DOCSLIB.ORG

Converted by Filemerlin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Converted by Filemerlin Ahnentafel of Annet d'Anglure --- 1st Generation --- 1. Annet1 d'Anglure (M. de La Chenaye-des-Bois, Dictionnaire de La Noblesse, Contenant lesa Généalogies, l'Histoire et la Chronologie des Familles Nobles de France in Volumes, 1 to 15 (Seconde Édition; Rue St-Jacques, Paris: Antoine Boudet, Libraire-Imprimeur du Roi, (1770 - 1786)), Tome IV (Volume 4), MDCCLXXII (1772), Page 124.). AKA: Anne, Baron de Givri (Ibid.). AKA: René-Anne d'Anglure (Citing: Père Anselme, Histoire généalogique et chronologique de la Maison Royale de France, des Pairs, Grands Officiers de la Couronne et de la Maison du Roy: et des anciens Barons du Royaume, Collection H&G, (édition originale 1726-1733 et suppplément de Potier de Courcy en 12 volumes), n.d., http://www.histoirepassion.eu/?Genealogie-de-la-famille-Chabot-de-Jarnac-et-autres-lieux.). AKA: René-Anne, Baron de Givry (Ibid.). AKA: René- Anne, Comte de Tancarville (Ibid.). Born: before 1540, son of François d'Anglure and Marie de Verés, René-Anne is presumed to have been at least 20 years old by the itme he married Jeanne Chabot. Married on 1 Jun 1560: Jeanne Chabot,, daughter of Gui I Chabot and Louise de Pisseleu (Anne was Jeanne's first husband) (M. de La Chenaye-des-Bois, Dictionnaire de La Noblesse, Tome IV (Volume 4), MDCCLXXII (1772), Page 124.) (http://web.genealogie.free.fr/Les_dynasties, http://www.histoirepassion.eu/?Genealogie-de-la-famille-Chabot-de-Jarnac-et-autres-lieux.). Died: in 1562 (Ibid., https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). --- 2nd Generation --- 2. François2 d'Anglure (Ibid.). AKA: François, Vicomte d’Étoges (Ibid., https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d %27Anglure.). AKA: François, Sire de Boursault (Ibid., https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). AKA: François, Sire de Givry (Ibid.). AKA: François, Sire de la Fère-Champenoise (Ibid.). AKA: François, Vicomte d’Estoges (Ibid., http://www.histoirepassion.eu/?Genealogie-de-la-famille-Chabot-de-Jarnac-et-autres-lieux.). AKA: François, Chambelan / Gouverneur de Sainte- Menehould François was the Governor of de Sainte-Menehould, de Mouzon, Pierrefonds, Stenay et Luxembourg, and colonel du Régiment de Champagne de Charles Ier d'Aumale (Ibid., https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). AKA: François, Sire de Pont-Sainte-Maxence (Ibid.). Born: before 1500, son of René, Sire d'Anglure and Catherine de Bouzey, François is presumed to have been at least 18 years old when he married Anne. Married in 1518: Anne du Bec,, daughter of Jean du Bec and Marguerite de Roncherolles (Anne was François' first wife) (http://web.genealogie.free.fr/Les_dynasties, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). Married in 1523: Marie de Verés (Marie was the widow of Louis when she married François) (http://web.genealogie.free.fr/Les_dynasties, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). Died: in 1544 (Ibid., https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n %C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). 3. Marie2 de Verés. AKA: Marie de Véres (Ibid., https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). Born: before 1487 Marie is presumed to have been at least 18 years old when her daughter, Marie, was born. Married before 1505: Louis de Brichanteau. Married Name: de Brichanteau. Married in 1523: François d'Anglure,, son of René, Sire d'Anglure and Catherine de Bouzey (Marie was the widow of Louis when she married François) (http://web.genealogie.free.fr/Les_dynasties, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d %27Anglure.). Married Name: d'Anglure. --- 3rd Generation --- 4. René, Sire3 d'Anglure (Ibid.) (Ibid.). AKA: René, Vicomte d’Étoges (Ibid.). AKA: René, Vicomte de Blaigny (Ibid.). AKA: René, Sire de Pont-Sainte- Maxence (Ibid.). Born: before 1465, son of Simon, dit Saladin d'Anglure and Jeanne de Neufchatel, René is presumed to have been at least 20 years old when he married Catherine. Married in 1485: Catherine de Bouzey,, daughter of Jean de Bouzey and Marguerite de Brion (Ibid.). Died: in 1529 (Ibid.). 