DOCSLIB.ORG

I3 QUARTERLY INNOVATION MONITOR INNOVATION I3 QUARTERLY Data Fr Powe Solar SPONSORED by I3 QUARTERLY Innovation MONITOR | SOLAR Q1 | 2014 Q1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I3 QUARTERLY INNOVATION MONITOR INNOVATION I3 QUARTERLY Data Fr Powe Solar SPONSORED by I3 QUARTERLY Innovation MONITOR | SOLAR Q1 | 2014 Q1 Q1 | 2014 Powered by data from Q2 | 2014 i3 QUARTERLY INNOVATION MONITOR Solar Q3 | 2014 Q4 | 2014 i3connect.com SPONSORED BY i3 QUARTERLY INNOVatiON MONITOR | SOLAR Q1 | 2014 Solar Corporate & institutional equity investment in solar DEALS: $172mm invested across 19 equity deals technology and business model innovation totaled in 1Q14; start-ups in PV downstream services and balance-of-systems form commercial partnerships. $172mm across 19 deals in the first quarter, with 2 deals having undisclosed values. That total was 30% lower than COMPARISON: Compared to four-quarter Q2 | 2014 the $245mm solar companies raised in the final quarter of running average for 2013, equity dollars were 2013, and 8% lower than the four-quarter running average 8% lower and deal volume down 26%. of $187mm. Deal volume, at 19, also followed a downward THEME: Innovation in PV downstream service trend in Q1, falling 17% from 23 in 4Q13 and 26% relative to business models and balance-of-systems the four-quarter running average. Unlike recent quarters, components seek to lower “soft-costs”. there were no debt or growth stage PIPE deals reported. GLOBAL CORPORATE & VENTURE INVESTMENT IN SOLAR Powered by data from $1,000 45 Q3 | 2014 1 $22 $900 40 41 1 1 1 1 $800 36 1 37 37 35 35 36 35 36 2 $700 33 2 32 30 31 4 $600 3 29 3 28 $8 25 2 26 1 olume $500 25 $908 23 23 23 Millions 20 $745 $2 21 $400 20 $7 19 Deal V Q4 | 2014 $589 15 $300 $527 $4 $121 $391 $391 $356 $5 $348 10 $320 $18 $22 $200 $289 $278 $29 $245 $204 $172 $183 $183 $166 $25 $168 $141 $3 $132 $100 5 $8 8 $0 0 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q091Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Venture Equity - - - $ PIPE + Venture Debt - - - $ Venture Equity - - - Deal Volume PIPE + Venture Debt - - - Deal Volume DEALS The solar sector has entered a new era for innovation. that aim to drive down so-called “soft costs” of installa- The 2011-2013 silicon photovoltaic (Si-PV) panel-supply tion, where consensus holds that there is still plenty of glut caused the failure of many established Si-PV manu- room for improved margins. In the first quarter, corporate facturers as well as next-generation, thin-film PV start- bets on downstream service models included SolarCity’s ups, and drove investors to the exit. But investors are now investment in Off Grid Electric, and Trepp’s participation cautiously creeping back in, in support of downstream in Mercatus’ Series A round. business models and PV balance-of-systems components 1 i3 QUARTERLY INNOVatiON MONITOR | SOLAR Q1 | 2014 This segment also saw several corporate partnerships during the quarter, with Mosaic and RGS Energy working i3 subscribers have access to real-time on home solar loans, and Sunrun and Sungevity teaming investment activity. Take i3 for a up to take on SolarCity. free test drive at i3connect.com Q2 | 2014 GLOBAL CORPORATE & VENTURE EQUITY INVESTMENT IN SOLAR Powered by data from 100% Downstream 90% Services 80% 2 Si-PV Mamufacturing 70% 1 olume Thin Films 60% 9 Solar Thermal 50% 1Q14 Q3 | 2014 e of Deal V 40% Balance of Systems Shar 30% 2 CPV 20% 2 PV Consumer Products 10% Other 0% 2011 2012 2013 In balance-of-systems, Clal Industries and Investments Further up the value chain, the manufacturing segment Q4 | 2014 joined Tigo Energy’s latest equity funding, which the should not be ignored. Both the Si-PV and thin film spaces start-up closed shortly after announcing a partnership contain new early-stage innovators and survivors of the with Lightway Solar to integrate its power optimizers shake-out that require growth capital. In the first quarter, into Lightway’s modules. Meanwhile, Constellation Redlen Technologies (Cadmium-Telluride thin films) Technology Ventures invested in micro-inverter and Qcept Technologies (wafer inspection technology) company SolarBridge Technologies’ growth round. raised growth funding, while Columbus Photovoltaics (wide band-gap Si-PV cells) was seeded. COMMENTS While the solar sector is unlikely to return to the high yield any deals in the space, innovation in solar thermal levels of investment it experienced during 2008-2011, energy is getting serious looks from corporate investors we still see plenty of innovation in all segments of the who are ready to take technology through to commer- PV value chain. Further, though the first quarter did not cialization. 