DOCSLIB.ORG

July 7, 2019 Bulletin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
July 7, 2019 Bulletin Greetings on this blessed Lord’s Day! Please take a green Holy information sheet if this is your first time here. You can put in any collection basket or hand to greeter Protection IN EMERGENCY CALL/TEXT 813- 406-2620 (Fr.’s cell). If in middle Orthodox of night and no answer, call 813- 659-0123or 813-451-9829 (Pani’s cell). If they are off duty please Jesus Christ, our Church call Parish Council President below Saviour and Redeemer Schedule Announcements Tone 2 Shh…It’s a surp rise! On July 14, after fellowship, the parish council is having a baby shower for Alexis Sunday, July 7 for anyone who would like to stay. She would love to have a book for the baby instead of a card. She is 10 am Divine Liturgy registered on Amazon: https://smile.amazon.com/baby-reg/28LF9SCLHA9FV 11:15am Fellowship Reader: Andy If you would like to serve on the parish council, please submit your name to a council member. The Altar: Jefferson elections committee will review all names and we will elect members on September 8 at the General Counters: Scottie, Assembly. Toney Please review the calendar on the side of the bulletin and notice if you are scheduled to be a counter with Sunday, July 14 a parish council member. 10 am Divine Liturgy Please do not walk through the flower bed in front of the church, several parishioners are working hard to 11:15am Fellowship make this area beautiful. Alexis Baby Shower Reader: Mat. Terry Sign up for fellowship! It can be as simple as bagels or donuts. Please see the board in the hall, or a Altar: Vasily & council member if you have any questions. Please refer to the Fellowship guidelines when it is your Vladislav Sunday to do fellowship. Counters: Scottie, Harry Christian Education will resume after summer. Pani will still print out the Children’s Word weekly for Sunday, July 21 the youth. Memorial Rebecca Delp’s Parents As you take your summer vacations, please remember to keep your pledge, the church’s expenses don’t 10 am Divine Liturgy take a vacation. 11:15am Fellowship Reader: Andy Reminder…Father’s days off are Monday and Saturday. Altar: Jefferson th Counters: Scottie, Tina Star Spangled Banner 4 Verse: Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand Sunday, July 28 Between their loved home and the war's desolation! Blest with victory and peace, may the heav'n rescued land 10 am Divine Liturgy Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation. 11:15am Fellowship Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, Reader: Brian And this be our motto: "In God is our trust." Altar: Vasily & And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave Vladislav O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave! Counters: Scottie, John S If you are coming to confession, please be in line by 9:50 am on a normal Sunday. On a Sunday there is a Memorial scheduled, please be in line by 9:35 am. Please line up down the center isle of the church. Parish council contacts: Scottie (President): 813-629-6027, Brian (Vice President): (813) 763-5226, Rebecca (Treasurer): (813) 763-5225, Paula (813) 838-4554 (Secretary) Tom Moore Financial Secretary Prayer Corner: Please pray for the ailing: Mary,Kathy, Susan, Helen, Neila, Olexander, Anna, John, Carol, Mat. Mary, SD. John, Randee, John, Ryan, Marie, Paul, Mary, Pangratios, Tikon, Vasili, Jeremiah, Dcn. Luke, Maria, John David, Elisabeth, Joshua, Alexander, Nicholas, Rebecca, Genevieve, Panteleimon, Vladimir, Margaret, David, Sarah, Jonathon, Simon, Judy, Fr. Michael, Anastasia, Demitrios, Alexandra, Israel, George, Michelle, Joseph, Jaqueline, Michael, Geverlyn, Thomas, Norma, Sally, Sarah, Derek, Susan, Lucy, Beth, Kathy, Phyllis, John, David, Shirley, Kalie, Madeline, Thomas, Patricia, Archimandrite David, Jake, Tom, Beverly, Taylor, Sylvia, Andreas, Josh, Nicole, Joyce, Sandy,Georgina, Kathy, Pam, Ann, Eli, Shay, Ocean, Lauren, Donna, Kim, Lori, Nancy, George, Sharon, Sylvia, Kristi, Gary, Tori, Joan, Thomas, Susan, Alexei, Mary, Mary Saint Kyriake was the only child of Dorotheus and Eusebia. Since she was born on a Sunday (Kyriake, in Greek), she was named Kyriake. One day a wealthy magistrate wished to betroth Kyriake to his son. Not only was she young and beautiful, but her parents were wealthy, and the magistrate wished to control that wealth. The magistrate went to her parents to request her hand, but Saint Kyriake told him that she wished to remain a virgin, for she had dedicated herself to Christ. The magistrate was angered by her words, so he went to the emperor Diocletian to denounce the saint and her parents as Christians who mocked the