MYANMAR: FSS Gap Analysis – SO 1 Food Assistance* January to May 2021 *This Map Is Based on Data Available at Township Level

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

MYANMAR: FSS Gap Analysis – SO 1 Food Assistance* January to May 2021 *This map is based on data available at Township level. Information visualized on this map is based on data collected from 31 of partners which shared the 5Ws reports. Highlights KEY FACTS & FIGURES • Total 16 Townships (Kyaukkyi Township in Bago Region, Chipwi and Injangyang Township in Kachin State, Hlaingbwe and Hpapun Townships PEOPLE IN NEED in Kayin State, Kyethi, Larshio and Muse Townships in Shan State, and Kyauktaw, Mrauk-U, Minbya, Myebon, Ann, Ponnagyun and Rathedaung Townships in Rakhine State) have not been reached while 583 K achievements in some other 9 townships (Puta-O, Bhamo, Myitkyina, Tanai and Mohnyin Townships in Kachin State, Pauktaw Township in PEOPLE TARGETED Rakhine State, Namhkan, Namtu, Hsipaw Townships in Shan State) are beyond the targets as defined in HRP 2021. These townships require more accurate FSS coordination at ward/village level to avoid 514 K duplication while townships not being assisted require a specific attention from FSS partners. PEOPLE REACHED Total Numbers of Implementing 248 K Partners 15 S O 48% 52% 1 % of Reached and Gap by State/Region Types of Beneficiary Reached 100% 80% 39% 31% 33% Returnees 23, 0.01% 56% Non-displacement Stateless 125912, 60% People in Rakhine State 100% 100% 51% 40% Internally Displaced Persons 72325, 29% 61% 69% 67% 20% 44% Host/local Community 49782, 20% 0% 0% 0% Bago Chin Kachin Kayin Rakhine Shan Reach% Gap% CASH BASED TRANSFER Response Modality $ 1.2 M (individual) % of Beneficiaries Reached 38% 48% 58% 4% GAP Total (Reached Vs HRP Target) Cash Hybrid (In-kind & Cash) In-kind 266 K Contact: The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official Production date: 06-Jun-2021 http://fscluster.org/myanmar [email protected] endorsement or acceptance by the UN. Data sources: FSLC/FSLC Partners http://fscluster.org/.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Acknowledgments
FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Acknowledgments Thisresearch study was led by U Kyaw Khine & Associates with the assistance of the field survey team of the FSWG members organizations. The research team would like to express sincere thanks to Dr Ohnmar Khaing (FSWG Coordinator), Dr. Min Ko Ko Maung, (Deputy Coordinator), and Mr. Thijs Wissink (Programme Advisor) for their kind and effective support for the research. The team is especially grateful to Daw Yi Yi Cho (M&E Officer) for providing logistical and technical support along with study design, data collection, analysis, and report writing. Finally, this research would not have been possible without the valuable participation and knowledge imparted by all the respondents from the villages of Pauktaw and Taungup Townships and focus group discussion (FGD) participants. The research team would like to acknowledge the experts and professors from respective institutions concerned with livestock who willingly agreed to take part in the FGDs. We are greatly indebted to them. 1 FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Ensure adequate financial and human resources to village volunteers for veterinary extension services to cover all rural areas Upgrade local pig breeds with improved variety for better genetic performance in rural livestock production Attract private sector investment to finance all livestock support infrastructure, such as cold chain, cold storage, animal feed mills, veterinary drugs, and meat and
[Show full text]
Rakhine State – Nutrition Information Analysis
RAKHINE STATE – NUTRITION INFORMATION ANALYSIS January – December 2014 INTRODUCTION The Rakhine state nutrition response aims to achieve 4 key objectives: Sector objectives 1. To reduce malnutrition-related deaths in girls and boys under-5 by ensuring access to quality life-saving interventions for management of acute malnutrition, guided by global standards; 2. Ensure access to key preventive nutrition services routinely provided by Government; 3. Ensure enhanced monitoring and analysis of nutrition situation, needs, and evolving vulnerabilities; 4. Improve cross sector and actor collaboration to address underlying factors of malnutrition. This report addresses the first and second objectives for which the sector is able to obtain information regularly though the Nutrition Information Systems (NIS) and monitor indicators on a monthly basis; Outcome level indicators 1. Percentage of girls and boys CURED of acute malnutrition 2. Percentage of girls and boys with acute malnutrition who DIED 3. Percentage of children under 5 years provided with vitamin A and deworming treatment routinely provided by government 4. Percentage of affected women provided with skilled breastfeeding counselling Activities Active and passive screening of children 6-59 months for acute malnutrition Treatment of severe and moderate acute malnutrition in children 6-59 months through provision of ready-to-use therapeutic or supplementary food, routine medicines, medical consultation and counselling for cases of severe acute malnutrition with infant and young child feeding support Micronutrient prevention and control (children/ PLW) Vitamin A supplementation and deworming Blanket supplementary feeding (children/ PLW) Organizations involved in response DoH, ACF, MHAA, SCI, UNICEF, WFP, MNMA Rakhine State nutrition information December 2014 1 1.