2013 saw deals like eSolar+General Electric, 2 i3 QUARTERLY INNOVatiON MONITOR | SOLAR Q1 | 2014 Terrajoule+Air Liquide, Sopogy+Mitsui, and Skyfuel+Leaf Clean Energy. It is due to these trends, and the overwhelming fact that PV deployment Access to real-time deal- worldwide is skyrocketing, that we expect corporate and institutional level data is available investors to continue to return to the solar sector. to i3 subscribers. — Troy Ault, Co-Manager of Research Q2 | 2014 About The i3 market intelligence platform is the definitive source for insight into innovation: it connects Take i3 for a free test drive corporate, utility, government, and venture at capital teams with companies creating sustainable Add your profile to i3 to get in front technologies and business models. Subscribers use i3 to of top corporates and investors. discover and vet companies, and explore trends across Q3 | 2014 18 technology sectors using proprietary data. About our Sponsors Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Silicon Valley Bank is the premier is the leading law firm in the world bank for technology, life science, advising enterprises devoted to development of energy cleantech, venture capital, private equity and premium and clean technologies and projects. We represent wine businesses. Named one of the top financial services Q4 | 2014 a dynamic client base that includes more than 300 company for cleantech companies by the San Francisco emerging companies seeking to be tomorrow’s energy and Business Times, SVB provides industry knowledge and resources leaders, mature energy technology and project connections, financing, treasury management, corporate development companies, and major public companies investment and international banking services to its clients developing winning strategies in energy and clean worldwide through 28 U.S. offices and six international technologies. We offer the energy and clean tech industry operations. (Nasdaq: SI VB) www.svb.com. Silicon Valley unmatched experience gained in representing high tech Bank is the California bank subsidiary and the commercial companies in all phases of their growth cycle. For more banking operation of SVB Financial Group. Banking information, visit www.wsgr.com. services are provided by Silicon Valley Bank, a member of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve System. SVB Private Bank is a division of Silicon Valley Bank. SVB Financial Read the latest on other sectors Group is also a member of the Federal Reserve System. Interested in reports on other sectors and topics in resource innovation? We have a library of reports available for you to download at no charge. Please visit www.cleantech.com/reports 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Improving the Performance of Solar Thermal Power
    The Oil Drum: Australia/New Zealand | Improving the Performance of Solar Therhmtatpl :P/o/wanezr.theoildrum.com/node/6279 Improving the Performance of Solar Thermal Power Posted by Big Gav on March 12, 2010 - 1:23am in The Oil Drum: Australia/New Zealand Topic: Alternative energy Tags: bill gross, concentrating solar power, esolar, solar power, solar thermal power [list all tags] The US Department of Energy granted a US$1.37 billion loan guarantee to Brightsource Energy last week which could help clear the way for over 15 gigawatts of solar thermal power projects in California. Brightsource built a pilot plant in Israel to prove their technology and has tested it over the past 18 months. Their flagship Ivanpah project in California got a big boost when construction giant Bechtel agreed to build the plant. Solar thermal is a way of harnessing the largest source of energy available to us, so in this post I'll have a look at the upswing in interest in the use of this technology for electricity generation in recent years and look at some of the approaches being pursued to make it economically competitive with coal fired power generation. Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/ The US Department of Energy granted a US$1.37 billion loan guarantee to Brightsource Energy last week which could help clear the way for over 15 gigawatts of solar thermal power projects in California. Brightsource built a pilot plant in Israel to prove their technology and has tested it over the past 18 months. Their flagship Ivanpah project in California got a big boost when construction giant Bechtel agreed to build the plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Amherst Request for Proposals
