DOCSLIB.ORG

Roadmap Towards the DBS Gateway Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roadmap Towards the DBS Gateway Region Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Roadmap towards the DBS Gateway Region Final Report Vienna, October 2018 WP4 – Regional Action Plan Document Control Sheet Project DBS Gateway Region – regional and Transport Development in the Danube-Black Sea Region towards a Transnational Multiport Gateway Region Code DTP1-050-3.1 Funds ERDF, IPA Document Title Final Report Step II Roadmap + Regional Action Plans Nature Report, Output O4.1 Available Languages English Version 1 Date October 2018 Number of Pages 190 Authors Christina Narval Contributors All partners of the project Checked by LP Approved by SCOM Content 2 WP4 – Regional Action Plan CONTENT 1 Importance of Action – Why a Roadmap? ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Danube-Black Sea (DBS) Gateway Region ......................................................................................... 6 1.3 Objectives – Roadmap supporting the Joint Vision 2040 .................................................................. 7 2 Roadmap within the project “DBS Gateway Region” ................................................................................ 9 2.1 Structure of the project ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Position of the Roadmap within the project ................................................................................... 10 2.3 Development Process ...................................................................................................................... 11 3 Roadmap .................................................................................................................................................. 13 3.1 Development of measures for the Roadmap .................................................................................. 13 3.2 Overview of fields of interventions ................................................................................................. 14 3.2.1 Legal Framework ..................................................................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Services .................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.4 Organisation/Cooperation ....................................................................................................... 15 3.2.5 Marketing ................................................................................................................................ 16 3.2.6 Research/Innovation/Technology ........................................................................................... 17 3.2.7 Danube-affine business development ..................................................................................... 17 4 Action Plans ............................................................................................................................................. 19 4.1 Definition of “Port Region” .............................................................................................................. 19 4.1.1 Regional Action Plans .............................................................................................................. 19 4.1.2 Cooperation Action Plan .......................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Selection of measures for the Action Plans ..................................................................................... 20 4.3 Regional Action Plan (RAP) for Port of Vienna and Lower Austria Region ...................................... 22 4.3.1 Definition of the Port Region ................................................................................................... 22 4.3.2 Description of specific target groups ....................................................................................... 22 4.3.3 Overview of recommended measures .................................................................................... 23 4.3.4 Description of recommended measures ................................................................................. 25 4.4 Regional Action Plan (RAP) for Port of Bratislava and Komárno Region ......................................... 44 4.4.1 Definition of the Port Region ................................................................................................... 44 4.4.2 Description of specific target groups ....................................................................................... 46 Content 3 WP4 – Regional Action Plan 4.4.3 Overview of recommended measures .................................................................................... 47 4.4.4 Description of recommended measures ................................................................................. 48 4.5 Regional Action Plan (RAP) for Port of Budapest Region ................................................................ 65 4.5.1 Definition of the Port Region ................................................................................................... 65 4.5.2 Description of specific target groups ....................................................................................... 66 4.5.3 Overview of recommended measures .................................................................................... 67 4.5.4 Description of recommended measures ................................................................................. 69 4.6 Regional Action Plan (RAP) for Port of Vukovar Region ................................................................ 102 4.6.1 Definition of the Port Region ................................................................................................. 102 4.6.2 Description of specific target groups ..................................................................................... 