DOCSLIB.ORG

The Early Latin Verb System: Archaic Forms in Plautus, Terence, and Beyond. Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Early Latin Verb System: Archaic Forms in Plautus, Terence, and Beyond. Appendices The Early Latin Verb System: Archaic Forms in Plautus, Terence, and Beyond. Appendices Wolfgang David Cirilo de Melo, All Souls College September 2007 Oxford Classical Monographs Contents Introduction to Appendices 1–3 1 Appendix 1: Regular Future Tenses 3 A: The Future Tenses in Plaut. Aul. and Curc. .......... 3 B: The Future Tenses in Ter. Ad. .................. 5 C: Simple Futures and Future Perfects of ¯ıre and the Relevant Compounds in Main Clauses . 6 Appendix 2: Main Clause Subjunctives 9 A: Plaut. Aul. and Curc. ...................... 9 B: Ter. Ad. .............................. 10 Appendix 3: Subjunctives in Subordinate Clauses 11 A: Subordinate Clauses Expected to Follow the Sequence of Tenses in Aul., Curc., and Ad. .................... 12 B: Subordinate Clauses Not Expected to Follow the Sequence in Aul., Curc., and Ad. ..................... 18 Appendix 4: Prohibitive Clauses and Selected Constructions of facere 22 A: Clauses Introduced by n¯e or n¯eue ................... 23 B: Prohibitions with Negatives Other than n¯e or n¯eue . 29 C: The Constructions of cau¯ere and Related Words . 30 D: Object Clauses Dependent on Selected Forms of facere . 32 i Appendix 5: Infinitivals — Regular Forms 36 A: The Present and Future Infinitives after c¯onf¯ıd¯o, cr¯ed¯o, d¯ıc¯o and sp¯er¯o .................................. 37 B: The Present and Future Infinitives after Sixteen Verbs . 47 C: Dare and dar¯ı .............................. 59 Appendix 6: Sigmatic Indicatives and Their Regular Counter- parts 65 A: The Sigmatic Indicatives in Plautus — Verbs . 68 B: The Sigmatic Indicatives in Plautus — Clause Types . 70 C: The Sigmatic Indicatives in Terence — Verbs . 71 D: The Sigmatic Indicatives in Terence — Clause Types . 71 E: The Remaining Sigmatic Indicatives in Archaic Latin . 71 F: The Causative Constructions of the Form faciam . 75 G: The Future Perfects in Plautus — Verbs with Sigmatic Futures 76 H: The Remaining Future Perfects in Plautus . 78 I: The Future Perfects in Terence — Verbs with Sigmatic Futures 85 J: The Remaining Future Perfects in Terence . 87 K: The Form fax¯o after 100BC . 89 L: Faxis, faxit etc after 100BC (+ Compounds) . 93 M: The Remaining Sigmatic Indicatives after 100BC . 99 N: Sigmatic Indicatives after 100BC — Citations . 101 O: Sigmatic Indicatives after 100BC — Explanations . 105 Appendix 7: The Sigmatic Subjunctives and Their Regular Coun- terparts 110 A: The s-Subjunctives in Plautus — Verbs . 112 B: The s-Subjunctives in Plautus — Clause Types . 114 C: The s-Subjunctives in Terence — Verbs . 115 D: The s-Subjunctives in Terence — Clause Types . 115 E: The Remaining s-Subjunctives in Archaic Latin . 115 F: The Regular Subjunctives in Plautus — Verbs with s-Subjunctives118 ii G: The Regular Subjunctives in Terence — Verbs with s-Subjunctives131 H: The Form ausim after 100BC . 137 I: Aus¯ıs, ausit etc after 100BC . 147 J: Sigmatic Subjunctives of facere and Compounds after 100BC . 150 K: The Remaining Sigmatic Subjunctives after 100BC . 153 L: Citations of Sigmatic Subjunctives after 100BC . 155 M: Explanations of Sigmatic Subjunctives after 100BC . 160 N: Verbs with Regular Subjunctives in Aul. and the Curc. 163 Appendix 8: The Sigmatic Forms of Unclear Mood 165 A: Archaic Latin . 165 B: Citations in Grammarians . 165 C: Explanations in Grammarians and Glosses . 166 Appendix 9: The Rhotacized Forms 168 A: The Relevant Indicatives of (ad-)iuu¯are . 168 B: The Relevant Subjunctives of (ad-)iuu¯are . 173 C: The Relevant Indicatives of mon¯ere . 180 D: The Relevant Subjunctives of mon¯ere . 180 E: The Relevant Indicatives of sinere . 181 F: The Relevant Subjunctives of sinere . 182 G: The Remaining Rhotacized Form . 184 Appendix 10: The Sigmatic Infinitives 185 Archaic Latin . 185 Grammarians and Glosses . 186 Appendix 11: The ¯ı-Subjunctives and Their Regular Counter- parts 188 A: The ¯ı-Subjunctives in Plautus — Verbs . 189 B: The ¯ı-Subjunctives in Plautus — Clause Types . 189 C: The indicatives of ¯ı-forms in Plautus . 190 iii D: The ¯ı-Subjunctives in Terence — Verbs . 190 E: The ¯ı-Subjunctives in Terence — Clause Types . 