DOCSLIB.ORG

Linguistic Survey of Nepal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Linguistic Survey of Nepal 1 LINGUISTIC SURVEY OF NEPAL (LinSuN) ___________________ A Proposal Prepared on behalf of National Planning Commission Government of Nepal ___________________ Drafting Team LinSuN Central Department of Linguistics Tribhuvan University June 27, 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (1 PAGER) ..................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (4 PAGER) ..................................................................................................... 3 1 BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE ................................................................................................. 8 2 CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY IN NEPAL ............................................................. 9 2.1 VARIOUS ESTIMATES ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 GENETIC AFFILIATION .................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 WRITING SYSTEMS ......................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 LANGUAGE AND ETHNICITY ........................................................................................................... 13 2.5 SECOND LANGUAGES AND LINGUA FRANCAS ................................................................................. 14 2.6 EXISTING LEGAL PROVISIONS ......................................................................................................... 15 3 EARLIER LINGUISTIC SURVEYS ................................................................................................ 17 3.1 HODGSON'S SURVEYS ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.2 CAREY'S LINGUISTIC SURVEY OF INDIA ......................................................................................... 17 3.3 GRIERSON'S LINGUISTIC SURVEY OF INDIA (1898-1927) ............................................................... 17 3.3.1 Grierson's Methodology ........................................................................................................ 18 3.4 CONTRIBUTIONS OF SUMMER INSTITUTE OF LINGUISTICS (SIL) ..................................................... 20 3.5 POKHAREL AND CHAUDHARI'S SURVEY ......................................................................................... 20 3.6 POKHAREL AND CHAUDHARI'S RESEARCH TOOL ........................................................................... 20 3.6.1 B K Pokharel's Research Tool ............................................................................................... 20 3.7 BANDHU'S FIELD SURVEY AND RNA'S SURVEY DESIGN ................................................................ 20 3.8 RAHUL SANKRITYAYAN'S SURVEY ................................................................................................. 21 3.9 GLOVER'S SURVEY OF GURUNG DIALECTS..................................................................................... 21 3.10 WINTER'S LINGUISTIC SURVEY OF NEPAL (1981-84) ................................................................... 21 3.10.1 Winter's Survey Tool ............................................................................................................ 22 3.11 MICHAILOVSKY'S TYPOLOGICAL SURVEY OF NEPALESE LANGUAGES (1988) .............................. 22 3.12 M POKHAREL'S SURVEY OF NEPALI DIALECTS ............................................................................. 22 3.13 AUSTIN HALE'S CNAS PROPOSAL FOR SOCIOLINGUISTIC SURVEY .............................................. 22 3.14 RESEARCH AND LANGUAGE DOCUMENTATION PROGRAMS AT CDL (1999-) ............................... 22 3.15 LINSUN PROJECT .......................................................................................................................... 23 3.16 TOBA ET AL'S SURVEYS ................................................................................................................ 23 3.16.1 Toba et al (2002)'s Survey Tool ........................................................................................... 24 3.17 BIELMEIER'S SURVEY OF TIBETAN DIALECTS ............................................................................... 24 3.18 MINOR SURVEYS .......................................................................................................................... 24 4 OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................... 24 5 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................. 25 5.1 A SOCIOLINGUISTIC DESCRIPTION OF ALL THE LANGUAGES OF NEPAL (OBJECTIVE 1) ................... 25 5.1.1 Lexical similarity ................................................................................................................... 