DOCSLIB.ORG

I Organization Charts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

I ORGANIZATION CHARTS Notes 1. Only the major organs and units of each organization (ministry, commission or agency) are shown; divisions of bureaus and departments, and local branch offices at lower levels are omitted. (The names of such divisions appear in “II Organization and Functions of the Executive Branch”.) The councils of each organization are also omitted. They are listed in “III List of Councils”. 2. The lines indicate relationships between organs. double line (= ) chief organs of cach organization solid line (―) internal divisions and external organs broken line (---) local branch offices wavy line (～～～) auxiliary organs 3. The figures indicate the fixed number of personnel of each organization. 4. The figures in parentheses indicate the number of units. 5. The data in principle are as of December 1, 2013, except the figures with foot notes. -1- GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN [Legislative Branch] [Administrative Branch] [Judicial Branch] DIET CABINET COURTS House of Representatives Cabinet Office Supreme Court 1-7-1, Nagatacho, 4-2, Hayabusa-cho Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Reconstruction Agency * Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-3581-5111 Tel. 03-3264-8111 Ministry of Internal Affairs House of Councillors High Courts (8) and Communications 1-7-1, Nagatacho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Ministry of Justice District Courts (50) Tel. 03-3581-3111 Judge Impeachment Court Ministry of Foreign Affairs Family Courts (50) Judge Indictment Committee Ministry of Finance Summary Courts (438) Ministry of Education, Committees for the National Diet Library (165) Culture, Sports, Science Inquest of Prosecution and Technology 1-10-1, Nagatacho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Ministry of Health, Labour Tel. 03-3581-2331 and Welfare Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Ministry of the Environment Ministry of Defense Board of Audit * Nonpermanent Agency, until 31 March, 2022 -2- Cabinet National Personnel 㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 Authority 671 Cabinet Secretariat 817 1-2-3, Kasumigaseki, 1-6-1, Nagata-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-3581-5311 Tel. 03-5253-2111 Employee Welfare Bureau Cabinet Affairs Office Human Resources Bureau National Security Secretariat IT Strategic Headquarters Remuneration Bureau Cabinet Public Relations Urban Renaissance Headquarters Office Equity and Headquarters for the Promotion of Investigation Bureau Cabinet Intelligence and Special Zones for Structural Reform Research Office National Institute of Intellectual Property Strategy 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 Cabinet Legislation Bureau Headquarters Public Administration 76 Global Warming 3-1-1, Kasumigaseki, (8) Prevention Headquarters Regional Bureaus Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-3581-7271 Headquarters for the Regional Revitalization Okinawa Local Office Administration Office of the Director-General Headquarters for the Promotion of Privatization of Postal Services National Public Service Ethics Board First Department City Center Vitalization Headquarters Second Department Headquarters for the Promotion of Special Zone for Regional Government (doshu-sei) Third Department Headquarters for Ocean Policy Fourth Department Headquarters for the Promotion of Civil Service Reform National Security Council Strategic Headquarters for Space Policy 2-4-12, Nagata-cho, * Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Reconstruction Headquarters in Tel. 03-5253-2111 Response to Great East Japan Earthquake Headquarters for the Development of Comprehensive Special Zones Headquarters for the Promotion of National Resilience Headquarters for the Promotion of Social Security Reform as of January 7, 2014 -3- 1-6-1, Nagatacho, Cabinet Office Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-5253-2111 Okinawa General Bureau Prime Minister Imperial Household Agency Council on Economic and 㹼㹼㹼 Fiscal Policy Minister of State, Fair Trade Commission Chief Cabinet Secretary Council for Science and 㹼㹼㹼 Technology Policy Minister of State National Public Safety Council on National Strategic Commission for Special Missions 㹼㹼㹼 Special Zones Central Disaster Deputy Chief Cabinet Specific Personal Information (3) 㹼㹼㹼 Management Council Secretary Protection Commission 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 Council for Gender 㹼㹼㹼 Equality Senior Vice-Minister (3) Financial Services Agency Economic and Social 㹼㹼㹼 Research Institute Parliamentary Secretary (3) Consumer Affairs Agency 㹼㹼㹼 State Guest-House Vice-Minister Northern Territories Affairs 㹼㹼㹼 Administration Financial System Vice-Minister for (2) 㹼㹼㹼 Management Council Pocily Coordination Council for the Promotion 㹼㹼㹼 of Private Finance Initiative Headquarters for Promotion of 㹼㹼㹼 Support for Youth Affairs Minister’s Secretariat Council for Food Education 㹼㹼㹼 Promotion Director General for Declining Fertility Society (7) 㹼㹼㹼 Policy Planning Policy Council The Aging Society Policy 㹼㹼㹼 Council Decoration Bureau Central Traffic Safety 㹼㹼㹼 Policy Council Gender Equality Bureau The council for the Promotion 㹼㹼㹼of Policies for Crime Victims Okinawa Development and Council