[Show full text]
Climate Risk Assessment for Fisheries and Aquaculture Based Adaptation in Myanmar
######################################################### Climate risk assessment for fisheries and aquaculture based adaptation in Myanmar Prepared By: Mark Dubois, Kimio Leemans, Michael Akester, Shwu Jiau Teoh, Bethany Smith, Hsu Mon Aung, Tinzar Win Pyae Kyaw, May Hsu Mon Soe & KuMuDara Win Maung Table of Content Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 Fisheries in Myanmar: A Brief Overview ............................................................................................ 1 Problem Statement ............................................................................................................................. 2 Overview of the Climate Based Risk Assessment Within Myanmar ................................................. 3 Ayeyarwady Region ......................................................................................................................... 5 Yangon Region ................................................................................................................................. 6 Rakhine State ................................................................................................................................... 7 The 2014 IPCC Risk Assessment Framework ...................................................................................... 8 Methodology .........................................................................................................................................12
[Show full text]
Rakhine State Production Date : 1St July 2015 Mangrove Coverage Evolution in Pauktaw Township 1988-2015
For Humanitarian Purposes Only MYANMAR - Rakhine State Production date : 1st July 2015 Mangrove Coverage Evolution in Pauktaw Township 1988-2015 Thea Hpyu Thar Yar Min Kan San Htoe Chaik Khaung Laung Ywar Haung Kan Bu Kan Chaung Wa Kyan Chaung Kone (Sin Tan Taung Thar Zay Ah Wa Shwe Taik Chan) Pyin Nga Swei Htaunt Nyaung Pin Zin Khin Thar Dar Mrauk-U Taung Taung Moe Tein Lel (Ku Pyun To (Rakhine) Lar Pone) Chin Thea Tan Taik Kan Pyin Pyin Hpet Kya Taung Poet Gyi Thu Htay Khaung Laung Total MangroveThin Coverage for Hin Kha Ei Thei Kone Thu Nge Tway Ma Ywar Thit Pone Tan Yaw Taw Soke Nga Pyi Chay Na Daung Nat Chaung Kin Seik Ah Lel Inn tYarhe Taw Township in 1988 and 2015 (ha) Kya Ywar Haung Ku Lar Ah Lel Chaung Kyauk Pan Zin Htaunt Kywe Cha Gyin Ku Lar Sin Gyi Bar Chaung Ywar Nge Tin Htu Let Wea Seik Maw Chay Ah Me Chaung Pyin Myit Nar Thar Yar Sar Taik Nat Chaung Chay Tat Yar Khin (Rakhine) Pyin Kone Ywar Thit Sin Gyi Ma Gyi Di Par Pyin (MSL) Chaung Thar Si Shwe Zin Daing Yon Ku Lar Myit Nar Thone Pat Mi Kyaung Kone Kyat Pone Chaing Wet Ma Tet Kya Thin Pone Yin Ye Kan Chaung (Middle) Sint Minbya Hpyu Yae Paik Pin Yin Ponnagyun Chaung Dar Khan Ah Wa Son Kyein Zay Ya Htaunt Gan Kya Chaung Bu Pin Kyun Wa Di Bar Bu Taung Nga Wet Gyi Kyun Chaung Taung Yin Yae Hpyu Yin Ye Ohn Hna Leik Taunt Chay Tha Pyay Nga/Wai (Ein Nga Tan Kan Chaung Thein Zee Pin Teit Su Kyun Ah Htoke Kan Thein Kan Shey Min) Pyin Ku Lar Taung Gyi Chay Thei Wet Hnoke Taung Chaung Met Ka Hpar Lar Yar Ah Lel14590 Lar Kya Thee Chaung Let Pan Kone Zee Auk Zee Yae Pauk Se Thone
[Show full text]
Forced Migration and Land Rights in Burma
