DOCSLIB.ORG

Space Domain Mission Assurance Is the First Priority in Space Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Space Domain Mission Assurance Is the First Priority in Space Policy Space Policy of Japan Feb. 2019 National Space Policy Secretariat Cabinet Office of Japan Contents 1. Overview of Space Policy of Japan 2. Space Security 3. Quasi-Zenith Satellite System(QZSS） 4. Future Direction 1 Rich Space experience , but heavily focused on only Science & Technology 1950s 1980s 2000s 2010s ～1970s ～1990s ▲1991 Soviet Union Collapse ▲1993 GPS operation start Over ▲1957 Sputnik crisis ▲1958 NASA established ▲1998 ISS operation start seas ▲2007 China ASAT test ▲2011 Space shuttle ▲1969 Apollo 11 landed terminate on the moon ▲1955 Pen-shaped rocket launch test ▲2008 Space basic law ▲1969 Parliament resolution of Domestic ▲2016 peaceful use of space Space Activities Act ▲1970 Japan’s 1st satellite 2018 ▲ 「Ohsumi」 （4th country） National Defense Program Guidelines ▲1986 Purely domestic H-I rocket 2 Parliament resolution in 1969 left huge influence on Japanese Space “Parliament resolution of peaceful use of outer space”（in 1969, Sato Cabinet ) The development and use of outer space is limited only for peaceful purpose. It should ensure the progress of education and promotion of people’s life and welfare. In addition to that, it contributes the development of industry and international cooperation. The 61st Parliament session: House of Representatives, special committee of science and technology promotion measures. （8. May. 1969） ○Tsuguo Ishikawa（Socialist Party） The word “peaceful use” or just “peace” should be perceived under the assumption that the word “peace” must include “non-military” meaning. This is my interpretation of the word “peace”. What is your comment on this point? ○Shiro Kiuchi (Secretary of Science and Technology Agency) I agree , for the most part, with your interpretation of “peace” . 3 Japan’s Space Policy has changed since Basic Act for Space was settled in 2008 • Basic Act on Space policy was settled in 2008. Past Today Aimed at development of Promoting use of space for satellite and rocket solutions for challenges （national security, use in civil area） １．Non-military use ⇒ include use for national security within exclusively defensive oriented policy ２．Establishment of Strategic Headquarters for Space Policy ・Establishing “Basic Plan on Space policy” ・Chaired by Prime Minister. ３．Establishment of National Space Policy Secretariat in Cabinet Office ・Adding new missions to JAXA 2 The Cabinet Office comprehensively navigates space policy Strategic Headquarters for National Space Policy (Chairman; the Prime Minister) Request for advice Secretariat Committee on National Space Policy Secretariat National Space Policy Management of (9 committees from industry, academia etc.) (NSPS) QZSS [Cooperation among ministries] Cabinet Satellite MOFA Intelligence MEXT NPA Center MAFF etc… (CSICE) MLIT MOE MOD MIC MEXT METI Meteorological Greenhouse National Intelligence Communications Science and Satellite Gases Defense Space Industry and Technology Observing Promotion Broadcast Development Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency MLIT: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport MIC: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications MOFA: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan 3 MOE: Ministry of the Environment MEXT: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology NPA: National Police Agency MOD: Ministry of Defense METI: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry MAFF: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan Japan’s space policy stands on 3 pillars. 3 goals of Basic Plan ①Ensuring stable use of outer space ①Ensuring Space ②Strengthen security capabilities by using space Security ③Strengthen partnership with the U.S through cooperation for space use ②Promoting use of ① Resolution for global problem by using outer space and realizing safe and secure society space in civil area ②Creation of New business ③Maintaining and ①Maintain and Strengthen space industrial relation strengthening Industrial ②Maintain and Strengthen Science and Technology and Science and basis which can produce the new value Technology basis Japan’s Space budget for fiscal 2019 is $ 3270 million , the biggest ever. Fiscal 2019 budget proposal $3,270 million （Increase of $158 million year on year（Increase of 5.1％）） ＜The biggest ever＞ ［Trends in Space budget］ ［Breakdown by ministry and agency］ （Unit: million dollars） 3,270 MIC 67 3,014 2,946 3,027 2,950 3,020 3,112 3,111 2,804 2,827 2,904 MOD 321 MLIT 57 3000 MOE 30 METI 24 2500 NPA 8 2000 MAFF 3 MOFA 2 1500 1000 CAO 385 500 MEXT 1,655 CAS 716 (JAXA) 0 H21 H22 H23 H24 H25 H26 H27 H28 H29 H30 H31 （Unit: million dollars） MEXT: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology