World Bank Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Bank Document Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. T-6807-BIH TECHNICAL ANNEX Public Disclosure Authorized BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EMERGENCYTRANSPORT RECONSTRUCTIONPROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized MARCH 13, 1996 Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Unit of Currency: Bosnia and Herzegovina Dinar (BHD) BHD100.00 = US$0.67 (as of March 8, 1996) US$1.00 = BHD 149.25 (as of March 8, 1996) ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT - Annual Average Daily Traffic BH - Bosnia and Herzegovina BHMTC - BH Ministry of Foreign Trade and International Communications EBRD - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC - European Commission ECA - Europe and Central Asia Regional Office EU - European Union FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FBH - Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina FRD - Federal Road Directorate FMTC - Federal Ministry of Transport and Communications FYP - First year Program GDP - Gross Domestic Product ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organization IDA - International Development Association IFOR - Implementation Force IMG - International Management Group IRI - International Roughness Index IRR - Internal Rate of Return NBF - Non Bank Financed PID - Project Implementation Directorate PMA - Program Management Advisor RAS - Road Advisory Services RD - Road Directorate RS - Republica Srpska SUS - Start Up Services TFBH - Trust Fund for Bosnia and Herzegovina UN - United Nations UNPROFOR - United Nations Protection Force USAID - United States Agency for International Development VOC - Vehicle Operating Costs Wi-HO - World Health Organization FISCAL YEAR January 1 to December 31 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EMERGENCY TRANSPORT RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT TECHNICAL ANNEX Table of Contents Page A. Background ........................................ 1l General ......................................... I Scope of Emergency ........................................ 1I Roads ......................................... 1 Bridges ......................................... I Sava/Una river bridges......................................... 1 Construction and maintenance equipment......................................... 2 R ailw ays ........................................ 2 Airports ......................................... 2 Ports ......................................... 2 Urban Transport ......................................... 2 Institutions......................................... 3 B. Donors' Response and Strategy ......................................... 3 C. First Year Program and Project Description ......................................... 4 The Program Objective......................................... 4 The Project Description Objective......................................... 6 Costs ......................................... 8 Financing........................................ 10 D. Studies and Technical Assistance........................................ 12 E. Institutional Arrangements and Project Implementation....................................... 14 Institutional arrangements........................................ 14 Procurement, Accounts, and Reporting ........................................ 15 F. Project Justification........................................ 22 G. Action Plan........... 26 ANNEXES and TABLES Annexes: 1. Indicative Program for Republica Srpska ............................ 28 2. Sarajevo Airport ............................ 35 3 Project Procurement Plan............................ 38 4 Technical Assistance Selection Method and Schedule.39 Financing .... 40 Terms of Reference Start-up Services.41 Road Advisory Services.44 Sava/Una river bridges review.51 Program Management Adviser.55 Tables: 1. Three Years Overall Program.59 2. Three and one Year Transport Programs.59 Project Details and Costs: 3. The Federation a) Roads ........................ 60 b) Bridges ........................ 61 c) Equipment........................ 62 d) Asphalt/Quarries........................ 63 e) Urban Transport - Buses........................ 64 f) Railways Component........................ 65 5. Disbursement........................ 68 6. Highway Design Standards........................ 69 Map IBRD 27802: Project roads, bridges and Republica Srpska Indicative Program .70 Technical Annex p.1 of 26 Bosnia and Herzegovina Emergency Transport Reconstruction Project A. BACKGROUND General 1. Prior to the hostilities, the transport system of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH) was organized to meet the needs of the former Yugoslavia.Inland transport was provided by a road system (including8,600 km of main and regionalroads). As with other sectors, the ability of the transport sector to function has been seriouslyaffected by the hostilities.Virtually all parts of the transport system have been damaged, either as a result of direct targeting, by the movementsof military vehicles on roads which were not designed to carry heavy traffic, or by lack of maintenanceand spare parts for more than four years. Scope of Emergency 2. Roads: The past four years of hostilitieshave affected the entire road network. Virtually no road maintenance has been carried out and this combined with military