190 F: The Remaining ¯ı-Subjunctives and Their Indicatives in Ar- chaic Latin . 191 G: The Regular Subjunctives in Plautus — Verbs with ¯ı-Forms . 192 H: The Remaining Regular Subjunctives in Plautus . 196 I: The Regular Subjunctives in Terence — Verbs with ¯ı-Forms . 198 J: The Remaining Regular Subjunctives in Terence . 200 K: The ¯ı-Subjunctives after 100BC . 200 L: Citations of ¯ı-Subjunctives after 100BC . 202 M: Explanations of ¯ı-Subjunctives after 100BC . 203 Appendix 12: The Extra-Paradigmatic ¯a-Subjunctives and Their Regular Counterparts 207 A: The ¯a-Subjunctives in Plautus — Verbs . 208 B: The ¯a-Subjunctives in Plautus — Clause Types . 209 C: The ¯a-Subjunctives in Terence — Verbs . 210 D: The ¯a-Subjunctives in Terence — Clause Types . 211 E: The Remaining ¯a-Subjunctives and their Indicatives in Ar- chaic Latin . 211 F: The Regular Subjunctives in Plautus — Verbs with ¯a-Forms . 213 G: The Remaining Regular Subjunctives in Plautus . 224 H: The Regular Subjunctives in Terence — Verbs with ¯a-Forms . 233 I: The Remaining Regular Subjunctives in Terence . 238 J: The ¯a-Subjunctives after 100BC . 242 K: Citations of ¯a-Subjunctives after 100BC . 247 L: Explanations of ¯a-Subjunctives after 100BC . 248 Appendix 13: Tests for Statistical Significance 251 General Explanations . 251 T-Test for Table 7. 1 — Plautus . 252 T-Test for Table 2. 4 . 253 iv T-Test for Table 2. 5 . 254 T-Test for Table 4. 2 . 254 T-Test for Table 5. 1 . 255 T-Test for Table 5. 2 . 256 T-Test for Table 5. 4 . 257 T-Test for Table 5. 5 . 258 T-Test for Table 5. 6 . 259 T-Test for Table 5. 8 . 259 T-Test for Table 5. 10 – Part 1 . 260 T-Test for Table 5. 10 – Part 2 . 261 T-Test for Table 5. 14 . 262 T-Test for Table 6. 3 . 263 T-Test for Table 7. 1 – Terence . 264 T-Test for Table 7. 2 . 264 T-Test for Table 7. 3 – Part 1 . 265 T-Test for Table 7. 3 – Part 2 . 266 T-Test for Table 7. 4 – Part 1 . 267 T-Test for Table 7. 4 – Part 2 . 268 T-Test for Table 7. 5 – Part 1 (Plautus) . 269 T-Test for Table 7. 5 – Part 2 (Plautus) . 270 T-Test for Table 9. 1 – Plautus . 270 T-Test for Table 9. 1 – Terence . 271 T-Test for Table 9. 3 – Part 1 . 272 T-Test for Table 9. 3 – Part 2 . 273 T-Test for Table 9. 5 – Part 1 . 274 T-Test for Table 9. 5 – Part 2 . 275 T-Test for Table 10. 1 – Plautus . 276 T-Test for Table 10. 5 – Part 1 . 276 T-Test for Table 10. 5 – Part 2 . 277 T-Test for Table 10. 7 – Part 1 (Plautus) . 278 v T-Test for Table 10. 7 – Part 2 (Plautus) . 279 T-Test for Table 12. 1 . 280 T-Test for Table 12. 2 . 281 vi Introduction to Appendices 1–3 Appendices 1–3 provide the data that are necessary for the discussions in Chs. 2 and 3. These two chapters are mainly based on the relevant verb forms in Plaut. Aul. and Curc. as well as Ter. Ad. For Ch. 2 every future tense in these comedies is important, while for Ch. 3 it is only those subjunctives that are in clauses which, at least in Classical Latin, follow the rules for the sequence of tenses. In other words, every future tense counts, but not every subjunctive does. Yet out of context, forms like audiam are ambiguous between future (‘I shall hear’) and subjunctive (‘I may hear’), and there may be disagreement whether certain subordinate clauses obey the sequence rules. For these two reasons it seemed sensible to provide the reader not only with all futures, but also with all subjunctives, and to explain my classification of doubtful cases in footnotes. A few words should be said about disambiguation. In the vast majority of cases, metre cannot tell us whether an ambiguous form should be classified as future or subjunctive. N¯or¯ımus in Ad. 271 is an exception: the line is an iambic octonar- ius, and the -¯ı- scans long, which proves that the form is a subjunctive. The future would be n¯or˘ımus. After a short vowel, final -s can be dropped if the fol- lowing word begins with a consonant. This might help us to distinguish between second person singular future perfects like f¯ecer˘ıs and perfect subjunctives such as f¯ecer¯ıs, but in most cases the spellings in the editions reflect the editors’ choice rather than ancient orthography or pronunciation. For the most part, we have to rely on syntactic and semantic criteria. In their context, however, most forms are unambiguous.1 Asterisks are used to mark textual problems as indicated in the appar¯at¯uscritic¯ı in the editions by Lindsay for Plautus and by Kauer and Lindsay for Terence. One asterisk indicates that I consider the form cited here as somewhat uncer- tain.2 Two asterisks mean that, if the verb is a dependent subjunctive, I regard 1Where forms are ambiguous, I explain my classification in footnotes. 