Lists of Gypsophilous Plants from Southern Australia David E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lists of Gypsophilous Plants from Southern Australia David E © 2007 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 21 (2007) 45–54 © 2007 Department for Environment & Heritage, Government of South Australia Lists of gypsophilous plants from southern Australia David E. Symon State Herbarium of South Australia, Hackney Road, Adelaide, South Australia 5000 Email: [email protected] Abstract An annotated list is provided of plants that appear to be gypsophilous. About 14 species may be considered obligate gypsophiles: Asteridia archeri, Austrostipa geoffreyi, Austrostipa nulla nulla, Calytrix gypsophila, Embadium johnstonii, Goodenia gypsicola, Kippistia suaedifolia, Lawrencia helmsii, Melaleuca nanophylla, Minuria gardneri, Minuria multiseta, Nicotiana burbidgeae, Nicotiana truncata, Senecio gypsicola. A further 233 species are facultative gypsophiles, being clearly tolerant of high concentrations of gypsum but much more widely spread. Fifty-six species of naturalised plants were recorded from gypsum deposits in South Australia in field surveys by the author; all species would be considered facultative gypsophiles. Introduction The largest deposit in Australia is at Lake McDonnell on western Eyre Peninsula, 60 km west of Thevenard, Gypsum (CaSO42H2O), a calcium dihydrate, occurs widely in drier southern and interior Australia. It may South Australia (Forbes 1960a, 1960b; Anon. 2000). be present in three main forms: as kopi, a white floury This extensive deposit averages 3.87 m thick and much powder (gypsite); seed gypsum (crystalline gypsarenite), of it is greater than 95% pure gypsum. Impurities are a porous granular state; or rock gypsum (selenite), calcium carbonate and some sodium chloride. in larger aggregates. The latter may form rock-like Further accounts of gypsum in South Australia may masses or occur at times as glass-like plates. Kopi is an be found in a popular account of the Arckaringa hills Aboriginal word for a mourning cap made of gypsum area, Deichman (1986) and King (1951) on Cooke and was used by the Aborigines near the junction of the Plains, and King (1952) on the Craigie Plains deposits. Darling and Murray rivers (Curr 1886–87). Gypsum commonly occurs as dunes to the lee Accounts of gypsum in South Australia may be sides of salt lakes. In many cases this is on the east or found in Jack (1921) and in Western Australia in De la south east side of the lakes. Many gypsum dunes taper Hunty & Low (1958) and Jones (1993). Many localities down to the saline lake systems at their base making are itemized and chemical analyses given but in neither the separation of salt tolerant and gypsophilic species of these are there any botanic details. difficult. A great many herbarium labels lack any A substantial account of gypsum in New South Wales critical distinction between these two categories. The is given by Wynn (1965). This showed that gypsum is mere sighting of samphires prompts a response that the found in many localities in the Western Division and area must be saline. The summit of the dunes may be with few exceptions in areas with less than 375 mm (15 more or less pure gypsum or with thin leaf mould when inches) average annual rainfall. The only plant species well vegetated and the lower slopes often have thin to mentioned is Nicotiana glauca (tree tobacco) with the deep layers of loam covering the gypsum. A number comment “Although not specific for the mineral… the of small annual herbs live in the shallow mould above plant grows profusely on many deposits …”. the gypsum and it is difficult to know whether these are An extensive account of gypsum deposits of Western truly gypsophilous or merely tolerant. Australia is provided by Jones (1993). These are The face of the mining cut through the dune at mainly in the southern portion of the State and quite Cooke Plains, South Australia shows mallee roots numerous. However, no plants are mentioned in this descending almost vertically through 4 m of gypsum. report. Considering the particularly interesting flora of The herbaceous perennial Microseris scapigera may southern Western Australia there is scope to investigate have its tubers completely developed in floury white gypsophily in this area. kopi. The roots of some Austrostipa clearly penetrate An account of gypsum deposits in Victoria was gypsum to considerable depths, and shrubs at such sites published by Thomas (1947). The deposits are (e.g., Atriplex, Maireana, Rhagodia, Lawrencia) clearly principally in the north-west of the State but again no have their permanent root systems well into the gypsum plants are mentioned. whatever the surface veneer may consist of. 45 David E. Symon J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 21 (2007) Parsons (1976) published