traffic has caused significant deterioration in road pavements. Roads either near or used as bypasses around shiftingconfrontation lines have sufferedthe most with some sections of regional and local roads now requiring complete reconstruction. Also roads used as deviations around downed bridges (e.g. around the Visoko bridge) are breaking up. While some sections of main roads show only superficial signs of apparent wear, they are well past due periodic maintenance and visible distress can be expected soon with a more rapid deteriorationsetting in quickly. While the entire network will need attention in the next five to seven years, about 28% of the main and regional network will require more immediate attention within the next three years to remedy both damage and the more severe effects of maintenance neglect. Damage estimates are based on visual surveys and, without neglecting immediate attention to urgent works, will be supplementedby technicalinvestigations to confirm or revise the proposed repair treatment. 3. Bridges: Bridges are prime strategic targets in military operations and, in the last four years, about 70 bridges have been damaged with about 25 of these made impassable.Many of these bridges are on main routes with the principal crossings now being maintained through makeshiftdeviations or single lane militarybridges. Although,for some impassablebridges, both part or all of the superstructure and, in some cases, piers and/or pier heads have been destroyed, many have the piers and abutments still standing and most reconstruction will be confined to replacement of the decks. Demolition of the damaged sections and downed decks will form a significant part of the reconstruction cost. Areas around and beneath some of the damaged bridges have been mined. 4. Sava/Una river bridges: All ten bridges (7 road, 2 road/rail and 1 rail) connecting the Republic of Croatia with BH across the Sava and Una rivers are now impassable. Some have been completelydestroyed while others have one or two spans cut. At least one of the destroyed Technical Annex p.2 of 26 bridges is still mined. While one or two ferries are operating and IFOR has constructed two pontoon bridges near Orasje, most road and all rail traffic is virtually cut off from the rest of Europe. 5. Construction and maintenance equipment: Many items of construction and maintenanceequipment were damaged, destroyed or purloined during the hostilities. Much of the remainderhas sufferedfrom neglect due to an inabilityto use the equipment or through lack of spare parts. Shortage of this equipmentnow severely hampers reconstruction of the transport system. Of particularlyhigh priority is the need for asphalt plants and quarries to supply material for the repair of both the road network and city streets. 6. Railways: The railway system was severely damaged and, within the Federation, with the exception of some minor lengths, is not functioning.Two bridges on the main line between Ploce and Sarajevo and one between Sarajevo and Zenica have been cut and equipment damaged or stolen. Some traction and rolling stock has also been damaged, but most is sitting in unknown condition, in isolated pockets. A US$8.6 million EU initiativeis underway to reopen the main trunk line between Sarajevo and Ploce for about two pairs of trains per day. In the RS, the line from Banja Luka west to Prijedor and to the east is functioningbut with light traffic and no connection outside RS. The EU and Germany are involved in the railway reconstruction program in a substantialway and it is suggested that they continue to take the lead in this sub- sector. IFOR is currentlyundertaking a detailed survey of the rail infrastructure. 7. Airports: The runway, taxiwaysand aprons at Sarajevo airport are severelycracked and most of the air traffic control equipment has been destroyed. In addition, most mobile equipment, the lighting system and airport buildings have also been damaged. The airport is operating but with military equipment and under the managementof IFOR. While UNPROFOR has carried out urgent maintenanceworks to the runway, taxiway and aprons, major repairs have been precluded by the proximity of the confrontation line. For the remainder of the airports, Banja Luka is said to be operational, Tuzla is operating as an IFOR base, and Bihac and Mostar are damaged and not in operation. 8. Ports: The port of Ploce,
Recommended publications
  • Croatia - Bosnia and Herzegovina)
    IPA Cross-Border project "Una - Spring of Life" (Croatia - Bosnia and Herzegovina) Prepered by MSc Lamija Abdijevic, Architect Conservator (Expert Advisor at the Institute of Protection of Monuments in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina) Sarajevo, September, 2015 About project The project "Una - Spring of Life" has been chosen for co-financing within the IPA Cross-Border Programme Croatia - Bosnia and Herzegovina 2007-2013. The implementation of the project began in 2011. Partners - The Zadar County, Croatia (it is a self-government regional unit, one of the seven Croatian coastal counties), - The Municipality of Bihać, Bosnia and Herzegovina (it is a self-government unit located in north-western part of Bosnia and Herzegovina, - The Municipality of Gračac, Croatia (it is the largest municipality in Croatia, located in the Zadar County), - Centre for the promotion of local development PLOD, Bosnia and Herzegovina (it is a civic association), - NATURA-JADERE, Croatia (it is a public institution for the management of protected areas in Zadar County), - Zadar County Development Agency – ZADRA, Croatia, - Zadar County Tourist Board, Croatia, - Una-Sana Canton Tourist Board, Bosnia and Herzegovina, - Una Association, Bosnia and Herzegovina (NGO). Associates - The Lika-Senj County Development Agency – LIRA, Croatia, - The Gračac Tourist Board, Croatia. The aim of the project is to jointly develop the Una Spring in Croatia and the Una Waterfalls and the Old Town of Ostrovica in the area of Martin Brod in Bosnia and Herzegovina as a part of the same, environmental- adopted joint tourism product through cross-border cooperation and pooling of various experiences of all stakeholders from the area of the upper course of the Una River.