5. Catherine3 de Bouzey (Ibid.) (Ibid.) (Ibid.). AKA: Catherine, Dame de Givry-en-Argonne (Ibid.). Born: before 1470, daughter of Jean de Bouzey and Marguerite de Brion, Catherine is presumed to have been at least 15 years old when she married René. Married Name: d'Anglure (Ibid.). Married in 1485: René, Sire d'Anglure,, son of Simon, dit Saladin d'Anglure and Jeanne de Neufchatel (Ibid.). --- 4th Generation --- 8. Simon, dit Saladin4 d'Anglure (Paul Theroff, posts on the Genealogy Bulletin Board of the Prodigy Interactive Personal Service, was a member as of 5 April 1994, at which time he held the identification MPSE79A, until July, 1996. His main source was Europaseische Stammtafeln, 5 April 1994 @ 22:04 Hours.) (M. de La Chenaye-des-Bois, Dictionnaire de La Noblesse, Tome II (Volume 2), MDCCLXXI (1771), Page 430.). AKA: Saladin, Sire de Nogent. AKA: Saladin, Sire de Mouliherne. AKA: Saladin, Sire Châtel-sur-Moselle. AKA: Saladin d'Anglure (http://web.genealogie.free.fr/Les_dynasties, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). AKA: Saladin, Sire d’Étoges. AKA: Saladin, Sire de Gondrecourt Saladin was the chambelan de René II de Lorraine. AKA: Saladin, Sire de Givry. AKA: Saladin,Sire de Boursault. Born: circa 1436, son of Simon d'Anglure and Isabelle de Chastelet. Married before 1460: Jeanne de Neufchatel,, daughter of Humbert de Neufchâtel and Claudine de Ténare. Died: in 1499 (Ibid., http://fabpedigree.com/s078/f284138.htm, 7 December 2008.). 9. Jeanne4 de Neufchatel. AKA: Jeanne, Dame de Plancy (P.D. Abbott, Provinces, Pays and Seigneuries of France in ISBN: 0-9593773-0-1 (Author at 266 Myrtleford, 3737, Australia: Priries Printers Pty. Ltd, Canberra A.C.T., Australia, November, 1981), Page 81.). Married Name: d'Anglure. AKA: Jeanne de Neufchâtel (Paul Theroff, posts, 5 April 1994 @ 22:04 Hours.). AKA: Jeanne, Vicomtesse de Blaigny. Born: before 1445 at France, daughter of Humbert de Neufchâtel and Claudine de Ténare, Jeanne is presumed to have been at least 15 years of age by the time she married Simon, dit Saladin, d'Anglure. Married Name: d'Anglure. Married before 1460: Simon, dit Saladin d'Anglure,, son of Simon d'Anglure and Isabelle de Chastelet. Note - in 1503: Jeanne and her half-sisters and half-brother sold their rights to the fief de Plancy; Jeanne in 1503, Louise in 1502, Nicole in 1507, Jacques in 1510 [three offsprings of Miles de Dampierre by Charlotte d'Autrey who had married Humbert de Neufchâtel as his second wife]. The purchaser was Geoffroy La Croix, trésorier des Guerres [d. 1514]. This family kept the fief for six generations until 1654 when it was seized for debts. The acquirer was Henri Guénégaud [d. 1676], secretary of State. He had it erected into a marquisate in 1656 but his son Henri II lost it in 1714 in the same manner as his predecessors. Jean Moreau [d.1721] was the fortunate acquirer. Following the death of his daughter, Hélène, wife of Jérome Bignon, Maître des requêtes, the fief passed to Hélène's brother, Jean Baptiste. His son Charles Louis suffered the fate of the earlier holders in 1764. Claude Gocard d'Aucour, Secretary to the King, and his son were able to keep it until the Revolution (Abbott, Page 81.). 10. Jean4 de Bouzey (http://web.genealogie.free.fr/Les_dynasties, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d %27Anglure.). AKA: Jean, Sire de Saint-Germain. Born: before 1450 Jean is presumed to have been at least 20 years old by the time his daughter, Catherine, was born. Married before 1469: Marguerite de Brion. 11. Marguerite4 de Brion (Ibid.). AKA: Marguerite, Dame de Givry-en-Argonne (Ibid.). Married before 1469: Jean de Bouzey. Married Name: de Bouzey. --- 5th Generation --- 16. Simon5 d'Anglure (Paul Theroff, posts, 18 March 1995 at 16:07 Hours.). AKA: Simon, Seigneur d'Estoges. AKA: Simon, Seigneur de Donjeux. AKA: Simon, Sire de Bourlemont. Born: circa 1400, son of Jean Saladin d'Anglure and Jeanne de Bourlemont (http://web.genealogie.free.fr/Les_dynasties, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). Married in 1433: Isabelle de Chastelet,, daughter of Renaud, Seigneur de Chastelet and N? N? (Ibid.). Died: between 1471 and 1472. 17. Isabelle5 de Chastelet (Paul Theroff, posts, 18 March 1995 at 16:07 Hours.). Married Name: d'Anglure. AKA: Isabelle Matfride du Châtelet (http://web.genealogie.free.fr/Les_dynasties, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9n%C3%A9alogie_de_la_famille_d%27Anglure.). Born: circa 1410 at France, daughter of Renaud, Seigneur de Chastelet and N? N? (Ibid.). Married in 1433: Simon d'Anglure,, son of Jean Saladin d'Anglure and Jeanne de Bourlemont (Ibid.). Died: circa 1485. 