-R&YVQE,SYWMRK0ERHERH4VSTIVX] ,04 VMKLXWEVIMRI\XVMGEFP]PMROIHXSXLIGSYRXV]«W SRKSMRKWXVYKKPIJSVNYWXMGIERHHIQSGVEG]ERHWYWXEMREFPIPMZIPMLSSHW7MRGI[LIRXLI QMPMXEV]VIKMQIXSSOTS[IVSZIVSRIQMPPMSRTISTPILEZIFIIRHMWTPEGIHEWYFWXERXMZIRYQFIV EVIJVSQIXLRMGREXMSREPMX]GSQQYRMXMIWHIRMIHXLIVMKLXXSVIWMHIMRXLIMVLSQIPERHW0ERH GSR´WGEXMSRF]+SZIVRQIRXJSVGIWMWVIWTSRWMFPIJSVQER]WYGL,04ZMSPEXMSRWMR&YVQE -R'3,6)GSQQMWWMSRIH%WLPI]7SYXLSRISJXLI[SVPH«WPIEHMRK&YVQEVIWIEVGLIVWXS GEVV]SYXSRWMXIVIWIEVGLSR,04VMKLXW8LIIRWYMRKVITSVX(MWTPEGIQIRXERH(MWTSWWIWWMSR *SVGIH1MKVEXMSRERH0ERH6MKLXWMR&YVQEJSVQWEGSQTVILIRWMZIPSSOEXXLIOI],04 MWWYIWEJJIGXMRK&YVQEXSHE]ERHLS[XLIWIQMKLXFIWXFIEHHVIWWIHMRXLIJYXYVI Displacement and Dispossession: 8LMWVITSVX´RHWXLEXWYGLTVSFPIQWGERSRP]FIVIWSPZIHXLVSYKLWYFWXERXMEPERHWYWXEMRIH GLERKIMR&YVQEETSPMXMGEPXVERWMXMSRXLEXWLSYPHMRGPYHIMQTVSZIHEGGIWWXSEVERKISJ Forced Migration and Land Rights JYRHEQIRXEPVMKLXWEWIRWLVMRIHMRMRXIVREXMSREPPE[ERHGSRZIRXMSRWMRGPYHMRKVIWTIGXJSV ,04VMKLXW4VSXIGXMSRJVSQ ERHHYVMRK JSVGIHQMKVEXMSRERHWSPYXMSRWXSXLI[MHIWTVIEH ,04GVMWIWMR&YVQEHITIRHYPXMQEXIP]SRWIXXPIQIRXWXSXLIGSRµMGXW[LMGLLEZI[VEGOIHXLI GSYRXV]JSVQSVIXLERLEPJEGIRXYV] BURMA )JJSVXWEXGSRµMGXVIWSPYXMSRLEZIXLYWJEVQIX[MXLSRP]ZIV]PMQMXIHWYGGIWW2IZIVXLIPIWW XLMWVITSVXHIWGVMFIWWSQIMRXIVIWXMRKERHYWIJYPTVSNIGXWXLERLEZIFIIRMQTPIQIRXIHF]GMZMP WSGMIX]KVSYTWMR&YVQE8LIWII\EQTPIWWLS[XLEXRSX[MXLWXERHMRKXLIRIIHJSVJYRHEQIRXEP TSPMXMGEPGLERKIMR&YVQEWXITWGERERHWLSYPHFIXEOIRRS[XSEHHVIWW,04MWWYIW-RTEVXMGYPEV STTSVXYRMXMIWI\MWXXSEWWMWXXLIVILEFMPMXEXMSRSJHMWTPEGIHTISTPIMR[E]W[LMGLPMROTSPMXMGEP
[Show full text]
THE STATE of LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS in KACHIN Photo Credits
Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN Photo credits Mike Adair Emilie Röell Myanmar Survey Research A photo record of the UNDP Governance Mapping Trip for Kachin State. Travel to Tanai, Putao, Momauk and Myitkyina townships from Jan 6 to Jan 23, 2015 is available here: http://tinyurl.com/Kachin-Trip-2015 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN UNDP MYANMAR Table of Contents Acknowledgements II Acronyms III Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 5 2. Kachin State 7 2.1 Kachin geography 9 2.2 Population distribution 10 2.3 Socio-economic dimensions 11 2.4 Some historical perspectives 13 2.5 Current security situation 18 2.6 State institutions 18 3. Methodology 24 3.1 Objectives of mapping 25 3.2 Mapping tools 25 3.3 Selected townships in Kachin 26 4. Governance at the front line – Findings on participation, responsiveness and accountability for service provision 27 4.1 Introduction to the townships 28 4.1.1 Overarching development priorities 33 4.1.2 Safety and security perceptions 34 4.1.3 Citizens’ views on overall improvements 36 4.1.4 Service Provider’s and people’s views on improvements and challenges in selected basic services 37 4.1.5 Issues pertaining to access services 54 4.2 Development planning and participation 57 4.2.1 Development committees 58 4.2.2 Planning and use of development funds 61 4.2.3 Challenges to township planning and participatory development 65 4.3 Information, transparency and accountability 67 4.3.1 Information at township level 67 4.3.2 TDSCs and TMACs as accountability mechanisms 69 4.3.3 WA/VTAs and W/VTSDCs 70 4.3.4 Grievances and disputes 75 4.3.5 Citizens’ awareness and freedom to express 78 4.3.6 Role of civil society organisations 81 5.
