DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Services Agency Financial Services Agency Central Government Bldg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Services Agency Financial Services Agency Central Government Bldg National Diet Bldg. Kokkai-gijidomae Sta. Kokkai-gijidomae (Marunouchi Sta. Line) (Chiyoda Line) Cabinet Office Ministry of Land, Central Infrastructure, Kasumigaseki Financial Government Transport and Bldg. Services Bldg. No. 4 Tourism Agency Ministry of Ministry of Internal Affairs Ministry of Education, Foreign Culture, Sports, Science and Ministry of and Technology / Board of Audit Finance Affairs Communications Kasumigaseki Sta. (Hibiya Line) Kasumigaseki Sta. Sta. Kasumigaseki Sta. Kasumigaseki (Marunouchi Line) Toranomon Sta. Toranomon Tokyo Court (Chiyoda Line) (Ginza Line) Ministry of Ministry of Complex Agriculture, Economy, Forestry and Trade and Fisheries Industry Bar Ministry of Association Health, Bldg. Labour and Welfare Financial Services Agency Financial Services Agency Central Government Bldg. No. 7, 3-2-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8967, Japan TEL: +81-3-3506-6000 (main) Access (By subway) ● 6-minute walk from Toranomon Station on Ginza Line (G07) ● 6-minute walk from Kasumigaseki Station on Chiyoda Line (C08) or Hibiya Line (H07) ● 9-minute walk from Kasumigaseki Station on Marunouchi Line (M15) ● 7-minute walk from Kokkai-gijidomae Station on Marunouchi Line (M14) or Chiyoda Line (C07) Published in June 2020 Financial Services Agency About the Financial Services Agency (FSA) History of the FSA Finance is like blood circulating in the human body—an appropriate supply of funds enhances the The Financial Supervisory Agency was established as an administrative organ (external organ of the Prime Minister’s economy and people's lives. Office) responsible for inspection and supervision of private sector financial institutions and surveillance of securities June 1998 The Financial Services Agency (FSA) engages in financial transactions. With the establishment of the Financial Reconstruction Commission (FRC) in December of the same year, regulation with the aim of enhancing national welfare through the Financial Supervisory Agency became an organization under the jurisdiction of the FRC. sustainable corporate and economic growth and stable asset building, etc., by achieving a balance between The Financial Services Agency (FSA) was established under the jurisdiction of the FRC through July 2000 reorganization of the Financial Supervisory Agency. With this change, the FSA became responsible for (1) stability of the financial system and demonstration of financial planning of the financial system for which the Ministry of Finance had been responsible. intermediation functions, (2) user protection and user convenience, and By the reorganization of central government ministers, the FSA became an external organ of the Cabinet (3) market fairness/transparency and market vigor January 2001 Office and, with concurrent abolishment of the FRC, the FSA took over the business concerning disposition even amid the rapid changes in the financial environment. of failed financial institutions. The Role of the FSA Changes in Financial Administration The FSA is responsible for ensuring stability of Japan’s financial system, protection of depositors, insurance Ministry of Finance policyholders and securities investors, and smooth finance through such measures as planning and policymaking Until July concerning the financial system, inspection and supervision of private sector financial institutions, and surveillance Securities Bureau Banking Bureau 1992 of securities transactions. The FSA thereby plays extremely important roles for the sound development of the Inspection Department Insurance Department national economy. Act for Establishment of the Financial Services Agency (Extract) Ministry of Finance (Missions) July 1992 Minister's Secretariat Securities Bureau Article 3 to Banking Bureau June 1998 Securities and Exchange (1) The Financial Services Agency has a mission to secure the stability of financial functions in Japanand protect Financial Inspection Department Insurance Department Surveillance Commission depositors, policyholders, securities investors, and any equivalent persons, and facilitating financing. (2) Beyond what is specified in the preceding paragraph, the Financial Services Agency has a mission to assist Prime Minister's Office Ministry of Finance with affairs of the Cabinet concerning specific important policies of the Cabinet relating to the mission June 1998 referred to in that paragraph. to Financial Supervisory Agency Financial System Planning Bureau (3) The Financial Services Agency is to assist the Cabinet Secretariat in carrying out the mission referred to in the December 1998 Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission preceding paragraph. Prime Minister's Office Ministry of Finance Article 4, etc. of the Act for Establishment December 1998 Affairs handled by the FSA( of the Financial Services Agency ) Financial Reconstruction Commission Financial System Planning Bureau to Financial Supervisory Agency Planning and policy making of financial systems June 2000 ◆ Secretariat Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission ◆ Inspection and supervision of private sector financial institutions, including banks, insurance companies, !"