DOCSLIB.ORG

Outline of Duties, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Outline of Duties, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan Ministers, Senior Vice-Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries Ministers Prime Minister Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo ABE Yoshihide SUGA Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy Minister of State for Disaster Management Akira AMAR I Keiji FURUYA Minister of State for the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Minister of State for the Corporation in support of Compensation for Nuclear Damage Nobuteru ISHIHARA Toshimitsu MOTEGI Minister of State for Okinawa and Northern Territories Affairs Minister of State for National Strategic Special Zones Minister of State for Science and Technology Policy Minister of State for Decentralization Reform Minister of State for Space Policy Ichita YAMAMOTO Yoshitaka SHINDO Minister of State for Regulatory Reform Minister of State for Consumer Affairs and Food Safety Minister of State for Measures for Declining Birthrate Minister of State for Gender Equality Tomomi INADA Masako MORI i Senior Vice-Ministers Senior Vice-Minister Senior Vice-Minister Masazumi GOTODA Yasutoshi NISHIMURA Senior Vice-Minister Senior Vice-Minister Hiroshi OKADA Masakazu SEKIGUCHI Senior Vice-Minister Senior Vice-Minister Kazuyoshi AKABA Shinji INOUE Parliamentary Secretaries Parliamentary Secretary Parliamentary Secretary Yoshitami KAMEOKA Shinjiro KOIZUMI Parliamentary Secretary Parliamentary Secretary Takamaro FUKUOKA Fumiaki MATSUMOTO Parliamentary Secretary Parliamentary Secretary Tadahiko ITO Yoshihiko ISOZAKI Parliamentary Secretary Tomoko UKISHIMA *as of January 31, 2014 ii Contents ○Overview Office for the Public Interest Corporation・Public The Cabinet Officeʼs Role in the Cabinet ................... 1 Interest Commission ........................................... 3 8 Structure ............................................................. 2 Office for the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness ...... 39 Office for Decentralization Reform ......................... 41 ○Outline of Duties(*) Office for Regional Economy Vitalization Corporation of Economic and Fiscal Policy ..................................... 4 Japan ................................................................ 43 Director General for Policy Planning（Economic and Office for Promotion of Regional Revitalization ........ 44 Fiscal Management） ............................................. 5 Office of National Space Policy .............................. 45 Director General for Economic, Fiscal and Social Secretariat of Supervisory Commission for Structure ............................................................. 8 Public-Private and Private-Private Competitive Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Tenderings ......................................................... 47 Analysis ............................................................. 11 Food Safety Commission Secretariat ..................... 48 Director General for Science, Technology and Statistical Commission ......................................... 49 Innovation Policy ................................................. 13 Information Disclosure and Personal Information Director General for Disaster Management ............. 16 Protection Review Board ...................................... 50 Director General for Policy Planning, Okinawa Reemployment Surveillance Commission (RSC) ...... 51 Development and Promotion Bureau, Okinawa General Center for Personnel Interchanges Between the Bureau .............................................................. 19 Government and Private Entities (CPIGPE) ............. 52 Director General for Policy Planning for Policies on Consumer Commission ........................................ 53 Cohesive Society ................................................. 21 Office for Promotion of Regulatory Reform ............. 55 Decoration Bureau .............................................. 27 Economic and Social Research Institute ................. 56 Gender Equality Bureau ....................................... 29 State Guest Houses ............................................. 57 Records and Archives Management Division ........... 33 Northern Territories Affairs Administration ............. 58 Public Relations Office.......................................... 34 International Peace Cooperation Headquarters ....... 59 Abandoned Chemical Weapons Office .................... 35 Science Council of Japan ...................................... 61 Office for the Assistance of the Abductees and their Council for the Policy on Corpse Examination ......... 62 Family Members.................................................. 36 Cabinet Office Logo ............................................. 63 Hideyo Noguchi Africa Prize Unit ........................... 37 Address ............................................................. 