DOCSLIB.ORG

NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus About NPNF2-02

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus About NPNF2-02 NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus About NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus Title: NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf202.html Author(s): Socrates Scholasticus Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) (Editor) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886 Source: Logos Inc. Rights: Public Domain Status: This volume has been carefully proofread and corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Proofed; Early Church; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature. Fathers of the Church, etc. NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories Socrates Scholasticus Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page.. p. 1 The Ecclesiastical History of Socrates Scholasticus.. p. 2 Title Page.. p. 2 Prefatory Note.. p. 2 Introduction.. p. 3 Sources and Literature.. p. 3 Life of Socrates.. p. 4 Socrates© Ecclesiastical History.. p. 9 History of Socrates© Work.. p. 14 Book I. p. 16 Introduction to the Work.. p. 16 By what Means the Emperor Constantine became a Christian.. p. 17 While Constantine favors the Christians, Licinius, his Colleague, persecutes them.. p. 19 War arises between Constantine and Licinius on Account of the Christians.. p. 19 The Dispute of Arius with Alexander, his Bishop.. p. 20 Division begins in the Church from this Controversy; and Alexander Bishop of Alexandria excommunicates Arius and his Adherents.. p. 20 The Emperor Constantine being grieved at the Disturbance of the Churches, sends Hosius the Spaniard to Alexandria, exhorting the Bishop and Arius to Reconciliation and Unity.. p. 24 Of the Synod which was held at Nicña in Bithynia, and the Creed there put forth.. p. 27 The Letter of the Synod, relative to its Decisions: and the Condemnation of Arius and those who agreed with him.. p. 33 The Emperor also summons to the Synod Acesius, Bishop of the Novatians.. p. 41 Of the Bishop Paphnutius.. p. 41 Of Spyridon, Bishop of the Cypriots.. p. 42 Of Eutychian the Monk.. p. 43 Eusebius Bishop of Nicomedia, and Theognis Bishop of Nicña, who had been banished for agreeing in Opinion with Arius, having published theirp. 44 iii NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories Socrates Scholasticus Recantation, and assented to the Creed, are reinstated in their Sees.. After the Synod, on the Death of Alexander, Athanasius is constituted Bishop of Alexandria.. p. 45 The Emperor Constantine having enlarged the Ancient Byzantium, calls it Constantinople.. p. 46 The Emperor©s Mother Helena having come to Jerusalem, searches for and finds the Cross of Christ, and builds a Church.. p. 46 The Emperor Constantine abolishes Paganism and erects many Churches in Different Places.. p. 48 In what Manner the Nations in the Interior of India were Christianized in the Times of Constantine.. p. 49 In what Manner the Iberians were converted to Christianity.. p. 50 Of Anthony the Monk.. p. 52 Manes, the Founder of the Manichñan Heresy, and on his Origin.. p. 52 Eusebius Bishop of Nicomedia, and Theognis Bishop of Nicña, having recovered Confidence, endeavor to subvert the Nicene Creed, by plotting against Athanasius.. p. 54 Of the Synod held at Antioch, which deposed Eustathius, Bishop of Antioch, on whose account a Sedition broke out and almost ruined the City.. p. 55 Of the Presbyter who exerted himself for the Recall of Arius.. p. 56 Arius, on being recalled, presents a Recantation to the Emperor, and pretends to accept the Nicene Creed.. p. 57 Arius having returned to Alexandria with the Emperor©s Consent, and not being received by Athanasius, the Partisans of Eusebius bring Many Charges against Athanasius before the Emperor.. p. 58 On Account of the Charges against Athanasius, the Emperor convokes a Synod of Bishops at Tyre.. p. 60 Of Arsenius, and his Hand which was said to have been cut off.. p. 60 Athanasius is found Innocent of what he was accused; his Accusers take to Flight.. p. 61 When the Bishops will not listen to Athanasius© Defense on the Second Charge, he betakes himself to the Emperor.. p. 61 On the Departure of Athanasius, those who composed the Synod vote his Deposition.. p. 62 The Members of the Synod proceed from Tyre to Jerusalem, and having celebrated the Dedication of the ©New Jerusalem,© receive Arius and his Followers into Communion.. p. 62 iv NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories Socrates Scholasticus The Emperor summons the Synod to himself by Letter, in order that the Charges against Athanasius might be carefully examined before him.. p. 63 The Synod not having come to the Emperor, the Partisans of Eusebius accuse Athanasius of having threatened to divert the Corn supplied to Constantinople from Alexandria: the Emperor being exasperated at this