#"$%&'()*(+ "#,and#-. financial instrument business operators, as well as market participants, including exchanges Prime Minister's Office Ministry of Finance Establishment of rules for trading in markets ◆ July 2000 Financial Reconstruction Commission Financial System Stabilization Division, ◆ Establishment of business accounting standards and others concerning corporate finance to Financial Services Agency Minister's Secretariat* ◆ Supervision of certified public accountants and auditing firms January 2001 Secretariat Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission ◆ Participation in activities of international organizations and bilateral and multilateral fora on financial issues to develop internationally consistent financial administration Surveillance of compliance of rules in markets Cabinet Office Ministry of Finance ◆ January 2001 to Financial Services Agency Financial System Stabilization Division, Minister's Secretariat* March 2004 FSA's symbol mark Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission The FSA's symbol mark has been designed from "FSA"—the initial letters of the Financial Cabinet Office Ministry of Finance Services Agency. The middle "S" represents a smooth flow of finance, which is being guarded from both sides. Financial Services Agency Financial System Stabilization Division, Current Minister's Secretariat* The light blue color expresses the smooth flow of finance and the transparency of the FSA's administration. Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission Certified Public Accountants and Auditing Oversight Board ※ Concurrently responsible for planning and policymaking concerning the system for disposal of failed financial institutions and concerning financial risk management. 1 2 Financial Services Agency FSA's Organization Chart and Local Finance Bureaus Organization of the FSA （as of January 2020 ） Resources Management Division Planning and Management Division Prime Minister Strategy Development and Strategy Development Division Minister of State for Financial Services Management Bureau Risk Analysis Division State Minister Parliamentary Vice-Minister Director for Risk Analysis Division Planning and Management Division Policy and Markets Financial Services Commissioner Bureau Financial Markets Division Agency Vice Minister for Corporate Accounting and Disclosure Division International Affairs Planning and Management Division Banking Business Division I Local Finance Bureaus Supervision Bureau Banking Business Division II The FSA Commissioner delegates a part of the authority for inspection and supervision of local private financial institutions, Insurance Business Division etc. to the Directors-General of Local Finance Bureaus, etc. (local Hokkaido Local Securities Business Division branch organs of the Ministry of Finance) based on laws and Finance Bureau regulations. The FSA Commissioner directs and supervises the Hakodate Local Finance Office Asahikawa Local Finance Office Directors-General of Local Finance Bureaus, etc. with regard to Kushiro Local Finance Office Obihiro Local Finance Office affairs related to the delegated authority. Otaru Sub-Office Administrative Kitami Sub-Office Law Judges Fukuoka Local Kinki Local Hokuriku Local Planning and Management Division Finance Branch Bureau Finance Bureau Finance Bureau Saga Local Finance Office Otsu Local Finance Office Toyama Local Finance Office Nagasaki Local Finance Office Kobe Local Finance Office Fukui Local Finance Office Market Surveillance Division Wakayama Local Finance Office Kyoto Local Finance Office Nara Local Finance Office Tohoku Local Finance Bureau Aomori Local Finance Office Securities Business Monitoring Division Morioka Local Finance Office Akita Local Finance Office Yamagata Local Finance Office Kyusyu Local Chugoku Local Fukushima Local Finance Office Securities and Exchange Executive Bureau Director for Securities Business Monitoring Division Finance Bureau Finance Bureau Surveillance Commission Oita Local Finance Office Tottori Local Finance Office Miyazaki Local Finance Office Matsue Local Finance Office Market Misconduct Investigation Division Kagoshima Local Finance Office Okayama Local Finance Office Kanto Local Finance Bureau Yamaguchi Local Finance Office Mito Local Finance Office Yokohama Local Finance Office Utsunomiya Local Finance Office Niigata Local Finance Office Maebashi Local Finance Office Kofu Local Finance Office Disclosure Inspection Division