18. Humbert5 de Neufchâtel (Paul Theroff, posts, 18 March 1995 at 16:07 Hours.). AKA: Humbert, Vicomte de Blaigny. AKA: Humbert, Seigneur de Nanteuil-la-Fosse. Born: before 1434 at France, son of Thibaut, bâtard de Neufchâtel and Améline de Bavans, Humbert is presumed to have been at least 18 years of age by the time his daughter, Jeanne, was born. Married before 1451: Claudine de Ténare,, daughter of Claude de Ténare and Jeanne, Dame de Plancy. Died: in 1471. 19. Claudine5 de Ténare (Ibid.). AKA: Claudine de Tonnerre (Abbott, Page 81.). AKA: Claudine, Dame de Plancy (Ibid.). Born: before 1412 at France, daughter of Claude de Ténare and Jeanne, Dame de Plancy. Married before 1451: Humbert de Neufchâtel,, son of Thibaut, bâtard de Neufchâtel and Améline de Bavans. Died: in 1459. --- 6th Generation --- 32. Jean Saladin6 d'Anglure (Paul Theroff, posts, 18 March 1995 at 16:07 Hours.). AKA: Jean Saladin, Seigneur d'Estoges.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crusaders and Georgia: a Critical Approach to Georgian Historiography1
    David Tinikashvili Ilia State University Ioane Kazaryan Unaffiliated researcher Crusaders and Georgia: A Critical Approach to Georgian Historiography1 Keywords: Georgia, Iberia, Crusades, David the Builder (King of Georgia), Jerusalem, Antioch, Roman Church, Pope I. Introduction In the present article we consider military relations between Latins and Georgians (Iberians) in the period of the Crusades. The research draws on Georgian and non-Georgian medieval sources as well as relevant secondary historical publications and reassesses some of the opinions expressed in the works by Georgian researchers. One of the first mentions of Georgians (Iberians2) in the Medieval Latin sources is a letter of a 12th century Latin clergyman, Ansellus, the Cantor of the Holy Sepulchre, addressed to Gallon the Bishop of Paris [Ansellus 1902: 729-732]. However, the major source of information about the Georgians is Historia Orientalis by Jacques de Vitry, bishop of Acre (†1240) [Jacques de Vitry 2008]. The chronicle was written at the time of the Fifth Crusade. Since then Georgians become widely known to Latin authors, who portrayed them 1 The authors are grateful to Dr Peter Halfter for his helpful comments on the article. 2 In this period “Iberia” and “Georgia” were synonyms [Skylitzae 1973: 339, 74-80; 340]. It should be mentioned that when Emperor Basilius arrived in Georgia, it was not eastern but south-western Georgia, which Skylitzae likewise calls Iberia. Besides, under the reign of David the Builder and King Thamar, Georgia (Saqartvelo) was a single kingdom called by the Latins Iberia in the 12th-13th centuries; e.g. crusader G. De Boys writes: “quodde Hiberia quidam Christiani” (“Christians from Iberia”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronicle of Matthew of Edessa Translated Below Is a Valuable Source for the History of the Middle East in the 10Th-12Th Centuries
    Matthew of Edessa's Chronicle Translated from Classical Armenian by Robert Bedrosian To the memory of Matti Moosa, visionary historian Sources of the Armenian Tradition (Long Branch, N.J., 2017) This translation is in the public domain. It may be copied and distributed freely. Maps: Two collections of maps appear as attachments to this document. Cartographers include: Robert H. Hewsen, B. H. Harut'yunyan, William R. Shepherd, Ramsey Muir, and H. W. Hazard. Translator's Preface Matthew of Edessa's Chronicle Part 1 The following Table of Contents was created for the convenience of readers and is not part of the Armenian text. 952-960 The famine of 952 in Mesopotamia; the Arabs assemble troops in Edessa and capture Samosata in 958; Emperor Romanus of Byzantium seizes Crete in 959. 961-970 The Arabs capture Anazarba and Aleppo in 961; royalty gathers at Ani for a coronation, also in 961; death of Emperor Romanus and the reign of Nicephorus II, Phocas 963-969 beginning in 963; how John Tzimisces became emperor, in 969. 971-980 Events in the Armenian city of Ani in 971 and thereafter; invasion of the Daylamites (Delmunk'); Vasak Pahlawuni's single-combat with a Qipchaq warrior named Seven Wolves; subsequent death of Vasak; the Byzantine general Mleh arrives at Melitene and forces the city to surrender, in 972; Mleh's subsequent defeat near Amida; Mleh's letter to Emperor Tzimisces; Tzimisces takes his troops to the East in 972 and is met by a large, watchful Armenian army; Tzimisces and the Armenian King Ashot make peace and Ashot agrees to provide auxiliaries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Political History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099 to 1187 C.E