for Policy of Promotion Bureau 㹼㹼㹼 Suicide Prevention 㹼㹼㹼 Consumer Policy Council International Peace 㹼㹼㹼 Cooperation Headquarters 㹼㹼㹼 Science Council of Japan The Center for personnel inter- 㹼㹼㹼 changes between the government and private entities * 2,273 for the Office proper. ** Nonpermanent Council, until 31 Council for Nuclear Power March, 2021 㹼㹼㹼 Sited Regions ** *** Nonpermanent Council, until the date The Council for the Policy of the expiration of Act on Promotion 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼㹼 *** on Corpse Examination of Policy on Corpse Examination. -4- 1-1, Chiyoda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 1-1-1, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-3213-1111 Tel. 03-3581-5471 Imperial Household Agency Fair Trade Commission 1,004 General Secretariat 823 Grand Steward Secretary General Vice-Grand Steward Secretariat Grand Steward’s Secretariat Economic and Trade Affairs Bureau Board of the Chamberlains Trade Practices Department Board of the Crown Prince’s Household Investigation Bureau Board of the Ceremonies Criminal Investigation Department Archives and Mausolea Department Local Offices (5) Maintenance and Works Department 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼Office㹼 of the Shosoin Treasure House 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 Imperial Stock Farm Kyoto Office of the Imperial Household -5- National Public 2-1-2, Kasumigaseki, Safety Commission Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-3581-0141 National Police Agency 7,721 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼㹼㹼㹼 Commissioner-General’s Commissioner General Regional Police Bureaus (7) Secretariat Deputy Commissioner Community Safety Bureau Police Info-Communications (2) General Departments Criminal Investigation Bureau 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼National㹼 Police Academy Organized Crime Department 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼National㹼㹼 Research Institute of Police Science Traffic Bureau Imperial Guard 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 Headquarters Security Bureau Foreign Affairs and Intelligence Department Info-Communications Bureau -6- 1-9-13, Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 3-2-1, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-6441-3685 Tel. 03-3506-6000 Specific Personal Information Financial Services Agency * Protection Commission 1, 547 Secretariat 2 Commissioner General Affairs Division Planning and Coordination Bureau Inspection Bureau Supervisory Bureau Director-General for International Affairs Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission Certified Public Accountants and Auditing Oversight Board *Matters which the FSA administers are under the control of Minister for Financial Services. -7- Sanno Park Tower, 11-1,2-11-1, Nagatacho Nagatacho, 2chome, Chiyoda-ku, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tokyo Tel. 03-3507-8800 Consumer Affairs Agency 289 Commissioner Vice-Commissioner General Affairs Division Consumer Policy and International Affairs Division Legal System Planning Division Consumer Education and Information Division Local Cooperation Division Consumer Safety Division Consumer Transaction Division Representation Division Food Labeling Division -8- 1-9-13, Akasaka, Reconstruction Agency Minato-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-5545-7230 169 Reconstruction Prime Minister Director General (3) Promotion Council Reconstruction Minister for (2) Reconstruction Promotion Committee Senior Vice-Minister Regional Bureaus of 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼 㹼 (3) Reconstruction Parliamentary Secretary 㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼㹼 Branch Offices (6) Administrative Vice-Minister 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼 㹼 Regional Offices (Aomori, Ibaraki) * Nonpermanent Agency, until 31 March, 2022 -9- Ministry of Internal Affairs and 2-1-2, Kasumigaseki, Communications Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Tel. 03-5253-5111 5,216* Minister of Internal Affairs 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼㹼㹼㹼 and Communications Regional Administrative (7) Evaluation Bureau Environmental Dispute Coordination Commission Senior Vice-Minister (2) Shikoku Branch Office of Secretariat 35 Regional Administrative Evaluation Bureau 3-1-1, Kasumigaseki, Parliamentary Secretary (3) Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo District Administrative Tel. 03-3581-9601 (38) Evaluation Office Administrative Vice-Minister Fire and Disaster Management Regional Bureau of (10) Agency Telecommunications 168 Vice-Minister for (3) Policy Coordination Okinawa Administrative Commissioner Evaluation Office Okinawa Office of Vice-Commissioner Telecommunications Minister’s Secretariat Civil Protection and Disaster Personnel and Pension 㹼㹼㹼 Local Autonomy College Management Department Bureau Fire and Disaster Institute for Information and 㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼㹼 㹼 㹼 Administrative Management 㹼㹼㹼 Management College Bureau Communications Policy Statistical
Recommended publications
  • Iaea International Fact Finding Expert Mission of the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Npp Accident Following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