64 (*)”Outline of Duties” is based on the data collected until January 31st, 2014. ○The Cabinet Office Website ・Top page: ・Outline of Duties 2014: http://www.cao.go.jp/index-e.html http://www.cao.go.jp/en/about/pmf_index-e.html ・List of designated policies: http://www.cao.go.jp/en/policies.html Overview The Cabinet Officeʼs Role in the Cabinet Unique Functions Ministers of State for Special Missions “Ministers of State for Special Missions,” ordered to provide strong and prompt policy planning and comprehensive policy coordination on crucial issues in the Cabinet, are exclusively established in the Cabinet Office. Important Policy Councils The Cabinet Office works as "the place of wisdom" that helps the Cabinet and the Prime Minister. The Cabinet Office has five “Important Policy Councils”; the chairman of each council should be either the Prime Minister or the Chief Cabinet Secretary, while members of the councils are designated to ministers in charge of related policies and specialists in the fields. 1 Structure Prime Minister Chief Cabinet Minister of State Secretary for Special Missions Deputy Chief Cabinet Senior Vice‐Minister （ ） （ ） Secretary 3 6 Parliamentary Secretary（7） Vice‐Minister Vice‐Minister for Policy Coodination（2） Director General for Economic and Fiscal P.5 Minister's Management Secretariat Director General for ●Director General for Policy Economic, Fiscal and P.8 Coordination Social Structure ●Deputy Director General for Policy Evaluation Director General for ●Deputy Director General for P.11 Economic Research National Space Policy ●Deputy Director General for Policy on Declining Birthrate and Director General for Youth Affairs Science and P.13 ●Deputy Director General（18） Technology Policy ●Director（9） General Affairs Division Director General for P.16 Secretarial Office Disaster Management Personnel Division Director General for Accounts Division P.19 Okinawa affairs Policy Coordination Division Director General for P.21 International Affairs Office Policies on Cohesive Society Office for Information Systems Policy Evaluation and Public Relations Division Records and Archives Director（42） Management Division P.33 Public Relations Office P.34 Director of Welfare Office 2 ●Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy（P.4） ●Council for Science and Technology Policy（P.13） ●Council on National Strategic Special Zones ●Central Disaster Managiment Council（P.16） ●Council for Gender Equality（P.30） ●Committee on National Space Policy ●Committeefor the Promotion of Private Finance Initiative ●Supervisory Commission for Public‐Private and Private‐Private Competitive Tenderings ┗Secretariat（P.47） ●Food Safety Commission Decoration ●Economic and Social Research P.27 ┗Secretariat（P.48） Institute（P.56） Bureau ●Council for Children and Child‐rearing ●State Guest House（P.57） ●Commission on Evaluation of General Affairs Division Incorporated Administrative Agencies ● ●Public Records and Archives Management Examination Officer（3） Northern Territories Affairs Administration（P.58） Commission ●Financial System Management Council ●Central Council on Promotion of Measures Gender Equality ●Council for the Promotion of Private for Persons with Disabilities P.29 ● Bureau Finance Initiative Atomic Energy Commission ●LocalGovernment System Research ●Headquarters for Promotion of Support Council General Affairs Division for Youth Affairs ●Election System Council ●Council for Food Education Promotion ●Council on the House of Representatives Research Division ●Declining Fertility Society Policy Council Electoral District ●Aging Society Policy Council Gender Equality ●Council for Relocation of the Diet and Promotion Division ●CentralTraffic Safety Policy Council Other Organizations Office for Elimination of ●Council for the Promotion of Policies for ┗Secretariat Violence against Women Crime Victims ●StatisticsCommission（P.49） ●Council for Policy of Suicide Prevention ●Information Disclosure and Personal Okinawa ●Council for Poor Children Information Protection Review Board Development and P.19 ●Consumer Policy Council ┗Secretariat（P.50） Promotion Bureau ●InternationalPeace Cooperation ●Public Interest Corporation Commission Headquarters ┗Secretariat（P.59） ┗Secretariat（P.38） General Affairs Division ●Science Council of Japan ●Reemployment Surveillance Commission ┗ （ ） Development and ┗Secretariat（P.61） Secretariat P.51 ● Promotion Office ●Center for Personnel Interchanges Consumer Commission ┗Secretariat（P.53） Office for Support of between the Government and Private ●Okinawa Development Council Military Base Reuse Entities（P.52） ● ●Council for Nuclear Power Sited Regions Council for Regulatory Reform ┗ （ ） Director（4） ●Council for the Policy on Corpse Secretariat P.55 ● Examination ┗Secretariat（P.62） Tax Commission ●Okinawa General Bureau （P.19） ●Imperial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cabinet Office Consultation on 'Better Use of Data in Government