CAS: Cabinet Secretariat (Cabinet Satellite Intelligence Center) (Source; Ministry of Finance) CAO: Cabinet Office (QZSS) (1USD=110yen) MOD: Ministry of Defense 7 National Defense Program Guidelines focus on Space. ＜Construct new power for defense＞ It has become essential that Japan achieve superiority in new domains, which are space, cyberspace and electromagnetic spectrum. ＜ Cooperation with JAXA and US＞ Enhance cooperation with relevant agencies including the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and with the United States and other relevant countries. ＜ Organization building and Develop human resources＞ Engage in organization building such as the creation of units specializing in space and dedicated career field, and develop human resources and accumulate knowledge and expertise in the space field. 8 Space Domain Mission Assurance is the first priority in space policy. Space Domain Mission Assurance Japan is strengthening Space Domain Mission Assurance refer to US white paper “Space Domain Mission Assurance A Resilience Taxonomy”. Basic concept of Space Domain Mission Assurance was released by Space policy council in 2017. Space Domain Mission Assurance Defensive Operations Resilience Reconstruction ・Strengthening threat ・Every kind of Protective Measures and risk detection ・System recovery ・ ・Distribution of Equipment Timely provision of ・Substitute system(s) warning ・Redundancy of Means ・Strengthening operational ability 9 Strategy for strengthening mission assurance 〇Make the architecture of space system more resilient . Small Sat, Proliferation, Use of LEO 〇Partnerships with allies 『The Guidelines for Japan-U.S. Defense Cooperation (April 27, 2015 )』 Information sharing for SSA・MDA Cooperation in equipment and technology (Hosted payloads) 〇Partnerships with industries 10 Augment ＳＳＡ capability, ＭＤＡ and ＴＴＸ are progressing Implementation Plan of the Basic Plan on Space Policy SSA(SpaceSSA Situational Awareness) ■SSA system in Japan will start operating in 2023. MOD will start detailed design, manufacturing, test, etc. with JAXA and US partnerships for various asset in 2019. MDA(MaritimeMDA Domain Awareness ) ■We will steadily establish the Maritime Situational Display System and other systems to effectively gather, share, and distribute information. We are also promoting maritime information gathering and observation, including the use of earth observation satellites. TTX(Table Top Exercise) ■Japan participated in the Schriever Wargame, a multilateral tabletop exercise in the space field, in FY2018 for the first time. Government of Japan is developing 7 satellite constellation of QZSS. 【QZSS Orbit】 “QZO” satellites move in elliptical orbits tilted between 40 to 50 degrees with respect to the “GEO” orbit. The orbital period is about 24 hours and in-sync with the earth’s rotation, like GEO. As a result, they trace a figure “8” on the earth’s surface, with a focus around 135 degrees east longitude, and stay long-term just above Japan. QZO covers East Asia. 【QZO】 slow Elliptical orbit tilted between 40 to 50 degrees with Long-time respect to the stationary GEO orbital plane. （set to remain over Japan） （From ground it traces an “8” far orbital path,） Just above Japan about 3㎞/sec Period: 24 hours （about ８ hours） ←Japan Japan Equator 【GEO】 fast near Above the equator 36,000㎞ about 3㎞/sec（constant velocity） Period: 24 QZSS Satellite Ground Track Short-time Low altitude or not hours above Japan Used by communication satellites, and weather satellites 13 Initial Operations with 4-Satellite-Constellation in 2018 JFY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020～2032 QZSS 3 Sats Launch Development / Design Adjustments In operation （No. ２～４） Preliminary Development 1st(Michibiki) Adjustments design Design Successor Around 2023; 7 satellites constellation ①GPS complementary ②GNSS augmentation ③Messaging service Improved accuracy by using Improved precision positioning ・Disaster/crisis report more satellites （improved in （enables cm-class positioning utilizing ・ urban areas) GPS-based Control Station） Safety confirmation service through QZS QZS Rescue signal messaging Rescue signal Receive Disaster Report Rescue signal Control Receive Station 14 Autonomous operation; Promotion of utilization of QZSS ©三菱重工/JAXA ©三菱重工/JAXA weeding（day） weeding（night） fertilization agricultural Constructing machines machine 3次元地図 Autonomous Driving Seaベクトル 情報 Transportation 14 Future Direction ◇Steady progress based on “Space Basic Plan” ◇Ensuring Stable Use of Outer Space ・Mission Assurance ・SSA, STM, Partnerships with concerned ministries ◇Develop human resources 15 Cabinet Office Thank You 16 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Program for Promoting Japan As an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment Into Japan
    Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Office of FDI Promotion, Cabinet Office Program for Promoting Japan as an １ Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Growth of foreign direct investment to Japan In December 2011, the Government of Japan formulated the “Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan” consisting of policy measures to create an attractive, world-class business and living environment. The “New Growth Strategy” (June 2010, Cabinet decision) and the “Interim Report on Strategies to Revitalize Japan” (August 2011, Cabinet decision) requested the Government to formulate this Program. The Program was determined by the Interagency Parliamentary Secretary Meeting chaired by Hiroshi Ogushi, Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet Office. ＜1st stage＞ ＜2nd stage＞ Doubling FDI stock Doubling FDI to GDP from 2001 to 2006 ratio to around 5% by 2010 ２ Three Targets of The Program The Program sets out three targets that are to be achieved by 2020. 1) To Increase the Number of High Value-Added Sites The aim is to increase the number of high value-added sites (Asia Regional Headquarters and research and development facilities) by 30 sites each year by attracting FDI. As of the end of FY2009, there were approximately 500 high value-added sites in Japan. 2) To Double the Number of Employees of Foreign Enterprises The aim is to increase the number of employees of foreign enterprises (defined as those which have more than one-third ratio of foreign ownership) to 2,000,000 by FY2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Administrative Organization in Japan
    Appendix 2 THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION IN JAPAN 1. The Outline of National Administrative Organization National administration is uniformly carried out by the Cabinet and the organizations under the cabinet. The Cabinet, Ministries, Agencies and Incorporated Administrative Agencies (IAAs), etc. function as one organization, at the top of which exists the Cabinet. It is responsible for all the activities of State except legislative and judicial ones. Consequently it is natural that these organizations which take care of national administration should be systematically organized under the Cabinet. As of 2019, the Cabinet Office, 11 Ministries, and the Reconstruction Agency are under the Cabinet. They are national administrative organizations in the proper sense of terms. However, not all the areas of State activities are covered by these Ministries. Incorporated Administrative Agencies and Public Corporations also cover other parts of the activities. One of their purposes is accomplishing enough efficiency and effectiveness in their business with autonomy and legal personalities separated from State.To necessary extent, they are subject to various controls by their competent Ministers. The former, for which more general rules are prepared, amount 87 as of October 1, 2019. Some of them are regarded the same as government offices in terms of quality of their roles, to which are applied statutes concerned. Public Corporations, which now amount 33 as of the same date, are enterprises dealing with different quality business from IAAs. They must be regulated by individual acts of rules, not common rules, unlike IAAs. Thus we can see some types of organizations following policy process from planning to implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Japan's Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space
    A Guide to Japan’s Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space A Working Paper on Japan’s Space Policy By Takuya Wakimoto ISSUES & INSIGHTS WORKING PAPER VOL. 19, WP3 | APRIL 2019 Pacific Forum Based in Honolulu, the Pacific Forum (www.pacforum.org) is a foreign policy research institute focused on the Asia-Pacific Region. Founded in 1975, the Pacific Forum collaborates with a broad network of research institutes from around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating project findings and recommendations to global leaders, governments, and members of the public throughout the region. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic, and maritime policy issues, and works to help stimulate cooperative policies through rigorous research, analyses and dialogues. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................ iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................... vi ENGLISH-JAPANESE TRANSLATIONS ...................................... vii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2. KEY GOVERNMENTAL ACTORS, POLICY DOCUMENTS AND MECHANISMS ........................................................................ 3 3. JAPAN’S SPACE POLICY OBJECTIVE ......................................... 23 4. CONCLUSION .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • Satoshi Kogure, Co-Chair of Multi-GNSS Asia Director, National Space Policy Secretariat, Cabinet Office, the Government of Japan