a review of gypsophily Occurences relate to South Australia unless otherwise in plants. This dealt largely with the ability of plants stated. to metabolise the sulphur in gypsum. It contained Nomenclature follows the Census of South Australian references to principal gypsum deposits elsewhere in Vascular Plants (Barker et al. 2005). the world and included some species lists. Only five The original intention of the following lists was to Australian species were listed, all of which are included provide one of truly gypsophilous plants substantially in the present lists. confined to gypseous soils and a second list of gypsum Chippendale (1963) describes some of the tolerant species. Because of a lack of critical collecting gypsophilous plants and the ecological succession on details, this was more difficult than expected. In the margin of Lake Amadeus. A list of plant species addition, a much greater number of species was is given in the ecological gradient from the edge of the rapidly found whose habitats extended widely beyond saline lake surface to the edge of the gypseous sands. recognised gypsum fields. From the saline margin to the edge of the gypseous More often than not label data is inadequate and sands they included Plagianthus (now Lawrencia) in most cases notes made by the collector cannot be glomeratus, Pachycornia (= Sclerostegia) tenuus, checked. Where a single label record of gypsum has Frankenia cordata, Arthrocnemum halocnemoides, been found commonsense assessments have been made. Bassia (= Maireana) leuhmannii, Bassia (= Sclerolaena) The term “likely sites” is used repeatedly in the text birchii, Zygophyllum compressum, Atripex vesicaria, where a number of collections come from possible sites Chenopodium nitrariaceum, Hakea leucoptera, but do not actually mention gypsum. Melaleuca glomerata and Eremophila macdonnellii. May I plead for more careful and more detailed However the ecological gradient was steep and the collecting notes on the soils on which your worthy analysis complicated by blown red sand. specimens grow. The only account that provides a near comprehensive listing of gypsophilous plants for a region in Australia Results that I have located is one by Mattiske Consulting (1995– From the specimen and literature survey, just 14 96) for the Department of Conservation and Land species are likely to fall into O’Keefe’s (2003) category Management, Perth, which examined the “botanical of “obligate gypsophiles”: values on a range of gypsum dunes in the wheat belt of Asteridia archeri – Compositae Western Australia”. The report includes a large list of Austrostipa geoffreyi – Gramineae plants collected, many of which are gypsum tolerant, Austrostipa nulla nulla – Gramineae and does include about 30 species “present mostly at Calytrix gypsophila – Myrtaceae high gypsum sites”. These have been incorporated into Embadium johnstonii – Boraginaceae this report. Goodenia gypsicola – Goodeniaceae Kippistia suaedifolia – Compositae O’Keefe (2003) in an article on gypsophily Lawrencia helmsii – Malvaceae in Victoria, makes a plea for more knowledge of Melaleuca nanophylla – Myrtaceae gypsophiles in Australia. The author records three Minuria gardneri – Compositae classes of gypsophily: Minuria multiseta – Compositae Obligate gypsophiles Nicotiana burbidgeae – Solanaceae Falcultative or non-differential gypsophiles Nicotiana truncata – Solanaceae Halophytic gypsophiles Senecio gypsicola – Compositae Very few plant species are named. The other 233 species seem best considered as facultative gypsophiles. Indigenous gypsophilous plants in southern Australia: A survey of weeds evidence from plant collections and literature at South Autralian gypseous sites Methods Methods Data from herbarium collections and the literature Between 2000 and 2006 nine gypseous sites in South have been assembled to provide a list of gypsophilous Australia were surveyed by the author for occurrences plants, contained in the Appendix to this paper. of naturalised plants. Sites visited were: The list of actual and suspected gyposphiles contained Lake Macdonnell, Eyre Peninsula in the Appendix are based substantially on herbarium Streaky Bay, Eyre Peninsula Yaninee, Eyre Peninsula label data and on recent collections by R. Bates, F. Kopi, Eyre Peninsula Badman and the author. It also incorporates data from the Marion Lake, Yorke Peninsula few published accounts available: Chippendale (1963), Lake Fowler, York Peninsula Mattiske (1995–96) and O’Keefe (2003), together with Craigie Plain, Murray Lands label data from the State Herbarium of South Australia Cooke Plains, South East Lake Gillies, Eyre Peninsula (AD), the Herbarium of the Northern Territory (DNA, NT) and the Western Australia Herbarium (PERTH). The species located are listed in Table 1. 46 J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 21 (2007) Southern
