DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District Is Based on Information Received from the ICPDR Contracting Parties by 10 November 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / н ϊ ρ κ Y Flood Risk / / / / a v o Management Plan d l uj //// Crna o pб Gor M // C a //// / // Ro // a mân я / in ia //// ρu for the Danube River Basin District Бълѕѕ v o g e c r e H i a n nd //// Ös s schla terreic o ut h //// B e Č / D esk // // á r / / ep a // ub / lik k / a / s / /// t / a / Sl v / ov r / en / sk H / o / / / /// / M // agyar ija н ors n ϊ zág //// Slove ρ κ Y / / / / a v o d l o M / / / / я u ρ ѕ л ъ Б / / / / a i n â m o R / / / / a r o G a n agyarorsz r /// M ág //// C / S ko lov / s en / n ija / e //// / ov H Sl rva j // tska u // //// б ka Bosn Cp bli a i H //// pu ercegovina re ská / Če h /// rreic / Öste land /// ////// eutsch D Disclaimer This Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District is based on information received from the ICPDR Contracting Parties by 10 November 2015. Sources other than the competent authorities have been clearly identified in the Plan. A more detailed level of information is presented in the national Flood Risk Management Plans. Hence, the Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District should be read and interpreted in conjunction with the national Flood Risk Management Plans. The data in this report has been dealt with, and is presented, to the best of our knowledge. Nevertheless inconsistencies cannot be ruled out. In this report the terminology of the EU Flood Directive was applied by the authors. In a common language the “low probability” scenarios should be considered as events that are very rare, and would maybe happen once in a human lifetime. “Medium probability” events usually mean “100-year floods”, which could happen once (or even more often) in the same generation cycle. The so called “high probability” events are quite common compared to the before mentioned ones, since they can be experienced several times during a lifetime. The statistical probability expresses the uncertainty of the time frame of the flood phenomena, hence these events can happen in many years but also tomorrow. The flood experts in the Danube River Basin work continuously on being prepared for the projected conditions. Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District 3 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 9 2 CONCLUSIONS OF THE prELIMINARY FLOOD riSK ASSESSMENT 15 2.1 PFRA 15 2.2 APSFR in the Danube River Basin District 16 3 FLOOD HAZArd MAPS AND FLOOD riSK MAPS 21 3.1 Flood hazard map 22 3.2 Flood risk maps 23 3.3 Conclusions drawn from the maps 24 4 OBJECTIVES 27 4.1 Avoidance of new risks 27 4.2 Reduction of existing risks 27 4.3 Strengthening resilience 27 4.4 Raising awareness 27 4.5 Solidarity principle 28 5 MEASURES 31 5.1 Prioritization 31 5.2 EU Strategy for the Danube Region 31 5.3 Types of measures 33 5.3.1 Measures to avoid new risks 33 5.3.2 Measures reducing the existing risks 37 5.3.3 Strengthening resilience 44 5.3.4 Raising awareness 53 5.3.5 Solidarity principle 56 6 WATER RETENTION 59 6.1 Flood retention 59 6.2 Towards better environmental options in flood risk management 59 6.3 Natural water retention measures 61 6.4 National activities towards water retention in the Danube River Basin District 63 6.4.1 Germany 63 6.4.2 Austria 63 6.4.3 Czech Republic 64 6.4.4 Slovakia 64 6.4.5 Hungary 65 6.4.6 Slovenia 65 6.4.7 Croatia 66 6.4.8 Serbia 67 6.4.9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 67 6.4.10 Romania 67 6.4.11 Bulgaria 68 6.4.12 Ukraine 68 ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District 4 7 COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS 71 7.1 Germany 71 7.2 Austria 71 7.3 Czech Republic 72 7.4 Slovakia 72 7.5 Hungary 72 7.6 Slovenia 73 7.7 Croatia 73 7.8 Serbia 74 7.9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 74 7.10 Romania 74 7.11 Bulgaria 75 7.12 Ukraine 75 8 COOrdiNATION wiTH WFD 77 8.1 Examples of win-win measures 80 8.2 Floodplains/wetlands reconnection 80 8.2.1 Summary of measures of basin-wide importance – DRBMP update 2015 81 8.3 Interruption of river continuity and future infrastructure projects 83 8.4 National activities towards coordinating FD & WFD implementation 84 8.4.1 Germany 84 8.4.2 Austria 85 8.4.3 Czech Republic 86 8.4.4 Slovakia 87 8.4.5 Hungary 87 8.4.6 Slovenia 87 8.4.7 Croatia 87 8.4.8 Serbia 88 8.4.9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 88 8.4.10 Romania 89 8.4.11 Bulgaria 89 8.4.12 Ukraine 90 9 IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE 93 10 INTERNATIONAL