banishes Athanasius into Gaul.. p. 64 Of Marcellus Bishop of Ancyra, and Asterius the Sophist.. p. 65 After the Banishment of Athanasius, Arius having been sent for by the Emperor, raises a Disturbance against Alexander Bishop of Constantinople.. p. 66 The Death of Arius.. p. 66 The Emperor falls sick and dies.. p. 67 The Funeral of the Emperor Constantine.. p. 68 Book II. p. 68 Introduction containing the Reason for the Author©s Revision of his First and Second Books.. p. 68 Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia, and his Party, by again endeavoring to introduce the Arian Heresy, create Disturbances in the Churches.. p. 69 Athanasius, encouraged by the Letter of Constantine the Younger, returns to Alexandria.. p. 70 On the Death of Eusebius Pamphilus, Acacius succeeds to the Bishopric of Cñsarea.. p. 71 The Death of Constantine the Younger.. p. 71 Alexander, Bishop of Constantinople, when at the Point of Death proposes the Election either of Paul or of Macedonius as his Successor.. p. 71 The Emperor Constantius ejects Paul after his Election to the Bishopric, and sending for Eusebius of Nicomedia, invests him with the Bishopric of Constantinople.. p. 72 Eusebius having convened Another Synod at Antioch in Syria, causes a New Creed to be promulgated.. p. 72 Of Eusebius of Emisa.. p. 73 The Bishops assembled at Antioch, on the Refusal of Eusebius of Emisa to accept the Bishopric of Alexandria, ordain Gregory, and change the Language of the Nicene Creed.. p. 74 On the Arrival of Gregory at Alexandria, tended by a Military Escort, Athanasius flees.. p. 75 The People of Constantinople restore Paul to his See after the Death of Eusebius, while the Arians elect Macedonius.. p. 76 v NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories Socrates Scholasticus Paul is again ejected from the Church by Constantius, in consequence of the Slaughter of Hermogenes, his General.. p. 76 The Arians remove Gregory from the See of Alexandria, and appoint George in his Place.. p. 77 Athanasius and Paul going to Rome, and having obtained Letters from Bishop Julius, recover their respective Dioceses.. p. 78 The Emperor Constantius, through an Order to Philip the Prñtorian Prefect, secures the Exile of Paul, and the Installation of Macedonius in his See.. p. 79 Athanasius, intimidated by the Emperor©s Threats, returns to Rome again.. p. 80 The Emperor of the West requests his Brother to send him Three Persons who could give an Account of the Deposition of Athanasius and Paul. Those who are sent publish Another Form of the Creed.. p. 81 Of the Creed sent by the Eastern Bishops to those in Italy, called the Lengthy Creed.. p. 82 Of the Council at Sardica.. p. 85 Defense of Eusebius Pamphilus.. p. 86 The Council of Sardica restores Paul and Athanasius to their Sees; and on the Eastern Emperor©s Refusal to admit them, the Emperor of the West threatens him with War.. p. 88 Constantius, being Afraid of his Brother©s Threats, recalls Athanasius by Letter, and sends him to Alexandria.. p. 89 Athanasius, passing through Jerusalem on his Return to Alexandria, is received into Communion by Maximus: and a Synod of Bishops, convened in that City, confirms the Nicene Creed.. p. 94 Of the Usurpers Magnentius and Vetranio.. p. 94 After the Death of Constans, the Western Emperor, Paul and Athanasius are again ejected from their Sees: the Former on his Way into Exile is slain; but the Latter escapes by Flight.. p. 95 Macedonius having possessed himself of the See of Constantinople inflicts much Injury on those who differ from him.. p. 96 Athanasius© Account of the Deeds of Violence committed at Alexandria by George the Arian.. p. 97 Of the Heresiarch Photinus.. p. 98 Creeds published at Sirmium in Presence of the Emperor Constantius.. p. 99 Of Hosius, Bishop of Cordova.. ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D
    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus
    NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus Christian Classics Ethereal Library About NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories by Socrates Scholasticus Title: NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf202.html Author(s): Socrates Scholasticus Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) (Editor) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886 Source: Logos Inc. Rights: Copyright Christian Classics Ethereal Library Status: This volume has been carefully proofread and corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Proofed; Early Church; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature. Fathers of the Church, etc. NPNF2-02. Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories Socrates Scholasticus Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page.. p. 1 The Ecclesiastical History of Socrates Scholasticus.. p. 2 Title Page.. p. 2 Prefatory Note.. p. 2 Introduction.. p. 3 Sources and Literature.. p. 3 Life of Socrates.. p. 4 Socrates© Ecclesiastical History.. p. 11 History of Socrates© Work.. p. 17 Book I. p. 19 Introduction to the Work.. p. 19 By what Means the Emperor Constantine became a Christian.. p. 20 While Constantine favors the Christians, Licinius, his Colleague, persecutes them.. p. 22 War arises between Constantine and Licinius on Account of the Christians.. p. 22 The Dispute of Arius with Alexander, his Bishop.. p. 23 Division begins in the Church from this Controversy; and Alexander Bishop of Alexandria excommunicates Arius and his Adherents.. p. 24 The Emperor Constantine being grieved at the Disturbance of the Churches, sends Hosius the Spaniard to Alexandria, exhorting the Bishop and Arius to Reconciliation and Unity.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman-Barbarian Marriages in the Late Empire R.C
    ROMAN-BARBARIAN MARRIAGES IN THE LATE EMPIRE R.C. Blockley In 1964 Rosario Soraci published a study of conubia between Romans and Germans from the fourth to the sixth century A.D.1 Although the title of the work might suggest that its concern was to be with such marriages through- out the period, in fact its aim was much more restricted. Beginning with a law issued by Valentinian I in 370 or 373 to the magister equitum Theodosius (C.Th. 3.14.1), which banned on pain of death all marriages between Roman pro- vincials and barbarae or gentiles, Soraci, after assessing the context and intent of the law, proceeded to discuss its influence upon the practices of the Germanic kingdoms which succeeded the Roman Empire in the West. The text of the law reads: Nulli provineialium, cuiuscumque ordinis aut loci fuerit, cum bar- bara sit uxore coniugium, nec ulli gentilium provinciales femina copuletur. Quod si quae inter provinciales atque gentiles adfinitates ex huiusmodi nuptiis extiterit, quod in his suspectum vel noxium detegitur, capitaliter expietur. This was regarded by Soraci not as a general banning law but rather as a lim- ited attempt, in the context of current hostilities with the Alamanni, to keep those barbarians serving the Empire (gentiles)isolated from the general Roman 2 populace. The German lawmakers, however, exemplified by Alaric in his 63 64 interpretatio,3 took it as a general banning law and applied it in this spir- it, so that it became the basis for the prohibition under the Germanic king- doms of intermarriage between Romans and Germans.
    [Show full text]
  • Exiling Bishops: the Policy of Constantius II
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Classical Studies Faculty Publications Classical Studies 2014 Exiling Bishops: The olicP y of Constantius II Walter Stevenson University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/classicalstudies-faculty- publications Part of the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Stevenson, Walt. "Exiling Bishops: The oP licy of Canstantius II." Dumbarton Oaks Papers 68 (2014): 7-27. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classical Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Exiling Bishops: The Policy of Constantius II Walt Stevenson onstantius II was forced by circumstances to all instances in which Constantius II exiled bishops Cmake innovations in the policy that his father and focus on a sympathetic reading of his strategy.2 Constantine had followed in exiling bishops. While Though the sources for this period are muddled and ancient tradition has made the father into a sagacious require extensive sorting, a panoramic view of exile saint and the son into a fanatical demon, recent schol- incidents reveals a pattern in which Constantius moved arship has tended to stress continuity between the two past his father’s precedents to mold a new, intelligent regimes.1 This article will attempt to gather
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca
    Conversion and Empire: Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (ca. 300-900) by Alexander Borislavov Angelov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor John V.A. Fine, Jr., Chair Professor Emeritus H. Don Cameron Professor Paul Christopher Johnson Professor Raymond H. Van Dam Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Alexander Borislavov Angelov 2011 To my mother Irina with all my love and gratitude ii Acknowledgements To put in words deepest feelings of gratitude to so many people and for so many things is to reflect on various encounters and influences. In a sense, it is to sketch out a singular narrative but of many personal “conversions.” So now, being here, I am looking back, and it all seems so clear and obvious. But, it is the historian in me that realizes best the numerous situations, emotions, and dilemmas that brought me where I am. I feel so profoundly thankful for a journey that even I, obsessed with planning, could not have fully anticipated. In a final analysis, as my dissertation grew so did I, but neither could have become better without the presence of the people or the institutions that I feel so fortunate to be able to acknowledge here. At the University of Michigan, I first thank my mentor John Fine for his tremendous academic support over the years, for his friendship always present when most needed, and for best illustrating to me how true knowledge does in fact produce better humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Emperors and Generals in the Fourth Century Doug Lee Roman