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
    [Show full text]
  • TAIEX EPPA IED Workshop June 2020 Vienna Report
    Event Report EPPA Regional Workshop on Flood Protection and River Restoration 22 – 23 September 2020 Live video conference The project implemented by the Consortium of NIRAS (lead) This Project is funded by the European Union and Umweltbundesamt GmbH TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 OBJECTIVES OF THE TRAINING AND EXPECTED RESULTS ............................................................................ 1 3 HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE WORKSHOP ......................................................................................................... 2 3.1 OPENING REMARKS.............................................................................................................................................. 2 3.2 FINDINGS OF THE 2019 REPORT OF THE FITNESS CHECK EVALUATION OF THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE AND THE FLOODS DIRECTIVE ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 3.3 OUTCOMES OF THE GAP ANALYSIS AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF IMPLEMENTING EU FLOODS DIRECTIVE (WBIF STUDY SEP 2015) AND OUTCOMES IPA REGIONAL PROJECT ON FLOODS .................................................................................. 3 3.4 “ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE THROUGH TRANSBOUNDARY FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE WESTERN BALKANS - ALBANIA, KOSOVO*, MONTENEGRO, NORTH MACEDONIA (GIZ PROJECT)
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Emerika Bluma 1, 71000 Sarajevo Tel. 28 35 00 Fax. 28 35 01 Department for Legal Affairs CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA “Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, 1/94, 13/97 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - consolidated translation, with amendments indicated - • The Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was adopted by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at the session held on June 24, 1994. It was published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 1, 1994. • Amendment I to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was passed by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at the session held on June 24th,1994. It was also published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 1, 1994. • Amendments II to XXIV to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina were passed by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at its 14th session held on June 5th,1996. They were published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 13, 1997. • Amendments XXV and XXVI to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina were passed according to the procedure in Chapter VIII, finalized on May 8th, 1997. They were also published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 13, 1997. PREAMBLE I. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FEDERATION Arts. 1-6 II. HUMAN RIGHTS A. General Arts. 1-7 B. Initial Appointment and Functions of the Ombudsmen Arts. 1-9 III. DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN THE FEDERATION GOVERNMENT AND THE CANTONS Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District Is Based on Information Received from the ICPDR Contracting Parties by 10 November 2015
    / / / / / / / / / / / / / н ϊ ρ κ Y Flood Risk / / / / a v o Management Plan d l uj //// Crna o pб Gor M // C a //// / // Ro // a mân я / in ia //// ρu for the Danube River Basin District Бълѕѕ v o g e c r e H i a n nd //// Ös s schla terreic o ut h //// B e Č / D esk // // á r / / ep a // ub / lik k / a / s / /// t / a / Sl v / ov r / en / sk H / o / / / /// / M // agyar ija н ors n ϊ zág //// Slove ρ κ Y / / / / a v o d l o M / / / / я u ρ ѕ л ъ Б / / / / a i n â m o R / / / / a r o G a n agyarorsz r /// M ág //// C / S ko lov / s en / n ija / e //// / ov H Sl rva j // tska u // //// б ka Bosn Cp bli a i H //// pu ercegovina re ská / Če h /// rreic / Öste land /// ////// eutsch D Disclaimer This Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District is based on information received from the ICPDR Contracting Parties by 10 November 2015. Sources other than the competent authorities have been clearly identified in the Plan. A more detailed level of information is presented in the national Flood Risk Management Plans. Hence, the Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District should be read and interpreted in conjunction with the national Flood Risk Management Plans. The data in this report has been dealt with, and is presented, to the best of our knowledge. Nevertheless inconsistencies cannot be ruled out.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Specified