25 5.1.2 Comprehension of Recorded Texts ........................................................................................ 26 5.1.3 Levels of Competence in the National Language ................................................................... 26 5.1.4 Sociolinguistic Questionnaires .............................................................................................. 26 5.2 BASIC LINGUISTIC DESCRIPTION: GRAMMAR SKETCHES (OBJECTIVE 2) ........................................ 27 5.2.1 Linguistic Description: Lexicon ............................................................................................. 29 5.3 DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN A COMPLETE DATABASE OF THE LANGUAGES OF NEPAL (OBJECTIVE 3) . 29 5.3.1 Database: Written corpora .................................................................................................... 29 5.3.2 Database: Spoken corpora .................................................................................................... 29 5.4 NEPALI SIGN LANGUAGE ................................................................................................................ 30 5.5 USE OF MOTHER TONGUES IN EDUCATION AND LITERACY IN NEPAL .............................................. 30 6 MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................................. 31 7 WORK PLAN ...................................................................................................................................... 33 7.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 33 7.2 TIME FRAME .................................................................................................................................. 35 7.3 MAN POWER .................................................................................................................................. 35 7.4 OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................... 36 1 2 7.5 PHASE ONE (YEAR 1 AND 2)........................................................................................................ 38 7.5.1 Sociolinguistic Component .................................................................................................... 38 7.5.2 Documentation Component ................................................................................................... 38 7.5.3 Literacy Component ............................................................................................................... 39 7.6 PHASE 2 (YEARS 3, 4, 5, 6, AND 7) .................................................................................................. 41 7.6.1 Sociolinguistics ...................................................................................................................... 41 7.6.2 Documentation ....................................................................................................................... 41 7.6.3 Literacy .................................................................................................................................. 42 7.7 INCOMPLETE DOCUMENTATION ..................................................................................................... 44 7.8 ARCHIVING COMPONENT ............................................................................................................... 44 7.9 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................ 45 7.10 SUMMARY OF WORK PLAN .......................................................................................................... 45 8 HUMAN RESOURCES AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTS ..................................................... 46 8.1 A PHASE BY PHASE REQUIREMENT ................................................................................................. 46 8.2 SPECIAL TRAINING PROGRAMMES.................................................................................................. 46 8.3 ACADEMIC TRAINING PROGRAMMES ............................................................................................. 47 8.4 ANALYTICAL AND TECHNICAL MANPOWER ................................................................................... 47 8.5 TRAINING ALLOCATIONS ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Language Use in Nepal
