date Authorised Draft V0.1 23/03/2018 EHOO Draft V1.1 28/09/2018 EHOO Final V1.2 17/10/2018 EHOO Contributing Authors Name Organisation Email Werner Auer EHOO [email protected] Karin Kainzinger EHOO [email protected] Melanie Ebner EHOO [email protected] Robert Wanger EHOO [email protected] Herfried Leitner TTS GmbH [email protected] Marian Timler Port of Vienna [email protected] Otto Hawlicek Container Terminal Enns GmbH [email protected] Jürgen Schrampf ECONSULT GmbH [email protected] Paul Weiss ECONSULT GmbH [email protected] Martin Golias VP, a.s. [email protected] Silvena Krumova – Port complex Ruse [email protected] Todorova Slaveyko Vasilev Bulgarian River Shipping JSCo [email protected] Aneliya Petkova BPICo [email protected] Laura Niculae Port of Constanta [email protected] Silviu Meterna PDR [email protected] Andreea Stavarache APDM [email protected] Thury Mónika HFIP [email protected] Srdja Ljesevic PGA [email protected] Iva Horvat PAV [email protected] Container Market Report Project co-funded by European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) 3 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ______________________________________________________________________________________ 6 2. Introduction ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 3. Container market in the Danube region______________________________________________________________ 9 4. Market Research _______________________________________________________________________________________ 12 4.1. Freight traffic on the Danube ________________________________________________________________________12 4.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Market Transfer Conditions Market Analysis Danube Corridor
    PLATFORM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAIADES II WP 1: Markets & Awareness D 1.7: Report on market transfer conditions Market Analysis Danube Corridor Grant Agreement: MOVE/FP7/321498/PLATINA II (Sub)Work Package: WP 1: Markets and Awareness Deliverable No: Midterm Report for D 1.7 Author: via donau Version (date): 18.11.2014 - 1 - PLATFORM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAIADES II Authors of the document Responsible organisation Principal author VIA Milica Gvozdic Contributing organisation(s) Contributing author(s) VIA Simon Hartl, Ulf Meinel CRUP Renata Kadric DISCLAIMER PLATINA II is funded by the Directorate General on Mobility and Transport of the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. The views expressed in the working papers, deliverables and reports are those of the project consortium partners. These views have not been adopted or approved by the Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission's or its services' views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in the working papers and reports, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. - 2 - PLATFORM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAIADES II Users and readers of the study are very welcome to share feedback, suggestions and experiences regarding inland waterway transports and potential of modal shift towards inland navigation in the Danube Corridor! Important note: This study evaluates data on production and trade volumes of all Danube riparian countries. It includes data based on a national scope. In other words, the market analysis for e.g. Germany, contains data for the whole country and not only for the German Danube Corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • „Dunajská Os – Prípadová Štúdia Prístavných Miest Bratislava, Komárno a Štúrovo“
    „DUNAJSKÁ OS – PRÍPADOVÁ ŠTÚDIA PRÍSTAVNÝCH MIEST BRATISLAVA, KOMÁRNO A ŠTÚROVO“ Bratislava, september 2013 GOV/TDPC/URB(2013)6 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 RECOMMENDATIONS: 8 1. INLAND WATER TRANSPORT ALONG THE DANUBE AXIS 10 2. PORT PERFORMANCE 44 2.1 Port characteristics 44 2.2 Port performance 50 2.3 Determinants of port performance 54 Synergies between ports 58 3. PORT IMPACT 62 3.1 Economic impact 62 3.2. Port-city interface 72 3.3 Environmental impact 76 4. POLICIES 78 4.1 Stimulating inland water transport 78 NOTES 96 BIBLIOGRAPHY 98 ANNEX 100 Tables Table 1.1. Expected modal share development of European IWT corridors in 2020, 2040 16 Table 1.2. Destinations of inland water transport cargo flows loaded in the Slovak Republic, reported by importing country, 2011 28 Table 1.3. Type of goods per country of destination for Slovakian exports by IWT 2011 30 Table 1.4. Slovakian rail cargo flows by country of destination and origin in 2011 34 Table 1.5 . Forecast of commodities shipped across Danube axis per NSTR type, in ton-km 36 Table 1.6. Overview of train connections along the Danube axis including comparison with inland navigation. 