    S/1994/674/Annex VI Page 221 Casualties: Not specified Narrative of Events: 416. Despite Monday's dispatch of UN troops from Croatia to take control of the Sarajevo airport, Sarajevo itself remained volatile as sporadic fighting continued throughout the city. Serbian forces were reported to have withdrawn from the Sarajevo airfield, and they were also reported to have taken their large artillery weapons with them. Muslim forces had likewise been persuaded to reduce their fire in the airport area. 446/ 417. One hundred twenty-five French marines arrived at the airport and 1,000 members of the Canadian Mechanized Infantry and 80 armoured vehicles were scheduled to arrive on 2 July. These Canadian infantry forces were scheduled to be replaced within three weeks by combined UN peace-keeping forces from France, the Ukraine and Egypt. 447/ (b) Local reported events 418. The first UN relief supplies reached Sarajevo airport and local relief workers distributed 15 tons of food to 1,500 Muslim refugees and food and medical supplies also reached Koševo Hospital. 448/ (c) International reported events 419. US Defense Secretary, Richard B. Cheney, stated that the Bush administration was prepared to commit air and naval combat forces to escort and protect relief convoys into Sarajevo. 449/ 2. 2/7/92 (Thursday) (a) Military Activity Combat and Shelling Activity: BiH and Serbian forces continued to exchange artillery fire around the airport. Source(s): Agence France Presse. Targets Hit: Not specified Description of Damage: Not specified Sniping Activity: Not specified Casualties: Not specified Narrative of Events: 420. Following a series of delays that kept a Canadian mechanized infantry battalion stranded for three days on its 250 mile journey from Croatia, the Canadian battalion, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Michel Jones, fought its way through a Serb roadblock 74 miles north-west of Sarajevo and deployed 40 of its 80 armoured vehicles around the perimeter of the Sarajevo airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Impact Study
    Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia-Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Final revised versions that incorporates inputs from consultations with the public and relevant authorities Zagreb, May 2015 IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Strategic Environmental Impact Study Document quality information Authors of SEA Jiří Dusík, Dipl. Engineer - Water Resource Engineering Study Marta Brkić, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Ivan Juratek, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Vjeran Magjarević, B. Sc. Phys. Tomislav Hriberšek, B.Sc. Geology Ines Geci, B.Sc. Geology Mario Pokrivač, B.Sc. Traffic, Occupational Safety Specialist Authors of Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Appropriate Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology Assessment M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Tajana Uzelac Obradović, B.Sc. Biology Project name Ex-ante evaluation and Strategic Environmental Assessment for Interreg IPA Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Document name Strategic Environmental Impact Study Version and Final draft incorporating comments after public consultations (20 May dates 2015) Reference U070_14 Managing Directorate for Managing Cooperation Programmes and Regional authority Development within the Agency for Regional Development Sent to Service for Managing Cooperation Programmes Sent on (date): 20 May 2015 Contact
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality of the Bosna River
    P119 Analysis of the Bosna River water samples from the spring to Kakanj city was performed with the aim of assessing the quality of the Bosna River water and comparing the obtained values with the national, EU regulations and guidelines of the World Health Organization. Samples were collected at eight selected locations, during two sampling periods: unstable weather conditions (precipitation), and stable weather conditions (without precipitation). The following parameters were analysed: pH, electrical conductivity, temperature, residue on evaporation at 105 °C, chloride and phosphate content, and metal content: Cr, Cu, Mn, Pb, Fe, Ni, Cd, Zn, Ca, Mg and Na. The metal content was determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) and atomic emission spectrometry (AES), phosphate by UV/Vis spectrophotometry, chloride by volumetric method, and evaporation residue by gravimetric method. In the case of metals, the concentrations of which were below the limit of detection of the method used (FAAS), a preconcentration method using an ion-exchange resin was applied. The results showed that the Bosna River in the investigated part of the stream meets most of the parameters required by the regulations and guidelines. In order to obtain a complete status of the impact of numerous factors on the pollution of the Bosna River water, it would be necessary to perform passive sampling, and biological and microbiological analysis of water. Bosna River, pollution, metals, AAS, chlorides, phosphates, preconcentration treatment.6 In accordance with
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do You Oppose Bih's Accession?