idols, and refused to offer sacrifice to them. Diocletian sent soldiers to arrest the family and have them brought before him. He asked them why they would not honor the gods which he himself honored. They told him that these were false gods, and that Christ was the one true God. Dorotheus was beaten until the soldiers grew tired and were unable to continue. Since neither flattery nor torment had any effect, Diocletian sent Dorotheus and Eusebia to Melitene on the eastern border between Cappadocia and Armenia. Then he sent Saint Kyriake to be interrogated by his son-in-law and co-ruler Maximian at Nicomedia. Maximian urged her not to throw her life away, promising her wealth and marriage to one of Diocletian’s relatives if she would worship the pagan gods. Saint Kyriake replied that she would never renounce Christ, nor did she desire worldly riches. Enraged by her bold answer, Maximian had her flogged. The soldiers who administered this punishment became tired, and had to be replaced three times. Shamed by his failure to overcome a young woman, Maximian sent Saint Kyriake to Hilarion, the eparch of Bithynia, at Chalcedon. He told Hilarion to either convert Kyriake to paganism, or send her back to him. Making the same promises and threats that Diocletian and Maximian had made before, Hilarion was no more successful than they were. Saint Kyriake challenged him to do his worst, because Christ would help her to triumph. The saint was suspended by her hair for several hours, while soldiers burned her body with torches. Not only did she endure all this, she also seemed to become more courageous under torture. Finally, she was taken down and put into a prison cell. That night Christ appeared to her and healed her wounds. When Hilarion saw her the next day, he declared that she had been healed by the gods because they pitied her. Then Hilarion urged her to go to the temple to give thanks to the gods. She told him that she had been healed by Christ, but agreed to go to the temple. The eparch rejoiced, thinking that he had defeated her. In the temple, Saint Kyriake prayed that God would destroy the soulless idols. Suddenly, there was a great earthquake which toppled the idols, shattering them to pieces. Everyone fled the temple in fear, leaving Hilarion behind. Instead of recognizing the power of Christ, the eparch blasphemed the true God as the destroyer of his pagan gods. He was struck by a bolt of lightning and died on the spot. Saint Kyriake was tortured again by Apollonius, who succeeded Hilarion as eparch. When she was cast into a fire, the flames were extinguished. When she was thrown to wild beasts, they became tame and gentle. Therefore, Apollonius sentenced her to death by the sword. She was permitted time to pray, so she asked God to receive her soul, and to remember those who honored her martyrdom. Just as Saint Kyriake ended her prayer, angels took her soul before the soldiers could strike off her head. Pious Christians took her relics and buried them in a place of honor. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St. Kyriake of Nicomedia
    St. Kyriake of Nicomedia Commemorated on July 7 St. Kyriake was the only child of Dorotheus and Eusebia. Since she was born on a Sunday (Kyriake, in Greek), she was given the name Kyriake. Not only was Kyriake young and beautiful, but her parents were wealthy. Thus, there came a time when a magistrate wished to betroth Kyriake to his son in order to control her wealth. The magistrate went to her parents to request her hand, but Kyriake told him that she wished to remain a virgin, as she had dedicated herself to Christ. The magistrate became angry and denounced Kyriake and her parents as Christians to Emperor Diocletian Upon Diocletian’s orders, soldiers arrested the family and brought them before him. He asked why they would not honor the pagan gods, and they replied that his gods were false ones, with Christ being the one true God. Dorotheus was beaten until the soldiers grew tired and were unable to continue. Since neither flattery nor torment had any effect, Diocletian sent Dorotheus and Eusebia to Melitene (located between Cappadocia and Armenia). He then sent Kyriake to Nicomedia to be interrogated by his son-in-law and co-ruler, Maximian. Maximian urged Kyriake not to throw her life away, promising her wealth and marriage to one of Diocletian’s relatives if she agreed to worship the pagan gods. Kyriake replied that she would never renounce Christ, nor did she desire worldly riches. Enraged by her answer, Maximian ordered that she be flogged. The soldiers who administered the torture eventually became tired, and had to be replaced three times.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Age of Constantine.Pdf