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Honors Program Senior Projects WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Spring 2014 A Political History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099 to 1187 C.E. Tobias Osterhaug Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Osterhaug, Tobias, "A Political History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099 to 1187 C.E." (2014). WWU Honors Program Senior Projects. 25. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/25 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Honors Program Senior Projects by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Tobias Osterhaug History 499/Honors 402 A Political History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099 to 1187 C.E. Introduction: The first Crusade, a massive and unprecedented undertaking in the western world, differed from the majority of subsequent crusades into the Holy Land in an important way: it contained no royalty and was undertaken with very little direct support from the ruling families of Western Europe. This aspect of the crusade led to the development of sophisticated hierarchies and vassalages among the knights who led the crusade. These relationships culminated in the formation of the Crusader States, Latin outposts in the Levant surrounded by Muslim states, and populated primarily by non-Catholic or non-Christian peoples. Despite the difficulties engendered by this situation, the Crusader States managed to maintain control over the Holy Land for much of the twelfth century, and, to a lesser degree, for several decades after the Fall of Jerusalem in 1187 to Saladin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latin Principality of Antioch and Its Relationship with the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, 1188-1268 Samuel James Wilson
    The Latin Principality of Antioch and Its Relationship with the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, 1188-1268 Samuel James Wilson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2016 1 Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of the author. You may copy up to 5% of this work for private study, or personal, non-commercial research. Any re-use of the information contained within this document should be fully referenced, quoting the author, title, university, degree level and pagination. Queries or requests for any other use, or if a more substantial copy is required, should be directed to the owner of the Intellectual Property Rights. 2 Abstract The Latin principality of Antioch was founded during the First Crusade (1095-1099), and survived for 170 years until its destruction by the Mamluks in 1268. This thesis offers the first full assessment of the thirteenth century principality of Antioch since the publication of Claude Cahen’s La Syrie du nord à l’époque des croisades et la principauté franque d’Antioche in 1940. It examines the Latin principality from its devastation by Saladin in 1188 until the fall of Antioch eighty years later, with a particular focus on its relationship with the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia. This thesis shows how the fate of the two states was closely intertwined for much of this period. The failure of the principality to recover from the major territorial losses it suffered in 1188 can be partly explained by the threat posed by the Cilician Armenians in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • Cry Havoc Règles Fr 20/07/17 10:50 Page1