    Emperors and Generals in the Fourth Century Doug Lee Roman emperors had always been conscious of the political power of the military establishment. In his well-known assessment of the secrets of Augustus’ success, Tacitus observed that he had “won over the soldiers with gifts”,1 while Septimius Severus is famously reported to have advised his sons to “be harmonious, enrich the soldiers, and despise the rest”.2 Since both men had gained power after fiercely contested periods of civil war, it is hardly surprising that they were mindful of the importance of conciliating this particular constituency. Emperors’ awareness of this can only have been intensified by the prolonged and repeated incidence of civil war during the mid third century, as well as by emperors themselves increasingly coming from military backgrounds during this period. At the same time, the sheer frequency with which armies were able to make and unmake emperors in the mid third century must have served to reinforce soldiers’ sense of their potential to influence the empire’s affairs and extract concessions from emperors. The stage was thus set for a fourth century in which the stakes were high in relations between emperors and the military, with a distinct risk that, if those relations were not handled judiciously, the empire might fragment, as it almost did in the 260s and 270s. 1 Tac. Ann. 1.2. 2 Cass. Dio 76.15.2. Just as emperors of earlier centuries had taken care to conciliate the rank and file by various means,3 so too fourth-century emperors deployed a range of measures designed to win and retain the loyalties of the soldiery.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories Of
    ABSTRACT The Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret Scott A. Rushing, Ph.D. Mentor: Daniel H. Williams, Ph.D. This dissertation analyzes the transposition of the apostolic tradition in the fifth-century ecclesiastical histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret. In the early patristic era, the apostolic tradition was defined as the transmission of the apostles’ teachings through the forms of Scripture, the rule of faith, and episcopal succession. Early Christians, e.g., Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen, believed that these channels preserved the original apostolic doctrines, and that the Church had faithfully handed them to successive generations. The Greek historians located the quintessence of the apostolic tradition through these traditional channels. However, the content of the tradition became transposed as a result of three historical movements during the fourth century: (1) Constantine inaugurated an era of Christian emperors, (2) the Council of Nicaea promulgated a creed in 325 A.D., and (3) monasticism emerged as a counter-cultural movement. Due to the confluence of these sweeping historical developments, the historians assumed the Nicene creed, the monastics, and Christian emperors into their taxonomy of the apostolic tradition. For reasons that crystallize long after Nicaea, the historians concluded that pro-Nicene theology epitomized the apostolic message. They accepted the introduction of new vocabulary, e.g. homoousios, as the standard of orthodoxy. In addition, the historians commended the pro- Nicene monastics and emperors as orthodox exemplars responsible for defending the apostolic tradition against the attacks of heretical enemies. The second chapter of this dissertation surveys the development of the apostolic tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Kyriake of Nicomedia
    St. Kyriake of Nicomedia Commemorated on July 7 St. Kyriake was the only child of Dorotheus and Eusebia. Since she was born on a Sunday (Kyriake, in Greek), she was given the name Kyriake. Not only was Kyriake young and beautiful, but her parents were wealthy. Thus, there came a time when a magistrate wished to betroth Kyriake to his son in order to control her wealth. The magistrate went to her parents to request her hand, but Kyriake told him that she wished to remain a virgin, as she had dedicated herself to Christ. The magistrate became angry and denounced Kyriake and her parents as Christians to Emperor Diocletian Upon Diocletian’s orders, soldiers arrested the family and brought them before him. He asked why they would not honor the pagan gods, and they replied that his gods were false ones, with Christ being the one true God. Dorotheus was beaten until the soldiers grew tired and were unable to continue. Since neither flattery nor torment had any effect, Diocletian sent Dorotheus and Eusebia to Melitene (located between Cappadocia and Armenia). He then sent Kyriake to Nicomedia to be interrogated by his son-in-law and co-ruler, Maximian. Maximian urged Kyriake not to throw her life away, promising her wealth and marriage to one of Diocletian’s relatives if she agreed to worship the pagan gods. Kyriake replied that she would never renounce Christ, nor did she desire worldly riches. Enraged by her answer, Maximian ordered that she be flogged. The soldiers who administered the torture eventually became tired, and had to be replaced three times.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) P.289