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Independent Supervisory Bodies Report Audit Office, Ombuds Office, Data Protection Authority M O C
    Independent Supervisory Bodies Report Audit Office, Ombuds Office, Data Protection Authority m o c . e b o d a . k c Sustainable Governance o t s - e g Indicators 2020 e v © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2020 | 2 Independent Supervisory Bodies Indicator Audit Office Question Does there exist an independent and effective audit office? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = There exists an effective and independent audit office. 8-6 = There exists an effective and independent audit office, but its role is slightly limited. 5-3 = There exists an independent audit office, but its role is considerably limited. 2-1 = There does not exist an independent and effective audit office. Australia Score 10 Under the Auditor-General Act 1997, the auditor-general is responsible for providing auditing services to parliament and other public sector entities. The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) supports the auditor-general, who is an independent officer of parliament. The ANAO’s purpose is to provide parliament with an independent assessment of selected areas of the public administration, and to provide assurance regarding public sector financial reporting, administration and accountability. This task is undertaken primarily by conducting performance and financial statement audits. Citation: https://www.anao.gov.au/about/auditor-general-and-office https://www.aph.gov.au/~/~/link.aspx?_id=387AD00794BD41C39579392068D56CF9&_z=z Austria Score 10 The Austrian Court of Audit (Rechnungshof) is an instrument of parliament. The office reports regularly to parliament, and parliament can order it to perform specific tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Program for Promoting Japan As an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment Into Japan
    Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Office of FDI Promotion, Cabinet Office Program for Promoting Japan as an １ Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Growth of foreign direct investment to Japan In December 2011, the Government of Japan formulated the “Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan” consisting of policy measures to create an attractive, world-class business and living environment. The “New Growth Strategy” (June 2010, Cabinet decision) and the “Interim Report on Strategies to Revitalize Japan” (August 2011, Cabinet decision) requested the Government to formulate this Program. The Program was determined by the Interagency Parliamentary Secretary Meeting chaired by Hiroshi Ogushi, Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet Office. ＜1st stage＞ ＜2nd stage＞ Doubling FDI stock Doubling FDI to GDP from 2001 to 2006 ratio to around 5% by 2010 ２ Three Targets of The Program The Program sets out three targets that are to be achieved by 2020. 1) To Increase the Number of High Value-Added Sites The aim is to increase the number of high value-added sites (Asia Regional Headquarters and research and development facilities) by 30 sites each year by attracting FDI. As of the end of FY2009, there were approximately 500 high value-added sites in Japan. 2) To Double the Number of Employees of Foreign Enterprises The aim is to increase the number of employees of foreign enterprises (defined as those which have more than one-third ratio of foreign ownership) to 2,000,000 by FY2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Administrative Organization in Japan
    Appendix 2 THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION IN JAPAN 1. The Outline of National Administrative Organization National administration is uniformly carried out by the Cabinet and the organizations under the cabinet. The Cabinet, Ministries, Agencies and Incorporated Administrative Agencies (IAAs), etc. function as one organization, at the top of which exists the Cabinet. It is responsible for all the activities of State except legislative and judicial ones. Consequently it is natural that these organizations which take care of national administration should be systematically organized under the Cabinet. As of 2019, the Cabinet Office, 11 Ministries, and the Reconstruction Agency are under the Cabinet. They are national administrative organizations in the proper sense of terms. However, not all the areas of State activities