[Show full text]
Rakhine State, Myanmar
World Food Programme S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 Photographs: ©FAO/F. Del Re/L. Castaldi and ©WFP/K. Swe. This report has been prepared by Monika Tothova and Luigi Castaldi (FAO) and Yvonne Forsen, Marco Principi and Sasha Guyetsky (WFP) under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP secretariats with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned for further information if required. Mario Zappacosta Siemon Hollema Senior Economist, EST-GIEWS Senior Programme Policy Officer Trade and Markets Division, FAO Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific, WFP E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ The Global Information and Early Warning System on Food and Agriculture (GIEWS) has set up a mailing list to disseminate its reports. To subscribe, submit the Registration Form on the following link: http://newsletters.fao.org/k/Fao/trade_and_markets_english_giews_world S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO.
[Show full text]
Job Announcement Training Officer - One Post Yangon
Job Announcement Training Officer - One Post Yangon The Lutheran World Federation (LWF) Myanmar is an international non-government organization serving the people of Myanmar since 2008 after Cyclone Nargis. Currently LWF is facilitating rights-based empowerment process in 34 villages of Mindat and 20 villages in Matupi Township, Chin State, 29 villages of Kyarinnseikgyi, Pharpun and Hlainbwe Townships in Kayin State and 21 villages in Ann Township, Rakhine State. 36 Women Groups in Pyapon, Dedaye and Twantay Townships are also being supported and accompanied technically for sustainability. LWF is also assisting the IDPs, host communities and nearby villages of Sittwe, Mrauk U, Ponna Kyun and Pauktaw Township in Rakhine State to improve children’s access to education. LWF also works with Camp Management Committees (CMC) of 8 camps in Sittwe and Pauktaw Townships. Mainstreaming community based psychosocial support; gender; environment; fire-safety and protection are integral part of the program. The working approach of LWF is Rights Based Empowerment and Integrated Programmatic Approaches. Livelihoods, Quality Services, Protection and Social Cohesion and Systems and Practices for Quality Programming are four main components of LWF Myanmar. The strategic objectives of LWF are Communities have increased access to livelihoods and income generating opportunities, Communities have improved access to quality basic services (including basic infrastructures: roads, water, sanitation, electricity; education and healthcare) through their active engagement and Right holders, especially women, are empowered in managing their individual, household and village development through accessing their rights and entitlements. Its values and principles such as Dignity, Human Rights and Justice, Compassion and Commitment, Inclusion and Diversity, Meaningful Participation, Transparency and Accountability, Humanitarian Principles, Gender Justice and Climate Change guide the work.
[Show full text]
Myanmar 2014-2016 / Conflict
CONFLICT A.2 / MMYYANMAR 2014-2016 / CONFLICT ASIA - PACIFIC CASE STUDY MYANMAR 2014-2016 / CONFLICT KEYWORDS: Individual housing, Cash assistance, Advocacy, Community participation, Protection CRISIS Inter-communal violence, Rakhine, 2012. TOTAL PEOPLE 145,000 displaced due to 2012 violence AFFECTED (119,560 as of Nov 2016). INDIA KACHIN CHINA PROJECT Rakhine State, Myanmar (Townships of Mrauk-U, LOCATIONS Kyauktaw and Minbya, Rathedaung and Pauktaw). BENEFICIARIES 25,000 individuals (approx.). SAGAING BANGLADESH PROJECT OUTPUTS 4,737 beneficiary-led houses. SHAN SHELTER SIZE1 Min. 16.7 m2 (4.6m x 3.7m basic design). CHIN MANDALAY THE LAO 2 SHELTER DENSITY Min. 3.4 m /person (average 5 members per family). PEOPLE’S RAKHINE MAGWAY DEMO- CRATIC PROJECT COST USD 1,000 (Labour cost = USD 160; Materials, Logis- REPUBLIC PER SHELTER tics, Transport, etc. = USD 840). KAYAH BAY OF BAGO THAILAND OCCUPANCY RATE 100% (estimated). BENGAL PROJECT SUMMARY YANGON AYEYARWADY KAYIN This was a beneficiary-led, cash-based, project that allowed fami- MON lies displaced due to inter-communal violence to vacate their temporary shelter and rebuild their houses. The project enabled the construction of 4,737 houses for a marginalized group in a highly volatile environment, PROJECT AREAS TANINTHARYI where some stakeholders were keen to use a contractor-driven ap- proach. In fact, the more discreet owner-driven methodology, used in 1 Note: families were free to increase the size or modify the this project, proved highly effective. house design according to their needs. JUL 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2 3 4 5 CONFLICT / VIOLENCE PLANNING PHASE 1 PHASE 2 TIMELINE SEP OCT JAN MAR JUL OCT APR 1 Jan 2013: Activation of Shelter Cluster.