COOrdiNATION 97 10.1 ICPDR 97 10.2 Flood risk management in the Danube River Basin District 97 11 SOLidAriTY priNcipLE 101 ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District 5 12 PUBLIC INFORMATION AND CONSULTATION 105 12.1 Danube River Basin District 105 12.1.1 Objectives and legal framework for Public Participation 105 12.1.2 Observers to the ICPDR 105 12.1.3 Public participation, communication and outreach 106 12.1.4 Public consultation for the DFRM Plan 106 12.1.5 Public Consultation Report 108 12.1.6 Links to public consultation on the national level 108 12.1.7 Links to public consultation for the Danube River Basin Management Plan Update 2015 108 12.2 Germany 108 12.3 Austria 109 12.4 Czech Republic 109 12.5 Slovakia 110 12.6 Hungary 111 12.7 Slovenia 112 12.8 Croatia 112 12.9 Serbia 113 12.10 Bosnia and Herzegovina 113 12.11 Bulgaria 113 12.12 Romania 114 12.13 Ukraine 115 13 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS 117 ANNEX 1: FLOOD HAZArd AND FLOOD riSK MAPS 119 ACKnowledgements 129 ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District 6 List of Tables Table 1: Measures on the reconnection of wetlands/floodplains by 2021 and exemptions for each country 82 List of Figures Figure 1: Flood events in 2010 10 Figure 2: Oil pollution caused by 2013 floods in Bavaria 11 Figure 3: Floods in 2014 a) in Gunja settlement, HR; b) Flooded town of Brcˇko, BA 11 Figure 4: Areas of potential significant flood risk in the Danube River Basin 18 Figure 5: Main water gauging stations in DRBD 51 Figure 6: Screenshot of the EFAS web interface for the forecast from 15 May during the Balkan floods in 2014 52 Figure 7: Measures for the reconnection of wetlands/floodplains by 2021 and exemptions 82 Figure 8: ICPDR Organigram 98 Figure 9: Three levels of management for WFD implementation in the DRBD showing the increase of the level of detail from Part A to Part B and C 99 List of Annexes Annex 1: Flood hazard and flood risk maps 119 only digitally available on www.icpdr.org: Annex 2: Overview of measures Annex 3: List of competent authorities Annex 4: Bilateral agreements Annex 5: Resource Document "Economics and the Floods Directive" ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District 7 List of Acronyms APC Accident Prevention and Control ME Montenegro APSFR Areas of Potential Significant Flood Risk MoE SR Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic AT Austria NARW National Administration "Romanian Waters" BA Bosnia and Herzegovina NGO Non-Governmental Organization BAT Best Available Techniques NWRM Natural Water Retention Measures BG Bulgaria OVF General Directorate of Water Management in CBA Cost-Benefit Analysis Hungary cm centimetre PFRA Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment CZ Czech Republic PP Public Participation DE Germany PS Permanent Secretariat DRBD Danube River Basin District RBD River Basin District DRBMP Danube River Basin District Management Plan RBM River Basin Management DRPC Danube River Protection Convention RO Romania EC European Commission RS Republic of Serbia EFAS The European Flood Awareness System SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment EG Expert Group SI Slovenia EIA Environmental Impact Assessment SK Slovak Republic EU European Union SWMI Significant Water Management Issues EU WGF EU Working Group on Floods TG Task Group EUCP EU Civil Protection UA Ukraine EULEX European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo UK United Kingdom EUR Euro UN United Nations EUSDR EU Strategy for the Danube Region UNDAC UN Disaster Assessment and Coordination FD Floods Directive UoM Unit of Management FEM Floodplain evaluation matrix WFD EU Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC FHRM Flood Hazard and Risk Map WWF World Wildlife Fund FIPs Future Infrastructure Projects FP Flood Protection FRM Flood Risk Management FRMP Flood Risk Management Plan GIS Geographic Information System ha hectare HEC-RAS Hydrologic Engineering Centres River Analysis System HR Croatia HU Hungary ICPDR International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River IED Industrial Emissions Directive IMGIS Information Management & GIS IPPC Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control ISRBC International Sava River Basin Commission JPM Joint Programme of Measures km kilometre LC Land Cover MA Monitoring and Assessment MD Moldova ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River / www.icpdr.org Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District 9 1.
Recommended publications
  • The South Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy

    The South Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Nationalitaetenrecht: The outhS Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy Sean Krummerich University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, and the European History Commons Scholar Commons Citation Krummerich, Sean, "Nationalitaetenrecht: The outhS Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4111 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nationalitätenrecht: The South Slav Policies of the Habsburg Monarchy by Sean Krummerich A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History College of Arts & Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor, Graydon A. Tunstall, Ph.D. Kees Botterbloem, Ph.D. Giovanna Benadusi, Ph.D. Date of Approval: July 6, 2012 Keywords – Austria, Hungary, Serb, Croat, Slovene Copyright © 2012, Sean Krummerich Dedication For all that they have done to inspire me to new heights, I dedicate this work to my wife Amanda, and my son, John Michael. Acknowledgments This study would not have been possible without the guidance and support of a number of people. My thanks go to Graydon Tunstall and Kees Boterbloem, for their assistance in locating sources, and for their helpful feedback which served to strengthen this paper immensely.
  • What an Almost 500-Year-Old Map Can Tell to a Geoscientist

    What an Almost 500-Year-Old Map Can Tell to a Geoscientist

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., Vol. 44(1), pp. 3–16 (2009) DOI: 10.1556/AGeod.44.2009.1.2 REDISCOVERING THE OLD TREASURES OF CARTOGRAPHY — WHAT AN ALMOST 500-YEAR-OLD MAP CAN TELL TO A GEOSCIENTIST BSzekely´ 1,2 1Christian Doppler Laboratory, Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vienna University of Technology, Gusshausstr. 27–29, A-1040 Vienna, Austria, e-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Geophysics and Space Science, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, E¨otv¨os University, P´azm´any P. s´et´any 1/C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary Open Access of this paper is sponsored by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund under the grant No. T47104 OTKA (for online version of this paper see www.akkrt.hu/journals/ageod) Tabula Hungariae (1528), created by Lazarus (Secretarius), is an almost 500 year-old map depicting the whole Pannonian Basin. It has been used for several geographic and regional science studies because of its highly valued information con- text. From geoscientific point of view this information can also be evaluated. In this contribution an attempt is made to analyse in some extent the paleo-hydrogeography presented in the map, reconsidering the approach of previous authors, assuming that the mapmaker did not make large, intolerable errors and the known problems of the cartographic implementation are rather exceptional. According to the map the major lakes had larger extents in the 16th century than today, even a large lake (Lake Becskerek) ceased to exist.
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive

    National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive

    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
  • Permanent Mission of the Republic of Croatia to the International

    Permanent Mission of the Republic of Croatia to the International

    Permanent Mission of the Republic of Croatia EF.DEL/10/07/Corr.1 to the International Organizations in Vienna 23 January 2007 ENGLISH only Statement made by Mr. Zdravko KRMEK, State Secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management (Session IV of the 15th OSCE Economic and Environmental Forum, Vienna, 23 January 2007) Mr. Chairman, in the framework of our today's discussion I would like to stress the importance of a consultation between neighbouring states and at the regional level when combating soil degradation in the aim to avoid social problems linked to sustainable development. The Republic of Croatia, as probably a number of other states who have been part of former federations or composite states, has interesting experience in the field: rivers or river basins of internal nature are now of international character. This requires a number of interstate agreements on integral water management. One of the best examples for good cooperation on the regional level is without any doubt the Framework Agreement in Sava River Basin signed in 2003 by four countries of the Former Yugoslav Federation: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia with the participation of international partners including the Stability Pact and the OSCE. This initiative is today better known as Sava River Initiative and the first experience shows that this is a very good basis for further cooperation between these four countries. With the Republic of Slovenia there is also the Agreement of Integral Water Management, signed in 1997, as well as with Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1996. With the Republic of Montenegro a preparation of such an agreement is in final phase, as well as with the Republic of Serbia.
  • IN BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA June 2008