are covered by these Ministries. Incorporated Administrative Agencies and Public Corporations also cover other parts of the activities. One of their purposes is accomplishing enough efficiency and effectiveness in their business with autonomy and legal personalities separated from State.To necessary extent, they are subject to various controls by their competent Ministers. The former, for which more general rules are prepared, amount 87 as of October 1, 2019. Some of them are regarded the same as government offices in terms of quality of their roles, to which are applied statutes concerned. Public Corporations, which now amount 33 as of the same date, are enterprises dealing with different quality business from IAAs. They must be regulated by individual acts of rules, not common rules, unlike IAAs. Thus we can see some types of organizations following policy process from planning to implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground Between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title The Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9v5803kw Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 30(1) Author Aronson, Bruce E. Publication Date 2012 DOI 10.5070/P8301022242 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE OLYMPUS SCANDAL AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM: CAN JAPAN FIND A MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN THE BOARD MONITORING MODEL AND MANAGEMENT MODEL? By Bruce E. Aronson* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................. 95 II. The Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Issues ..................................... 106 A. Background of the Olympus Case ............ 106 B. Monitoring of Management under Japan's Corporate Governance System .............. 115 III. Back to Basics: Revisiting Theoretical and Structural Issues ............................ 120 A. Purpose of Corporate Governance Reform .... 120 B. Monitoring Function of the Board of Directors..... ........................ 125 IV. Practical Issues: Achieving "Truly Effective" Corporate Governance Reform ................. 129 A. Information ............................. 130 1. Internal Sharing of Information .......... 130 2. Public Information Disclosure ............ 132 * Senior Fulbright Research Scholar, Waseda University; Professor of Law, Creighton University School of Law. I thank Mr. Sumitaka Fujita, Professor Yumiko Miwa, and Mr. Naoaki Okabe for acting as a panel of commentators following my presentation on this research at the Meiji Institute for Global Affairs Inaugural Symposium, Tokyo, Japan (Feb. 21, 2012), and participants in presentations at Nagoya University (April 20, 2012), AIMA Japan Hedge Fund Forum 2012, Tokyo Stock Exchange (June 4, 2012), 2012 International Conference on Law & Society, Law & Society Association, Honolulu (June 5, 2012), and Business Research Institute, Tokyo (Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Japan's Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space
    A Guide to Japan’s Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space A Working Paper on Japan’s Space Policy By Takuya Wakimoto ISSUES & INSIGHTS WORKING PAPER VOL. 19, WP3 | APRIL 2019 Pacific Forum Based in Honolulu, the Pacific Forum (www.pacforum.org) is a foreign policy research institute focused on the Asia-Pacific Region. Founded in 1975, the Pacific Forum collaborates with a broad network of research institutes from around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating project findings and recommendations to global leaders, governments, and members of the public throughout the region. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic, and maritime policy issues, and works to help stimulate cooperative policies through rigorous research, analyses and dialogues. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................ iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................... vi ENGLISH-JAPANESE TRANSLATIONS ...................................... vii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2. KEY GOVERNMENTAL ACTORS, POLICY DOCUMENTS AND MECHANISMS ........................................................................ 3 3. JAPAN’S SPACE POLICY OBJECTIVE ......................................... 23 4. CONCLUSION .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • Satoshi Kogure, Co-Chair of Multi-GNSS Asia Director, National Space Policy Secretariat, Cabinet Office, the Government of Japan