    ager historique UK_cry havoc règles fr 20/07/17 10:50 Page1 HISTORY & SCENARIOS ager historique UK_cry havoc règles fr 20/07/17 10:50 Page2 © Buxeria & Historic’One éditions - 2017 - v1.0 ager historique UK_cry havoc règles fr 20/07/17 10:50 Page3 SELJUK SULTANATE OF RUM Konya COUNTY OF EDESSA Sis PRINCIPALITY OF ARMENIAN CILICIA Edessa Tarsus Turbessel Harran BYZANTINE EMPIRE Antioch Aleppo PRINCIPALITY OF ANTIOCH Emirate of Shaïzar Isma'ili COUNTY OF GRAND SELJUK TRIPOLI EMPIRE Damascus Acre DAMASCUS F THE MIDDLE EAST KINGDOM IN 1135 TE O OF between the First JERUSALEM and Second Crusades Jerusalem EMIRA N EW S FATIMID 0 150 km CALIPHATE ager historique UK_cry havoc règles fr 20/07/17 10:43 Page1 History The Normans in Northern Syria in the 12th Century 1. Historical background Three Normans distinguished themselVes during the First Crusade: Robert Curthose, Duke of NormandY and eldest son of William the Conqueror 1 Whose actions Were decisiVe at the battle of DorYlea in 1197, Bohemond of Taranto, the eldest son of Robert Guiscard 2, and his nepheW Tancred, Who led one of the assaults upon the Walls of Jerusalem in 1099. Before participating in the crusade, Bohemond had been passed oVer bY his Younger half-brother Roger Borsa as Duke of Puglia and Calabria on the death of his father in 1085. Far from being motiVated bY religious sentiment like GodfreY of Bouillon, the crusade Was for him just another occasion to Wage War against his perennial enemY, BYZantium, and to carVe out his oWn state in the HolY Land.
    [Show full text]
  • Heineman Royal Ancestors Medieval Europe
    HERALDRYand BIOGRAPHIES of the HEINEMAN ROYAL ANCESTORS of MEDIEVAL EUROPE HERALDRY and BIOGRAPHIES of the HEINEMAN ROYAL ANCESTORS of MEDIEVAL EUROPE INTRODUCTION After producing numerous editions and revisions of the Another way in which the royal house of a given country familiy genealogy report and subsequent support may change is when a foreign prince is invited to fill a documents the lineage to numerous royal ancestors of vacant throne or a next-of-kin from a foreign house Europe although evident to me as the author was not clear succeeds. This occurred with the death of childless Queen to the readers. The family journal format used in the Anne of the House of Stuart: she was succeeded by a reports, while comprehensive and the most popular form prince of the House of Hanover who was her nearest for publishing genealogy can be confusing to individuals Protestant relative. wishing to trace a direct ancestral line of descent. Not everyone wants a report encumbered with the names of Unlike all Europeans, most of the world's Royal Families every child born to the most distant of family lines. do not really have family names and those that have adopted them rarely use them. They are referred to A Royal House or Dynasty is a sort of family name used instead by their titles, often related to an area ruled or by royalty. It generally represents the members of a family once ruled by that family. The name of a Royal House is in various senior and junior or cadet branches, who are not a surname; it just a convenient way of dynastic loosely related but not necessarily of the same immediate identification of individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Converted by Filemerlin
    Descendancy Narrative of Wulgrin I, Count de Périgord Wulgrin I, Count de Périgord (Wulgrin I was Mayor of the Palace of King Charles Le Chauve) (André Roux: Scrolls from his personal genealogicaL research. The Number refers to the family branch numbers on his many scrolls, 87, 156.) (Roderick W. Stuart, Royalty for Commoners in ISBN: 0- 8063-1344-7 (1001 North Calvert Street, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA: Genealogical Publishing Company, Inc., 1992), Page 234, Line 329-38.) (P.D. Abbott, Provinces, Pays and Seigneuries of France in ISBN: 0-9593773-0-1 (Author at 266 Myrtleford, 3737, Australia: Priries Printers Pty. Ltd, Canberra A.C.T., Australia, November, 1981), Page 329.). AKA: Wulgrin I, Count d'Agen. AKA: Wulfgrin I, Count d'Angoulême The province of Angoumois comprised the areas now occupied by the Departments of Charente, with some rectifications. Regions of Charente excluded from the Province were, in the North, those of Confolentais, Champagne Mouton, and Villelagnon; in the Southwest, that part of the arrondissement of Cognac, South of the Né. But included in the Province were Deux Sèvres, a small pays near Sauzé- Vaussais and in Haute Vienne, an irregular intrusion comprising Oradour, Saint Mathieu, and Saint Victurnien. The Capital of Angoumois was Angoulême [Charente]. At first part of Saintonge, Angoumois became an independent City late in the Roman era. During the Carolingians Period, the pays constituted a County, as it was also probably under the Mérovingiens. In 770, there was a Comte named Vulgrin; in 839, the Comte was Turpion. The latter was killed by Normans in 863.