    IN BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA June 2008

    RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA June 2008 RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 30th June 2008 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON BIH.................................................................. 5 3 IDENTIFIED SOURCES OF INFORMATION ............................................................. 8 3-a Relevant institutions.......................................................................................................................................8 3-b Experts.............................................................................................................................................................9 3-c Relevant scientific publications ...................................................................................................................10 3-c-i) Birds...........................................................................................................................................................10 3-c-ii) Fish ........................................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iii) Mammals ...............................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iv)
  • Paleochannel Evolution of the Leitha River (Eastern Austria) – a Bird’S Eye View A

    Paleochannel Evolution of the Leitha River (Eastern Austria) – a Bird’S Eye View A

    Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 8, 08976, 2006 SRef-ID: 1607-7962/gra/EGU06-A-08976 © European Geosciences Union 2006 Paleochannel evolution of the Leitha river (eastern Austria) – A bird’s eye view A. Zámolyi (1), E. Draganits (2), M. Doneus (3), K. Decker (1), Martin Fera (3) (1) Department of Geodynamics and Sedimentology, Structural Processes Group, University of Vienna, Austria, *[email protected] (2) Institute for Engineering Geology, Vienna University of Technology, Austria (3) Department for Prehistory and Early History, University of Vienna, Austria The Leitha river is an important tributary to the Danube in eastern Austria. It is formed by the Schwarza river, originating in the Northern Calcareous Alps, and the Pitten river, coming from the Lower Austroalpine unit of the Wechsel area. In contrast to the general trend of the rivers in the southern Vienna Basin towards the NNE di- rectly towards with the Danube, the Leitha river makes an abrupt turn towards the East at Götzendorf. At Rohrau the next turn follows towards the SE and the Leitha runs through the gate of Carnuntum onto the little Hungarian Plain. The confluence with the Moson-Danube lies farther to the East at Mosonmagyaróvár. The geometry of paleochannels of the Leitha river was investigated in the river section between the confluence of Pitten and Schwarza (forming the Leitha) near Lanzenkirchen and Bruck/Leitha by paleochannel digitization using infrared and black and white aerial photography. This study is part of an archaeological project investigating patterns of prehistoric settlements in this region. The section of the Lei- tha river between Lanzenkirchen and Bruck/Leitha is especially suitable for the study of dynamic fluvial processes and the comparison between former natural river behav- ior and present regulated riverbed, because of the transition from relatively high to low river slopes in this section.
  • The 22 Sites of the Water Management System Of