    MULTI-GNSS ASIA Satoshi Kogure, Co-Chair of Multi-GNSS Asia Director, National Space Policy Secretariat, Cabinet Office, The Government of Japan Supported by: WHAT’S MGA? Multi-GNSS Asia (MGA) which promotes multi GNSS in the Asia and Oceania regions and encourages GNSS service providers and user communities to develop new applications and businesses. The MGA activities are reported annually in the ICG providers’ forum. The MGA also supports developing countries in achieving its SDGs through technical support on GNSS via seminars for policy makers and more. Aug. 2020 GISTDA Aug. 2019 GISTDA Oct. 2018 RMIT, FrontierSI, GA, GNSS,asia, QSS Oct. 2017 LAPAN, BELS, GNSS.asia, QSS, JAXA Nov. 2016 Univ. Philippines, NAMRIA, Phivolcs, BELS, GNSS.asia, QSS, JAXA Dec. 2015 Soartech, BELS, GNSS.asia, QSS, JAXA, SPAC Oct. 2014 NSTDA, G-NAVIS, QSS, JAXA, SPAC Dec. 2013 G-NAVIS, HUST, QSS, JAXA, SPAC Dec. 2012 ANGKASA, JAXA, G-NAVIS, SPAC Nov. 2011 GTC, KARI, JAXA, SPAC Nov. 2010 IGNSS, JAXA, SPAC https://www.multignss.asia https://www.multignss.asia/contact Jan. 2010 GISTDA, JAXA, SPAC https://www.facebook.com/multignss Conference and Exhibition What is MGA? To share the latest advancements to the GNSS and PNT landscape, the MGA conference is organized annually in a different location across the Asia- Oceania region. Delegates can also find out about new technologies, products and services, updates on R&D projects and achievements. The Pillars of conference attracts participants from industry, government and academia from around the world, making its networking opportunities second-to- none. Activity Networking and Capacity Building via Webinars, Workshops and Forums To make sure you’re on top of rapidly changing technological developments • Conference and Exhibition in GNSS, PNT technologies and its utilization in the business landscape, MGA hosts webinars, regional workshops and networking forums.
    [Show full text]
  • III. Emergency Responses Required and Taken by Governments and Other Bodies 1
    III. Emergency Responses Required and Taken by Governments and Other Bodies 1. Emergency Responses Mandated in the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Act, the Basic Plan for Emergency Preparedness, etc. See Chapter III 1 of the Interim Report. 2. Government Response after the Accident (1) General description of the response of the national government1 Right after the earthquake struck at 14:46 on March 11, 2011, METI established the Emergency Response Headquarters for the disaster and began gathering information on the state of the reactors at nuclear power stations in the stricken areas. At the Prime Minister’s Office, at 14:50 the same day, Tetsuro Ito, the Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary for Crisis Management (“Crisis Management Deputy Chief Ito”), established the Emergency Response Office in the Prime Minister’s Office for the earthquake, and summoned members of the Emergency Operations Team, which was made up of the bureau chiefs of relevant ministries, to the Prime Minister’s Office Crisis Management Center located below ground inside the Prime Minister’s Office. At around 15:42 the same day, Masao Yoshida, the site superintendent of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station (hereinafter referred to as “Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS) (hereinafter referred to as “Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS Site Superintendent Yoshida”) of Tokyo Electric Power Company (hereinafter referred to as “TEPCO), sent an Article 10 Notification via the TEPCO head office to the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (“NISA”) and other competent bodies, having judged that,
    [Show full text]
  • KAKEHASHI Project Asian American Leadership Program Report
    Japan’s Friendship Ties Program (USA) KAKEHASHI Project Asian American Leadership Program Report １．Program Overview As part of the Exchange Program “KAKEHASHI Project,” 10 Asian Americans visited Japan. They stayed in Japan from October 2 to October 9 to participate in programs aimed at promoting their understanding of Japan with regard to Japanese politics, economy, society, culture, history, and foreign policy. Through the lectures by ministries observation of the historical landmarks, and other experiences of the traditional Japanese cultures, the participants enjoyed a wide range of opportunities to improve their understanding of Japan and shared their individual interests and experiences through SNS. To wrap up the whole program they exchanged opinion with MOFA officers on the contents to dedicate for the future program 【Participating Countries and Number of Participants】 United States of America：10 participants 【Prefectures Visited】 Tokyo, Hiroshima, Kyoto ２．Program Schedule Oct 2 (Sun.) 【Arrival】Arrival at Narita International Airport and Haneda Airport Oct 3 (Mon.) 