    Iaea International Fact Finding Expert Mission of the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Npp Accident Following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

    IAEA Original English MISSION REPORT THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE EXPERT MISSION IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPP ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI Tokyo, Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP, Fukushima Dai-ni NPP and Tokai Dai-ni NPP, Japan 24 May – 2 June 2011 IAEA MISSION REPORT DIVISION OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SAFETY DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR SAFETY AND SECURITY IAEA Original English IAEA REPORT THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE EXPERT MISSION IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPP ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI REPORT TO THE IAEA MEMBER STATES Tokyo, Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP, Fukushima Dai-ni NPP and Tokai Dai-ni NPP, Japan 24 May – 2 June 2011 i IAEA ii IAEA REPORT THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE EXPERT MISSION IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPP ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI Mission date: 24 May – 2 June 2011 Location: Tokyo, Fukushima Dai-ichi, Fukushima Dai-ni and Tokai Dai-ni, Japan Facility: Fukushima and Tokai nuclear power plants Organized by: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) IAEA Review Team: WEIGHTMAN, Michael HSE, UK, Team Leader JAMET, Philippe ASN, France, Deputy Team Leader LYONS, James E. IAEA, NSNI, Director SAMADDAR, Sujit IAEA, NSNI, Head, ISCC CHAI, Guohan People‘s Republic of China CHANDE, S. K. AERB, India GODOY, Antonio Argentina GORYACHEV, A. NIIAR, Russian Federation GUERPINAR, Aybars Turkey LENTIJO, Juan Carlos CSN, Spain LUX, Ivan HAEA, Hungary SUMARGO, Dedik E. BAPETEN, Indonesia iii IAEA SUNG, Key Yong KINS, Republic of Korea UHLE, Jennifer USNRC, USA BRADLEY, Edward E.
  • Independent Supervisory Bodies Report Audit Office, Ombuds Office, Data Protection Authority M O C

    Independent Supervisory Bodies Report Audit Office, Ombuds Office, Data Protection Authority M O C

    Independent Supervisory Bodies Report Audit Office, Ombuds Office, Data Protection Authority m o c . e b o d a . k c Sustainable Governance o t s - e g Indicators 2020 e v © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2020 | 2 Independent Supervisory Bodies Indicator Audit Office Question Does there exist an independent and effective audit office? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = There exists an effective and independent audit office. 8-6 = There exists an effective and independent audit office, but its role is slightly limited. 5-3 = There exists an independent audit office, but its role is considerably limited. 2-1 = There does not exist an independent and effective audit office. Australia Score 10 Under the Auditor-General Act 1997, the auditor-general is responsible for providing auditing services to parliament and other public sector entities. The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) supports the auditor-general, who is an independent officer of parliament. The ANAO’s purpose is to provide parliament with an independent assessment of selected areas of the public administration, and to provide assurance regarding public sector financial reporting, administration and accountability. This task is undertaken primarily by conducting performance and financial statement audits. Citation: https://www.anao.gov.au/about/auditor-general-and-office https://www.aph.gov.au/~/~/link.aspx?_id=387AD00794BD41C39579392068D56CF9&_z=z Austria Score 10 The Austrian Court of Audit (Rechnungshof) is an instrument of parliament. The office reports regularly to parliament, and parliament can order it to perform specific tasks.
  • Use of Insolvency Proceedings for Systemically Important Financial Institutions