    Bosnia and Herzegovina: Public Opinion on Foreign Influence and Violent Extremism March 7, 2019 – March 26, 2019 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights in Survey Research by Ipsos Bosnia and Herzegovina. • Data was collected between March 7 and 26, 2019, through in-home, in-person interviews using the CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing) method. • A total of 2,190 interviews were completed with an overall margin of error of +/- 2.1% at the midrange of the 95-percent confidence level for the full sample. • A nationally representative sample was based on a multistage stratification proportionate to population sample distribution, with a random selection of households and respondents within each Primary Sampling Unit (PSU). The first level was the region and the second level was urbanity. • Using data from the 2013 census as statistical reference for sample design, the sample is made up of citizens of BiH, aged 18+. • Sampling frame: address registry within strata defined by region and type of settlements (urban and rural). • Targeted oversampling was conducted in four areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina that have been identified as susceptible to radical tendencies: Zenica-Doboj Canton (n=148), Una-Sana Canton (n=188), Herzegovina-Neretva Canton (n=206) and Republika Srpska East (n=102). Oversampling in these areas sought to yield more specific insights into the public’s perception of the role of religion in society, the presence of extremism, and interethnic tension, among others. • Households were selected by a random route technique. • Respondent selection was made using random selection, any member of a household with the same probability (SRSWoR).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Rufford Foundation Final Report Congratulations on the completion of your project that was supported by The Rufford Foundation. We ask all grant recipients to complete a Final Report Form that helps us to gauge the success of our grant giving. The Final Report must be sent in word format and not PDF format or any other format. We understand that projects often do not follow the predicted course but knowledge of your experiences is valuable to us and others who may be undertaking similar work. Please be as honest as you can in answering the questions – remember that negative experiences are just as valuable as positive ones if they help others to learn from them. Please complete the form in English and be as clear and concise as you can. Please note that the information may be edited for clarity. We will ask for further information if required. If you have any other materials produced by the project, particularly a few relevant photographs, please send these to us separately. Please submit your final report to [email protected]. Thank you for your help. Josh Cole, Grants Director Grant Recipient Details Your name Nedim Jukić Research and Contribution to the Conservation of Project title Pezizales (Fungi) in Bosnia and Herzegovina RSG reference 13188-1 Reporting period April 2016 – May 2017 Amount of grant £4985 Your email address [email protected] Date of this report 30.05.2017. 1. Please indicate the level of achievement of the project’s original objectives and include any relevant comments on factors affecting this. Objective achieved Not achieved Partially achieved Fully Comments 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report 7 (Inventory of Planned Hydropower Projects)