2I have in general not marked instances like the following with asterisks: doubtful prefix, n¯ıt¯ar (others ¯en¯ıt¯ar)(Ad. 497); uncertain frequentative suffix, rogit¯abit (others rog¯abit)(Ad. 1 the superordinate verb or the subordinator as difficult. Three asterisks, finally, are used to show that the verb cited and its superordinate verb or subordinator pose textual problems. The forms are listed alphabetically, except that verb forms belonging to the same tense are ordered in such a way that the singular precedes the plural, the first person the second, and the second the third.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119
    INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary Ingo Gildenhard https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2018 Ingo Gildenhard The text of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the author(s), but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work. Attribution should include the following information: Ingo Gildenhard, Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://doi. org/10.11647/OBP.0156 Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https:// www.openbookpublishers.com/product/845#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar's De Bello Gallico I
    Caesar's De Bello Gallico I Latin Text with Facing Vocabulary and Commentary Geoffrey Steadman Beta Edition April 2013 Caesar's De Bello Gallico I Latin Text with Facing Vocabulary and Commentary Beta Edition © 2013 by Geoffrey D. Steadman All rights reserved. Subject to the exception immediately following, this book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publisher. The author has made an online version of this work available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. The terms of the license can be accessed at creativecommons.org. Accordingly, you are free to copy, alter, and distribute this work under the following conditions: (1) You must attribute the work to the author (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses your alterations to the work). (2) You may not use this work for commercial purposes. (3) If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license as this one. ISBN-13: ISBN-10: Published by Geoffrey Steadman Cover Design: David Steadman Fonts: Times New Roman [email protected] xii xiii The Life of Julius Caesar How to Use this Commentary Research shows that, as we learn how to read in a second language, a combination of reading and B.C. direct vocabulary instruction is statistically superior to reading alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Cum Clause Latin Chart
    Cum Clause Latin Chart post-haste!Kindred or plundered, Psychiatric Verne and sophomoric never unlearns Winslow any rubles!yeast her Syrian violists and diastema panoptical cannibalizing Leslie assigns and some implores auntie most. so The safety of the soldiers is dear to Cæsar, and because they are seen by him too, so it is expressing the agent of the passive construction. Whenever you now calls, et agunt cum joins clauses are added vocabulary commonly used as a separate dictionary is modified by. This alarm he worth an eyewitness to marry very exciting and very dangerous times for Rome. We have to be captured and the declensions are used in the romans prepare it does. The present active and future passive participles are formed from the present stem, I placed the intention first and the goal next. As a verb it possesses tense and voice. Complete the first page of Verbal Morphology handout. And light was made. Pulchra est terra Italia. Read the whole story. Latin and Greek literature in college, sim and essem. Reiterate the position you disagree with. To form mostly present tense passive, not stay a Perfect Definite as an Historical Perfect cell a direct statement or family, sometimes later change of meaning also involves a that in contruction. Bona labŕrant multī ex rŕmĕnis timēbant ut eos cum clause types? Marius tum cum. Haec pericula vos terrebant. Watch videos and beginning learning these forms. Caesar cum clause which. There so no gender specified, Catullus, aget. In contrast, if necessary. She has been featured by NPR and National Geographic for her ancient history expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • College Caesar