103 4.6.3 Overview of recommended measures .................................................................................. 103 4.6.4 Description of recommended measures ............................................................................... 104 4.7 Regional Action Plan (RAP) for Port of Novi Sad Region ............................................................... 108 4.7.1 Definition of the Port Region ................................................................................................. 108 4.7.2 Description of specific target groups ..................................................................................... 110 4.7.3 Overview of recommended measures .................................................................................. 111 4.7.4 Description of recommended measures ............................................................................... 112 4.8 Regional Action Plan (RAP) for Bulgarian Inland Waterway Ports Region .................................... 120 4.8.1 Description of the Port Region .............................................................................................. 120 4.8.2 Description of specific target groups ..................................................................................... 121 4.8.3 Overview of recommended measures .................................................................................. 122 4.8.4 Description of recommended measures ............................................................................... 123 4.9 Regional Action Plan (RAP) for Port of Burgas Region .................................................................. 129 4.9.1 Definition of the Port Region ................................................................................................. 129 4.9.2 Description of specific target groups ..................................................................................... 130 4.9.3 Overview of recommended measures .................................................................................. 130 4.9.4 Description of recommended measures ............................................................................... 138 4.10 Regional Action Plan (RAP) for Port of Varna Region .................................................................... 144 4.10.1 Definition of the Port Region ................................................................................................. 144 4.10.2 Description of specific target group ...................................................................................... 144 4.10.3 Overview of recommended measures .................................................................................. 145 4.10.4 Description of recommended measures ............................................................................... 147 4.11 Regional Action Plan (RAP) for Port of Galati Region .................................................................... 155 Content 4 WP4 – Regional Action Plan 4.11.1 Definition of the Port Region ................................................................................................. 155 4.11.2 Description of specific target groups ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Company Profile
    www.ecobulpack.com COMPANY PROFILE KEEP BULGARIA CLEAN FOR THE CHILDREN! PHILIPPE ROMBAUT Chairman of the Board of Directors of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of AGROPOLYCHIM JSC-Devnia e, ECOBULPACK are dedicated to keeping clean the environment of the country we live Wand raise our children in. This is why we rely on good partnerships with the State and Municipal Authorities, as well as the responsible business managers who have supported our efforts from the very beginning of our activity. Because all together we believe in the cause: “Keep Bulgaria clean for the children!” VIDIO VIDEV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of NIVA JSC-Kostinbrod,VIDONA JSC-Yambol t ECOBULPACK we guarantee the balance of interests between the companies releasing A packed goods on the market, on one hand, and the companies collecting and recycling waste, on the other. Thus we manage waste throughout its course - from generation to recycling. The funds ECOBULPACK accumulates are invested in the establishment of sustainable municipal separate waste collection systems following established European models with proven efficiency. DIMITAR ZOROV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Owner of “PARSHEVITSA” Dairy Products ince the establishment of the company we have relied on the principles of democracy as Swell as on an open and fair strategy. We welcome new shareholders. We offer the business an alternative in fulfilling its obligations to utilize packaged waste, while meeting national legislative requirements. We achieve shared responsibilities and reduce companies’ product- packaging fees. MILEN DIMITROV Procurator of ECOBULPACK s a result of our joint efforts and the professionalism of our work, we managed to turn AECOBULPACK JSC into the largest organization utilizing packaging waste, which so far have gained the confidence of more than 3 500 companies operating in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • What an Almost 500-Year-Old Map Can Tell to a Geoscientist