    TOWN OF AMHERST REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR OLD LANDFILL REUSE PROPOSAL Presented by: In partnership with: Letter of Transmittal............................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 8 1. Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................................................ 10 1.1. Proposal protects the existing landfill caps. ...............................................................................10 1.2. Proposal protects operation of landfill gas systems...................................................................10 1.3. Experience of team proposing project........................................................................................10 1.4. Risk to human, health and the environment..............................................................................11 1.5. Effect on the environment..........................................................................................................11 1.6. Project compatibility with neighboring properties.....................................................................12 1.7. Noise levels from use of site.......................................................................................................12 1.7. Best compensation to Town of Amherst ....................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Thermal Energy an Industry Report
    Solar Thermal Energy an Industry Report . Solar Thermal Technology on an Industrial Scale The Sun is Our Source Our sun produces 400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 watts of energy every second and the belief is that it will last for another 5 billion years. The United States An eSolar project in California. reached peak oil production in 1970, and there is no telling when global oil production will peak, but it is accepted that when it is gone the party is over. The sun, however, is the most reliable and abundant source of energy. This site will keep an updated log of new improvements to solar thermal and lists of projects currently planned or under construction. Please email us your comments at: [email protected] Abengoa’s PS10 project in Seville, Spain. Companies featured in this report: The Acciona Nevada Solar One plant. Solar Thermal Energy an Industry Report . Solar Thermal vs. Photovoltaic It is important to understand that solar thermal technology is not the same as solar panel, or photovoltaic, technology. Solar thermal electric energy generation concentrates the light from the sun to create heat, and that heat is used to run a heat engine, which turns a generator to make electricity. The working fluid that is heated by the concentrated sunlight can be a liquid or a gas. Different working fluids include water, oil, salts, air, nitrogen, helium, etc. Different engine types include steam engines, gas turbines, Stirling engines, etc. All of these engines can be quite efficient, often between 30% and 40%, and are capable of producing 10’s to 100’s of megawatts of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Fulfilling the Promise of Concentrating Solar Power Low-Cost Incentives Can Spur Innovation in the Solar Market
    AGENCY/PHOTOGRAPHER ASSOCIATED PRESS ASSOCIATED Fulfilling the Promise of Concentrating Solar Power Low-Cost Incentives Can Spur Innovation in the Solar Market By Sean Pool and John Dos Passos Coggin June 2013 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Fulfilling the Promise of Concentrating Solar Power Low-Cost Incentives Can Spur Innovation in the Solar Market By Sean Pool and John Dos Passos Coggin May 2013 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 6 reasons to support concentrating solar power 5 Concentrating solar power is a proven zero-carbon technology with high growth potential 6 Concentrating solar power can be used for baseload power 7 Concentrating solar power has few impacts on natural resources 8 Concentrating solar power creates jobs Concentrating solar power is low-cost electricity 9 Concentrating solar power is carbon-free electricity on a budget 11 Market and regulatory challenges to innovation and deployment of CSP technology 13 Low-cost policy solutions to reduce risk, promote investment, and drive innovation 14 Existing policy framework 15 Policy reforms to reduce risk and the cost of capital 17 Establish an independent clean energy deployment bank 18 Implement CLEAN contracts or feed-in tariffs Reinstate the Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee Program 19 Price carbon Policy reforms to streamline regulation and tax treatment 20 Tax reform for capital-intensive clean energy technologies Guarantee transmission-grid connection for solar projects 21 Stabilize and monetize existing tax incentives 22 Further streamline regulatory approval by creating an interagency one-stop shop for solar power 23 Regulatory transparency 24 Conclusion 26 About the authors 27 Endnotes Introduction and summary Concentrating solar power—also known as concentrated solar power, concen- trated solar thermal, and CSP—is a cost-effective way to produce electricity while reducing our dependence on foreign oil, improving domestic energy-price stabil- ity, reducing carbon emissions, cleaning our air, promoting economic growth, and creating jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative Hawaiian Electric Companies’ Energy Agreement One-Year Progress Update
    Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative Hawaiian Electric Companies’ Energy Agreement One-Year Progress Update n October 2008, the Hawaiian Electric Companies joined the Governor of Hawaii; the Hawaii Department of Busi ness, Economic Development and Tourism; and Office of Consumer Advocacy in an energy agreement Ias part of the Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative. The agreement – the most aggressive such effort in the nation – aims to move Hawaii decisively away from imported oil for electricity and ground transportation toward diverse, local renewable energy and energy efficiency. Our goal is energy and economic security for Hawaii and reduced greenhouse gas emissions responsible for the climate change to which our islands are especially vulnerable. Making the needed investments now can provide more stable energy costs in the long-run. It will require unprecedented cooperation and commitment among individuals, businesses, institutions and government. We need unity of purpose through good and bad times, success and setbacks, no matter whether oil prices go up and down. This list summarizes some key actions by the Hawaiian Electric Companies in cooperation with others after only one year. Increased Renewable Portfolio Standards (Act 155 - 2009) Hawaiian Electric Companies supported placing into law an increased renewable energy requirement of 40 percent of electric sales by 2030 and a new Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard. New HCEI proposals submitted to the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission (PUC) • Feed-In Tariff (FIT): Creates standard rates to ease the process for private developers to add renewable energy to Hawaiian Electric Companies’ grids. After detailed hearings to obtain input from a broad range of stakeholders, the PUC issued basic principles for such tariffs.
    [Show full text]
  • Energysecurityovervi
    energy.sandia.gov EERE Program Overview 26 March 2012 http://energy.sandia.gov Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND 2012-3066 P. History of Sandia Energy Programs Energy crisis of the 1970s Combustion Research spawned the beginning of Facility (CRF) & significant energy work Cummins partner on their newest diesel DOE’s Tech engine Strategic Petroleum Transfer Reserve – geological Initiative was characterization of established by Sandia was born as a nuclear salt domes to host oil Congress in weapons engineering laboratory storage caverns 1991 with deep science and Advent Solar engineering competencies Energy Policy Joint BioEnergy Act of 2005 Institute 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2007 2010 CRF opens to Vertical axis researchers wind turbine Power grid reliability study Consortium for Advanced NRC cask Simulation of Light Water Sunshine to Reactors (CASL) certification Petrol Pilot Test Our core NW studies & competencies core melt enabled us to take studies on additional large SunCatcher™ Climate study national security Solar Tower partnership with Large-scale pool fire uncertainties to tests of liquefied challenges opens Stirling Energy economies Systems natural gas (LNG) on water Distributed Energy Technology Laboratory (DETL) to integrate Combustion Research emerging energy technologies Computation
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of CSP Development
    The Status of CSP Development DISH STIRLING POWER TOWER CLFR Tom Mancini CSP Program Manager Sandia National Laboratories PARABOLIC TROUGH 505.844.8643 DISH STIRLING [email protected] [email protected] 1 Presentation Content • Brief Overview of Sandia National Laboratories • Background information • Examples of CSP Technologies − Parabolic Trough Systems − Power Tower Systems − Thermal Energy Storage − Dish Stirling Systems • Status of CSP Technologies • Cost of CSP and Resource Availability • Deployments • R & D Directions [email protected] 2 Four Mission Areas Sandia’s missions meet national needs in four key areas: • Nuclear Weapons • Defense Systems and Assessments • Energy, Climate and Infrastructure Security • International, Homeland, and Nuclear Security [email protected] 3 Research Drives Capabilities High Performance Nanotechnologies