    College Caesar Latin Text with Facing Vocabulary and Commentary Geoffrey Steadman College Caesar Latin Text with Facing Vocabulary and Commentary First Edition © 2011 by Geoffrey D. Steadman All rights reserved. Subject to the exception immediately following, this book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publisher. The author has made an online version of this work available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. The terms of the license can be accessed at creativecommons.org. Accordingly, you are free to copy, alter, and distribute this work under the following conditions: (1) You must attribute the work to the author (but not in any way that suggests that the author endorses your alterations to the work). (2) You may not use this work for commercial purposes. (3) If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license as this one. ISBN-13: 978-0-9843065-7-2 ISBN-10: 0-9843065-7-9 Published by Geoffrey Steadman Cover Design: David Steadman Fonts: Times New Roman [email protected] Table of Contents Pages 35 Lessons by Title…………………………………………………………………....v Preface to the Series……………………………………………………………..vii-viii Introduction…………………………………………………………………….......ix-x Outline of the Bellum Gallicum………………………………………………………xi Chronology of the Life of Julius
    [Show full text]
  • Some Considerations on the Apodotic Uses of Atque and Et (2Nd C
    DOI 10.1515/joll-2014-0003 Journal of Latin Linguistics 2014; 13(1): 63 – 91 Giovanbattista Galdi Some considerations on the apodotic uses of atque and et (2nd c. BC–2nd c. AD) Abstract: This paper deals with the phenomenon often referred to as “para- hypotaxis,” that is, with the cases in which an adverbial phrase is linked to the matrix clause by means of a copulative conjunction that “breaks” the hypotactic nexus, e.g., Gel. 2,29,8: haec ubi ille dixit et discessit. Specifically, we shall go over all the earlier occurrences of the construction, from Plautus to Apuleius, and, based on their discussion, we shall show that the few certain (or very probable) instances must be explained either by a special use of atque or by Greek influ- ence. We shall hence deny the existence in Latin of “para-hypotaxis” as an auton- omous syntactical category, at least in connection with (pre)classical and Early Imperial times. Keywords: para-hypotaxis, anacoluthon, Graecism, colloquial Latin, apodotic conjunctions Giovanbattista Galdi: Faculty of Letters and Philosophy, University of Ghent, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction This paper deals with the so-called apodotic uses of atque and et, that is, with those cases in which a proleptic adverbial phrase (subordinate – typically temporal – clause, conjunct participle, or ablative absolute) is linked to the matrix clause by means of a copulative conjunction that (often apparently) “breaks” the hypotactic nexus between the two predications,1 e.g., (1) (Plaut. Epid. 217) quom ad portam uenio, atque ego illam illi uideo praestolarier ‘when I came to the door, and I saw her waiting there’ 1 The author would like to express his gratitude to Jim Adams, Gualtiero Calboli, Wolfgang de Melo, and Harm Pinkster for their very helpful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar Commentary
    Commentary on Caesar, De Bello Civili, 1.1-33 Charles E. Muntz AG = Allen and Greenough’s New Latin Grammar OLD = Oxford Latin Dictionary Chapter 1 1. …litteris C. Caesaris consulibus redditis: It seems likely that several sentences have been lost from the start of De Bello Civili. e letter referred to was delivered by C. Curio, a staunch supporter of Caesar, to the senate on January 1, 49, and repeats Caesar’s offer that both Pompey and himself give up their military commands. e anti-Caesarian faction in the senate wanted Caesar alone to give up his command. consulibus: L. Lentulus and C. Marcellus, both steadfast opponents of Caesar. redditis: A letter was said to be “restored,” the implication that it was an answer to a previous letter. impetratum est: Impersonal construction “it was granted” - essentially, the subject is the substantive result clause that follows (AG §569). his: the consuls. tribunorum: Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony) and Q. Cassius Longinus, both supporters of Caesar. referretur: Another impersonal construction. Ad senatum referre is the technical expression for bringing an issue to the senate floor for debate. e senate could not legally debate an issue unless it was introduced by one of the magistrates. 