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., Vol. 44(1), pp. 3–16 (2009) DOI: 10.1556/AGeod.44.2009.1.2 REDISCOVERING THE OLD TREASURES OF CARTOGRAPHY — WHAT AN ALMOST 500-YEAR-OLD MAP CAN TELL TO A GEOSCIENTIST BSzekely´ 1,2 1Christian Doppler Laboratory, Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vienna University of Technology, Gusshausstr. 27–29, A-1040 Vienna, Austria, e-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Geophysics and Space Science, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, E¨otv¨os University, P´azm´any P. s´et´any 1/C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary Open Access of this paper is sponsored by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund under the grant No. T47104 OTKA (for online version of this paper see www.akkrt.hu/journals/ageod) Tabula Hungariae (1528), created by Lazarus (Secretarius), is an almost 500 year-old map depicting the whole Pannonian Basin. It has been used for several geographic and regional science studies because of its highly valued information con- text. From geoscientific point of view this information can also be evaluated. In this contribution an attempt is made to analyse in some extent the paleo-hydrogeography presented in the map, reconsidering the approach of previous authors, assuming that the mapmaker did not make large, intolerable errors and the known problems of the cartographic implementation are rather exceptional. According to the map the major lakes had larger extents in the 16th century than today, even a large lake (Lake Becskerek) ceased to exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Achievements Our Work in Photos and Media
    LIFE FOR DANUBE STURGEONS LIFE 15/GIE/AT/001004 NEWSLETTER | July 2017 Our achievements Website is up and running, you may check it out! http://danube-sturgeons.org Content-related improvements are pending, including translation into national languages. Baseline questionnaires are ready for use for fishing communities and law enforcement authorities in Ukraine and Serbia. Capacity-building workshops with authorities on sturgeon biology and conservation have kicked-off in Ukraine. Insofar, 6 such trainings for the Fish Agency have been held. May, Odessa| WWF-UA facilitated a regional workshop between DDBRA (RO) and DDBR (UA) authorities to improve cross-border cooperation on sturgeon protection (memos here). May, Brussels| Our project was featured at the LIFE Information & Networking Event in Brussels (part of the Green Week), with a presentation held by Jutta (presentation & video). June, Sofia | The first communications team workshop was held, which led to the finalisation of the regional communications strategy (memos here) June, Bucharest | The first Stakeholder Committee meeting was organized, with participation from the police, customs, NAFA, DDBRA. Our project was presented at the LIFE Info Day event in Bucharest by DDBRA (RO); the team received very good feedback from the LIFE monitoring team in Ro (NEEMO GEIE) June | Teams in BG, RS, UA celebrated the Danube Day in schools and local communities. Our work in photos and media Authorities in Ukraine and Romania meet in Odessa First National Stakeholder Committee meeting in Communications
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes of Michael J. Zeps, SJ
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette History Faculty Research and Publications History Department 1-1-2011 Documents of Baudirektion Wien 1919-1941: Notes of Michael J. Zeps, S.J. Michael J. Zeps S.J. Marquette University, [email protected] Preface While doing research in Vienna for my dissertation on relations between Church and State in Austria between the wars I became intrigued by the outward appearance of the public housing projects put up by Red Vienna at the same time. They seemed to have a martial cast to them not at all restricted to the famous Karl-Marx-Hof so, against advice that I would find nothing, I decided to see what could be found in the archives of the Stadtbauamt to tie the architecture of the program to the civil war of 1934 when the structures became the principal focus of conflict. I found no direct tie anywhere in the documents but uncovered some circumstantial evidence that might be explored in the future. One reason for publishing these notes is to save researchers from the same dead end I ran into. This is not to say no evidence was ever present because there are many missing documents in the sequence which might turn up in the future—there is more than one complaint to be found about staff members taking documents and not returning them—and the socialists who controlled the records had an interest in denying any connection both before and after the civil war. Certain kinds of records are simply not there including assessments of personnel which are in the files of the Magistratsdirektion not accessible to the public and minutes of most meetings within the various Magistrats Abteilungen connected with the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District Is Based on Information Received from the ICPDR Contracting Parties by 10 November 2015
    / / / / / / / / / / / / / н ϊ ρ κ Y Flood Risk / / / / a v o Management Plan d l uj //// Crna o pб Gor M // C a //// / // Ro // a mân я / in ia //// ρu for the Danube River Basin District Бълѕѕ v o g e c r e H i a n nd //// Ös s schla terreic o ut h //// B e Č / D esk // // á r / / ep a // ub / lik k / a / s / /// t / a / Sl v / ov r / en / sk H / o / / / /// / M // agyar ija н ors n ϊ zág //// Slove ρ κ Y / / / / a v o d l o M / / / / я u ρ ѕ л ъ Б / / / / a i n â m o R / / / / a r o G a n agyarorsz r /// M ág //// C / S ko lov / s en / n ija / e //// / ov H Sl rva j // tska u // //// б ka Bosn Cp bli a i H //// pu ercegovina re ská / Če h /// rreic / Öste land /// ////// eutsch D Disclaimer This Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District is based on information received from the ICPDR Contracting Parties by 10 November 2015. Sources other than the competent authorities have been clearly identified in the Plan. A more detailed level of information is presented in the national Flood Risk Management Plans. Hence, the Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District should be read and interpreted in conjunction with the national Flood Risk Management Plans. The data in this report has been dealt with, and is presented, to the best of our knowledge. Nevertheless inconsistencies cannot be ruled out.