    HEATHER, PETER, The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) p.289 The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion Peter Heather MMIANUS MARCELLINUS provides a detailed account of the re­ A lations between the Emperor Valens and the Goths during the period 367-378. But essentially because Ammianus does not mention it, there has been much controversy over the date of a Gothic conversion to Christianity ascribed in other sources to the reign of Valens. Equally, because the historians Socrates and So­ zomen link a civil war among the Goths to the conversion, it has also been unclear when this split might have taken place. It will be argued here that the primary accounts found in Socrates, Sozomen, and Eunapius can be reconciled with the secondary ones of Jordanes, Theodoret, and Orosius to suggest a Gothic conversion in 376. Fur­ ther, combined with Ammianus, they strongly indicate that Christian­ ity initially affected only elements of one Gothic group, the Tervingi, and was part of the agreement by which Valens allowed them to cross the Danube and enter the Empire in 376. It also becomes clear that the split too affected only the Tervingi, and occurred immediately before the crossing and conversion. This reconstruction in turn highlights the Huns' role in overturning the established order in Gothic society: their attacks first divided the Tervingi, who were unable to agree on an appropriate response, and prompted the larger group to seek asylum in the Empire and accept conversion to Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation
    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The Meletian schism at antioch Barker, Celia B. How to cite: Barker, Celia B. (1974) The Meletian schism at antioch, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9969/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk THE MSLETIAN SCHISM AT ANTIOCH THE MELETIAN SCHISM AT ANTIOCH THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM BY CELIA B. BARKER, B.A. (Dunelm) FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS Department of Theology, Date: April,1974. University of Durham. (1) The object of this thesis is to examine the schism in the Church of Antioch during the Arian Controversy of the Fourth century, with a view to establishing what coherent order, if any, can be found in the course of events, and to show how the interaction of theological emphases and personal prejudices exacerbated and prolonged the Antiochene divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Saints, Signs Symbols
    \ SAINTS, SIGNS and SYMBOLS by W. ELLWOOD POST Illustrated and revised by the author FOREWORD BY EDWARD N. WEST SECOND EDITION CHRIST THE KING A symbol composed of the Chi Rho and crown. The crown and Chi are gold with Rho of silver on a blue field. First published in Great Britain in 1964 Fourteenth impression 1999 SPCK Holy Trinity Church Acknowledgements Marylebone Road London NW1 4DU To the Rev. Dr. Edward N. West, Canon Sacrist of the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine, New York, who has © 1962, 1974 by Morehouse-Barlow Co. graciously given of his scholarly knowledge and fatherly encouragement, I express my sincere gratitude. Also, 1 wish to ISBN 0 281 02894 X tender my thanks to the Rev. Frank V. H. Carthy, Rector of Christ Church, New Brunswick, New Jersey, who initiated my Printed in Great Britain by interest in the drama of the Church; and to my wife, Bette, for Hart-Talbot Printers Ltd her loyal co-operation. Saffron Walden, Essex The research material used has been invaluable, and I am indebted to writers, past and contemporary. They are: E. E. Dorling, Heraldry of the Church; Arthur Charles Fox-Davies, Guide to Heraldry; Shirley C. Hughson of the Order of the Holy Cross, Athletes of God; Dr. F. C. Husenbeth Emblems of Saints; C. Wilfrid Scott-Giles, The Romance of Heraldry; and F. R. Webber, Church Symbolism. W. ELLWOOD POST Foreword Contents Ellwood Post's book is a genuine addition to the ecclesiological library. It contains a monumental mass of material which is not Page ordinarily available in one book - particularly if the reader must depend in general on the English language.
    [Show full text]