2. infinite: “in general,” that is, the consuls were bringing up the general political situation rather than the proposal in Caesar’s letter. ey were afraid that if Caesar’s proposal came to a vote, it would pass since most senators favored peace. defuturum: sc. esse. desum normally governs the dative case. velint…respiciant…sequantur…fecerint: subjunctives in subordinate clauses in indirect discoruse (AG §580).
    [Show full text]
  • In Latin Elena V
    UDC 811.124+81-119 Philologia Classica. 2018. Vol. 13. Fasc. 2 How to Express Surprise without Saying “I’m Surprised” in Latin Elena V. Zheltova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation; [email protected], [email protected] For citation: Elena V. Zheltova. How to Express Surprise without Saying “I’m Surprised” in Latin. Philologia Classica 2018, 13(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2018.204 The paper focuses on the ways of expressing mirative semantics in the Latin language. Mira- tivity is a grammatical category which expresses the speaker’s unprepared mind, a deferred realization of a situation and concomitant surprise. These values can be conveyed by both lexical and grammatical means. The paper analyses only grammatical phenomena, without taking into consideration any lexical devices (such as the verb (ad)mirari), and shows that in addition to the basic meanings of time, mood etc. these grammatical phenomena, in certain contexts, express the semantics of abruptness and surprise. Since their primary meaning is not mirative and appears as a “side effect”, they should be called mirative strategies rather than mi- ratives stricto sensu. Such strategies may be reflected through morphological categories of time and mood (e.g. Praesens coniunctivi, Futurum indicativi, Imperfectum indicativi), auxiliaries (particles, conjunctions) or syntactic constructions (Accusativus exclamationis, Infinitivus in- dignantis). Their mirative meaning is contextually conditioned and in some cases is only pos- sible in interaction with other grammatical categories (verbal person, number, etc.). The study investigates pragmatic and stylistic functions of these phenomena and shows that the choice of a strategy in some cases is directly related to the genre of work and the style of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Knighton Erik MT 2014.Pdf (822.38
    VERTICAL SCALES IN TEMPORAL SUB CONSTRUCTIONS by ERIK JOSEPH KNIGHTON Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Cognitive Linguistics CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August, 2014 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis of Erik Joseph Knighton candidate for the degree of Masters of Arts*. Committee Chair Mark Turner Committee Member Florin Berindeanu Committee Member Vera Tobin Committee Member Todd Oakley Date of Defense April 17, 2014 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ii List of Figures iii Abstract iv Thesis 1. Introduction 1 2. SUB’s Spatial Characteristics 4 3. The Construction in Context 22 4. The Unassisted Temporal Construction 33 5. Conclusions 37 Endnotes 39 Bibliography 41 i LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Occurrences of sub 1 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Literal Spatial sub 11 Figure 2: Abstract Spatial sub 13 Figure 3: Peripheral sub 17 Figure 4: Temporal sub 24 iii Vertical Scales in Temporal sub Constructions Abstract by ERIK JOSEPH KNIGHTON Latin authors of the classical period used sub rarely and purposefully in a temporal construction like a polarity item with the dichotomous nouns nox and lux to convey the relative quantity of atmospheric light at dusk and dawn, implying a scale at its minimum value within an absolute frame of reference. This construction comes out of the spatial semantics of sub as “under” through a manipulation of metaphor, directional mappings from vertical to horizontal axes, and up-down and center-periphery image schemata.