    Cabinet Office consultation on ‘Better use of data in government’ Response from the CLOSER Consortium CLOSER (Cohorts and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resources) is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) to maximise the use, value and impact of the UK’s longitudinal studies. The network brings together eight leading longitudinal studies, the British Library and the UK Data Archive. CLOSER’s response to the consultation predominantly reflects our interest in being able to link individual administrative records to longitudinal survey data collected from that same individual. The linking of these two forms of data offers potential that exceeds the sum of the two approaches in isolation. While administrative records can provide enviable coverage and frequency, they rarely provide the richness and depth that comes from survey data collected to tackle specific research questions; conversely, survey data collection can be costly and challenging to administer, leading to missing data and possible biases which can be overcome by using administrative records to fill in the missing information. Consequently, combining the two can yield considerable benefits. For example, recent analysis of the National Pupil Database (NPD) and Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) found higher participation rates in higher education among a range of groups including ethnic-minorities.1 However, those records could not help explain these differences in participation; exploring this required linking individual
    [Show full text]
  • The Cabinet Handbook
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA THE CABINET HANDBOOK Cabinet Secretariat Office of the President www.cabinetsecretariat.go.ug December 2008 FOREWORD I am pleased to introduce the Cabinet Handbook which provides clear and comprehensive policy management guidelines for the Cabinet and other arms of Government involved in the policy management process. Cabinet is the highest policy making organ of government and is therefore responsible for policy development and its successful implementation. Cabinet collectively, and Ministers individually, have a primary duty to ensure that government policy best serves the public interest. This Cabinet Handbook outlines the principles by which Cabinet operates. It also sets out the procedures laid down to facilitate Cabinet’s realization of its central role of determining government policy and supporting ministers in meeting their individual and collective responsibilities, facilitating coordinated and strategic policy development. In the recent past, my government has made major contributions in the documentation and improvement of processes and procedures that support decision making at all levels of government. In conformity to our principle of transforming government processes and achieving greater transparency, and effectiveness in our management of policy; my government has focused its attention on introducing best practices in the processes and procedures that support decision making at all levels of Government. This Cabinet Handbook is primarily intended for Cabinet Ministers and Ministers of State. However, it must be read by all officers that are in various ways associated with the policy process, so that they are guided to make a better contribution to Cabinet's efficient functioning. The Secretary to Cabinet and the Cabinet Secretariat are available to offer advice and assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The System of Trade Between Japan and the East European Countries, Including the Soviet Union
    THE SYSTEM OF TRADE BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES, INCLUDING THE SOVIET UNION YATARO TERADA* INTRODUCTION Poor in natural resources, Japan has long been dependent on overseas supply for most of her raw material and fuel requirements. While imports of raw materials and fuel by the United States and West Germany in 197o accounted respectively for 14 per cent and 22 per cent of their total imports, Japan's imports of raw materials and fuel in the same year amounted to about 59 per cent of her total imports. In addition, Japan depends on imports from foreign countries for ioo per cent of her wool, raw cotton, and nickel; 98 per cent of her petroleum; 95 per cent of her iron ores; and 55 per cent of her industrial coal. Such being the case, one of the guiding principles in Japan's foreign trade policy has been to expand trade with any country, regardless of its political system. Japan was plagued by a gap between her economic growth and her international balance of payments until the mid-i96o's and, in order to improve this situation, promotion of exports was given highest priority. Thus, efforts have been made to expand trade with the Soviet Union and East European countries on a commercial basis. After the resumption of private foreign trade in 1949, trade between Japan and the Soviet Union and East European countries was conducted at a low level for some time. However, since the conclusion of a treaty of commerce and an agree- ment on trade and payment with the Soviet Union in 1957, and the conclusion of treaties of commerce with Poland and Czechoslovakia in 1958 and 1959, Japan's trade with Eastern Europe has increased yearly.