【Orientation】 【Courtesy Call】Parliamentary Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs Takei 【Lecture】Ministry of Foreign Affairs/Asian and Oceanian Affairs Bureau and North American Affairs Bureau 【Lecture】Cabinet Secretariat/Office of Policy Planning and Coordinator on Territory and Sovereignty Oct 4 (Tue.) 【Local Industry】Tsukiji Market 【Observation】Edo Tokyo Museum ＊Group A:【Lecture】Ministry of Justice/Japanese Regal System/Intellectual Property Law 【Lecture】Cabinet Office/Measures to the Aging Population of Japa ＊Group B:【Lecture 】Reconstruction Agency / Recovery for the Great East Earthquake 1 【Lecture】Cabinet Secretariat / Growth Strategy Oct.5 (Wed.) 【Observation】Diet Building 【Cutting-edge Technology】National Museum of Emerging Science 【Historical Landmark】Meiji Shrine Move to Hiroshima Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • I-4-1 National Governmental Organizations
    Chapter I: Impact of the Internet on Japan I-4-1 National governmental organizations Websites have been established to transmit information and to request and receive comments. I-4 Most national bodies in Japan, such as ministries have individual domain names, have established The Internet in the public sector and agencies, now have websites where they offer websites within the Kasumigaseki WAN Mainte- a wide range of information. The “Report on the nance Center under the “.admix.go.jp” domain Progress of Administrative Informatization,” pub- name. lished in April 1999 by the Government Informa- tion System Committee, revealed that by the end 1. Internet access to the Diet of fiscal 1998, of the 26 ministries and agencies, all A joint Diet Session Record Search system using but the Imperial Household Agency had opened the Internet was started in January 1999 on a trial websites. Also, there were 29 websites for internal basis by the two houses of Diet and the National bureaus that are part of ministries and agencies, 111 Diet Library. It enables searches to be made of the for their regional bureaus and branch offices and minutes of the main Diet sessions and the Stand- 325 for national universities and research institutes, ing Committee on the Budget, as well as public totaling 465 sites (Refer to Appendix 3). hearings, dating from January 1998. The system is At the national level, there are also the websites to be brought into regular service from January for the House of Councilors and the House of Rep- 2000. resentatives that comprise the Diet, and for the Na- The House of Councilors opened a website in tional Diet Library, the Supreme Court and the May 1998, followed by the House of Representa- Board of Audit.
    [Show full text]
  • Localizing Public Dispute Resolution in Japan: Lessons from Experiments with Deliberative Policy-Making By
    Localizing Public Dispute Resolution in Japan: Lessons from experiments with deliberative policy-making by Masahiro Matsuura Master in City Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998 B. Eng. Civil Engineering University of Tokyo, 1996 Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban and Regional Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2006 © 2006 Masahiro Matsuura. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of author: Dep artment of Urban Studies and Planning June 27, 2006 Certified by: Lawrence E. Susskind Ford Professor of Urban and Environmental Planning, Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Frank Levy, Daniel Rose Professor of Urban Economics, Chair, Ph.D. Committee 2 Localizing Public Dispute Resolution in Japan: Lessons from experiments with deliberative policy-making by Masahiro Matsuura Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on August 11, 2006 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban and Regional Planning ABSTRACT Can consensus building processes, as practiced in the US, be used to resolve infrastructure disputes in Japan? Since the 1990s, proposals to construct highways, dams, ports and airports, railways, as well as to redevelop neighborhoods, have been opposed by a wide range of stakeholders. In response, there is a growing interest among Japanese practitioners in using consensus building processes, as practiced in the US, in order to resolve infrastructure disputes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Audit. Eight Remarkable Government Auditors on Stage
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Janssen, Roel Book — Published Version The Art of Audit. Eight remarkable government auditors on stage Provided in Cooperation with: Amsterdam University Press (AUP) Suggested Citation: Janssen, Roel (2015) : The Art of Audit. Eight remarkable government auditors on stage, ISBN 978-90-485-3082-3, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789462980914 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/181381 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten
    [Show full text]