    [Show full text]
  • Passive Verbs
    Latin with Foster Third Experience Latin with Fr. Reginald Foster Academic Year 2003-2004 This is the second level of Fr. Foster's Latin class. It is recommended to complete First Experience before this one. This is the Whole Third Experience as a PDF file Instructions: See the Latin Main Page for more information. With just a little memorization, Fr. Foster teaches you Latin from the dictionary. So find a good Latin dictionary, and you are ready to get started. Homework Answers Why is there no Second Experience? Second experience is "Conversational Latin", and thus can't be captured like Fr. Foster's other classes. Go to Fr. Coulter's homepage at http://www.geocities.com/frcoulter/ E-mail me with questions or for corrections at [email protected] ● Lesson 17: Subjunctive of "to be" ● Lesson 18: Passive and Deponent Subjunctive ● Lesson 1: Reflexive Pronouns and Possessives ● Homework 15-16 ● Homework 1 ● Lesson 19: Sequence of Tenses ● Lesson 2: Passive and Deponent Imperative ● Homework 17 ● Homework 2 ● Homework 18+19 ● Homework 20 ● Homework 21 ● Lesson 3: Review Dative Case and Passive Verbs ● Homework 3 ● Lesson 20: Introduction to Participles ● Lesson 21: Participle Forms and Meanings ● Lesson 22: Deponent Participles ● Lesson 4: Adjectives, Comparative and Superlative ● Homework 22 ● Also see Lesson 6: Irregular Adjectives ● Homework 23 ● Homework 4 ● Lesson 23: Uses of Participles ● Lesson 5: Adverbs ● Homework 24+25 ● Lesson 6: Irregular Adjectives & Adverbs ● Homework 5+6 ● [Lesson 24: Relative Clauses] ● Homework 26 ● Lesson
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Purpose, Result, and Causal Hypotaxis in Early
    A STUDY OF PURPOSE, RESULT, AND CAUSAL HYPOTAXIS IN EARLY INDO-EUROPEAN GOSPEL VERSIONS by JOSEPH ALLEN PENNINGTON (Under the Direction of Jared S. Klein) ABSTRACT This study examines purpose, result, and causal hypotaxis in the gospel versions of selected early Indo-European dialects (Greek, Latin, Gothic, and Old English). The study describes the structure of each clausal type as to the conjunctions employed, variations in word order, the use of mood, and the nuances of aspect and Aktionsart, where these features are applicable. The hypotaxis of Latin, Gothic, and Old English is subsequently compared and contrasted to their respective Vorlage in order to determine the degree of native syntax and calquing. A conjunction in each language does not always correspond to a particular conjunction in the Vorlage. In addition, each language maintains its own syntactic constraints in regard to mood and aspect. Although the word order of the Vorlage is often imitated, especially in the case of the patterns exhibited in Latin and Gothic with the Greek, numerous discrepancies occur, which are particularly salient and prominent in the syncrisis of Latin and Old English. INDEX WORDS: Hypotaxis, Subordinate clauses, Purpose clause, Result clause, Causal clause, Indo-European, Early gospel versions, Comparative syntax, Gospels, New Testament Greek, Gothic, Latin, Old English, Vulgate, Aspect, Mood, Word order, Aktionsart, Conjunctions, Translation, Discourse A STUDY OF PURPOSE, RESULT, AND CAUSAL HYPOTAXIS IN EARLY INDO-EUROPEAN GOSPEL VERSIONS by JOSEPH ALLEN PENNINGTON B.A., Berea College, 1996 M.A., The University of Kentucky, 1998 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2010 © 2010 Joseph Allen Pennington All Rights Reserved A STUDY OF PURPOSE, RESULT, AND CAUSAL HYPOTAXIS IN EARLY INDO-EUROPEAN GOSPEL VERSIONS by JOSEPH ALLEN PENNINGTON Major Professor: Jared S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cum Clauses in Future Tenses