Recommended publications
  • 5.4 Insect Visitors to Marianthus Aquilonaris and Surrounding Flora
    REPORT: Insect visitors to Marianthus aquilonaris and surrounding flora Nov 2-4, 2019 Kit Prendergast, Native bee scientist BSc First Class Honours, PhD researcher and Forrest Scholar On behalf of Botanica Consulting 1 REPORT: Insect visitors to Marianthus aquilonaris and surrounding flora Nov 2-4 2019 Kit Prendergast, Native bee scientist Background Marianthus aquilonaris (Fig. 1) was declared as Rare Flora under the Western Australian Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 in 2002 under the name Marianthus sp. Bremer, and is ranked as Critically Endangered (CR) under the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN 2001) criteria B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v); C2a(ii) due to its extent of occurrence being less than 100 km2, its area of occupancy being less than 10 km2, a continuing decline in the area, extent and/or quality of its habitat and number of mature individuals and there being less than 250 mature individuals known at the time of ranking (Appendix A). However, it no longer meets these criteria as more plants have been found, and a recommendation has been proposed to be made by DBCA to the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC) to change its conservation status to CR B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v) (Appendix A), but this recommendation has not gone ahead (DEC, 2010). Despite its listing as CR under the Western Australian Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, the species is not currently listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The main threats to the species are mining/exploration, track maintenance and inappropriate fire regimes (DEC, 2010). Fig. 1. Marianthus aquilonaris, showing flower, buds and leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Pinaroo Ramsar Site
    Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (DECC) has compiled the Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECC does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. © State of New South Wales and Department of Environment and Climate Change DECC is pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290, Sydney South 1232 Phone: 131555 (NSW only – publications and information requests) (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DECC 2008/275 ISBN 978 1 74122 839 7 June 2008 Printed on environmentally sustainable paper Cover photos Inset upper: Lake Pinaroo in flood, 1976 (DECC) Aerial: Lake Pinaroo in flood, March 1976 (DECC) Inset lower left: Blue-billed duck (R. Kingsford) Inset lower middle: Red-necked avocet (C. Herbert) Inset lower right: Red-capped plover (C. Herbert) Summary An ecological character description has been defined as ‘the combination of the ecosystem components, processes, benefits and services that characterise a wetland at a given point in time’.
    [Show full text]
  • Weedsoc.Org.Au
    THE WEED SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Inc. Website: www.nswweedsoc.org.au Seminar Papers WEEDS – WOE to GO IV Wednesday 6 September 2006 Metcalfe Auditorium State Library of NSW Macquarie Street , SYDNEY Sponsors Collated / Edited by Copies of this publication are available from: Dr Stephen Johnson THE WEED SOCIETY & Bob Trounce OF NEW SOUTH WALES Inc. PO Box 438 WAHROONGA NSW 2076 THE WEED SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Seminar Organising Committee Lawrie Greenup (chair) Mike Barrett Bertie Hennecke Luc Streit Coordinator power point presentations Erica McKay Welcome to speakers and delegates Warwick Felton (President) Summary of the day’s presentations Mike Barrett Collation and preparation of proceedings Stephen Johnson Bob Trounce The committee thanks all who took part and attended the seminar and particularly the speakers for their presentations and supply of written documents for these proceedings. THE WEED SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Inc. SEMINAR SERIES: WEEDS WOE TO GO IV “Poisonous and Allergenic Plants Where are they?” Date: Wednesday 6th September 2006 Location: The Metcalfe Auditorium The State Library of NSW Macquarie Street Sydney Time Topic Speaker 9.00 – 9.30 am REGISTRATION & MORNING TEA 9.30 – 9.40 am Welcome Warwick Felton 9.40 – 10.30 am Weeds that make you sick Rachel McFadyen 10.30 – 11.20 am Poisonous, prickly, parasitic, pushy? John Virtue Prioritising weeds for coordinated control programs” 11.20 – 1130 am break 11.30 – 11.50 am Parietaria or Asthma Weed Sue Stevens Education & incentive project
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Color Plates of Solanales Species