    CHAPTER 2 LANGUAGE USE IN NEPAL Yogendra P. Yadava* Abstract This chapter aims to analyse the use of languages as mother tongues and second lan- guages in Nepal on the basis of data from the 2011 census, using tables, maps, and figures and providing explanations for certain facts following sociolinguistic insights. The findings of this chapter are presented in five sections. Section 1 shows the impor- tance of language enumeration in censuses and also Nepal’s linguistic diversity due to historical and typological reasons. Section 2 shows that the number of mother tongues have increased considerably from 92 (Census 2001) to 123 in the census of 2011 due to democratic movements and ensuing linguistic awareness among Nepalese people since 1990. These mother tongues (except Kusunda) belong to four language families: Indo- European, Sino-Tibetan, Austro-Asiatic and Dravidian, while Kusunda is a language isolate. They have been categorised into two main groups: major and minor. The major group consists of 19 mother tongues spoken by almost 96 % of the total population, while the minor group is made up of the remaining 104 plus languages spoken by about 4% of Nepal’s total population. Nepali, highly concentrated in the Hills, but unevenly distributed in other parts of the country, accounts for the largest number of speakers (44.64%). Several cross-border, foreign and recently migrated languages have also been reported in Nepal. Section 3 briefly deals with the factors (such as sex, rural/ urban areas, ethnicity, age, literacy etc.) that interact with language. Section 4 shows that according to the census of 2011, the majority of Nepal’s population (59%) speak only one language while the remaining 41% speak at least a second language.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics &A
    Online Appendix for Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue (2014) Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics & Change Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue The following document lists the languages of the world and their as- signment to the macro-areas described in the main body of the paper as well as the WALS macro-area for languages featured in the WALS 2005 edi- tion. 7160 languages are included, which represent all languages for which we had coordinates available1. Every language is given with its ISO-639-3 code (if it has one) for proper identification. The mapping between WALS languages and ISO-codes was done by using the mapping downloadable from the 2011 online WALS edition2 (because a number of errors in the mapping were corrected for the 2011 edition). 38 WALS languages are not given an ISO-code in the 2011 mapping, 36 of these have been assigned their appropri- ate iso-code based on the sources the WALS lists for the respective language. This was not possible for Tasmanian (WALS-code: tsm) because the WALS mixes data from very different Tasmanian languages and for Kualan (WALS- code: kua) because no source is given. 17 WALS-languages were assigned ISO-codes which have subsequently been retired { these have been assigned their appropriate updated ISO-code. In many cases, a WALS-language is mapped to several ISO-codes. As this has no bearing for the assignment to macro-areas, multiple mappings have been retained. 1There are another couple of hundred languages which are attested but for which our database currently lacks coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Demography of Nepal
    AIMSA Collection For study Ethnic Demography of Nepal Harka Gurung Paper presented at a talk programme organized bv Nepal Foundation for Advanced Studies (NEFAS) January 10,1996, Kathmandu. 1. Definition and Data I. The basic elements of social composition include (a) race, as ethnicity/caste; (b) language or mother tongue; and (c) religion or belief. Many tend to include all these three under the rubric of 'ethnicity'. This seems misplaced. One such example leading to confusion is the terms 'Nepalese ethnic' used as in the case of refugees from Bhutan. They, however, include many ethnic/castes and are considered refugees because of their non-Nepalese political identity. They are indeed a group of people sharing Nepali language of which some have their own Tibeto-Burman mother tongue. Again, not all of them are Hindus as some follow their tribal belief. These so-called 'Nepalese ethnics' are actually a language group whether they subscribe to the semantics of Bhandari's 'Nepali' or Ghising's 'Gorkhali' Ethnicity, language, and religion do tend to overlap but treating them as discrete entities for analysis will contribute to clarity. 2. One also finds loose use of terms in Nepalese anthropological literature. This refers to transposition of linguistic labels in ethnic context such as 'Indo-Aryan' for Caucasoid or Khasa and 'Tibeto-Burman' for Mongoloid or Kirant. These two racial divisions also differ in social structure in that the Caucasoids are caste-based and the Mongoloids are mostly tribal. It would be useful here to make a subtle distinction of native terms 'jat' (caste) for the Caucasoids and 'Jati' (nationality) for the Mongoloids although they have a common etymology in the sense of 'species'.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Survey of India Bihar