[Show full text]
Burma's Identity Crisis
Burma’s identity crisis How ethno-religious nationalism has led to religious intolerance, crimes against humanity and genocide May 2019 Daniel Sinclair/CSW February 2019 For public use Burma’s Identity Crisis Explanatory note CSW has always used the name ‘Burma’, rather than the official name of the country, ‘Myanmar’, and continues to do so. Ever since the military regime changed the name to Myanmar in 1989, one year after the bloody suppression of pro- democracy demonstrations, Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy (NLD), and many of the country’s ethnic nationalities, requested the international community not to adopt the military’s name, arguing that the regime had no mandate to change the name of the country. Although Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD are now in government, it is unclear what their wishes are, and so we tend to use Burma and Myanmar interchangeably, depending on the context. In this report we use Burma throughout, except when directly quoting sources which themselves use Myanmar. Similarly we use the name ‘Rangoon’ for the country’s formal capital and major city, except where the official name ‘Yangon’ is used in direct quotations. Much of the research for this report was conducted first hand by CSW, through visits to Burma and its borders, interviewing ethnic and religious minorities, Buddhist monks, civil society and refugees. However, given the scale of the topic, and limitations on access to some areas, we have referred to information researched and published by other human rights groups and international organisations, notably the United Nations, the US Commission on International Religious Freedom, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Fortify Rights and the Burma Human Rights Network.
[Show full text]
Hrc/42/Crp.5
A/HRC/42/CRP.5 Distr.: General 16 September 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty-second session 9-27 September 2019 Agenda item 2 Human rights situation that require the Council’s attention Detailed findings of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar* * Information complementary to that contained in the official report (A/HRC/42/50), submitted to the Human Rights Council pursuant to resolution 39/2. Reproduced as received, in the language of submission only. GE. A/HRC/42/CRP.5 Contents Page I. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 II. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8 III. Mandate and follow up the Human Rights Council resolution 39/2 ................................................ 9 A. Interpretation of the Mandate .................................................................................................. 9 B. Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 9 C. Legal Framework ..................................................................................................................... 9 1. Economic, social and cultural rights ............................................................................... 10 2. Rules of State responsibility ...........................................................................................
[Show full text]
March 16, 2021)
PEACE Info (March 16, 2021) − BURMA’S TWO CORE ISSUES: Constitutional Crisis and Rights of Self-Defense − Myanmar Crackdown on Protesters Kills 25 as Junta Imposes 24-Hour Mobile Internet Shutdown − Continuing Brutality by Myanmar Military Junta Pushes Death Toll to 193 − Eleven killed in anti-coup demonstrations after Myanmar’s deadliest day − Myanmar’s Military Regime Hands Down Prison Sentences to Striking Civil Servants − Under Martial Law, Myanmar Military Commanders Empowered to Issue Death Penalty − Residents flee violence, martial law in Yangon factory district − Youth Detained in Military Camps Across Chin State − A Return to the Comfort Zone is Not Enough: We Must Fight for Truly Inclusive Freedom − Policemen, firemen among over 400 Myanmar nationals seeking shelter in India − Myanmar Regime Seizes Bank Accounts of Soros' Open Society Foundation − Protests Force Myanmar’s Ethnic Chinese to Distinguish Themselves From China − India Must Break its ‘Silence’ on Myanmar Coup to Avoid Global Embarrassment − UN: Killings of Peaceful Protesters by Myanmar Junta Soaring − UN Chief Calls Intl’ Community to Help End Military Repression in Myanmar − Myanmar Crisis Could Reset Toxic US-China Ties − Quad leaders issue statement on Myanmar crisis − Global alarm grows as 20 more protesters killed in Myanmar crackdown − Kachin Villagers Flee Fighting Between Myanmar’s Military and KIA − Fighting Between Burma Army and KIO/A Breaks Out Across Kachin State − Arakan Army sides with the coup regime while conflict rages across the nation − စစ�အ�ဏ�သ�မ��မ�အ�ပ��
[Show full text]