Extreme Computing & Microsystems Environments Computer Materials Engineering Micro Bioscience Pulsed Power Science Sciences Electronics Research Disciplines 4 People and Budget . On-site workforce: 11,677 FY10 operating revenue . Regular employees: 8,607 $2.3 billion 13% . Over 1,500 PhDs and 2,500 MS/MA 13% 43% 31% Technical staff (4,277) by discipline: (Operating Budget) Nuclear Weapons Defense Systems & Assessments Energy, Climate, & Infrastructure Security International, Homeland, and Nuclear Security Computing 16% Math 2% Chemistry 6% Physics 6% Other science 6% Other fields 12% Electrical engineering 21% Mechanical engineering 16% Other engineering 15% 5 Sandia’s NSTTF Dish Engine Engine Test Rotating Testing Facility Platform Established in 1976, we provide ………. • CSP R&D NSTTF • Systems analysis and FMEA • System and Tower Testing Solar Furnace component testing and support NATIONAL SOLAR THERMAL TEST FACILITY [email protected] 6 Labs Support the DOE Program The CSP Programs at Sandia and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) support the DOE Solar Energy Technology Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Lsoar Value Chain Value Chain
    Solar Private companies in black Public companies in blue Followed by the founding date of companies less than 15 years old value chain (1 of 2) This value chain publication contains information gathered and summarized mainly from Lux Research and a variety of other public sources that we believe to be accurate at the time of ppggyublication. The information is for general guidance only and not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither EYGM Limited nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization nor Lux Research can accept responsibility for loss to any person relying on this publication. Materials and equipment Components and products Balance of system and installations Crystalline silicon photovoltaic GCL Silicon, China (2006); LDK Solar, China (2005); MEMC, US; Renewable Energy Corporation ASA, Norway; SolarWorld AG, Germany (1998) Bosch Solar Energy, Germany (2000); Canadian Solar, Canada/China (2001); Jinko Solar, China (2006); Kyocera, Japan; Sanyo, Japan; SCHOTT Solar, Germany (2002); Solarfun, China (2004); Tianwei New Energy Holdings Co., China; Trina Solar, China (1997); Yingli Green Energy, China (1998); BP Solar, US; Conergy, Germany (1998); Eging Photovoltaic, China SOLON, Germany (1997) Daqo Group, China; M. Setek, Japan; ReneSola, China (2003); Wacker, Germany Hyundai Heavy Industries,,; Korea; Isofoton,,p Spain ; JA Solar, China (();2005); LG Solar Power,,; Korea; Mitsubishi Electric, Japan; Moser Baer Photo Voltaic, India (2005); Motech, Taiwan; Samsung
    [Show full text]
  • Design, Construction and Operation of CSP Solar Thermal Power Plants in Florida
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA Design, Construction and Operation of CSP Solar Thermal Power Plants in Florida PI: D. Yogi Goswami Co-PIs: Elias Stefanakos, Muhammad M. Rahman, Sunol Aydin, Robert Reedy Students: Gokmen Demirkaya (Ph.D.); Ricardo Vasquez Padilla (Ph.D.); Huijuan Chen (Ph.D.); Jamie Trahan (Ph.D.) Description: Florida utilities are mandated to achieve 20% renewable energy contribution to their generation mix by 2020. Fig. 1 Direct Normal Radiation for While technologically feasible with solar energy, the capital costs are high – presently, capital costs range from $6,000-$7,000/kW for PV and $3,500-$4,000/kW for concentrating solar thermal power. This project targets the development of solar thermal power technology for bulk power and distributed generation, which will diversify energy resources in Florida and reduce greenhouse emissions by utilizing renewable sources. Also, there will be economic impacts with the establishment of new power industry in Florida, which will help the electrical utilities of the state to meet the renewable portfolio standards. The project has three main tasks; the first one is to develop design methodologies and standards for the proven solar thermal power technologies in combination with bio or fossil fuels based on Florida conditions and resources. Secondly, the project aims to set up demonstration and test facilities for these technologies for optimization for Florida conditions, and the final task is to develop and commercialize innovative technologies based on new thermodynamic cycles. Budget: $882,000 Universities: USF, UF, UCF External Colaborators: Sopogy Corporation Progress Summary Research Objectives for Current Reporting Period: The main research objectives for the current reporting period include the development of a test facility and pilot demonstration systems based on parabolic trough technology.