    [Show full text]
  • Abenomics' Effect on Gender Inequality in Japanese Society And
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Honors College Theses 2021 Abenomics’ Effect on Gender Inequality in Japanese Society and the Workplace Arianna C. Johnson Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses Part of the Japanese Studies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Arianna C., "Abenomics’ Effect on Gender Inequality in Japanese Society and the Workplace" (2021). Honors College Theses. 583. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/583 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact digitalcommons@georgiasouthern.edu. Abenomics’ Effect on Gender Inequality in Japanese Society and the Workplace An Honors Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in Political Science and International Studies. By Arianna C. Johnson Under the mentorship of Dr. Christopher M. Brown ABSTRACT In this study, I determine the extent to which Japan’s shrinking workforce population has been affected by gender roles. Many Asian countries are experiencing a prominent decline in birth rate and population, which has increased global interest in these issues. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Japanese government officials have eagerly responded, pushing Japanese women into the labor force as a possible solution. However, this decision has unanticipated drawbacks, which requires officials to address Japanese women’s concerns in and outside of the workplace. I argue that the Japanese government will have more success by addressing these needs, creating a more gender-equal society for Japanese women.
    [Show full text]
  • Raising Awareness of Gender Equality Among Young People’
    EVALUATION REPORT FINAL EVALUATION OF THE UN WOMEN PROJECT ‘RAISING AWARENESS OF GENDER EQUALITY AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE’ EVALUATION REPORT FINAL EVALUATION OF THE UN WOMEN PROJECT ‘RAISING AWARENESS OF GENDER EQUALITY AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE’ JAPAN LIAISON OFFICE UN WOMEN Tokyo , April 10 © 20 20 UN Women. All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of UN Women, the United Nations or any of its affiliated organizations. Produced by UN Women Japan Liaison Office Prepared by Foundation for Advanced Studies on In- ternational Development (FASID) TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS ⅰⅰⅰ LIST OF TABLES ⅱⅱⅱ LIST OF FIGURES ⅲⅲⅲ LIST OF ANNEXES ⅴⅴⅴ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ⅵⅵⅵ 1. CONTEXT OF THE PROJECT 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES 1 1.3 APPROACHES 2 1.4 THEORY OF CHANGE 2 1.5 MAIN ACTIVITIES 3 1.6 STAKEHOLDERS 5 2. EVALUATION OVERVIEW 7 2.1 EVALUATION PURPOSE, OBJECTIVES 7 2.2 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION 8 2.3 EVALUATION DESIGN AND GUIDELINES 8 2.4 METHODOLOGY 9 2.4.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND EVALUATION MATRIX 9 2.4.2 INDICATORS FOR MEASURING RESULTS 9 2.4.3 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 11 2.4.4 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 12 2.4.5 SAMPLE AND SAMPLING DESIGN 12 2.4.6 ETHICAL CODE OF CONDUCT 13 2.5 LIMITATION TO THE EVALUATION 13 2.6 RESPONSIBILITIES 14 2.6.1 EVALUATION MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE 14 2.6.2 EVALUATION IMPLEMENTING STRUCTURE 15 3. EVALUATION FINDINGS 16 3.1 RELEVANCE 16 3.2 EFFECTIVENESS 18 3.2.1 OUTCOME ONE: AWARENESS OF GENDER EQUALITY INCREASED AMONG YOUTH, SHISEIDO AND GENERAL AUDIENCE 19 3.2.2 OUTCOME TWO: SKILLS AND CAPACITIES IN PROMOTING GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN INCREASED AMONG YOUTH 25 3.2.3 OUTCOME THREE: ENABLING ENVIRONMENT FOR ADVOCACY ACTIVITIES ON GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN 32 3.3 EFFICIENCY 38 3.4 SUSTAINABILITY 40 3.5 GENDER EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS 45 4.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants As of 17 January 2014