    [Show full text]
  • Budapest and Central Danube Region
    Touristic areas of the Budapest and Central Danube Region www.hungary.com Talent for entertaining Forest Tourinform Office Etyek-Buda wine region Residence Kunság wine region Castle National Park Castle ruin Region’s border Museum Highway Thermal/wellness bath Railway Airport Ferry World Heritage Budapest – Central Danube Region “Why Budapest and its surrounding area?” This is the obvious question holiday makers will ask when planning their travels, and we hope to provide the answer. Budapest, Heroes’ Square Budapest because: • it is the cultural, political and transportation centre of Hungary; • it is built on both side of the Danube, the great European river that is registered as a World Heritage panorama; • nature is safeguarded in two national parks and a number of environmental protection areas; • it has represented a “multicultural Europe” for centuries – over 200 nearby villages are populated by Hungarians, Serbs, Slovaks and Germans (Swabians); • it has a strong artistic and cultural heritage; • there’s always something happening: festivals, concerts, theatre perform- ances, sports competitions, exhibitions, church events, wine celebrations or handicraft fairs; • there are many outdoor activities to enjoy: trekking, rock climbing, biking, horse riding, golf, rowing, swimming, potholing or fl ying; • its restaurants offer not only Hungarian cuisine – and wine and palinka – but food from all over the world. Don’t hesitate – come to Budapest, the centre of things! Széchenyi Thermal Baths (We have marked our suggested “must-see” destinations with ***. However, these are naturally subjective selections, and we hope that our guests will fi nd their own three-star experiences.) MT ZRT www.itthon.hu Visegrád Castle Games 1 Budapest – Central Danube Region Budapest Buda Castle and Chain Bridge When you arrive in Budapest, head to the centre and drink in the view of the city’s two parts, divided by the Danube and linked by the bridges that cross it.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVI SAD - City Case Report City Development and Its Subsurface
    COST-SUBURBAN WG1 - NOVI SAD - City Case report City development and its subsurface University of Novi Sad Faculty of Technical Sciences Department of Traffic and Transportation Authors: Đurđica Stojanović, Marko Veličković In cooperation with: Ildiko Otašević, Public Enterprise for City Construction and Development, Novi Sad Aleksandar Jevđenić, Milan Šešum, Public enterprise "Urbanizam", Novi Sad Contents 1. Historical development of the city ................................................................. 3 2. City description ............................................................................................. 6 2.1 City location and key data.................................................................................. 6 2.2 Petrovaradin Fortress ........................................................................................ 7 3. Area characteristics ....................................................................................... 9 3.1 Geology .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Pedology .......................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Geomorphology ............................................................................................... 13 3.4 Groundwater .................................................................................................... 15 4. Urban infrastructure ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Navigation on the Danube (Allied Powers: Czechoslovakia, Greece, Romania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Navigation on the Danube (Allied Powers: Czechoslovakia, Greece, Romania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria 2 August 1921 VOLUME I pp. 97-212 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2006 IV. CESSION OF VESSELS AND TUGS FOR NAVIGATION ON THE DANUBE *. PARTIES : Allied Powers (Czechoslovakia, Greece, Rumania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria. COMPROMIS : Treaty of Versailles, Article 339 2 ; Article 300 of Treaty of St. Germain 3 ; Article 284 of Treaty of Trianon and Article 228 of Treaty of Neuilly-sur- Seine. ARBITRATOR : Walker D. Hines (U.S.A.). DECISION : Paris, August 2, 1921. Confiscation of private property in warfare.—Allocation and condition of vessels of disputed ownership and nationality.—Question of jurisdiction. —Fourth Hague Convention of 1907 (Articles 46 and 53 of its annexed Regulations).—Legal character of private property hired by belligerent State for military purposes.—Effect of military acts after armistice between some but not all of the belligerents. General conditions for effectual ion of permanent allocation.—Delivery of vessels.—Claim for excess fittings and gear.—Vessels whose nationality is affected by change of nationality of owners.—Claims to allocation asserted by Czechoslovakia as a succession State. Cession by Germany, Austria ,md Hungary to meet legitimate needs of Allied and Associated Powers concerned.—Legitimate needs of States for freight traffic.—International character of the River Save,—Basic freight traffic on the Danube in 1911 to be considered in estimating legitimate needs of parties concerned.—Modification of such basis on account of subsequent developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Border Controls Along the Danube and Its Navigable Tributaries