    The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine offers students a com- prehensive one-volume introduction to this pivotal emperor and his times. Richly illustrated and designed as a readable survey accessible to all audiences, it also achieves a level of scholarly sophistication and a freshness of interpretation that will be welcomed by the experts. The volume is divided into five sections that examine political history, reli- gion, social and economic history, art, and foreign relations during the reign of Constantine, a ruler who gains in importance because he steered the Roman Empire on a course parallel with his own personal develop- ment. Each chapter examines the intimate interplay between emperor and empire and between a powerful personality and his world. Collec- tively, the chapters show how both were mutually affected in ways that shaped the world of late antiquity and even affect our own world today. Noel Lenski is Associate Professor of Classics at the University of Colorado, Boulder. A specialist in the history of late antiquity, he is the author of numerous articles on military, political, cultural, and social history and the monograph Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century ad. Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S Edited by Noel Lenski University of Colorado Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521818384 c Cambridge University Press 2006 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • 81 the 'Marcellus Case' and the Loyalty of Julian
    TALANTA XLV (2013), 81 - 96 THE ‘MARCELLUS CASE’ AND THE LOYALTY OF JULIAN: ‘LATENT ARGUMENTS’ AND OTHERNESS IN AMMIANUS’ RES GESTAE María Pilar García Ruiz* This paper explores the traces of ‘latent’ argumentation in the account of Julian’s initial moves in Gaul under the guidance of the magister equitum Marcellus. Consequently it is considered whether or not the Panegyric in Honour of Eusebia, sent to the Court at that time, should be read as part of Julian’s defence against the accusations made by Marcellus in Milan, and if it had any bearing on Constantius’ decision. Finally, the leitmotif of Julian’s loyalty in the Panegyric in Honour of Eusebia and the Res Gestae (pιστός and apparitor fidus) prompts a consideration of key cultural differences in the works of Julian and Ammianus. Ammianus Marcellinus, a soldier of Greek origin, wrote a history of Rome (Res Gestae: RG) in which he endeavoured to be wholly faithful to facts by drawing on authoritative texts (Amm. Marc. 16.1.3: quicquid autem narrabitur, quod non falsitas arguta concinnat, sed fides integra rerum absolvit documentis eviden- tibus fulta, ad laudativam paene materiam pertinebit (“Now whatever I shall tell – and no wordy deceit adorns my tale, but untrammelled faithfulness to fact, based upon clear proofs, composes it – will almost belong to the domain of pan- egyric”)1. However, “the historical truthfulness” of Ammianus’ account is the most common subject of debate among scholars, whose views range from regarding the RG as an ‘accurate document’ to describing it as a ‘complex work of art’, and encompass a broad spectrum of intermediary positions2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ruin of the Roman Empire
    7888888888889 u o u o u o u THE o u Ruin o u OF THE o u Roman o u o u EMPIRE o u o u o u o u jamesj . o’donnell o u o u o u o u o u o u o hjjjjjjjjjjjk This is Ann’s book contents Preface iv Overture 1 part i s theoderic’s world 1. Rome in 500: Looking Backward 47 2. The World That Might Have Been 107 part ii s justinian’s world 3. Being Justinian 177 4. Opportunities Lost 229 5. Wars Worse Than Civil 247 part iii s gregory’s world 6. Learning to Live Again 303 7. Constantinople Deflated: The Debris of Empire 342 8. The Last Consul 364 Epilogue 385 List of Roman Emperors 395 Notes 397 Further Reading 409 Credits and Permissions 411 Index 413 About the Author Other Books by James J. O’ Donnell Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher preface An American soldier posted in Anbar province during the twilight war over the remains of Saddam’s Mesopotamian kingdom might have been surprised to learn he was defending the westernmost frontiers of the an- cient Persian empire against raiders, smugglers, and worse coming from the eastern reaches of the ancient Roman empire. This painful recycling of history should make him—and us—want to know what unhealable wound, what recurrent pathology, what cause too deep for journalists and politicians to discern draws men and women to their deaths again and again in such a place. The history of Rome, as has often been true in the past, has much to teach us.