    Appendix Color Plates of Solanales Species The first half of the color plates (Plates 1–8) shows a selection of phytochemically prominent solanaceous species, the second half (Plates 9–16) a selection of convol- vulaceous counterparts. The scientific name of the species in bold (for authorities see text and tables) may be followed (in brackets) by a frequently used though invalid synonym and/or a common name if existent. The next information refers to the habitus, origin/natural distribution, and – if applicable – cultivation. If more than one photograph is shown for a certain species there will be explanations for each of them. Finally, section numbers of the phytochemical Chapters 3–8 are given, where the respective species are discussed. The individually combined occurrence of sec- ondary metabolites from different structural classes characterizes every species. However, it has to be remembered that a small number of citations does not neces- sarily indicate a poorer secondary metabolism in a respective species compared with others; this may just be due to less studies being carried out. Solanaceae Plate 1a Anthocercis littorea (yellow tailflower): erect or rarely sprawling shrub (to 3 m); W- and SW-Australia; Sects. 3.1 / 3.4 Plate 1b, c Atropa belladonna (deadly nightshade): erect herbaceous perennial plant (to 1.5 m); Europe to central Asia (naturalized: N-USA; cultivated as a medicinal plant); b fruiting twig; c flowers, unripe (green) and ripe (black) berries; Sects. 3.1 / 3.3.2 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 6.5.2 / 7.5.1 / 7.7.2 / 7.7.4.3 Plate 1d Brugmansia versicolor (angel’s trumpet): shrub or small tree (to 5 m); tropical parts of Ecuador west of the Andes (cultivated as an ornamental in tropical and subtropical regions); Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Flora Survey Rottnest Island Golf Course
    PARTIAL FLORA SURVEY ROTTNEST ISLAND GOLF COURSE Prepared by Marion Timms Commencing 1 st Fairway travelling to 2 nd – 11 th left hand side Family Botanical Name Common Name Mimosaceae Acacia rostellifera Summer scented wattle Dasypogonaceae Acanthocarpus preissii Prickle lily Apocynaceae Alyxia Buxifolia Dysentry bush Casuarinacea Casuarina obesa Swamp sheoak Cupressaceae Callitris preissii Rottnest Is. Pine Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia indica supsp. Bidens Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Chenopodiaceae Threlkeldia diffusa Coast bonefruit Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Suada australis Seablite Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Poaceae Sporabolis virginicus Marine couch Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phylliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Poaceae Stipa flavescens Tussock grass 2nd – 11 th Fairway Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Cyperaceae Gahnia trifida Coast sword sedge Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phyliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Central drainage wetland commencing at Vietnam sign Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia halecnomoides Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Poaceae Sporobolis virginicus Cyperaceae Gahnia Trifida Coast sword sedge
    [Show full text]
  • The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886
    The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 Sascha Nolden, Simon Nathan & Esme Mildenhall Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H November 2013 Published by the Geoscience Society of New Zealand Inc, 2013 Information on the Society and its publications is given at www.gsnz.org.nz © Copyright Simon Nathan & Sascha Nolden, 2013 Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H ISBN 978-1-877480-29-4 ISSN 2230-4495 (Online) ISSN 2230-4487 (Print) We gratefully acknowledge financial assistance from the Brian Mason Scientific and Technical Trust which has provided financial support for this project. This document is available as a PDF file that can be downloaded from the Geoscience Society website at: http://www.gsnz.org.nz/information/misc-series-i-49.html Bibliographic Reference Nolden, S.; Nathan, S.; Mildenhall, E. 2013: The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886. Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H. 219 pages. The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 CONTENTS Introduction 3 The Sumner Cave controversy Sources of the Haast-Hooker correspondence Transcription and presentation of the letters Acknowledgements References Calendar of Letters 8 Transcriptions of the Haast-Hooker letters 12 Appendix 1: Undated letter (fragment), ca 1867 208 Appendix 2: Obituary for Sir Julius von Haast 209 Appendix 3: Biographical register of names mentioned in the correspondence 213 Figures Figure 1: Photographs
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Updated Checklist of the Libyan Flora