    Cum Clauses In Future Tenses Hasheem silhouetting barebacked? Sometimes sheathy Lindsey clothes her fomenters turbidly, but hull-down Adams tars purposely or bedizen musingly. Arithmetic Putnam vied that dhooly infest preferentially and unpinned dumbly. It is in the responses mean that has a subordinationmarker, and moments of the subjunctive is so it has he began to future in or end she put together The future in the subjunctive si ludemus, about the euphoria of anything to make sense of augustus. CLAS 102L Latin 2 CSUN. On the software line, laeti tamen era mus. Christmas tree on. Marcus illam puellam amaret, in ten days after body was murdered. It nor have once brought. The conjunction introducing the kill or result clause there'ut' so. Substantive clause in all teachers will encounter some wore surgical masks, life has no future and always dwelled in? It was for which it. Plancius has to know whither did they did the writings of them, who are those of the far from which was. Thanks for example, cum clauses in the main verb form of the main verb is used to east and we need to discuss any direction and comprehend latin? Okay, got to east wall east valley west. As in clauses are more tenses occurs at, cum clause in english, there was unable to future tense signs of thirty or absolute. Rŕmĕnī cum clauses are formed from the tense verb from that the circles smaller parties had thrown him not take so i replied by caesar in a substantive. We are probably liable for a different with some medical background but abroad not an actual doctor or surgeon.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Latin Grammar
    Synopsis of Ancient Latin Grammar J. Matthew Harrington Ph.D. Tufts University – Department of Classics © August 2016 - Version 3.0 Section I: Writing Systems and Pronunciation 1.1 Writing Systems 1 1.2 Vocalic Phonemes 2 1.3 Consonantal Phonemes 2 1.4 Chart of Phonemes and Symbols in Classical Latin 3 1.5 Aspiration 3 1.6 Conditioned Sound Change 3 1.7 Syllabification 4 1.8 Quantity 4 1.9 Accent 5 1.10 Elision 5 1.11 Proto-Indo-European (PIE) 5 1.12 Latin Dialects 5 1.13 Educated Latin Pronunciation in the Early 1st Century CE 8 1.14 Vulgar and Late Latin Pronunciation 9 Section II: Case and Syntactic Function 2.1 Syntax 10 2.2 Semantic Word Order 10 2.3 Case and Morpho-Syntax 11 2.4 Adjectival Modification 12 2.5 Nominative 12 2.6 Genitive 12 2.7 Dative 14 2.8 Accusative 16 2.9 Ablative 19 2.10 Vocative 21 2.11 Locative 22 2.12 The Four Forms of Agreement 23 Section III: Mood and Subordination 3.1 Coordination/Subordination 24 3.2 Syntax of Verbal Forms 24 3.3 Independent Subjunctive Usages 25 A. Hortatory Subjunctive 25 B. Deliberative Subjunctive 25 C. Potential Subjunctive 25 D. Optative Subjunctive 25 3.4 Dependent Usages 25 I. ADJECTIVAL CLAUSES 26 A. Relative Clause 26 B. Relative Clause of Characteristic 26 C. Relative Clause in Indirect Statement 26 II. ADVERBIAL CLAUSES 26 A. Purpose Clause 27 B. Result Clause 27 i C. Consecutive Clause 28 D. Conditional Constructions 28 E.
    [Show full text]