    Japan Meeting List of Participants As of 17 January 2014 Tokyo, Japan, 11 June 2013 Shinzo Abe Prime Minister of Japan Evgeny V. Afanasiev Ambassador of the Russian Federation Embassy of the Russian Japan to Japan Federation in Japan Nicolas Aguzin Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Hong Kong SAR Asia-Pacific Hirotsugu Aida Columnist Kyodo News Japan Koichi Akaishi Japan Economic Revitalization Bureau Cabinet Office of Japan Japan Manager, Assistant Director Akira Amari Minister for Economic Revitalization and Minister for Economic and Fiscal Policy of Japan Jun Arai Representative Director and Chief Showa Shell Sekiyu KK Japan Operating Officer Hiroto Arakawa Vice-President, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Japan Hiroto Arakawa Vice-President, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Japan Keiichiro Asao Member of the House of Representatives, Japan William Barriga Chief of Mission International Organization for Japan Migration (IOM) Neelanjan Head, Japan Business HCL Technologies Ltd Japan Bhattacharjee Børge Brende Managing Director and Member of the World Economic Forum Switzerland Managing Board Børge Brende Managing Director and Member of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway Managing Board Norway Urs Bucher Ambassador of Switzerland Embassy of Switzerland Japan Johan Cels Representative United Nations High Japan Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Adrian David Cheok Professor and Inventor, Graduate Keio University Japan School of Media Design Mitsuru Claire Chino Executive Officer, General Manager of Itochu Corporation Japan Lega l Division I-han Chou Senior Editor, Nature Nature Publishing Group Japan Sayuri Daimon Managing Editor The Japan Times Ltd Japan Katsuya Debari President and Chief Executive Officer Odyssey Communications Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Insolvency Proceedings for Systemically Important Financial Institutions
    INTERNATIONAL INSOLVENCY INSTITUTE Twelfth Annual International Insolvency Conference Supreme Court of France Paris, France SHOWCASE PRESENTATION: PLANNING FOR FAILURE: USE OF INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS FOR SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Overview Of The Japanese Legal Framework To Resolve A Systemically Important Financial Institution In Insolvency Proceedings In Japan By Hideyuki Sakai Bingham McCutchen Murase Sakai Mimura Tokyo June 21-22, 2012 ©International Insolvency Institute 2012. All rights reserved. Admin*1656557.1 OVERVIEW OF THE JAPANESE LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO RESOLVE A SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION IN INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN JAPAN May 28, 2012 Hideyuki Sakai hideyuki.sakai@bingham.com Tokyo Tel: +81-3-6721-3131 (Direct) Introduction This article is intended to provide an overview of the Japanese legal framework within which the resolution of a systemically important financial institution would occur in Japan. While Japan has a well-established scheme of insolvency laws, there have been few insolvencies of Japanese regulated financial institutions in the past decade. In addition, Japanese courts have considerable latitude in administering insolvency proceedings and rendering decisions. The combination of these factors makes it difficult to predict with certainty the mechanisms for implementing a proposed resolution. International Context Japan is a member of the Group of Twenty (“G20”) and the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”). As such, Japan’s leaders have committed to pursue financial stability, implement international financial standards and undergo periodic peer reviews.1 On November 4, 2011, three Japanese financial institutions were named in the initial group of twenty-nine globally systemically important financial institutions (“G-SIFIs”) identified by the FSB and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”).