    LINGUISTIC SURVEY OF INDIA BIHAR 2020 LANGUAGE DIVISION OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, INDIA i CONTENTS Pages Foreword iii-iv Preface v-vii Acknowledgements viii List of Abbreviations ix-xi List of Phonetic Symbols xii-xiii List of Maps xiv Introduction R. Nakkeerar 1-61 Languages Hindi S.P. Ahirwal 62-143 Maithili S. Boopathy & 144-222 Sibasis Mukherjee Urdu S.S. Bhattacharya 223-292 Mother Tongues Bhojpuri J. Rajathi & 293-407 P. Perumalsamy Kurmali Thar Tapati Ghosh 408-476 Magadhi/ Magahi Balaram Prasad & 477-575 Sibasis Mukherjee Surjapuri S.P. Srivastava & 576-649 P. Perumalsamy Comparative Lexicon of 3 Languages & 650-674 4 Mother Tongues ii FOREWORD Since Linguistic Survey of India was published in 1930, a lot of changes have taken place with respect to the language situation in India. Though individual language wise surveys have been done in large number, however state wise survey of languages of India has not taken place. The main reason is that such a survey project requires large manpower and financial support. Linguistic Survey of India opens up new avenues for language studies and adds successfully to the linguistic profile of the state. In view of its relevance in academic life, the Office of the Registrar General, India, Language Division, has taken up the Linguistic Survey of India as an ongoing project of Government of India. It gives me immense pleasure in presenting LSI- Bihar volume. The present volume devoted to the state of Bihar has the description of three languages namely Hindi, Maithili, Urdu along with four Mother Tongues namely Bhojpuri, Kurmali Thar, Magadhi/ Magahi, Surjapuri.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Languages
    AMERICA’S LANGUAGES Investing in Language Education for the 21st Century COMMISSION ON LANGUAGE LEARNING COMMISSION ON LANGUAGE LEARNING AMERICA’S LANGUAGES Investing in Language Education for the 21st Century american academy of arts & sciences Cambridge, Massachusetts © 2017 by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences All rights reserved. isbn: 0-87724-112-0 This publication is available online at https://www.amacad.org/language. The views expressed in this publication are those held by the contributors and are not necessarily those of the Officers and Members of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Please direct inquiries to: American Academy of Arts & Sciences 136 Irving Street Cambridge, ma 02138-1996 Telephone: 617-576-5002 Fax: 617-576-5050 Email: [email protected] Web: www.amacad.org Contents Acknowledgments v Preface vii Executive Summary viii Key Findings of this Report Key Recommendations of the Commission Introduction 1 Section 1: Building Educational Capacity 8 Section 2: Involving Local Communities, Businesses, and Philanthropies 20 Section 3: Developing Heritage Languages and Revitalizing Native American Languages 22 Section 4: Encouraging International Study and Cultural Immersion 27 Conclusion 30 Endnotes 32 Congressional Letters 39 Commissioner Biographies 43 Acknowledgments America’s Languages: Investing in Language Education for the 21st Century is the American Academy’s response to a bipartisan request from four members of the United States Senate and four members of the House of Representatives to examine the
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Side, We Must Mention Prof
    The Journal of Newar Studies Swayambhv, Ifliihichaitya Number - 2 NS 1119 (TheJournal Of Newar Studies) NUmkL2 U19fi99&99 It has ken a great pleasure bringing out the second issue of EdltLlo the journal d Newar Studies lijiiiina'. We would like to thank Daya R Sha a Gauriehankar Marw&~r Ph.D all the members an bers for their encouraging comments and financial support. ivc csp~iilly:-l*-. urank Prof. Uma Shrestha, Western Prof.- Todd ttwria Oregon Univers~ty,who gave life to this journd while it was still in its embryonic stage. From the Nepal side, we must mention Prof. Tej Shta Sudip Sbakya Ratna Kanskar, Mr. Ram Shakya and Mr. Labha Ram Tuladhar who helped us in so many ways. Due to our wish to publish the first issue of the journal on the Sd Fl~ternatioaalNepal Rh&a levi occasion of New Nepal Samht Year day {Mhapujii), we mhed at the (INBSS) Pdand. Orcgon USA last minute and spent less time in careful editing. Our computer Nepfh %P Puch3h Amaica Orcgon Branch software caused us muble in converting the files fm various subrmttd formats into a unified format. We learn while we work. Constructive are welcome we try Daya R Shakya comments and will to incorporate - suggestions as much as we can. Atedew We have received an enormous st mount of comments, Uma Shrcdha P$.D.Gaurisbankar Manandhar PIID .-m -C-.. Lhwakar Mabajan, Jagadish B Mathema suggestions, appreciations and so forth, (pia IcleI to page 94) Puma Babndur Ranjht including some ~riousconcern abut whether or not this journal Rt&ld Rqmmtatieca should include languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study from Nepal
    Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 13 (July 2017) Documenting Variation in Endangered Languages ed. by Kristine A. Hildebrandt, Carmen Jany, and Wilson Silva, pp. 152-179 http://nlfrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ 8 http://handle.net/24753 Areal Analysis of Language Attitudes and Practices: A Case Study from Nepal Kristine A. Hildebrandt and Shunfu Hu Southern Illinois University Edwardsville This paper has two aims. One aim is to consider non-structural (language attitude and use) variables as valid in the field of dialect and linguistic geography in an inner Himalayan valley of Nepal, where four languages have traditionally co- existed asymmetrically and which demonstrate different degrees of vitality vs. endangerment. The other aim is an application of modified spatiality as it aligns with speaker attitudes and practices amidst recent and ongoing socio-economic and population changes. We demonstrate that variation in self-reported attitudes and practices across languages in this region can be explained as much with adjusted spatial factors (labeled ‘social space’) as with traditional social factors (e.g. gender, age, formal education, occupation, etc.). As such, our study contributes to a dis- course on the role and potential of spatiality in sociolinguistic analyses of smaller language communities. 1. INTRODUCTION. In a recent paper on sampling in dialectology research, Buchstaller and Alvanides lament that until recently, “The majority of sociolinguistic work [could] be described as spatially naïve, using geographical space merely as a canvas…on to which the results of linguistic analysis [could] be mapped.” (2013: 96). This need for inclusion and testing of different types of spatial factors alongside social ones is increasingly being addressed in regions like the United States and Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Indigenous Knowledge
    Lund University Lund University Master of International Development and Management May 2010 The Seed and the Shaman: Encountering Diversity in Development Indigenous Knowledge Production among the Lohorung Rai of Eastern Nepal Author: Nathaniel Adams Supervisor: Anne Jernek Acronyms _____________________________________________________________ 2 Glossary ______________________________________________________________ 3 1.0 Introduction ________________________________________________________ 5 2.0 Research Problem: Diversity and Poverty in Rural Nepal ____________________ 7 2.1 Diversity in Nepal: What's at Stake __________________________________________ 7 2.2 Deconstructing Rural Poverty and Agricultural Development in Nepal _____________ 9 3.0 Research Purpose and Questions ______________________________________ 10 4.0 Study Construction __________________________________________________ 11 4.1 Study Area _____________________________________________________________ 11 4.2 Methodology and Sampling Technique ______________________________________ 12 4.3 Reliability, Validity and Ethical Considerations _______________________________ 14 5.0 Local Perspectives in Development: The Role of Indigenous Knowledge _______ 15 5.1 Anthropological Perspectives on Indigenous Knowledge ________________________ 15 5.2 Indigenous Knowledge and the Domains of Cultural Memory ___________________ 16 6.0 Indigenous Knowledge and the Construction of Lohorung Identity ___________ 18 6.1 Public Labels ___________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Glimpse of Kirat-Yakthung (Limbu) Language, Writing, and Literacy
    Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2017, pp. 560-593 Delinking, Relinking, and Linking Methodologies: A Glimpse of Kirat-Yakthung (Limbu) Language, Writing, and Literacy Marohang Limbu1 Writing, Rhetoric, and American Cultures Michigan State University, USA Abstract: Limbus (Limboos), who are also known as “Yakthungs” or “Kirat-Yakthung” or “Kirats,” have/had their own unique culture, language, writing, and Mundhum rhetorics. After “Nun-Paani Sandhi” (Salt-Water Treaty) in 1774 with Khas-Aryas, they (Khas- Aryans) ideologically and Politically banned Limbus from teaching of their language, writing, and Mundhum rhetorics in Yakthung laje (Limbuwan). Because of the Khas-Aryan oPPression, Limbu culture had/has become oral-dominant; Yakthungs used/use oral- Performance-based Mundhum rhetorics to Preserve their culture, language, histories, and Mundhum rhetorics. The main PurPose of this article is to discuss the develoPment of Kirat-Yakthung’s writing and rhetoric and/or rise-fall-rise of Yakthung scriPt, writing, and literacy. The essay demonstrates how Kirat-Yakthung indigenous PeoPles are delinking (denaturalizing or unlearning) Khas-Aryan-, Indian-, and Western linguistic and/or cultural colonization, how they are relinking (revisiting or relandscaPing) their Susuwa Lilim and/or Sawa Yet Hang ePistemologies, and how they are linking their cultural and linguistic identities from local to global level. In this essay, I briefly discuss delinking, relinking, and linking methodology, and how Kirat-Yakthungs are translating it into Practice. This essay demonstrates Khas-Aryan intervention and/or Khas-Aryan paracolonial intervention in the develoPment of Kirat-Yakthung writing and literacy, and Kirat-Yakthungs’ resistance for their existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociolinguistic Survey of Lohorung