    [Show full text]
  • A Medallion of Constantius II Julia Ruff Lawrence University
    Lawrence University Lux Lawrence University Honors Projects 2005 A Medallion of Constantius II Julia Ruff Lawrence University Follow this and additional works at: https://lux.lawrence.edu/luhp Part of the Byzantine and Modern Greek Commons © Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Recommended Citation Ruff, Julia, "A Medallion of Constantius II" (2005). Lawrence University Honors Projects. 70. https://lux.lawrence.edu/luhp/70 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Lux. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lawrence University Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Lux. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This honors these submitted by Julia Ruff has been read and found acceptable for Honors in Independent Study Randall McNeill, Member of the Examinin~ Committee Je#ld Podair, Member of the Examining Committee Carol Lawton, Thesis Adviser A MEDALLION OF CONSTANTIUS II Julia Ruff TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 1 Introduction 2-3 The Sources 4 Historical Background 4-9 Ammianus Marcellinus 9-12 Reign of Constantius II 13-18 Medallions: Definition 18-19 Medallions: Occasions for Minting 19-22 Medallions: Intended Recipients 23-27 Description of the Medallion 28 Obverse 28-33 Reverse 34-39 Medallions: Production 39-45 The Messages of the Medallion of Constantius 45-50 Conclusions 50-51 Figure 1 52 Figure 2 53 Figure 3 54 Figure 4 55 Figure 5 56 Figure 6 57 Figure 7 58 Figure 8 59 Figure 9 60 Bibliography 61-62 ( 1 ( PREFACE I would like to acknowledge those individuals who have helped to make this work possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saracen Defenders of Constantinople in 378 Woods, David Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1996; 37, 3; Proquest Pg
    The Saracen defenders of Constantinople in 378 Woods, David Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1996; 37, 3; ProQuest pg. 259 The Saracen Defenders of Constantinople in 378 David Woods RITING ca 391, the historian Ammianus Marcellinus has left us a vivid description of the Roman defense of W Constantinople against the Goths shortly after their crushing defeat by these Goths at Adrianopolis on 9 August 378 (31. 16.4ff): Unde Constantinopolim, copiarum cumulis inhiantes amplis­ simis, formas quadratorum agmimum insidiarum metu ser­ vantes, ire ocius festinabant, multa in exitium urbis inclitae molituri. Quos inferentes sese immodice, obicesque portarum paene pulsantes, hoc casu caeleste reppulit numen. Saracen­ orum cuneus (super quorum origine moribusque diversis in locis rettulimus plura), ad furta magis expeditionalium re­ rum, quam ad concursatorias habilis pugnas, recens illuc accersitus, congressurus barbarorum globo repente con­ specto, a civitate fidenter e rup it, diuque extento certamine pertinaci, aequis partes discessere momentis. Sed orientalis turma novo neque ante viso superavit eventu. Ex ea enim crinitus quidam, nudus omnia praeter pubem, subraucum et lugubre strepens, educto pugione, agmini se medio Goth­ orum inseruit, et interfecti hostis iugulo labra admovit, effusumque cruorem exsuxit. Quo monstroso miraculo bar­ bari territi, postea non ferocientes ex more, cum agendum appeterent aliquid, sed ambiguis gressibus incedebant. 1 1 "From there [Perinthus] they [the Goths] hastened in rapid march to Con­ stantinople, greedy for its vast heaps of treasure, marching in square forma­ tions for fear of ambuscades, and intending to make mighty efforts to destroy the famous city. But while they were madly rushing on and almost knocking at the barriers of the gates, the celestial power checked them by the following event.