    [Show full text]
  • US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009
    US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009 Thursday, April 15, 2010 575 7th Street NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20004 | www.seia.org Executive Summary U.S. Cumulative Solar Capacity Growth Despite the Great Recession of 2009, the U.S. solar energy 2,500 25,000 23,835 industry grew— both in new installations and 2,000 20,000 employment. Total U.S. solar electric capacity from 15,870 2,108 photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) 1,500 15,000 technologies climbed past 2,000 MW, enough to serve -th MW more than 350,000 homes. Total U.S. solar thermal 1,000 10,000 MW 1 capacity approached 24,000 MWth. Solar industry 494 revenues also surged despite the economy, climbing 500 5,000 36 percent in 2009. - - A doubling in size of the residential PV market and three new CSP plants helped lift the U.S. solar electric market 37 percent in annual installations over 2008 from 351 MW in 2008 to 481 MW in 2009. Solar water heating (SWH) Electricity Capacity (MW) Thermal Capacity (MW-Th) installations managed 10 percent year-over-year growth, while the solar pool heating (SPH) market suffered along Annual U.S. Solar Energy Capacity Growth with the broader construction industry, dropping 10 1,200 1,099 percent. 1,036 1,000 918 894 928 Another sign of continued optimism in solar energy: 865 -th 725 758 742 venture capitalists invested more in solar technologies than 800 542 any other clean technology in 2009. In total, $1.4 billion in 600 481 2 351 venture capital flowed to solar companies in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • New Energy Finance
    new energy finance GLOBAL TRENDS IN SUS T AINABLE ENER G Y INVES T MEN T 2009 Analysis of Trends and Issues in the Financing of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency ROGRAMME P NVIRONMENT E Endorsed by ATIONS N NITED U Copyright © United Nations Environment Programme, 2009 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views UNEP expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations promotes environ- Environment Programme, nor does citing of trade mentally sound practices names or commercial processes constitute globally and in its own activities. endorsement. This publication is printed on 100% ISBN 978 92 807 3038 recycled paper, using vegetable -based DTI/1186/PA inks and other eco-friendly practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Energy Options for Buildings: Distributed Generation— Power Generation at Or Near Buildings
    chapter six Alternative Energy Options for Buildings: Distributed Generation— Power Generation At or Near Buildings Frederick R. Fucci With the Assistance of Clara Vondrich and Annette Nichols Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to discuss how sources of electric and thermal energy generation can be placed within or near buildings and thus serve as an alternative to the traditional model of delivering electricity to the customer—the central station model, where large power plants in relatively remote locations generate electricity from fossil fuels (and nuclear fuel and water), and the power they generate is transmitted long distances before being stepped down in voltage for use in local distribution systems. The alternative to this model, where electricity and thermal energy are generated at or near the site where the energy is used, is called distributed generation because the Alternative Energy Options for Buildings 125 generation resources are distributed around the grid. More fundamentally, every com- mercial and residential facility is potentially a small power plant. This is the real alter- native to the central generation model. With existing and readily available technology, every office building, apartment building, hotel, campus, hospital, and factory can generate enough electricity and thermal energy on-site to meet its own basic energy needs and export some to the grid. If configured correctly, these on-site systems can also keep the power on when the grid goes down and provide a much higher level of reliability, efficiency, and even quality than grid power. Distributed Resources Before getting into the considerations involved in actually generating power on-site, this chapter will discuss and consider as alternatives some less complicated measures that reduce the amount of electricity buildings and facilities use.
    [Show full text]