    DigitalResources Electronic Survey Report 2014-003 ® Sociolinguistic Survey of Lohorung Jessica R. Mitchell and Holly J. Hilty Sociolinguistic Survey of Lohorung Jessica R. Mitchell and Holly J. Hilty SIL International® 2014 SIL Electronic Survey Report 2014-003, March 2014 © 2014 SIL International® All rights reserved 1 Abstract This report presents the results of sociolinguistic research conducted among representatives of the Lohorung [ISO 639-3: lbr], Yamphu [ybi], and Southern Yamphu [lrr] language communities of Sankhuwasabha and Dhankuta districts in Nepal. Linguistic and anthropological research, by van Driem (2001), Rutgers (1998), Hansson (1991), and Hardman (2000), provide helpful context for this investigation of sociolinguistic realities between these groups. The goals of this survey include clarifying the relationships between Lohorung and two related languages; investigating dialect variation and attitudes between three Lohorung communities (Pangma, Angala, and Dhupu); assessing Lohorung language vitality in these three communities; and understanding the Lohorung community’s desires for development. This research adds to previous linguistic description of Lohorung and Yamphu to confirm that, despite their close relationship, they speak separate languages. There is little dialect variation between the Lohorung villages we visited. There are positive attitudes towards the speech variety of Pangma. While language vitality varies among these three Lohorung villages, the degree of vitality (EGIDS 6b, Threatened) warrants language-based
    [Show full text]
  • Language Perceptions and Practices in Multilingual Universities
    Language Perceptions and Practices in Multilingual Universities Edited by Maria Kuteeva Kathrin Kaufhold Niina Hynninen Language Perceptions and Practices in Multilingual Universities Maria Kuteeva Kathrin Kaufhold • Niina Hynninen Editors Language Perceptions and Practices in Multilingual Universities Editors Maria Kuteeva Kathrin Kaufhold Department of English Department of English Stockholm University Stockholm University Stockholm, Sweden Stockholm, Sweden Niina Hynninen Department of Languages University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland ISBN 978-3-030-38754-9 ISBN 978-3-030-38755-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38755-6 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Languages in India
    Thomas Benedikter Minority Languages in India An appraisal of the linguistic rights of minorities in India ---------------------------- EURASIA-Net Europe-South Asia Exchange on Supranational (Regional) Policies and Instruments for the Promotion of Human Rights and the Management of Minority Issues 2 Linguistic minorities in India An appraisal of the linguistic rights of minorities in India Bozen/Bolzano, March 2013 This study was originally written for the European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen (EURAC), Institute for Minority Rights, in the frame of the project Europe-South Asia Exchange on Supranational (Regional) Policies and Instruments for the Promotion of Human Rights and the Management of Minority Issues (EURASIA-Net). The publication is based on extensive research in eight Indian States, with the support of the European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano and the Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group, Kolkata. EURASIA-Net Partners Accademia Europea Bolzano/Europäische Akademie Bozen (EURAC) – Bolzano/Bozen (Italy) Brunel University – West London (UK) Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität – Frankfurt am Main (Germany) Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group (India) South Asian Forum for Human Rights (Nepal) Democratic Commission of Human Development (Pakistan), and University of Dhaka (Bangladesh) Edited by © Thomas Benedikter 2013 Rights and permissions Copying and/or transmitting parts of this work without prior permission, may be a violation of applicable law. The publishers encourage dissemination of this publication and would be happy to grant permission.
    [Show full text]