    [Show full text]
  • Julian, Plutarch, and the Dangers of Self-Praise Lea Niccolai
    Julian, Plutarch, and the Dangers of Self-Praise Lea Niccolai T WAS IN THE INTEREST of Julian as emperor to present his own actions and decisions in the best possible light and to Iseek acceptance of his policies by providing his readers with an idealised image of himself. However, as a rhetorician aware that his audience included men of lofty rank and high literary standards, he also knew of the dangers of explicit self-praise. This paper aims to deepen the enquiry into the issue of Julian’s rhetorical (self)awareness by providing a closer look at his argu- mentative techniques and at the unusual context in which they were employed, given that his addressees were also his subjects. In particular, I will propose that Julian’s political writings show the influence of a model of an unexpected nature, that is, of a source of rhetorical inspiration not stemming from the environ- ment of rhetorical training: Plutarch’s De se ipsum citra invidiam laudando, a short moralistic treatise in which Plutarch, touching on the theme of self-praise with unparalleled sensitivity to the social and political consequences of the practice, offers sugges- tions on how to pursue self-promotion without exposing oneself to charges of arrogance and conceit. Praise (and self-praise) in late antiquity When in his Confessions Augustine praises God for bringing home to him the “misery” associated with court flattery,1 his statement does not represent a sudden disclosure, to unaware readers, of the moral dubiousness of panegyrics, for audiences 1 Conf. 6.6.9: quomodo egisti ut sentirem miseriam meam die illo quo, cum pararem recitare imperatori laudes, quibus plura mentirer et mentienti faveretur ab scientibus.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Women and Clerical Exile in Late Antiquity
    This is a repository copy of Imperial women and clerical exile in late antiquity. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/144690/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Hillner, J. (2019) Imperial women and clerical exile in late antiquity. Studies in Late Antiquity, 3 (3). pp. 369-412. ISSN 2470-6469 https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2019.3.3.369 Published as Hillner, Julia, Imperial Women and Clerical Exile in Late Antiquity, Studies in Late Antiquity, Vol. 3 No. 3, Fall 2019; (pp. 369-412). © 2019 by the Regents of the University of California. Copying and permissions notice: Authorization to copy this content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by the Regents of the University of California for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified fee via Rightslink® or directly with the Copyright Clearance Center. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
    [Show full text]
  • NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus About NPNF2-02
    NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus About NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus Title: NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf202.html Author(s): Socrates Scholasticus Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) (Editor) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886 Source: Logos Inc. Rights: Public Domain Status: This volume has been carefully proofread and corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Proofed; Early Church; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature. Fathers of the Church, etc. NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories Socrates Scholasticus Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page.. p. 1 The Ecclesiastical History of Socrates Scholasticus.. p. 2 Title Page.. p. 2 Prefatory Note.. p. 2 Introduction.. p. 3 Sources and Literature.. p. 3 Life of Socrates.. p. 4 Socrates© Ecclesiastical History.. p. 9 History of Socrates© Work.. p. 14 Book I. p. 16 Introduction to the Work.. p. 16 By what Means the Emperor Constantine became a Christian.. p. 17 While Constantine favors the Christians, Licinius, his Colleague, persecutes them.. p. 19 War arises between Constantine and Licinius on Account of the Christians.. p. 19 The Dispute of Arius with Alexander, his Bishop.. p. 20 Division begins in the Church from this Controversy; and Alexander Bishop of Alexandria excommunicates Arius and his Adherents.. p. 20 The Emperor Constantine being grieved at the Disturbance of the Churches, sends Hosius the Spaniard to Alexandria, exhorting the Bishop and Arius to Reconciliation and Unity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experiences and Education of the Emperor Julian and How It
