I Organization Charts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Iaea International Fact Finding Expert Mission of the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Npp Accident Following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami
IAEA Original English MISSION REPORT THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE EXPERT MISSION IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPP ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI Tokyo, Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP, Fukushima Dai-ni NPP and Tokai Dai-ni NPP, Japan 24 May – 2 June 2011 IAEA MISSION REPORT DIVISION OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SAFETY DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR SAFETY AND SECURITY IAEA Original English IAEA REPORT THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE EXPERT MISSION IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPP ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI REPORT TO THE IAEA MEMBER STATES Tokyo, Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP, Fukushima Dai-ni NPP and Tokai Dai-ni NPP, Japan 24 May – 2 June 2011 i IAEA ii IAEA REPORT THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE EXPERT MISSION IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPP ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI Mission date: 24 May – 2 June 2011 Location: Tokyo, Fukushima Dai-ichi, Fukushima Dai-ni and Tokai Dai-ni, Japan Facility: Fukushima and Tokai nuclear power plants Organized by: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) IAEA Review Team: WEIGHTMAN, Michael HSE, UK, Team Leader JAMET, Philippe ASN, France, Deputy Team Leader LYONS, James E. IAEA, NSNI, Director SAMADDAR, Sujit IAEA, NSNI, Head, ISCC CHAI, Guohan People‘s Republic of China CHANDE, S. K. AERB, India GODOY, Antonio Argentina GORYACHEV, A. NIIAR, Russian Federation GUERPINAR, Aybars Turkey LENTIJO, Juan Carlos CSN, Spain LUX, Ivan HAEA, Hungary SUMARGO, Dedik E. BAPETEN, Indonesia iii IAEA SUNG, Key Yong KINS, Republic of Korea UHLE, Jennifer USNRC, USA BRADLEY, Edward E. -
Independent Supervisory Bodies Report Audit Office, Ombuds Office, Data Protection Authority M O C
Independent Supervisory Bodies Report Audit Office, Ombuds Office, Data Protection Authority m o c . e b o d a . k c Sustainable Governance o t s - e g Indicators 2020 e v © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2020 | 2 Independent Supervisory Bodies Indicator Audit Office Question Does there exist an independent and effective audit office? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = There exists an effective and independent audit office. 8-6 = There exists an effective and independent audit office, but its role is slightly limited. 5-3 = There exists an independent audit office, but its role is considerably limited. 2-1 = There does not exist an independent and effective audit office. Australia Score 10 Under the Auditor-General Act 1997, the auditor-general is responsible for providing auditing services to parliament and other public sector entities. The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) supports the auditor-general, who is an independent officer of parliament. The ANAO’s purpose is to provide parliament with an independent assessment of selected areas of the public administration, and to provide assurance regarding public sector financial reporting, administration and accountability. This task is undertaken primarily by conducting performance and financial statement audits. Citation: https://www.anao.gov.au/about/auditor-general-and-office https://www.aph.gov.au/~/~/link.aspx?_id=387AD00794BD41C39579392068D56CF9&_z=z Austria Score 10 The Austrian Court of Audit (Rechnungshof) is an instrument of parliament. The office reports regularly to parliament, and parliament can order it to perform specific tasks. -
Use of Insolvency Proceedings for Systemically Important Financial Institutions
INTERNATIONAL INSOLVENCY INSTITUTE Twelfth Annual International Insolvency Conference Supreme Court of France Paris, France SHOWCASE PRESENTATION: PLANNING FOR FAILURE: USE OF INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS FOR SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Overview Of The Japanese Legal Framework To Resolve A Systemically Important Financial Institution In Insolvency Proceedings In Japan By Hideyuki Sakai Bingham McCutchen Murase Sakai Mimura Tokyo June 21-22, 2012 ©International Insolvency Institute 2012. All rights reserved. Admin*1656557.1 OVERVIEW OF THE JAPANESE LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO RESOLVE A SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION IN INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN JAPAN May 28, 2012 Hideyuki Sakai [email protected] Tokyo Tel: +81-3-6721-3131 (Direct) Introduction This article is intended to provide an overview of the Japanese legal framework within which the resolution of a systemically important financial institution would occur in Japan. While Japan has a well-established scheme of insolvency laws, there have been few insolvencies of Japanese regulated financial institutions in the past decade. In addition, Japanese courts have considerable latitude in administering insolvency proceedings and rendering decisions. The combination of these factors makes it difficult to predict with certainty the mechanisms for implementing a proposed resolution. International Context Japan is a member of the Group of Twenty (“G20”) and the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”). As such, Japan’s leaders have committed to pursue financial stability, implement international financial standards and undergo periodic peer reviews.1 On November 4, 2011, three Japanese financial institutions were named in the initial group of twenty-nine globally systemically important financial institutions (“G-SIFIs”) identified by the FSB and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”). -
Medical Innovation As a National Strategy
Medical Innovation as a National Strategy March 18, 2013 Hideaki Nakagaki Deputy Director‐General, Office of Healthcare Policy Cabinet Secretariat Provisional Translation 1 Establishment of Office of Healthcare Policy On February 22, 2013, the government established an Office of Healthcare Policy within the Cabinet Secretariat as part of concerted Government efforts to implement a growth strategy for Japan. The office aims to establish Japan as a nation that boasts of the most advanced medical technologies and healthcare services in the world, which is expected to result in Japan being the country with the longest healthy life expectancy. Given these achievements, the Office also aims to develop the medical sector, pharmaceutical products and medical devices and equipment as strategic industries that will form a key pillar for Japan's economic revitalization. 2 Structure of the Office for Healthcare Policy As of March 18, 2013 Chief Cabinet Secretary (Yoshihide SUGA ) Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary (Katsunobu Kato and Hiroshige Seko) Director-General:Special Advisor to the Prime Minister (Hiroto Izumi) Deputy Director General: Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Nakagaki, MHLW) Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Morimoto, MEXT) Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Miyamoto, METI) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat (Akuzawa, MoF) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat(Fujimoto, METI) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat (Saruta, MHLW) Director Director (Private sector: Director Director Director Director (Private sector: (Private sector: (MEXT) FIRM*) (MHLW) (Private -
Program for Promoting Japan As an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment Into Japan
Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Office of FDI Promotion, Cabinet Office Program for Promoting Japan as an 1 Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Growth of foreign direct investment to Japan In December 2011, the Government of Japan formulated the “Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan” consisting of policy measures to create an attractive, world-class business and living environment. The “New Growth Strategy” (June 2010, Cabinet decision) and the “Interim Report on Strategies to Revitalize Japan” (August 2011, Cabinet decision) requested the Government to formulate this Program. The Program was determined by the Interagency Parliamentary Secretary Meeting chaired by Hiroshi Ogushi, Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet Office. <1st stage> <2nd stage> Doubling FDI stock Doubling FDI to GDP from 2001 to 2006 ratio to around 5% by 2010 2 Three Targets of The Program The Program sets out three targets that are to be achieved by 2020. 1) To Increase the Number of High Value-Added Sites The aim is to increase the number of high value-added sites (Asia Regional Headquarters and research and development facilities) by 30 sites each year by attracting FDI. As of the end of FY2009, there were approximately 500 high value-added sites in Japan. 2) To Double the Number of Employees of Foreign Enterprises The aim is to increase the number of employees of foreign enterprises (defined as those which have more than one-third ratio of foreign ownership) to 2,000,000 by FY2020. -
National Sustainable Development Strategy (NSDS) 2010-2021