    MULTI-GNSS ASIA Satoshi Kogure, Co-Chair of Multi-GNSS Asia Director, National Space Policy Secretariat, Cabinet Office, The Government of Japan Supported by: WHAT’S MGA? Multi-GNSS Asia (MGA) which promotes multi GNSS in the Asia and Oceania regions and encourages GNSS service providers and user communities to develop new applications and businesses. The MGA activities are reported annually in the ICG providers’ forum. The MGA also supports developing countries in achieving its SDGs through technical support on GNSS via seminars for policy makers and more. Aug. 2020 GISTDA Aug. 2019 GISTDA Oct. 2018 RMIT, FrontierSI, GA, GNSS,asia, QSS Oct. 2017 LAPAN, BELS, GNSS.asia, QSS, JAXA Nov. 2016 Univ. Philippines, NAMRIA, Phivolcs, BELS, GNSS.asia, QSS, JAXA Dec. 2015 Soartech, BELS, GNSS.asia, QSS, JAXA, SPAC Oct. 2014 NSTDA, G-NAVIS, QSS, JAXA, SPAC Dec. 2013 G-NAVIS, HUST, QSS, JAXA, SPAC Dec. 2012 ANGKASA, JAXA, G-NAVIS, SPAC Nov. 2011 GTC, KARI, JAXA, SPAC Nov. 2010 IGNSS, JAXA, SPAC https://www.multignss.asia https://www.multignss.asia/contact Jan. 2010 GISTDA, JAXA, SPAC https://www.facebook.com/multignss Conference and Exhibition What is MGA? To share the latest advancements to the GNSS and PNT landscape, the MGA conference is organized annually in a different location across the Asia- Oceania region. Delegates can also find out about new technologies, products and services, updates on R&D projects and achievements. The Pillars of conference attracts participants from industry, government and academia from around the world, making its networking opportunities second-to- none. Activity Networking and Capacity Building via Webinars, Workshops and Forums To make sure you’re on top of rapidly changing technological developments • Conference and Exhibition in GNSS, PNT technologies and its utilization in the business landscape, MGA hosts webinars, regional workshops and networking forums.
    [Show full text]
  • III. Emergency Responses Required and Taken by Governments and Other Bodies 1
    III. Emergency Responses Required and Taken by Governments and Other Bodies 1. Emergency Responses Mandated in the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Act, the Basic Plan for Emergency Preparedness, etc. See Chapter III 1 of the Interim Report. 2. Government Response after the Accident (1) General description of the response of the national government1 Right after the earthquake struck at 14:46 on March 11, 2011, METI established the Emergency Response Headquarters for the disaster and began gathering information on the state of the reactors at nuclear power stations in the stricken areas. At the Prime Minister’s Office, at 14:50 the same day, Tetsuro Ito, the Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary for Crisis Management (“Crisis Management Deputy Chief Ito”), established the Emergency Response Office in the Prime Minister’s Office for the earthquake, and summoned members of the Emergency Operations Team, which was made up of the bureau chiefs of relevant ministries, to the Prime Minister’s Office Crisis Management Center located below ground inside the Prime Minister’s Office. At around 15:42 the same day, Masao Yoshida, the site superintendent of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station (hereinafter referred to as “Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS) (hereinafter referred to as “Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS Site Superintendent Yoshida”) of Tokyo Electric Power Company (hereinafter referred to as “TEPCO), sent an Article 10 Notification via the TEPCO head office to the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (“NISA”) and other competent bodies, having judged that,
    [Show full text]
  • KAKEHASHI Project Asian American Leadership Program Report
    Japan’s Friendship Ties Program (USA) KAKEHASHI Project Asian American Leadership Program Report １．Program Overview As part of the Exchange Program “KAKEHASHI Project,” 10 Asian Americans visited Japan. They stayed in Japan from October 2 to October 9 to participate in programs aimed at promoting their understanding of Japan with regard to Japanese politics, economy, society, culture, history, and foreign policy. Through the lectures by ministries observation of the historical landmarks, and other experiences of the traditional Japanese cultures, the participants enjoyed a wide range of opportunities to improve their understanding of Japan and shared their individual interests and experiences through SNS. To wrap up the whole program they exchanged opinion with MOFA officers on the contents to dedicate for the future program 【Participating Countries and Number of Participants】 United States of America：10 participants 【Prefectures Visited】 Tokyo, Hiroshima, Kyoto ２．