    COMPANION TO THE GODS, FRIEND TO THE EMPIRE: THE EXPERIENCES AND EDUCATION OF THE EMPEROR JULIAN AND HOW IT INFLUE NCED HIS REIGN Marshall Lilly Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2014 APPROVED: Christopher Fuhrmann, Major Professor Laura Stern, Committee Member Robert Citino, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Lilly, Marshall. Companion to the Gods, Friend to the Empire: The Experiences and Education of the Emperor Julian and How It Influenced His Reign 361-363 A.D. Master of Arts (History), August 2014, 108 pp., bibliography, 114 titles. This thesis explores the life and reign of Julian the Apostate the man who ruled over the Roman Empire from A.D. 361-363. The study of Julian the Apostate’s reign has historically been eclipsed due to his clash with Christianity. After the murder of his family in 337 by his Christian cousin Constantius, Julian was sent into exile. These emotional experiences would impact his view of the Christian religion for the remainder of his life. Julian did have conflict with the Christians but his main goal in the end was the revival of ancient paganism and the restoration of the Empire back to her glory. The purpose of this study is to trace the education and experiences that Julian had undergone and the effects they it had on his reign. Julian was able to have both a Christian and pagan education that would have a lifelong influence on his reign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire: Volume II by Edward Gibbon
    HISTORY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE By Edward Gibbon VOLUME II This is volume two of the six volumes of Edward Gibbon's History Of The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire. I will be scanning and putting out on the net the remaining five volumes as I find time to do this. So have patience. If you find any errors please feel free to notify me of them. I want to make this the best etext edition possible for both scholars and the general public. [email protected] and [email protected] are my email addresses for now. Please feel free to send me your comments and I hope you enjoy this. David Reed History Of The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire Edward Gibbon, Esq. With notes by the Rev. H. H. Milman Vol. 2 1782 (Written), 1845 (Revised) Chapter XVI: Conduct Towards The Christians, From Nero To Constantine. Part I. Note: The sixteenth chapter I cannot help considering as a very ingenious and specious, but very disgraceful extenuation of the cruelties perpetrated by the Roman magistrates against the Christians. It is written in the most contemptibly factious spirit of prejudice against the sufferers; it is unworthy of a philosopher and of humanity. Let the narrative of Cyprian's death be examined. He had to relate the murder of an innocent man of advanced age, and in a station deemed venerable by a considerable body of the provincials of Africa, put to death because he refused to sacrifice to Jupiter. Instead of pointing the indignation of posterity against such an atrocious act of tyranny, he dwells, with visible art, on the small circumstances of decorum and politeness which attended this murder, and which he relates with as much parade as if they were the most important particulars of the event.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lover of Mankind
    THE LOVER OF MANKIND By DEMETRIOS J. CONSTANTELOS YZANTINE THEOLOGY was historical] theology, and as such it is of contemporary significance. In its long process of ~ development and crystallization, religious thought in the medieval greek world became pregnant with the wisdom of the past and the solutions to the problems of the present and the future. Its study call engrave or draw a highway for the future of christianity and the ecumenical movement in particular. In the present article we are concerned with a most profound con- cept of byzantine theology, the meaning and implications of the term Theos Philanthropos, and philanthropia as a property of God. Early christian theology seldom used either the noun philanthropia as a property of the Almighty or the adjective philanthropos as God's attribute. Primarily, after the first quarter of the third century, christianity, in its efforts to adapt itself in the graeco-roman world and to make itself meaningful and attractive to future converts, appropriated terms and ideas already meaningful to the cultural and intellectual environment. Thus, while agape dominates in early christian literature as the new commandment, after the epoch of Clement and Origen of Alexandria christian thought became im- pregnated with the greek words philanthropia and philanthropos. 1 Clement of Alexandria was one of the most significant theologians who borrowed the term philanthropia in order to speak to pagans about God's love for man manifested through the incarnation of the Logos. Both God the Father and God the Logos are described as friends and lovers of man. Christ is the lover of man as both God and as man himself.
    [Show full text]