    The 22 Sites of the Water Management System Of

    bueroecco.com AUGSBURG WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION THE 22 SITES OF THE Find out all about WATER MANAGEMENT the World Heritage nomination here: wassersystem-augsburg.de SYSTEM OF AUGSBURG The site plan of the nomination FOUNTAINS WATERPOWER DRINKING WATER HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES Sponsored by Discover the 22 sites of Augsburg’s water system 13 14 15 Augustus Fountain 1 Hercules Fountain 2 Mercury Fountain 3 Lower Waterworks 4 The Stadtmetzg 5 The fountain on the Rathausplatz Like the Augustus and the Mercury The bronze sculptures of the foun- The ensemble of the Lower The building (Trade Guild House (City Hall Plaza) was completed in Fountain, the Hercules Fountain, tain were designed by Adriaen de Waterworks with the Liliom for the Butchers) was erected in 1594. It was designed by the Dutch created by Adriaen de Vries, embod- Vries and cast in 1599. A cupid at cinema consists of the Lower 1609 by Elias Holl. Its innovative artist, Hubert Gerhard. In addition to ies Augsburg’s pride in its wealth his feet unties Mercury’s sandal to Watertower, the pumping house use of canal water was a novelty: the city´s founder Caesar Augustus, of water resources. The Kastenturm keep the god of trade in the city and and the water supply lead over The Vorderer Lech canal was bronze sculptures of four river gods at the Red Gate was erected as an to thereby secure its wealth. the cast iron Zirbelnuss canal guided through the basement of the represent the main watercourses additional water tower to supply bridge. This is Augsburgs second Stadtmetzg to keep the meat cool in Augsburg.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. T-6807-BIH TECHNICAL ANNEX Public Disclosure Authorized BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EMERGENCYTRANSPORT RECONSTRUCTIONPROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized MARCH 13, 1996 Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Unit of Currency: Bosnia and Herzegovina Dinar (BHD) BHD100.00 = US$0.67 (as of March 8, 1996) US$1.00 = BHD 149.25 (as of March 8, 1996) ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT - Annual Average Daily Traffic BH - Bosnia and Herzegovina BHMTC - BH Ministry of Foreign Trade and International Communications EBRD - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC - European Commission ECA - Europe and Central Asia Regional Office EU - European Union FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FBH - Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina FRD - Federal Road Directorate FMTC - Federal Ministry of Transport and Communications FYP - First year Program GDP - Gross Domestic Product ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organization IDA - International Development Association IFOR - Implementation Force IMG - International Management Group IRI - International Roughness Index IRR - Internal Rate of Return NBF - Non Bank Financed PID - Project Implementation Directorate PMA - Program Management Advisor RAS - Road Advisory Services RD - Road Directorate RS - Republica Srpska SUS - Start Up Services TFBH - Trust Fund for Bosnia and Herzegovina UN - United Nations UNPROFOR - United Nations Protection Force USAID - United States Agency for International Development VOC - Vehicle Operating
  • Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Emerika Bluma 1, 71000 Sarajevo Tel. 28 35 00 Fax. 28 35 01 Department for Legal Affairs CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA “Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, 1/94, 13/97 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - consolidated translation, with amendments indicated - • The Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was adopted by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at the session held on June 24, 1994. It was published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 1, 1994. • Amendment I to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was passed by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at the session held on June 24th,1994. It was also published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 1, 1994. • Amendments II to XXIV to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina were passed by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at its 14th session held on June 5th,1996. They were published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 13, 1997. • Amendments XXV and XXVI to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina were passed according to the procedure in Chapter VIII, finalized on May 8th, 1997. They were also published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 13, 1997. PREAMBLE I. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FEDERATION Arts. 1-6 II. HUMAN RIGHTS A. General Arts. 1-7 B. Initial Appointment and Functions of the Ombudsmen Arts. 1-9 III. DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN THE FEDERATION GOVERNMENT AND THE CANTONS Arts.
  • Amtsblatt Nr. 41 Vom 31.12.2020

    Amtsblatt Nr. 41 Vom 31.12.2020

    Amtsblatt des Landratsamtes Ostallgäu herausgegeben vom Landratsamt Ostallgäu Schwabenstraße 11, 87616 Marktoberdorf Sprechzeiten: Öffnungszeiten Bürgerservice: Montag, Mittwoch und Freitag 07.30 – 12.30 Uhr Montag und Dienstag 07.30 – 17.30 Uhr Dienstag 07.30 – 16.00 Uhr Mittwoch und Freitag 07.30 – 12.30 Uhr Donnerstag 07.30 – 17.30 Uhr Donnerstag 07.30 – 19.00 Uhr und nach Terminvereinbarung Jahrgang 75 Donnerstag, 31.12.2020 Nummer 41 Verlängerung der vorläufigen Sicherung des Über- sowie in den betroffenen Gemeinden niedergelegt sind; sie schwemmungsgebietes an der Wertach von Flusskilo- können dort während der Dienststunden eingesehen wer- meter 74.400 (Stadtgrenze Kaufbeuren / Gemeinde- den. Die Unterlagen sind auch auf der Homepage des grenze Biessenhofen) bis Flusskilometer 98.800 (Stadt- Landratsamts Ostallgäu einsehbar unter https://buerger-os- grenze Marktoberdorf / Gemeindegrenze Unterthingau) tallgaeu.de/ueberschwemmungsgebiete. im Bereich der Stadt Marktoberdorf und der Gemeinden Ganz oder teilweise im Überschwemmungsgebiet liegende Ruderatshofen und Biessenhofen Gebäude sind in den Karten farblich hervorgehoben. Verän- BEKANNTMACHUNG derungen der Grenzen oder der Bezeichnungen der im Das Überschwemmungsgebiet an der Wertach von Flusski- Überschwemmungsgebiet gelegenen Grundstücke berüh- lometer 74.400 bis Flusskilometer 98.800 im Bereich der ren die festgesetzten Grenzen des Überschwemmungsge- Stadt Marktoberdorf und der Gemeinden Ruderatshofen biets nicht. und Biessenhofen wurde mit Bekanntmachung vom Hinweis: Soweit die Wertach Grenzgewässer zwischen dem 18.01.2016 im Amtsblatt des Landkreises Ostallgäu vom Landkreis Ostallgäu und der kreisfreien Stadt Kaufbeuren 28.01.2016 vorläufig gesichert. Die vorläufige Sicherung en- ist, wird nur der im Landkreis Ostallgäu befindliche Bereich det, sobald die Rechtsverordnung zur Festsetzung des betrachtet. Überschwemmungsgebiets in Kraft tritt oder das Festset- Weitere Informationen: zungsverfahren eingestellt wird.
  • Sava River Basin Project