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Secretary for Culture and External Affairs.Dot
    Rt Hon Michael Gove MP Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Cabinet Office 70 Whitehall London SW1A 2AS __ 17 June 2020 Dear Michael In our joint statement of 14 June, which expressed disappointment in your decision not to request an extension to transition before we had an opportunity to discuss this crucial matter ahead of the high level political stocktake, we said that we would write to you on the subject of ‘rebooting’ the process of engagement between the UK and Devolved Governments on the EU-UK negotiations. This letter sets out our thinking on this important subject. We have, in the meantime, received your letter of 14 June responding to our statement. As you acknowledged, we have different views on the way forward and our governments are not going to agree on the core fundamental positions with regard to the EU-UK future relationship. To our mind, this is all the more reason for us to re-double our efforts to work together for the benefit of business and communities in all parts of the United Kingdom, particularly as the option of an extension will no longer be open to the UK after the end of this month. It was because of the immutability of that deadline within the Withdrawal Agreement that we were so disappointed that the final decision was taken in advance of the meeting. While we have had the opportunity to register our views on this issue on several occasions, we would point out the difference between the quantity of meetings and other contacts between our administrations, and the quality of the engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Japan
    WOMEN IN JAPAN BASIC DEMOGRAPHICS POPULATION1 127,298,000 People % % 65 million 51 WOMEN MEN 49 62 million Population is expected to decrease by 32.3% by 20602 AGE RATIO3 13% 62% 25% 0–14 15–64 65+ YEARS YEARS YEARS WORKING AGE FERTILITY RATE4 PROPORTION5 People Age 65+ 1.4 1.7 25% 39% LIVE BIRTHS ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC PER WOMAN CO-OPERATION AND 2013 2050 DEVELOPMENT (OECD) AVERAGE TERTIARY ENROLLMENT6 43% 57% 13% 87% 66% 34% WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN TOTAL UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS HUMANITIES STUDENTS GRADUATE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT7 30% 70% 33% 67% 28% 72% WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN MASTER’S PROGRAM PHD PROGRAM LAW SCHOOL LABOR FORCE EMPLOYMENT RATE8 61% WOMEN 57% OECD average—women 80% MEN 73% OECD average—men LABOR FORCE9 Non-Regular Employees Regular Employees (Part-time, Contract, Temporary, and Agency Dispatched) 44% 56% WOMEN 79% 21% MEN PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN PARTICIPATING IN THE LABOR FORCE BY AGE GROUP10 79 76.1 74.9 73.1 70.3 70.1 69.6 66.5 47.4 15.6 13.8 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65+ Male comparison Approximate time of marriage and children EMPLOYMENT STATUS11 UNDERUTILIZED LABOR FORCE12 After Pregnancy continued working 17% million women are not working, with maternity/parental leave 3 but would like to work 10% continued working without maternity/ % in age group % 53 44 parental leave 25-44 left job after % becoming 24 not employed pregnant 5% N/A GENDER WAGE GAP13 In 2013, women in regular employment earned: 16% OECD average gap % 73 WOMEN 27% GAP less than their male counterparts MEN PRESIDENTS14 BOARD DIRECTORS Of All Private and Public Of All Public Companies15 TOPIX Core 30 Index16 Companies 7.5% 1.6% 3.1% 2014 2012 2014 WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN MANAGEMENT Section Manager or Higher in Companies Section Manager or Higher The target year 2020 will coincide 17 18 With More Than 100 Employees in Companies with the return of the Olympics to Tokyo.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Innovation As a National Strategy