    Towards an updated checklist of the Libyan flora Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 (CC-BY) Open access Gawhari, A. M. H., Jury, S. L. and Culham, A. (2018) Towards an updated checklist of the Libyan flora. Phytotaxa, 338 (1). pp. 1-16. ISSN 1179-3155 doi: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/76559/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 Identification Number/DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 <https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1> Publisher: Magnolia Press All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Phytotaxa 338 (1): 001–016 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 Towards an updated checklist of the Libyan flora AHMED M. H. GAWHARI1, 2, STEPHEN L. JURY 2 & ALASTAIR CULHAM 2 1 Botany Department, Cyrenaica Herbarium, Faculty of Sciences, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya E-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Reading Herbarium, The Harborne Building, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Read- ing, RG6 6AS, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT 25/10/90; Plant List Updated Oct. 1992; Notes Added June 2021
    DRAFT 25/10/90; plant list updated Oct. 1992; notes added June 2021. PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION VALUES OF OPEN COUNTRY PADDOCK, BOOLARDY STATION Allan H. Burbidge and J.K. Rolfe INTRODUCTION Boolardy Station is situated about 150 km north of Yalgoo and 140 km west-north-west of Cue, in the Shire of Murchison, Western Australia. Open Country Paddock (about 16 000 ha) is in the south-east corner of the station, at 27o05'S, 116o50'E. The most prominent named feature is Coolamooka Hill, near the eastern boundary of the paddock. There are no conservation reserves in this region, although there are some small reserves set aside for various other purposes. Previous biological data for the station consist of broad scale vegetation mapping and land system mapping. Beard (1976) mapped the entire Murchison region at 1: 1 000 000. The Open Country Paddock area was mapped as supporting mulga woodlands and shrublands. More detailed mapping of land system units for rangeland assessment purposes has been carried out more recently at a scale of 1: 40 000 (Payne and Curry in prep.). Seven land systems were identified in open Country Paddock (Fig. 1). Apart from these studies, no detailed biological survey work appears to have been done in the area. Open Country Paddock has been only lightly grazed by domestic stock because of the presence of Kite-leaf Poison (Gastrolobium laytonii) and a lack of fresh water. Because of this and the generally good condition of the paddock and presence of a wide range of plant species, P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER No -70 MARCH 1992
    AlAstraliaYJ S~stematic · · . BotaVl~ 5ociet~ . NEWSLETTER No -70 MARCH 1992 Dodonaea heteromorpha West . Price: $5.00 Registered by Australia Post Publication No. NBH 8068 ~ . , ISSN 1034-1218 AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED . Office Bearers Pre~ide-nt Dr J.G. West Australian National Herbarium GPO ~Box 1600 CANBERRAACT2601 - Tel (06) 246 5113 Fax (06) 246 5000 Vice Pr-esident Secretary-~ Treasurer Dr G.P. Guymer Dr B.J. Conn Dr D.B. Foreman Queensland Herbarium National Herbarium of NSW · National Herbarium of Victoria Meiers Road Mrs Macquaries Road Birdwood Avenue INDOOROOPILLY QLJ:) 4068 SYDNEY NSW 2000 . SOU'I;H YARRAVIC3141 Tel (07) 377 9320 - Tel (02) 231 8131 Tel (03) 655 23oo Fax-(07) 870 327§ Fax (02) 251 4403 Fax (03) 650 5917 Councillors Dr J.A. Chappill Dr J.M. Powell DepartmentofBotany National Herbarium of NSW University of Western Australia Mrs MadJQaries Road NEDLANDS WA 6009 .SYDNEY NSW 2000" _'Tel (09) 380 2212 · Tel (02) 2:U 8135t . Fax (09) 380 1001, · FaJS (02) 251 4403 _ Affiliated So~iety ·Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Australian Botanical Liais-on Officer Dr P.S. Short Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Richmond, s'urrey. TW9 JAB. ENGLAND. Tel 44-81-940-1171 Fax 44-81C::B2-5278 Austral. Syst. Bot. Soc. Newsletter 70 (March 1992) 1 EDITORIAL It seems to me that systematics is at a cross­ slide, if not reverse the trend entirely. roads. During most of this century, taxonomy has There have been a couple of recent publications been on the decline from its pre-eminent position in discussing the details of these issues that are worth the biology of the previous two centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tmcm1de1.Pdf