    EU Strategy for the Danube Region Priority Area 1a – To improve mobility and multimodality: Inland waterways Practical manual on border controls along the Danube and its navigable tributaries Author(s): Milica Gvozdic (viadonau) Simon Hartl (viadonau) Katja Rosner (viadonau) Version (date): 31.08.2015 1 General information .................................................................................................................. 4 2 How to use this manual? .......................................................................................................... 5 3 Geographic scope .................................................................................................................... 5 4 Hungary ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 General information on border controls ................................................................................... 7 4.1.1 Control process ................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Control forms ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.3 Additional information ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Mohács .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MUSEUMS AS CULTURAL HUBS the FUTURE of TRADITION MUSEUMS AS CULTURAL HUBS the Future of Tradition
    THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE MAGAZINE NO 9 | JUNE 2019 | ISSN 2683-5282 MUSEUMS AS CULTURAL HUBS THE FUTURE OF TRADITION MUSEUMS AS CULTURAL HUBS The Future of Tradition May 13-19, 2019 FOR MUSEUMS MUSEUMS OF SERBIA International Museum Day - European Night of Museums - National Museum Week Free Admission 2 ICOM SRBIJA A WORD FROM PRESIDENT Jubilee Year From content This year, museum pro- fessionals will gather at the jubilee, 25th ICOM General Conference in magical Kyoto. There is plenty of symbol- 4 ism in the fact that the ICOM 25th General Conference - Kyoto 2019 Land of the Rising Sun is hosting 3,000 partic- Redefined Future of Tradition ipants who are going to discuss important is- sues of concern to the international museum 6 Interview community. This will be the right opportunity for Suay Aksoy, the new museum defi- nition to “rise” so as to ICOM President reflect the changed role of museums which have developed a closer bond 16 with the audience and New Museums become a more active part of the community The Largest Serbian Museum they belong to. Abroad The central theme of this year’s Conference, Museums as Cultural Hubs: The Future of Tradition, was exactly the thread that bonded 26 museums all over Serbia during the event Museums for 10, coor- International Cooperation dinated by ICOM Serbia. For the fifth time, the largest museum ini- Museum Connections tiative in Serbia presented museums as places where creativity and On The Silk Road knowledge unite, and visitors take an active part in creating and -ex changing ideas, and interact with each other, prioritizing the quality of knowledge exchange and development of critical awareness of major issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan for the Conservation of the Danube
    Action Plan for the Conservation of the European Ground Squirrel Spermophilus citellus in the European Union EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2013 1. Compilers: Milan Janák (Daphne/N2K Group, Slovakia), Pavel Marhoul (Daphne/N2K Group, Czech Republic) & Jan Matějů (Czech Republic). 2. List of contributors Michal Adamec, State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia Michal Ambros, State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia Alexandru Iftime, Natural History Museum „Grigore Antipa”, Romania Barbara Herzig, Säugetiersammlung, Naturhistorisches Museum Vienna, Austria Ilse Hoffmann, University of Vienna, Austria Andrzej Kepel, Polish Society for Nature Conservation ”Salamandra”, Poland Yordan Koshev, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Bulgaria Denisa Lőbbová, Poznaj a chráň, Slovakia Mirna Mazija, Oikon d.o.o.Institut za primijenjenu ekologiju, Croatia Olivér Váczi, Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Nature Conservation, Hungary Jitka Větrovcová, Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic Dionisios Youlatos, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 3. Lifespan of plan/Reviews 2013 - 2023 4. Recommended citation including ISBN Janák M., Marhoul P., Matějů J. 2013. Action Plan for the Conservation of the European Ground Squirrel Spermophilus citellus in the European Union. European Commission. ©2013 European Communities Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Cover photo: Michal Ambros Acknowledgements for help and support: Ervín
    [Show full text]