    Sava River Basin Project

    Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplains International (WI) with technical support from Orbicon (DK) have jointly initiated the Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplains project to support the Sava Basin countries in identifying, designating and managing the biological and landscape diversity along the Sava River and in supporting the implementation of the EU Birds and Habitats Directives. The proposed project will demonstrate innovative protection and management schemes that seek to combine viable land use practices, biodiversity protection and management and flood management. Du{ka Dimovi} Donors and Partners The project is financially supported by the LIFE-Third countries programme and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation. The international project applicant responsible for Lonjsko polje Nature Park, Croatia / Park, Croatia Lonjsko polje Nature executing the project is IUCN Regional The Sava River found in the central Sava basin with a Office for Europe. Throughout the mosaic of natural floodplains and project, the IUCN together with the WI The Sava River is the second largest cultural landscapes formed by will be responsible for the project tributary to the Danube River and is of traditional land-use patterns typical to management, while the partner institu- biological significance because of its the river valleys of Central Europe in the tions from the Sava countries - the outstanding biological and landscape past. The Sava River is considered by Center for Ecology and Natural diversity. It hosts the largest complex of nature conservationists and scientists to Resources of the Faculty of Science in alluvial floodplain wetlands in the be one of the “Crown Jewels” of Sarajevo, the Agricultural Institute of Danube basin and the largest lowland European nature and has been selected Republic of Srpska, the State Institute forests.
  • Investing Guide Hungary 2014

    Investing Guide Hungary 2014

    Investing Guide Hungary 2014 Why invest in Hungary? A guide with useful information and inspiring success stories of investors in Hungary. Investing Guide Hungary 2014 3 PwC welcomes you with offices in Budapest and Győr Contents I. WHAT SHOULD YOU KNOW ABOUT HUNGARY? 5 Location and climate 6 Infrastructure in Hungary 10 Office market 12 Main industries 14 Leading sector in Hungary: automotive 15 Takata to establish first plant in Hungary – Production scheduled to commence in October 2014 16 Interview with Jiro Ebihara, president of DENSO Manufacturing Hungary Ltd. – Re-invest in Hungary 18 Electronics 19 Pharmaceuticals & medical technology 20 Interview with Erik Bogsch, CEO, Richter Gedeon Nyrt. – A flagship of the Hungarian pharmaceutical industry 21 ICT sector 22 Discover ICT opportunities in Hungary 24 Food industry II. WHY INVEST IN HUNGARY? 25 Overview about the incentives in Hungary 26 Regional aid intensity map 27 Non refundable cash subsidies 28 R&D&I in focus 29 Fast growing and best performing sector 30 Interview with Andor Faragó, General Manager – British Telecom in Hungary 35 Tax incentives III. HOW DOES ONE INVEST IN HUNGARY? 37 Establishing your business 40 Accounting requirements 42 Hiring and employment 44 Key tax related issues IV. ABOUTPlease THE HUNGARIANvisit our website INVESTMENT at www.pwc.com/hu. AND TRADE AGENCY (HITA) 49 Introduction of HITA 49 Investing An interview Guide with HungaryJános Berényi, 2013 Presidentwas prepared of HITA by PricewaterhouseCoopers Hungary Ltd. in cooperation with the Hungarian Investment and Trade Agency. Additional content was provided by Absolut Media Please visit our website at www.pwc.com/hu.