Program Schedule Oct 2 (Sun.) 【Arrival】Arrival at Narita International Airport and Haneda Airport Oct 3 (Mon.) 【Orientation】 【Courtesy Call】Parliamentary Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs Takei 【Lecture】Ministry of Foreign Affairs/Asian and Oceanian Affairs Bureau and North American Affairs Bureau 【Lecture】Cabinet Secretariat/Office of Policy Planning and Coordinator on Territory and Sovereignty Oct 4 (Tue.) 【Local Industry】Tsukiji Market 【Observation】Edo Tokyo Museum ＊Group A:【Lecture】Ministry of Justice/Japanese Regal System/Intellectual Property Law 【Lecture】Cabinet Office/Measures to the Aging Population of Japa ＊Group B:【Lecture 】Reconstruction Agency / Recovery for the Great East Earthquake 1 【Lecture】Cabinet Secretariat / Growth Strategy Oct.5 (Wed.) 【Observation】Diet Building 【Cutting-edge Technology】National Museum of Emerging Science 【Historical Landmark】Meiji Shrine Move to Hiroshima Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Localizing Public Dispute Resolution in Japan: Lessons from Experiments with Deliberative Policy-Making By
    Localizing Public Dispute Resolution in Japan: Lessons from experiments with deliberative policy-making by Masahiro Matsuura Master in City Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998 B. Eng. Civil Engineering University of Tokyo, 1996 Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban and Regional Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2006 © 2006 Masahiro Matsuura. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of author: Dep artment of Urban Studies and Planning June 27, 2006 Certified by: Lawrence E. Susskind Ford Professor of Urban and Environmental Planning, Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Frank Levy, Daniel Rose Professor of Urban Economics, Chair, Ph.D. Committee 2 Localizing Public Dispute Resolution in Japan: Lessons from experiments with deliberative policy-making by Masahiro Matsuura Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on August 11, 2006 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban and Regional Planning ABSTRACT Can consensus building processes, as practiced in the US, be used to resolve infrastructure disputes in Japan? Since the 1990s, proposals to construct highways, dams, ports and airports, railways, as well as to redevelop neighborhoods, have been opposed by a wide range of stakeholders. In response, there is a growing interest among Japanese practitioners in using consensus building processes, as practiced in the US, in order to resolve infrastructure disputes.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Innovation Strategy
    provisional translation Integrated Innovation Strategy 1 Contents Introduction 3 (1) Positioning of the Fifth Basic Plan and Comprehensive Strategy 2017 ............... 3 (2) Evaluation of Current Status and Necessity of Integrated Innovation Strategies ....... 3 (3) New Strategy Formation Process and Structure ................................. 5 CHAPTER 1: General 6 (1) Status of the Action on the Fifth Basic Plan and Comprehensive Strategy 2017 ........ 6 (2) Global Trend ............................................................. 10 (3) Our Strength in the Context of Game-Changing Developments .................... 12 (4) Basic Concept of an Integrated Strategy ....................................... 14 (5) Future Issues ............................................................. 15 CHAPTER 2: Source of Knowledge 16 (1) Construction of the Cross-domain Exchange Platform towards the Society 5.0 Realization ........................................................................... 17 (2)Construction of Data Infrastructure for Open Science ............................ 22 (3) Evidence Based Policy Making/Promotion of University Corporation Management ... 28 CHAPTER 3: Knowledge Creation 31 (1) Creation of Innovation Ecosystem with University Reform and such ............... 34 (2) Strategic R&D (SIP, PRISM, ImPACT) ....................................... 46 CHAPTER 4: Social Implementation of Knowledge 50 (1) Startups ................................................................. 52 (2) Promotion of Innovation in the Government Projects/Systems
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Operating Results for Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Estimated at the End of the 3Rd Mid to Long-Term Objective Period