    Use of Insolvency Proceedings for Systemically Important Financial Institutions

    INTERNATIONAL INSOLVENCY INSTITUTE Twelfth Annual International Insolvency Conference Supreme Court of France Paris, France SHOWCASE PRESENTATION: PLANNING FOR FAILURE: USE OF INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS FOR SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Overview Of The Japanese Legal Framework To Resolve A Systemically Important Financial Institution In Insolvency Proceedings In Japan By Hideyuki Sakai Bingham McCutchen Murase Sakai Mimura Tokyo June 21-22, 2012 ©International Insolvency Institute 2012. All rights reserved. Admin*1656557.1 OVERVIEW OF THE JAPANESE LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO RESOLVE A SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION IN INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN JAPAN May 28, 2012 Hideyuki Sakai [email protected] Tokyo Tel: +81-3-6721-3131 (Direct) Introduction This article is intended to provide an overview of the Japanese legal framework within which the resolution of a systemically important financial institution would occur in Japan. While Japan has a well-established scheme of insolvency laws, there have been few insolvencies of Japanese regulated financial institutions in the past decade. In addition, Japanese courts have considerable latitude in administering insolvency proceedings and rendering decisions. The combination of these factors makes it difficult to predict with certainty the mechanisms for implementing a proposed resolution. International Context Japan is a member of the Group of Twenty (“G20”) and the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”). As such, Japan’s leaders have committed to pursue financial stability, implement international financial standards and undergo periodic peer reviews.1 On November 4, 2011, three Japanese financial institutions were named in the initial group of twenty-nine globally systemically important financial institutions (“G-SIFIs”) identified by the FSB and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”).
  • Medical Innovation As a National Strategy

    Medical Innovation As a National Strategy

    Medical Innovation as a National Strategy March 18, 2013 Hideaki Nakagaki Deputy Director‐General, Office of Healthcare Policy Cabinet Secretariat Provisional Translation 1 Establishment of Office of Healthcare Policy On February 22, 2013, the government established an Office of Healthcare Policy within the Cabinet Secretariat as part of concerted Government efforts to implement a growth strategy for Japan. The office aims to establish Japan as a nation that boasts of the most advanced medical technologies and healthcare services in the world, which is expected to result in Japan being the country with the longest healthy life expectancy. Given these achievements, the Office also aims to develop the medical sector, pharmaceutical products and medical devices and equipment as strategic industries that will form a key pillar for Japan's economic revitalization. 2 Structure of the Office for Healthcare Policy As of March 18, 2013 Chief Cabinet Secretary (Yoshihide SUGA ) Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary (Katsunobu Kato and Hiroshige Seko) Director-General：Special Advisor to the Prime Minister (Hiroto Izumi) Deputy Director General： Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Nakagaki, MHLW) Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Morimoto, MEXT) Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Miyamoto, METI) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat (Akuzawa, MoF) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat(Fujimoto, METI) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat (Saruta, MHLW) Director Director (Private sector： Director Director Director Director (Private sector： (Private sector： (MEXT) FIRM*) (MHLW) (Private
  • Program for Promoting Japan As an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment Into Japan

    Program for Promoting Japan As an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment Into Japan

    Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Office of FDI Promotion, Cabinet Office Program for Promoting Japan as an １ Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Growth of foreign direct investment to Japan In December 2011, the Government of Japan formulated the “Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan” consisting of policy measures to create an attractive, world-class business and living environment. The “New Growth Strategy” (June 2010, Cabinet decision) and the “Interim Report on Strategies to Revitalize Japan” (August 2011, Cabinet decision) requested the Government to formulate this Program. The Program was determined by the Interagency Parliamentary Secretary Meeting chaired by Hiroshi Ogushi, Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet Office. ＜1st stage＞ ＜2nd stage＞ Doubling FDI stock Doubling FDI to GDP from 2001 to 2006 ratio to around 5% by 2010 ２ Three Targets of The Program The Program sets out three targets that are to be achieved by 2020. 1) To Increase the Number of High Value-Added Sites The aim is to increase the number of high value-added sites (Asia Regional Headquarters and research and development facilities) by 30 sites each year by attracting FDI. As of the end of FY2009, there were approximately 500 high value-added sites in Japan. 2) To Double the Number of Employees of Foreign Enterprises The aim is to increase the number of employees of foreign enterprises (defined as those which have more than one-third ratio of foreign ownership) to 2,000,000 by FY2020.
  • National Sustainable Development Strategy (NSDS) 2010-2021