Message General Economics Division, Planning Commission of the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh has prepared the National Sustainable Development Strategy 2010-21 (NSDS) to address a critical development aspiration of our time. We need to balance economic, social and environmental requirements of development in order to ensure “the needs of the present generation are met without compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their own needs.” Despite our past achievements, a large population is still in poverty, unemployment and underemployment rate is still high. This strives achieving high growth so urgent that it is easy to downplay the right of the next generation to natural resources. But a large and growing population living in a relatively small geographical area which is increasingly pressurizing our environment – air, water and soil, dictates the urgency of sustainable development in the country. NSDS fulfils the twin objectives of formulating strategies to meet the challenges of economic, social and environmental sustainability faced by the economy as well as meeting international obligation of our country to global sustainable development principles and agenda. Meeting the sustainable development challenges will need raising the awareness and understanding of people of the challenges and coordinated efforts at the local, regional, national and global levels. The time frame of NSDS coincides with the Perspective Plan of Bangladesh 2010-2021which guides the economy towards its transition to a middle income economy by early next decade of this millennium. The Planning Commission will need to take necessary measures to mainstream the strategies of NSDS into national development planning processes. -
Dhaka Urban Transport Network Development Project Environmetal
DHAKA TRANSPORT COORDINATION BOARD MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS (MOC) GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH DHAKA URBAN TRANSPORT NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ENVIRONMETAL IMPACT ASSESSEMENT STUDY FEBRUARY 2011 Prepared by Dhaka Transport Coordination Board PREPARATORY SURVEY ON DHAKA URBAN TRANSPORT NETWORK DEVELOPMENT STUDY (DHUTS) PHASE II ENVIRONMETAL IMPACT ASSESSEMENT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents List of Abbreviations CHAPTER 1: DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE MRT LNE 6 ................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 THE MRT LINE 6 LOCATION .............................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 PROJECT INITIATION .......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 IMPORTANCE OF THE PROJECT ....................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN UTTARA PHASE 3 PROJECT BY RAJUK ............................ 1-5 1.7 THE EXECUTING AGENCY OF THE PROJECT ................................................................ 1-5 CHAPTER 2: POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 2.1 POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 EIA System and Procedure set by DOE .................................................................... -
The National Administrative Organization in Japan
Appendix 2 THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION IN JAPAN 1. The Outline of National Administrative Organization National administration is uniformly carried out by the Cabinet and the organizations under the cabinet. The Cabinet, Ministries, Agencies and Incorporated Administrative Agencies (IAAs), etc. function as one organization, at the top of which exists the Cabinet. It is responsible for all the activities of State except legislative and judicial ones. Consequently it is natural that these organizations which take care of national administration should be systematically organized under the Cabinet. As of 2019, the Cabinet Office, 11 Ministries, and the Reconstruction Agency are under the Cabinet. They are national administrative organizations in the proper sense of terms. However, not all the areas of State activities are covered by these Ministries. Incorporated Administrative Agencies and Public Corporations also cover other parts of the activities. One of their purposes is accomplishing enough efficiency and effectiveness in their business with autonomy and legal personalities separated from State.To necessary extent, they are subject to various controls by their competent Ministers. The former, for which more general rules are prepared, amount 87 as of October 1, 2019. Some of them are regarded the same as government offices in terms of quality of their roles, to which are applied statutes concerned. Public Corporations, which now amount 33 as of the same date, are enterprises dealing with different quality business from IAAs. They must be regulated by individual acts of rules, not common rules, unlike IAAs. Thus we can see some types of organizations following policy process from planning to implementation. -
Who Is Yoshihide Suga, Japan's Next Prime Minister?
THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION THE CURRENT: Who is Yoshihide Suga, Japan’s next prime minister? Tuesday, September 15, 2020 Host: Adrianna Pita, Office of Communications, Brookings Guest: Mireya Solís, Senior Fellow and Director, Center for East Asia Policy Studies, Philip Knight Chair in Japan Studies, Brookings (MUSIC) PITA: You’re listening to The Current, part of the Brookings Podcast Network. I’m your host, Adrianna Pita. After last month’s surprise resignation of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party has elected its Chief Cabinet Secretary, Yoshihide Suga, into leadership, all but assuring he will become the next prime minister following a parliamentary vote on Wednesday. With us again with some insight into what to expect from Mr. Suga’s leadership is Mireya Solis, director of our Center for East Asia Policy Studies and the Philip Knight Chair in Japan studies. Mireya, thanks for talking to us again. SOLÍS: It's wonderful to be here. Thank you, Adrianna. PITA: So, who is Mr. Suga, and what do we know about him? SOLÍS: Well, he has an interesting biography. I think I would start first by pointing out that he is a self-made man. It's a very important characteristic of Japan that political lineage matters a great deal. It is very common to have second-generation politicians who inherit the family name. That is not the case for Mr. Suga. He comes from Akita prefecture, rural Japan. His father had a strawberry farm and therefore he started in the political world without any connections, without any advantages, and he now has risen to the top. -
Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground Between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model
UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title The Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9v5803kw Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 30(1) Author Aronson, Bruce E. Publication Date 2012 DOI 10.5070/P8301022242 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE OLYMPUS SCANDAL AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM: CAN JAPAN FIND A MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN THE BOARD MONITORING MODEL AND MANAGEMENT MODEL? By Bruce E. Aronson* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................. 95 II. The Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Issues ..................................... 106 A. Background of the Olympus Case ............ 106 B. Monitoring of Management under Japan's Corporate Governance System .............. 115 III. Back to Basics: Revisiting Theoretical and Structural Issues ............................ 120 A. Purpose of Corporate Governance Reform .... 120 B. Monitoring Function of the Board of Directors..... ........................ 125 IV. Practical Issues: Achieving "Truly Effective" Corporate Governance Reform ................. 129 A. Information ............................. 130 1. Internal Sharing of Information .......... 130 2. Public Information Disclosure ............ 132 * Senior Fulbright Research Scholar, Waseda University; Professor of Law, Creighton University School of Law. I thank Mr. Sumitaka Fujita, Professor Yumiko Miwa, and Mr. Naoaki Okabe for acting as a panel of commentators following my presentation on this research at the Meiji Institute for Global Affairs Inaugural Symposium, Tokyo, Japan (Feb. 21, 2012), and participants in presentations at Nagoya University (April 20, 2012), AIMA Japan Hedge Fund Forum 2012, Tokyo Stock Exchange (June 4, 2012), 2012 International Conference on Law & Society, Law & Society Association, Honolulu (June 5, 2012), and Business Research Institute, Tokyo (Aug. -
2. Process and Players Second Edition
2. Process and players Second edition What is Japan Health Policy NOW? Created in 2015 by Health and Global Policy Institute (HGPI), Japan Health Policy NOW (JHPN) is the only centralized platform in the world on Japanese health policy available in both Japanese and English. As the world’s attention turns to Japan, one of the world’s fastest ageing countries, there is increasing interest in Japanese health policy and a growing need to share information on Japan’s health policy with the world. JHPN is committed to addressing this need by delivering factual information about the Japanese health system, Japanese health policy stories of interest, recent Japanese health policy news, and a resource list for those who want to learn more about Japanese health policy. For more information, please see http://japanhpn.org/en/jhpn/ © 2019 Health and Global Policy Institute 2.1 Processes and players|Japan’s government The Constitution of Japan, created in 1946 and implemented in 1947, laid the foundation for Japan’s parliamentary system of government. This system is divided into three branches: the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. Power is separate and checks and balances exist between the three branches. The legislative branch The legislative branch is comprised of the country’s sole law-making body, the National Diet. The Diet has two Houses, the House of Representatives and the House of Councilors, both comprised of members elected by the public. Members of each House are required to serve on at least one standing committee during ordinary sessions, which begin in January and last 150 days, with one extension possible. -
A Guide to Japan's Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space
A Guide to Japan’s Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space A Working Paper on Japan’s Space Policy By Takuya Wakimoto ISSUES & INSIGHTS WORKING PAPER VOL. 19, WP3 | APRIL 2019 Pacific Forum Based in Honolulu, the Pacific Forum (www.pacforum.org) is a foreign policy research institute focused on the Asia-Pacific Region. Founded in 1975, the Pacific Forum collaborates with a broad network of research institutes from around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating project findings and recommendations to global leaders, governments, and members of the public throughout the region. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic, and maritime policy issues, and works to help stimulate cooperative policies through rigorous research, analyses and dialogues. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................ iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................... vi ENGLISH-JAPANESE TRANSLATIONS ...................................... vii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2. KEY GOVERNMENTAL ACTORS, POLICY DOCUMENTS AND MECHANISMS ........................................................................ 3 3. JAPAN’S SPACE POLICY OBJECTIVE ......................................... 23 4. CONCLUSION .........................................................................