    Evaluation of Operating Results for Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Estimated at the End of the 3rd Mid to Long-Term Objective Period August 2017 Prime Minister, Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications, Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Form 2-2-1 National Research and Development Agency Evaluation on mid to long-term objective period (Estimated evaluation) / Overview of the Evaluation 1. Items related to the evaluation Agency Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency FY for evaluation FY evaluation the 3rd mid to long-term objective period (including estimated performance in the final year) Mid to long-term objective period FY 2013-FY2017 2. Items related to the assessor The Competent Minister Prime Minister Incorporated jurisdiction dept. National Space Policy of the Cabinet Office Dept. and person in charge National Space Policy of the Cabinet Office, Counselor, Hidekazu Takakura Evaluation and inspection dept. Policy Evaluation Public Relations Division, Minister’s Secretariat Dept. and person in charge Policy Evaluation and Public Relations Division, Director, Hiroki Kawata The Competent Minister Minister of Internal Affairs and Communications Incorporated jurisdiction dept. Global ICT Strategy Bureau Dept. and person in charge Space Communications Policy Division, Director, Hisashi Onaga Evaluation and inspection dept. Policy Evaluation Public Relations Division, Minister's Secretariat Dept. and person in charge Policy Evaluation and Public Relations Division, Director, Shinya Hirano The Competent Minister Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Incorporated jurisdiction dept. Research and Development Bureau Dept. and person in charge Space Development and Utilization Division, Director, Hirota Tani Evaluation and inspection dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's National Security Policy Infrastructure
    INTRODUCTION | i JAPAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY INFRASTRUCTURE CAN TOKYO MEET WASHINGTON’S EXPECTATION? Yuki Tatsumi November 2008 ii | JAPAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY INFRASTRUCTURE Copyright ©2008 The Henry L. Stimson Center ISBN: 0-9770023-9-X Photos by the Ministry of Defense in Japan and the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force Cover design by Rock Creek Creative. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from The Henry L. Stimson Center. The Henry L. Stimson Center 1111 19th Street, NW 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone: 202-223-5956 fax: 202-238-9604 www.stimson.org YUKI TATSUMI | iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms............................................................................................................ iv Preface ................................................................................................................ vi Acknowledgements............................................................................................ vii INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: EVOLUTION OF JAPANESE NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY .............. 11 CHAPTER 2: CIVILIAN INSTITUTIONS ................................................................ 33 CHAPTER 3: UNIFORM INSTITUTIONS................................................................ 65 CHAPTER 4: THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.................................................. 97 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • I Organization Charts
    I ORGANIZATION CHARTS Notes 1. Only the major organs and units of each organization (ministry, commission or agency) are shown; divisions of bureaus and departments, and local branch offices at lower levels are omitted. (The names of such divisions appear in “II Organization and Functions of the Executive Branch”.) The councils of each organization are also omitted. They are listed in “III List of Councils”. 2. The lines indicate relationships between organs. double line (= ) chief organs of cach organization solid line (―) internal divisions and external organs broken line (---) local branch offices wavy line (～～～) auxiliary organs 3. The figures indicate the fixed number of personnel of each organization. 4. The figures in parentheses indicate the number of units. 5. The data in principle are as of December 1, 2013, except the figures with foot notes. -1- GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN [Legislative Branch] [Administrative Branch] [Judicial Branch] DIET CABINET COURTS House of Representatives Cabinet Office Supreme Court 1-7-1, Nagatacho, 4-2, Hayabusa-cho Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Reconstruction Agency * Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-3581-5111 Tel. 03-3264-8111 Ministry of Internal Affairs House of Councillors High Courts (8) and Communications 1-7-1, Nagatacho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Ministry of Justice District Courts (50) Tel. 03-3581-3111 Judge Impeachment Court Ministry of Foreign Affairs Family Courts (50) Judge Indictment Committee Ministry of Finance Summary Courts (438) Ministry of Education, Committees for the National Diet Library (165) Culture, Sports,
    [Show full text]