    [Show full text]
  • Cilician Armenia in the Thirteenth Century.[3] Marco Polo, for Example, Set out on His Journey to China from Ayas in 1271
    The Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia (also known as Little Armenia; not to be confused with the Arme- nian Kingdom of Antiquity) was a state formed in the Middle Ages by Armenian refugees fleeing the Seljuk invasion of Armenia. It was located on the Gulf of Alexandretta of the Mediterranean Sea in what is today southern Turkey. The kingdom remained independent from around 1078 to 1375. The Kingdom of Cilicia was founded by the Rubenian dynasty, an offshoot of the larger Bagratid family that at various times held the thrones of Armenia and Georgia. Their capital was Sis. Cilicia was a strong ally of the European Crusaders, and saw itself as a bastion of Christendom in the East. It also served as a focus for Armenian nationalism and culture, since Armenia was under foreign oc- cupation at the time. King Levon I of Armenia helped cultivate Cilicia's economy and commerce as its interaction with European traders grew. Major cities and castles of the kingdom included the port of Korikos, Lam- pron, Partzerpert, Vahka (modern Feke), Hromkla, Tarsus, Anazarbe, Til Hamdoun, Mamistra (modern Misis: the classical Mopsuestia), Adana and the port of Ayas (Aias) which served as a Western terminal to the East. The Pisans, Genoese and Venetians established colonies in Ayas through treaties with Cilician Armenia in the thirteenth century.[3] Marco Polo, for example, set out on his journey to China from Ayas in 1271. For a short time in the 1st century BCE the powerful kingdom of Armenia was able to conquer a vast region in the Levant, including the area of Cilicia.
    [Show full text]
  • Cilician Armenian Mediation in Crusader-Mongol Politics, C.1250-1350
    HAYTON OF KORYKOS AND LA FLOR DES ESTOIRES: CILICIAN ARMENIAN MEDIATION IN CRUSADER-MONGOL POLITICS, C.1250-1350 by Roubina Shnorhokian A thesis submitted to the Department of History In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (January, 2015) Copyright ©Roubina Shnorhokian, 2015 Abstract Hayton’s La Flor des estoires de la terre d’Orient (1307) is typically viewed by scholars as a propagandistic piece of literature, which focuses on promoting the Ilkhanid Mongols as suitable allies for a western crusade. Written at the court of Pope Clement V in Poitiers in 1307, Hayton, a Cilician Armenian prince and diplomat, was well-versed in the diplomatic exchanges between the papacy and the Ilkhanate. This dissertation will explore his complex interests in Avignon, where he served as a political and cultural intermediary, using historical narrative, geography and military expertise to persuade and inform his Latin audience of the advantages of allying with the Mongols and sending aid to Cilician Armenia. This study will pay close attention to the ways in which his worldview as a Cilician Armenian informed his perceptions. By looking at a variety of sources from Armenian, Latin, Eastern Christian, and Arab traditions, this study will show that his knowledge was drawn extensively from his inter-cultural exchanges within the Mongol Empire and Cilician Armenia’s position as a medieval crossroads. The study of his career reflects the range of contacts of the Eurasian world. ii Acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without the financial support of SSHRC, the Marjorie McLean Oliver Graduate Scholarship, OGS, and Queen’s University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Literary Contribution of Some Important Historians Contemporary to Shams Al-Din Al-Dhahabi