    Departament de Biologia Facultat de Ciències Hybridization patterns in Balearic endemic plants assessed by molecular and morphological markers — Ph. D. Thesis — Miquel Àngel Conesa Muñoz Supervisors: Dr. Maurici Mus Amézquita (Universitat de les Illes Balears) Dr. Josep Antoni Rosselló Picornell (Universitat de València) May 2010 Palma de Mallorca El doctor Maurici Mus Amézquita, professor titular de la Universitat de les Illes Balears, i el doctor Josep Antoni Rosselló Picornell, professor titular de la Universitat de València, CERTIFIQUEN: Que D. Miquel Àngel Conesa Muñoz ha realitzat, baix la seva direcció en el Laboratori de Botànica de la Universitat de les Illes Balears i en el Departament de Botànica del Jardí Botànic de la Universitat de València, el treball per optar al grau de Doctor en Biologia de les Plantes en Condicions Mediterrànies, amb el títol: “HYBRIDIZATION PATTERNS IN BALEARIC ENDEMIC PLANTS ASSESSED BY MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL MARKERS” Considerant finalitzada la present memòria, autoritzem la seva presentació amb la finalitat de ser jutjada pel tribunal corresponent. I per tal que així consti, signem el present certificat a Palma de Mallorca, a 27 de maig de 2010. Dr. Maurici Mus Dr. Josep A. Rosselló 1 2 A la meva família, als meus pares. 3 4 Agraïments - Acknowledgements En la vida tot arriba. A moments semblava que no seria així, però aquesta tesi també s’ha acabat. Per arribar avui a escriure aquestes línies, moltes persones han patit amb mi, per mi, o m’han aportat el seu coneixement i part del seu temps. Així doncs, merescut és que els recordi aquí. Segurament deixaré algú, que recordaré quan ja sigui massa tard per incloure’l.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013–142.05 Mb
    Department of Parks and Wildlife Science and Conservation Division annual research report 2013–14 DIRECTOR'S MESSAGE There has been much change since we became the Department of Parks and Wildlife in July 2013, with renewed focus on conservation of Western Australia's unique plants and animals and our world- class network of parks, reserves and natural areas. Our Strategic Directions for 2013-14 recognised that science and research play a critical role in effective management of species and ecosystems. In October 2013 the Science Division was amalgamated with the Nature Conservation Division providing new opportunities for science to more directly inform conservation policy and management, and for management requirements and knowledge gaps to set research priorities. While much of our work supports the conservation priorities of the Wildlife corporate goal, we also provide scientific research and information to support delivery of the Parks, Fire, Managed Use and People corporate goals. The combined responsibilities of the divisions are focused around two main areas of Species conservation and Landscape conservation. Our work in species conservation involves activities, such as species and community recovery, wildlife protection and licensing, understanding species biology and taxonomy, while our landscape conservation work is focused on landscape and seascape management, development advice and liaison, understanding ecosystem processes and biological survey. Information systems and monitoring and evaluation link across both species and landscape conservation activities. Across all areas, effective exchange of knowledge and information to support legislation and policy is fundamental to effective delivery of wildlife management outcomes. Partnerships have always been an important means of achieving our outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematische Studien Im Umkreis Von Athrixia Ker-Gawler (Asteraceae)
    . © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at - 1 - Mitt. Bot .München 16 1 - 268 30.9.1980 ISSN 0006-8179 SYSTEMATISCHE STUDIEN IM UMKREIS VON ATHRIXIA KER-GAWLER (ASTERACEAE) von G. KRONER Inhaltsverzeichnis ALLGEMEINER TEIL 1 . Einleitung 3 2 . Material 4 3 . Historischer Überblick 5 4 • überblick zur Gattungsabgrenzung 8 5 Morphologie und Anatomie 9 Athrixia 9 Lepidostephium 13 Printzia 15 Asteridea 18 6. Morphologischer Vergleich von Athrixia und Printzia 22 7. Gründe für eine Trennung in Athrixia und Asteridea. 24 8. Die verwandtschaftliche Beziehung von Asteridea und Podolepis 28 9. Die Beziehungen von Athrixia zu Macowania, (Arrows- mithia) und Lepidostephium 29 a. Macowania und Arrovjsmithia 29 b Lepidostephium 31 c. Notwendige Neukombinationen 33 10. Abgrenzung der Gattungen und ihre verwandtschaftli- chen Beziehungen 34 11. Stellung der Gattungen im System der Inuleae 37 12. Tabellarische Übersicht über die wichtigsten Eigen- schaften von Macowania, Athrixia, Lepidostephium, Printzia, Asteridea, Podolepis und Leptorhynchus. 40 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at - 2 - SPEZIELLER TEIL Gattungsschlüssel 4 5 Athrixia Synonyme und Gattungsbeschreibung 4 6 Verbreitung und Ökologie 47 Schlüssel 49 Übersicht der einzelnen Arten, Gliederung der Sippen 52 Die einzelnen Arten 54 Spezies excludendae 101 Lepidostephium Gattungsbeschreibung 102 Verbreitung und Ökologie 103 Schlüssel 103 Die einzelnen Arten 104 Printzia Gattungsbeschreibung
    [Show full text]