    National Sustainable Development Strategy (NSDS) 2010-2021

    Message General Economics Division, Planning Commission of the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh has prepared the National Sustainable Development Strategy 2010-21 (NSDS) to address a critical development aspiration of our time. We need to balance economic, social and environmental requirements of development in order to ensure “the needs of the present generation are met without compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their own needs.” Despite our past achievements, a large population is still in poverty, unemployment and underemployment rate is still high. This strives achieving high growth so urgent that it is easy to downplay the right of the next generation to natural resources. But a large and growing population living in a relatively small geographical area which is increasingly pressurizing our environment – air, water and soil, dictates the urgency of sustainable development in the country. NSDS fulfils the twin objectives of formulating strategies to meet the challenges of economic, social and environmental sustainability faced by the economy as well as meeting international obligation of our country to global sustainable development principles and agenda. Meeting the sustainable development challenges will need raising the awareness and understanding of people of the challenges and coordinated efforts at the local, regional, national and global levels. The time frame of NSDS coincides with the Perspective Plan of Bangladesh 2010-2021which guides the economy towards its transition to a middle income economy by early next decade of this millennium. The Planning Commission will need to take necessary measures to mainstream the strategies of NSDS into national development planning processes.
  • Dhaka Urban Transport Network Development Project Environmetal

    Dhaka Urban Transport Network Development Project Environmetal

    DHAKA TRANSPORT COORDINATION BOARD MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS (MOC) GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH DHAKA URBAN TRANSPORT NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ENVIRONMETAL IMPACT ASSESSEMENT STUDY FEBRUARY 2011 Prepared by Dhaka Transport Coordination Board PREPARATORY SURVEY ON DHAKA URBAN TRANSPORT NETWORK DEVELOPMENT STUDY (DHUTS) PHASE II ENVIRONMETAL IMPACT ASSESSEMENT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents List of Abbreviations CHAPTER 1: DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE MRT LNE 6 ................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 THE MRT LINE 6 LOCATION .............................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 PROJECT INITIATION .......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 IMPORTANCE OF THE PROJECT ....................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN UTTARA PHASE 3 PROJECT BY RAJUK ............................ 1-5 1.7 THE EXECUTING AGENCY OF THE PROJECT ................................................................ 1-5 CHAPTER 2: POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 2.1 POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 EIA System and Procedure set by DOE ....................................................................
  • The National Administrative Organization in Japan

    The National Administrative Organization in Japan

    Appendix 2 THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION IN JAPAN 1. The Outline of National Administrative Organization National administration is uniformly carried out by the Cabinet and the organizations under the cabinet. The Cabinet, Ministries, Agencies and Incorporated Administrative Agencies (IAAs), etc. function as one organization, at the top of which exists the Cabinet. It is responsible for all the activities of State except legislative and judicial ones. Consequently it is natural that these organizations which take care of national administration should be systematically organized under the Cabinet. As of 2019, the Cabinet Office, 11 Ministries, and the Reconstruction Agency are under the Cabinet. They are national administrative organizations in the proper sense of terms. However, not all the areas of State activities are covered by these Ministries. Incorporated Administrative Agencies and Public Corporations also cover other parts of the activities. One of their purposes is accomplishing enough efficiency and effectiveness in their business with autonomy and legal personalities separated from State.To necessary extent, they are subject to various controls by their competent Ministers. The former, for which more general rules are prepared, amount 87 as of October 1, 2019. Some of them are regarded the same as government offices in terms of quality of their roles, to which are applied statutes concerned. Public Corporations, which now amount 33 as of the same date, are enterprises dealing with different quality business from IAAs. They must be regulated by individual acts of rules, not common rules, unlike IAAs. Thus we can see some types of organizations following policy process from planning to implementation.
  • Who Is Yoshihide Suga, Japan's Next Prime Minister?

    Who Is Yoshihide Suga, Japan's Next Prime Minister?

    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION THE CURRENT: Who is Yoshihide Suga, Japan’s next prime minister? Tuesday, September 15, 2020 Host: Adrianna Pita, Office of Communications, Brookings Guest: Mireya Solís, Senior Fellow and Director, Center for East Asia Policy Studies, Philip Knight Chair in Japan Studies, Brookings (MUSIC) PITA: You’re listening to The Current, part of the Brookings Podcast Network. I’m your host, Adrianna Pita. After last month’s surprise resignation of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party has elected its Chief Cabinet Secretary, Yoshihide Suga, into leadership, all but assuring he will become the next prime minister following a parliamentary vote on Wednesday. With us again with some insight into what to expect from Mr. Suga’s leadership is Mireya Solis, director of our Center for East Asia Policy Studies and the Philip Knight Chair in Japan studies. Mireya, thanks for talking to us again. SOLÍS: It's wonderful to be here. Thank you, Adrianna. PITA: So, who is Mr. Suga, and what do we know about him? SOLÍS: Well, he has an interesting biography. I think I would start first by pointing out that he is a self-made man. It's a very important characteristic of Japan that political lineage matters a great deal. It is very common to have second-generation politicians who inherit the family name. That is not the case for Mr. Suga. He comes from Akita prefecture, rural Japan. His father had a strawberry farm and therefore he started in the political world without any connections, without any advantages, and he now has risen to the top.
  • Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground Between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model

    Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground Between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model

    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title The Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9v5803kw Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 30(1) Author Aronson, Bruce E. Publication Date 2012 DOI 10.5070/P8301022242 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE OLYMPUS SCANDAL AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM: CAN JAPAN FIND A MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN THE BOARD MONITORING MODEL AND MANAGEMENT MODEL? By Bruce E. Aronson* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................. 95 II. The Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Issues ..................................... 106 A. Background of the Olympus Case ............ 106 B. Monitoring of Management under Japan's Corporate Governance System .............. 115 III. Back to Basics: Revisiting Theoretical and Structural Issues ............................ 120 A. Purpose of Corporate Governance Reform .... 120 B. Monitoring Function of the Board of Directors..... ........................ 125 IV. Practical Issues: Achieving "Truly Effective" Corporate Governance Reform ................. 129 A. Information ............................. 130 1. Internal Sharing of Information .......... 130 2. Public Information Disclosure ............ 132 * Senior Fulbright Research Scholar, Waseda University; Professor of Law, Creighton University School of Law. I thank Mr. Sumitaka Fujita, Professor Yumiko Miwa, and Mr. Naoaki Okabe for acting as a panel of commentators following my presentation on this research at the Meiji Institute for Global Affairs Inaugural Symposium, Tokyo, Japan (Feb. 21, 2012), and participants in presentations at Nagoya University (April 20, 2012), AIMA Japan Hedge Fund Forum 2012, Tokyo Stock Exchange (June 4, 2012), 2012 International Conference on Law & Society, Law & Society Association, Honolulu (June 5, 2012), and Business Research Institute, Tokyo (Aug.
  • 2. Process and Players Second Edition

    2. Process and Players Second Edition

    2. Process and players Second edition What is Japan Health Policy NOW? Created in 2015 by Health and Global Policy Institute (HGPI), Japan Health Policy NOW (JHPN) is the only centralized platform in the world on Japanese health policy available in both Japanese and English. As the world’s attention turns to Japan, one of the world’s fastest ageing countries, there is increasing interest in Japanese health policy and a growing need to share information on Japan’s health policy with the world. JHPN is committed to addressing this need by delivering factual information about the Japanese health system, Japanese health policy stories of interest, recent Japanese health policy news, and a resource list for those who want to learn more about Japanese health policy. For more information, please see http://japanhpn.org/en/jhpn/ © 2019 Health and Global Policy Institute 2.1 Processes and players｜Japan’s government The Constitution of Japan, created in 1946 and implemented in 1947, laid the foundation for Japan’s parliamentary system of government. This system is divided into three branches: the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. Power is separate and checks and balances exist between the three branches. The legislative branch The legislative branch is comprised of the country’s sole law-making body, the National Diet. The Diet has two Houses, the House of Representatives and the House of Councilors, both comprised of members elected by the public. Members of each House are required to serve on at least one standing committee during ordinary sessions, which begin in January and last 150 days, with one extension possible.
  • A Guide to Japan's Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space

    A Guide to Japan's Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space

    A Guide to Japan’s Space Policy Formulation: Structures, Roles and Strategies of Ministries and Agencies for Space A Working Paper on Japan’s Space Policy By Takuya Wakimoto ISSUES & INSIGHTS WORKING PAPER VOL. 19, WP3 | APRIL 2019 Pacific Forum Based in Honolulu, the Pacific Forum (www.pacforum.org) is a foreign policy research institute focused on the Asia-Pacific Region. Founded in 1975, the Pacific Forum collaborates with a broad network of research institutes from around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating project findings and recommendations to global leaders, governments, and members of the public throughout the region. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic, and maritime policy issues, and works to help stimulate cooperative policies through rigorous research, analyses and dialogues. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................ iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................... vi ENGLISH-JAPANESE TRANSLATIONS ...................................... vii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2. KEY GOVERNMENTAL ACTORS, POLICY DOCUMENTS AND MECHANISMS ........................................................................ 3 3. JAPAN’S SPACE POLICY OBJECTIVE ......................................... 23 4. CONCLUSION .........................................................................