    Code: WBEC-REG-ENE-01 REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE HYDROPOWER IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Background Report No. 7 Inventory of planned hydropower plant projects Final Draft 3 November 2017 IPA 2011-WBIF-Infrastructure Project Facility- Technical Assistance 3 EuropeAid/131160/C/SER/MULTI/3C This project is funded by the European Union Information Class: EU Standard The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Mott MacDonald IPF Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This r epor t has been prepared solely for use by the party which commissioned it (the ‘Client ’) in connection wit h the captioned project It should not be used for any other purpose No person other than the Client or any party who has expressly agreed terms of reliance wit h us (the ‘Recipient ( s)’) may rely on the content inf ormation or any views expr essed in the report We accept no duty of car e responsibilit y or liabilit y t o any other recipient of this document This report is conf idential and contains pr opriet ary intellect ual property REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE HYDROPOWER IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Background Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Via Dinarica Phase II Prodoc Signed Jul18
    h7 : Uf /h/8h5/hUh uŽćC\ ččš(h1vU l 0( v 386:h3 : ( /t hUm:v m5: ·Q" 8 8 R· \ //J YYR ~wTpw0 T6 wbTH5Lb1 0 p8k T5L 8!{ š) 7đp{ 7$• ) Qđ May2018 E b{ $Qđ! sl { ŠQ}ĐĐQ(k ) !z ) q{ >}QĐ 8!{ š) 7đ3}đ=) s y Q•1 Q&• šQ\ •c) \ č&'; q• Ć 8!{ š) 7đ0 $• 4) !s v ŽČ; ŽČDaRRDRCHDDrv ŽČ; ŽČOaRRDDDFM! w• ?=) • ) Qđ}Qq8Đ!đQ) !s J &QČ 'U• ČQč&Ć1 Š ·č; " &ČmščKš• " " IJ U1 mT 5đĐ!đpĐđ) s ORDP LQ(pĐđ) s OROD U8Tb2 ) ) đ}Qq( Đđ) s ! D2• &Ž• š{ORDP w• ?=) • ) QđĐđ}{ Q• { ( Đ=}đy s 1 Qš \ Č/" ; · " &Č• ČQč&3 č' • ·QČ{I1 /3 T l !}) /p) Š7!}?đ}{ Q 8q y Q•1 Q&• šQ\ •mšč% \ ČcĆ \ č&'; q• Ć ž Q··Ć _ČčxŽšČq š \ č&č" Q\' Š ·č; " &Čč; ; čšČŽ&QČQ ĆQ&s čĆ&Q•• &' 6 š# KčŠQ&•~{ĆŽ; ; čšČQ&KĆŽĆČ• Q&• ~· &• ČŽš c~• Ć 'Č莚QĆ" ' Š ·č; " &Čo8čČqQĆ &' uČq mšč% \ ČQ&Č &' ĆČč • ' Š• &\ Čq y Q• 1 Q&• šQ\ • \ č&\ ; Č• Ć• " \ q• &QĆ" \ č&& \ ČQ&K\ Ž·ČŽš• ·uqQĆČčšQ\ • ·u• &' &• ČŽš• ·š Ć莚\ Ću ž čš_Q&KQ&; • šČ& šĆqQ; ž QČqš · Š• &ČQ&ĆČQČŽČQč&Ć• &' čČq šĆČ• _ qč·' šĆu• &' \ č&ČšQ~ŽČQ&KČčQ" ; ščŠ ' ·QŠ ·Qqčč' Ć• &' \ č&č" Q\Kščž Čqu; • šČQ\ Ž·• š·{xčššŽš• ·\ č" " Ž&QČQ Ć• ·č&KČq Čš• Q·ĆQ&s čĆ&Q•• &'6 š# KčŠQ&• o 8qQĆž Q··~ • \ qQ Š 'ČqščŽKqČq xč··čž Q&KčŽČ; ŽČĆa Do y Q•1 Q&• šQ\ •• xxQš" '• Ć•Ć• x • &'Q&Č š&• ČQč&• ··{š \ čK&Q# 'Č莚QĆ" ; ·• Čxčš" xčšĆŽĆČ• Q&• ~· Č莚QĆ" ' Š ·č; " &Č• &'·č\ • · \ č&č" Q\Kščž Čqu Oo 5č\ • ·\ č" " Ž&QČQ Ć " ; čž š 'Čč; ŽšĆŽ šŽš• · &Č š; šQĆ ' Š ·č; " &Čo j qQ· ž čš_Q&Kž QČq•ž Q' š• &K čxQ&ĆČQČŽČQč&• ·ĆČ• _ qč·' šĆu" • Q&mšč% \ Č; • šČ& šĆž Q··~ Čq 3 Q&QĆČš{čx 0čš QK&8š• ' • &': \ č&č" Q\( ·• ČQč&Ćčxs čĆ&Q•• &'6 š# KčŠQ&•
    [Show full text]