    THE LITERARY CONTRIBUTION OF SOME IMPORTANT HISTORIANS CONTEMPORARY TO SHAMS AL-DIN AL-DHAHABI DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY^ ALIGARH, U.P. (INDIA) FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF iWaiter of ^|)iIo«op^p IN ARABIC Under the Supervision of By Dr, Abdul Bari Mrs, Sultana Razia Khanam M.A. (Arabic & Urdu;, B.A. (Hons) (Dae), B.L., Ph.D. (Patna) M.A. (Alig.) DEPARTMENT OF ARABIC, ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY, ALIGARH. 1986 J)s ^--1 ^g DS996 r"- ^«- •- Tele : 234 DEPARTMENT Of ARABIC ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH Dated..?*.**^..f.*^^.?^.».?.^ This is to certify that Mr«, ^Itena 'Isiasiw '^b^namhus ^one h#r M.Phil w®tlc uniar By suservlsion an4 h«s eoruDleted h«i» work succ«ssf!illy. This Is aa orlsrlnwl contrlbuties and «ntlr#ly h#r own* ( Pr* AHiuI Bari ) Sttparvlsor The tltl« ©f th» K^Phll m«sert«tloa is "Thf* T,lt«r?ry Contribution ©f 5-ORJ« lwf>ort'»T5t *!l?torl»»n!» Contvanwemrj to ^liras al-Dln CONTENTS Page Acknowledgement ... ... ... i Introduction Ibn al-Tiqtaqa ... ... ... 26 Abu al-Fida ... ... ... 62 Ibn Shakir al-Kutubi ... ... 7 9 Al-SafadI ... ... ... 86 Bibliography ... ... ... 99 I avail myself of this opportunity to express my high sense of gratitude to my learned supervisor and benign guide Dr. ''Abdul Barl, Reader in the Department of Arabic, Aligarh Muslim University, whose affectionate patronage and constant guidance have been an incessant source of information for me in completing this M.Phil. Dissertation entitled, "The Literary Contribution of Some important Historians Contemporary to Shams al-Din al-DhahabI" and whose valuable advice made this work possible to see the light of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the Royal Succession of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem (1099–1291)*
    Women in the Royal Succession of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem (1099–1291)* Alan V. Murray (Leeds UK) »During this time Baldwin, king of Jerusalem, died, leaving adaughter of marriageable age (for he lacked ason) as heir to the kingdom, which wasdeservedly divided against it- self, forsaken on account of itssins, and despised by the pagans, since it had passed into the hands of agirl, in what wasnogoodomen for government. For each of the foremost men of the kingdom desired to becomeruler and wanted to secure the girl and the royal inheritance by marriage –tohimself, if he lacked awife,tohis son, if he wasmarried, or to akinsman,ifhehad no son of his own;this caused the greatestill-will among them, which led to the destruction of the kingdom. Yet she, spurning the natives of the realm, took up with Guy, countofAscalon, anew arrival of elegantappearance and proven courage, and, with the approval of both the patriarch and the knights of the Temple, took him as her husband and conferred the kingdom on him«1). *) Dates given in parentheses in this essay relate to the reigns of the individualsaskings or queens of Je- rusalem.For ease of reference, royal documents issued in the kingdom of Jerusalem will be given accord- ing to their number in: Die Urkunden der lateinischen Könige vonJerusalem, ed. Hans EberhardMayer, 4vols. (MGH Diplomata Regum LatinorumHierosolymitanorum), Hanover 2010 (cited henceforth as D/DDJerus.), as well as those in the calendared forms given in: Regesta Regni Hierosolymitani (MXCVII–MCCXCI), ed. Reinhold Rçhricht, 2vols.,Innsbruck 1893–1904 (cited henceforth as RRH), which has been widely used in earlier scholarship.
    [Show full text]