    Medical Innovation as a National Strategy March 18, 2013 Hideaki Nakagaki Deputy Director‐General, Office of Healthcare Policy Cabinet Secretariat Provisional Translation 1 Establishment of Office of Healthcare Policy On February 22, 2013, the government established an Office of Healthcare Policy within the Cabinet Secretariat as part of concerted Government efforts to implement a growth strategy for Japan. The office aims to establish Japan as a nation that boasts of the most advanced medical technologies and healthcare services in the world, which is expected to result in Japan being the country with the longest healthy life expectancy. Given these achievements, the Office also aims to develop the medical sector, pharmaceutical products and medical devices and equipment as strategic industries that will form a key pillar for Japan's economic revitalization. 2 Structure of the Office for Healthcare Policy As of March 18, 2013 Chief Cabinet Secretary (Yoshihide SUGA ) Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary (Katsunobu Kato and Hiroshige Seko) Director-General：Special Advisor to the Prime Minister (Hiroto Izumi) Deputy Director General： Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Nakagaki, MHLW) Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Morimoto, MEXT) Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Miyamoto, METI) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat (Akuzawa, MoF) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat(Fujimoto, METI) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat (Saruta, MHLW) Director Director (Private sector： Director Director Director Director (Private sector： (Private sector： (MEXT) FIRM*) (MHLW) (Private
    [Show full text]
  • Program for Promoting Japan As an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment Into Japan
    Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Office of FDI Promotion, Cabinet Office Program for Promoting Japan as an １ Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Growth of foreign direct investment to Japan In December 2011, the Government of Japan formulated the “Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan” consisting of policy measures to create an attractive, world-class business and living environment. The “New Growth Strategy” (June 2010, Cabinet decision) and the “Interim Report on Strategies to Revitalize Japan” (August 2011, Cabinet decision) requested the Government to formulate this Program. The Program was determined by the Interagency Parliamentary Secretary Meeting chaired by Hiroshi Ogushi, Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet Office. ＜1st stage＞ ＜2nd stage＞ Doubling FDI stock Doubling FDI to GDP from 2001 to 2006 ratio to around 5% by 2010 ２ Three Targets of The Program The Program sets out three targets that are to be achieved by 2020. 1) To Increase the Number of High Value-Added Sites The aim is to increase the number of high value-added sites (Asia Regional Headquarters and research and development facilities) by 30 sites each year by attracting FDI. As of the end of FY2009, there were approximately 500 high value-added sites in Japan. 2) To Double the Number of Employees of Foreign Enterprises The aim is to increase the number of employees of foreign enterprises (defined as those which have more than one-third ratio of foreign ownership) to 2,000,000 by FY2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Administrative Organization in Japan
    Appendix 2 THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION IN JAPAN 1. The Outline of National Administrative Organization National administration is uniformly carried out by the Cabinet and the organizations under the cabinet. The Cabinet, Ministries, Agencies and Incorporated Administrative Agencies (IAAs), etc. function as one organization, at the top of which exists the Cabinet. It is responsible for all the activities of State except legislative and judicial ones. Consequently it is natural that these organizations which take care of national administration should be systematically organized under the Cabinet. As of 2019, the Cabinet Office, 11 Ministries, and the Reconstruction Agency are under the Cabinet. They are national administrative organizations in the proper sense of terms. However, not all the areas of State activities are covered by these Ministries. Incorporated Administrative Agencies and Public Corporations also cover other parts of the activities. One of their purposes is accomplishing enough efficiency and effectiveness in their business with autonomy and legal personalities separated from State.To necessary extent, they are subject to various controls by their competent Ministers. The former, for which more general rules are prepared, amount 87 as of October 1, 2019. Some of them are regarded the same as government offices in terms of quality of their roles, to which are applied statutes concerned. Public Corporations, which now amount 33 as of the same date, are enterprises dealing with different quality business from IAAs. They must be regulated by individual acts of rules, not common rules, unlike IAAs. Thus we can see some types of organizations following policy process from planning to implementation.
    [Show full text]