36 Table 1.7. Constraints and opportunities to use inland water transport indicated by interviewed companies 40 Table 2.1. Containers handled by IWT and land modes between 2007-2010 48 Table 2.2. General port characteristics 50 Table 2.3. Port facilities 50 Table 2.4. Cargo handling statistic according NST 2007 classifications in 2011 (tonnes) 52 Table 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomarbeit Diplom-Ingenieurs
    Diplomarbeit Regional divergence regarding transport flows especially within the Danube region ausgeführt zum Zwecke der Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Diplom-Ingenieurs unter der Leitung von Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dipl. Wirt.-Ing. Prof. eh. Dr. h.c. Wilfried Sihn (E330 Institut für Managementwissenschaften, Bereich: Betriebstechnik und Systemplanung) Univ.Ass. Mag. Dr. Sandra Stein (E330 Institut für Managementwissenschaften, Bereich: Betriebstechnik und Systemplanung, Fraunhofer Austria Research GmbH) eingereicht an der Technischen Universität Wien Fakultät für Maschinenwesen und Betriebswissenschaften von Elena Campdelacreu Ortega 1327752 (066 482) Kandlgasse 30 1070 Wien Vienna, 10th July 2014 _________________________ Elena Campdelacreu Ortega Ich habe zur Kenntnis genommen, dass ich zur Drucklegung meiner Arbeit unter der Bezeichnung Diplomarbeit nur mit Bewilligung der Prüfungskommission berechtigt bin. Ich erkläre weiters Eides statt, dass ich meine Diplomarbeit nach den anerkannten Grundsätzen für wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen selbstständig ausgeführt habe und alle verwendeten Hilfsmittel, insbesondere die zugrunde gelegte Literatur, genannt habe. Weiters erkläre ich, dass ich dieses Diplomarbeitsthema bisher weder im In- noch Ausland (einer Beurteilerin/einem Beurteiler zur Begutachtung) in irgendeiner Form als Prüfungsarbeit vorgelegt habe und dass diese Arbeit mit der vom Begutachter beurteilten Arbeit übereinstimmt. Vienna, 10th July 2014 _________________________ Elena Campdelacreu Ortega I Acknowledgment I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Sandra Stein for her comments, remarks and corrections and for giving me the possibility to take part of the project. Also to Tanja Nemeth for her help and for introducing me to the project. Finally I thank my family and the people I met in Vienna, who have supported me throughout the entire process and have encouraged me when needed.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    Slovak Shipping and Ports JSC Shipping company Address: Horárska 12 81524 Bratislava Slovakia Phone: +421 2 58271 1110 E-Mail: [email protected] www.spap.sk Spoken languages: English German Russian Other Languages: Slovak, Czech Managing Director: Mr. Jaroslav Michalco Phone: +421 / 2 / 58 27 1110 Download vCard Sales contact: Mr. Stanislav Blaško Phone: +421 / 2 / 58 271 4 21 E-Mail: [email protected] Download vCard Transported Cargo: Dry bulk Liquid bulk Break bulk High & heavy cargo Container RoRo cargo Petroleum products refined Crude oil Agricultural cargo Additional Cargo: In the port of Bratislava there is a special area and crane for oversized and overdimensional cargo (up to 560t). Special warehouse dedicated for steel products (26.000 sqm, barge/truck/train), RoRo ramp. Dangerous goods: Dry bulk Liquid bulk Services: Organisation of pre- and posthaulage Storage Organisation of transhipment Port Service Freight forwarding Bunkering service Customs clearance Consulting Additional Services: Shipyard Areas of Operation: Germany Austria Slovakia Hungary Croatia Serbia Romania Bulgaria Moldova Ukraine Regularly served Ports: Germany Passau Regensburg Kelheim Straubing Deggendorf Austria Aschach Enns / Ennsdorf Ybbs Pöchlarn Pischelsdorf Linz Krems Korneuburg Vienna Slovakia Sturovo Bratislava Komari Hungary Baja Paks Komarom Dunaföldvar Bogyiszlo Györ-Gönyü Budapest Szazhalombatta Dunaujvaros Dunavecse Mohacs Croatia Osijek Vukovar Serbia Belgrad Bogojevo Beocin Smederevo
    [Show full text]